Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Maternal & Child Nutrition logoLink to Maternal & Child Nutrition
. 2022 Aug 15;18(4):e13413. doi: 10.1111/mcn.13413

Evolution of infant feeding practices in children from 9 to 24 months, considering complementary feeding indicators and food processing: Results from the Brazilian cohort of the MAL‐ED study

Eva Débora de Oliveira Andrade 1, Amanda de Sousa Rebouças 2, José Q Filho 3, Ramya Ambikapathi 4, Laura E Caulfield 5, Aldo Ângelo Moreira Lima 3, Bruna Leal Lima Maciel 1,2,✉
PMCID: PMC9480934  PMID: 35971636

Abstract

Infant feeding practices impact children's nutritional and health status, influencing growth and development. This study aimed to analyse the evolution of infant feeding practices from 9 to 24 months of age, considering infant and young child feeding (IYCF) indicators and food processing. The infant feeding practices in children from the Brazilian site of the MAL‐ED study were evaluated at 9 (n = 193), 15 (n = 182) and 24 months (n = 164) using 24‐h dietary recalls. IYCF indicators were evaluated, and the extent of food processing was evaluated, using the NOVA classification. Breastfeeding declined significantly over time, from 77.6% at 9 months to 45.1% at 24 months. Although dietary diversity did not significantly change during the study period (80.5% at 24 months), the minimum acceptable diet significantly increased from 67.9% to 76.1% at 24 months (p < 0.0005). All the studied children consumed sweetened beverages from 9 months. Unhealthy food consumption and zero vegetable or fruit consumption significantly increased over time (p < 0.0005). Unprocessed food consumption decreased from 9 to 24 months of age (p < 0.0005), while ultra‐processed food consumption increased (p < 0.0005) during the study period. Logistic regressions showed that, at 9 months, breastfed children presented a lower risk for ultra‐processed food consumption (odds ratio [OR] = 0.31; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.13–0.77); and children reaching the minimum acceptable diet presented more risk for ultra‐processed food consumption (OR = 2.31; 95% CI = 1.01–5.27). In conclusion, data showed a reduction in the quality of infant feeding practices over the first 2 years of life, with a decrease in breastfeeding and an increase in the consumption of unhealthy and ultra‐processed foods.

Keywords: breastfeeding, children, complementary feeding, ultra‐processed food

The article aimed to analyse the evolution of infant feeding practices from 9 to 24 months of age in children from the Brazilian cohort of the MAL‐ED study. The study showed a reduction in the quality of infant feeding practices over the first 2 years of life, with a decrease in breastfeeding and an increase in the consumption of unhealthy and ultra‐processed foods.

graphic file with name MCN-18-e13413-g002.jpg

Key messages

  • Data showed a reduction in the quality of infant feeding practices over the first 2 years of life.

  • Breastfeeding decreased over the studied period. There was an increase in the consumption of ultra‐processed and unhealthy foods, which occurred concomitantly to the increase of no consumption of fruits/vegetables.

  • Breastfeeding was an important protective factor against a greater consumption of ultra‐processed food.

  • National nutrition policy should consider promoting breastfeeding and increasing fresh and minimally processed food consumption in children under 2 years.

1. INTRODUCTION

1.1.

Infant feeding practices, including breastfeeding and complementary feeding, influence children's nutritional and health status, generating impacts on growth and development (World Health Organization, 2008). Inadequate infant feeding practices in the first years of life increase the risk of malnutrition and infections, which, therefore, negatively affect growth and development (Guerrant et al., 2008; World Health Organization, 2001, 2008). Inappropriate practices can also increase the risk of overweight/obesity in childhood, increasing the risk for related comorbidities (Gonçalves et al., 2019; Schneider et al., 2020; Victora et al., 2008).

According to the World Health Organization—WHO (World Health Organization, 2000), breastfeeding should be exclusively offered to children until 6 months. From that age onwards, solid foods and beverages should be provided, in addition to breast milk.

The WHO/UNICEF Technical expert advisory group on nutrition monitoring (TEAM) created a set of indicators, recently updated (World Health Organization & the United Nations Children's Fund UNICEF, 2021), to assess infant and young child feeding (IYCF) practices. Studies should prioritize these indicators to provide concise information on health status and trends, including responses at national and global levels (World Health Organization, 2008; World Health Organization & the United Nations Children's Fund UNICEF, 2021).

Thus, studies aimed to understand childhood nutrition through the characterization of dietary practices in local communities (Raymond et al., 2017); Schneider et al. (2020) described the association of complementary feeding during the first year of life with the risk of overweight at 24 months of age, using the birth cohorts of Pelotas (Brazil) from 2004 and 2015. In both cohorts, most of the children received complementary feeding earlier than recommended, and this early introduction was associated with a higher risk for overweight at the age of 24 months. Others reported on select IYCF indicators (Owais et al., 2016) and their relationship with nutritional status (Campbell et al., 2017; Ersino et al., 2016; Owais et al., 2016).

In Brazil, a large national cross‐sectional study was conducted from February 2019 to March 2002, called the ENANI‐2019 study, using a probabilistic sample of children distributed in 123 municipalities in the 26 states of the Federation and the Federal District (n = 14,558 children). The study evaluated dietary practices in children under 2 years of age and found that exclusive breastfeeding was 45.8%, continued breastfeeding was 43.6%, and complementary feeding from 6 to 8 months was 86.3% (UFRJ. Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, 2021a, 2021b). Other cross‐sectional Brazilian studies also analysed children's eating habits using the IYCF indicators. Most of these studies showed that few children were exclusively breastfed in the first 6 months, receiving an adequate number of meals per day, but with low dietary diversity (Gonsalez et al., 2017; Isabel et al., 2010; Lindsay et al., 2008; Oliveira et al., 2014; Saldan et al., 2015).

Thus, although several studies describe breastfeeding both globally and locally using the IYCF indicators (Horta et al., 2007; World Health Organization, 2000, 2001, 2003, 2006, 2008), the same number of studies have not been done to characterize complementary feeding, with few prospective analyses. This fact can be explained by the logistical difficulty in applying and analysing 24‐h recalls, as the prospective assessment of populations is complex, even for the observation of the IYCF indicators (P. N. Costa et al., 2020).

However, prospective studies are essential for understanding the trends and evolution of dietary practices over the first 2 years of life. Furthermore, they can help plan more assertive public policies to promote child health. In addition to the IYCF indicators for evaluating dietary practices, it is also necessary to recognize that the quality of food offered in complementary food is essential. Thus, the extent of food processing has been used to characterize the quality of food consumed in some studies. The majority of these studies were cross‐sectionally designed, analysing children older than 2 years, demonstrating a significant presence of food with a high degree of processing in the diet of the studied populations (Cornwell et al., 2018; C. S. Costa et al., 2019; Filgueiras et al., 2019; Rauber et al., 2015; Spaniol et al., 2020).

Some Brazilian researchers have performed an analysis of complementary feeding, considering the extent of food processing (Fonseca et al., 2019; Giesta et al., 2019; Passanha et al., 2021; Ribas et al., 2021; Santos et al., 2018). They concluded that the feeding practices of children between 4 and 24 months were inappropriate, with high ultra‐processed food consumption. However, they presented the limitations of performing a cross‐sectional analysis (Fonseca et al., 2019; Passanha et al., 2021; Santos et al., 2018) or retrospective analysis of hospitalized children (Giesta et al., 2019; Ribas et al., 2021).

Therefore, although studies have also found data supporting the hypothesis that the extent of processing in food is negatively associated with nutritional status and health outcomes in childhood (Cornwell et al., 2018; C. S. Costa et al., 2019; Filgueiras et al., 2019; Fonseca, Ribeiro, Andreoli, 2019; Rauber et al., 2015; Spaniol et al., 2020), food processing in complementary feeding has not been extensively studied.

Rocha et al. (2021) evaluated commercial baby food availability and child nutritional status in Natal, Brazil. They found that the food was predominantly ultra‐processed (79%); only 4.2% was minimally processed, with similar proportions of ultra‐processed food found in high‐ and low‐income areas. Hence, it is essential to evaluate the quality of food consumed, considering its processing extent in complementary feeding.

Among studies that allow a prospective analysis of infant feeding practices, there is the birth cohort MAL‐ED study, which aimed to improve the understanding of the complex interrelationships between enteropathogenic infections, food intake, nutritional status, intestinal physiology, cognitive development, immune function, growth and development (Miller et al., 2014). Using the MAL‐ED, Maciel et al. (2018) described infant feeding practices and the determinants of early complementary feeding in Brazilian children from birth to 8 months of age. Here we extend the characterization of this population, using the IYCF indicators and food processing, to better understand the quality of complementary feeding. The hypothesis under study is that infant feeding practices worsen over time, with breastfeeding reduction and increased consumption of less healthy ultra‐processed food.

2. METHODOLOGY

2.1. Study population

The present work is part of the birth cohort, The Etiology, Risk Factors and Interactions of Enteric Infections and Malnutrition and the Consequences for Child Health and Development, known as the MAL‐ED study (Miller et al., 2014) with data referring to the Brazilian site of the cohort (Lima et al., 2014). The community under investigation is a slum, known as Parque universitário, located in Fortaleza, capital of Ceará state. The population of this community is 42,494 thousand inhabitants, according to the latest Brazilian demographic census (IBGE, 2003). A census of the local community was performed to obtain an assessment of the number of women of reproductive age and the number of children <5 years of age. With these data, a catchment area was identified for which it was estimated that >200 infants (the target number of children to be enrolled per site in the MAL‐ED study) would be born within the 2‐year enrolment period (Miller et al., 2014).

The criteria for inclusion in the study were: healthy newborn child, up to 17 days after birth; birth weight greater than 1500 g; child from a family that intended to remain in the study area for the next 6 months; no other children from the same family in the study and a mother at the age of 16 or over. Children were excluded from the study if they were premature, had congenital diseases, serious illnesses that required hospitalization or any other condition that was serious or chronic, such as kidney disease, chronic heart failure or severe liver disease (Miller et al., 2014). The study obtained ethical approval and the research participants were included in the study after the informed consent of the mother or caregiver (Miller et al., 2014).

The open birth cohort enrolled in November 2010 was followed up until February 2017, with children being monitored from birth to 5 years. The enrolment was performed within the first 2 years of the cohort. and follow‐up was performed by local health community agents in the children's households for dietary and anthropometry assessments. In the Brazilian MAL‐ED site, 244 children were included at birth, 11 children left the study due to a change of location or abandonment of the study, totalling 233 children in the cohort (Lima et al., 2014). As described by Lima et al. (2014), most of the households (87%) had access to clean water, 98% had electricity and 69% had access to improved toilet/sanitation. Most childbirths occurred at the hospital, and the under‐5 mortality rate was 20 per 1000 live births.

The present work used data from birth, 9, 15 and 24 months of age. Birth data were used to characterize the studied children. The follow‐up of 9 months was evaluated because it was the first month of 24‐h recall registration in the MAL‐ED study, as discussed by Caulfield et al. (2014). Data from 15 months were used because they represented a middle point from 6 to 24 months with a good sample size in the study. In the study, 193 children at 9 months, 182 children at 15 months and 164 children at 24 months completed the 24‐h recalls (Figure 1). Considering a total sample of 233, losses in the dietary follow‐up were 17% at 9 months, 22% at 15 months and 29% at 24 months. Power analysis was performed a posteriori, considering our smallest sample size (n = 164, at 24 months), an effect size of 0.3, a given α of 0.05 and two degrees of freedom. Power was 94%, and the critical X 2 = 5.99.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Inclusions, losses and data collection flowchart of the studied population

2.2. Food intake

In the MAL‐ED study, food intake was verified monthly from 9 to 24 months of age through 24‐h recalls. For data collection, the caregiver was asked to remember the food intake in the last 24h and all foods and meals given to the children were registered, using a common form across the MAL‐ED sites (Caulfield et al., 2014). These data were collected by trained field investigators, including details on ingredients and preparation steps, mainly for local preparations. Food composition analysis was performed using the Brazilian food composition tables (TACO) and the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE), food labels and the USDA table by staff trained at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD (Caulfield et al., 2014).

In the present research, recalls from 9, 15 and 24 months of age were used. Based on these data, infant feeding practices and food processing levels were evaluated.

2.3. Infant feeding practices

The infant feeding practices were assessed from the children's 24‐h recalls, using the following IYCF indicators (World Health Organization & the United Nations Children's Fund UNICEF, 2021): (1) breastfeeding; (2) minimum dietary diversity; (3) minimum meal frequency; (4) minimum milk feeding frequency for non‐breastfed children; (5) minimum acceptable diet; (6) egg and/or flesh food consumption; (7) sweet beverage consumption; (8) unhealthy food consumption and (9) zero vegetable or fruit consumption.

Breastfeeding was verified through monthly interviews for the 24‐h recalls. Minimum dietary diversity was considered to be met when the child received food from five or more of the following groups per day: (1) breast milk; (2) grains, roots and tubers; (3) pulses (beans, peas, lentils), nuts and seeds; (4) Dairy products (milk, infant formula, yoghurt, cheese); (5) flesh foods (meat, fish, poultry, organ meats); 6) eggs; (7) vitamin A‐rich fruits and vegetables and (8) other fruits and vegetables (World Health Organization & the United Nations Children's Fund UNICEF, 2021).

In the present study, the analysis of the 24‐h recalls allowed the visualization of the frequent consumption of sugar, oils and fats. Therefore, these food groups were also included in the studied food groups, but they were not considered in the calculation of minimum dietary diversity.

The minimum meal frequency was assessed as adequate when three feedings of solid, semi‐solid or soft foods were given for breastfed children aged 9–23 months, and four feedings of solid, semi‐solid or soft foods or milk feeds for non‐breastfed children aged 6–23 months whereby at least one of the four feeds was a solid, semi‐solid or soft feed (World Health Organization & the United Nations Children's Fund UNICEF, 2021).

For non‐breastfed children, it was observed if they received milk or dairy products, liquid dairy products, such as infant formula, cow's milk or other animal milk and dairy products at least twice a day, which was considered adequate (World Health Organization & the United Nations Children's Fund UNICEF, 2021).

The minimum acceptable diet was considered met when breastfed children met the criteria of minimum dietary diversity and minimum meal frequency. For non‐breastfed children, besides meeting the criteria of minimum dietary diversity and minimum meal frequency, they should have received at least two milk feeds to meet the minimum acceptable diet (World Health Organization & the United Nations Children's Fund UNICEF, 2021).

Unhealthy foods (sentinel foods) were considered commercially prepared food products that are often energy‐dense, nutrient‐poor, and rich in salt, sugar and saturated and/or trans fatty acids, such as candies, chocolates, cookies, salty biscuits, chips, industrialized popcorn and instant noodles. For this indicator, we calculated the percentage of children who consumed at least one unhealthy food, such as candies, chocolate, chips, French fries, cakes and cookies (World Health Organization & the United Nations Children's Fund UNICEF, 2021).

Zero consumption of vegetables and fruits was the total number of children who did not consume any vegetables or fruits during the previous day (World Health Organization & the United Nations Children's Fund UNICEF, 2021).

2.4. Food processing

The foods and beverages consumed were evaluated according to the extent of processing, based on Monteiro et al. (2010) NOVA classification. Examples of foods observed in 24‐h recalls of the studied children according to their extent of processing are shown in Table 1. In the present study, fresh and minimally processed food were considered separately as the 24‐h recalls allowed this differentiation, and this proved important when considering the food groups. The food groups recommended by the WHO for the calculation of minimum dietary diversity were considered to assess the extent of food processing.

Table 1.

Examples of foods observed in 24‐h recalls of the studied children according to the extent of processing

Extent of food processing Examples of foods
Unprocessed Fresh fruits and vegetables.
Minimally processed Rice, beans, powdered milk (without stabilizers), spaghetti, chilled meat and corn cuscus flakes.
Processed Foods made by adding salt, oil, sugar or other substances from unprocessed or minimally processed foods: tomato extract or concentrates (with salt or sugar); fruits in syrup and candied fruits; dried meat and bacon; canned sardines and tuna; bread made from wheat, yeast, water and salt.
Ultra‐processed Foods made of formulations of ingredients, mostly of exclusive industrial use, typically created by a series of industrial techniques and processes: industrialized cookies, ice cream, chocolates, candies and sweets in general. Industrialized chips, popcorn, salty biscuits, cereal bars, soups and instant noodles. Industrialized spices and sauces, sodas, sweetened flavoured yoghurts and sweetened flavoured milk drinks. Frozen, ready‐to‐heat industrialized products, such as pasta dishes and pizzas. Industrialized hamburgers, fish or chicken nuggets and sausages. Sliced bread, bread for hamburgers or hot dogs, sweet buns and other baked products with ingredients, such as hydrogenated vegetable fat, whey, emulsifiers and other additives.
Open in a new tab

The analysis of the extent of food processing in the studied food groups revealed that: (1) the legumes consumed were all minimally processed; (2) there was no significant consumption of nuts, seeds or eggs in the studied population; (3) Fruit and vegetables consumed were classified as fresh, unprocessed food. Thus, the food groups ‘grains, roots and tubers’, ‘dairy products’ and ‘flesh foods’ were presented considering the extent of processing.

The number and frequency of food consumed according to the level of processing were evaluated. This was done by counting the different foods consumed daily by the child, classifying each food according to processing (e.g., the child consumed seven different kinds of food from a given group throughout the day, three of these belonged to the fresh group, two to the minimally processed group and two to the ultra‐processed group). The food consumption frequency considered the number of times the child received the same food a day.

2.5. Statistical analysis

Quantitative variables were tested for normality using the Kolmogorov−Smirnov test. Variables without normal distribution were presented as median (Q1–Q3) and variables with normal distribution as mean (standard deviations). Categorical variables were presented as absolute and relative frequencies, using the χ 2 test. The medians of the number and frequency of consumption of the food groups were tested using the Kruskal−Wallis test.

Factors associated with high consumption of ultra‐processed food were analysed in logistic regression models. First, the number of ultra‐processed food consumed at each age (9, 15 and 24 months) was divided into quartiles. Children were categorized in relation to consumption ≥ than the Q3 (yes = 1 or no = 0). Then, logistic regression models were calculated, primarily in bivariate analysis, exploring the effect of a single variable on the consumption of ultra‐processed foods greater than Q3 (yes = 1 or no = 0) at 9, 15 and 24 months, with the unadjusted odds ratio (OR) and their respective 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) demonstrated. The logistic regression models were calculated for each studied period (9, 15 and 24 months), considering the consumption of ultra‐processed food higher than Q3 (yes = 1 or no = 0) as a dependent variable. The adjustment of the three final models was evaluated using the Omnibus test, with p values less than 0.05, and the Hosmer and Lemeshow test, considering p values greater than 0.05. Maternal education at birth, income, breastfeeding, minimum acceptable diet and the number of unprocessed food consumed per day entered the final models as independent variables. The adjusted odds ratios (AOR) and their respective 95% CI were presented in the models. The analysis was performed using the SPSS statistical program, version 23 (IBM).

3. RESULTS

Table 2 shows the general characteristics of the studied children: 51.5% were male, the mean birth weight was 3360 (499) g, and the median maternal education was 7.0 (6.0–8.0) years. Household income increased during the study period from $236 (229–307) at 6 months to $308 (276–621) at 24 months.

Table 2.

Sex, birth weight, maternal education and family income of the Brazilian children from the MAL‐ED cohort (n = 233)

Variables Total
Male child (birth), n (%) 120 (51.5)
Birth weight (g), mean (SD) 3360 (499)
Maternal education (years), median (Q1–Q3) 7.0 (6.0–8.0)
Family income ($), median (Q1 – Q3)
At 6 months of age 236 (229–307)
At 12 months of age 272 (229–339)
At 24 months of age 308 (276–361)
Open in a new tab

The prevalence of breastfeeding declined over time, from 77.6% at 9 months to 55.0% at 15 months and 45.1% at 24 months (χ 2, p < 0.0005; Figure 2). Minimum dietary diversity did not increase significantly during the study period (χ 2, p = 0.251) and was 76.7% at 9 months, 83.5% at 15 months and 80.1% at 24 months (Figure 2). Minimum meal frequency significantly increased during the study period (χ 2, p < 0.0005): from 88.6% at 9 months, to 99.5% at 15 months and 97% at 24 months (Figure 2). The frequency of milk consumption among non‐breastfed children also significantly increased over time (χ 2, p = 0.005) and was 96.7% at 24 months (Figure 2). The minimum acceptable diet significantly increased over the study period (χ 2, p = 0.001) and was 67.9% at 9 months, 84.1% at 15 months and 76.1% at 24 months (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Infant feeding practices in the studied children at 9 (n = 193), 15 (n = 182) and 24 (n = 164) months old, assessed using the following IYCF indicators: breastfed children; minimum dietary diversity; minimum meal frequency; minimum milk feeding frequency for non‐breastfed children; minimum acceptable diet; flesh food consumption; sweet beverage consumption; unhealthy food consumption; zero vegetable or fruit consumption. IYCF, infant and young child feeding.

Flesh food consumption significantly increased over the months (χ 2, p = 0.001) to 81.1% at 24 months (Figure 2). Sweetened beverages were consumed by all children from 15 months (χ 2, p = 0.165; Figure 2). These were mostly industrialized ultra‐processed flavoured liquid or powdered juices. Unhealthy food consumption significantly increased (χ 2, p < 0.0005) from 5.7% at 9 months, to 9.9% at 15 months and 18.9% at 24 months (Figure 2). Zero vegetable or fruit consumption also significantly increased (χ 2, p < 0.0005) from 14.0% at 9 months, 17.6% at 15 months and 30.5% at 24 months (Figure 2).

The number and frequency of foods consumed were assessed by food groups, considering those recommended by the WHO to estimate the minimum dietary diversity (Table 3). The number and frequency of ‘Grains, roots and tubers’, ‘pulses, nuts and seeds’, ‘sugar, fats and oils’ consumed per day increased during the study period (Kruskal−Wallis, p < 0.0005). The number and frequency of ‘Vitamin A‐rich fruits and vegetables’ and ‘other fruits and vegetables’ consumed tended to decrease over the studied period (Kruskal−Wallis, p < 0.0005), and was only 1.0 (0.0–1.0) per day at 24 months.

Table 3.

Number and frequency of food consumed per day by the studied children at 9, 15 and 24 months of age, considering food groups

Food group Number of foods consumed per day p value, Kruskal−Wallis test
9 months (n = 193) 15 months (n = 182) 24 months (n = 164)
Median (Q1–Q3) Median (Q1–Q3) Median (Q1–Q3)
Grains, roots and tubers 4.0 (3.0–4.0) 4.0 (3.0–5.0) 4.0 (4.0–4.0) <0.0005
Pulses (beans, peas lentils), nuts and seeds 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–1.0) 1.0 (0.0–1.0) <0.0005
Dairy products 1.0 (1.0–2.0) 1.0 (1.0–2.0) 2.0 (1.0–2.0) 0.002
Flesh foods 1.0 (0.0–1.0) 1.0 (0.0–1.0) 1.0 (1.0–1.0) 0.525
Eggs 0.0 (0.0 – 0.0) 0.0 (0.0 – 0.0) 0.0 (0.0 – 0.0) *
Vitamin A‐rich fruits and vegetables 1.0 (0.0–2.0) 1.0 (0.0–1.0) 1.0 (0.0–1.0) <0.0005
Other fruits and vegetables 1.0 (1.0–2.0) 1.0 (0.0–3.0) 1.0 (0.0–1.0) <0.0005
Sugar, oils and fats 1.0 (1.0–2.0) 2.0 (1.0–2.0) 2.0 (1.0–2.0) <0.0005
Frequency of foods consumed per day
9 months (n = 193) 15 months (n = 182) 24 months (n = 164)
Food group Median (Q1–Q3) Median (Q1–Q3) Median (Q1–Q3) p value, Kruskal−Wallis test
Grains, roots and tubers 7.0 (5.0–9.0) 8.0 (6.0–9.0) 8.0 (6.0–9.0) 0.011
Pulses (beans, peas lentils), nuts and seeds 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–1.0) 1.0 (0.0–1.0) <0.0005
Dairy products 3.0 (2.0–4.0) 3.5 (2.0–4.0) 3.0 (3.0–4.0) 0.992
Flesh foods 1.0 (0.0–1.0) 1.0 (0.0–1.0) 2.0 (1.0–2.0) <0.0005
Eggs 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) *
Vitamin A‐rich fruits and vegetables 1.0 (0.0–2.0) 1.0 (0.0–1.0) 1.0 (0.0–1.0) <0.0005
Other fruits and vegetables 1.0 (1.0–2.0) 1.0 (0.0–3.0) 1.0 (0.0–1.0) <0.0005
Sugar, oils and fats 4.0 (3.0–5.0) 4.0 (3.0–5.0) 5.0 (4.0–6.0) <0.0005
Open in a new tab
*

Not calculated, no significant consumption and variation in the population studied.

Foods consumed within each group shown in Table 3 were also analysed, considering food processing, with the number and frequency of consumption evaluated per day (Table 5). The number of unprocessed foods consumed decreased during the study period: from a median of 3.0 (1.0–4.0) at 9 months to 2.0 (1.0–2.0) at 24 months (Kruskal−Wallis, p < 0.0005, Table 5). The frequency of unprocessed food consumption also reduced over the study period, from a median of 3.0 (2.0–5.0) per day at 9 months, to 2.0 (1.0−2.0) at 24 months (Kruskal−Wallis, p < 0.0005, Table 5). On the other hand, ultra‐processed food consumption increased significantly over time: from 2.0 (1.0−2.0) foods, 3.0 (3.0−4.0) times a day at 9 months to 2.0 (2.0−2.0) foods, 4.0 (3.0−4.0) times a day at 24 months (Kruskal−Wallis, p < 0.0005, Table 5).

Table 5.

Number and frequency of food consumed/day by the studied children, considering food processing in different food groups, at 9, 15 and 24 months

Food groups Number of foods consumed per day p value, Kruskal–Wallis test
9 months (n = 193) 15 months (n = 182) 24 months (n = 164)
Median (Q1–Q3) Median (Q1–Q3) Median (Q1–Q3)
Total of food consumed
Unprocessed food 3.0 (1.0–4.0) 2.0 (1.0–5.0) 2.0 (1.0–2.0) <0.0005
Minimally processed food 5.0 (3.0–5.0) 5.0 (5.0–5.0) 5.0 (5.0–5.0) <0.0005
Processed food 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) *
Ultra‐processed food 2.0 (1.0–2.0) 2.0 (2.0–2.0) 2.0 (2.0–2.0) <0.0005
Grains, roots and tubers
Unprocessed food 1.0 (0.0–1.0) 0.0 (0.0–1.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) <0.0005
Minimally processed food 2.0 (0.0–2.0) 2.0 (1.0–2.0) 1.0 (1.0–1.0) <0.0005
Processed food 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) *
Ultra‐processed food 1.0 (1.0–1.0) 2.0 (1.0–2.0) 2.0 (2.0–2.0) <0.0005
Dairy products
Unprocessed food — — — —
Minimally processed food 1.0 (1.0–1.0) 1.0 (1.0–1.0) 1.0 (1.0–1.0) 0.007
Processed food 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) *
Ultra‐processed food 0.0 (0.0–1.0) 0.0 (0.0–1.0) 1.0 (1.0–1.0) <0.0005
Flesh foods
Unprocessed food — — — —
Minimally processed food 1.0 (0.0–1.0) 1.0 (0.0–1.0) 1.0 (0.0–1.0) 0.166
Processed food 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) *
Ultra‐processed food 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) *
Frequency of foods consumed per day
9 months (n = 193) 15 months (n = 182) 24 months (n = 164)
Food groups Median (Q1–Q3) Median (Q1–Q3) Median (Q1– Q3) p value, Kruskal–Wallis test
Total of food consumed
Unprocessed food 3.0 (2.0–5.0) 3.0 (1.0–3.0) 2.0 (1.0–2.0) <0.0005
Minimally processed food 10.0 (6.0–10.0) 10.0 (6.0–10.0) 7.0 (6.0–10.0) 0.308
Processed food 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) *
Ultra‐processed food 3.0 (3.0–4.0) 4.0 (3.0–4.0) 4.0 (3.0–4.0) <0.0005
Grains, roots and tubers
Unprocessed food 1.0 (0.0–1.0) 0.0 (0.0–1.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) <0.0005
Minimally processed food 2.0 (0.0–2.0) 2.0 (1.0–2.0) 1.0 (1.0–2.0) <0.0005
Processed food 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) *
Ultra‐processed food 3.0 (3.0–4.0) 4.0 (4.0–4.0) 4.0 (4.0–4.0) <0.0005
Dairy products
Unprocessed food — — — —
Minimally processed food 3.0 (2.0–4.0) 3.0 (2.0–4.0) 3.0 (2.0–4.0) 0.984
Processed food 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) *
Ultra‐processed food 0.0 (0.0–1.0) 0.0 (0.0–1.0) 1.0 (1.0–1.0) <0.0005
Flesh foods
Unprocessed food — — — —
Minimally processed food 1.0 (0.0–1.0) 1.0 (0.0–1.0) 1.0 (1.0–1.0) <0.0005
Processed food 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) *
Ultra‐processed food 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) 0.0 (0.0–0.0) *
Open in a new tab
*

Not perfomed ‒ no variation in data.

Ultra‐processed food was consumed by 96.4% of children at 9 months, 99.5% at 15 months and 99.4% at 24 months. Regarding ‘grains, roots and tubers’, there was a higher consumption of minimally processed and ultra‐processed food, with a reduction in the consumption of unprocessed and an increase in the consumption of ultra‐processed foods over the studied period (Kruskal−Wallis, p < 0.0005, Table 5). The most frequently consumed foods in this group were flours for porridge, which were all sweetened and sometimes flavoured (ultra‐processed food), spaghetti (minimally processed food) and rice (minimally processed food) (Table 4).

Table 4.

Most consumed food, considering food groups in the studied children at 9, 15 and 24 months

Consumed food 9 months, n (%) 15 months, n (%) 24 months, n (%) p value, χ 2 test
Grains, roots and tubers
Bread 0 (0.0) 7 (3.9) 5 (3.1) 0.029
English potato 51 (26) 46 (25.2) 39 (23.8) 0.832
Flours for porridge 168 (87.0) 180 (98.9) 115 (71.9) <0.0005
Rice 60 (31.1) 144 (79.1) 130 (79.3) <0.0005
Spaghetti 36 (18.7) 108 (59.3) 115 (70.1) <0.0005
Pulses
Beans 24 (12.4) 36 (20) 28 (17.1) 0.150
Dairy products
Chocolate milk 1 (0.5) 10 (5.5) 21 (12.8) <0.0005
Yoghurt (flavoured/sweetened) 48 (24.8) 76 (41.8) 109 (66.5) <0.0005
Powdered milk 125 (64.8) 150 (82.4) 135 (82.3) <0.0005
UHT milk 23 (11.9) 31 (17.0) 22 (13.4) 0.347
Flesh food
Red meat 31 (16.1) 43 (23.6) 43 (26.2) 0.050
Chicken 53 (27.5) 65 (35.7) 71 (43.3) 0.007
Vitamin A‐rich fruits and vegetables
Carrots 26 (13.5) 20 (11.0) 18 (11.0) 0.693
Other fruit and vegetables
Banana 62 (32.1) 51 (28) 38 (23.2) 0.172
Beet 19 (9.8) 14 (7.7) 14 (8.5) 0.758
Orange 23 (11.9) 24 (13.2) 27 (16.5) 0.446
Apple 35 (18.1) 29 (15.9) 26 (15.9) 0.800
Culinary ingredients
Sugar 182 (94.3) 177 (97.2) 152 (92.7) 0.149
Margarine/butter 12 (6.2) 21 (11.5) 32 (19.5) 0.001
Vegetable oils 64 (33.2) 72 (39.6) 81 (49.4) 0.008
Sentinel foods
Candies 5 (2.6) 12 (6.6) 22 (13.4) <0.0005
Chocolates 3 (1.6) 9 (4.9) 14 (8.5) 0.009
Cookies/salty biscuits 12 (6.2) 90 (49.5) 106 (64.6) <0.0005
Chips/industrialized popcorn 1 (0.5) 13 (7.1) 25 (15.2) <0.0005
Instant noodles 6 (3.1) 21 (11.5) 26 (15.9) <0.0005
Open in a new tab

The number and frequency of ultra‐processed ‘dairy products’ consumed increased during the study period: from 0.0 (0.0−1.0) at 9 months to 1.0 (1.0−1.0) at 24 months (Kruskal−Wallis, p = 0.007, Table 5). The most consumed foods in this group were powdered milk (minimally processed food) and yoghurts, which were all flavoured and sweetened (ultra‐processed food) (Table 4). Most ‘flesh foods’ were minimally processed (Table 5), and were most often chicken or beef (Table 4).

For the group of ‘grains, roots and tubers’ (Table 4), there was a significant increase in the percent of children consuming rice, spaghetti and bread during the study period; and in ‘dairy products’ of flavoured/sweetened yoghurts and powdered milk. The most frequently consumed ‘vitamin A‐rich vegetable’ (carrots) and ‘other fruit and vegetables’ (banana, beet, orange and apple) did not change frequency during the study period. Sugar was consumed by almost all the studied children (94.3%) from 9 months, with no significant change during the study period. This sugar was mostly added to powdered milk to prepare porridges, using ultra‐processed sweetened flours. The proportion of children consuming margarine/butter and vegetable oils increased significantly during the study period. Margarine/butter was mostly used in bread or salty biscuits, whereas vegetable oils were used in family preparations, such as soups, fried chicken or meat.

The most consumed sentinel foods (all ultra‐processed foods) were cookies/salty biscuits, instant noodles and chips/industrialized popcorn. The number of children consuming these foods significantly increased over the studied period (χ 2, p < 0.0005) (Table 4).

Among the factors associated with higher consumption of ultra‐processed foods (Table 6), the logistic regressions showed that, at 9 months, children who were breastfed were less likely to have a high consumption of ultra‐processed food (AOR = 0.31; 95% CI = 0.13−0.77), whereas children who reached the minimum acceptable diet were more likely to receive a high amount of ultra‐processed food (AOR = 2.31; 95% CI = 1.01−5.27).

Table 6.

Logistic regression models for ultra‐processed food consumption at 9, 15 and 24 months and associated factors

Independent variables Consumption of ultra‐processed food at 9 months ≥ Q3 Consumption of ultra‐processed food at 15 months ≥ Q3 Consumption of ultra‐processed food at 24 months ≥ Q3
Non‐adjusted OR (95% IC) Adjusted OR (95% IC) Non‐adjusted OR (95% IC) Adjusted OR (95% IC) Non‐adjusted OR (95% IC) Adjusted OR (95% IC)
Maternal education 1.22 (0.89–1.68) 1.15 (0.79–1.67) 1.01 (0.68–1.52) 0.87 (0.54–1.41) 1.22 (0.66–2.24) 0.93 (0.47−1.84)
Income 1.00 (1.00–1.00) 1.00 (0.99−1.00) 1.00 (1.00−1.00) 1.00 (1.00−1.00) 1.00 (1.00−1.01) 1.00 (1.00−1.01)
Breastfeeding
No — — — — — —
Yes 0.47 (0.21−1.02) 0.31 (0.13−0.77) 0.95 (0.43−2.08) 0.83 (0.33−2.08) 0.33 (0.08−1.32) 0.52 (0.12−2.21)
Minimum acceptable diet
No — — — — — —
Yes 2.00 (1.07−3.73) 2.31 (1.01−5.27) 1.80 (0.69−4.69) 1.81 (0.59−5.53) 0.00 (0.00−0.00) 0.00 (0.00−0.00)
Number of unprocessed food consumed/day 1.13 (0.97−1.31) 0.99 (0.82−1.19) 1.09 (0.90−1.32) 1.03 (0.84−1.28) 1.01 (0.70−1.47) 1.02 (0.69−1.52)
Open in a new tab

Note: Unadjusted ORs were calculated using logistic regressions in bivariate analysis, exploring the effect of the independent variable alone on the outcomes studied. Q3 of ultra‐processed food consumed per day was 2, at 9, 15 and 24 months.

Abbreviation: OR, odds ratio.

4. DISCUSSION

This study investigated the evolution of infant feeding practices in children from 9 to 24 months, using 24‐h recalls. In addition to using the IYCF indicators, we also observed the quality of consumed food, evaluating its processing. Most of the studied children achieved the minimum dietary diversity, minimum meal frequency and minimum acceptable diet. Gatica‐Domínguez et al. (2021), in low‐ and middle‐income countries, demonstrated that only 21.3%, 56.2% and 10.1% of the 80 countries studied had >50% prevalence for dietary diversity, minimum meal frequency and minimum acceptable diet, respectively. For Latin America and the Caribbean, the same study found 56.5%, 71.5% and 43.7% of minimum dietary diversity, minimum meal frequency and minimum acceptable diet, respectively (Gatica‐Domínguez et al., 2021). The national Brazilian ENANI‐19 study found 57.1% of minimum dietary diversity and 39.2% of minimum meal frequency (UFRJ. Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, 2021b). Therefore, our results might indicate greater diet quality than has been reported in other studies.

There was a significant increase in the consumption of vegetables or fruit and unhealthy foods. Sweetened beverages were consumed by all children from 15 months. Schneider et al. (2020), in their work with children during the first year of life, found that juice was introduced before 3 months in half of the children and before 12 months by 95.5% in 2004 and 87.8% in 2015. In addition, nearly 20.0% of children in 2015 received soft drinks before 12 months of age. Excess consumption of sweetened beverages and ultra‐processed food is related to the risk of overweight, obesity and childhood diabetes (Berkey et al., 2004; Davis et al., 2010). On the other hand, the low consumption of vegetables and fruit is associated with nutritional disorders, especially anaemia, malnutrition and overweight/obesity (World Health Organization & the United Nations Children's Fund UNICEF, 2021).

The widespread consumption of sugar by children from 9 months is similar to that found by Filha et al. (2012), in a study with children from 6 to 35 months in five health units in Aracajú, northeast Brazil. Excess sugar consumption is associated with the presence of cavities in childhood and increases the risk of overweight (Berkey et al., 2004; Davis et al., 2010; Malik & Willett, 2013; Vos et al., 2017). Therefore, the Brazilian Ministry of Health (Brasil, 2019) and the World Health Organization (2018) recommend introducing sugar only after 24 months of age, which was not observed in the studied population.

The prospective analysis of the groups of food consumed showed there was a low consumption of pulses, no consumption of eggs and a tendency towards a reduction in the consumption of fruit and vegetables in general. These types of food help prevent nutritional disorders prevalent in childhood, such as anaemia, malnutrition and overweight/obesity, being sources of nutrients, such as iron, zinc, calcium, vitamin A, vitamin C and folate (Dewey, 2001; World Health Organization, 2003). Thus, their consumption must be promoted in the study population. Santos et al. (2018), in a cross‐sectional study on complementary feeding, in Juiz de Fora, Minas Gerais, also found a low consumption of fruit, vegetables and eggs. However, they observed a high consumption of pulses, with around 78% of children receiving pulses twice a day, different from the results in the present study.

Thus, the analysis of the IYCF indicators indicated an unfavourable evolution of infant feeding practices, with a reduction in breastfeeding and concomitant low consumption of eggs and pulses, a tendency to reduce fruit consumption, early consumption of sugar, sweetened beverages, and an increase in the consumption of unhealthy foods. Therefore, the hypothesis that infant feeding practices present an unfavourable evolution was confirmed in the study. This hypothesis was reinforced when considering the extent of processing. In the studied population, the frequency of consumption of ultra‐processed foods was higher than that of unprocessed and minimally processed foods. In addition, the consumption of unprocessed and minimally processed foods decreased over time, while the consumption of ultra‐processed foods increased over the months studied. Our results agree with data from the Brazilian ENANI‐2019 study. In this national population survey, a high prevalence (80.5%) of consumption of ultra‐processed foods was found in children from 6 to 23 months (UFRJ. Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, 2021b).

Ultra‐processed food consumption is associated with low diet quality (Moubarac et al., 2013; Monteiro et al., 2019), obesity (Cornwell et al., 2018) and non‐communicable chronic diseases (Monteiro et al., 2019; Rauber et al., 2015). Thus, the increased consumption of these kinds of food has become the target of public health nutrition policies worldwide (Brasil, 2014; Monteiro et al., 2019). However, most studies that analysed the consumption of ultra‐processed food in children provided data on older children (Buckley et al., 2019; C. S. Costa et al., 2019; Filgueiras et al., 2019; Hoffman et al., 2020; Mais et al., 2017; Moubarac et al., 2017; Neri et al., 2019; Onita et al., 2021; Ribeiro & de Araújo Pinto, 2021).

In the present study, among the possible factors associated with high consumption of ultra‐processed foods, logistic regressions showed that, at 9 months, breastfed children had a lower likelihood of high consumption of ultra‐processed food. This finding is in line with studies reporting that breast milk consumption is associated with lower consumption of ultra‐processed foods among children between 6 and 12 months (Fonseca et al., 2019; Giesta et al., 2019; Passanha et al., 2021; Spaniol et al., 2020). A possible cause for this lower consumption of ultra‐processed food is that breastfeeding mothers tend to limit their children's exposure to and consumption of unhealthy foods (Dwyer, 2018).

Interestingly, children presenting the minimum acceptable diet were more likely to have a high consumption of ultra‐processed food. This indicator is only met when children reach both the minimum dietary diversity and minimum meal frequency. However, minimum dietary diversity and meal frequency do not consider food processing. Thus, our result can be explained by the fact that children who reached the minimum dietary diversity and the minimum meal frequency relied on ultra‐processed foods and beverages, including sweetened flour for porridges, flavoured/sweetened yoghurt and chocolate milk.

Potential limitations of our study must be mentioned, such as the lack of data about salt used to prepare family meals in the 24‐h recalls. Analysing salt could also measure the quality of children's consumed food, as ultra‐processed foods commonly contain high amounts of salt (Monteiro et al., 2019). Furthermore, Brazilian studies have shown high consumption of salt in adult populations (Pizzol et al., 2019; Rodrigues et al., 2015).

The strengths of the study are the longitudinal design and the description of the number and frequency of food consumed, considering the different levels of processing. Although the data found are not nationally representative and rigorous sampling was not performed, the results may reflect infant feeding practices in slums in northeastern Brazil because the studied population represents a typical slum, as previously discussed by Maciel et al. (2018), where accessibility is challenging because of drug trafficking. In addition, this study is one of the first to collect longitudinal information on infant feeding practices through monthly 24‐h recalls. The collection of longitudinal data allowed a detailed assessment of the evolution of children's eating habits. The food analysis, considering the level of processing, allowed a better evaluation of the quality of infant feeding practices, complementing the IYCF indicators.

In conclusion, data showed a reduction in the quality of infant feeding practices over the first 2 years of life, with a decrease in breastfeeding and an increase in the consumption of unhealthy and ultra‐processed foods. Virtually all the studied children consumed sweetened beverages and sugar. The increase in the consumption of ultra‐processed foods occurred concomitantly with the increase in the prevalence of days with no consumption of vegetables and fruit. Breastfeeding was an important protective factor against a greater consumption of ultra‐processed food. Thus, the quality of infant feeding practices must be improved with breastfeeding promotion and greater consumption of fresh and minimally processed food.

Nutrition data have improved since 2013 (Heidkamp et al., 2021; Keats et al., 2021), but more action is needed to ensure that global sustainable development goals can be reached and tracked. Our data contribute to the knowledge of a specific vulnerable group, which might have suffered even more during the COVID‐19 crisis, with the double burden of malnutrition. Thus, data shown might help multisectoral double duty actions (World Health Organization, 2017) in northeast Brazilian slums. National nutrition policy and key strategies should consider promoting breastfeeding and increasing fresh and minimally processed food consumption among children under 2 years.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Laura E. Caulfield, Aldo Ângelo Moreira Lima and Bruna Leal Lima Maciel conducted the research. Aldo Ângelo Moreira Lima and Bruna Leal Lima Maciel designed the study. Eva Débora de Oliveira Andrade, Amanda de Sousa Rebouças, José Q. Filho and Bruna Leal Lima Maciel analysed the data. Eva Débora de Oliveira Andrade and Bruna Leal Lima Maciel wrote the paper. José Q. Filho, Ramya Ambikapathi, Laura E. Caulfield and Aldo Ângelo Moreira Lima critically reviewed the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank the children and families participating in the study and the MAL‐ED network investigators.

Andrade, E. D. d. O. , Rebouças, A. d. S. , Filho, J. Q. , Ambikapathi, R. , Caulfield, L. E. , Lima, A. Â. M. , & Maciel, B. L. L. (2022). Evolution of infant feeding practices in children from 9 to 24 months, considering complementary feeding indicators and food processing: Results from the Brazilian cohort of the MAL‐ED study. Maternal & Child Nutrition, 18, e13413. 10.1111/mcn.13413

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Data are available on request from the authors.

REFERENCES

  1. Berkey, C. S. , Rockett, H. R. , Field, A. E. , & Gillman, M. W. (2004). Sugar‐added beverages and adolescent weight change. Obesity Research, 12, 778–788. 10.1038/oby.2004.94 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brasil . (2014). Guia alimentar para a população brasileira (pp. 1−56) Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde, Departamento de Atenção Básica. https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/guia_alimentar_populacao_brasileira_2ed.pdf
  3. Brasil . (2019). Guia Alimentar para crianças brasileiras menores de 2 anos (pp. 1−256). Secretaria de Atenção Primária à Saude, Departamento de Promoção Da Saúde. http://189.28.128.100/dab/docs/portaldab/publicacoes/guia_da_crianca_2019.pdf
  4. Buckley, J. P. , Kim, H. , Wong, E. , & Rebholz, C. M. (2019). Ultra‐processed food consumption and exposure to phthalates and bisphenols in the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2013–2014. Environment International, 131(August), 105057. 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105057 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Campbell, R. K. , Aguayo, V. M. , Kang, Y. , Dzed, L. , Joshi, V. , Waid, J. , Gupta, S. D. , Haselow, N. , & West, K. P., Jr. (2018). Infant and young child feeding practices and nutritional status in Bhutan. Maternal Child Nutrition, 14, 1–6. 10.1111/mcn.12580 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Caulfield, L. E. , Bose, A. C. R. , Chandyo, R. K. , Nesamvuni, C. , Moraes, M. L. , Turab, A. , Patil, C. , Mahfuz, M. , Ambikapathi, R. , & Tahmeed, A. (2014). Infant feeding practices, dietary adequacy, and micronutrient status measures in the MAL‐ED study. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 59, S248–S254. 10.1093/cid/ciu421 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cornwell, B. , Villamor, E. , Mora‐Plazas, M. , Marin, C. , Monteiro, C. A. , & Baylin, A. (2018). Processed and ultra‐processed foods are associated with lower‐quality nutrient profiles in children from Colombia. Public Health Nutrition, 21(1), 142–147. 10.1017/S1368980017000891 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Costa, C. S. , Rauber, F. , Leffa, P. S. , Sangalli, C. N. , Campagnolo, P. D. B. , & Vitolo, M. R. (2019). Ultra‐processed food consumption and its effects on anthropometric and glucose profile: A longitudinal study during childhood. Nutrition, Metabolism, and Cardiovascular Diseases, 29(2), 177–184. 10.1016/j.numecd.2018.11.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Costa, P. N. , Soares, A. M. , Filho, J. Q. , Junior, F. S. , Ambikapathi, R. , Rogawski McQuade, E. T. , Guerrant, R. L. , Caulfield, L. E. , Lima, A. , & Maciel, B. (2020). Dietary intake from complementary feeding is associated with intestinal barrier function and environmental enteropathy in Brazilian children from the MAL‐ED cohort study. British Journal of Nutrition, 123(9), 1003–1012. 10.1017/S0007114520000215 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Davis, J. N. , Lê, K. A. , Walker, R. W. , Vikman, S. , Spruijt‐Metz, D. , Weigensberg, M. J. , Allayee, H. , & Goran, M. I. (2010). Increased hepatic fat in overweight Hispanic youth influenced by interaction between genetic variation in PNPLA3 and high dietary carbohydrate and sugar consumption. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 92, 1522–1527. 10.3945/ajcn.2010.30185 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Dewey, K. G. (2001). Nutrition, Growth, and Complementary Feeding of The Brestfed Infant. Pediatric Clinics of North America, 48(1), 87–104. 10.1016/s0031-3955(05)70287-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Dwyer, J. T. (2018). The feeding infants and toddlers study (FITS) 2016: Moving forward. Journal of Nutrition, 148(9), 1575S–1580S. 10.1093/jn/nxy159 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ersino, G. , Henry, C. J. , & Zello, G. A. (2016). Suboptimal feeding practices and high levels of undernutrition among infants and young children in the rural communities of Halaba and Zeway, Ethiopia. Food and Nutrition Bulletin, 37(3), 409–424. 10.1177/0379572116658371 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Filgueiras, A. R. , Pires de Almeida, V. B. , Koch Nogueira, P. C. , Alvares Domene, S. M. , Eduardo da Silva, C. , Sesso, R. , & Sawaya, A. L. (2019). Exploring the consumption of ultra‐processed foods and its association with food addiction in overweight children. Appetite, 135, 137–145. 10.1016/j.appet.2018.11.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Filha, E. de O. S. , Araújo, J. S. , Barbosa, J. S. , Gaujac, D. P. , Santos, C. F. da S. , & da Silva, D. G. (2012). Consumption of food groups among children attending the public health system of Aracaju, Northeast Brazil, in Sergipe TT. Revista Paulista de Pediatria, 30(4), 529–536. 10.1590/S0103-05822012000400011 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fonseca, P. , Ribeiro, S. , Andreoli, C. S. , de Carvalho, C. A. , Pessoa, M. C. , de Novaes, J. F. , Priore, S. E. , & Franceschini, S. (2019). Association of exclusive breastfeeding duration with consumption of ultra‐processed foods, fruit and vegetables in Brazilian children. European Journal of Nutrition, 58(7), 2887–2894. 10.1007/s00394-018-1840-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Gatica‐Domínguez, G. , Neves, P. A. R. , Barros, A. J. D. , & Victora, C. G. (2021). Complementary feeding practices in 80 low‐ and middle‐Income countries: Prevalence of and socioeconomic inequalities in dietary diversity, meal frequency, and dietary adequacy. Journal of Nutrition, 151(7), 1956–1964. 10.1093/jn/nxab088 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Giesta, J. M. , Zoche, E. , Corrêa, R. da S. , & Bosa, V. L. (2019). Associated factors with early introduction of ultra‐processed foods in feeding of children under two years old. Ciencia e Saude Coletiva, 24(7), 2387–2397. 10.1590/1413-81232018247.24162017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Gonçalves, H. , Barros, F. C. , Buffarini, R. , Horta, B. L. , Menezes, A. , Barros, A. , Domingues, M. R. , Victora, C. G. , & Pelotas Cohorts Study, G. (2019). Infant nutrition and growth: Trends and inequalities in four population‐based birth cohorts in Pelotas, Brazil, 1982−2015. International Journal of Epidemiology, 48, I80–I88. 10.1093/ije/dyy233 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Gonsalez, P. S. , Retondario, A. , Bricarello, L. P. , González‐Chica, D. A. , Silva, D. A. S. , & de Vasconcelos, F. de A. G. (2017). Exclusive breastfeeding, complementary feeding and association with body fat excess among schoolchildren in Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Saúde Materno Infantil, 17(1), 115–125. 10.1590/1806-93042017000100007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Guerrant, R. L. , Oriá, R. B. , Moore, S. R. , Oriá, M. O. B. , & Lima, A. A. M. (2008). Malnutrition as an enteric infectious disease with long‐term effects on child development. Nutrition Reviews, 66(9), 487–505. 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2008.00082.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Heidkamp, R. A. , Piwoz, E. , Gillespie, S. , Keats, E. C. , D'Alimonte, M. R. , & Bhutta, Z. A. (2021). Mobilising evidence, data, and resources to achieve global maternal and child undernutrition targets and the sustainable development goals: An agenda for action. The Lancet, 397(10282), 1400–1418. 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00568-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hoffman, D. , dos Leffa, P. , Sangalli, C. , Valmórbida, J. , Rauber, F. , & Vitolo, M. (2020). Ultra‐processed foods consumption and lipid profile in Brazilian children. Current Developments in Nutrition, 4(Suppl 2), 842. 10.1093/cdn/nzaa053_047 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Horta, B. L. , Bahl, R. , Martinés, J. C. , & Victora, C. G. , & World Health Organization . (2007). Evidence on the long‐term effects of breastfeeding: Systematic review and meta‐analyses (pp. 1–52). World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/43623 [Google Scholar]
  25. IBGE . (2003). Censo Demográfico 2000—Características Gerais da População . Resultados da Amostra . IBGE. https://biblioteca.ibge.gov.br/index.php/biblioteca-catalogo?view=detalhes%26id=783
  26. Isabel, F. , Souza, S. D. , Oselka, R. , & Sarni, S. (2010). Complementary feeding: Inappropriate practices in infants. Jornal de Pediatria, 86(3), 196–201. 10.2223/JPED.1994 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Keats, E. C. , Das, J. K. , Salam, R. A. , Lassi, Z. S. , Imdad, A. , Black, R. E. , & Bhutta, Z. A. (2021). Effective interventions to address maternal and child malnutrition: An update of the evidence. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, 5, 367–384. 10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30274-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lima, A. A. , Oriá, R. B. , Soares, A. M. , Filho, J. Q., Jr. , de Sousa, F., Jr. , Abreu, C. B. , Bindá, A. , Lima, I. , Quetz, J. , Moraes, M. , Maciel, B. , Costa, H. , Leite, A. M. , Lima, N. L. , Mota, F. S. , Di Moura, A. , Scharf, R. , Barrett, L. , & Guerrant, R. L. (2014). Geography, population, demography, socioeconomic, anthropometry, and environmental status in the MAL‐ED cohort and case–control study sites in Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 59(Suppl 4), 287–294. 10.1093/cid/ciu438 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Lindsay, A. C. , Machado, M. T. , Sussner, K. M. , Hardwick, C. K. , & Peterson, K. E. (2008). Infant‐feeding practices and beliefs about complementary feeding among low‐income Brazilian mothers: A qualitative study. Food and Nutrition Bulletin, 29(1), 15–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Maciel, B. L. L. , Moraes, M. L. , Soares, A. M. , Cruz, I. F. S. , Andrade, M. I. R. D. , Filho, J. Q. , & Junior, F. S. (2018). Infant feeding practices and determinant variables for early complementary feeding in the first 8 months of life: Results from the Brazilian MAL‐ED cohort site. Public Health Nutrition, 21(13), 2462–2470. 10.1017/S136898001800099X [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Mais, L. , Warkentin, S. , Vega, J. , Latorre, M. , do, R. , Carnell, S. , & Taddei, J. A. (2017). Risk characteristics and behaviors for ultra‐processed food consumption in a sample of Brazilian children. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, 49(7), S72. 10.1016/j.jneb.2017.05.211 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Malik, P. , & Willett, H. (2013). Sugar‐sweetened beverages and weight gain in children and adults: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 98, 1084–1102. 10.3945/ajcn.113.058362 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Miller, M. , Acosta, A. M. , Chavez, C. B. , Flores, J. T. , Olotegui, M. P. , Pinedo, S. R. & Shrestha, S. K. (2014). The MAL‐ED study: A multinational and multidisciplinary approach to understand the relationship between enteric pathogens, malnutrition, gut physiology, physical growth, cognitive development, and immune responses in infants and children up to 2 years of age in resource‐poor environments. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 59(Suppl 4), S193–S206. 10.1093/cid/ciu653 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Monteiro, C. A. , Cannon, G. , Lawrence, M. , Costa‐Louzada, M. L. , & Pereira‐Machado, P. , & FAO . (2019). Ultra‐processed foods, diet quality, and health using the NOVA classification system. http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/mediation/rules
  35. Monteiro, C. A. , Levy, R. B. , Claro, R. M. , de Castro, I. R. R. , & Cannon, G. (2010). A new classification of foods based on the extent and purpose of their processing. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 26(11), 2039–2049. 10.1590/s0102-311x2010001100005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Moubarac, J. C. , Batal, M. , Louzada, M. L. , Martinez Steele, E. , & Monteiro, C. A. (2017). Consumption of ultra‐processed foods predicts diet quality in Canada. Appetite, 108, 512–520. 10.1016/j.appet.2016.11.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Moubarac, J. C. , Martins, A. P. , Claro, R. M. , Levy, R. B. , G. Cannon, G. , & Monteiro, C. A. (2013). Consumption of ultra‐processed foods and likely impact on human health. Evidence from Canada. Public Health Nutrition, 16, 2240–2248. 10.1017/S1368980012005009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Neri, D. , Monteiro, C. A. , & Levy, R. B. (2019). Consumption of ultra‐processed foods and its association with added sugar content in the diets of US children, NHANES 2009−2014. Pediatric Obesity, 14(12), e12563. 10.1111/ijpo.12563 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. de Oliveira, D. A. , de Castro, I. R. R. , & Jaime, P. C. (2014). Complementary feeding patterns in the first year of life in the city of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Time trends from 1998 to 2008. Cadernos de Saúde Pública, 30(8), 1755–1764. 10.1590/0102-311x00120013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Onita, B. M. , Azeredo, C. M. , Jaime, P. C. , Levy, R. B. , & Rauber, F. (2021). Eating context and its association with ultra‐processed food consumption by British children. Appetite, 157, 105007. 10.1016/j.appet.2020.105007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Owais, A. , Schwartz, B. , Kleinbaum, D. G. , Suchdev, P. S. , Faruque, A. S. G. , Das, S. K. , & Stein, A. D. (2016). Minimum acceptable diet at 9 months but not exclusive breastfeeding at 3 months or timely complementary feeding initiation is predictive of infant growth in rural Bangladesh. PLoS One, 11(10), 1–10. 10.1371/journal.pone.0165128 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Passanha, A. , Benício, M. H. D. , & Venâncio, S. I. (2021). Determinants of fruits, vegetables, and ultra‐processed foods consumption among infants. Ciencia e Saude Coletiva, 26(1), 209–220. 10.1590/1413-81232020261.06892019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Pizzol, T. , Moraes, C. G. , Arrais, P. , Bertoldi, A. D. , Ramos, L. R. , Farias, M. R. , Oliveira, M. A. , Tavares, N. , Luiza, V. L. , & Mengue, S. S. (2019). Estimativa do consumo de sal pela população brasileira: Resultado da Pesquisa Nacional de Saúde 2013. The Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia, 22(Suppl 2), E190009. 10.1590/1980-549720190009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Rauber, F. , Campagnolo, P. D. B. , Hoffman, D. J. , & Vitolo, M. R. (2015). Consumption of ultra‐processed food products and its effects on children's lipid profiles: A longitudinal study. Nutrition, Metabolism, and Cardiovascular Diseases, 25(1), 116–122. 10.1016/j.numecd.2014.08.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Raymond, J. , Agaba, M. , Mollay, C. , Rose, J. W. , & Kassim, N. (2017). Analysis of nutritional adequacy of local foods for meeting dietary requirements of children aged 6−23 months in rural central Tanzania. Archives of Public Health, 75(1), 1–8. 10.1186/s13690-017-0226-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Ribas, S. A. , de Rodrigues, M. C. C. , Mocellin, M. C. , Marques, E. S. , da Rosa, G. P. C. , & Maganha, C. R. (2021). Quality of complementary feeding and its effect on nutritional status in preterm infants: A cross‐sectional study. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 34(1), 3–12. 10.1111/jhn.12762 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Ribeiro, G. J. S. , & de Araújo Pinto, A. (2021). Consumption of ultra‐processed foods in Brazilian children: An analysis of regional trends. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 61, E106–E111. 10.1016/j.pedn.2021.06.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Rocha, K. F. , Araújo, C. R. B. , Morais, I. L. , Padrão, P. , Moreira, P. , & Ribeiro, K. D. S. (2021). Commercial foods for infants under the age of 36 months: An assessment of the availability and nutrient profile of ultra‐processed foods. Public Health Nutrition, 24, 3179–3186. 10.1017/S1368980021001555 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Rodrigues, S. L. , Souza Júnior, P. R. , Pimentel, E. B. , Baldo, M. P. , Malta, D. C. , Mill, J. G. , & Szwarcwald, C. L. (2015). Relationship between salt consumption measured by 24‐h urine collection and blood pressure in the adult population of Vitória (Brazil). Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, 48(08), 728–735. 10.1590/1414-431X20154455 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Saldan, P. C. , Venancio, S. I. , Saldiva, S. R. D. M. , Pina, J. C. , & de Mello, D. F.  (2015). Práticas de aleitamento materno de crianças menores de dois anos de idade com base em indicadores da organização mundial da saúde. Revista de Nutricao, 28(4), 409–420. 10.1590/1415-52732015000400007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  51. Santos, G. D. C. , da Costa, J. A. S. , & Netto, M. P. (2018). Frequência do consumo de alimentos in natura ou minimamente processados em lactentes. HU Revista, 43(3), 233–238. 10.34019/1982-8047.2017.v43.2820 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  52. Schneider, B. C. , Gatica‐Domínguez, D. , Assunção, M. C. F. , Matjasevich, A. , Barros, A. J. D. , Santos, I. S. , & Silveira, M. F. (2020). Introduction to complementary feeding in the first year of life and risk of overweight at 24 months of age: Changes from 2004 to 2015 Pelotas (Brazil) birth cohorts. British Journal of Nutrition, 124(6), 620–630. 10.1017/S0007114520001634 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Spaniol, A. M. , Da Costa, T. H. M. , Bortolini, G. A. , & Gubert, M. B. (2020). Breastfeeding reduces ultra‐processed foods and sweetened beverages consumption among children under two years old. BMC Public Health, 20(1), 1–9. 10.1186/s12889-020-8405-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. UFRJ. Federal University of Rio de Janeiro . (2021a). Breastfeeding: Prevalence and practices of breastfeeding in Brazilian children under 2 years of age. Brazilian National Survey on Child Nutrition (ENANI‐2019). https://enani.nutricao.ufrj.br/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Relatorio-4_ENANI-2019_Aleitamento-Materno.pdf
  55. UFRJ. Federal University of Rio de Janeiro . (2021b). Prevalence of feeding indicators for children under 5 years of age. Brazilian National Survey on Child Nutrition (ENANI‐2019). https://enani.nutricao.ufrj.br/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Relatorio-5_ENANI-2019_Alimentacao-InfantiL.pdf
  56. Victora, C. G. , Adair, L. , Fall, C. , Hallal, P. C. , Martorell, R. , Richter, L. , & Sachdeva, H. S. , for the Maternal and Child Undernutrition Study Group . (2008). Maternal and child undernutrition: Consequences for adult health and human capital. Lancet, 371, 340–357. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61692-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Vos, M. B. , Kaar, J. L. , Welsh, J. A. , Van Horn, L. V. , Feig, D. I. , Anderson, C. A. M. , Patel, M. J. , Cruz Munos, J. , Krebs, N. F. , Xanthakos, S. A. ,  Johnson, R. K. , & American Heart Association Nutrition Committee of the Council on Lifestyle and Cardiometabolic Health; Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; Council on Functional Genomics and Translational Biology; and Council on Hypertension . (2017). Added sugars and cardiovascular disease risk in children: A scientific statement from the American heart association. Circulation, 135, 1017–1034. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000439 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. World Health Organization . (2000). Effect of breastfeeding on infant and child mortality due to infectious diseases in less developed countries: A pooled analysis. The Lancet, 355, 451–455. 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)82011-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. World Health Organization . (2001, December). Complementary feeding, 10–13. https://www.who.int/nutrition/publications/guiding_principles_compfeeding_breastfed.pdf
  60. World Health Organization & United Nations Children's Fund (‎‎UNICEF) . (2003). Global strategy for infant and young child feeding. Fifty‐Fourth World Health Assembly. World Health Organiztion, 1, 1–27. https://apps.who.int/gb/archive/pdf_files/WHA54/ea54id4.pdf [Google Scholar]
  61. World Health Organization . (2006). WHO child growth standards based on length/height, weight and age. Acta Paediatrica, 450(Suppl), 76–85. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16817681/ [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. World Health Organization . (2008). Indicators for assessing infant and young child feeding practices: Part 1 Definitions: Conclusions of a consensus meeting held 6–8 November 2007. WHO Press. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/43895/9789241596664_eng.pdf?sequence=1 [Google Scholar]
  63. World Health Organization . (2017). Double‐duty actions (Policy brief). World Health Organization. chrome‐extension://oemmndcbldboiebfnladdacbdfmadadm/, https://apps.who.int/iris/rest/bitstreams/1084413/retrieve
  64. World Health Organization . (2018). Guideline: Sugars intake for adults and children. World Health Organization, 57(6), 1716–1722. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241549028 [Google Scholar]
  65. World Health Organization, & the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) . (2021). Indicators for assessing infant and young child feeding practices. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/340706

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available on request from the authors.

Articles from Maternal & Child Nutrition are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES