Emerging Therapeutic Strategies of Different Immunotherapy Approaches Combined with PD-1/PD-L1 Blockade in Cervical Cancer

Abstract

Currently, therapeutic methods for advanced and recurrent cervical cancer patients are limited and unsatisfactory. Immunotherapy is a promising approach for cancer treatment. However, its investigation and application in cervical cancer remain slow. Although pembrolizumab is a remarkable milestone as the first anti-PD-1 mAb approved by the FDA for treating cervical cancer, it shows relatively low response rate. It is noticed that multiple novel immune checkpoints have emerged in recent years, such as CTLA-4, TIGIT, LAG-3, TIM-3, and A2AR. Accumulated studies have suggested that strategies combining the PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and different immunotherapies or biotherapies could enhance the antitumor efficacy in human cancers. In this review article, we provide an overview of anti-PD-1/PD-L1-based immunotherapy in cervical cancer treatment. We further summarize the developmental strategies of different immunotherapies or biotherapies combined with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade for treating cervical cancer. We also discuss how these new combined therapies increase the therapeutic benefit gained from experimental evidence in cervical cancer.

Introduction

Cervical cancer (CC) ranks fourth for both incidence and mortality among cancers in women globally,1 indicating that this cancer remains a heavy burden worldwide despite the development and application of prophylactic HPV vaccines and effective screening and early detection methods. Traditional treatments for cervical cancer are surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy.2 For early-stage cervical cancers, radical surgery and radiation therapy can achieve good prognosis. However, for advanced and recurrent cervical cancers, the efficacy of the current treatment modalities is unsatisfactory, resulting in poor survival outcomes.3 Therefore, searching for novel treatment strategies for advanced and recurrent cervical cancers is necessary. Treatments targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) or vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) are improvements made in cervical cancer therapy in recent years.4,5 But their efficacy is not very satisfying. Chemotherapy combined with the anti-VEGF antibody bevacizumab for cervical cancer showed progression-free survival of only 8.2 months in the phase III randomized trial, GOG 240.6

Immunotherapy is emerging and rapidly developing in recent years. It is expected to harness the host’s immune system to attack tumor cells by stimulating the adaptive immune system through the administration of anti-cancer vaccines, which is known as active immunotherapy, or by using immune compounds such as adoptive cellular transfer (ACT), immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and cytokines to enhance antitumor immunity, ie passive immunotherapy.7,8 In addition, several other agents such as IDO (indoleamine 2.3-dioxygenase) inhibitors are classified as “immunomodulation”, and they also enhance antitumor immune response through different mechanisms.8 Compared with conventional treatment methods, immunotherapy demonstrates a more durable clinical response once effective, and is better tolerated.

In particular, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have made a remarkable step forward in the field of cancer immunotherapy. ICIs are used to block negative immune cell regulatory axes, such as programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and its ligand PD-L1, which typically impair antitumor immunity when they are activated, aiming to restore the anti-cancer capacity of immune cells. It has been observed that PD-1 blockade induces antitumor responses through enhancing the activity of effector T cells and NK cells in tissues and tumor microenvironments and diminishing the number and suppressive activity of Treg cells, as well as abrogating the inhibition of kinases and recruitment of tyrosine phosphatases that are related to T cell activation.9,10

Pembrolizumab, one of the ICIs, was approved by the FDA in 2018 for treating advanced PD-L1 positive cervical cancer due to its safety and antitumor effects in the KEYNOTE-158 clinical trial on advanced cervical cancer.11 It is also the only immunotherapy drug approved to date for the treatment of cervical cancer. Although PD-1/PD-L1 blockade has shown clinically significant efficacy and prolonged patient survival, the response rate of cervical cancer patients is less than 30%.12 In the KEYNOTE-158 study, an objective response rate (ORR) for pembrolizumab monotherapy was 12.2% in all patients with advanced cervical cancer and 14.6% in patients with PD-L1-positive tumors.11 In the phase I/II CheckMate 358 trial, nivolumab showed an objective response rate of 26.3% in patients with recurrent/metastatic cervical cancer.13 Recently, in the first phase III randomized trial of a checkpoint inhibitor in cervical cancer (GOG 3016, NCT03257267), cemiplimab (PD-1-blocking antibody) showed an objective response rate of 16.4%.14 A retrospective cross-sectional study reported that the estimated percentage of US cancer patients who respond overall to the six ICIs approved for 14 indications in 2018 was only 12.46%.15 Taken together, monotherapy of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade shows unsatisfactory effects. The low response rate may be due to intrinsic resistance to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade drugs, involving lack of neoantigen in tumors with mismatch repair function, T cell malfunction due to T cell exhaustion, and immunosuppressive components of the tumor microenvironment.16–18 Another issue is that some patients who initially gain the benefits of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy may eventually harbor tumor progression or recurrence due to adaptive resistance, such as compensatory activation of alternative immune checkpoint signaling pathways, allowing the tumors to regain the ability of immune escape.17,18 Therefore, new strategies for immunotherapy of cervical cancer should be explored to improve the therapeutic efficacy. In fact, PD-1 blockade therapy combined with conventional therapy or molecular-targeted therapy has shown efficacy. For example, pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab showed benefits in progression-free and overall survival in patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer, as reported in the results of KEYNOTE-826.19 Therefore, combination therapies may be promising. Here, we hold the view that combination of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy and other immunotherapy approaches appears to be a promising direction.

Besides PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy, several other immunotherapy approaches with different mechanisms of action are emerging and have shown preliminary effects, such as other immune checkpoint blockade therapies, therapeutic vaccines, adoptive cell therapy and so on. There has been appreciable evidence suggesting that the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy may be boosted by other immunotherapy approaches or vice versa, or even mutually, resulting in potent synergistic effects when they are combined. Indeed, Hegde et al listed “optimizing long-term survival with multi-agent cancer immunotherapy combination regimens” as one of the top 10 challenges in cancer immunotherapy,20 suggesting that this strategy is both unknown and promising. Smyth et al proposed four immune nodes that immunotherapy should target, namely, elimination of immune suppression, induction of immunogenic cancer cell death, enhancement of antigen presentation or adjuvanticity and stimulation of the activation and survival of immune effector cells.21 Combinatorial immunotherapies can focus on multiple immune pathways and target more than one node of the above four, thereby fully activating endogenous tumor immunity.

Cervical cancer has unique features involving the tumor genome and tumor microenvironment, indicating a high probability of responding to combinatorial immunotherapies. Firstly, a large proportion of cervical cancers harbor high tumor mutational burdens and T cell-inflamed gene signature, known as immunologically hot.22–24 Unlike tumors with the “immune-desert” or “immune cell-excluded” phenotype, in the immunologically hot tumors there exists an ongoing immune response that is suppressed due to immunoevasive or immunosuppressive pathways in the tumor microenvironment.22,25 For example, the immunosuppressive signal involving TIGIT contributes to immune evasion of cancer cells in these immunologically hot tumors.26 In these tumors, upregulation of metabolites and cytokines associated with immunosuppression, such as adenosine, kynurenine produced by tryptophan catabolism and TGFβ, induces suppression of antitumor immunity.22 Decreased levels of major histocompatibility complex class I (MHC I) on the surface of HPV-infected cells caused by HPV oncoprotein E5 may affect antigen presentation in HPV-related cervical cancer.22,27 These mechanisms, as well as others that will be mentioned and elaborated on in the following text, provide possible avenues for further improving antitumor immunity. Importantly, tumors with high mutational burdens are theoretically highly responsive to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy but practically show low levels of response because of these immunoevasive and immunosuppressive mechanisms.28 Therefore, combining PD-1/PD-L1 blockade with other immunotherapies may enhance the proportion of cervical cancer patients responsive to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy. Secondly, as the main cause of cervical carcinogenesis, human papilloma virus was found to exert influence on host immunity. HPV oncoproteins activate multiple signaling pathways such as PI3K/AKT, MAPK and STAT3/NF-kB.29 This may contribute to dysregulation of the tumor immune microenvironment as these pathways are closely related to immune response. In addition, HPV infection leads to recruitment of suppressive immune cells to the infected sites, impairment of NK cell activity and CTL responses as well as hindrance of antigen presentation machinery.30

Therefore, this review highlights the potential and promise of the combinatorial strategies of different immunotherapy approaches based on PD-1/PD-L1 blockade to further enhance the host immune response against tumors and increase the proportion of cervical cancer patients benefiting from immunotherapy (Figure 1), as well as the clinical development (Table 1).

Figure 1.

Diagram of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade based combinational cervical cancer therapy. PD-1/PD-L1 blockade based combinational cancer therapy mainly includes five immune checkpoint blockades, CTLA-4 blockade, TIGIT blockade, LAG-3 blockade, TIM-3 blockade and A2AR blockade, which contribute to overcome immunosuppressive factors of the tumor microenvironment to improve antitumor immunity. PD-1/PD-L1 blockade also combines with other immunotherapy approaches including adoptive cell therapy and therapeutic vaccines. In addition, PD-1/PD-L1 blockade has the potential to combine with TLR9 agonists, TGF-β inhibition and IDO inhibition, which can maximize the immunotherapeutic benefit for cervical cancer patients.

Table 1.

Ongoing Clinical Trials of PD-1/PD-L1 Blockade Therapy Combined with Other Immunotherapies for Cervical Cancer Only or a Variety of Tumor Types Including Cervical Cancer

ClinicalTrial.Gov Identifier	Phase	Combination Regimen Type	Combination Intervention	Status
NCT02488759	1/2	PD-1 + CTLA-4; PD-1 + LAG-3	Nivolumab + Ipilimumab; Nivolumab + Relatlimab	Active, not recruiting
NCT03508570	1	PD-1 + CTLA-4	Nivolumab + Ipilimumab	Recruiting
NCT04256213	NA	PD-1 + CTLA-4	Nivolumab + Ipilimumab	Active, not recruiting
NCT03894215	2	PD-1 + CTLA-4	AGEN2034 + AGEN1884	Recruiting
NCT03495882	1/2	PD-1 + CTLA-4	AGEN2034+ AGEN1884	Active, not recruiting
NCT04380805	2	PD-1 + CTLA-4	AK104 (a PD-1/CTLA-4 bispecific antibody)	Recruiting
NCT04868708	2	PD-1 + CTLA-4	AK104 (a PD-1/CTLA-4 bispecific antibody)	Not yet recruiting
NCT03518606	1/2	PD-L1 + CTLA-4 + chemotherapy	Durvalumab + Tremelimumab + metronomic Vinorelbine	Active, not recruiting
NCT03452332	1	PD-L1 + CTLA-4 + radiotherapy	Durvalumab + Tremelimumab + stereotactic body radiation therapy	Active, not recruiting
NCT03277482	1	PD-L1 + CTLA-4 + radiotherapy	Durvalumab + Tremelimumab + radiotherapy	Recruiting
NCT04693234	2	PD-1 + TIGIT	Tislelizumab + Ociperlimab	Active, not recruiting
NCT03219268	2	PD-1 + LAG-3	Tebotelimab (an anti-PD-1, anti-LAG-3 bispecific DART protein)	Active, not recruiting
NCT03849469	1	PD-1 + LAG-3 + CTLA-4	Pembrolizumab + XmAb®22,841 (a bispecific antibody targeting LAG-3 and CTLA-4)	Recruiting
NCT03454451	1	PD-1 + CD73	Pembrolizumab + CPI-006	Recruiting
NCT03578406	1	PD-1 + adoptive cell therapy	HPV E6-specific TCR-T cell with anti-PD1 auto-secreted element	Unkown
NCT03108495	2	PD-1 + adoptive cell therapy	Pembrolizumab + LN-145 (autologous TIL)	Recruiting
NCT02379520	1	PD-1 + adoptive cell therapy + chemotherapy	Nivolumab + HPVSTs (HPV-specific T cells from the blood of patients with HPV-cancers) + Cytoxan + Fludarabine	Active, not recruiting
NCT04800978	2	PD-L1 + therapeutic vaccine	Durvalumab + BAVC-C	Not yet recruiting
NCT02291055	1/2	PD-L1 + therapeutic vaccine	Durvalumab + ADXS11-001	Unknown
NCT03260023	1/2	PD-L1 + therapeutic vaccine	Avelumab + TG4001	Recruiting
NCT03946358	2	PD-L1 + therapeutic vaccine	Atezolizumab + UCPVax	Recruiting
NCT03444376	1/2	PD-1 + therapeutic vaccine	Pembrolizumab + GX-188E	Recruiting
NCT04405349	2	PD-L1 + therapeutic vaccine	Atezolizumab +VB10.16	Active, not recruiting
NCT03439085	2	PD-L1 + therapeutic vaccine	Durvalumab + INO-3112	Active, not recruiting
NCT03427411	2	PD-L1 + TGF-β	M7824 (a bifunctional fusion protein targeting PD-L1 and TGF-β)	Active, not recruiting
NCT04432597	1/2	PD-L1 + TGF-β + therapeutic vaccine	M7824 (a bifunctional fusion protein targeting PD-L1 and TGF-β) + PRGN-2009	Recruiting
NCT04287868	1/2	PD-L1 + TGF-β + therapeutic vaccine + IL12	M7824 (a bifunctional fusion protein targeting PD-L1 and TGF-β) +PDS0101 + NHS-IL12	Recruiting
NCT04551950	1	PD-L1 + TGF-β + chemotherapy + radiotherapy	M7824 (a bifunctional fusion protein targeting PD-L1 and TGF-β) + cisplatin + radiotherapy	Active, not recruiting

Combination of Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Therapy with Other Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

CTLA-4 Blockade

CTLA-4 is an important negative regulator of immune responses and its ligands are CD80 and CD86 (Figure 2). Anti-CTLA-4 antibodies, the start of immune checkpoint blockade therapy, have shown impressive results in a range of cancers such as melanoma, renal cell carcinoma and colorectal carcinoma, either alone or in combination.31 Blocking CTLA-4 activates both CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ effector cells and selectively depletes regulatory T cells in tumors, thereby enhancing antitumor immunity and promoting tumor rejection.32,33 Certain types of CTLA-4 genetic polymorphism have been proven to be relevant to an increased risk of cervical cancer.34,35 CTLA-4 is expressed on more than 50% of invasive cervical cancer cells and is associated with the clinical stage of the tumor and lymph node metastasis.36 A clinical trial has found that ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4) following chemoradiation therapy in locally advanced cervical cancer patients induced an expansion of central and effector memory T cells.37 Accordingly, inhibition of CTLA-4 has the potential to help patients fight cervical cancer.

Figure 2.

Current and emerging inhibitory drugs target immune checkpoint receptors and their cell surface ligands on T cells. Blockade of inhibitory immune-related receptors such as PD-1, CTLA-4, TIGIT, LAG-3, TIM-3 and A2AR on T cells will impair immunosuppressive signals and elicit potent antitumor effects. Combination of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade with other immune checkpoint receptor blockades may induce strong antitumor immune response for cervical cancer patients.

Blocking PD-1 and CTLA-4 has shown remarkable antitumor activity in a wide range of tumors.38 Several studies have explored the effects of PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA-4 checkpoint co-inhibitory pathways on immunomodulatory functions and their potential tumor immunotherapeutic effects. Blockade of CTLA-4 may upregulate expression of PD-L1 on tumor cells and immune cells through IFN-γ produced by T cells.38 In a study evaluating the safety and antitumor activity of an anti-CTLA-4 mAb, ipilimumab, in recurrent cervical cancer, PD-1 expression was found to be upregulated in peripheral CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells following the use of ipilimumab.39 In a preclinical study, concurrent blockade of PD-1 and CTLA-4 showed synergistic antitumor activity in mouse colorectal tumor models.40 The potential mechanism may be that combination therapy leads to a favorable ratio of effector and regulatory T-cell, increased secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines, and activation of tumor-specific T cells.40 Another study, using an HPV⁺ oral tumor model, showed an increased survival benefit under the condition of combining anti-PD-1 therapy with anti-CTLA-4 therapy.41 The addition of CTLA-4 blockade therapy to PD-1 blockade therapy induces an expansive frequency of effector CD4⁺ T cells that is not sufficient for PD-1 inhibitory monotherapy, which is observed in murine colon carcinoma models.9,42 However, dual blockade may not induce the expansion of phenotypically exhausted CD8⁺ T cells, which occurs with anti-PD-1 monotherapy, and may lead to an increase in activated terminally differentiated effector CD8⁺ T cells.42 Therefore, dual blockade of PD-1 and CTLA-4 induces an improved frequency of effector CD8⁺ and CD4⁺ T cells in the tumor, resulting in an increased ratio of CD8⁺ T cell to Treg (regulatory T cell) and CD4⁺ T cell to Treg ratio, which correlates with high antitumor activity.40,43,44 Collectively, these findings support the potential of dual blockade of PD-1 and CTLA-4 in cervical cancer.

Clinical trials using this combination regimen in cervical cancer are currently underway (NCT02488759, NCT03894215, NCT05033132). In addition, a PD-1/CTLA-4 bispecific antibody (AK104) is undergoing clinical trials for recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer (NCT04380805, NCT04868708). Furthermore, several other clinical trials have added chemotherapy or radiation therapy to the combination of PD-1 and CTLA-4 blockade (NCT03518606, NCT03452332, NCT03277482). Hopefully, these clinical trials will provide evidence for the novel therapy for treating cervical cancer patients.

Immune-related adverse events of the combination should not be neglected. It was reported that for advanced melanoma patients who received ipilimumab plus nivolumab, immune-related adverse drug reactions occurred more frequently and earlier with higher severity, compared with those who received ipilimumab or nivolumab alone.45

TIGIT Blockade

T cell immunoreceptor with immunoglobulin and ITIM domain (TIGIT) is an immune checkpoint receptor expressed on natural killer (NK) cells and T cells (Figure 2). It attenuates the functions of these immune cells by binding to its ligand PVR located in antigen-presenting cells or tumor cells.46,47

Dual blockade of TIGIT and PD-1 has the potential to recover and augment the activity of immune cells in cervical cancer. Firstly, a significant increase in various subsets of peripheral blood NK cells and T cells expressing both PD-1 and TIGIT has been reported in patients with cervical cancer.48 Moreover, diverse inhibitory checkpoints including PD-1 and TIGIT tend to co-express in HPV+ head and neck cancer samples.49 Co-blockade of TIGIT and PD-L1 synergistically and specifically enhanced the effector function of CD8(+) T cells, leading to significant clearance of tumors and viruses in murine models of colorectal carcinoma and chronic viral infections.49,50 Therefore, concurrent blockade of TIGIT and PD-1 may significantly reverse the exhausted state and enhance the function of these PD-1⁺TIGIT⁺ immune cells, which may not be fully achieved by blocking only a single checkpoint receptor. Secondly, it was found that in mouse models of colon cancer, breast cancer, melanoma and fibrosarcoma, NK cells highly expressed TIGIT, while PD-1 expression was relatively low, resulting in limited efficacy of mono blockade of PD-1 on NK cells.51 Therefore, dual blockade of TIGIT and PD-1 will not only enhance the function of T cells highly expressing PD-1 and TIGIT, but also enhance the function of NK cells by blocking TIGIT.51 This means that this combination can sufficiently reactivate different types of antitumor immune cells through their highly expressed checkpoint receptors. A bispecific nanobody targeting both PD-1 and TIGIT has been shown to have the ability to enhance T cell activity in vitro.52 Combination therapy of anti-PD-1 with anti-TIGIT has shown efficacy in various tumor models, such as colon carcinoma models and glioblastoma models.50,53 In addition, CD96, another member in the TIGIT axis expressed on T cells and NK cells, was recently found to attenuate the function of CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in cooperation with PD-1 in cervical cancer.54 As a result, dual blockade of CD96 and PD-1 further enhanced the function of CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and inhibited tumor growth in cervical cancer murine models.54 In terms of clinical application, the anti-TIGIT mAb tiragolumab in combination with the anti-PD-L1 mAb atezolizumab has been approved by FDA for treating the metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A phase II trial involving NSCLC patients reported that combination treatment of tiragolumab and atezolizumab achieved an overall response rate (ORR) of 37% and a median progression-free survival (PFS) of 5.6 months compared with 21% and 3.9 months for the atezolizumab treatment alone.46 However, in the combination group 69% of the patients had immune-related adverse events (most frequently rash and infusion) compared with 47% in the atezolizumab group.46 Although there have been only a few preclinical and clinical investigations involving this combination in cervical cancer, encouraging results can be expected.

LAG-3 Blockade

LAG-3 is another immune checkpoint receptor whose ligands are MHC-II on APCs and LSECtin on tumor cells (Figure 2).55,56 LAG-3 is highly expressed in a variety of HPV-related malignancies, especially in cervical cancer with an expression rate as high as 75%.53,55,57 LAG-3 blockade has been reported to exhibit excellent performance in enhancing immune activity.57 Specifically, the blockade of LAG-3 enhanced the proliferation of CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells and secretion of IFN-γ and TNF-α more conspicuously than the PD-1 blockade in vitro.57 Furthermore, LAG-3 blockade increased markedly WT1 tumor antigen-specific T cells, whereas PD-1 blockade only slightly increased.57 This significant difference between the two blockades is probably due to WT1 being expressed in various solid tumor cells, including cervical cancer cells, to play an oncogenic role during carcinogenesis.58,59 Therefore, adding LAG-3 blockade to PD-1 blockade therapy may further activate antitumor immunity through the advantages of LAG-3 blockade over PD-1 blockade and significantly increase treatment efficacy. In addition, LAG-3 blockade inhibits Treg cells that perform inhibitory functions, and its influences on Treg cells were observed in mouse models with loss of both LAG-3 and PD-1.60,61 Several studies have revealed that dual blockade of LAG-3 and PD-1 resulted in augmented T cell proliferation, an enhanced proportion of effector T cells, and improved T cell killing capacity compared with PD-1 blockade alone, thereby suppressing tumor growth.57,61 In addition, dual blockade of LAG-3 and PD-1 resulted in upregulation of IFN-γ expression, and blockade of the two checkpoints achieved this through diffirent types of T cells--LAG3 blockade through naïve T cells and central memory T cells while PD-1 blockade through effector memory T cells.57,62 Increased production of TNF-α may also be obtained under conditions of dual blockade.62 Recently, a phase 2–3 clinical trial reported that the combination of relatlimab (a LAG-3-blocking antibody) and nivolumab achieved a median progression-free survival of 10.1 months compared with 4.6 months for nivolumab monotherapy in untreated advanced melanoma.63 Another clinical trial has shown antitumor activity of the combination of ieramilimab (anti-LAG-3) and spartalizumab (anti-PD-1) in solid tumors, with 3 (2%) complete responses and 10 (8%) partial responses, compared with no complete response and partial response in ieramilimab monotherapy.64 MGD013, a bispecific DART^® protein that binds to PD-1 and LAG-3, is going through a clinical trial for patients with a variety of tumors, including cervical cancer (NCT03219268).

TIM-3 Blockade

T cell immunoglobulin mucin 3 (TIM-3) plays an important role in immunosuppression following binding to its ligand Gal-9 (Figure 2).65 High expression of TIM-3 and its ligand was found in cervical and vulvar squamous neoplasia.65 Overexpression of TIM-3 is associated with HPV-positive status and may be related to poor tumor differentiation and shorter survival time in cervical cancer.66,67 Co-expression of TIM-3/Gal-9 and PD-1/PD-L1 occurs frequently in cervical cancer.48,65 Tim-3⁺PD-1⁺ TILs (tumor infiltrating cells) exhibit an exhausted phenotype characterized by decreased secretion of IL-2, TNF, and IFN-γ.68 Therefore, concurrent blockade of TIM-3 and PD-1 may result in a reversal of immune cell exhaustion and an increase in cytokines, thereby enhancing the antitumor immune response against cervical cancer. This combination regimen has shown potential benefit in several advanced solid tumors.69,70 One clinical trial reported that a combination of LY3300054 (anti-PD-L1) and LY3321367 (anti-TIM-3) showed antitumor activity against PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor-naïve MSI-H/dMMR solid tumors.69 Another clinical trial also showed preliminary efficacy of sabatolimab(anti-TIM-3) plus spartalizumab(anti-PD-1) for advanced solid tumors.70 However, studies involving cervical cancer are sparse. Thus, the efficacy of the dual blockade approach in cervical cancer needs to be explored.

A2AR Blockade

A2A receptor (A2AR) is one of four subtypes of adenosine receptor and belongs to the G-protein coupled receptors (Figure 2).71 A2AR is highly expressed on the immune cells and is involved in the regulation of immune functions after activation.72 The adenosine pathway involves CD39/CD73/A2AR and was found to impede NK cell maturation and enhance the immunosuppressive function of regulatory T cells.72,73 A2AR blockade downregulated PD-1 expression on CD8+ effector T cells (Teff) and FoxP3+ CD4+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) and the draining lymph nodes of a tumor, which was found in colon cancer mouse models.74 Dual blockade therapy with A2AR and PD-1 contributed to tumor regression and prolonged survival in colon cancer models.74 A phase I clinical trial has shown antitumor activity of the combination of ciforadenant (a small-molecule A2AR antagonist) and atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1) in renal cell cancer.75 In addition, CD73 expression was found to be associated with limited efficacy of anti-PD-1 therapy,76,77 and CD73 inhibitors were shown to enhance antitumor activity with PD-1 blockade in mouse tumor models of breast cancer and colon cancer.78,79 A clinical trial involving cervical cancer patients is underway to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of the combination of a CD73 monoclonal antibody with an oral A2AR antagonist or an anti-PD1 antibody (NCT03454451).

Combination of Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Therapy with Biotherapies

With Adoptive Cell Therapy

Adoptive cell therapy (ACT) is an immunotherapeutic approach that involves isolating autologous immune cells from a patient, manipulating them specifically ex vivo, and then infusing them back into the patient with the expectation that these manipulated cells will attack and eliminate tumor cells.80,81 In chimeric antigen receptor and T-cell receptor (CAR-T/TCR-T) immunotherapy, which is the main modality of ACT, T cells are genetically modified to express a special chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) or T-cell receptor (TCR) to achieve specific and precise recognition of tumor cells.80,81 There have been several clinical trials assessing the safety and efficacy of TCR-T cell therapy in cervical cancer, with significant regression of the tumors.82,83 Although to date CAR-T cell therapy for cervical cancer has not been clinically evaluated, preclinical studies have shown preliminary efficacy and more preclinical assessments are underway.84,85 In another strategy of ACT, tumor-infiltrating T cells (TIL), T cells are isolated from tumor samples, selected, amplified, and then reinfused.80 Clinical studies have demonstrated efficacy of TIL in HPV-associated cancers.86,87

The rationale for combining the use of adoptive cell therapy with PD-1 blockade can be illustrated from two perspectives. Firstly, monotherapy with PD-1 blockade has shown unsatisfactory efficacy in certain poorly immunogenic cancer types, as exhaustion-reversed effector T cells still cannot recognize these cancer cells well.17,88 Therefore, the addition of manipulated T cells with good tumor recognition ability may enhance antitumor responses and treatment efficacy of these cancer types.80 Secondly, CAR-T therapy is less effective in solid tumors than in hematological tumors, possibly due to the negative function of inhibitory checkpoints on CAR-T cells.89–92 Therefore, applying PD-1 blockade to CAR-T therapy will augment the activity of CAR-T cells and improve the efficacy of this therapeutic approach in solid tumors, including cervical cancer.

There are several strategies for blocking PD-1 function on CAR-T cells (Table 2). One strategy is to engineer CAR-T cells to secrete PD-1-blocking antibodies that then act on the CAR-T cells themselves, which has been shown to enhance antitumor efficacy.90,93,94 Besides PD-1-blocking antibodies, CAR-T cells modified to secrete soluble PD-1 (sPD-1) were also shown to improve antitumor efficacy through blockade of PD-L1 present on cancer cells.95,96 Another strategy is to genetically modify CAR-T cells to overexpress a PD-1 dominant negative receptor that competes with normal PD-1 to bind to PD-L1 on tumor cells but does not show inhibitory effects, thereby attenuating the effects of the PD-1 signaling pathway.97 In addition, the use of CRISPR/Cas9 gene-editing approaches could disrupt PD-1 on CAR-T cells, and stronger antitumor immunity has been observed in vitro and in vivo.98,99 Tang et al constructed a chimeric activated receptor named PD1-CAR, which consists of the extracellular domain of PD1 and the transmembrane and intracellular domains of the positive costimulatory molecules CD28 and 4–1BB. T cells expressing PD1-CAR retained the capacity to bind to PDL1 and were activated to specifically target PD-L1⁺ tumor cells.100 CD8+ T cells transfected with PD1-CAR (CAR-T-PD1 cells) showed higher antitumor activity against cervical cancer in a mouse model, while CAR-T-PD1 cells activated by HPV16mE7-pulsed and SOCS1-silenced DCs showed even more significant increases in cytokine secretion, cytotoxic activity and survival rate.89 In addition to intrinsic PD-1 blockade of adoptively transferred T cells, which license the cells with checkpoint blockade without extra antibody administration, one study used TIL therapy in combination with the PD-1 monoclonal antibody nivolumab to treat patients with metastatic cervical cancer with low microsatellite instability and low PD-L1 expression, and observed an improved prognosis.101 Besides T cells, NK cell therapy also has the potential to cooperate with anti-PD-1 therapy to improve antitumor efficacy. Jeffrey et al developed a manufacturing system for production of NK cells derived from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC-derived NK cells), which can recruit and activate T cells to tumors and make them responsive to PD-1 blockade due to their potential to overcome checkpoint blockade resistance, thereby enhancing cytokine production and tumor elimination in ovarian cancer models.102 These results suggest that the use of a combination of adoptive cell therapy and PD-1 blockade therapy in solid tumors, including cervical cancer, is promising, although more studies are needed to further validate this. There have been clinical trials demonstrating the antitumor efficacy of the combination of CAR-T cell therapy and PD-1 blockade in solid tumors.103,104 A clinical trial involving patients with recurrent, metastatic and persistent cervical cancer is underway, with a cohort receiving TIL therapy and pembrolizumab (NCT03108495). In addition, an ongoing clinical trial is evaluating the efficacy of HPV-E6-specific TCR-T cells with anti-PD-1 autocrine elements in the treatment of HPV-positive head and neck carcinoma and cervical cancer (NCT03578406).

Table 2.

Strategies Combining Adoptive Cell Therapy with PD-1 Blockade

Intrinsic or Extrinsic Blockade	Strategy	Reference
Intrinsic blockade	Engineering CAR-T cells to secrete PD-1-blocking antibody	[90,93,94]
Intrinsic blockade	Engineering CAR-T cells to secrete soluble PD-1	[95]
Intrinsic blockade	Genetically modifying CAR-T cells to overexpress a PD-1 dominant negative receptor	[97]
Intrinsic blockade	Using CRISPR/Cas9 gene-editing methods to disrupt PD-1 on CAR-T cells	[98,99]
Intrinsic blockade	Constructing a chimeric activated receptor composed of the extracellular domain of PD1 and transmembrane and intracellular domains of CD28 and 4–1BB and then transfecting to CD8+ T cells	[89,100]
Intrinsic blockade	HPV-E6-specific TCR-T cells with anti-PD1 autocrine elements (ongoing clinical trial)	NCT03578406
Extrinsic blockade	TIL therapy with nivolumab	[101]
Extrinsic blockade	iPSC-derived NK cells with anti-PD-1 antibody	[102]
Extrinsic blockade	TIL therapy with pembrolizumab (ongoing clinical trial)	NCT03108495

With Therapeutic Vaccines

Therapeutic vaccines are designed to activate antigen-specific immunity and then kill tumor cells through a variety of vaccine platform technologies. The therapeutic vaccines have included live vector vaccines, peptide/protein-based vaccines, DNA vaccines, cell-based vaccines, and combinatorial strategies such as prime-boost regimen.105,106 For treating HPV-associated cervical cancer, the E6 and E7 oncoproteins of HPV are the ideal vaccine targets because they are constitutively expressed on malignant cells following HPV infection and play a pivotal role in the carcinogenesis and maintenance of malignant phenotype in cervical cancer.105–108 The desired effect of HPV-targeted vaccines is to elicit a robust immune response produced primarily by Th1 cells and cytotoxic lymphocytes, which may be the key elements to clear HPV-induced cervical cancer.105,106,109 Although clinical studies have demonstrated the efficacy of the therapeutic HPV vaccine in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN),110,111 efficacy is unsatisfactory in invasive cervical cancers and no therapeutic vaccines have been approved in clinical practice yet. The efficacy is limited due to negative regulatory role of various factors in the tumor immunosuppressive environment, including the negative function exerted by the PD-1 axis on vaccine-activated immune cells, resulting in the exhaustion of these cells that are expected to play a role in the eradication of cancer cells.112–114 Therefore, combining PD-1 blockade with therapeutic vaccines may maintain the immune activity of vaccine-activated cells, thus allowing them to efficiently kill tumor cells.

Lee et al developed a non-oncogenic HPV 16 E6/E7 vaccine called Ad5 [E1-, E2b-]- E6/E7 immunizations.115 They have demonstrated that this therapeutic vaccine induced HPV-E6/E7 specific cell-mediated immune responses. In a mouse model of HPV-E6/E7 TC-1 tumors, co-administration of anti-PD-1 antibody with Ad5 [E1-, E2b-]-E6/E7 showed tumor regression rates of up to 57% compared to 29% in mice treated with Ad5 [E1-, E2b-]-E6/E7 alone.116 In addition, they observed that the expression of PD-1 and LAG-3 on TILs and PD-L1 on tumor cells was reduced when Ad5 [E1-, E2b-]-E6/E7 was bound to anti-PD-1 antibodies, implying a reduction in the exhaustive phenotype of effector T cells.116 Hung et al developed a pBI-11 DNA vaccine targeting E6/E7 of HPV16 and HPV18, and found that combination of the pBI-11 DNA vaccination boosted by TA-HPV (tissue-antigen HPV vaccine) with PD-1 antibody blockade induced E7-specific CD8⁺ T cell immune responses and higher antitumor effects as well as better survival, whereas treatment with anti-PD-1 antibody alone without a prior immune response did not show significant antitumor effects when treating mice bearing HPV-E6/E7 TC-1 tumors.117 This suggests that the efficacy of PD-1 blockade might be improved with the combination of therapeutic vaccines.

A phase II clinical trial showed that nivolumab in combination with ISA 101, a synthetic long-peptide HPV-16 vaccine, was superior to PD-1 blockade alone in treating patients with incurable HPV-16-positive cancers, having 33% of ORR and 17.5 months of median overall survival (NCT02426892).118 A single-arm, phase II trial that has a combination of GX-188E therapeutic DNA vaccine and pembrolizumab for treating recurrent and advanced cervical cancer is ongoing.119 Interim analysis declared preliminary anti-tumor activity, with 42% of patients showing an overall response at 24 weeks.119 In addition, some other clinical trials focusing on this combination regimen involving cervical cancer patients are underway (NCT04800978, NCT03946358).

Combination of Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Therapy with Other Immunotherapies

With TLR9 Agonists

TLR9, a member of Toll-like receptors, is a pattern recognition receptor expressed on the innate immune cells, including dendritic cells, macrophages, and natural killer cells.120,121 TLR9 agonists elicit the secretion of cytokines such as interferon (IFN) that contribute to antigen presentation to naive T cells and induce antigen-specific adaptive immune responses.120–122 The combination of TLR9 agonists and anti-PD-1 therapy has been observed to have superior antitumor effects at both injection sites and distant non-injected sites, revealing systemic antitumor immunity.122–124 CMP-001, a virus-like particle (VLP) encapsulating an immunostimulatory CpG-A oligodeoxynucleotide (ODN) TLR9 agonist, combined with PD-1 blockade elicited durable regression of injected and distant tumors and prolonged survival of the HPV⁺ tumor mouse model, compared to anti-PD-1 alone.122 The mechanism underlying the therapeutic effects was elucidated by increased recruitment of activated T cells to the draining lymph nodes and enhanced circulating TNFα and IL-6 levels when the combination treatment was administered.122 Another study, by Torrejon et al, revealed that TLR9 agonist can overcome anti-PD-1 resistance caused by JAK1/2 loss of function mutations and subsequent lack of IFN signaling by inducing a potent type I IFN systemic response.124 Similarly, after intratumoral injection of TLR9 agonist SD-101 combined with anti-PD-1 in mice with JAK1 and JAK2 knockout tumors, antitumor effects were observed at both the injection site and the contralateral non-injection site, and survival rates were higher.124 In addition, TLR9 agonists have been reported to improve the response rate to anti-PD-1 therapy because they upregulate PD-L1 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma cells through STAT3^(Tyr705) phosphorylation.125 Therefore, the addition of TLR9 agonists to PD-1 blockade has the potential to enhance antitumor effects via multiple mechanisms and achieve systemic antitumor responses, indicating promising clinical applications. Results of a phase Ib clinical trial of the TLR9 agonist DV281 plus nivolumab showed potential efficacy in NSCLC.126

With TGF-β Inhibition

TGF-β promotes tumor progression, invasiveness and metastasis in the late stages of tumor (mainly TGF-β1 and TGF-β2, while TGF-β3 may have a protective function).127,128 The activation of TGF-β pathway is associated with the reduced chemo-sensitivity in gynecologic cancer.129 Combined inhibition of PD-L1 and TGF-β may enhance antitumor activity due to independent and complementary immunosuppressive effects on the two pathways.130 In a study by Strauss et al, a fusion protein composed of a mAb against PD-L1 fused to a TGF-β “trap” was used to treat the heavily pretreated patients with advanced solid tumors, including cervical cancer.130 Results showed that one cervical cancer patient was ongoing confirmed to have a complete response, and one other was in near partial response.

With IDO Inhibition

Indoleamine 2.3-dioxygenase (IDO) is a crucial enzyme in the catabolism of tryptophan to kynurenine.131 Tryptophan depletion induces an increase in T cell apoptosis and a decrease in T cell proliferation through suppression of mTORC1 and eIF-2 phosphorylation, respectively, while kynurenine accumulation leads to a promotion of Treg differentiation, resulting in a diminished antitumor immune response.131 Thus, IDO inhibition enhances antitumor immunity and promotes cancer elimination to generate encouraging results of suppressing various types of tumor in animal models and clinical trials.131

Considering the remarkable effects of IDO inhibition, combining it with PD-1 blockade may produce high treatment efficacy in cervical cancer, as evidence has shown. As detected in cervical squamous neoplasia, expression of tumoral IDO was up to 75%.132 In addition, the co-expression of IDO and PD-L1 on cervical cancer cells was 63%.132 These data provide evidence to support the immunotherapy of concurrent inhibition of IDO and PD-1 in the majority of cervical cancer patients. Furthermore, it was observed that IDO mRNA expression increased after the treatment of anti-PD-1 in a murine melanoma model, which may be part of resistance mechanisms of anti-PD-1 therapy and thus can be overcome with the combination regimen.133 Spranger et al found that dual blockade of IDO and PD-1/PD-L1 induced tumor rejection by restoring IL-2 production and proliferation of tumor-infiltrating CD8(+) T cells in the tumor microenvironment without attracting new T cells from secondary lymphoid structures.133 Given these studies revealing the possible potential mechanisms of improving combination therapy efficacy, the undergoing clinical trial will be promising. A phase I clinical study has shown the efficacy of a combination of the IDO inhibitor navoximod and the anti-PD-L1 mAb atezolizumab in multiple types of cancer, including cervical cancer.134 Another clinical trial is ongoing to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab plus epacadostat, an orally available IDO1 inhibitor, in recurrent and metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), an HPV-related cancer type (NCT03358472).

Conclusions and Perspectives

The combination of different immunotherapeutic approaches is rational and promising, with an increased ability to mobilize the host immune system to recognize, fight and ultimately destroy malignant cells. As mentioned above, some combination strategies have shown higher efficacy in cancers other than in cervical cancer. The limited preliminary efficacy in cervical cancer shown in the published studies is still far from clinical application. In addition, some other immunotherapeutic strategies involving some immune-related enzymes and chemokines as well as co-stimulatory molecules (such as ICOS) are not listed here, as their combinations with PD-1/PD-L1 blockade are rarely investigated in cervical cancer and need more attention and research. In spite of this, combinatorial immunotherapies hold great potential in cervical cancer treatment due to unique features in the tumor microenvironment of HPV-induced cancers. Therefore, preclinical and clinical studies are greatly required for evaluating the antitumor efficacy and safety of these combinatorial immunotherapy approaches in cervical cancer.

Despite the potential advantages of a combinatorial strategy, there are challenges and problems. Firstly, concurrent administration of two immunotherapy approaches may increase the frequency of immune-related adverse events and even lead to special ones that never occur in monotherapy. In fact, higher frequency and greater severity as well as earlier onsets of adverse drug reactions have been observed when combining two immune checkpoint inhibitors, and even, in some severe cases, the drugs had to be terminated to control the immune toxicities.45 Secondly, it remains a challenge how to identify patients who are suitable for a certain combination regimen and have a high possibility of gaining benefits. Mismatch repair deficiency, elevated tumor mutation burden, high microsatellite instability, increased intratumoral plasma cells and elevated Notch signaling have shown the potential to predict clinical benefit of PD-1 blockade therapies.135–139 In addition, vaginal and gut microbiota also influence immune checkpoint protein profiles.140,141 PD-L1 and LAG-3 in the cervicovaginal microenvironment are negatively associated with abundance of Lactobacillus while positively correlated with dysbiotic bacteria in the vagina.140 Bifidobacterium in the gut are positively correlated with response to anti-PD-L1 treatment in cancer patients.141 Therefore, to select appropriate patients for combinatorial immunotherapy, it may be valuable to test gene expression profiling, molecular profiling, immune profiling or microbiota as the bases for selection.142 Thirdly, when is the best time to use combinatorial immunotherapies and how they can be added to the existing treatment algorithms need to be investigated. Accordingly, future studies should focus on resolving these issues, which are important for the entry of combination therapies into clinical practice, in addition to further validating their efficacy, durability and safety in patients with cervical cancer.

Funding Statement

This work is supported by Research Project of Shanghai Municipal Health Care Commission [grant number 202040129].

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.