Skip to main content
JAMA Network logoLink to JAMA Network
. 2022 Sep 14;158(11):1323–1325. doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2022.3180

Prevalence of Contact Allergens in Natural Skin Care Products From US Commercial Retailers

Peter A Young 1,2,, Haiwen Gui 1, Gordon H Bae 1,
PMCID: PMC9475434  PMID: 36103164

Abstract

This quality improvement study assesses the prevalence of contact allergens in personal care products classified as clean or natural among 3 national retailers in the US.


Contact dermatitis is the fifth most prevalent skin disease in the US,1 exceeding $1.5 billion in direct annual medical costs.2 Personal care products (PCPs) such as soaps, lotions, and fragrances contain ingredients that may cause allergic contact dermatitis (ACD).2 The prevalence of PCP-related dermatitis increased 2.7-fold between 1996 and 2016.3 Increasing numbers of natural PCPs (NPCPs) have been marketed to consumers concerned about the effects of chemicals on the skin, such as irritation and allergic reactions. Retail chains such as supermarkets are the most prolific distributors of NPCPs, accounting for 41.7% of worldwide NPCP revenue in 2019.4 The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not defined clean or natural, allowing sellers to freely advertise with these terms that imply safety and health benefits.

Contact dermatitis is only preventable by identification and avoidance of causative substances,5 but patients may find avoidance difficult owing to complex ingredient names.2 Confusion may be compounded by NPCP manufacturers frequently listing botanical extracts (leading causes of contact dermatitis and photosensitization) by their Latin names.

Little is known about the allergenic potential of NPCPs. The increasing prevalence of ACD, expanding NPCP industry, and lack of regulation by the FDA underscore the need for objective study. Therefore, we evaluated 1651 NPCPs from 3 national retailers in the US for the presence of allergens using the American Contact Dermatitis Society’s (ACDS) Contact Allergen Management Program (CAMP), a web-based resource for patients with ACD.

Methods

The Stanford University School of Medicine institutional review board deemed this quality improvement study exempt and waived informed consent because it was non–human participant research. We followed the SQUIRE reporting guideline.

Using Python, version 3.8.9, we extracted product ingredient lists of NPCPs from 3 national retailer websites from January to March 2022: Target.com, Walgreens.com, and WholeFoodsMarket.com. Using filters on the websites, products categorized as natural or clean were included. Products without allergens were manually checked. Products considered irrelevant (cotton rounds, scrub brushes, and oral multivitamins), duplicates (doubly listed due to multiple container sizes), and products without readily accessible ingredient lists were excluded.

Allergen was defined as a contact sensitizer according to the CAMP database. Ingredients were cross-referenced with the 191 contact allergens in CAMP. Identified allergenic ingredients and the number of allergens per product were recorded. Clinical prevalence for identified allergens was determined by cross-referencing earlier work describing the 100 allergens most frequently eliciting positive reactions using ACDS patch tests (Table 1).6

Table 1. Clinical Prevalence of Contact Allergens and Products Containing Them.

Allergena Clinical prevalence, rankb NPCPs with ingredient, No. (%) (N = 1651)
Fragrance mixc 1 605 (36.6)
Eugenolc,d 1 40 (2.4)
Hexyl cinnamalc,d 3 57 (3.5)
Cinnamic alcoholc,d 3 1 (0.1)
MCI, MITd 9 23 (1.4)
Propylene glycol 10 162 (9.8)
Iodopropynyl butylcarbamate 11 37 (2.2)
P-phenylenediamine 13 2 (0.1)
Propolis 14 7 (0.4)
Cocamidopropyl betaine 20 129 (7.8)
Linalool 21 297 (18.0)
Benzoyl peroxide 28 2 (0.1)
Dimethylaminopropylamine 30 1 (0.1)
Decyl glucoside 31 98 (5.9)
Limonenec 32 309 (18.7)
Rosin 35 2 (0.1)
Diazolidinyl urea 41 17 (1.0)
Benzoate 44 428 (25.9)
Sodium benzoate 44 381 (23.1)
Benzyl benzoate 44 44 (2.7)
Benzoic acid 44 117 (7.1)
Benzophenone-4 46 8 (0.5)
Tea tree (melaleuca) oil 52 77 (4.7)
Benzalkonium chloride 54 3 (0.2)
Benzyl salicylate 58 63 (3.8)
Lanoline 59 43 (2.6)
DMDM hydantoin 60 14 (0.8)
Cocamide DEA 61 1 (0.1)
Carmine 62 19 (1.2)
Tocopherolf 63 792 (48.0)
Ammonium persulfate 64 1 (0.1)
Benzyl alcoholc 65 189 (11.4)
Phenoxyethanol 70 776 (47.0)
Benzophenone-3 71 5 (0.3)
Lauryl glucoside 82 57 (3.5)
Chlorhexidine digluconate 83 7 (0.4)
Propyl gallate 89 1 (0.1)
Triethanolamine 90 18 (1.1)
Amyl cinnamalc 96 31 (1.9)
Jasminec 97 32 (1.9)
Isoeugenolc 98 2 (0.1)
Sorbic acid 99 37 (2.2)
Peppermintc 100 45 (2.7)
Cetyl alcohold,g NA 268 (16.2)
Stearyl alcohold,g NA 100 (6.1)
Lyralc,g,h NA 10 (0.6)
BHTg NA 2 (0.1)

Abbreviations: BHT, butylated hydroxytoluene; DEA, diethanolamine; DMDM, 1,3-dimethylol-5, 5-dimethyl; MCI, methylchloroisothiazolinone; MIT, methylisothiazolinone; NA, not applicable; NPCPs, natural personal care products.

a

Seventy-three unique allergens were identified; the table includes 43 that were among the 100 most clinically prevalent sources of allergic contact dermatitis6 and 4 (cetyl alcohol, stearyl alcohol, Lyral, and BHA) that are clinically prevalent but were not among the top 100.

b

Based on data from Scheman et al.6

c

Commonly used as fragrance.

d

Clinical prevalence ranks shown are for closely related substances that would elicit a positive reaction: cetyl alcohol and stearyl alcohol (not ranked among the 100 most clinically prevalent allergens) test positive to cetylstearyl alcohol; eugenol is found in fragrance mix; hexyl cinnamal and cinnamic alcohol are common components of Balsam of Peru; and MCI cross-reacts with MIT.

e

Lanolin, lanolin alcohol, and wool alcohol.

f

Tocopherol and vitamin E.

g

Clinically prevalent but not among the 100 most clinically prevalent allergens.

h

Lyral and hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde.

Results

Of the 1756 NPCPs advertised, 105 did not meet inclusion criteria for analysis. Of the remaining 1651 NPCPs, 1555 (94.2%) had at least 1 contact allergen, 1478 (89.5%) contained 1 or more contact allergens from among the 100 most clinically prevalent, and 96 (5.8%) had no contact allergens. The mean (SD) number of contact allergens per product was 4.5 (3.2). There were 73 unique allergens identified, appearing 7487 times on ingredient lists of the 1555 products (Table 2).

Table 2. Summary of Analyses.

Overall Walgreens.com WholeFoodsMarket.com Target.com
NPCPs, No. (%)
Total analyzed 1651 (100) 393 (100) 203 (100) 1055 (100)
With contact allergens 1555 (94.2) 380 (96.7) 179 (88.2) 996 (94.4)
With top-100 contact allergensa 1478 (89.5) 378 (96.2) 172 (84.7) 928 (87.9)
Allergens per NPCP
Median (IQR) 4 (2-6) 6 (4-8) 3 (1-5) 4 (2-6)
Mean (SD) 4.5 (3.2) 6.4 (3.7) 3.5 (3.0) 4.1 (2.7)
Unique allergens, No. 73 66 37 60
Total allergenic ingredients, No. 7487 2497 707 4283

Abbreviation: NPCP, natural personal care product.

a

The 100 most prevalent causes of acute contact dermatitis.6

Discussion

Most of the analyzed NPCPs contained contact allergens, including many fragrances, and 89.5% contained 1 or more of the 100 most prevalent allergens in the ACDS CAMP database. These results suggest a need to educate patients and health care professionals to ensure the public is informed about the products they apply to their skin.

A study limitation is that comparing allergen prevalence in NPCPs vs ordinary PCPs was beyond our scope because retailers did not have a distinct category for nonnatural products. Also, owing to marketing and website differences between retailers, product types (eg, shampoo vs lotion, leave on vs wash off) were not uniformly obtainable; thus, these comparisons were not practicable.

The results suggest that advertising claims that PCPs are natural or clean may not portend health or safety with respect to ACD. This knowledge may enable clinicians to guide consumers toward purchasing decisions that could lessen ACD prevalence and preserve health care resources.

References

  • 1.Lim HW, Collins SAB, Resneck JS Jr, et al. The burden of skin disease in the United States. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76(5):958-972.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.12.043 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Nguyen HL, Yiannias JA. Contact dermatitis to medications and skin products. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2019;56(1):41-59. doi: 10.1007/s12016-018-8705-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Warshaw EM, Schlarbaum JP, Silverberg JI, et al. Contact dermatitis to personal care products is increasing (but different!) in males and females: North American Contact Dermatitis Group data, 1996-2016. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;85(6):1446-1455. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.10.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Grand View Research . Natural skin care products market report, 2023-2030. September, 2020. Accessed December 12, 2021. https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/natural-skin-care-products-market
  • 5.Zhu TH, Suresh R, Warshaw E, et al. The medical necessity of comprehensive patch testing. Dermatitis. 2018;29(3):107-111. doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000362 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Scheman A, Patel KR, Roszko K, et al. Relative prevalence of contact allergens in North America in 2018. Dermatitis. 2020;31(2):112-121. doi: 10.1097/DER.0000000000000521 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from JAMA Dermatology are provided here courtesy of American Medical Association

RESOURCES