Abstract
The misattribution of an adverse drug reaction (ADR) as a symptom or illness can lead to the prescribing of additional medication, referred to as a prescribing cascade. The aim of this systematic review is to identify published prescribing cascades in community‐dwelling adults. A systematic review was reported in line with the PRISMA guidelines and pre‐registered with PROSPERO. Electronic databases (Medline [Ovid], EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane Library) and grey literature sources were searched. Inclusion criteria: community‐dwelling adults; risk‐prescription medication; outcomes‐initiation of new medicine to “treat” or reduce ADR risk; study type‐cohort, cross‐sectional, case‐control, and case‐series studies. Title/abstract screening, full‐text screening, data extraction, and methodological quality assessment were conducted independently in duplicate. A narrative synthesis was conducted. A total of 101 studies (reported in 103 publications) were included. Study sample sizes ranged from 126 to 11 593 989 participants and 15 studies examined older adults specifically (≥60 years). Seventy‐eight of 101 studies reported a potential prescribing cascade including calcium channel blockers to loop diuretic (n = 5), amiodarone to levothyroxine (n = 5), inhaled corticosteroid to topical antifungal (n = 4), antipsychotic to anti‐Parkinson drug (n = 4), and acetylcholinesterase inhibitor to urinary incontinence drugs (n = 4). Identified prescribing cascades occurred within three months to one year following initial medication. Methodological quality varied across included studies. Prescribing cascades occur for a broad range of medications. ADRs should be included in the differential diagnosis for patients presenting with new symptoms, particularly older adults and those who started a new medication in the preceding 12 months.
Keywords: appropriate prescribing, community‐dwelling adults, prescribing cascades, systematic review
Prescribing cascades in community dwelling adults: Systematic review.

Abbreviations
- ADR
adverse drug reaction
- ATC
Anatomical Therapeutic Classification
- CCB
calcium channel blocker
- ED
Emergency Departments
- PRISMA
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analysis
- TRIP
Turning Research Into Practice
1. BACKGROUND
A prescribing cascade occurs when a medication is used to treat or prevent the adverse effects of another medication. 1 , 2 , 3 An unintentional prescribing cascade occurs when the adverse drug reaction (ADR) is misinterpreted as a new medical condition, leading to the prescription of new medication to treat the emerging symptoms. 4 For example, calcium channel blocker (CCB) induced lower extremity oedema may be misinterpreted as a sign of congestive heart failure and result in the inappropriate prescribing of a loop diuretic to alleviate the oedema instead of simply switching the CCB to an alternative class antihypertensive agent. 5 , 6 , 7 Intentional prescribing cascades occur when the ADR is recognised and a subsequent medication is prescribed to combat this ADR either via treatment of the ADR or prevention of it in the first instance. 4 Prescribing cascades can be further characterised as either appropriate (potential benefits>risks), or inappropriate (risks>potential benefits). 4 Furthermore, this characterisation of appropriateness is a dynamic entity; an appropriate prescribing cascade can become inappropriate over time, particularly should the clinical circumstances of the patient change. 4
It is not clear what drives prescribing cascades. Older adults may be more vulnerable due to the nonspecific nature of ADR symptoms in older adults, e.g. falls, fatigue or constipation, all of which have multiple potential causes. 8 Multimorbidity, which is more common in older adults, may also make the identification of new onset ADRs more challenging. 9 , 10 However, the failure to correctly identify an ADR and the resultant prescribing cascade compounds the risk for medication‐related harm.
To date prescribing cascades have remained under‐researched. A previous scoping review identified only 10 original investigations and seven case reports that examined prescribing cascades. 11 In order to optimise prescribing, it is vital that clinically relevant prescribing cascades that commonly occur in practice are identified. The objective of this systematic review was to identify published prescribing cascades in community‐dwelling adults.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.1. Search protocol
The study protocol was previously published 12 and pre‐registered with PROSPERO [CRD42021243163]. 13 This study was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. 14 , 15 (eTable 1 and eTable 2 in Appendix S1).
2.2. Search strategy
Searches were conducted in the following databases: Medline (Ovid), EMBASE, PsycInfo, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library. Searches were initially conducted from inception to March 2021 and updated in February 2022. The search strategy (eBox 1 in Appendix S1) was developed in consultation with an experienced librarian. No restrictions were placed on language or publication year. Grey literature database searches were conducted in MedNar, Dart Europe, Open Grey, and the Turning Research Into Practice (TRIP) databases using keyword searches. Forwards and backwards citation searching of articles selected for full text review was also conducted. Retrieved results were exported to EndNote X9 prior to screening and study selection using Covidence® systematic review management system. Following duplicates removal, titles and abstracts were independently screened by two reviewers (AD and EW, OC or FS) according to inclusion criteria. Disagreements were managed by consensus. Additional information was sought from study authors where necessary.
Studies were included if they met the following criteria:
Population: community‐dwelling adults (≥18 years).
Risk: prescription of medication that had the potential to cause an ADR that resulted in the prescription of further medication.
Outcome: prescribing cascade defined as the initiation of a new medication to ‘treat’ an ADR (unintentional cascade) or to reduce the risk of an ADR (intentional cascade).
Study type: prospective or retrospective cohort, cross‐sectional, case‐crossover, case–control or case‐series studies.
Setting: primary care and community settings, including ambulatory care.
2.2.1. Exclusion criteria
The following studies were excluded;
Population of interest <18 years;
Studies conducted solely in nursing homes, residential care, inpatient settings or Emergency Departments (ED);
Case reports
2.3. Data extraction and quality assessment
Data extraction was conducted by two independent reviewers (AD and EW, OC or FS) using a standardised Microsoft Excel proforma. (see eBox 2, Appendix S1). The methodological quality of included publications was independently performed in duplicate (AD and EW, OC or FS) using the appropriate JBI‐ Critical Appraisal checklist (eBox 3, Appendix S1). Data synthesis was conducted using a narrative synthesis. Alluvial plots of drug pair combinations were created, using R‐Studio 2021.09.2 statistical software using the ggalluvial package, to identify the drug‐pair combinations examined and to summarise the overall quantitative association reported.
3. RESULTS
3.1. Study identification
The study identification flow diagram is presented in Figure 1. A total of 103 publications relating to 101 studies met the inclusion criteria. Three publications included data from the same study relating to updated data collection time periods (2000–2006; 2000–2010; and 2000–2012). 16 , 17 , 18 Thus, only the final study publication, 18 which contained the entire data collection period, was included in the narrative synthesis.
FIGURE 1.

PRISMA flow diagram of included studies.
3.2. Study population demographics
Seventy‐nine studies presented study participants demographics, of which 15 specifically examined older adults (≥60 years), with different age‐related thresholds (e.g. ≥60; ≥65; ≥66 years) used across studies. 5 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 Thirteen studies reported analyses stratified by age. 7 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 Total study sample sizes ranged from 126 45 to 11 593 989 46 participants. (See eTable 3, Appendix S1).
3.3. Methodological approach to analysis
Most studies (n = 88) were retrospective cohort studies, 5 , 7 , 18 , 21 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 , 110 , 111 , 112 , 113 three of which incorporated a case–control study within the study design 49 , 85 , 110 and one that conducted a preliminary cross‐sectional study. 112 Five were case–control studies, 19 , 20 five cross‐sectional studies, 6 , 46 , 114 , 115 , 116 and three case‐crossover studies. 45 , 117 , 118 All studies used routine data (health insurance claims, prescription dispensing, clinical databases, national health surveys and pharmacovigilance data). In total, 83 studies examined dispensed prescriptions whereas 18 studies examined prescribed medications (see eTable 3, Appendix S1).
Of 101 studies, 62 used prescription sequence symmetry analysis (PSSA) to determine the ratio of participants who initiated two medications in both possible sequences (i.e. Drug A → Drug B vs. Drug B → Drug A), with the majority (n = 52) adjusting for prescribing trends.
Several studies reported stratified results by dosage, 5 , 7 , 28 , 29 , 39 concomitant medication use or polypharmacy, 7 , 40 , 44 , 85 , 104 duration, 32 , 94 comorbidity, 36 , 38 , 40 , 44 race 34 and nursing home residence. 26 For other studies, analyses were adjusted by age, 20 , 22 , 24 , 30 , 52 , 71 , 89 sex, 20 , 22 , 24 , 30 , 52 , 71 , 73 , 82 race, 22 , 24 dose, 52 , 71 nursing home residence, 22 concomitant medication or polypharmacy, 22 , 52 , 71 comorbidity, 24 with some studies conducting adjusted analyses but not reporting the independent association of these covariates. 23 , 27 , 31 , 88 , 117 , 118
Length of follow up ranged from one month 55 , 91 , 107 , 118 to seven years, 113 with the majority over one year (n = 33 studies).
3.4. Initial medication(s) prescribed to patient
A broad range of medication types were examined as potentially precipitating a prescribing cascade (see Table 1 and column 1, Figure 2A). Ninety‐four studies were hypothesis‐driven or examined a predefined list of medications (Table 2 and Figure 2A). Seven studies conducting exploratory analyses to identify new signals of potential prescribing cascades are not represented in Figure 2. 68 , 75 , 78 , 87 , 101 , 102 , 106 Initial medication Anatomical Therapeutic Classification (ATC) codes were not reported for 66 studies and were assigned by our research team.
TABLE 1.
Primary results of included studies by ATC pharmacological classification (n = 101)
| Primary author (year) | Initial medication(s) | Suspected ADR | New medication(s) | Quantitative association (primary analysis or association at 1 year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alimentary tract and metabolism | ||||
| Adimadhyam (2019) 47 | Sodium/Glucose cotransporter‐2 inhibitors (SGLT2‐I) | Genital mycotic infections | Antifungal |
PSSA SGLT2‐I → Antifungal ± 365 days aSR 1.24 (95%CI 1.20–1.28) |
| Avorn (1995) a , 20 | Metoclopramide | Extrapyramidal symptoms (EPS) | Anti‐Parkinson drug (APD) |
Metoclopramide → APD (<90 days) aOR 3.04 (95%CI 2.22–4.17) |
| Gadzhanova (2017) 88 |
SGLT2‐I Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitor (DPP4‐I) |
Urinary or genital infections |
Trimethoprim Nitrofurantoin Norfloxacin |
Risk of UTI (<6 months) SGLT2‐I users (3.6%) compared to DPP4‐I users (4.9%), aHR 0.90 (95%CI 0.66–1.24) Risk of genital infections (<6 months) SGLT2‐I users (2.9%) compared with DPP4‐I users (0.9%), aHR 3.50 (95%CI 1.95–5.89) |
| Janetzki (2021) 99 | PPI | Development or exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) | Long‐acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) or long‐acting beta‐2 agonist (LABA) listed for the treatment of COPD |
PSSA: PPI → LAMA/LABA ± 1 year Omeprazole: aSR = 1.29 (95%CI 1.22–1.36) Esomperazole: aSR = 1.25 (95%CI 1.22–1.29) Rabeprazole: aSR = 1.15 (95%CI 1.08–1.21) Pantoprazole: aSR = 1.08 (95%CI 1.05–1.12) Lansoprazole: aSR = 1.08 (95%CI 0.96–1.22) |
| Lund (2021) 111 |
SGLT2‐I Glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (GLP1‐RA) |
Gout |
Any uric acid lowering therapy, colchicine or first hospital diagnosis of gout (composite) |
Risk of gout <3 years: intention to treat analysis HR: 0.58 (0.44 to 0.75) [GLP1‐RA as referent] Risk of gout <3 years: per‐protocol analysis HR: 0.48 (0.33 to 0.70) [GLP1‐RA as referent] PSSA: SGLT2‐I → Gout ± 365 days aSR 0.63 (95%CI 0.47–0.84) PSSA: GLP1‐RA → Outcome ± 365 days aSR 0.94 (95%CI 0.78–1.13) |
| Park (2018) 32 |
PPI Histamine 2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) |
Dementia | Anti‐dementia medication (secondary outcome) |
PSSA: PPI → Anti‐dementia medication ± 3 years aSR 1.38 (95%Ci 1.28–1.48); n = 3025 PSSA: H2RA → Anti‐dementia medication ± 3 years aSR 2.35 (2.13–2.59); n = 2308 |
| Roughead (2015) 96 |
Pioglitazone Rosiglitazone |
Oedema | Furosemide |
PSSA: Rosiglitazone → Furosemide ± 1 year Pooled (Australia and Canada): aSR 1.65 (95%CI 1.58–1.72) Pooled (Asia): aSR 1.21 (95%CI 1.01–1.45) PSSA: Pioglitazone → Furosemide ± 1 year Pooled (Australia and Canada): aSR 1.47 (95%CI 1.41–1.91) Pooled (Asia): aSR 1.11 (95%CI 0.86–1.32) |
| Roughead (2016) 95 | PPI | Clostridium difficile infection | Oral vancomycin |
PSSA: PPI → Oral vancomycin ± 1 year Pooled estimate: aSR 2.40 (95%CI 1.88–3.05) Pooled estimate (Asia only): aSR 3.16 (95%CI 1.95–5.10) |
| Wahab (2014) 113 | Rosiglitazone | Heart failure | Furosemide |
PSSA: Rosiglitazone → Furosemide (Jul 2000 to Dec 2007) aSR = 1.73 (99%CI 1.34–2.24) |
| Blood and blood forming organs | ||||
| Hachiken (2013) 109 | Low dose aspirin (LDA) | Gastrointestinal (GI) complications |
H2RAs PPIs |
PSSA: LDA → PPIs ± 365 days Enteric coated LDA: aSR 1.87 (95% CI 1.26–2.83) |
| Maura (2018) 93 |
Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs; excluding edoxaban) |
GI events (composite) Nausea Constipation Depression Glaucoma |
Gastrointestinal medications (composite) Gastrointestinal medications without acid disorder drugs Antiemetics Drugs for constipation |
PSSA: DOAC → Gastrointestinal medications (composite) ± 360 days aSR 0.95 (95%CI 0.92–0.97); n = 24 916 Apixaban → Gastrointestinal medications ± 360 days aSR 1.18 (95%CI 1.10–1.26); n = 3440 PSSA: DOAC → Gastrointestinal medications (without acid disorder drugs ± 360 days) aSR 1.26 (95%CI 1.24–1.29); n = 37 764 PSSA: DOAC → Antiemetic ± 360 days aSR 1.25 (95%CI 1.22–1.28); n = 27 080 PSSA: DOAC → Drugs for constipation ± 360 days aSR 1.25 (95%CI 1.22–1.27); n = 43 112 DOAC → Antidepressant medication ± 360 days aSR 1.26 (95%CI 1.23–1.30); n = 20 613 DOAC → Glaucoma medication ± 360 days aSR 1.01 (95%CI 0.97–1.05); n = 9473 |
| Takada (2014) 67 |
Low dose aspirin (LDA) Enteric coated Buffered |
GI complications |
H2RAs PPIs |
PSSA: LDA → PPIs ± 12 months Enteric‐coated LDA: aSR 1.20 (95%CI 0.97–1.49) Buffered LDA: aSR 0.59 (95%CI 0.33–1.05) PSSA: LDA → H2RAs ± 12 months Enteric‐coated LDA: aSR 0.83 (95%CI 0.67–1.02) Buffered LDA: aSR 0.78 (95%CI 0.350–1.21) |
| Yokoyama (2020) 84 | Oral anticoagulants | Osteoporosis | Bisphosphonate |
PSSA: Warfarin → Bisphosphonate ± 12 months aSR 1.43 (95%CI 1.02–2.03); n = 148 |
| Cardiovascular system | ||||
| Bowman (1995) 73 | Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) | Cough | Antitussive |
ACEI → Antitussive (<1 year; adjusted) aOR 1.53 (95%CI 1.17–2.01) |
|
Fujimoto (2014) 50 |
Statins | Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) | Drugs for storage LUTS |
PSSA: Statins → Drugs for storage LUTS ± 365 days All statins: aSR 1.17 (95% CI 1.05–1.30) Pravastatin: aSR 1.27 (95%CI 1.05–1.54) Statins → Solifenacin: aSR 1.47 (95% CI 1.25–1.73) Statins → Oxybutynin: aSR 1.71 (95% CI 1.09–2.72) |
| Gurwitz (1997) 23 |
Antihypertensive medication (see Appendix S1) |
Gout |
Anti‐gout medication (see Appendix S1) |
Antihypertensive → Anti‐gout medication < 365 days Non‐thiazide antihypertensive alone: aRR 1.00 (95%CI 0.65–1.53) Thiazide diuretic alone: aRR 1.99 (95%CI 1.21–3.26) Thiazide diuretic plus non‐thiazide antihypertensive: aRR 2.29 (95%CI 1.55–3.37) |
| Hallas (1996) 52 |
Beta blockers Cardiovascular drugs (see Appendix S1) |
Depression | Antidepressants |
Beta‐blocker → Antidepressant (study period) aRR 1.09 (95% CI 0.95, 1.26) ACEIs → Antidepressant aRR 1.29 (95% CI 1.08, 1.56) Calcium channel blockers → Antidepressant aRR 1.31 (95% CI 1.14, 1.51) |
| Lindberg & Hallas (1998) 98 | Cholesterol‐lowering medication | Depression | Antidepressants |
PSSA: Cholesterol‐lowering drug → Antidepressant (study period) All drugs: aSR 0.90 (95%CI 0.68–1.22); n = 184 Simvastatin: aSR 1.59 (1.08–2.45); n = 91 |
| Morris (2021) c , 116 | Dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (DH‐CCBs) | Oedema | Loop diuretic | Among 5 458 467 DH CCB users (weighted), 185 130 individuals (3.4% weighted) were identified with new loop diuretic use. |
| Pouwels (2013) 128 | ACEI | Urinary tract infection (UTI) | Nitrofurantoin |
PSSA: ACEI → Nitrofurantoin ± 4 weeks aSR 1.68 (95% CI 1.21–2.36); n = 161 |
| Pouwels (2014) b , 118 | ACEI | UTI | Nitrofurantoin |
ACEI → Nitrofurantoin (<30 days vs < 60–90 days) Crude OR = 1.84 (95%CI 1.51–2.25) |
| Pouwels (2016) 69 | Statin | Infection | Antibiotic |
PSSA: Statin → Antibiotic ± 13 months Any antibiotic: aSR 0.86 (95%CI 0.81–0.91) |
| Pratt (2015) 61 | Amiodarone | Hypothyroidism | Thyroxine |
PSSA: Amiodarone → Thyroxine ± 12 months Pooled aSR 2.63 (95%CI 1.47–4.72) |
| Savage (2020) 5 |
Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) ACEIs or Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) (comparator) |
Oedema | Loop diuretic |
CCB → Loop diuretic < 90 days Incident CCB users had a higher cumulative incidence of loop diuretic than the comparators (1.4% vs. 0.7% [other antihypertensive comparator] and 0.5% [general comparator], p < .001). CCB versus other antihypertensive (ACEI or ARB) 1–30 days: aHR 1.68 (95%CI 1.38–2.05) 31–60 days: aHR 2.26 (95%CI 1.76–2.92) 61–90 days: aHR 2.40 (95%CI 1.84–3.13) 91–180 days: aHR 2.24 (95%CI 1.86–2.71) 181–365 days: aHR 1.64 (95%CI 1.38–1.94) |
| Silwer (2006) 92 | Statin | Muscle pain | NSAID |
PSSA: Statin → NSAID ± 365 days aSR 0.94 (95%CI 0.85–1.05) |
| Singh (2021) 64 | CCBs | Lower extremity oedema | Diuretics |
CCB → Diuretic day 8 → day 365 Cohort 1: 161 incident diuretic users among 3304 incident CCB users (4.9%, 95%CI 4.2–5.7). Cohort 2: 1586 incident diuretic users among 36 462 prevalent CCB users (1.3%, 95%CI 4.1–4.6). Cohort 3: 130 incident diuretic use among 2525 participants with polypharmacy at the day of incident CCB dispensing (5.1, 95%CI 4.3–6.0). |
| Takada (2014) 129 | Statins | Sleep disturbance | Hypnotic drugs |
PSS: Statin → Hypnotic drugs ± 365 days aSR 1.18 (95%CI 1.11–1.25) |
| Thiessen (1990) e , 112 | Beta‐blocker | Depression | Antidepressants |
Beta‐blocker → Antidepressant < 34 days (concurrent use) Beta‐blocker: RR 2.6 (95%CI 2.3–3.0) |
| Vegter (2013) 18 | ACEI | Cough | Cough medication |
PSSA: ACEI → Cough medication ± 6 months 2000–2012: SR 2.0 (95%CI 1.8–2.2) |
| Vouri (2018) c , 6 | DH‐CCBs | Lower extremity oedema | Loop diuretic |
DH‐CCB → Loop diuretic (2014) The potential prescribing cascade was identified in 2.2 million visits (4.6%) using the primary definition of prescribing cascade. |
| Vouri (2019) 7 | DH‐CCBs | Lower extremity oedema | Loop diuretic |
PSSA: DH‐CCB → Loop diuretic (2014) ± 360 days aSR 1.87 (95%CI 1.84–1.90) |
| Vouri (2021) 105 | DH‐CCBs | DH‐CCB induced oedema | Loop diuretic |
PSSA: DH‐CCB → Loop diuretic ± 360 days aSR 2.27 (95% CI 1.44–3.58) |
| Vouri (2021) 104 |
DH‐CCB |
DH‐CCB induced oedema | Loop diuretic |
PSSA: DH‐CCB → Loop diuretic ± 360 days Relative to levothyroxine initiators: aSR 1.72 (95%CI 1.66–1.78) Relative to ACEI/ARBs initiators: aSR 1.45 (1.41–1.49) |
| Vouri (2022) 36 | Beta‐blocker | Oedema | Loop diuretic |
PSSA: Beta‐blocker → Loop diuretic ± 90 days aSR 1.78 (99%CI 1.72–1.84) |
| Yokoyama (2021) d , 85 | Amiodarone | Hypothyroidism | Thyroid preparations |
PSSA: Amiodarone → Thyroid preparations ± 12 months aSR 12.8 (95%CI 8.44–20.28) |
| Dermatologicals | ||||
| Azoulay (2007) b , 45 | Isotretinoin | Depression | Antidepressants |
Isotretinoin → Antidepressant (5 month risk and control windows) aRR 2.68 (95%CI 1.10–6.48) |
| Hersom (2003) 72 |
Isotretinoin Minocycline |
Depression |
Antidepressants (MAOIs excluded) |
Isotretinoin → Antidepressant (study period) aRR 0.97 (95%CI 0.92–1.02) Minocycline → Antidepressant (study period) aRR 0.98 (95%CI 0.95–1.02) |
| Sturkenboom (1995) 65 | Acitretin | Vulvo‐vaginal infection | Vulvo‐vaginal anti‐infective drug |
Acitretin → Vulvo‐vaginal anti‐infective (study period) Pooled Mantel–Haenszel IRR: 3.3 (95%CI 1.1–9.6) |
| Genito urinary system and sex hormones | ||||
| Dyson (2020) 33 | 5‐α reductase inhibitors (5‐ARI) | Depression | Antidepressant |
PSSA: 5‐ARI → Antidepressant ± 365 days Crude SR 0.84 (95% CI 0.80–0.89) |
| Hagberg (2017) d , 110 |
5‐ARI Alpha blocker (AB) |
Depression | Antidepressant (<90 days of depression diagnosis) |
5ARI → Antidepressant (compared with AB only users) 5‐ARIs only: aIRR = 0.94 (95%CI 0.85–1.04) 5‐ARIs + ABs: aIRR = 1.04 (94%CI 0.89–1.21) Nested case–control analysis (compared with AB only users) 5‐ARIs only: aOR 0.88 (95%CI 0.78–1.01) 5‐ARIs+ABs: aOR 0.90 (95%CI 0.73–1.10). |
| Anti‐infectives for systemic use | ||||
| Corrao (2005) d , 49 | Antibacterial drugs for systemic use | Arrhythmia triggered by prolonged QT interval | Antiarrhythmic |
PSSA: Antibacterial → Antiarrhythmic (study period) Erythromycin aSR 1.78 (95%CI 1.09, 2.89); n = 73 Ciprofloxacin aSR 1.17 (95%CI 1.02, 1.33); n = 870 Cohort analysis (standardised incidence ratios) Erythromycin: 1.96 (95%CI 1.45–2.59); n = 8956 Clarithromycin: 1.18 (95%CI 1.08–1.29); n = 97 900 Rokitamycin: 1.27 (95%CI 1.00–1.66); n = 15 247 Ciprofloxacin: 1.25 (95%CI 1.14–1.37); n = 58 070 Norfloxacin: 1.17 (95%CI 1.00–1.36); n = 22 421 Levofloxacin: 1.33 (95%CI 1.03–1.38); n = 14 159 Case–control analysis Erythromycin: OR 1.89 (95%CI 1.33–2.68) Clarithromycin: OR 1.18 (95%CI 1.04–1.34) Ciprofloxacin: OR 1.21 (95%CI 1.05–1.39) Levofloxacin: OR 1.33 (95%CI 1.04–1.70) |
| Antineoplastic and immunomodulating agents | ||||
| Farkas (2021) 21 | Aromatase inhibitors (AI) |
For the treatment of menopausal symptoms Vasomotor symptoms, vaginal dryness, arthralgias, pain |
See Appendix S1 |
Medication use in 12 months before AI: Any new side effect medication: 7436 (40.2%) Opiates 31.5%; SSRIs 16.1%; Gabapentin 7.0% Medication use in the 24 months after AI: Any new side effect medication: 13179 (71.2%) Opiates 55.1%; SSRIs 22.6%; Benzodiazepines 18.4%; Tramadol 17.7%; Gabapentin 14.6% |
| Musculo‐skeletal system | ||||
| Gurwitz (1994) a , 22 | NSAID | Hypertension | Antihypertensive |
NSAID → Antihypertensive (<365 days) OR = 2.01 (95%CI 1.89–2.14) |
| Nervous system | ||||
| Avorn (1995) a , 19 | Neuroleptics | Extrapyramidal symptoms | APD (excluding amantadine monotherapy) |
Any Anti‐Parkinson drug (<90 days) Any neuroleptic: aOR 5.4 (95%CI 4.8–6.1) Anticholinergic anti‐Parkinson drug (<90 days) Any neuroleptic: aOR 8.5 (95%CI 4.8–6.1) Dopaminergic agent (<90 days) Any neuroleptic: aOR 2.2 (95%CI 1.9–2.7) |
| Brandt‐Christensen (2007) 37 |
APD Control 1: Antidiabetics Control 2: unexposed |
Depression | Antidepressants |
Anti‐Parkinson drug → Antidepressant (versus unexposed) APD cohort: RR 2.10 (95%CI 2.04–2.16) Antidiabetic cohort: RR 1.34 (95%CI 1.32–1.36) |
| Dalgard Dunvald (2020) 38 | Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) | Restless leg syndrome (RLS) |
Dopamine agonist Quinine |
PSSA: SSRI → RLS drug ± 365 days Any drug: aSR 0.99 (95%CI 0.95–1.02) Dopamine agonist only: aSR 1.21 (95%CI 1.12–1.32); n = 2267 |
| Gau (2010) a , 130 |
Lithium Carbamazepine Valproate |
Hypothyroidism | Thyroxine, liothyronine or thyroid hormone and hypothyroidism diagnosis (composite) |
Likelihood for incident hypothyroidism (study period) Lithium: OR 1.41 (95%CI 1.14–1.74) Carbamazepine: OR 1.37 (95%CI 1.13–1.65) Valproate: OR 1.72 (95%CI 1.40–2.11) |
| Gill (2005) 26 | Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AChEI) | Urge urinary incontinence | Urinary anticholinergics |
AChEI → Anticholinergic Patients dispensed cholinesterase inhibitors were more likely to receive an anticholinergic medication in follow‐up (4.5% vs. 3.1%; p < .001). |
| Hirano (2020) 100 |
Anxiolytic Hypnotic Antidepressants Antipsychotics |
EPS | Diagnosis of EPS and APD prescription in same month (composite) |
PSSA: Psychotropic medication → EPS and APD ± 12 months Anxiolytic: aSR 2.48 (95%CI 2.16–2.85); n = 992 Hypnotic: aSR 2.28 (95%CI 1.97–2.64); n = 872 Antidepressant: aSR 2.26 (95%CI 1.93–2.66); n = 728 Antipsychotic: aSR 9.24 (95%CI 7.35–11.8); n = 817 |
| Kalisch Ellett (2018) c , 114 | Antipsychotics |
EPS Hyperprolactinaemia Diabetes mellitus |
Anticholinergic Hyperprolactinaemia medications Oral diabetes medications |
Concomitant medication use Anticholinergic: n = 51 (0.7%) Hyperprolactinaemia medications: n = 8 (0.1%) Oral diabetes medicines: n = 874 (11.8%) |
| Kroger (2015) b , 117 | AChEI | Urinary incontinence | Drugs for urinary frequency and incontinence |
AChEI → Drugs for urinary frequency < 90 days All patients (n = 2700): aHR 1.13 (95%CI 0.97–1.32) Rivastigmine patients (n = 1853): aHR 1.13 (95%CI 0.95–1.34) Galantamine patients (n = 1043): aHR 1.10 (95%CI 0.81–1.50) |
| Lai (2013) 79 | Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) | Hypothyroidism | Levothyroxine |
PSSA: AEDs → Levothyroxine ± 12 months Any AED: aSR 1.13 (99%CI 1.09–1.18) Carbamazepine: aSR 1.21 (99%CI 1.08–1.34) Phenobarbital: aSR 1.25 (99%CI 1.15–1.36) Phenytoin: aSR 1.75 (99%CI 1.58–1.94) Valproate: aSR 1.34 (99%CI 1.20–1.49) Oxcarbazepine: aSR 1.22 (99%CI 1.03–1.46) |
| Lampela (2016) 44 | AChEI or Memantine | Urinary incontinence | Urinary anticholinergics |
AChEI → Urinary anticholinergics (versus memantine users) <6 months: aHR 1.47 (95%CI 1.17–1.86) <12 months: aHR 1.41 (95%CI 1.17–1.69) |
| Marras (2016) 27 |
Lithium Valproic acid Antidepressant |
Drug induced tremor diagnosed as Parkinson's Disease (PD) |
Anti‐Parkinson drug or PD diagnosis (see Appendix S1) |
Start of dopaminergic drug (no previous antipsychotic use) Lithium (versus antidepressant): aHR (95%CI 1.06–3.30) Start of anti‐Parkinson drug or PD diagnosis (no previous antipsychotic use) Lithium (versus antidepressant): aHR 1.68 (95%CI 1.13–2.48) |
| Masurkar (2021) 24 | AChEI | Overactive bladder | Urinary anticholinergic |
AChEI → Anticholinergic cascade <6 months Rivastigmine: aHR = 1.0 Donepezil: aHR = 1.55 (95%CI 1.31–1.83) Galantamine: aHR = 1.17 (95%CI 0.87–1.58) |
| Movig (2002) 41 | SSRI | Urinary incontinence | Spasmolytic agent or 30 or more units of incontinence wear |
SSRI → Spasmolytic agent/incontinence wear <3 month During SSRI (versus before SSRI): IDR 1.57 (95%CI 1.38–1.79) During SSRI (versus after SSRI): IDR 2.03 (95%CI 1.76–2.34) During SSRI (versus before and after SSRI): IDR 1.75 (95%CI 1.56–1.97) Risk for incontinence during exposed period (versus non‐exposed) aRR 1.61, 95%CI 1.42–1.82 |
| Narayan (2019) 25 |
AChEI or Memantine |
Several ADRs examined relating to anticholinergic medication use | Anticholinergics (see Appendix S1) |
Anti‐dementia drug → Marker medication ± 180 days Exposed to at least one anticholinergic ±180 days: n = 1439 Exposed to at least one anticholinergic after anti‐dementia drug: n = 416 |
| Onder (2014) c , 46 |
Anti‐Parkinson drugs and antipsychotics (concomitant use) |
Parkinsonism (side effect of antipsychotics); Behavioural disorders (side effect of anti‐Parkinson drugs) |
Anti‐Parkinson drugs and antipsychotics (concomitant use) |
Prevalence of concomitant use of anti‐Parkinson and antipsychotic medication (2011) Total population: n = 25 949 (0.2%) 65–74 years: n = 10 200 (0.2%) 75–84 years: n = 10 625 (0.2%) ≥ 85 years: n = 5124 (0.3%) |
| Park (2018) 94 | Benzodiazepines | Dementia | Anti‐dementia drugs |
PSSA: Benzodiazepines → Anti‐dementia drugs ± 3 years aSR 2.19 (95%CI 1.92–2.49); n = 1285 |
| Petri (1988) 55 | Flunarizine | Depression | Antidepressant |
Flunarizine → Antidepressant < 30 days Number of antidepressant starts during or within 30 days after flunarizine use was 5 out of a total of 34 histories |
| Petri (1990) 57 | Flunarizine | Depression or Parkinsonism | Antidepressant or Anti‐Parkinson drug |
Flunarizine → Antidepressant (study period) Incidence Rate = 1.342 (95%CI 1.00–1.80) Flunarizine → Anti‐Parkinson drug In a subset of 777 flunarizine recipients there were 10 participants who received anti‐Parkinson drugs |
| Pratt (2013) 60 | Antipsychotics | Acute hyperglycaemia | Insulin |
PSSA: Olanzapine → Insulin ± 12 months USA Public: aSR 1.14 (95%CI 1.1–1.17) Sweden: aSR 1.53 (95%CI 1.13–2.06) Risperidone → Insulin ± 12 months USA Public: aSR 1.09 (95%CI 1.07–1.12) |
| Read (2021) 28 | Gabapentinoid | Oedema | Diuretic |
Gabapentinoid → Diuretic < 90 days (versus non‐users) aHR 1.44 (95%CI 1.23–1.70). |
| Rochon (2005) 29 | Antipsychotic | Parkinsonism | Anti‐Parkinson drug or Parkinson diagnosis (composite) |
Antipsychotic → Anti‐Parkinson drug/diagnosis <1 year (versus atypical antipsychotic) Typical antipsychotics: adjusted HR 1.30 (95%CI 1.04–1.58) No therapy: aHR 0.40 (95%CI 0.29–0.43) |
| Takada (2016) 66 | Benzodiazepine | Dementia | Anti‐dementia drug |
PSSA: Benzodiazepine → Anti‐dementia drug ± 12 months 12 months: aSR 1.23 (95%CI 1.11–1.37) |
| Takeuchi (2015) 43 | Atypical antipsychotics | Hyperlipidemia | Anti‐hyperlipidemic drugs |
PSSA: Atypical antipsychotics → Anti‐hyperlipidemic drugs Olanzapine ±360 days: aSR 2.19 (95%CI 1.55–3.12) |
| Thacker (2006) 107 | AChEI | Drug‐induced airways complications | Antibacterial and oral corticosteroid |
AChEI → Antibacterial and oral corticosteroid <1 month Fully‐adjusted RR = 1.19 (95%CI 0.52–2.74) |
| Venalainen (2017) 70 | AChEI |
Nausea Dyspepsia Diarrhoea Urinary incontinence Seizures Anxiety Insomnia Depression |
Antiemetics PPIs/H2RAs Loperamide/Oral rehydration sachets Oxybutynin Anxiolytics Anticonvulsants Hypnotics and sedatives Antidepressants |
AChEI → Marker drug ± 1 year Loperamide/Oral rehydration: aSR 1.42 (95%CI 1.14–1.77); n = 348 Anxiolytics: aSR 1.16 (95%CI 1.01–1.34); n = 807 Hypnotics and sedatives: aSR 1.19 (95%CI 1.05–1.36); n = 963 Antiemetics: aSR 1.18 (95%CI 1.05–1.32); n = 1202 Anticonvulsants: aSR 1.26 (95%CI 1.03–1.55); n = 389 PPI/H2RAs: aSR 0.87 (95%CI 0.77–0.98), n = 1079 Antidepressant: aSR 0.77 (95%CI 0.70–0.85), n = 1698 Oxybutynin: aSR 1.04 (95%CI 0.81–1.34), n = 261 |
| Vouri (2020) c , 131 | AChEI or Memantine | Rhinorrhea |
Rhinorrhea medications (see Appendix S1) |
AChEI/Memantine → Rhinorrhea medications (concomitant use) AChEI users were more likely to use a rhinorrhea medication compared to non‐AChEI users, OR 7.16 (95%CI 2.25–22.73); adjusted OR = 4.7 (95%CI 1.53–14.43) |
| Wang (2021) 80 | Varenicline |
Neuropsychiatric adverse events: Depression Anxiety Sleep disorders |
Antidepressant Anxiolytics Hypnotics and sedatives (composite outcome) |
PSSA: Varenicline → Any NPAE drug ± 365 days aSR 1.00 (95%CI 0.89–1.13) PSSA: Varenicline → Hypnotics and sedatives ± 365 days Sleep disorder drug: aSR = 1.25 (95% CI 1.05–1.48) |
| Wang (2021) 42 |
Varenicline (Nicotine replacement therapy [NRT] as comparator) |
Neuropsychiatric adverse events: Depression Anxiety Insomnia |
Antidepressants Antidepressants in combination with psycholeptics Anxiolytics Hypnotics and sedatives (composite outcome) |
General population with psychiatric disorders < 24 weeks Any NPAE medication: adjusted OR 0.82 (95% CI 0.68 to 0.99) General population without psychiatric disorders < 24 weeks Any NPAE medication: adjusted OR 0.85, (95% CI 0.72 to 1.00) COPD population with psychiatric disorders < 24 weeks Any NPAE medication: adjusted OR 0.97 (95% CI 0.66 to 1.44) COPD population without psychiatric disorders < 24 weeks Any NPAE medication: adjusted OR 0.81 (95% CI 0.54 to 1.20) |
| Yokoyama (2020) 86 | Antipsychotics | Osteoporosis | Bisphosphonate |
PSSA: Antipsychotic → Bisphosphonate No association identified. |
| Respiratory system | ||||
| Fox (2022) 34 | Montelukast | Neuropsychiatric adverse events (NPAE) |
Antidepressants Benzodiazepines Hypnotics Antipsychotics Mood stabilisers Buspirone (composite outcome) |
PSSA: Montelukast → Any NPAE medication ± 14–365 days SR 0.84 (95%CI 0.80–0.89) |
| Henriksen (2017) 39 | Inhaled corticosteroids | Oral candidiasis | Systemic or topical antifungal |
PSSA: Inhaled corticosteroid → Topical antifungal ± 12 months Crude SR 2.89 (95%CI 2.80–2.97) PSSA: Inhaled corticosteroid → Systemic antifungal ± 12 months Crude SR 1.50 (95%CI 1.46–1.54) |
| Petri (1991) 56 | Inhaled corticosteroids | Oral candidiasis | Topical antifungal |
Inhaled corticosteroids → Topical antifungal < 90 days Crude OR = 1.66 (n = 21) |
| Van Boven (2013) 71 | Inhaled corticosteroids | Oral candidiasis | Topical antifungal |
PSSA: Inhaled corticosteroids → Topical antifungal ± 12 months Crude SR 1.94 (95%CI 1.71–2.21) |
| Winkel (2018) 40 | Montelukast | Depression | Antidepressant (excluding bupropion) |
PSSA: Montelukast → Antidepressant ± 1 year Crude SR 1.19 (95%CI 1.11–1.28) |
| Sensory organs | ||||
| Roughead (2012) 97 |
Timolol Latanoprost Bimatoprost Pilocarpine Brimonidine |
Exacerbation of airways disease Exacerbation of depression |
Inhaled beta‐agonists Inhaled corticosteroids Oral corticosteroids SSRI |
PSSA: Glaucoma → marker medications ± 1 year Timolol → Inhaled beta agonist: aSR 1.48 (95%CI 1.22–1.78); n = 786 Timolol → Inhaled corticosteroid: aSR 1.43 (95%CI 1.13–1.81); n = 494 Latanoprost → Inhaled beta agonist: aSR 1.24 (95%CI 1.11–1.38); n = 2251 Latanoprost → Oral corticosteroid: aSR 1.14 (95%CI 1.00–1.29); n = 1671 Timolol → Antidepressant: aSR 1.24 (95%CI 1.07–1.43); n = 1253 Timolol → SSRI: aSR 1.30 (95%CI 1.08–1.56); n = 791 Latanoprost → Antidepressant: aSR 1.16 (95%CI 1.03–1.31); n = 1871 Latanoprost → SSRI: aSR 1.20 (95%CI 1.03–1.39); n = 1155 |
| Multiple medication groups examined | ||||
| Brandt‐Christensen (2006) 82 |
Antidepressant Lithium Antidiabetic |
Parkinsonism |
APD (see Appendix S1 for exclusions) |
Index drug → Anti‐Parkinson drug (versus unexposed) Antidepressant: RR 1.79 (95%CI 1.72–1.86) Lithium: RR 1.88 (95%CI 1.60–2.20) Antidiabetic: RR 0.80 (95%CI 0.74–0.86) |
| Bytzer & Hallas (2000) 81 | Predefined list of 32 index medications (see Appendix S1) | Dyspepsia or nausea | Cisapride or Metoclopramide |
PSSA: Index medication → Cisapride < 100 days NSAIDS: aSR = 1.33 (95%CI 1.02–1.77); n = 211 Methylxanthines: aSR = 2.36 (1.00–8.44); n = 18 PSSA: Index medication → Metoclopramide < 100 days Insulin aSR 2.91 (95%CI 1.40–8.11); n = 28 Opioids: aSR 2.84 (95%CI 2.48–3.28); n = 1017 Potassium supplement: 1.42 (95%CI 1.15–1.79); n = 324 Digoxin: 2.87 (95%CI 2.01–4.35); n = 138 Nitrates: 1.74 (95%CI 1.16–2.77); n = 88 Loop diuretics: 1.50 (95%CI 1.23–1.85); n = 383 ACEIs: 2.27 (95%CI 1.46–3.85); n = 77 Oral corticosteroids: 1.33 (95%CI 1.11–1.60); n = 458 Antibiotics: 1.40 (95%CI 1.24–1.60); n = 974 Penicillins: 1.38 (95%CI 1.21–1.59); n = 868 Macrolides: 1.58 (95%CI 1.31–1.94); n = 414 NSAIDs: 1.48 (95%CI 1.28–1.74); n = 676 Asthma drugs: 1.42 (95%CI 1.14–1.79); n = 307 Methylxanthines: 2.03 (95%CI 1.25–3.65); n = 63 |
| Caughey (2010) 48 |
Medicines commonly associated with dizziness identified (see Appendix S1) |
Dizziness | Prochlorperazine |
PSSA: Index medication → Prochlorperazine ± 12 months Cardiac therapy: aSR = 1.14 (95%CI 1.06–1.22); n = 3017 Nitrates: aSR = 1.11 (95%CI 1.03–1.21); n = 2224 Isosorbide mononitrate: aSR = 1.21 (95%CI 1.07–1.38); n = 918 Diuretic: aSR = 1.07 (95%CI 1.01–1.14); n = 3845 Beta‐blocker: aSR = 1.13 (95%CI 1.05–1.21); n = 3156 CCBs: aSR = 1.22 (95%CI 1.16–1.36); n = 2696 ACE inhibitors: aSR = 1.22 (95%CI 1.14–1.31); n = 3162 AR2B: aSR = 1.20 (95%CI 1.11–1.30); n = 2577 Statins: aSR = 1.50 (95%CI 1.40–1.61); n = 3411 NSAIDs: aSR = 1.37 (95%CI 1.27–1.47); n = 3079 Opioids: aSR = 1.24 (95%CI 1.17–1.31); n = 5266 Sedatives: aSR = 1.18 (95%CI 1.11–1.26); n = 3470 |
| de Jong (2003) 108 | Antidepressant with or without NSAID | GI adverse effects |
H2RAs PPIs Prostaglandins |
Antidepressant → Ulcer drugs (compared with TCA only) SSRI: IRR 1.2 (95%CI 0.5–2.8); n = 1181 SSRI + NSAID: IRR 12.4 (95%CI 3.2–48.0); n = 86 |
| Garrison (2012) 51 |
Statin Diuretic Inhaled long‐acting beta‐agonists (LABA) |
Nocturnal leg cramps | Quinine |
PSSA: Index drug → Quinine ± 1 year All statins: aSR 1.16 (95%CI 1.04–1.29); n = 1326 All LABAs: aSR 2.42 (95%CI 2.02–2.89); n = 576 LABA alone: aSR 2.17 (95%CI 1.56–3.02); n = 137 LABA‐corticosteroid: aSR 2.55 (95%CI 2.06–3.12); n = 439 All diuretics: aSR 1.47 (95%CI 1.33–1.63); n = 1590 Loop diuretic: aSR 1.20 (95%CI 1.00–1.44); n = 447 Thiazide diuretic: aSR 1.48 (95%CI 1.29–1.68); n = 977 Potassium‐sparing diuretic: aSR 2.12 (95%CI 1.61–2.78); n = 206 |
| Hallas & Bytzer (1998) 89 | Predefined list of 33 medications (see Appendix S1) | Dyspepsia | Ulcer drug prescription |
PSSA: Index drug → Ulcer drug prescription ± 100 days NSAIDs: aSR 1.80 (95%CI 1.64–1.99) CCBs: aSR 1.40 (95%CI 1.18–1.67) Oral corticosteroids: aSR 1.15 (95%CI 1.02–1.30) ACEIs: aSR 1.38 (1.12–1.73) Methylxanthines: aSR 1.49 (1.05–2.19) |
| Hashimoto (2015) 53 |
Medicines that cause storage symptoms; Medicines that cause voiding symptoms |
LUTS | Medications for (LUTS) |
PSSA: Index drug → Medications for LUTs ± 12 months Oxycodone: aSR 1.20 (95%CI 1.03–1.41) Morphine: aSR: 1.29 (95%CI 1.14–1.45) Donepezil: aSR: 1.98 (95%CI 1.57–2.50) Intestinal lavage solution: aSR 1.86 (95%CI 1.65–2.10) Cyclophosphamide: aSR 1.52 (95%CI 1.14–2.04) Levodopa/benserazide: aSR 1.82 (95%CI 1.18–2.81) Amantadine: aSR 1.53 (95%CI 1.12–2.09) Paroxetine: aSR 1.77 (95%CI 1.33–2.36) Milnacipran: aSR 2.10 (95%CI 1.28–3.45) Diazepam: aSR 1.73 (95%CI 1.46–2.06) Risperidone: aSR 1.55 (95%CI 1.34–1.79) Levomepromazine: aSR 2.20 (95%CI 1.34–1.79) Sulpiride: aSR 1.32 (95%CI 1.01–1.72) Cimetidine: aSR 1.99 (95%CI 1.24–3.20) Scopolamine butylbromide: aSR 1.72 (95%CI 1.55–1.92) Tiotropium bromide: aSR 1.75 (95%CI 1.42–2.16) Cibenzoline: sSR 2.97 (95%CI 1.92–4.59) Amezinium metilsufate: aSR 1.89 (95%CI 1.10–3.26) |
| Huh (2019) 31 | Metoclopramide or levosulpiride | Drug induced Parkinsonism | Levodopa |
PSSA: Metoclopramide → Levodopa < 90 days aOR 2.94 (95%CI 2.35, 3.67) PSSA: Levosulpiride → Levodopa < 90 days aOR 3.30 (95%CI 2.52, 4.32) |
| Kalisch Ellett (2014) 74 | See Appendix S1 | Urinary incontinence | Oxybutynin |
PSSA: Index medication → Oxybutynin ± 12 months Prazosin (women only): aSR 1.84 (95%CI 1.29–2.63); n = 135 Low‐ceiling diuretics, excluding thiazides: aSR 1.22 (95%CI 1.06–1.41); n = 750 CCBs: aSR 1.45 (95%CI 1.33–1.57); n = 2230 ACEIs: aSR 1.28 (95%CI 1.19–1.39); n = 2616 ACEIs + diuretic: aSR 1.35 (1.15–1.58); n = 620 ARBs: aSR 1.42 (1.30–1.55); n = 2040 ARB+ diuretic: aSR 1.32 (1.16–1.49); n = 999 HRT: aSR 1.54 (95%CI 1.42–1.67); n = 2446 Antipsychotics: aSR 0.83 (95%CI 0.78–0.89); n = 2121 Hypnotic sedatives: aSR 1.10 (95%CI 1.03–1.18); n = 3326 |
| Kim (2019) a , 119 |
Propulsives Antipsychotics Antivertigo agent (see Appendix S1) |
Drug induced Parkinsonism |
APD or Parkinson diagnosis (composite) (see Appendix S1) |
Index medication → Anti‐Parkinson drug/diagnosis <1 year Levosulpiride: OR 4.3 (95%CI 3.5–5.3); n = 595 Mosapride: OR 2.1 (95%CI 1.7–2.6); n = 430 Domperidone: OR 2.1 (95%CI 1.6–2.8); n = 247 Metoclopramide: OR 2.7 (95%CI 1.8–4.1); n = 121 Itopride: OR 1.6 (95%CI 1.2–2.2); n = 232 Clebopride: OR 12.8 (95%CI 2.8–57.0); n = 19 Combined propulsive use: OR 3.9 (95%CI 2.8–5.5); n = 219 Typical antipsychotic: OR 6.4 (95%CI 1.4–28.2); n = 17 Atypical antipsychotic: OR 2.4 (95%CI 1.2–4.9); n = 56 Risperidone: OR 13.5 (95%CI 1.8–102.1); n = 23 Flunarizine: OR 5.0 (95%CI 2.7–9.0); n = 86 |
| Ko (2019) 76 |
Statins Statins |
Skin and soft tissue infection New onset diabetes mellitus |
Dicloxacillin/Flucloxacillin Antidiabetic |
PSSA: Statin → Antibiotic ± 365 days aSR 1.40 (95%CI 1.34–1.47); n = 7726 PSSA: Statin → Antidiabetic ± 365 days aSR 1.09 (95%CI 1.04–1.15); n = 6794 PSSA: Antidiabetic → Antibiotic ± 365 days aSR 1.24 (95%CI 1.15–1.33); n = 2828 |
| Nishtala & Chyou (2017) 54 |
Amiodarone Lithium Frusemide Fluticasone Simvastatin |
Hypothyroidism Hyperthyroidism Hypokalaemia Oral candidiasis Muscle cramps |
Thyroxine Carbimazole Potassium Nystatin Quinine sulphate |
PSSA: Amiodarone → Thyroxine ± 360 days aSR 3.57 (95% CI 3.17–4.02) Lithium → Thyroxine ± 360 days aSR 3.43 (95% CI 2.55–4.70) Amiodarone → Carbimazole ± 360 days aSR 8.81 (95% CI 5.86–13.77) Simvastatin → Quinine sulphate ± 360 days aSR 1.69 (95% CI 1.61–1.77) Fluticasone → Nystatin ± 360 days aSR 2.34 (95% CI 2.19–2.50) Frusemide → Potassium ± 360 days aSR 2.94 (95% CI 2.83–3.05) |
| Pouwels (2013) 132 |
SSRI with or without NSAID |
Peptic ulcer | Peptic ulcer drug treatment |
PSSA: SSRI +/− NSAID → Peptic ulcer treatment ± 4 weeks SSRI: aSR 0.83 (95%CI 0.65–1.06) NSAID: aSR 2.50 (95%CI 2.27–2.76) SSRI + NSAID: aSR 1.48 (95%CI 0.90–2.49) |
| Rasmussen (2015) 62 |
Antithrombotic drugs Cardiovascular drugs (see Appendix S1) |
Erectile dysfunction | 5‐phosphodiesterase inhibitor |
PSSA: Cardiovascular drugs → 5‐phosphodiesterase inhibitor ± 6 months Thiazides: aSR 1.28 (95%CI 1.20, 1.38); NNTH 370 (95%CI 300, 500); n = 3118 ß‐blockers: aSR 1.18 (95%CI 1.09, 1.28); NNTH 680 (95%CI 480, 1200); n = 2511 CCBs: aSR 1.29 (95%CI 1.21, 1.38); NNTH 330 (95%CI 270, 440); n = 3379 ACEIs: aSR 1.29 (95%CI 1.21, 1.37); NNTH 350 (95%CI 290, 440); n = 4182 ARBs: aSR 1.16 (95%CI 1.06, 1.26); NNTH 540 (95%CI 360, 1200); n = 2082 |
| Singh (2021) 63 | Antipsychotic or Metoclopramide | Parkinsonism | Anti‐Parkinson drug |
Antipsychotic/metoclopramide → Anti‐Parkinson drug < day 8–365 Cohort 1: 36 (0.8%) incident anti‐Parkinson drug users among 4534 incident antipsychotic/metoclopramide users Cohort 2: 20 (0.5%) incident users of anti‐Parkinsonian drugs among 3485 antipsychotic/metoclopramide users |
| Trenaman (2021) 30 |
AChEIs Metoclopramide CCBs |
Urinary incontinence Parkinsonism Pedal oedema |
Urinary medications Anti‐Parkinson drug Diuretic |
AChEI → Urinary medications <6 months 60 cases of prescribing cascade were identified. Extending to 365 days resulted in 52 additional cases. Metoclopramide → Anti‐Parkinson drug <6 months 11 cases of the prescribing cascade were identified. Extending to 365 days resulted in 5 additional cases. CCB → Diuretic <6 months 289 cases of prescribing cascade were identified. Extending to 365 days resulted in 369 cases. |
| Exploratory studies | ||||
| Tsiropoulos (2009) 68 | AEDs | Exploratory analysis | Any other medication presented in the same period |
PSSA: All AEDs → Marker medication Propulsives ±183 days: aSR 1.31 (95%CI 1.11–1.56); n = 571 Laxatives ±183 days: aSR 1.57 (95%CI 1.29–1.92); n = 432 Topical corticosteroids ±183 days: aSR 1.32 (95%CI 1.16–1.52); n = 900 PSSA: Carbamazepine → Marker medication Propulsives ±183 days: aSR 1.57 (95%CI 1.14–2.19); n = 163 Laxatives ±183 days: aSR 1.61 (95%CI 1.01–2.59); n = 82 Topical corticosteroids ±183 days: aSR 1.48 (95%CI 1.17–1.87); n = 305 Anti‐acne preparations ±183 days: aSR 3.66 (95%CI 1.31–2.62); n = 23 Bone disease treatment ±548 days: aSR 1.98 (95%CI 1.03–3.92); n = 43 PSSA: Oxcarbazepine → Marker medication Propulsives ±183 days: aSR 2.54 (95%CI 1.71–3.85); n = 119 Laxatives ±183 days: aSR 3.74 (95%CI 2.31–6.29); n = 103 Topical corticosteroids ±183 days: aSR 1.40 (95%CI 1.08–1.83); n = 245 Phenobarbital → Marker medication Bone disease treatment ±548 days: aSR 4.51 (95%CI 1.42–8.82); n = 18 |
| King (2020) 75 | 654 different medications examined | New onset heart failure | Furosemide |
PSSA: Index drug → Furosemide ± 12 months Fosaprepitant: aSR 2.60 (95%CI 2.42–2.81); n = 3394 Granisetron: aSR 2.24 (95%CI 2.42–2.81); n = 2299 Tropisetron: aSR 1.43 (95%CI 1.08–1.79); n = 340 Degarelix: aSR 1.66 (95%CI 1.29–2.06); n = 293 Brinzolamide: aSR 1.18 (95%CI 1.06–1.32); n = 1304 Travoprost: aSR 1.18 (95%CI 1.01–1.35); n = 788 Latanoprost: aSR 1.11 (95%CI 1.04–1.19); n = 3619 Brimonidine: aSR 1.10 (95%CI 1.00–1.20); n = 2012 Pizotifen: aSR 1.27 (95%CI 1.11–1.44); n = 978 Rizatriptan: aSR 1.16 (95%CI 1.03–1.31); n = 1036 Sumatriptan: aSR 1.16 (95%CI 1.03–1.29); n = 1250 Benzhexol: aSR 1.65 (95%CI 1.12–2.24); n = 142 Mesalazine: aSR 1.33 (95%CI 1.13–1.54); n = 646 Levetiracetam: aSR 1.13 (95%CI 1.03–1.23); n = 2005 Fluorometholone: aSR 1.11 (95%CI 1.07–1.15); n = 9410 Ranitidine: aSR 1.08 (95%CI 1.04–1.12); n = 10 875 Denosumab: aSR 1.07 (95%CI 1.03–1.10); n = 16 714 |
| Wahab (2016) 106 | 691 different medications examined | Heart failure | Furosemide |
PSSA: Index medication → Furosemide ± 1 year Teriparatide: aSR 5.02 (95% CI 1.07–23.7); n = 10 Lodoxamide: aSR 2.50 (95% C; 1.06–5.91); n = 27 Famotidine: aSR 1.69 (95% CI 1.38–2.08); n = 423 Latanoprost: aSR 1.48 (95% CI 1.38–1.59); n = 3107 Pilocarpine: aSR 1.43 (95% CI 1.16–1.77); n = 632 Brinzolamide: aSR 1.37 (95% CI 1.16–1.62); n = 564 Betahistine: aSR 1.31 (95% CI 1.07–1.62); n = 359 Ranitidine: aSR 1.24 (95% CI 1.17–1.31); n = 5554 Paracetamol: aSR 1.06 (95% CI 1.04–1.09); n = 24 210 |
| Chen (2021) 87 |
Confirmatory analysis Amiodarone Exploratory analysis ACEIs Statins Buffered LDA Enteric‐coated LDA DH‐CCBs |
Hypothyroidism Gout Cough UTI Storage LUTS Depression Sleep disturbances Hepatotoxicity Muscle pain Skin and soft tissue infection Infection in those with type‐2 diabetes GI complications Oedema |
Confirmatory analysis Thyroxine Allopurinol Exploratory analysis (see Appendix S1) |
Confirmatory PSSA ± 1 year Amiodarone → Thyroxine: aSR 3.77 (95%CI 3.43–4.14); n = 2667 Amiodarone → Allopurinol: aSR 0.83 (95%CI 0.76–0.90); n = 2071 Exploratory PSSA ± 1 year ACEIs → Antitussive: aSR 1.33 (95% CI 1.31–1.34); n = 141 924 Statins → Drugs for urinary frequency: aSR 1.17 (95% CI 1.16–1.19); n = 107 422 Statins → Antidepressants: aSR 1.19 (95% CI 1.18–1.21); n = 117 443 Statins → Hypnotics: aSR 1.10 (95% CI 1.09–1.12); n = 124 061 Statins → Ursodeoxycholic acid: aSR 1.26 (95% CI 1.21–1.31); n = 11 231 Statins → NSAIDs: aSR 1.02 (95% CI 1.02–1.03); n = 430 774 Statins → Dicloxacillin/Flucloxacillin: aSR 1.18 (95% CI 1.15–1.22); n = 23 068 Statins → Antibiotic treatment (those with type 2 diabetes): aSR 1.38 (95% CI 1.36–1.39); n = 150 016 DH‐CCBs → Loop diuretic: aSR 1.46 (95% CI 1.45–1.48); n = 139 375 |
| Lai (2014) 78 |
Sulpiride Non‐sulpiride antipsychotics |
EPS Diabetes Hyperprolactinaemia Cardiac arrhythmias |
Confirmatory analyses: Anticholinergics Oral hyperglycaemics Prolactine inhibitors Class 1B antiarrhythmics Exploratory analyses: all medications prescribed after the index date |
Confirmatory PSSA analyses ± 12 months Sulpiride → Anticholinergics: aSR 1.73 (95%CI 1.46–2.06); n = 568 Haloperidol → Anticholinergics: aSR 1.99 (95%CI 1.68–2.35); n = 611 Risperidone → Anticholinergics: aSR 1.21 (95%CI 1.04–1.41); n = 702 Olanzapine → Anticholinergics: aSR 0.73 (95%CI 0.58–0.93); n = 281 Amisulpiride → Anticholinergics: aSR 0.54 (95%CI 0.40–0.73); n = 188 Sulpiride → Prolactine inhibitors: aSR 12.0 (95%CI 1.59–91.2); n = 16 Amisulpiride→Prolactine inhibitors: aSR 8.05 (95%CI 1.00–65.4); n = 8 Haloperidol → Class 1b antiarrhythmics: sSR 2.81 (95%CI 1.03.7.66); n = 21 Exploratory PSSA analyses: Sulpiride → Marker medication ± 12 months Stomatological preparations: aSR 1.86 (95%CI 1.13–3.07); n = 71 Corticosteroids for local oral treatment: aSR 1.71 (95%CI 1.00–2.91); n = 59 Beta blockers, any: aSR 1.42 (95%CI 1.12–1.71); n = 371 Beta blockers, non‐selective: aSR 1.61 (95%CI 1.28–2.03); n = 304 Dermatological preparations, corticosteroids: aSR 2.18 (95%CI 1.21–3.92); n = 57 Corticosteroids weak, other combinations: aSR 2.15 (95%CI 1.08–4.28); n = 42 Quinolones: aSR 1.50 (95%CI 1.00–2.24); n = 101 Fluroquinolones: aSR 1.81 (95%CI 1.03–3.17); n = 55 Anti‐inflammatory preparations, non‐steroidal for topical use: aSR 1.36 (95%CI 1.01–1.84); n = 173 |
| Hallas (2018) 101 |
186 758 associations tested in the main analysis; 30 best signals reported |
Exploratory analysis | 30 strongest signals reported |
PSSA: Index → Marker medication ± 12 months Opioids → Drugs for constipation (crude SR 2.34, 95%CI 2.31–2.38); n = 84 020 High ceiling diuretics → Potassium SR 3.31 (95%CI 3.24–3.38); n = 48 539 Thiazide → Potassium SR 3.46 (95%CI 3.39–3.54); n = 45 175 Opioids → Propulsives SR 2.14 (95%CI 2.10–2.17); n = 62 139 NSAIDS → Anti‐ulcer drugs SR 1.71 (95%CI 1.67–1.74); n = 49 646 Antithrombotic → Anti‐ulcer drugs SR 1.41 (95%CI 1.39–1.44); n = 54 841 Cough suppressants → Drugs for constipation SR 1.95 (95%CI 1.90–2.00); n = 260 015 Corticosteroids, systemic use → Drugs affecting bone structure and mineralisation SR 3.40 (95%CI 3.27–3.54); n = 13 023 |
| Hellfritzsch (2018) 102 | Non‐vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOAC) | Exploratory analysis | 20 strongest signals reported |
PSSA: NOAC → Marker drug ± 6 months Benzodiazepines, hypnotic: cSR 8.28 (95%CI 6.01–12.05); NNTH 193 Osmotic laxatives: cSR 1.35 (95%CI 1.25–1.46); NNTH 133 Benzodiazpines, sedative: cSR 1.99 (95%CI 1.74–2.30); NNTH 174 Corticosteroids, anal use: cSR 2.03 (95%CI 1.76–2.35); NNTH 176 SSRI: cSR 1.57 (95%CI 1.37–1.77); NNTH 202 Other antidepressant: cSR 1.59 (95%CI 1.41–1.80); NNTH 207 PPI: cSR 1.19 (95%CI 1.11–1.28); NNTH 209 Phenylpiridine opioids: cSR 2.12 (95%CI 1.81–2.51); NNTH 215 Propulsives: cSR 1.51 (95%CI 1.35–1.71); NNTH 216 Iron bivalent, oral: cSR 1.62 (95%CI 1.42–1.86); NNTH 238 Contact laxatives: cSR 1.29 (95%CI 1.17–1.43); NNTH 253 |
Abbreviations: aHR, adjusted hazard ratio; aIRR, adjusted incidence rate ratio; aOR, adjusted odds ratio; aSR, adjusted sequence ratio; cSR, crude sequence ratio; HR, hazard ratio; IDR, incidence density ratio; IRR, incidence rate ratio; NNTH, number needed to harm; PSSA, prescription sequence symmetry analysis.
Case–control study.
Case‐crossover study.
Cross‐sectional study.
Includes case–control study.
Includes cross‐sectional study.
FIGURE 2.

Prescribing cascades examined in non‐exploratory studies (n = 94) stratified by ATC classification. These alluvial plots represent initial (column 1) and subsequent (column 2) medication pairs examined and the primary quantitative association identified (column 3). The height of the strata in columns 1 and 2 is proportional to the number of instances that the relevant medication has been examined across included studies. The height of the strata in column 3 is proportional to the number of identified quantitative associations that belong to each association type. The width of the linkage between column 1 and column 2 is proportional to the number of instances that the unique medication pair has been examined across included studies. The width of the linkage between column 2 and column 3 is proportional to the number of tested medication pairs that result in a prescribing cascade (positive association), do not result in a prescribing cascade (none), indicate a lower likelihood of a prescribing cascade (negative association), or where no association could be examined due to study reporting (N/A: non‐applicable); (A) ATC1 level; (B) Cardiovascular medications (ATC3 level); (C) Nervous system medications (ATC3 level).
TABLE 2.
Summary of findings for the most commonly identified prescribing cascades
| Initial medication | Suspected ADR | Second medication | Main findings |
|---|---|---|---|
| DH‐CCB | Oedema | Loop diuretic |
<1 year: aSR 1.46 (95% CI 1.45–1.48); n = 139375 87 <360 days: aSR 1.87 (95%CI 1.84–1.90); 55818 7 <360 days: aSR 2.27 (95% CI 1.44–3.58); n = 90 105 <360 days: aSR 1.72 (95%CI 1.66–1.78) relative to levothyroxine negative control; aSR 1.45 (1.41–1.49) relative to ACEI/ARB negative control 35 Rate of being dispensed a loop diuretic versus general comparator group 5 1–30 days: aHR 2.51 (95%CI 2.13–2.96) 31–60 days: aHR 2.99 (95%CI 2.43–3.69) 61–90 days: aHR 3.89 (95%CI 3.11–4.87) 91–180 days: aHR 3.20 (95%CI 2.72–3.76) 181–365 days: aHR 2.22 (95%CI 1.90–2.60) |
| Amiodarone | Hypothyroidism | Thyroxine |
<1 year: aSR 3.77 (95% 3.43–4.14); n = 2667 87 <360 days: aSR 3.57 (95%CI 3.17–4.02) 54 <1 year: aSR 2.14 (99%CI 1.92–2.39); n = 2613 79 <1 year Australia: aSR 5.30 (95%CI 4.69–5.96); n = 1979 61 < 1 year Hong Kong: aSR 2.33 (95%CI 1.99–2.72); n = 754 < 1 year Japan: aSR 1.77 (95%CI 0.61–5.08); n = 6 < 1 year Korea: aSR 1.52 (95%CI 1.29–1.80); n = 657 < 1 year Taiwan: aSR 3.26 (95%CI 2.26–4.70); n = 153 <1 year: Pooled aSR 2.63 (95%CI 1.47–4.72) <6 months: aSR 13.6 (95%CI 7.73–25.96) 85 <12 months: aSR 12.8 (95%CI 8.44–20.28) <18 months: aSR 11.4 (95%CI 7.98–16.80) <24 months: aSR 11.7 (95%CI 8.32–16.94) <30 months: aSR 10.8 (95%CI 7.86–15.29) <36 months: aSR 10.8 (95%CI 7.89–15.00) |
| Inhaled corticosteroids | Oral candidiasis | Topical antifungals |
<90 days OR 1.66; n = 21 56 <1 year: SR 2.89 (95%CI 2.80–2.97) 39 <1 year: SR SR 1.94 (95%CI 1.71–2.21) 71 <360 days: aSR 2.34 (95% CI 2.19–2.50) 54 |
| Neuroleptics/Antipsychotic | Parkinsonian symptoms/ extrapyramidal symptoms | Anti‐parkinson medication or Parkinson diagnosis |
<90 days: aOR 5.4 (95%CI 4.8–6.1) 19 <1 year (1 antipsychotic): aSR 9.24 (7.35–11.8); n = 817 100 <1 year (2 antipsychotics): aSR 22.2 (9.94–61.7); n = 137 <1 year (≥3 antipsychotics): aSR 34.8 (5.87–1413.8); n = 37 Never use: aOR 1.0 (referent); n = 10714 119 Very‐late use (≥181 days): aOR 1.1 (95%CI 0.6–1.8); n = 61 Late use (31–180 days): aOR 2.0 (95%CI 1.2–3.3); n = 94 Early use (8–30 days): aOR 6.0 (95%CI 2.3–15.9); n = 43 Current use (≤7 days): aOR 3.0 (95%CI 1.7–5.4); n = 80 Typical: aOR 6.4 (95%CI 1.4–28.2); n = 17 Haloperidol: aOR 4.3 (95%CI 0.9–20.1); n = 12 Atypical: aOR 2.4 (95%CI 1.2–4.9); n = 56 Quetiapine: aOR 0.9 (95%CI 0.4–2.2); n = 26 Risperidone: aOR 13.5 (95%CI 1.8–102.1); n = 23 Combined use: aOR 3.2 (95%CI 0.6–17.9); n = 7 Typical antipsychotics: aHR 1.30 (95%CI 1.04–1.58) versus atypical antipsychotic use 29 No therapy: aHR 0.40 (95%CI 0.29–0.43) |
| Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors | Urinary incontinence | Drugs for urinary frequency and incontinence |
During follow‐up (1st June 1999–31st March 2003): older adults dispensed acetylcholinesterase inhibitors had a higher risk of subsequently receiving an anticholinergic medication to treat urge urinary incontinence (aHR, 1.55,95% CI, 1.39–1.72) 26 Donepezil → Medication for managing Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) 53 <3 months: 1.32 (95%CI 1.00–3.50); n = 243 <12 months: aSR: 1.98 (95%CI 1.57–2.50); n = 319 <6 months: aHR 1.47 (95%CI 1.17–1.86) versus memantine users 44 <12 months: aHR 1.41 (95%CI 1.17–1.69) versus memantine users Donepezil: aHR 1.55 (95%CI 1.31–1.83) versus rivastigmine use 24 Galantamine: aHR 1.17 (95%CI 0.87–1.58) versus rivastigmine use |
| Metoclopramide | Parkinsonian symptoms | Levodopa |
<90 days aOR 3.04 (95%CI 2.22–4.17) 20 <90 days aOR 2.94 (95%CI 2.35–3.67) 31 Anti‐Parkinson medication or diagnosis <1 year: aOR 2.7 (95%CI 1.8–4.1); n = 121 119 |
| ACE inhibitors | Cough | Antitussive |
<1 year OR = 1.58 (95%CI 1.21–2.07) 73 <6 months: SR 2.0 (95%CI 1.8–2.2); n = 1898; estimated 13.4% mistreated cough 18 <1 year: aSR 1.33 (95% CI 1.31–1.34); n = 141924 87 |
| NSAID | GI symptoms | Anti‐ulcer medication |
<4 weeks: aSR 2.50 (95%CI 2.27–2.76); n = 2016 132 <100 days: aSR 1.80 (95%CI 1.64–1.99); n = 1814 89 <1 year: SR 1.71 (95%CI 1.67–1.74); n = 49646 101 |
| Ranitidine | Heart failure | Furosemide |
<1 year: aSR 1.08 (95%CI 1.04–1.12); n = 10875 75 <1 year: aSR 1.24 (95% CI 1.17–1.31); n = 5554 106 |
| Rosiglitazone | failure | Furosemide |
<1 year Australia‐1: aSR 1.70 (95%CI 1.34–2.15) 96 <1 year Australia‐2: aSR 1.63 (95%CI 1.51–1.76) <1 year Canada: aSR 1.65 (95%CI 1.57–1.73) <1 year Pooled estimate (Australia & Canada): aSR 1.65 (95%CI 1.58–1.72) <1 year Hong Kong: aSR 3.37 (95%CI 1.69–6.72) <1 year Korea: aSR 1.14 (95%CI 1.08–1.21) <1 year Taiwan: aSR 1.12 (95%CI 0.99–1.25) <1 year Pooled estimate (Asia): aSR 1.21 (95%CI 1.01–1.45) July 2000–December 2007: aSR 1.73 (99%CI 1.34–2.24) 113 |
| SGLT2‐I | Genital infections | Antifungal |
<30 days: aSR 1.35 (95%CI 1.26–1.44) 47 <60 days: aSR 1.48 (95%CI 1.40–1.56) <90 days: aSR 1.53 (95% CI 1.43–1.60) <180 days: aSR 1.42 (95%CI 1.37–1.47) <365 days: aSR 1.24 (95%CI 1.20–1.28) Genital infection occurred more frequently among SGLT2‐I users than DPP‐4 users (2.9% vs, 0.9%, aHR 3.50, 95%CI 1.95–5.89) 88 |
| DOAC | Depression | Antidepressant |
<3 months: aSR 1.29 (95%CI 1.23–1.35); n = 7253 93 <6 months: aSR 1.28 (95%CI 1.24–1.33); n = 12 530 <12 months: aSR 1.26 (95%CI 1.23–1.30); n = 20 613 SSRI <6 month: SR 1.57 (1.37–1.77); n = 1137; NNTH 202 102 Other antidepressant <6 month: SR 1.59; 1076; (1.41–1.80); NNTH 207 |
| High ceiling diuretics | Hypokalaemia | Potassium |
Furosemide <360 days: aSR 2.94 (95% CI 2.83–3.05) 54 High ceiling diuretic <1 year: SR 3.31 (95%CI 3.24–3.38); n = 48539 101 |
| Statins | Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) | Drugs for urinary frequency and incontinence |
<91 days: aSR 1.21 (95% CI 1.00, 1.46); n = 446 50 <182 days: aSR 1.19 (95% CI 1.04, 1.38); n = 785 <365 days: aSR 1.17 (95% CI 1.05, 1.30); n = 1373 <1 year: aSR 1.17 (95% CI 1.16–1.19); n = 107422 87 |
| Statins | Skin soft tissue infection | Antibiotic (Dicloxacillin or Flucloxacillin) |
<1 year: aSR 1.18 (95% CI 1.15–1.22); n = 23068 87 <91 days: aSR 1.40 (95%CI 1.29–1.52); n = 2498 76 <182 days: aSR 1.41 (95%CI 1.33–1.50); n = 4277 <365 days: aSR 1.40 (95%CI 1.34–1.47); n = 7726 |
| Statins | Depression | Antidepressant |
<1 year: aSR 1.19 (95% CI 1.18–1.21); n = 117443 87 Simvastatin → Antidepressant (April 1991–December 1995): aSR 1.59 (1.08–2.45); n = 91 98 |
| Statins | Muscle cramps | Quinine |
<360 days: aSR 1.69 (95% CI 1.61–1.77) 70 <1 year: aSR = 1.16 (95%CI 1.04–1.29); n = 1326 51 |
| Brinzolamide | Heart failure | Furosemide |
<1 year Brinzolamide: aSR 1.18 (95%CI 1.06–1.32); n = 1304 75 <1 year Brinzolamide: aSR 1.37 (95% CI 1.16–1.62); n = 564 106 |
| Latanoprost | Heart failure | Furosemide |
<1 year Latanoprost: aSR 1.11 (95%CI 1.04–1.19); n = 3619 75 <1 year Latanoprost: aSR 1.48 (95% CI 1.38–1.59); n = 3107 106 |
| Carbamazepine | Hypothyroidism | Levothyroxine |
1998–2004: aOR 1.37 (95%CI 1.13–1.65) 130 <1 year: aSR 1.21 (99%CI 1.08–1.34) 79 |
| Valproate | Hypothyroidism | Levothyroxine |
1998–2004: aOR 1.72 (95%CI 1.40–2.11) 130 <1 year: aSR 1.34 (99%CI 1.20–1.49) 79 |
| Lithium | Drug induced tremor Parkinson | Anti‐parkinson drug |
Jan 1995‐December 1999: RR 1.88 (95%CI 1.60–2.20) 82 Up to 2 year follow‐up (referent valproic acid): aHR 1.50 (95%CI 0.68–3.36) 27 Up to 2 year follow‐up (referent antidepressant): aHR 1.56 (95%CI 0.98–2.48) |
| Lithium | Hypothyroidism | Thyroxine |
1998–2004: aOR 1.41 (95%CI 1.14–1.74) 130 <360 days: aSR 3.43 (95% CI 2.55–4.70) 54 |
| Benzodiazepine | Dementia | Anti‐dementia drug |
<3 months: aSR 1.24 (95%CI 1.05–1.45); n = 625 66 <6 months: aSR 1.20 (95%CI 1.06–1.37); n = 973 <12 months: aSR 1.23 (95%CI 1.11–1.37); n = 1450 <24 months: aSR 1.34 (95%CI 1.23–1.47); n = 2049 <36 months: aSR 1.41 (95%CI 1.29–1.53); n = 2408 <48 months: aSR 1.44 (95%CI 1.33–1.56); n = 2653 <3 years: aSR 2.19 (95%CI 1.92–2.49); n = 1285 94 <2 years: aSR 2.00 (95%CI 1.71–2.34); n = 780 <1 year: aSR 1.77 (95%CI 1.39–2.27); n = 286 |
| SSRI | Urinary incontinence | Drugs for urinary frequency and incontinence (or incontinence products) 41 |
Paroxetine <1 year: aSR 1.77 (95%CI 1.33–2.36) 53 During SSRI (before SSRI as referent): IDR 1.57 (95%CI 1.38–1.79) 41 During SSRI (after SSRI as referent): IDR 2.03 (95%CI 1.76–2.34) During SSRI (before and after SSRI as referent): IDR 1.75 (95%CI 1.56–1.97) Patients had a 61% higher risk for incontinence (aRR 1.61, 95%CI 1.42–1.82) |
Abbreviations: aHR, adjusted hazard ratio; aOR, adjusted odds ratio; aSR, adjusted sequence ratio; IDR, incidence density ratio; NNTH, number needed to har; SR, crude sequence ratio.
3.5. Suspected adverse reaction(s)
Throughout the included studies, suspected ADRs were presumed to have occurred based on the initiation of the second medication as a treatment. In one study examining the CCB → loop diuretic prescribing cascade, an additional medical chart review was also conducted. 105
The suspected ADRs, symptoms or new diagnoses explored were broad‐ranging (see Table 2) most commonly depression (n = 13) 33 , 37 , 40 , 45 , 52 , 55 , 57 , 72 , 93 , 97 , 98 , 110 , 112 ; peripheral oedema (n = 11) 5 , 6 , 7 , 28 , 30 , 36 , 64 , 96 , 103 , 104 , 105 , 116 ; urinary incontinence (n = 9). 24 , 26 , 30 , 41 , 44 , 50 , 53 , 74 , 117 and parkinsonism (n = 9). 27 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 46 , 57 , 63 , 82 , 119
3.6. New medication(s) prescribed
The medication sub‐classifications most frequently initiated as a new medication in the 94 studies are summarised in Figure 2A. Seventy‐eight studies reported at least one significant positive association, indicating a potential prescribing cascade (Table 1 and Figure 2A–C).
The most commonly identified prescribing cascades are summarised in Table 2. These include; amiodarone associated with subsequent thyroid hormone prescriptions for hypothyroidism (n = 5), 54 , 61 , 79 , 85 , 87 CCBs associated with diuretic prescriptions to treat peripheral oedema (n = 5), 5 , 7 , 87 , 104 , 105 topical antifungals to treat oral candidiasis following inhaled corticosteroids (n = 4), 39 , 54 , 56 , 71 anti‐Parkinson medication to treat Parkinsonian symptoms following antipsychotic initiation (n = 4), 19 , 29 , 100 , 119 urinary anticholinergics to treat urinary incontinence following acetylcholinesterase inhibitors(n = 4), 24 , 26 , 44 , 53 and antitussives to treat cough following angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) (n = 3). 18 , 73 , 87 Additional prescribing cascades identified included metoclopramide to anti‐Parkinson medication (n = 3). 20 , 31 , 119 and NSAID to anti‐ulcer medication. 89 , 91 , 101
No association between drug pairs could be determined for several studies, largely due to either a cross‐sectional study design examining concurrent drug use, insufficient drug‐pair sample size to determine a sequence ratio or reporting of incidence rates with no incidence rate ratio (labelled N/A in Figure 2). 6 , 21 , 25 , 30 , 43 , 46 , 53 , 55 , 63 , 64 , 78 , 79 , 112 , 114 , 115 Several studies reported at least one negative association between drug pairs, indicating a reduced likelihood of the second medication being initiated (see eTable 3 Appendix S1). 33 , 60 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 74 , 81 , 87 , 89 , 93 , 111
3.7. Modifiers of identified associations
Older people (aged ≥65 years) were more likely to receive; (i) anticholinergics for urinary incontinence following SSRI initiation, 41 (ii) ulcer drug therapy within 100 days of NSAID initiation, 89 (iii) diuretic to treat beta‐blocker induced oedema, 36 and, (iv) thyroxine for hypothyroidism following amiodarone initiation. 85 Females were more likely to receive an antitussive for cough following ACEI initiation, 73 anticholinergic medication for urinary incontinence following acetylcholinesterase inhibitor 24 , 30 and SSRI initiation, 41 and levothyroxine following amiodarone initiation. 85
Differential associations were identified for initial medication dosage in nine studies. Those who received higher doses of CCBs 5 , 7 and gabapentinoids were more likely to receive a diuretic for oedema 28 ; higher doses of inhaled corticosteroids were associated with a greater likelihood of treatment for oral candidiasis 39 ; and higher metoclopramide dosage was found to increase the likelihood for dopaminergic treatment initiation. 20 Polypharmacy (≥5 drugs) was associated with a greater likelihood of receiving thyroid hormones for amiodarone induced hypothyroidism. 85
3.8. Intentional and unintentional cascades
The intentionality of potential prescribing cascades was not reported in any study nor was the intended duration (if any) of the prescription of the second medication. One study provided a breakdown of prescriptions for the initial drug by prescriber type: 23% private cardiologist, 35.5% hospital practitioner, 30.3% General Practitioner, and 11.3% other private specialist, but did not provide details of the prescriber of the second drug. 93 Another study reported that of the sample who initiated the second drug (irrespective of initiating the first drug), 87.1% of prescriptions were started by family physicians. 51
3.9. Clinical importance of prescribing cascade
Two studies reported a number needed to harm (NNTH) for investigated cascades. 62 , 102 (See Table 1). One study (n = 90) conducted a medical chart validation study of those initiated a loop diuretic after initiating a dihydropyridine CCB (n = 64) and determined that 54.7% (n = 35) experienced a prescribing cascade. 105
3.10. Quality assessment
Overall, the methodological quality varied across included studies (Figure 3 and eTables 4–6, Appendix S1). Among the retrospective cohort studies (eTable 4, Appendix S1) there was a lack of clarity surrounding the similarity of exposed and unexposed groups at baseline and the presence of the outcome at the start of the study. For case–control studies (eTable 5, Appendix S1), reporting of baseline comparison of cases and controls was inadequate as well as the appropriateness of matching cases with controls.
FIGURE 3.

Quality appraisal summary of included studies (n = 98): (A) cohort studies; (B) case–control studies; (C) cross‐sectional studies.
4. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS
4.1. Principal findings
This systematic review identified 101 studies across 103 publications that examined potential prescribing cascades across a broad range of pharmacological drug groups. All studies used routine administrative data that included either medication prescribing or dispensed medications data. Of the 101 included studies, 78 (77%) reported at least one significant positive quantitative association that indicates a potential prescribing cascade. The most commonly identified prescribing cascades include: (i) CCBs → loop diuretics to treat peripheral oedema (n = 5); (ii) amiodarone → thyroxine to treat hypothyroidism (n = 5); inhaled corticosteroids → topical antifungal to treat candidiasis (n = 4); (iii) antipsychotics → anti‐Parkinson medication to treat Parkinsonism (n = 4); and (iv) acetylcholinesterase inhibitors → drugs for urinary frequency (n = 4).
Study methodological quality was variable with a considerable proportion of studies not reporting participant demographics. Almost two‐thirds of included studies used PSSA methodology in which all included participants have experienced the outcome at the start of the study. A recent scoping review reported that whilst the PSSA method is a useful tool in detecting prescribing cascades, such cascades need careful clinical review as there is a risk of both false positive and false negative findings. 120 This is particularly problematic when screening for cascades without predefined hypotheses. In our systematic review, the vast majority of included studies (n = 94, 93%) examined predefined medications as potentially contributing to a prescribing cascade. However, PSSA analyses cannot determine causality and should be interpreted with caution.
Several well‐designed cohort and case–control studies examining prescribing cascades were identified. For example, a Canadian population‐based study reported that incident CCB users had a higher cumulative incidence of loop diuretic use at one year follow up compared to patients dispensed ACEIs or angiotensin‐II‐receptor blocker antihypertensives (adjusted hazards ratio 1.4% vs. 0.7%, p < 0.001). 5 In a US case–control study, metoclopramide users were three times more likely to begin use of a levodopa‐containing medication compared with nonusers (OR = 3.09; 95% Cl 2.25 to 4.26). 20 Risk increased with increasing daily metoclopramide dose and the effect persisted after adjustment for demographic, health service utilization, and medication use variables. 20
Fifteen of 101 studies focused specifically on older populations, with 11 reporting a significant association between increasing age and prescribing cascade occurrence. Older adults are more likely to experience medication‐related harm due to increasing prevalence of multimorbidity, polypharmacy and age‐related physiological changes that affect drug metabolism. 9 , 10 , 121 , 122 , 123 Furthermore, ADRs are more difficult to diagnose in older adults due to their often non‐specific presentation and overlap with pre‐existing conditions or conditions likely to develop among older adults. 1 , 8 , 124
4.2. Comparison with existing literature
Two scoping reviews of prescribing cascades have been conducted to date, one that focused on literature surrounding the prevention, detection and reversal of prescribing cascades 11 and the second that focused on the use of PSSA as a potential pharmacovigilance tool. 120 In 2018, Brath et al retrieved 10 original investigations and seven case reports pertaining to prescribing cascades. 11 A considerable number of studies have been published since, indicating that this is a rapidly developing field. Morris el al. concluded that PSSA methodology demonstrated only moderate sensitivity and specificity in identifying prescribing cascades and more consistency was required in how these studies were reported. 120 As described previously, similar issues with methodological quality were identified in this systematic review.
4.3. Clinical and research implications
Multi‐country studies have shown variation in prescribing cascade likelihood both within and across countries, 60 , 95 , 96 underscoring the need to consider the local prescribing context. Differences in sample demographics, medication availability, approved clinical indications, help‐seeking behaviour and prescribing cultures or genetic polymorphisms may influence the incidence of prescribing cascades.
The complexity of optimising prescribing for patients with multimorbidity presents challenges for the prescriber due to the preponderance of single‐disease guidelines, resultant polypharmacy, fragmentation and lack of continuity of care and resourcing constraints. 125 Identification of ADRs remains a clinically challenging area, particularly in relation to older adults. Non‐specific presentation of ADR symptoms in older adults, such as delirium, falls, fatigue and constipation, can be challenging to identify as being medication‐related as such symptoms have several causes and may overlap with existing multimorbidity. 8 , 124 The failure to recognise an ADR may result in a prescribing cascade, furthering the risk for additional medication‐related harm. 1 , 2 The potential for ADRs should be considered as part of the differential diagnosis for all patients reporting new symptoms, particularly among those who have started a new medication within the previous year. 1 , 8 , 124
Developing an explicit list of evidence‐based prescribing cascades is one way of supporting clinicians' awareness and detection of this issue. The iKASCADE international consortium are currently developing an inventory of prescribing cascades affecting older adults, through a modified Delphi procedure where international experts in medicines management for older adults will rank a list of prescribing cascades as to their clinical importance. 126 The development of an explicit list of clinically important and common prescribing cascades is an important step in raising awareness of this issue and in supporting clinicians to detect cascades. 127 To maximise use in clinical practice will require explicit criteria of prescribing cascades be incorporated into existing electronic health record and prescribing support systems. Such systems will need to be able to detect the sequential prescription of drugs known to represent potentially inappropriate prescribing cascades. 127
The use of routine administrative data in included studies means that information on the broader clinical context and the rationale for medication prescribing is lacking. The identification of significant negative associations between drug pairs may indicate that prescribers are aware of certain prescribing cascades and proactively avoid their development or that therapeutic alternatives were prescribed. However, no exploration of intentionality of identified cascades could be made based on the data used in included studies.
Overall, it is difficult to determine the clinical importance of prescribing cascades identified as few studies examined clinical endpoints. 48 , 62 , 102 One study examined the association between prescribing cascades that resulted in prochlorperazine initiation and reported a subsequent 49% increased risk of hip fracture. 48 Future research is required to determine the relative clinical impact of increased medication exposure and the clinical appropriateness of prescribing cascades.
4.4. Strengths and limitations
This systematic review extends the work of previously published scoping reviews 11 , 120 by conducting a comprehensive literature search using several databases, including several grey literature searches.
This study also has some limitations. The lack of a MeSH term for prescribing cascades meant broad search terms were used, which led to a high yield of citations to be searched. Additional information was sought from study authors but a small number of studies (n = 10) could not be retrieved for eligibility assessment due to the lack of access to the full text or a translated version. The information collated is somewhat limited by the methodological and reporting quality of included studies.
5. CONCLUSION
Prescribing cascades are of increasing interest to the research and clinical communities, with a broad range of medications involved. The identification of the most common prescribing cascades can support optimising prescribing as one part of identifying potentially inappropriate prescribing. Few studies have examined the clinical importance or the broader clinical context, including intentionality of prescribing cascades, thereby limiting the inferences that can be drawn about the implications for clinical practice. Challenges remain in differentiating ADR symptoms from that of new onset disease and advancing age and frailty. 1 , 8 , 124 ADRs should be considered as part of the differential diagnosis in patients presenting with new symptoms, particularly for those who have started a new medication in the preceding 12 months.
6. AUTHOR CONTRIBTIONS
Conception and funding acquisition: EW. Study design EW, AD, FM, FB, BC, SK, and TF. Data acquisition: AD, FS, and EW. Data interpretation: AD, FS, TD, FM, FB, BC, TF, SK, and EW. Drafting of manuscript: AD, and EW. Revising of manuscript and agreement of final manuscript: AD, FS, FM, FB, BC, SK, TF, TD, and EW.
FUNDING INFORMATION
This work was funded by a Health Research Board (HRB) Ireland Emerging Clinician Scientist Award awarded to EW [HRB‐ECSA‐2020‐002]. BC is funded by the HRB Emerging Investigator Award [EIA‐2019‐09].
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
ETHICS STATEMENT
Ethical approval was not required for this systematic review.
Supporting information
Appendix S1
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The authors would like to thank Mr Paul Murphy Information Specialist in the RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences for his advice and input in generating the search string and Dr Orla Cotter Health Services Executive (HSE) GP Fellow in Medicines Optimisation (2021–2022) for her work in data extraction and methodological quality assessment of included articles. Open access funding provided by IReL. WOA Institution: N/A. Consortia Name: IReL gold OA 2022.
Doherty AS, Shahid F, Moriarty F, et al. Prescribing cascades in community‐dwelling adults: A systematic review. Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2022;10:e01008. doi: 10.1002/prp2.1008
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Additional systematic review data is available from the authors on request.
REFERENCES
- 1. Rochon PA, Gurwitz JH. Optimising drug treatment for elderly people: the prescribing cascade. Br Med J. 1997;315(7115):1096‐1099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Rochon PA, Gurwitz JH. The prescribing cascade revisited. Lancet. 2017;389(10081):1778‐1780. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Rochon PA, Gurwitz JH. Drug therapy. Lancet. 1995;346(8966):32‐36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. McCarthy LM, Visentin JD, Rochon PA. Assessing the scope and appropriateness of prescribing cascades. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019;67(5):1023‐1026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Savage RD, Visentin JD, Bronskill SE, et al. Evaluation of a common prescribing cascade of calcium channel blockers and diuretics in older adults with hypertension. JAMA Intern Med. 2020;180(5):643‐651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Vouri SM, van Tuyl JS, Olsen MA, Hong X, Schootman M, Xian H. An evaluation of a potential calcium channel blocker‐lower‐extremity edema‐loop diuretic prescribing cascade. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2018;58(5):534‐539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Vouri SM, Jiang X, Manini TM, et al. Magnitude of and characteristics associated with the treatment of calcium channel blocker‐induced lower‐extremity edema with loop diuretics. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(12):e1918425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Lavan AH, Gallagher P. Predicting risk of adverse drug reactions in older adults. Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2016;7(1):11‐22. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Palladino R, Tayu Lee J, Ashworth M, Triassi M, Millett C. Associations between multimorbidity, healthcare utilisation and health status: evidence from 16 European countries. Age Ageing. 2016;45(3):431‐435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Salisbury C, Johnson L, Purdy S, Valderas JM, Montgomery AA. Epidemiology and impact of multimorbidity in primary care: a retrospective cohort study. Br J Gen Pract. 2011;61(582):e12‐e21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Brath H, Mehta N, Savage RD, et al. What is known about preventing, detecting, and reversing prescribing cascades: a scoping review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018;66(11):2079‐2085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta‐analysis protocols (PRISMA‐P) statement. Syst Rev. 2015;2015:4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Doherty A, Moriarty F, Boland F, et al. Prescribing cascades in community‐dwelling adults: protocol for a systematic review. HRB Open Res. 2021;4:72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Grp P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta‐analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264‐W264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Vegter S, De Jong‐Van Den Berg LTW. Misdiagnosis and mistreatment of a common side‐effect—Angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor‐induced cough. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2010;69(2):200‐203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Vegter S, De Boer P, Van Dijk KW, Visser S, De Jong‐Van Den Berg LTW. Misdiagnosis and mistreatment of ACE‐inhibitor‐induced cough occurs frequently and decreases therapy compliance. Pharm Weekbl. 2012;147(42):177‐180. [Google Scholar]
- 18. Vegter S, de Boer P, van Dijk KW, Visser S, de Jong‐van den Berg LTW. The effects of antitussive treatment of ACE inhibitor‐induced cough on therapy compliance: a prescription sequence symmetry analysis. Drug Saf. 2013;36(6):435‐439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Avorn J, Bohn RL, Mogun H, et al. Neuroleptic drug exposure and treatment of parkinsonism in the elderly: a case‐control study. Am J Med. 1995;99(1):48‐54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Avorn J, Gurwitz JH, Bohn RL, Mogun H, Monane M, Walker A. Increased incidence of levodopa therapy following metoclopramide use. JAMA. 1995;274(22):1780‐1782. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Farkas AH, Winn A, Pezzin LE, Fergestrom N, Laud P, Neuner JM. The use and concurrent use of side effect controlling medications among women on aromatase inhibitors. J Women's Health. 2021;30(1):131‐136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Gurwitz JH, Avorn J, Bohn RL, Glynn RJ, Monane M, Mogun H. Initiation of antihypertensive treatment during nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drug therapy. JAMA. 1994;272(10):781‐786. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Gurwitz JH, Kalish SC, Bohn RL, et al. Thiazide diuretics and the initiation of anti‐gout therapy. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50(8):953‐959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Masurkar PP, Chatterjee S, Sherer JT, Aparasu RR. Antimuscarinic cascade across individual cholinesterase inhibitors in older adults with dementia. Drugs Aging. 2021;38(7):593‐602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Narayan SW, Pearson SA, Litchfield M, et al. Anticholinergic medicines use among older adults before and after initiating dementia medicines. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019;85(9):1957‐1963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Gill SS, Mamdani M, Naglie G, et al. A prescribing cascade involving cholinesterase inhibitors and anticholinergic drugs. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(7):808‐813. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Marras C, Herrmann N, Fischer HD, et al. Lithium use in older adults is associated with increased prescribing of Parkinson medications. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2016;24(4):301‐309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Read SH, Giannakeas V, Pop P, et al. Evidence of a gabapentinoid and diuretic prescribing cascade among older adults with lower back pain. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021;69(10):2842‐2850. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Rochon PA, Stukel TA, Sykora K, et al. Atypical antipsychotics and parkinsonism. Arch Intern Med. 2005;165(16):1882‐1888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Trenaman SC, Bowles SK, Kirkland S, Andrew MK. An examination of three prescribing cascades in a cohort of older adults with dementia. BMC Geriatr. 2021;21(1):1‐11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Huh Y, Kim DH, Choi M, et al. Metoclopramide and levosulpiride use and subsequent levodopa prescription in the korean elderly: the prescribing cascade. J Clin Med. 2019;8(9):1496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Park SK, Baek YH, Pratt N, Kalisch Ellett L, Shin JY. The uncertainty of the association between proton pump inhibitor use and the risk of dementia: prescription sequence symmetry analysis using a Korean healthcare database between 2002 and 2013. Drug Saf. 2018;41(6):615‐624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Dyson TE, Cantrell MA, Lund BC. Lack of association between 5α‐reductase inhibitors and depression. J Urol. 2020;204(4):793‐798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Fox CW, Khaw CL, Gerke AK, Lund BC. Montelukast and neuropsychiatric events–a sequence symmetry analysis. J Asthma. 2022;1‐7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Vouri SM, Jiang X, Brumback B, Winterstein AG. Use of negative controls in a prescription sequence symmetry analysis used to mitigate time‐varying bias. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2020;29(suppl 3):390‐391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Vouri SM, Morris EJ, Jiang X, et al. Evaluation of a beta‐blocker–edema–loop diuretic prescribing cascade: a prescription sequence symmetry analysis. Am J Hypertens. 2022;35:601‐609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Brandt‐Christensen M, Kvist K, Nilsson FM, Andersen PK, Kessing LV. Treatment with antiparkinson and antidepressant drugs: a register‐based, pharmaco‐epidemiological study. Mov Disord. 2007;22(14):2037‐2042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Dunvald ACD, Henriksen DP, Hallas J, Christensen MMH, Lund LC. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and the risk of restless legs syndrome: a symmetry analysis. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2020;76(5):719‐722. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Henriksen DP, Davidsen JR, Christiansen A, Laursen CB, Damkier P, Hallas J. Inhaled corticosteroids and systemic or topical antifungal therapy: a symmetry analysis. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2017;14(6):1045‐1047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Winkel JS, Damkier P, Hallas J, Henriksen DP. Treatment with montelukast and antidepressive medication—a symmetry analysis. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2018;27(12):1409‐1415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Movig KLL, Leufkens HGM, Belitser SV, Lenderink AW, Egberts ACG. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor‐induced urinary incontinence. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2002;11(4):271‐279. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Wang Y, Bos JH, Schuiling‐Veninga CCM, et al. Neuropsychiatric safety of varenicline in the general and COPD population with and without psychiatric disorders: a retrospective cohort study in a real‐world setting. BMJ Open. 2021;11(5):e042417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Takeuchi Y, Kajiyama K, Ishiguro C, Uyama Y. Atypical antipsychotics and the risk of hyperlipidemia: a sequence symmetry analysis. Drug Saf. 2015;38(7):641‐650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Lampela P, Taipale H, Hartikainen S. Use of cholinesterase inhibitors increases initiation of urinary anticholinergics in persons with Alzheimer's disease. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016;64(7):1510‐1512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Azoulay L, Blais L, Koren G, LeLorier J, Bérard A. Isotretinoin and the risk of depression in patients with acne vulgaris: a case‐crossover study. J Clin Psychiatry. 2008;69(4):526‐532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Onder G, Bonassi S, Abbatecola AM, et al. High prevalence of poor quality drug prescribing in older individuals: a nationwide report from the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA). J Gerontol Series A: Biol Sci Med Sci. 2014;69(4):430‐437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Adimadhyam S, Schumock GT, Calip GS, Smith Marsh DE, Layden BT, Lee TA. Increased risk of mycotic infections associated with sodium‐glucose co‐transporter 2 inhibitors: a prescription sequence symmetry analysis. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019;85(1):160‐168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Caughey GE, Roughead EE, Pratt N, Shakib S, Vitry AI, Gilbert AL. Increased risk of hip fracture in the elderly associated with prochlorperazine: is a prescribing cascade contributing? Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2010;19(9):977‐982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Corrao G, Botteri E, Bagnardi V, et al. Generating signals of drug‐adverse effects from prescription databases and application to the risk of arrhythmia associated with antibacterials. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2005;14(1):31‐40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Fujimoto M, Higuchi T, Hosomi K, Takada M. Association of statin use with storage lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS): data mining of prescription database. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014;52(9):762‐769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Garrison SR, Dormuth CR, Morrow RL, Carney GA, Khan KM. Nocturnal leg cramps and prescription use that precedes them: a sequence symmetry analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(2):120‐126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Hallas J. Evidence of depression provoked by cardiovascular medication: a prescription sequence symmetry analysis. Epidemiology. 1996;7(5):478‐484. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Hashimoto M, Hashimoto K, Ando F, Kimura Y, Nagase K, Arai K. Prescription rate of medications potentially contributing to lower urinary tract symptoms and detection of adverse reactions by prescription sequence symmetry analysis. J Pharm Health Care Sci. 2015;1(1):7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Nishtala PS, Chyou TY. Exploring New Zealand prescription data using sequence symmetry analyses for predicting adverse drug reactions. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2017;42(2):189‐194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Petri H, de Vet HC, Naus J, Urquhart J. Prescription sequence analysis: a new and fast method for assessing certain adverse reactions of prescription drugs in large populations. Stat Med. 1988;7(11):1171‐1175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Petri H, Kessels F, Kamakura T. Markers of adverse drug reactions in medication histories. An analysis of inhaled steroid utilization. Pharmaceutisch Weekbl. 1991;13(2):97‐106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Petri H, Leufkens H, Naus J, Silkens R, Van Hessen P, Urquhart J. Rapid method for estimating the risk of acutely controversial side effects of prescription drugs. J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43(5):433‐439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Pouwels K, Visser S, Bos J, Hak E. Angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor treatment and the development of urinary tract infection. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013;22:127‐128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Adrian Kym P, Elizabeth Ellen R, Nicole LP. Sequence symmetry analysis graphic adjustment for prescribing trends. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019;19(1):143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Pratt N, Andersen M, Bergman U, et al. Multi‐country rapid adverse drug event assessment: the Asian Pharmacoepidemiology Network (AsPEN) antipsychotic and acute hyperglycaemia study. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013;22(9):915‐924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Pratt N, Chan EW, Choi NK, et al. Prescription sequence symmetry analysis: assessing risk, temporality, and consistency for adverse drug reactions across datasets in five countries. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2015;24(8):858‐864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Rasmussen L, Hallas J, Madsen KG. Cardiovascular drugs and erectile dysfunction–a symmetry analysis. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015;80(5):1219‐1223. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Singh S, Cocoros NM, Haynes K, et al. Antidopaminergic‐Antiparkinsonian medication prescribing cascade in persons with Alzheimer's disease. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021;69:1328‐1333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Singh S, Cocoros NM, Haynes K, et al. Identifying prescribing cascades in Alzheimer's disease and related dementias: the calcium channel blocker‐diuretic prescribing cascade. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2021;30:1066‐1073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Sturkenboom MC, Middelbeek A, de Jong van den Berg LT, van den Berg PB, Stricker BH, Wesseling H. Vulvo‐vaginal candidiasis associated with acitretin. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995;48(8):991‐997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Takada M, Fujimoto M, Hosomi K. Association between benzodiazepine use and dementia: data mining of different medical databases. Int J Med Sci. 2016;13(11):825‐834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Takada M, Fujimoto M, Hosomi K. Difference in risk of gastrointestinal complications between users of enteric‐coated and buffered low‐dose aspirin. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014;52(3):181‐191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Tsiropoulos I, Andersen M, Hallas J. Adverse events with use of antiepileptic drugs: a prescription and event symmetry analysis. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2009;18(6):483‐491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Pouwels KB, Widyakusuma NN, Bos JHJ, Hak E. Association between statins and infections among patients with diabetes: a cohort and prescription sequence symmetry analysis. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2016;25(10):1124‐1130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Venalainen O, Bell JS, Kirkpatrick CM, Nishtala PS, Liew D, Ilomaki J. Adverse drug reactions associated with cholinesterase inhibitors‐sequence symmetry analyses using prescription claims data. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2017;18(2):186‐189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. van Boven JFM, de Jong‐van den Berg LTW, Vegter S. Inhaled corticosteroids and the occurrence of oral candidiasis: a prescription sequence symmetry analysis. Drug Saf. 2013;36(4):231‐236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Hersom K, Neary MP, Levaux HP, Klaskala W, Strauss JS. Isotretinoin and antidepressant pharmacotherapy: a prescription sequence symmetry analysis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2003;49(3):424‐432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Bowman L, Carlstedt BC, Miller ME, McDonald CJ. Evaluation of ACE‐inhibitor (ACE‐I) associated cough using modified prescription sequence analysis (PSA). Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 1995;4(1):17‐22. [Google Scholar]
- 74. Kalisch Ellett LM, Pratt NL, Barratt JD, Rowett D, Roughead EE. Risk of medication‐associated initiation of oxybutynin in elderly men and women. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014;62(4):690‐695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. King CE, Pratt NL, Craig N, et al. Detecting medicine safety signals using prescription sequence symmetry analysis of a national prescribing data set. Drug Saf. 2020;43(8):787‐795. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Ko HHT, Lareu RR, Dix BR, Hughes JD, Parsons RW. A sequence symmetry analysis of the interrelationships between statins, diabetes and skin infections. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019;85:2559‐2567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Knowledge and confidence in medication management. Nurs Manag. 2017;24(5):14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Lai EC‐C, Hsieh C‐Y, Yang Y‐HK, Lin S‐J. Detecting potential adverse reactions of sulpiride in schizophrenic patients by prescription sequence symmetry analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e89795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Lai EC‐C, Yang Y‐HK, Lin S‐J, Hsieh C‐Y. Use of antiepileptic drugs and risk of hypothyroidism. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013;22(10):1071‐1079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Wang Y, van Boven JFM, Bos JHJ, et al. Risk of neuropsychiatric adverse events associated with varenicline treatment for smoking cessation among Dutch population: a sequence symmetry analysis. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2022;31(2):158‐166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Bytzer P, Hallas J. Drug‐induced symptoms of functional dyspepsia and nausea. A symmetry analysis of one million prescriptions. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2000;14(11):1479‐1484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Brandt‐Christensen M, Kvist K, Nilsson FM, Andersen PK, Kessing LV. Treatment with antidepressants and lithium is associated with increased risk of treatment with antiparkinson drugs: a pharmacoepidemiological study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006;77(6):781‐783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Iwasawa M, Sagami K, Yokoyama S, Hosomi K, Takada M. Adherence to guidelines for antiulcer drug prescription in patients receiving low‐dose aspirin therapy in Japan. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019;57(4):197‐206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Yokoyama S, Ieda S, Nagano M, et al. Association between oral anticoagulants and osteoporosis: real‐world data mining using a multi‐methodological approach. Int J Med Sci. 2020;17(4):471‐479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Yokoyama S, Tanaka Y, Hosomi K, Takada M. Polypharmacy is associated with amiodarone‐induced hypothyroidism. Int J Med Sci. 2021;18(15):3574‐3580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Yokoyama S, Wakamoto S, Tanaka Y, Nakagawa C, Hosomi K, Takada M. Association between antipsychotics and osteoporosis based on real‐world data. Ann Pharmacother. 2020;54(10):988‐995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Chen Y, Huang ST, Hsu TC, Peng LN, Hsiao FY, Chen LK. Detecting suspected prescribing cascades by prescription sequence symmetry analysis of nationwide real‐world data. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022;23(3):468‐476.e6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Gadzhanova S, Pratt N, Roughead E. Use of SGLT2 inhibitors for diabetes and risk of infection: analysis using general practice records from the NPS MedicineWise MedicineInsight program. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017;130:180‐185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Hallas J, Bytzer P. Screening for drug related dyspepsia: an analysis of prescription symmetry. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1998;10(1):27‐32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Genia English, August 10, 1996. National Library of Medicine.
- 91. Pouwels K, Kalkman A, Schagen D, Visser S, Hak E. Do SSRIs increase the risk of gastrointestinal adverse effects? Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013;22:127. [Google Scholar]
- 92. Silwer L, Petzold M, Hallas J, Lundborg CS. Statins and nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory drugs‐an analysis of prescription symmetry. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2006;15(7):510‐511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Maura G, Billionnet C, Coste J, Weill A, Neumann A, Pariente A. Non‐bleeding adverse events with the use of direct oral anticoagulants: a sequence symmetry analysis. Drug Saf. 2018;41(9):881‐897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Park KR, Kim KB, Baek YH, et al. Signal detection of benzodiazepine use and risk of dementia: sequence symmetry analysis using South Korean national healthcare database. Int J Clin Pharm. 2018;40(6):1568‐1576. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Roughead EE, Chan EW, Choi NK, et al. Proton pump inhibitors and risk of Clostridium difficile infection: a multi‐country study using sequence symmetry analysis. Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2016;15(12):1589‐1595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Roughead EE, Chan EW, Choi NK, et al. Variation in association between thiazolidinediones and heart failure across ethnic groups: retrospective analysis of large healthcare claims databases in six countries. Drug Saf. 2015;38(9):823‐831. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Roughead EE, Kalisch LM, Pratt NL, Killer G, Barnard A, Gilbert AL. Managing glaucoma in those with co‐morbidity: not as easy as it seems. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2012;19(2):74‐82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Lindberg G, Hallas J. Cholesterol‐lowering drugs and antidepressants—a study of prescription symmetry. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 1998;7(6):399‐402. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Janetzki JL, Sykes MJ, Ward MB, Pratt NL. Proton pump inhibitors may contribute to progression or development of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease—a sequence symmetry analysis approach. J Clin Pharm Ther. 2021;46(6):1687‐1694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Hirano Y. Risk of extrapyramidal syndromes associated with psychotropic polypharmacy: a study based on large‐scale Japanese claims data. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2020;54(2):259‐268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Hallas J, Wang SV, Gagne JJ, Schneeweiss S, Pratt N, Pottegård A. Hypothesis‐free screening of large administrative databases for unsuspected drug‐outcome associations. Eur J Epidemiol. 2018;33(6):545‐555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Hellfritzsch M, Rasmussen L, Hallas J, Pottegård A. Using the symmetry analysis design to screen for adverse effects of non‐vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants. Drug Saf. 2018;41(7):685‐695. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Alaskar MA, Brown JD, Voils SA, Vouri SM. Loop diuretic use following fluid resuscitation in the critically ill. Am J Health‐Syst Pharm. 2022;79(3):165‐172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Vouri SM, Jiang X, Morris EJ, Brumback BA, Winterstein AG. Use of negative controls in a prescription sequence symmetry analysis to reduce time‐varying bias. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2021;30(9):1192‐1199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Vouri SM, Morris EJ, Usmani SA, et al. Evaluation of the key prescription sequence symmetry analysis assumption using the calcium channel blocker: loop diuretic prescribing cascade. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2022;31(1):72‐81. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Wahab IA, Pratt NL, Ellett LK, Roughead EE. Sequence symmetry analysis as a signal detection tool for potential heart failure adverse events in an administrative claims database. Drug Saf. 2016;39(4):347‐354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Thacker EL, Schneeweiss S. Initiation of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and complications of chronic airways disorders in elderly patients. Drug Saf. 2006;29(11):1077‐1085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. de Jong JC, van den Berg PB, Tobi H, de Jong‐van den Berg LT. Combined use of SSRIs and NSAIDs increases the risk of gastrointestinal adverse effects. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2003;55(6):591‐595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Hachiken H, Murai A, Wada K, Kuwahara T, Hosomi K, Takada M. Difference between the frequencies of antisecretory drug prescriptions in users of buffered vs. enteric‐coated low‐dose aspirin therapies. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2013;51(10):807‐815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Hagberg KW, Divan HA, Nickel JC, Jick SS. Risk of incident antidepressant‐treated depression associated with use of 5α‐reductase inhibitors compared with use of α‐blockers in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia: a population‐based study using the clinical practice research datalink. Pharmacotherapy. 2017;37(5):517‐527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Lund LC, Højlund M, Henriksen DP, Hallas J, Kristensen KB. Sodium‐glucose cotransporter‐2 inhibitors and the risk of gout: a Danish population based cohort study and symmetry analysis. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2021;30(10):1391‐1395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Thiessen BQ, Wallace SM, Blackburn JL, Wilson TW, Bergman U. Increased prescribing of antidepressants subsequent to beta‐blocker therapy. Arch Intern Med. 1990;150(11):2286‐2290. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Wahab IA, Pratt NL, Kalisch LM, Roughead EE. Comparing time to adverse drug reaction signals in a spontaneous reporting database and a claims database: a case study of rofecoxib‐induced myocardial infarction and rosiglitazone‐induced heart failure signals in Australia. Drug Saf. 2014;37(1):53‐64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. Kalisch Ellett LM, Pratt NL, Kerr M, Roughead EE. Antipsychotic polypharmacy in older Australians. Int Psychogeriatr. 2018;30(4):539‐546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Vouri SM. Rhinorrhea as a result of Alzheimer's disease treatment. Senior Care Pharm. 2020;35(4):148‐149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. Morris EJ, Brown JD, Manini TM, Vouri SM. Differences in health‐related quality of life among adults with a potential dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker–loop diuretic prescribing cascade. Drugs Aging. 2021;38(7):625‐632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117. Kröger E, Van Marum R, Souverein P, Carmichael PH, Egberts T. Treatment with rivastigmine or galantamine and risk of urinary incontinence: results from a Dutch database study. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2015;24(3):276‐285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Pouwels KB, Bos JH, Hak E. ACE inhibitors and urinary tract infections. Epidemiology. 2014;25(3):466‐467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119. Kim S, Cheon SM, Suh HS. Association between drug exposure and occurrence of parkinsonism in Korea: a population‐based case‐control study. Ann Pharmacother. 2019;53(11):1102‐1110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. Morris EJ, Hollmann J, Hofer AK, et al. Evaluating the use of prescription sequence symmetry analysis as a pharmacovigilance tool: a scoping review. Res Soc Admin Pharm. 2022;18(7):3079‐3093. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121. Moriarty F, Hardy C, Bennett K, Smith SM, Fahey T. Trends and interaction of polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate prescribing in primary care over 15 years in Ireland: a repeated cross‐sectional study. BMJ Open. 2015;5(9):e008656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122. Mangoni AA, Jackson SHD. Age‐related changes in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: basic principles and practical applications. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2004;57(1):6‐14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123. Guthrie B, Makubate B, Hernandez‐Santiago V, Dreischulte T. The rising tide of polypharmacy and drug‐drug interactions: population database analysis 1995–2010. BMC Med. 2015;13:74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124. Petrovic M, van der Cammen T, Onder G. Adverse drug reactions in older people. Drugs Aging. 2012;29(6):453‐462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125. Wallace E, Salisbury C, Guthrie B, Lewis C, Fahey T, Smith SM. Managing patients with multimorbidity in primary care. Br Med J. 2015;350:h176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126. Sternberg SA, Petrovic M, Onder G, Cherubini A, O'Mahony D, Gurwitz JH, Pegreffi F, Mason R, Akerman J, McCarthy L, Lawson A, Li J, Wu W, Rochon PA. Identifying key prescribing cascades in older people (iKASCADE): a transnational initiative on drug safety through a sex and gender lens‐rationale and design. Eur Geriatr Med 2021. Jun;12(3):475–483. doi: 10.1007/s41999-021-00480-w. Epub 2021 Apr 9. PMID: 33835427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127. O'Mahony D, Rochon PA. Prescribing cascades: we see only what we look for, we look for only what we know. Age Ageing. 2022;51(7):afac138. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afac138 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128. Pouwels KB, Visser ST, Bos HJ, Hak E. Angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitor treatment and the development of urinary tract infections: a prescription sequence symmetry analysis. Drug Saf. 2013;36(11):1079‐1086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129. Takada M, Fujimoto M, Yamazaki K, Takamoto M, Hosomi K. Association of statin use with sleep disturbances: data mining of a spontaneous reporting database and a prescription database. Drug Saf. 2014;37(6):421‐431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130. Gau CS, Chang CJ, Tsai FJ, Chao PF, Gau SS. Association between mood stabilizers and hypothyroidism in patients with bipolar disorders: a nested, matched case‐control study. Bipolar Disord. 2010;12(3):253‐263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131. Vouri SM, Possinger MC, Usmani S, Solberg LM, Manini T. Evaluation of the potential acetylcholinesterase inhibitor‐induced rhinorrhea prescribing cascade. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020;68(2):440‐441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132. Pouwels KB, Kalkman GA, Schagen D, Visser ST, Hak E. Is combined use of SSRIs and NSAIDs associated with an increased risk of starting peptic ulcer treatment? Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2014;78(1):192‐193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Appendix S1
Data Availability Statement
Additional systematic review data is available from the authors on request.
