ABSTRACT
This report describes the complete genome sequences of four isolates of the nondiphtheritic Corynebacterium (NDC) species Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriticum and Corynebacterium propinquum, recovered during investigation of a large diphtheria outbreak in Bangladesh. These data will assist in better delineating the boundary between these related species and understanding their virulence potential.
ANNOUNCEMENT
While toxigenic strains of Corynebacterium diphtheriae cause diphtheria, various nondiphtheritic Corynebacterium (NDC) species commonly colonize the skin and mucous membranes of various mammals (1). NDC are considered commensals but have gradually been recognized as opportunistic pathogens associated with endocarditis, pneumonitis, bronchiectasis, and skin infections (2–7). NDC identified as Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriticum were codetected with C. diphtheriae in a large diphtheria outbreak reported previously (8). Subsequent whole-genome sequencing (WGS) revealed that 7.14% of the recovered NDC isolates were instead Corynebacterium propinquum, which is morphologically and biochemically similar (9). Isolates were selected to represent four unique biochemical profiles defined by API Coryne strips (bioMérieux, Durham, NC). Here, we report the complete genome sequences of three C. pseudodiphtheriticum isolates and one C. propinquum isolate to enrich the limited genomic resources of NDC species.
Isolates were grown from cryogenic stocks at CDC by streaking onto Trypticase soy agar with 5% sheep blood at 37°C for 24 h. Genomic DNA was extracted using the Maxwell RSC whole-blood DNA kit (Promega, San Luis Obispo, CA), further cleaned by salt/chloroform washing (10), and quantified using the Qubit double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) broad-range kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). WGS was performed using both an Illumina MiSeq instrument (Illumina, San Diego, CA) and a PacBio Sequel II instrument (Pacific Biosciences, Menlo Park, CA). Illumina libraries were prepared using the NEBNext Ultra DNA library prep kit (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA), which resulted in DNA fragments of 500 to 1,000 bp for sequencing with the Illumina reagent kit v2 (500 cycles). PacBio libraries were prepared, following the selection of fragments of >20 kb with BluePippin (Sage Science, Beverly, MA, USA), using a SMRTbell template prep kit v2.0 and sequenced using the Sequel binding kit v2.0 with internal controls. The Illumina raw reads were checked for quality using FastQC v0.11.5 (11) and trimmed and filtered with Cutadapt v2.3 (-q 20,20 -m 50 –max-n = 2) (12). The PacBio reads were de novo assembled without filtering using Flye v2.9 (13), manually checked for circularity using Gepard v1.30 (14), and further polished by mapping them onto the Illumina trimmed reads using CLC Genomics Workbench v21 (CLC bio, Boston, MA, USA). The assembly completeness was evaluated using QUAST v5.0.2 (15). Finally, the assemblies were annotated using the NCBI Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP) (16). Default parameters were used for all software unless otherwise noted.
The genome of C. propinquum PC1113 was distinguishable in length, G+C content, and number of predicted protein-coding sequences (CDSs) (Table 1). The average nucleotide identity (ANI) between PC1113 and C. propinquum reference genomes (GenBank accession numbers CP068160 and CP068161) was 97.6%, while the ANI between PC1113 and the three C. pseudodiphtheriticum genomes here averaged 86.8%, consistent with their species assignment based on a 95% threshold (17). All four genomes encoded ermX, a determinant of macrolide resistance (18). Compared with the virulence factor profile of C. diphtheriae NCTC13129 (NC_002935.2), all four encoded similar iron uptake systems but lacked the adherence pili. A further query against the Virulence Factor Database (VFDB) (19) predicted genes encoding acid resistance, antiphagocytosis, and copper uptake, leaving much to learn about the ecology of NDC species.
TABLE 1.
Characteristics of the four NDC isolates and genome assemblies in this study
Strain | Species | API code | Illumina |
PacBio |
Genome size (bp) | G+C content (%) | No. of CDSs | PC0752 = CD1121 for the GenBank accession no. | SRA accession no. | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No. of reads | Coverage (×) | No. of reads | Coverage (×) | ||||||||
PC0752 | C. pseudodiphtheriticum | 5001004 | 1,552,280 | 152 | 65,122 | 418 | 2,374,277 | 55.4 | 2,078 | CP091087 | SRR17736613 |
PC1113 | C. propinquum | 7001004 | 1,218,404 | 117 | 108,487 | 644 | 2,514,362 | 56.6 | 2,185 | CP091865 | SRR17736611 |
PC1130 | C. pseudodiphtheriticum | 5101004 | 1,154,574 | 111 | 127,414 | 790 | 2,362,766 | 55.3 | 2,045 | CP091864 | SRR17736600 |
PC1145 | C. pseudodiphtheriticum | 7101004 | 2,658,698 | 258 | 104,700 | 630 | 2,402,479 | 55.2 | 2,094 | CP091863 | SRR17736585 |
Data availability.
The trimmed sequencing reads have been deposited at the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under accession numbers SRR17736613, SRR17736611, SRR17736600, and SRR17736585. The complete genome sequences have been deposited at GenBank under the accession numbers CP091087.1, CP091865.1, CP091864.1, and CP091863.1. The versions described in this paper are the first versions.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank colleagues at the Institute of Epidemiology, Disease Control & Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh, for providing specimens for this work. We also acknowledge the Special Bacteriology Reference Laboratory at CDC for performing biochemical testing for the four isolates in this study. In addition, we thank Janessa S. Aneke and Gladys Maldonado-Quiles for performing the Etest.
The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Contributor Information
Michael R. Weigand, Email: mweigand@cdc.gov.
Frank J. Stewart, Montana State University
REFERENCES
- 1.Bernard K. 2012. The genus Corynebacterium and other medically relevant coryneform-like bacteria. J Clin Microbiol 50:3152–3158. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00796-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Colt HG, Morris JF, Marston BJ, Sewell DL. 1991. Necrotizing tracheitis caused by Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriticum: unique case and review. Rev Infect Dis 13:73–76. doi: 10.1093/clinids/13.1.73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Diez-Aguilar M, Ruiz-Garbajosa P, Fernández-Olmos A, Guisado P, Del Campo R, Quereda C, Cantón R, Meseguer MA. 2013. Non-diphtheriae Corynebacterium species: an emerging respiratory pathogen. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 32:769–772. doi: 10.1007/s10096-012-1805-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hemsley C, Abraham S, Rowland-Jones S. 1999. Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriticum—a skin pathogen. Clin Infect Dis 29:938–939. doi: 10.1086/520466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jangda U, Upadhyay A, Bagheri F, Patel NR, Mendelson RI. 2016. Corynebacterium propinquum: a rare cause of prosthetic valve endocarditis. Case Rep Med 2016:1391789. doi: 10.1155/2016/1391789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Martaresche C, Fournier PE, Jacomo V, Gainnier M, Boussuge A, Drancourt M. 1999. A case of Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriticum nosocomial pneumonia. Emerg Infect Dis 5:722–723. doi: 10.3201/eid0505.990517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Morris A, Guild I. 1991. Endocarditis due to Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriticum: five case reports, review, and antibiotic susceptibilities of nine strains. Rev Infect Dis 13:887–892. doi: 10.1093/clinids/13.5.887. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Weil LM, Williams MM, Shirin T, Lawrence M, Habib ZH, Aneke JS, Tondella ML, Zaki Q, Cassiday PK, Lonsway D, Farrque M, Hossen T, Feldstein LR, Cook N, Maldonado-Quiles G, Alam AN, Muraduzzaman AKM, Akram A, Conklin L, Doan S, Friedman M, Acosta AM, Hariri S, Fox LM, Tiwari TSP, Flora MS. 2021. Investigation of a large diphtheria outbreak and cocirculation of Corynebacterium pseudodiphtheriticum among forcibly displaced Myanmar nationals, 2017–2019. J Infect Dis 224:318–325. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bernard K, Pacheco AL, Cunningham I, Gill N, Burdz T, Wiebe D. 2013. Emendation of the description of the species Corynebacterium propinquum to include strains which produce urease. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 63:2146–2154. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.046979-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.PacBio. 2014. Guidelines for using a salt:chloroform wash to clean up gDNA. https://www.pacb.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/09/Shared-Protocol-Guidelines-for-Using-a-Salt-Chloroform-Wash-to-Clean-Up-gDNA.pdf.
- 11.Andrews S. 2010. FastQC: a quality control tool for high throughput sequencing data. https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/.
- 12.Martin M. 2011. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet J 17:10–12. doi: 10.14806/ej.17.1.200. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kolmogorov M, Yuan J, Lin Y, Pevzner PA. 2019. Assembly of long, error-prone reads using repeat graphs. Nat Biotechnol 37:540–546. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0072-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Krumsiek J, Arnold R, Rattei T. 2007. Gepard: a rapid and sensitive tool for creating dotplots on genome scale. Bioinformatics 23:1026–1028. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Gurevich A, Saveliev V, Vyahhi N, Tesler G. 2013. QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29:1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Tatusova T, DiCuccio M, Badretdin A, Chetvernin V, Nawrocki EP, Zaslavsky L, Lomsadze A, Pruitt KD, Borodovsky M, Ostell J. 2016. NCBI prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res 44:6614–6624. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P, Tiedje JM. 2007. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57:81–91. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64483-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ortiz-Perez A, Martín-de-Hijas NZ, Esteban J, Fernández-Natal MI, García-Cía JI, Fernández-Roblas R. 2010. High frequency of macrolide resistance mechanisms in clinical isolates of Corynebacterium species. Microb Drug Resist 16:273–277. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2010.0032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Chen L, Yang J, Yu J, Yao Z, Sun L, Shen Y, Jin Q. 2005. VFDB: a reference database for bacterial virulence factors. Nucleic Acids Res 33:D325–D328. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The trimmed sequencing reads have been deposited at the NCBI Sequence Read Archive under accession numbers SRR17736613, SRR17736611, SRR17736600, and SRR17736585. The complete genome sequences have been deposited at GenBank under the accession numbers CP091087.1, CP091865.1, CP091864.1, and CP091863.1. The versions described in this paper are the first versions.