Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Public Health in Practice logoLink to Public Health in Practice
. 2020 Jun 18;1:100021. doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2020.100021

Maternal anaemia and risk of adverse obstetric and neonatal outcomes in South Asian countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Md Aminur Rahman a, Md Nuruzzaman Khan b,∗, Md Mostafizur Rahman a
PMCID: PMC9461600  PMID: 36101702

Abstract

Background

The occurrence of maternal anaemia is common in South Asian countries which increase the risk of adverse maternal obstetric and birth outcomes. This may adversely affect the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals’ (SDG) targets of reducing maternal and under-five deaths by 2030.

Objectives

To summarize the evidence on the association of maternal anaemia with adverse birth and maternal obstetric outcomes.

Methods

We adopted the PRISMA consensus statement. PubMed, CINAHL and Web of Science databases were searched on February 20, 2020. A total of 38 studies was included, of which 25 articles were included in the quantitative synthesis and meta-analysis.

Results

Maternal anaemia was associated with a significantly higher risk of low birth weight (OR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.06-2.60, p ​< ​0.05), preterm birth (OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.20-2.41, p ​< ​0.05) and perinatal mortality (OR, 2.90; 1.97-3.78, p ​< ​0.05). Non-significant associations were seen with neonatal mortality (OR, 1.80; 95% CI, 0.90-27.77, p ​= ​0.7), miscarriage (OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 0.48-3.20, p ​= ​0.08), preeclampsia (OR, 2.66; 95% CI, 0.61-11.52, p ​= ​0.6) and caesarean delivery (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.36-2.80, p ​= ​0.07).

Conclusion

Maternal anaemia increases the risk of low birth weight, preterm birth and perinatal mortality. Improving maternal nutritional status and iron supplementation during pregnancy are important for reducing these adverse outcomes.

Keywords: Anaemia, South Asian countries, Pregnancy outcomes, Meta-analysis

1. Introduction

The Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) have set ambitious targets to reduce maternal and under-five deaths between 2015 and 2030 [1]. The majority of these deaths occurred in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). These are associated with higher rates of pregnancy-related complications (responsible for around 303,000 maternal and 2.7 million newborn deaths) during and following the delivery [2]. The occurrence of low birth weight (LBW), stillbirth, preterm birth (PTB) are also common in LMICs; all are factors that further increase under-five mortality [3]. Moreover, all of these adverse consequences increase hospital admissions, therefore create an additional burden on existing healthcare facilities in LMICs which are usually over-crowded with limited resources. Importantly, planned pregnancy and recommended use of maternal healthcare services during and following pregnancy could be keys to reduce these adverse outcomes. However, these are still challenges for LMICs despite having been set as a priority in both the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs, 2000-2015) and SDGs [1].

Anaemia is common worldwide and affects 33% of the global population despite the high priority given to tackle this in the maternal and child health programs [4,5]. This percentage is higher among pregnant women. Around 32 million women become pregnant with anaemia or become anaemic following pregnancy. This represents around 38% of annual pregnancies globally [6]. Importantly, this varies significantly across regions. Whilst the Central and Western Europe (24%) region have a low prevalence, Central and West Africa (56%), South Asia (52%), Oceania and East Africa (36%) regions have much higher prevalence of maternal anaemia [6]. Generally, these are the regions where the occurrence of anaemia during pregnancy and reported adverse maternal obstetric and birth outcomes (including maternal and under-five deaths) are both higher. Therefore, investigation of the associations between maternal anaemia and adverse maternal obstetric and birth outcomes is of public health importance.

Several primary research studies have been conducted to identify the potential effects of maternal anaemia on adverse maternal obstetric and birth outcomes. However, findings across the studies are not consistent which makes it challenging to form evidence-based policies to reduce these adverse consequences. For instance, maternal anaemia is reported as a risk factor of pre-term birth (PTB) in a few studies [7,8] but other studies reported no significant associations [9,10]. In addition, studies also showed that anaemia during the first trimester of pregnancy is associated with increased risk of PTB [11,12] though contradictory findings are reported in other studies [13,14]. Similar contradictions are also reported for other adverse outcomes, including low birth weight (LBW), stillbirths, small for gestational age (SGA), and perinatal mortality [9,13,15]. These findings may vary depending upon when anaemia is measured in pregnancy (first, second, or third trimester of pregnancy), method and population types investigated, and confounders adjusted for in the models. Therefore, summarizing the actual effects may help policymakers make more effective and targeted policies.

However, there is a lack of research conducted to address these contradictions in LMICs. A broad exploratory search of the literature for this study found only one study that had been conducted in LMICs [16] which examined the effects of maternal anaemia on LBW, PTB, perinatal mortality and neonatal mortality. The major drawback of the study was only inclusion of cohort studies, which are usually rare in resource-poor countries; therefore, it might not be representative of the whole population. Moreover, the authors found higher risks of adverse birth outcomes among anaemic than non-anemic mothers in South Asian countries in their geographic region stratified analysis. However, separate estimates for different adverse birth outcomes are still necessary to solve the existing disagreements in South Asian countries.

We therefore conducted this study to try to ascertain conclusively the true effects of maternal anaemia on adverse maternal obstetric and birth outcomes.

2. Methods

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis following the PRISMA consensus statement (see Supplement Table S1). Studies conducted in South Asian countries to examine the effects of maternal anaemia on adverse birth and obstetric outcomes were included.

2.1. Search strategy

Systematic computerized literature searches were conducted on February 20, 2020, in three databases: PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science. Searches were conducted based on individual comprehensive search strategies separately for each database. We developed search strategies consisting of a combination of free text words, words in titles/abstracts, and medical subject headings for participants, exposure, and settings that were combined using the Boolean operators (AND, OR). The detailed search strategies and search results for PubMed, CINAHL, and Web of Science databases are presented in Tables S2–S4 (in Supplementary file). Further searches for eligible studies were conducted in the reference list of articles and relevant journal websites. We set no time, language, and outcome restrictions to select the studies. The World Health Organization (WHO) guideline of haemoglobin concentration during pregnancy (<11 ​g/dl (anemic) and ≥11 ​g/dl (non-anemic)) was used to diagnose anaemia status [17].

2.2. Inclusion criteria

In this review, comparative studies of the effects of maternal anaemia on adverse birth and obstetric outcomes were included. Moreover, selected studies met the following inclusion criteria: i) maternal anaemia was defined as the exposure variable, ii) gestational age at the time of anaemia measurement was provided, iii) a comparison group of the mother without anaemia with comparable gestational age was also presented, and iv) present at least one of the outcome variables (adverse maternal obstetric and birth outcomes). Additional inclusion criteria were the availability of odds ratios (ORs) and its 95% confidence intervals (CIs) or the raw data that allows us to calculate the ORs and its 95% CIs. The outcome variables were LBW (if birth weight is ​< ​2500 ​gm), PTB (if the birth occurred <37 weeks), perinatal mortality (include stillbirth and early neonatal mortality), neonatal mortality (defined as deaths within first months of the birth), miscarriages (defined as loss of a pregnancy during the first 23 weeks of pregnancy), small for gestational age (SGA, defined as birth weight below the tenth percentile of the gestational age and sex), preeclampsia (defined as disorder of pregnancy characterized by high blood pressure and a large amount of protein in the urine) and caesarean delivery (defined as the delivery through the surgical procedure).

2.3. Exclusion criteria

We did not search for unpublished papers. We excluded duplicate publications and studies published as abstract only. We excluded studies if they used women’s post-pregnancy anaemia. For multiple publications from the same study, if they referred to anaemia at the same gestational age and same predictors’ variables, only one publication with high quality was included.

2.4. Data collection process and data items

A data extraction form was designed, trialled, and modified prior to tabulating final data. Two reviewers (Khan MN, and Rahman MA) independently extracted the following data from the selected full-text articles: country of origin, year of study, study design, participant, exposure and their time of assessment, outcome(s), confounders, and measure of association. Inconsistencies were checked and resolved by the third reviewer available as an adjudicator (Rahman MM).

2.5. Quality assessment

We used the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale to assess the methodological quality of all included studies [18]. The scale gives separate measures to assess the methodological quality of cross-sectional, case-control, and cohort studies.

2.6. Data analysis

The odds ratios (ORs) as effect measures were extracted from each selected study. If the OR was unavailable, unadjusted OR with its 95% CI was calculated from raw data extracted from the selected studies. We used fixed-effects or random-effects models to calculate the summary effect of maternal anaemia on specific birth or obstetric outcome. The model was selected based on heterogeneity assessment; I2 statistics with its p-value was estimated for each meta-analysis to describe the extent of heterogeneity. The random-effects model was used when heterogeneity was moderate (50%) or high (75%), whereas the fixed-effects model was used when heterogeneity was low (<50%) [19].

We explored the sources of heterogeneity through the sub-group and meta-regression analyses across pre-specified subgroups [20]. These were study country, study design, confounding factors, sample size, and maternal age. We also assessed the publication bias through visual inspection of the funnel plot and Egger’s regression asymmetry test [21]. Trim-and-Fill procedure was used when evidence of publication bias was found [22]. The Stata software version 15.1 (Stata Corp, College Station, Texas, USA) was used to perform all analyses.

3. Results

3.1. Study selection

Fig. 1 shows the results of the literature search and study selection process. A total of 2,018 potentially eligible articles was identified, of which 1,250 articles were identified from PubMed, 570 articles were identified from Web of Science, and 198 articles were identified from CINAHL. An additional 18 articles were identified through reviewing the reference lists of the selected articles and the relevant journal websites. After removing duplicates, a total of 1,567 potential articles were included to review. Of these, 1,480 articles were removed through screening the titles and abstracts, and the remaining 87 articles were selected for full-text review. A total of 38 articles was finally selected through a detailed review of the articles’ full-text; 23 of them were cohort studies, 7 of them were cross-sectional studies, and 8 of them were case-control studies. Of these, 19 (50%) studies were conducted in India, 8 (21.1%) studies were conducted in Pakistan, 6 (15.8%) studies were conducted in Bangladesh, 3 (7.8%) studies were conducted in Nepal, 1 (2.6%) study was conducted in Sri Lanka, and 1 study analysed data from both India and Pakistan (2.6%). We did not find any related study conducted in Afghanistan, Bhutan, or the Maldives.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

PRISMA flowchart for selection of studies.

3.2. Study characteristics

The basic characteristics of the 38 studies included in this systematic review are presented in Table 1. The sample size of the included studies ranged from 76 to 92,247. The sum of the sample size for all included studies was 209,796. All included studies were conducted between 1992 and 2019. Of the 38 included studies, 29 studies reported LBW, 12 studies reported PTB, 9 studies reported perinatal mortality, and 3 studies reported caesarean delivery. Moreover, 4 studies reported miscarriage, SGA, neonatal mortality, and preeclampsia. All included studies in this review were of high quality (in Supplement Tables S5–S7).

Table 1.

Background information of the included study.

Study (location) Sample Study design Mean age (years) Measurement of anaemia Outcomes Confounding adjustment
Abeysena et al., 2010 [10] b
(Sri Lanka)		 817 Prospective cohort 26.4 First trimester PTB, LBW, Miscarriage Adjusted
Bakhtiar et al., 2007 [40] b
(Pakistan)		 860 Prospective cohort 25.0 First, second trimester PTB, LBW, Perinatal mortality Unadjusted
Bhalerao et al., 2011 [47] b
(India)		 1200 Prospective cohort 24.9 First, second trimester PTB, LBW, Perinatal mortality Unadjusted
Bondevik et al., 2001 [48] b
(Nepal)		 1400 Prospective cohort 23.4 First trimester LBW, PTB Unadjusted
Baig et al., 2013 [49] b
(Pakistan)		 600 Case-control NA Third trimester PTB Unadjusted
Bora et al., 2014 [50] b
(India)		 470 Prospective cohort 24 Third trimester Caesarean delivery Unadjusted
Begum et al., 2002 [51] a
(Bangladesh)		 357 Cross-sectional 29.1 Third trimester Diabetes Mellitus Unadjusted
Dhar et al., 2003 [52] b
(Bangladesh)		 316 Cross-sectional 23.9 Third trimester LBW Maternal age, family income, gestational age, mothers education
Deshmukh et al., 1998 [53] b
(India)		 210 Prospective cohort 22.6 Third trimester LBW Unadjusted
Ferdous et al., 2012 [54] a
(Bangladesh)		 4817 Prospective cohort NA Third trimester Perinatal death Age, parity, maternal education, socio-economic status, place of delivery
Hasin et al., 1996 [55] b
(Bangladesh)		 151 Cross-sectional 25 Third trimester LBW Unadjusted
Hossian et al., 2006 [56] b
(Bangladesh)		 350 Prospective cohort 26.5 First trimester LBW Unadjusted
Hirve et al., 1994 [57] b
(India)		 1922 Prospective cohort 20.3 First trimester LBW Unadjusted
Iltaf et al., 2017 [58] a
(Pakistan)		 1603 Prospective cohort NA Third trimester LBW Unadjusted
Jehan et al., 2007 [59] b
(Pakistan)		 1369 Prospective cohort 28.8 Second trimester Stillbirth Unadjusted
Javed et al., 2018 [60] a
(Pakistan)		 397 Cross-sectional 25.4 Third trimester LBW Unadjusted
Kumar et al., 2010 [61] b
(India)		 2027 Prospective cohort 24.6 First trimester LBW Adjusted
Kader and Perera, 2014 [62] b
(India)		 20946 Cross-sectional 25.9 Post Pregnancy LBW Sex of child, wealth status, antenatal visit, living place
Marahatta, 2007 [63] b
(Nepal)		 863 Prospective cohort NA First trimester LBW, PTB Unadjusted
Lone et al., 2004 [64] b
(Pakistan)		 629 Prospective cohort 27.0 First, second trimester PTB, LBW, Perinatal mortality Adjusted
Malhotra et al., 2002 [65] b
(India)		 447 Prospective cohort 25.3 First trimester PTB, LBW, still birth, neonatal mortality,
Preeclampsia,
Caesarean delivery		 Unadjusted
Monirujjaman et al., 2014 [66] a
(Bangladesh)		 343 Cross-sectional NA Third trimester LBW Unadjusted
Mavalankar et al., 1992 [67] a
(India)		 1465 Case-control NA Third trimester PTB Maternal education, religion, socio economic factors
Nair et al., 2016 [68] b
(India)		 1007 Retrospective cohort NA Third trimester LBW, SGA, prenatal mortality Adjusted with caste, religion, residence, below poverty line status, women’s employment status, tea garden worker, parity, body mass index, maternal age, previous caesarean section, previous pregnancy problems,
pre-existing medical problems, multiple pregnancies, number of antenatal visits, whether folic acid tablets were received, and mode of delivery
Parks et al., 2019 [69] a
(India and Pakistan)		 92,247 Retrospective cohort NA Third trimester LBW, stillbirth, PTB, neonatal mortality Adjusted with maternal age, education, and parity
Nair et al., 2018 [70] a
India		 200 Case-control study NA First, second, and third trimester LBW Unadjusted
Patel et al., 2018 [71] b
(India)		 68,338 Prospective cohort NA Third trimester Caesarean delivery, stillbirths, neonatal deaths, LBW Adjusted with maternal socio-demographic charecteristics
Rizvi et al., 2007 [72] a
(Pakistan)		 524 Case-control 25.5 Third trimester LBW Unadjusted
Shobeiri et al., 2006 [73] b
(India)		 500 Prospective cohort 24.0 First, second, third trimester LBW Unadjusted
Swain et al., 1994 [74] b
(India)		 484 Retrospective cohort NA Third trimester LBW Unadjusted
Singla et al., 1997 [75] a
(India)		 76 Cross-sectional NA First trimester LBW Unadjusted
Singal et al., 2018 [76] a
(India)		 400 Case-control NA Third trimester PTB Unadjusted
Sharma et al., 2015 [77] b
(Nepal)		 465 Retrospective case-control NA Third trimester LBW Adjusted with maternal socio-demographic and pregnancy-related charactersics
Yousaf et al., 2011 [78] b
(Pakistan)		 818 Prospective cohort 27.0 First, second, third trimester PTB, LBW, Perinatal mortality Unadjusted
Varsha et al., 2017 [79] a
(India)		 200 Case-control study NA Third trimester LBW Unadjuted
Ahankari et al., 2017 [80] b
(India)		 615 Retrospective cohort 22 Third trimester PTB, LBW Unadjusted
Ahankari et al., 2017 [81] b
(India)		 303 Prospective cohort NA Third trimester LBW Unadjusted
Daljeet et al., 2016 [82] a
(India)		 60 Case-control NA Third trimester LBW Unadjusted
Open in a new tab

LBW, low birth weight; PTB, preterm birth.

a

Included in narrative review; and.

b

Study included in meta-analysis.

3.3. Summary estimate

The pooled odds ratios (ORs) of the 25 studies included are presented in Table 2. Heterogeneity index, publication bias, and Trim-and-Fill estimate for all outcomes were also calculated and presented. Maternal anaemia was found to be associated with the increased likelihood of LBW (OR, 1.90, 95% CI, 1.06-2.60, p ​< ​0.05) and the result was consistent in the Trim-and-Fill estimate (OR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.01-1.98 p ​< ​0.01) which accounted for five missing studies. Significantly increased odds of PTB (OR, 1.96, 95% CI, 1.20-2.41 p ​< ​0.05) and perinatal mortality (OR, 2.90, 95% CI, 1.97-3.78 p ​< ​0.05) among anaemic mothers than their non-anaemic counterparts were also found in our study. These results remained same in the Trim-and-fill estimate once missing studies were adjusted. We found higher odds of caesarean delivery. (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.36-2.80, p ​= ​0.07) among anaemic mothers than non-anaemic mothers, however, the association was not significant. Higher odds of other adverse birth and obstetric outcomes including neonatal mortality (OR, 1.80; 95% CI, 0.05-27.77, p ​= ​0.7), miscarriage (OR, 1.68; 95% CI, 0.48-3.20, p ​= ​0.08) and preeclampsia (OR, 2.66; 95% CI, 0.61-11.52, p ​= ​0.6) were also found among anaemic mothers than their non-anaemic counterparts.

Table 2.

Summary, Publication bias, and Trim and Fill estimates.

Characteristics No. of studies Summary estimates
 Bias test p-value Trim and Fill estimatesa
OR (95% CI) Heterogeneity Index Missing studies no. OR (95% CI)
Low birth weight 21 1.90 (1.06–2.60)b 86.4 0.01 5 1.80 (1.01–1.98)
Preterm birth 10 1.96 (1.20–2.41)b 78.9 0.04 2 1.42 (1.03–2.90)
Perinatal mortality 7 2.90 (1.97–3.78)c 84.0 0.05 2 1.98 (1.04–3.05)
Neonatal mortality 2 1.80 (0.90–27.77)c 37.0 NA 0 1.80 (0.90–27.77)
Miscarriages 2 1.68 (0.48–3.20)c 47.0 NA 0 1.68 (0.48–3.20)
SGA 2 0.98 (0.20–1.60)c 43.0 NA 0 0.98 (0.20–1.60)
Preeclampsia 1 2.66 (0.61-11.52)d NA NA 0 2.66 (0.61-11.52)
Caesarean delivery 3 1.18 (0.36–2.80)b 73.3 – 1 1.10 (0.90-1.60)
Open in a new tab

CI, confidence interval; NA, not applicable; OR, odds ratio.

a

The trim-and-fill method simulates studies that are likely to be missing from the literature due to publication or other forms of bias. The trim-and-fill OR estimates what the pooled OR would be if these missing studies were included in the analysis.

b

Summary estimates were based on random-effects methods.

c

Summary estimates were based on fixed-effects methods.

d

No pooling method was used due to single study.

Table 3 presents the summary results of the narrative review of 13 additional papers. Our narrative results indicate that the anaemic mothers (Hgb<9 ​g/dl) were at higher risk of LBW, and the risk was relatively higher among severely anaemic mothers than moderately anaemic mothers. One study also reported around 26.5% higher risk of perinatal deaths among mildly anaemic than non-anaemic mothers.

Table 3.

Narrative review for anaemia and birth and health outcomes.

Study Study design, Country Population Result
Ferdous et al., 2012 [54] Prospective cohort,
Bangladesh		 4817 women who delivered during 2007-2008 in the icddr,b field site in Matlab. About 26.49% perinatal deaths occur in mild anemic group.
Monirujjaman et al., 2014 [66] Cross-sectional,
Bangladesh		 343 women aged 18-38 years were enrolled in this study from the district of Khulna division. Incidence of LBW was comparatively higher (35.5%) in anemic women (hb ​< ​9 ​g/dl) than normal women.
Begum et al., 2002 [51] Cross-sectional,
Bangladesh		 357 women were included from one hospital. Anemic women had lower prevalence of diabetes (23.4%) than non-anemic women (54.2%). Anaemia was found protective for diabetes.
Mavalankar et al., 1992 [67] Case-control, India 1317 LBW cases mothers and 1465 controls mothers were selected during 1987 to 1988. The risk of delivering LBW in serve anemic women was 5.6 (95% CI, 2.1-15.3) and the moderate anemic woman was 1.8 (95%CI, 1.4-2.4).
Rizvi et al., 2007 [72] Case-control,
Pakistan		 262 cases (LBW neonates) and 262 controls (normal weight) enrolled during July 2003 to September 2003. Maternal haemoglobin level was independently associated with LBW. Odds of delivering an LBW baby decreased with increased in maternal haemoglobin (OR:0.70; 95% CI:0.63-0.79)
Singla et al., 1997 [75] Cross-sectional
India		 66 pregnant women were selected randomly from a hospital. Inverse association was found between birth weight maternal anaemia:
Daljeet et al., 2016 [82] Case-control
India		 60 pregnant women included in this study; 30 of which were anemic Maternal anaemia was found significantly correlated with the LBW
Iltaf et al., 2017 [58] Prospective cohort
India		 1606 women included in this study of which 161 had given a child classified as LBW Higher percentage of LBW was found among mothers had low haemoglobin level
Javed et al., 2018 [60] Cross-sectional
Pakistan		 397 women included in this study of which 53 had given a child classified as LBW Maternal anaemia was found significantly associated with the occurrence of LBW.
Parks et al., 2019 [69] Retrospective cohort
India and Pakistan		 A total of 92,247 deliveries data was analysed Maternal anaemia was found associated with LBW, stillbirth, preterm birth, neonatal mortality.
Singal eta l., 2018 [76] Case-control study
India		 A total of 400 women given birth were included; 200 of them were anemic Higher occurrence of preterm birth was found among anemic mother.
Varsha et al., 2017 [79] Case-control study
India		 200 mother-baby were included in this study The occurrence of LBW was found higher among the mothers were anaemic during delivery.
Nair et al., 2018 [70] Case-control study
India		 200 pregnant mothers included and followed up delivery occurred Mothers with anaemia at any time during pregnancy was found to have 4.3 times higher risk of giving birth to low birth weight babies compared to non-anemic mothers
Open in a new tab

LBW, low birth weight; OR, odds ratio; CI, Confidence interval; hb, haemoglobin.

3.4. Sub-group analysis

We found higher heterogeneity among the selected studies, which reported LBW, PTB, and perinatal mortality (Table 2). We, therefore, conducted the stratified analysis to assess the source of variations. We assess the source of variations across countries, study designs, confounding factors, studies sample size, and maternal age. The results are presented in Table 4. Stratification by countries revealed an increased risk of LBW (OR, 2.04, 95% CI, 1.98-2.45, p ​< ​0.05), PTB (OR, 3.30, 95% CI, 2.28-4.79, p ​< ​0.05) for Pakistani anaemic mothers compared to the other countries. Studies reporting unadjusted odds reported a higher risk of LBW (OR 1.79, 95% CI, 1.26-1.96, p ​< ​0.01), whereas studies citing adjusted odds (OR 1.18, 95% CI, 0.89-1.30) reported a non-significant association. We did not find any evidence of significant variations for LBW, PTB, and perinatal mortality by study designs sample sizes, and maternal ages.

Table 4.

Stratified analysis of pooled relative risks of low birth weight, preterm birth, and perinatal mortality for anemic pregnant women.

Characteristics Low birth weight
 Preterm birth
 Perinatal mortality
Number of study Pooled OR (95% CI) Meta regression (p-values) Number of study Pooled OR (95% CI) Meta regression (p-values) Number of study Pooled OR (95% CI) Meta regression (p-values)
Country
Bangladesh 2 1.74 (1.24-2.44) 0.03 0.05
India 12 1.80 (1.13-2.20) 3 1.59 (0.0.58-2.78) 3 1.98 (0.78-3.80) 0.40
Nepal 3 1.46 (1.09-1.76) 2 2.28 (0.30-17.32)
Pakistan 3 2.04 (1.98-2.45) 4 3.30 (2.28-4.79) 4 2.25 (1.14-4.44) 4
Sri lanka 1 0.72 (0.27-1.90) 1 0.72 (0.27-1.90)
Study design
Cohort study 18 1.80 (1.04-1.70) 0.51 9 2.70 (1.40-3.60) 0.63
Cross sectional 2 1.21 (0.87-1.68) 1 1.60 (0.86-2.99)
Case control 1 0.51 (0.24-1.07)
Confounding factors
Adjusted 8 1.18 (0.89-1.30) 0.001 2 1.79 (0.33-9.60) 0.80
Unadjusted 13 1.79 (1.26-1.96) 8 2.78 (1.48-3.39)
Sample size
≤817 11 1.76 (1.21-1.86) 0.26 5 1.98 (0.68-3.40) 0.27 2 2.88 (0.74-11.20) 0.59
>817 9 1.34 (1.30-1.82) 5 2.66 (1.41-5.00) 5 1.91 (1.04-3.50)
Maternal age, year
<25 8 1.76 (1.08-1.66) 0.22 3 1.70 (0.64-3.07) 0.40 1 1.70 (0.64-3.07) 0.40
≥25 13 1.78 (1.30-2.40) 7 2.43 (1.43-4.10) 5 2.43 (1.43-4.10)
Open in a new tab

4. Discussion

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we investigated the effects of maternal anaemia during pregnancy on adverse birth and maternal obstetric outcomes. This is the first comprehensive review of studies of South Asian countries that systematically evaluated the scientific literature to assess the proportion of adverse birth and maternal obstetric outcomes attributed to maternal anaemia during pregnancy. The meta-analysis demonstrated significantly higher risks of adverse birth and maternal obstetric outcomes including LBW, PTB, and perinatal mortality among anaemic mothers than their non-anemic counterparts. We also found higher risks of caesarean delivery, neonatal mortality, miscarriage, preeclampsia among the anaemic than non-anemic mothers, however, the results were not statistically significant.

We found that maternal anaemia during pregnancy increases the risk of occurrence of LBW-a common adverse birth outcome in South Asian countries and known risk factor of under-five mortality. This association between maternal anaemia during pregnancy and the occurrence of LBW is linked with the physiological fall of haemoglobin level during pregnancy that leads to normal plasma volume and red cell mass increase [23,24]. These changes contribute to the change in haemoglobin concentration. For instance, average haemoglobin concentration among the anaemic pregnant women at 36 weeks of gestation was found to be significantly lower (≈110 ​g/L) than non-anemic women (≈133 ​g/L) [[25], [26], [27]]. The decrease in maternal haemoglobin concentration may then affect fetal birth weight. This finding is consistent with the findings of other studies [28,29].

Every year an estimated 15 million babies are born preterm, 1 million of them die before reaching their fifth birthday, and many face lifetime disabilities, including learning disabilities, visual and hearing problems [30]. Importantly, more than 60% of these PTBs occur in African and South Asian countries. Moreover, India, Pakistan, and Bangladesh, countries of South Asia included in this review, are ranked among the 10 countries with a higher number of PTB worldwide [30]. This study found maternal anaemia during pregnancy is associated with an elevated risk of occurrence of PTB in South Asia, that is consistent with the previous observations [8,29,31,32] and meta-analysis [33]. The mechanism of higher occurrence of PTB among anaemic than non-anaemic women is comparable with the occurrence of LBW among the anaemic women. Maternal haemoglobin or haematocrit during pregnancy among anaemic women leads to a decline in red cell mass and maternal plasma volume during pregnancy, which contribute to the occurrence of PTB [34]. Moreover, a significant number of studies have observed that the trimester of anaemia onset during pregnancy was associated with PTB occurrence. For instance, some studies reported anaemia in the first trimester of pregnancy is associated with increased risk of PTB [11,12] while others did not [14]. A meta-analysis also reported that early pregnancy anaemia was associated with a slightly increased risk of PTB than late pregnancy anaemia [13]. These differences might be due to various physical factors. However, the aggregate measures of maternal anaemia that were used in the referred studies could be one of the factors associated with these differences [35].

Consistent with other studies [13,29,36,37], this systematic review and meta-analysis reported the strongest significant effect of maternal anaemia during pregnancy on the increased occurrence of perinatal and neonatal mortality. Higher occurrence of LBW and PTB among the anaemic mothers than non-anaemic women are known factors associated with the increased risks of perinatal, neonatal and child mortality. For instance, Goldenberg and colleagues found a 75% higher risk of perinatal mortality following PTB than normal birth, and the WHO reported around 60-80% of all neonatal deaths in LMICs are attributed to the LBW [38]. The other possible factors contributing to the increased risk of perinatal and neonatal mortality are primarily attributed to the anaemia during pregnancy [33,36,39,40]. For instance, the occurrence of anaemia during pregnancy increases the risk of birth asphyxia, a contributor of 26% of the total perinatal mortality in Pakistan [41] and 23% total perinatal deaths in developing countries [42].

Our study found higher risks of LBW and PTB among the anaemic mothers in Pakistan than in other South Asian countries. We could not explain these findings as mechanisms are unclear, and there is a lack of relevant research. However, several available estimates reported a higher incidence of LBW (24.5%) [43] and PTB (15.7%) [44] in Pakistan than the average in South Asian countries (LBW, 15.5% [3] and PTB, 9.6% [45]). Rural residence, lower education, lower use of antenatal care, and larger size of parity may often be cited as common risk factors of such higher occurrences of LBW and PTB in Pakistan [43,46].

4.1. Strengths and limitations

In this study, we did not apply any time, language, or outcome restrictions. This has enabled us to include a large number of studies, which allowed us to determine the number of outcomes attributed to maternal anaemia and finally to draw reasonable conclusions. A very comprehensive analysis also enable us to draw accurate estimates along with possible biases in the estimates. However, several limitations should be mentioned. Firstly, although the WHO developed the standard cut off point for anaemia categorization (anaemic, <11 ​g/dl, not anemic, ≥ 11 ​g/dl) during pregnancy, not all studies use this categorization. In the meta-analysis, we considered papers that used this categorization or that had otherwise explained them narratively. Secondly, significant heterogeneity existed in several outcomes that could not be linked with different factors except for the sub-groups in the stratified analysis of this study. This limits our understanding of the association in various settings and restricts the generalization of our findings.

5. Conclusion

Maternal anaemia during pregnancy is associated with the increased risks of adverse birth and obstetric outcomes in South Asian countries. Proper nutrition before and during pregnancy, iron supplements, and screening of anaemia during pregnancy, are recommended to improve maternal health and to control higher proportions of LBW, PTB, and perinatal mortality in South Asia.

Funding

There is no funding source for this study.

Authors contributions

Khan MN and Rahman MA developed the study concept and undertook reviews of published studies. Khan MN, and Rahman MM contribute to the study design. Khan MN and Rahman MA screened the studies and extracted data. Khan MN and Rahman MA analysed the data. Khan MN wrote the first draft. Rahman MM and Rahman MA critically reviewed the drafts. All authors have seen and approved the final draft of the study.

Declaration of competing interest

There are no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Acknowledgement

The authors gratefully acknowledge the Department of Population Science and Human Resource Development, University of Rajshahi, Bangladesh where this study was conducted.

Footnotes

Appendix A

Supplementary data to this article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhip.2020.100021.

Appendix A. Supplementary data

The following is the Supplementary data to this article:

Multimedia component 1
mmc1.doc (159KB, doc)

References

  • 1.UN . 2015. Sustainable Development Goal The United Nation.https://wwwunorg/sustainabledevelopment/health/2015 USA. Accessed from. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.WHO . 2018. Maternal Mortality The World Health Organization.http://wwwwhoint/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/maternal-mortalityon%202018 Geneva, Switzerland. Accessed from. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.WHO . The World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2018. Under-five Mortality.https://wwwwhoint/gho/child_health/mortality/mortality_under_five_text/en/2018 Accessed from. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Kassebaum N.J., Jasrasaria R., Naghavi M., Wulf S.K., Johns N., Lozano R., et al. A systematic analysis of global anemia burden from 1990 to 2010. Blood. 2014;123:615–624. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-06-508325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kidanto H.L., Mogren I., Lindmark G., Massawe S., Nystrom L. Risks for preterm delivery and low birth weight are independently increased by severity of maternal anaemia. S. Afr. Med. J. 2009;99:98–102. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Stevens G.A., Finucane M.M., De-Regil L.M., Paciorek C.J., Flaxman S.R., Branca F., et al. Global, regional, and national trends in haemoglobin concentration and prevalence of total and severe anaemia in children and pregnant and non-pregnant women for 1995-2011: a systematic analysis of population-representative data. Lancet Global Health. 2013;1:e16–25. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70001-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Drukker L., Hants Y., Farkash R., Ruchlemer R., Samueloff A., Grisaru-Granovsky S. Iron deficiency anemia at admission for labor and delivery is associated with an increased risk for Cesarean section and adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Transfusion. 2015;55(12):2799–2806. doi: 10.1111/trf.13252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Levy A., Fraser D., Katz M., Mazor M., Sheiner E. Maternal anemia during pregnancy is an independent risk factor for low birthweight and preterm delivery. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2005;122:182–186. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.02.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Scholl T.O., Reilly T. Anemia, iron and pregnancy outcome. J. Nutr. 2000;130:443S–447S. doi: 10.1093/jn/130.2.443S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Abeysena C., Jayawardana P., de A.S.R. Maternal haemoglobin level at booking visit and its effect on adverse pregnancy outcome. Aust. N. Z. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2010;50:423–427. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2010.01220.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ren A., Wang J., Ye R.W., Li S., Liu J.M., Li Z. Low first-trimester hemoglobin and low birth weight, preterm birth and small for gestational age newborns. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2007;98:124–128. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2007.05.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Zhou L.M., Yang W.W., Hua J.Z., Deng C.Q., Tao X., Stoltzfus R.J. Relation of hemoglobin measured at different times in pregnancy to preterm birth and low birth weight in Shanghai, China. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1998;148:998–1006. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Xiong X., Buekens P., Alexander S., Demianczuk N., Wollast E. Anemia during pregnancy and birth outcome: a meta-analysis. Am. J. Perinatol. 2000;17:137–146. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-9508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Xiong X., Buekens P., Fraser W.D., Guo Z. Anemia during pregnancy in a Chinese population. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2003;83:159–164. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7292(03)00214-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Alwan N.A., Cade J.E., McArdle H.J., Greenwood D.C., Hayes H.E., Simpson N.A. Maternal iron status in early pregnancy and birth outcomes: insights from the Baby’s Vascular health and Iron in Pregnancy study. Br. J. Nutr. 2015;113:1985–1992. doi: 10.1017/S0007114515001166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Rahman M.M., Abe S.K., Rahman M.S., Kanda M., Narita S., Bilano V., et al. Maternal anemia and risk of adverse birth and health outcomes in low- and middle-income countries: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2016;103(2):495–504. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.115.107896. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.WHO . The World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 1968. Nutritional Anaemias: Report of a WHO Scientific Group.https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/40707.March%2017 Accessed from. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Margulis A.V., Pladevall M., Riera-Guardia N., Varas-Lorenzo C., Hazell L., Berkman N.D., et al. Quality assessment of observational studies in a drug-safety systematic review, comparison of two tools: the Newcastle–Ottawa scale and the RTI item bank. Clin. Epidemiol. 2014;6:359. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S66677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Higgins J.P., Thompson S.G., Deeks J.J., Altman D.G. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327:557–560. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Thompson S.G., Higgins J.P. How should meta-regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted? Stat. Med. 2002;21:1559–1573. doi: 10.1002/sim.1187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Egger M., Davey Smith G., Schneider M., Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315:629–634. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Duval S., Tweedie R. Trim and fill: a simple funnel-plot-based method of testing and adjusting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Biometrics. 2000;56:455–463. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hytten F. Blood volume changes in normal pregnancy. Clin. Haematol. 1985;14:601–612. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Institute of Medicine Committee on Nutritional Status During P., Lactation . National Academy of Sciences; Washington DC, USA: 1990. Nutrition during Pregnancy: Part I Weight Gain. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lu Z.M., Goldenberg R.L., Cliver S.P., Cutter G., Blankson M. The relationship between maternal hematocrit and pregnancy outcome. Obstet. Gynecol. 1991;77:190–194. doi: 10.1097/00006250-199102000-00005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Steer P.J. Maternal hemoglobin concentration and birth weight. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2000;71:1285s–1287s. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/71.5.1285s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yazdani M., Tadbiri M., Shakeri S. Maternal hemoglobin level, prematurity, and low birth weight. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2004;85:163–164. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2003.07.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Little M.P., Brocard P., Elliott P., Steer P.J. Hemoglobin concentration in pregnancy and perinatal mortality: a London-based cohort study. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2005;193:220–226. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.11.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Savajols E., Burguet A., Grimaldi M., Godoy F., Sagot P., Semama D.S. Maternal haemoglobin and short-term neonatal outcome in preterm neonates. PloS One. 2014;9 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.WHO . The World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2018. Preterm birth.https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/preterm-birth Accessed from. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Adam I., Babiker S., Mohmmed A.A., Salih M.M., Prins M.H., Zaki Z.M. Low body mass index, anaemia and poor perinatal outcome in a rural hospital in eastern Sudan. J. Trop. Pediatr. 2008;54:202–204. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmm110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Goldenberg R.L., Tamura T., DuBard M., Johnston K.E., Copper R.L., Neggers Y. Plasma ferritin and pregnancy outcome. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1996;175:1356–1359. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70054-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Haider B.A., Olofin I., Wang M., Spiegelman D., Ezzati M., Fawzi W.W. Anaemia, prenatal iron use, and risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2013;346:f3443. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f3443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Klebanoff M.A., Shiono P.H., Berendes H.W., Rhoads G.G. Facts and artifacts about anemia and preterm delivery. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 1989;262:511–515. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zhang Q., Ananth C.V., Li Z., Smulian J.C. Maternal anaemia and preterm birth: a prospective cohort study. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2009;38:1380–1389. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyp243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Rasmussen K.M. Is there a causal relationship between iron deficiency or iron-deficiency anemia and weight at birth, length of gestation and perinatal mortality? J. Nutr. 2001;131:590S–603S. doi: 10.1093/jn/131.2.590S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Lone F.W., Qureshi R.N., Emmanuel F. Maternal anaemia and its impact on perinatal outcome in a tertiary care hospital in Pakistan. East. Mediterr. Health J. 2004;10:801–807. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.WHO . World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2011. Guidelines on Optimal Feeding of Low Birth-Weight Infants in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.https://www.who.int/maternal_child_adolescent/documents/infant_feeding_low_bw/en/ Accessed from. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Charkaluk M.L., Truffert P., Fily A., Ancel P.Y., Pierrat V. Neurodevelopment of children born very preterm and free of severe disabilities: the Nord-Pas de Calais Epipage cohort study. Acta Paediatr. 2010;99:684–689. doi: 10.1111/j.0803-5253.2010.01695.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Bakhtiar U.J., Khan Y., Nasar R. Relationship between maternal hemoglobin and perinatal outcome. Int. J. Reprod. Contracept. Obstet. Gynecol. 2007;25 24.20. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Jehan I., Harris H., Salat S., Zeb A., Mobeen N., Pasha O., et al. Neonatal mortality, risk factors and causes: a prospective population-based cohort study in urban Pakistan. Bull. World Health Organ. 2009;87:130–138. doi: 10.2471/BLT.08.050963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lawn J.E., Cousens S., Zupan J. 4 million neonatal deaths: when? Where? Why? Lancet. 2005;365:891–900. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)71048-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Jalil A., Zakar R., Zakar M.Z. A secondary analysis of maternal factors determining low birth weight in Pakistan. Iran. J. Public Health. 2015;44:136–137. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lawn J.E., Gravett M.G., Nunes T.M., Rubens C.E., Stanton C. Global report on preterm birth and stillbirth (1 of 7): definitions, description of the burden and opportunities to improve data. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2010;10:S1. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-10-S1-S1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Beck S., Wojdyla D., Say L., Betran A.P., Merialdi M., Requejo J.H., et al. The worldwide incidence of preterm birth: a systematic review of maternal mortality and morbidity. Bull. World Health Organ. 2010;88:31–38. doi: 10.2471/BLT.08.062554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Shaikh K., Premji S.S., Rose M.S., Kazi A., Khowaja S., Tough S. The association between parity, infant gender, higher level of paternal education and preterm birth in Pakistan: a cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2011;11:88. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-11-88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Bhalerao A., Kawthalkar A., Ghike S., Joshi S. Anemia during pregnancy: most preventable yet most prevalent. J. S. Asian Fed. Obstet. Gynecol. 2011;3:75–77. [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Bondevik G.T., Lie R.T., Ulstein M., Kvale G. Maternal hematological status and risk of low birth weight and preterm delivery in Nepal. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2001;80:402–408. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Baig S.A., Khan N., Baqai T., Fatima A., Karim S.A., Aziz S. Preterm birth and its associated risk factors. A study at tertiary care hospitals of Karachi, Pakistan. J. Pakistan Med. Assoc. 2013;63:414–418. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Bora R., Sable C., Wolfson J., Boro K., Rao R. Prevalence of anemia in pregnant women and its effect on neonatal outcomes in Northeast India. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;27:887–891. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.845161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Begum S., Huda S.N., Musarrat N., Ahmed S., Banu L.A., Ali S.M. Nutritional status and birth outcomes of the diabetic and non-diabetic pregnant women. Bangladesh Med. Res. Counc. Bull. 2002;28:97–103. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Dhar B., Mowlah G., Kabir D.M. Newborn anthropometry and its relationship with maternal factors. Bangladesh Med. Res. Counc. Bull. 2003;29:48–58. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Deshmukh J.S., Motghare D.D., Zodpey S.P., Wadhva S.K. Low birth weight and associated maternal factors in an urban area. Indian Pediatr. 1998;35:33–36. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Ferdous J., Ahmed A., Dasgupta S.K., Jahan M., Huda F.A., Ronsmans C., et al. Occurrence and determinants of postpartum maternal morbidities and disabilities among women in Matlab, Bangladesh. J. Health Popul. Nutr. 2012;30:143–158. doi: 10.3329/jhpn.v30i2.11308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Hasin A., Begum R., Khan M.R., Ahmed F. Relationship between birth weight and biochemical measures of maternal nutritional status at delivery in Bangladeshi urban poors. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 1996;47:273–279. doi: 10.3109/09637489609012588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Hosain G.M., Chatterjee N., Begum A., Saha S.C. Factors associated with low birthweight in rural Bangladesh. J. Trop. Pediatr. 2006;52:87–91. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmi066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Hirve S.S., Ganatra B.R. Determinants of low birth weight: a community based prospective cohort study. Indian Pediatr. 1994;31:1221–1225. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Iltaf G., Shahid B., Khan M.I. Incidence and associated risk factors of low birth weight babies born in Shaikh Khalifa Bin Zayad Al-Nayan Hospital Muzaffarabad, Azad Jammu and Kashmir. J. Pakistan Med. Assoc. 2017;33(3):626. doi: 10.12669/pjms.333.12413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Jehan I., McClure E.M., Salat S., Rizvi S., Pasha O., Harris H., et al. Stillbirths in an urban community in Pakistan. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2007;197 doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2007.07.012. 257.e251-258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Javed H., Mehmood B., Javed R.A. Frequency of low birth weight in term pregnancy and its association with maternal risk factors. Rawal Med. J. 2018;43(1):102–105. [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Kumar A., Chaudhary K., Prasad S. Maternal indicators and obstetric outcome in the north Indian population: a hospital-based study. J. Postgrad. Med. 2010;56:192–195. doi: 10.4103/0022-3859.68647. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Kader M., Perera N.K. Socio-economic and nutritional determinants of low birth weight in India. N. Am. J. Med. Sci. 2014;6:302–308. doi: 10.4103/1947-2714.136902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Marahatta R. Study of anaemia in pregnancy and its outcome in Nepal medical College teaching hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal. Nepal Med. Coll. J. 2007;9:270–274. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Lone F.W., Qureshi R.N., Emanuel F. Maternal anaemia and its impact on perinatal outcome. Trop. Med. Int. Health. 2004;9:486–490. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2004.01222.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Malhotra M., Sharma J.B., Batra S., Sharma S., Murthy N.S., Arora R. Maternal and perinatal outcome in varying degrees of anemia. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 2002;79:93–100. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7292(02)00225-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Monirujjaman M., Azhar B.S., Islam K.S., Ferdouse A., Afrin S., Sabir M. Maternal obstetric and morbidity factors in relation to infant birth weight. Sch. J. App. Sci. 2014;2(2):539–547. [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Mavalankar D.V., Gray R.H., Trivedi C.R. Risk factors for preterm and term low birthweight in Ahmedabad, India. Int. J. Epidemiol. 1992;21:263–272. doi: 10.1093/ije/21.2.263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Nair M., Choudhury M.K., Choudhury S.S., Kakoty S.D., Sarma U.C., Webster P., Knight M. Association between maternal anaemia and pregnancy outcomes: a cohort study in Assam, India. BMJ Glob. Health. 2016;1(1) doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2015-000026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Parks S., Hoffman M.K., Goudar S.S., Patel A., Saleem S., Ali S.A., et al. Maternal anaemia and maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcomes in a prospective cohort study in India and Pakistan. BJOG. 2019;126(6):737–743. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Nair M., Gireesh S., Rubeena Y., Cherian N.C. Effect of maternal anemia on birth weight of term babies. Int. J. Contemp. Pediatr. 2018;5(3):1019–1022. [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Patel A., Prakash A.A., Das P.K., Gupta S., Pusdekar Y.V., Hibberd P.L. Maternal anemia and underweight as determinants of pregnancy outcomes: cohort study in eastern rural Maharashtra, India. BMJ Open. 2018;8(8) doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021623. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Rizvi S.A., Hatcher J., Jehan I., Qureshi R. Maternal risk factors associated with low birth weight in Karachi: a case-control study. East. Mediterr. Health J. 2007;13:1343–1352. doi: 10.26719/2007.13.6.1343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Shobeiri F., Begum K., Nazari M. A prospective study of maternal hemoglobin status of Indian women during pregnancy and pregnancy outcome. Nutr. Res. 2006;26:209–213. [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Swain S., Singh S., Bhatia B.D., Pandey S., Krishna M. Maternal hemoglobin and serum albumin and fetal growth. Indian Pediatr. 1994;31:777–782. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Singla P.N., Tyagi M., Kumar A., Dash D., Shankar R. Fetal growth in maternal anaemia. J. Trop. Pediatr. 1997;43:89–92. doi: 10.1093/tropej/43.2.89. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Singal N., Setia G., Taneja B.K., Singal K.K. Maternal outcome in pregnant women with anaemia. Bangladesh J. Med. Sci. 2018;17(3):446–454. [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Sharma S.R., Giri S., Timalsina U., Bhandari S.S., Basyal B., Wagle K., Shrestha L. Low birth weight at term and its determinants in a tertiary hospital of Nepal: a case-control study. PloS One. 2015;10(4) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Yousaf F., Haider G., Shaikh R.B., Haider A., Muhammad N. Impact of maternal anemia on perinatal outcome. Pakistan Armed Forces Med. J. 2007;61(4):610–613. [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Varsha D.S., Walvekar R.P., Mallapur M.D. Maternal factors affecting the birth weight of a new born a case control study. Indian J. Publ. Health Res. Dev. 2017;8(4):258–261. [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Ahankari A., Bapat S., Myles P., Fogarty A., Tata L. Factors associated with preterm delivery and low birth weight: a study from rural Maharashtra, India. F1000Research. 2017;6 doi: 10.12688/f1000research.10659.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Ahankari A.S., Myles P.R., Dixit J.V., Tata L.J., Fogarty A.W. Risk factors for maternal anaemia and low birth weight in pregnant women living in rural India: a prospective cohort study. Publ. Health. 2017;151:63–73. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2017.06.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Daljeet K., Bhupinder K., Devi G.L. Assessment of placental weight, newborn birth weight in normal pregnant women and anemic pregnant women: a Co-relation and comparative study. Indian J. Publ. Health Res. Dev. 2016;7(2):150–154. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Multimedia component 1
mmc1.doc (159KB, doc)

Articles from Public Health in Practice are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES