Sotorasib Shows Intracranial Activity in Patients with KRAS G12C-Mutated Adenocarcinoma of the Lung and Untreated Active Brain Metastases

Abstract

Treatment with sotorasib has shown intracranial complete responses and continued intracranial stabilization in KRAS G12C-mutated non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients with previously treated, stable brain metastases in a post hoc analysis of the ongoing CodeBreaK 100 trial. We present the case of a patient with KRAS G12C-mutant adenocarcinoma of the lung with active untreated brain metastases with a nearly complete intracranial response only 6 weeks after start of sotorasib illustrating the benefit of sotorasib in patients with active, previously untreated brain metastases in KRAS G12C-mutated NSCLC.

Introduction

Findings from a post hoc analysis of the ongoing CodeBreaK 100 trial showed intracranial complete responses and continued intracranial stabilization in KRAS G12C-mutated non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients with previously treated, stable brain metastases receiving sotorasib. Patients with active brain metastases are often excluded from clinical trials. In our case report, we present the case of a patient with KRAS G12C-mutant adenocarcinoma of the lung with active untreated brain metastases with a nearly complete intracranial response only 6 weeks after start of treatment with the KRAS G12C-inhibitor sotorasib.

Case Presentation

A 61-year-old female patient with persisting fatigue was diagnosed with metastatic adenocarcinoma of the right upper lung lobe with locoregional lymph node involvement, multiple pulmonary, and one brain metastasis in the right frontal gyrus in June 2018 (clinical staging according to the PET-CT findings: cT3 cN2 cM1c). Next-generation sequencing of the tumour DNA (Ion AmliSeq Colon and Lung Research Panel v2, Ion Torrent platform, analysis of the hotspot regions) revealed a KRAS p.G12C (c.34G>T) mutation in the absence of additional targetable alterations. Immunohistochemistry staining for PD-L1 was <1% of tumour cells.

First-line systemic treatment with cisplatin, pemetrexed, and pembrolizumab resulted in an overall partial response including a complete remission of the brain metastasis and maintenance therapy with pemetrexed and pembrolizumab was started in September 2018. Pemetrexed was stopped due to progressive polyneuropathy in March 2019.

In June 2019, the patient progressed in the lung necessitating haemostyptic radiotherapy due to haemoptysis and pembrolizumab was stopped as well. The solitary brain metastasis continued to be in remission. In November 2019, the patient progressed again in the lung and had symptomatic brain progression with a new lesion in the cerebellar vermis, resulting in compression of the aqueduct and consecutive hydrocephalus. A ventriculoperitoneal shunt was implanted and the lesion in the cerebellar vermis was treated with stereotactic radiotherapy; the progressive pulmonal lesion was treated with radiotherapy; in addition, treatment with pembrolizumab was resumed as the disease was otherwise stable with ongoing disease control for over a year. However, in February 2021 the patient developed progression of the known lesion in the cerebellum which was not rated as clinically significant, a new metastasis in the left periventricular white matter and further progression in the lung. Docetaxel was initiated in March 2021 with progressive disease in the lungs and in the brain with new lesions in the right frontal and temporal lobe as best response after four cycles (see Fig. 1 for schematic presentation of chronology of treatments).

Fig. 1.

History of treatment. CR complete remission, PD, progressive disease; VP shunt, ventriculoperitoneal shunt.

In June 2021, therapy with sotorasib 960 mg daily perorally was started. After 6 weeks of sotorasib, an impressive treatment response was observed not only of the lung but also of the untreated brain metastases, lasting for 5 months (see Fig. 2). Due to systemic progression, the treatment with sotorasib was stopped and treatment with gemcitabine was started at the end of November 2021.

Fig. 2.

Radiological response to treatment with sotorasib. Left panel: pretherapeutic axial MR images (a: T2 weighted,b: after i.v. contrast) demonstrating a contrast-enhancing metastasis (b: arrow head) in the right frontal lobe with adjacent parenchymal oedema (a: arrow). Post-therapeutic axial MR images after 6 weeks of therapy with sotorasib showing CR (c: T2 weighted,d: after i.v. contrast). Right panel: pretherapeutic contrast-enhanced chest CT (a) demonstrating a locally advanced primary tumour (*) of the right upper pulmonary lobe with PR after 6 weeks of therapy with sotorasib (b).

At the beginning of December 2021, symptomatic brain progression with behavioural changes and listlessness occurred and neurosurgical intervention with craniectomy and tumour resection was performed. The systemic treatment with gemcitabine was continued until February 2022 and stopped due to progressive disease. The patient received further systemic treatments with pemetrexed in March 2022 (re-challenge) and later on with carboplatin and paclitaxel in April 2022. Additionally, whole brain radiotherapy was performed in April 2022. Upon further progression, the patient is on best supportive care since May 2022.

Discussion/Conclusion

In the past two decades, multiple molecular alterations in NSCLC and targeted treatments for patients with actionable oncogenic alterations have been identified. Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene (KRAS) mutations represent the most commonly found oncogenic driver mutations in patients with adenocarcinoma of the lung and can be found in up to a quarter of patients [1, 2]. The RAS proteins regulate signal transduction by activating different effectors, thereby controlling various cellular functions. G12C, G12V, and G12D are the predominant KRAS mutations with KRAS G12C mutations being present in approximately 13% of patients with NSCLC [1, 3].

Only recently KRAS stopped to be considered an undruggable target with several new agents specifically targeting KRAS G12C showing promising results [4, 5]. Sotorasib, a covalent KRAS G12C inhibitor locking KRAS in its inactive GDP-bound state by irreversibly binding to the switch II pocket [6], was evaluated in the phase I CodeBreaK 100 trial in 129 patients with previously treated advanced or metastatic KRAS G12C-mutated cancer, including 59 patients with NSCLC [7]. The overall response rate (ORR) seen in patients with NSCLC was 32.2% (95% CI: 20.62–45.64) and the disease control rate (DCR) was 88.1% (95% CI: 77.07–95.09). This was confirmed in a single-group, phase II trial exclusively conducted in 126 NSCLC patients showing an ORR of 37.1% (95% CI: 28.6–46.2) and a DCR of 80.6% (95% CI: 72.6–87.2) [8]. Furthermore, a progression-free survival of 6.8 months (95% CI: 5.1–8.2) and a median overall survival of 12.5 months (95% CI: 10.0 could not be evaluated) were reported. However, patients with untreated active brain metastases such as in our case were excluded from these trials.

More recently, findings from a post hoc analysis in patients with NSCLC included in the ongoing phase 1/2 CodeBreaK 100 trial showed intracranial complete responses in KRAS G12C-mutated NSCLC patients with stable brain metastases after previous local treatments such as radiotherapy or surgery [9]. Out of 174 patients with KRAS G12C-mutated NSCLC included in the post hoc analysis, 40 patients had stable brain metastases at baseline. The ORR in these 40 patients was 25% compared to 41.7% in the 132evaluable patients without brain metastases. Sixteen of the 174 included patients (9.2%) had a baseline and at least one on treatment brain scan evaluable for response assessment, showing an intracranial DCR of 87.5% (14/16 patients).

In contrast, in our case sotorasib treatment demonstrated an intracranial response in the setting of asymptomatic but active, untreated, and measurable brain metastases with a nearly complete remission within weeks after start of treatment, questioning the need for upfront local treatment strategies in these patients. In patients with other oncogenic driver alterations such as ALK and EGFR, newer generation TKIs as osimertinib, alectinib, and lorlatinib have demonstrated intracranial activity [10, 11, 12, 13] and local treatment of brain metastases can often be deferred [14, 15]. Whether this could be a safe strategy in patients treated with sotorasib has to be evaluated in clinical trials. One advantage of this strategy might be the avoidance or delay of toxicity of radiotherapy to the brain. Whereas we did observe an impressive response to sotorasib in our patient, duration of response was short with fast symptomatic brain progression after a few months of treatment, suggesting the need for close monitoring with brain imaging if such a deferred strategy is chosen.

Several trials addressing this question are planned or already recruiting. A currently recruiting phase 1b study is investigating sotorasib as monotherapy in KRAS G12C-mutated NSCLC patients with untreated brain metastases and in combination with other anticancer therapies in advanced solid tumours (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04185883). Furthermore, a phase I/II trial investigating sotorasib in combination with MVASI (a bevacizumab biosimilar) in subjects with advanced KRAS G12C-mutant NSCLC with small, untreated brain metastases (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05180422) is planned. The results of these studies including patients with KRAS G12C-mutated NSCLC and untreated brain metastases will shed more light on optimal management of these patients and especially intracranial activity of sotorasib.

Recently, first data on acquired resistance mechanisms to KRAS G12C inhibition have emerged. As seen with EGFR TKIs, new KRAS mutations as KRAS-dependent and activation of alternative pathways and lineage plasticity as KRAS-independent mechanisms of resistance are being observed [16, 17] and knowledge of type of resistance might be relevant to detect new targets and maybe overcome drug resistance in the future.

Treatment with sotorasib with deferral of local treatment could be an option in patients with NSCLC harbouring a KRAS G12C mutation and active untreated brain metastases. The objective intracranial response and duration of response in these patients need to be evaluated in clinical trials.

Statement of Ethics

Ethical approval is not required for this study in accordance with local guidelines. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of the details of her medical case and the accompanying images.

Conflict of Interest Statement

Kira-Lee Koster, Christina Appenzeller, and Arno Lauber declare no conflict of interest. Martin Früh: grants from BMS and Astra Zeneca; consulting fees from Astra Zeneca, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Pfizer, and Takeda; payment for expert testimony from Takeda and Roche; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Merck; and advisory board of Roche. Sabine Schmid (within last 36 months): advisory (institutional) for MSD, BMS, and AstraZeneca and research grants from University of Zürich, Swiss Cancer League Foundation, and Vontobel-Stiftung.

Funding Sources

There was no funding for this study.

Author Contributions

Kira-Lee Koster made the conceptualization, data curation, visualization, wrote the first draft, and reviewed and edited the final manuscript. Christina Appenzeller made the data curation and reviewed and edited the final manuscript. Arno Lauber made the visualization and reviewed and edited the final manuscript. Martin Früh reviewed and edited the final manuscript. Sabine Schmid made the conceptualization, data curation, and reviewed and edited the final manuscript.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this article. Further enquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.