Skip to main content
PMC home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2022 Sep 14;12:15472. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19843-9

Ficus dubia latex extract prevent DMH-induced rat early colorectal carcinogenesis through the regulation of xenobiotic metabolism, inflammation, cell proliferation and apoptosis

Rentong Hu 1,2, Weerachai Chantana 1, Pornsiri Pitchakarn 1, Subhawat Subhawa 1, Bhanumas Chantarasuwan 3, Piya Temviriyanukul 4, Teera Chewonarin 1,✉
PMCID: PMC9474822  PMID: 36104433

Abstract

Ficus dubia latex is recognized as a remedy in Asian traditional medicine with various therapeutic effects. The present study aimed to determine the preventive action of Ficus dubia latex extract (FDLE) on 1,2-dimethylhydrazine (DMH)-induced rat colorectal carcinogenesis and its mechanisms. The experiment included an initiation model in which rats were orally administered with FDLE daily for 1 week before DMH injection until the end of the experiment, while only after DMH injection until the end in the post-initiation model. The results firstly indicated that FDLE treatment could reduce the level of methylazoxymethanol (MAM) in rat colonic lumen by inhibition of the activities of both phase I xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes in the liver and β-glucuronidase in the colon, leading to reduced DNA methylation in colonic mucosal cells, related to the number of ACF in the initiation stage. Besides, FDLE modulated the inflammation which could suppress the growth and induce apoptosis of aberrant colonic mucosal cells, leading to retardation of ACF multiplicity. Therefore, FDLE showed the ability to suppress the DMH-induced rat ACF formation and inflammation promoted growth of ACF. In conclusion, FDLE had the potential to prevent carcinogens-induced rat colorectal carcinogenesis in the initiation stage.

Subject terms: Biochemistry, Cancer

Introduction

Colorectal cancer is the third most recurrently diagnosed cancer and the fourth most likely cause of cancer mortality worldwide with increasing incidence in recent years1. Nowadays, the chemopreventive strategies using dietary supplements and natural active compounds show potential for the protection of humans against colorectal cancer in its early stages2,3.

DMH-induced colorectal carcinogenesis has been established to study the chemopreventive effect of test compounds in a variety of mechanisms4. With regard to the DMH-induced rat model, aberrant crypt foci (ACF) are preneoplastic lesions indicated the early stages of colorectal carcinogenesis in rats and associated with colorectal cancer5. Whereas, inflammation is considered to be an important risk factor for the progression of many cancers6 and it also promotes cell proliferation by activating proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) which, as a typical marker of cell proliferation, has an important role in DNA synthesis and DNA repair during the cell cycle from G1phase to S phase7. Therefore, to inhibit inflammation and cell proliferation or to induce cell apoptosis becomes an effective strategy to slow down the progression of cancer8,9.

Ficus dubia, as a new Ficus species, is abundantly found in tropical Asia, including southern Thailand, Malaysia and Sumatra. Only a few reports have shown that its latex extract had anti-inflammatory activity in lipopolysaccharide-induced macrophages and that its sap extract had anti-oxidant activity in skin10,11. Especially, its latex was utilized as an ingredient in traditional drugs, due to a belief in its health benefits, unsupported by any scientific data about its anti-tumor activity. However, research has found that the anti-tumor biological activities of other Ficus species have been reported. For example, Ficus racemose contains a high content of flavonoids which had anti-diabetes, anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidant and anti-proliferation properties12,13. The latex of Ficus carica showed an inhibitory effect on the proliferation of several cancer cells14,15. Therefore, the present study aims to evaluate the anti-tumor efficacy of Ficus dubia latex extract on DMH-induced rat colorectal carcinogenesis in early stage by investigating xenobiotic metabolism, inflammation, cell proliferation and apoptosis.

Results

Phytochemical composition analysis of FDLE

Total amounts of phenolic acids and flavonoids in FDLE were shown in Table 1. The total phenolic and flavonoid content of FDLE were 341.6 ± 5.4 mg gallic acid equivalent (GAE)/g extract and 72.8 ± 1.5 mg catechin equivalent (CE)/g extract, respectively. The HPLC chromatogram at 280 nm (Fig. 1a–c) showed that chlorogenic acid was the predominant phenolic compound in FDLE at RT = 10.759 which was calculated to 21.1 ± 0.6 mg chlorogenic acid (CGA)/g extract while unidentified peaks were observed at RT = 5.092, 8.264 and 11.180, respectively.

Table 1.

Total amounts of major phytochemicals in FDLE.

Phytochemicals Total amounts (mg/g FDLE)
Total phenolic content (mg GAE) 341.6 ± 5.4
Total flavonoid content (mg CE) 72.8 ± 1.5
Chlorogenic acid (mg CGA) 21.1 ± 0.6
Open in a new tab

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

HPLC chromatograms of (a) FDLE, (b) the standard of chlorogenic acid and apigenin and (c) FDLE with standard.

Effect of FDLE on aberrant crypt foci (ACF) formation in initiation stage

During the entire experiment (Fig. 2a,b), the death of rats, differences of body weight and increasing level of serum ALT and AST in both initiation stage and post-initiation stage were not observed (Supplementary Table S1). The number and size of aberrant crypt foci (ACF) in experimental rats are presented in Table 2 according to the morphological structure of ACF as shown in Supplementary Fig. S1. All rats treated with DMH exhibited ACF that was distributed throughout the colon (Gr.2–4), while no ACF was observed in the NSS-treated group (Gr.1 and Gr.5). The total numbers of ACF observed in the DMH-treated group (Gr.2) accounted for 241 ± 69 (5.8% inhibition) ACF/rat. Interestingly, only administration with FDLE at dose of 500 mg/kg bw (Gr.4) significantly decreased the total number of ACF/per rat to 151 ± 41 (37.3% inhibition), when compared with a group of DMH-treated alone (Gr.2). Then, the mechanistic effect of FDLE on mutagenicity of colonic epithelial cell was investigated in the initiation stage.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

The experimental protocol and treatment schedule. (a) Initiation stage and (b) post-initiation stage of DMH-induced ACF formation.

Table 2.

The number of ACF in DMH-treated rats with and without FDLE administration in initiation stage.

Treatment Number of ACF/rata Aberrant crypt/focus
Proximal Distal Rectal Total colon (% inhibition)
NSS (Gr.1) 0 ± 0 0 ± 0 0 ± 0 0 ± 0 0 ± 0
DMH (Gr.2) 115 ± 30 100 ± 32 26 ± 10 241 ± 69 1.6 ± 0.1
DMH + 100 mg/kg bw FDLE (Gr.3) 117 ± 29 93 ± 26 18 ± 9 227 ± 58 (5.8%) 1.5 ± 0.1
DMH + 500 mg/kg bw FDLE (Gr.4) 70 ± 24* 57 ± 15* 23 ± 10 151 ± 41* (37.3%) 1.7 ± 0.1
NSS + 500 mg/kg bw FDLE (Gr.5) 0 ± 0 0 ± 0 0 ± 0 0 ± 0 0 ± 0
Open in a new tab

aMean ± SD of 6 rats per group, *p < 0.05; Significantly different from Gr.2.

Effect of FDLE on DNA adduct and phase I and II xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes activities

During DMH metabolism, DNA methylation at the guanine O6 site (O6-MeG) was commonly observed in rat liver and colonic epithelial cells (Fig. 3a). The concentration of O6-MeG was determined 12 h after the second DMH injection in experimental rats and is presented in Fig. 3b. The O6-MeG level of DMH-treated rats (Gr.2) had significantly increased, when compared to the NSS-treated rats (Gr.1), in both liver tissue and colonic mucosa. In terms of FDLE-treated groups, administration at 100 and 500 mg/kg bw in DMH-treated rats (Gr.3 and 4), both significantly reduced the level of O6-MeG in both liver tissue and colonic mucosa, when compared to rats only treated with DMH (Gr.2), while no significant change in this number was observed in both FDLE alone and the control group.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Effect of FDLE on the metabolism of dimethylhydrazine and DNA adduct formation in rat liver and colon (a) scheme of inhibitory effect of Ficus dubia latex extract on DMH-induced carcinogenesis. (b) The level of O6-MeG DNA adducts in liver tissue and colonic mucosa. (c) The activity of phase I and II xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes in rat liver tissue, cytochrome P4502E1 (CYP2E1) catalyzed PNP-hydroxylation, (d) UDP-glucuronosyltransferase (UDPGT) and (e) Glutathione-S-transferase (GST), phase II detoxifying enzymes. (f) The activity of bacterial β-glucuronidase in rat feces. (g) Lineweaver–Burk plot of E. coli β-glucuronidase in the presence of FDLE with data representing three independent experiments with similar results. Rat experiments data are presented as the mean ± SD of five rats per group. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.

According to a reduction of DNA methylation by MAM, the effect of FDLE on MAM generation, including activities of hepatic DMH metabolizing enzyme, CYP2E1, UDPGT and GST were determined. Figure 3c–e illustrated the activities of CYP2E1, UDPGT, and GST, respectively. When the DMH-treated group (Gr.2) was compared to the NSS-treated group (Gr.1), the activity of CYP2E1-catalized hydroxylation was dramatically increased. FDLE administration at 100 and 500 mg/kg bw in DMH-treated rats (Gr.3 and 4) all significantly reduced this activity, when compared to rats only treated with DMH (Gr.2). Additionally, the activity of UDPGT and GST were also significantly increased in DMH-injected rats (Gr.2) in the response of reactive intermediates from phase I activity. For UDPGT, FDLE administration both 100 and 500 mg/kg bw in DMH-treated rats significantly reduced the activity, when compared to rats only treated with DMH (Gr.2), whereas only FDLE at 500 mg/kg bw was able to significantly reduce GST activity. In addition, PFLE treatment alone (Gr.5) had no effect on determined xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes. These results indicated that the reduction of phase I CYP2E1 activity decreased the generation of reactive intermediate MAM and the reduction of phase II UDPGT and GST activity decreased the production of MAM conjugate, which may cause the reduction of DNA adduct levels in the liver.

Effect of FDLE on rat fecal bacterial β-glucuronidase activity

In the colon, MAM conjugates are hydrolyzed to free MAM by intestinal bacterial β-glucuronidase enzymes, especially O6-methylguanine (O6-MeG), resulting in mutagenesis and thus tumorigenesis16; the activity of fecal bacterial β-glucuronidase before and after DMH injection are shown in Fig. 3f. The fecal β-glucuronidase activity in each group of rats was not different before DMH injection. After DMH injection, rat feces of the DMH-treated group (Gr.2) exhibited significantly higher β-glucuronidase activity (54.5%) compared to the NSS-treated group (Gr.1). In terms of FDLE administration, fecal β-glucuronidase activity in 500 mg/kg bw with DMH-treated group (Gr.4) significantly declined, when compared to that of the rats only treated with DMH (Gr.2). Looking at the similarities between patterns of 2nd before and after DMH injection, FDLE administration at doses of 100 and 500 mg/kg bw (Gr.3 and 4), both of which significantly decreased fecal β-glucuronidase activity compared to that of the DMH-treated alone group (Gr.2). However, only FDLE administration (Gr.5) had no effect on fecal β-glucuronidase activity, compared to the untreated group (Gr.1) in different times. The results revealed that inhibiting fecal bacterial β-glucuronidase by FDLE may result in similar effect in the liver by ultimately decreasing the level of MAM, as well as the level of DNA adducts and ACF formation in the colon. Subsequently, the effect of FDLE on the kinetics of β-glucuronidase inhibition in E. coli was investigated.

The kinetics of E. coli β-glucuronidase inhibition by FDLE were analyzed and Lineweaver–Burk plots were drawn as shown in Fig. 3g. In comparison to the untreated group, FDLE had no effect on the E. coli β-glucuronidase Vmax, whereas all dosages of FDLE treatments increased the Km values of E. coli β-glucuronidase in a dose-dependent manner. The results suggested that the FDLE was a competitive inhibitor against β-glucuronidase activity. These findings demonstrated that the lowering of DMH-induced O6-MeG DNA adduct formation in the colon was related to the regeneration of reactive intermediate MAM by bacterial β-glucuronidase. Therefore, FDLE could alter the DNA mutations and the formation of precancerous lesions during the initiation stage of colorectal carcinogenesis.

Effect of FDLE on aberrant crypt foci (ACF) progression in post-initiation stage

The number of ACF and crypt multiplicity (aberrant crypt/focus) in each part of the large intestine were presented in Table 3. The total number of ACF and average crypt multiplicity were observed in the DMH-treated group (Gr.2): about 354 ± 52 ACF/rat and 2.4 ± 0.2 AC/focus. Interestingly, administration with FDLE at doses of 100 and 500 mg/kg bw (Gr.3 and 4) significantly decreased the total number of ACF/rat to 239 ± 53 (32.5% inhibition) and 184 ± 63 (48.0% inhibition), when compared to rats only treated with DMH (Gr.2). Administration with FDLE at dose of 100 and 500 mg/kg bw (Gr.3 and 4) also significantly decreased the average crypt multiplicity to 2.0 ± 0.2 (16.7% inhibition) and 1.9 ± 0.1 (18.4% inhibition) when compared with DMH-treated group alone (Gr.2). Afterwards, the mechanistic effect of FDLE on inflammation, cell proliferation and apoptosis related to ACF progression were investigated in the post-initiation stage.

Table 3.

The number of ACF and AC/F in DMH-treated rats with and without FDLE administration in post-initiation stage.

Treatment Number of ACF/rata Aberrant crypt/focus (%inhibition)
Proximal Distal Rectal Total colon (% inhibition)
NSS (Gr.1) 0 ± 0 0 ± 0 0 ± 0 0 ± 0 0 ± 0
DMH (Gr.2) 136 ± 26 175 ± 33 43 ± 15 354 ± 52 2.4 ± 0.2
DMH + 100 mg/kg bw FDLE (Gr.3) 97 ± 28** 125 ± 39** 17 ± 12**** 239 ± 53**** (32.5%) 2.0 ± 0.2**** (16.7%)
DMH + 500 mg/kg bw FDLE (Gr.4) 73 ± 33**** 96 ± 30**** 15 ± 13**** 184 ± 63**** (48.0%) 1.9 ± 0.1**** (18.4%)
NSS + 500 mg/kg bw FDLE (Gr.5) 0 ± 0 0 ± 0 0 ± 0 0 ± 0 0 ± 0
Open in a new tab

aMean ± SD of 10 rats per group, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001, Significantly different from Gr.2.

Effects of FDLE on inflammation in rat colonic mucosal cells

Inflammation plays a vital role in mechanism of cancer development17. Firstly, the mRNA levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines and enzymes in rat colonic epithelial cells were determined, as shown in Fig. 4a. The relative expression of IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, iNOS and COX-2 in DMH treatment (Gr.2) were significantly upregulated, compared to NSS-treated rats (Gr.1). Administration with FDLE only at a dose of 500 mg/kg bw (Gr. 4) to DMH-treated rats were able to significantly suppress the expression of IL-1β, IL-6 when, while both doses at 100 and 500 mg/kg bw of FDLE (Gr.3–4) were found to considerably suppress the expression of TNF-α, iNOS and COX-2, when compared with DMH-treated rats (Gr.2). Administration with FDLE (Gr.5) had no effect on the expression of these genes. The results suggested that FDLE could reduce the rat colonic inflammation determined by the downregulation of IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, COX-2 and iNOS genes expression. However, the scraped colonic mucus layer was composed of both activated immune cells and colonic epithelial cells, the inflammatory responses in the colon cancer cell line and activated macrophage were confirmedly determined in vitro.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Anti-inflammation effects of FDLE (a) Relative mRNA level of pro-inflammatory cytokines and enzymes including IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α, iNOS and COX-2 in rat colonic mucosa. Data are presented as the mean ± SD of 4 rats per group. (b) The secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines including TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6 in LPS induce RAW 264.7 cells treated with FDLE. Relative mRNA levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6 in cytokines (TNF-α, IFN-γ and LPS each 10 ng/mL) induced colorectal cancer cell lines at 48 h. (c) HT-29 cells. (d) HCT-116 cells. Data are presented as the mean ± SD of three independent experiments which are similar results. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.

Effects of FDLE on inflammatory responses in cell lines

To elucidate the inhibitory effect on microenvironments rich in inflammatory cells by using LPS-activated RAW 264.7 cells, the level of pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6 were measured, as shown in Fig. 4b. LPS increased TNF-, IL-1, and IL-6 secretion, relative to the control group, but were not compared to FDLE alone. While FDLE significantly reduced TNF- and IL-1 secretion but had no effect on IL-6 secretion compared to LPS alone. This data assumed that FDLE could reduce inflammation in macrophage induced by bacterial lipopolysaccharide.

To investigate whether FDLE could modulate the response of human colorectal cancer cell lines to mixtures of TNF-α, IFN-γ and LPS, the mRNA expression of TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6 in HT-29 and HCT-116 in human colorectal cancer cell lines treated by a combination of cytokines was then measured and shown in Fig. 4c,d. After 48 h of treatment with a cytokine mixture, TNF-, IL-1, and IL-6 relative mRNA increased in HT-29 and HCT-116 colorectal cancer cells, compared to the negative control. FDLE reduced both TNF- and IL-1 expression in HT-29 cells, and TNF-, IL-1, and IL-6 expression in HCT-116 cells. The results indicated that FDLE also inhibited the responsibility of colorectal cancer cell lines to inflammatory cytokines from inflammation, which might be related to the growth promotion of aberrant colonic cells.

Effects of FDLE on cell proliferation and apoptosis of rat colonic mucosa in post-initiation stage

Inflammation plays a critical role in the neoplastic process by promoting proliferation and survival which inhibits apoptosis induction18. The protein expression related to cell proliferation and apoptosis in colonic mucosal cells was shown in the Fig. 5a–c. PCNA, cell proliferation marker protein, considerably higher in the DMH-treated group (Gr.2) compared to the NSS-treated group (Gr.1). FDLE at 100 and 500 mg/kg bw reduced the expression of PCNA protein in DMH-treated rats (Gr.3 and 4) compared to DMH alone (Gr.2). Furthermore, DMH administration retarded colonic epithelial cell apoptosis observed by reducing cleavage caspase-3 level, compared to NSS treatment (Gr.1). FDLE at 100 and 500 mg/kg bw significantly increased the level of cleaved caspase-3 protein in DMH-treated rats (Gr.3 and 4) compared to DMH alone (Gr.2). Likewise, rats only treated with FDLE (Gr.5) had no effect on the level of PCNA or cleaved caspase-3 proteins. These results confirmed that FDLE was able to inhibit cell proliferation and promote cell apoptosis in hyperproliferative colonic epithelial cells.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Effect of FDLE on cell proliferation and apoptosis in rat colonic mucosa and human colorectal cancer cells. (a) Immunoblot analysis of PCNA, cleaved caspase-3 and β-actin proteins. (b) Relative expression of PCNA to β-actin proteins. (c) Relative expression of cleaved caspase-3 to β-actin protein. Data are presented as the mean ± SD of four rats per group. Relative cell proliferation (%zerotime) of colorectal cancer cell lines with cytokines (TNF-α, IFN-γ and LPS each 10 ng/mL) or together with FDLE for 24 and 48 h. (d) HT-29 cells. (e) HCT-116 cells. Data are presented as the mean ± SD of three independent experiments with similar results, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001.

Effects of FDLE on cell proliferation of HT-29 and HCT-116 colorectal cancer cell lines induced by pro-inflammatory cytokines

To investigate the effect of FDLE on the growth of the HT-29 and HCT-116 colorectal cancer cell lines in an inflammatory environment, we examined FDLE's anti-proliferation activity against cytokine-induced HT-29 and HCT-116. As shown in Fig. 5d,e, treatment with cytokines resulted in a considerable increase in the relative cell number of HT-29 and HCT-116 at 48 h, when compared to the negative control. After 48 h, FDLE administration considerably decreased cytokine-induced HT-29 and HCT-116 cell proliferation, compared to the positive control; at the same time, a high dose of FDLE administration dramatically decreased cytokine-induced HT-29 and HCT-116 cell proliferation, compared to the negative control. Cytokines were found to enhance cell proliferation, whereas FDLE inhibited cell proliferation in both inflamed and non-inflamed HT-29 and HCT-116 colorectal cancer cell lines.

Discussion

Ficus species are a rich source of polyphenolic compounds and flavonoids, which are responsible for antioxidant, anti-inflammation and anti-proliferation properties that help in the prevention of various diseases19–21. The biological composition and function of Ficus dubia as a new Ficus species have not been studied on its which should have greater research value. Our finding showed that FDLE contains 34.2% of phenolic acids and 7.3% of flavonoids, whereas the chlorogenic acid accounted for 161.84 mg per gram of latex (2.1%) and a comparable quantity of total phenolic content and extraction yield of 7.67% from previous study10. Additionally, the aforementioned study provides similar results for quinic acid, a metabolite form of chlorogenic acid. The remaining phenolic acids detected in FDLE require further investigation to determine their identity. In terms of other Ficus species, especially F. carica, the most common phenolic chemicals were chlorogenic acid, followed by rutin despite the plant's extraction from other parts22–24. Chlorogenic acid could increase ROS generation and decrease cell viability in human colorectal cancer cells, whereas quinic acid, a chlorogenic derivative, exhibited anticancer effects in HT-29 human colorectal cancer cells in vitro and xenograft models25,26. Moreover, it may be a major active ingredient in Ficus dubia latex, which could be used to prevent liver and prostate cancer as a functional natural substance27. Therefore, the effect of FDLE on DMH-induced rat colorectal carcinogenesis was investigated by designed concentration according to existing of chlorogenic acid in the extract and non-toxic range (LD50 > 5000 mg/kg bodyweight).

Based on the initiation of colorectal carcinogenesis, the transformation of normal crypts to aberrant crypt foci (ACF) is a hallmark of DMH-induced colorectal carcinogenesis that has been used in a variety of studies to evaluate the extract's effects4. Moreover, in both animal and human, ACF are the earliest identifiable lesions and a critical morphological feature in the early stages of colorectal carcinogenesis which can be recognized on the colon mucosa28,29. ACF has been utilized to evaluate the preventative effects of natural compounds on the early stages of colorectal carcinogenesis30. Earlier evidence suggested that the bioactive compounds which inhibit ACF could also promote the anti-carcinogenicity of carcinogen-induced colorectal cancer models31–33. In our study, no adverse effects were found in the rats only treated with FDLE throughout an 8-week period, indicating that FDLE had not toxicity in this experimental model, as shown in Supplementary Table S1. ACF is mainly reflected in the appearance of small crypt multiplicity, which indicates the initiation of colorectal cancer. However, the progression of ACF is manifested in the transformation of small into large crypt multiplicity, which shows the progression of colorectal cancer34. Our results demonstrated that FDLE treatment diminished not only the total number of ACF, but also the size of crypts, particularly those with a large crypt multiplicity. Therefore, it could be firstly summarized that FDLE suppressed ACF formation at the initiation stage of DMH-induced colorectal carcinogenesis and prevented ACF progression during the post-initiation stage.

In DMH-induced rat ACF formation, liver CYP2E1 activate DMH to form methylazoxymethanol (MAM) that interacts with DNA, resulting in DNA adduction at O6-methylguanine (O6-MeG) and N7-methylguanine (N7-MeG) and then, ultimately, occur mutagenesis and tumorigenesis16,35. Therefore, reducing phase I enzyme activity is considered to be an effective strategy to prevent DNA adduct formation by reactive intermediates in the early stage35–37. It was found that DMH administration significantly increased the activities of CYP2E1 enzymes subsequently increased the level of O6-MeG DNA adduct in the liver, whereas the administration with FDLE significantly reduced these effects (Fig. 3b,c). UDPGT and GST detoxifying enzymes that increase the water solubility and decrease the toxicity of xenobiotic substrates by conjugation with glucuronic acid and glutathione, respectively38 were also determined. Unfortunately, the activities of these phase II enzymes were decreased which responded to the inhibition of phase I enzyme (Fig. 3d,e). Consequently, the data indicated that FDLE decreases DNA adducts in liver primarily by inhibiting the activity of phase I enzyme which relates to the formation of MAM.

In colon lumen, intestinal bacterial β-glucuronidase hydrolyzes the conjugated MAM to release free MAM39. After it is reabsorbed to colonic epithelial cell, the colorectal carcinogenesis is proceeded by DNA adduct and mutation40. Therefore, reducing bacterial β-glucuronidase activity is an effective strategy to prevent colorectal carcinogenesis36,41. In this study, administration with FDLE significantly reduced the activity of bacterial β-glucuronidase induced by DMH in the rat colon (Fig. 3f) and FDLE was confirmed to be a competitive inhibitor against purified E.coli β-glucuronidase (Fig. 3g). Therefore, administration with FDLE significantly reduced the colon O6-MeG DNA adduct by lowering free MAM from bacterial enzyme hydrolysis. All the mentioned results can be concluded that FDLE inhibited DMH-induced colorectal carcinogenesis through the alteration of xenobiotic metabolizing processes in both the liver and colon, which causes the reduction of DNA adduct levels and ACF numbers in the initiation stage. Likewise, Chlorogenic acid has been also reported to inhibit ACF formation in rat-received azoxymethane (AOM) by affecting the AKT/mTOR pathway42,43. Therefore, the well-known effect of chlorogenic acid has been used to compare the effects of FDLE in this study.

In post-initiation stage, DMH was administered to rats before FDLE treatment to determine its suppressive activities on ACF progression4. Due to the difference in ACF progression time, the amount of DMH-induced ACF in the post-initiation stage was greater than in the initiation stage, while FDLE administration still significantly decreased, accounting for 32% and 48% at doses of 100 and 500 mg/kg bw, respectively. Moreover, FDLE showed inhibitory effect against ACF multiplicity (Table 3). Therefore, in-depth investigation of the mechanism was interesting to investigate. It has been established that inflammation promotes tumor progression and pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-, IL-6, and IL-1 can cooperate to regulate colorectal cancer-associated cell proliferation and differentiation, immunity, metabolism and metastatic behavior44,45. According to certain research, the expression of these inflammatory cytokines is increased during carcinogenesis; hence, inhibition of inflammation using certain active substances serves as an effective approach to prevent colorectal cancer44,46,47. Our experiment also found that DMH significantly increased the inflammatory response, while treatment with FDLE markedly decreased the expression of TNF-α, IL-6, IL-1β, iNOS and COX-2 in rat colonic mucosa, substantiating their inhibitory action towards inflammation-associated colorectal tumor progression (Fig. 4a). In addition, the anti-inflammation of FDLE on macrophages was also analyzed. FDLE significantly decreased LPS-induced secretion of TNF-α and IL-1β from macrophages (Fig. 4b). Moreover, mixed cytokines could induce inflammatory responses in HT-29 and HCT-116 colorectal cancer cell lines (Fig. 4c,d), which could promote these cancer proliferations (Fig. 5d,e). It could be demonstrated that inflammation and an inflammatory microenvironment could continue to promote cell inflammation and proliferation48. Interestingly, FDLE suppressed the expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and enzymes induced by carcinogens or inflammatory inducers, which could establish their anti-inflammatory and anti-proliferative potential. Our experimental findings support the concept that inhibitors of one or some of these inducible pro-inflammatory cytokines are potential chemopreventive agents against colorectal carcinogenesis in preclinical models49. Correspondingly, chlorogenic acid has also been reported to decrease the inflammatory response by decreasing TNF-α and COX-2 levels50.

The balance of cell proliferation and apoptosis is critical for the intestinal mucosa's integrity, and dysregulation of tumor cell proliferation and apoptosis frequently results in hyperplasia and carcinogenesis2,46,51. Therefore, inhibiting cell proliferation and inducing cell apoptosis are considered to be effective strategies for the prevention and treatment of cancer9. In this experiment DMH dramatically raised nuclear availability of PCNA protein, a marker of DNA synthesis, leading to increase cellular proliferation of colonic epithelial cells which related to aberration of colonic crypt alignment in DMH-treated rat according to the morphological structure of ACF (Supplementary Fig. S1). Administration with FDLE significantly decreased the expression of PCNA protein (Fig. 5a,b) with the amelioration of ACF (Supplementary Fig. S1). In addition, colorectal cancer cell lines proliferation was response to combinations of cytokines whereas this growth was suppressed by FDLE treatments (Fig. 5d,e). In terms of apoptosis, DMH dramatically reduced the activation of caspase-3, but an increase of cleaved caspase 3 was observed following FDLE administration, demonstrating that FDLE may enhance cell apoptosis (Fig. 5a,d). Moreover, these effects are most likely the result of chlorogenic acid that suppresses cell proliferation and induces apoptosis43,52. When combined with the results of previous inflammation and ACF in vivo and in vitro experiments, these data clearly demonstrated that FDLE inhibited the multiplicity of ACF by controlling inflammation, which leads to decreased cell proliferation and induces cell apoptosis in the post-initiation stage and this plant will be value-added further in the future.

Conclusion

The experimental findings of our study indicate that administration of FDLE effectively prevent DMH-induced rat colorectal carcinogenesis in the early stage by the inhibition of ACF formation and progression. FDLE inhibits ACF formation by reducing xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes activities in the liver and reducing β-glucuronidase activity in the colon, leading to both reduced formation of DNA adducts and the number of ACF, in the initiation stage. FDLE inhibits ACF progression by reducing inflammation, leading to decreased cell proliferation and increased cell apoptosis which caused a decrease of ACF numbers and crypt multiplicity in the post-initiation stage. Therefore, the latex of Ficus dubia has the potential to be a chemopreventive agent for colorectal diseases. The molecular mechanisms and the applications should be further investigated. A summary of chemopreventive mechanism of FDLE in DMH-induced rat colorectal carcinogenesis in the early stage is shown in Fig. 6.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

The chemopreventive mechanism of FDLE in DMH-induced rat colorectal carcinogenesis in the early stage.

Materials and methods

All methods in these studies were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations. In addition, the animal protocol has been proved by the Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Thailand (code: 04/2562). We confirmed that all data were reported in accordance with ARRIVE guidelines.

Chemicals

The carcinogen 1, 2-dimethylhydrazine (DMH) was obtained from Tokyo Chemical Industry. P-nitrophenyl-β-d-glucuronide, E coli β-glucuronidase, glutathione, uridine diphosphate glucuronic acid (UDPGA), 1-chloro-2,4dinitro benzene (CDNB), glycogen, guanine and O6-MeG were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Co. Tris–HCl and sucrose were obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. Phenol–chloroform–isoamylalcohol was obtained from Research Organics Inc. Other reagent grade chemicals were obtained from Merck Millipore Bioscience (Thailand).

The extraction and preparation of Ficus dubia latex

Ficus dubia latex was collected and identified by Bhanumas Chantarasuwan, National Science Museum, Thailand (voucher number: Chantarasuwan 040117-1) and extract was conducted and provided by the Institute of Nutrition, Mahidol University as described in previous study10. The powder of Ficus dubia latex was soaked with deionized water at the ratio of 1:10 w/v. The aqueous fraction was filtrated and freeze-dried. The crude extract powder of Ficus dubia latex (FDLE) was kept at − 20 °C for further experiments. FDLE was dissolved in deionized water just before use.

Measurement of total phenolic and flavonoid contents

The total phenolic contents were determined by Folin–Ciocaiteu assay, as described in Song et al.53. The total phenolic contents were calculated and expressed as gallic acid equivalents (GAE) in mg/g extract, by comparison with the standard calibration curve of gallic acid. The total flavonoid contents were determined by aluminum chloride colorimetric method. The assay was performed according to the method of Subedi et al.54 The total flavonoid contents were calculated and expressed as catechin equivalents (CE) in mg/g extract by comparison with the standard calibration curve of catechin.

Measurement of known phenolic and flavonoid concentration

The phenolic and flavonoid fingerprint of FDLE were determined by HPLC, according to the method of Shao et al.55. The extract was determined for the existence of phytochemical contents by HPLC using a C18 column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm) (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The chromatographic separation was carried out using the isocratic mode of mobile phase A (1% acetic acid in water) and mobile phase B (100% acetonitrile) with a total run time of 50 min for detection with a flow rate of 0.7 mL/min. The gradient system used was 90% A in 0 min–60% in 28 min, followed by 40% in the next 39 min and 10% in the next 50 min. The extract of 10 mg/mL dissolved in 1 mL of MeOH was injected into the column and phytochemical contents at 280 nm were detected. The peak area and retention time of the extract sample were evaluated as the comparison with the standard curve (apigenin and chlorogenic acid).

Animals model and protocol approving

The male Wistar rats (4–5 weeks of age, weighing 80–100 g) used in this study were purchased from Nomura Siam International, Thailand. Rats were housed in cages in an air-conditioned room (25–30 °C) with exposure to 12/12-h light/dark cycle. The animal treatment protocol was approved by the Animal Ethics Committee, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Thailand (code: 04/2562).

Colorectal cancer induction and experimental protocol and treatment schedule

Initiation protocol

Rats were divided into five groups (10 rats each). The control groups (groups 1 and 5) received a normal diet (negative control) and only a high dose of FDLE (treatment control) with 0.9% normal saline solution (NSS) injection, respectively. In the experimental groups, positive control (group 2) rats received a normal diet. Rats in group 3 and 4 received FDLE of 100 and 500 mg/kg bodyweight (equal to chlorogenic acid 2.1 and 10.5 mg/kg body weight), respectively, for 1 week before the first injection of DMH and continued for 5 weeks. All experimental rats were injected with DMH (40 mg/kg of body weight), subcutaneously, once a week at weeks 1 and 2. Feces of rats from each group were directly collected for β-glucuronidase activity measurement. Twelve hours after the second DMH injection (2 weeks), five rats of each group were sacrificed using Zoletil 100, a combination of tiletamine and zolazepam, at 20 mg/kg of body weight. The liver and colon were collected for xenobiotic metabolism enzyme activity and DNA adduct determination. After 5 weeks, the remaining six rats were sacrificed, then the colon was collected and processed for ACF determination according to Bird et al.28. The whole colon was collected and defined as having three parts including proximal colon (caecum, ascending colon, transverse colon), distal colon (descending colon and sigmoid colon) and rectum(rectal) according the description by Keum56 as shown in Supplementary Fig. S2. Serum was used for measurement of ALT and AST for liver function.

Post-initiation protocol

The grouping was the same as the initiation stage with 14 rats/group, FDLE were treated after 2 weeks of the second DMH injection for a further 4 weeks. After the rats were sacrificed, colons from six rats were fixed for determination of ACF and those from the other four rats were frozen for mRNA and protein extraction. The toxicity of FDLE was evaluated by rat body weight and serum transaminase activity, sGOT and sGPT.

Aberrant crypt foci (ACF) analysis

Rat colons were removed and fixed in 10% formalin-phosphate-buffer saline (PBS) solution (pH 7.4) by initial cutting the rectum (2 cm from the anus) followed by the proximal and distal convoluted tubule halving of the colon. Fixed colons were stained with 0.2% blue methylene, then the ACF were scored under a light microscope at a magnification of 10 ×. The number of ACF/rat and AC/focus were analyzed according to Bird et al.28.

Measurement of phase I and phase II xenobiotic metabolic enzymes activity

Liver tissues were extracted cytosolic and microsomal protein by centrifugal sedimentation33. The procedure for microsomal cytochrome P4502E1 (CYP2E1)-catalyzed p-nitrophenol hydroxylation measurement was based on the method described by Chang et al., with some modifications57, the enzyme activity was calculated and expressed as micromole of product formed/min/mg protein. UDP-Glucuronosyltransferase (UDPGT) activity measurement was done using p-nitrophenyl phosphate (PNP) as the substrate according to the modified method of Woodcock et al.58, while glutathione-S-transferase (GST) activity measurement was evaluated by monitoring the conjugation of 1-chloro-2,4-dinitro benzene (CDNB) with glutathione, according to the methods of Habig et al.59.

Measurement of fecal bacterial β-glucuronidase activity

Fecal bacterial β-glucuronidase activity was measured using rat feces collected before and after the injections of DMH, using p-nitrophenyl phosphate (PNP) as the substrate, according to the modified method of Deeptha et al.60. The enzyme activity was calculated and expressed as μmol min−1/g feces. To determine the kinetically inhibitory effect of FDLE E. coli β-glucuronidase, 5 µL of 20 U/mL of E. coli β-glucuronidase was added to a reaction mixture containing 5 µL of 0.1 M PBS pH 7.0, 5 µL of 0.1 mM EDTA with the 5 µL of various concentration of FDLE and incubated at 37 °C for 15 min. The reaction was started by adding 5 µL of 2–8 mM of p-nitrophenyl-β-d-glucuronide (PNPG) substrate or distilled water (blank), then the reaction mixture was incubated at 37 °C for 15 min. After adding 200 µL of 0.2 M glycine buffer, pH 10.4 in 0.2 M NaCl, absorbance was measured at 450 nm to calculate the reaction velocity in the presence of each concentration of inhibitor (extract). The alteration of Km and Vmax were determined from double-reciprocal plot to define the inhibition type of FDLE against β-glucuronidase.

Measurement of DNA adducts O6-methylguanine by HPLC

The procedure for detection of DNA adducts was based on the method described by Iwitzki et al.61 Frozen liver and colon were defrosted on ice. Total DNA was isolated by phenol–chloroform and DNA in the aqueous phase was precipitated with cold ethanol. 500 μg of DNA was hydrolyzed in 1 M HCl at 95 °C for 1 h (acid hydrolysis). Diluted DNA hydrolysate was analyzed using an Agilent HPLC Column (PL-SCX1000A 10 μm 250 × 4.6 mm). The isocratic separation with buffer A (10% methanol in 20 mM ammonium formate, pH 4.0) was carried out for 3 min then a linear gradient was applied ranging from buffer A to 25% buffer B (5% methanol in 200 mM ammonium formate, pH 4.0) for 15 min, followed by 25% buffer B for 2 min at a flow rate of 1.5 mL/min. The nucleotide bases were detected using a UV detector at 275 nm. The amount of hydrolyzed DNA was quantified by the peak area of the guanine and O6-methylguanine. The level of O6-methylguanine was calculated by using a standard curve and expressed as micromole of O6-MeG/mole of guanine.

Determination of pro-inflammatory cytokines and enzymes mRNA expression by qPCR

Total RNA from rat colonic mucosa was isolated using Trizol reagent (AMBION, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The cDNA was synthesized from total RNA (2 µg) using ReverTra Ace qPCR RT master mix (TOYOBO, Japan) in a 20 µL reaction mixture carried out at 37 °C for 15 min, 50 °C for 5 min, 98 °C for 5 min. PCR amplification performed with the maxima SYBR Green qPCR master mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA), the reaction included at 95 °C for 15 min, 95 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 60 s for 40 cycles and the PCR-amplified gene products were analyzed. The specific primer parings were; TNF-α fwd 5′-AAATGGGCTCCCTCTCATCAGTCC-3′, rev 5′-TCTGCTTGGTGGTTTGCTACGAC-3′; IL-6 fwd 5′-TCCTACCCCAACTTCAATGCTC-3′, rev 5′-TTGGATGGTCTTGGTCCTTA-GCC-3′; IL-1β: fwd 5′-CACCTCTCAAGCAGAGCACAG-3′, rev 5′-GGGTTCCATGGT-GAAGTCAAC-3′; COX-2 fwd 5′-GCCCACCAACTTACAATGTGC-3′, rev 5′-CATGGG-AGTTGGGCAGTCAT-3′ and iNOS fwd 5′-CATTGGAAGTGAAGCGTTTCG-3′, rev 5′-CAGCTGGGCTGTACAAACCTT-3′ were quantified with normalization to β-actin mRNA fwd 5′-GACATGCCGCCTGGAGAAAC-3′, rev 5′-AGCCCAGGATGCCCTTTAGT-3′. Level of mRNAs were quantified with normalization to β-actin mRNA.

Measurement of pro-inflammatory cytokine in culture supernatant by ELISA

Firstly, RAW264.7 cells (5 × 105 cells) were cultured in a 6-well plate with 1 µg/mL lipopolysaccharide (LPS) for 24 h. Then, the cells were washed with PBS and various concentrations of PFLE (50, 100 and 200 µg/mL) were added for 24 h. Finally, the culture supernatant was collected and used to determine the secreted inflammatory cytokines including TNF-α, IL-1β and IL-6 with ELISA kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA and Canada) according to the manufacturer’s instruction. Three independent experiments were performed with at least triplicate per experiment.

Measurement of cell proliferation by MTT

HT-29 and HCT-116 colon cancer cells (1 × 104 cells) were cultured in a 96-well plate with cytokines (TNF-α, IFN-γ and LPS at each 10 ng/mL) for 24 h, then, various concentrations of FDLE (50, 100 and 200 µg/mL) were added for 24 and 48 h. At the indicated times, 15 µL of 5 mg/mL MTT solution were added. The incubation was carried out at 37 °C for 4 h. All solution was discarded and a 100 µL DMSO was added to dissolve formazan crystals. The violet solution was measured the absorbance at 540/630 nm by using microplate reader. A percentage of cell proliferation was calculated against vehicle treated cells. The experiments were repeated three times with at least triplicate per experiment.

Measurement of PCNA and cleaved caspase-3 by western blot

Total proteins were collected after centrifugation of epithelial cell homogenate and SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) was used to separate denatured proteins and then transferred them onto nitrocellulose membrane. The transferred proteins were detected using specific primary anti-PCNA (1:2000), anti-cleaved caspase-3 (1:1000), anti-β-actin (1:5000) overnight at 4 °C and secondary anti-rabbit (1:5000) were labeled with horse radish peroxidase enzyme followed by chemiluminescent substrate. The specific target proteins were visualized by adding Western Lightening Chemiluminescent HRP Substrate (PerkinElmer, USA) and the pictures were captured by Kodak X-ray film. The intensity of the target proteins was measured by ImageJ program. The relative expression was normalized against β-actin expression and then compared to the non-treatment group.

Statistical analysis

The values are given as the mean ± SD. Significant differences between the means of the groups were analyzed by one way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The results were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. All the image quantifications were done by Image-Pro (version 7.0). All the statistics were performed on GraphPad Prism 6.0 (GraphPad Software, USA).

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Figures. (489.9KB, docx)
Supplementary Tables. (16.8KB, docx)

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by Agricultural Research Development Agency (Public Organization) (grant number: CRP610502213).

Author contributions

T.C. has contributed considerably to the study conception and experimental design. R.H. and W.C. was responsible for experimental performing, data collecting, and analysis. B.C., was responsible for sample collecting and identification. P.T. and P.P. prepared materials and extracts with quality control. R.H. and S.S. wrote the first draft of the manuscript, and all authors provided feedback on previous versions. T.C. read and approved the submitted version. All authors have agreed both to be personally accountable for the author’s own contributions and to ensure that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-022-19843-9.

References

  • 1.Okada K, et al. Combination of the histone deacetylase inhibitor depsipeptide and 5-fluorouracil upregulates major histocompatibility complex class II and p21 genes and activates caspase-3/7 in human colon cancer HCT-116 cells. Oncol. Rep. 2016;36:1875–1885. doi: 10.3892/or.2016.5008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Aranganathan S, Nalini N. Retracted: Antiproliferative efficacy of hesperetin (citrus flavanoid) in 1, 2-dimethylhydrazine-induced colon cancer. Phytother. Res. 2013;27:999–1005. doi: 10.1002/ptr.4826. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Manju V, Nalini N. Effect of ginger on lipid peroxidation and antioxidant status in 1, 2-dimethyl hydrazine induced experimental colon carcinogenesis. J. Biochem. Technol. 2010;2:161–167. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Khanaree C, Pintha K, Tantipaiboonwong P, Suttajit M, Chewonarin T. The effect of Perilla frutescens leaf on 1, 2-dimethylhydrazine-induced initiation of colon carcinogenesis in rats. J. Food Biochem. 2018;42:e12493. doi: 10.1111/jfbc.12493. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Nguyen LH, Goel A, Chung DC. Pathways of colorectal carcinogenesis. Gastroenterology. 2020;158:291–302. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.08.059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Murata M. Inflammation and cancer. Environ. Health Prev. Med. 2018;23:1–8. doi: 10.1186/s12199-018-0740-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Strzalka W, Ziemienowicz A. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA): A key factor in DNA replication and cell cycle regulation. Ann. Bot. 2011;107:1127–1140. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcq243. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Thangaraj K, et al. Orientin induces G0/G1 cell cycle arrest and mitochondria mediated intrinsic apoptosis in human colorectal carcinoma HT29 cells. Biomolecules. 2019;9:418. doi: 10.3390/biom9090418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhang R, Xu J, Zhao J, Wang X. Silencing of hsa_circ_0007534 suppresses proliferation and induces apoptosis in colorectal cancer cells. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2018;22:118–126. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201801_14108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chansriniyom C, et al. Tandem mass spectrometry of aqueous extract from Ficus dubia sap and its cell-based assessments for use as a skin antioxidant. Sci. Rep. 2021;11:1–13. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-96261-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Rodthayoy, D. et al. Effect of Ficusdubia latex and root extracts in lipopolysaccharide-induced macrophages. Innovation of Functional Foods in Asia (IFFA), 205 (2018).
  • 12.Li RW, et al. A new anti-inflammatory glucoside from Ficus racemosa L. Planta Med. 2004;70:421–426. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-832644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Veerapur V, et al. Ficus racemosa stem bark extract: A potent antioxidant and a probable natural radioprotector. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2009;6:317–324. doi: 10.1093/ecam/nem119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Badgujar SB, Patel VV, Bandivdekar AH, Mahajan RT. Traditional uses, phytochemistry and pharmacology of Ficus carica: A review. Pharm. Biol. 2014;52:1487–1503. doi: 10.3109/13880209.2014.892515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Soltana H, et al. Antitumoral activity of Ficus carica L. on colorectal cancer cell lines. Cell. Mol. Biol. 2019;65:6–11. doi: 10.14715/cmb/2019.65.6.2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Megaraj V, et al. Role of hepatic and intestinal p450 enzymes in the metabolic activation of the colon carcinogen azoxymethane in mice. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2014;27:656–662. doi: 10.1021/tx4004769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Coussens LM, Werb Z. Inflammation and cancer. Nature. 2002;420:860–867. doi: 10.1038/nature01322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Sugiyama M, et al. Localisation of apoptosis and expression of apoptosis related proteins in the synovium of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 1996;55:442–449. doi: 10.1136/ard.55.7.442. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Sirisha N, Sreenivasulu M, Sangeeta K, Chetty CM. Antioxidant properties of Ficus species—A review. Int. J. Pharmtech. Res. 2010;2:2174–2182. [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lv H, et al. Phytochemical compositions and antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities of crude extracts from Ficus pandurata H. (Moraceae) Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2013;2013:215036. doi: 10.1155/2013/215036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ali B, et al. Anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activity of Ficus carica Linn. leaves. Nat. Prod. Res. 2012;26:460–465. doi: 10.1080/14786419.2010.488236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.El-hawary SS, Ali ZY, Younis IY. Hepatoprotective potential of standardized Ficus species in intrahepatic cholestasis rat model: Involvement of nuclear factor-κB, and Farnesoid X receptor signaling pathways. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2019;231:262–274. doi: 10.1016/j.jep.2018.11.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Çalişkan O, Polat AA. Phytochemical and antioxidant properties of selected fig (Ficus carica L.) accessions from the eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey. Sci. Hortic. 2011;128:473–478. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2011.02.023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Khadhraoui M, Bagues M, Artés F, Ferchichi A. Phytochemical content, antioxidant potential, and fatty acid composition of dried Tunisian fig (Ficus carica L.) cultivars. J. Appl. Bot. Food Qual. 2019;92:143–150. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Hou N, Liu N, Han J, Yan Y, Li J. Chlorogenic acid induces reactive oxygen species generation and inhibits the viability of human colon cancer cells. Anticancer Drugs. 2017;28:59–65. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0000000000000430. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Liu ZH, Zhang SY, Yu YY, Su GQ. (–)-4-O-(4-O-β-d-glucopyranosylcaffeoyl) quinic acid presents antitumor activity in HT-29 human colon cancer in vitro and in vivo. Mol. Cell. Toxicol. 2015;11:457–463. doi: 10.1007/s13273-015-0049-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Suttisansanee U, et al. Health-promoting bioactivity and in vivo genotoxicity evaluation of a hemiepiphyte fig, Ficus dubia. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021;9:2269–2279. doi: 10.1002/fsn3.2205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bird RP. Observation and quantification of aberrant crypts in the murine colon treated with a colon carcinogen: Preliminary findings. Cancer Lett. 1987;37:147–151. doi: 10.1016/0304-3835(87)90157-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mori H, Hata K, Yamada Y, Kuno T, Hara A. Significance and role of early-lesions in experimental colorectal carcinogenesis. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2005;155:1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2005.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Pretlow TP, Pretlow TG. Mutant KRAS in aberrant crypt foci (ACF): Initiation of colorectal cancer? Biochim. Biophys. Acta (BBA) Rev. Cancer. 2005;1756:83–96. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2005.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Sengottuvelan M, Viswanathan P, Nalini N. Chemopreventive effect of trans-resveratrol-a phytoalexin against colonic aberrant crypt foci and cell proliferation in 1, 2-dimethylhydrazine induced colon carcinogenesis. Carcinogenesis. 2006;27:1038–1046. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgi286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Kilari BP, Kotakadi VS, Penchalaneni J. Anti-proliferative and apoptotic effects of Basella rubra (L.) against 1, 2-dimethyl hydrazine-induced colon carcinogenesis in rats. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2016;17:73–80. doi: 10.7314/APJCP.2016.17.1.73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Summart R, Chewonarin T. Purple rice extract supplemented diet reduces DMH-induced aberrant crypt foci in the rat colon by inhibition of bacterial β-glucuronidase. Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2014;15:749–755. doi: 10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.2.749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Cheng L, Lai M-D. Aberrant crypt foci as microscopic precursors of colorectal cancer. World J. Gastroenterol. 2003;9:2642–2649. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v9.i12.2642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zhu Q-C, et al. Effect of a high-fat diet in development of colonic adenoma in an animal model. World J. Gastroenterol. WJG. 2014;20:8119. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i25.8119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Pallem PVSP, Bodiga S, Bodiga VL. Dietary phytate lowers K-ras mutational frequency, decreases DNA-adduct and hydroxyl radical formation in azoxymethane-induced colon cancer. Iran. J. Basic Med. Sci. 2020;23:20. doi: 10.22038/IJBMS.2019.34374.8161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Senapathy JG, Jayanthi S, Viswanathan P, Umadevi P, Nalini N. Effect of gallic acid on xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes in 1, 2-dimethyl hydrazine induced colon carcinogenesis in Wistar rats—A chemopreventive approach. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2011;49:887–892. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2010.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Fisher MB, Paine MF, Strelevitz TJ, Wrighton SA. The role of hepatic and extrahepatic UDP-glucuronosyltransferases in human drug metabolism. Drug Metab. Rev. 2001;33:273–297. doi: 10.1081/DMR-120000653. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Weisburger JH. Colon carcinogens: Their metabolism and mode of action. Cancer. 1971;28:60–70. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197107)28:1&#x0003c;60::AID-CNCR2820280113&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-U. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Manoj G, Thampi B, Leelamma S, Menon P. Effect of dietary fiber on the activity of intestinal and fecal beta-glucuronidase activity during 1, 2-dimethylhydrazine induced colon carcinogenesis. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2001;56:13–21. doi: 10.1023/A:1008188009174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Azcárate-Peril MA, Sikes M, Bruno-Bárcena JM. The intestinal microbiota, gastrointestinal environment and colorectal cancer: A putative role for probiotics in prevention of colorectal cancer? Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2011;301:G401–G424. doi: 10.1152/ajpgi.00110.2011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Exon JH, Magnuson BA, South EH, Hendrix K. Effect of dietary chlorogenic acid on multiple immune functions and formation of aberrant crypt foci in rats. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A. 1998;53:375–384. doi: 10.1080/009841098159231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Banerjee N, et al. Plum polyphenols inhibit colorectal aberrant crypt foci formation in rats: Potential role of the miR-143/protein kinase B/mammalian target of rapamycin axis. Nutr. Res. 2016;36:1105–1113. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2016.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Umesalma S, Sudhandiran G. Differential inhibitory effects of the polyphenol ellagic acid on inflammatory mediators NF-κB, iNOS, COX-2, TNF-α, and IL-6 in 1, 2-dimethylhydrazine-induced rat colon carcinogenesis. Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2010;107:650–655. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2010.00565.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ullman TA, Itzkowitz SH. Intestinal inflammation and cancer. Gastroenterology. 2011;140:1807–1816.e1801. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.01.057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Thangaraj K, Vaiyapuri M. Orientin, a C-glycosyl dietary flavone, suppresses colonic cell proliferation and mitigates NF-κB mediated inflammatory response in 1, 2-dimethylhydrazine induced colorectal carcinogenesis. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017;96:1253–1266. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.11.088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Long AG, Lundsmith ET, Hamilton KE. Inflammation and colorectal cancer. Curr. Colorectal Cancer Rep. 2017;13:341–351. doi: 10.1007/s11888-017-0373-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Yu B, Hu J, Li Q, Wang F. CircMAP3K11 contributes to proliferation, apoptosis and migration of human periodontal ligament stem cells in inflammatory microenvironment by regulating TLR4 via miR-511 sponging. Front. Pharmacol. 2021;12:139. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.633353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Patel MJ, et al. A supercritical CO2 extract of neem leaf (A. indica) and its bioactive liminoid, nimbolide, suppresses colon cancer in preclinical models by modulating pro-inflammatory pathways. Mol. Carcinog. 2018;57:1156–1165. doi: 10.1002/mc.22832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Yun N, Kang JW, Lee SM. Protective effects of chlorogenic acid against ischemia/reperfusion injury in rat liver: Molecular evidence of its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2012;23:1249–1255. doi: 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2011.06.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Holmgren L, O'Reilly MS, Folkman J. Dormancy of micrometastases: Balanced proliferation and apoptosis in the presence of angiogenesis suppression. Nat. Med. 1995;1:149–153. doi: 10.1038/nm0295-149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Sadeghi Ekbatan S, Li XQ, Ghorbani M, Azadi B, Kubow S. Chlorogenic acid and its microbial metabolites exert anti-proliferative effects, S-phase cell-cycle arrest and apoptosis in human colon cancer Caco-2 cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018;19:723. doi: 10.3390/ijms19030723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Song F-L, et al. Total phenolic contents and antioxidant capacities of selected Chinese medicinal plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2010;11:2362–2372. doi: 10.3390/ijms11062362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Subedi L, et al. Antioxidant activity and phenol and flavonoid contents of eight medicinal plants from Western Nepal. J. Tradit. Chin. Med. 2014;34:584–590. doi: 10.1016/S0254-6272(15)30067-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Shao Y, Xu F, Sun X, Bao J, Beta T. Phenolic acids, anthocyanins, and antioxidant capacity in rice (Oryza sativa L.) grains at four stages of development after flowering. Food Chem. 2014;143:90–96. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.07.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Keum N, Giovannucci E. Global burden of colorectal cancer: Emerging trends, risk factors and prevention strategies. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2019;16:713–732. doi: 10.1038/s41575-019-0189-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Chang TK, Crespi CL, Waxman DJ. Cytochrome P450 Protocols. Springer; 2006. pp. 127–131. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Woodcock B, Wood G. Effect of protein-free diet on UDP-glucuronyltransferase and sulphotransferase activities in rat liver. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1971;20:2703–2713. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(71)90180-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Habig WH, Pabst MJ, Jakoby WB. Glutathione S-transferases: The first enzymatic step in mercapturic acid formation. J. Biol. Chem. 1974;249:7130–7139. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)42083-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Deeptha K, Kamaleeswari M, Sengottuvelan M, Nalini N. Dose dependent inhibitory effect of dietary caraway on 1, 2-dimethylhydrazine induced colonic aberrant crypt foci and bacterial enzyme activity in rats. Investig. New Drugs. 2006;24:479–488. doi: 10.1007/s10637-006-6801-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Iwitzki F, et al. Nickel (II) inhibits the repair of O6-methylguanine in mammalian cells. Arch. Toxicol. 1998;72:681–689. doi: 10.1007/s002040050561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Figures. (489.9KB, docx)
Supplementary Tables. (16.8KB, docx)

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES