Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2022 Sep 15;17(9):e0274702. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274702

Prevalence and intensity of soil-transmitted helminth infections and associated risk factors among household heads living in the peri-urban areas of Jimma town, Oromia, Ethiopia: A community-based cross-sectional study

Ahmed Zeynudin 1,*, Teshome Degefa 1, Million Tesfaye 2, Sultan Suleman 3, Elias Ali Yesuf 4, Zuber Hajikelil 5, Solomon Ali 6, Khalide Azam 7, Abdusemed Husen 8, Jafer Yasin 9, Andreas Wieser 10,11,12
Editor: Hesham M Al-Mekhlafi13
PMCID: PMC9477373  PMID: 36107925

Abstract

Background

Ethiopia has set national targets for eliminating soil-transmitted helminths (STH) as public health problems by 2020 and for breaking their transmission by 2025 using periodic mass treatment of children in endemic areas. However, the status of STH infection among the adults living in the same communities remains unknown. The aim of this study, therefore, was to determine the prevalence and intensity of STH infections and associated factors among the household heads in the peri-urban areas of Jimma town, Oromia, Ethiopia.

Methods

A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted in five peri-urban kebeles (smallest administrative unit in Ethiopia) of Jimma town from May to July 2021. A semi-structured questionnaire was used to collect data on socio-demographic and predisposing factors. The Kato-Katz concentration technique was utilized to detect and quantify the STH in stool samples. Both bivariate and multivariate analyses were done. P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

A total of 376 household heads (19.9% women and 80.1% men) from peri-urban areas were included in the study. The overall STH prevalence was 18.1% (95% CI: 14.6–22.1) with A. lumbricoides being the predominant species (11.4%) followed by T. trichiura (7.2%) and hookworm (2.1%). Most of the STH positive household heads had single infections (85.3%) and light-intensity infections (88.5%). Wealth status (AOR = 2.7; 95% CI: 1.31–5.50, P = 0.007), hand washing habits before meals (AOR = 7.07; 95% CI: 1.79–27.88, p = 0.005), fingernails status (AOR = 2.99; 95% CI: 1.59–5.65, p = 0.001), and toilet facility type (AOR = 2.06; 95% CI: 1.13–3.76, p = 0.017) were found to have statistically significant associations with the STH infection.

Conclusion

The findings of this study showed a nearly moderate level of STH prevalence among household heads in the peri-urban community. This could serve as an important reservoir for reinfection of the treated children and other at-risk groups in the community.

Introduction

Soil-transmitted helminths (STH) are among the most common and widely distributed infections, particularly in tropical and subtropical countries where poverty, inadequate sanitation and hygiene are common [1,2]. Globally, over 1.5 billion people are estimated to be infected with STH, leading to an estimated 3.3 million disability-adjusted life years [35]. Ascaris lumbricoides, Trichuris trichiura, and hookworms (Necator americanus and Ancylostoma duodenale) are the three main species of concern that infect humans with a global prevalence estimated to be 1.2 billion, 795 million, and 740 million people, respectively [6]. Sub-Saharan Africa [7], the Americas, India, China and East Asia are the most affected regions, predominantly carrying the highest burden of STH infections [2,4,8].

In sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), helminth infections account for approximately 85% of the neglected tropical diseases, with hookworm infection affecting almost half of the SSA’s poorest communities [9]. Over the past decades, there are reports of considerable reductions in the intensity of STH infections through a combination of measures including preventive chemotherapy (PC), improved water supplies and sanitation, as well as hygiene education programs implemented in different countries in SSA [10,11]. Nevertheless, the STH infection continues to pose a major socio-economic challenge and remains an important public health problem in many countries in SSA including Ethiopia [12].

Ethiopia is one of the most populous low-income African countries with one of the highest burdens of STH infections [7]. It is estimated that 79 million people live in areas endemic to STH. This population consists of about 9.1 million pre-school-aged children (pre-SAC), 25.3 million school-aged children (SAC), and 44.6 million adults (above 18 years of age). The number of people living in these areas and requiring treatment for STH is estimated to be 53.6 million people, including 4.6 million pre-SAC, 17.7 million SAC, and 31.3 million adults [13,14]. Low socioeconomic status, poor sanitation, very low latrine coverage and the lack of access to safe drinking water are some of the major factors contributing to an increased risk and high prevalence of STH and other infectious diseases in Ethiopia [1416].

Morbidity and the burden of the disease resulting from STH infection are directly related to the intensity of infection and its chronic nature [4,17]. Moderate and heavy infection intensity and chronic STH infection can result in and contribute to anemia, malnutrition, growth stunting, low birth weight, physical and cognitive impairment, decreased school performance and hence impacting negatively on economic development [18,19]. Pre-SAC, SAC, women of reproductive age, and adults in high-risk occupations are the vulnerable groups with a significant burden of STH infections [4].

The current global control and prevention strategy for STH infections is based on an integrated approach which includes periodic medicinal treatment (deworming) with single-dose albendazole (400 mg) or mebendazole (500 mg) in the target population and health education on environmental sanitation and personal hygiene [1,4]. These measures are intended to prevent re-infection and reduce soil contamination [1,4,11]. The control efforts have reduced the intensity of infections among pre-SAC and SAC with associated reductions in morbidity in the targeted populations. However, adults and other vulnerable groups in the population are not frequently targeted and remain important reservoirs for reinfection of the treated children as well as others [20].

Ethiopia has set an ambitious national target of eliminating STH as public health problems by 2020, and breaking their transmission by 2025 [21]. Therefore, there is a need to additionally incorporate other groups at risk in the community into the current target population, increasing the impact of the interventions and eliminating STH as a public health concern [22]. Most of the studies conducted in Ethiopia mainly focus on SAC, and data regarding the prevalence and distribution among adults are scarce [23]. Therefore, the present study was undertaken to determine the prevalence and intensity of soil-transmitted helminth infections as well as associated risk factors among the household heads (HH) in the peri-urban areas of Jimma town, Oromia, Ethiopia.

Materials and methods

Study design and setting

A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted in five Peri-urban kebeles (the smallest administration unit in Ethiopia, which comprises of a population of approximately 5,000 household populations) of Jimma town from May to July 2021. Jimma town is located 356 km south-west of the capital city, Addis Ababa. Geographically, it is located at a latitude and longitude of 7° 40’ N, 36° 50’ E and between altitudes of 1750 and 2000m above sea level. The town is characterized by a semi-arid type of climate with an average annual rainfall of 800–2,500 mm and a temperature range of 20–30°C [24]. Based on the 2007 Ethiopian central statistical agency census report and current projections, the total population of the town was estimated to be 205,384 in 2018 [25]. The town is divided into 17 kebeles (12 urban and 5 peri-urban kebeles). Jiren, Bore, Horagibe, Kofe, and Ifabula are the names of the five peri-urban kebeles that surround Jimma town and are covered by the study (Fig 1).

Fig 1. Location of the study sites: The five peri-urban kebeles in Jimma town, Oromia, Ethiopia.

Fig 1

Sample size and sampling procedure

The sample size was determined using a single population proportion formula and assuming a 48.25% prevalence rate of STH derived from a previous study conducted in Jimma town [26]. By using a marginal error of 5%, a 95% confidence interval, and 10% non-response rates, the total sample size was calculated to be 422 household heads. All the five kebeles in the peri-urban areas of Jimma town were included in the study. Using the stratified random sampling method, the sample size for each kebeles (stratum) was determined by proportionate allocation to the total number of households in the kebeles. Finally, the head of the household in each of the selected households in the five peri-urban kebeles was selected and asked for consent to be included in the study (Fig 2).

Fig 2. Diagrammatic representation of the study kebeles (area) and their respective household heads (HH).

Fig 2

Qualitative data collection and processing

Data on demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, personal and household level sanitation and hygiene practices, as well as other potential risk factors for STH infections, were collected using a pretested semi-structured questionnaire and a checklist prepared for the purpose of this study. The questionnaire was first prepared in English and then translated into the local language (Afan Oromo). Trained community health workers conversant in the local language made house-to house visits and collected the qualitative data from each of the HH heads after obtaining written informed consent.

Stool sample collection and examination

A sufficient amount of stool specimens (approximately 5 g) was collected from each participant by an experienced laboratory technologist using a clean, leak-proof, screw-cap stool cup labeled with a unique identifier (UID) and following standard operating procedures. All collected specimens were checked for their labels, quantity, and procedure of collection. The stool specimen was then stored in a plastic bag and transported to the medical parasitology laboratory at Jimma University within 2 hours. The stool specimens were processed using a single Kato-Katz smear and examined microscopically to detect ova of the STHs and to quantify the intensity of infections based on fecal egg count (eggs per gram) and according to WHO guidelines [27]. All the Kato-Katz slides were prepared immediately after the arrival of the stool specimens in the laboratory and read between 20 and 30 minutes after slide preparation, which is less than the WHO recommends reading time (30 to 60 minutes) to have better results for hook worm [28].

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical clearance was obtained from Jimma University Research and Ethics Review Board (IRB) (Reference No. IHRPGD/227/13 in Ethiopian calendar) and permission to conduct the study was obtained from Jimma Zone Health Bureau. Informed written consent was obtained from each household head prior to involvement in the study. Confidentiality of an individual’s information was maintained during data collection, analysis, and interpretation. Individuals found positive for any STH were treated with albendazole (400 mg/day, P.O. for three days by the study nurse.

Data analysis

The collected data was manually checked for completeness and consistency before being coded and double-entered into EpiData version 4.6. The data was then exported to SPSS statistical software version 25.0 for further analysis. Normality was checked for continuous variables using histograms, PP plots and Q-Q plots. The dependent variable was any STH infection among the household heads. The independent variables such as demographic, socioeconomic, environmental and behavioral factors were treated as categorical variables and presented as frequencies and percentages. A chi-square test was performed where appropriate to identify any association between STH infection and the independent variables. Both, bivariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were employed to identify the candidate variables and potential risk factors for STHs respectively. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated, and a p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The wealth index of the household was assessed using the demographic health survey (DHS) [29,30].

Results

Socio-demographic characteristics of the household heads

A total of 422 households with an eligible head of household in the peri-urban community were included in this study with a response rate of 89% (n = 376). Of the 376 households that participated in the study, 19.9% and 80.1% of the households were headed by women and men, respectively. The mean age of the household heads was 40.92 ± 9.3 (mean ± SD) years, with the age range from 26 to 75 years. The family size ranged from 2 to 10 individuals per household, with a mean of 4.8 ± 1.5. The majority of the household heads were married (85.4%), had primary school or less education (78.5%), were farmers (32.9%) by occupation, and had low income (36.7%) (Table 1).

Table 1. Prevalence of STH and its distribution by socio-demographic characteristics of the household heads in the peri-urban area of Jimma town, Oromia, Ethiopia, May to July 2021 (n  =  376).

Variables Categories Prevalence rate
Any STH A. lumbricoides T. trichiura Hookworm species Total
n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%)
Total 68 (18.1) 43 (11.4) 27 (7.2) 9 (2.4) 376 (100)
Kebeles Bore 30(27.8) 19(17.6) 15(13.9) 4(3.7) 108(28.7)
Kofe 9(18.0) 6(12.0) 2(4.0) 1(2.0) 50(13.3)
Hora gibe 4(12.1) 2(6.1) 3(9.1) 0(0.0) 33(8.8)
Jiren 11(10.6) 9(8.7) 3(2.9) 0(0.0) 104(27.7)
Ifabula 14(17.3) 7(8.6) 4(4.9) 4(4.9) 81(21.5)
Age 18–39 37 (20.2) 21 (11.5) 18 (9.8) 4 (2.2) 183 (48.7)
≥ 40 30 (18.1) 21 (12.7) 8 (4.8) 5(3.0) 193 (51.3)
Sex Male 58 (19.3) 38 (12.6) 23 (7.6) 6 (2.0) 301 (80.1)
Female 10 (13.3) 5 (6.7) 4 (5.3) 3 (4.0) 75 (19.9)
Family size <5 34 (19.1) 23 (12.9) 13 (7.3) 6 (3.4) 178 (47.3)
>5 34 (17.2) 20 (10.1) 14 (7.1) 3(1.5) 198 (52.7)
Educational status (school years) Unable to read and write 18 (32.1) 14 (25.0) 4 (7.1) 4 (7.1) 56 (14.9)
Primary (1–8) 39 (16.3) 23 (9.6) 20 (8.4) 3 (1.3) 239 (63.6)
Secondary (9–12) 9 (16.7) 5 (9.3) 2 (3.7) 2 (3.7) 54 (14.4)
High school and above 12 2 (7.4) 1 (3.7) 1 (3.7) 0 (0.0) 27 (7.2)
Marital status Single 1 5 (9.1) 3 (5.5) 2 (3.6) 2 (3.6) 55 (14.6)
Married 63 (19.6) 40 (12.5) 25 (7.8) 7 (02.2) 321 (85.4)
Occupation Farmer 23 (19.0) 14 (11.6) 11 (9.1) 1 (0.8) 121 (32.2)
Civil servant 12 (12.1) 7 (7.1) 4 (4.0) 2 (2.0) 99 (26.3)
Merchant 8 (10.8) 6 (8.1) 5 (6.8) 1 (1.4) 74 (19.7)
Daily laborer 24 (35.8) 15 (22.4) 7 (10.4) 5 (7.5) 67 (17.8)
Others* 1 (6.7) 1 (6.7) 0 (00) 0 (0.0) 15 (4.0)
Wealth status Low 38 (27.5) 24 (19.4) 15 (10.9) 5 (3.6) 138 (36.7)
Medium 15 (14) 9 (8.4) 3 (2.8) 3(2.8) 107 (28.5)
High 15 (11.5) 10 (7.6) 9 (6.9) 1 (0.8) 131 (34.8)

Others* includes drivers, retired, tailor, unemployed.

Single1; includes divorced, separated and, widowed/widower.

Prevalence and intensity of STH infections

The overall prevalence of STH infection among the household heads in the per-urban Kebele was found to be 18.1%. A. lumbricoides was the predominant STH identified with a prevalence rate of 11.4%, followed by T. trichiura and Hookworm species with a prevalence of 7.2% and 2.1%, respectively (Table 1).

Most of the STH positive household heads had a single infection (85.3%), while 14.7% of them had multiple infections, which included seven cases of A. lumbricoides and T. trichiura co-infection (Fig 3). Similarly, most of the study participants infected with A. lumbricoides (83.7%), T. trichiura (92.6%), and all the eight subjects positive for hookworm eggs had light infection intensity, and only one individual infected with T. trichiura had heavy infection intensity (defined by the egg count per gram of stool). The overall geometric mean faecal egg count for A. lumbricoides, T. trichiura, and hookworms was found to be 607.06 (IQR: 144–2136), 122.59 (IQR: 72–120, and 110.64 (IQR: 72–180), respectively (Table 2).

Fig 3. Prevalence of single and multiple STH species.

Fig 3

Table 2. Intensity of STH infections in the peri-urban area of Jimma town, Oromia, Ethiopia, May to July 2021 (n  =  376).

Infection intensity           Soil-transmitted helminths
A. lumbricoides T. trichiura Hookworm species
n (%) n (%) n (%)
Light 36 (83.7) 25 (92.6) 9 (100)
Moderate 7 (16.3) 1 (3.7) 0
Heavy 0 1 (3.7) 0
Geometric mean (EPG) 607.06 122.59 110.64
Total 43 27 9

*EPG = Eggs per gram of feces. **Infection intensity = A. lumbricoides (Light infection 1–4,999 EPG, Moderate infection 5,000–49,999 EPG, and heavy infection >50,000 EPG), T.trichiura (Light infection 1–999 EPG, Moderate infection 1,000–9,999 EPG, and heavy infection >10,000 EPG) and hookworm (Light infection 1–1,999 EPG, Moderate infection 2,000–3,999 EPG, and heavy infection >4,000 EPG).

Household water supply, sanitation and hygiene conditions

Overall, about 97.1% and 88.6% of the peri-urban households had access to an improved source of water for drinking and domestic use, respectively. Protected well/spring was the most common sources of water in households for both drinking (46.3%) and domestic use (51.6%). Water piped into the household’s dwelling was the second most commonly used water source for drinking (35%) and domestic use (19.4%). Most peri-urban households (88%) had private toilet facilities, while 10.1% and 1.9% shared toilet facilities with neighbors and practiced open defecation, respectively. About 56.1% of the households surveyed used improved toilet facilities, but only 11.1% of them had hand washing facilities in their premises. Moreover, 67.6% of the households disposed of solid waste in open fields and 94.7% of them drained the liquid waste directly into the garden (Table 3, S1 and S2 Tables).

Table 3. Water supply, sanitation and hygiene conditions of the households and distribution of STH in the peri-urban area of Jimma town, Oromia, Ethiopia, May to July 2021 (n  =  376).

Variables Categories
STH prevalence Total n (%)
Positive n (%) Negative n (%)
Hygiene
Hand washing before meal Always 61 (16.7) 304 (3.3) 365 (97.1)
often 7 (63.6) 4 (36.4) 11 (2.9)
Hand washing after defecation Always 59 (16.5) 299 (83.5) 358 (95.2)
often 9 (50) 9 (50) 18 (4.8)
Washing vegetable before eating Always 36 (15.5) 192 (84.2) 228 (60.8)
Often 19 (17.8) 88 (82.2) 107 (28.5)
Sometimes 13 (32.5) 27 (67.5) 40 (10.7)
Washing / peeling fruits before eating Always 29 (14.6) 170 (85.4) 119 (52.9)
Often 27 (20.6) 104 (79.4) 131 (34.8)
Sometimes 12 (26.1) 34 (73.9) 46 (12.2)
Status of fingernails trimmed 43 (14) 265 (86) 308 (82.1)
untrimmed 25 (37.3) 42 (62.7) 67 (17.9)
Hand washing facility on premises Available with soap
and water
2 (11.8) 15 (88.2) 17 (4.9)
Available without soap
and water
4 (18.2) 18 (81.8) 22 (6.3)
Not available 54 (17.4) 257 (82.6) 311 (88.9)
Sanitation
Toilet availability Yes 60 (17.1) 290 (82.9) 350 (93.1)
No 8 (30.8) 18 (69.2) 26 (6.9)
Status of the Toilet facilities Improved 23 (10.6) 188 (89.1) 211 (56.1)
Unimproved 45 (27.3) 120 (72.7) 165 (43.9)
Shoe wearing habit Always 35 (15.8) 187 (84.2) 222 (59.0)
Often 27 (19.6) 111 (80.4) 138 (36.7)
Sometimes 6 (37.5) 10 (62.5) 16 (4.3)
Water source
Drinking water source
Protected/improved 67 (18.4) 298 (81.6) 365 (97.1)
unprotected 1 (9.1) 10 (90.9) 11 (2.9)
Water source for domestic use Protected/improved 63 (18.9) 270 (81.1) 333 (88.6)
unprotected 5 (11.6) 38 (88.4) 43 (11.4)
Waste disposal
Proper solid waste disposal yes 60 (18.0) 274 (82.0) 334 (88.8)
No 8 (19.0) 34 (81.0) 42 (11.2)
Proper liquid waste disposal yes 3 (42.9) 4 (57.1) 7 (1.9)
No 65 (17.6) 304 (82.4) 369 (98.1)

Risk factor analysis for STH infections

Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed after selecting the candidate variables through bivariate logistic regression analysis. The binary logistic regression revealed an association between sex, marital status, educational status, occupational status, wealth status, having own latrine, habits of hand washing after defecation, habits of hand washing before meals, washing vegetable before consumption, washing/peeling of fruits before eating, hand washing after contact with soil, shoe wearing habits and status of fingernails at p-value ≤ 0.25. After adjusting for potential confounding variables in the multivariable logistic regression model, wealth status, hand washing habits before meals, fingernails status and toilet facility types were found to have a significant association with STH at p-value <0.05 with 95% CI and AOR.

The odds of having STH were was seven times higher among household heads who do not always wash their hands before meals compared to household heads who always wash their hands before meals (AOR = 7.07; 95% CI: 1.79–27.88, p = 0.005). The odds of having STH was 3 times higher among household heads with untrimmed hand finger-nails than among those with trimmed fingernails (AOR = 3; 95% CI: 1.59–5.65, p = 0.001). Household heads who were within the lower wealth percentile were 2.7 times more likely to be infected with STHs as compared to household heads who were wealthier (AOR = 2.7; 95% CI: 1.31–5.50, P = 0.007). Household heads who used unimproved toilet facilities were two times more likely to be infected with STH as compared to household heads who possessed improved toilet facilities (AOR = 2.06; 95% CI: 1.13–3.76, p = 0.017), (Table 4).

Table 4. Binary and multivariable logistic regression model to identify factors associated with STH infection among the household heads in the peri-urban area of Jimma town, Oromia, Ethiopia, May to July 2021(n  =  376).

Variables Categories
Soil-transmitted helminth COR (95% CI) P-value
AOR (95% CI) P-value
Positive n (%) Negative n (%)
Kebeles Bore 30(27.8) 78(72.2) 1.84 (0.90–3.76) 0.094* 1.22(0.53–2.78) 0.643
Kofe 9(18.0) 41(82.0) 1.05(0.42–2.64) 0.917 0.58(0.19–1.62) 0.284
Hora gibe 4(12.1) 29(87.9) 0.66(0.20–2.18) 0.495 0.63(0.17–2.21) 0.470
Jiren 11(10.6) 93(89.4) 0.56(0.24–1.32) 0.189* 0.58(0.23–1.50) 0.257
Ifabula 14(17.3) 67(82.7) 1
Sex Male 58(19.3) 243(80.7) 1.55(0.75–3.20) 0.235* 1.37(0.60–3.09) 0.447
Female 10(13.3) 65(86.7) 1 1
Marital status Single1 5(9.1) 50(90.9) 0.410(0.15–1.06) 0.068* 0.38(0.14–1.04) 0.060
Married 63(19.6) 258(80.4) 1 1
Educational status Unable to read and write 18(32.1) 38(67.9) 5.92(1.26–27.77) 0.024* 1.60(0.29–8.73) 0.586
Primary (1–8) 39(16.3) 200(83.7) 2.43(0.55–10.71) 0.238* 0.96(0.19–4.63) 0.959
Secondary (9–12) 9(16.7) 45(83.3) 2.50(0.50–12.49) 0.264 1.83(0.34–9.83) 0.478
High school & above 2(7.4) 25(92.6) 1 1
Occupation Farmer 23(19.0) 98(81.0) 3.28(0.41–26.27) 0.262 2.17(0.25–18.45) 0.477
Civil servant 12(12.1) 87(87.9) 1.93(0.23–16.03) 0.542 1.45(0.16–12.76) 0.736
Merchant 8(10.8) 66(89.2) 1.69(0.19–14.67) 0.631 1.14(0.12–10.47) 0.907
Daily laborer 24(35.8) 43(64.2) 7.81(0.96–63.13) 0.054* 4.58(0.53–39.30) 0.167
Others 1(6.7) 14(93.3) 1 1
Wealth status Low 38(27.5) 100(72.5) 2.94(1.53–5.66) 0.001* 2.7(1.31–5.50) 0.007 **
Medium 15(14.0) 92(86.0) 1.26(0.59–2.71) 0.553 1.53(0.67–3.48) 0.303
High 15(11.5) 116(88.5) 1 1
Latrine availability Yes 60(17.1) 290(82.9) 1 1
No 8(30.8) 18(69.2) 2.15(0.89–5.17) 0.088* 0.58(0.19–1.75) 0.335
Toilet facility
Improved 23(10.6) 188(89.1) 1 1
unimproved 45(27.3) 120(72.7) 3.06(1.76–5.32) <0.001* 2.06(1.13–3.76) 0.017 **
Source of Water for domestic use
protected 63(18.9) 270(81.1) 1 1
Unprotected 5(11.6) 38(88.4) 0.56(0.21–1.49) 0.248* 0.49(0.17–1.44) 0.194
Hand washing after defecation Always 59(16.5) 299(83.5) 1 1
Often 9(50) 9(50) 5.07(1.9–13.3) 0.001* 1.60(0.44–5.77) 0.468
Hand washing before meals Always 61(16.7) 304(3.3) 1 1
Often 7(63.6) 4(36.4) 8.72(2.48–30.71) 0.001* 7.07(1.79–27.88) 0.005 **
Washing vegetable before eating Always 36(15.5) 192(84.2) 1 1
Often 19(17.8) 88(82.2) 1.15(0.62–2.12) 0.651 1.51(0.45–5.06) 0.503
Sometimes 13(32.5) 27(67.5) 2.59(1.21–5.44) 0.014* 2.33(0.56–9.61) 0.239
Washing/ peeling fruits before eating Always 29(14.6) 170(85.4) 1 1
Often 27(20.6) 104(79.4) 1.52(0.85–2.71) 0.155* 1.42(0.74–2.68) 0.285
Sometimes 12(26.1) 34(73.9) 2.07(0.96–4.45) 0.063* 0.96(0.39–2.34) 0.925
Hand washing after contact with soil Always 54(16.6) 271(83.4) 1 1
Often 9(33.3) 18(66.7) 2.51(1.07–5.88) 0.034* 1.52(0.50–4.64) 0.458
Sometimes 5(20.8) 19(79.2) 1.32(0.47–3.69) 0.596 0.97(0.27–3.44) 0.963
Shoe wearing habit Always 35(15.8) 187(84.2) 1 1
Often 27(19.6) 111(80.4) 1.30(0.75–3.26) 0.354 0.79(0.36–1.70) 0.551
Sometimes 6(37.5) 10(62.5) 3.21(1.09–9.39) 0.034* 1.68(0.43–6.57) 0.454
Status of fingernails trimmed 43(14) 265(86) 1 1
untrimmed 25(37.3) 42(62.7) 3.67(2.03–6.62) <0.001* 3(1.59–5.65) 0.001 **

Key

* = candidate variables at p ≤0.25 in bivariate logistic regression

** predictor variables in multivariate logistic regression at p <0.05.

Discussion

The overall prevalence of any STH infection among the household heads living in the peri-urban area of Jimma town was found to be 18.1%, and most of these positive cases were single infections (85.3%) and light intensity infections (88.5%). A. lumbricoides was the predominant STH, followed by T. trichiura and hookworm. The vast majority of households had access to an improved source of water for drinking (97.1%) and domestic use (88.8%). Overall, 56.1% of households use improved toilet facilities. In the present study, about 80.1% of households were male-headed while 19.9% of them were female-headed, which is comparable with (78% male and 22% female) the Ethiopian national demographic and health survey of 2019 [30]. In general, the wealth status of the household, habits of hand washing before meals, the status of fingernails, and types of toilet facilities showed a statistically significant association with the presence of soil- transmitted helminth eggs in the stool sample.

The results of this study revealed that the STH is prevalent among the adult population and endemic in the study area, despite many years of school-based deworming programs in the town. This implies that if the infected adult populations of the community are left untreated, they may serve as an important reservoir and source of re-infection for the treated children, contributing to the sustained transmission of the STH in the community. Previous studies conducted in various countries have shown that STH reinfections occur rapidly after treatment, particularly for A. lumbricoides and T. trichiura, and hence have a significant impact on the success of preventive mass chemotherapy [3135].

In Ethiopia, the number of people living in STH endemic areas is estimated at 79 million, including 9.1 million pre-school-aged children, 25.3 million school-aged children, and 44.6 million adults [13]. In the past decades, Ethiopia has demonstrated a marked and sustained decrease in the prevalence and intensity of STH infections through preventive mass chemotherapy in the targeted populations [21]. However, the levels of infection among older individuals and adults continued to be high, which could pose a significant challenge to the parasite reduction achieved in children and to Ethiopia’s national target of eliminating STH as a public health problem by 2020, which wasn’t achieved, and breaking their transmission by 2025 in general [7,21].

The result of this study illustrates the importance of addressing the community-based reservoir to reduce the reinfections of the treated children and other at-risk populations through expanding the target population, integrated with health and hygiene education and the provision of adequate sanitation facilities [31,32,34]. A study conducted among agrarian communities of Kogi State, Nigeria recommends the inclusion of all age groups in preventive chemotherapy along with health education and provision of basic sanitation facilities to eliminate STH and break their transmission by 2025 [36,37].

Most of the previous studies conducted on STH in Ethiopia focused on SAC, which is possible because of the Ethiopian priority target population set in the national master plan of neglected tropical diseases (NTDs) control program [13,21,38]. There is a lack of data on the prevalence and burden of STH among pre-SAC and adults, and no studies have been conducted specifically among Ethiopian heads of households [21]. In Ethiopia, the head of the household is generally considered as a reference person and major decision maker in the household unit who controls the household finances and other assets, which may lead to deference in health care access and service utilization among the household members [16,39]. On the other hand, the infection of the household head with intestinal helminths could have an indirect impact on the productivity and wage-earning capacity of the household. A review conducted by Helen Guyatt indicated that productivity during adulthood could be affected by current infection and associated morbidity, and early infection during childhood [40].

This study is the first to provide information on the prevalence and intensity of STH infection and the associated risk factors among the household heads in the peri-urban communities of Jimma town. Variation in prevalence was seen among the five kebeles, ranging from 10.6% (Hora gibe kebele) to 27.8% (Bore kebele) and the prevalence of any STH were not, however, shown to be statistically associated (p > 0.05). The current study’s observed total prevalence of STH infections was 18.1%, which is comparable to previous studies conducted among adult populations in the coast of Kenya (20.7%) [34], Southern Thailand (15.7%) [41], Eastern Côte d’Ivoire (19.5%) [42] and Northwest Ethiopia (20.9%) [43]. However, it was lower than the finding of the studies conducted in the rural community of the southwest Ethiopia (70.3%) [44], Kogi state, Nigeria (45.1%) [36], Cameron’s Western region of (26.4%) [45], Ghana’s middle-belt (45%) [46] and Guinea Bissau’s Bijagos Islands (40%) [47]. Prevalence of STH infections ranging from 3.3 to 51.5% were also reported in the study conducted among the adult population in five communities in Nepal [48]. On the other hand, the prevalence rate in the current study is higher than the finding of the study conducted in central Kenya (0.2%) [49], and in the district of Come in Benin (5.3%) [50].

Regarding the prevalence of STH species, A. lumbricoides was the most common STH in the present study (11.4%), followed by T. trichiura (7.2%) and hookworm (2.1%). However, T. trichiura (66.6%) and hookworm species (19.1%) were found to be the predominant STH species in the study conducted among the rural community of southwest Ethiopia [44] and on the coast of Kenya [34]. In the current study, most of the household heads positive for STH had single infections (85.3%), while only 14.7% of them had multiple infections, which was lower than in the study conducted in rural communities of southwest Ethiopia [44] and the western region of Cameroon [51], with multiple infection rates of 44.2% and 26.4%, respectively. Moreover, most of the study participants infected with STH in the current study had light infection intensity (88.5%), which was comparable with the findings of the study conducted in a rural community in southwest Ethiopia, and among elderly people in rural areas of the southern part of Thailand [41,44]. People with light intensity infections may not usually seek treatment because of not having observable symptoms, which may contribute to environmental contamination and the sustained transmission of the parasites in the community.

In general, the variation in prevalence rate, intensity, and distribution of these STH species among the different communities and populations of the study might be due to differences in the socio-demographics and socioeconomic status of the households, macro-and micro-environmental factors, and host-specific and individual factors which may affect the risk of acquiring or harboring heavy intensity STH infections [52].

In this study, about 97.1% of the peri-urban households had access to an improved source of water for drinking, which is higher than the national figure of 87% for urban households and 61% for rural households [30], Protected well/spring (46.3%) and water piped into the household’s dwelling (35%) were found to be the most common sources of water for drinking in the peri-urban households in Jimma town. Our findings are comparable with the findings of the Ethiopia demographic and health survey (2019) [30], which reported that water piped into the household’s dwelling, yard, or plot (40%) and water piped into a public tap/standpipe (30%) in the urban households and public taps/standpipes (31%) and protected springs (13%) in the rural households were reported to be the most common sources of water for drinking use.

Overall, 56.1% of the peri-urban households of Jimma town use improved toilet facilities. However, this is in contrast to the finding of the Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey (2019) [30], which reported that only 20% of Ethiopian households use improved toilet facilities (42% in urban areas and 10% in rural). This variation can be explained by a variety of factors, including but not limited to differences in the socioeconomic characteristics of the household population, water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) facilities and usage.

Low socioeconomic status and poor hygienic behaviors, which include untrimmed hand fingernails and not always washing hands before meals, were found to be significantly associated with STH infections. The odds of having STHs was seven times higher among household heads that do not always wash their hands before meals compared to those household heads that always washed their hands before meals. A similar finding was reported in the study conducted in Bibugn district, northwest Ethiopia [43], and the western region of Cameroon, which indicated that households not washing their hands before meals were more affected by STHs than their counterparts [45].

The odds of having STH were 3 times higher among household heads that had untrimmed hand fingernails compared to household heads with trimmed fingernails. This is in agreement with the study conducted in southwest Ethiopia [53]. The present study also found that household heads in the lowest wealth percentile were 2.7 times more likely to be infected with STHs as compared to household heads in the highest wealth percentile. A similar result was reported from Kenya, Nigeria, Benin, Malaysia, and Indonesia, where individuals with low income were more affected by STHs than their counterparts [34,36,50,54,55]. Here we also found that household heads who possessed unimproved toilet facilities were two times more likely to be infected with STHs as compared to household heads who possessed improved toilet facilities. This has also been described in the study conducted in western Cameron and southern India [51,56].

Limitation

The major limitation of this study is that the prevalence and infection intensity of STHs were determined by the examination of a single stool specimen from each study participant only. This might not be enough to accommodate the day-to-day and inter-stool variation of egg output. Furthermore, a single Kato-Katz template was examined for each of the stool specimens that might affect the accuracy of the egg count. Both limitations are expected to underestimate the real STH burden in the population investigated, especially as those subjects with low egg counts are missed more easily by the investigation of only one sample.

Conclusion

The results of this study revealed a nearly moderate level of STH prevalence among household heads in the peri-urban area, which could be a significant reservoir for reinfection of the treated children and other at-risk groups of the community, posing serious challenges to the national targets of eliminating STH as a public health problem. The wealth status of the household, habits of hand washing before meals, and the status of fingernails showed significant associations with the detection of soil-transmitted helminth infection, suggesting a need for prompting health education and improving the socioeconomic status of the community. Moreover, the findings of this study indicate the need for expanding the deworming program to other at-risk groups, or the whole community. The use of only one stool sample might also lead to a certain under-detection of cases with low infection intensity, so the potential reservoir of STH infections in adults might be even greater, strengthening the evidence for more broad scale deworming.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Socio-demographic characteristics, sanitation and hygiene practice of the household heads in peri-urban Kebeles in Jimma town.

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Prevalence of STH and its distribution by socio-demographic characteristics, sanitation and hygiene practice of the household heads in peri-urban Kebeles in Jimma town.

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

The authors are so grateful to the household heads for their cooperation in participating and providing the necessary information and stool samples. The authors are also thankful to the laboratory technologist in the Parasitology and Microbiology laboratory for collecting and examining the stool samples. The authors are grateful to the department of medical laboratory science, Jimma University for providing laboratory facilities and material support. We would also like to extend our heartiest appreciation to the Jimma town health office for their cooperation. Dr. Ming-Chieh Lee mapped the study sites, for which we are grateful. Special acknowledgments also goes to the Center for International Health at Ludwig-Maximilians-University (CIH-LMU) for facilitation and support of this project.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

Initials of the authors who received the award = Ahmed Zeynudin Grant numbers awarded to the author = Not applicable The full name of the funder= The Bavarian State Government through CIH-LMU URL of funder website: https://www.cih.lmu.de the funders have no any role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Montresor A, Mupfasoni D, Mikhailov A, Mwinzi P, Lucianez A, Jamsheed M, et al. The global progress of soil-transmitted helminthiases control in 2020 and World Health Organization targets for 2030. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2020;14(8):e0008505. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008505 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sturrock SL, Yiannakoulias N, Sanchez AL. The geography and scale of soil-transmitted helminth infections. Current Tropical Medicine Reports. 2017;4(4):245–55. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.World Health Organization. Accelerating work to overcome the global impact of neglected tropical diseases: a roadmap for implementation. World Health Organization; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.World Health Organization. Soil-transmitted helminth infections [Internet]. WHO; 2022. [cited 2023 23, July]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/soil-transmitted-helminth-infections. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hay SI, Abajobir AA, Abate KH, Abbafati C, Abbas KM, Abd-Allah F, et al. Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 333 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. The Lancet. 2017;390(10100):1260–344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Soil transmited helminthes [Internet]. CDC; 2022 [Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/parasites/sth/index.html.
  • 7.Leta GT, Mekete K, Wuletaw Y, Gebretsadik A, Sime H, Mekasha S, et al. National mapping of soil-transmitted helminth and schistosome infections in Ethiopia. Parasit Vectors. 2020;13(1):437. doi: 10.1186/s13071-020-04317-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hotez PJ, Bundy DA, Beegle K, Brooker S, Drake L, de Silva N, et al. Helminth infections: soil-transmitted helminth infections and schistosomiasis. Disease Control Priorities in Developing Countries 2nd edition. 2006. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Hotez PJ, Kamath A. Neglected tropical diseases in sub-saharan Africa: review of their prevalence, distribution, and disease burden. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2009;3(8):e412. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000412 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Sartorius B, Cano J, Simpson H, Tusting LS, Marczak LB, Miller-Petrie MK, et al. Prevalence and intensity of soil-transmitted helminth infections of children in sub-Saharan Africa, 2000–18: a geospatial analysis. The Lancet Global Health. 2021;9(1):e52–e60. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30398-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mupfasoni D, Bangert M, Mikhailov A, Marocco C, Montresor A. Sustained preventive chemotherapy for soil-transmitted helminthiases leads to reduction in prevalence and anthelminthic tablets required. Infectious diseases of poverty. 2019;8(1):1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lustigman S, Prichard RK, Gazzinelli A, Grant WN, Boatin BA, McCarthy JS, et al. A research agenda for helminth diseases of humans: the problem of helminthiases. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2012;6(4):e1582. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001582 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Negussu N, Mengistu B, Kebede B, Deribe K, Ejigu E, Tadesse G, et al. Ethiopia schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminthes control programme: progress and prospects. Ethiopian medical journal. 2017;55(Suppl 1):75. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Samuel F. Status of soil-transmitted helminths infection in Ethiopia. American Journal of Health Research. 2015;3(3):170–6. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kumie A, Ali A. An overview of environmental health status in Ethiopia with particular emphasis to its organization, drinking water and sanitation: a literature survey. Ethiopian Journal of Health Development. 2005;19(2):89. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Central Statistical Agency—CSA/Ethiopia, ICF. Ethiopia Demographic and Health Survey 2016. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: CSA and ICF; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Roach RR. Soil-transmitted helminths. Helminthiasis: IntechOpen; 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Blouin B, Casapía M, Joseph L, Kaufman JS, Larson C, Gyorkos TW. The effect of cumulative soil-transmitted helminth infections over time on child development: a 4-year longitudinal cohort study in preschool children using Bayesian methods to adjust for exposure misclassification. International journal of epidemiology. 2018;47(4):1180–94. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyy142 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pabalan N, Singian E, Tabangay L, Jarjanazi H, Boivin MJ, Ezeamama AE. Soil-transmitted helminth infection, loss of education and cognitive impairment in school-aged children: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2018;12(1):e0005523. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005523 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Means AR, Werkman M, Walson JL. Prospects for elimination of soil-transmitted helminths. Current opinion in infectious diseases. 2017;30(5):482. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000395 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Maddren R, Phillips A, Ower A, Landeryou T, Mengistu B, Anjulo U, et al. Soil-transmitted helminths and schistosome infections in Ethiopia: a systematic review of progress in their control over the past 20 years. Parasites & vectors. 2021;14(1):1–15. doi: 10.1186/s13071-021-04600-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Anderson RM, Turner HC, Truscott JE, Hollingsworth TD, Brooker SJ. Should the goal for the treatment of soil transmitted helminth (STH) infections be changed from morbidity control in children to community-wide transmission elimination? PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2015;9(8):e0003897. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003897 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hailegebriel T, Nibret E, Munshea A. Prevalence of Soil-Transmitted Helminth Infection Among School-Aged Children of Ethiopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Infectious Diseases: Research and Treatment. 2020;13:1178633720962812. doi: 10.1177/1178633720962812 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Mekonnen Z, Getachew M, Bogers J, Vercruysse J, Levecke B. Assessment of seasonality in soil-transmitted helminth infections across 14 schools in Jimma Town, Ethiopia. The Pan African Medical Journal. 2019;32. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2019.32.6.16085 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Population Census Commission. The 2007 population and housing census of Ethiopia, result for Oromia region. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: Central Statistical Agency; 2008. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Jejaw A, Zeynudin A, Zemene E, Belay T. Status of intestinal parasitic infections among residents of Jimma Town, Ethiopia. BMC research notes. 2014;7(1):1–6. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-502 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.World Health Organization. Bench aids for the diagnosis of intestinal parasites: World Health Organization; 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bosch F, Palmeirim MS, Ali SM, Ame SM, Hattendorf J, Keiser J. Diagnosis of soil-transmitted helminths using the Kato-Katz technique: What is the influence of stirring, storage time and storage temperature on stool sample egg counts? PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2021;15(1):e0009032. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Rutstein SO, Johnson K. The DHS wealth index. DHS comparative reports no. 6. Calverton: ORC Macro. 2004.
  • 30.Ethiopian Public Health Institute—EPHI, Federal Ministry of Health—FMoH, ICF. Ethiopia Mini Demographic and Health Survey 2019. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: EPHI/FMoH/ICF; 2021. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Halwindi H, Magnussen P, Olsen A, Lisulo M. Potential contribution of adult populations to the maintenance of schistosomiasis and soil-transmitted helminth infections in the Siavonga and Mazabuka districts of Zambia. Journal of biosocial science. 2017;49(2):265–75. doi: 10.1017/S0021932016000201 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Shumbej T, Menu S, Girum T, Bekele F, Gebru T, Worku M, et al. Impact of annual preventive mass chemotherapy for soil-transmitted helminths among primary school children in an endemic area of Gurage zone: a prospective cross-sectional study. Research and reports in tropical medicine. 2019;10:109. doi: 10.2147/RRTM.S208473 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Truscott J, Turner H, Anderson RJP, vectors. What impact will the achievement of the current World Health Organisation targets for anthelmintic treatment coverage in children have on the intensity of soil transmitted helminth infections? 2015;8(1):1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Halliday KE, Oswald WE, Mcharo C, Beaumont E, Gichuki PM, Kepha S, et al. Community-level epidemiology of soil-transmitted helminths in the context of school-based deworming: Baseline results of a cluster randomised trial on the coast of Kenya. 2019;13(8):e0007427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.World Health Organization. Soil-transmitted helminthiases. Eliminating soil-transmitted helminthiases as a public health problem in children: Progress report 2001–2010 and strategic plan 2011–2020. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2012.
  • 36.Anunobi JT, Okoye IC, Aguzie ION, Ndukwe YE, Okpasuo OJJb. Risk of soil-transmitted helminthiasis among agrarian communities of Kogi State , Nigeria: Evaluated in the context of The Soil-Transmitted Helminthiasis Advisory Committee recommendation 2016. 2019:663237. [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Brooker SJ, Mwandawiro CS, Halliday KE, Njenga SM, Mcharo C, Gichuki PM, et al. Interrupting transmission of soil-transmitted helminths: a study protocol for cluster randomised trials evaluating alternative treatment strategies and delivery systems in Kenya. BMJ open. 2015;5(10):e008950. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008950 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Mengitsu B, Shafi O, Kebede B, Kebede F, Worku DT, Herero M, et al. Ethiopia and its steps to mobilize resources to achieve 2020 elimination and control goals for neglected tropical diseases: Spider webs joined can tie a lion. International health. 2016;8(suppl_1):i34–i52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kleinjans KJ. The man of the house—How the use of household head characteristics may lead to omitted variable bias. Economics Letters. 2013;119(2):133–5. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Guyatt H. Do intestinal nematodes affect productivity in adulthood? Parasitology Today. 2000;16(4):153–8. doi: 10.1016/s0169-4758(99)01634-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kache R, Phasuk N, Viriyavejakul P, Punsawad C. Prevalence of soil-transmitted helminth infections and associated risk factors among elderly individuals living in rural areas of southern Thailand. BMC Public Health. 2020;20(1):1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Loukouri A, Méité A, Kouadio OK, Djè NN, Trayé-Bi G, Koudou BG, et al. Prevalence, intensity of soil-transmitted helminths, and factors associated with infection: importance in control program with ivermectin and albendazole in eastern Côte d’Ivoire. 2019;2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Goshu A, Alemu G, Ayehu AJJoTM. Prevalence and Intensity of Soil-Transmitted Helminths and Associated Factors among Adolescents and Adults in Bibugn Woreda, Northwest Ethiopia: A Community-Based Cross-Sectional Study. 2021;2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Tekalign E, Bajiro M, Ayana M, Tiruneh A, Belay TJBri. Prevalence and intensity of soil-transmitted helminth infection among rural community of southwest Ethiopia: a community-based study. 2019;2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Igore K, Payne V, Nadia A, Cedric YJJIDE. Risk Factors Associated with Prevalence and Intensity of Gastro-Intestinal Parasitic Infections within Households in Tonga Sub-Division, West Region, Cameroon. 2020;6:123. [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Adu-Gyasi D, Asante KP, Frempong MT, Gyasi DK, Iddrisu LF, Ankrah L, et al. Epidemiology of soil transmitted Helminth infections in the middle-belt of Ghana, Africa. Parasite epidemiology and control. 2018;3(3):e00071. doi: 10.1016/j.parepi.2018.e00071 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Farrant O, Marlais T, Houghton J, Goncalves A, Teixeira da Silva Cassama E, Cabral MG, et al. Prevalence, risk factors and health consequences of soil-transmitted helminth infection on the Bijagos Islands, Guinea Bissau: A community-wide cross-sectional study. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2020;14(12):e0008938. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0008938 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Parajuli R, Fujiwara T, Umezaki M, Konishi S, Takane E, Maharjan M, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of soil-transmitted helminth infection in Nepal. Transactions of The Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2014;108(4):228–36. doi: 10.1093/trstmh/tru013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Masaku J, Mutungi F, Gichuki PM, Okoyo C, Njomo DW, Njenga SMJTm, et al. High prevalence of helminths infection and associated risk factors among adults living in a rural setting, central Kenya: a cross-sectional study. 2017;45(1):1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Avokpaho EF, Houngbégnon P, Accrombessi M, Atindégla E. Factors associated with soil-transmitted helminths infection in Benin: Findings from the DeWorm3 study. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2021;15(8):e0009646. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009646 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Igore K, Payne V, Nadia N, Cedric Y. Risk factors associated with prevalence and intensity of gastrointestinal parasitic infections within households in Tonga Sub-Division, West Region, Cameroon. J Infect Dis Epidemiol. 2020;6:123. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Alemu A, Atnafu A, Addis Z, Shiferaw Y, Teklu T, Mathewos B, et al. Soil transmitted helminths and Schistosoma mansoni infections among school children in Zarima town, northwest Ethiopia. BMC infectious diseases. 2011;11(1):1–7. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-11-189 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Terefe B, Zemene E, Mohammed AEJBrn. Intestinal helminth infections among inmates in Bedele prison with emphasis on soil-transmitted helminths. 2015;8(1):1–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Muslim A, Mohd Sofian S, Shaari SA, Hoh B-P, Lim YA-LJPntd. Prevalence, intensity and associated risk factors of soil transmitted helminth infections: A comparison between Negritos (indigenous) in inland jungle and those in resettlement at town peripheries. 2019;13(4):e0007331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kurscheid J, Laksono B, Park M, Clements AC, Sadler R, McCarthy JS, et al. Epidemiology of soil-transmitted helminth infections in Semarang, Central Java, Indonesia. 2020;14(12):e0008907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ajjampur SS, Kaliappan SP, Halliday KE, Palanisamy G, Farzana J, Manuel M, et al. Epidemiology of soil transmitted helminths and risk analysis of hookworm infections in the community: Results from the DeWorm3 Trial in southern India. PLoS neglected tropical diseases. 2021;15(4):e0009338. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009338 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Hesham M Al-Mekhlafi

22 Jun 2022

PONE-D-22-15060Prevalence and intensity of soil-transmitted helminth infections and associated risk factors among household heads living in the peri-urban areas of Jimma town, Oromia, EthiopiaPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Zeynudin,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

==============================

Please find the comments provided by the editor and reviewers below this email. The comments should be adequately addressed in a revised manuscript.

============================== Please submit your revised manuscript by Aug 06 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Hesham

Hesham M. Al-Mekhlafi, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments:

The manuscript needs a more careful proofread by a native speaker to correct some errors.

Please, prepare your revised manuscript following journal's style and format.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

********** 

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

********** 

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

********** 

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

********** 

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Manuscript Title:

Prevalence and intensity of soil-transmitted helminth infections and associated risk

factors among household heads living in the peri-urban areas of Jimma town, Oromia, Ethiopia

Reviewer’s decision: Accept with Minor Corrections

The manuscript is of high quality considering the amount of work-done and analysis made. It is also well written. The introduction and rationale for the study is sound. The methodology section is also very well described, without scientific jargon. The result section is also well written and tables well presented. The authors claimed that the prevalence of 18.1% is low, it would be nice to see the prevalence across each communities studied to have a better insight. In the supplementary file 2, one of the communities has a prevalence as high as 27.8%. It would be a great point to talk about these dynamics in the manuscript abstract and discussion.

Reviewer’s Comment

TOPIC:

The title of this manuscript is appropriate and concise,

ABSTRACT:

This is a well written abstract. However authors should confirm the word limit for the abstract section.

INTRODUCTION

Line 68: recast as..”…lack of access to ...

Line 74-75: recast as “hence impacting negatively on economic development….

Line 79-80? Please mention the medicine used during the treatment,

Line 80: Remove the words “to eliminate infecting worms”

Lin 82-83: Please provide a reference here

Line 85: replace “as well as others” with “ and other vulnerable groups”

Materials and Methods

Line 144” mention the specific name of the medicine and the dosage e.g. Albendazole 40mg/kg or so

RESULTS

Line 163: Maintain a 1-digit decimal point. So, 9.3 instead of 9.285

Table showing the prevalence by communities is missing. It would be nice to see how the overall 18.1% STH prev is distributed across the communities studied.

One great suggestion that could help is the rearrangement of the tables, the table on intensity can follow directly after table 1.

Table 3: Authors should provide a footnote explain the infection intensity, and the acronym EPG

Line 196-198: Since it wasn’t reported in the manuscript table, how useful are these lines here.

DISCUSSION

Line 269: needs a reference

Line 272: Rather than using the word failed, authors could recast that the target was not met

Line 353: remove the comma after from,

Line 353: replace the semi-colon with “with”

Reviewer #2: A community-based cross sectional study by Ahmed Zeynudin and others was conducted in Ethiopia from May to July 2021. The study targeted household populations (18 years and above) and aimed at determining the prevalence of STH and risk factors in Jiren, Bore, Horagibe, Kofe and Ifabula Peri-urban kebeles surrounding the Jimma town. While the study is not novel, it provided an update on the STH prevalence and the associated risk factors.

Here are some comments that I hope are constructive for manuscript improvement:

I: General comments

1. It will be useful if the author(s) can provide a country map showing the location of the five selected peri-urban kebeles of study.

2. The prevalence of STH in this study was based on the Kato-Katz microscopy, however, hookworms, in particular, was expected to be underestimated using this technique especially when light infections are common.

3. Please include more details on the Kato-Katz smear preparation and microscopic examination, specimens processing and examination timing, as there is no reference provided in the methodology.

4. Table 1 showed the prevalence of STH in different variable subgroups. The age group >60 years consisted of 27 households which are very low compared to other subgroups, and only one individual was found infected with Ascaris lumbricoides and Trichuris trichiura parasites. I recommend merging this sub-group into the previous one.

5. In table 2, no subjects under “Sometimes” for the washing hand hygiene. Better to delete them from the table.

6. Line 184-185: households who drained the liquids directly into the garden = 94.9%. It should be 94.7% (according to S2 file).

7. Single infections were 83.8% in the abstract (line 32) and discussion (line 247) while 85.1% in the results (line 199) and 83.1% in line 311 in the discussion. Please check and correct.

8. Line 192-195: no need for the CI to present the prevalence (%) of parasite detection.

II: Editing issues:

• Abstract line 16: soil transmitted helminthes: change to “soil-transmitted helminths” (correct elsewhere in lines 41, 44).

• Line 22: A community based: change to “A community-based” (correct elsewhere in line 97).

• Line 23: May to July, 2021: delete comma (similarly in line 99).

• Line 30: A. lumbricoides: italic.

• Line 31: T. trichiura: italic.

• Line 38: still remain: delete still (redundant).

• Line 60: major: change to “a major”.

• Line 68: socio- economic: remove space.

• Line 68: lack of accesses: change to “access”.

• Line 71: is: “are”.

• Line 98: population: change to “a population”.

• Line 102: temperature: change to “a temperature”.

• Line 129: Sufficient: change to “A sufficient”.

• Line 129: were collected: change to “was”.

• Line 130: leak proof: change to “leak-proof”.

• Line 131: unique Identifier (UID): change to “unique identifier” or “Unique Identifier” (UID).

• Line 133: specimen were: change to “specimen was”.

• Line 148: sold waste: change to “solid”.

• Line 156: was assess: change to “ assessed”.

• Line 182: About 56.1% the households: change to “of” the households.

• Line 196-197: S. mansoni, H. nana and E. vermicularis: full genera names.

• Line 199: had single infection: change to “a single”.

• Line 220: washing / peeling: remove spaces.

• Line 222: p- value: remove space.

• Line 222: finger nail: change to fingernails (correct elsewhere in 224, 230, 231, 253, 374 and in tables 2 and table 4).

• Line 250: about 80.1% households: “of” households.

• Line 272: as public health problem: “a public”.

• Line 289: indirect: “an indirect”.

• Line 336: finding the Ethiopia Demographic: “of” the Ethiopia Demographic.

• Line 347: counter parts: one word.

• Line 374: soil- transmitted: remove space.

• Table 1: N (%): change to “n” (%) (correct elsewhere for consistency).

• Table 3 and Table 4: No (%): change to “n” (%).

• Line 247: (88,5%): (88.5%).

• Line 308: (19.1%). were found: remove the full stop after the bracket.

• Line 309: Species: “species” (uncapitalize the word).

• Line 311: (83.1 %,): remove the comma after correcting the number (see comment 6).

• The AOR for untrimmed hand fingernail was 2.99, change the 2.9 (line 229) to 3. Similarly, wealth status (2.7) in line 232.

III: References:

Many references are not according to the journal style, please correct accordingly.

********** 

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: Yes: Wahib M. Atroosh

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2022 Sep 15;17(9):e0274702. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274702.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


27 Jul 2022

Reviewer #1: Manuscript Title:

Prevalence and intensity of soil-transmitted helminth infections and associated risk

factors among household heads living in the peri-urban areas of Jimma town, Oromia, Ethiopia

Reviewer’s decision: Accept with Minor Corrections

The manuscript is of high quality considering the amount of work-done and analysis made. It is also well written. The introduction and rationale for the study is sound. The methodology section is also very well described, without scientific jargon. The result section is also well written and tables well presented. The authors claimed that the prevalence of 18.1% is low, it would be nice to see the prevalence across each communities studied to have a better insight. In the supplementary file 2, one of the communities has prevalence as high as 27.8%. It would be a great point to talk about these dynamics in the manuscript abstract and discussion.

RESPONSE:

• “Variation in prevalence was seen among the five kebeles, ranging from 10.6% (Hora gibe kebele) to 27.8% (Bore kebele) and the prevalence of any STH were not, however, shown to be statistically associated (p > 0.05).”

Reviewer #1

Reviewer’s Comment

1. TOPIC:

The title of this manuscript is appropriate and concise,

2. ABSTRACT:

This is a well written abstract. However authors should confirm the word limit for the abstract section.

RESPONSE:

• The abstract is corrected to 300 word limit as per the comments and guideline

3. INTRODUCTION

Line 68: recast as..”…lack of access to .

• Corrected - line 71

Line 74-75: recast as “hence impacting negatively on economic development….

• Corrected - line 77

Line 79-80? Please mention the medicine used during the treatment,

• Corrected (medicine used during the treatment is mentioned) - line 81-82

Line 80: Remove the words “to eliminate infecting worms”

• Removed - line 82

Lin 82-83: Please provide a reference here

• Reference is provided for line 82-83 (reference No: 1 & 4)

Line 85: replace “as well as others” with “ and other vulnerable groups”

• Corrected - line 87

4. MATERIALS AND METHODS

Line 144” mention the specific name of the medicine and the dosage e.g. Albendazole 40mg/kg or so

RESPONSE:

• Specific name and dosage of the drugs are incorporated - line 154

• Albendazole (400 mg/day, P.O. for three days )

5. RESULTS

Line 163: Maintain a 1-digit decimal point. So, 9.3 instead of 9.285

• Corrected - line 174

Table showing the prevalence by communities is missing. It would be nice to see how the overall 18.1% STH prev is distributed across the communities studied.

RESPONSE:

• Data showing the distribution of the STH prevalence across the different communes are added to

o Table 1(- line 185-190) &

o Table 4(- line 281-285)

One great suggestion that could help is the rearrangement of the tables, the table on intensity can follow directly after table 1.

RESPONSE:

• Tables are rearranged

o Table 3 rearranged and relabeled as Table 2(- line 207) following table 1 and paragraph following the table - line 192-199

o Table 2 rearranged and relabeled as table 3) - line 229

Table 3 (now table 2): Authors should provide a footnote that explains the infection intensity, and the acronym EPG

• RESPONSE:

o Footnote and acronym added as follows - line 210-213

o *EPG = Eggs per gram of feces. **Infection intensity = A. lumbricoides (Light infection 1–4,999 EPG, Moderate infection 5,000-49,999 EPG, and heavy infection >50,000 EPG), T.trichiura (Light infection 1-999 EPG, Moderate infection 1,000-9,999 EPG, and heavy infection >10,000 EPG) and hookworm (Light infection 1-1,999 EPG, Moderate infection 2,000-3,999 EPG, and heavy infection >4,000 EPG)

Line 196-198: Since it wasn’t reported in the manuscript table, how useful are these lines here.

• Removed from the manuscript - line 184

6. DISCUSSION

Line 269: needs a reference

o Reference inserted - line 312 (reference no 21)

Line 272: Rather than using the word failed, authors could recast that the target was not met

o Corrected as “which wasn't achieved.” - line 315

Line 353: remove the comma after from,

• comma removed - line 403

Line 353: replace the semi-colon with “with”

• Corrected as “A similar result was reported from Kenya, Nigeria, Benin, Malaysia, and Indonesia, where individuals with low income were more affected by STHs than their counterparts. - line 402-404

Reviewer #2:

A community-based cross sectional study by Ahmed Zeynudin and others was conducted in Ethiopia from May to July 2021. The study targeted household populations (18 years and above) and aimed at determining the prevalence of STH and risk factors in Jiren, Bore, Horagibe, Kofe and Ifabula Peri-urban kebeles surrounding the Jimma town. While the study is not novel, it provided an update on the STH prevalence and the associated risk factors.

Here are some comments that I hope are constructive for manuscript improvement:

I: GENERAL COMMENTS

1. It will be useful if the author(s) can provide a country map showing the location of the five selected peri-urban kebeles of study.

• RESPONSE: - line 111

o country map showing the location of the five selected peri-urban kebele of study is added to the main manuscript as

o Fig 1. Location of the study sites: the five peri-urban kebeles surrounding Jimma town, Oromia, Ethiopia

2. The prevalence of STH in this study was based on the Kato-Katz microscopy, however, hookworms, in particular, was expected to be underestimated using this technique especially when light infections are common.

3. Please include more details on the Kato-Katz smear preparation and microscopic examination, specimens processing and examination timing, as there is no reference provided in the methodology.

RESPONSE for comment No 2 & 3

� The following sentences were added to the main manuscript - line 144-147

o All the Kato-Katz slides were prepared immediately after the arrival of the stool specimens in the laboratory and read between 20 and 30 minutes after slide preparation, which is less than the WHO recommends reading time (30 to 60 minutes) to have better results for hook worm

• Reference

o Additionally, New reference No= 27 and 28 explaining the detailed procedure recommended by the WHO was added to explain the concern of the reviewer = line 524 and 526

4. Table 1 showed the prevalence of STH in different variable subgroups. The age group >60 years consisted of 27 households which are very low compared to other subgroups, and only one individual was found infected with Ascaris lumbricoides and Trichuris trichiura parasites. I recommend merging this sub-group into the previous one.

• RESPONSE:

o The age category are merged as per the reviewer’s comments and as follows = line 185 ( table 1) and line 281(table 4)

� 18-39

� ≥ 40

o Consecutively (as indicted in the truck changes)

� prevalence figures for the new age category in table 1 is changed accordingly

� AOR (95% CI) and P-value in table 4 are changed

� The Age variable is removed from the analysis in table 4 because the binary logistic regression didn’t show association between Age and STH at p- value ≤ 0.25. when age is categorized as 18-39 and ≥ 40 years

5. In table 2, no subjects under “Sometimes” for the washing hand hygiene. Better to delete them from the table.

• RESPONSE:

o Deleted from table 2 (now relabeled as table 3) - line 229

6. Line 184-185: households who drained the liquids directly into the garden = 94.9%. It should be 94.7% (according to S2 file).

• RESPONSE:

o corrected - line 224

7. Single infections were 83.8% in the abstract (line 32) and discussion (line 247) while 85.3% in the results (line 199) and 85.3% in line 311 in the discussion. Please check and correct.

• RESPONSE:

o All are corrected as 85.3% - line 34, 192, 291 & 360

8. Line 192-195: no need for the CI to present the prevalence (%) of parasite detection.

• RESPONSE:

o CI deleted - line 184

II: EDITING ISSUES:

• Abstract line 16: soil transmitted helminthes: change to “soil-transmitted helminths” (correct elsewhere in lines 41, 44).

• Corrected - line 16,

• Line 41- 43 is removed to the adjust the word limit in the abstract to 300

Line 22: A community based: change to “A community-based” (correct elsewhere in line 97).

• Corrected - line 23

• Line 23: May to July, 2021: delete comma (similarly in line 99).

• Corrected - line 24 and line 102

• Line 30: A. lumbricoides: italic.

• Corrected : - line 32

• Line 31: T. trichiura: italic.

• Corrected - line 33

• Line 38: still remain: delete still (redundant).

• Deleted - line 40

• Line 60: major: change to “a major”.

• Corrected - line 62

• Line 68: socio- economic: remove space.

• Corrected - line 70

• Line 68: lack of accesses: change to “access”.

• Corrected - line 71

• Line 71: is: “are”.

• Corrected - line 73

• Line 98: population: change to “a population”.

• Corrected - line 101

• Line 102: temperature: change to “a temperature”.

• Corrected - line 106

• Line 129: Sufficient: change to “A sufficient”.

• Corrected - line 136

• Line 129: were collected: change to “was”.

• Corrected - line 136

• Line 130: leak proof: change to “leak-proof”.

• Corrected - line 137

• Line 131: unique Identifier (UID): change to “unique identifier” or “Unique Identifier” (UID).

• Corrected - line 138

• Line 133: specimen were: change to “specimen was”.

• Corrected - line 140

• Line 148: sold waste: change to “solid”.

• Corrected - line 224

• Line 156: was assess: change to “ assessed”.

• Corrected - line 168

• Line 182: About 56.1% the households: change to “of” the households.

• Corrected - line 222

• Line 196-197: S. mansoni, H. nana and E. vermicularis: full genera names.

• RESPONSE: - line 184

o Reviewer #1 recommend me to delete those parasite as it didn’t appear in table

• Line 199: had single infection: change to “a single”.

• Corrected - line 192

• Line 220: washing / peeling: remove spaces.

• Corrected - line 263

• Line 222: p- value: remove space

• Corrected - line 269

• Line 222: finger nail: change to fingernails (correct elsewhere in 224, 230, 231, 253, 374 and in tables 2 and table 4).

• All are corrected - line 36, 231, 264, 267, 273, 274, 284, 298, 391, 399 and 427

• Line 250: about 80.1% households: “of” households.

• Corrected - line 294

• Line 272: as public health problem: “a public”.

• Corrected - line 315

• Line 289: indirect: “an indirect”.

• Corrected- line 334

• Line 336: finding the Ethiopia Demographic: “of” the Ethiopia Demographic.

• Corrected- line 385

• Line 347: counter parts: one word.

• Corrected- line 397

• Line 374: soil- transmitted: remove space.

• Corrected - line 428

• Table 1: N (%): change to “n” (%) (correct elsewhere for consistency).

• Table 3 and Table 4: No (%): change to “n” (%).

• Corrected in all tables including the

• Line 247: (88,5%): (88.5%).

• Corrected- line 291

• Line 308: (19.1%). were found: remove the full stop after the bracket.

• Corrected- line 357

• Line 309: Species: “species” (uncapitalize the word).

• Corrected - line 358

• Line 311: (83.1 %,): remove the comma after correcting the number (see comment 6).

• Corrected - line 360

• The AOR for untrimmed hand fingernail was 2.99, change the 2.9 (line 229) to 3. Similarly, wealth status (2.7) in line 232.

• Corrected both in text and table 4 - line 273, 275, 284

III: References:

Many references are not according to the journal style, please correct accordingly.

• RESPONSE:

o All the references are corrected according to the recommended journal style(Vancouver)

o Additionally, New reference No= 27 and 28 explaining the detailed procedure recommended by the WHO was added to explain the concern of the reviewer

Note:

• General

o All the comments and suggestion given by reviewer #1 and reviewer #2 are corrected

o Acknowledgement: the following sentenced was added to the acknowledgment “Dr. Ming-Chieh Lee mapped the study sites, for which we are grateful.”

• Editorial and numerical errors

o Some additional editorial, grammar, and spelling errors identified by the language experts were also corrected as indicated in the manuscript with truck changes.

o Some numerical errors identified by the authors are corrected, in table 1 and table 3 (now relabeled as table 2), the total number of hookworms identified was 9, not 8 and accordingly, prevalence figures under the column, Hookworm species in table 1 was changed (as indicted in truck changes)

o In table 3 (now relabeled as table 2), the geometric mean under the column, hookworm species is corrected as 110.64( not 112.62)

• Figure

o A new figure (Fig 1) (a map of the study sites) is added and labeled as figure 1. - line 111

o Fig 1 is relabeled as Fig 2. - line 123

o Fig 2 is relabeled as Fig 3.- Line 200

o Fig 2 is corrected as the number of hookworm species only, was 6, not 5, and the total number of hookworms was 9, not 8. The total denominator was 68, not 67, and hence the percentage in figure 2 (currently relabeled as figure 3) was corrected as follows:

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Hesham M Al-Mekhlafi

2 Sep 2022

Prevalence and intensity of soil-transmitted helminth infections and associated risk factors among household heads living in the peri-urban areas of Jimma town, Oromia, Ethiopia: A community-based cross-sectional study

PONE-D-22-15060R1

Dear Dr. Zeynudin,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Hesham

Hesham M. Al-Mekhlafi, PhD

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The authors have satisfactorily responded and addressed all the comments raised in the last round. The manuscript is technically sound and of high quality. It can be accepted for publication as it stands.

Reviewer #2: The author(s) successfully responded to the reviewer 2 comments and coherently addressed all the points raised.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: Yes: Prof Uwem Friday Ekpo

Reviewer #2: Yes: Wahib M. Atroosh

**********

Acceptance letter

Hesham M Al-Mekhlafi

6 Sep 2022

PONE-D-22-15060R1

Prevalence and intensity of soil-transmitted helminth infections and associated risk factors among household heads living in the peri-urban areas of Jimma town, Oromia, Ethiopia: A community-based cross-sectional study

Dear Dr. Zeynudin:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Prof. Hesham M. Al-Mekhlafi

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table. Socio-demographic characteristics, sanitation and hygiene practice of the household heads in peri-urban Kebeles in Jimma town.

    (DOCX)

    S2 Table. Prevalence of STH and its distribution by socio-demographic characteristics, sanitation and hygiene practice of the household heads in peri-urban Kebeles in Jimma town.

    (DOCX)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to Reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES