Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2022 Sep 14;17(9):e0274034. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274034

Development of E-ice-COLD-PCR assay combined with HRM analysis for Nucleophosmin1 gene mutation detection in acute myelogenous leukemia

Rattana Kongta 1, Noppamas Panyasit 2, Wuttichote Jansaento 3, Suwit Duangmano 1,4,*
Editor: Daniel Thomas5
PMCID: PMC9473412  PMID: 36103476

Abstract

Mutations of the nucleophosmin1 (NPM1) gene represent the most frequent molecular alteration in acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), especially in patients with AML who have a normal karyotype. These alterations have been shown to carry favorable prognostic significance in patients with AML. Several methods have been developed for detection of NPM1 gene mutations. However, their ability to detect low levels of mutations in a wild-type background is limited. In this study, the Enhance improved and complete enrichment Co-amplification at Lower Denaturation temperature Polymerase Chain Reaction (E-ice-COLD-PCR) assay combined with High Resolution Melting (HRM) analysis was developed and validated for highly specific and sensitive screening for NPM1 gene mutations. A total of 83 blood samples from patients with AML were collected, and their DNA was extracted. For mutational analysis, the E-ice-COLD-PCR assay for the detection of NPM1 gene mutations was developed. PCR products were analyzed by HRM analysis. All positive samples were confirmed by direct sequencing. This assay enabled detection specificity and sensitivity of NPM1 mutations in 9/83 patients with AML. Direct sequencing results were 100% concordant with this method. In addition, the limit of detection was 12.5% mutant in the final concentration of 5 ng genomic DNA. The E-ice-COLD-PCR assay with HRM analysis is a highly specific and sensitive screening method for enrichment of detecting NPM1 gene mutations. This method has both a short turn around time and easier interpretation compared to those of other methods.

Introduction

Acute myelogenous leukemia (AML), a hematological malignancy with a high mortality rate, is characterized by the uncontrolled proliferation of white blood cells and the loss of their ability to normally differentiate. AML is the highest incidence rate among hematological malignancies in Thailand [1]. There are several factors that support the development of AML, including chronic or high-dose chemical exposure; high levels of radiation exposure; receipt of chemotherapy in previous cancer treatment; and genetic disorders, such as chromosomal abnormalities and gene mutations. Among these factors, gene mutations are the most common cause of AML. Recently, researchers have suggested that mutations of the nucleophosmin1 (NPM1) gene represent the most frequent molecular alterations in AML that affect the processes of cellular differentiation and apoptosis, especially in the presence of a normal karyotype [2, 3]. In Thailand, the prevalence of NPM1 mutations in patients with AML were 38.1% [4] and 17.5% [5] in central Thailand and in upper northern Thailand, respectively. NPM1 gene mutations are characteristically heterozygous and are mainly insertions of nucleotide clusters within exons 11 [6] and 12 [7] of the NPM1 gene. The insertions are typically tetranucleotide insertions at positions 956 to 971. The most prevalent mutation is insertion of TCTG in exon 12 of the NPM1 gene or type A mutation, leading to a frameshift mutation and abnormally elongated proteins, resulting in abnormalities of the functions involved in ribosome biogenesis, centrosome duplication, genomic stability, controlling DNA repair, cell proliferation, and apoptosis. Increasing evidence of NPM1 gene mutations has been found in AML, and AML with NPM1 gene mutations has been separated as a provisional entity for the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of AML [8]. Additionally, these alterations have been shown to carry favorable prognostic significance in patients with AML because of their clinical importance in terms of risk assessment and treatment decisions. Therefore, the analysis of NPM1 gene mutational status should be usable after the diagnosis.

To date, several PCR-based methods have been developed for detection of NPM1 mutations, including PCR amplification and direct sequencing [9, 10], high-resolution fragment analysis [11, 12], melting curve analysis, denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC) [4, 13], locked nucleic acid (LNA) PCR assay [1416], allele-specific oligonucleotide (ASO) PCR [17], and FAST PCR assay with agarose E-gel electrophoresis [18]. However, most of these methods are technically challenging, complicated, and expensive. Most importantly, they do not have the ability to detect low levels of mutant alleles in a wild-type background. Enhance improved and complete enrichment co-amplification at lower denaturation temperature polymerase chain reaction (E-ice-COLD-PCR) is a modified PCR-based method that is usable for the enrichment of all types of mutations. This method is based on a non-extendable blocker probe that is incorporated with chemically modified nucleotides or LNA bases into the blocker probe. The addition of LNA bases into the blocker probe increases the stability and the melting temperature (Tm) of the complete match DNA-LNA probe heteroduplex, leading to a high Tm difference between the complete match and mismatch DNA-LNA heteroduplex. The blocker probe overlaps six bases at the 3’ end of only one primer, which could be hybridized by the complete match with the wild-type sequence while being an incomplete match with the mutant sequence. After the denaturation step in each cycle, a blocker probe hybridizes to the target sequence at 70°C and the blocker probe allows for the complete denaturation of the mutant-LNA probe heteroduplex at the critical temperature (Tc), while the WT-LNA probe heteroduplex remains strongly hybridized, which only allows the amplification of the mutant. The E-ice-COLD-PCR assay is the strongest for the detection of mutations compared with full-, fast- and ice-COLD-PCR methods [19].

Mutation scanning with high-resolution melting (HRM) analysis consists of post-COLD-PCR analysis with a continuous increase in temperature from 65°C to 95°C to identify the mutations based on detecting small differences in PCR melting (dissociation) curves. The signal differences of PCR products are generated from the transition of double stranded DNA (dsDNA) to single stranded DNA (ssDNA) in the presence of the fluorescent intercalating dye. The fluorescent dye is released when dsDNA denatures into ssDNA, resulting in the loss or decrease of the fluorescent signal at the Tm of the PCR products. In addition, HRM is a rapid and inexpensive scanning method and can be performed without opening the PCR tubes, which prevents contamination [20]. Therefore, the combination of COLD-PCR with HRM analysis could improve the mutation scanning ability of COLD-PCR.

Significantly, the advent of personalized medicine exhibits a paradigm shift in the treatment of AML, in which both the genetic and molecular analyses of patients with AML are more important than both morphological and cytochemical testing to guide the treatment and response of the patient. The evaluation of NPM1 gene mutations is of great importance for risk stratification in the patient and treatment decisions of the physician, resulting in decreasing mortality rates from AML. Moreover, AML with NPM1 gene mutations is a separate entity in the revised 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification. Therefore, establishing sensitive and reliable E-ice-COLD-PCR methods with HRM analysis for detecting lower levels of NPM1 gene mutations in a wild-type background is essential for individualized patient management.

Materials and methods

Blood sample collection

EDTA blood samples were all leftover from 83 patients diagnosed with AML at Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai Hospital, Chiang Mai, Thailand. The use of de-identified blood samples was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand (exempted number AMSEC-62EM-018) and Research Ethics Committee, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand (exempted number EXEMPTION-6485/2019). The sample size was calculated using the finite population proportion formula by free application (n4Studies). The DNA extraction was performed within 24 hours of obtaining blood samples using the NucleoSpin® Blood DNA extraction kit (MACHEREY-NAGEL GmbH & Co. KG, Germany) according to manufacturer’s instructions. The extracted DNA was quantified and assessed for purity by a microplate spectrophotometer and stored at -20°C.

Locked nucleic acid (LNA) probe designed

The LNA probe incorporated one LNA base into the blocker probe. Its design was dependent on the primer and overlapped six bases at the 3’ end of the forward primer, which could be hybridized with the complete match with the NPM1 wild-type template while the incomplete match was with the mutant template. The presence of a LNA base in the blocker probe allows for the complete denaturation of the mutant-LNA probe heteroduplex at the Tc, while the WT-LNA probe heteroduplex remained strongly hybridized, which only allowed for the amplification of mutants. The 3’ end of the LNA probe was modified by phosphorylation to prevent the extension by the DNA polymerase enzyme.

Detecting NPM1 gene mutations in patient samples using a standard PCR assay

The standard PCR assay was performed on 83 patient samples to detect NPM1 mutations. The PCR reaction in a final volume 20 μL contained 10 μL of 2X Quick Taq HS DyeMix (Toyobo, Japan), 0.2 μM of forward primer (NPM-F:5’-GTGTTGTGGTTCCTTAACCACAT-3’) and reverse primer (5’-CTGTTACAG AAATGAAATAAGACGGAAA-3’), approximately 100 ng of patient DNA, and ddH20 (up to 20 μL). KG-1a DNA and synthesized mutated-NPM1 ssDNA fragments were used as the wild-type control and mutated control, respectively. PCR was performed in a Mini MJ Thermal Cycler (Bio-rad, Inc., Singapore), including initial denaturation 95°C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles of 95°C for 30 s, 60°C for 30 s and 72°C for 30 s, with a final extension at 72°C for 3 min. PCR products were obtained on 10% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis using vertical gel electrophoresis, run at 400 volts for 150 min and visualized by a molecular imager to determine the amplicon of both wild-type and mutant products. All PCR products were confirmed by direct sequencing in both directions using fluorescent dye-terminator sequencing on ABI 3730xl DNA sequencers (Applied Biosystems, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. MA, USA).

Development of the E-ice-COLD-PCR assay

The feature of the E-ice-COLD-PCR assay is the Tc for selectively denaturing mutant-LNA probe heteroduplexes, while the WT-LNA probe heteroduplexes remain strongly hybridized to allow enhancement of the mutant alleles of NPM1 mutations. To determine the Tc of the E-ice-COLD-PCR assay, each PCR reaction in final volume of 20 μL contained 10 μL of 2x SensiFAST HRM Master Mix (Meridian Bioscience, Inc., USA), 0.2 μM of forward primer (NPM-F:5’-GTGTTG TGGTTCCTTAACCACAT-3’) and reverse primer (5’-CTGTTACAGAAATGAAATA AGACGGAAA-3’), 400 nM of LNA probe (NPM-LNA Probe: 5’-CCACATTTCTTTTTTTTTTTTTCC AGGCTATTC AAGATCTCTG+GC-Ph-3’), approximately 5 ng of KG-1a DNA or 1 ag of synthesized mutated NPM1 ssDNA fragments and ddH20 (up to 20 μL). PCR was performed in the CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR System (Bio-Rad laboratories, Inc., USA), including initial denaturation at 95°C for 3 min; followed by three cycles of 95°C for 5 s, 60°C for 10 s and 72°C for 30 s; then followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 5 s, LNA probe hybridization at 70°C for 30 s, various Tc ranges (80–90°C) for 40 s, primer annealing at 60°C for 10 s and extension at 72°C for 30 s, with a final extension at 72°C for 3 min. The final step was a melting curve with a continuous increase in temperature from 65°C to 85°C (0.2°C per acquisition and 5 s hold before each acquisition). Finally, HRM was analyzed using Precision Melt Analysis software for the detection of mutations.

After determination of the Tc, the E-ice-COLD-PCR assay with HRM analysis were used to verify the enrichment of the detection of NPM1 mutations in four types of mutations, including NPM1 mutation types A, B, D and J. Synthesized ssDNA fragments of the four types of NPM1 mutations were used as the mutated template, and KG-1a DNA was used as the wild-type template. In brief, the PCR reaction in a final volume of 20 μL contained 10 μL of 2x SensiFAST HRM Master Mix (Meridian Bioscience, Inc., USA), 0.2 μM of each primer, 400 nM of LNA probe, approximately 5 ng of KG-1a DNA or 1 ag of each synthesized mutated-NPM1 ssDNA fragments and ddH20 (up to 20 μL). PCR was performed in the CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR System (Bio-Rad laboratories, Inc., USA), including initial denaturation at 95°C for 3 min; followed by three cycles of 95°C for 5 s, 60°C for 10 s and 72°C for 30 s; then followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 5 s, LNA probe hybridization at 70°C for 30 s, critical denaturation at 88°C for 40 s, primer annealing at 60°C for 10 s and extension at 72°C for 30 s, with a final extension at 72°C for 3 min. The final step was a melting curve with a continuous increase in temperature from 65°C to 85°C (0.2°C per acquisition and 5 s hold before each acquisition), and HRM was analyzed using Precision Melt Analysis software to determine the sensitivity of the E-ice-COLD-PCR assay.

LOD of the E-ice-COLD-PCR assay

The mutated NPM1 template was diluted in the NPM1 wild-type template. All dilutions were performed by the E-ice-COLD-PCR assay combined with HRM analysis. In brief, each PCR reaction in a final volume of 20 μL contained 10 μL of 2x SensiFAST HRM Master Mix (Meridian Bioscience, Inc., USA), 0.2 μM of each forward primer, 400 nM of LNA probe, approximately 5 ng of DNA and ddH20 (up to 20 μL). PCR was performed in the CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR System (Bio-Rad laboratories, Inc., USA), including initial denaturation at 95°C for 3 min, three cycles of 95°C for 5 s, 60°C for 10 s and 72°C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 5 s, LNA probe hybridization at 70°C for 30 s, critical denaturation at 88°C for 40 s, primer annealing at 60°C for 10 s and extension at 72°C for 30 s, with a final extension at 72°C for 3 min. The final step was a melting curve analysis with a continuous increase in temperature from 65°C to 85°C (0.2°C per acquisition and 5 s hold before each acquisition), and HRM was analyzed using Precision Melt Analysis software to determine the LOD of the E-ice-COLD-PCR assay.

Detecting NPM1 gene mutations in patient samples using the E-ice-COLD-PCR assay

The E-ice-COLD- PCR assay was performed on 83 patient samples to detect NPM1 mutations. In brief, each PCR reaction in a final volume of 20 μL contained 10 μL of 2x SensiFAST HRM Master Mix (Meridian Bioscience, Inc., USA), 0.2 μM of each primer, 400 nM of LNA probe, approximately 5 ng of patient DNA and ddH20 (up to 20 μL). KG-1a DNA and synthesized mutated-NPM1 ssDNA fragments were used as the wild-type control and mutated control, respectively. PCR was performed in the CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR System (Bio-Rad laboratories, Inc., USA), including initial denaturation at 95°C for 3 min, three cycles of 95°C for 5 s, 60°C for 10 s and 72°C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 5 s, LNA probe hybridization at 70°C for 30 s, critical denaturation at 88°C for 40 s, primer annealing at 60°C for 10 s and extension at 72°C for 30 s, with a final extension at 72°C for 3 min. The final step was a melting curve analysis with a continuous increase in temperature from 65°C to 85°C (0.2°C per acquisition and 5 s hold before each acquisition), and HRM was analyzed using Precision Melt Analysis software for detecting NPM1 mutations in patient samples. Positive samples from the E-ice-COLD-PCR assay combined with HRM analysis were confirmed by direct sequencing in both directions using fluorescent dye-terminator sequencing on ABI 3730xl DNA sequencers (Applied Biosystems, Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. MA, USA).

Statistical analysis

The positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), sensitivity, and specificity of the E-ice-COLD-PCR assay were determined using direct sequencing as the reference method. The PPV was defined as [the number of true positives / (the number of true positives+ the number of false positives)] *100. The NPV was defined as [the number of true negatives / (the number of true negatives+ the number of false negatives)] *100. The sensitivity was defined as [the number of true positives / (the number of true positives+ the number of false negatives)] *100. The specificity was defined as [the number of true negatives / (the number of true negatives+ the number of false positives)] *100.

Results

Detecting NPM1 gene mutation in patient samples using standard PCR assay

A total of 83 patient samples were included in this study—nine samples contained NPM1 gene mutations and 74 samples were wild-type as determined by standard PCR assay followed by 10% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The mutant showed a banding pattern size of 144 bp, while the wild-type showed a banding pattern size of 140 bp. The mutated PCR products from patient samples showed two distinct banding patterns on polyacrylamide gel (Fig 1 and S1 Fig). All PCR products were confirmed by direct sequencing in both directions. The results exhibited that eight samples (including sample no. 3, 41, 44, 47, 50, 57, 62 and 68, respectively) were NPM1 mutation type A, whereas 75 samples were wild-type. One sample (sample no. 11) showed inconsistent results with the standard PCR assay followed by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and direct sequencing.

Fig 1. Detecting NPM1 gene mutations in patient samples using a standard PCR assay.

Fig 1

The PCR products are visualized on 10% polyacrylamide gel. MT indicates NPM1 mutated control and WT indicates NPM1 wild-type control. A double band indicates a heterogeneous mutation.

Tc of E-ice-COLD-PCR assay

The Tc was determined to select the best Tc with the highest enrichment of the mutant product amplification, while the wild-type products could not be produced. The determination of the Tc was performed in NPM1 wild-type and NPM1 mutation type A as representations of NPM1 mutations. The E-ice-COLD-PCR assay had varying levels of Tc, range 80–90°C. PCR products were analyzed by HRM analysis, generating the data into HRM difference curves. The results showed that the Tc at 80–88°C was able to selectively denature and amplify only mutant products (Fig 2a), while the wild-type product could not be produced (Fig 2b). The enrichment of mutants increased from the Tc 80–88°C, which was represented by the increasing height of the peak. Whereas, the Tc at 89–90°C highly enhanced the amplification of mutants. However, it could not selectively amplify only mutant products, because the wild-type product could also be amplified (Fig 2b). Therefore, the Tc of 88°C was selected for the highest enrichment of the detection of NPM1 mutations in the E-ice-COLD-PCR assay.

Fig 2. HRM difference curves of Tc determinations.

Fig 2

(a) The height of the difference curve for mutants increased with increasing Tc from 80–90°C. (b) No signals of wild-type products were produced when increasing the Tc from 80–88°C, while the wild-type was amplified when increasing the Tc to more than 88°C and presented the signal in the HRM difference curve.

Verification of E-ice-COLD-PCR for detection of NPM1 mutations

The E-ice-COLD-PCR assay was performed in four types of NPM1 mutations, including NPM1 mutation types A, B, D, and J to verify the E-ice-COLD-PCR method for detection of NPM1 mutations covering the four mutation types. Following the E-ice-COLD-PCR assay, the PCR products were analyzed by HRM analysis, and the PCR products were also detected by agarose gel electrophoresis. The results showed that the E-ice-COLD-PCR assay was able to amplify the mutant PCR products in all four types of NPM1 mutations, while the wild-type product could not be produced (Fig 3).

Fig 3. The E-ice-COLD-PCR assay combined with HRM analysis of four types of NPM1 mutations.

Fig 3

Following the E-ice-COLD-PCR assay, the PCR products were analyzed by HRM analysis. The HRM difference curves show the peaks of NPM1 mutation types A, B, D, and J, while no peak in the NPM1 wild-type indicated that the E-ice-COLD-PCR assay can inhibit wild-type amplification. Meanwhile, it can enhance the amplification of the four types NPM1 mutations.

Limit of detection of the E-ice-COLD-PCR assay

The limit of detection (LOD) of the E-ice-COLD-PCR assay was the lowest concentration of the DNA sample that can reliably detect NPM1 gene mutations. In this study, the mutant DNA was diluted in the wild-type DNA for various final concentrations (100%, 50%, 25%, 12.5%, 6.25%, 3.13%, and 0%). A total of 5 ng DNA was amplified as a template in each PCR reaction. The PCR products were analyzed by HRM analysis. The results showed that the peak or signal of different relative fluorescence units on the HRM difference curves decreased from the decreasing final concentration of mutant DNA 100% to 12.5%, and the peak or signal of different relative fluorescence units disappeared at the decreasing final concentration of mutant DNA from 6.25% to 0% (Fig 4). The lowest amount of mutant DNA detecting NPM1 mutations was 12.5% of the mutants in the final concentration of 5 ng DNA. Therefore, the LOD of the E-ice-COLD-PCR assay was 12.5% of the mutants in the final concentration of 5 ng DNA.

Fig 4. LOD of the E-ice-COLD-PCR assay combined with HRM analysis.

Fig 4

Following the E-ice-COLD-PCR assay, the PCR products were analyzed by HRM analysis. The HRM difference curves show the height of the curves decreased with the decreasing percentage of mutants, and the peak disappeared with the decreasing percentage of mutants from 6.25% to 0%.

Detecting NPM1 gene mutations in patient samples using the E-ice-COLD-PCR assay

Detecting NPM1 mutations were performed in a total of 83 patient samples using the E-ice-COLD-PCR assay. The PCR products were analyzed by HRM analysis, and the data generated for each sample as the HRM difference curves in Fig 5 and S2 Fig. The results from 83 samples showed that nine samples contained NPM1 mutations, and the remaining samples were wild-type. All PCR products were confirmed by direct sequencing in both directions. The results were in 100% concordance with the E-ice-COLD-PCR assay. The most common mutation was type A, which is caused by insertion of TCTG (Fig 6b). The sensitivity and specificity of the E-ice-COLD-PCR assay for the detection of NPM1 mutations were both 100%. All positive samples carried mutations, and none of the negative samples contained mutations. The positive predictive value (PPV) was 100%, and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 100%.

Fig 5. Detecting NPM1 gene mutations by HRM analysis.

Fig 5

Detecting NPM1 gene mutations using the E-ice-COLD-PCR assay and generating the data into HRM difference curves. Red line indicates mutant control. Green line indicates wild-type control. The wild-type samples present the peak at the same location as the wild-type control, and the mutant samples present the peak at the same location as the mutant control.

Fig 6. Direct sequencing in the reverse direction of mutated products.

Fig 6

(a) Mutated products from the standard PCR assay (b) Mutated products from the E-ice-COLD-PCR assay. The results showed that the NPM1 mutation type A is a 4 bp insertion.

Discussion

AML, a hematological disorder characterized by the uncontrolled proliferation of white blood cells and reduced hematopoiesis, is the highest incidence rate of hematological malignancies in Thailand. Several factors have been reported to support the development of AML, most of which are genetic alterations or gene mutations. Many reports have found that the nucleophosmin1 (NPM1) gene represents the most frequent molecular alteration in AML, especially in the presence of a normal karyotype. NPM1 gene mutations occur in approximately one-third of patients with AML. In Thailand, the most prevalent NPM1 mutation is the type A mutation, which inserts TGTC into exon 12 of the NPM1 gene, followed by type B, type D, and type J mutations that insert CATG, CCTG, and TATG, respectively [4]. NPM1 mutations resulted in elongated proteins and abnormalities of their functions involved in ribosome biogenesis, centrosome duplication during mitosis, genomic stability, controlling DNA repair, and the interactions with the oncosuppressors p53 and ARF and their partners, such as Hdm2/Mdm2, for controlling cell proliferation and apoptosis. NPM1 mutations carry a favorable prognostic significance in patients with AML because of their clinical importance in terms of risk assessment and treatment decisions. Patients with AML who carried NPM1 gene mutations in the absence of FLT3-ITD mutations were classified into a favorable prognosis group [21] that is susceptible to chemotherapy as compared to patients with AML without NPM1 mutations and showed the best complete remission rate among these patients. The NPM1 protein normally translocates between the nucleus and cytoplasm. It is involved in protecting DNA polymerase eta in the nucleus, controlling DNA repair via the translesion synthesis (TLS) pathway by binding to DNA polymerase eta for prevention of proteasome degradation, while mutant NPM1 protein accumulated in the cytoplasm, resulting in increased DNA polymerase eta degradation and failure to protect the cell from chemotherapy-induced DNA lesions via the TLS pathway [22]. It has been indicated that the addition of chemotherapy is enough for the treatment of patients with AML with NPM1 mutations in the absence of FLT3-ITD mutations, and it is unnecessary to perform autologous or allogenic stem cell transplantation. In addition, the most commonly co-occurring mutation with NPM1 in AML is cohesion mutation. When compared their variant allele frequency (VAF) relationships to survival, If NPM1 mutations occurred before a chromatin/cohesin variant, there are association with a good response to treatment and five-year survival [23]. The variant of NPM1 is also importance for AML prognosis. Therefore, after the diagnosis, the detection of NPM1 gene mutation status should be usable for patient prognosis and making decisions about treatment.

Several methods have been developed for detecting NPM1 mutations, such as PCR amplification and direct sequencing, high-resolution fragment analysis, PCR with capillary electrophoresis, melting curve analysis, DHPLC, LNA-mediated PCR, ASO-PCR and FAST PCR assays with agarose E-gel electrophoresis, but most of these methods are technically challenging, complicated, expensive, and require additional laboratory equipment that is not routinely available in some molecular laboratories. Most importantly, the inability to detect low levels of mutations in a wild-type background. Because these methods are standard PCR-based methods. They could be amplified the amplicon not only mutant but also wild-type amplicon. After PCR amplification, the wild-type PCR products were generated more than the mutant PCR products in case of low levels of mutations in a wild-type background that affects their result interpretation in post-PCR analysis. For example, the PCR products were analyzed by agarose E-gel or non- saturated acrylamide gel electrophoresis and their represented the vary faint band of mutant on the gel resulting in misdetection of NPM1 mutations as well as standard sequencing, the signal of wild-type amplicons were overlaid the signal of mutant amplicons in standard sequencing. Even detecting NPM1 mutations by melting curve analysis or DHPLC, the interpretation of NPM1 mutations were also difficult because the signal of mutant was overlaid by wild-type. Finally, the misdetection of NPM1 mutations lead to decision-making mistake in AML patient treatment. To enrich low level NPM1 mutation detection, the E-ice-COLD-PCR assay is a new PCR-based method used for enrichment of low levels of mutated genes in mixtures of wild-type and mutant alleles by blocked amplification of wild-type. Several studies have reported that the E-ice-COLD-PCR assay was used for enrichment of the sensitivity for detection of mutations, such as the BRAF mutation, NRAS mutation [24], and KRAS mutations [2426], and even detection of disease-related hypermethylation [27].

To enrich low levels of NPM1 mutations in this study, the E-ice-COLD-PCR assay was developed for the enrichment of NPM1 mutations, which provides the strongest enrichment for all types of mutations as compared to the full-, fast-, and ice-COLD-PCR methods. A non-extendable blocker probe is very important to block wild-type amplification, which incorporates with chemically modified nucleotides or locked nucleic acid (LNA) bases into the blocker probe. The addition of LNA into the blocker probe increases the stability and Tm of the complete match DNA-LNA probe heteroduplex, leading to a higher Tm difference between the complete match and mismatch DNA-LNA heteroduplex compared with and without incorporated LNA [28]. Primers for E-ice-COLD-PCR should be designed to a have similar Tm, range 55–60°C, with the recommended Tm of the blocker probe being 7–10°C higher than that of the Tm of the primers. Self-complementarity of primers or probes or primer-probes decrease the efficiency of the E-ice-COLD-PCR assay for enrichment of detecting low levels of mutations. In previous studies, the LNA blocker probes were usually designed based on the mutation site, which should be located in the center of the probe and appropriate for detection of point mutations or SNPs. In this study, there were insertion mutations. The LNA blocker probe was designed differently from other studies, with the mutation site located closely to the 3’ end of the probe, leading to a higher Tm difference between the complete match and mismatch DNA-LNA heteroduplex. Because a non-extendable blocker probe of E-ice-COLD PCR blocked wild-type amplification, only mutant PCR product was produced. Consequently, E-ice-COLD PCR could enhance the low levels of mutated gene amplification, increase the sensitivity of post-PCR analysis method, increase the accuracy of result interpretation, and reduce the misdetection of NPM1 mutations. Consequently, the patients were treated with appropriate treatment.

A total of 83 patient samples were included in this study—nine samples were mutated NPM1 genes and 74 samples were wild-type as determined by a standard PCR assay followed by 10% polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, which can be separated by a four bp difference. All products were confirmed by direct sequencing—eight samples had NPM1 mutation type A, which inserts TCTG, and 75 samples were wild-type. One sample showed inconsistent results between the conventional PCR assay followed by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and direct sequencing. Mutations by the conventional PCR assay followed by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis were verified by direct sequencing as the wild-type. Perhaps, the low level of mutations in the wild-type background interfered with the direct sequencing, leading to verification of the mutation sample as the wild-type. Nine samples contained mutated NPM1 genes and 74 samples were wild-type as determined by the E-ice-COLD-PCR assay combined with HRM analysis. All PCR products confirmed by direct sequencing showed 100% concordance with the E-ice-COLD-PCR assay. The most common mutation was type A, which inserts TCTG.

The E-ice-COLD-PCR assay combined with HRM analysis enhances the detection of low levels of NPM1 mutations in a mutant/wild-type mixture compared to that with conventional PCR. This method is important for prognostic information and the determination of appropriate therapeutic interventions in patients with AML. However, this method cannot identify the type of mutation unless the scanning is followed by sequencing of the positive samples due to slight differences in the Tm between each NPM1 mutation type. Moreover, performing the E-ice-COLD-PCR assay prior to direct sequencing allows for substantially increasing the LOD of the sequencing method. In addition, the E-ice COLD-PCR protocol for NPM1 mutations requires 5 ng genomic DNA, which is a low DNA concentration for detecting NPM1 mutations in patients with AML as compared that for conventional PCR, which requires a DNA concentration of at least 100 ng genomic DNA. Several studies have shown that 2–10 ng of DNA was used as a template for the E-ice COLD-PCR assay for detecting the mutations [2527]. HRM analysis is an inexpensive scanning method and does not require opening the PCR tubes, preventing contamination and, more importantly, shorter turn around time and easier interpretation of the results. Interestingly, the E-ice-COLD-PCR protocol in this study can be performed on a real-time PCR machine followed by HRM analysis or conventional PCR machine followed by agarose gel electrophoresis. However, both methods can also be integrated in the routine molecular diagnosis of AML using standard laboratory equipment. In addition, when compare the cost of E-ice-COLD PCR combined with HRM analysis for detecting NPM1 mutations per individual patient to routine methods in Thailand including FAST PCR assays with agarose E-gel electrophoresis and standard PCR with polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis found that the E-ice-COLD PCR combined with HRM analysis is cheaper than those of routine methods. Therefore, AML patients could have paid low cost for high quality of molecular diagnosis of AML.

NPM1 mutations can be considered markers of minimal residual disease (MRD) [15, 22]. The method used in the routine monitoring of low levels of MRD is qPCR, but it requires high concentrations of DNA. Therefore, the E-ice COLD-PCR method is a simple and effective way to enhance the detection of MRD and can be applied in the detection of other makers for monitoring MRD. Moreover, a highly sensitive method such as the E-ice-COLD-PCR assay is desirable for the detection of rare circulating tumor cells or application for solid tumors, such metastatic lesions, with a low percentage of tumor.

Conclusions

The E-ice-COLD-PCR assay with HRM provides highly specific, short turn around time and sensitive screening for the detection of NPM1 mutations with easy interpretation of the results, which is great importance for decision-making regarding the treatments for patients with AML. This method detected NPM1 mutations covering four types of mutations, which are the most prevalent mutations found in Thailand. The LOD for detecting NPM1 mutations was 12.5% mutant in the final concentration of 5 ng genomic DNA. Out of 83 samples from patients with AML, nine samples contained NPM1 mutations that were identified as mutation type A. All mutations were detected by this method. In addition, performing the E-ice-COLD-PCR assay prior to direct sequencing allows for substantially increasing the LOD of direct sequencing. Moreover, the E-ice-COLD-PCR protocol can be easily integrated into the routine molecular diagnosis of AML using standard laboratory equipment, as the E-ice-COLD-PCR assay can use a conventional PCR machine and is visualized by agarose gel electrophoresis for detecting NPM1 mutations.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. The results of detecting NPM1 gene mutations in total 83 patient samples using a standard PCR assay.

The PCR products are visualized on 10% polyacrylamide gel. MT indicates NPM1 mutated control and WT indicates NPM1 wild-type control. A double band indicates a heterogeneous mutation.

(DOCX)

S2 Fig. Detecting NPM1 gene mutations by HRM analysis.

Detecting NPM1 gene mutations using the E-ice-COLD-PCR assay and generating the data into HRM difference curves. Red line indicates mutant control. Green line indicates wild-type control. The wild-type samples present the peak at the same location as the wild-type control, and the mutant samples present the peak at the same location as the mutant control.

(DOCX)

S1 Data

(DOCX)

S1 Raw images

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Faculty of Associated Medical Sciences and Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University for the research facility support. We would also like to thank all colleagues of the Division of Hematology that contributed to blood sample collection.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.

Funding Statement

We are grateful for research fund from National Research Council of Thailand (NRCT), grant no. GSCMU (NRCT)/15/2563 to RK, Health System Research Institute (HSRI), grant no. HSRI 63-079 to SD, Chiang Mai University Grant for New Researcher to SD.

References

  • 1.Rojanamatin J, Ukranun Q, Supattagorn P, Chaiviriyabunya I, Wongsena M, Chaiweerawattana A, et al. Cancer in Thailand. Bangkok: Medical Record and Databased Cancer Unit; 2021. [cited 2022 Jul 25] https://www.nci.go.th/e_book/cit_x/index.html [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chen Y, Hu J. Nucleophosmin1 (NPM1) abnormality in hematologic malignancies, and therapeutic targeting of mutant NPM1 in acute myeloid leukemia. Ther Adv Hematol. 2020; 11:2040620719899818. doi: 10.1177/2040620719899818.eCollection 2020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Kelemen K. The Role of Nucleophosmin 1 (NPM1) Mutation in the Diagnosis and Management of Myeloid Neoplasms. Life (Basel). 2022;12(1). doi: 10.3390/life12010109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Boonthimat C, Thongnoppakhun W, Auewarakul CU. Nucleophosmin mutation in Southeast Asian acute myeloid leukemia: eight novel variants, FLT3 coexistence and prognostic impact of NPM1/FLT3 mutations. Haematologica. 2008;93(10):1565–9. doi: 10.3324/haematol.12937 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Mevatee P, Tantiworawit A, Traisathit P, Puaninta C, Mevatee U, Angsuchawan S, et al. FLT3-ITD, NPM1, and DNMT3A Gene Mutations and Risk Factors in Normal Karyotype Acute Myeloid Leukemia and Myelodysplastic Syndrome Patients in Upper Northern Thailand. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2017;18(11):3031–9. doi: 10.22034/APJCP.2017.18.11.3031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Pitiot AS, Santamaria I, Garcia-Suarez O, Centeno I, Astudillo A, Rayon C, et al. A new type of NPM1 gene mutation in AML leading to a C-terminal truncated protein. Leukemia. 2007;21(7):1564–6. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2404679 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Falini B, Martelli MP, Pileri SA, Mecucci C. Molecular and alternative methods for diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia with mutated NPM1: flexibility may help. Haematologica. 2010;95(4):529–34. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2009.017822 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Arber DA, Orazi A, Hasserjian R, Thiele J, Borowitz MJ, Le Beau MM, et al. The 2016 revision to the World Health Organization classification of myeloid neoplasms and acute leukemia. Blood. 2016;127(20):2391–405. doi: 10.1182/blood-2016-03-643544 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kassem N, Hamid AA, Attia T, Baathallah S, Mahmoud S, Moemen E, et al. Novel mutations of the nucleophosmin (NPM-1) gene in Egyptian patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a pilot study. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst. 2011;23(2):73–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jnci.2011.09.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Scholl S, Mugge LO, Landt O, Loncarevic IF, Kunert C, Clement JH, et al. Rapid screening and sensitive detection of NPM1 (nucleophosmin) exon 12 mutations in acute myeloid leukaemia. Leuk Res. 2007;31(9):1205–11. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2006.12.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Tan AY, Westerman DA, Carney DA, Seymour JF, Juneja S, Dobrovic A. Detection of NPM1 exon 12 mutations and FLT3—internal tandem duplications by high resolution melting analysis in normal karyotype acute myeloid leukemia. J Hematol Oncol. 2008;1:10. doi: 10.1186/1756-8722-1-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Liu Y, Tang J, Wakamatsu P, Xue H, Chen J, Gaynon PS, et al. High-resolution melting curve analysis, a rapid and affordable method for mutation analysis in childhood acute myeloid leukemia. Front Pediatr. 2014; 2:96. doi: 10.3389/fped.2014.00096 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Roti G, Rosati R, Bonasso R, Gorello P, Diverio D, Martelli MF, et al. Denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography: a valid approach for identifying NPM1 mutations in acute myeloid leukemia. J Mol Diagn. 2006;8(2):254–9. doi: 10.2353/jmoldx.2006.050098 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Wertheim G, Bagg A. Nucleophosmin (NPM1) mutations in acute myeloid leukemia: an ongoing (cytoplasmic) tale of dueling mutations and duality of molecular genetic testing methodologies. J Mol Diagn. 2008;10(3):198–202. doi: 10.2353/jmoldx.2008.080019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Laughlin TS, Becker MW, Liesveld JL, Mulford DA, Abboud CN, Brown P, et al. Rapid method for detection of mutations in the nucleophosmin gene in acute myeloid leukemia. J Mol Diagn. 2008;10(4):338–45. doi: 10.2353/jmoldx.2008.070175 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Warshawsky I, Mularo F. Locked nucleic acid probes for enhanced detection of FLT3 D835/I836, JAK2 V617F and NPM1 mutations. J Clin Pathol. 2011;64(10):905–10. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2011-200086 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ottone T, Ammatuna E, Lavorgna S, Noguera NI, Buccisano F, Venditti A, et al. An allele-specific rt-PCR assay to detect type A mutation of the nucleophosmin-1 gene in acute myeloid leukemia. J Mol Diagn. 2008;10(3):212–6. doi: 10.2353/jmoldx.2008.070166 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Oppliger Leibundgut E, Porret NA, Bienz Muggli M, Baumgartner H, Dahlhaus M, Baerlocher GM. Rapid and highly specific screening for NPM1 mutations in acute myeloid leukemia. Ann Hematol. 2013;92(2):173–7. doi: 10.1007/s00277-012-1617-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mauger F, How-Kit A, Tost J. COLD-PCR Technologies in the Area of Personalized Medicine: Methodology and Applications. Mol Diagn Ther. 2017;21(3):269–83. doi: 10.1007/s40291-016-0254-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Meistertzheim A-L, Calves I, Artigaud S, Friedman CS, Paillard C, Laroche J, et al. High Resolution Melting Analysis for fast and cheap polymorphism screening of marine populations. Research square. doi: 10.1038/protex.2012.015 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Gulley ML, Shea TC, Fedoriw Y. Genetic tests to evaluate prognosis and predict therapeutic response in acute myeloid leukemia. J Mol Diagn. 2010;12(1):3–16. doi: 10.2353/jmoldx.2010.090054 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Falini B, Nicoletti I, Martelli MF, Mecucci C. Acute myeloid leukemia carrying cytoplasmic/mutated nucleophosmin (NPMc+ AML): biologic and clinical features. Blood. 2007;109(3):874–85. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-07-012252 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Benard BA, Leak LB, Azizi A, Thomas D, Gentles AJ, Majeti R. Clonal architecture predicts clinical outcomes and drug sensitivity in acute myeloid leukemia. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1): 7244. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27472-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mauger F, Daunay A, Deleuze JF, Tost J, How-Kit A. Multiplexing of E-ice-COLD-PCR Assays for Mutation Detection and Identification. Clin Chem. 2016;62(8):1155–8. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2016.258830 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.How Kit A, Mazaleyrat N, Daunay A, Nielsen HM, Terris B, Tost J. Sensitive detection of KRAS mutations using enhanced-ice-COLD-PCR mutation enrichment and direct sequence identification. Hum Mutat. 2013;34(11):1568–80. doi: 10.1002/humu.22427 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sefrioui D, Mauger F, Leclere L, Beaussire L, Di Fiore F, Deleuze JF, et al. Comparison of the quantification of KRAS mutations by digital PCR and E-ice-COLD-PCR in circulating-cell-free DNA from metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Clin Chim Acta. 2017;465:1–4. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2016.12.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Mauger F, Kernaleguen M, Lallemand C, Kristensen VN, Deleuze JF, Tost J. Enrichment of methylated molecules using enhanced-ice-co-amplification at lower denaturation temperature-PCR (E-ice-COLD-PCR) for the sensitive detection of disease-related hypermethylation. Epigenomics. 2018;10(5):525–37. doi: 10.2217/epi-2017-0166 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.You Y, Moreira BG, Behlke MA, Owczarzy R. Design of LNA probes that improve mismatch discrimination. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(8):e60. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl175 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Daniel Thomas

23 Jun 2022

PONE-D-22-05079Development of E-ice-COLD-PCR assay combined with HRM analysis for Nucleophosmin1 gene mutation detection in acute myelogenous leukemiaPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Duangmano,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 07 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Daniel Thomas, MD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. PLOS ONE now requires that authors provide the original uncropped and unadjusted images underlying all blot or gel results reported in a submission’s figures or Supporting Information files. This policy and the journal’s other requirements for blot/gel reporting and figure preparation are described in detail at https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements and https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-preparing-figures-from-image-files. When you submit your revised manuscript, please ensure that your figures adhere fully to these guidelines and provide the original underlying images for all blot or gel data reported in your submission. See the following link for instructions on providing the original image data: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/figures#loc-original-images-for-blots-and-gels. 

  

In your cover letter, please note whether your blot/gel image data are in Supporting Information or posted at a public data repository, provide the repository URL if relevant, and provide specific details as to which raw blot/gel images, if any, are not available. Email us at plosone@plos.org if you have any questions

Additional Editor Comments (if provided):

Good method development paper; important test for patient management, any improvements in sensitivity and turn around time celebrated. Will likely be citied.

Minor points:

Check/provide reference that AML is responsible for most number of deaths from blood cancer in Thailand

Abstract: define HRM, reduce number of abbreviations if possible

Line 61: poor grammar: results of NPM1 molecular analysis change management

Turn around time is perhaps better english than time to result

Can the authors provide a discussion of similar methods for other molecular markers/ other cancers in discussion? and brief discussion on cost vs routine methods

Discussion: Could emphasis that VAF of NPM1 is also important for prognosis and its order of acquisition: See Figure 4f Nat Commun

. 2021 Dec 13;12(1):7244. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27472-5.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Partly

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The authors have attempted to develop and report a method to characterise Nucleophosmin1 gene mutation in AML samples using E-ice-COLD-PCR assay combined with HRM analysis. The study cohort used include 83 samples and they have detected NPM1 mutations in 9 patients with AML using the E-ice-COLD-PCR/HRM analysis assay. The sincere efforts and hard work of the authors in collecting the samples, developing the assay, optimising it and compiling the data are evident in the presented study. However, the manuscript in its current form is not suitable for publication as the presentation of the manuscript does little justice to the presented work.

The results, figures and discussion are presented poorly to fully evaluate the findings reported. For instance, in section, Detecting NPM1 gene mutations in patient samples using the E-ice-COLD-PCR assay, opening sentence mentions "NPM1 mutations were detected in a total of 83 patient samples using the E-ice-COLD-PCR assay" which is wrong. Several inaccurate and misleading sentences are present throughout the manuscript. Similarly, the figures and associated legends should be revised as it is difficult to evaluate them in their current form. For example, In Figure 1, the authors could indicate which samples they believe to include double bands as wild type in gel that includes samples 60 to 65 appears to have have a double band and the contrasts are different between gel pictures.

It is very difficult to understand clearly and appreciate why and how the E-ice-COLD-PCR assay is better than the other existing assays. In the current manuscript, a one line limitation statement ("However, most of these methods are technically challenging, complicated, and expensive") is provided and it would be beneficial to have a clear comparison with an existing method and highlight how E-ice-COLD-PCR assay is more suitable showing better accuracy.

The data shows 9 positive cases and one that has discrepancy between the sequencing and the PCR assay. However, the results sections do not describe the data well. The results include figure legends instead of clear description of the data. Thus, the presentation of the results section makes it very hard to evaluate the figures, data in general and the methods. Therefore, major, rigorous revision of all the sections and complete rewriting of the results section with clear introduction that places the use of NPM1 mutations detection in resource limited clinical settings including Thailand is needed before this can be considered for Publication. The discussion can be revised to actually focus on the data presented and how this compares to other currently available methods and the significance of the assay.

The presented study can be useful and may have a potential to contribute towards AML stratification and MRD but the manuscript requires major revision.

Reviewer #2: In general, the work is well written, aiming to develop a quick and cost effective method for the detection of NPM1 mutation in acute myeloid leukemia patients. However, I believe that some important points need to be answered by the authors before the work can be considered for publication. My comments are as follows:

1. Abstract, line 25: I think the authors need to use the word "ability" instead of "inability", since it refers to the limitation of the previous detection methods.

2. Abstract, line 26: "HRM" is written for the first time, thus, must be written in full.

3. Abstract, line 27-28: Is the samples from AML patients with normal karyotype?

4. Introduction: I suggest the authors carefully check each of the statement that need to cite the reference. For examples, "AML is the major cause of death among hematological malignancies in Thailand" and "Recently, researchers have suggested that mutations of the nucleophosmin 1 (NPM1) gene represent the most frequent molecular alterations in AML that affect the processes of cellular differentiation and apoptosis, especially in the presence of a normal karyotype." There are other few statements.

5. Result, line 222-223: I suggest the authors write or label the respective patient samples with the mutation.

6. Result, line 239-241: Are you referring to Fig. 2a?

7. Result, line 289-290: The authors state that "The results showed that nine samples contained NPM1 mutations, and the remaining samples were wild-type" in reference to Fig. 5. However, the number of mutant curve in Fig. 5 does not correspond with the number of samples with NPM1 mutation. Please clarify.

8. Result, line 295: I suggest the authors to show the calculation of PPV and NPV.

9. Is the manuscript has been proofread? If not, I suggest that the authors get editing help from someone with full professional proficiency in English.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2022 Sep 14;17(9):e0274034. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274034.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


18 Aug 2022

1. Additional Editor Comments:

1.1 Check/provide reference that AML is responsible for most number of deaths from blood cancer in Thailand

Answer: We have already revised the sentence

1.2 Abstract: define HRM, reduce number of abbreviations if possible

Answer: We have revised

1.3 Line 61: poor grammar: results of NPM1 molecular analysis change management

Answer: We didn’t find this sentence at line 61

1.4 Turn around time is perhaps better english than time to result

Answer: We have revised

1.5 Can the authors provide a discussion of similar methods for other molecular markers/ other cancers in discussion? and brief discussion on cost vs routine methods

Answer: We have provided a discussion at line 361-383 and 436-441

2. Reviewer #1:

2.1 The results, figures and discussion are presented poorly to fully evaluate the findings reported. For instance, in section, Detecting NPM1 gene mutations in patient samples using the E-ice-COLD-PCR assay, opening sentence mentions "NPM1 mutations were detected in a total of 83 patient samples using the E-ice-COLD-PCR assay" which is wrong. Several inaccurate and misleading sentences are present throughout the manuscript. Similarly, the figures and associated legends should be revised as it is difficult to evaluate them in their current form. For example, In Figure 1, the authors could indicate which samples they believe to include double bands as wild type in gel that includes samples 60 to 65 appears to have have a double band and the contrasts are different between gel pictures.

Answer: We have revised the sentence that represent inaccurate or misleading sentence. The contrasts are difference between gel because we analyzed PCR products by acrylamide gel electrophoresis for 5-6 samples per a gel, but we have been tried to adjust the contrast for each gel in similar condition. However, the results are still difficult interpretation. This is a reason that why we develop new method for detecting NPM1 mutations.

2.2 It is very difficult to understand clearly and appreciate why and how the E-ice-COLD-PCR assay is better than the other existing assays. In the current manuscript, a one line limitation statement ("However, most of these methods are technically challenging, complicated, and expensive") is provided and it would be beneficial to have a clear comparison with an existing method and highlight how E-ice-COLD-PCR assay is more suitable showing better accuracy.

Answer: We have provided the discussion at line 367-378 and 401-405

2.3 The data shows 9 positive cases and one that has discrepancy between the sequencing and the PCR assay. However, the results sections do not describe the data well. The results include figure legends instead of clear description of the data. Thus, the presentation of the results section makes it very hard to evaluate the figures, data in general and the methods. Therefore, major, rigorous revision of all the sections and complete rewriting of the results section with clear introduction that places the use of NPM1 mutations detection in resource limited clinical settings including Thailand is needed before this can be considered for Publication. The discussion can be revised to actually focus on the data presented and how this compares to other currently available methods and the significance of the assay.

The presented study can be useful and may have a potential to contribute towards AML stratification and MRD but the manuscript requires major revision.

Answer: We have revised

3. Reviewer #2

3.1 Abstract, line 25: I think the authors need to use the word "ability" instead of "inability", since it refers to the limitation of the previous detection methods.

Answer: We have revised at line 26

3.2 Abstract, line 26: "HRM" is written for the first time, thus, must be written in full.

Answer: We have revised.

3.3 Abstract, line 27-28: Is the samples from AML patients with normal karyotype?

Answer: The samples weren’t examined the karyotype test because in this study we aim to develop the highly specific and sensitive screening method for NPM1 mutation in AML patients. We don’t concern about the karyotype of AML samples using validate the developed method. So, we use all types of AML samples without the identification of normal or abnormal karyotype to validate the developed method.

3.4 Introduction: I suggest the authors carefully check each of the statement that need to cite the reference. For examples, "AML is the major cause of death among hematological malignancies in Thailand" and "Recently, researchers have suggested that mutations of the nucleophosmin 1 (NPM1) gene represent the most frequent molecular alterations in AML that affect the processes of cellular differentiation and apoptosis, especially in the presence of a normal karyotype." There are other few statements.

Answer: We have already revised the sentence

3.5 Result, line 222-223: I suggest the authors write or label the respective patient samples with the mutation.

Answer: We have revised at line 240-241.

3.6 Result, line 239-241: Are you referring to Fig. 2a?

Answer: Yes, we are. We have revised.

3.7 Result, line 289-290: The authors state that "The results showed that nine samples contained NPM1 mutations, and the remaining samples were wild-type" in reference to Fig. 5. However, the number of mutant curve in Fig. 5 does not correspond with the number of samples with NPM1 mutation. Please clarify.

Answer: The fig 5, we represented the HRM difference curve from few mutant and wild-type samples because we would like to give some examples of data generated from HRM analysis. In addition, we represented mutant and wild-type results after HRM analysis in the same figure because we would like to show the differences between mutant and wild-type HRM difference curve in the same figure. For HRM analysis of total 83 patient samples, the PCR products were analyzed by HRM analysis, and the data generated in separated HRM difference curve from each other. The separation of HRM analysis in each sample resulting in clearly interpretation of HRM difference curve of patient samples. We show the results of the total 83 patients in supplementary data.

3.8 Result, line 295: I suggest the authors to show the calculation of PPV and NPV.

Answer: We have described the calculation of PPV and NPV at line 222-227.

3.9 Is the manuscript has been proofread? If not, I suggest that the authors get editing help from someone with full professional proficiency in English.

Answer: Yes, it is. We have proofread the manuscript.

Attachment

Submitted filename: response to reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Daniel Thomas

22 Aug 2022

Development of E-ice-COLD-PCR assay combined with HRM analysis for Nucleophosmin1 gene mutation detection in acute myelogenous leukemia

PONE-D-22-05079R1

Dear Dr. Duangmano,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Daniel Thomas, MD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Editor is satisfied that all reviewers' comments have been adequately addressed.

Reviewers' comments:

Acceptance letter

Daniel Thomas

5 Sep 2022

PONE-D-22-05079R1

Development of E-ice-COLD-PCR assay combined with HRM analysis for Nucleophosmin1 gene mutation detection in acute myelogenous leukemia

Dear Dr. Duangmano:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Daniel Thomas

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. The results of detecting NPM1 gene mutations in total 83 patient samples using a standard PCR assay.

    The PCR products are visualized on 10% polyacrylamide gel. MT indicates NPM1 mutated control and WT indicates NPM1 wild-type control. A double band indicates a heterogeneous mutation.

    (DOCX)

    S2 Fig. Detecting NPM1 gene mutations by HRM analysis.

    Detecting NPM1 gene mutations using the E-ice-COLD-PCR assay and generating the data into HRM difference curves. Red line indicates mutant control. Green line indicates wild-type control. The wild-type samples present the peak at the same location as the wild-type control, and the mutant samples present the peak at the same location as the mutant control.

    (DOCX)

    S1 Data

    (DOCX)

    S1 Raw images

    (PDF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: response to reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES