Abstract
We describe a novel method for visualizing the network of axons in the unlabeled fresh wholemount retina. The intrinsic radiation of second harmonic generation (SHG) was utilized to visualize single axons of all major retinal neurons, i.e., photoreceptors, horizontal cells, bipolar cells, amacrine cells, and the retinal ganglion cells. The cell types of SHG+ axons were determined using transgenic GFP/YFP mice. New findings were obtained with retinal SHG imaging: Müller cells do not maintain uniformly polarized microtubules in the processes; SHG+ axons of bipolar cells terminate in the inner plexiform layer (IPL) in a subtype-specific manner; a subset of amacrine cells, presumably the axon-bearing types, emits SHG; and the axon-like neurites of amacrine cells provide a cytoskeletal scaffolding for the IPL stratification. To demonstrate the utility, retinal SHG imaging was applied to testing whether the inner retina is preserved in glaucoma, using DBA/2 mice as a model of glaucoma and DBA/2-Gpnmb+ as the nonglaucomatous control. It was found that the morphology of the inner retina was largely intact in glaucoma and the presynaptic compartments to the retinal ganglion cells were uncompromised. It proves retinal SHG imaging as a promising technology for studying the physiological and diseased retinas in 3D.
Keywords: axon, bipolar cell, amacrine cell, second harmonic generation, glaucoma
Significance Statement.
Conventional fluorescence microscopy for visualizing the axons, despite numerous advantages, suffers critical drawbacks, such as low throughput and/or having to express fluorescent proteins. Here we demonstrate the use of an intrinsic radiation of second harmonic generation for imaging the axonal architecture in the unlabeled murine retina. The new technique allows insights into the retinal interneurons in health and diseases. As proof of utility, we show the persistence of the inner retina in glaucoma.
Introduction
Imaging the retina's three-dimensional architecture is crucial for understanding the parallel processing of visual information. The neural circuit has been dissected in the physiological tissue via fluorescent labeling. Green fluorescent protein (GFP) allows targeting specific cells genetically (1–4). However, due to an expression too low for revealing thin processes, it often requires additional labeling such as Lucifer yellow or biocytin (5). Synthetic fluorophores can be microinjected to permit in situ correlation with the neurite's anatomy during electrophysiological recording, but the low throughput is ill-suited for a large-scale interrogation. Here we describe a new method to image single axon-like processes in the fresh retina without labeling. Endogenous second harmonic generation (SHG), previously demonstrated for imaging the retinal ganglion cell (RGC) axons (6, 7), can visualize all major neurons in the inner and outer retinas.
Results
Intrinsic SHG visualizes neurites across the inner and outer retina
SHG can be obtained from the axon because of uniformly polarized microtubules (8, 9). The nonlinear optical radiation is particularly intense from the retinal nerve fiber bundle owing to a large number of the RGC axons (6, 7). Although, in principle, SHG should also arise from the axons of non-RGC retinal cells, the signal was expected to be much weaker. Using a setup collecting the forward emission at a half of the excitation wavelength (Fig. 1a), we acquired images of the whole retina (CAG-H2B-EGFP (10)). The vertical fibers as well as neuropils were visible in the inner and outer retina (Fig. 1b). The nuclear and plexiform layers could be distinguished for 3D reconstruction (Fig. 1c) and segmentation (Fig. 1d). Major retinal neurons were recognizable, including the photoreceptors and horizontal cells in the outer retina. The emission was not autofluorescence (Fig. S1a), but exhibited the characteristics of SHG due to microtubules: It vanished when the retina was fixed with paraformaldehyde (Fig. S1b) (11). The signal was excitable from 700 to 1250 nm, unusually broad for fluorescence. Finally, it responded to a microtubule-depolymerizing agent (nocodazole) with the intensity gradually decreasing after the treatment. These results indicated that the new optical contrast is SHG due to axonal microtubules.
Vertical SHG+ fibers of the inner retina are bipolar cell axons
It seemed that the vertical SHG+ fibers of the inner retina were the axons of bipolar cells. However, Müller cells could not be ruled out as certain glial cells are known to contain polarized microtubules in their processes, e.g., oligodendrocyte (12). To resolve the cellular identity, the vertical SHG+ fibers were examined in transgenic mice expressing GFP or YFP under the neuro- and glia-specific promoters, i.e., GUS (13), Thy1 (16 line) (14), and GFAP (15).Three specific subtypes of the bipolar cell are distinguishable in the GUS-GFP retina, i.e., type 4, 7 cone and rod bipolar cells (CBC4, CBC7, and RBC, respectively) (16), whereas broad retinal neurons, including bipolar and amacrine cells, express fluorescent proteins in Thy1-YFP-16. Müller cells and astrocytes are labeled in the GFAP-GFP retina. SHG and GFP/YFP were excited simultaneously with a single 915-nm beam. The co-localization was detected in GUS and Thy1-16, but not in the GFAP retinas (Fig. 2a). Thus, it was determined that the vertical SHG processes belong to bipolar cells while Müller cells did not polarize microtubules in their processes. Comparing SHG versus GFP/YFP in the same axons revealed that the axon terminals lack SHG signals. Intriguingly, the bipolar cell axons, as seen by SHG, exhibited variable terminal depths in the IPL (Fig. 2a, arrows), which was also observable in vertical slices with a higher resolution (Fig. 2b and c).
Classification of bipolar cell subtypes in the unlabeled fresh retina
Bipolar cell ramifies to an IPL sublamina to form synapses with specific amacrine cells and RGCs; therefore, the depth of the axon terminal is a chief anatomical marker of the function (17, 18). We investigated this parameter with SHG imaging. The census of bipolar cell axons was conducted (Fig. 3a). The number of axons increased steadily toward the INL and then decreased inside the INL, as some SHG fibers coalesced into the interstitial space between the cell bodies beyond the optical resolution (Fig. 3b, arrowheads). The peak density, which occurred around zero IPL depth (i.e., the interface between the IPL and INL), was approximately 40,000 to 45,000 axons/mm2. It was consistent with the previous counts of bipolar cells in the mouse retina (∼40,000 to 50,000 cells/mm2), measured by immunohistochemical staining (19, 20) or electron microscopy (21, 22). Detecting thin bipolar cell axons can be improved with a high signal-to-background ratio and a lateral resolution of SHG imaging. The derivative of the number of bipolar cell axons with respect to the depth yielded the number of axon terminals (Fig. 3c), which revealed a subdivision with four and five maxima of relatively uniform separation, suggestive of the internal structure of the IPL (arrowheads, Fig. 3c). Conceivably, the pattern mimicking the IPL subdivision emerged because of the diverse subtypes of bipolar cells. To test this idea, we examined SHG axon terminals in the GUS-GFP retinas. For an objective measurement of axon terminals, single-neurite tracing was performed on SHG z-stacks (Fig. 3d). The GUS+ subpopulation of SHG traces were identified by the superimposition with GFP at zero IPL depth (Fig. 3d). The axial distribution of GUS+ SHG axon terminals showed distinct populations of CBC4, CBC7, and RBC (Fig. 3e). Furthermore, the histogram conformed to the mean GFP profile, verifying the accuracy of measurement. The predicted cell subtypes of the GUS+ SHG axons were corroborated with GFP images (Fig. 3f and g); two cells with SHG axons ending in layers 4 and 5 (blue and yellow arrowheads, respectively) showed the characteristic morphology of axon terminals of cone and rod bipolar cells, respectively. Consequently, the SHG-based classification of bipolar cell subtypes was validated. Remarkably, it exploits only an anatomical property, which has been little utilized as a classifier. Compared to molecular classifiers revealing only select subtypes per marker, SHG accounts for all bipolar cells and is applicable to the unlabeled retina. Furthermore, free from the need for an exogenous stain (e.g., fluorescent antibodies) to penetrate thick tissue, the principle is scalable to the whole 3D retinal flatmount. The precision is limited by the axial resolution of imaging (∼1.5 µm), which is approximately 4% of the IPL thickness.
SHG intensity varies significantly along the bipolar cell axons
SHG intensity depends on the amount of uniformly polarized microtubules, thus scales with the axon caliber, which is of electrotonic significance but too small to measure by light microscopy. Despite significant variations, the SHG intensity of bipolar cell axons, on average, was higher close to the INL, implying the thickening of axons (Fig. 4a). The variations could stem from the subtypes of bipolar cells, e.g., OFF cells have thicker axons than ON cells. However, the SHG intensities of GUS+ axons displayed just as significant variations as total bipolar cell axons at zero IPL depth (Fig. 4b). To disentangle the variability, SHG intensity was analyzed axially along single axon traces. The individual traces showed little correlation between the SHG intensity and the IPL depth of the axon terminals. Hence, the cell type was not a major determinant of the SHG intensity. Moreover, the variations of SHG intensity were substantial along the single axons regardless of the subtype, often relative to the choline acetyltransferase (ChAT) bands (3, 23–25) (gray, Fig. 4c).
Cytoskeletal substrate for the IPL stratification
The IPL consists of 5 (or 10) sublaminae of equal thickness participating in discrete parallel processing (18, 26). SHG imaging of the IPL neuropil routinely revealed a subdivision with 3 strata (Fig. 5a). The axial positions of the gaps coincided approximately with the ChAT bands (Fig. 5a, right), suggesting that the SHG strata aligned with the functional sublayers of sustained ON, transient ON–OFF, and sustained OFF. Furthermore, it indicated that there exists a microtubule scaffolding underlying the IPL stratification, i.e., a cytoskeletal substrate for retinal neurons to establish proper synapses. More refined SHG strata appeared in a shorter range, i.e., approximately 5 sublayers over 20 µm (Fig. 5b), implying variable lateral frequencies of SHG+ neurites. To verify the relationship with the IPL sublaminae, SHG strata were analyzed in the GUS-GFP and ChAT-EYFP retinas. The GUS-GFP signal appeared in the fourth of 5 SHG strata (Fig. 5c), while the ChAT-EYFP bands were correctly at the 25% and 62% IPL depths relative to the SHG neuropil (Fig. 5d).
Lateral SHG+ processes within the IPL represent a subset of amacrine cells
The molecular origin of the IPL neuropil SHG was determined as microtubules, based on the response to a nocodazole treatment where the intensity of neuropil SHG decreased at the same rate as that of the retinal nerve fibers (Fig. 6a). We asked whether the IPL neuropil SHG was due to specific types of retinal neurons. The IPL consists of three major neuronal components, i.e., RGC dendrites, amacrine cell neurites, and bipolar cell axon terminals. To find out which is responsible for neuropil SHG, we employed the transgenic retinas of Thy1-YFP (lines H and 16), where the RGC dendrites and amacrine cell neurites are labeled, respectively (14), and GUS-GFP. SHG and GFP/YFP did not co-localize in GUS-GFP and Thy1-YFP-H (Fig. 6b), excluding bipolar cell axon terminals or RGC dendritic arbors as the source. By contrast, overlaps in Thy1-YFP-16 (arrowheads) suggested that neuropil SHG originates from amacrine cell processes. The observed diffuse SHG in the IPL could result from the dense network of subresolution neurites.
As the most diverse retinal interneurons, amacrine cells perform a variety of functions in visual integration, which are dictated by the spatial range of neurites (27–29). We investigated the lateral field and axial stratification of SHG+ amacrine cells. Single-neurite tracing revealed mostly medium to wide fields (>100 µm) but scarcely narrow fields (Fig. 6c), implying that only a subset of amacrine cells gives rise to SHG. Named for the presumed absence of axons, some amacrine cells are now known to bear axon-like processes (e.g., polyaxonal amacrine cells) (28, 30–33). Plausibly, these axon-bearing amacrine cells are SHG+. In terms of stratification, SHG revealed discrete classes of amacrine cells, i.e., mono- (Fig. 6c, blue and red) and multistratified (green). The latter appeared to be displaced amacrine cells whose soma are in the ganglion cell layer. Displaced amacrine cells encompass multiple subtypes whose lateral fields range from narrow to wide (34). One of the best characterized narrow-field, and also the most numerous, displaced amacrine cells is the starburst amacrine cell (SACs) (23, 35, 36). Since SACs are not endowed with axon-like processes, we reasoned that their processes would be SHG-. To test this, we imaged the ChAT-EYFP retinas in which SACs are labeled by EYFP. The SHG+ processes of displaced amacrine cells, while Thy1+ (Fig. 6d), were not ChAT+, and vice versa (Fig. 6e, arrow and arrowheads). Together with the absence of SHG from the ChAT bands (Fig. 5), this result indicate that the SAC processes do not habor uniformly polarized microtubules.
The broad excitability of SHG aids safer retinal imaging
Since imaging non-RGC cells required an excitation about more than five times higher than for the RGC axons, the risk of photodamage was elevated. There are measures to improve photosafety. First, the laser beam could be switched off during the fly-back motion of the galvoscanner, i.e., when images are not acquired, reducing the average power that the sample receives by approximately 37% with no adverse effect on the image quality. In addition, the excitation could be tuned to a longer near-infrared wavelength, which is in general safer than shorter wavelengths (37, 38). Unlike fluorescence, SHG can be excited at any wavelength since it does not hinge on molecular absorption and indeed, similar image qualities were obtained from 700 to 1250 nm (Fig. 7a). To assay the photosafety of SHG imaging, regions in the fresh retina were irradiated at 800, 950, and 1150 nm at the same energy density ( 500 J/cm2) and then evaluated by autofluorescence and SHG. The photodamages were negligible at 1150 nm compared to 800 nm (Fig. 7b). Also, the SHG intensity from the ganglion cell layers reduced significantly under the continuous illumination at 800 nm, indicating the loss of cytoskeleton, while it was relatively maintained at 950 and 1150 nm (Fig. 7c). Another indicator of photodamage was provided by the swelling of the retina, which is presumably a result of disrupted transcellular water distribution by Müller cells due to excessive K+ current (39). The threshold light dosage to initiate the expansion depended on the wavelength, which was much higher at 950 nm than at 800 nm (Fig. 7d). The effect was not noticeable at 1150 nm, where almost no visual transduction was evoked, establishing the relative safety of longer excitation wavelengths.
The persistence of the inner retina in glaucoma
To prove the utility, retinal SHG imaging was recruited for asking an outstanding question in glaucoma; namely, whether the pathology is restricted to the RGCs or also involves non-RGC parts of the inner retina. In addition to the RGC dendrites and synapses that degrade in early glaucoma (40–45), the presynaptic components of amacrine cells and bipolar cell axons might be impaired. The notion has been tested by various modalities in primates and rodents, but the results have been inconsistent (46–49). We evaluated the inner retina of a mouse model of glaucoma DBA (50, 51) and the nonglaucomatous control DBA-Gpnmb+ (52) (n = 7 and 4 retinas, respectively, 13 to 16 months old). Regions around the central retina (0.5 mm from the optic nerve head) were imaged at an excitation wavelength of 950 nm. The SHG images of DBA retinas revealed that, despite the substantial loss of the RGC axons, the morphology of the IPL was largely intact (Fig. 8a and b). Also, the SHG intensity in the IPL was comparable to that of DBA-Gpnmb+, suggesting that the axon-like neurites of amacrine cells were preserved. Our results complement the previous immunohistochemistry data confirming the structural integrity of amacrine cells in glaucoma (53–56).
