Skip to main content
Heliyon logoLink to Heliyon
. 2022 Sep 5;8(9):e10491. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10491

Woody species diversity and carbon stock of church forests along age gradient in Dangila district, Awi-zone, Ethiopia

Geremew Bitew Sewagegn a,, Dagm Fikir Abate b,c, Yohannis Gebremariam Girma c
PMCID: PMC9463591  PMID: 36097492

Abstract

Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahido Churches comprise remnant native woody species around their premises that are important for biodiversity conservation and carbon sequestration. The current study was conducted to examine woody species diversity and carbon stock of church forests along age gradient in Dangila district, Awi-zone, Ethiopia. A list of documented churches was taken from parish council and tourism that categorized into three age gradients i.e., >200yrs, 100–200yrs and ≤100yrs. Then one church was purposively selected from each age gradient. At each of the selected churches, three Gentry transect lines were laid down systematically in three cardinal directions with 120° interval. Tree height and DBH/DSH ≥5cm were measured and saplings were counted within 2m width; whereas, seedling with height <1m was counted from three plots of 2 m × 2 m size along the transect line. Woody species diversity and evenness were computed using Shannon diversity and Evenness indices and carbon stock estimation was done by allometric equation. A total of 91 woody species belong to 45 families and 77 genera were recorded in the church forests. Woody species community structure along age gradients showed an inverted J-shape. The mean Shannon diversity of old, middle and recent church age gradient was 2.85 ± 0.21, 2.74 ± 0.13 and 2.37 ± 0.49 respectively. Woody species richness is statistically significant along age classes. The mean total biomass carbon stock along old, middle and recent age gradients was 64.58 ± 23.58, 65.22 ± 63.47 and 18.65 ± 11.02 metric ton respectively. Hence, old aged churches play a better role for indigenous woody species conservation and carbon sequestration.

Keywords: Age gradient, Biomass carbon stock, Church forest, Ethiopia orthodox Tewahido church, Woody species diversity


Age gradient; Biomass carbon stock; Church forest; Ethiopia orthodox Tewahido Church; Woody species diversity.

1. Introduction

The forest resources of Ethiopia have been facing intense degradation and deforestation because of agricultural land expansion, urbanization and overgrazing that result in significant loss of forest biodiversity and ecosystem services (Gebeyehu et al., 2019). Due to this, Ethiopia has lost about 60% of its intact natural forests since 1900 (Gobena, 2018); and small isolated patch remnant Afromontane forests are left around churches (Healey, 2016). These patches of natural forests have been survived as a result of the traditional conservation effort of the ancient Ethiopia Orthodox Tewahido Church (EOTC) (Tilahun et al., 2015), through spiritual, social and cultural taboos, rules and customs in the church yard (Bayrak and Marafa, 2017). EOTC has a long history of planting, protecting and preserving old-aged trees in its premises and serving as a hot spots of biodiversity, mainly indigenous trees and shrubs of Ethiopia (Tilahun et al., 2015; Yilma and Derero, 2020).

The sacred grounds of ancient churches and monasteries contain natural forest vegetation that constitutes important habitats for a variety of species with a complex structure than non-sacred forests (Gobena, 2018). The older churches are surrounded by primary forests while recently established churches are observed with secondary forests. It indicates older church forests are characterized by a high floral and faunal diversity of indigenous species; which in turn give prestige to the religious sites and as a shelters for endemic, rare and threatened species (Tilahun et al., 2015; Healey, 2016; Mekonen et al., 2019). Church forests are also essential for climate change mitigation, ecosystem function and stability (Tilahun et al., 2015) and play its own role to balance the global carbon dioxide (CO2) (Beyene et al., 2018).

The highest proportion of terrestrial carbon was stored in forest ecosystems (Beyene et al., 2018). As Moges et al. (2010) estimated 2.76 billion tons of carbon was stored in the forest resources of Ethiopia (Moges et al., 2010). Among this, Dry Afromontane forests store a huge amount of aboveground carbon compared to other terrestrial ecosystems (Mekonnen and Tolera, 2019). As a remnant dry Afromontane Forest, EOTC forests as well as the church forests in Dangila district might have a considerable role for biomass carbon storage and climate change mitigation. However, most of previous church forest studies were concentrated in South Gondar zone through different scholars such as Ruelle et al. (2017); Woods et al.(2016); Zegeye et al. (2011); Aerts et al. (2016) and to some extent in Bahir Dar Zuria areas. Only researcher Birhanu et al. (2021) studied church forests in Dangila Woreda. However, the scholars didn't consider the effect of church establishment year for carbon sequestration, woody species diversity, evenness and richness. These studies may not represent unexplored church forests of Awi-zone in general and Dangila district in particular. The aim of the current study was therefore investigation of woody species diversity and biomass carbon stock of selected church forests along age gradient in Dangila district.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Site description

The study was conducted in selected church forests of Dangila district, Awi zone, Amhara National Regional State. The district is located between 11o04′48″-11o24′36″ N latitude and 36o34′48″-37o00′37″ E longitude (Figure 1). It is 918.4 km2 wide and its elevation traverses between 1500 and 2400 m.a.s.l. The topography is characterized by plain landscape (70% plain, 27% rugged and others cover 3 %). The major soil types are Lithosols, Nitosols, Vertisols, Luvisols, Gleysols, Cambisols and rocky surfaces. The mean annual temperature and rainfall records were 17 °C and 1578 mm respectively (Belay, 2018). The most common tree species were Eucalyptus camaldulensis, Croton macrostachyus, Albizia gummifera, Ritchiea albersii, Prunus africana, Cordia africana, Acacia abyssinica and Dracaena steudneri. Therefore, the church forests in Dangila district were categorized as dry evergreen Afromontane Forest and grassland complex vegetation.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Map of the study area.

2.2. Sampling technique and data collection

A list of documented churches was taken from parish council and tourism office. The churches were categorized into three age gradients based on establishment year i.e., >200yrs, 100–200yrs and ≤100yrs. A preliminary survey was made and 9 churches were selected purposively from the district woreda based on their best representativeness, accessibility, budget and time (Tilahun et al., 2015; Abiyu et al., 2017). Therefore, each age gradient has three sampled church forests. Then, a reconnaissance survey was made for each of the selected churches and three modified Gentry transect lines were laid down systematically in three cardinal directions with 120° interval from the church center to the edge of the forest (Figure 2). Modified Gentry transect lines method was more appropriate for church forests because most of the church forests envelop the church and they were more or less circular (E.g.: - Figure 3). The first transect line were laid down purposively at 2m width and the length depends on the size of the church forest.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Sampling design.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Google map of Gult teklehaymanot church forest, 2021

Finally, woody species inventory has been carried out within 2m width in either side of each modified Gentry transect line (Cardelus et al., 2019). The height of woody species were measured using caliper in a position which was possible to observe the tips and bottom of the trees/shrub (Abunie and Dalle, 2018; Cardelu's et al., 2019; Woods et al., 2016). Woody individuals with DBH/DSH ≥ 5cm were measured and recorded using clinometer for biomass estimation (Yilma and Derero, 2020; Gedefaw et al., 2014; Gebeyehu et al., 2019). For individuals that are branched below the breast height, the diameter was measured separately and the average was taken. The woody species with DBH < 5cm were considered as sapling and the undergrowth woody species with height of less than 1m were seedlings (Abunie and Dalle, 2018). Seedlings were counted and recorded in 2 m × 2 m of three quadrates (10m away from the internal wall of the church, in the center & 10m away from the outer edge of the forest) for each church forest along the Gentry transect lines (Figure 2) following (Cardelu's et al., 2019).

All woody plant species encountered in each sample quadrates were recorded and code with vernacular and local names whenever possible. Woody species identification was done by using Bekele-Tesemma (2007); Edwards et al. (1995); Hedberg & Edwards. (1989) and Plant Net software. The vegetation data collection was conducted from January–February 2021 after the main rainy season of the study area.

2.3. Analysis of woody species diversity

Woody species diversity was analyzed by using different diversity indices such as Shannon diversity index (H′), Shannon equitability/evenness index (E), density (D) and species richness (S). They provide important information about rarity and commonness of woody species in the church forests (Molla and Kewessa, 2015).

Shannon Wiener diversity index accounts for both abundance and evenness of the species present. It was important to compute and analysis woody species diversity of each church forest in the study area. Shannon diversity index could be calculated by Eq. (1) as follows:

H=i=1sPiLnPi (1)

Where H′ is Shannon diversity index and pi is proportion of individuals found in the ith species and Ln = the natural logarithm to base e (loge).

Evenness index (E) was calculated to estimate the homogeneous distribution of tree species on the church forests. It was computed by Eq. (2) as follows: -

E=H/Hmax (2)

Where, H' = Shannon-Wiener diversity index, and H'max = ln s, where s is the number of species.

2.4. Analysis of church forests composition and structure

2.4.1. The structure and composition the forests were analyzed by computing frequency, density, dominance and important value index

Frequency: is an indicator of homogeneity and heterogeneity of a given vegetation type. The maximum number of woody species in higher frequency classes shows homogeneity of species in the forest and vice versa (Abunie and Dalle, 2018). Frequency was used to estimate the number of times of a given species recorded at each Modified Gentry transect line of church forests. Therefore, each individual woody species in the sample area were counted and recorded. Finally, species frequency was computed by by Eq. (3) as follows below: -

Frequency=Number​of​Plots​in​which​a​species​occurTotal​number​of​plots​×100 (3)

Density: is the number of individual woody species within a given area. It was simply obtained by counting the number of woody species present within a 2m width Modified Gentry transect line. Species density was computed by Eq. (4) as follows: -

Density=Totalnumberofalltreessamplesizeinhectare (4)

Dominance: is the degree of coverage of a species as an expression of the space it occupied in a given area. It is usually expressed in terms of species basal area. Species dominance was crucial to explain the crowdedness of the church forest. The DBH of each species was measured and basal area was estimated by Eq. (6) within the sample area. Then, species dominance was computed by with Eq. (5) as shown below: -

Dominance=Basal​area​of​species​ASample​area​ (5)
BA = π d2/4 (6)

Where, π = 3.14; d = diameter at breast height (cm); BA = basal area (m2).

Importance value index (IVI): is a composite index that summarizes the relative measures of species density, frequency and dominance (Mekonen et al., 2016). This index was used to determine the overall importance of each species in the community which describes the structural role and ecological success of a species in each church forest (Tegene et al., 2018). It was also used to prioritize species for conservation. After estimating the relative density, frequency and dominance of each species using Eqs. (8), (9), and (10) respectively, IVI was calculated by Eq. (7) as shown below:-

(IVI) = Relative density + Relative frequency + Relative dominance (7)
Relative ​density ​(Rd)=Density​of​species​ATotal​density​of​all​species​×100 (8)
Relative ​Frequency(RF)=Frequency​of​a​speciesSum​of​frequencies​of​all​species×100 (9)
Relative​dominance​(RD)=Basal​area​of​species​ATotal​basal​area​of​all​species​×100 (10)

2.5. Analysis of population structure and regeneration status of the forest

Woody species composition and structure are crucial to identify the presence of rare or threatened species for conservation and management planning (Zegeye et al., 2011). The woody species structure of all individuals of each species encountered in the samples was grouped into ten (10) diameter and height classes by using Microsoft Excel. These are 5–10cm (A), 10.1–15cm (B), 15.1–20cm (C), 20.1–25cm (D), 25.1–30cm (E), 30.1–35cm (F), 35.1–40cm (G), 40.1–45cm (H), 45.1–50cm (I) & >50cm (J); and ten height classes: <5m (A), 5.1–10(B), 10.1–15(C), 15.1–20(D), 20.1–25(E), 25.1–30(F), 30.1–35(G), 35.1–40(H), 40.1–45(I), >45m (J). Then, it was analyzed by categorizing each individual woody species at each DBH and height classes.

In addition, the regeneration status of the church forest was determined by recording the list of species and number of seedlings, saplings and mature trees in each sample area (Abunie and Dalle, 2018). It was also analyzed by comparing sapling and seedling total counts with that of mature trees (Atsbha et al., 2019).

2.6. Estimation of above and below ground biomass carbon stock

The carbon stock of each church forest was estimated through a nondestructive approach which involves the use of allometric equations (Yilma and Derero, 2020). The biomass of each tree was calculated using the same allometric equations because many species didn't have species-specific allometric equation (Cardelus et al., 2019), and it consumes time and cost. Therefore, Chave et al. (2014) general allometric equation was used to determine the biomass of woody species having ≥5 cm DBH/DSH as it fits to biophysical conditions of the study area following (Yilma and Derero, 2020; Esubalew et al., 2019). The carbon stock of each church forest was estimated by Chave et al. (2014) as shown in Eq. (11).

AGB = 0.0673 × (ρD2H) ˆ0.976 (11)

Where, AGB – aboveground biomass (kg), H– Height of tree (m), D– Diameter (cm) at breast height (1.3m), and ρ– Wood density (ton/m3), (0.58 ton/m3 (Esubalew et al., 2019).

Woody species biomass was converted into carbon (C) by using Brown (2002) formula as shown in Eqs. (12) and (14). The CO2 equivalent sequestered in the aboveground biomass = AGC × 3.67 (Pearson et al., 2007).

AGC = AGB × 0.5 (12)

Where, AGC – Aboveground carbon.

Estimation of below ground biomass is much more difficult and time consuming due to uncertainty of root biomass measurement. Root biomass is often estimated from root-shoot ratios (R/S) by taking 25% of aboveground biomass by using Cairns et al. (1997) formula as shown in Eq. (13).

BGB = AGB × 0.25 (13)
BGC = BGB × 0.5 (14)

Where, BGC = below ground carbon.

BGB = below ground biomass.

Then the total biomass carbon stock was calculated by Eq. (15) following Pearson et al. (2005) formula.

TBC = AGC + BGC (15)

Where, TBC = total biomass carbon stock (ton/ha).

2.7. Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics such as mean, standard deviation, minimum and maximum values were determined for the major variables of interest, such as species richness, evenness, Shannon diversity, species density, basal area and biomass carbon stock. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and multiple comparison test (LSD) were used to examine the level of significance for each parameter under investigation along age gradient. Pearson's correlation analysis method also used to examine the relationship between parameters such as species richness, evenness, Shannon diversity, density, basal area and biomass carbon stock among each church forests (Esubalew et al., 2019). All the aforementioned descriptive and inferential analysis was performed by using SPSS version 20 and PAST software.

3. Result and discussion

3.1. Floristic composition

A total of 91 woody species were identified in the study area. It is comparable with the findings of Yilma and Derero (2020) who reported 90 woody species in 17 churches of Addis Ababa and Tilahun et al. (2015) who reported 92 woody species in six monasteries of North Shewa. However, it is also greater than Woods et al. (2016) who found 64 woody plant species from 13 church forests in South Gondar and Mequanint et al. (2020) who found 70 species in 24 churches of North-West Ethiopia and lower than Wassie et al. (2010) reported 168 species in 28 different churches of South Gondar.

The encountered woody species belong to 45 families and 77 genera, from those 79 (86.81%) were indigenous while the remaining 12 (13.19%) were exotic species. Among these species 45 (49.45%) were trees, 39 (42.86%) were shrubs and 7 (7.69%) were lianas species. Fabaceae was the most diverse family and represented by 10 woody species (10.55%) followed by Asteraceae and Rutaceae each represented by 5 (5.38%) species. Whereas Apocynaceae, Arecaceae, Asparagaceae, Bignoniaceae, Capparaceae, Capparidaceae, Casuarinaceae, Cucurbitaceae, Dracaenaceae, Flacourtiaceae, Iridaceae, Phytolaccaceae, Podocarpaceae, Polygonaceae, Proteaceae, Santalaceae, Simaroubaceae, Solanaceae, Tiliaceae, Ulmaceae, Urticaceae, Verbenaceae, Icacinaceae and Primulaceae were the lowest families represented only by 1 (1.09%) woody species. Acacia was the most diverse genera and represented by 5 (6.49%) woody species followed by Vernonia and Ficus each represented by 4 (5.2%) and 3 (3.9%) species respectively.

3.2. Woody species diversity

Woody species richness of the studied church forest ranges from 31 up to 43 species. The highest were recorded at Agunta Maryam church forest while the lowest was recorded at Gisa Balegziabher and Debre Tiguhan Kidus Uarael church forests. The mean woody species richness of the study church forests was 35.00 ± 4.42 (Table 1). The result was comparable with Abunie and Dalle (2018) who reported 39 woody species in Yemrehane Kirstos Church Forest. However, it was lower than Hordofa et al. (2020) reported 59 species in Debre Libanos church forest and Zegeye et al. (2011) reported 113 woody species in Tara Gedam Church Forest. It was also greater than Yilma and Derero (2020) who reported 26 woody species in church forests of Addis Ababa. The variation in the number of woody species could be related to church establishment year, urbanization, agroecology, management strategy and objective.

Table 1.

Church Forest area, basal area BA), above ground carbon (AGC), below ground carbon (BGC), total biomass carbon (TC), exotic species carbon (ExC), family, richness (R), evenness (E), Shannon diversity (H’) and % of exotic species richness (%ex) of nine church forests in Dangila district along age gradient.

Age class Area (ha) BA (m2) AGC (t/ha) BGC (t/ha) TBC (t/ha) Family ExC (t/ha) R E H′ %ex Species life form
tree shrub Lianas
Old 4.35 86.54 51.67 12.92 64.60 28.33 1.29a 39.67a 0.45 2.85 5.85 19.33 19.33a 1
Middle 3.42 64.57 52.18 13.04 65.22 22.33 2.23b 33.33b 0.47 2.74 11.02 17.67 14b 1.33
Recent 2.07 33.14 14.92 3.73 18.65 22 6.54b 32.00b 0.36 2.37 19.16 18 12.67b 1.67
Mean 3.28 61.42 39.59 9.90 49.49 24.22 3.35 35.00 .42 2.65 12.01 18.33 15.33 1.33
F 3.78 1.154 1.364 1.364 1.364 1.641 10.831 5.458 .527 1.934 2.078 .375 7.149 .600
P 0.087 0.377 0.325 .325 .325 .270 0.010 0.045 .615 .225 0.206 .702 .026 .579

Means with different letter are statistically significant different along age gradients at 0.05 level of significance.

The mean Shannon-Wiener diversity of the study area was 2.65 ± 0.35. The result was greater than (Hˈ = 2.29) Gra-Kahsu natural vegetation, (Atsbha et al., 2019); (Hˈ = 2.27) in church forests of Addis Ababa (Yilma and Derero, 2020) and lower than (Hˈ = 3.5) in church forests of Dangila district, (Hˈ = 3.14) in Debre Libanos church forest (Hordofa et al. 2020); (Hˈ = 2.98) in Tara Gedam church forest (Zegeye et al., 2011); and (Hˈ = 2.88) inYemrehane Kirstos Church Forest (Abunie and Dalle, 2018). Atsbaha et al. (2019) noted that Shannon-Wiener diversity index considered as high when the calculated value is > 3.0, medium 2.0–3.0, low 1.0–2.0, and very <1.0. Woody species evenness also considered as high when the calculated value is >0.5 and low <0.5 (Atsbaha et al., 2019). Hence, the study area shows a medium Shannon-Wiener diversity (H’ = 2.65) and lower species evenness (E = 0.42) from other similar forests in Ethiopia. As Montagnini and Jordan (2005) noted that high woody species diversity benefits to defend against disease and complementarity (Montagnini and Jordan, 2005). The lower woody species evenness shows there was a dominance of one or few species in the community and unbalanced distribution of individuals of different species in the study area. For example: Ficus thonningii, Apodytes dimidiate and Ficus vasta were represented only by two (2) individuals/ha; on the other hand, E. camaldulensis had 2239 individuals/ha in the studied church forests. The reason for the lower/higher variation of Shannon diversity and evenness from other similar studies might be management strategy and objective (e.g., for conservation, cash crop or social purpose), church establishment year, urbanization, site suitability, micro-climate, selective cutting and expansion of some exotic species such as Eucalyptus species and Grevillea robusta.

The mean woody species richness, evenness and Shannon-Wiener diversity of church forests decrease with decreasing church age. However, only species richness showed a statistically significant variation along age gradient (d.f = 8; p = . 045) (Table 1). The result showed that woody species richness was influenced by the establishment year of the churches. The reason could be old aged churches forests were conserved for a long year period; that gives an opportunity for better soil seed bank and regeneration than recently established church forests. Old aged church forests have many indigenous mother trees that feed a seed for regeneration. On the other hand, many recently established churches planted exotic species such as E. camaldulensis and G. robusta for economical purposes.

3.3. Indigenous and exotic species diversity

A total of 12 exotic woody species were recorded from all sampled church forests of Dangila district. Out of these, E. camaldulensis was the most abundant species with a total of 2239 individuals/ha followed by G. robusta having a total of 163 individuals/ha in Dangila district. The quantity of exotic species was identical with the study conducted by Mequanint et al. (2020) who has recorded 12 exotic species from 24 church forests in Northern Ethiopia. The highest and lowest proportion of exotic species richness was recorded at Chiwagi Mikael (2.38%) and Gisa Balegziabher (29.03%) church forests respectively; which is lower than 38–71% at Mierafe Kidus Felege Hiwet Gebre Menfes Kidus and Debre Menkrat T/Haymanot church forests in Addis Ababa (Yilma and Derero, 2020). Hence, the church forests in Dangila district were relatively intact natural forests. The reason might be agroecology, urbanization, management objective and strategy.

Woody species richness and Shannon diversity of exotic species were quantitatively increased as church age decreased from old to recent age gradients. The result confirms the study conducted by Lemenih and Kassa (2014) who has reported that the tendency of planting exotic species was increasing whereas that of indigenous species was decreasing with decreasing church age (Lemenih and Kassa, 2014). On the other hand, indigenous woody species richness was quantitatively increased as church age increased from recent to old age gradients. However, ANOVA didn't reveal significant differences along age gradients for both exotic and indigenous species richness (Table 2). Indigenous woody species richness showed a statistically significant negative correlation with exotic species richness (r = -.808∗∗ & p = 0.008) along age gradient (Table 3). The reason could be the expansion of planting fast growing exotic species in recent churches for shading and income source. The field observation also shows recently established churches have relatively maximum number of exotic species than old aged churches. Many exotic species were relatively fast growing and used as a cash crop for the church.

Table 2.

Exotic and indigenous species biomass carbon stock (TBC), density (D), richness (R), evenness (E), Shannon diversity (H’) density of E. camldulensis (EcD) of 9 church forests along age gradient.

Age gradient Exotic species
Ec D Indigenous
TBC (t/ha) D R E H′ TBC (t/ha) D R E H′
Old 1.29a 1374a 2.67 0.8 0.42 812a 63.30 13775 37 0.45 2.76
Middle 2.23b 1570a 3.67 0.61 0.65 1173a 62.99 10673 29.67 0.51 2.72
Recent 6.54b 6110b 6 0.43 0.72 4726b 12.11 8424 26.33 0.63 2.8
Mean 3.35 3018 4.11 0.610 0.60 2237 46.13 10957 30.89 0.53 2.76
F 10.831 7.246 .506 .548 .595 4.590 1.611 2.971 .396 .231 .120
P 0.010 .025 .625 .604 .581 0.062 0.275 .127 .690 .801 .889

Means with different letter has a statistically significant variation along age gradient.

Table 3.

Pearson correlation of indigenous and exotic species richness, Shannon diversity, and evenness along age gradient in the study area (N = 9).

Items Indigenous species richness Exotic species richness Indigenous Shannon diversity Exotic Shannon diversity Indigenous species evenness Exotic species evenness
Indigenous species richness 1
Exotic species richness -.808∗∗ 1
Indigenous Shannon diversity .093 -.388 1
Exotic Shannon diversity -.695∗ .840∗∗ -.528 1
Indigenous species evenness -.772∗ .502 .539 .259 1
Exotic species evenness .549 -.681∗ .303 -.333 -.349 1

∗∗Correlation is significant at 0.01 level (2-tailed). ∗Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

3.4. Above and below ground biomass carbon stock

The mean total biomass carbon stock of the church forests in the study area was 445.41 metric ton. Hence, the mean biomass carbon stock contained within each church forest was 49.49 ± 13.79 metric ton/ha. It could generate a carbon credit of 762.64 ± 212.5 USD; assuming the price of carbon credits per ton is about 15.41 USD (Siraj, 2019). The minimum and maximum biomass carbon stock was recorded in Debre Tiguhan Kidus Urael and Gult Teklehaymanot respectively. The mean above ground and below ground biomass carbon stock of church forest in the study area was 39.59 ± 33.10 and 9.90 ± 8.27 ton/ha respectively (Table 1).

The mean total biomass carbon stock of the church forest in the district was comparable with Sekele-Mariam church forest (Mekonnen and Tolera, 2019) and lower than a similar study in Ethiopia conducted by Girma et al. (2014); Yilma & Derero (2020); Esubalew et al. (2019); Tura et al. (2013) (Table 4). The variation of biomass carbon stock might be due to selective cutting, fuel-wood extraction, over exploitation, allometric equation used (Mekonnen and Tolera, 2019), management practice and micro climate.

Table 4.

Comparison of carbon stock (ton/ha) of church forests in Dangila district with other similar forest types in Ethiopia.

Study areas AGC BGC Mean total Reference
Church forests in Dangila 39.59 9.90 49.49 Present study
Sekele-Mariam forest 37.54 9.76 47.3 Mekonnen and Tolera (2019)
Zequala Monastery Forest 237.20 47.60 284.8 Girma et al. (2014)
church forests in Addis Ababa 130 26 156 Yilma and Derero (2020).
Alemsaga forest 91.85 22.86 114.71 Esubalew et al. (2019)
Carbon stock in church forests of Addis Ababa 129.85 25.97 155.82 Tura et al. (2013)

The statistical result indicates that the mean total biomass carbon stock along old, middle and recent age gradients were 64.60 ± 23.58, 65.22 ± 63.47and 18.65 ± 11.02 ton/ha respectively (Table 1). The mean biomass carbon stock of indigenous species along old, middle and recent age gradient was 63.30, 62.99 & 12.11 ton/ha. The biomass carbon stock increased as church age increased however, the difference was statistically insignificant. On the other hand, the mean biomass carbon stock of exotic species along old, middle and recent age gradients was 1.29, 2.23 & 6.54 ton/ha. The result showed a statistically significant variation (α = 95%; df = 8; & p = .010) (Table 2). It indicates exotic plantation in general and E. camaldulensis in particular were planted in the studied church forests for income generation, area demarcation and live fencing.

3.5. Relationship between biomass carbon stock and woody species diversity

The relationship between species diversity and biomass carbon stock has become an important consideration in the carbon cycle and climate change adaptation. Woody species diversity plays a role in supporting ecosystem processes, function and services (Gebrewahid and Meressa, 2020). The Pearson's correlation relation of total biomass carbon stock with Shannon diversity had a quantitative positive relationship in Dangila district. However, it was statistically insignificant (r = .471 & p = .05). The result was different from Mensah et al. (2016), who stated that woody carbon stock increases with diversity in highly diverse natural forests and high productivity areas i.e. church forests (Mensah et al., 2016). The Pearson's correlation relation of biomass carbon stock had statistically significant positive relationship with basal area at 95% confidence interval (r = .763∗ & p = .05) (Table 5). Therefore, the reduction of basal area due to selective cutting, fuel wood extraction, over exploitation and any other factors might reduce the biomass carbon stock of church forests in Dangila district.

Table 5.

The Pearson's correlation of church forest area, basal area (BA), biomass and carbon stock (TBC), richness(R), density (D), diversity indices (H’& E) and percent of exotic species (%Ex) of church forests along age gradient.

Area (ha) BA (m2) TBC (t/ha) D E R %Ex
Area 1
BA .573 1
TBC .212 .763∗ 1
D .122 .324 .083 1
.439 .496 .471 -.362 1
E .132 .284 .403 -.629 .902∗∗ 1
R .730∗ .510 .150 .601 .300 -.118 1
%Ex -.682∗ -.493 -.510 -.327 -.324 -.043 -.575 1

∗. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

∗∗. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

3.6. Church forest structure

3.6.1. Frequency, density and dominance of woody species

Frequency: The overall frequent tree species were E. camaldulensis and C. macrostachyus occurring in 85.12% of the Gentry transect line of sampled church forests; whereas Celtis africana, Ekebergia capensis, Eriobotrya japonica and Galiniera saxifrage were the least frequent tree species each occurring 3.7% of the Gentry transect line in the church forests. The frequent occurrence of woody species along age gradient was varied. The highest frequent species along old, middle and recent age gradients was Justicia schimperiana, Brucea antidyssenterica and E. camaldulensis respectively (Appendix 1). Eucalyptus species was most frequently present in recently established churches surrounding indigenous and old-growth trees as protection and as a source of materials, fuel wood, and income (Sahle et al., 2021).

Density: The overall result revealed that E. camaldulensis was the highest density (2239 individuals/ha) tree species while the lowest were E. japonica and C. africana (2 individuals/ha for each). The variation in density between species might be attributed to habitat differences, habitat preferences among the species, species characteristics for adaptation, degree of exploitation and conditions for regeneration (Zegeye et al., 2011). In addition, the lowest species density indicates that the population size was too low to sustain itself within the forest unless their abundance is increased through different management practices (Molla and Kewessa, 2015). Therefore, E. japonica and C. africana were the lowest abundance tree species that requires the highest priority for conservation in the study area.

The mean woody species density of the church forests were 13976 individuals/ha; which was less than 18,508 individuals/ha in Debre Libanos church forest (Hordofa et al., 2020); and greater than 3001 individuals/ha in Tara Gedam forest (Zegeye et al., 2011) and 670 individuals/ha in Addis Ababa church forests (Yilma and Derero, 2020). The mean woody species density along old, middle and recent age gradients was 15150, 12243 and 14534 respectively however, the variation was not statistically significant at 95% confidence interval. The highest woody species density along old, middle and recent age gradients was J. schimperiana, E. camaldulensis, and E. camaldulensis (Appendix 1).

The density of exotic species showed a statistically significant variation from old to middle and recent church age gradients (Table 2). The result was different from a similar study conducted by (Yilma and Derero, 2020). Particularly, the density of E. camaldulensis along old, middle and recent age gradients were 812, 1173 and 4726 individuals/ha respectively. Even though ANOVA reveals the variation was statistically insignificant; the multiple comparison test (LSD) indicates that the density of E. camaldulensis in recent church age had a statistically significant variation with old and middle age churches in Dangila district (Table 2). The reason might be its fast growing nature for area demarcation, live fencing and income generation. On the other hand, the quantity of indigenous woody species density was decreased as church age decreased from old to recent age gradient in the study area. However, it was statistically insignificant at 95% confidence interval (Table 2).

Dominance: woody species dominance was expressed by basal area. The overall total basal area of Dangila district was 552.82 m2. Hence, the mean basal area of each church forest was 61.42 ± 44.09 m2 (Table 1). The result was greater than 14.6 ± 8.4 m2 in Addis Ababa church forests (Yilma and Derero., 2020) and 56.1 m2 in Shawo Sacred Forest (Agidew and Mezgebe, 2019); however, it was lower than 72 m2 at Yemrehane Kirstos church forest (Abunie and Dalle., 2018), and 115.36 m2 in Tara Gedam monastery forests (Zegeye et al., 2011). Woody species dominance ranges from 22.23 m2 at Debre Tiguhan Kidus Urael to 153.51 m2 at Chiwagi Mikael. E. camaldulensis contributes the highest basal area followed by C. macrostachyus and A. gummifera. According to the statistical result, the mean basal area along old, middle and recent age gradients was 86.54 ± 58.03, 64.57 ± 44.82 and 33.16 ± 15.48 m2 respectively (Table 1). The species that contribute the largest dominance/basal area along old, middle and recent age gradient were D. steudneri, C. macrostachyus and E. camaldulensis (Appendix 1).

3.6.2. Importance value index (IVI)

The highest and the lowest IVI value trees species was E. camaldulensis and Celtis africana respectively. The species with the highest IVI value in old, middle and recent age gradients were also J. schimperiana (29.18), E. camaldulensis (41.14) and E. camaldulensis (136.17) respectively (Appendix 1). Woody species with the highest IVI value need less conservation efforts, whereas species having low IVI value need high conservation effort (Molla and Kewessa, 2015); and (Zegeye et al., 2011). Therefore, J. schimperiana & E. camaldulensis was the most abundant species that needs less sustainable management; whereas Celtis africana occurred in scarce and needs the first priority for conservation in the study area. A similar result was reported in Dangila church forests (Birhanu et al., 2021).

3.6.3. Population structure and regeneration status of the forest

The general pattern of DBH and height class distribution of church forests in Dangila district showed an inverted J-shaped (Figure 4A & B). This was similar with Tara Gedam church forest (Zegeye et al., 2011); Kuandisha forest (Berhanu et al., 2016); Debre Libanos church forest (Hordofa et al., 2020) and Kenech Forest (Balemlay and Siraj, 2021). The DBH class distribution of woody species along age gradient also had an inverted J-shape (Figure 5A - C). The distribution pattern indicates the general trends of population dynamics and recruitment processes. A species with the highest number of individuals in the lower DBH classes suggests that they had good regeneration potential and vice versa (Zegeye et al., 2011; Balemlay and Siraj, 2021). The average distribution of seedlings, saplings and mature tree of the studied church forests were 5023, 7026 and 1925 individuals/ha respectively (Table 6). Hence, the regeneration status of the forest was considered as good since sapling > seedling > matures (Khumbongmayum et al., 2006; Dhaulkhandi et al., 2008; Tiwari et al., 2010; Atsbha et al., 2019). The church forests were also showed a good regeneration status along age gradient (Table 6). The major reason might be the commitment of the church followers on theological thoughts and biblical basis of church forest; and plantation forests in Amhara region mainly found in Awi zones that could reduce the pressure on remnant indigenous woody species (Mekonnen et al., 2016). The species that contribute the largest seedling and sapling counts were Millettia ferruginea, Croton macrostachyus, Eucalyptus camaldulensis, Albizia gummifera, Bersama abyssinica, Vepris nobilis and Ritchiea albersii.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

DBH (A) and height (B) class structure of woody plant community in church forests of Dangila district. DBH classes: 5–10cm (A), 10.1–15cm (B), 15.1–20cm (C), 20.1–25cm (D), 25.1–30cm (E), 30.1–35cm (F), 35.1–40cm (G), 40.1–45cm (H), 45.1–50cm (I) & >50cm (J); Height classes: <5m (A), 5.1–10(B), 10.1–15(C), 15.1–20(D), 20.1–25(E), 25.1–30(F), 30.1–35(G), 35.1–40(H), 40.1–45(I), >45m (J).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Woody species community structures along old, middle and recent age gradients of church forests in the district.

Table 6.

Woody species regeneration status of church forests in the study area.

Gradients Mean adults trees/ha Mean saplings/ha Mean seedlings/ha
Old age 1322 7307 6521
Age Middle age 1293 6067 4883
Recent age 3161 7706 3667
Mean 1925 7026 5023

However, some tree species (i.e., Ehretia cymosa and Podocarpus falcatus) showed unhealthy population structure in the study area (Figure 6A & B). The major factors might be grazing, poor germination and biotic potential of the tree (Atsbha et al., 2019), rocky land, poorly developed soil (Zegeye et al., 2011), and selective cutting for church building. Moreover, individuals in young stages of any species were more vulnerable to any kind of environmental stress and anthropogenic disturbance (Atsbha et al., 2019). It is important to note that some of the species were in poor regeneration status, and, thus, should be prioritized for conservation (Zegeye et al., 2011).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Examples of woody species with irregular population structure.

As the result reveals that E. japonica, C. africana, F. thonningii, P. falcatus and Acacia obscura might face a great extinction in the locality because they didn't have seedlings and saplings. However, these species were least concerned (plentiful in the wild) except P. falcatus that was categorized as vulnerable in the wild by IUCN. The species might be threatened with extinction in the wild unless its survival and reproduction improves. In addition, four shrub species (Asparagus africanus, Dovyalis abyssinica, Lippia adoensis and Sida schimperiana) and one liana species (Gladious candidus) might also face a great extinction because they occurred in a very small population number in the church forests. Euphorbia abyssinica, Ficus ingens, Ficus sycomorus, Myrica salicifolia and Senna petersiana species face extinction in Bahir Dar Zuriya, Dera and Fogera district church forests (Mequanint et al., 2020). These species were locally extinct in the study area except E. abyssinica (occurred with a small number of tree and sapling forms). Therefore, they might be extinct in the studied church forests. The major reasons might be unfavorable niche due to climate change and over exploitation. Hence, the church forests need an attention for conservation and management in the study area. Because forest management by the church community might reduce extinction rates and contributes for maintaining species richness (Wassie et al., 2010).

4. Conclusion and recommendation

4.1. Conclusion

According to the characteristic's species recorded, the church forests in the study area was categorized as dry Afromontane Forest and Grassland Complex. The forests have 91 woody species that belong to 45 families and 77 genera. The most diverse family and genera were Fabaceae and Acacia respectively. The oldest church forests had a higher Shannon diversity and species richness than recently established church forests. In addition, exotic and indigenous species richness had a strong negative relationship along age gradients. Because, the community give more attention for planting fast growing exotic species particularly E. camaldulensis in recently established churches for income generation, area demarcation and live fencing. The community structure and regeneration status of the church forests indicate that there were a better level of protection in the church forests. However, it doesn't mean that all individual woody species were healthy because some species, i.e., Podocarpus falcatus and Ehretia cymosa, had an irregular population structure in the study area.

The mean total above and below ground biomass carbon stock of the church forest could store 145.29 and 36.33 metric tons/ha of CO2 equivalence respectively. The lowest mean total biomass carbon stock was recorded at recently established church forests; because biomass carbon stock was mainly depends on tree size. The native species biomass carbon stock was higher than exotic species in all age gradients. It indicates that churches provide a sound conservation of indigenous tree species in their periphery. The mean biomass carbon stock of exotic species was highest in recently established churches due to the expansion of Eucalyptus plantation. Generally, the church forests in Dangila district have an important contribution for remnant woody species conservation and carbon sequestration as well as climate change mitigation.

4.2. Recommendation

Based on the results of the study, the following recommendations are made; (i), the practice of maintaining and establishing church forests around churches should be scaled up and supported by policy for a long-term development and management of forests particularly indigenous species. (ii), these remnant church forests need to be conserved though a collaboration work of governmental institutions and the community. (iii), the government should encourage churches in general and recently established churches in particular to plant and conserve indigenous species around their premises. (iv), the species with the least IVI value should be prioritized for in-situ and ex-situ conservation approaches. (v), the government should work for EOTC to get a payment for its contribution to ecosystem service. (vi), finally, the role of EOTC for herbs and wild animals as well as their potential for ecotourism needs to be investigated in the future.

Declarations

Author contribution statement

Geremew Bitew Sewagegn: Conceived and designed the experiments; Performed the experiments; Analyzed and interpreted the data; Contributed reagents, materials, analysis tools or data; Wrote the paper.

Dagm Fikir Abate: Conceived and designed the experiments; Analyzed and interpreted the data; Wrote the paper.

Yohannis Gebremariam Girma: Conceived and designed the experiments; Contributed reagents, materials, analysis tools or data.

Funding statement

This work was supported by the Ethiopia Biodiversity Institute.

Data availability statement

Data included in article/supp. material/referenced in article.

Declaration of interests statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

No additional information is available for this paper.

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to Asmamaw Alemu (PhD) for his advice and comments from proposal up to the manuscript. We are very grateful to Ethiopian Biodiversity Institute for funding. We glad Mr.Tilahun Azene and Mulugeta Aschale for their support during data collection and identification as well as Mr. Agumassie Genet for his support in site map preparation. We are also thankful to Dangila Woreda Parish council office and cultural and tourism office for their support for providing the necessary information.

Appendix

Appendix 1.

Woody species relative frequency, relative density, relative dominance and IVI of the district along age gradient.

Scientific name Origin Habit Old age class
Middle age class
Recent age class
RF Rd RD IVI RF Rd RD IVI RF Rd RD IVI
Acacia abyssinica I T 0.9 0.34 0.09 1.34 3.57 0.73 3.35 7.66 3.59 3.59 1.36 5.77
Acacia brevispica I S 1.35 0.57 0.01 1.93 2.38 1.19 0.02 3.2
Acacia decurrens E T 0.6 1.19 0.64 3.83 0.6 0.6 0 1.2
Acacia lahai I T 0.45 0.11 0 0.56 1.79 0.64 0 2.64 1.8 1.8 0.37 2.84
Acacia obscura I T 1.19 0.64 0.86 3.5
Acanthus pubescens I S 1.8 0.63 0 2.43 1.19 0.37 0 2.37 1.8 1.8 0 3.45
Acanthus sennii. I S 0.9 0.23 0 1.13 0.6 0.6 0 0.67
Albizia gummifera I T 2.7 1.54 2.55 6.79 2.98 6.3 15.95 24.25 2.4 2.4 0.08 3.3
Apodytes dimidiate I T 1.8 0.46 0.82 3.07 0.6 0.09 0.03 2.12
Arundinaria alpine I S 0.6 1.64 0 3.64
Arundo donax I S 0.45 0.91 0 1.36 0.6 1.37 0 3.37
Asparagus africanus I S 0.45 0.06 0 0.51
Azadirachta indica E T 0.45 0.11 0 0.56 0.6 0.6 0 0.67
Berchemia discolor I T 1.35 1.54 1.21 4.1
Bersama abyssinica I T 2.25 3.93 7.62 13.81 1.79 0.82 0 2.82
Bridelia micrantha I T 1.19 0.55 0.01 2.56
Brucea antidyssenterica I S 2.7 1.03 0 3.73 4.76 3.01 0 5.01 4.79 4.79 0 6.36
Calppurina aurea I T 0.6 0.18 0 2.18
Capparis tomentosa I S 1.8 1.37 0.05 3.21 0.6 0.09 0 2.09 1.8 1.8 0 3
Carissa spinarum I S 3.15 3.53 0.72 7.4 3.57 2.19 0.03 4.23 1.8 1.8 0.15 4.19
Casuarina equisetifolia E T 0.45 0.06 0 0.51 0.6 0.6 0 0.67
Celtis africana I T 0.6 0.09 0.26 2.35
Citrus aurantifolia I T 0.45 0.06 0 0.51 1.2 1.2 0.04 1.61
Citrus reticulata I T 1.35 0.23 0.03 1.61
Clausena anisata I T 2.25 3.87 0.06 6.18 4.17 4.11 0 6.11 2.4 2.4 0 7.79
Clematis hirsute I L 0.6 0.09 0 2.09 1.2 1.2 0 1.65
Clematis longicauda I L 1.35 1.03 0 2.38 1.79 1.1 0 3.1
Clematis simensis I L 1.2 1.2 0 1.57
Coffea arabica I S 1.35 0.97 0 2.32 1.79 3.65 0 5.65 0.6 0.6 0 0.97
Cordia africana I T 2.7 0.46 1.27 4.42 1.19 0.46 0.02 2.47 2.4 2.4 0.76 3.76
Croton macrostachyus I T 3.6 1.71 22.31 27.63 4.76 3.84 31.04 36.88 4.79 4.79 3.38 13.41
Cupressus lusitanica E T 1.19 1.37 0.59 3.96 1.8 1.8 4.45 8.42
Dombeya quinqueseta I T 1.19 0.73 0 2.73
Dovyalis abyssinica I S 0.45 0.06 0 0.51
Dracaena steudneri I T 2.7 1.82 22.64 27.17 0.6 0.09 0 2.09 0.6 0.6 0 0.97
Ehretia cymosa I T 1.35 0.4 2.5 4.25 1.19 0.18 0.01 2.19
Ekebergia capensis I T 0.45 0.11 2.04 2.61
Embelia schimperi I L 1.35 0.34 0 1.69 0.6 0.09 0 2.09
Eriobotrya japonica E T 0.6 0.09 0 2.1
Eucalyptus camaldulensis E T 2.7 8.38 1.38 12.46 4.76 15.8 23.34 41.14 5.39 5.39 87.92 136.17
Euphorbia abyssinica I T 1.35 0.34 4.62 6.31 2.38 2.1 7.58 11.68
Ficus sur I T 0.9 0.23 1.35 2.48 1.8 1.8 0 2.17
Ficus thonningii I T 1.35 0.11 2.3 3.77 0.6 0.6 0.07 0.74
Ficus vasta I T 1.2 1.2 0.03 1.38
Galiniera saxifrage I T 0.6 0.64 0 2.64
Gladious candidus I L 0.6 0.09 0 2.09
Grevillea robusta E T 1.35 2.05 5.85 9.25 1.79 1.19 0.34 3.52 1.8 1.8 0.38 4.57
Grewia ferruginea I S 2.7 0.91 0.1 3.72 1.19 0.73 0 2.73 2.4 2.4 0.02 4.07
Hibisscus ovalifolius I S 1.19 0.37 0 2.37
Hypericum revolutum I S 0.45 0.11 0 0.56
Jasminum abyssinicum I S 0.9 0.46 0 1.36
Juniperus procera I T 1.8 0.4 1.42 3.62 1.19 0.18 0.6 2.78 0.6 0.6 0.58 2.68
Justicia schimperiana I S 4.05 25.13 0 29.18 4.76 14.52 0 16.52 1.8 1.8 0 3.45
Lippia adoensis I S 0.45 0.06 0 0.51
Maesa lanceolata I T 1.8 2.34 0.75 4.89 2.99 2.99 0 4.41
Mangifera indica E T 0.45 0.06 0 0.51 0.6 0.6 0 0.67
Maytenus arbutifolia I S 3.6 6.55 0 10.16 4.76 7.12 0.01 9.13 5.39 5.39 0 8.91
Maytenus obscura I S 0.45 0.17 0 0.62
Milletia ferruginea I T 2.25 3.36 15.18 20.79 1.79 0.37 0.29 2.65 0.6 0.6 0.06 1.03
Morus alba E S 1.2 1.2 0 1.35
Ocimum lamiifolium I S 0.45 0.23 0 0.68 2.4 2.4 0 3
Olea europaea I T 0.45 0.34 0 0.79 0.6 0.27 0 2.27 1.8 1.8 0.01 3.08
Osyris quadripartita I S 1.8 1.8 0.01 2.26
Oxytenanthera abyssinica I S 0.6 0.6 0 1.12
Pavonia urens I S 2.7 3.08 0 5.78 2.38 1.46 0 3.46 3.59 3.59 0 6.13
Phoenix reclinata I S 0.45 0.06 0 0.51 0.6 0.6 0 0.75
Phytolaca dodecandra I S 0.45 0.11 0 0.56 0.6 0.27 0 2.27
Podocarpus falcatus I T 1.79 0.64 14.79 17.43
Prunus africana I T 3.15 0.8 0.82 4.77 0.6 0.18 0.04 2.22 1.8 1.8 0 2.25
Psidium guajava E T 0.45 0.17 0.1 0.72 1.2 1.2 0 1.65
Pterolobium stellatum E L 0.6 0.46 0 2.46 1.2 1.2 0 1.72
Rhamnus prinoides I S 0.45 0.11 0 0.57 1.79 1.19 0.02 3.21 0.6 0.6 0 0.75
Rhus glutinosa I T 0.45 0.51 0.62 1.59 1.2 1.2 0 1.35
Ritchiea albersii I T 2.7 1.54 0 4.24 2.38 3.2 0.02 5.22 1.8 1.8 0 2.77
Rosa abyssinica I S 0.45 0.06 0 0.51 1.2 1.2 0 1.57
Rubus steudneri I S 1.35 0.85 0 2.21 1.19 0.37 0 2.37 1.2 1.2 0 1.72
Rumex abyssinicus I S 0.45 0.17 0 0.62
Sesbania sesban E T 0.6 0.18 0 2.18 1.8 1.8 0.03 2.35
Sida schimperiana I S 0.45 0.06 0 0.51
Solanecio gigas I S 1.8 2.34 0.01 4.15 1.19 0.46 0 2.46
Solanum villosum I S 0.45 0.11 0 0.56 2.38 0.27 0 2.27 0.6 0.6 0 0.67
Steganotaenia araliacea I S 0.45 0.23 0 0.68
Stereospermum kunthianum I T 1.2 1.2 0.07 1.72
Teclea carpopunctifera I T 1.35 0.57 0.09 2.01 2.38 0.09 0 2.09
Urera hypselodendron I S 1.8 1.82 0.01 3.63 0.6 0.6 0 0.75
Vepris nobilis I T 3.6 3.08 1.36 8.04 0.6 1.46 0.11 3.58 0.6 0.6 0 0.82
Vernonia adoensis I S 0.45 0.57 0 1.02 0.6 0.18 0 2.18 0.6 0.6 0 1.42
Vernonia amygdalina I S 2.25 0.74 0.11 3.1 2.38 1.1 0.02 3.12 4.19 4.19 0.24 7.5
Vernonia auriculifera I S 3.6 4.22 0.02 7.84 4.76 8.49 0.02 10.52 4.79 4.79 0 7.86
Vernonia thomosoniana I S 1.8 1.8 0 3
Zehneria scabra I L 0.9 0.11 0 1.01

I = indigenous, E = exotic, T = tree, S = shrub, L = liana, RF = relative frequency, Rd = relative density, RD = relative dominance and IVI = important value index.

References

  1. Abiyu A., Teklay D., Glatzel G., Aerts R., Gratzer G. Restoration of degraded ecosystems in the Afromontane highlands of Ethiopia: comparison of plantations and natural regeneration. South. For. a J. For. Sci. 2017;79(2):2070–2639. [Google Scholar]
  2. Abunie A.A., Dalle G. Woody species diversity, structure, and regeneration status of Yemrehane Kirstos church forest of lasta woreda, north Wollo zone, Amhara region, Ethiopia. Int. J. For. Res. 2018;2018:1–8. [Google Scholar]
  3. Agidew S.T., Mezgebe A.H. Woody species composition analysis of Shawo sacred forest, Ethiopia. Int. J. Appl. Sci. Biotechnol. 2019;7(1):12–21. [Google Scholar]
  4. Atsbha T., Desta A.B., Zewdu T. Woody species diversity, population structure, and regeneration status in the Gra-Kahsu natural vegetation, southern Tigray of Ethiopia. Heliyon. 2019;5(1) doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Balemlay S., Siraj M. Population structure and regeneration status of woody species in Kenech forest, Southwest Ethiopia. Int. J. For. Res. 2021;2021(2):1–14. [Google Scholar]
  6. Bayrak M.M., Marafa L.M. 2017. The Role of Sacred Forests and Traditional Livelihoods in REDD+ Two Case Studies in Vietnam’s Central Highlands. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bekele-Tesemma A. World Agroforestry Centre – Eastern Africa Region Programme; Nairobi Kenya: 2007. Useful Trees of Ethiopia: Identification, Propagation and Management in 17 Agroecological Zones. RELMA in ICRAF Project. [Google Scholar]
  8. Belay M. Appraisal of issues affecting soil-Steps building for sustainable Farmland management in high potential district, Ethiopia. Environ. Manag. Sustain. Dev. 2018;7(3):102–122. [Google Scholar]
  9. Beyene B., Pötzelsberger E., Hasenauer H. The carbon sequestration potential of degraded agricultural land in the Amhara region of Ethiopia. Forests. 2018;9:470–492. [Google Scholar]
  10. Berhanu A., Demissew S., Woldu Z., Didita M. Woody species composition and structure of Kuandisha afromontane forest fragment in northwestern Ethiopia. J. For. Res. 2016;28(2):343–355. [Google Scholar]
  11. Birhanu T., Mohammed A.S., Mekonnen A.B. Floristic composition, structure and regeneration status of woody plants in church forests of Dangila, Northwestern Ethiopia. Cogent Food Agric. 2021;7(1) 2331-1932. [Google Scholar]
  12. Brown S. Measuring carbon in forests: current status and future challenges. Environ. Pollut. 2002;116(3):363–372. doi: 10.1016/s0269-7491(01)00212-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Cairns M.A., Brown S., Helmer E.H., Baumgardner G.A. Root biomass allocation in the world's upland forests. Oecologia. 1997;111(1):1–11. doi: 10.1007/s004420050201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cardelus C.L., Woods C.L., Mekonnen Bitew A., Dexter S., Peter S., Tsegay B.A. Human disturbance impacts the integrity of sacred church forests, Ethiopia. PLoS One. 2019;14(3) doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212430. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chave J., Réjou-Méchain M., Búrquez A., Chidumayo E., Colgan M.S., Delitti W.B.C., Duque A., Eid T., Fearnside P.M., Goodman R.C., Henry M., Martínez-Yrízar, Mugasha A.W., Muller-Landau H.C., Mencuccini M., Nelson B.W., Ngomanda A., Nogueira E.M., Ortiz-Malavassi E., Pélissier R., Ploton P., Ryan C.M., Saldarriaga J.G., Vieilledent G. Improved allometric models to estimate the aboveground biomass of tropical trees Running head: pantropical aboveground biomass equations. Global Change Biol. 2014;20(10):3177–3190. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Dhaulkhandi M., Dobhal A., Bhatt S., Kumar M. Community structure and regeneration potential of natural forest site in Gangotri, India. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 2008;4(1):49–52. [Google Scholar]
  17. Edwards S., Tadesse M., Hedberg I. Flora of Ethiopia and Eritrea Volume 2. Part 2: Canellaceae to Euphorbiaceae. The National Herbarium, Addis Ababa University; Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: 1995. [Google Scholar]
  18. Esubalew E., Giday K., Hishe H., Goshu G. Carbon stock of woody species along altitude gradient in alemsaga forest, South Gondar, north Western Ethiopia. Int. J. Environ. Agric. Res. (IJOEAR) 2019;5(7) 2454-1850. [Google Scholar]
  19. Gebeyehu G., Soromessa T., Bekele T., Teketay D. Carbon stocks and factors affecting their storage in dry Afromontane forests of Awi Zone, northwestern Ethiopia. J. Ecol. Environ. 2019;43(7) 2288-1220. [Google Scholar]
  20. Gebrewahid Y., Meressa E. Tree species diversity and its relationship with carbon stock in the parkland agroforestry of Northern Ethiopia. Cogent. Biol. 2020;6(1) [Google Scholar]
  21. Gedefaw M., Soromessa T., Belliethathan S. Forest carbon stocks in woody plants of Tara Gedam forest: implication for climate change mitigation. STAR J. 2014;3(1):101–107. [Google Scholar]
  22. Girma A., Soromessa T., Bekele T. Forest carbon stocks in woody plants of mount Zequalla monastery and it’s variation along altitudinal gradient: implication of managing forests for climate change mitigation. STAR J. 2014;3(2):132–140. [Google Scholar]
  23. Gobena A. MSc Thesis. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences; 2018. Importance of Teaching and Practices of Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church in forest Biodiversity Conservation: Implications for National Conservation Policy. [Google Scholar]
  24. Healey J. The role of fragmented sacred forests in biodiversity conservation in the Gamo Highlands of Ethiopia. Drylands Coordin. Group. 2016:13–16. [Google Scholar]
  25. Hedberg I., Edwards S., editors. Flora of Ethiopia Volume 3: Pittosporaceae to Araliaceae. The National Herbarium,Addis Ababa University; Addis Ababa: 1989. [Google Scholar]
  26. Hordofa H.K., Shumi G., Gebreyesus T., Song S., Fufa F. Woody plant species diversity and composition in and around Debre Libanos church forests of North Shoa Zone of Oromiya, Ethiopia. J. For. Res. 2020;32(1):1929–1939. [Google Scholar]
  27. Khumbongmayum A.D., Khan M.L., Tripathi R.S. Biodiversity conservation in sacred groves of Manipur, northeast India: population structure and regeneration status of woody species. Biodivers. Conserv. 2006;15(1):2439–2456. [Google Scholar]
  28. Mekonnen M., Sewunet T., Gebeyehu M., Azene B., Melesse A.M. 2016. GIS and Remote Sensing-Based Forest Resource Assessment, Quantification and Mapping in Amhara Region, Ethiopia. Landscape Dynamics, Soils and Hydrological Processes in Varied Climates; pp. 9–29. [Google Scholar]
  29. Mensah S., Veldtman R., Assogbadjo A.E., Kakaï R.G., Seifert T. Tree species diversity promotes aboveground carbon storage through functional diversity and functional dominance. Ecol. Evol. 2016;6:7546–7557. doi: 10.1002/ece3.2525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Mekonnen A., Tolera M. Carbon stock estimation along altitudinal gradient in Sekele-Mariam dry evergreen Montane forest, north-Western Ethiopia. Agric. For. Fish. 2019;8(2):48–53. [Google Scholar]
  31. Mekonen A.B., Gebreegziabher B.G., Wassie W.A., Tsegay B.A. Review : church forests — the green spots of Ethiopian highlands. Asian J. For. 2019;3(2):45–53. [Google Scholar]
  32. Mequanint F., Wassie A., Aynalem S., Adgo E., Nyssen J., Frankl A., Muys B., Lens L., Strubbe D. Biodiversity conservation in the sacred groves of north-west Ethiopia: diversity and community structure of woody species. Global Ecol. Conserv. 2020;24(2020) [Google Scholar]
  33. Molla A., Kewessa G. Woody species diversity in traditional agroforestry practices of Dellomenna district, Southeastern Ethiopia: implication for maintaining native woody species. Int. J. Biodiver. 2015 [Google Scholar]
  34. Montagnini F., Jordan C.F. Springer Hailderberg; Germany: 2005. Tropical forest Ecology: the Basis for Conservation and Management. [Google Scholar]
  35. Pearson T., Walker S., Brown S. 2005. Sourcebook for Land-Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry Projects: Win Rock International and the Bio-Carbon Fund of the World Bank. Arlington, USA. [Google Scholar]
  36. Pearson R.H.T., Brown L.S., Bridsey A.R. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service; Northern Research Station: 2007. Measurement Guidelines for the Sequestration of forest Carbon. [Google Scholar]
  37. Sahle M., Saito O., Reynolds T.W. Nature’s contributions to people from church forests in a fragmented tropical landscape in southern Ethiopia. Global Ecol. Conserv. 2021;28(2021) [Google Scholar]
  38. Siraj M. Forest carbon stocks in woody plants of Chilimo-Gaji Forest, Ethiopia: implications of managing forests for climate change mitigation. South Afr. J. Bot. 2019;127:213–219. [Google Scholar]
  39. Tegene A.S., Gamo F.W., Cheche S.S. Woody vegetation composition , structure , and community types of Doshke forest in Chencha , Gamo Gofa zone , Ethiopia. Int. J. Biodiver. 2018;(2018):1–16. [Google Scholar]
  40. Tilahun A., Terefe H., Soromessa T. The contribution of Ethiopian orthodox Tewahido church in forest management and its best practices to be scaled up in North Shewa zone of Amhara region, Ethiopia. Agric. For. Fish. 2015;4(3):123–137. [Google Scholar]
  41. Tiwari K., Tadele K., Aramde F., Tiwari C. Community structure and regeneration potential of Shorea robusta forest in sub-tropical Submontane Zone of Garhwal Himalaya, India. Nat. Sci. 2010;8(1):70–74. [Google Scholar]
  42. Tura T.T., Argaw M., Eshetu Z. In: Climate-Smart Technologies. Climate Change Management. Leal Filho W., Mannke F., Mohee R., Schulte V., Surroop D., editors. Springer; Berlin, Heidelberg: 2013. Estimation of carbon stock in church forests: implications for managing church forest to Help with carbon emission reduction; pp. 403–414. [Google Scholar]
  43. Wassie A., Sterck F.J., Bongers F. Species and structural diversity of church forests in a fragmented Ethiopian Highland landscape. J. Veg. Sci. 2010;21(5):938–948. [Google Scholar]
  44. Woods C.L., Cardelús C.L., Scull P., Wassie A., Baez M., Klepeis P. Stone walls and sacred forest conservation in Ethiopia. Biodivers. Conserv. 2016;26(1):209–221. [Google Scholar]
  45. Yilma G., Derero A. Carbon stock and woody species diversity patterns in church forests along church age gradient in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Urban Ecosyst. 2020;23(5):971–983. [Google Scholar]
  46. Zegeye H., Teketay D., Kelbessa E. Diversity and regeneration status of woody species in Tara Gedam and Abebaye forests, northwestern Ethiopia. J. For. Res. 2011;22(3):315–328. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data included in article/supp. material/referenced in article.


Articles from Heliyon are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES