Abstract
Enantiomers of a series of hydantoin derivatives were prepared from d- and l-amino acids with p-tolyl isocyanate and 3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl isocyanate as guests for chiral recognition by 1H NMR spectroscopy. Meanwhile, several tetraaza macrocyclic compounds were synthesized as chiral solvating agents from d-phenylalanine and (1S,2S)-(+)-1,2-diaminocyclohexane. An uncommon enantiomeric discrimination has been successfully established for hydantoin derivatives, representatives of five-membered N,N-heterocycles, in the presence of tetraaza macrocyclic chiral solvating agents (TAMCSAs) 1a–1c by means of 1H NMR spectroscopy. Several unprecedented nonequivalent chemical shifts (un to 1.309 ppm) were observed in the split 1H NMR spectra. To evaluate practical applications in the determination of enantiomeric excess (ee), the ee values of samples with different optical purities (up to 95% ee) were accurately calculated by the integration of relevant proton peaks. To better understand the chiral discriminating behavior, Job plots of (±)-G1 with TAMCSA 1a were investigated. Furthermore, in order to further explore any underlying intermolecular hydrogen bonding interactions, theoretical calculations of the enantiomers of (S)-G1 and (R)-G1 with TAMCSA 1a were performed by means of the hybrid density functional theory (B3LYP/6-31G*) of the Gaussian 16 program.
Graphical Abstract

INTRODUCTION
Chiral recognition is one of the most significant topics in a variety of research fields, such as catalytic asymmetric chemistry and chiral pharmaceuticals, biology, and life science.1 Among them, assignment of the absolute configuration of chiral molecules and determination of enantiomeric excess (ee) of chiral compounds are indispensable elements of structural characterization and practical applications because different enantiomers possess different optical properties, biological activities, and pharmacological (even toxic) effects.2 For this purpose, a variety of techniques and methods, such as high-performance liquid chromatography,3 X-ray crystallography,4 circular dichroism (CD),5 vibrational CD,6 nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR),7 UV–vis, and fluorescence spectroscopy,8 have been developed and utilized separately or in tandem. Among these available techniques, the 1H NMR technique has several obvious advantages, associated with simple and fast measurement, accurate and convenient application, and employment of a low amount of samples, as well as the availability of a ubiquitous NMR apparatus in nearly all chemical laboratories.9 Thus, the NMR technique has widely emerged as the commonly applied tool for the determination of absolute configuration and quantitative analysis of ee of chiral substrates.10 In the course of research on chiral recognition, on the one hand, effective chiral auxiliaries play a key role in chiral discriminating behavior between hosts and guests by NMR spectroscopy because the differentiation of chiral substrates relies on the generation of a pair of diastereomeric adducts by means of covalent bond formation or noncovalent interactions with chiral auxiliaries (chiral derivatizing agents and chiral solvating agents).11 To explore chiral auxiliaries with sufficient sensitivity and high chiral discriminating performance, various chiral auxiliaries have been designed, synthesized, and screened through the continuous efforts of chemists.12 On the other hand, chiral recognition of a variety of chiral substrates should be explored and investigated to further deepen and promote the development of chiral recognition and its related applications by 1H NMR spectroscopy. In the past decades, chiral recognition of acyclic compounds, such as chiral amines,13 amino alcohols,14 alcohols,15 amino acids or their derivatives,16 carboxylic acids,17 and esters,18 has been frequently reported by means of 1H NMR spectroscopy. In recent years, we have also reported some studies on chiral recognition of α-hydroxy acids, α-amino acid derivatives, dipeptide derivatives with two chiral centers, and tripeptide derivatives with three stereogenic centers as acyclic substrates in the presence of a series of tetraaza macrocyclic chiral solvating agents (TAMCSAs) by means of 1H NMR spectroscopy. Based on these results, these TAMCSAs have been successfully established as a family of versatile and highly effective chiral solvating agents vis-à-vis the aforementioned acyclic compounds.19 Nevertheless, recognition of chiral cyclic substrates has rarely been investigated by 1H NMR spectroscopy.20 This is surprising, given the fact that enantiomerically pure cyclic products, including several chiral hydantoin derivatives, have been used to treat many human diseases, due to their powerful physiological and pharmacological activities.21 In this paper, we offer a significant solution to the challenging chiral recognition of hydantoin derivatives, as five-membered N,N-heterocyclic compounds, with the discovery of a panel of remarkable tetraaza macrocyclic chiral solvating agents (TAMCSAs) that enable the determination of enantiomeric purity by means of 1H NMR spectroscopy.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
TAMCSAs 1a–1c were synthesized by intramolecular reductive coupling reaction of enantiopure diimines 3a–3c (1 mmol), which were prepared according to our previously reported synthetic procedure,22 with a dilute suspension (60 mL of dried DMF) of the activated Zn powder (0.65 g, 10 mmol) and MsOH (0.96 g, 10 mmol) in dried DMF (20 mL) for chiral recognition as chiral auxiliaries (Scheme 1).23 Meanwhile, chiral compounds 2a–2c were also obtained as intramolecular reductive products in 17–19% isolated yields.
Scheme 1.

Synthesis of TAMCSAs 1a–1c and Chiral Compounds 2a–2c
All products were characterized by 1H NMR, 13C NMR, HRMS, and IR methods. Unfortunately, we were unable to obtain crystals of TAMCSAs 1a–1c, suitable for X-ray singlecrystal diffraction. Therefore, their nuclear overhauser effect spectroscopy (NOESY) spectra were measured for assignment of absolute configuration of the two newly generated chiral carbon atoms (ArCHNH) of TAMCSAs 1a–1c. Their spectra show that the two types of protons of the ArCHNH and COCHBn (phenylalanine moiety) groups of TAMCSAs 1a–1c are located on the same side of the macrocyclic framework, as determined by the NOESY correlated 1H NMR signals between the two types of protons (ArCHNH and COCHBn). Based on the known absolute configuration (R) of COCHBn and the C2-symmetric geometry, the absolute configuration of 5- and 6-carbon atoms (ArCHNH) of TAMCSAs 1a–1c is assigned as S and S-configurations (Scheme 1). Detailed NOESY spectra are available in the Supporting Information (Figures S5, S9, and S13).
As shown in Scheme 1, the multiple potential hydrogen bonding sites, such as amino, amide, and phenolic hydroxyl groups, featured in the molecular structure of TAMCSAs 1a–1c, are the most distinguished structural elements, along with a C2-symmetry and a 12-membered cavity.
Meanwhile, the enantiomers of hydantoin derivatives G1–14, as five-membered N,N-heterocycles, were directly prepared from the corresponding l- and d-amino acids (5.5 mmol, 1.1 equiv) in NaOH solution (1 M, 5 mL) with p-tolyl isocyanate (5 mmol) and 3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl isocyanate (5 mmol) in CH3CN (2 mL) in 50–89% isolated yields according to the related literature,24 respectively (Scheme 2).
Scheme 2.

Synthesis of Enantiomers of Hydantoin Derivatives 1–14a
aConditions: (i) NaOH, CH3CN, 0 °C and (ii) 1,4-dioxane, rt; HCl, reflux.
The new products were characterized by the spectroscopic methods noted above and by 19F NMR spectroscopy (for new products containing CF3 groups).
To explore the discrimination of enantiomers of hydantoin derivatives in the presence of TAMCSAs 1a–1c by 1H NMR spectroscopy, two samples of (±)-G1 with TAMCSA 1a (1:1 molar ratio, [5 mM]) and (±)-G7 with TAMCSA 1c (1:1 molar ratio, [10 mM]) were prepared in CDCl3 based on the solubility, and their 1H NMR spectra were measured on a 400 MHz spectrometer at 25 °C. The results show that enantiomers of (±)-G1 and (±)-G7 were remarkably differentiated by the split protons of CONH and PhCH3 groups, respectively. Especially, a maximum nonequivalent chemical shift value (ΔΔδ) of the NH proton (CONH) of (±)-G7 has been established as 1.031 ppm, which is a sufficiently large nonequivalent chemical shift value in the field of chiral recognition by 1H NMR chiral solvating agents. Subsequently, the assignments of enantiomers were determined by adding (R)-G1 and (R)-G7 to their corresponding samples note above. The 1H NMR spectra of (±)-G7 (a) and (±)-G7 in the presence of TAMCSA 1c (b), including partial expanded spectra and ΔΔδ values of the split protons of CONH and PhCH3, are shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1.

1H NMR spectra of (±)-G7 (a) and (±)-G7 in the presence of TAMCSA 1c (b) and their expanded spectra in CDCl3 at 25 °C (400 MHz), [(±)-G7] = 10 mM. The marks “red ○”and “red ●” stand for (S)-G7 and (R)-G7, respectively.
Encouraged by these remarkable chiral discriminating results, we sought to further test and evaluate a range of chiral discriminating conditions, including concentration effects, the molar ratio of the host and guest, and a variety of deuterated solvents. In the end, CDCl3 (in most cases) and a 1:1 molar ratio of the host/guest were adopted in this study. Different concentrations were used from 2.0 to 12.5 mM for obtaining clear 1H NMR signals with as little overlapping and better baseline resolution peaks as possible. Detailed information is available (Table S1 and Figures S1 and S2).
