Abstract
The objective of this study was to optimize the organic selenium (Se) requirements of intensively reared silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix). A total of n = 300 juveniles silver carp 11.40±0.52 cm long, and average weighing 25.28±0.18 grams were randomly assigned to 15 aquaria (20 fish/100L aquaria) and subjected to five different dietary Se levels in a completely randomized design. The diets were pelleted supplemented with exogenous Se methionine @ 0.0, 0.3, 0.6, 0.9 and 1.2 mg/kg of the diet. The fourteen days of aquaria acclimatization was given to fish and then an 84-day feeding trial was conducted. The group supplemented with 0.9 mg/kg Se had greater feed intake, gain in length, body weight %, and specific growth rate with a better feed conversion ratio as compared to those fed on the rest of the dietary levels or control (P<0.05). The deposition of Se was greater in the liver, and kidneys of the fishes fed on diets containing 0.9 and 1.2 mg Se levels than in the rest of the treatments (P<0.05). However, dietary Se levels had no effects on the bioaccumulation of Se in muscle tissues (P>0.05). The proximate analysis showed that dry matter, crude protein, and fat contents of meat were not changed (P>0.05) by dietary treatments. Similarly, values of TBARS, RBCs, Hb, and blood glucose contents were similar (P>0.05) across the treatments. However, the concentration of WBCs, HCT, and MCHC was greater in those groups fed on 0.9 and 1.2 Se levels than in those fed on 0.6, 0.3, and 0.0 Se levels respectively (P<0.05). The activities of ALT, AST, and ALP were lowered in the 0.9 mg Se supplemented fishes compared with the rest of the treatments (P<0.05). The SOD, catalases, and GPx levels for muscle, liver, and whole body were greater (P<0.05) in the Se-supplemented groups than in the control. These outcomes indicated that up to 0.9 mg/kg inclusion of methionine-based Se in the diet of juvenile silver carp improved the growth performance, feed conversion ratio, organs Se enrichment, and antioxidant status without any compromise on meat quality.
Introduction
The silver carp is an important freshwater aquaculture commodity in Pakistan, China, and India. Silver carp can attain a maximum length of 140 cm and weigh up to 50 kg [1]. It has relatively higher market demand because of delicious meat, more lean carcass percentage, and better shelf life. In addition, silver carp has better adaptation to confinement with faster growth rates, and better feed conversion [2] which makes it a viable specie to fit in modern intensive rearing systems. Although this system increased aquaculture production efficiency around the world, high density, which is common practice, caused oxidative stress by producing Reactive oxygen species (ROS) like peroxides of hydrogen, superoxide anion, and nitric oxide [3, 4]. Several studies showed that higher levels of ROS production can lead to disturbances in fish physiological responses, and antioxidant status leading to poor performance, and higher rates of morbidity, and mortality [5, 6]. Therefore, practical techniques that could boost this species’ antioxidative status and growth efficiency have drawn more interest.
Endogenous enzymes (superoxide dismutase, catalase, glutathione peroxidase) and exogenous antioxidant substances like Se make up the antioxidant defense system [7]. Selenium is the key trace element required to smooth the growth and metabolism of animals including fish [8]. Research is established in different animal species that dietary Se deficiency led to lower growth performance, exudative diathesis, nutritional muscular dystrophy, and reproductive issues in different animal species [9–13]. The Se toxicity due to higher dosage led to digestive upset and down-regulation of the immune system of the fish [14]. Selenium combined with cysteine amino acid to form selenocysteine (Se-Cys), a well-known 21 amino acid containing cofactor that exists in 25 different forms in the animal body and is an integral part of the glutathione peroxidase (GPx) system that protects cells by catalyzing hydrogen peroxide and lipid peroxide reduction [15]. Several studies evaluated organic and inorganic dietary Se sources in hybrid striped bass [16], common carp [17], crucian carp [18], Nile tilapia [19], and common barbel [20]. According to these studies, organic sources have higher digestibility and bioavailability with better tissue accumulation as compared to inorganic sources.
The organic sources are yeast fermented (Se yeast) and chelated micronutrients (Se methionine). Se methionine has relatively higher bioavailability, digestibility, and organ enrichment properties than Se yeast [18]. Moreover, Se methionine is comparatively less toxic than inorganic sources [14]. In a recent study [1], we compared the sodium selenite, Se yeast, and Se methionine sources with two levels (0.5 and 1 mg/kg of the diet) in silver carp. Feeding 0.5 mg Se methionine/kg of the diet, resulted in stronger silver carp with better performance. According to our knowledge, this was the first study in which Se requirements for the fingerlings of silver carp were investigated. Moreover, dietary selenium requirements differ according to the fish type, stage of growth, and rearing environment. Therefore, the current study aimed to evaluate the Se methionine in different doses and their influence on growth performance, feed intake, meat chemical composition, Se bioaccumulation, blood biochemistry, and antioxidant response of juvenile silver carp.
