Abstract
Background
Haemoproteus is a sister genus to malaria parasites (Plasmodium), which both belong to the order Haemosporida (Apicomplexa). Parasites of both genera are flourishing in birds, however, Haemoproteus species are noticeably less investigated. This is unfortunate because knowledge about close relatives of malaria pathogens is important for better understanding the evolutionary origin and basic biological features of the entire group of haemosporidian infections. Moreover, recent findings show that Haemoproteus species can cause severe damage of various bird organs due to megalomeronts and other exo-erythrocytic stages. These haemosporidians are remarkably diverse, but remain neglected partly due to difficulties in species identification. Hundreds of Haemoproteus genetic lineages have been reported in birds, and numerous new lineages are found each year, but most remain unidentified to the species level. Numerous new Haemoproteus pathogens were described during the past 20 years. However, keys for their identification are absent. Identification of Haemoproteus species remains a difficult task and is an obstacle for better understanding of the distribution and epidemiology of these parasites. This study aimed to develop comprehensive keys for the identification of described avian Haemoproteus species using morphological features of their blood stages (gametocytes).
Methods
Type and voucher preparations of avian Haemoproteus species were accessed in museums in Europe, Australia and the USA. Gametocytes of most described species were examined, and these data formed a background for this study. The data also were considered from published articles containing parasite species descriptions. The method of dichotomous keys was applied. The most difficult steps in the keys were accompanied with references to the corresponding parasite pictures.
Results
In all, 201 published articles were included in this review. Morphological diagnostic features of gametocytes of all described Haemoproteus species were analysed and compared. Illustrated keys for identification of these parasite species were developed. Available information about the molecular characterization of Haemoproteus parasites was provided.
Conclusion
This review shows that 177 described species of avian Haemoproteus can be distinguished and identified in blood films using morphological characters of their gametocytes and host cells. These species were incorporated in the keys. Information about possible morphologically cryptic parasites was provided. Molecular markers are available for only 42% of the described Haemoproteus parasites, calling for researchers to fill this gap.
Keywords: Key to species, Birds, Molecular characterization, Haemoproteus taxonomy, Plasmodium
Background
Order Haemosporida (Alveolata, Apicomplexa, Sporozoa) unites a diverse group of closely related obligate heteroxenous protists, whose currently are classified in four families—Plasmodiidae, Haemoproteidae, Leucocytozoidae and Garniidae [1–5]. These pathogens have many similar basic features in their life cycles. Mainly, they are transmitted exclusively by dipteran blood-sucking insect (Diptera), in which the sporozoites (invasive stage for vertebrates) develop. Sporozoites initiate the exo-erythrocytic development (exo-erythrocytic merogony or schizogony) in various tissues of vertebrate hosts. Exoerythrocytic merozoites are capable of infecting blood cells, in which gametocytes (the invasive stage for vectors) finally inhabit. Asexual dividing stages (erythrocytic meronts or schizonts) do not develop in Haemoproteus species. Gametocytes are characterized by sexually dimorphic characters. Development in vectors is similar in all haemosporidians; it consists of exflagellation, which is followed by the sexual process of the oogamy, development of motile ookinetes, sporogony, and finally the formation of sporozoites, which complete their maturation in the salivary glands of vectors. Infection of vertebrate hosts occurs actively during the blood meal of vectors, who inject sporozoites into the blood stream. Similarities in life cycles and other features of the biology (particularly ultrastructure) of haemosporidians belonging to different families [3, 5–7] have been supported by molecular phylogenies, which indicate that these parasites are relatives and likely have a common origin [8–12]. In other word, accumulation of new knowledge about different groups of haemosporidians, which are remarkably diverse and flourishing in wildlife [5, 6, 13–15], would be beneficial for better understanding the biology of the entire group of Haemosporida, including agents of diseases of domestic animals and humans, as well as malaria [10].
Molecular phylogenetic data show that Haemoproteus parasites (Haemoproteidae) are a sister group to malaria agents of the genus Plasmodium (Plasmodiidae) [8, 9, 11]. Haemosporidians of both these genera do not digest haemoglobin completely, resulting in the accumulation of residual pigment (haemozoin) in their blood stages [1–3]. This feature unites species of Haemoproteus and Plasmodium and distinguishes them from species of the Leucocytozoidae and Garniidae, which do not produce residual pigment when developing in red blood cells. The life cycles of Haemoproteus and Plasmodium parasites differ mainly due to the inability of the haemoproteids (i) to multiply in blood cells (erythrocytic merogony is absent) and (ii) to complete sporogony in mosquitoes [7]. Haemoproteus parasites are transmitted mainly by Culicoides biting midges (Ceratopogonidae), and a few species are vectored by louse flies (Hippoboscidae) [2, 7, 16]. In spite of these differences, the knowledge on Haemoproteus spp. is important for better understanding evolutionary biology of haemosporidians [17–19], including human malaria parasites of genus Plasmodium [10]. For example, the application of Haemoproteus tartakovskyi genomic information in phylogenetic studies contributes to understanding the evolutionary relationships of Laverania parasites [8].
Haemosporidians of the genus Haemoproteus parasitize only birds and reptiles [1, 3, 6]. These protists remain a neglected group of blood pathogens mainly because they have been traditionally considered to be relatively benign to their hosts [20]. This seems to be true in regard to the blood pathology during haemoproteosis due to the absence of multiplication in blood cells and predominantly light or moderate parasitaemia, which rarely reaches 5%, but usually is less than 1% in wild-caught animals [3]. However, recent studies show that haemoproteids are pathogenic to blood-sucking insects, including mosquitoes, who often die within 12 h after taking heavily infected blood meals due to damage caused by the migration of ookinetes [21–23]. Furthermore, the application of molecular diagnostic tools has proven that large-sized megalomeronts (up to 300 µm and even bigger) develop in many Haemoproteus infections, resulting in the damage of various organs [2, 24–30]. These findings call for research aimed at better understanding the biology of haemoproteids in regard of animal health.
Haemoproteus species are cosmopolitan and often prevalent in birds [3, 5, 14, 31–34]. Molecular studies have revealed over 4600 unique cytochrome b gene lineages of these parasites, and many more likely exist [13] (see MalAvi database http://130.235.244.92/Malavi, accessed in April 2022). Over 170 species of Haemoproteus have been described, including 49 new species described during the past 20 years. Difficulties in species identification using morphological data preclude comprehensive parasite diversity research. This is unfortunate because morphological and molecular data complement each other and are essential in obtaining a true understanding of pathogen diversity in certain bird populations [35, 36], particularly during co-infections of parasites belonging to same genus [37–39]. Species-specific molecular markers are absent for the majority of avian Haemoproteus, and currently they are difficult to design and use due to the vast genetic diversity of these pathogens, most of which remain insufficiently investigated or even non-described in wildlife. Morphological identification using microscopic examination of blood films supplements the information providing by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based diagnostic tools and remains important in the research of wildlife haemosporidians [36, 38, 40]. Thus, the available keys for the identification of avian Haemoproteus species [3] should be reworked and supplemented.
This review aimed to simplify the identification of avian Haemoproteus species by developing easy-to-use keys based on morphological characters of gametocytes, the parasite development stage easily accessed due to presence in the peripheral circulation. This article provides comprehensive keys, which include new Haemoproteus species that are not already found in formerly published keys [3]. This should assist academic and veterinary medicine researchers in the identification of Haemoproteus pathogens. The available information about molecular markers (molecular barcodes), which can be used for the detection of described Haemoproteus species and the comparative research, was summarized as well. This study generalizes the over 40-years of experience of the authors in taxonomy of Haemoproteus species, and is designed for researchers who are interested in wildlife pathogens.
Methods
Full-length papers with descriptions of new Haemoproteus species as well as articles with re-descriptions and molecular characterizations of these parasites published in peer-reviewed journals were considered. In all, 201 articles and books were reviewed, and 191 publications containing the representative morphological and/or PCR-based information related to identification of these parasites were cited and incorporated in the References.
Type and voucher preparation as well as gametocyte images of avian Haemoproteus parasites were obtained from the collections of Nature Research Centre (Vilnius, Lithuania), International Reference Centre for Avian Haematozoa (Queensland Museum, Queensland, Australia), the US National Parasite Collection (National Museum of Natural History, Washington DC, USA), Natural History Museum (London, UK), Muséum National d’Histoire Naturelle (Paris, France), Grupo de Estudio Relación Parásito Hospedero, Universidad Nacional de Colombia (Bogotá, Colombia) and individual researchers. All accessed preparations were examined. An Olympus BX61 light microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with an Olympus DP70 digital camera and imaging software AnalySIS FIVE (Olympus Soft Imaging Solution GmbH, Münster, Germany) was used to examine preparations and prepare illustrations. It is important to note that the staining quality of some old type specimens of Haemoproteus species, which were obtained from museums, was of insufficient quality mainly due to fading, resulting in some poorly visible diagnostic characters. However, images of the parasites from such preparations were included in this review and were shown in the corresponding species figures if they provided valuable information about the general shape of gametocytes, the size of pigment granules, the mode of influence on host cells and others readily visible taxonomic characters. Use of this information helps to distinguish some species, and also is important for future taxonomic studies being the source of illustrations from valuable type specimens. The quality of these slides could hardly be improved in the future, so worth documentation at this stage. Black and white drawings were also provided to illustrate morphological details of the parasites, of whose high-quality photographs were not available.
Classical dichotomous keys were developed for the identification of Haemoproteus species [3]. Each key consists of steps divided into two alternatives, which identifies the species of a specimen following a series of simple choices that lead the user to the correct name of a given species. The most difficult choices, which might lead to ambiguity, were accompanied with references to the corresponding pictures that further illustrate meaning of the text information. This simplifies the comparison of diagnostic features used in the keys and minimizes possible misunderstanding. All species names in the keys were accompanied with references to the original parasite descriptions, re-descriptions and (or) other publications, which contain description and (or) illustrations of corresponding parasites. Published articles containing valuable morphological descriptions were collected, analysed and cited. These references help to access parasite descriptions and confirm a parasite identification. Information about the barcoding DNA sequences, which can be used for molecular detection and identification of corresponding parasites are also provided.
The experimental observations showed that Haemoproteus species vary in vertebrate host specificity, but the same parasite usually cannot complete life cycle and produce invasive stages (gametocytes) in birds belonging to different orders (see review in [3, p. 69]. Molecular sequence information is in accordance with these empirical data and indicates only rare cases when the same Haemoproteus lineages could be found in birds belonging to different orders [13]. Importantly, the rare reports of the same Haemoproteus lineages in birds of different orders have never been supported by the observation of the corresponding species gametocytes, an invasive parasite stage for vectors, indicating abortive (incomplete) development, which is a dead-end of infection [7]. Thus, morphologically similar parasites in birds belonging to different orders are different species in most cases. This conclusion was confirmed by molecular data [7, 9, 11, 13]. Due to vertebrate host specificity and the resulting restriction of parasite distributions by bird orders, the natural host range of haemosporidians remains helpful in species identification. This provided an opportunity to design separate keys for identification of parasites inhabiting birds of different orders. This approach simplifies parasite identification by minimizing the number of species, which are needed for comparison before making the final conclusion about a species identity. This approach was used in the keys.
Approximately 50% of all described Haemoproteus species parasitize birds of the order Passeriformes. Due to the marked species diversity of haemoproteids in passerines, the keys for their identification were developed for closely related passeriform bird families, which were grouped in suborders or superfamilies as suggested by the current bird phylogenies [41, 42]. Such keys provide the opportunity to easily identify the majority of described parasites of passeriform birds. However, it should be noted that some Haemoproteus parasites of passerines might infect and produce gametocytes in birds belonging to different families within the same order [43], supporting information that host taxonomic characteristic cannot be considered as the main parasite taxonomic character [3, 44]. This might lead to circumstances when a sample under identification could be not found in a certain key. This also certainly will happen if a researcher is dealing with a new (non-described) parasite species. Further comparison of such samples with parasites of most closely related avian groups is suggested before making a final conclusion about the identity of a sample. This is a relatively weak point of the keys for the identification of Haemoproteus species parasitizing passeriform birds. However, experience shows [3] that creating one big key for all parasites of Passeriformes birds would be even more difficult to use due to the need of too many minor morphological characters, which often are difficult to estimate in practical work, particularly during low parasitaemia. This usually make the identification even more complicated in comparison to the approach, which was used here.
Genus Haemoproteus includes two subgenera—Haemoproteus and Parahaemoproteus. Species of these subgenera differ in patterns of sporogony, which occur in louse flies (family Hippoboscidae) and Culicoides biting midges (family Ceratopogonidae), respectively [3, 7]. Haemoproteus and Parahaemoproteus parasites are indistinguishable at the gametocyte stages, but might be present in birds of the same orders. They also sometimes occur in co-infection [3]. The current examples are the parasites of Columbiformes and Suliformes birds [45, 46]. To facilitate identification of species of both subgenera using morphological characters of gametocytes, these parasites were given in the same keys. Most of avian haemoproteid species belong to Parahaemoproteus. All species of subgenus Haemoproteus were indicated in notes to the corresponding keys.
Results
Birds are hosts of various intracellular blood parasites belonging to Apicomplexa. For example, they are infected by haemosporidians of the genera Plasmodium, