Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2022 Sep 19;17(9):e0266155. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266155

Demographic and clinical profile of black patients with chronic kidney disease attending a tertiary hospital in Johannesburg, South Africa

Alfred Meremo 1,2,*, Graham Paget 1, Raquel Duarte 1, Caroline Dickens 1, Therese Dix-Peek 1, Deogratius Bintabara 3, Saraladevi Naicker 1
Editor: Kanhaiya Singh4
PMCID: PMC9484689  PMID: 36121812

Abstract

Background

The prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is increasing worldwide; black patients have an increased risk of developing CKD and end stage kidney disease (ESKD) at significantly higher rates than other races.

Methods

A cross sectional study was carried out on black patients with CKD attending the kidney outpatient clinic at Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital (CMJAH) in South Africa, between September 2019 to March 2020. Demographic and clinical data were extracted from the ongoing kidney outpatient clinic records and interviews, and were filled in a questionnaire. Patients provided blood and urine for laboratory investigations as standard of care, and data were descriptively and inferentially entered into REDcap and analysed using STATA version 17. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify demographic and clinical variables associated with advanced CKD.

Results

A total of 312 black patients with CKD were enrolled in the study with a median age of 58 (IQR 46–67) years; 58% patients had advanced CKD, 31.5% of whom had grossly increased proteinuria, 96.7% had hypertension, 38.7% had diabetes mellitus and 38.1% had both hypertension and diabetes mellitus. In patients with advanced CKD, the median age was 61 (IQR 51–69) years, eGFR 33 (30–39) mL/min/1.73 m2, serum bicarbonate 22 (IQR 20–24), haemoglobin 12.9 (IQR 11.5–14.0) g/dl and serum uric acid 0.43 (IQR 0.37–0.53). The prevalence of metabolic acidosis was 62.4%, anemia 46.4% and gout 30.9% among those with advanced CKD, while the prevalence of metabolic acidosis and anaemia was 46.6% and 25.9% respectively in those with early CKD. Variables with higher odds for advanced CKD after multivariable logistic regression analysis were hypertension (OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.2–9.2, P = 0.020), diabetes mellitus (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1–3.3, P = 0.024), severe proteinuria (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.9–6.5, P = 0.001), angina (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.2–5.1, P = 0.008), anaemia (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.7–4.9, P = 0.001), hyperuricemia (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.4–4.1, P = 0.001), and metabolic acidosis (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2–3.1, P = 0.005). Other associations with advanced CKD were loss of spouse (widow/widower) (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.4–7.4, P = 0.006), low transferrin (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.1–5.1, P = 0.028), hyperkalemia (OR 5.4, 95% CI 1.2–24.1, P = 0.029), use of allopurinol (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.4–4.3, P = 0.005) and doxazosin (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.2–3.1, P = 0.006).

Conclusion

Hypertension and diabetes mellitus were strongly associated with advanced CKD, suggesting a need for primary and secondary population-based prevention measures. Metabolic acidosis, anemia with low transferrin levels, hyperuricemia and hyperkalemia were highly prevalent in our patients, including those with early CKD, and they were strongly associated with advanced CKD, requiring clinicians and dietitians to be proactive in supporting the needs of CKD patients in meeting their daily dietary requirements towards preventing and slowing the progression of CKD.

Introduction

Chronic kidney disease (CKD), defined as decreased kidney function identified by glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of less than 60 mL/min per 1·73 m2, or markers of kidney damage, or both, of at least 3 months duration, regardless of the underlying cause [1], is a major public health issue worldwide and contributes immensely to the overall non-communicable disease (NCD) burden, with NCDs also contributing to the burden of CKD [2, 3]. Chronic kidney disease is usually asymptomatic until the more advanced stages and accurate prevalence data are lacking in most regions including sub-Saharan Africa [4]. As the prevalence of CKD is increasing worldwide and consequently the demand for kidney replacement therapy (KRT), the incidence of cardiovascular events and death is also increasing [5, 6]. Recent systematic reviews have reported the prevalence of CKD to be 15.8% in Africa, similar to other continents, constituting a true public health need with major cost implications to healthcare systems [1, 7]. Diabetes mellitus and hypertension are the leading causes of CKD worldwide; and in sub-Saharan Africa, hypertension is the leading cause of CKD [8, 9]. Studies have shown that African-Americans have a 2- to 4-fold greater risk for end stage kidney disease (ESKD) requiring renal replacement therapy than their white counterparts [10, 11]. Individuals of black ethnicity due to their genetics, including the presence of APOL1 high-risk genotypes, are at higher risk of death due to CKD as a result of social, economic and medical causes [12, 13]. African ancestry has been associated with higher serum creatinine levels, lower eGFR estimates and more rapid CKD progression [14, 15]. In addition to the known risk factors for advanced CKD, which are age, male sex, black race, arterial hypertension and proteinuria, other modifiable factors including medications (traditional and herbal), hyperuricemia, hyperlipidemia, elevated phosphate levels, heart failure and anemia are common in CKD at later stages [16, 17]. Metabolic acidosis increases with worsening eGFR, with prevalence of around 40% among patients with CKD stage 4 and it is associated with rapid CKD progression [18, 19]. Anaemia is common in CKD and is frequently associated with poor outcomes, including increased cardiovascular risks, hospitalization, decreased quality of life and increased risk of mortality [20, 21]. Hyperuricemia greatly contributes to the development of CKD and its progression, it appears that increasing uric acid levels increase the risk for CKD development by causing inflammation, endothelial cell injury and activation of the renin-angiotensin system [22, 23]. Hyperkalemia is also common in advanced CKD; its prevalence increases with decreasing eGFR and it is significantly associated with faster CKD progression [24, 25]. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine the demographic and clinical profile of black patients with CKD attending Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital (CMJAH) in Johannesburg, South Africa.

Methods

Study design, population and settings

This was a cross-sectional study to evaluate the demographic and clinical profile of black patients with CKD attending the kidney outpatient department (KOPD) clinic at CMJAH between September 2019 to March 2020. The CMJAH is a public accredited central hospital with 1088 beds serving patients from across the Gauteng province and nearby provinces in South Africa, CMJAH is also the main teaching hospital for The University of the Witwatersrand, faculty of Health Sciences. Johannesburg is the largest city in South Africa and among the largest 50 urban agglomerations in the world. Johannesburg had an estimated population of around 5.9 million in 2021, the most common racial groups include; black African (76.4%), colored (5.6%), White (12.3%) and Indian/Asian (4.9%).

Inclusion criteria included patients who were >18 years of age, CKD stages 1–4, who had controlled hypertension (blood pressure < 140/90 mm Hg) and diabetes mellitus (HbA1C < 7%), attending the KOPD clinic for at least 6 months and were able to provide informed consent. Patients who had active infections, active malignancies, autoimmune diseases and who were not black were excluded, black patients have an increased risk of developing CKD and end stage kidney disease (ESKD) at significantly higher rates than other races [13, 15].

Data collection and laboratory procedures

Demographic and clinical data including age, gender, weight, height, glycemic status, history of smoking, etiology of CKD and medications were extracted from the ongoing continuous KOPD clinic records and face to face interviews, and were filled in a questionnaire. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure was measured 3 times, the average of the second and third measurements was used. Body mass index (BMI) was calculated using the National Health Services (NHS-UK) BMI calculator [26]. Measurements of urinary protein creatinine ratio (uPCR), serum creatinine, electrolytes, HbA1C, WBC, haemoglobin level, platelets, calcium, phosphate, transferrin and HDL cholesterol were done as standard of care at the time of recruitment during a clinic visit. Serum creatinine was measured using the isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS) traceable enzymatic assay and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation without using the African American correction factor [27]. Patients with eGFR < 45 ml/min/1.72m2 were considered to have advanced CKD, while those patients with eGFR ≥ 45 ml/min/1.72m2 early CKD.

Data management and analysis

Study data were collected and entered into REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) tools [28, 29] hosted at the University of the Witwatersrand and analyzed using STATA version 17 (College Station, Texas, USA). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize demographic and clinical characteristics; continuous variables have been reported as medians with interquartile ranges and Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used for the non-normally distributed variables. Discrete variables have been reported as frequencies and proportions, Pearson’s chi-square test were used to test for association between two variables. Odd ratios were used to estimate the strength of association between variables and advanced CKD, univariate and multivariate logistic regression models have been used to estimate the association of variables and advanced CKD. Variables with p-value less than 0.2 on univariate logistic regression models were then fitted into the multivariate logistic regression models with the addition of age and sex as adjusting variables; variables with a p-value of less than 0.05 were considered to have significant strength of association.

Ethical issues

Ethical approval was obtained from the Human Research Ethics Committee of the University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg (ethics clearance certificate No. M190553). Written informed consent was obtained from each of the participants before embarking on data collection.

Results

Demographic and clinical characteristics of the study population

Of the 476 black patients with CKD stages 1–4, 164 patients were excluded from the study including 110 patients who had uncontrolled hypertension, 35 patients who had uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, 11 patients had autoimmune diseases, 6 patients had active infections and 2 patients had active malignancies. A total of 312 CKD black patients were enrolled into this study, of whom 162 (51.9%) were male, 292 (93.6%) were hypertensive, 103 (33.0%) were diabetic and 164 (52.6%) were married. The median age was 61 (IQR 51–69) years for advanced CKD and 53 (IQR 41–62) years for early CKD; the median eGFR was 33 (30–39) mL/min/1.73 m2 for advanced CKD and 60 (IQR 51–75) mL/min/1.73 m2 for early CKD; the median urine protein creatinine ratio (uPCR) was 0.029 (IQR 0.015–0.67) g/mmol for advanced CKD and 0.016 (IQR 0.008–0.034) g/mmol for early CKD. The median serum bicarbonate was 22 (IQR 20–24) mmol/L for advanced CKD and 23 (IQR 21–25) mmol/L for early CKD; the median haemoglobin (Hb) was 12.9 (IQR 11.5–14.0) g/dl for advanced CKD and 13.8 (IQR 12.4–15.7) g/dl for early CKD; the median serum transferrin was 2.44 (IQR 2.23–2.73) g/L for advanced CKD and 2.62 (IQR 2.37–2.89) g/L for early CKD. The median serum uric acid was 0.43 (IQR 0.37–0.53) mmol/L for advanced CKD and 0.36 (IQR 0.30–0.46) mmol/L for early CKD (Table 1).

Table 1. Demographic characteristics and clinical profile of 312 CKD patients by eGFR.

Characteristic eGFR < 45 ml/min/1.72m2 (n = 181) eGFR ≥ 45 ml/min/1.72m2 (n = 131) P-value
Proportion (%) or Median (IQR) Proportion (%) or Median (IQR)
Age (years) 61 (51–69) 53 (41–62) 0.001
Sex
Male 96 (53.0%) 66 (50.4%)
Female 85(47.0%) 65 (49.6%) 0.643
Marital status
Single 43(23.8%) 48(36.6%)
Married 98 (54.1%) 66 (50.4%)
Widow/Widower 30(16.6%) 10 (7.6%)
Separated/Divorced 10(5.5%) 7 (5.4%) 0.026
Highest level of education
No formal education 24(13.3%) 14 (10.7%)
Primary 41(22.7%) 30 (22.9%)
Secondary 56(30.9%) 43 (32.8%)
Tertiary 60(33.1%) 44 (33.6%) 0.505
Occupation
Unemployed 26(14.4%) 19(14.5%)
Domestic workers 37(20.4%) 25(19.1%)
Self employed 43(23.8%) 27(20.6%)
Public / Private servant 57(31.5%) 52(39.7%)
Retired 18(9.9%) 8(6.1%) 0.523
BMI (kg/m2) 30.2 (26.0–34.5) 30.2 (26.6–34.7) 0.731
SBP (mmHg) 140 (130–140) 140 (128–140) 0.339
DBP (mmHg) 82 (72–90) 83 (74–90) 0.630
uPCR (g/mmol) 0.029 (0.015–0.67) 0.016 (0.008–0.034) 0.001
Creatinine (umol/L) 163 (141–190) 109 (88–122) 0.001
eGFR (ml/min/1.72m2) 33 (30–39) 60 (51–75) 0.001
FBG (mmol/L) 4.5 (4.2–5.2) 4.4 (4.2–4.9) 0.146
HbA1C (%) 7.0 (6.6–7.0) 7.0 (7.0–7.0) 0.222
Haemoglobin (g/dl) 12.9 (11.5–14.0) 13.8 (12.4–15.7) 0.001
Transferrin (g/L) 2.44 (2.23–2.73) 2.62 (2.37–2.89) 0.001
WBC (x 109 cells/L) 6.4 (5.13–7.71) 6.03 (4.81–7.73) 0.420
Platelets (x 109 cells/L) 256 (213–320) 271 (217–325) 0.378
Uric acid (mmol/L) 0.43 (0.37–0.53) 0.36 (0.30–0.46) 0.001
HDL cholesterol (mmol /L) 1.23 (0.98–1.48) 1.22 (1.02–1.52) 0.528
Calcium (mmol /L) 2.31 (2.23–2.40) 2.33 (2.26–2.42) 0.054
Phosphate (mmol /L) 1.1 (0.94–1.24) 1.02 (0.85–1.15) 0.005
Sodium (mmol/L) 141 (138–143) 141 (139–143) 0.965
Potassium (mmol/L) 4.4 (3.9–4.8) 4.1 (3.9–4.4) 0.001
Bicarbonate (mmol/L) 22 (20–24) 23 (21–25) 0.013

IQR, interquartile range; uPCR, urine protein creatinine ratio; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; FBG, fasting blood glucose; HbA1C, glycosylated hemoglobin A1C; WBC, white blood cells; HDL, high density lipoprotein; SBP, systolic blood pressure.

Clinical profile of CKD patients

Of the 312 CKD black patients, 58% patients had advanced CKD (CKD stage 3b or 4), of whom 57 (31.5%) patients presented with severely increased proteinuria as compared to 23 (17.4%) patients with early CKD. Metabolic acidosis was present in 113 (62.4%) of those who had advanced CKD and in 61 (46.6%) patients with early CKD. Anaemia was present in 84 (46.4%) patients with advanced CKD including 30 (16.6%) patients who had low transferrin levels, while 34 (25.9%) patients with early CKD had anemia. Among patients with advanced CKD, hyperuricemia was found in 56 (30.9%) patients and 16 (8.8%) patients had hyperkalemia. Among patients with advanced CKD, majority (96.7%) patients were diagnosed with hypertension, 70 (38.7%) patients had diabetes mellitus and 69 (38.1%) had both hypertension and diabetes mellitus as compared to 117 (89.3%) patients who had hypertension, 33 (25.2%) patients who had diabetes mellitus and 32 (24.4%) had both hypertension and diabetes mellitus among those with early CKD. Angina was reported in 41 (22.7%) patients with advanced CKD and 15 (11.5%) patients in early CKD. Most (56.9%) patients with advanced CKD were using more than 5 medications as compared to 41.2% patents with early CKD who were using 3–4 medications for their blood pressure control. Majority (84.0%) of the patients with advanced CKD and 76.3% patients in early CKD were on calcium channel blockers (CCBs), while 18.8% patients with advanced CKD and 21.4% of those with early CKD were using angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin receptors blockers (ARBs). For patients with advanced CKD, most (57.5%) were on diuretics followed by 51.4% on doxazosin; 29.3% of patients were on insulin and 16 (8.8%) on oral hypoglycemic agents (Table 2).

Table 2. Clinical profile of 312 CKD patients by eGFR.

Parameter eGFR < 45 ml/min/1.72m2 (n = 181) Proportion (%) eGFR ≥ 45 ml/min/1.72m2 (n = 131) Proportion (%) P-value
eGFR (ml/min/1.72m 2 )
Stage 1 (> 90) 0 (0.0%) 4 (3.1%)
Stage 2 (60–89) 0 (0.0%) 62 (47.3%)
Stage 3a (45–59) 0 (0.0%) 65 (49.6%)
Stage 3b (30–44) 144 (79.6%) 0 (0.0%)
Stage 4 (16–29) 37 (20.4%) 0 (0.0%) 0.001
Diagnoses encountered
Hypertension 175 (96.7%) 117 (89.3%) 0.009
Diabetes mellitus 70 (38.7%) 33 (25.2%) 0.012
Hypertension & Diabetes mellitus 69 (38.1%) 32 (24.4%) 0.011
Adult polycystic kidney disease 5 (2.8%) 7 (5.3%) 0.242
Reflux nephropathy 0 (0.0%) 5 (3.8%) 0.008
Obstructive uropathy 1 (0.6%) 0 (0.0%) 0.394
Unknown 6 (3. 3%) 5 (3.8%) 0.812
Current smoking
Yes 13 (7.2%) 10 (7.6%)
No 168 (92.8%) 121 (92.4%) 0.880
Current Alcohol
Yes 14 (7.7%) 18 (13.7%)
No 169 (92.3%) 113 (86.3%) 0.084
Cardiovascular Diseases
None 120 (66.3%) 108 (82.4%)
Angina 41 (22.7%) 15 (11.5%)
Myocardial infarction 8 (4.4%) 4 (3.0%)
Heart failure 6 (3.3%) 2 (1.5%)
Stroke 6 (3.3%) 1 (0.8%)
Transient ischemic attack 0 (0.0%) 1 (0.8%) 0.017
Medications
None 2 (1.1%) 8 (6.1%) 0.004
Diuretics 104 (57.5%) 58 (44.3%) 0.021
ACEIs / ARBs 34 (18.8%) 28 (21.4%) 0.572
Aldactone 6 (3.3%) 5 (3.8%) 0.812
CCBs 152 (84.0%) 100 (76.3%) 0.092
Statins 100 (55.3%) 60 (45.8%) 0.099
Oral hypoglycemics 16 (8.8%) 21(16.0%) 0.053
Insulin 53 (29.3%) 19 (14.5%) 0.002
Allopurinol 22 (12.1%) 13 (9.9%) 0.538
Junior ASA 90 (49.7%) 57 (43.5%) 0.278
Beta blockers 41 (22.7%) 30 (22.9%) 0.959
Aldomet 12 (6.6%) 7 (5.3%) 0.639
Hydralazine 4 (2.2%) 3 (2.3%) 0.962
Doxazosin 93 (51.4%) 48 (36.6%) 0.010
Others 68 (37.6%) 38 (29.0%) 0.115
Number of medications per patient
0 2 (1.1%) 8 (6.1%)
1–2 20 (11.1%) 20 (15.3%)
3–4 56 (30.9%) 55 (41.2%)
≥ 5 103 (56.9%) 48 (36.6%) 0.001
uPCR (g/mmol)
Normal to mildly increased (<0.015) 47 (26.0%) 63 (48.2%)
Moderately increased (0.015–0.05) 77 (42.5%) 45 (34.4%)
Severely increased (> 0.050) 57 (31.5%) 23 (17.4%) 0.001
Haemoglobin (g/dl)
Normal (> 12.0 or 13.0) 97 (53.6%) 97 (74.1%)
Anaemia (<12.0 or 13.0) 84 (46.4%) 34 (25.9%) 0.001
Transferrin g/dl)
Low (< 2.0) 30 (16.6%) 10 (7.6%)
Normal (2.0–3.60) 148 (81.8%) 117 (89.3%)
High (>3.60) 3 (1.7%) 4 (3.1%) 0.052
Uric acid (mmol/l)
Low (< 0.16 or 0.21) 4 (2.2%) 15 (11.5%)
Normal (0.16/0.21–0.36/0.43) 121 (66.9%) 98 (74.8%)
High (> 0.36 or 0.43) 56 (30.9%) 18 (13.7%) 0.001
Potassium (mmol/l)
Low (< 3.5) 13 (7.2%) 15 (11.5%)
Normal (3.5–5.1) 152 (84.0%) 114 (87.0%)
High (> 5.1) 16 (8.8%) 2 (1.5%) 0.013
Bicarbonate (mmol/l)
Low (< 23) 113 (62.4%) 61 (46.6%)
Normal (23–29) 67 (37.0%) 68 (51.9%)
High (> 29) 1 (0.6%) 2 (1.5%) 0.018

uPCR, urine protein creatinine ratio; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; CCBs, calcium channel blockers; ACEIs, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors; ARBs, Aldosterone receptors blockers.

Factors associated with advanced CKD

We divided the patients into two subgroups according to their CKD stages [early CKD (eGFR ≥ 45 ml/min/1.72m2) vs. advanced CKD (eGFR < 45 ml/min/1.72m2)]. A total of 24 potential variables were identified after performing univariate logistic regression analyses. Backward elimination reduced this to 15 parameters; the factors associated with advanced CKD after adjusting for age and sex on multivariate logistic regression analysis included: hypertension (OR 3.3, 95% CI 1.2–9.2, P = 0.020), diabetes mellitus (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1–3.3, P = 0.024), angina (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.2–5.1, P = 0.008), severe proteinuria (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.9–6.5, P = 0.001), moderate proteinuria (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.5–4.3, P = 0.001), hyperuricemia (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.4–4.1, P = 0.001), anaemia (OR 2.9, 95% CI 1.7–4.9, P = 0.001), metabolic acidosis(OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2–3.1, P = 0.005), allopurinol (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.4–4.3, P = 0.005) and doxazosin (OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.2–3.1, P = 0.006), low transferrin (OR 2.4, 95% CI 1.1–5.1, P = 0.028), hyperkalemia (OR 5.4, 95% CI 1.2–24.1, P = 0.029) and, widow/widower (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.4–7.4, P = 0.006) (Table 3).

Table 3. Factors associated with advanced CKD.

Characteristic Number of patients UNIVARIATE MULTIVARIATE
OR (95% CI) P. value OR (95% CI) P. value
Age 312 1.1(1.0–1.2) 0.001
Marital status
Single 91 1(Reference) 1(Reference)
Married 164 1.7 (0.9–2.8) 0.055 1.5 (0.9–3.0) 0.137
Widow/Widower 40 3.3 (1.5–7.7) 0.004 3.2 (1.4–7.4) 0.006
Separated/Divorced 17 1.6 (0.6–4.6) 0.038 1.4 (0.5–4.3) 0.466
Hypertension
No 20 1(Reference) 1(Reference)
Yes 292 3.5 (1.3–9.3) 0.013 3.3 (1.2–9.2) 0.020
Diabetes mellitus
No 209 1(Reference) 1(Reference)
Yes 103 1.9 (1.1–3.1) 0.013 1.8 (1.1–3.0) 0.024
Current Alcohol
No 280 1(Reference) 1(Reference)
Yes 32 0.5 (0.3–1.1) 0.088 0.5 (0.2–1.0) 0.059
Cardiovascular Disease:
None 228 1(Reference) 1(Reference)
Angina 56 2.7 (1.4–5.3) 0.004 2.5 (1.2–5.1) 0.008
Myocardial infarction 12 1.8 (0.5–6.1) 0.348 1.4 (0.4–5.0) 0.578
Heart failure 8 2.7 (0.5–13.7) 0.230 2.8 (0.5–14.5) 0.219
Stroke 8 5.4 (0.6–45.6) 0.121 4.6 (0.5–39.2) 0.167
Medications
No 10 1 (Reference) 1(Reference)
Yes 302 11.7 (1.4–94.8) 0.021 0.1 (0.0–0.9) 0.042
Diuretics
No 150 1(Reference) 1(Reference)
Yes 162 1.7 (1.1–2.7) 0.022 1.6 (1.0–2.5) 0.053
CCB
No 60 1(Reference) 1(Reference)
Yes 252 1.6 (0.9–2.9) 0.093 1.6 (0.9–2.8) 0.127
Statins
No 152 1(Reference) 1(Reference)
Yes 160 1.5 (0.9–2.3) 0.100 1.4 (0.9–2.2) 0.171
Oral hypoglycemics
No 275 1(Reference) 1(Reference)
Yes 37 0.5 (0.3–1.0) 0.056 0.5 (0.2–1.0) 0.048
Allopurinol
No 277 1(Reference) 1(Reference)
Yes 35 2.5 (1.4–4.4) 0.003 2.4 (1.3–4.3) 0.005
Nitrates
No 306 1(Reference) 1(Reference)
Yes 6 1.9 (1.1–3.3) 0.024 1.7 (1.0–3.0) 0.059
Doxazosin
No 171 1(Reference) 1(Reference)
Yes 141 1.8 (1.2–2.9) 0.010 1.9 (1.2–3.1) 0.006
Others
No 206 1(Reference) 1(Reference)
Yes 106 1.5 (0.9–2.4) 0.116 1.5 (0.9–2.5) 0.100
Proteinuria (g/mmol)
Normal to mild (<0.015) 110 1(Reference) 1(Reference)
Moderately (0.015–0.05) 122 2.3 (1.4–3.9) 0.002 2.5 (1.5–4.3) 0.001
Severely (> 0.050) 80 3.9 (2.0–7.2) 0.000 3.5 (1.9–6.5) 0.001
Hyperuricemia
No 216 1(Reference) 1(Reference)
Yes 96 2.4 (1.4–4.0) 0.001 2.4 (1.4–4.1) 0.001
Anaemia
No 194 1(Reference) 1(Reference)
Yes 118 2.5 (1.5–4.0) 0.001 2.9 (1.7–4.9) 0.001
Transferrin g/dl)
Normal (2.0–3.60) 265 1(Reference) 1(Reference)
Low (< 2.0) 40 2.4 (1.1–5.1) 0.025 2.4 (1.1–5.1) 0.028
High (>3.60) 7 0.6 (0.1–2.7) 0.499 0.5 (0.1–2.7) 0.491
WBC (x 109 cells/l)
Normal (4–11) 276 1(Reference) 1(Reference)
Low (> 4) 23 0.5 (0.2–1.3) 0.051 1.8 (0.7–4.2) 0.202
High (>11) 13 1.1 (0.4–3.5) 0.859 1.8 (0.4–7.5) 0.418
Calcium (mmol /l)
Normal (2.15–2.45) 244 1(Reference) 1(Reference)
Low (< 2.15) 25 2.2 (0.9–5.8) 0.098 2.1 (0.8–5.8) 0.125
High (>2.45) 43 0.6 (0.3–1.1) 0.081 0.6 (0.3–1.1) 0.081
Potassium (mmol/l)
Normal (3.5–5.1) 266 1(Reference) 1(Reference)
Low (< 3.5) 28 0.7 (0.3–1.4) 0.280 0.6 (0.3–1.4) 0.261
High (> 5.1) 18 6.0 (1.4–26.6) 0.018 5.4 (1.2–24.1) 0.029
Bicarbonate (mmol/l)
Normal (23–29) 135 1(Reference) 1(Reference)
Low (< 23) 174 1.9 (1.2–3.0) 0.007 2.0 (1.2–3.1) 0.005
High (> 29) 3 0.5 (0.1–5.7) 0.583 0.4 (0.0–5.1) 0.495

P < 0.05 was used to identify potential variables, those with P <0.2 in univariate were included into the multivariate analysis adjusting for age and sex.

Discussion

This study evaluated the demographic and clinical profile of black patients with CKD attending the CMJAH kidney outpatient clinic in Johannesburg, South Africa. There were 42% with early CKD and 58% with advanced CKD; 93.6% had hypertension and 33.0% diabetes mellitus, and 32.3% had both hypertension and diabetes. The prevalence of hypertension among patients with CKD is high and it is strongly associated with advanced CKD and CKD progression [30, 31], the majority (96.7%) of patients with advanced CKD had hypertension, similar to findings in other studies from SSA [9, 32]. Peripherally acting α-blockers like doxazosin are commonly used in the management of hypertension in CKD, mainly due to their pharmacokinetic profile that is undisturbed by worsening kidney function and their role in blood sugar control [33, 34], approximately 51.4% of patients with advanced CKD were using doxazosin for treatment of hypertension with a 1.9 times increased association with advanced CKD, as also has been reported in other studies [35, 36]. Studies have shown that diabetes related CKD is the leading cause of end stage kidney disease among patients with T2DM patients worldwide [37, 38], approximately 38.7% patients with advanced CKD had T2DM; T2DM had 1.8 increased risk for advanced CKD, similar to other studies conducted among black patients in South Africa and Ethiopia [32, 39]. In patients with advanced CKD, approximately 29.3% of the patients were on insulin and 8.8% were on oral hypoglycemics for treatment of their T2DM. Oral hypoglycemics were associated with 0.5 times higher risk for advanced CKD, similar to other studies [40, 41].

Metabolic acidosis is common in CKD and it can lead to dysfunction of many organs and systems including the kidney resulting in CKD progression [42, 43], the prevalence of metabolic acidosis was 62.4% in advanced CKD and 46.6% in early CKD; this prevalence is higher than the 33% - 40% among patients with CKD stage 3–4 from other continents [4345]. The possible explanation could be firstly, the more rapid CKD progression which has been shown to occur in black patients even early in their CKD stages [15, 19] and secondly, diet where replacement of traditional diets with contemporary/ western foods which contain mainly animal proteins, less vegetables and low intake of fruits might increase CKD patients’ dietary acid load [46, 47]. Patients with low serum bicarbonate levels were 2-fold more likely to have advanced CKD, as reported also in other studies [18, 44]. Anaemia is common in CKD, and it is associated with decreased quality of life, high morbidity and mortality [48, 49]. The prevalence of anaemia was 46.4% in advanced CKD, including 16.6% who had low transferrin levels, while 25.9% of the patients with early CKD had anaemia, advanced CKD was 2.9 times more prevalent if a patient had anemia and 2.4 times more prevalent if a patient had low transferrin, similar to other studies [20, 21, 50]. High serum uric acid levels are associated with high risk for advanced CKD and CKD progression [51, 52], the prevalence of hyperuricemia was 30.9% in advanced CKD; advanced CKD had a 2.4-fold higher OR if a patient had hyperuricemia and 2.4-fold higher if a patient was on allopurinol; similar findings have been reported in other studies [23, 53]. Hyperkalemia is common in patients with chronic CKD and its prevalence increases as the eGFR declines [54, 55], approximately 8.8% patients with advanced CKD were found to have hyperkalemia; hyperkalemia had a 5.4-fold increased association with advanced CKD; similar findings have been reported in other studies [24, 25].

Studies have shown that the incidence of cardiovascular events increases with worsening kidney function [56, 57]; 22.7% patients with advanced CKD reported angina with a 2.5 times increased risk in advanced CKD, similar to other studies [56, 58]. Also 31.5% patients with advanced CKD presented with severely increased proteinuria; advanced CKD was 3.5 times higher if a patient had severe proteinuria, as also reported in other studies [39, 59, 60]. Furthermore, few (18.8%) patients with advanced CKD and 21.4% of those with early CKD were using ACEIs or ARBs; similar findings have been reported from other studies on the underutilization of ACEIs/ARBs when they were clinically indicated or discontinuation of RAAS inhibitors by clinicians during the course of CKD possibly due to their associated side effects [6163]. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin receptors blockers (ARBs) had no significant association with advanced CKD, possibly due to the small numbers on these agents, unlike findings from other studies that did demonstrate that the use of ACEIs/ARBs had beneficial effects for kidney events and cardiovascular outcomes compared to other antihypertensive medications in patients with CKD [6365]. The possible explanation could be the fact that the majority (84.0%) of the study patients with advanced CKD were using calcium channel blockers. Studies have demonstrated that calcium channel blockers have similar kidney and cardiovascular protective effects when compared to RAAS blockers in patients with CKD [66, 67].

Conclusion

Hypertension and diabetes mellitus were strongly associated with advanced CKD, suggesting a need for primary and secondary population-based prevention measures. Metabolic acidosis, anaemia with low transferrin levels, hyperuricemia and hyperkalemia were highly prevalent in our patients, including those with early CKD, and they were strongly associated with advanced CKD. This calls for the proactive role of clinicians and dietitians in supporting the needs of CKD patients in meeting their daily dietary requirements towards preventing and slowing the progression of CKD. Further studies on the role of diet including plant-based proteins, vegetables and fruits in preventing and slowing CKD progression and other metabolic complications of CKD are warranted.

Acknowledgments

Special thanks to all patients with CKD attending at the Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital (CMJAH) kidney outpatient clinic for their willingness to participate in this study and to the staff at the Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital (CMJAH) kidney outpatient clinic and laboratory for their continued care, proper keeping of patient data and support which made this study possible. I thank the International Society of Nephrology (ISN), the University of the Witwatersrand, the University of Dodoma and Shinei industries (Aichi, Japan) Co. Ltd, for support, and providing a good and conducive environment for my nephrology fellowship training.

Abbreviations

CKD

chronic kidney diseases

CMJAH

Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital

CKD-EPI

chronic kidney disease epidemiology collaboration

ESKD

end stage kidney disease

T2DM

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

eGFR

estimated glomerular filtration rate

IDMS

isotope dilution mass spectroscopy

uPCR

urine protein creatinine ratio

CCBs

calcium channel blockers

ACEIs

angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors

ARBs

Aldosterone receptors blockers

KDIGO

kidney disease improving global outcomes

NCDs

non-communicable diseases

SSA

sub-Saharan Africa

Data Availability

Data cannot be shared publicly because of ethics policy at University of Witwatersrand, the participants signed a consent form, which states that data is exclusively available for professional research staff. Data are available to qualifying organizations and/or individuals from the chairperson of the Human Research Ethics Committee (Medical) of the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg (“Committee”) who is Dr. Clement Penny, who may be contacted by e-mail on Clement.Penny@wits.ac.za) for researchers who meet the relevant ethics criteria for access to these data.

Funding Statement

The authors received no specific funding for this work.

References

  • 1.Abd ElHafeez S, Bolignano D, D’Arrigo G, Dounousi E, Tripepi G, Zoccali C. Prevalence and burden of chronic kidney disease among the general population and high-risk groups in Africa: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2018;8(1):e015069. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015069 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hill NR, Fatoba ST, Oke JL, Hirst JA, O’Callaghan CA, Lasserson DS, et al. Global Prevalence of Chronic Kidney Disease–A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE. 2016;11(7). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158765 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Carrero JJ, Hecking M, Chesnaye NC, Jager KJ. Sex and gender disparities in the epidemiology and outcomes of chronic kidney disease. Nature reviews Nephrology. 2018;14(3):151–64. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2017.181 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jardine MJ, Kasiske B, Adu D, Alrukhaimi M, Ashuntantang GE, Basnet S, et al. Closing the gap between evidence and practice in chronic kidney disease. Kidney International Supplements. 2017;7(2):114–21. doi: 10.1016/j.kisu.2017.07.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Adeniyi AB, Davids MR, Laurence CE, Volmink JA. Prevalence of chronic kidney disease and association with cardiovascular risk factors among teachers in Cape Town, South Africa. Clinical Kidney Journal. 2017;10(3):363–9. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfw138 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Alemán-Vega G, Gómez Cabañas I, Reques Sastre L, Rosado Martín J, Polentinos-Castro E, Rodríguez Barrientos R. Prevalence and risk of progression of chronic kidney disease in diabetics and hypertensive patients followed by primary care physicians. Nefrología (English Edition). 2017;37(3):343–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.George JA, Brandenburg J-T, Fabian J, Crowther NJ, Agongo G, Alberts M, et al. Kidney damage and associated risk factors in rural and urban sub-Saharan Africa (AWI-Gen): a cross-sectional population study. The Lancet Global Health. 2019;7(12):e1632–e43. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30443-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kaze AD, Ilori T, Jaar BG, Echouffo-Tcheugui JB. Burden of chronic kidney disease on the African continent: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Nephrol. 2018;19(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12882-018-0930-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Tannor EK, Sarfo FS, Mobula LM, Sarfo-Kantanka O, Adu-Gyamfi R, Plange-Rhule J. Prevalence and predictors of chronic kidney disease among Ghanaian patients with hypertension and diabetes mellitus: A multicenter cross-sectional study. Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn). 2019;21(10):1542–50. doi: 10.1111/jch.13672 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Laster M, Shen JI, Norris KC. Kidney Disease Among African Americans: A Population Perspective. American journal of kidney diseases: the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation. 2018;72(5 Suppl 1):S3–s7. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.06.021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Umeukeje EM, Young BA. Genetics and ESKD Disparities in African Americans. American journal of kidney diseases: the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation. 2019;74(6):811–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mathur R, Dreyer G, Yaqoob MM, Hull SA. Ethnic differences in the progression of chronic kidney disease and risk of death in a UK diabetic population: an observational cohort study. BMJ open. 2018;8(3):e020145. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020145 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Nelson ML, Buchanan-Peart KR, Oribhabor GI, Khokale RV, Cancarevic I. Survival of the Fittest: Addressing the Disparities in the Burden of Chronic Kidney Disease. Cureus. 2020;12(7):e9499. doi: 10.7759/cureus.9499 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bukabau JB, Sumaili EK, Cavalier E, Pottel H, Kifakiou B, Nkodila A, et al. Performance of glomerular filtration rate estimation equations in Congolese healthy adults: The inopportunity of the ethnic correction. PLoS ONE. 2018;13(3):e0193384. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0193384 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chu CD, Powe NR, McCulloch CE, Crews DC, Han Y, Bragg-Gresham JL, et al. Trends in Chronic Kidney Disease Care in the US by Race and Ethnicity, 2012–2019. JAMA network open. 2021;4(9):e2127014. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.27014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Galán I, Goicoechea M, Quiroga B, Macías N, Santos A, García de Vinuesa MS, et al. Hyperuricemia is associated with progression of chronic kidney disease in patients with reduced functioning kidney mass. Nefrología (Madrid). 2018;38:73–8. doi: 10.1016/j.nefro.2017.04.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bulbul MC, Dagel T, Afsar B, Ulusu NN, Kuwabara M, Covic A, et al. Disorders of Lipid Metabolism in Chronic Kidney Disease. Blood Purification. 2018;46(2):144–52. doi: 10.1159/000488816 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Raphael KL, Kraut JA. Assessing Acid-Base Status in Patients With CKD: Does Measurement of Blood pH Matter? American Journal of Kidney Diseases. 2021;77(1):9–11. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.08.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hounkpatin HO, Fraser SDS, Honney R, Dreyer G, Brettle A, Roderick PJ. Ethnic minority disparities in progression and mortality of pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease: a systematic scoping review. BMC Nephrology. 2020;21(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s12882-020-01852-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Alagoz S, Dincer MT, Eren N, Bakir A, Pekpak M, Trabulus S, et al. Prevalence of anemia in predialysis chronic kidney disease: Is the study center a significant factor? PloS one. 2020;15(4):e0230980. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230980 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Shaikh H, Aeddula NR. Anemia Of Chronic Renal Disease. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing Copyright © 2022, StatPearls Publishing LLC.; 2022. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kuwabara M, Bjornstad P, Hisatome I, Niwa K, Roncal-Jimenez CA, Andres-Hernando A, et al. Elevated Serum Uric Acid Level Predicts Rapid Decline in Kidney Function. American Journal of Nephrology. 2017;45(4):330–7. doi: 10.1159/000464260 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Guo L-P, Wang Q, Pan Y, Wang Y-L, Zhang Z-J, Hu C, et al. A retrospective cross-sectional study of the associated factors of hyperuricemia in patients with chronic kidney disease. Journal of International Medical Research. 2020;48(6):0300060520919224. [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Caravaca-Fontán F, Valladares J, Díaz-Campillejo R, Barroso S, Luna E, Caravaca F. Association of hyperkalemia with clinical outcomes in advanced chronic kidney disease. Nefrología (English Edition). 2019;39(5):513–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Watanabe R. Hyperkalemia in chronic kidney disease. Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992). 2020;66Suppl 1(Suppl 1):s31–s6. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.66.S1.31 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Research NS. Health Survey for England 2016: adult health trends. Health and Social Care Information Centre London; 2017. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Levey AS, Titan SM, Powe NR, Coresh J, Inker LA. Kidney Disease, Race, and GFR Estimation. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 2020;15(8):1203–12. doi: 10.2215/CJN.12791019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL, Elliott V, Fernandez M, O’Neal L, et al. The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. Journal of biomedical informatics. 2019;95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. Journal of biomedical informatics. 2009;42(2):377–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Polychronopoulou E, Wuerzner G, Burnier M. How Do I Manage Hypertension in Patients with Advanced Chronic Kidney Disease Not on Dialysis? Perspectives from Clinical Practice. Vascular health and risk management. 2021;17:1–11. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S292522 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Georgianos PI, Agarwal R. Resistant Hypertension in Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD): Prevalence, Treatment Particularities, and Research Agenda. Current hypertension reports. 2020;22(10):84. doi: 10.1007/s11906-020-01081-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Matsha TE, Erasmus RT. Chronic kidney disease in sub-Saharan Africa. The Lancet Global Health. 2019;7(12):e1587–e8. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30467-X [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Pugh D, Gallacher PJ, Dhaun N. Management of Hypertension in Chronic Kidney Disease. Drugs. 2019;79(4):365–79. doi: 10.1007/s40265-019-1064-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Geng TT, Jafar TH. Hypertension Pharmacogenomics in CKD: The Clinical Relevance and Public Health Implications. Kidney360. 2022;3(2):204–7. doi: 10.34067/KID.0007792021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sinha AD, Agarwal R. Clinical Pharmacology of Antihypertensive Therapy for the Treatment of Hypertension in CKD. Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 2019;14(5):757–64. doi: 10.2215/CJN.04330418 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hundemer GL, Knoll GA, Petrcich W, Hiremath S, Ruzicka M, Burns KD, et al. Kidney, Cardiac, and Safety Outcomes Associated With α-Blockers in Patients With CKD: A Population-Based Cohort Study. American journal of kidney diseases: the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation. 2021;77(2):178–89.e1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Saran R, Robinson B, Abbott KC, Agodoa LYC, Bragg-Gresham J, Balkrishnan R, et al. US Renal Data System 2018 Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of Kidney Disease in the United States. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. 2019;73(3):A7–A8. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.01.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Jitraknatee J, Ruengorn C, Nochaiwong S. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Chronic Kidney Disease among Type 2 Diabetes Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study in Primary Care Practice. Scientific Reports. 2020;10(1):6205. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63443-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Fiseha T, Ahmed E, Chalie S, Gebreweld A. Prevalence and associated factors of impaired renal function and albuminuria among adult patients admitted to a hospital in Northeast Ethiopia. PloS one. 2021;16(2):e0246509. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0246509 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Prischl FC, Wanner C. Renal Outcomes of Antidiabetic Treatment Options for Type 2 Diabetes—A Proposed MARE Definition. Kidney International Reports . 2018;3(5):1030–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2018.04.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Rangaswami J, Bhalla V, Boer IHd, Staruschenko A, Sharp JA, Singh RR, et al. Cardiorenal Protection With the Newer Antidiabetic Agents in Patients With Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2020;142(17):e265–e86. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000920 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Adamczak M, Surma S. Metabolic Acidosis in Patients with CKD: Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, and Treatment. Kidney diseases (Basel, Switzerland). 2021;7(6):452–67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Cook EE, Davis J, Israni R, Mu F, Betts KA, Anzalone D, et al. Prevalence of Metabolic Acidosis Among Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Hyperkalemia. Advances in therapy. 2021;38(10):5238–52. doi: 10.1007/s12325-021-01886-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Melamed ML, Raphael KL. Metabolic Acidosis in CKD: A Review of Recent Findings. Kidney medicine. 2021;3(2):267–77. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2020.12.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Collister D, Ferguson TW, Funk SE, Reaven NL, Mathur V, Tangri N. Metabolic Acidosis and Cardiovascular Disease in CKD. Kidney medicine. 2021;3(5):753–61.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.xkme.2021.04.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Goraya N, Munoz-Maldonado Y, Simoni J, Wesson DE. Treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease-Related Metabolic Acidosis With Fruits and Vegetables Compared to NaHCO(3) Yields More and Better Overall Health Outcomes and at Comparable Five-Year Cost. Journal of renal nutrition: the official journal of the Council on Renal Nutrition of the National Kidney Foundation. 2021;31(3):239–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Naber T, Purohit S. Chronic Kidney Disease: Role of Diet for a Reduction in the Severity of the Disease. Nutrients. 2021;13(9). doi: 10.3390/nu13093277 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Portolés J, Martín L, Broseta JJ, Cases A. Anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease: From Pathophysiology and Current Treatments, to Future Agents. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8:642296. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.642296 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Weir MR. Managing Anemia across the Stages of Kidney Disease in Those Hyporesponsive to Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents. Am J Nephrol. 2021;52(6):450–66. doi: 10.1159/000516901 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Nalado AM, Mahlangu JN, Waziri B, Duarte R, Paget G, Olorunfemi G, et al. Ethnic prevalence of anemia and predictors of anemia among chronic kidney disease patients at a tertiary hospital in Johannesburg, South Africa. International journal of nephrology and renovascular disease. 2019;12:19–32. doi: 10.2147/IJNRD.S179802 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Stack AG, Johnson ME, Blak B, Klein A, Carpenter L, Morlock R, et al. Gout and the risk of advanced chronic kidney disease in the UK health system: a national cohort study. BMJ open. 2019;9(8):e031550. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031550 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Mohammed E, Browne LD, Kumar AUA, Adeeb F, Fraser AD, Stack AG. Prevalence and treatment of gout among patients with chronic kidney disease in the Irish health system: A national study. PloS one. 2019;14(1):e0210487. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210487 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Ramirez-Sandoval JC, Madero M. Treatment of Hyperuricemia in Chronic Kidney Disease. Contributions to nephrology. 2018;192:135–46. doi: 10.1159/000484288 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Morales E, Cravedi P, Manrique J. Management of Chronic Hyperkalemia in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: An Old Problem With News Options. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;8:653634. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.653634 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Dashputre AA, Gatwood J, Sumida K, Thomas F, Akbilgic O, Potukuchi PK, et al. Association of dyskalemias with short-term health care utilization in patients with advanced CKD. Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy. 2021;27(10):1403–15. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2021.27.10.1403 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Jankowski J, Floege J, Fliser D, Böhm M, Marx N. Cardiovascular Disease in Chronic Kidney Disease. Circulation. 2021;143(11):1157–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Ryu H, Kim J, Kang E, Hong Y, Chae D-W, Choi KH, et al. Incidence of cardiovascular events and mortality in Korean patients with chronic kidney disease. Scientific Reports. 2021;11(1):1131. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80877-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Sarnak MJ, Amann K, Bangalore S, Cavalcante JL, Charytan DM, Craig JC, et al. Chronic Kidney Disease and Coronary Artery Disease: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2019;74(14):1823–38. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.08.1017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Rosenstock JL, Pommier M, Stoffels G, Patel S, Michelis MF. Prevalence of Proteinuria and Albuminuria in an Obese Population and Associated Risk Factors. Frontiers in Medicine. 2018;5(122). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Brück K, Jager KJ, Zoccali C, Bello AK, Minutolo R, Ioannou K, et al. Different rates of progression and mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease at outpatient nephrology clinics across Europe. Kidney international. 2018;93(6):1432–41. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2018.01.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Bhandari S, Chadburn M. How Do We Navigate the Complexities Surrounding the Use of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/Angiotensin Receptor Blockers in Chronic Kidney Disease? Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2019;94(11):2166–9. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.09.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Ku E, McCulloch CE, Vittinghoff E, Lin F, Johansen KL. Use of Antihypertensive Agents and Association With Risk of Adverse Outcomes in Chronic Kidney Disease: Focus on Angiotensin‐Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers. Journal of the American Heart Association . 2018;7(19):e009992. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009992 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Leon SJ, Whitlock R, Rigatto C, Komenda P, Bohm C, Sucha E, et al. Hyperkalemia-Related Discontinuation of Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitors and Clinical Outcomes in CKD: A Population-Based Cohort Study. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2022.01.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Zheng C-M, Wang J-Y, Chen T-T, Wu Y-C, Wu Y-L, Lin H-T, et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin receptor blocker monotherapy retard deterioration of renal function in Taiwanese chronic kidney disease population. Scientific Reports. 2019;9(1):2694. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-38991-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Zhang Y, He D, Zhang W, Xing Y, Guo Y, Wang F, et al. ACE Inhibitor Benefit to Kidney and Cardiovascular Outcomes for Patients with Non-Dialysis Chronic Kidney Disease Stages 3–5: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomised Clinical Trials. Drugs. 2020;80(8):797–811. doi: 10.1007/s40265-020-01290-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Lin Y-C, Lin J-W, Wu M-S, Chen K-C, Peng C-C, Kang Y-N. Effects of calcium channel blockers comparing to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in patients with hypertension and chronic kidney disease stage 3 to 5 and dialysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS one. 2017;12(12):e0188975. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0188975 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Fu EL, Clase CM, Evans M, Lindholm B, Rotmans JI, Dekker FW, et al. Comparative Effectiveness of Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibitors and Calcium Channel Blockers in Individuals With Advanced CKD: A Nationwide Observational Cohort Study. American journal of kidney diseases: the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation. 2021;77(5):719–29.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.10.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Data cannot be shared publicly because of ethics policy at University of Witwatersrand, the participants signed a consent form, which states that data is exclusively available for professional research staff. Data are available to qualifying organizations and/or individuals from the chairperson of the Human Research Ethics Committee (Medical) of the University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg (“Committee”) who is Dr. Clement Penny, who may be contacted by e-mail on Clement.Penny@wits.ac.za) for researchers who meet the relevant ethics criteria for access to these data.


Articles from PLoS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

RESOURCES