Abstract
Introduction:
Almost every cesarean delivery is done under spinal anesthesia because of ease of doing, rapid onset, avoids maternal and fetal risk of general anesthesia, promotes early recovery. Major complication especially in young women undergoing LSCS under spinal anesthesia is post dural puncture headache (PDPH) which is caused by cerebrospinal fluid leakage. There is wide variation in reported incidence of PDPH (0.3% to 40 %) after spinal anesthesia being affected by various procedure and non procedure related risk factors like age, gender, needle size and type, numbers of spinal attempts and previous history of PDPH.
Methods:
Prospective cohort study was conducted in 335 patients posted for caesarean section under spinal anesthesia from January 2019 to September 2019 in medical College situated in rural India. Spinal anesthesia was given by 26 G Quincke spinal needle. All patients were evaluated for incidence and severity of PDPH from post operative day 1 to day 5.
Result:
Incidence of PDPH was 11.4% in this study. Majority of patients (62.5%) were having mild pain. All patients reported PDPH with 72 hours.
Conclusion:
Body mass index (BMI), h/o PDPH, multiple attempts for successful spinal anesthesia did not have any significant association with PDPH in our study.
KEYWORDS: Cesaren delivery, post dural puncture headache (PDPH), spinal anesthesia, spinal needle
INTRODUCTION
Lower segment cesarean section (LSCS) is one of the most common procedures done in any health-care institution in India, especially in rural settings. Almost every cesarean delivery is done under spinal anesthesia because of its various advantages such as ease of doing and rapid onset, avoids airway instrumentation and maternal and fetal risk of general anesthesia, promotes early recovery, and increases maternal and fetal bonding.[1] However, no procedure is without its complications. Various complications such as hypotension, nausea, vomiting, urinary retention, and postdural puncture headache (PDPH) occur frequently.[2,3]
Major complication, especially in young women undergoing LSCS under spinal anesthesia, is PDPH, which is caused by cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage. According to the International Classification of Headache Disorders criteria, PDPH is a headache that develops within 5 days after dural puncture, which worsens in an upright position and improves with lying down and accompanied by neck stiffness, tinnitus, photophobia, and nausea. The incidence of PDPH after spinal anesthesia varies from 0.3% to 40%.,[4,5,6,7] It is affected by procedure- and nonprocedure-related risk factors such as age, gender, needle size and type, numbers of spinal attempts, and previous history of PDPH. These risk factors can be classified as nonmodifiable and modifiable.[8]
Women for cesarean delivery are at increased risk because of their young age and increased vascular distension response to CSF leakage, due to higher estrogen level during pregnancy.[9]
Untreated PDPH leads to subdural hematoma and even death from bilateral subdural hematomas. It might be leakage of CSF, or reduction in the CSF pressure, could result to brain sagging, with traction on the delicate blood vessels causing to rupture and hematoma.[10]
Various studies have compared the incidence of PDPH after dura cutting and dura separating or pencil tip spinal needle. Dura separating needles definitely have lower incidence of PDPH.[11,12]
Hence, recommendations are laid down to use only dura separating needles for spinal anesthesia. Among dura cutting spinal needles such as Quincke, the incidence of PDPH varies with the size of the needle, being more with larger sizes such as 24, 24G, and 25G. Various studies have assessed the incidence of PDPH after 25 and 26G Quincke in all surgeries under spinal anesthesia in nonobstetrics surgery. However, there is a paucity of data finding the incidence of PDPH in patients undergoing cesarean delivery, specifically by a 26G spinal needle. We conducted this study to find the incidence and association of various risk factors related to PDPH using specifically 26G Quincke needle. Like any other government institution in India, 26G Quincke is the most commonly used and widely available spinal needle (because of low cost and familiarity of using Quincke needle).
Exact pathophysiology of PDPH is not completely understood, but it has been suggested due to disruption of CSF homeostasis. Persistent leakage of CSF from punctured arachnoid layer causes CSF hypotension which causes headache due to bimodal mechanism involving both loss of intracranial support and cerebral dilatation. It results in traction and pressure on pain-sensitive structures inside the skull (dura meter, veins, venous sinuses, and cranial nerves). This sagging of brain is more in the upright position (increase in headache in the upright position). PDPH is one of the most frequent claims for malpractice involving obstetrics anesthesia in the USA.
METHODS
After taking institutional ethical clearance, this prospective cohort study was conducted in 335 patients posted for cesarean section under spinal anesthesia from January 1, 2019, to September 30, 2019, in medical college situated in rural India. After taking informed consent for procedure and participation, patients were shifted inside the operation theater. Patients who refused to participate in the study, or having any contraindication for subarachnoid block such as bacteremia or infection at local site, uncooperative patients, and patients with coagulopathy, hypotension, or refusal for subarachnoid block were excluded from the study.
Baseline information regarding age, body mass index (BMI), history of previous LSCS, and history of PDPH in previous LSCS was noted. Inside the “operation theater,” all patients received standard monitoring (5-lead electrocardiogram, noninvasive blood pressure, and SpO2) and subarachnoid block was given by 26G Quincke spinal needle in sitting position with bevel parallel to long axis of the spine. All procedures were performed by an experienced anesthesiologist. Numbers of attempts taken for successful blocks were noted. After completion of surgery, the patients were kept in the postoperative room. Patients were shifted to the ward as per recovery protocol. From postoperative day 1, daily, all patients were enquired about the PDPH for a total of 5 days. In case of early discharge, patients were enquired through telephonically. PDPH was defined as a characteristic headache, which is more in sitting and ambulation and relieved by lying down and by the presence of one of the following associated factors: neck stiffness, tinnitus, hyperacusia, photophobia, or nausea. Severity of PDPH was rated on “numerical rating scale” from 0 to 10 (NRS-11) as mild, moderate, and severe: 0 is the absence of headache; mild pain: 1–3 (nagging, annoying, and interfering slightly with activities of daily living); moderate: 4–6 (interferes significantly with activities of daily living); and severe: 7–10 (disabling; unable to perform activities of daily living). Patients with a headache were evaluated and given standard treatment for the duration of the headache. The primary outcome of this study was the incidence and risk factors of postdural puncture. The secondary outcome was to measure the severity of PDPH.
Statistical analysis
The data were summarized in the form of mean ± standard deviation for continuous variables and the frequency distribution for categorical variables. Chi-square test of association was applied to investigate the association between each variable and the occurrence of PDPH. Binary logistic regression was performed to determine the adjusted relative risk of these variables on the incidence of PDPH. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. We used SPSS version 20 (SPSS Statistics software IBM, New York, United States) for data entry and analysis.
Based on the body weight and height, BMI (= height/weight [in meter] 2) was calculated for all the patients and BMI grouping of <30 and ≥30 were applied for all the cases. Age grouping was also performed, and the patients were divided into two groups: less than 30 years and greater than 30 years.
RESULTS
Sociodemographic and preoperative characteristics
A total of 335 pregnant mothers were enrolled in the study with fulfilling the criteria. However, this study was conducted on 323 patients. Twelve patients could not be contacted after early discharge either due to wrong mobile number or did not respond to our call. The majority of the respondents (245, 73.13%) were between the ages of 18 and 30 years. The mean age of the respondents was 23.44 ± standard deviation (SD, 4.0) (minimum 18 and maximum 38). 94% of the patients were in nonobese category of BMI. The mean BMI of the respondents was 26.1 ± SD (2.4) (minimum 20 and maximum 32). Almost all of the respondents (144, 96%) were found in ASA Class II, while 6 (4%) of all respondents were found in ASA Class III. Regarding previous history of anesthesia, 71.3% of all respondents had no previous history of anesthesia. Seven patients among previous LSCS patients had a history of PDPH in previous surgery [Table 1].
Table 1.
Sociodemographic and preoperative characteristics of patients, who underwent spinal anesthesia
| Variable | Category | Frequency (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 18-30 | 236 (73.06) |
| 30-40 | 87 (26.9) | |
| Parity | Primigravida | 180 (55.7) |
| Multigravida | 143 (44.2) | |
| ASA class | Class II | 285 (88.2) |
| Class III | 38 (11.7) | |
| BMI | <30 (nonobese) | 280 (86.6) |
| >30 (obese) | 43 (13.3) | |
| Previous history of anesthesia | Yes | 94 (29.1) |
| No | 229 (70.8) | |
| Previous history of PDPH | Yes | 7 (94) (7.4) |
| No | 87 (94) (92.5) |
BMI: Body mass index, ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists, PDPH: Postdural puncture headache
Intraoperative characteristics of the patients who underwent spinal anesthesia
Successful spinal anesthesia was established in 83.5% of the patients. In 20 patients, more than two attempts were taken for establishing spinal anesthesia [Table 2].
Table 2.
Number of attempts
| Variable | Category | Frequency (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Number of attempt | 1 | 270 (83.5) |
| 2 | 33 (10.2) | |
| >2 | 20 (6.1) |
Incidence of postdural puncture headache
A total of 36 patients complained of PDPH. Thus, the overall incidence of PDPH in our study was 11.14% [Figure 1]. Majority of the patients (62.5%) had mild pain. Only three patients had severe pain [Table 3], resulting in longer stay in the hospital. Out of 36 PDPH cases, 52.7% occurred on postoperative day 1. Majority of the patients complained about PDPH within 2 postoperative days [Table 4].
Figure 1.

Incidence of postdural puncture headache in women undergoing lower segment cesarean section under spinal anesthesia (n = 323)
Table 3.
Severity of postdural puncture headache
| Category | Frequency (%) |
|---|---|
| Mild | 23 (63.8) |
| Moderate | 11 (30.5) |
| Severe | 2 (5.5) |
Table 4.
Onset of postdural puncture headache (n=36)
| Postoperative day | Frequency (%) |
|---|---|
| 1 | 19 (52.7) |
| 2 | 17 (47.2) |
| 3 | 2 (0.5) |
| 4 | 0 |
| 5 | 0 |
Association of various risk factors for postdural puncture headache
There was no significant difference in the incidence of headache in different age and BMI groups as shown in [Table 5]
Number of attempts: In our study, successful spinal anesthesia was established in the first attempt in 83.5% of the participants. A total of 20 patients required more than two attempts. PDPH developed in 20% of those patients
Previous history of PDPH: One out of 7 patients with a previous history complained of PDPH.
Table 5.
Association of various risk factors
| Variable | Number of patients with PDPH, n (%) | Number of patients without PDPH, n (%) | P |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age | |||
| <30 (236) | 26 (11.01) | 210 (88.9) | 0.930 |
| >30 (87) | 10 (11.49) | 77 (88.5) | |
| BMI | |||
| <30 (280) | 32 (11.4) | 248 (88.5) | 0.68 |
| >30 (43) | 4 (9.3) | 39 (90.6) | |
| Previous history of PDPH (7) | 1 (14.2) | 6 (85.7) | 0.7 |
| Number of attempts | |||
| 1 (270) | 27 (10) | 243 (90) | 0.29 |
| 2 (33) | 5 (15.1) | 28 (84.8) | |
| >2 (20) | 4 (20) | 16 (80) |
BMI: Body mass index, PDPH: Postdural puncture headache
DISCUSSION
Incidence
PDPH is more common in the young and female compared to the male.13- 18 It is two times more common in nonpregnant women than among men.[19,20,21,22,23,24] Women for cesarean section are particularly at higher risk because of their young age and sex.[25,26,27,28,29,30]
More than 50% of the patients reported symptoms of PDPH on the 1st postoperative day. Majority of the patients presented within 48 h postoperatively. In our study, no patient developed headache after 3rd postoperative day. Lybecker et al. reported that 65% of the patients experienced symptoms within 24 h and 92% within 48 h.[26] Vandam et al. reported that 84.8% of patients presented within 3 days of spinal anesthesia.[27]
CONCLUSION
In our study, the incidence of PDPH with 26G Quincke needle was 11.4%. BMI, age of pregnant women, number of attempts, and previous history of PDPH did not influence the incidence of PDPH.
Financial support and sponsorship
Nil.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES
- 1.Grieff J, Cousins M. Anaesthesia. 2nd ed. London: Blackwell Scientific Publication; 1994. Sub-arachnoid and extradural anaesthesia; pp. 1411–54. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Aftab S, Nur-Ul-Haq S, Ara A, Hassan JA. Post dural puncture headache: comparison of 26G Quincke with 25G Whitacre needle for elective caesarean section. Pak J Surg. 2009;25:257–61. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Malik MA, Farooqi WS, Khan BH, Ishaq M. To compare the frequency and severity of post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) in parturients given spinal anaesthesia with 25 G quincke with that of 25 G whitacre needle. Pak J Med Health Sci. 2012;6:90–3. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Davoudi M, Tarbiat M, Ebadian MR, Hajian P. Effect of position during spinal anesthesia on postdural puncture headache after cesarean section: a prospective, single-blind randomized clinical trial, Anesthesiol. Pain Med. 2016;6:e35486.136–143. doi: 10.5812/aapm.35486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Khraise WN, Allouh MZ, El-Radaideh KM, Said RS, Al-Rusan AM. Assessment of risk factors for postdural puncture headache in women undergoing cesarean delivery in Jordan: a retrospective analytical study, Local Reg. Anesth. 2017;10:9–13. doi: 10.2147/LRA.S129811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kwak KH. Postdural puncture headache. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2017;70:136–43. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2017.70.2.136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Khalid M, Morsy M, Ayman M, Osman M, Omar M, Shaaban M, et al. Post dural puncture headache in fibromyalgia after cesarean section: a comparative cohort study. Pain Physician. 2016:19. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bezov D, Lipton RB, Ashina S. Post-dural puncture headache: Part I diagnosis, epidemiology, etiology, and pathophysiology. Headache. 2010;50:1144–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2010.01699.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kassa AA, Beyen TK, Denu ZA. Post dural puncture headache (PDPH) and associated factors after spinal anesthesia among patients in university of gondar referral and teaching hospital, gondar, north west Ethiopia. J. Anesth. Clin. Res. 2015;6(536):1–6. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Vande K, Bosman S, Parizel P. Intra-cerebral hemorrhage after lumbar myelography. Report Cases and Rev Lit Neurosurg. 1991;8:570e4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Geurts JW, Haanschoten MC, Van Wijk RM, Kraak H, Besse TC. Postdural puncture headache in young patients. A comparative study between the use of 0.52 mm (25 gauge) and 0.33 mm (29 gauge) spinal needles. Acta Anesthesiol Scand. 1999;34:350–3. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1990.tb03101.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Corbey MP, Bach AB, Lech K, Frorup AM. Grading of severity of postdural puncture headache after 27gauge Quincke and Whitacre needles. Acta Anesthesiol Scand. 1997;41:779–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1997.tb04783.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wu CL, Rowlingson AJ, Cohen SR, Michaels RK, Courpas GE, Joe EM, et al. Gender and post–dural puncture headache. Anesthesiology. 2006;105:613–8. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200609000-00027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Choi PT, Galinski SE, Takeuchi L, Lucas S, Tamayo C, Jadad AR. PDPH is a common complication of neuraxial blockade in parturients: A meta analysis of obstetrical studies. Can J Anesth. 2003;50:460–9. doi: 10.1007/BF03021057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Uluer MS, Sargın M, Akın F, Uluer E, Şahin O. A randomized study to evaluate post-dural puncture headache after cesarean section: Comparison with median and paramedian approaches. Niger J Clin Pract. 2019;22:1564–9. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_100_19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pal A, Acharya A, Pal ND, Dawn S, Biswas J. Do pencil-point spinal needles decrease the incidence of postdural puncture headache in reality? A comparative study between pencil-point 25G Whitacre and cutting-beveled 25G Quincke spinal needles in 320 obstetric patients. Anesth Essays Res. 2011;5:162–6. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.94757. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.94757. PMID: 25885381. PMCID: PMC4173408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Vallejo MC, Mandell GL, Sabo DP, Ramanathan S. Postdural puncture headache: A randomized comparison of five spinal needles in obstetric patients. Anesth Analg. 2000;91:916–20. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200010000-00027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hwang JJ, Ho ST, Wang JJ, Liu HS. Post dural puncture headache in cesarean section: comparison of 25-gauge Whitacre with 25- and 26-gauge Quincke needles. Acta Anaesthesiol Sin. 1997;35:33–7. PMID: 9212479. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Nafiu OO, Salam RA, Elegbe EO. Post dural puncture headache in obstetric patients: Experience from a West African teaching hospital. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2007;16:4–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2006.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Corbey MP, Bach AB, Lech K, Frorup AM. Grading of severity of postdural puncture headache after 27gauge Quincke and Whitacre needles. Acta Anesthesiol Scand. 1997;41:779–84. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.1997.tb04783.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ferede YA, Nigatu YA, Agegnehu AF, Mustofa SY. Incidence and associated factors of post dural puncture headache after caesarean section delivery under spinal anesthesia in University of Gondar Comprehensive Specialized Hospital, 2019, cross sectional study. International Journal of Surgery Open. 2021;33:100348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijso.2021.100348. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Peralta F, Higgins N, Lange E, Wong CA, McCarthy RJ. The relationship of body mass index with the incidence of postdural puncture headache in parturients. Anesth Analg. 2015;121:451–6. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Makito K, Matsui H, Fushimi K, Yasunaga H. Incidences and risk factors for post–dural puncture headache after neuraxial anaesthesia: A national inpatient database study in Japan. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care. 2020;48:381–8. doi: 10.1177/0310057X20949555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Miu M, Paech MJ, Nathan E. The relationship between body mass index and post-dural puncture headache in obstetric patients. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2014;23:371–5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2014.06.005. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2014.06.005. Epub 2014 Jun 30. PMID: 25266319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Beyaz SG, Ergönenç T, Saritaş A, Şahin F, Ülgen AM, Eman A, et al. The interrelation between body mass index and post-dural puncture headache in parturient women. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2021;37:425–9. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_249_19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Lybecker H, Moller JT, May O, Nielsen HK. Incidence and prediction of postdural puncture headache. A prospective study of 1021 spinal anesthesias. Anesth Analg. 1990;70:389–94. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199004000-00008. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199004000-00008. PMID: 2316881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Vandam LD, Dripps RD. Long term follow up of the patients who received 10098 spinal anesthetics. JAMA. 1956;161:586–91. doi: 10.1001/jama.1956.02970070018005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Seeberger MD, Kaufmann M, Staender S, Schneider M, Scheidegger D. Repeated dural punctures increase the incidence of postdural puncture headache. Anesth Analg. 1996;82:302–5. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199602000-00015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lybecker H, Moller JT, May O, Nielsen HK. Incidence and prediction of postdural puncture headache. A prospective study of 1021 spinal anesthesias. Anesth Analg. 1990;70:389–94. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199004000-00008. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199004000-00008. PMID: 2316881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Chekol B, Yetneberk T, Teshome D. Prevalence and associated factors of post dural puncture headache among parturients who underwent cesarean section with spinal anesthesia: A systemic review and meta-analysis, 2021. Annals of Medicine and Surgery. 2021;66:102456. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
