Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Elsevier - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2021 Oct 1;192:4448–4457. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2021.09.222

Conducting a secret ballot elections for virtual meetings

Grzegorz Szyjewski a
PMCID: PMC9468608  PMID: 36117959

Abstract

Communication plays a crucial role in business, education, and generally in everyday people’s interactions. Face-to-face communication has been banned by the COVID-19 pandemic restrictions and had to be replaced with its electronic remote form. Popular digital applications allowed us to switch to online life quite easily. That conversion wasn’t problematic for most (especially young) people. Working online and meeting people virtually became a standard, and people have mostly adapted to the new reality. Moving conventional communication to the Internet wasn’t much challenging, because it was only a matter of existing ICT solutions popularization. They have already existed and were functional, but haven’t been used much often. COVID-19 pandemic changed it permanently because there was no other way as rapid adoption to this unusual situation. Although most of the actions could have been realized online, some were more problematic to conduct electronically. One of them was secret balloting for virtual meetings. As open voting was not much complicated to arrange using remote communication, conduction the secret type of elections was not so obvious. In open voting electors’ data can be revealed and the results may be easily verified when it’s finished. Secret voting demands to remain voters’ data and their choices confidential. That leads to the question of how to verify the users’ identity and voting rights and keep them anonymous at the same time? This paper provides an overview of a person’s remote identification and verification methods, also explores the possibilities of using them for secret voting authentication. Results show that conducting a secret ballot with remote voter authentication is possible. The method was widely described and also applied in a authors’ digital system. A fully functional ICT solution has been tested in real elections across several organizations in Poland, in which present authorities were elected electronically during the COVID-19 lockdown period.

Keywords: virtual voting, secret ballot, electronic election, digital system, COVID-19 pandemic, remote communication

References

  • 1.Fisher J., Languilaire J.-C., Lawthom R., Nieuwenhuis R., Petts R.J., Runswick-Cole K., Yerkes M.A. Community, work, and family in times of COVID-19. Community, Work & Family. 2020;23(3):247–252. doi: 10.1080/13668803.2020.1756568. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Velavan T.P., Meyer C.G. The COVID‐19 epidemic. Tropical Medicine & International Health. 2020;25(3):278–280. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Milne, G. J., & Xie, S. (2020). The Effectiveness of Social Distancing in Mitigating COVID-19 Spread: a modelling analysis. MedRxiv. 10.1101/2020.03.20.20040055 [DOI]
  • 4.McGrail D.J., Dai J., McAndrews K.M., Kalluri R. Enacting national social distancing policies corresponds with dramatic reduction in COVID19 infection rates. Plos One. 2020;15(7):e0236619. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mishra Dr. L., Gupta Dr. T., Shree Dr. A. Online Teaching-Learning in Higher Education during Lockdown Period of COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Educational Research Open. 2020;1:100012. doi: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.DeFilippis E., Impink S., Singell M., Polzer J.T., Sadun R. Collaborating During Coronavirus: The Impact of COVID-19 on the Nature of Work. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2020 doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3654470. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Gabbiadini A., Baldissarri C., Durante F., Valtorta R.R., De Rosa M., Gallucci M. Together Apart: The Mitigating Role of Digital Communication Technologies on Negative Affect During the COVID-19 Outbreak in Italy. Frontiers in Psychology. 2020:11. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.554678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Bottanelli F., Cadot B., Campelo F., Curran S., Davidson P.M., Dey G., Raote I., Straube A., Swaffer M.P. Science during lockdown – from virtual seminars to sustainable online communities. Journal of Cell Science. 2020;133(15) doi: 10.1242/jcs.249607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Anderson D., Kelliher C. Enforced remote working and the work-life interface during lockdown. Gender in Management: An International Journal. 2020 doi: 10.1108/gm-07-2020-0224. ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jones R.E., Abdelfattah K.R. Virtual Interviews in the Era of COVID-19: A Primer for Applicants. Journal of Surgical Education. 2020;77(4) doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.03.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wagner N., Strulak-Wójcikiewicz R. Concerns about the technology used by collaborative platforms - a challenge for managers. Procedia Computer Science. 2020;176:2536–2545. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2020.09.319. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Van Selm M., Jankowski N.W. Conducting Online Surveys. Quality and Quantity. 2006;40(3):435–456. doi: 10.1007/s11135-005-8081-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Qureshi A., Megias D., Rifa-Pous H. SeVEP: Secure and Verifiable Electronic Polling System. IEEE Access. 2019;7:19266–19290. doi: 10.1109/access.2019.2897252. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.NERMEND, K., ALSAKAA, A., BORAWSKA, A., & NIEMCEWICZ, P. (2017). Emotion recognition based on eeg signals during watching video clips. Studies & Proceedings of Polish Association for Knowledge Management, 40–52. http://pszw.edu.pl/images/publikacje/t086_pszw_2017_nermend_alsakaa_borawska_niemcewicz_-_emotion_recognition_based_on_eeg_signals_during_watching_video_clips.pdf
  • 15.Braz, C., & Robert, J.-M. (2006). Security and usability. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Association Francophone d’Interaction Homme-Machine - IHM ‘06. 10.1145/1132736.1132768 [DOI]
  • 16.Patel V.M., Chellappa R., Chandra D., Barbello B. Continuous User Authentication on Mobile Devices: Recent progress and remaining challenges. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine. 2016;33(4):49–61. doi: 10.1109/MSP.2016.2555335. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Szyjewski G. VII. WULS Press; 2010. Remote authentication as a gateway to automate process of non-electronic service offering. in information systems in management; pp. 86–94. (Information Systems in Management). http://isim.wzim.sggw.pl/resources/ISIM_VII_2010.pdf. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Cresitello-Dittmar, B. (2016). Application of the Blockchain For Authentication and Verification of Identity. http://www.cs.tufts.edu/comp/116/archive/fall2016/bcresitellodittmar.pdf
  • 19.Isobe Y., Seto Y., Kataoka M. Development of personal authentication system using fingerprint with digital signature technologies. IEEE Xplore. 2001 doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2001.927272. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Blythe S. Issue 2 Article 3 2005 of the United Nations, European Union, United Kingdom and United States: Promotion of Growth in E-Commerce With Enhanced Security, 11 Rich. J.L. & Tech. 2005;11(2) https://scholarship.richmond.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1238&context=jolt. [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Królikowski T., Susłow W. A Concept of a Training Project IT Management System. Procedia Computer Science. 2019;159:1468–1478. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2019.09.317. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Bauer, L., Bravo-Lillo, C., Fragkaki, E., & Melicher, W. (2013). A comparison of users’ perceptions of and willingness to use Google, Facebook, and Google+ single-sign-on functionality. Proceedings of the 2013 ACM Workshop on Digital Identity Management. 10.1145/2517881.2517886 [DOI]

Articles from Procedia Computer Science are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES