Skip to main content
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2022 Sep 15;12:15483. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19816-y

Fabrication of a biological metal–organic framework based superhydrophobic textile fabric for efficient oil/water separation

M E Mohamed 1,, B A Abd-El-Nabey 1
PMCID: PMC9477873  PMID: 36109549

Abstract

In response to the industry's difficulty in properly separating oily wastewater discharge, researchers are investigating enhanced oil/water separation materials. In this work, a cost-effective and environmentally friendly superhydrophobic textile fabric was fabricated for effective oil–water mixture and emulsion separation. A biological metal–organic framework consisting of copper as a core metal and aspartic acid as a linker (Cu-Asp MOF) was used to improve the surface roughness of the pristine textile fabric, and stearic acid was used to lower its surface energy. The thermal gravimetric analysis investigated the prepared Cu-Asp MOF's thermal stability. X-ray spectroscopy and Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy studied the crystal orientation and chemical composition of the Cu-Asp MOF, Cu-Asp MOF@SA, pristine textile fabric, and superhydrophobic textile fabric, respectively. The surface morphology of the pristine and modified textile fabric was studied by scanning electron microscope. The wettability results showed that the prepared superhydrophobic textile fabric has a water contact angle of 158° ± 1.3 and water sliding angle of 2° ± 0.2°. The prepared superhydrophobic textile fabric showed excellent oil–water mixture and emulsion separation performance, oil absorption capacity, chemical stability, mechanical abrasion resistance, and a high flux rate. These outstanding characteristics of the prepared superhydrophobic textile fabric greatly increase the possibility for practical applications.

Subject terms: Chemical engineering, Nanoscale materials

Introduction

Oil pollution issues such as accidental crude oil spills and the discharge of oily wastewater due to industrial activities have gotten much attention and spurred a debate regarding oil/water separation18. Many technologies such as centrifugation separation9, oil skimmers10, demulsifiers11, microbiological degradation12, gravity separation13, vacuum dehydration14, and functional material absorption15 have been developed for separating oil from oily wastewater. Researchers have been developing more effective separation methods for oil/water separation to address the limitations of present systems, such as large equipment, high energy consumption, complex separation process, easy creation of secondary pollutants, and low separation efficiency1618. Because of its ease of separation equipment and low energy consumption, membrane separation techniques such as metal mesh16,19, fabric20,21, sponge22,23, and paper23,24 are the most efficient techniques for separating oil–water combinations.

Because of their differing inherent wettability of oil and water, superhydrophobic membranes are currently thought to be promising in oil–water separation2,2530. Different superhydrophobic films with exceptional water repellency can be achieved by increasing the roughness of the surface, the first characteristic necessary to attain superhydrophobicity, and lowering surface energy, the second characteristic necessary to attain superhydrophobicity3135. To improve roughness, researchers used a variety of nanomaterials, including SiO23, TiO222, ZnO36, CuO37, carbon nanotubes38, and metal–organic frameworks39. Immersion40,41, electrodeposition42, electrospinning43, plasma etching44, layer self-assembly45, electrochemical anodic oxidation46, chemical vapour deposition47, phase separation48, dipping49, spraying50, and sol–gel methods51 have all been proposed for the preparation of superhydrophobic coatings.

Metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) based membranes with great wettability can be used to enable selective and effective separation of oil–water mixtures39,52. MOFs are an innovative mixture of natural porous materials with a periodic network structure generated by core metal ions and organic linkers53. MOFs have gotten a lot of press because of their unique properties. They have a complex and varied framework structure, ordered and regular pore structure, a high specific surface area, and the capacity to move functional groups in pores and surfaces53,54. MOFs are used in many applications, including bioreactors55, proton conductive materials53, medication delivery56, chemical sensors, water purification57, catalysis58, and gas separation and storage59. MOFs are manufactured by microwave-assisted synthesis60, colloidal deposition method61, layer-by-layer synthesis62, evaporation induced crystallization63, and solvothermal/ hydrothermal synthesis64. Complex procedures, high energy consumption, the need for modern equipment, long reaction times, difficult process regulation, and the use of undesired anions through utilizing metal salts are all drawbacks of these approaches. Compared to traditional methods, electrochemical methods provide a variety of advantages, including mild reaction conditions, convenience of use, and clean-up65. Biological metal–organic frameworks, Bio–MOFs, have lately gained popularity as green, biodegradable, renewable framework material66. Bio–MOFs use nucleobases, peptides, amino acids, and saccharides as building blocks66.

This research aims to construct a Bio-MOF-based superhydrophobic coating on textile fabric for oil/water separation. A Bio-MOF consists of copper as a core metal and aspartic acid as a linker, Cu-Asp MOF, which was manufactured using an electrochemical method. The prepared Cu-Asp MOF was immersed in an ethanolic solution of stearic acid. The Cu-Asp MOF modified with stearic acid, Cu-Asp MOF@SA, was sprayed on the textile fabric to produce the superhydrophobic coating. The composition, crystal orientation, and thermal stability of the prepared Cu-Asp MOF were investigated. The prepared superhydrophobic textile fabric's surface composition, morphology, wettability, oil–water mixture and emulsion separation performance, oil absorption capacity, Flux, mechanical abrasion resistance, and chemical stability were studied.

Experimental

Materials

Stearic acid, aspartic acid, methyl red, silicone oil (viscosity 500 cSt at 20 °C), petroleum ether, n-hexane, sulphuric acid (99%), Tween 80 and sodium hydroxide were gained from SIGMA ALDRICH. Pure textile fabric and a sheet of copper metal were purchased from a local store.

The fabrication of Cu-Asp MOF

A copper sheet (50 mm × 20 mm × 1.0 mm) was polished with sandpaper (300 and 800 grit) to erase the oxide layer at the surface of copper and rinsed with distilled water and ethanol. A solution of 100 mL aspartic acid (4.5 gL−1) was served as the electrochemical bath. A direct current was used to start the electrochemical synthesis, with two polished copper sheets serving as anode and cathode. The current density was adjusted to 0.05 A/cm2 for one hour at a temperature of 55 ± 1 °C. A blue precipitate formed at the anode as the process continued. The formed precipitate was rinsed with ethanol and dried at room temperature; then, it was scratched. The obtained MOF was dried in an oven at 100 °C for two hours. The formed copper aspartic acid MOF was designated as Cu-Asp MOF.

Superhydrophobic textile fabric fabrication

An ethanolic solution of 250 mL of Cu-Asp MOF (0.8 gL−1) and stearic acid (8.0 gL−1) was stirred for one hour, then sonicated for half hour, and a solution of Cu-Asp MOF@SA was prepared. A Circular textile fabric (diameter of 10.5 mm) was sprayed with Cu-Asp MOF@SA. The modified textile fabric, TF@ Cu-Asp MOF@SA, was then rinsed with ethanol and dried for two hours at 60 °C. Figure 1 shows the fabrication scheme for superhydrophobic textile fabric, TF@Cu-Asp MOF@SA.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Schematic diagram of the manufacturing of superhydrophobic textile fabric, TF@Cu-Asp MOF@SA.

Characterization

A scanning electron microscope, SEM, was used to examine the textile fabric morphology before and after modification (model JSM-200 IT, JEOL). An energy dispersive x-ray spectrometer was used to determine the elemental composition of the prepared materials and surfaces (EDX JEM-2100 Japan). Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, FTIR, was used to investigate the chemical composition of the surface (model: Bruker Tensor 37 FTIR). The FTIR spectra were taken in the 4000–400 cm−1 range. Furthermore, an X-ray diffractometer (Bruker D2 phaser) was used to distinguish the crystal phase and crystallinity. Thermogravimetric analysis was used to determine the Cu-Asp MOF's thermal stability (TGA-Shimadzu-50). An optical contact angle goniometer (Rame-hart CA instrument, model 190-F2) was used to measure the water contact angle (WCA) and sliding angle (WSA) with water droplets of 5 µl. The contact angle values are the averages of four measurements taken at various locations on the surface of the manufactured superhydrophobic textile fabric. Sodium hydroxide and sulfuric acid were used to alter the water droplets' pH. An abrasion test measured the mechanical stability of the prepared superhydrophobic textile fabric. The prepared superhydrophobic textile fabric was placed on 600 mesh sandpaper, and a weight of 100 g was applied to it and pulled for 10 cm, named one abrasion cycle. The created superhydrophobic textile fabric's chemical stability was investigated by examining the impact of immersion times of various prepared superhydrophobic samples in solutions of pH ranging from 1 to 13 for 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 h on the value of WCA67. Meantime, water CAs on all samples are measured in three different positions every hour, which is repeated 3 times.

The chemical stability results presented here are the averages of the three tests.

Absorption capacity measurements

The prepared superhydrophobic textile fabric's absorption capability was determined by immersing a piece of the fabric in silicone oil, petroleum ether, or n-hexane for one minute, draining for a few seconds, and wiping with filter paper to remove the excess organic solvents. Using weights measured at room temperature, the absorption capacity (k) of silicone oil, petroleum ether, and n-hexane was determined by the following equation68:

k=M1/M0 1

M0 represents the weight of the modified superhydrophobic textile fabric sample, whereas M1 represents the weight of the sample after organic solvent absorption.

Measurements of oil/water separation performance

The oily wastewater was made of a 50 mL oil/water mixture with a volume ratio of 1:1. Methyl red was employed to color the distilled water. The oil phases were chosen from various organic solvents such as silicone oil, petroleum ether, and n-hexane. The oil-in-water (O/W) emulsion was formed by mixing up water, n-hexane, and Tween 80 in a mass ratio of 40:9.9:0.1 and then sonicating by ultrasonication at 25 °C for 1.5 h. During oil/water separation, the prepared superhydrophobic textile fabric was used as a filter membrane. When the oily wastewater was put into the separation system, the oil penetrated the modified textile fabric and fell into the lower receipting container, leaving water in the upper container. The following equation was used to compute the separation efficiency (W)68:

W=M2/M3×100% 2

M3 and M2 are the starting and collected oil weights, respectively. The total organic carbon (TOC) of the aqueous phase after separation process was measured using total organic carbon analyzer (HACH DR 2700) to confirm the separation efficiency.

The following equation was used to estimate the Flux of the modified textile fabric68:

Flux=V/S×t 3

where V is the volume of permeating liquid, S is the effective area of the film, and t is the time it takes for the liquid to pass through the film.

Results and discussion

Thermogravimetric results of the prepared Cu-Asp MOF

The thermograms for the prepared Cu-Asp MOF under an air atmosphere are presented in Fig. 2. The thermograms are divided into three regions. The first region is within the temperature range between 30 and 100 °C. In the first region, weight reduction was noticed due to the volatilization of adsorbed water. The second region ranges from 100 to 215 °C. The weight loss observed at 215 °C is attributed to the breakage of the bridge between the metal cluster and the organic linker and the decomposition of Cu-Asp MOF. The third region ranges from 215 to 285 °C. The weight loss observed in the third region is due to the decomposition of the linker, aspartic acid69. So, we can conclude that the prepared Cu-Asp MOF is thermally stable until 215 °C.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Thermogravimetric analysis in air atmosphere of Cu-Asp MOF.

XRD results

The XRD technique was used to know the composition and the crystal orientation of the Cu-Asp MOF, Cu-Asp MOF@SA, pristine textile fabric, and modified textile fabric. Figure 3 depicts the XRD patterns of the Cu-Asp MOF, Cu-Asp MOF@SA, pristine textile fabric, and modified textile fabric. The prepared Cu-Asp MOF XRD pattern implies that the deposits contain copper, oxygen, and carbon. The main diffraction peaks are observed at 2Ɵ value equals 10.48°, 14.15°, 16.10°, 18.70°, 24.88°, 29.13°, 35.32°, 37.22°, 39.92° and 44.67°. These peaks are characteristics of the monoclinic crystal system of the prepared Cu-Asp MOF. The Scherrer equation determines the average grain size of the prepared Cu-Asp MOF sample; the crystallite size equals 19.6 nm. The XRD pattern of prepared Cu-Asp MOF@SA shows the same pattern of Cu-Asp MOF with two extra diffraction peaks at 2Ɵ values equal to 21.79° and 27.44°, indicating that the Cu-Asp MOF was grafted by stearic acid70. The XRD pattern of pristine textile fabric shows diffraction peaks at 17.31°, 22.40°, and 25.22° which are lattice faces of alpha polyamide contributed by nylon textile substrate. The modified textile fabric has a similar diffraction peak compared to the pristine textile fabric and Cu-Asp MOF@SA, indicating that Cu-Asp MOF was successfully grafted on the textile fabric. Interestingly, all peak intensities of modified textile were decreased, which attributed to the grafting of Cu-Asp MOF at the textile fabric would shield the signal of polyamide of nylon textile fabric7175.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

XRD pattern of Cu-Asp MOF, Cu-Asp MOF@SA, pristine textile fabric, and modified textile fabric.

FTIR results

FTIR spectroscopy techniques investigated the chemical composition of the Cu-Asp MOF, Cu-Asp MOF@SA, pristine textile fabric, and modified textile fabric, Fig. 4. The spectrum of pristine textile fabric displays a peak at 3430 cm−1 attributed to the N–H stretch of secondary amide and the two peaks at 2912 cm−1 and 2965 cm−1, assigned to the -CH2- asymmetry and symmetry vibration76. The peak at 1715 cm−1 is attributed to the C=O stretch, and the peak at 1409 cm−1 is caused by the bending vibration of C-H. While the peaks at 1093 and 1242 cm−1 are attributed to C-N stretch, the peak at 873 cm−1 is due to C–H bending, and the peak at 726 cm−1 is due to N–H out of plane bending. The spectrum Cu-Asp MOF displays the same peaks as that of the pristine textile fabric except that the appearance of two peaks at 3269 and 3433 cm−1 attributed to N-H2 stretch of primary amine of aspartic acid74,7780. The two peaks at 501, and 431 cm−1 attributed to the Cu−O and Cu−N bonds vibration, respectively8185. This result confirms that the copper is coordinated with both the nitrogen and oxygen of aspartic acid. The spectrum Cu-Asp MOF@SA displays the same peaks as that of the Cu-Asp MOF with a shift in C=O stretch peak and N-H2 stretch peak located at 1719 cm−1 and 3444 cm−1, indicating the grafting of Cu-Asp MOF with stearic acid. The spectrum of modified textile fabric displays the same peaks as Cu-Asp MOF@SA, indicating that the prepared Cu-Asp MOF@SA grafted the pristine textile fabric.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

FTIR of the Cu-Asp MOF, Cu-Asp MOF@SA, pristine and modified textile fabric.

Energy dispersive x-ray spectrometer (EDX) results

The EDX was used to investigate the chemical composition of the Cu-Asp MOF, Cu-Asp MOF@SA, pristine textile fabric, and modified textile fabric, Fig. 5. The micrograph of Cu-Asp MOF shows peaks of carbon, oxygen, nitrogen, and copper. The micrograph of Cu-Asp MOF@SA shows the same peaks of Cu-Asp MOF but with a higher weight percent of carbon and oxygen, indicating that the stearic acid is successfully grafted on the prepared MOF. The pristine textile fabric micrograph shows carbon, oxygen, and nitrogen peaks. The modified textile fabric micrograph shows the same pristine peaks with an extra peak of copper, indicating that the prepared Cu-Asp MOF@SA was grafted on the textile fabric.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

EDX micrographs of the (a) Cu-Asp MOF, (b) Cu-Asp MOF@SA, (c) pristine textile fabric, and (d) modified textile fabric.

SEM and wettability of the pristine and modified textile fabric results

Surface roughness and surface chemical composition determine the superhydrophobic property. The SEM was used to investigate the surface topography of the pristine and modified textile fabric. The SEM micrographs of pristine and modified textile fabric are shown in Fig. 6. As illustrated in the figure, the fibers of pristine textile have a relatively smooth surface. While numerous micro/nano structures cover the modified textile fabric fibers, the fibers' surface roughness was significantly improved.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

SEM images of the pristine (a) and modified textile fabric (b).

The wettability of the pristine and modified textile fabric was investigated by the measurement of WCA, Fig. 7. As shown in Fig. 7, the surface of the pristine textile fabric is hydrophilic, WCA near 0, and the water droplets do not slide even if the textile fabric is upset. The modified textile fabric has a water contact angle, WCA, of 158° ± 1.3 o, and a water sliding angle, WSA, of 2° ± 0.2° (see video S1), which showed excellent superhydrophobic properties.

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Images of water droplets at the pristine surface (a) and modified textile fabric (b).

Absorption capacity measurements

The prepared superhydrophobic textile fabric's absorption capability to n-hexane, petroleum ether, and silicone oil was determined. Although the pristine textile fabric absorbed both water and oil, the developed superhydrophobic modified textile fabric selectively absorbed only oil. The high porosity, low density, superhydrophobic characteristics, and capillary force of the prepared modified textile fabric contribute to its rapid absorption of organic solvents68.

The prepared superhydrophobic textile fabric's absorption capacity to n-hexane, petroleum ether, and silicone oil was repeated ten times, Fig. 8. After each cycle, the oil absorption capacity was measured, and the desorption process of the organic solvents was done by squeezing the prepared superhydrophobic textile fabric. The absorption capacity of silicone oil is the highest, while n-hexane is the lowest, as shown in Fig. 8. The developed modified textile fabric has absorption capacities of 85.4, 106.59, and 159.712 g/g for n-hexane, petroleum ether, and silicone oil, respectively. It is reported in many previous works that when the oil density and viscosity increase, the absorption capacity increases8692. This may be explained by the fact that oil with a higher density and viscosity will take longer to release from the superhydrophobic membrane, leaving more oil in the porous structure and increasing its absorption capacity89. In comparison to the light oil, the higher density oil will weigh more in the same pore volume of the superhydrophobic membrane so that the higher density oil will have a higher absorption capacity.

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Absorption capacity of various oil/water combinations as a function of cycle count.

This result could be explained by the density difference between these organic solvents; the solvent with a higher density has a greater absorption capacity. Even after ten cycles, the absorption capacity remains practically constant, showing that the developed superhydrophobic textile fabric for oil separation is recyclable. The contact angle of the prepared superhydrophobic/oleophilic textile fabric was 154° ± 1.4° after the ten cycles reflecting its high mechanical stability. So, the modified textile fabric maintains its superhydrophobic characteristics even after ten absorption processes to the organic solvents under study.

Furthermore, these absorption capabilities (wt/wt) are greater than those of previously reported absorbents such as textile fabric grafted by CuS nanoparticles and silicone elastomer polydimethylsiloxane (71.43–156.24)93. Textile fabric modified with phytic acid and polydimethylsiloxane (71.43–156.24)94. The developed modified textile fabric's high absorption capacity effectively absorbs spilled oils and other organic liquids.

Oil/water separation efficiency

Figure 9 shows the results of 10 cycles of separation efficiency of the manufactured superhydrophobic textile fabric with various oil/water mixes. The modified textile fabric has a good separation efficiency for the various oil/water mixes under investigation. The separation efficiency for n-hexane/water mixtures, petroleum ether/water mixtures, and silicone oil/water mixtures equal 99.4, 96.4, and 95.0%, respectively (see video S2, which shows the separation process of n-hexane/water mixtures). As a result, the superhydrophobic textile fabric exhibits remarkable oil selectivity. The separation efficiency was confirmed by measuring the TOC of the aqueous phase after separation process. The TOC of the aqueous phase after the separation process of n-hexane/water, petroleum ether/water, and silicone oil/water mixtures are 12 ppm, 14 ppm, and 17 ppm, respectively. The small values of TOC of the aqueous phase after separation process confirm the high separation efficiency of the oil/water mixture using the prepared superhydrophobic textile fabric.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Separation efficiency of the modified textile fabric for different oil/water mixtures with the number of separation cycles.

The figure also demonstrates that the first cycle has the highest separation efficiency. The separation efficiency was still greater than 93.5 percent after ten oil/water separation cycles. The minor loss of collected oil during the separation process is primarily due to oil adherence to the funnel and sample. Furthermore, the oil's volatility should contribute to a drop in separation efficiency68. Due to its porosity, the oil penetrates through the modified textile fabric, and the rough features make it simple to build oil channels, resulting in a high oil flux. Furthermore, this absorbent's separation effectiveness (%) is greater than that of previously reported absorbents, such as textile modified with polyvinyl alcohol (91–95%)95. Textile grafted with fluoroalkyl silane-modified iron oxide nanoparticles in polydimethylsiloxane (92.2–93.5)96.

Furthermore, the same method can be used to separate O/W emulsions that have been stabilized by surfactants. Oil/water emulsion separation is quite challenging, especially when surfactants are present28. Here, a Tween 80-stabilized n-hexane in water emulsion was prepared in order to explore the separation of O/W emulsion. The prepared modified textile fabric was used for the O/W emulsion separation. As soon as the emulsion was poured into the top funnel, the oil permeated through the modified fabric and was collected there, leaving the water on the upper funnel (see video S3, which shows the separation process of the oil/water emulsion). Figure 10 shows the emulsion images before and after the separation process. It is obvious that the colour is transformed from milky to clear after one separation cycle, and no n-hexane droplets were observed in the water phase. The separation efficiency for Tween 80-stabilized n-hexane in water emulsion equals 90.1% which is calculated using Eq. 2. The separation efficiency of the O/W emulsions was confirmed by measuring the TOC of the aqueous phase after separation process. The TOC of the aqueous phase after separation is 22 ppm. The TOC values of the water after filtration are smaller than many previously reported values indicating high separation efficiency of the prepared superhydrophobic membrane toward O/W mixture and emulsion9799. These results show that the prepared superhydrophobic textile fabric can be used for O/W mixture and emulsion separation.

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Images of oil-in-water emulsion before and after the separation process.

Mechanical stability

Poor mechanical abrasion of produced superhydrophobic coatings is viewed as a key problem in industrial applications. It has been shown that enhancing superhydrophobic coatings' abrasion resistance is essential for their industrial uses. The WCAs and WSAs after each five abrasion cycles are measured to demonstrate the variation in wettability, as shown in Fig. 11. The plots show that as the abrasion cycles increased, the WCAs reduced and the WSAs increased. The prepared superhydrophobic textile fabric maintains its superhydrophobicity until 55 abrasion cycles, where the WCA is greater than 150o, and the WSA is lower than 10°. The prepared superhydrophobic textile fabric has mechanical stability superior to several previously recorded values94,100.

Figure 11.

Figure 11

Variation of WCAs and WSAs with the abrasion cycles.

Chemical stability and Flux rate

The stability of superhydrophobic surfaces is a critical issue for their practical uses. To establish the chemical stability of the created superhydrophobic textile fabric, the effect of acid and alkali solutions on the water contact angle was investigated. The prepared textile fabric was immersed in aqueous solutions of pH from 1 to 13 for different immersion times (1–6 h), and the WCA was estimated each one hour. The relation between the pH and WCA of the prepared superhydrophobic textile fabric for different immersion times is shown in Fig. 12. At pH 5–9, the WCA values are greater than 150°, showing that the modified textile fabric is still superhydrophobic. While the created superhydrophobic textile fabric loses its superhydrophobicity before 6 h of immersion in an extremely acidic and basic environment. The superhydrophobic nature is primarily responsible for effective oil/water separation capabilities, although most reported superhydrophobic coatings are chemically unstable. Furthermore, the chemical stability of the produced textile fabric (wt/wt) is superior to that of previously reported absorbents such as textile fabric modified with polyvinyl alcohol (WCA = 149°)95. Textile fabric modified with a fluoropolymer (WCA = 140°)96. Textile fabric grafted by silica aerogel and polydimethylsiloxane (WCA = 140°)101.

Figure 12.

Figure 12

Influence of pH values on the modified textile fabric's water contact angle at different immersion times.

Due to its porosity and the rough features of the modified textile fabric, it is easy to form oil channels, which contribute to the high oil flux. The Flux of modified textile fabric was determined using Eq. (3). The modified textile fabric had a high oil flux rate. The Flux values for n-hexane, petroleum ether, silicone oil and n-hexane in water emulsion equal 15,700, 15,500, 15,400 and 8040 L m−2 h−1, respectively. The Flux stability of the modified textile fabric in the oil/water separation process was determined by measuring it after 10 cycles of separation processes. The Flux value for n-hexane, petroleum ether, silicone oil and n-hexane in water emulsion after 10 cycles of separation processes equal 14,900, 14,700, 14,500 and 7650 L m−2 h−1, respectively. It is obvious that the Flux is slightly decreased, reflecting the high Flux stability of the modified textile fabric.

The viscosities of various organic solvents are responsible for the variance in flux levels; Flux is inversely proportional to the viscosity of the liquid102. As a result, the created textile fabric can be utilized to effectively and quickly separate oil and water. Additionally, in comparison, these Flux rates are superior to those of reported absorbents, such as thiol-poly dopamine coated-textile (4500 L m−2 h−1)100. Textile fabric modified with lauric acid-TiO2 composites and Fe3O4 nanoparticles (7400–11,000 L m−2 h−1)71.

Conclusion

A spray-coating technique was employed to achieve cost-effective and environmentally friendly superhydrophobic textile fabric for effective oil–water mixture and emulsion separation. The pristine textile fabric was turned into a superhydrophobic one by improving the surface roughness using Cu-Asp MOF and lowering the surface energy using stearic acid. The superhydrophobic textile fabric exhibits a high contact angle (158o ± 1.3°), reflecting excellent superhydrophobic characteristics, and has a high absorption capacity of 85.4, 106.59, and 159.712 g/g for n-hexane, petroleum ether, and silicone oil. The superhydrophobic textile fabric has a good separation efficiency (95–99.4%) for the various oil/water mixes under investigation. The prepared modified textile fabric was successfully used for a Tween 80-stabilized n-hexane in water emulsion separation and has a high separation efficiency (90.1%). The prepared superhydrophobic textile fabric has high mechanical stability where it maintains its superhydrophobicity until 55 abrasion cycles. The prepared textile fabric exhibits high chemical stability, whereas it retains superhydrophobicity after immersion in aqueous solutions of pH from 1 to 13 for one hour. The created textile fabric has a high Flux rate (15,400–15,700 L m−2 h−1) for the different oil/water mixtures under study and a Flux rate of 8040 L m−2 h−1 for the n-hexane in water emulsion, so the prepared superhydrophobic textile fabric exhibits a unique application potential to effectively and quickly separate oil–water mixture and emulsion.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Video 1. (479.7KB, mp4)
Supplementary Video 2. (1.7MB, mp4)
Supplementary Video 3. (4.3MB, mp4)

Author contributions

M.E. Mohamed: Writing—review & editing, Methodology, Supervision, Data curation, and Writing—original draft. B.A. Abd-El-Nabey: Writing—review & editing, supervision, discussion and validation. At the end, this manuscript has resulted by the collaboration of the two authors.

Funding

Open access funding provided by The Science, Technology & Innovation Funding Authority (STDF) in cooperation with The Egyptian Knowledge Bank (EKB). This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-022-19816-y.

References

  • 1.Cao C, Cheng J. Fabrication of robust surfaces with special wettability on porous copper substrates for various oil/water separations. Chem. Eng. J. 2018;347:585–594. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.04.146. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hu Y, et al. Facile preparation of superhydrophobic metal foam for durable and high efficient continuous oil-water separation. Chem. Eng. J. 2017;322:157–166. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.04.034. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Qiu L, Zhang J, Guo Z, Liu W. Asymmetric superwetting stainless steel meshes for on-demand and highly effective oil-water emulsion separation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021;273:118994. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.118994. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Yin Z, et al. Preparation of superhydrophobic magnetic sawdust for effective oil/water separation. J. Clean. Prod. 2020;253:120058. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120058. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Thasma Subramanian B, Alla JP, Essomba JS, Nishter NF. Non-fluorinated superhydrophobic spray coatings for oil-water separation applications: An eco-friendly approach. J. Clean. Prod. 2020;256:120693. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120693. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Baig U, Matin A, Gondal MA, Zubair SM. Facile fabrication of superhydrophobic, superoleophilic photocatalytic membrane for efficient oil-water separation and removal of hazardous organic pollutants. J. Clean. Prod. 2019;208:904–915. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.079. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Miao G, et al. Ag/polydopamine-coated textile for enhanced liquid/liquid mixtures separation and dye removal. iScience. 2022;25:104213. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Lu J, et al. Robust hydrogel coating with oil-repellent property in air, water, and oil surroundings. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2020;12:49138–49145. doi: 10.1021/acsami.0c16410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Klasson KT, Taylor PA, Walker JF, Jr, Jones SA, Cummins RL, Richardson SA. Modification of a centrifugal separator for in-well oil-water separation. Sep. Sci. Technol. 2005;40:453–462. doi: 10.1081/SS-200042503. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Song JL, et al. Barrel-shaped oil skimmer designed for collection of oil from spills. Adv. Mater. Interfaces. 2015;2:1–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Roodbari NH, Badiei A, Soleimani E, Khaniani Y. Tweens demulsification effects on heavy crude oil/water emulsion. Arab. J. Chem. 2016;9:S806–S811. doi: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2011.08.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Alabresm A, Chen YP, Decho AW, Lead J. A novel method for the synergistic remediation of oil-water mixtures using nanoparticles and oil-degrading bacteria. Sci. Total Environ. 2018;630:1292–1297. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Khan JA, Al-Kayiem HH, Aleem W, Saad AB. Influence of alkali-surfactant-polymer flooding on the coalescence and sedimentation of oil/water emulsion in gravity separation. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 2019;173:640–649. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2018.10.055. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Peng Y, Liu T, Gong H, Zhang X. Dehydration of emulsified lubricating oil by three fields: swirl centrifugal field, pulse electric field and vacuum temperature field. Appl. Petrochemical Res. 2016;6:389–395. doi: 10.1007/s13203-016-0165-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.An Q, et al. A facile method to fabricate functionally integrated devices for oil/water separation. Nanoscale. 2015;7:4553–4558. doi: 10.1039/C5NR00026B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wang J, Liu S. Fabrication of water-repellent double-layered polydopamine/copper films on mesh with improved abrasion and corrosion resistance by solution-phase reduction for oily wastewater treatment. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2020;233:116005. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2019.116005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Deng Y, et al. Metal-organic framework membranes: Recent development in the synthesis strategies and their application in oil-water separation. Chem. Eng. J. 2021;405:127004. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.127004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Moatmed SM, Khedr MH, El-Dek SI, Kim HY, El-Deen AG. Highly efficient and reusable superhydrophobic/superoleophilic polystyrene@ Fe3O4 nanofiber membrane for high-performance oil/water separation. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2019;7:103508. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2019.103508. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lü X, Lin H. Facile fabrication of robust superhydrophobic/superoleophlic Cu coated stainless steel mesh for highly efficient oil/water separation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021;256:117512. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2020.117512. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Chauhan P, Kumar A, Bhushan B. Self-cleaning, stain-resistant and anti-bacterial superhydrophobic cotton fabric prepared by simple immersion technique. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019;535:66–74. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2018.09.087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yang W, Li J, Zhou P, Zhu L, Tang H. Superhydrophobic copper coating: Switchable wettability, on-demand oil-water separation, and antifouling. Chem. Eng. J. 2017;327:849–854. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2017.06.159. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Xu P, Li X. Fabrication of TiO2/SiO2superhydrophobic coating for efficient oil/water separation. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021;9:105538. doi: 10.1016/j.jece.2021.105538. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Li X, Cao M, Shan H, Handan Tezel F, Li B. Facile and scalable fabrication of superhydrophobic and superoleophilic PDMS-co-PMHS coating on porous substrates for highly effective oil/water separation. Chem. Eng. J. 2019;358:1101–1113. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.10.097. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Belal AS, et al. Superhydrophobic functionalized cellulosic paper by copper hydroxide nanorods for oils purification. Sci. Rep. 2021;11:1–12. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95784-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Li Y, et al. A robust salt-tolerant superoleophobic alginate/graphene oxide aerogel for efficient oil/water separation in marine environments. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:1–7. doi: 10.1038/s41598-016-0028-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Gao X, Wang X, Ouyang X, Wen C. Flexible superhydrophobic and superoleophilic MoS2 sponge for highly efficient oil-water separation. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:1–8. doi: 10.1038/s41598-016-0001-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Chen B, et al. Efficient oil–water separation coating with robust superhydrophobicity and high transparency. Sci. Rep. 2022;12:1–8. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99269-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Lu J, et al. Superhydrophilic/superoleophobic shell powder coating as a versatile platform for both oil/water and oil/oil separation. J. Membr. Sci. 2021;637:119624. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2021.119624. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Ren G, et al. A superhydrophobic copper mesh as an advanced platform for oil-water separation. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018;428:520–525. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.09.140. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Zhu X, et al. Superlyophobic graphene oxide/polydopamine coating under liquid system for liquid/liquid separation, dye removal, and anti-corrosion. Carbon N. Y. 2022;190:329–336. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2022.01.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zhang Y, Zhang L, Xiao Z, Wang S, Yu X. Fabrication of robust and repairable superhydrophobic coatings by an immersion method. Chem. Eng. J. 2019;369:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2019.03.021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wang J, et al. Robust superhydrophobic mesh coated by PANI/TiO2 nanoclusters for oil/water separation with high flux, self-cleaning, photodegradation and anti-corrosion. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2020;235:116166. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2019.116166. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Mohamed ME, Mahgoub FM, Ragheb DM, Abdel-Gaber AM. Novel and facile method for fabrication of robust superhydrophobic film on copper surface and its chemical, mechanical, and corrosion performance. Surf. Eng. 2021 doi: 10.1080/02670844.2021.1951502. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Mohamed ME, Ezzat A, Gaber AMA. Fabrication of eco - friendly graphene - based superhydrophobic coating on steel substrate and its corrosion resistance, chemical and mechanical stability. Sci. Rep. 2022;12:1–15. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99269-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Mohamed ME, Abd-El-Nabey BA. Corrosion performance of a steel surface modified by a robust graphene-based superhydrophobic film with hierarchical roughness. J. Mater. Sci. 2022 doi: 10.1007/s10853-022-07325-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Xu B, Cai Z. Fabrication of a superhydrophobic ZnO nanorod array film on cotton fabrics via a wet chemical route and hydrophobic modification. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2008;254:5899–5904. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.03.160. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Cao C, Wang F, Lu M. Superhydrophobic CuO coating fabricated on cotton fabric for oil/water separation and photocatalytic degradation. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2020;601:125033. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.125033. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Wan F, Yang DQ, Sacher E. Repelling hot water from superhydrophobic surfaces based on carbon nanotubes. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2015;3:16953–16960. doi: 10.1039/C5TA05231A. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Yang Y, et al. Fabrication of multifunctional textiles with durable antibacterial property and efficient oil-water separation via in situ growth of zeolitic imidazolate framework-8 (ZIF-8) on cotton fabric. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020;503:144079. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.144079. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Qu M, et al. Fabrication of superhydrophobic surfaces on engineering materials by a solution-immersion process. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2007;17:593–596. doi: 10.1002/adfm.200600472. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Ou J, Chen X. Corrosion resistance of phytic acid / Ce (III) nanocomposite coating with superhydrophobicity on magnesium. J. Alloys Compd. 2019;787:145–151. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.02.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Mohamed ME, Abd-El-Nabey BA. Facile and eco-friendly method for fabrication of superhydrophobic surface on copper metal. ECS J. Solid State Sci. Technol. 2020;9:061006. doi: 10.1149/2162-8777/ab9dc7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Nuraje N, Khan WS, Lei Y, Ceylan M, Asmatulu R. Superhydrophobic electrospun nanofibers. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2013;1:1929–1946. doi: 10.1039/C2TA00189F. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Hou W, et al. Anti-icing performance of the superhydrophobic surface with micro-cubic array structures fabricated by plasma etching. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2020;586:124180. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2019.124180. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Zhang C, Zhang S, Gao P, Ma H, Wei Q. Superhydrophobic hybrid films prepared from silica nanoparticles and ionic liquids via layer-by-layer self-assembly. Thin Solid Films. 2014;570:27–32. doi: 10.1016/j.tsf.2014.08.045. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Saji VS. Superhydrophobic surfaces and coatings by electrochemical anodic oxidation and plasma electrolytic oxidation. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2020;283:102245. doi: 10.1016/j.cis.2020.102245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Mosayebi E, Azizian S, Noei N. Preparation of robust superhydrophobic sand by chemical vapor deposition of polydimethylsiloxane for oil/water separation. Macromol. Mater. Eng. 2020;305:2000425. doi: 10.1002/mame.202000425. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Seyfi J, et al. Antibacterial superhydrophobic polyvinyl chloride surfaces via the improved phase separation process using silver phosphate nanoparticles. Colloids Surfaces B Biointerfaces. 2019;183:110438. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2019.110438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Contreras CB, Chagas G, Strumia MC, Weibel DE. Permanent superhydrophobic polypropylene nanocomposite coatings by a simple one-step dipping process. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014;307:234–240. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.04.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Zhang J, Zhu L, Zhao S, Wang D, Guo Z. A robust and repairable copper-based superhydrophobic microfiltration membrane for high-efficiency water-in-oil emulsion separation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021;256:117751. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2020.117751. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Rezayi T, Entezari MH. Achieving to a superhydrophobic glass with high transparency by a simple sol-gel-dip-coating method. Surf. Coatings Technol. 2015;276:557–564. doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.06.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Zhang Y, Wu C, Zhu H, Zhang B. Facial fabrication of superhydrophobic ZIF-7 coatings with fast self-healing ability for ultra-efficient emulsion separation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021;276:119272. doi: 10.1016/j.seppur.2021.119272. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Wang S, et al. A robust zirconium amino acid metal-organic framework for proton conduction. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:1–8. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02088-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Gutiérrez-Serpa A, Pacheco-Fernández I, Pasán J, Pino V. Metal–organic frameworks as key materials for solid-phase microextraction devices—a review. Separations. 2019;6:1–29. doi: 10.3390/separations6040047. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Zare A, Bordbar AK, Razmjou A, Jafarian F. The immobilization of Candida rugosa lipase on the modified polyethersulfone with MOF nanoparticles as an excellent performance bioreactor membrane. J. Biotechnol. 2019;289:55–63. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2018.11.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ranjkesh B, Taherimehr M. Application of mesoporous COK-15 metal-organic framework as medication carrier for acetaminophen and clindamycin. Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 2021;66:68–77. doi: 10.1134/S0036023621010150. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Bedia J, et al. A review on the synthesis and characterization of metal organic frameworks for photocatalytic water purification. Catalysts. 2019;9:52. doi: 10.3390/catal9010052. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Ghorbani-Choghamarani A, Bastan H, Kakakhani Z, Taherinia Z. Preparation of Ni-microsphere and Cu-MOF using aspartic acid as coordinating ligand and study of their catalytic properties in Stille and sulfoxidation reactions. RSC Adv. 2021;11:14905–14914. doi: 10.1039/D1RA00734C. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Zheng J, et al. Shaping of ultrahigh-loading MOF pellet with a strongly anti-tearing binder for gas separation and storage. Chem. Eng. J. 2018;354:1075–1082. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.08.119. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Yoo Y, Jeong HK. Rapid fabrication of metal organic framework thin films using microwave-induced thermal deposition. Chem. Commun. 2008 doi: 10.1039/b800061a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Horcajada P, et al. Colloidal route for preparing optical thin films of nanoporous metal-organic frameworks. Adv. Mater. 2009;21:1931–1935. doi: 10.1002/adma.200801851. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Shekhah O, et al. Step-by-step route for the synthesis of metal-organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007;129:15118–15119. doi: 10.1021/ja076210u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Ameloot R, et al. Direct patterning of oriented metal-organic framework crystals via control over crystallization kinetics in clear precursor solutions. Adv. Mater. 2010;22:2685–2688. doi: 10.1002/adma.200903867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Tranchemontagne DJ, Hunt JR, Yaghi OM. Room temperature synthesis of metal-organic frameworks: MOF-5, MOF-74, MOF-177, MOF-199, and IRMOF-0. Tetrahedron. 2008;64:8553–8557. doi: 10.1016/j.tet.2008.06.036. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Yang HM, et al. In situ electrochemical synthesis of MOF-5 and its application in improving photocatalytic activity of BiOBr. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China (English Ed.) 2015;25:3987–3994. doi: 10.1016/S1003-6326(15)64047-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Nadar SS, Vaidya L, Maurya S, Rathod VK. Polysaccharide based metal organic frameworks (polysaccharide–MOF): A review. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2019;396:1–21. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2019.05.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Lv Z, Yu S, Song K, Zhou X, Yin X. Fabrication of a leaf-like superhydrophobic CuO coating on 6061Al with good self-cleaning, mechanical and chemical stability. Ceram. Int. 2020;46:14872–14883. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.03.013. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Mohamed ME, Nabey BAAE. Fabrication of durable superhydrophobic / oleophilic cotton fabric for highly efficient oil / water separation. Water Sci. Technol. 2021;83:90–99. doi: 10.2166/wst.2020.562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Mohamed SA, Chong S, Kim J. Thermal stability of methyl-functionalized MOF - 5. J. Phys. Chem. C. 2019;123:29686–29692. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b08060. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Tummala S, et al. Formulation and optimization of oxaliplatin immuno-nanoparticles using Box-Behnken design and cytotoxicity assessment for synergistic and receptor-mediated targeting in the treatment of colorectal cancer. Artif. Cells Nanomedicine Biotechnol. 2016;44:1835–1850. doi: 10.3109/21691401.2015.1111226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Yan T, et al. A magnetic pH-induced textile fabric with switchable wettability for intelligent oil/water separation. Chem. Eng. J. 2018;347:52–63. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2018.04.021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Xu L, Liu Y, Yuan X, Wan J, Wang L. One-pot preparation of robust, ultraviolet-proof superhydrophobic cotton fabrics for self-cleaning and oil / water separation. Cellulose. 2020;27:9005–9026. doi: 10.1007/s10570-020-03369-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Liu Y, Qu R, Li X, Wei Y, Feng L. Applied Surface Science Discarded cigarette butts regenerated hydrophobic-oleophilic materials for both immiscible and emulsi fied oil / water separation through a wettability reversal strategy. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020;532:147350. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147350. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Online VA, Ghorbani-choghamarani A, Taherinia Z, Bastan H, Kakakhani Z. Preparation of Ni-microsphere and Cu-MOF using aspartic acid as coordinating ligand and study of their catalytic properties in Stille and sulfoxidation. RSC Adv. 2021;11:14905–14914. doi: 10.1039/D1RA00734C. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Nasresfahani S, Tashkhourian J, Shamsipur M, Zargarpour Z, Sheikhi MH. Nano fibers of polyaniline and Cu(II)−L-aspartic acid for a room- temperature carbon monoxide gas sensor. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2021;13:39791–39805. doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c07116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Abd-El-Nabey BA, Ashour M, Aly A, Mohamed M. Fabrication of robust superhydrophobic nickel films on steel surface with high corrosion resistance, mechanical and chemical stability. J. Eng. Mater. Technol. 2022;144:021007. doi: 10.1115/1.4052768. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Mohammad F. Preparation, FTIR spectroscopic characterization and isothermal stability of differently doped fibrous conducting polymers based on polyaniline. Synth. Met. 2009;159:119–122. doi: 10.1016/j.synthmet.2008.08.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Liu Y, Qu R, Li X, Wei Y, Feng L. Applied Surface Science Discarded cigarette butts regenerated hydrophobic-oleophilic materials for both immiscible and emulsi fied oil/water separation through a wettability reversal strategy. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020;532:147350. doi: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147350. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Cooper SJ, Coogan M, Everall N, Priestnall I. A polarised m -FTIR study on a model system for nylon 6 6: implications for the nylon Brill structure. Poymer. 2001;42:10119–10132. [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Nasresfahani S, Tashkhourian J, Shamsipur M, Zargarpour Z, Sheikhi MH. Nano fibers of polyaniline and Cu(II)−L-aspartic acid for a room-temperature carbon monoxide gas sensor. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2021;13:39791–39805. doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c07116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Dudley, R. J., Hathaway, B. J., Mulcahy, P. G. H. J. K. & Tomlinson, A. A. The Chemistry Department, University College. Cork, h’eland {Receiced 12 December 1973). 36, 1947–1950 (1974).
  • 82.Botsa SM, Ramadevi D, Basavaiah K. A facile synthesis of copper oxide nanorods for photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutant and inactivation of pathogens. J. Nanosci. Technol. 2018;4:467–470. doi: 10.30799/jnst.146.18040502. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Rakibuddin M, Mandal S, Ananthakrishnan R. A novel ternary CuO decorated Ag3AsO4/GO hybrid as a Z-scheme photocatalyst for enhanced degradation of phenol under visible light. New J. Chem. 2017;41:1380–1389. doi: 10.1039/C6NJ02366E. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Karimzadeh M, Niknam K, Manouchehri N, Tarokh D. A green route for the cross-coupling of azide anions with aryl halides under both base and ligand-free conditions: Exceptional performance of a Cu2O-CuO-Cu-C nanocomposite. RSC Adv. 2018;8:25785–25793. doi: 10.1039/C8RA04608E. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Nasresfahani S, Tashkhourian J, Shamsipur M, Zargarpour Z, Sheikhi MH. Nano fibers of Polyaniline and Cu(II)−L-aspartic acid for a room- temperature carbon monoxide gas sensor. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2021 doi: 10.1021/acsami.1c07116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Shang Q, et al. Facile fabrication of superhydrophobic cross-linked nanocellulose aerogels for oil–water separation. Polymers. 2021;13:1–14. doi: 10.3390/polym13040625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Zhou S, et al. Sustainable, reusable, and superhydrophobic aerogels from microfibrillated cellulose for highly effective oil/water separation. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2016;4:6409–6416. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b01075. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Superhydrophobic_superoleophilic cotton-oil absorbent_ preparation and its application in oil_water separation _ Enhanced Reader.pdf.
  • 89.Parsaie A, Tamsilian Y, Pordanjani MR, Abadshapoori AK, McKay G. Novel approach for rapid oil/water separation through superhydrophobic/ superoleophilic zinc stearate coated polyurethane sponges. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2021;618:126395. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2021.126395. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Dopamine‐Induced Superhydrophobic Melamine Foam for Oil_Water Separation_Enhanced Reader.pdf.
  • 91.Shi M, Huang R, Qi W, Su R, He Z. Synthesis of superhydrophobic and high stable Zr-MOFs for oil-water separation. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2020;602:125102. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2020.125102. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Zhu X, et al. A versatile approach to produce superhydrophobic materials used for oil-water separation. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2014;432:105–108. doi: 10.1016/j.jcis.2014.06.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Xu L, et al. One-pot preparation of robust, ultraviolet-proof superhydrophobic cotton fabrics for self-cleaning and oil/water separation. Cellulose. 2020;27:9005–9026. doi: 10.1007/s10570-020-03369-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Zhou C, et al. Nature-inspired strategy toward superhydrophobic fabrics for versatile oil/water separation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 2017;9:9184–9194. doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b00412. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Wang J, Geng G. Simple and eco-friendly fabrication of superhydrophobic textile for oil/water separation. Environ. Technol. (United Kingdom) 2016;37:1591–1596. doi: 10.1080/09593330.2015.1122094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Yang M, et al. Facile preparation of robust superhydrophobic cotton textile for self-cleaning and oil-water separation. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2019;58:187–194. doi: 10.1021/acs.iecr.8b04433. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Tian N, et al. Biomass-derived oriented neurovascular network-like superhydrophobic aerogel as robust and recyclable oil droplets captor for versatile oil/water separation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022;424:127393. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Zhang W, et al. Salt-induced fabrication of superhydrophilic and underwater superoleophobic PAA-g-PVDF membranes for effective separation of oil-in-water emulsions. Angew. Chemie Int. Ed. 2014;53:856–860. doi: 10.1002/anie.201308183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Zhang T, et al. Evaluating of the performance of natural mineral vermiculite modified PVDF membrane for oil/water separation by membrane fouling model and XDLVO theory. J. Membr. Sci. 2022;641:119886. doi: 10.1016/j.memsci.2021.119886. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Chen L, Guo Z. A facile method to mussel-inspired superhydrophobic thiol-textiles@polydopamine for oil/water separation. Colloids Surfaces A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2018;554:253–260. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2018.06.059. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Cao C, et al. Robust fluorine-free superhydrophobic PDMS-ormosil@fabrics for highly effective self-cleaning and efficient oil-water separation. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2016;4:12179–12187. doi: 10.1039/C6TA04420D. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Zhang W, et al. Superhydrophobic and superoleophilic PVDF membranes for effective separation of water-in-oil emulsions with high flux. Adv. Mater. 2013;25:2071–2076. doi: 10.1002/adma.201204520. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Video 1. (479.7KB, mp4)
Supplementary Video 2. (1.7MB, mp4)
Supplementary Video 3. (4.3MB, mp4)

Data Availability Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.


Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES