Skip to main content
Journal of Experimental Botany logoLink to Journal of Experimental Botany
. 2022 Jun 21;73(16):5625–5633. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erac241

Constant hydraulic supply enables optical monitoring of transpiration in a grass, a herb, and a conifer

Ibrahim Bourbia 1, Christopher Lucani 2, Timothy J Brodribb 3,
Editor: Jianhua Zhang4
PMCID: PMC9467656  PMID: 35727898

The water potential and shrinkage of leaves are shown to be linearly related to transpiration rate in irrigated plants, providing the potential to monitor transpiration using optical methods.

Keywords: Canopy transpiration monitoring, optical dendrometer, root to stem hydraulic conductance, water potential

Abstract

Plant transpiration is an inevitable consequence of photosynthesis and has a huge impact on the terrestrial carbon and water cycle, yet accurate and continuous monitoring of its dynamics is still challenging. Under well-watered conditions, canopy transpiration (Ec) could potentially be continuously calculated from stem water potential (Ψstem), but only if the root to stem hydraulic conductance (Kr-s) remains constant and plant capacitance is relatively small. We tested whether such an approach is viable by investigating whether Kr-s remains constant under a wide range of daytime transpiration rates in non-water-stressed plants. Optical dendrometers were used to continuously monitor tissue shrinkage, an accurate proxy of Ψstem, while Ec was manipulated in three species with contrasting morphological, anatomical, and phylogenetic identities: Tanacetum cinerariifolium, Zea mays, and Callitris rhomboidea. In all species, we found Kr-s to remain constant across a wide range of Ec, meaning that the dynamics of Ψstem could be used to monitor Ec. This was evidenced by the close agreement between measured Ec and that predicted from optically measured Ψstem. These results suggest that optical dendrometers enable both plant hydration and Ec to be monitored non-invasively and continuously in a range of woody and herbaceous species. This technique presents new opportunities to monitor transpiration under laboratory and field conditions in a diversity of woody, herbaceous, and grassy species.

Introduction

Plant transpiration is an unavoidable consequence of biomass production and a key component of the terrestrial water cycle (Schlesinger and Jasechko, 2014). Maximum transpiration generally occurs in moist soil where stomata are not forced to close by leaf water deficit generated directly by drying soil, or by reductions in soil–leaf hydraulic conductivity (Scoffoni and Sack, 2017; Rodriguez-Dominguez and Brodribb, 2019; Carminati and Javaux, 2020; Abdalla et al., 2021; Bourbia et al., 2021). Quantifying the dynamic behaviour of transpiration under non-stressed conditions is necessary to explain the atmospheric cycling as well as temporal dynamics of carbon assimilation and plant water use under varying atmospheric conditions (Brodribb et al., 2020). However, continuous in situ estimation of plant transpiration is still a challenging task due to technical limitations.

Few techniques have been developed to continuously quantify transpiration at the plant level. Sap flow measurement is perhaps the most commonly applied method, but this has limited temporal resolution and is typically restricted to measuring woody plants (Granier, 1987; Steppe et al., 2015; Tfwala et al., 2018). Gravimetric methods can provide precise information, but are really only suitable for small (potted) plants (Herbst et al., 1996). Other methods relying on meteorological variables, such as the Bowen ratio energy balance (Spittlehouse and Black, 1980; Malek and Bingham, 1993) or eddy covariance systems (Baldocchi et al., 2001; Williams et al., 2004), and satellite-based remote sensing combined with complex modelling (Allen et al., 2007; Senay et al., 2013; Reyes-González et al., 2018) have been also employed for larger scale measurements. However, these techniques are unable to partition soil and plant water loss and differentiate transpiration between species in spatially heterogenous environments (Tang et al., 2006; Schlesinger and Jasechko, 2014; Bai et al., 2019; Nelson et al., 2020). Therefore, they are unsuitable for studying temporal dynamics of a species-specific water budget or competition for water between different species.

Canopy transpiration (Ec) is strongly influenced by plant hydraulic conductance, mainly root–stem conductance (Kr-s; here denoting the flow path from the root surface to the stem xylem) which is known to be the lowest within the liquid component of the soil–plant–atmosphere continuum and the most sensitive to water stress (Brodribb and Cochard, 2009; Rodriguez-Dominguez and Brodribb, 2019; Bourbia et al., 2020, 2021). The relationship between Kr-s and Ec can be described using Darcy’s law in the form Ec= Kr-s×ΔΨ (Equation 1) (Sperry et al., 1998), where ΔΨ is the water potential difference between the root surface (Ψsoil) and the stem xylem (Ψstem). Based on Equation 1, if Kr-s remains constant when Ec changes, clearly ΔΨ should be directly proportional to the Ec at equilibrium. In this case ΔΨ could be used as a sensitive proxy for Ec. Clearly this approach would not be valid under conditions of drought because Kr-s has been shown to decline drastically during the early stages of water stress (around –1 MPa; Ψsoil), triggering stomatal closure in different species (Blizzard and Boyer, 1980; North and Nobel, 1991; Cuneo et al., 2016, 2021; Rodriguez-Dominguez and Brodribb, 2019; Bourbia et al., 2021). However, under relatively wet soils (0≥ Ψsoil≥ –1 MPa), where most transpiration typically occurs, Kr-s may be sufficiently stable to allow monitoring by ΔΨ proxy. Yet this assumption of constant Kr-s in unstressed plants is still uncertain due to various reports that root K changes in response to Ec (Boyer, 1985). Some studies argue that, in well-watered plants, ΔΨ remains constant over a wide range of Ec rates, suggesting that Kr-s is dynamic (i.e. Kr-s increases and decreases with diurnally changing Ec) (Macklon and Weatherley, 1965; Tinklin and Weatherley, 1966; Aston and Lawlor, 1979; Black, 1979). A similar number of papers present data indicating, on the contrary, that ΔΨ varies in a linear manner with Ec in other species, indicating constant Kr-s with changing Ec (Hailey et al., 1973; Neumann et al., 1974; Dubé et al., 1975; Bunce, 1978; Ike et al., 1978; Hirasawa and Ishihara, 1991).

In species displaying constant Kr-s under non-limiting water conditions where Ψsoil was close to zero, Ψstem could be used to monitor Ec, potentially providing a new window into the dynamics of plant water use. However, the main hurdle for employing such an approach is to accurately resolve the dynamics of Ψstem under variable field conditions. Psychrometers are the most widely used instruments for continuous monitoring of the in situ Ψstem. However, their application is limited by installation difficulties, particularly on soft herbaceous plants, and the low degree of stability under fluctuating temperatures (Dainese et al., 2022). Alternatively, several studies have shown that plant Ψstem can be readily estimated, indirectly but accurately, using tissue width variation (e.g. petioles and branchlets) because of the strong linear relationship found between these two parameters across a wide range of Ψstem (Bourbia et al., 2021). Stem width variation can be recorded continuously using automated dendrometers (Klepper et al., 1971; Fereres and Goldhamer, 2003; De Swaef et al., 2009, 2015), but a newly described optical dendrometer provides sufficient resolution to measure changes in tissue width in determinate (non-growing) structures such that changes in petiole or leaf width over extended periods can be used to monitor plant water status (Bourbia et al., 2021). Optical dendrometers thus have the potential to continuously track daily fluctuations in plant transpiration at high temporal resolution using tissue width changes as a proxy for transpiration.

With the aim of assessing the potential for Ec to be monitored optically using dendrometers attached to leaves, we first investigated whether Kr-s is constant or a function of changing Ec in well-watered individuals of three divergent species. We use three phylogenetically, morphologically, and ecologically divergent species—Tanacetum cinerariifolium is a perennial herb with herbaceous roots, Zea mays is a grassy monocot which also has herbaceous roots, and Callitris rhomboidea is a hardy conifer with woody roots—in an attempt to test the generality of our findings. Establishing that Kr-s remains static in each species, we test the accuracy of predicting dynamic Ec from variation in petiole or leaf shrinkage.

Materials and methods

Plant material and growth conditions

Plants of Tanacetum cinerariifolium (Trevir.) Sch. Bip, Zea mays L, and Callitris rhomboidea R. Br. ex A. Rich. & Rich. were grown from seeds or rootstock (in the case of T. cinerariifolium) in glasshouse facilities at the University of Tasmania. Due to the different growth characteristics of the species, plants were potted in the optimum growth medium which was different for the different species. Tanacetum cinerariifolium plants were grown in 5 litre pots containing natural soil (clay) obtained from northwest Tasmania where it is grown commercially. The woody C. rhomboidea seedlings ranged from 30 cm to 40 cm in height and were potted in 2 litre pots using potting mix (medium 7:4 mix of composted fine pine bark and coarse washed river sand). Zea mays plants were gown in 2 litre pots filled with loamy soil. All plants were grown under unfiltered natural light in a controlled glasshouse cell at 25/15 °C day/night temperature and 40/80% day/night relative humidity (RH), and were watered daily to field capacity. Plants of Z. mays, T. cinerariifolium, and C. rhomboidea used in this experiment were ~2, 6, and 14 months old, respectively.

K r-s response to changes in Ec

K r-s was determined at high and low rates of steady-state whole plant transpiration (Ec, mmol m−2 s−1) to verify whether it is static or dependent on Ec or Ψstem. Kr-s was calculated based on the normal application of Darcy’s law standardized to viscosity of water at 20 °C:

Krs = Ec Ψ soil Ψ stem   (2)

This was done by simultaneously and continuously measuring Ec and Ψstem in well-watered plants subjected to different transpirational demands by manipulating RH in a controlled chamber as described below. Ψsoil was assumed to be 0 MPa because pots were watered before and throughout measurements. Steady-state conditions refer here to conditions where both Ec and corresponding Ψstem are at steady state under stable RH, meaning that the plant capacitance effect is negligible.

Continuous measurements of Ec and Ψstem

On the evening preceding measurements, pots of four plants per species were watered and allowed to drain excess water then covered with a plastic bag to prevent evaporation from the soil. Plants were then transferred to a well-ventilated controlled-environment chamber, placed on computer-interfaced balances, and weighed continuously (every 5 min) to an accuracy of ±0.01 g (model PG5002-S; Mettler Toledo, Columbus, OH, USA). In each individual plant, a high-resolution automated optical dendrometer (Cavicam Co, Hobart, Australia) (for details see www.cavicam.co and Bourbia et al., 2021) was attached to a mature (non-growing) petiole (T. cinerariifolium), leaf blade (Z. mays), and terminal branchlet (C. rhomboidea). The optical dendrometer was used to monitor width variation continuously (at 1–5 min intervals) from which the temporal dynamics of Ψstem could be inferred (see calibration details below) during Ec measurements.

Prior to the transpiration treatments, plants were left in the dark during the night at 20 °C (for T. cinerariifolium and C. rhomboidea) and 25 °C (for Z. mays), and high RH (~90%). During the next morning, plants were illuminated at a photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) of 450 μmol quanta m−2 s−1 (at the canopy level) and RH was decreased to ~70% [vapour pressure deficit (VPD)=0.6 kPa for T. cinerariifolium and C. rhomboidea; VPD=1 kPa for Z. mays] and sustained using a commercial humidifier (SeccoUltra 00563, Olimpia-Splendid, Gualtieri, Italy) until Ec and leaf width reached stability and remained steady for at least 1–2 h, then RH was decreased to ~40–26% (VPD=1.6 kPa for T. cinerariifolium and C. rhomboidea; VPD=2.4 kPa for Z. mays) and maintained at this level using a dehumidifier until Ec and width reached a new steady state and remained stable for at least 1–2 h (Fig. 1). RH levels in the chamber were always modified in a regular sequence; from high RH in the morning to low RH at mid-day as described above. Temperature was held constant throughout measurement irrespective of RH change and was maintained at the same level as night temperature.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

The response of stem water potential (Ψstem; black line), inferred from foliar width variation measured continuously with optical dendrometers, to changes in whole-plant transpiration (Ec; red line) measured gravimetrically in one representative individual of Z. mays, T. cinerariifoliumm, and C. rhomboidea subjected to two RH levels under well-watered conditions. Temporal dynamics of Ψstem were monitored at 1 min intervals in Z. mays and at 5 min intervals in T. cinerariifolium and C. rhomboidea. The vertical dashed lines represent the time at which RH was decreased from 70% to 40–30%. Grey background, PPFD=0 μmol m–2 s–1; white background, PPFD=450 μmol m–2 s–1. Arrows indicate when pots were watered.

Foliar width was calibrated against Ψstem measured with a Scholander chamber (PMS, Albany, OR, USA) in each individual plant across a range of 2–3 Ψstem values encompassing the maximum range observed during transpiration treatments. These measurements were performed on non-transpiring mature leaves in T. cinerariifolium, branchlets in C. rhomboidea, and the tips of the uppermost fully expanded leaves in Z. mays (15 cm in length=one-third of the total leaf length) that were enclosed in a plastic bag covered with aluminium foil the night before measurements. One measurement was made in the dark before switching on the lights and the others were made at the two levels of RH to which the plants were exposed after width had reached a steady state.

Soil temperature in the centre of the pot was monitored using a thermocouple connected to a datalogger (CR850, Campbell Scientific, Logan, UT, USA). Soil temperature reached air temperature during the night, and both remained constant during measurements throughout the day (within 0.5 °C) independent of RH change.

Air temperature and RH in the growth chamber were monitored at 30 s interval with a temperature/humidity probe (HMP45AC; Vaisala Inc., Helsinki, Finland) placed close to the measured plants, and logged on the same datalogger.

During measurements, water lost by transpiration was added at the top of the pot periodically to avoid any drop in soil water potential (or soil hydraulic conductance) especially at high transpiration after decreasing RH. The water added into the soil was at the same temperature as the soil. Ec was normalized by the projected canopy leaf area measured at the end of the experiment with a flatbed scanner in all species.

Predicting Ec from optically monitored Ψstem dynamics using a constant Kr-s

According to Equation 2, if Kr-s remains constant, Ec can be estimated from Ψstem after correcting for viscosity. In each individual plant, we used plant-specific Kr-s values (corrected for changes in viscosity due to soil temperature) measured at high RH (and less negative Ψstem) to estimate Ec in the same individual at low RH from Ψstem inferred from petiole/leaf width measured with the optical dendrometer. This predicted Ec was compared with Ec measured gravimetrically under these conditions. To determine the error associated with using species mean Kr-s rather than individual Kr-s, mean measured Kr-s of each species was also used to predict Ec in individual plants of each species at varying measured Ψstem levels, and the values were compared with the measured Ec values.

Statistical analysis

Differences between species mean values of Kr-s were tested with Student’s t-tests after testing for normality and homogeneity of variances. We used linear regressions to quantify the correlation between tissue width variation and Ψstem in each plant individual used for Kr-s measurements. Results are presented as mean values ±SE. Differences were considered to be significant when P<0.05. The accuracy of predicted Ec relative to the observed Ec was computed using the mean absolute percentage error metric: MAEP=100nni=1|AiBiAi|, where Ai is the actual value, Bi is the predicted value, and n is the total number of observations. All analyses were performed using R version 3.5.3 (R Core Team, 2019). Figures were created using Sigmaplot version 12.5 (Systat Software Inc., San Jose, CA, USA).

Results

Leaf width monitored continuously with optical dendrometers was highly linearly correlated with measured Ψstem in each individual plant (r2=0.99, P<0.001) (Supplementary Fig. S1), allowing the Ψstem dynamics to be predicted at high temporal resolution and in situ from leaf/petiole width variation. Changes in Ψstem, inferred from leaf/petiole width changes, followed Ec changes closely in all species (Fig. 1). Based on the calibrated optical dendrometers, Ψstem was found to fall and reach a new steady state quickly (within 30 min) once Ec increased in all species. There was no lag between Ec and a resultant change in Ψstem under non-steady-state conditions either in the morning after turning on the lights or at mid-day after changing RH (i.e. both Ec and Ψstem reached steady state at the same time).

Mean Kr-s varied considerably among species (P<0.05) and was significantly higher in the monocot Z. mays (6.94 ± 0.75 mmol m−2 s−1 MPa−1) and the herbaceous T. cinerariifolium (5.48 ± 0.16 mmol m−2 s−1 MPa) compared with the woody C. rhomboidea (3.84 ± 0.37 mmol m−2 s−1 MPa; Fig. 2). However, due to the variability in Kr-s among Z. mays plants (SD=22%), differences in mean Kr-s between this species and T. cinerariifolium were not significant. Significant variability in Kr-s was also observed between plants in C. rhomboidea (SD=19%) but it was very small in T. cinerariifolium (SD=6%).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Mean measured root to stem hydraulic conductance (Kr-s) in Z. mays, T. cinerariifolium, and C. rhomboidea under well-watered conditions (n=4±SE). Different letters indicate statistically significant differences at P<0.05.

Constancy in Kr-s

Across a range of RH designed to simulate typical daytime conditions, the steady-state Ec and Ψstem remained in constant proportion in each individual plant of the three species (Fig. 3), revealing a constant Kr-s with changing Ec in all species (Fig. 4). As a result, Kr-s also remained constant alongside changing Ψstem in all species (Fig. 5).

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Response of stem water potential (Ψstem) to changes in whole-plant transpiration (Ec) achieved by varying RH in each individual plant of Z. mays, T. cinerariifolium, and C. rhomboidea under well-watered conditions. Both Ψstem and Ec presented here were in the steady state. Each colour represents an individual measured at high RH (circle) and low RH (triangle).

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Response of root to stem hydraulic conductance (Kr-s) to the increase in whole-plant transpiration (Ec) induced by lowering RH in individual plants of Z. mays, T. cinerariifolium, and C. rhomboidea under well-watered conditions. Each colour represents an individual measured at high RH (circle) and low RH (triangle).

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Response of root to stem hydraulic conductance (Kr-s) to decreasing stem water potential (Ψstem) induced by increasing whole-plant transpiration (Ec) in each individual plant of Z. mays, T. cinerariifolium, and C. rhomboidea under well-watered conditions.

Predicted versus observed Ec

According to Equation 2 applied during steady-state, the constancy of Kr-s should enable Ec to be predicted from monitored values of Ψstem (as measured by the optical dendrometer). In each individual plant, the predicted values for Ec at low RH calculated from individual Kr-s measured at high RH closely followed a 1:1 line (R2=0.92) and were within 5% (MAEP) of the measured values (Fig. 6A).

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

(A) Observed whole-plant transpiration (Ec) measured at low RH compared with predicted values determined using individual Kr-s calculated at high RH. (B) Observed whole-plant transpiration (Ec) compared with predicted values at low and high RH calculated using mean species Kr-s. Circles and triangles in (B) refer to values Ec predicted at high and low RH, respectively.

High predictive accuracy in Ec was also achieved when the species average Kr-s was used to estimate Ec at the individual level in the herbaceous T. cinerariifolium (R2=0.97, MAEP=6%) (Fig. 6B). However, this accuracy was limited by the substantial variation in the species mean Kr-s measured in Z. mays (R2=0.69, MAEP=14%) and C. rhomboidea (R2=0.48, MAEP=16%)

Discussion

K r-s remains constant with changing Ec

Our results demonstrated conclusively that, under steady-state conditions in hydrated soil, Ψstem varies in a proportional manner with Ec, indicating that Kr-s remains constant with changing Ec in the three distinctly different species studied here (Figs 3, 4). Our results are consistent with those observed in several other species such as cotton, pea, cassava, rice, and sunflower (Hailey et al., 1973; Ike et al., 1978; Passioura, 1980; McBurney and Costigan, 1982; Hirasawa and Ishihara, 1991), and extend those presented by Neumann et al. (1974) and Dubé et al. (1975) for Z. mays. The consistent lack of variation in Kr-s in response to changes in Ec observed across our experimental species suggests that this is a consistent pattern across seed plants. Nevertheless, some studies reported Kr-s to vary with Ec in species grown in hydroponics (Macklon and Weatherley, 1965; Tinklin and Weatherley, 1966; Aston and Lawlor, 1979; Black, 1979). Macklon and Weatherley (1965) suggested that the decrease in Ψstem with increasing Ec usually observed in soil-rooted plants under field conditions is due to the steady drop in the hydraulic conductance of the rhizosphere (at the soil–root interface), occurring when water is absorbed more quickly at the root surface than it is replaced by that moving from untapped soils, even in well-watered conditions. They also argued that this does not occur in hydroponically grown plants because roots are constantly surrounded with water. Local dehydration around the root would violate the assumption in Equation 2 that soil Ψsoil=0 MPa. Here we avoided this possible error in Kr-s calculation by carefully adding water to the pot to ensure the water content remained saturated throughout the experiment. Furthermore, we did not observe any change in steady-state Ec or Ψstem after the addition of water at high transpirational demands (i.e. at RH=30%), suggesting that rhizosphere water potential remained close to zero (Fig. 1) and that our calculation of constant Kr-s was correct. Water flows radially across the root cylinder (from the root surface to the stele/xylem) along two parallel apoplastic and symplastic pathways, the latter being mediated by aquaporins. The discrepancy between our results and those discussed above regarding the constancy of Kr-s with changing Ec may be attributed to differences in the relative contribution of the apoplastic and cell to cell pathways to the whole Kr-s between different species during transpiration due to differences in root morphological and anatomical features (Kim et al., 2018). A cell to cell transport of water has been shown to dominate in roots of some species such as barely (Steudle and Jeschke, 1983; Knipfer and Fricke, 2010) and bean (Steudle and Brinckmann, 1989), but to play a minor role in roots of maize (Steudle et al., 1987), cotton (Radin and Matthews, 1989), and grapevine (Gambetta et al., 2013) (i.e. water flows mostly through the apoplastic pathway). If water flows predominantly through the cell to cell pathway during transpiration, then Kr-s may change with Ec due to changes in aquaporin expression or activity (Maurel, 1997; Javot and Maurel, 2002; Knipfer and Fricke, 2011; Laur and Hacke, 2013). In the three species measured here, the constancy of Kr-s with changing Ec suggests that water flow in the roots follows a largely apoplastic pathway during transpiration under natural conditions.

In this study, Kr-s measured using the gravimetric method remained constant alongside decreasing Ψstem induced by increasing Ec in all species. This behaviour has also been demonstrated by Bourbia et al. (2021) in roots of T. cinerariifolium and C. rhomboidea measured with a non-steady-state rehydration technique over a wide range of Ψsoil induced by drought (between –0.35 MPa and –1 MPa). This observation contrasts with that of a recent study in cotton (Wang et al., 2020) which reported Kr-s to decline by >50% as Ψstem fell marginally from 0 MPa to –0.16 MPa. This surprisingly high sensitivity of Kr-s to water potential was measured on small segments of roots using the centrifuge technique which is known to produce contrasting results in roots depending on the pressure gradient protocols used (Bouche et al., 2015). Our data support the conclusions of Bouche et al. (2015) that very high sensitivity of Kr-s to water deficit seen in centrifuge studies may be artefactual. However, it remains a possibility that a high sensitivity of Kr-s to water stress observed in cotton compared with other species could also be attributed to physiological and morphological differences between these species. Testing Kr-s in intact cotton plants would be a valuable step to confirm these results.

Constancy of Kr-s allows in situ estimation of Ec from optically measured Ψstem

The constancy of Kr-s observed here indicates that the dynamics of Ec can be calculated from Ψstem when it is at steady state according to Equation 2. The validity of using Ψstem as a proxy for Ec was evidenced by the strong agreement between gravimetrically measured Ec and that calculated from steady-state Ψstem at varying transpirational demands in all species (Fig. 6). The ability to continuously monitor Ψstemin situ using optical dendrometers, as demonstrated in this study (Fig. 1), provides a promising approach for tracking Ec changes on a fine temporal scale in both woody and soft herbaceous species.

Unlike other plant-based methods, such as sap flux methods, optical dendrometers are very simple and easy to install, insensitive to external temperature variation, and very responsive to rapid changes in Ψstem (Fig. 1). Compared with microclimatological techniques (Bowen ratio and eddy covariance) which provide estimates of evapotranspiration, incorporating both plant and soil water loss (Williams et al., 2004; Tang et al., 2006; Schlesinger and Jasechko, 2014; Perez-Priego et al., 2018), the optical technique measures plant transpiration alone, thus making it suitable for studying spatial and temporal dynamics of species-specific water use and carbon assimilation in mixed stands, and the responses to changes in climate in both natural and agricultural systems. This method can also be used, if scaled up to stand or regional level, as an independent ground-based method to validate models partitioning evaporation and vegetation transpiration (Lawrence et al., 2007; Sutanto et al., 2012), and as a tool to quantify irrigation demands in agricultural systems.

Optical estimation of Ec under non-steady state conditions

The highly accurate estimations of Ec from optically derived Ψstem observed in the studied species were restricted to periods of steady-state conditions with no influence of plant capacitance (internal stored water). However, under field conditions, Ec may fluctuate substantially and rapidly over the course of the day in response to variations in climatic conditions, and seldom reaches a steady state (Jones et al., 1982). In this case, the use of a steady-state model to predict instantaneous and fast changes of Ec from optically measured Ψstem can be valid only if the plant capacitance is negligible or its contribution to Ec is accounted for.

Conclusion

The constancy of Kr-s under varying transpirational demands observed in this study was a common feature among different species. This means that the optical technique presented here can probably be used to estimate Ec in real-time in diverse plant species under steady-state conditions. Yet, further work is necessary to elucidate the applicability of this technique in monitoring instantaneous non-steady changes of transpiration under non-steady atmospheric conditions over the long term.

Supplementary data

The following supplementary data are available at JXB online.

Fig. S1. Relationship between foliar tissue width and Ψstem.

erac241_suppl_supplementary_figure_S1

Acknowledgements

We thank Michelle Lang for glasshouse assistance.

Contributor Information

Ibrahim Bourbia, School of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tas, Australia.

Christopher Lucani, School of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tas, Australia.

Timothy J Brodribb, School of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tas, Australia.

Jianhua Zhang, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong.

Author contributions

IB and TB: conceptualization; IB and CL: design of the experiment; IB: data collection and analysis; IB: writing, with revisions by TB.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Funding

This work was funded by the Tasmania Graduate Research Scholarship (Training Program Scholarship to IB), the Australian Research Council (LP170100103), Botanical Resources Australia Pty Ltd, and the ARC Centre of Excellence for Plant Success in Nature and Agriculture.

Data availability

The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, Timothy Brodribb, upon request.

References

  1. Abdalla M, Carminati A, Cai G, Javaux M, Ahmed MA.. 2021. Stomatal closure of tomato under drought is driven by an increase in soil–root hydraulic resistance. Plant, Cell & Environment 44, 425–431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Allen RG, Tasumi M, Trezza R.. 2007. Satellite-based energy balance for mapping evapotranspiration with internalized calibration (METRIC)—model. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 133, 380–394. [Google Scholar]
  3. Aston MJ, Lawlor DW.. 1979. The relationship between transpiration, root water uptake, and leaf water potential. Journal of Experimental Botany 30, 169–181. [Google Scholar]
  4. Bai Y, Li X, Zhou S, et al. 2019. Quantifying plant transpiration and canopy conductance using eddy flux data: an underlying water use efficiency method. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 271, 375–384. [Google Scholar]
  5. Baldocchi D, Falge E, Gu L, et al. 2001. FLUXNET: a new tool to study the temporal and spatial variability of ecosystem-scale carbon dioxide, water vapor, and energy flux densities. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 82, 2415–2434. [Google Scholar]
  6. Black CR. 1979. The relationship between transpiration rate, water potential, and resistances to water movement in sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Journal of Experimental Botany 30, 235–243. [Google Scholar]
  7. Blizzard WE, Boyer JS.. 1980. Comparative resistance of the soil and the plant to water transport. Plant Physiology 66, 809–814. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bouche PS, Jansen S, Cochard H, Burlett R, Capdeville G, Delzon S.. 2015. Embolism resistance of conifer roots can be accurately measured with the flow-centrifuge method. Journal of Plant Hydraulics 2, e002. [Google Scholar]
  9. Bourbia I, Carins-Murphy MR, Gracie A, Brodribb TJ.. 2020. Xylem cavitation isolates leaky flowers during water stress in pyrethrum. New Phytologist 227, 146–155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bourbia I, Pritzkow C, Brodribb TJ.. 2021. Herb and conifer roots show similar high sensitivity to water deficit. Plant Physiology 186, 1908–1918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Boyer JS. 1985. Water transport. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 36, 473–516. [Google Scholar]
  12. Brodribb TJ, Cochard H.. 2009. Hydraulic failure defines the recovery and point of death in water-stressed conifers. Plant Physiology 149, 575–584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Brodribb TJ, Powers J, Cochard H, Choat B.. 2020. Hanging by a thread? Forests and drought. Science 368, 261–266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Bunce JA. 1978. Effects of shoot environment on apparent root resistance to water flow in whole soybean and cotton plants. Journal of Experimental Botany 29, 595–601. [Google Scholar]
  15. Carminati A, Javaux M.. 2020. Soil rather than xylem vulnerability controls stomatal response to drought. Trends in Plant Science 25, 868–880. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Cuneo IF, Barrios-Masias F, Knipfer T, Uretsky J, Reyes C, Lenain P, Brodersen CR, Walker MA, McElrone AJ.. 2021. Differences in grapevine rootstock sensitivity and recovery from drought are linked to fine root cortical lacunae and root tip function. New Phytologist 229, 272–283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Cuneo IF, Knipfer T, Brodersen CR, McElrone AJ.. 2016. Mechanical failure of fine root cortical cells initiates plant hydraulic decline during drought. Plant Physiology 172, 1669–1678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Dainese R, de CFL Lopes B, Tedeschi G, Lamarque LJ, Delzon S, Fourcaud T, Tarantino A.. 2022. Cross-validation of the high-capacity tensiometer and thermocouple psychrometer for continuous monitoring of xylem water potential in saplings. Journal of Experimental Botany 73, 400–412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. De Swaef T, De Schepper V, Vandegehuchte MW, Steppe K.. 2015. Stem diameter variations as a versatile research tool in ecophysiology. Tree Physiology 35, 1047–1061. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. De Swaef T, Steppe K, Lemeur R.. 2009. Determining reference values for stem water potential and maximum daily trunk shrinkage in young apple trees based on plant responses to water deficit. Agricultural Water Management 96, 541–550. [Google Scholar]
  21. Dubé PA, Stevenson KR-S, Thurtell GW, Neumann HH.. 1975. Steady state resistance to water flow in corn under well watered conditions. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 55, 941–948. [Google Scholar]
  22. Fereres E, Goldhamer DA.. 2003. Suitability of stem diameter variations and water potential as indicators for irrigation scheduling of almond trees. Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology 78, 139–144. [Google Scholar]
  23. Gambetta GA, Fei J, Rost TL, Knipfer T, Matthews MA, Shackel KA, Walker MA, McElrone AJ.. 2013. Water uptake along the length of grapevine fine roots: developmental anatomy, tissue-specific aquaporin expression, and pathways of water transport. Plant Physiology 163, 1254–1265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Granier A. 1987. Evaluation of transpiration in a Douglas-fir stand by means of sap flow measurements. Tree Physiology 3, 309–320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Hailey JL, Hiler EA, Jordan WR, van Bavel CHM.. 1973. Resistance to water flow in Vigna sinensis L. (Endl.) at high rates of transpiration. Crop Science 13, 264–267. [Google Scholar]
  26. Herbst M, Kappen L, Thamm F, Vanselow R.. 1996. Simultaneous measurements of transpiration, soil evaporation and total evaporation in a maize field in northern Germany. Journal of Experimental Botany 47, 1957–1962. [Google Scholar]
  27. Hirasawa T, Ishihara K.. 1991. On resistance to water transport in crop plants for estimating water uptake ability under intense transpiration. Japanese Journal of Crop Science 60, 174–183. [Google Scholar]
  28. Ike IF, Thurtell GW, Stevenson KR-S.. 1978. The relationship between steady-state transpiration rates and leaf water potential in cassava (Manihot esculenta cv. Llanera). Canadian Journal of Botany 56, 1537–1539. [Google Scholar]
  29. Javot H, Maurel C.. 2002. The role of aquaporins in root water uptake. Annals of Botany 90, 301–313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Jones JW, Zur KJ, Boote KJ, Hammond LC.. 1982. Plant resistance to water flow in field soybeans: I. Non-limiting soil moisture1. Agronomy Journal 74, 92–98. [Google Scholar]
  31. Kim YX, Ranathunge K, Lee S, Lee Y, Lee D, Sung J.. 2018. Composite transport model and water and solute transport across plant roots: an update. Frontiers in Plant Science 9, 193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Klepper B, Browning VD, Taylor HM.. 1971. Stem diameter in relation to plant water status. Plant Physiology 48, 683–685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Knipfer T, Fricke W.. 2010. Root pressure and a solute reflection coefficient close to unity exclude a purely apoplastic pathway of radial water transport in barley (Hordeum vulgare). New Phytologist 187, 159–170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Knipfer T, Fricke W.. 2011. Water uptake by seminal and adventitious roots in relation to whole-plant water flow in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Journal of Experimental Botany 62, 717–733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Laur J, Hacke UG.. 2013. Transpirational demand affects aquaporin expression in poplar roots. Journal of Experimental Botany 64, 2283–2293. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Lawrence DM, Thornton PE, Oleson KW, Bonan GB.. 2007. The partitioning of evapotranspiration into transpiration, soil evaporation, and canopy evaporation in a GCM: impacts on land–atmosphere interaction. Journal of Hydrometeorology 8, 862–880. [Google Scholar]
  37. Macklon AES, Weatherley PE.. 1965. Controlled environment studies of the nature and origins of water deficits in plants. New Phytologist 64, 414–414. [Google Scholar]
  38. Malek E, Bingham GE.. 1993. Comparison of the Bowen ratio-energy balance and the water balance methods for the measurement of evapotranspiration. Journal of Hydrology 146, 209–220. [Google Scholar]
  39. Maurel C. 1997. Aquaporins and water permeability of plant membranes. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 48, 399–429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. McBurney T, Costigan PA.. 1982. Measurement of stem water potential of young plants using a hygrometer attached to the stem. Journal of Experimental Botany 33, 426–431. [Google Scholar]
  41. Nelson JA, Pérez-Priego O, Zhou S, et al. 2020. Ecosystem transpiration and evaporation: insights from three water flux partitioning methods across FLUXNET sites. Global Change Biology 26, 6916–6930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Neumann HH, Thurtell GW, Stevenson KR-S.. 1974. In situ measurements of leaf water potential and resistance to water flow in corn, soybean, and sunflower at several transpiration rates. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 54, 175–184. [Google Scholar]
  43. North G, Nobel P.. 1991. Changes in hydraulic conductivity and anatomy caused by drying and rewetting roots of Agave deserti (Agavaceae). American Journal of Botany 78, 906. [Google Scholar]
  44. Passioura J. 1980. The transport of water from soil to shoot in wheat seedlings. Journal of Experimental Botany 31, 333–345. [Google Scholar]
  45. Perez-Priego O, Katul G, Reichstein M, El-Madany TS, Ahrens B, Carrara A, Scanlon TM, Migliavacca M.. 2018. Partitioning eddy covariance water flux components using physiological and micrometeorological approaches. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences 123, 3353–3370. [Google Scholar]
  46. Radin JW, Matthews MA.. 1989. Water transport properties of cortical cells in roots of nitrogen- and phosphorus-deficient cotton seedlings. Plant Physiology 89, 264–268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. R Core Team. 2019. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. [Google Scholar]
  48. Reyes-González A, Kjaersgaard J, Trooien T, Hay C, Ahiablame L.. 2018. Estimation of crop evapotranspiration using satellite remote sensing-based vegetation index. Advances in Meteorology 2018, e4525021. [Google Scholar]
  49. Rodriguez-Dominguez CM, Brodribb TJ.. 2019. Declining root water transport drives stomatal closure in olive under moderate water stress. New Phytologist 225, 126–134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Schlesinger WH, Jasechko S.. 2014. Transpiration in the global water cycle. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 189–190, 115–117. [Google Scholar]
  51. Scoffoni C, Sack L.. 2017. The causes and consequences of leaf hydraulic decline with dehydration. Journal of Experimental Botany 68, 4479–4496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Senay GB, Bohms S, Singh RK, Gowda PH, Velpuri NM, Alemu H, Verdin JP.. 2013. Operational evapotranspiration mapping using remote sensing and weather datasets: a new parameterization for the SSEB approach. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 49, 577–591. [Google Scholar]
  53. Sperry JS, Adler FR, Campbell GS, Comstock JP.. 1998. Limitation of plant water use by rhizosphere and xylem conductance: results from a model. Plant, Cell & Environment 21, 347–359. [Google Scholar]
  54. Spittlehouse DL, Black TA.. 1980. Evaluation of the Bowen ratio/energy balance method for determining forest evapotranspiration. Atmosphere-Ocean 18, 98–116. [Google Scholar]
  55. Steppe K, Vandegehuchte MW, Tognetti R, Mencuccini M.. 2015. Sap flow as a key trait in the understanding of plant hydraulic functioning. Tree Physiology 35, 341–345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Steudle E, Brinckmann E.. 1989. The osmometer model of the root: water and solute relations of roots of Phaseolus coccineus. Botanica Acta 102, 85–95. [Google Scholar]
  57. Steudle E, Jeschke WD.. 1983. Water transport in barley roots: measurements of root pressure and hydraulic conductivity of roots in parallel with turgor and hydraulic conductivity of root cells. Planta 158, 237–248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Steudle E, Oren R, Schulze ED.. 1987. Water transport in maize roots: measurement of hydraulic conductivity, solute permeability, and of reflection coefficients of excised roots using the root pressure probe. Plant Physiology 84, 1220–1232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Sutanto SJ, Wenninger J, Coenders-Gerrits AMJ, Uhlenbrook S.. 2012. Partitioning of evaporation into transpiration, soil evaporation and interception: a comparison between isotope measurements and a HYDRUS-1D model. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 16, 2605–2616. [Google Scholar]
  60. Tang J, Bolstad PV, Ewers BE, Desai AR, Davis KJ, Carey EV.. 2006. Sap flux-upscaled canopy transpiration, stomatal conductance, and water use efficiency in an old growth forest in the Great Lakes region of the United States. Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences 111. [Google Scholar]
  61. Tfwala CM, van Rensburg LD, Bello ZA, Green SR.. 2018. Calibration of compensation heat pulse velocity technique for measuring transpiration of selected indigenous trees using weighing lysimeters. Agricultural Water Management 200, 27–33. [Google Scholar]
  62. Tinklin R, Weatherley PE.. 1966. On the relationship between transpiration rate and leaf water potential. New Phytologist 65, 509–517. [Google Scholar]
  63. Wang DR, Venturas MD, Mackay DS, Hunsaker DJ, Thorp KR-S, Gore MA, Pauli D.. 2020. Use of hydraulic traits for modeling genotype-specific acclimation in cotton under drought. New Phytologist 228, 898–909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Williams DG, Cable W, Hultine K, et al. 2004. Evapotranspiration components determined by stable isotope, sap flow and eddy covariance techniques. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 125, 241–258. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

erac241_suppl_supplementary_figure_S1

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, Timothy Brodribb, upon request.


Articles from Journal of Experimental Botany are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES