Skip to main content
PMC home page
Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma logoLink to Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
. 2022 Sep 15;9:1029–1040. doi: 10.2147/JHC.S380237

Circulating Non-Coding RNAs as Potential Diagnostic Biomarkers in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Tingsong Chen 1,✉
PMCID: PMC9484560  PMID: 36132427

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is currently the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with high morbidity and mortality. The clinical diagnosis of HCC mainly depends on imaging technology, such as ultrasound and computed tomography, and serum biomarkers, such as alpha-fetoprotein (AFP). However, HCC is still hard to diagnose at an early stage due to the low sensitivity of the above mentioned traditional methods. Typically, HCC is diagnosed at an advanced stage when limited treatment options are available. It is urgent to identify effective biomarkers for the early diagnosis of HCC. Increasing evidence uncovered ncRNAs, including microRNAs (miRNAs), long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), and circular RNAs (circRNAs), could be used in HCC diagnosis. The aim of this review is to summarize our understanding of circulating miRNAs, lncRNAs and circRNAs as fluid-based non-invasive biomarkers, and aiming at providing new insights into the diagnosis of HCC.

Keywords: hepatocellular carcinoma, microRNAs, long non-coding RNAs, circular RNAs, diagnosis

Introduction

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), one of the most common cancers worldwide, lists as a primary cause of cancer-related deaths globally.1 Currently, most patients with HCC grow into advanced stages after diagnosis, at which point the efficacy of radiotherapy and chemotherapy is limited and the time of surgical treatment was missed.2 Traditional imaging techniques including computed tomography (CT), positron emission computed tomography (PET) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are the most widely used screening tools for HCC;3 however, they have limited sensitivity and are less efficient for detecting early HCC.4 Moreover, as the most commonly used clinical serum biomarker for detection of HCC, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) also lacks the desired sensitivity and specificity for early diagnosis of HCC.5 It has been reported that the serum levels of AFP remain normal in up to 40% of the patients with HCC, particularly during the early stage.6 Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop clinical biomarkers for the detection of early-stage HCC.

Recently, there is extensive evidence suggesting that several circulating ncRNAs including microRNAs (miRNAs), long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), and circular RNAs (circRNAs) in body fluids, such as urine, plasma, serum or saliva, could be potential non-invasive biomarkers for the diagnosis of cancers.7,8 These cell-free ncRNAs in body fluids are proposed to be leaked from cells following cell injury and death or be secreted by extracellular vesicles, such as exosomes.9,10 Due to the fact that ncRNAs have highly specific expression among different tissues or diseases, circulating ncRNAs are considered to be tumor-specific.11,12

A growing body of research has illuminated that ncRNAs play essential roles in the occurrence and development of HCC.13 Abnormal expression of circulating ncRNAs in HCC may provide potential diagnostic biomarkers.14 In this review, we will summarize the available knowledge on the diagnostic potential of circulating miRNAs, lncRNAs and circRNAs in HCC, aiming at providing new insights into the diagnosis of HCC.

Origins of Circulating ncRNAs

  1. It has been demonstrated that circulating ncRNAs are packaged into various membrane-bound vesicles including exosomes and microvesicles, and apoptotic bodies.15

  2. Lipoproteins complexes such as high-density lipoprotein and RNA-binding proteins such argonaute 2 are known to be another sources of circulating ncRNAs.16

Advantages of ncRNAs as Potential Biomarkers

  1. ncRNAs exhibit high stability in the circulation. Circulating ncRNAs are stably maintained in diverse biological fluids including cerebrospinal fluid and peripheral serum/plasma due to their protection in exosomes, microvesicles, apoptotic bodies, and protein complexes.17 In terms of circRNAs, they have excellent stability owning to the covalently closed RNA circle without 5ʹ end caps or 3ʹ poly tails.18

  2. Circulating ncRNAs can be quantified, even at low amounts, by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) with high sensitivity, specificity, and high dynamic range, a technique readily available in clinical laboratories.19 Additionally, the global profiles of ncRNAs can be obtained in a single experiment using qRT-PCR panels, next-generation sequencing or microarrays.

  3. Circulating ncRNAs are known to have tissue-specific expression patterns and profound relationships to development and diseases.20

Detection Methods of Circulating ncRNAs

It has been reported that different sources of liquid biopsy including whole blood, plasma, and serum can be used to quantify circulating ncRNAs. Different approaches including qRT-PCR, RNA-sequencing, and microarray, have been developed to study ncRNA expression.

  1. The most commonly used method to detect the expression of specific ncRNAs is qRT-PCR. This method allows evaluation of the expression of a few specific molecules but do not permit the discovery of new ncRNAs or provide an overview of all ncRNAs.21

  2. RNA-sequencing is a high-throughput sequencing method which can be used to sequence the entire transcriptome, leading to the identification of new ncRNAs.22

  3. Microarray-based technique is another powerful high-throughput method extensively used for ncRNA profiling, because of their ability to screen large number of ncRNAs simultaneously in large variety of samples. However, microarrays use already known sequences, thus making them unsuitable for the discovery of novel ncRNAs.23,24

MiRNA Biomarkers

MiRNAs, a class of small non-coding RNAs with a length of 18–25 nucleotides, are endogenous and function as negative regulators of gene expression at the post-transcriptional level by promoting the degradation of messenger RNA (mRNA) or repressing its translation.25 It has been well demonstrated that miRNAs are secreted by cells through exosomes and extracellular vesicles, and secreted miRNAs remain stable in bodily fluids.26 Abnormal expression of miRNAs has been identified in various kinds of malignancies, which can function as oncogenes or tumor suppressors.27,28

Over the past several years, numerous studies have focused on exploring the possibility of circulating miRNAs as potential biomarkers for HCC diagnosis (Table 1). For example, it has been shown that the plasma miRNA-21 levels in the 126 patients with HCC were significantly increased than in patients with chronic hepatitis and healthy volunteers, respectively.29 ROC analysis showed that the area under the curve (AUC) of miRNA-21 in plasma was 0.773 with 61.1% sensitivity and 83.3% specificity in distinguishing patients with HCC from patients with chronic hepatitis; the AUC of miRNA-21 in plasma was 0.953 with 87.3% sensitivity and 92.0% specificity in distinguishing patients with HCC from patients with healthy volunteers.29 Recently, another study evaluated the diagnostic value of circulating levels of miRNA-9-3p in hepatitis C virus infection (HCV)-related HCC patients. The results showed that at a cutoff point of 1.01, miRNA-9-3p can discriminate between HCC patients and healthy volunteers with a sensitivity of 91.43% and a specificity of 87.50%.30 The performance of serum miRNA-224 as diagnostic biomarker for HCC at early stage has been assessed.31 The results of ROC analysis demonstrated that the AUC was 0.880 with 86.5% sensitivity and 76.7% specificity for serum miR-224 in discriminating early-stage HCC from all three controls (liver cirrhosis (LC), chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and healthy subjects), higher than that for AFP.31

Table 1.

Circulating miRNAs Serve as Potential Diagnostic Biomarkers for HCC

miRNAs Source Cohort Size Ethnic Population Detection Method of ncRNAs AUC Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Reference
miR-107 Serum 115 HCC vs 40 HC Chinese Microarray 0.730 [33]
miR-122 Plasma 40 HCC vs 20 HC Egyptian qRT-PCR 0.96 87.5 95 [35]
miR-122+AFP Plasma 40 HCC vs 40 CHC Egyptian qRT-PCR 1 97.5 100 [35]
miR-199a Serum 23 HCC vs.17 CH Egyptian qRT-PCR 0.856 54.5 100 [36]
miR-21 Plasma 126 HCC vs 30 CH Japanese qRT-PCR 0.773 61.1 83.3 [29]
miR-21 Plasma 126 HCC vs 50 HC Japanese qRT-PCR 0.953 87.3 92.0 [29]
miR-21 Serum 23 HCC vs.17 CH Egyptian qRT-PCR 0.943 100.0 81.2 [36]
miR-21+AFP Plasma 126 HCC vs 30 CH Japanese qRT-PCR 0.823 81.0 76.7 [29]
miR-21+AFP Plasma 126 HCC vs 50 HC Japanese qRT-PCR 0.971 92.9 90 [29]
miR-224 Plasma 40 HCC vs 20 HC Egyptian qRT-PCR 0.94 92.5 90 [35]
miR-224 Plasma 40 HCC vs 40 CHC Egyptian qRT-PCR 0.93 87.5 97 [35]
miR-224+AFP Plasma 40 HCC vs 40 CHC Egyptian qRT-PCR 0.93 90 100 [35]
miR-3126-5p Serum 115 HCC vs 40 HC Chinese Microarray 0.881 [33]
miR-34a Serum exosome 60 HCC vs 60 HC Chinese qRT-PCR 0.664 78.3 51.7 [37]
miR-34a+AFP Serum exosome 60 HCC vs 60 HC Chinese qRT-PCR 0.855 68.3 93.3 [37]
miR-424 Serum 123 HCC vs 76 HC Chinese qRT-PCR 0.768 75.0 72.4 [38]
miR-665 Serum 80 HCC vs 80 LC Egyptian qRT-PCR 0.930 92.5 86.3 [39]
miR-9-3p Serum 35 HCC vs 33 HCV Egyptian qRT-PCR 91.43 87.88 [30]
miR-9-3p Serum 35 HCC vs 32 HC Egyptian qRT-PCR 91.43 87.50 [30]
miR-92a-3p Serum 115 HCC vs 40 HC Chinese Microarray 0.705 [33]
miR-122 + miR-192 + miR-21 + miR-223 + miR-26a + miR-27a + miR-801 Plasma 204 HCC vs 60 LC + 75 CHB + 68 HC Chinese Microarray and qRT-PCR 0.864 68.6 90.1 [32]
miR-122 + miR-192 + miR-21 + miR-223 + miR-26a + miR-27a + miR-801 Plasma 196 HCC vs 56 LC + 72 CHB + 66 HC Chinese Microarray and qRT-PCR 0.888 81.8 83.5 [32]
miR-29a + miR-29c + miR-133a + miR143 + miR-145 + miR-192 + miR-505 Serum 108 HCC vs 47 LC + 51 CHB + 51 HC Chinese qRT-PCR 0.826 80.6 84.6 [34]
miR-29a + miR-29c + miR-133a + miR143 + miR-145 + miR-192 + miR-505 Serum 153 HCC vs 71 LC + 68 CHB + 60 HC Chinese qRT-PCR 0.817 74.5 88.9 [34]
miR-29a + miR-29c + miR-133a + miR143 + miR-145 + miR-192 + miR-505 Serum 49 HCC vs 42 IHC + 48 HC Chinese qRT-PCR 0.884 85.7 91.1 [34]
miR-29a + miR-29c + miR-133a + miR143 + miR-145 + miR-192 + miR-505 Serum Nested cohort: 568 samples from 135 CHB/LC vs 100 samples from 27 HCC Chinese qRT-PCR 0.670 55.6 78.5 [34]
Open in a new tab

Abbreviations: AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; AUC, area under the curve; CH, chronic hepatitis; CHB, chronic hepatitis B infection; CHC, chronic hepatitis C infection; HC, healthy control; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; HCV, hepatitis C virus infection; IHC, inactive HBsAg carrier; LC, liver cirrhosis.

Combining detection of different biomarkers has been reported to be a useful strategy due to the increased sensitivity and specificity of each biomarker. Consistently, several studies have evaluated the clinical value of miRNA panel for the early diagnosis of HCC. It has been shown that a miRNA panel (miR-122, miR-192, miR-21, miR-223, miR-26a, miR-27a and miR-801) can differentiate HCC from healthy (AUC 0.941), chronic hepatitis B (AUC 0.842), and cirrhosis (AUC 0.884), respectively.32 Similarly, another study has demonstrated that the unique 3-miRNA signature (miR-92a-3p, miR-107, and miR-3126-5p) combined with AFP can serve as a sensitive, specific, and noninvasive biomarker for the diagnosis of HCC, especially in the patients at early stages or with low AFP level.33 A large-scale, multicentre, retrospective longitudinal study has been conducted to assess the performance of serum miRNA for HCC detection.34 The results revealed that a seven-miRNA classifier (miR-29a, miR-29c, miR-133a, miR-143, miR-145, miR-192, and miR-505) had significantly higher sensitivity than AFP to distinguish patients with HCC from healthy controls, inactive HBsAg carriers, chronic hepatitis B patients, and patients with hepatitis B-induced liver cirrhosis.34

LncRNA Biomarkers

LncRNAs, a diverse class of ncRNAs, are defined as untranslated RNA molecules greater than 200 nucleotides in length with low protein-coding potential.40 Mounting evidence have suggested that lncRNAs play important roles in regulating gene expression at transcriptional, posttranscriptional and epigenetic levels in the development and progression of tumors.41,42 More importantly, aberrant signatures of lncRNAs are developed as the potential diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets of cancer due to their specific expression pattern in carcinomas.43,44

Recent studies have evaluated the possibility of circulating lncRNAs as diagnostic biomarkers for HCC (Table 2). Ma et al recruited a cohort of 146 participants including healthy volunteers (HVs) and patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB), cirrhosis and HCC, and investigated the potential use of circulating lncRNA differentiation antagonizing non-protein coding RNA (DANCR) in plasma as a diagnostic biomarker for HCC. The results showed that plasma DANCR exhibited significantly increased discriminatory power for differentiating patients with HCC from HVs and non-HCC patients compared to AFP.45 Similarly, another study showed that LINC00978 was upregulated in tissues and serum of HCC patients.46 The results of ROC analysis indicated that the upregulation of LINC00978 had a high diagnostic value to distinguish HCC patients from patients with hepatitis and liver cirrhosis and healthy controls.46 In addition, Zeng et al investigated the clinical value and functional role of lncRNA DQ786243 (lncDQ) in the pathogenesis of HCC.47 It has been found that serum lncDQ level could differentiate HCC patients from healthy controls, with an AUC of 0.804.

Table 2.

Circulating lncRNAs Serve as Potential Diagnostic Biomarkers for HCC

lncRNAs Source Cohort Size Ethnic Population Detection Method of ncRNAs AUC Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Reference
lnc00152 Plasma 66 HCC vs 53 HC Chinese qRT-PCR 0.850 [53]
lnc00152 + HULC Plasma 66 HCC vs 53 HC Chinese qRT-PCR 0.870 [53]
lnc00152 + HULC + AFP Plasma 66 HCC vs 53 HC Chinese qRT-PCR 0.890 [53]
lnc00853 Serum exosome 90 HCC vs 35 LC + 28 CH + 29 HC Korean qRT-PCR 0.935 83.3 89.8 [54]
lnc00853 + AFP Serum exosome 90 HCC vs 35 LC + 28 CH + 29 HC Korean qRT-PCR 0.969 93.8 89.8 [54]
lnc00974 Plasma Operation: 150 preoperative vs postoperative Chinese qRT-PCR 0.733 51.1 95.6 [55]
lnc00974 Plasma Tumor size (5 cm): 78 large vs 72 small Chinese qRT-PCR 0.755 67.5 83.5 [55]
lnc00974 Plasma Metastasis: 62 positive vs 88 negative Chinese qRT-PCR 0.791 68.5 89.6 [55]
lnc00978 Serum 58 HCC vs 49 CH/LC and 45 HC Chinese qRT-PCR 0.910 76.0 96.0 [46]
lnc01225 Serum 66 HCC vs 70 HC Chinese qRT-PCR 76.1 44.3 [56]
AF085935 Serum 137 HCC vs 104 CHB Chinese qRT-PCR 0.860 [57]
AF085935 Serum 137 HCC vs 138 HC Chinese qRT-PCR 0.960 [57]
DANCR Plasma 52 HCC vs 22 LC + 29 CHB + 43 HC Chinese qRT-PCR 0.868 83.8 72.7 [45]
DANCR Plasma 52 HCC vs 22 LC + 29 CHB Chinese qRT-PCR 0.864 80.8 84.3 [45]
DGCR5 Serum 60 HCC vs HC Chinese qRT-PCR 0.782 63.3 83.3 [58]
LncDQ Serum 50 HCC vs 30 HC Chinese qRT-PCR 0.804 72.0 80.0 [47]
lnc-GPR89B-15 Serum exosome 45 HCC vs 45 HC Chinese qRT-PCR 0.717 [59]
HULC Plasma 66 HCC vs 53 HC Chinese qRT-PCR 0.780 [53]
JPX Plasma 42 HCC vs 68 HC Chinese qRT-PCR 0.814 [50]
JPX + AFP Plasma 42 HCC vs 68 HC Chinese qRT-PCR 0.905 97.1 72.2 [50]
MALAT1 Plasma 88 HCC vs 28 CH Japanese qRT-PCR 0.660 51.1 89.3 [60]
MALAT1 + AFP + PIVKA II Plasma 88 HCC vs 28 CH Japanese qRT-PCR 88.6 75.0 [60]
PVT1 + uc002mbe.2 Serum 40 HCC vs 33 HC Chinese qRT-PCR 0.764 60.6 90.6 [61]
SPRY4-IT1 Plasma 60 HCC vs HC Chinese qRT-PCR 0.702 87.3 50.0 [48]
SPRY4-IT1 + AFP Plasma 60 HCC vs HC Chinese qRT-PCR 0.800 87.3 65.0 [48]
SPRY4-IT1 Plasma 60 HCC vs 85 CHB/LC Chinese qRT-PCR 0.611 43.5 86.7 [48]
SPRY4-IT1 Plasma 60 preoperative vs postoperative Chinese qRT-PCR 0.624 83.3 49.0 [48]
UBE2CP3 Serum 80 HCC vs 75 HC Chinese Microarray and qRT-PCR 0.839 [49]
UBE2CP3 + AFP Serum 80 HCC vs 75 HC Chinese Microarray and qRT-PCR 0.933 [49]
uc001ncr + AX800134 Serum 121 HCC vs 95 CHB + 137 HC Chinese Microarray and qRT-PCR 0.949 95.0 88.1 [42]
uc001ncr + AX800134 Serum 61 HCC vs 60 CHB + 60 HC Chinese Microarray and qRT-PCR 0.949 78.7 90.9 [42]
uc003wbd Serum 137 HCC vs 104 CHB Chinese qRT-PCR 0.700 [47]
uc003wbd Serum 137 HCC vs 138 HC Chinese qRT-PCR 0.860 [47]
UCA1 Serum 82 HCC vs 34 CHC + 44 HC Egyptian qRT-PCR 0.861 92.7 82.1 [41]
WRAP53 Serum 82 HCC vs 34 CHC + 44 HC Egyptian qRT-PCR 0.896 85.4 82.1 [41]
UCA1 + WRAP53 Serum 82 HCC vs 34 CHC + 44 HC Egyptian qRT-PCR 95.1 82.1 [41]
UCA1 + WRAP53 + AFP Serum 82 HCC vs 34 CHC + 44 HC Egyptian qRT-PCR 0.727 100.0 62.8 [41]
lnc-ZEB2-19 Serum exosome 45 HCC vs 45 HC Chinese qRT-PCR 0.852 [49]
Open in a new tab

Abbreviations: AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; AUC, area under the curve; CH, chronic hepatitis; CHB, chronic hepatitis B infection; CHC, chronic hepatitis C infection; HC, healthy control; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; LC, liver cirrhosis.

In terms of the combination of lncRNA and AFP, it has been reported that combination of lncRNA SPRY4 intronic transcript 1 (SPRY4-IT1) and AFP possessed a moderate ability for discrimination between HCC patients and controls.48 The AUC of the combined indicators (0.800) is higher than that of SPRY4-IT1 alone (0.702).48 More recently, it has been indicated that a combination of lncRNA ubiquitin conjugating enzyme E2 C pseudogene 3 (UBE2CP3) and AFP yielded an AUC of 0.933, which was improved as compared to lncRNA UBE2CP3 (0.839) or AFP (0.912) alone.49 Similarly, combination of lncRNA JPX and AFP possessed a promoted ability for discrimination between HCC patients and controls (AUC 0.905, 97.1% sensitivity, 72.2% specificity) compared to JPX alone (AUC 0.814, 100% sensitivity, 52.4% specificity).50

In terms of the panel of lncRNAs, Kamel et al demonstrated that the panel of serum lncRNA urothelial carcinoma associated-1 (lncRNA UCA1) and WD repeat containing, antisense to TP53 (WRAP53) is superior to the AFP in specificity for the diagnosis of patients with HCC.51 Moreover, a panel based on the expression of lncRNAs uc001ncr and AX800134 accurately diagnosed HBV-positive HCC from control.52 It is worth noting that the diagnostic performance of the panel remained high in patients with AFP ≤ 400 ng/mL or in patients with early HCC.52 Furthermore, a plasma panel of lncRNAs HULC and 00152 possessed a moderate ability to discrimination between HCC and control with an area under ROC value of 0.87.53

CircRNA Biomarkers

As a novel class of endogenous ncRNAs, circRNAs form covalently closed continuous loops without 3’ end poly (A) tails and 5’ end caps.62 Owing to the outstanding characteristics including high stability, abundant expression, tissue-specific expression pattern, and wide distribution in various body fluids, circRNAs have great potential as suitable biomarkers for disease diagnosis.63 Recently, several reports have shown the potential of circulating circRNAs as a clinical biomarker in HCC diagnosis (Table 3). It has been reported that the AUC for circ_104075 was 0.973 with a sensitivity of 96.0% and a specificity of 98.3% in distinguishing patients with HCC from patients with healthy controls.64 Moreover, plasma circSMARCA5 showed a high accuracy (AUC = 0.938, 0.853, 0.711) for diagnosing HCC from healthy controls, hepatitis and cirrhosis.65 It is worth noting that plasma circSMARCA5 presented a high accuracy (AUC = 0.847, 0.706) for detecting HCC with serum AFP below 200 ng/mL from those hepatitis and cirrhosis with AFP below 200 ng/mL.65 These results suggested that circSMARCA5 may serve as a potential diagnostic biomarker for HCC, especially in HCC patients with AFP blow the cutoff value.

Table 3.

Circulating circRNAs Serve as Potential Diagnostic Biomarkers for HCC

circRNAs Source Cohort Size Ethnic Population Detection Method of ncRNAs AUC Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) Reference
circ_0004277 Plasma exosome 60 HCC vs 60 HC Chinese qRT-PCR 0.816 58.3 96.7 [76]
circ_0028861 Serum exosome 56 HCC vs 57 HBV Chinese qRT-PCR 0.83 76.79 78.95 [72]
circ_0028861 Serum exosome HCC vs CIRR Chinese qRT-PCR 0.75 67.86 76.60 [72]
circ_0028861 Serum exosome HCC vs HBV + CIRR Chinese qRT-PCR 0.79 67.86 82.69 [72]
circ_0051443 Plasma exosome 60 HCC vs 60 HC Chinese qRT-PCR 0.809 [77]
circ_0070396 Plasma exosome 111 HCC vs 54 HC Chinese qRT-PCR 0.857 62.16 98.15 [73]
circ_0070396 Plasma exosome 111 HCC vs 50 CHB Chinese qRT-PCR 0.774 76.58 68 [73]
circ_0070396 Plasma exosome 111 HCC vs 58 cirrhosis Chinese qRT-PCR 0.661 46.85 81.03 [73]
circ_0072088 Serum exosome 50 HCC vs 50 HC Chinese qRT-PCR 0.899 [70]
circ_104075 Serum 101 HCC vs 60 HC Chinese qRT-PCR 0.973 96.0 98.3 [64]
circANTXR1 Serum exosome 70 HCC vs 50 HC Chinese qRT-PCR 0.760 [71]
circSMARCA5 Plasma 135 HCC vs HC Chinese qRT-PCR 0.938 86.7 89.3 [65]
circSMARCA5 Plasma 135 HCC vs 117 CH Chinese qRT-PCR 0.853 74.8 88.9 [65]
circSMARCA5 Plasma 135 HCC vs 143 LC Chinese qRT-PCR 0.711 77.0 63.6 [65]
circSMARCA5 + AFP Plasma 135 HCC vs HC Chinese qRT-PCR 0.992 100.0 100.0 [65]
circSMARCA5 + AFP Plasma 135 HCC vs 117 CH Chinese qRT-PCR 0.903 77.8 89.7 [65]
circSMARCA5 + AFP Plasma 135 HCC vs 143 LC Chinese qRT-PCR 0.858 71.9 83.2 [65]
circPTGR1 Serum 82 HCC vs 47 HC Chinese qRT-PCR [78]
circWHSC1 Serum exosome 50 HCC vs 35 HC Chinese qRT-PCR 0.869 [69]
circ_0000976 + circ_0007750 + circ_0139897 Plasma 158 HCC vs 50 LC + 52 CHB + 53 HC Chinese qRT-PCR 0.863 81.6 91.0 [74]
circ_0000976 + circ_0007750 + circ_0139897 Plasma 152 HCC vs 50 LC + 54 CHB + 50 HC Chinese qRT-PCR 0.843 87.5 81.2 [74]
circ_0000976 + circ_0007750 + circ_0139897 Plasma 290 HCC vs 80 LC + 82 CHB + 76 HC Chinese qRT-PCR 0.864 85.5 87.3 [74]
circ_0000976 + circ_0007750 + circ_0139897 + AFP Plasma 158 HCC vs 50 LC + 52 CHB + 53 HC Chinese qRT-PCR 0.878 91.8 83.9 [74]
circ_0000976 + circ_0007750 + circ_0139897 + AFP Plasma 152 HCC vs 50 LC + 54 CHB + 50 HC Chinese qRT-PCR 0.863 92.8 79.9 [74]
circ_0000976 + circ_0007750 + circ_0139897 + AFP Plasma 290 HCC vs 80 LC + 82 CHB + 76 HC Chinese qRT-PCR 0.874 91.7 83.1 [74]
circ_0004001 Serum exosome 21 HCC vs 32 HC Chinese qRT-PCR 0.79 76.19 81.25 [75]
circ_0004123 Serum exosome 21 HCC vs 32 HC Chinese qRT-PCR 0.73 66.67 84.38 [75]
circ_0075792 Serum exosome 21 HCC vs 32 HC Chinese qRT-PCR 0.76 80.95 68.75 [75]
circ_0004001+ circ_0004123+ circ_0075792 Serum exosome 21 HCC vs 32 HC Chinese qRT-PCR 0.89 90.5 78.1 [75]
Open in a new tab

Abbreviations: AFP, alpha-fetoprotein; AUC, area under the curve; CH, chronic hepatitis; CHB, chronic hepatitis B infection; CIRR, cirrhosis; HBV, hepatitis B virus; HC, healthy control; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; LC, liver cirrhosis.

Exosomes, a specific subtype of extracellular vesicles of 30–150 nm, secreted by almost all types of cells and widely distributed in body fluids, including blood.66 As an important carrier of cell-to-cell signal transmission, exosomes carry a variety of important signal molecules such as proteins, nucleic acids and lipids, and are closely related to the development and occurrence of many disease processes, especially in cancer.67 Recent studies have indicated that circRNAs are enriched and stable in exosomes and exosomal circRNAs show great potential as biomarkers in human diseases.68 ROC curve analysis revealed that serum exosomal circWHSC1,69 circ_0072088,70 and circANTXR171 exhibited a potential diagnostic value for discriminating patients with HCC from healthy controls, respectively. Moreover, several studies have focused on distinguishing patients with HCC from patients with benign liver diseases by exosomal circRNAs. It has been demonstrated that the AUC for serum exosomal circ_0028861 was 0.79 for discriminating HCC from chronic HBV and cirrhosis individuals.72 Similarly, plasma exosomal circ_0070396 could discriminate HCC individuals from patients with chronic hepatitis B and liver cirrhosis.73

The ability of a combined panel of circRNAs to discriminate HCC patients has also been evaluated. It has been identified that a plasma circRNA panel (circPanel) containing three circRNAs (circ_0000976, circ_0007750 and circ_0139897) could detect HCC patients in three sets from three hospitals in China.74 Specifically, circPanel showed a higher accuracy than AFP to distinguish individuals with HCC from controls with AUCs of 0.843–0.864.74 Notably, circPanel also performed well in detecting small-HCC (solitary, ≤3 cm), AFP-negative HCC and AFP-negative Small-HCC.74 Another study has investigated the differentially expressed circRNAs in human blood exosomes from patients with HCC and investigated their diagnostic value.75 The results showed that the AUCs of serum exosomal circ_0004001, circ_0004123, and circ_0075792 were 0.79, 0.73, and 0.76 with adequate sensitivity and specificity in discriminating HCC patients from the healthy controls.75 Combination of these circRNAs considerably improved the AUC value (0.89), sensitivity and specificity, suggesting that the three circRNA signatures could be utilized as a diagnostic biomarker in HCC.75

Future Directions

  1. Although aberrant expression profiles of circulating ncRNAs in patients with HCC have been well demonstrated in numerous studies, the sample size is relative small and further confirmation with large-sample, multicentre, prospective clinical trial is needed in the future.

  2. Current studies on the abnormal expressions of circulating ncRNAs in patients with HCC are all cross-sectional, the dynamic change of circulating ncRNAs levels during the progression of the disease has not been reported.

  3. Although accumulating evidence has detailed the close relationship between HCC and ncRNAs, little is known about the causal relationship between them.

  4. There are no universally accepted methods and assays for measuring the levels of circulating ncRNAs, which might result in the lack of consistency in various studies. Therefore, the methodology of the detection of circulating ncRNAs levels needs to be standardized for future clinical use.

Conclusions

With the development of high-throughput technologies, a large number of biologically functional ncRNAs have now been identified. Accumulating evidence has indicated that ncRNAs can be used as novel biomarkers for the diagnosis and screening of diseases due to the molecular characteristics. Although the above described circulating ncRNAs have adequate sensitivity and specificity in discriminating patients with HCC, it is necessary to cross-check and validate these markers with various cohorts of patients representing high variabilities of HCCs, including patients with different etiologies, HCC cellular profiles, and stages of cancer.

Acknowledgments

The present study was supported by the Shanghai Municipal Health Commission (No. 202040180 and 202040187).

Disclosure

The author declares that there are no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

  • 1.Akinyemiju T, Abera S, Ahmed M, et al. The burden of primary liver cancer and underlying etiologies from 1990 to 2015 at the global, regional, and national level: results from the global burden of disease study 2015. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3(12):1683–1691. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.3055 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Yan T, Yu L, Zhang N, et al. The advanced development of molecular targeted therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Biol Med. 2022;19:1–16. doi: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2021.0661 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Jiang H, Chen J, Xia C, Cao L, Duan T, Song B. Noninvasive imaging of hepatocellular carcinoma: from diagnosis to prognosis. World J Gastroenterol. 2018;24(22):2348–2362. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v24.i22.2348 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lo E, Rucker A, Federle M. Hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: imaging for diagnosis, tumor response to treatment and liver response to radiation. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2018;28(4):267–276. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2018.06.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Sun W, Liu Y, Shou D, et al. AFP (alpha fetoprotein): who are you in gastrology? Cancer Lett. 2015;357(1):43–46. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2014.11.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Daniele B, Bencivenga A, Megna A, Tinessa V. Alpha-fetoprotein and ultrasonography screening for hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2004;127:S108–112. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.09.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Anfossi S, Babayan A, Pantel K, Calin G. Clinical utility of circulating non-coding RNAs - an update. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2018;15(9):541–563. doi: 10.1038/s41571-018-0035-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Grimaldi A, Zarone M, Irace C, et al. Non-coding RNAs as a new dawn in tumor diagnosis. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2018;78:37–50. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.07.035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Southwood D, Singh S, Chatterton Z. Brain-derived cell-free DNA. Neural Regener Res. 2022;17(10):2213–2214. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.335794 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cinque A, Vago R, Trevisani F. Circulating RNA in kidney cancer: what we know and what we still suppose. Genes. 2021;12(6):835. doi: 10.3390/genes12060835 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Esteller M. Non-coding RNAs in human disease. Nat Rev Genet. 2011;12(12):861–874. doi: 10.1038/nrg3074 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wang W, Han C, Sun Y, Chen T, Chen Y. Noncoding RNAs in cancer therapy resistance and targeted drug development. J Hematol Oncol. 2019;12(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s13045-019-0748-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zhou H, Xu Q, Ni C, et al. Prospects of noncoding RNAs in hepatocellular carcinoma. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:6579436. doi: 10.1155/2018/6579436 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Song T, Li L, Wu S, et al. Peripheral blood genetic biomarkers for the early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Front Oncol. 2021;11:583714. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.583714 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wang J, Wang X, Song Y, et al. Circulating noncoding RNAs have a promising future acting as novel biomarkers for colorectal cancer. Dis Markers. 2019;2019:2587109. doi: 10.1155/2019/2587109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Butz H. Circulating noncoding RNAs in pituitary neuroendocrine tumors-two sides of the same coin. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(9):5122. doi: 10.3390/ijms23095122 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Videira R, da Costa Martins P, Falcão-Pires I. Non-coding RNAs as blood-based biomarkers in cardiovascular disease. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(23):9285. doi: 10.3390/ijms21239285 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Xu Y, Chen F. Current status of functional studies on circular RNAs in rheumatoid arthritis and their potential role as diagnostic biomarkers. J Inflamm Res. 2021;14:1185–1193. doi: 10.2147/JIR.S302846 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Carballo-Perich L, Puigoriol-Illamola D, Bashir S, et al. Clinical parameters and epigenetic biomarkers of plaque vulnerability in patients with carotid stenosis. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(9):5149. doi: 10.3390/ijms23095149 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kuo M, Liu S, Hsu Y, Wu R. The role of noncoding RNAs in Parkinson’s disease: biomarkers and associations with pathogenic pathways. J Biomed Sci. 2021;28(1):78. doi: 10.1186/s12929-021-00775-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Villa C, Stoccoro A. Epigenetic peripheral biomarkers for early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Genes. 2022;13(8):1308. doi: 10.3390/genes13081308 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Mortazavi A, Williams B, McCue K, Schaeffer L, Wold B. Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq. Nat Methods. 2008;5(7):621–628. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1226 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Schena M, Shalon D, Davis R, Brown P. Quantitative monitoring of gene expression patterns with a complementary DNA microarray. Science. 1995;270(5235):467–470. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5235.467 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Irfan J, Febrianto M, Sharma A, et al. DNA methylation and non-coding RNAs during tissue-injury associated pain. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(2):752. doi: 10.3390/ijms23020752 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Li Z, Rana T. Therapeutic targeting of microRNAs: current status and future challenges. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2014;13(8):622–638. doi: 10.1038/nrd4359 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mohr A, Mott J. Overview of microRNA biology. Semin Liver Dis. 2015;35(1):3–11. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1397344 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tang S, Li S, Liu T, et al. MicroRNAs: emerging oncogenic and tumor-suppressive regulators, biomarkers and therapeutic targets in lung cancer. Cancer Lett. 2021;502:71–83. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2020.12.040 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Babaei K, Shams S, Keymoradzadeh A, et al. An insight of microRNAs performance in carcinogenesis and tumorigenesis; an overview of cancer therapy. Life Sci. 2020;240:117077. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2019.117077 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Tomimaru Y, Eguchi H, Nagano H, et al. Circulating microRNA-21 as a novel biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2012;56(1):167–175. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2011.04.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Wahb A, El Kassas M, Khamis A, Elhelbawy M, Elhelbawy N, Habieb M. Circulating microRNA 9-3p and serum endocan as potential biomarkers for hepatitis C virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Hepatol. 2021;13(11):1753–1765. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v13.i11.1753 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lin L, Lu B, Yu J, Liu W, Zhou A. Serum miR-224 as a biomarker for detection of hepatocellular carcinoma at early stage. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2016;40(4):397–404. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2015.11.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zhou J, Yu L, Gao X, et al. Plasma microRNA panel to diagnose hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(36):4781–4788. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2011.38.2697 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Zhang Y, Li T, Qiu Y, et al. Serum microRNA panel for early diagnosis of the onset of hepatocellular carcinoma. Medicine. 2017;96(2):e5642. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005642 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Lin X, Chong Y, Guo Z, et al. A serum microRNA classifier for early detection of hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicentre, retrospective, longitudinal biomarker identification study with a nested case-control study. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(7):804–815. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00048-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Amr K, Elmawgoud Atia H, Elazeem Elbnhawy R, Ezzat W. Early diagnostic evaluation of miR-122 and miR-224 as biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma. Genes Dis. 2017;4(4):215–221. doi: 10.1016/j.gendis.2017.10.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Amr K, Ezzat W, Elhosary Y, Hegazy A, Fahim H, Kamel R. The potential role of miRNAs 21 and 199-a in early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gene. 2016;575(1):66–70. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2015.08.038 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Chen S, Mao Y, Chen W, et al. Serum exosomal miR-34a as a potential biomarker for the diagnosis and prognostic of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Cancer. 2022;13(5):1410–1417. doi: 10.7150/jca.57205 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Yang C, Du P, Lu W. MiR-424 acts as a novel biomarker in the diagnosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Biother Radiopharm. 2021. doi: 10.1089/cbr.2020.4141 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Mohamed A, Omar A, El-Awady R, et al. MiR-155 and MiR-665 role as potential non-invasive biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma in Egyptian patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection. J Transl Intern Med. 2020;8(1):32–40. doi: 10.2478/jtim-2020-0006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Shaath H, Vishnubalaji R, Elango R, et al. Long non-coding RNA and RNA-binding protein interactions in cancer: experimental and machine learning approaches. Semin Cancer Biol. 2022. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2022.05.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Yang J, Liu F, Wang Y, Qu L, Lin A. LncRNAs in tumor metabolic reprogramming and immune microenvironment remodeling. Cancer Lett. 2022;543:215798. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2022.215798 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Yao R, Wang Y, Chen L. Cellular functions of long noncoding RNAs. Nat Cell Biol. 2019;21(5):542–551. doi: 10.1038/s41556-019-0311-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Chi Y, Wang J, Wang J, Yu W, Yang J. Long non-coding RNA in the pathogenesis of cancers. Cells. 2019;8(9):1015. doi: 10.3390/cells8091015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Nandwani A, Rathore S, Datta M. LncRNAs in cancer: regulatory and therapeutic implications. Cancer Lett. 2021;501:162–171. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2020.11.048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ma X, Wang X, Yang C, et al. DANCR acts as a diagnostic biomarker and promotes tumor growth and metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Anticancer Res. 2016;36(12):6389–6398. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.11236 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Xu X, Gu J, Ding X, et al. LINC00978 promotes the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma by regulating EZH2-mediated silencing of p21 and E-cadherin expression. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10(10):752. doi: 10.1038/s41419-019-1990-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Zeng B, Lin Z, Ye H, et al. Upregulation of LncDQ is associated with poor prognosis and promotes tumor progression via epigenetic regulation of the EMT pathway in HCC. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018;46(3):1122–1133. doi: 10.1159/000488841 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Jing W, Gao S, Zhu M, et al. Potential diagnostic value of lncRNA SPRY4-IT1 in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncol Rep. 2016;36(2):1085–1092. doi: 10.3892/or.2016.4859 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Cao S, Huang J, Chen J, et al. Long non-coding RNA UBE2CP3 promotes tumor metastasis by inducing epithelial-mesenchymal transition in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2017;8(39):65370–65385. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.18524 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Ma W, Wang H, Jing W, et al. Downregulation of long non-coding RNAs JPX and XIST is associated with the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol. 2017;41(2):163–170. doi: 10.1016/j.clinre.2016.09.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Kamel M, Matboli M, Sallam M, Montasser I, Saad A, El-Tawdi A. Investigation of long noncoding RNAs expression profile as potential serum biomarkers in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Transl Res. 2016;168:134–145. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2015.10.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Wang K, Guo W, Li N, et al. Serum LncRNAs profiles serve as novel potential biomarkers for the diagnosis of HBV-positive hepatocellular carcinoma. PLoS One. 2015;10(12):e0144934. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144934 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Li J, Wang X, Tang J, et al. HULC and Linc00152 act as novel biomarkers in predicting diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2015;37(2):687–696. doi: 10.1159/000430387 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kim S, Baek G, Ahn H, et al. Serum small extracellular vesicle-derived LINC00853 as a novel diagnostic marker for early hepatocellular carcinoma. Mol Oncol. 2020;14(10):2646–2659. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12745 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Tang J, Zhuo H, Zhang X, et al. A novel biomarker Linc00974 interacting with KRT19 promotes proliferation and metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell Death Dis. 2014;5:e1549. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2014.518 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Wang X, Zhang W, Tang J, et al. LINC01225 promotes occurrence and metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma in an epidermal growth factor receptor-dependent pathway. Cell Death Dis. 2016;7:e2130. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2016.26 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Lu J, Xie F, Geng L, Shen W, Sui C, Yang J. Investigation of serum lncRNA-uc003wbd and lncRNA-AF085935 expression profile in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and HBV. Tumour Biol. 2015;36(5):3231–3236. doi: 10.1007/s13277-014-2951-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Huang R, Wang X, Zhang W, et al. Down-regulation of LncRNA DGCR5 correlates with poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell Physiol Biochem. 2016;40:707–715. doi: 10.1159/000452582 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Yao Z, Jia C, Tai Y, et al. Serum exosomal long noncoding RNAs lnc-FAM72D-3 and lnc-EPC1-4 as diagnostic biomarkers for hepatocellular carcinoma. Aging. 2020;12(12):11843–11863. doi: 10.18632/aging.103355 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Konishi H, Ichikawa D, Yamamoto Y, et al. Plasma level of metastasis-associated lung adenocarcinoma transcript 1 is associated with liver damage and predicts development of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Sci. 2016;107(2):149–154. doi: 10.1111/cas.12854 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Yu J, Han J, Zhang J, et al. The long noncoding RNAs PVT1 and uc002mbe.2 in sera provide a new supplementary method for hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis. Medicine. 2016;95(31):e4436. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004436 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Chen L, Yang L. Regulation of circRNA biogenesis. RNA Biol. 2015;12(4):381–388. doi: 10.1080/15476286.2015.1020271 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Zhang Z, Yang T, Xiao J. Circular RNAs: promising biomarkers for human diseases. EBioMedicine. 2018;34:267–274. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.07.036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Zhang X, Xu Y, Qian Z, et al. circRNA_104075 stimulates YAP-dependent tumorigenesis through the regulation of HNF4a and may serve as a diagnostic marker in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9(11):1091. doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-1132-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Li Z, Zhou Y, Yang G, et al. Using circular RNA SMARCA5 as a potential novel biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma. Clinica chimica acta. 2019;492:37–44. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2019.02.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Raposo G, Stoorvogel W. Extracellular vesicles: exosomes, microvesicles, and friends. J Cell Biol. 2013;200(4):373–383. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201211138 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Milman N, Ginini L, Gil Z. Exosomes and their role in tumorigenesis and anticancer drug resistance. Drug Resist Updates. 2019;45:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.drup.2019.07.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Tuo B, Chen Z, Dang Q, et al. Roles of exosomal circRNAs in tumour immunity and cancer progression. Cell Death Dis. 2022;13(6):539. doi: 10.1038/s41419-022-04949-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Lyu P, Zhai Z, Hao Z, Zhang H, He J. CircWHSC1 serves as an oncogene to promote hepatocellular carcinoma progression. Eur J Clin Invest. 2021;51(6):e13487. doi: 10.1111/eci.13487 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Lin Y, Zheng Z, Wang J, Zhao Z, Peng T. Tumor cell-derived exosomal Circ-0072088 suppresses migration and invasion of hepatic carcinoma cells through regulating MMP-16. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021;9:726323. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.726323 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Huang C, Yu W, Wang Q, Huang T, Ding Y. CircANTXR1 contributes to the malignant progression of hepatocellular carcinoma by promoting proliferation and metastasis. J Hepatocell Carcinoma. 2021;8:1339–1353. doi: 10.2147/JHC.S317256 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Wang Y, Pei L, Yue Z, Jia M, Wang H, Cao L. The potential of serum exosomal hsa_circ_0028861 as the novel diagnostic biomarker of HBV-derived hepatocellular cancer. Front Genet. 2021;12:703205. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.703205 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Lyu L, Yang W, Yao J, et al. hsa_circ_0070396The diagnostic value of plasma exosomal for hepatocellular carcinoma. Biomark Med. 2021;15(5):359–371. doi: 10.2217/bmm-2020-0476 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Yu J, Ding W, Wang M, et al. Plasma circular RNA panel to diagnose hepatitis B virus-related hepatocellular carcinoma: a large-scale, multicenter study. Int J Cancer. 2020;146(6):1754–1763. doi: 10.1002/ijc.32647 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Sun X, Wang Y, Li G, Zhang N, Fan L. Serum-derived three-circRNA signature as a diagnostic biomarker for hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Cell Int. 2020;20:226. doi: 10.1186/s12935-020-01302-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Zhu C, Su Y, Liu L, Wang S, Liu Y, Wu J. Circular RNA hsa_circ_0004277 stimulates malignant phenotype of hepatocellular carcinoma and epithelial-mesenchymal transition of peripheral cells. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2020;8:585565. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.585565 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Chen W, Quan Y, Fan S, et al. Exosome-transmitted circular RNA hsa_circ_0051443 suppresses hepatocellular carcinoma progression. Cancer Lett. 2020;475:119–128. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2020.01.022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Wang G, Liu W, Zou Y, et al. Three isoforms of exosomal circPTGR1 promote hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis via the miR449a-MET pathway. EBioMedicine. 2019;40:432–445. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.12.062 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma are provided here courtesy of Dove Press

RESOURCES