Skip to main content
Frontiers in Chemistry logoLink to Frontiers in Chemistry
. 2022 Aug 29;10:1000709. doi: 10.3389/fchem.2022.1000709

Biomedical applications of iron sulfide-based nanozymes

Yunyi Shan 1, Wenjie Lu 1, Juqun Xi 1,2, Yayun Qian 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC9465017  PMID: 36105309

Abstract

Nanozymes have attracted great interest owing to their marvelous advantages, such as high stability, facile preparation, and high tunability. In particular, iron sulfide-based nanozymes (termed as ISNs), as one of the most researched nanomaterials with versatile enzyme-mimicking properties, have proved their potential in biomedical applications. In this review, we briefly summarize the classification, catalytic mechanisms of ISNs and then principally introduce ISNs’ biomedical applications in biosensors, tumor therapy, antibacterial therapy, and others, demonstrating that ISNs have promising potential for alleviating human health.

Keywords: nanozymes, iron sulfides, classification, catalytic mechanism, biomedical applications

1 Introduction

Nanozymes belong to mimic enzymes, which not only possess the unique properties of nanomaterials but also have catalytic activities (Gao and Yan, 2013). Ferromagnetic (Fe3O4) nanoparticles were first discovered to have the intrinsic peroxidase-like (POD-like) activity, with the similar catalytic process to horseradish peroxidase (HRP) in 2007 (Gao et al., 2007) and then defined in 2013 (Gao and Yan, 2013). Nanozymes have superior properties. For instance, nanozymes are high stability, working in a broader range of pH and temperature. Compared with HRP, Fe3O4 nanoparticles are certainly stable over a wide range of pH from 1.0 to 12.0 and temperatures from 4.0 to 90.0°C (Gao et al., 2007). Moreover, the preparation of nanozymes is facile, such as hydrothermal synthesis (Xu et al., 2018). Thirdly, nanozymes are conducive to surface modification due to their large surface areas (Miao et al., 2019). Last but not least, nanozymes are high tunability and specific environmental responsiveness (Gao and Yan, 2016; Yang et al., 2021). Based on the advantages described above, frontier research has dramatically promoted the novel applications of nanozymes in sensing, ecological treatment, and biomedicine (Dong et al., 2019; Huang et al., 2019; Sutrisno et al., 2020; Wu et al., 2022; Zhu et al., 2022).

With the development of nanozymology, plentiful nanozymes have been discovered or synthesized, such as metal oxides, metal sulfides, and carbon materials. Among these, iron oxide-based nanozymes have been studied and summarized comprehensively, including synthesis, catalytic mechanisms, biomedical applications, and so on (Gao et al., 2017). Nevertheless, iron sulfide-based nanozymes (ISNs) have not been fully studied. What’s more, O and S are congeneric elements. On the one hand, iron sulfides possess similar physiochemical properties as iron oxides; on the other hand, they have their own unique properties, which endow them with special applications in biomedicine. For example, there are more phases of iron sulfides than iron oxides, such as pyrite (FeS2), pyrrhotite (Fe1−xS), and mackinawite (FeS), while iron oxides have only two forms (Fe2O3 and Fe3O4) in nature (Fan et al., 2018; Gao et al., 2019; Kantar et al., 2019; Huang et al., 2021). Notably, ISNs are essential cofactors that serve as active centers for electron transfer in catalytic processes and respiratory chain reactions (Yuan et al., 2020). Therefore, it is predicted that ISNs have huge potential in the biomedical field. Recently, a few studies have focused on the research of ISNs and have made progress in biomedical applications. However, few have thoroughly summarized the intrinsic enzyme-like properties. As a result, it is worthwhile sorting out these study results. In this review, we will try to summarize the classification and catalytic mechanisms of ISNs, and underline their applications in biomedicine (Scheme 1). The work is expected to provide ideas for follow-up research on ISNs.

SCHEME 1.

SCHEME 1

Schematic diagram of biomedical applications of ISNs. Schematics for FeS2@C NSs. Reproduced with permission from Ref. (Ding et al., 2020). Copyright © 2020 American Chemical Society. Schematics for a biomimetic nanozyme system (CF) by coating FeS2 into tumor-derived exosomes. Reproduced with permission from Ref. (Huang et al., 2021). Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Scheme of polysulfane release from nFeS. Reproduced with permission from Ref. (Xu et al., 2018). Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Comparison of cholelithiasis and cholecystitis before and after oral treatment. Reproduced with permission from Ref. (Ding et al., 2021). Copyright © 2021 American Chemical Society. photothermal therapy, PTT; radiotherapy, RT; immunogenic cell death, ICD; photodynamic therapy, PDT; catalysis-accelerated release, CAR.

2 Classification of ISNs

The preparation methods of ISNs mainly include hydrothermal synthesis, biomineralization method, co-precipitation, low temperature chemical synthesis, and so on. According to the elemental compositions, ISNs are classified into two categories: 1) different valence states combination of iron and sulfide atoms only, and 2) iron-sulfur compounds doped with other elements.

2.1 Different valence states combination of iron and sulfide atoms only

The representative nanozymes in this category are pyrite (FeS2), pyrrhotite (Fe1−xS), and mackinawite (FeS). Pyrite has a cubic structure with FeS6 octahedra and S‒S dimers. The twisted FeS6 octahedron has six identical Fe‒S bond distances. A tetrahedral configuration which contains three iron atoms and one S atom is coordinated in each S atom. Pyrrhotite has a hexagonal crystal system, simply described as a twisted octahedral FeS6 that forms a three-dimensional (3D) structure. Each FeS6 unit shares an edge in the a or c direction with its neighbor. Mackinawite is a kind of tetragonal mineral with a layered structure. The FeS4 tetrahedra within the layer connect their adjacent units by sharing corners or edges (Figure 1) (Lai et al., 2021).

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

The crystal structure of ISNs from natural minerals. Reproduced with permission from Ref. (Lai et al., 2021). Copyright 2021 Elsevier B.V.

2.2 Iron-sulfur compounds doped with other elements

Iron-sulfur compounds are usually doped with metallic or (and) non-metallic elements, such as Cu5FeS4 (bornite), CuFeS2 (chalcopyrite), and FeS2@C. Cu5FeS4 and CuFeS2 are both doped with a metallic element, which the former crystallizes in the orthorhombic system and the latter has a tetragonal system (Huang et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2020; Wang X. et al., 2021). FeS2@C is doped with the non-metallic element which contains an amorphous nanocomposite (Ding et al., 2020). As far as we know, the crystal form of ISNs affect the catalytic activities. For instance, the FeS2 activity of a cubic system is better than CuFeS2 that of a tetragonal system (Ltaïef et al., 2018). In addition, in order to improve the activity of nanozymes, researchers tried to modify the surface of ISNs. As proof, Ding et al. designed to wrap two-dimensional (2D) carbon nanosheets on FeS2, and the carbon sheets can endow the composites with high specific surface area and abundant active sites to enhance the reaction with substrates (Ding et al., 2020).

3 Catalytic mechanisms of ISNs

Up to now, many ISNs have been discovered with distinct enzyme-mimicking properties, including peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT), oxidase (OXD), and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activities. For ISNs, most of them exhibit POD-like activity (Table 1). Therefore, we emphasize the catalytic mechanism of POD activity. However, the current understanding of the mechanism is still incomplete, and we try to explain it on our limited information. The catalytic mechanism of POD-like activity consists of reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and the electron transfer process (Yang et al., 2021). On the one hand, ROS include a broad range of chemical species, such as hydroxyl (•OH), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), superoxide (•O2 ), and singlet oxygen (1O2) (Levy et al., 2018). ISNs produce ROS by catalyzing the substrate, which usually trigger the cytotoxicity to fulfill therapeutic effects, such as antibacterial treatment and tumor treatment. For instance, the catalytic mechanism of pyrite (FeS2) to produce ROS is divided into the following three pathways: firstly, the active component   Fe2+ react with dissolved O2, gradually forming O2 and releasing Fe3+ in aqueous solution (Eq. 1). The resulting Fe3+ will be further reduced to Fe2+ by S22 (Eq. 2). Both   Fe2+ and Fe2+ react with O2 to form H2O2 (Eqs 34). H2O2 is finally activated by   Fe2+ and Fe3+ (or Fe2+/Fe3+) to form •OH and hydroxyl peroxide radical (•O2H) (Eqs 58). Secondly, due to the erosion of H2O2 on the pyrite surface Fe3+ release, which is further reduced to Fe2+ by the electron donor S2 2− (Eq. 9). Then, Fe2+ (or   Fe2+) and oxidized Fe3+ (or   Fe3+) by some consecutive reactions with H2O2 to form •OH and •O2H (Eqs 58). Thirdly, in the aid of sulfur-defects, the adsorbed H2O reacts with surface   Fe3+ at a sulfur-deficient site to form the adsorbed •OH, which in turn generates H2O2 and •OH in aqueous solution. To sum up, the S2 2− not only promotes the Fe2+ dissolution, but also acts as an electron donor to enhance the circulation of Fe2+/Fe3+ (or   Fe2+/   Fe3+). Consequently, pyrite can produce more ROS to apply in antibacterial and antitumor therapies, and so on (Lai et al., 2021). On the other hand, in the electron transfer process, the reduction of H2O2 or oxygen and the oxidation of substrates are accelerated because ISNs obtain electrons by adsorbing the substrate on the surface and become a wealthy electron donor. This process does not produce •OH or even eliminate its production but can mediately achieve the therapeutic effect (Yang et al., 2021). For example, it is hypothesized that Fe–N–S co-doped porous carbons promoted oxygen reduction by catalyzing the transfer of electrons and protons from organic matter to oxygen. Hence, the reduction product contained O2 (Borkowski et al., 2020). In addition to POD-like activity, Xu and co-workers proved that nFeS possesses catalase activity which can decompose H2O2 into oxygen (Xu et al., 2018). Huang et al. discovered a biomimetic nanozyme system in which exosomes from tumors encapsulated by pyrite (FeS2) exhibited glutathione oxidase activities which could catalyze glutathione (GSH) into oxidized glutathione (GSSG) (Huang et al., 2021).

Fe2++O2Fe3++·O2 (1)
FeS2+14Fe3++8H2O15Fe2++2SO42+16H+ (2)
Fe2++·O2+2H+Fe3++H2O2 (3)
Fe2++·O2+2H+Fe3++H2O2 (4)
Fe2++H2O2Fe3++·OH+OH (5)
Fe3++H2O2Fe2++·O2H+H+ (6)
Fe2++H2O2Fe3++·OH+OH (7)
Fe3++H2O2Fe2++·O2H+H+ (8)
2FeS2+15H2O22Fe3++4SO42+2H++14H2O (9)

TABLE 1.

Catalytic activities of ISNs. Peroxidase, POD; catalase, CAT; oxidase, OXD; FeS2@C nanosheets, FeS2@C NSs; FeS@carbon nanosheets, FeS@CNs; glucose oxidase, GOx; paclitaxel, PTX; extracellular matrix-degrading nanoagonist, ECM-dNAc.

Material Appearances Catalytic activity Applications References
Pyrite (FeS2) Spherical nanoparticles POD-like activity Tumor therapy Kantar et al., 2019; Huang et al., 2021
and OXD-like activity
Pyrrhotite (Fe1-xS) Nanosheets POD-like activity Pollutant degradation Gao et al. (2019)
Mackinawite (FeS) Quasi-spherical nanoparticles POD-like activity Antibacterial therapy Agnihotri et al., 2020
nFeS (Fe1-xS, Fe3S4) Nanosheets POD-like activity Antibacterial therapy Xu et al. (2018)
and CAT-like activity
FeS2@C NSs Nanoparticles POD-like activity Biosensers Ding et al. (2020)
FeS@CNs Nanoparticles POD-like activity Biosensers Song et al. (2022)
FeS@BSA Uniform spherical nanoparticles CAT-like activity Tumor therapy Xie et al. (2020)
Chalcopyrite (CuFeS2) Tetragonal POD-like activity Pollutant degradation Huang et al. (2020)
Bornite (Cu5FeS4) Orthorhombic POD-like activity Pollutant degradation Zhang et al. (2020)
FeS-GOx@PTX Uniform nanoparticles OXD-like activity Tumor therapy Ren et al. (2021)
CuS-Fe@polymer nanoparticle Nanoparticles POD-like activity Tumor therapy Nie et al., 2019
ECM-dNAc Nanoparticles POD-like activity Tumor therapy Zhan et al., 2022

4 Biomedical applications

4.1 Biosensors

With the development of biological applications of nanozymes, biosensor has become one of the application branches. Until now, the application of ISNs as biosensors can be divided into three categories: 1) colorimetric assay, 2) fluorescence assay, and 3) electrochemical assay.

4.1.1 Colorimetric assay

The colorimetric assay is mainly based on the principle that ISNs catalyze H2O2 to form •OH to oxidize substrate 3,3′,5,5′-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) to blue oxTMB (oxidized TMB), which generates the maximum absorption peak at 652 nm. Therefore, the catalytic activity of ISNs can be utilized to detect the glucose (GLU), glutathione (GSH), cysteine (Cys), and gallic acid (GA) (Song et al., 2022). For example, Ding and co-workers synthesized a hybrid of FeS2 nanoparticles encapsulated by 2D carbon sheets (denoted as FeS2@C NSs), which was able to detect glucose in more real samples, such as protamine, starch, heparin, lysozyme, and bovine serum albumin (BSA), with a linear range of 0.5–50 µM and detection limit of 0.19 µM (Ding et al., 2020). Song et al. fabricated FeS@CNs, which were capable of detecting H2O2 content by the colorimetric assay, with a detection limit of 0.78 µM (Song et al., 2022). Accordingly, the FeS@CNs nanozyme-based H2O2 sensing platform was further constructed to evaluate the antioxidant capacity of GSH, Cys, and GA. Taken together, compared with other colorimetric methods, the colorimetric method using ISNs have the advantages of convenient detection, with the wide linear range and low detection limit.

4.1.2 Fluorescence assay

The fluorescence assay is based on the principle that ISNs effectively catalyze H2O2 to form •OH to oxidize non-fluorescent substrate to the fluorescent product. For instance, Amplex Red (AR) can be oxidized to oxAR (oxidized AR), which can result in a high fluorescence signal at 585 nm. Therefore, some ISNs can be applied to construct fluorescent biosensors. Song et al. fabricated FeS@CNs, which was also capable of detecting H2O2 content by detecting the fluorescence signal via the oxAR assay, with the detection limit of 0.86 µM. Notably, antioxidants have the ability of scavenging •OH generated by FeS@CNs, and the presence of antioxidants in the sensing system could reduce the fluorescence signal intensity. Thus, the amount of antioxidants could be quickly evaluated by detecting the fluorescence signals (Song et al., 2022).

4.1.3 Electrochemical assay

The electrochemical assay is mainly based on the determination the substance content by measuring electrochemical signals, such as voltage, current, and electricity. Zhang et al. designed a sandwich model including a FeS2-AuNPs-Ab2 (FeS2-Au nanoparticles-antibody) bioconjugate (Figure 2), in which FeS2-AuNPs acted as HRP mimicking enzyme to effectively decrease the differential pulse voltammetry (DPV) signal of electroactive materials NiHCFNPs for ultrasensitive detection of α-fetoprotein (AFP). Firstly, NiHCFNPs were anchored to the electrode to obtain a strikingly high initial current. Then, FeS2-AuNPs composites and Ab2 play the role of double hindrance, which greatly reduced the electrochemical signal and improve the ultrasensitive detection of AFP. With the help of this model, AFP in human serum samples could be determined with a linear dynamic and wide range from 0.0001–100 ng/ml. Moreover, the limit detection of this electrochemical assay was 0.028 pg/ml, showing high sensitivity to be used as tumor biomarkers (Zhang et al., 2019).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

(A) Preparation of the FeS2-AuNPs-Ab2 bioconjugates and (B) sandwich model making process for testing AFP. Reproduced with permission from Ref. (Zhang et al., 2019). Copyright © 2019 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH and Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

4.2 Tumor therapy

It is well known that tumor-related diseases have become one of the critical diseases that perplex people’s health and lifetime. In recent years, a variety of ISNs for tumor treatments are in full bloom. Presently, the common antitumor therapies based on ISNs are catalytic therapy, ferroptosis, and multiple strategies.

Above all, catalytic therapy refers to iron-based nanoparticles, especially ones containing Fe2+, which can catalyze the production of •OH from H2O2 in tumor cells by Fenton reaction to cause cytotoxicity. For example, Xie and his colleagues showed that FeS@BSA nanoclusters could inhibit hepatocellular carcinoma (Huh7) cells by releasing Fe2+ and hydrogen sulfide gas (H2S). Specifically, the released Fe2+ can produce tumor cytotoxicity through catalytic therapy. Different from iron oxides, the released H2S from FeS@BSA nanoclusters also plays a key role in tumor treatment. H2S produced by S2- is an endogenous gaseous signal molecule, which plays a vital role in physiological and pathophysiological activities of mammals. Some studies have shown that high concentration of H2S can specifically inhibit tumor cells through cellular cycle arrest, miRNA regulation, mitochondrial damage, uncontrolled intracellular acidification stemming from the different metabolic and signal pathways between tumor cells and normal cells. Here, the researchers further discovered that H2S effectively inhibited the CAT activity in the Huh7 cells. CAT is a vital antioxidant enzyme in the regulation of intracellular ROS by decomposing H2O2 to reduce the production of •OH. The failure of cancer treatment is usually related to the high expression of CAT, so inhibiting the expression of intracellular CAT is considered to be a significant means to promote the efficacy of ROS-based catalytic therapy. Here, H2S significantly inhibited the CAT activity, which was beneficial for remaining more intracellular H2O2 for Fe2+ to generate •OH, thus enhancing the antitumor effect. This study provided the possibility of gas-amplified tumor therapy achieved by ISN-based therapeutic platform (Xie et al., 2020).

Of course, it is impossible to rely on only one treatment to achieve an excellent antitumor effect. At present, tumor therapy is more advisable when various approaches are used together to play a combined or synergistic effect. In general, various treatments are combined with catalytic therapy. For example, with the combined use of radiotherapy (RT), Huang et al. reported that FeS2 wrapped in cancer cell-derived exosomes (CDE) achieved the purpose of synergistic treatment of tumors by catalytic therapy and radiation sensitization (Huang et al., 2021). RT, as is a common method to maintain the life of cancer patients, usually utilize high-energy radiations to cause DNA damage or to accelerate the formation of ROS. Here, FeS2 played both glutathione oxidase (GSH-OXD) and POD activities. The former activity reduced the concentration of GSH, an inhibitor of H2O2 production, to effectively enhance the RT efficacy. The latter activity produced •OH to inhibit the tumor growth. Also, CDE which played a crucial role in targeted tumor therapy has three edges. First, it was unlikely to be cleared by tumor cells because it came from tumor cells. Secondly, it exhibited a high level of non-immunogenicity, so it was barely not swallowed by macrophages. Thirdly, it was easy to penetrate blood vessels to tumor tissue, thus targeting the delivery of drugs (Huang et al., 2021). Above of these, this study showed the potential of ISNs to specifically kill tumor cells. It might provide an idea for the next ISNs targeted therapy of tumor.

Apart from the combination of catalytic therapy and RT, Wu et al. introduced the triple therapy of photothermal therapy (PTT)/starvation therapy/catalytic therapy to enhance catalytic therapy of tumor. They constructed nanocatalysts HPFeS2@C (hollow porous carbon coated FeS2) composed of tannic acid (TA), glucose oxidase (GOx), and others (Wu et al., 2020). First, TA could reduce Fe3+ to Fe2+, thus strengthening the Fenton reaction. Secondly, GOx activity of HPFeS2@C could promote glucose consumption and produce more H2O2 to supply the Fenton reaction. At the same time, glucose consumption achieved the goal of starvation therapy. The photothermal effect of the carbon shell which could effectively convert near-infrared (NIR) light into heat could also accelerate the process of Fenton reaction (Wang et al., 2019). In summary, the synergistic triple therapy could greatly improve the effect of catalytic tumor therapy (Wu et al., 2020).

The study of synergism is not over. Based on catalytic therapy, PTT, and starvation therapy, Ren and coworkers also studied the relationship between ISNs and immunity. The FeS-glucose oxidase@paclitaxel (abbreviated as FGP) gathered in the tumor tissue could broke down into smaller FeS-GOx nanodots with the unique ability to infiltrate into the depths of the tumor tissue due to small size. It was worth mentioning that under the triple action of catalytic therapy, PTT, and starvation therapy dominated by FeS and calreticulin could be exposed to enhance immunogenic cell death (ICD), which has been proved to be a promising method to reverse tumor immunosuppression. Dying tumor cells treated with ICD could release tumor-related antigens and damage-related molecular patterns (DAMPs), which were able to stimulate a specific anti-tumor immune response, promote the maturation of dendritic cells (DCs) and recruit special T cells, and ultimately inhibit metastasis of tumor cells with the cooperation of anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (anti-CTLA4) checkpoint blockade. This revealed that their work could be used as an effective treatment for inhibiting the metastasis and recurrence of tumor (Figure 3) (Ren et al., 2021).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Schematic illustration of the synthetic process of FGP and the mechanism of antineoplastic therapy by applying FGP bioreactor. Reproduced with permission from Ref. (Ren et al., 2021). Copyright 2021 Elsevier.

Additionally, photodynamic therapy (PDT) is another strategy of tumor treatments. Feng et al. designed a FeS2@sorafenib@bovine serum albumin (FeS2@SRF@BSA) nanoplatform that combined catalytic therapy, PTT and PDT to realize “all-in-one” nano reagents. Among them, the role of catalytic therapy is no longer discussed, focusing on the therapeutic effect of PDT. Photodynamic reaction of FeS2@SRF@BSA under 808 nm laser produced 1O2 that was also a kind of ROS. Simultaneously, PTT also occurred at the same wavelength and then loaded with chemotherapeutic drugs SRF, so it finally cooperated to inhibit tumor growth (Feng et al., 2022).

Compared with catalytic therapy, ferroptosis is a relatively new concept, which refers to one of the regulated forms of cell death. Lipid hydroperoxidase glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) plays a cardinal role in ferroptosis, which can use cofactor GSH to reduce the reactive lipid hydroperoxides (LPO) to inactive lipid alcohols, thus avoiding the production of toxic lipid ROS which lead to membrane damage and ferroptosis. Therefore, the inhibition of GPX4 by reducing GSH has become a novel idea of tumor therapy (Yang and Stockwell, 2016; Meng et al., 2021). Meng, Li and colleagues reported that pyrite (FeS2) exhibited POD-like activity and GSH-OXD-like activity (Figure 4). The former activity produced •OH for apoptosis, while the latter activity triggered ferroptosis of tumor cells, which bypassed the inhibition of apoptosis that often occurred in many tumor cells. Remarkably, they creatively summed up the features of FeS2 in the treatment of tumors. First, FeS2 exhibits extremely high affinity to H2O2, and its POD catalytic efficiency is 4,144- and 3,086-fold higher than that of classical Fe3O4 nanozyme and HRP, respectively. This makes it possible to make full use of the limited H2O2 in the tumor microenvironment to produce sufficient •OH for tumor therapy. Second, glutathione oxidase (GSH-OXD)-like activity was found in FeS2, which could oxidize GSH to produce H2O2 for catalytic therapy. Thus, a self-cascade platform to produce plentiful •OH is realized. Lastly, since tumor cells have more active metabolism and produce more H2O2 and have higher content of GSH and iron dependence, FeS2 gives priority to killing tumor cells, which means that it has tumor-specific cytotoxicity (Meng et al., 2021). Similar antitumor treatments include biogenic FeS NPs, as well as a biomimetic nanozyme system, in which exosomes from tumors encapsulated by pyrite (FeS2) (Dang et al., 2021; Huang et al., 2021).

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Schematic illustration of apoptosis−ferroptosis synergistic tumor therapy by using pyrite nanozymes with ultrahigh POD-like catalytic activity and intrinsic GSH-OXD mimicking ability. Reproduced with permission from Ref. (Meng et al., 2021). Copyright © 2021 American Chemical Society.

Furthermore, the surface modification of ISNs is necessary because the bare nanoparticles are small and easy to be eliminated by the kidney (Wang Z. et al., 2021). Usually, macromolecules, such as polyethylene glycol (PEG), are adopted to increase ISNs’ volume and prolong the time which it takes to function in the body. Some small molecules could also be used for the surface modification of ISNs. For example, paclitaxel, as a chemotherapeutic drug, was be able to co-assembled into FeS-GOx through hydrophobic interaction, which not only played a synergistic effect, but also prolonged the residence time of FeS-GOx in the tumor site (Ren et al., 2021). Additionally, in order to enhance the specificity of ISNs, researchers have tried to add targeted substances to the surface, such as folic acid (FA), tumor cell secretions and so on. For instance, the above-mentioned CDE is an endogenous vesicle with a size of 50–200 nm, and its three advantages make the material achieve considerable results in targeted tumor therapy (Huang et al., 2021). However, in some cases, surface modification may result in adverse effects. For example, the function of the FA-pyrite nanozymes modified by PEG was affected (Meng et al., 2021).

4.3 Antibacterial therapy

With the abuse of antibiotics and the production of superbugs, many existing antibiotics have a poor bactericidal or bacteriostatic effect, so there is an urgent need for more effective antimicrobials to be put on the market. In antibacterial treatments, some ISNs have achieved certain curative effects. For example, pyrrhotite (Fex-1S) nanoplates were synthesized, and it was found that ROS in bacteria enhanced when Fex-1S nanoplates were exposed to H2O2 and air. It showed germicidal performance against Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Enterococcus faecalis, which confirmed that Fex-1S nanoplates exhibited a good bactericidal effect (Argueta-Figueroa et al., 2018).

With the further development of the research, ISNs not only regulate the level of H2O2 in the organism to affect the survival of bacteria but also kill bacteria through catalysis-accelerated release (CAR), as discovered and named by Xu et al. CAR refers to the rapid oxidation of the surface of nFeS (Fe1-xS, Fe3S4) in the presence of H2O2, accelerating the release of polysulfanes. Polysulfanes have been proved to have the bactericidal ability, so the nFeS has the ability to kill a variety of pathogenic drug-resistant bacteria, such as Gram-negative bacteria (Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Escherichia coli), Gram-positive bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus) and drug-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus, which could be used in the treatment of biofilm on human teeth and promote wound healing. Moreover, the researchers illustrated that the release of polysulfanes might be the general feature of ISNs antibacterial therapy, which provided a new idea for ISNs in treatment of bacteria and even the whole biomedical applications (Xu et al., 2018; Liu and Qu, 2019).

In addition, some researchers introduced infrared laser based on the production of ROS through dual-modality therapy to achieve a better antibacterial effect. It is worth noting that although FeS is insoluble in water. FeS nanoparticles (200 μg/ml) synthesized in the aqueous phase, for example, can permanently release Fe2+ in an aqueous dispersion. Specifically, with the help of the ferrozine assay, the release curve of Fe2+ shows a time-dependent manner of rapid release at first and then stable release. Combined with visible and NIR light exposure, it caused significant hyperthermia and showed that the level of intracellular ROS was gradually increasing (Agnihotri et al., 2020).

Moreover, the carbon nanospheres (CNSs) with the decoration of ultrasmall FeS2 nanoparticles (denoted as CNSs@FeS2) reported by Xi and partners also used similar antibacterial mechanisms. Notably, they pointed out that the role of sulfur was to protect Fe2+ and ensure the antibacterial effect of Fe2+. Furthermore, it was also proved that different valences sulfur ions would determine whether they have a direct bactericidal activity or not. For instance, S2 2− and S2− had no direct germicidal ability. However, it was found that other polysulfides, such as S3 2− and S4 2− exhibited excellent bactericidal activity (Xi et al., 2021).

4.4 Others

Apart from biosensors, tumor therapy, and antibacterial, ISNs are also applied in other biomedical fields, such as cardiovascular diseases therapy, drug degradation, treatment of some digestive diseases, drug delivery systems, and so on.

About treatment of cardiovascular diseases, it has been proposed that the utilization of PTT is able to treat artery inflammation and stenosis using AgFeS2 nanoparticles. AgFeS2 nanomaterial can take therapeutic effects at very low concentration and have been demonstrated to be safe for cells and animals (Peng et al., 2020). With regard to the degradation of drug pollution, the photocatalyst FeS2-Bi2O3 was proved to have a high degradation rate of 97.5% for phenytoin sodium under 50 min of ultraviolet light. It is worth noting that FeS2-Bi2O3, as a photocatalyst, is only reduced by about 3% after five rounds of reuse, which significantly enhances the performance-to-price ratio (Pasha et al., 2019). Additionally, with the economic level gaining steam, humans’ quality of life has also improved, a double-edged sword. On the one hand, people’s happiness index has enhanced dramatically. On the other hand, obesity, hyperlipidemia, aging population are also coming. An increasing number of people suffering from gallstones every year stems from these factors (Yao et al., 2021). To treat cholelithiasis and cholecystitis, compared with traditional clinical drug therapy, Ding and his co-workers found that oral nFeS supernatant cleared gallstones and reduced the bacteria in the gallbladder by 60% after 2 days of treatment in mice. In addition to the remarkable treatment result, nFeS supernatant showed high biocompatibility and had the potential to be used as a nano-preparation for the treatment of cholelithiasis and cholecystitis (Ding et al., 2021). In terms of drug delivery, studies have shown that ferrihydrite and concentrated sulfuric acid undergo unusual chemical reactions to form hematite nanoparticles, which can be targeted at red blood cells, which means that if the nanoparticles are loaded with drugs, then they are able to be transported to various parts with the red blood cells. In addition, it can also target tumor cells. Ultimately, its application can be extended to nano-sensing, imaging, therapy, and so on (Lunin et al., 2020).

5 Conclusion

To sum up, we have briefly summarized the research progress of ISNs in recent years from three aspects: classification, catalytic mechanisms, and biomedical applications. Due to their simple preparation, excellent catalytic activities, and high tunability, ISNs have a broad development prospect, such as biosensors with higher sensitivity, biological agents with better inhibition of tumor growth, and new antibiotics with better bactericidal efficiency. Remarkably, the existence of sulfur element in ISNs make it different from other iron-based nanozymes and has its own unique biomedical applications. Combined with the current research results, sulfur has the following three major functions: 1) Sulfur element facilitates the circulation of Fe so that ROS can be formed persistently; 2) Sulfur element, as a donor of H2S, participates in the treatment of tumors; 3) As the source of polysulfanes formation, sulfur element helps to improve the killing ability of bacteria. Nevertheless, it is undeniable that there are still some problems to be solved in ISNs. First of all, ISNs, generally speaking, are not very toxic and has little effect on normal physiological activities while exerting curative effect in animals. However, the toxicity estimation of ISNs needs to be studied systematically. The metabolic pathways and degradation process should be studied in detail to assist in the assessment of ISNs’ toxicity. Theoretically, ISNs can be encapsulated by lipid carriers or modified by other biomolecules (such as PEG) to fabricate drug delivery systems to improve the dispersity and reduce the toxicity. Nevertheless, the effects of lipids or PEG on catalytic activities of ISNs should also be investigated carefully. Secondly, the specificity of ISNs which only kills tumor cells and has little effect on normal cells is expected to come true. If this point is resolved, the damage to human health caused by indistinguishable attacks on tumors and normal tissues by conventional treatments such as chemotherapy can be addressed. However, the half-life of ISNs in tumor targeted therapy is relatively short due to their fast degradation in serum, renal clearance and liver metabolism. So, the therapeutic effect is not satisfactory. How to extend the therapeutic half-life of ISNs is well worth considering. Furthermore, the role of sulfur in ISNs needs to be further explained by more studies. Moreover, the current research shows that ISNs have an excellent application prospect in tumor therapy, antibacterial, and other major diseases troubling human health, so whether they can really be applied in clinical treatment still need to spend an abundance of time. Last but not least, other biomedical applications of ISNs are worth digging into. These problems need more researchers to devote themselves to more scientific research. We are looking forward to the biomedical applications of ISNs to cure diseases and benefit humanity in the near future effectively.

Author contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct and intellectual contribution to the work, and approved it for publication.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21703198), College Students’ Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program (X20210737) and High-Level Talent Support Plan of Yangzhou University.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  1. Agnihotri S., Mohan T., Jha D., Gautam H. K., Roy I. (2020). Dual modality FeS nanoparticles with reactive oxygen species-induced and photothermal toxicity toward pathogenic bacteria. ACS Omega 5 (1), 597–602. 10.1021/acsomega.9b03177 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Argueta-Figueroa L., Torres-Gómez N., García-Contreras R., Vilchis-Nestor A. R., Martínez-Alvarez O., Acosta-Torres L.(2018). Hydrothermal synthesis of pyrrhotite (Fex-1S) nanoplates and their antibacterial, cytotoxic activity study. Prog. Nat. Sci. Mat. Int. 28 (4), 447–455. 10.1016/j.pnsc.2018.06.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  3. Borkowski A., Kiciński W., Szala M., Topolska J., Działak P., Syczewski M. D. (2020). Interactions of Fe-N-S Co-doped porous carbons with bacteria: Sorption effect and enzyme-like properties. Mater. (Basel) 13 (17), 3707–3721. 10.3390/ma13173707 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dang Z., Guan Y., Wu Z., Tao X., Xiong Y., Bai H., et al. (2021). Regulating the synthesis rate and yield of bio-assembled FeS nanoparticles for efficient cancer therapy. Nanoscale 13 (45), 18977–18986. 10.1039/d1nr03591f [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Ding L., Jiang J., Cheng L., Wang Y., Zhang W., Li D., et al. (2021). Oral administration of nanoiron sulfide supernatant for the treatment of gallbladder stones with chronic cholecystitis. ACS Appl. Bio. Mat. 4 (5), 3773–3785. 10.1021/acsabm.0c01258 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ding W., Liu H., Zhao W., Wang J., Zhang L., Yao Y., et al. (2020). A hybrid of FeS2 nanoparticles encapsulated by two-dimensional carbon sheets as excellent nanozymes for colorimetric glucose detection. ACS Appl. Bio. Mat. 3 (9), 5905–5912. 10.1021/acsabm.0c00605 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dong H., Fan Y., Zhang W., Gu N., Zhang Y. (2019). Catalytic mechanisms of nanozymes and their applications in biomedicine. Bioconjug. Chem. 30 (5), 1273–1296. 10.1021/acs.bioconjchem.9b00171 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fan J., Gu L., Wu D., Liu Z. (2018). Mackinawite (FeS) activation of persulfate for the degradation of p-chloroaniline: Surface reaction mechanism and sulfur-mediated cycling of iron species. Chem. Eng. J. 333, 657–664. 10.1016/j.cej.2017.09.175 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Feng M., Li M., Dai R., Xiao S., Tang J., Zhang X., et al. (2022). Multifunctional FeS2@SRF@BSA nanoplatform for chemo-combined photothermal enhanced photodynamic/chemodynamic combination therapy. Biomater. Sci. 10 (1), 258–269. 10.1039/d1bm01597d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gao J., Liu Y., Xia X., Wang L., Shao L., Cai T., et al. (2019). Mechanisms for photo assisted Fenton of synthesized pyrrhotite at neutral pH. Appl. Surf. Sci. 463, 863–871. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2018.09.007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gao L., Fan K., Yan X. (2017). Iron oxide nanozyme: A multifunctional enzyme mimetic for biomedical applications. Theranostics 7 (13), 3207–3227. 10.7150/thno.19738 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gao L., Yan X. (2013). Discovery and current application of nanozyme. Prog. Biochem. Biophysics 40 (10), 892–902. 10.3724/sp.J.1206.2013.00409 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gao L., Yan X. (2016). Nanozymes: An emerging field bridging nanotechnology and biology. Sci. China Life Sci. 59 (4), 400–402. 10.1007/s11427-016-5044-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gao L., Zhuang J., Nie L., Zhang J., Zhang Y., Gu N., et al. (2007). Intrinsic peroxidase-like activity of ferromagnetic nanoparticles. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2 (9), 577–583. 10.1038/nnano.2007.260 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Huang C., Liu Z., Chen M., Du L., Liu C., Wang S., et al. (2021). Tumor-derived biomimetic nanozyme with immune evasion ability for synergistically enhanced low dose radiotherapy. J. Nanobiotechnology. 19 (1), 457–466. 10.1186/s12951-021-01182-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Huang X., Zhu T., Duan W., Liang S., Li G., Xiao W. (2020). Comparative studies on catalytic mechanisms for natural chalcopyrite-induced Fenton oxidation: Effect of chalcopyrite type. J. Hazard. Mat. 381, 120998–121007. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.120998 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Huang Y., Ren J., Qu X. (2019). Nanozymes: Classification, catalytic mechanisms, activity regulation, and applications. Chem. Rev. 119 (6), 4357–4412. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00672 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kantar C., Oral O., Oz N. A. (2019). Ligand enhanced pharmaceutical wastewater treatment with Fenton process using pyrite as the catalyst: Column experiments. Chemosphere 237, 124440–124447. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.124440 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Lai L., He Y., Zhou H., Huang B., Yao G., Lai B. (2021). Critical review of natural iron-based minerals used as heterogeneous catalysts in peroxide activation processes: Characteristics, applications and mechanisms. J. Hazard. Mat. 416, 125809–125828. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125809 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Levy M., Courtney C. M., Chowdhury P. P., Ding Y., Grey E. L., Goodman S. M., et al. (2018). Assessing different reactive oxygen species as potential antibiotics: Selectivity of intracellular superoxide generation using quantum dots. ACS Appl. Bio. Mat. 1 (2), 529–537. 10.1021/acsabm.8b00292 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Liu Z., Qu X. (2019). New insights into nanomaterials combating bacteria: ROS and beyond. Sci. China Life Sci. 62 (1), 150–152. 10.1007/s11427-018-9417-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ltaïef A. H., Pastrana-Martínez L. M., Ammar S., Gadri A., Faria J. L., Silva A. M. T. (2018). Mined pyrite and chalcopyrite as catalysts for spontaneous acidic pH adjustment in Fenton and LED photo-Fenton-like processes. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 93 (4), 1137–1146. 10.1002/jctb.5472 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lunin A. V., Lizunova A. A., Mochalova E. N., Yakovtseva M. N., Cherkasov V. R., Nikitin M. P., et al. (2020). Hematite nanoparticles from unexpected reaction of ferrihydrite with concentrated acids for biomedical applications. Molecules 25 (8), 1984–1995. 10.3390/molecules25081984 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Meng X., Li D., Chen L., He H., Wang Q., Hong C., et al. (2021). High-performance self-cascade pyrite nanozymes for apoptosis-ferroptosis synergistic tumor therapy. ACS Nano 15 (3), 5735–5751. 10.1021/acsnano.1c01248 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Nie X., Xia L., Wang H., Chen G., Wu B., Zeng T., et al. (2019). Photothermal therapy nanomaterials boosting transformation of Fe(III) into Fe(II) in tumor cells for highly improving chemodynamic therapy. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 11 (35), 31735–31742. 10.1021/acsami.9b11291 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Miao Z., Chen S., Xu C. Y., Ma Y., Qian H., Xu Y., et al. (2019). PEGylated rhenium nanoclusters: A degradable metal photothermal nanoagent for cancer therapy. Chem. Sci. 10 (21), 5435–5443. 10.1039/c9sc00729f [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Pasha A. M. K., Hosseini M., Fakhri A., Gupta V. K., Agarwal S. (2019). Investigation of photocatalytic process for iron disulfide-bismuth oxide nanocomposites by using response surface methodology: Structural and antibacterial properties. J. Mol. Liq. 289, 110950–110957. 10.1016/j.molliq.2019.110950 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Peng X., Liu J., Ming C., Li B., Zhao Z., Ye K., et al. (2020). AgFeS2 nanoparticles as a novel photothermal platform for effective artery stenosis therapy. Nanoscale 12 (20), 11288–11296. 10.1039/d0nr01587c [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Ren H., Yong J., Yang Q., Yang Z., Liu Z., Xu Y., et al. (2021). Self-assembled FeS-based cascade bioreactor with enhanced tumor penetration and synergistic treatments to trigger robust cancer immunotherapy. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 11 (10), 3244–3261. 10.1016/j.apsb.2021.05.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Song C., Liu H., Zhang L., Wang J., Zhao C., Xu Q., et al. (2022). FeS nanoparticles embedded in 2D carbon nanosheets as novel nanozymes with peroxidase-like activity for colorimetric and fluorescence assay of H2O2 and antioxidant capacity. Sens. Actuators B. Chem. 353, 131131–131138. 10.1016/j.snb.2021.131131 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Sutrisno L., Hu Y., Hou Y., Cai K., Li M., Luo Z. (2020). Progress of iron-based nanozymes for antitumor therapy. Front. Chem. 8, 680–688. 10.3389/fchem.2020.00680 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wang X., Zhong X., Lei H., Geng Y., Zhao Q., Gong F., et al. (2019). Hollow Cu2Se nanozymes for tumor photothermal-catalytic therapy. Chem. Mat. 31 (16), 6174–6186. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b01958 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Wang X., Zhong X., Li J., Liu Z., Cheng L. (2021a). Inorganic nanomaterials with rapid clearance for biomedical applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 50 (15), 8669–8742. 10.1039/d0cs00461h [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Wang Z., Wang Y., Guo H., Yu N., Ren Q., Jiang Q., et al. (2021b). Synthesis of one-for-all type Cu5FeS4 nanocrystals with improved near infrared photothermal and Fenton effects for simultaneous imaging and therapy of tumor. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 592, 116–126. 10.1016/j.jcis.2021.02.037 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Wu F., Zhang Q., Zhang M., Sun B., She Z., Ge M., et al. (2020). Hollow porous carbon coated FeS2-based nanocatalysts for multimodal imaging-guided photothermal, starvation, and triple-enhanced chemodynamic therapy of cancer. ACS Appl. Mat. Interfaces 12 (9), 10142–10155. 10.1021/acsami.0c00170 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Wu K., Zhu D., Dai X., Wang W., Zhong X., Fang Z., et al. (2022). Bimetallic oxide Cu1.5Mn1.5O4 cage-like frame nanospheres with triple enzyme-like activities for bacterial-infected wound therapy. Nano Today 43, 101380–101391. 10.1016/j.nantod.2022.101380 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Xi J., An L., Huang Y., Jiang J., Wang Y., Wei G., et al. (2021). Ultrasmall FeS2 nanoparticles-decorated carbon spheres with laser-mediated ferrous ion release for antibacterial therapy. Small 17 (13), 2005473–2005484. 10.1002/smll.202005473 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Xie C., Cen D., Ren Z., Wang Y., Wu Y., Li X., et al. (2020). FeS@BSA nanoclusters to enable H2S-amplified ROS-based therapy with MRI guidance. Adv. Sci. (Weinh) 7 (7), 1903512–1903520. 10.1002/advs.201903512 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Xu Z., Qiu Z., Liu Q., Huang Y., Li D., Shen X., et al. (2018). Converting organosulfur compounds to inorganic polysulfides against resistant bacterial infections. Nat. Commun. 9, 3713–3725. 10.1038/s41467-018-06164-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Yang W. S., Stockwell B. R. (2016). Ferroptosis: Death by lipid peroxidation. Trends. Cell. Biol. 26 (3), 165–176. 10.1016/j.tcb.2015.10.014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Yang W., Yang X., Zhu L., Chu H., Li X., Xu W. (2021). Nanozymes: Activity origin, catalytic mechanism, and biological application. Coord. Chem. Rev. 448, 214170–214184. 10.1016/j.ccr.2021.214170 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Yao B. Y., Tian Z., Wu H. Y., Ma L. M. (2021). Generative models for predicting chemical composition of gallstones. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 25 (5), 2245–2251. 10.26355/eurrev_202103_25256 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Yuan Y., Wang L., Gao L. (2020). Nano-sized iron sulfide: Structure, synthesis, properties, and biomedical applications. Front. Chem. 8, 818–833. 10.3389/fchem.2020.00818 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Zhan M., Yu X., Zhao W., Peng Y., Peng S., Li J. (2022). Extracellular matrix-degrading STING nanoagonists for mild NIR-II photothermal-augmented chemodynamic-immunotherapy. J. Nanobiotechnology. 20 (1), 23–39. 10.1186/s12951-021-01226-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Zhang L., Xie X., Yuan Y., Chai Y., Yuan R. (2019). FeS2−AuNPs nanocomposite as mimicking enzyme for constructing signal‐off sandwich‐type electrochemical immunosensor based on electroactive nickel hexacyanoferrate as matrix. Electroanalysis 31 (6), 1019–1025. 10.1002/elan.201800827 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. Zhang X., Deng H., Zhang G., Yang F., Yuan G. (2020). Natural bornite as an efficient and cost-effective persulfate activator for degradation of tetracycline: Performance and mechanism. Chem. Eng. J. 381, 122717–122726. 10.1016/j.cej.2019.122717 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  47. Zhu D., Ling R., Chen H., Lyu M., Qian H., Wu K., et al. (2022). Biomimetic copper single-atom nanozyme system for self-enhanced nanocatalytic tumor therapy. Nano Res. 15 (8), 7320–7328. 10.1007/s12274-022-4359-6 [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Chemistry are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES