Abstract
Objectives
We sought to characterize the carbapenem resistance mechanism of Bacteroides xylanisolvens 14880, an imipenem-resistant strain from Germany, and assess its prevalence.
Methods
Antimicrobial susceptibilities were determined using agar dilution or Etest methodology and specific imipenemase activity was detected. The genomic sequence of B. xylanisolvens 14880 was determined and analysed for antibiotic resistance genes and genomic islands. We also used gene transfer to a carbapenem susceptible host, along with 5′-RACE, conventional PCR with capillary sequencing and RT–PCR-based screening.
Results
B. xylanisolvens 14880 displayed resistance to carbapenems and produced high specific imipenemase activity. Its genomic sequence was 6.1 Mbp and a class B1 β-lactamase gene (termed crxA) was detected in it. crxA was carried on a putative genomic island with insertion sequence (IS) elements and a putative GNAT (Gcn5-like acetyltransferase) toxin gene. Promoter localization by 5′-RACE and gene targeting to an imipenem-susceptible Bacteroides host indicated that it is activated by an IS1380-like IS element and it can confer carbapenem resistance. The PCR screening of Bacteroides strains showed that crxA was specific to B. xylanisolvens with a carriage rate of 16.7%.
Conclusions
B. xylanisolvens strains can harbour a carbapenem resistance gene, which has many similarities to the ‘cfiA system’: metallo-β-lactamase (MBL), IS element activation, carriage of a GNAT toxin gene, specific for a unique Bacteroides species with a significant prevalence.
Introduction
The most effective antibiotics that target anaerobic Bacteroides infections are carbapenems, metronidazole, β-lactam/β-lactamase combinations and tigecycline.1 The carbapenem resistance of Bacteroides fragilis is mediated by the CfiA metallo-β-lactamase (MBL), which is activated by the integration of insertion sequence (IS) elements upstream of the resistance gene.2 The cfiA gene is contained on a DNA segment (‘cfiA element’) that is specific for division II strains and it is always accompanied by two ORFs encoding acetylases (GNAT – Gcn5-like acetyltransferase and XAT/vat – xenobiotic acetylase, which are now thought to form a toxin–antitoxin pair).3–5 The CfiA-mediated resistance mechanism can limit the treatment of B. fragilis infections, but, so far, there have been no major concerns regarding non-fragilis Bacteroides species in terms of carbapenem resistance, despite its detection; in the USA it has been reported only at a very low prevalence (usually between 0% and 0.5% for different species).6 Additionally, except for a few cases, namely a Parabacteroides distasonis from the USA,7 two other Bacteroides strains isolated from faeces in our laboratory8 and a Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron strain also from the USA,9 no carbapenem-resistant, non-fragilis Bacteroides strain has been characterized in more detail.
Bacteroides xylanisolvens was described in 2008 based on the xylanolytic activity of some Bacteroides strains isolated from human faecal samples.10 It is very closely related to Bacteroides ovatus so that it is scarcely distinguishable from it by MALDI-TOF MS or 16S rDNA sequencing, but some phenotypic tests may be useful for this purpose.11
In this study we report the isolation of a highly imipenem-resistant B. xylanisolvens strain, its phenotypic and molecular characterization and the description of its novel MBL gene and its prevalence.
Materials and methods
Bacterial strains and cultivation
B. xylanisolvens 18440 (Table 1) was isolated in 2016 from one of the microbiological samples of a patient diagnosed as having thoracic empyema as the main symptom and posterior wall infarction, which was resolved with bypass-operation surgery (2015). The therapy for the pleural empyema in 2016 included partial pleurectomy, drainage, Kerlix rolls and antibiotic treatment (piperacillin/tazobactam IV 3 × 4.5 g and after its insufficiency imipenem IV 3 × 1 g and later 4 × 0.5 g). Following these treatments and an 11 week hospital stay the patient’s state improved and he returned home with regular wound observation and care.
Table 1.
List of strains and the results of examinations of the prevalence and activation mechanisms of crxA genes in Bacteroides strains
| Study/strains | Imipenem MIC (mg/L) | crxA | IS1380-like IS | crxA upstream regiona | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Original identification | identification using MALDI-TOF MS | identification using rpoB sequencing | ||||
| B. xylanisolvens 14880 | B. xylanisolvens | B. xylanisolvens | 128 | + | + | + (1.8 kb) |
| Study 18 | ||||||
| B. fragilis 3035 | B. fragilis | NA | 0.25 (4)b | − | NT | NA |
| Bacteroides capillosus 427/1 | Pseudoflavonifractor capillosus | NA | 2 (32)b | − | NT | NA |
| Bacteroides distasonis 22/1 | B. ovatus/xylanisolvens | B. xylanisolvens | 32 | + | − | − (208 bp) |
| Bacteroides vulgatus 5/4 | B. vulgatus/dorei | NA | 2 (32)b | − | NT | NA |
| Study 212 (400 Bacteroides and Parabacteroides isolates) | ||||||
| B. ovatus/xylanisolvens (n = 21) | B. ovatus/xylanisolvens (n = 3) | B. ovatus (n = 3) | NT | − | NT | NA |
| B. xylanisolvens (n = 15) | B. xylanisolvens (n = 15) | NT | − | NT | NA | |
| B. xylanisolvens D85 | B. xylanisolvens | 0.5 (8)b | + | − | − (208 bp) | |
| B. xylanisolvens Sz9 | B. xylanisolvens | 0.125 (0.5)b | + | − | − (208 bp) | |
| B. xylanisolvens P8 | B. xylanisolvens | 2 | + | + (PCR mapping −)c | − (208 bp) | |
NA, not applicable; NT, not tested.
Sizes of the amplified upstream fragments of the crxA genes are shown in parentheses.
Heterogeneous resistance phenotype; full inhibition zone is indicated first then the value where individual resistant colonies disappear is noted in parentheses.
The strain contains an IS1380-like IS, but it could not be mapped to the crxA gene.
Four hundred and four other Bacteroides strains were also included from two previous studies (see Table 1); one that screened imipenem-resistant Bacteroides strains from faeces in Hungary and the UK (4 strains, Study 1) and one that was a Bacteroides antibiotic resistance survey in Hungary in 2014–16 (400 strains, Study 2).8,12 The methods of bacterial cultivations and manipulations have been described previously.5
Antimicrobial susceptibility tests and carbapenemase assay
Antimicrobial susceptibilities were determined using Etest methodology, as recommended by the supplier (bioMérieux), or agar dilution in the case of the 400 clinical Bacteroides and Parabacteroides strains (Study 2; Table 1). Carbapenemase production by B. xylanisolvens 14880 was measured as described previously.8
WGS and bioinformatic analyses
WGS of B. xylanisolvens 14880 was performed using Illumina mate-paired sequencing technology, the resulting sequence was submitted to GenBank (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, acc. no. PRJNA481227) and the WGS data were further analysed using ResFinder and IslandViewer 4 for the presence of antibiotic resistance genes (80% coverage and 30% homology parameters) and genomic islands, respectively.13,14
Determination of the promoter of crxA in B. xylanisolvens 14880
5′-RACE was used to determine the transcription initiation site of the crxA gene in B. xylanisolvens 14880 using a kit (Roche) (using steps as recommended by the supplier). Template total RNA was isolated using the HighPure RNA Isolation Kit (Roche) and the contaminating DNA was digested using DNase I (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The sequences of the gene-specific primers are given in Table S1 (available as Supplementary data at JAC Online) with the corresponding annealing temperatures used in the PCR steps in 50 μL final volumes using the DreamTaq endpoint PCR Master Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The RACE PCR fragment was inserted into the pJET2.1 vector (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and the resulting constructs were sequenced using Sanger capillary sequencing (Life Technologies).
Gene transfer and PCR experiments
The crxA gene was amplified by PCR using different lengths of upstream regions (Table 2 and Figure S1), digested using BamHI and ligated into the BamHI site of the Bacteroides-Escherichia coli shuttle vector pFD288.15 The ligation mixtures were transformed by electroporation into the E. coli DH5α strain and the construct was transferred into the B. fragilis 638R host using triparental mating.15
Table 2.
Carbapenem MICs of the upstream constructs of crxA from B. xylanisolvens 14880 in B. fragilis 638Ra
| Carbapenem | MIC (mg/L) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| construct | pFD288 (empty vector) | pBCX12 | pBCX-A2 | pBCX-C6 (with promoter) | |
| Imipenem | 0.032 | 0.032 | 2 | 0.25 | 32 |
| Meropenem | 0.032 | 0.032 | 0.25 | 0.125 | 32 |
For the 5′ end of the constructs also see Figure S2.
PCR experiments were carried out as described previously8 and the primer sequences and PCR conditions are given in Table S1.
Results and discussion
B. xylanisolvens 14880 was found to have the following MICs: imipenem, 128 mg/L; meropenem, >32 mg/L; ertapenem, >32 mg/L; doripenem, >32 mg/L; and imipenem/EDTA, 1 mg/L (the latter suggesting an MBL phenotype). Carrying out cfiA PCR on B. xylanisolvens 14880 yielded a negative result, but it produced 185 U/mg specific imipenemase activity. To investigate this carbapenem resistance mechanism, WGS and bioinformatic analyses were performed and antimicrobial susceptibilities were determined using Etest methodology (Table S2). The full genomic sequence obtained for B. xylanisolvens 14880 was 6.01 Mbp and it was resistant to only β-lactams (Table 2). Antibiotic resistance genes were detected using ResFinder and thus some known antibiotic resistance genes were revealed (Table S2). An ORF was also detected that belonged to the class B1 MBL group and had 37.3% identity and 82.3% similarity to CfiA (see Table 2 and Figure S1) at the protein level. The genomic sequence also revealed an IS1380-like IS element in its upstream region. Using 5′-RACE, we were able to determine the transcriptional start site 160 nt upstream of its start codon (Figure S2). Its gene transfer with various upstream sequences by triparental mating to a carbapenem-susceptible host (B. fragilis 638R) demonstrated that it could confer carbapenem resistance and therefore it was termed crxA (carbapenem resistance protein of B. xylanisolvens). Notably, the construct harbouring the IS1380-like IS promoter was able to increase the imipenem/meropenem MIC for the susceptible host strain 1000-fold (Table 2).
Despite the low identity value between CrxA and CfiA (37.3%), we managed to locate within CrxA the amino acid residues that make up the active centre of CfiA16 (Figure S1) and CrxA also harboured a C-terminal tail of 101 amino acids (Figure S1) compared with CfiA, but the effect of all the main differences on the enzymatic activity (e.g. substrate specificity and kinetic parameters) needs to be clarified in a future study.
IslandViewer located several putative chromosomal elements/islands in the genome of B. xylanisolvens 14880 (Figure S3), of which one is for crxA (Figure S4). In the crxA ‘element’ and in its vicinity there are regulatory genes, IS elements (IS1380 and IS110-like ISs) and addiction toxin genes (Fic, GNAT) too. These and especially the latter make it somewhat similar to the cfiA gene island, which also contains a suspected GNAT toxin gene.
We also wished to determine the prevalence of crxA among Bacteroides spp.; strains from two earlier studies were screened for it by RT–PCR. Of the three non-fragilis Bacteroides strains of the first study, the B. xylanisolvens 22/1 strain proved to be positive, while of the strains of the second study, three B. xylanisolvens strains were positive (Table 1). We designed primers to detect the IS upstream of crxA in the latter strains, but a real activating one was just found in B. xylanisolvens 14880 (Table 1). Since MALDI-TOF MS cannot differentiate B. ovatus and B. xylanisolvens well, we used rpoB sequencing to determine the exact species identifications of the B. ovatus/xylanisolvens strains from the above two studies (Table 1). All the strains containing crxA turned out to be B. xylanisolvens, so we concluded that crxA is specific for B. xylanisolvens and estimated its prevalence among clinical B. xylanisolvens isolates in Hungary at 16.7% (3/18 crxA-positive B. xylanisolvens; Table 1).
Previously, the main carbapenem-resistant Bacteroides isolates were B. fragilis. Studies examining the faecal microbiota detected a significant proportion of resistant Bacteroides strains. In a recent study in our laboratory using selective media for Bacteroides isolation with (4 mg/L) and without meropenem, we found that about 1% of the cultivable Bacteroides population is resistant to carbapenems.17 Hansen et al.18 also noticed that after carbapenem treatment the prevalence of carbapenem-resistant Bacteroides strains increased in the normal microbiota of the treated patients and the majority of these strains were B. xylanisolvens. Recently some studies reported and characterized a few non-fragilis Bacteroides species isolates as carbapenem resistant,9,19 but this study is the most complete in characterization of the resistance mechanism.
Conclusions
Overall, we can state that B. xylanisolvens, a non-fragilis Bacteroides species, can also harbour a carbapenem resistance mechanism that is similar to the B. fragilis cfiA system (MBL, IS element activation, a GNAT toxin gene-containing genetic element and a similar prevalence of ‘silent’ and resistant cases). Hence, as demonstrated by our current case and measured prevalences, carbapenem-resistant Bacteroides strains other than B. fragilis should not be ignored in the clinics.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to Dr Katalin Kristóf, Dr Emese Juhász, Dr Cecilia Miszti, Dr Krisztina Latkóczky, Dr Szilvia Zsófia Melegh and Dr Edit Urbán for providing the Study 2 Bacteroides strains.
Funding
This study was supported by the Albert Szent-Györgyi Research Fund from the Albert Szent-Györgyi Medical School, University of Szeged.
Transparency declarations
None to declare.
Supplementary data
Tables S1 and S2 and Figures S1 to S4 are available as Supplementary data at JAC Online.
References
- 1. Wexler HM. Bacteroides: the good, the bad, and the nitty-gritty. Clin Microbiol Rev 2007; 20: 593–621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Sóki J. Extended role for insertion sequence elements in the antibiotic resistance of Bacteroides. World J Clin Infect Dis 2013; 3: 1–12. [Google Scholar]
- 3. Jurėnas D, Garcia-Pino A, Van Melderen L. Novel toxins from type II toxin-antitoxin systems with acetyltransferase activity. Plasmid 2017; 93: 30–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. García N, Gutiérrez G, Lorenzo Met al. Gene context and DNA rearrangements in the carbapenemase locus of division II strains of Bacteroides fragilis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2009; 53: 2677–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Sóki J, Hedberg M, Patrick Set al. Emergence and evolution of an international cluster of MDR Bacteroides fragilis isolates. J Antimicrob Chemother 2016; 71: 2441–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Snydman DR, Jacobus NV, McDermott LAet al. National survey on the susceptibility of Bacteroides fragilis group: report and analysis of trends in the United States from 1997 to 2004. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2007; 51: 1649–55. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Hurlbut S, Cuchural GJ, Tally FP. Imipenem resistance in Bacteroides distasonis mediated by a novel β-lactamase. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1990; 34: 117–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Sóki J, Edwards R, Urbán Eet al. Screening of isolates from faeces for carbapenem-resistant Bacteroides strains; existence of strains with novel types of resistance mechanisms. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2004; 24: 450–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Sadarangani SP, Cunningham SA, Jeraldo PRet al. Metronidazole- and carbapenem-resistant Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron isolated in Rochester, Minnesota, in 2014. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2015; 59: 4157–61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Chassard C, Delmas E, Lawson PAet al. Bacteroides xylanisolvens sp. nov., a xylan-degrading bacterium isolated from human faeces. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58: 1008–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Pedersen RM, Marmolin ES, Justesen US. Species differentiation of Bacteroides dorei from Bacteroides vulgatus and Bacteroides ovatus from Bacteroides xylanisolvens - back to basics. Anaerobe 2013; 24: 1–3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Sárvári KP, Sóki J, Kristóf Ket al. A multicentre survey of the antibiotic susceptibility of clinical Bacteroides species from Hungary. Infect Dis (Lond) 2018; 50: 372–80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Bortolaia V, Kaas RS, Ruppe Eet al. ResFinder 4.0 for predictions of phenotypes from genotypes. J Antimicrob Chemother 2020; 75: 3491–500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Bertelli C, Laird MR, Williams KPet al. IslandViewer 4: expanded prediction of genomic islands for larger-scale datasets. Nucleic Acids Res 2017; 45: W30–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Smith CJ, Rollins LA, Parker AC. Nucleotide sequence determination and genetic analysis of the Bacteroides plasmid, pBI143. Plasmid 1995; 34: 211–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Concha NO, Rasmussen BA, Bush Ket al. Crystal structure of the wide-spectrum binuclear zinc β-lactamase from Bacteroides fragilis. Structure 1996; 4: 823–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Sóki J, Wybo I, Hajdú Eet al. A Europe-wide assessment of antibiotic resistance rates in Bacteroides and Parabacteroides isolates from intestinal microbiota of healthy subjects. Anaerobe 2020; 62: 102182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Hansen KCM, Schwensen SAF, Henriksen DPet al. Antimicrobial resistance in the Bacteroides fragilis group in faecal samples from patients receiving broad-spectrum antibiotics. Anaerobe 2017; 47: 79–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Kaeuffer C, Ruge T, Diancourt Let al. First case of bacteraemia due to carbapenem-resistant Bacteroides faecis. Antibiotics (Basel) 2021; 10: 319. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