Under optimized conditions, 40 samples of (±)-G1–14 were prepared in the presence of TAMCSAs 1a–1c in CDCl3 or CDCl3 containing 10% CD3COCD3 (three samples). Their 1H NMR spectra were measured on a 400 or 600 MHz spectrometer at 25 °C, with the exception of (±)-G1 with TAMCSA 1a and (±)-G7 with TAMCSA 1c. The results indicate that the separated 1H NMR signals of the multiple protons of (±)-G1–14 were detected in the presence of TAMCSAs 1a–1c. Subsequently, the assignments of enantiomers [(S)-GX (red ○) and (R)-GX (red ●), X = 1–7 and 9–13; (S,R)-GX (red ○) and (R,S)-GX (red ●), X = 8 and 14] were determined based on the aforementioned method. The ΔΔδ values and partial 1H NMR spectra of the NH proton (CONH) of (±)-G1–14, as the representative protons, are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1.
Nonequivalent Chemical Shifts (ΔΔδ, ppm) and Partial 1H NMR Spectra of the NH Proton (CONH) of (+)-G1–14 in the Presence of TAMCSAs 1a–1c in CDCl3 (400 or 600 MHz) at 25 °Ca
|
5.0 mM.
7.5 mM.
10.0 mM.
6.0 mM.
4.0 mM.
12.5 mM.
2.0 mM.
3.0 mM.
600 MHz.
10% CD3COCD3.
As shown Table 1, all of the ΔΔδ values of the split NH proton of (±)-G1–14 exceed 0.1 ppm (from 0.167 to 1.309 ppm) in the TAMCSAs 1a–1c. Furthermore, among them, a maximum ΔΔδ value was observed at 1.309 ppm, which is unprecedented for the separated 1H NMR signal in the field of chiral recognition by CSAs. In addition, compared with the ΔΔδ values of the split proton of (±)-G2 and (±)-G3, and (±)-G7 and (±)-G8, the ΔΔδ values of the corresponding protons of the (±)-G11–14 with the 3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)-phenyl group exhibited a clear tendency to become larger in most cases in the presence of the same chiral solvating agent, which may be the result of the electronic effect of the 3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl substituent. Additional ΔΔδ values of other protons and the 1H NMR spectra of (±)-G1–14 are shown in Table 2.
Table 2.
Nonequivalent Chemical Shifts (ΔΔδ, ppm) of Other Split Protons of (±)-G1–14 in the Presence of TAMCSAs 1a–1c in CDCl3 (400 or 600 MHz) at 25 °Ca
| guest/TAMCSA | proton | ΔΔδ | guest/TAMCSA | proton | ΔΔδ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (±)-G1/1a | PhCH | 0.030 | (±)-G9/1bb | 4-PhCH2CH | 0.024 |
| (±)-G1/1bb | PhCH | 0.041 | (±)-G9/1ce | PhCH3 | 0.007 |
| (±)-G1/1c | PhCH | 0.029 | 4-PhCH2CH | 0.052 | |
| (±)-G2/1a | PhCH2 | 0.091 | (±)-G10/1ac | CH 2 | 0.070 |
| 0.049 | α-H(trp unit) | 0.036 | |||
| PhCH2CH | 0.042 | ArH | 0.012 | ||
| (±)-G2/1bb | PhCH2 | 0.061 | ArH | 0.119 | |
| 0.040 | C═CHNH | 0.031 | |||
| PhCH2CH | 0.031 | (±)-G10/1bf | CH 2 | 0.051 | |
| (±)-G2/1cc | PhCH2 | 0.111 | α-H(trp unit) | 0.027 | |
| 0.054 | ArH | 0.067 | |||
| PhCH2CH | 0.051 | ArH | 0.013 | ||
| (±)-G3/1ac,i | CH 3 | 0.049 | (±)-G10/1cb | CH 2 | 0.045 |
| (±)-G3/1bb | CH 3 | 0.020 | α-H(trp unit) | 0.029 | |
| (±)-G3/1cd,i | CH 3 | 0.029 | ArH | 0.078 | |
| (±)-G4/1a | (CH3)2CHCH | 0.014 | C═CHNH | 0.030 | |
| 0.042 | (±)-G11/1ac | PhCH2 | 0.153 | ||
| (CH3)2CHCH | 0.031 | 0.100 | |||
| (±)-G4/1b | (CH3)2CHCH | 0.007 | PhCH2CH | 0.086 | |
| 0.022 | ArH | 0.061 | |||
| (CH3)2CHCH | 0.024 | ArH | 0.014 | ||
| (±)-G4/1cb | (CH3)2CHCH | 0.013 | (±)-G11/1bb | PhCH2 | 0.095 |
| 0.044 | 0.068 | ||||
| (CH3)2CHCH | 0.037 | PhCH2CH | 0.077 | ||
| (±)-G5/1ae | CH 3 | 0.018 | ArH | 0.058 | |
| 0.007 | ArH | 0.012 | |||
| (CH3)2CHCH2CH | 0.039 | (±)-G11/1cc | PhCH2 | 0.154 | |
| (±)-G5/1bc | CH 3 | 0.022 | 0.087 | ||
| 0.008 | PhCH2CH | 0.080 | |||
| (CH3)2CHCH2CH | 0.059 | ArH | 0.061 | ||
| (±)-G5/1c | CH 3 | 0.020 | ArH | 0.013 | |
| 0.008 | (±)-G12/1ah | CH 3 | 0.034 | ||
| (CH3)2CHCH2CH | 0.045 | ArH | 0.016 | ||
| (±)-G6/1ab | SCH3 | 0.030 | (±)-G12/1bd | CH 3 | 0.017 |
| (±)-G6/1bb | SCH3 | 0.021 | ArH | 0.032 | |
| (±)-G6/1cb | SCH3 | 0.025 | (±)-G12/1cb | CH 3 | 0.032 |
| (±)-G7/1ac | PhCH3 | 0.038 | ArH | 0.019 | |
| (±)-G7/1bc | PhCH3 | 0.023 | (±)-G13/1ab | ArH | 0.026 |
| (±)-G7/1cc | PhCH3 | 0.033 | ArH | 0.012 | |
| (±)-G8/1ab | CH 3 | 0.040 | (±)-G13/1bb | ArH | 0.014 |
| PhCH3 | 0.037 | ArH | 0.040 | ||
| CH3(OH)CHCH | 0.027 | (±)-G13/1cc | ArH | 0.022 | |
| (±)-G8/1bf | CH 3 | 0.050 | ArH | 0.029 | |
| PhCH3 | 0.025 | (±)-G14/1ab,j | CH 3 | 0.024 | |
| CH3(OH)CHCH | 0.024 | CH3(OH)CHCH | 0.028 | ||
| (±)-G8/1cb | CH 3 | 0.038 | (±)-G14/1bb,j | CH 3 | 0.009 |
| PhCH3 | 0.035 | CH3(OH)CHCH | 0.022 | ||
| CH3(OH)CHCH | 0.027 | (±)-G14/1cj | CH 3 | 0.018 | |
| (±)-G9/1ag | PhCH3 | 0.005 | CH3(OH)CHCH | 0.021 | |
| 4-PhCH2CH | 0.030 |
5.0 mM.
7.5 mM.
10.0 mM.
6.0 mM.
4.0 mM.
12.5 mM.
2.0 mM.
3.0 mM.
600 MHz.
CDCl3 (10% CD3COCD3).
Stimulated by the highly significant discriminating results noted above, we strongly desired to explore interactions between the host and guest and the possible mechanism of chiral discrimination. First, Job plots25 of (±)-G1 with TAMCSA 1a were achieved by 1H NMR titration experiments. The results show that a maximum value (X × ΔδSR = 0.184 ppm, X × ΔδS = 0.255 ppm, and X × ΔδR = 0.071 ppm) of the NH proton (CONH) of (±)-G1 was observed at a molar fraction of X = 0.5. Meanwhile, a maximum value (X × ΔδSR = 0.011 ppm, X × ΔδS = 0.026 ppm, and X × ΔδR = 0.015 ppm) of PhCH of (±)-G1 was also exhibited at a molar fraction of X = 0.5 (Figure 2). The two results suggest that a pair of diastereoisomeric complexes with 1:1 stoichiometry is established between (±)-G1 and TAMCSA 1a.
Figure 2.

Job plots for diastereoisomeric complexes of (S)-G1 and (R)-G1 with TAMCSA 1a. Δδ stands for the chemical shift change in NH (CONH) of (S)-G1 (red ●) and (R)-G1 (blue ●), and PhCH of (S)-G1 (green ▼) and (R)-G1 (red ▲) in the presence of TAMCSA 1a in CDCl3 at 25 °C (400 MHz). X stands for the molar fraction of (±)-G1, (X = [(±)-G1]/[(±)-G1 + TAMCSA 1a]).
In addition, to further understand the chiral discriminating behavior between the guest and host, the geometries of enantiomers (S)-G1 and (R)-G1 with TAMCSA 1a were optimized using density functional theory (DFT) at the B3LYP/6-31G* level.26 The continuum model (SMD) for chloroform was employed in all NMR calculations to simulate the effects of the solvent. All quantum chemical calculations were performed by the Gaussian 16 program package. The proposed models suggest that two pairs of hydrogen bonds between (S)-G1 and (R)-G1 with TAMCSA 1a have been established. The hydrogen bonding interactions, CONH⋯OCNH (1.845 Å) and NHCO⋯HOC6H4 (1.748 Å) between (S)-G1 and TAMCSA 1a and CONH⋯OCNH (1.884 Å) and NHCO⋯HOC6H4 (1.749 Å) between (R)-G1 and TAMCSA 1a, are shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3.

Proposed DFT models for the hydrogen bonding interactions between (S)-G1 (a) and (R)-G1 (b) with TAMCSA 1a.
Additionally, the corresponding chemical shifts and non-equivalent chemical shifts obtained by DFT/SMD calculations are shown in Table 3.
Table 3.
Observed and Calculated Chemical Shift Values (δ, ppm) and Nonequivalent Chemical Shift Values (Δδ, ppm) for the NH Proton (CONH) of (S)-G1 and (R)-G1 with TAMCSA 1a
| δ (S)-G1 | δ (R)-G1 | Δδa | |
|---|---|---|---|
| obsd values | 6.5995 | 6.1139 | 0.4856 |
| calcd values | 8.6570 | 8.1340 | 0.5230 |
Δδ=δ(S)-G1 - δ(R)-G1.
The Cartesian coordinates and total energies (hartree) of the complexes of (S)-G1 and (R)-G1 with TAMCSA 1a were obtained by means of B3LYP/6-31G* structural optimization (Tables S2–S6).
To further evaluate the intermolecular interaction between the host and guest, 1H NMR titration of (S)-G2 and (R)-G2 with TAMCSA 1a was performed, and their association constants (Ka) were calculated by the nonlinear curve-fitting method and are shown in Table 4.27
Table 4.
Association Constants (Ka, M−1) of (S)-G2 and (R)-G2 with TAMCSA 1a in CDCl3 (400 MHz)
| guest | TAMCSA | Ka (M−1) | −ΔG° (kJ mol−1) |
|---|---|---|---|
| (S)-G2 | 1a | (3.98 ± 0.96) × 102 | 14.8 ± 4.4 |
| (R)-G2 | 1a | (3.83 ± 1.50) × 102 | 14.7 ± 4.3 |
As shown in Table 4, it can be found that no significant differences between the association constants of (S)-G2 and (R)-G2 with TAMCSA 1a may result from the differences in the geometry of the diastereoisomeric complexes, rather than the thermodynamic factors.
A highly remarkable chiral discrimination has thus been established by the split 1H NMR peaks of multiple protons of hydantoin derivatives, in conjunction with sufficiently enough nonequivalent chemical shift values. Based on these excellent discriminating results, we ventured to explore another research goal of chiral recognition, namely, its application in the determination of ee of chiral analytes. For this purpose, samples of G4 with different optical purities, containing (S)-G4% with 95.0, 90.0, 70.0, 50.0, 30.0, 5.0, and 0.0% ee, were prepared in the presence of TAMCSA 1a in CDCl3, and their 1H NMR spectra were recorded on a 400 MHz spectrometer at 25 °C. Their ee values were calculated based on the integration of the NH proton (CONH), featuring well-separated 1H NMR signals and superior baseline resolution. The ee values for samples of high optical purity (up to 95% ee) were clearly elucidated by 1H NMR spectra (Figure 4a). An excellent linear correlation between the theoretical (X) and observed (Y) % ee values was obtained (Figure 4c). To further verify this application, another set of samples of G10 with different optical purities containing (S)-G10% with 90.0, 70.0, 50.0, 30.0, 5.0, and 0.0% ee was prepared in the presence of TAMCSA 1c, and their 1H NMR spectra were recorded on a 400 MHz spectrometer. Similar results (up to 90% ee) were obtained based on the aforementioned method and are shown in Figure 4b,d.
Figure 4.

Determination of ee of G4 and G10, ee (%) = {[(S)-GX – (R)-GX]/[(S)-GX + (R)-GX]} × 100%, (X = 4 and 10). Overlaid 1H NMR spectra of the NH proton (CONH) of (S)-G4 (red ○) and (R)-G4 (red ●) in the presence of TAMCSAs 1a [5 mM] (a) and (S)-G10 (red ○) and (R)-G10 (red ●) in the presence of TAMCSAs 1c [7.5 mM] (b) in CDCl3 at 25 °C (400 MHz). Linear correlation between the theoretical (X) and observed (Y) % values of G4 with TAMCSA 1a (c) and G10 with TAMCSA 1c (d).
CONCLUSIONS
In conclusion, chiral recognition has been established by means of unprecedented nonequivalent chemical shift values (up to 1.309 ppm) of chiral hydantoin derivatives, in the presence of TAMCSAs 1a–1c by 1H NMR spectroscopy. In addition, better baseline resolution and clear 1H NMR signals without overlapping peaks have been achieved. Their practical application in the determination of ee values has been established by accurate calculation of the integration area of the NH proton (CONH) of G4 (up to 95% ee) in the presence of TAMCSA 1a and G10 (up to 90% ee) in the presence of TAMCSA 1c. Meanwhile, the intermolecular interaction between guests and hosts has been investigated by Job plots, association constants (Ka), and quantum chemical calculations. Most importantly, this work is highlighting the impact of the discrimination of enantiomers of chiral heterocyclic compounds and determination of ee values with the assistance of highly effective chiral solvating agents by 1H NMR spectroscopy.
EXPERIMENTAL SECTION
General Information.
1H NMR spectra and 13C NMR were recorded on a Bruker Avance III spectrometer at 400 MHz and JEOL spectrometers at 400 and 600 MHz at 25 °C. The peak patterns are shown as the singlet (s), doublet (d), triplet (t), quartet (q), multiplet (m), and broad (br). HRMS spectra were acquired on AB SCIEX Triple TOF 5600+. IR spectra were obtained on a 360 Avatar FT-IR spectrometer as KBr pellets. Optical rotations were measured on a PerkinElmer model 343 and Autopol III polarimeter using the sodium D line at 589 nm. All the solvents were dried by the standard procedure prior to use.
Synthesis of TAMCSAs 1a–1c.
To a solution of chiral diimines 3a–3c (1 mmol) in dried DMF (60 mL) were added the activated zinc powder (0.65 g, 10 mmol) and MsOH (0.96 g, 10 mmol) in dried DMF (20 mL). The mixture was stirred for 23 h under a nitrogen atmosphere from −18 °C to rt. The reaction mixture was basified to pH = 10 with a saturated NaHCO3 solution. The precipitate formed was filtered off and washed with CHCl3. The organic layer was separated from the filtrate. The water layer was extracted with CHCl3 (15 mL × 3). The combined organic phase was dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure, and the residue was purified by column chromatography on silica gel to afford TAMCSAs 1a–1c in 17–25% yields and chiral compounds 2a–2c in 17–19% yields.
(3R,5S,6S,8R,10aS, 14aS)-3,8-Dibenzyl-5,6-bis(2-hydroxy-5-methylphenyl)tetradecahydrobenzo[b][1, 4, 7, 10]-tetraazacydododecine-2,9-dione (TAMCSA 1a).
149 mg, 23% yield as a white solid. Rf = 0.3 (ethyl acetate/petroleum ether = 1/2). mp 186–188 °C. (c 0.01, CHCl3). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.15–7.19 (m, 6H), 7.06–7.08 (m, 4H), 6.89 (dd, J = 8.20, 1.64 Hz, 2H), 6.81 (d, J = 8.12 Hz, 2H), 5.95 (s, 2H), 5.71 (d, J = 7.88 Hz, 2H), 4.32 (s, 2H), 3.68–3.73 (m, 2H), 3.28–3.32 (m, 2H), 2.93 (dd, J = 12.66, 9.78 Hz, 2H), 2.78 (dd, J = 12.68, 5.52 Hz, 2H), 2.01 (s, 6H), 1.62–1.64 (m, 2H), 1.24–1.27 (m, 2H), 1.11–1.16 (m, 2H), 0.90–0.96 (m, 2H). 13C{1H}NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 173.7, 152.7, 136.7, 129.3, 128.6, 128.4, 128.3, 128.1, 126.7, 125.2, 116.8, 67.0, 61.6, 52.7, 40.1, 31.5, 24.6, 20.4. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3286, 2936, 1655, 1560, 1500, 1455, 1260, 700. HRMS (ESI+-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C40H47N4O4, 647.3591; found, 647.3594.
(3R,5S,6S,8R,10aS, 14aS)-3,8-Dibenzyl-5,6-bis(2-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)tetradecahydrobenzo[b][1, 4, 7, 10]-tetraazacyclododecine-2,9-dione (TAMCSA 1b).
115 mg, 17% yield as a white solid. Rf = 0.3 (ethyl acetate/petroleum ether = 2/3). mp 179–180 °C. (c 0.01, THF). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.12–7.19 (m, 6H), 7.08–7.10 (m, 4H), 6.71 (d, J = 8.04 Hz, 2H), 6.62 (t, J = 7.90 Hz, 2H), 6.37 (d, J = 7.28 Hz, 2H), 5.53 (br, 2H), 4.34 (s, 2H), 3.78 (s, 6H), 3.61–3.67 (m, 2H), 3.19–3.23 (m, 2H), 2.89–2.91 (m, 4H), 1.69 (br, 2H), 1.59–1.61 (m, 2H), 1.26–1.29 (m, 2H), 1.09–1.14 (m, 2H), 0.83–0.90 (m, 2H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 174.0, 147.4, 145.4, 137.1, 129.4, 128.3, 126.6, 124.2, 120.7, 118.5, 110.6, 66.8, 63.0, 56.0, 52.9, 40.1, 31.7, 24.7. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3300, 2938, 1661, 1631, 1450, 1406, 1238, 1076, 697. HRMS (ESI+-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C40H47N4O6, 679.3490; found, 679.3465.
(3R,5S,6S,8R,10aS,14aS)-3,8-Dibenzyl-5,6-bis(2-hydroxy-4-methoxyphenyl)tetradecahydrobenzo[b][1, 4, 7, 10]-tetraazacyclododecine-2,9-dione (TAMCSA 1c).
170 mg, 25% yield as a white solid. Rf = 0.3 (ethyl acetate/petroleum ether = 2/3). mp 156–158 °C. (c 0.01, CHCl3). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.13–7.21 (m, 6H), 7.05–7.07 (m, 4H), 6.44 (s, 2H), 6.22–6.23 (m, 2H), 6.20–6.21 (m, 2H), 5.64 (s, 2H), 4.28 (s, 2H), 3.73 (s, 6H), 3.69–3.75 (m, 2H), 3.23–3.26 (m, 2H), 2.92 (dd, J = 12.36, 9.76 Hz, 2H), 2.82 (dd, J = 12.74, 5.54 Hz, 2H), 1.62–1.64 (m, 2H), 1.22–1.26 (m, 2H), 1.11–1.16 (m, 2H), 0.86–0.92 (m, 2H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 174.1, 159.6, 156.4, 136.7, 129.3, 129.0, 128.3, 126.6, 117.5, 105.2, 102.2, 66.6, 61.6, 55.0, 52.6, 40.1, 31.4, 24.6. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3297, 2936, 1660, 1617, 1511, 1455, 1161, 700. HRMS (ESI+-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C40H47N4O6, 679.3490; found, 679.3488.
(2R,2′R)-N,N′-((1S,2S)-Cyclohexane-1,2-diyl)bis(2-((2-hydroxy-5-methylbenzyl)amino)-3-phenylpropanamide) (2a).
117 mg, 18% yield as a white solid. Rf = 0.3 (ethyl acetate/petroleum ether = 1/1). mp 172–174 °C. (c 0.01, CHCl3). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.21–7.28 (m, 6H), 7.09–7.11 (m, 4H), 6.91 (dd, J = 8.16, 1.80 Hz, 2H), 6.70 (d, J = 8.12 Hz, 2H), 6.53 (d, J = 5.84 Hz, 2H), 6.49 (d, J = 1.6 Hz, 2H), 3.78 (d, J = 13.04 Hz, 2H), 3.50–3.53 (m, 2H), 3.46 (d, J = 13.04 Hz, 2H), 3.28 (t, J = 7.32 Hz, 2H), 2.98 (dd, J = 13.42, 7.02 Hz, 2H), 2.83 (dd, J = 13.4, 7.64 Hz, 2H), 2.09 (s, 6H), 1.79–1.82 (m, 2H), 1.64–1.66 (m, 5H), 1.19–1.24 (m, 2H), 0.90–0.98 (m, 2H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 173.7, 154.6, 136.9, 129.5, 129.4, 129.1, 128.8, 128.6, 127.0, 122.9, 116.2, 63.6, 53.4, 50.5, 40.1, 31.9, 24.4, 20.3. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3299, 2933, 1647, 1629, 1550, 1499, 1252, 817, 699. HRMS (ESI+-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C40H49N4O4, 649.3748; found, 649.3750.
(2R,2′R)-N,N′-((1S,2S)-Cyclohexane-1,2-diyl)bis(2-((2-hydroxy-3-methoxybenzyl)amino)-3-phenylpropanamide) (2b).
129 mg, 19% yield as a white solid. Rf = 0.2 (ethyl acetate/petroleum ether = 2/3). mp 165—166 °C. (c 0.01, THF). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.42 (d, J = 6.56 Hz, 2H), 7.18–7.23 (m, 6H), 7.06–7.09 (m, 4H), 6.74 (dd, J = 8.16, 1.24 Hz, 2H), 6.63 (dd, J = 7.76, 7.92 Hz, 2H), 6.43 (dd, J = 7.60, 1.08 Hz, 2H), 3.85 (s, 6H), 3.81 (d, J = 12.84 Hz, 2H), 3.63—3.67 (m, 2H), 3.42 (d, J = 12.84 Hz, 2H), 3.29 (dd, J = 9.10, 5.30 Hz, 2H), 3.11 (dd, J = 13.70, 5.26 Hz, 2H), 2.65 (dd, J = 13.62, 9.18 Hz, 2H), 2.02–2.05 (m, 2H), 1.70–1.73 (m, 2H), 1.29–1.34 (m, 2H), 1.07–1.15 (m, 2H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 173.9, 147.2, 145.2, 137.3, 129.0, 128.6, 126.8, 124.1, 121.7, 119.2, 110.6, 63.2, 56.0, 52.9, 49.3, 40.1, 32.2, 24.6. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3292, 2940, 2860, 1641, 1530, 1481, 1456, 1269, 1240, 1074, 733, 696. HRMS (ESI+-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C40H49N4O6, 681.3647; found, 681.3587.
(2R,2′R)-N,N′-((1S,2S)-Cyclohexane-1,2-diyl)bis(2-((2-hydroxy-4-methoxybenzyl)amino)-3-phenylpropanamide) (2c).
116 mg, 17% yield as a white solid. Rf = 0.3 (ethyl acetate/petroleum ether = 1/1). mp 186–188 °C. (c 0.01, CHCl3). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.21–7.30 (m, 6H), 7.12–7.13 (m, 4H), 6.62 (d, J = 8.32 Hz, 2H), 6.38 (d, J = 2.48 Hz, 2H), 6.32 (d, J = 5.64 Hz, 2H), 6.23 (dd, J = 8.28, 2.52 Hz, 2H), 3.78 (d, J = 13.08 Hz, 2H), 3.72 (s, 6H), 3.46–3.49 (m, 4H), 3.27 (t, J = 7.32 Hz, 2H), 2.96 (dd, J = 13.42, 7.22 Hz, 2H), 2.87 (dd, J = 13.42, 7.42 Hz, 2H), 1.75–1.78 (m, 2H), 1.63–1.66 (m, 2H), 1.17–1.22 (m, 2H), 0.88–0.94 (m, 2H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 173.6, 160.6, 158.3, 136.9, 129.4, 129.1, 128.8, 127.0, 115.2, 105.1, 102.3, 63.2, 55.2, 53.7, 50.0, 40.1, 31.8, 24.4. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3330, 3303, 1633, 1535, 1508, 1204, 1160, 1106, 699. HRMS (ESI+-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C40H49N4O6, 681.3647; found, 681.3659.
Synthesis of Enantiomrs of Hydantoin Derivatives G1–14.
To d- or l-amino acid (5.5 mmol, 1.1 equiv) in NaOH solution (1 M, 5 mL) was dropwise added the corresponding isocyanate (5 mmol) in CH3CN (2 mL) at 0 °C. 1,4-Dioxane (5 mL) was added to the reaction solution after the mixture was stirred for 3 h. It was acidified to pH = 2 with concd hydrochloric acid after the reaction mixture was stirred for 8 h at room temperature. The mixture was stirred again for 10 h at 110 °C using a lab heating mantle. After cooling, the reaction mixture was extracted with EtOAc (10 mL × 3), and the combined organic phase was dried over anhydrous Na2SO4. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure, and the residue was purified by column chromatography on silica gel to afford the corresponding enantiomers of hydantoin derivatives G1–14 in 50–89% yields.
(S)-5-Phenyl-3-(p-tolyl)imidazolidine-2,4-dione ((S)-G1).
1.07 g, 85% yield as a white solid. Rf = 0.3 (ethyl acetate/petroleum ether = 2/3). mp 240–243 °C. (c 0.01, DMSO). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.42–7.44 (m, 5H), 7.26 (s, 3H), 6.28 (s, 1H), 5.19 (s, 1H), 2.37 (s, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 171.0, 157.0, 134.2, 129.8, 129.2, 128.6, 126.5, 126.1, 60.6, 21.2. IR (KBr, cm−1): 2915, 1713, 1515, 1430, 1176, 810, 708. HRMS (ESI+-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C16H15N2O2, 267.1128; found, 267.1126.
(R)-5-Phenyl-3-(p-tolyl)imidazolidine-2,4-dione ((R)-G1).
1.10 g, 87% yield as a white solid. Rf = 0.3 (ethyl acetate/petroleum ether = 2:3). mp 242–246 °C. (c 0.01, DMSO). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.42–7.45 (m, 5H), 7.26 (s, 3H), 6.29 (s, 1H), 5.19 (s, 1H), 2.37 (s, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 171.0, 156.9, 138.5, 134.2, 129.8, 129.2, 128.6, 126.5, 126.1, 60.6, 21.2. IR (KBr, cm−1): 2915, 1713, 1515, 1425, 1176, 810, 708. HRMS (ESI+-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C16H15N2O2, 267.1128; found, 267.1126.
(R)-5-Benzyl-3-(p-tolyl)imidazolidine-2,4-dione ((R)-G2).
1.07 g, 80% yield as a white solid. Rf = 0.3 (ethyl acetate/petroleum ether = 1:1). mp 119–120 °C. (c 0.01, CH3OH). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.28–7.33 (m, 3H), 7.21–7.25 (m, 4H), 7.04 (d, J = 8.20 Hz, 2H), 6.33 (s, 1H), 4.35–4.38 (m, 1H), 3.05 (dd, J = 13.90, 3.82 Hz, 1H), 3.05 (dd, J = 13.86, 7.34 Hz, 1H), 2.36 (s, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 172.2, 156.5, 138.5, 134.7, 129.8, 129.5, 128.8, 128.6, 127.5, 126.1, 58.1, 37.9, 21.2. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3288, 1724, 1476, 1419, 1278, 1137, 894, 702. HRMS (ESI+-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C17H17N2O2, 281.1284; found, 281.1289.
(R)-5-Methyl-3-(p-tolyl)imidazolidine-2,4-dione ((R)-G3).
0.75 g, 79% yield as a white solid. Rf = 0.2 (ethyl acetate/petroleum ether = 1:1). mp 150–153 °C. (c 0.01, CH3OH). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.27 (br, 4H), 6.33 (s, 1H), 4.21–4.23 (m, 1H), 2.38 (s, 3H), 1.54 (d, J = 6.36 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 173.7, 156.8, 138.5, 129.8, 128.7, 126.1, 52.9, 21.2, 17.8, IR (KBr, cm−1): 3232, 1713, 1520, 1430, 1188, 815, 770. HRMS (ESI+-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C11H13N2O2, 205.0971; found, 205.0973.
(R)-5-Isopropyl-3-(p-tolyl)imidazolidine-2,4-dione ((R)-G4).
0.93 g, 85% yield as a white solid. Rf = 0.3 (ethyl acetate/petroleum ether = 2:3). mp 170–173 °C. (c 0.01, CH3OH). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.25 (br, 4H), 6.06 (br, 1H), 4.05–4.06 (m, 1H), 2.38 (s, 3H), 2.32–2.33 (m, 1H), 1.09 (d, J = 6.84 Hz, 3H), 1.01 (d, J = 6.64 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 166.8, 151.6, 132.6, 124.0, 123.0, 120.3, 56.4, 24.8, 15.4, 12.9, 10.2. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3226, 1770, 1713, 1515, 1425, 1176, 787, 764. HRMS (ESI+-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C13H17N2O2, 233.1284; found, 233.1286.
(S)-5-Isobutyl-3-(p-tolyl)imidazolidine-2,4-dione ((S)-G5).
0.80 g, 69% yield as a white solid. Rf = 0.3 (ethyl acetate/petroleum ether = 2:3). mp 136–138 °C. (c 0.01, CH3OH). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.26 (br, 4H), 6.00 (br, 1H), 4.17–4.19 (m, 1H), 2.38 (s, 3H), 1.85–1.89 (m, 2H), 1.65–1.68 (m, 1H), 1.00 (2d, J = 6.68, 7.36 Hz, 6H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 173.5, 156.8, 138.3, 129.7, 128.8, 126.0, 55.7, 41.0, 25.1, 23.0, 21.7, 21.2. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3254, 2955, 1719, 1515, 1413, 1170, 815, 753. HRMS (ESI+-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C14H19N2O2, 247.1441; found, 247.1438.
(R)-5-Isobutyl-3-(p-tolyl)imidazolidine-2,4-dione ((R)-G5).
0.87 g, 75% yield as a white solid. Rf = 0.3 (ethyl acetate/petroleum ether = 2:3). mp 136–138 °C. (c 0.01, CH3OH). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.26 (br, 4H), 6.16 (br, 1H), 4.17–4.19 (m, 1H), 2.38 (s, 3H), 1.85–1.89 (m, 2H), 1.65–1.68 (m, 1H), 1.00 (2d, J = 7.12, 6.96 Hz, 6H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 173.5, 156.9, 138.3, 129.8, 128.8, 126.0, 55.7, 25.1, 23.0, 21.7, 21.2. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3254, 2955, 1719, 1515, 1413, 1171, 821, 747. HRMS (ESI+-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C14H19N2O2, 247.1441; found, 247.1443.
(S)-5-(2-(Methylthio)ethyl)-3-(p-tolyl)imidazolidine-2,4-dione ((S)-G6).
0.99 g, 79% yield as a white solid. Rf = 0.3 (ethyl acetate/petroleum ether = 1:1). mp 109–111 °C. (c 0.01, CH3OH). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.27 (br, 4H), 6.49 (br, 1H), 4.28–4.31 (m, 1H), 2.67–2.71 (m, 2H), 2.38 (s, 3H), 2.28–2.34 (m, 1H), 2.12 (s, 3H), 2.04–2.10 (m, 1H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 172.8, 156.7, 138.4, 130.0, 128.7, 126.0, 56.3, 30.5, 30.1, 21.2, 15.3. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3277, 2915, 1781, 1713, 1515, 1425, 1188, 815, 674. HRMS (ESI+-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C13H17N2O2S, 265.1005; found, 265.1007.
(R)-5-(2-(Methylthio)ethyl)-3-(p-tolyl)imidazolidine-2,4-dione ((R)-G6).
1.11 g, 89% yield as a white solid. Rf = 0.3 (ethyl acetate/petroleum ether = 1:1). mp 107–108 °C. (c 0.01, CH3OH). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.27 (br, 4H), 6.39 (br, 1H), 4.29–4.31 (m, 1H), 2.68–2.71 (m, 2H), 2.38 (s, 3H), 2.29–2.33 (m, 1H), 2.12 (s, 3H), 2.06–2.10 (m, 1H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 172.8, 156.8, 138.4, 129.8, 128.7, 126.0, 56.3, 30.5, 30.1, 21.2, 15.3. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3277, 2916, 1781, 1713, 1515, 1425, 1188, 821, 674. HRMS (ESI+-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C13H17N2O2S, 265.1005; found, 265.1003.
(S)-5-(Hydroxymethyl)-3-(p-tolyl)imidazolidine-2,4-dione ((S)-G7).
0.88 g, 85% yield as a white solid. Rf = 0.2 (ethyl acetate/petroleum ether = 8:1). mp 168–170 °C. (c 0.01, DMF). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.26 (br, 4H), 6.04 (br, 1H), 4.25–4.27 (m, 1H), 3.96–4.01 (m, 2H), 2.38 (s, 4H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CD3OD): δ 172.8, 157.7, 138.1, 129.4, 129.2, 126.4, 60.4, 59.5, 19.8. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3260, 2916, 1713, 1520, 1425, 1334, 1171, 776. HRMS (ESI+-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C11H13N2O3, 221.0920; found, 221.0923.
(R)-5-(Hydroxymethyl)-3-(p-tolyl)imidazolidine-2,4-dione ((R)-G7).
0.89 g, 86% yield as a white solid. Rf = 0.2 (ethyl acetate/petroleum ether = 8:1). mp 168–170 °C. (c 0.01, DMF). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.26 (br, 4H), 6.18 (br, 1H), 4.24–4.26 (m, 1H), 3.94–4.00 (m, 2H), 2.50 (br, 1H), 2.38 (s, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CD3OD): δ 172.8, 157.7, 138.1, 129.4, 129.2, 126.4, 60.4, 59.5, 19.8. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3328, 2921, 1775, 1713, 1521, 1425, 1176, 680. HRMS (ESI+-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C11H13N2O3, 221.0920; found, 221.0919.
(S)-5-((R)-1-Hydroxyethyl)-3-(p-tolyl)imidazolidine-2,4-dione ((S,R)-G8).
0.87 g, 79% yield as a white solid. Rf = 0.3 (ethyl acetate/petroleum ether = 6:1). mp 176–178 °C. (c 0.01, DMF). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.22–7.27 (m, 4H), 6.55 (s, 1H), 4.21 (br, 1H), 4.01–4.03 (m, 1H), 2.64 (br, 1H), 2.37 (s, 3H), 1.34 (d, J = 6.52 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CD3OD): δ 173.0, 157.9, 138.1, 129.4, 129.2, 126.4, 66.3, 62.9, 19.8, 18.9. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3305, 1781, 1719, 1515, 1425, 1182, 810. HRMS (ESI+-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C12H15N2O3, 235.1077; found, 235.1081.
(R)-5-((S)-1-Hydroxyethyl)-3-(p-tolyl)imidazolidine-2,4-dione ((R,S)-G8).
0.97 g, 88% yield as a white solid. Rf = 0.3 (ethyl acetate/petroleum ether = 6:1). mp 174–176 °C. (c 0.01, DMF). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.22–7.25 (m, 4H), 6.64 (s, 1H), 4.20 (br, 1H), 4.00–4.01 (m, 1H), 2.71–2.73 (m, 1H), 2.37 (s, 3H), 1.33 (d, J = 6.44 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CD3OD): δ 173.0, 157.9, 138.1, 129.4, 129.2, 126.4, 66.3, 62.9, 19.8, 18.9. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3305, 1781, 1719, 1515, 1425, 1182, 810. HRMS (ESI+-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C12H15N2O3, 235.1077; found, 235.1074.
(S)-5-(4-Hydroxybenzyl)-3-(p-tolyl)imidazolidine-2,4-dione ((S)-G9).
1.16 g, 82% yield as a white solid. Rf = 0.2 (ethyl acetate/petroleum ether = 1:1). mp 80–83 °C. (c 0.01, DMF). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.22 (d, J = 8.08 Hz, 2H), 7.04–7.08 (m, 4H), 6.71 (d, J = 8.48 Hz, 2H), 6.03 (br, 1H), 5.48 (s, 1H), 4.35–4.38 (m, 1H), 3.18 (dd, J = 14.12, 4.04 Hz, 1H), 3.02 (dd, J = 14.12, 6.92 Hz, 1H), 2.35 (s, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 172.8, 157.3, 155.3, 138.8, 130.8, 129.9, 128.3, 126.3, 125.7, 115.6, 58.3, 36.5, 21.1. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3316, 1782, 1713, 1515, 1420, 1170, 815. HRMS (ESI+-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C17H17N2O3, 297.1233; found, 297.1236.
(R)-5-(4-Hydroxybenzyl)-3-(p-tolyl)imidazolidine-2,4-dione ((R)-G9).
1.17 g, 83% yield as a white solid. Rf = 0.2 (ethyl acetate/petroleum ether = 1:1). mp 82–84 °C. (c 0.01, DMF). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.21 (d, J = 8.00 Hz, 2H), 7.02–7.05 (m, 4H), 6.67 (d, J = 8.56 Hz, 2H), 6.27 (s, 1H), 5.82 (br, 1H), 4.34–4.38 (m, 1H), 3.14 (dd, J = 14.10, 4.14 Hz, 1H), 3.03 (dd, J = 14.12, 6.52 Hz, 1H), 2.34 (s, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 172.8, 157.3, 155.3, 138.8, 130.8, 129.9, 128.3, 126.3, 125.7, 115.6, 58.3, 36.5, 21.1. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3322, 1781, 1509, 1430, 1171, 815. HRMS (ESI+-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C17H17N2O3, 297.1233; found, 297.1237.
(S)-5-((1H-Indol-3-yl)methyl)-3-(p-tolyl)imidazolidine-2,4-dione((S)-G10).
1.28 g, 80% yield as a white solid. Rf = 0.3 (ethyl acetate/petroleum ether = 2:1). mp 92–95 °C. (c 0.01, DMF). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.08 (s, 1H), 7.65 (d, J = 7.88 Hz, 1H), 7.36 (d, J = 8.12 Hz, 1H), 7.20–7.23 (m, 3H), 7.15 (t, J = 7.50 Hz, 1H), 7.04–7.06 (m, 3H), 5.75 (s, 1H), 4.42–4.45 (m, 1H), 3.49 (dd, J = 14.72, 3.76 Hz, 1H), 3.19 (dd, J = 14.68, 8.28 Hz, 1H), 2.35 (s, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 172.7, 156.6, 138.4, 136.2, 129.7, 128.7, 127.0, 126.1, 123.4, 122.5, 119.9, 118.7, 111.4, 109.0, 57.7, 28.0, 21.2. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3345, 1770, 1708, 1509, 1425, 1188, 815, 742. HRMS (ESI+-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C19H18N3O2, 320.1393; found, 320.1394.
(R)-5-((1 H-Indol-3-yl)methyl)-3-(p-tolyl)imidazolidine-2,4-dione ((R)-G10).
1.28 g, 80% yield as a white solid. Rf = 0.3 (ethyl acetate/petroleum ether = 2:1). mp 92–96 °C. (c 0.01, DMF). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.08 (s, 1H), 7.64 (d, J = 8.00 Hz, 1H), 7.35 (d, J = 8.04 Hz, 1H), 7.20–7.23 (m, 3H), 7.15 (t, J = 7.23 Hz, 1H), 7.02–7.05 (m, 3H), 5.84 (s, 1H), 4.41–4.44 (m, 1H), 3.47 (dd, J = 14.70, 3.70 Hz, 1H), 3.18 (dd, J = 14.70, 8.18 Hz, 1H), 2.35 (s, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 172.8, 156.8, 138.4, 136.2, 129.7, 128.6, 127.0, 126.1, 123.5, 122.4, 119.8, 118.7, 111.4, 108.9, 57.7, 27.9, 21.1. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3345, 1770, 1713, 1515, 1419, 1176, 810, 748. HRMS (ESI+-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C19H18N3O2, 320.1393; found, 320.1395.
(S)-5-Benzyl-3-(3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)imidazolidine-2,4-dione ((S)-G11).
1.11 g, 55% yield as a white solid. Rf = 0.3 (ethyl acetate/petroleum ether = 1:4). mp 110–111 °C. (c 0.01, DMF). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.85 (s, 1H), 7.78 (s, 2H), 7.30–7.36 (m, 3H), 7.24–7.26 (m, 2H), 5.82 (s, 1H), 4.47–4.49 (m, 1H), 3.35 (dd, J = 13.86, 3.10 Hz, 1H), 3.08 (dd, J = 13.94, 7.82 Hz, 1H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 171.1, 154.9, 134.1, 132.9, 132.5 (q, J = 33.9 Hz), 129.4, 129.0, 127.9, 126.0–126.8 (m), 122.8 (q, J = 269.7 Hz), 121.7(5)-121.8 (m), 58.2, 38.1. 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3): δ −62.8. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3299, 1790, 1726, 1476, 1418, 1279, 1184, 112, 895, 700. HRMS (ESI+-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C18H13N2O2F6, 403.0875; found, 403.0879.
(R)-5-Benzyl-3-(3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)imidazolidine-2,4-dione ((R)-G11).
1.05 g, 52% yield as a white solid. Rf = 0.3 (ethyl acetate/petroleum ether = 1:4). mp 110–111 °C. (c 0.01, DMF). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.85 (s, 1H), 7.77 (s, 2H), 7.30–7.38 (m, 3H), 7.24–7.26 (m, 2H), 5.89 (s, 1H), 4.47–4.50 (m, 1H), 3.34 (dd, J = 13.92, 3.72 Hz, 1H), 3.08 (dd, J = 13.96, 7.80 Hz, 1H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 171.4, 155.6, 134.1, 132.9, 132.5 (q, J = 33.9 Hz), 129.6, 128.9, 127.9, 126.1–126.1(2) (m), 122.8 (q, J = 271.5 Hz), 121.8–121.9 (m), 58.2, 38.0. 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3): δ −62.8. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3285, 1780, 1728, 1448, 1416, 1279, 1179, 1132, 895, 698. HRMS (ESI+-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C18H13N2O2F6, 403.0875; found, 403.0880.
(S)-3-(3,5-Bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-5-methylimidazolidine-2,4-dione ((S)-G12).
0.88 g, 54% yield as a white solid. Rf = 0.3 (ethyl acetate/petroleum ether = 1:2). mp 90–91 °C. (c 0.01, DMF). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.04 (s, 1H), 7.88 (s, 2H), 6.43 (br, 1H), 4.30–4.35 (m, 1H), 1.60 (d, J = 6.92 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 172.5, 155.0, 133.2, 132.5 (q, J = 33.9 Hz), 125.7–125.7(5) (m), 122.8 (q, J = 271.5 Hz), 121.5(5)–121.6 (m), 52.9, 17.8. 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3): δ −62.8. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3316, 1787, 1730, 1476, 1413, 1278, 1176, 1137, 894, 680; HRMS (ESI+-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C12H9N2O2F6, 327.0562; found, 327.0559.
(R)-3-(3,5-Bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-5-methylimidazolidine-2,4-dione ((R)-G12).
0.82 g, 50% yield as a white solid. Rf = 0.3 (ethyl acetate/petroleum ether = 1:2). mp 90–92 °C. (c 0.01, DMF). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.03 (s, 1H), 7.88 (s, 2H), 6.48 (br, 1H), 4.30–4.35 (m, 1H), 1.60 (d, J = 6.96 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 172.6, 155.0, 133.2, 132.5 (q, J = 33.9 Hz), 125.7 (q, J = 3.4 Hz), 122.8 (q, J = 271.5 Hz), 121.5(5)–121.6 (m), 52.9, 17.8. 19F NMR (376 MHz, CDCl3): δ −62.8. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3316, 1782, 1732, 1478, 1416, 1281, 1179, 1132, 893, 681. HRMS (ESI+-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C12H9N2O2F6, 327.0562; found, 327.0556.
(S)-3-(3,5-Bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-5-(hydroxymethyl)-imidazolidine-2,4-dione ((S)-G13).
0.91 g, 53% yield as a white solid. Rf = 0.3 (ethyl acetate/petroleum ether = 2:1). mp 134–136 °C. (c 0.01, DMF). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.02 (s, 2H), 7.89 (s, 1H), 6.13 (br, 1H), 4.35–4.37 (m, 1H), 4.03–4.12 (m, 2H), 2.28 (br, 1H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CD3OD): δ 171.8, 156.2, 134.2, 131.9 (q, J = 33.6 Hz), 126.1 (q, J = 3.9 Hz), 123.1 (q, J = 270.5 Hz), 120.6–120.8 (m), 60.3, 59.6. 19F NMR (376 MHz, CD3OD): δ −64.4. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3418, 3260, 1787, 1724, 1476, 1419, 1278, 1188, 1131, 1075, 685. HRMS (ESI+-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C12H9N2O3F6, 343.0511; found, 343.0509.
(R)-3-(3,5-Bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-5-(hydroxymethyl)-imidazolidine-2,4-dione ((R)-G13).
0.92 g, 54% yield as a white solid. Rf = 0.3 (ethyl acetate/petroleum ether = 2:1). mp 132–133 °C. (c 0.01, DMF). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.02 (s, 2H), 7.88 (s, 1H), 6.21 (br, 1H), 4.36–4.38 (m, 1H), 4.04–4.14 (m, 2H), 2.28 (br, 1H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CD3OD): δ 171.8, 156.2, 134.2, 131.9 (q, J = 33.7 Hz), 126.1 (q, J = 3.8 Hz), 123.1 (q, J = 270.5 Hz), 120.7 (q, J = 3.8 Hz), 60.3, 59.6. 19F NMR (376 MHz, CD3OD): δ −64.3. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3418, 3260, 1787, 1476, 1419, 1278, 1188, 1131, 1075, 889, 686. HRMS (ESI+-TOf) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C12H9N2O3F6, 343.0511; found, 343.0512.
(S)-3-(3,5-Bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-5-((R)-1-hydroxyethyl)-imidazolidine-2,4-dione ((S,R)-G14).
0.99 g, 56% yield as a white solid. Rf = 0.3 (ethyl acetate/petroleum ether = 1:1). mp 178–180 °C. (c 0.01, DMF). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.02 (s, 2H), 7.87 (s, 1H), 5.84 (s, 1H), 4.26–4.34 (m, 1H), 4.13–4.14 (m, 1H), 1.94 (d, J = 6.68 Hz, 1H), 1.45 (d, J = 6.48 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CD3OD): δ 172.0, 156.4, 134.2, 131.9 (q, J = 33.6 Hz), 126.1 (q, J = 3.5 Hz), 123.1 (q, J = 270.5 Hz), 120.6–120.7 (m), 66.3, 63.0, 18.9. 19F NMR (376 MHz, CD3OD): δ −64.3. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3433, 3372, 1777, 1730, 1482, 1423, 1281, 1182, 1135, 1088, 890, 686; HRMS (ESI+-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C13H11N2O3F6, 357.0668; found, 357.0669.
(R)-3-(3,5-Bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-5-((S)-1-hydroxyethyl)-imidazolidine-2,4-dione ((R,S)-G14).
1.02 g, 57% yield as a white solid. Rf = 0.3 (ethyl acetate/petroleum ether = 1:1). mp 172–174 °C. (c 0.01, DMF). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.02 (s, 2H), 7.87 (s, 1H), 5.89 (s, 1H), 4.26–4.33 (m, 1H), 4.13–4.14 (m, 1H), 1.95 (d, J = 6.64 Hz, 1H), 1.45 (d, J = 6.48 Hz, 3H). 13C{1H} NMR (100 MHz, CD3OD): δ 172.0, 156.4, 134.2, 131.9 (q, J = 33.6 Hz), 126.1–126.1(2) (m), 123.1 (q, J = 270.5 Hz), 120.6–120.7 (m), 66.3, 63.0, 18.9. 19F NMR (376 MHz, CD3OD): δ −64.4. IR (KBr, cm−1): 3373, 1775, 1730, 1481, 1425, 1278, 1182, 1131, 1086, 894, 680. HRMS (ESI+-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ calcd for C13H11N2O3F6, 357.0668; found, 357.0667.
Supplementary Material
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the Scientific Research Fund Performance Award of Beijing Normal University (award number 10200/111203277). Work in the Missouri Lab (P.S.) was supported by the National Institute of General Medical Science of the National Institutes of Health under award number R15GM117508 and R15GM139071.
Footnotes
Supporting Information
The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.joc.2c00587.
NMR and HRMS spectra of TAMCSAs 1a–c, chiral compounds 2a–2c, and enantiomers of hydantoin derivatives (G1–14) for all new compounds; 1H NMR spectra of chiral recognition of (±)-G1–14; optimization of chiral discriminating conditions; and DFT and related data (PDF)
Complete contact information is available at: https://pubs.acs.org/10.1021/acs.joc.2c00587
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Contributor Information
Jie Wen, College of Chemistry, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, P. R. China.
Lei Feng, College of Chemistry, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, P. R. China.
Hongmei Zhao, State Key Laboratory of Information Photonics and Communications, School of Science, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, P. R. China.
Li Zheng, College of Chemistry, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, P. R. China.
Pericles Stavropoulos, Department of Chemistry, Missouri University of Science and Technology, Rolla, Missouri 65409, United States.
Lin Ai, College of Chemistry, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, P. R. China.
Jiaxin Zhang, College of Chemistry, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, P. R. China.
REFERENCES
- (1).(a) Li M-L; Li Y; Pan J-B; Li Y-H; Song S; Zhu S-F; Zhou Q-L Carboxyl group-directed iridium-catalyzed enantioselective hydrogenation of aliphatic γ-ketoacids. ACS Catal. 2020, 10, 10032–10039. [Google Scholar]; (b) Calcaterra A; D’Acquarica I The Market of chiral drugs: Chiral switches de novo enantiomerically pure compounds. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal 2018, 147, 323–340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Glavin DP; Burton AS; Elsila JE; Aponte JC; Dworkin JP The search for chiral asymmetry as a potential biosignature in our solar system. Chem. Rev 2020, 120, 4660–4689. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Wang Y; Zhao X; Yu Z; Xu Z; Zhao B; Ozaki Y A chiral-label-free SERS strategy for the synchronous chiral discrimination and identification of small aromatic molecules. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2020, 59, 19079–19086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (2).(a) Höglund P; Eriksson T; Björkman S A double-blind study of the sedative effects of the thalidomide enantiomers in humans. J. Pharmcol. Biopharm 1998, 26, 363–383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Tran CD; Oliveira D; Yu S Chiral ionic liquid that functions as both solvent and chiral selector for the determination of enantiomeric compositions of pharmaceutical products. Anal. Chem 2006, 78, 1349–1356. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Zaremska V; Tan J; Lim S; Knoll W; Pelosi P Isoleucine residues determine chiral discrimination of odorant-binding protein. Chem.–Eur. J 2020, 26, 8720–8724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (3).(a) Pirkle WH; Pochapsky TC Considerations of chiral recognition relevant to the liquid chromatographic separation of enantiomers. Chem. Rev 1989, 89, 347–362. [Google Scholar]; (b) Han SM Direct enantiomeric separations by high performance liquid chromatography using cyclodextrins. Biomed. Chromatogr 1997, 11, 259–271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Welch CJ Pirkle William H.: Stereochemistry pioneer. Chirality 2020, 32, 961–974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (4).(a) Flack HD; Bernardinelli G The use of X-ray crystallography to determine absolute configuration. Chirality 2008, 20, 681–690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Parsons S. Determination of absolute configuration using X-ray diffraction. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2017, 28, 1304–1313. [Google Scholar]; (c) Gropp C; Husch T; Trapp N; Reiher M; Diederich F Hydrogen-bonded networks: Molecular recognition of cyclic alcohols in enantiopure alleno-acetylenic cage receptors. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2018, 57, 16296–16301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (5).(a) De Los Santos ZA; Lynch CC; Wolf C Optical chirality sensing with an auxiliary-free earth-abundant cobalt probe. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2019, 58, 1198–1202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Shimo S; Takahashi K; Iwasawa N 1,2-Dihydro-1-hydroxy-2,3,1-benzodiazaborine bearing an acridine moiety as a circular dichroism probe for determination of absolute configuration of mono-alcohols. Chem.–Eur. J 2019, 25, 3790–3794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Wang LL; Quan M; Yang TL; Chen Z; Jiang W A green and wide-scope approach for chiroptical sensing of organic molecules through biomimetic recognition in water. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2020, 59, 23817–23824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (6).(a) Komori K; Taniguchi T; Mizutani S; Monde K; Kuramochi K; Tsubaki K Short synthesis of berkeleyamide D and determination of the absolute configuration by the vibrational circular dichroism exciton chirality method. Org. Lett 2014, 16, 1386–1389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Poopari MR; Dezhahang Z; Shen K; Wang L; Lowary TL; Xu Y Absolute configuration and conformation of two Fráter–Seebach alkylation reaction products by film VCD and ECD spectroscopic analyses. J. Org. Chem 2015, 80, 428–437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (7).(a) Parker D. NMR determination of enantiomeric purity. Chem. Rev 1991, 91, 1441–1457. [Google Scholar]; (b) Yang G-H; Li Y; Li X Chirality sensing of molecules with diverse functional groups by using N-tert-butyl sulfinyl squaramide. Asian J. Org. Chem 2018, 7, 770–775. [Google Scholar]; (c) Kuhn LT; Motiram-Corral K; Athersuch TJ; Parella T; Pérez-Trujillo M Simultaneous enantiospecific detection of multiple compounds in mixtures using NMR spectroscopy. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2020, 59, 23615–23619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Li G-W; Wang X-J; Cui D-D; Zhang Y-F; Xu R-Y; Shi S-H; Liu L-T; Wang M-C; Liu H-M; Lei X-X Azaheterocyclic diphenylmethanol chiral solvating agents for the NMR chiral discrimination of alpha-substituted carboxylic acids. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 34605–34611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Recchimurzo A; Micheletti C; Uccello-Barretta G; Balzano F A dimeric thiourea CSA for the enantiodiscrimination of amino acid derivatives by NMR spectroscopy. J. Org. Chem 2021, 86, 7381–7389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (8).(a) Sheykhi S; Mosca L; Durgala JM; Anzenbacher P Jr. An indicator displacement assay recognizes enantiomers of chiral carboxylates. Chem. Commun 2019, 55, 7183–7186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Pu L. Enantioselective fluorescent recognition of free amino acids: challenges and opportunities. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2020, 59, 21814–21828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (9).(a) Ito S; Okuno M; Asami M Differentiation of enantiomeric anions by NMR spectroscopy with chiral bisurea receptors. Org. Biomol Chem 2018, 16, 213–222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Kriegelstein M; Profous D; Přibylka A; Cankař P The assignment of the absolute configuration of β-chiral primary alcohols with axially chiral trifluoromethylbenzimidazolylbenzoic acid. J. Org. Chem 2020, 85, 12912–12921. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (10).(a) Balzano F; Uccello-Barretta G; Aiello F Chiral analysis by NMR spectroscopy: chiral solvating agents. Chiral Analysis, 2nd ed.; Elsevier, 2018; pp 367–427. [Google Scholar]; (b) Wenzel TJ Differentiation of Chiral Compounds Using NMR Spectroscopy, 2nd ed.; Wiley, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- (11).(a) Labuta J; Hill JP; Ishihara S; Hanyková L; Ariga K Chiral sensing by nonchiral tetrapyrroles. Acc. Chem. Res 2015, 48, 521–529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Ema T; Yamasaki T; Watanabe S; Hiyoshi M; Takaishi K Cross-coupling approach to an array of macrocyclic receptors functioning as chiral solvating agents. J. Org. Chem 2018, 83, 10762–10769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (12).(a) Raval HB; Bedekar AV Synthesis and study of fluorine containing Kagan’s amides as chiral solvating agents for enantiodiscrimination of acids by NMR spectroscopy. Chemistry Select 2020, 5, 6927–6932. [Google Scholar]; (b) Prasad D; Mogurampelly S; Chaudhari SR R-VAPOL-phosphoric acid based 1H and 13C-NMR for sensing of chiral amines and acids. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 2303–2312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Erol Gunal S; Teke Tuncel S; Dogan I Enantiodiscrimination of carboxylic acids using single enantiomer thioureas as chiral solvating agents. Tetrahedron 2020, 76, 131141–131146. [Google Scholar]; (d) Recchimurzo A; Micheletti C; Uccello-Barretta G; Balzano F A dimeric thiourea CSA for the enantiodiscrimination of amino acid derivatives by NMR spectroscopy. J. Org. Chem 2021, 86, 7381–7389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (13).(a) Mishra SK; Chaudhari SR; Suryaprakash N In situ approach for testing the enantiopurity of chiral amines and amino alcohols by 1H NMR. Org. Biomol. Chem 2014, 12, 495–502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Seo M-S; Kim H 1H NMR chiral analysis of charged molecules via ion pairing with Aluminum complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2015, 137, 14190–14195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Sun Z; Chen Z; Wang Y; Zhang X; Xu J; Bian G; Song L Chiral discrimination of varied ammonium compounds through 1H NMR using a binuclear Ti complex sensor. Org. Lett 2020, 22, 589–593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (14).(a) Yang K; Li S-Z; Wang Y-H; Zhang W-Z; Xu Z-H; Zhou X-Y; Zhu R-X; Luo J; Wan Q Enantioselective recognition of an inherently chiral calix[4]arene crown-6 carboxylic acid cone conformer towards chiral aminoalcohols. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 6517–6526. [Google Scholar]; (b) Yang J; Chatelet B; Dufaud V; Hérault D; Jean M; Vanthuyne N; Mulatier J-C; Pitrat D; Guy L; Dutasta J-P; Martinez A Enantio- and substrates-selective recognition of chiral neurotransmitters with C3-symmetric switchable receptors. Org. Lett 2020, 22, 891–895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (15).(a) Bian G; Yang S; Huang H; Zong H; Song L; Fan H; Sun X Chirality sensing of tertiary alcohols by a novel strong hydrogen-bonding donor–selenourea. Chem. Sci 2016, 7, 932–938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Seo M-S; Jang S; Kim H A chiral aluminum solvating agent (CASA) for 1H NMR chiral analysis of alcohols at low temperature. Chem. Commun 2018, 54, 6804–6807. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (16).Chen Z; Fan H; Yang S; Bian G; Song L Chiral sensors for determining the absolute configurations of α-amino acids derivatives. Org. Biomol. Chem 2018, 16, 8311–8317. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (17).(a) Bai L; Chen P; Xiang J; Sun J; Lei X Enantiomeric NMR discrimination of carboxylic acids using actinomycin D as a chiral solvating agent. Org. Biomol. Chem 2019, 17, 1466–1470. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Malinowska M; Jarzyński S; Pieczonka A; Rachwalski M; Leśniak S; Zawisza A Optically pure aziridin-2-yl methanols as readily available 1H NMR sensors for enantiodiscrimination of α-recemic carboxylic acids containing tertiary or quaternary stereogenic centers. J. Org. Chem 2020, 85, 11794–11801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (18).Jang S; Kim H Understanding the origin of the chiral recognition of esters with octahedral chiral cobalt complexes. Asian J. Org. Chem 2021, 10, 886–890. [Google Scholar]
- (19).(a) Lv C-X; Feng L; Zhao H-M; Wang G; Stavropoulos P; Ai L Chiral discrimination of α-hydroxy acids and N-Ts-α-amino acids induced by tetraaza macrocyclic chiral solvating agents by using 1H NMR spectroscopy. Org. Biomol. Chem 2017, 15, 1642–1650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Fang L-X; Lv C-X; Wang G; Feng L; Stavropoulos P; Gao G-P; Ai L; Zhang JX Discrimination of enantiomers of dipeptide derivatives with two chiral centers by tetraaza macrocyclic chiral solvating agents using 1H NMR spectroscopy. Org. Chem. Front 2016, 3, 1716–1724. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (20).Couffin A; Thillaye du Boullay O; Vedrenne M; Navarro C; Martin-Vaca B; Bourissou D Enantio-differentiation of O-heterocycles using a binol-derived disulfonimide as a chiral solvating agent. Chem. Commun 2014, 50, 5997–6000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (21).(a) Nique F; Hebbe S; Peixoto C; Annoot D; Lefrançois J-M; Duval E; Michoux L; Triballeau N; Lemoullec J-M; Mollat P; Thauvin M; Prangé T; Minet D; Clément-Lacroix P; Robin-Jagerschmidt C; Fleury D; Guédin D; Deprez P Discovery of diarylhydantoins as new selective androgen receptor modulators. J. Med. Chem 2012, 55, 8225–8235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Ma B-D; Du S-H; Wang Y; Ou X-M; Huang M-Z; Wang L-X; Wang X-G Synthesis of chiral hydantoin derivatives by homogeneous Pd-catalyzed asymmetric hydrogenation. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 2017, 28, 47–53. [Google Scholar]
- (22).Feng L; Gao G-P; Zhao H-M; Zheng L; Wang Y; Stavropoulos P; Ai L; Zhang J-X Synthesis of tripeptide derivatives with three stereogenic centers and chiral recognition probed by tetrazaz macrocyclic chiral solvating agents derived from D-phenylalanine and (1S,2S)-(+)-1,2-diaminocyclohexane via 1H NMR spectroscopy. J. Org. Chem 2018, 83, 13874–13887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (23).Kise N; Oike H; Okazaki E; Yoshimoto M; Shono T Synthesis of nitrogen-containing macrocycles with reductive intramolecular coupling of aromatic diimines. J. Org. Chem 1995, 60, 3980–3992. [Google Scholar]
- (24).Wang C; Zhao Q; Vargas M; Jones JO; White KL; Shackleford DM; Chen G; Saunders J; Ng ACF; Chiu FCK; Dong Y; Charman SA; Keiser J; Vennerstrom JL Revisiting the SAR of the antischistosomal aryl hydantoin (RO 133978). J. Med. Chem 2016, 59, 10705–10718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (25).(a) Job P. Formation and stability of inorganic complexes in solution. Ann. Chim 1928, 9, 113–203. [Google Scholar]; (b) Ulatowski F; Dąbrowa K; Bałakier T; Jurczak J Recognizing the limited applicability of Job plots in studying host-guest interactions in supramolecular chemistry. J. Org. Chem 2016, 81, 1746–1756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- (26).Becke AD Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange. J. Chem. Phys 1993, 98, 5648–5652. [Google Scholar]
- (27).Uccello-Barretta G; Balzano F; Caporusso AM; Iodice A; Salvadori P Permethylated βcyclodextrin as chiral solvating agent for the NMR assignment of the absolute configuration of chiral trisubstituted allenes. J. Org. Chem 1995, 60, 2227–2231. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