Evidence suggests the progression of glaucoma is circuit-dependent; especially, the ON and OFF pathways exhibit divergent susceptibilities at the level of the RGCs (57–60). The differential susceptibility could be RGC-autonomous or pervade the larger inner retina beyond the RGCs. We decided to illuminate this outstanding question in a new light with SHG. First, the IPL sublaminae of DBA and DBA-Gpnmb+were analyzed for differential degeneration. The previous study has found, by counting the immunostained cell bodies, that specific amacrine cells are compromised in glaucoma (61). Should the neurites of certain amacrine cells stratifying ON or OFF layers be lost substantially, we reasoned, it will lead to a relative thinning of the IPL sublaminae, which should be detectable by SHG imaging regardless of whether the amacrine cells themselves are visualized by the nonlinear optical signal. We found three SHG strata maintained relatively normal thicknesses in DBA (Fig. 8c, arrowheads), indicating the resilience of sustained ON, transient ON−OFF, and sustained OFF layers in glaucoma.
Next, we studied the integrity of ON vs. OFF bipolar cell axons following glaucoma-like injury. Immunostaining against Sty2, which labels the axon terminals of type 2 and 6 bipolar cells (20), has verified the preservation of type 6 ON bipolar cell axons but OFF axons remain obscure (62). We distinguished the ON and OFF bipolar cells by the IPL depth of axon terminals, quantifying the entire population in the same wholemounts. The density of axon terminals showed distinct populations of the ON, ON−OFF, and OFF cells (Fig. 8d, arrowheads), indicating all the subtypes were largely intact. Taken together, SHG imaging data verified the persistence of the non-RGC axons of the inner retina in glaucoma and no morphological disparity was found between the ON and OFF pathways.
Discussion
SHG as a phenotype of axon-like neurites
SHG is shown to visualize the axons of all five major classes of retinal neurons. New properties are discovered with SHG, such as the fluctuating diameters of bipolar axons. Since the morphology of the axon controls the frequency response so is key for sculpting the visual signals, e.g., the shorter OFF bipolar axons are more suitable for conveying fast electric transients (18), the modulated axon caliber is likely to have consequences for visual processing rather than being a random feature. For example, it could be a mechanism to fine-tune the relative timing between parallel visual pathways of remote vertical integrations or the IPL sublayers. Another finding obtained with SHG is regarding the neurites of amacrine cells, which are the most diverse among retinal neurons reflecting the multitude of their functions in the visual processing. New subtypes of amacrine cells have been discovered with emerging techniques (1, 4, 32, 63, 64), but the taxonomy may be still incomplete. SHG is obtained only from a certain group of amacrine cells, presumably axon-bearing kinds comprising as much as 30% of amacrine cells in the mouse retina (1, 30, 32). The axon-like properties of amacrine cell neurites include morphology, spatial range, electrical spiking (33), and immunoreactivity against phosphorylated neurofilament-H (pNF-H) (65). Our study raises microtubule polarity as another axonal phenotype, adding a new dimension to the classification of amacrine cells (66). It opens a set of new questions, e.g., whether all axon-bearing amacrine cells are SHG+; whether the uniform polarity is maintained across the entire length of neurites; and how SHG correlates with other axon-like phenotypes such as pNF-H immunoreactivity.
Action at a distance in retinal neurodegeneration
To determine the precise loci of pathogenesis is a prerequisite to proper understanding and developing therapeutic strategies of neurodegeneration. Using SHG imaging, we investigated the sites displaying asymmetric susceptibility of ON and OFF pathways in glaucoma, i.e., whether it is confined to RGCs or extends to a larger inner retina. Considering the origin of dichotomy in the outer retina (67, 68), it seemed plausible that the intermediate bipolar cells connecting the inner and outer retinas might be involved. However, our retinal SHG imaging did not yield any evidence that either bipolar or amacrine cell axons are lost in the mouse model. Intact amacrine cells may be crucial for glaucoma therapy, not only for preserving the cytoskeletal scaffolding of the IPL but also for maintaining amacrine cell-derived signals required for the growth of the RGC axons (69). Surveying a large 3D retina without fixation or sectioning, as demonstrated in this study, can be useful for unraveling the relationship between distant cells in other retinal degeneration, e.g., retinitis pigmentosa (70), where significant remodeling of the inner retina follows after the loss of photoreceptors (71).
Comparison to other techniques
Two-photon excited fluorescence microscopy is increasingly common in the vision research (35, 72–78). In contrast, SHG microscopy, which has been widely used for structural imaging of collagen and myosin, is extended to the central nervous system only recently (79). Retinal SHG imaging can be performed using the same setup as two-photon fluorescence microscopy with minimum alterations, e.g., the forward signal detection. Along with the usual benefits of light microscopy, SHG brings new advantages to retinal imaging. As an intrinsic contrast, it is available from most species from teleost to mammals thus can facilitate comparative studies without transgenic animals. In contrast to other intrinsic contrasts such as reflectance (80–82) or autofluorescence (74, 75), SHG visualizes the IPL subdivision and the vertical fibers, which are salient features of visual processing. Furthermore, the relatively specific molecular origin makes the data interpretation straightforward.
Materials and methods
Animals
All procedures were approved by the Hunter College Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). All mice were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory and housed in the animal facility at Hunter College: CAG-H2B-EGFP (B6.Cg-Tg(HIST1H2BB/EGFP)1 Pa/J, #006,069), GUS-GFP (Tg(Gnat3-GFP)1Rfm/ChowJ, #026,704), Thy1-YFP-H (B6.Cg-Tg(Thy1-YFP)HJrs/J, #003,782), Thy1-YFP-16 (B6.Cg-Tg(Thy1-YFP)16Jrs/J, #003,709), GFAP-GFP (FVB/N-Tg(GFAPGFP)14Mes/J, #003,257), DBA (DBA/2 J, #000,671), and DBA-Gpnmb+ (DBA/2J-Gpnmb+/SjJ, #007,048). ChAT-EYFP mouse was obtained by crossing ChAT-IRES-Cre knock-in (B6.129S-Chattm1(cre)Lowl/MwarJ (#031,661) (83) with R26R-EYFP reporter mice (B6.129 × 1-Gt(ROSA)26Sortm1(EYFP)Cos/J, #006,148) (84).
Tissue preparation and pharmacology
The retinal wholemounts were prepared as previously described (6, 7). Animal was euthanized by CO2 inhalation and the eye was enucleated. The retinal wholemounts were immersed in the oxygenated Ames’ medium for imaging. It took less than 30 min from animal's euthanasia to the beginning of imaging. For vertical slices, the fresh retinal wholemount was embedded in 6% agar and cut into 250-µm slices with a vibrating blade microtome (Leica VT100 S). For nocodazole treatment, the drug was added to the Ames’ medium at the final concentration of 33 µM.
SHG microscopy
SHG microscopy was performed using a setup previously described (6, 7). Short pulses of a 150-fs duration and an 80-MHz repetition rate from a Ti: Sapphire laser tunable from 700 to 1050 nm (Chameleon; Coherent, Inc.) or an optical parametric oscillator tunable from 1050 to 1250 nm (OPO, Angewandte Physik & Elektronik GmbH) were used for excitation. The polarization state of excitation beam was controlled with half- and quarter-waveplates. A Pockels cell (Conoptics 350–80LA) was inserted in the beam path for switching off the laser beam during the fly-back motion of galvoscanner (“fly-back blanking”), which was driven with an electrical signal synchronized with the galvoscanner. The excitation beam was focused with a water-dipping objective lens (Nikon CFI75 16 × 0.8NA or Leica HC FLUOTAR L 25 × 0.95NA). The average power was 100-150 mW at the sample. The forward-propagating SHG signal was collected with a setup comprised of an objective lens (Olympus UApo340 40 × 1.35NA), a narrow-bandpass filter (<20-nm bandwidth) with the center wavelength at a half of the excitation wavelength, and a photomultiplier tube (PMT; Hamamatsu H10770PA-40). For an efficient collection of SHG signal, the collection objective lens had a high NA and a high ultraviolet to blue transmission. It was co-axially aligned, but did not have to be strictly confocal, with the focusing objective lens. Images were acquired with 512 × 512 pixels. The pixel dwell time was approximately 3 µs. Typically 1 to 5 frames were acquired at the frame rate of ∼1.5 Hz. The z step of z-stacks images was 2 or 3 µm.
Image processing and data analysis
Image processing was done using ImageJ (85) and MATLAB (MathWorks, Inc.). 3D reconstruction was obtained with Amira (Thermo Scientific). Segmentation was done using Trainable Weka Segmentation plugin (86). Single-neurite tracing was performed by an automatic procedure modified from single-particle tracking (87, 88) or semiautomatically by ridge detection (89, 90).
Supplementary Material
Notes
Competing Interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Contributor Information
Arafat Meah, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Hunter College, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Vinessia Boodram, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Hunter College, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Festa Bucinca-Cupallari, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Hunter College, New York, NY 10065, USA; The Graduate Centre of the City University of New York, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Hyungsik Lim, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Hunter College, New York, NY 10065, USA; The Graduate Centre of the City University of New York, New York, NY 10065, USA.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Institute of Health (GM140841).
Authors’ Contributions
H.L. designed the research and wrote the manuscript; A.M., V.B., F.B., and H.L. performed experiments; and H.L. analyzed the data. All authors approved the final manuscript.
Data Availability
All data are included in the manuscript and/or supporting information.
References
- 1. Badea TC, Nathans J. 2004. Quantitative analysis of neuronal morphologies in the mouse retina visualized by using a genetically directed reporter. J Comp Neurol. 480:331–351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Siegert S, et al. 2009. Genetic address book for retinal cell types. Nat Neurosci. 12:1197–1204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Ivanova E, Hwang GS, Pan ZH. 2010. Characterization of transgenic mouse lines expressing Cre recombinase in the retina. Neuroscience. 165:233–243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Zhu YL, Xu J, Hauswirth WW, DeVries SH. 2014. Genetically targeted binary labeling of retinal neurons. J Neurosci. 34:7845–7861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Horikawa K, Armstrong WE. 1988. A versatile means of intracellular labeling: injection of biocytin and its detection with avidin conjugates. J Neurosci Methods. 25:1–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Lim H, Danias J. 2012. Label-free morphometry of retinal nerve fiber bundles by second-harmonic-generation microscopy. Opt Lett. 37:2316–2318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Sharoukhov D, Bucinca-Cupallari F, Lim H. 2018. Microtubule imaging reveals cytoskeletal deficit predisposing the retinal ganglion cell axons to atrophy in DBA/2 J. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 59:5292–5300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Baas PW, Deitch JS, Black MM, Banker GA. 1988. Polarity orientation of microtubules in hippocampal neurons: uniformity in the axon and nonuniformity in the dendrite. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 85:8335–8339. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Dombeck D, et al. 2003. Uniform polarity microtubule assemblies imaged in native brain tissue by second-harmonic generation microscopy. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 100:7081–7086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Hadjantonakis A, Papaioannou V. 2004. Dynamic in vivo imaging and cell tracking using a histone fluorescent protein fusion in mice. BMC Biotech. 4:33. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Van Steenbergen V, et al. 2019. Molecular understanding of label-free second harmonic imaging of microtubules. Nat Commun. 10:3530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Lunn KF, Baas PW, Duncan ID. 1997. Microtubule organization and stability in the oligodendrocyte. J Neurosci. 17:4921–4932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Huang LQ, et al. 2003. G protein subunit G gamma 13 is coexpressed with G alpha o, G beta 3, and G beta 4 in retinal ON bipolar cells. J Comp Neurol. 455:1–10. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Feng GP, et al. 2000. Imaging neuronal subsets in transgenic mice expressing multiple spectral variants of GFP. Neuron. 28:41–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Zhuo L, et al. 1997. Live astrocytes visualized by green fluorescent protein in transgenic mice. Dev Biol. 187:36–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Lin B, Masland RH. 2005. Synaptic contacts between an identified type of ON cone bipolar cell and ganglion cells in the mouse retina. Eur J Neurosci. 21:1257–1270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Ghosh KK, Bujan S, Haverkamp S, Feigenspan A, Wassle H. 2004. Types of bipolar cells in the mouse retina. J Comp Neurol. 469:70–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Euler T, Haverkamp S, Schubert T, Baden T. 2014. Retinal bipolar cells: elementary building blocks of vision. Nat Rev Neurosci. 15:507–519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Jeon CJ, Strettoi E, Masland RH. 1998. The major cell populations of the mouse retina. J Neurosci. 18:8936–8946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Wässle H, Puller C, Muller F, Haverkamp S. 2009. Cone contacts, mosaics, and territories of bipolar cells in the mouse retina. J Neurosci. 29:106–117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Helmstaedter M, et al. 2013. Connectomic reconstruction of the inner plexiform layer in the mouse retina. Nature. 500:168–174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Behrens C, Schubert T, Haverkamp S, Euler T, Berens P. 2016. Connectivity map of bipolar cells and photo receptors in the mouse retina. Elife. 5:e20041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Famiglietti EV. 1983. ‘Starburst’ amacrine cells and cholinergic neurons: mirror-symmetric ON and OFF amacrine cells of rabbit retina. Brain Res. 261:138–144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Guiloff GD, Kolb H. 1992. Neurons immunoreactive to choline acetyltransferase in the turtle retina. Vision Res. 32:2023–2030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Haverkamp S, Wässle H. 2000. Immunocytochemical analysis of the mouse retina. J Comp Neurol. 424:1–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Ramón y Cajal S. 1972. The structure of the retina. Springfield, Illinois: Charles C. Thomas. [Google Scholar]
- 27. Kolb H. 1997. Amacrine cells of the mammalian retina: neurocircuitry and functional roles. Eye. 11:904–923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. MacNeil MA, Masland RH. 1998. Extreme diversity among amacrine cells: implications for function. Neuron. 20:971–982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Masland RH. 2012. The tasks of amacrine cells. Vis Neurosci. 29:3–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Vaney DI, Peichl L, Boycott BB. 1988. Neurofibrillar long-range amacrine cells in mammalian retinae. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci. 235:203–219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Dacey DM. 1989. Axon-bearing amacrine cells of the macaque monkey retina. J Comp Neurol. 284:275–293. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Lin B, Masland RH. 2006. Populations of wide-field amacrine cells in the mouse retina. J Comp Neurol. 499:797–809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Greschner M, et al. 2014. A polyaxonal amacrine cell population in the primate retina. J Neurosci. 34:3597–3606. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Muller LPD, Shelley J, Weiler R. 2007. Displaced amacrine cells of the mouse retina. J Comp Neurol. 505:177–189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Euler T, Detwiler P, Denk W. 2002. Directionally selective calcium signals in dendrites of starburst amacrine cells. Nature. 418:845–852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Zheng JJ, Lee S, Zhou ZJ. 2004. A developmental switch in the excitability and function of the starburst network in the mammalian retina. Neuron. 44:851–864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Squirrell J, Wokosin D, White J, Bavister B. 1999. Long-term two-photon fluorescence imaging of mammalian embryos without compromising viability. Nat Biotechnol. 17:763–767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Debarre D, Olivier N, Supatto W, Beaurepaire E. 2014. Mitigating phototoxicity during multiphoton microscopy of live Drosophilaembryos in the 1.0–1.2 µm wavelength range. PLoS One. 9:e104250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Bringmann A, et al. 2006. Muller cells in the healthy and diseased retina. Prog Retin Eye Res. 25:397–424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Weber AJ, Kaufman PL, Hubbard WC. 1998. Morphology of single ganglion cells in the glaucomatous primate retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 39:2304–2320. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Weber AJ, Harman CD. 2005. Structure-function relations of parasol cells in the normal and glaucomatous primate retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 46:3197–3207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Williams PA, et al. 2013. Retinal ganglion cell dendritic atrophy in DBA/2 J glaucoma. PLoS One. 8:e72282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Berry RH, Qu J, John SWM, Howell GR, Jakobs TC. 2015. Synapse loss and dendrite remodeling in a mouse model of glaucoma. PLoS One. 10:e0144341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Liu M, Duggan J, Salt TE, Cordeiro MF. 2011. Dendritic changes in visual pathways in glaucoma and other neurodegenerative conditions. Exp Eye Res. 92:244–250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Agostinone J, Di Polo A. Retinal ganglion cell dendrite pathology and synapse loss: implications for glaucoma. 2015. In: Bagetta G, Nucci C, editors. New trends in basic and clinical research of glaucoma: a neurodegenerative disease of the visual system, part A, Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Bv. ; p. 199–216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Raz D, Perlman I, Percicot CL, Lambrou GX, Ofri R. 2003. Functional damage to inner and outer retinal cells in experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 44:3675–3684. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Choi SS, et al. 2011. Evidence of outer retinal changes in glaucoma patients as revealed by ultrahigh-resolution in vivo retinal imaging. Br J Ophthalmol. 95:131–141. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Vidal-Sanz M, et al. 2012. Understanding glaucomatous damage: anatomical and functional data from ocular hypertensive rodent retinas. Prog Retin Eye Res. 31:1–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Park HYL, Kim JH, Park CK. 2014. Alterations of the synapse of the inner retinal layers after chronic intraocular pressure elevation in glaucoma animal model. Mol Brain. 7:53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. John SWM, et al. 1998. Essential iris atrophy, pigment dispersion, and glaucoma in DBA/2 J mice. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 39:951–962. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Bayer AU, et al. 2001. Retinal morphology and ERG response in the DBA/2NNia mouse model of angle-closure glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 42:1258–1265. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Howell GR, et al. 2007. Absence of glaucoma in DBA/2 J mice homozygous for wild-type versions of Gpnmb and Tyrp1. BMC Genet. 8:45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Vickers JC, et al. 1995. Differential vulnerability of neurochemically identified subpopulations of retinal neurons in a monkey model of glaucoma. Brain Res. 680:23–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Jakobs TC, Libby RT, Ben YX, John SWM, Masland RH. 2005. Retinal ganglion cell degeneration is topological but not cell type specific in DBA/2 J mice. J Cell Biol. 171:313–325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Kielczewski JL, Pease ME, Quigley HA. 2005. The effect of experimental glaucoma and optic nerve transection on amacrine cells in the rat retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 46:3188–3196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Gunn DJ, Gole GA, Barnett NL. 2011. Specific amacrine cell changes in an induced mouse model of glaucoma. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 39:555–563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Santina LD, Inman DM, Lupien CB, Horner PJ, Wong ROL. 2013. Differential progression of structural and functional alterations in distinct retinal ganglion cell types in a mouse model of glaucoma. J Neurosci. 33:17444–17457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Pang JJ, Frankfort BJ, Gross RL, Wu SM. 2015. Elevated intraocular pressure decreases response sensitivity of inner retinal neurons in experimental glaucoma mice. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 112:2593–2598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. El-Danaf RN, Huberman AD. 2015. Characteristic patterns of dendritic remodeling in early-stage glaucoma: evidence from genetically identified retinal ganglion cell types. J Neurosci. 35:2329–2343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Ou Y, Jo RE, Ullian EM, Wong ROL, Santina LD. 2016. Selective vulnerability of specific retinal ganglion cell types and synapses after transient ocular hypertension. J Neurosci. 36:9240–9252. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Akopian A, Kumar S, Ramakrishnan H, Viswanathan S, Bloomfield SA. 2019. Amacrine cells coupled to ganglion cells via gap junctions are highly vulnerable in glaucomatous mouse retinas. J Comp Neurol. 527:159–173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Della Santina L, et al. 2021. Disassembly and rewiring of a mature converging excitatory circuit following injury. Cell Rep. 36:109463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Macneil MA, Heussy JK, Dacheux RF, Raviola E, Masland RH. 1999. The shapes and numbers of amacrine cells: matching of photofilled with Golgi-stained cells in the rabbit retina and comparison with other mammalian species. J Comp Neurol. 413:305–326. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Yan WJ, et al. 2020. Mouse retinal cell atlas: molecular identification of over sixty amacrine cell types. J Neurosci. 40:5177–5195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Volgyi B, Bloomfield SA. 2002. Axonal neurofilament-H immunolabeling in the rabbit retina. J Comp Neurol. 453:269–279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Zeng HK, Sanes JR. 2017. Neuronal cell-type classification: challenges, opportunities and the path forward. Nat Rev Neurosci. 18:530–546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Werblin FS, Dowling JE. 1969. Organization of the retina of the mudpuppy, Necturus maculosus. II. Intracellular recording. J Neurophysiol. 32:339–355. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Kaneko A. 1970. Physiological and morphological identification of horizontal, bipolar and amacrine cells in goldfish retina. J Physiol. 207:623–633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Goldberg JL, Klassen MP, Hua Y, Barres BA. 2002. Amacrine-signaled loss of intrinsic axon growth ability by retinal ganglion cells. Science. 296:1860–1864. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Strettoi E, Pignatelli V. 2000. Modifications of retinal neurons in a mouse model of retinitis pigmentosa. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 97:11020–11025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Marc RE, Jones BW, Watt CB, Strettoi E. 2003. Neural remodeling in retinal degeneration. Prog Retin Eye Res. 22:607–655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Euler T, et al. 2009. Eyecup scope-optical recordings of light stimulus-evoked fluorescence signals in the retina. Pflugers Arch. 457:1393–1414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Wei W, Elstrott J, Feller MB. 2010. Two-photon targeted recording of GFP-expressing neurons for light responses and live-cell imaging in the mouse retina. Nat Protoc. 5:1347–1352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Imanishi Y, Batten M, Piston D, Baehr W, Palczewski K. 2004. Noninvasive two-photon imaging reveals retinyl ester storage structures in the eye. J Cell Biol. 164:373–383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Palczewska G, et al. 2010. Noninvasive multiphoton fluorescence microscopy resolves retinol and retinal condensation products in mouse eyes. Nat Med. 16:1444–1449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Borghuis BG, et al. 2011. Imaging light responses of targeted neuron populations in the rodent retina. J Neurosci. 31:2855–2867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Borghuis BG, Marvin JS, Looger LL, Demb JB. 2013. Two-photon imaging of nonlinear glutamate release dynamics at bipolar cell synapses in the mouse retina. J Neurosci. 33:10972–10985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Sharma R, et al. 2013. In vivo two-photon imaging of the mouse retina. Biomed Opt Express. 4:1285–1293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Lim H. 2019. Harmonic generation microscopy 2.0: New tricks empowering intravital imaging for neuroscience. Front Mol Biosci. 6:99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Gloesmann M, et al. 2003. Histologic correlation of pig retina radial stratification with ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 44:1696–1703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Srinivasan VJ, et al. 2006. Noninvasive volumetric imaging and morphometry of the rodent retina with high-speed, ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 47:5522–5528. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Bizheva K, et al. 2006. Optophysiology: depth-resolved probing of retinal physiology with functional ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 103:5066–5071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Rossi J, et al. 2011. Melanocortin-4 receptors expressed by cholinergic neurons regulate energy balance and glucose homeostasis. Cell Metab. 13:195–204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Srinivas S, et al. 2001. Cre reporter strains produced by targeted insertion of EYFP and ECFP into the ROSA26 locus. BMC Dev Biol. 1:1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. 2012. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods. 9:671–675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Arganda-Carreras I, et al. 2017. Trainable Weka Segmentation: a machine learning tool for microscopy pixel classification. Bioinformatics. 33:2424–2426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Crocker JC, Grier DG. 1996. Methods of digital video microscopy for colloidal studies. J Colloid Interface Sci. 179:298–310. [Google Scholar]
- 88. Chenouard N, et al. 2014. Objective comparison of particle tracking methods. Nat Methods. 11:281–U247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Meijering E, et al. 2004. Design and validation of a tool for neurite tracing and analysis in fluorescence microscopy images. Cytometry Part A. 58A:167–176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Longair MH, Baker DA, Armstrong JD. 2011. Simple Neurite Tracer: open source software for reconstruction, visualization and analysis of neuronal processes. Bioinformatics. 27:2453–2454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data are included in the manuscript and/or supporting information.