Materials and methods
Ethical approval, experimental design, diets, and fish husbandry
The protocols and procedures of this study were approved by the animal use and animal care committee of the University of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Lahore, Pakistan (DR/175, 05-04-2022). A total of n = 300 juveniles silver carp 11.40±0.52 cm long, and average weighing 25.28±0.18 grams were randomly assigned to 15 aquaria (20 fish/100L aquaria) and subjected to five different dietary Se levels in a completely randomized design. The diets were pelleted and contained 0.0, 0.3, 0.6, 0.9 and 1.2 mg/kg exogenous Se methionine supplementation. The feed ingredients along with Selenomethionine (Selisseo® 2% Se, Europe) were procured from a local market for this experiment. To produce the pellets (3 mm diameter), feed ingredients were ground through a 0.05 mm sieve (KENWOOD, AT284), batched according to basal diet ingredients inclusion levels, supplemented with Se levels, then each batch was thoroughly mixed (mixture; KENWOOD, AT283), dough by adding water, and then pelleted (meat mincer; ANEX, AG 3060). The fresh pellets were subjected to shade drying to achieve moisture up to 10% and then stored in airtight zipper bags. Feed ingredients, as well as diets, were analyzed by using the proximate method according to AOAC, [21]. The fourteen days ponds acclimatization was given to fish and then an 84-day feeding trial was conducted. The offer feed and orts were managed according to Mushtaq, [1] to calculate the feed intake. During the experimental period, each aquarium’s dissolved oxygen level, temperature, and pH were maintained @ 5.8–7.3 mg/L, 24.9–28.7°C, and 7.4–8.6. respectively. Moreover, each aquarium was subjected to water change on daily basis. The feed formulation, chemical composition, Se methionine levels, and dietary concentrations on a dry basis are given in Tables 1 & 2.
Table 1. Diets formulation and levels of Se methionine supplementation on a dry basis.
| Feed Ingredients | Selenium levels1 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 1.2 | |
| Fish Meal (g/kg) | 200.00 | 200.00 | 200.00 | 200.00 | 200.00 |
| Soybean Meal (g/kg) | 200.00 | 200.00 | 200.00 | 200.00 | 200.00 |
| Maize Gluten 60 (g/kg) | 200.00 | 200.00 | 200.00 | 200.00 | 200.00 |
| Wheat Flour (g/kg) | 145.00 | 145.00 | 145.00 | 145.00 | 145.00 |
| Rice Polish (g/kg) | 150.00 | 150.00 | 150.00 | 150.00 | 150.00 |
| Fish Oil (g/kg) | 60.00 | 60.00 | 60.00 | 60.00 | 60.00 |
| Vitamin Premix (g/kg)2 | 20.00 | 20.00 | 20.00 | 20.00 | 20.00 |
| Mineral Mixture (g/kg)3 | 20.00 | 20.00 | 20.00 | 20.00 | 20.00 |
| Choline Chloride (g/kg) | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 | 5.00 |
| Selenium Methionine (mg/kg) | 0.00 | 0.30 | 0.60 | 0.90 | 1.20 |
1Selenium levels = basal diet containing supplementation of selenium methionine @ 0 mg/kg (0.0), 0.3 mg/kg (0.3), 0.6 mg/kg (0.6), 0.9 mg/kg, (0.9) and 1.2 mg/kg (1.2).
2Locally customized and each kg of vitamin premix contains: Vitamin A 15 M.I.U, Vitamin D3 3M.I.U, Nicotinic acid 25000mg, Vitamin B1 5000mg, Vitamin E 6000IU, Vitamin B2 6000mg, Vitamin K3 4000mg, Vitamin B6 4000mg, Folic acid 750mg, Vitamin B12 9000mg, Vitamin C 15000mg, Calcium Pentothenate 10000mg.
3Locally customized and each kg of Mineral mixture contains: MgSO4.7H2O 153mg, CoCl.6H2O 0.0816mg, NaCl 51mg, AlCl3.6H2O 0.255mg CuSo4 .5H2O 210.67mg, FeSo4.H2O 100.67mg, MnSo4.5H2O 116.67mg, ZnSO4.7 H2O 121.33mg and Cellulose 65mg.
Table 2. Diets chemical composition on a dry basis.
| Nutrients | Selenium levels1 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 1.2 | |
| Dry matter (g/kg) | 898.70 | 898.70 | 898.70 | 898.70 | 898.70 |
| Crude protein (g/kg) | 316.20 | 316.20 | 316.20 | 316.20 | 316.20 |
| Crude fat (g/kg) | 123.20 | 123.20 | 123.20 | 123.20 | 123.20 |
| Crude fiber (g/kg) | 75.40 | 75.40 | 75.40 | 75.40 | 75.40 |
| Ash (g/kg) | 92.30 | 92.30 | 92.30 | 92.30 | 92.30 |
| Selenium (mg/kg) | 0.15 | 0.30 | 0.58 | 0.89 | 1.18 |
1Selenium levels = basal diet containing supplementation of selenium methionine @ 0 mg/kg (0.0), 0.3 mg/kg (0.3), 0.6 mg/kg (0.6), 0.9 mg/kg, (0.9) and 1.2 mg/kg (1.2).
Growth parameters
The body length and weight of each fish were measured just before the start of the feeding trial, biweekly, and on the day of termination of the experiment. Eqs 1–4 were used to calculate the different growth parameters.
| (1) |
| (2) |
| (3) |
| (4) |
Sample collection and laboratory analysis
After the growth experiment, seventeen fish from each tank were randomly selected, weighted, and anesthetized in the laboratory with tricane methanesulphate (MS-222) at 150 mg L1, as prescribed by Mushtaq, [1]. Ten fish were blood sampled using plain tuberculin syringes by puncturing the caudal vasculature and collected blood samples were immediately centrifuged at 3000 x g for 15 minutes, and harvested serum was stored at -20°C for further analysis. Furthermore, blood samples were collected via caudal vein puncture with EDTA-coated tuberculin syringes and immediately analyzed for hematological parameters with an automated hematology analyzer (MEK6550). The concentration of glucose in the blood was determined using commercial kits (21503, Biosystems, Barcelona, Spain). Five fish were dissected for organ collection and biological indices, and the other three were homogenized in a meat mincer (ANEX, AG 3060) to estimate the chemical composition of the meat. Organs (kidney, liver, gills, and pancreas) and meat samples were collected and stored at -20 0C in labeled plastic airtight zipper bags for further analysis. To calculate the dry matter contents, the collected feed and meat samples were dried for 48 hours at 55 0C in a forced-air oven. Using a Foss grinder, dried feed and meat samples were ground and passed through a 1 mm sieve (CT 293 Cyclotec, Denmark). The crude protein (Method 976.06) and fat contents of ground feed and meat samples were determined using the AOAC, [21] standard procedures (Soxtec procedure, Tecator, Hoganas, Sweden; method 920.29). To determine the ash content of ground meat and feed samples, they were ignited in a muffle furnace at 620 0C for 3 hours. The concentration of selenium in experimental diets and fish tissues was determined using atomic absorption spectroscopy (Hitachi ZA3000, Japan). In brief, 250 g of each tissue/feed sample was mineralized at 85°C for 4 hours in a closed vessel heating block system with 4 mL of 70% HNO3 (329756406; Sigma-Aldrich) and 2 mL of 35% H2O2 (3587191; SAFC) (Mars5, CEM, USA). The Thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) and antioxidant enzyme activities estimation were performed according to the given detailed methodology in our study Mushtaq, [1].
Statistical analysis
The data of the current experiment was analyzed by using the General Linear Model procedure of SAS (Online version) with diets as a fixed factor/independent variable. Means were separated by using the Tukey test and declared significant at P<0.05 (Tukey, 1991). The dietary Se level for the maximum response for performance variables (WG, and SGR) showed R2 significant and was predicted by using the following linear broken-line regression model of SAS (Online version).
Where: Y = dependent variable, L = theoretical maximum, R = requirement, X = independent variable, I = 1 (if X < R) or I = 0 (if X > R), U = rate constant.
Results
Growth performance
During the growth trial, the fish survival rate was recorded at 100% for the 0.0, 0.6, and 0.9, while, at 99 and 98% for the 0.3 and 1.2 Se levels respectively. The means, stander error of means, and P linear values for growth performance of silver carp fed different Se methionine levels are given in Table 3. The initial weight, as well as length, were similar across the treatments (P>0.05). The other growth parameters like feed intake, final weight, weight gain, final length, feed conversion ratio, and specific growth rate were significantly influenced (P<0.05) by Se levels. The feed intake was higher in supplemented groups and the group supplemented with 1.2 mg Se had a greater intake as compared to the rest of the treatments (P<0.05). Overall growth performance was improved (P<0.05) with Se supplementation. The growth performance parameters like final weight, final length, BW gain, and specific growth rate were significantly higher (P<0.05) in the 0.9 mg/kg Se supplemented group as compared with the rest of the supplemented groups. In addition, the broken line results for weight gain % and SGR showed 0.9 mg/kg as an optimum dietary Se methionine level (Figs 1 and 2). Similarly, those fish supplemented with 0.9 mg Se had better feed efficiency than those fed either on other supplemented levels.
Table 3. Growth performance of juvenile silver carp fed on different levels of selenium methionine.
| Parameters | Selenium levels1 | SEM | P-linear | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 1.2 | |||
| Feed intake (g) | 29.23a | 31.32b | 31.32b | 31.23b | 32.10c | 0.00 | < .0001 |
| Initial weight (g) | 25.31 | 25.26 | 25.27 | 25.27 | 25.29 | 0.06 | 0.38 |
| Final weight (g) | 36.13a | 41.00b | 41.71b | 49.81d | 44.16c | 0.43 | < .0001 |
| Weight gain (g) | 10.82a | 15.74b | 16.44b | 24.54d | 18.87c | 0.31 | < .0001 |
| Weight gain (%) | 42.77a | 62.34b | 65.08c | 97.14e | 74.67d | 1.77 | < .0001 |
| Feed conversion ratio | 2.78a | 2.10a | 1.93b | 1.29d | 1.73c | 0.05 | < .0001 |
| Initial length (cm) | 11.49 | 11.39 | 11.37 | 11.39 | 11.36 | 0.03 | 0.26 |
| Final length (cm) | 18.19a | 18.97a | 19.62b | 23.08d | 20.49c | 0.10 | < .0001 |
| Specific Growth rate (g) | 0.12a | 0.18b | 0.18b | 0.28d | 0.21c | 0.00 | < .0001 |
| Survival rate (%) | 100.00 | 99.00 | 100.00 | 100.00 | 98.00 | ||
1Selenium levels = basal diet containing supplementation of selenium methionine @ 0 mg/kg (0.0), 0.3 mg/kg (0.3), 0.6 mg/kg (0.6), 0.9 mg/kg, (0.9) and 1.2 mg/kg (1.2).
a-e superscripts within the same row differ significantly at P<0.05 while, cells within the same row containing shared subscript have no statistically significant difference (P>0.05).
Fig 1. The fitted broken-line plot of % weight gain of Hypophthalmichthys molitrix fed on different levels of selenium methionine.
Liner broken-line fitted model for selenium levels; Y = 60.12–0.13 (102-X) × I, I = 1 (if X<102) or I = 0 (if X>102), P < .006, R2 = 0.30, the breakpoint occurred at 96±2.12.
Fig 2. The fitted broken-line plot of SGR (specific growth rate) of Hypophthalmichthys molitrix fed on different levels of selenium methionine.
Liner broken-line fitted model for selenium levels; Y = 0.1921–0.22 (100-X) × I, I = 1 (if X<100) or I = 0 (if X>100), P < .002, R2 = 0.60, the breakpoint occurred at 0.27±0.02.
Tissues bioaccumulation of selenium
The means values with stander error of means for organ enrichment with Se of silver carp fed on different levels of selenium methionine are given in Table 4. The bioaccumulation of Se in the liver and kidney was influenced (P<0.05) by different dietary Se levels. The deposition of Se was higher for 0.9 and 1.2 Se levels respectively than in the rest of the treatments. However, Se enrichment in muscle was not influenced by dietary Se levels (P>0.05).
Table 4. Bioaccumulation of selenium in different organs of juvenile silver carp fed on different levels of selenium methionine.
| Parameters | Selenium levels1 | SEM | P-linear | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 1.2 | |||
| Liver (μg/g) | 0.40a | 0.43a | 0.45a | 0.57b | 0.55b | 0.01 | 0.022 |
| Kidney (μg/g) | 0.27a | 0.29a | 0.33b | 0.37d | 0.37d | 0.02 | 0.020 |
| Muscle (μg/g) | 0.19 | 0.22 | 0.24 | 0.29 | 0.275 | 0.03 | 0.261 |
1Selenium levels = basal diet containing supplementation of selenium methionine @ 0 mg/kg (0.0), 0.3 mg/kg (0.3), 0.6 mg/kg (0.6), 0.9 mg/kg, (0.9) and 1.2 mg/kg (1.2).
a-e superscripts within the same row differ significantly at P< .05 while, cells within the same row containing shared subscript have no statistically significant difference (P>0.05).
Meat chemical composition
The means, stander error of means, and significant differences among treatments for chemical analysis of the silver carp meat are given in Table 5. The changes in dry contents, fat, ash, and protein contents were non-significant (P>0.05) among the treatments.
Table 5. Meat chemical composition of juvenile silver carp fed on different levels of selenium methionine.
| Parameters | Selenium levels1 | SEM | P-linear | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 1.2 | |||
| Dry matter (%) | 44.35 | 44.25 | 43.93 | 43.45 | 43.70 | 0.26 | 0.7899 |
| Crude protein (%) | 16.49 | 16.47 | 16.30 | 16.23 | 16.61 | 0.13 | 0.9021 |
| Crude fat (%) | 7.33 | 7.17 | 7.16 | 7.38 | 7.39 | 0.11 | 0.3251 |
| Ash (%) | 5.76 | 5.57 | 5.45 | 5.56 | 5.34 | 0.08 | 0.1036 |
1Selenium levels = basal diet containing supplementation of selenium methionine @ 0 mg/kg (0.0), 0.3 mg/kg (0.3), 0.6 mg/kg (0.6), 0.9 mg/kg, (0.9) and 1.2 mg/kg (1.2).
Hematology and serum biochemistry
The results for blood biochemical properties of silver carp fed on different levels of selenium methionine are given in Table 6. The means of WBCs, HCT, MCHC, ALT, AST, and ALP were significantly changed (P<0.05) among treatment groups. However, the means for RBCs, Hb, and blood glucose concentration were similar (P>0.05) among the treatments. The concentration of WBCs, HCT, and MCHC was greater in the 0.9 and 1.2 Se supplemented groups than in 0.3, 0.6, and 0.0 Se fed groups respectively. The activities of ALT, AST, and ALP were lowered in the 0.9 Se supplemented group compared with the rest of the treatments.
Table 6. Blood biochemical properties of juvenile silver carp fed on different levels of selenium methionine.
| Parameters | Selenium levels1 | SEM | P-linear | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 1.2 | |||
| WBC (106/μl)2 | 439.78a | 463.97b | 467.85b | 471.88d | 469.81d | 3.62 | 0.0001 |
| RBC (106/μl)3 | 2.42 | 2.33 | 2.25 | 2.43 | 2.43 | 0.07 | 0.3591 |
| Hb (g/dl)4 | 8.55 | 8.49 | 8.46 | 8.57 | 8.52 | 0.08 | 0.6181 |
| HCT (%)5 | 37.45a | 43.19b | 45.33c | 45.67c | 45.57c | 1.77 | < .0001 |
| MCHC (g/dl)6 | 22.57a | 24.08b | 26.22c | 27.46d | 26.40c | 0.29 | 0.0018 |
| ALP (IU/ml)7 | 23.13d | 20.83c | 19.73b | 17.43a | 19.93b | 0.38 | 0.0004 |
| ALT (IU/ml)8 | 42.44e | 38.00d | 37.01c | 30.77a | 33.40b | 0.70 | 0.0002 |
| AST (IU/ml)9 | 80.23e | 70.82c | 72.13d | 65.86a | 69.25b | 0.74 | < .0001 |
| Glucose (mg/dl) | 3.42 | 3.28 | 3.45 | 3.49 | 3.50 | 0.06 | 0.1163 |
1Selenium levels = basal diet containing supplementation of selenium methionine @ 0 mg/kg (0.0), 0.3 mg/kg (0.3), 0.6 mg/kg (0.6), 0.9 mg/kg, (0.9) and 1.2 mg/kg (1.2); 2WBC = White blood cells
3RBC = Red blood cells
4Hb = Hemoglobin
5HCT = Hematocrit
6MCHC = Met hematocrit
7ALP = Alanine phosphatase
8ALT = Alanine transaminase
9AST = Aspartate transaminase.
a-e superscripts within the same row differ significantly at P<0.05 while, cells within the same row containing shared subscript have no statistically significant difference (P>0.05).
TBARS and enzyme assay
The results of TBARS, as well as antioxidant enzymes of silver carp, fed different Se levels are given in Table 7. The changes in TBARS were non-significant (P>0.05) among the treatments. However, means of catalases, SOD, and glutathione peroxidase levels for muscle, liver, and whole body were influenced (P<0.05) by dietary Se levels. The catalases and SOD were higher for the supplemented groups. Similarly, glutathione peroxidase was highest in 0.9 and 1.2 Se supplemented diet than in other levels.
Table 7. TBARS and antioxidant status of juvenile silver carp fed different levels of selenium methionine.
| Parameters | Selenium levels1 | SEM | P-linear | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.9 | 1.2 | |||
| TBARS (μg/mg) | |||||||
| Serum | 3.47 | 3.45 | 3.51 | 3.56 | 3.42 | 0.04 | 0.7351 |
| Muscle | 6.56 | 6.66 | 6.80 | 6.40 | 6.62 | 0.08 | 0.4084 |
| Superoxide dismutase (μ/mg) | |||||||
| Liver | 6.58a | 6.87b | 7.13c | 7.82d | 7.77d | 0.12 | 0.0265 |
| Whole body | 6.46 | 6.74 | 6.71 | 6.60 | 6.62 | 0.09 | 0.1263 |
| Catalases (μ/mg) | |||||||
| Muscle | 72.57a | 73.26b | 73.33b | 73.35b | 73.49b | 0.27 | 0.0211 |
| Liver | 75.12a | 77.04b | 76.94b | 77.78b | 79.47c | 0.45 | 0.0067 |
| Whole body | 73.33a | 75.37b | 75.50b | 75.43b | 75.50b | 0.11 | < .0001 |
| Glutathione peroxidase (μ/mg) | |||||||
| Liver | 234.20a | 286.50c | 281.40b | 392.70d | 395.30d | 12.89 | 0.0006 |
| Whole Body | 225.30a | 272.90b | 274.40c | 276.20d | 276.10d | 2.45 | < .0001 |
1Selenium levels = basal diet containing supplementation of selenium methionine @ 0 mg/kg (0.0), 0.3 mg/kg (0.3), 0.6 mg/kg (0.6), 0.9 mg/kg, (0.9) and 1.2 mg/kg (1.2).
a-e superscripts within the same row differ significantly at P<0 .05 while, cells within the same row containing shared subscript have no statistically significant difference (P>0.05).
Discussion
The current experiment results revealed that the optimal dietary Se level was essential for efficient growth performance and to smoothen the physiological function of silver carp. The survival rate suggests that selenium had an impact on the survival of the silver carp. The growth performance parameters like weight gain, and SGR showed significant differences among treatments. It is documented that higher dietary Se levels suppressed the growth performance as 1.2 mg/kg Se supplementation reverse the growth performance in this study [20]. The higher Se levels phenomenon regarding poor SGR is well established in aquatic species, like Epinephelus malabaricus [4] and Acanthopagrus schlegelii [22]. In the current experiment, the results of the broken-line regression for SGR and weight gain % showed that the optimal exogenous organic dietary Se which is methionine based required 0.9 mg/kg for silver carp. The results regarding different fish species Se requirements are not consistent some reported higher [4, 23], and others reported lower [24]. This difference might be due to the several incomputable variations in fish species, environmental differences [25], biochemical properties of different Se sources [26], and mathematical models used to find the Se requirement [27]. Therefore, we can infer that this research would provide the baseline regarding the Se requirement of silver carp. The Se bioaccumulation in the liver and kidney was significantly increased in this experiment and the results were consistent with previous research [22, 23, 27]. This higher Se deposition in tissues enhances the selenoproteins formation which results in better antioxidant capacity of the fish to combat the stress [28]. It is well documented that greater selenoprotein expression during oxidative stress demands more Se availability [29]. The changes in tissue Se concentration are closely related to fish health [30]. In this experiment, the results of the proximate analysis showed no changes in fish chemical composition, indicating that the silver carp meat composition is less sensitive to dietary Se supplementation. These results are in agreement with Mushtaq, [1] for silver carp, Zhou, [31] for crucian carp, and Le and Fotedar, [32] for juvenile yellowtail kingfish. Selenium conjugates with cysteine amino acid and forms selenocysteine which is an active part of the glutathione peroxidase system in this way, Se plays a vital role to strengthen the antioxidant defense system. During oxidative stress, enzymes like SOD, CAT, and GPx play scavenging effects on ROS [7]. In our experiment, the activities of GPx, SOD, and CAT were significantly increased in the supplemented groups and were highest in 0.9 and 1.2 levels of Se than in other levels. This data suggests that supplementation below 0.9 mg Se/kg is less effective to combat oxidative stress. Similar results regarding GPx, CAT, and SOD activities in liver tissues of loach were reported by Hao, [33]. In addition, several studies on different fish species evaluated different Se sources and mostly reported that Se supplementation strengthens the antioxidant system by improving GPx activities [12, 28]. However, TBARS values were not changed across the treatments in our experiment. TBARS test is used to measure the degree of lipid peroxidation and its lower index can be related to better shelf life as well as the quality of the meat [34]. The digestive and metabolic products of dietary ingredients are directly absorbed in the blood which resulted alters the blood’s biochemical properties. In the current experiment, we found a higher concentration of WBCs, HCT, and MCHC for 0.9 and 1.2 Se levels fed groups than in the rest of the treatments. It is well established that WBCs concentration has a direct relation with lysozyme activities [35]. In addition, activities of ALT, AST, and ALP were lowered in the 0.9 mg Se supplemented group compared with the rest of the treatments which suggests better liver health, and fish antioxidant status [36]. These results are in agreement with Abdel-Tawwab, [37] as they also documented higher AST and ALT activities in Se-fed African catfish.
Conclusion
Considering current experiment results, dietary supplementation with selenomethionine improved the feed intake, growth performance, and feed efficiency of intensively reared juvenile silver carp. In addition, it increased the bioaccumulation of selenium in body organs and strengthen the oxidative burst. The Se methionine 0.9 mg kg−1 dietary inclusion resulted in increased concentrations of GPX, SOD, and CAT which are involved in the activation of the antioxidant defense system. The oxidative stress-related hematological parameters like WBCs, HCT, and MCHC were greater and liver health indicators (ALT, AST, and ALP) were improved by feeding 0.9 mg kg−1 dietary Se methionine. However, meat composition parameters such as dry matter, crude protein, and crude fat contents were not improved through dietary Se supplementation. The broken line regression analyses were suggesting to 0.9 mg kg−1 an optimum dietary level of Se methionine for juvenile silver carp.
Supporting information
(XLSX)
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
The authors received no specific funding for this work.
References
- 1.Khan AM, Ali Z, Shelly SY, Ahmad Z, Mirza MR. Aliens; a catastrophe for native fresh water fish diversity in Pakistan. J. Anim. Plant Sci. 2011. Jan 1;21(2):435–40. http://thejaps.org.pk/docs/21-2-suppl/JAPS-20(Final).pdf [Google Scholar]
- 2.Mushtaq M, Fatima M, Shah SZ, Khan N, Naveed S, Khan M. Effects of sodium selenite, selenium methionine, and selenium yeast on growth performance, carcass composition, blood biochemistry, and antioxidant status of intensively reared Hypophthalmichthys molitrix. Aquaculture Reports. 2022. Jun 1;24:101182. 10.1016/j.aqrep.2022.101182 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Lin F, Zhang H, Yu J, Yu C, Chen C, Sun Z, et al. Effects of dietary selenium on growth performance, antioxidative status and tissue selenium deposition of juvenile Chu’s croaker (Nibea coibor). Aquaculture. 2021. Apr 15;536:736439. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.736439 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lin YH, Shiau SY. Dietary selenium requirements of juvenile grouper, Epinephelus malabaricus. Aquaculture. 2005. Nov 14;250(1–2):356–63. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2005.03.022 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sahin K, Yazlak H, Orhan C, Tuzcu M, Akdemir F, Sahin N. The effect of lycopene on antioxidant status in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) reared under high stocking density. Aquaculture. 2014. Jan 1;418:132–8. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.10.009 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Braun N, de Lima RL, Baldisserotto B, Dafre AL, de Oliveira Nuñer AP. Growth, biochemical and physiological responses of Salminus brasiliensis with different stocking densities and handling. Aquaculture. 2010. Mar 23;301(1–4):22–30. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.01.022 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Halliwell B, Gutteridge JM. Free radicals in biology and medicine. Oxford university press, USA; 2015. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=3DlKCgAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=Halliwell+and+Gutteridge,+2015&ots=bpnBcTxskU&sig=3hgUfdY2NiO9zp7klw_gjv5X4GQ#v=onepage&q=Halliwell%20and%20Gutteridge%2C%202015&f=false [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hamilton SJ. Review of selenium toxicity in the aquatic food chain. Science of the total environment. 2004. Jun 29;326(1–3):1–31. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.01.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rana T. Nano-selenium on reproduction and immunocompetence: an emerging progress and prospect in the productivity of poultry research. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2021. May;53(2):1–7. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11250-021-02698-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Buchman AL, Scolapio J, Fryer J. AGA technical review on short bowel syndrome and intestinal transplantation. Gastroenterol. 2003. Apr 1;124(4):1111–34. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5085(03)70064-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Le KT, Fotedar R, Partridge G. Selenium and vitamin E interaction in the nutrition of yellowtail kingfish (S eriola lalandi): physiological and immune responses. Aquaculture Nutrition. 2014. Jun;20(3):303–13. 10.1111/anu.12079 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Siddik MA, Vatsos IN, Rahman MA, Pham HD. Selenium-Enriched Spirulina (SeE-SP) Enhance Antioxidant Response, Immunity, and Disease Resistance in Juvenile Asian Seabass, Lates calcarifer. Antioxidants. 2022. Aug 14;11(8):1572. doi: 10.3390/antiox11081572 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Mehdi Y, Dufrasne I. Selenium in cattle: a review. Molecules. 2016. Apr 23;21(4):545. doi: 10.3390/molecules21040545 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Janz DM, DeForest DK, Brooks ML, Chapman PM, Gilron G, Hoff D, et al. Selenium toxicity to aquatic organisms. Ecological assessment of selenium in the aquatic environment. 2010. May 6:141–231. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=lFjRBQAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA141&dq=Janz,+D.M.,+DeForest,+D.K.,+Brooks,+M.L.,+Chapman,+P.M.,+Gilron,+G.,+Hoff,+D.,+Hopkins,+W.A.,+McIntyre,+D.O.,+Mebane,+C.A.,+Palace,+V.P.,+2010.+Selenium+toxicity+to+aquatic+organisms.+Ecological+assessment+of+selenium+in+the+aquatic+environment,+141231.&ots=_vBpfNW39_&sig=rCs98_kPz4Ujui8QKCuW-uXi1Bc#v=onepage&q&f=false [Google Scholar]
- 15.Fox TE, Van den Heuvel EG, Atherton CA, Dainty JR, Lewis DJ, Langford NJ, et al. Bioavailability of selenium from fish, yeast and selenate: a comparative study in humans using stable isotopes. European journal of clinical nutrition. 2004. Feb;58(2):343–9. https://www.nature.com/articles/1601787 doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601787 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Cotter PA, Craig SR, McLean E. Hyperaccumulation of selenium in hybrid striped bass: a functional food for aquaculture?. Aquaculture Nutrition. 2008. Jun;14(3):215–22. 10.1111/j.1365-2095.2007.00520.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jovanovic A, Grubor‐Lajsic G, Djukic N, Gardinovacki G, Matic A, Spasic M, et al. The effect of selenium on antioxidant system in erythrocytes and liver of the carp (Cyprinus carpio L.). Critical Reviews in Food Science & Nutrition. 1997. Aug 1;37(5):443–8. doi: 10.1080/10408399709527783 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wang Y, Han J, Li W, Xu Z. Effect of different selenium source on growth performances, glutathione peroxidase activities, muscle composition and selenium concentration of allogynogenetic crucian carp (Carassius auratus gibelio). Animal feed science and technology. 2007. Apr 2;134(3–4):243–51. 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.12.007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ibrahim MS, El‐gendy GM, Ahmed AI, Elharoun ER, Hassaan MS. Nanoselenium versus bulk selenium as a dietary supplement: Effects on growth, feed efficiency, intestinal histology, haemato‐biochemical and oxidative stress biomarkers in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus Linnaeus, 1758) fingerlings. Aquaculture Research. 2021. Nov;52(11):5642–55. 10.1111/are.15439 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kouba A, Velíšek J, Stará A, Masojídek J, Kozák P. Supplementation with sodium selenite and selenium-enriched microalgae biomass show varying effects on blood enzymes activities, antioxidant response, and accumulation in common barbel (Barbus barbus). BioMed research international. 2014. Feb 26;2014. 10.1155/2014/408270 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.AOAC Helrich K. "Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Arlington, VA: Off." Anal. Chem (1990) https://archive.org/details/gov.law.aoac.methods.1.1990 [Google Scholar]
- 22.Wang L, Xiao JX, Hua Y, Xiang XW, Zhou YF, Ye L, et al. Effects of dietary selenium polysaccharide on growth performance, oxidative stress and tissue selenium accumulation of juvenile black sea bream, Acanthopagrus schlegelii. Aquaculture. 2019. Mar 30;503:389–95. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2019.01.033 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Liu K, Wang XJ, Ai Q, Mai K, Zhang W. Dietary selenium requirement for juvenile cobia, Rachycentron canadum L. Aquaculture Research. 2010. Sep;41(10):e594–601. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2109.2010.02562.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Gaber H. Impact of certain heavy metals on the gill and liver of the Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Biology and Fisheries. 2007. Apr 1;11(2):79–100. https://ejabf.journals.ekb.eg/article_1936.html [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zhu GH, Lan YC, Wang H, Joshi G, Hao Q, Chen G, et al. Effect of selenium deficiency on the thermoelectric properties of n-type In 4 Se 3− x compounds. Physical Review B. 2011. Mar 4;83(11):115201. 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.115201 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Mateo RD, Spallholz JE, Elder R, Yoon I, Kim SW. Efficacy of dietary selenium sources on growth and carcass characteristics of growing-finishing pigs fed diets containing high endogenous selenium. Journal of animal science. 2007. May 1;85(5):1177–83. doi: 10.2527/jas.2006-067 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Du LC, Yu HR, Li LY, Zhang Q, Tian Q, Liu JQ, et al. Dietary selenium requirement of coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch W.) alevins. Aquaculture International. 2021. Oct;29(5):2291–304. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10499-021-00749-8 [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ferreira CM, Sinhorin VD, Netto GD, Hoshiba MA, de Abreu JS. Effects of hydroxy selenomethionine on performance, innate immune system and antioxidant defense of tambaqui (Colossoma macropomum) exposed to a physical stressor. Fish & Shellfish Immunology. 2022. Feb 1;121:362–9. 10.1016/j.fsi.2021.12.048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Surai PF, Kochish II, Fisinin VI, Velichko OA. Selenium in poultry nutrition: From sodium selenite to organic selenium sources. The journal of poultry science. 2018;55(2):79–93. doi: 10.2141/jpsa.0170132 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Khan KU, Zuberi A, Fernandes JB, Ullah I, Sarwar H. An overview of the ongoing insights in selenium research and its role in fish nutrition and fish health. Fish physiology and biochemistry. 2017. Dec;43(6):1689–705. doi: 10.1007/s10695-017-0402-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Zhou X, Wang Y, Gu Q, Li W. Effects of different dietary selenium sources (selenium nanoparticle and selenomethionine) on growth performance, muscle composition and glutathione peroxidase enzyme activity of crucian carp (Carassius auratus gibelio). Aquaculture. 2009. Jun 3;291(1–2):78–81. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2009.03.007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Le KT, Fotedar R. Bioavailability of selenium from different dietary sources in yellowtail kingfish (Seriola lalandi). Aquaculture. 2014. Jan 15;420:57–62. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2013.10.034 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Hao X, Ling Q, Hong F. Effects of dietary selenium on the pathological changes and oxidative stress in loach (Paramisgurnus dabryanus). Fish physiology and biochemistry. 2014. Oct;40(5):1313–23. doi: 10.1007/s10695-014-9926-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Gatta PP, Pirini M, Testi S, Vignola G, Monetti PG. The influence of different levels of dietary vitamin E on sea bass Dicentrarchus labrax flesh quality. Aquaculture Nutrition. 2000;6(1):47–52. https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/20001411285 [Google Scholar]
- 35.Safari O, Sarkheil M. Dietary administration of eryngii mushroom (Pleurotus eryngii) powder on haemato-immunological responses, bactericidal activity of skin mucus and growth performance of koi carp fingerlings (Cyprinus carpio koi). Fish & shellfish immunology. 2018. Sep 1;80:505–13. doi: 10.1016/j.fsi.2018.06.046 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Abdel-Daim MM, Dawood MA, Elbadawy M, Aleya L, Alkahtani S. Spirulina platensis reduced oxidative damage induced by chlorpyrifos toxicity in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus). Animals. 2020. Mar 12;10(3):473. doi: 10.3390/ani10030473 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Abdel-Tawwab M, Mousa MA, Abbass FE. Growth performance and physiological response of African catfish, Clarias gariepinus (B.) fed organic selenium prior to the exposure to environmental copper toxicity. Aquaculture. 2007. Nov 26;272(1–4):335–45. 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2007.09.004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]


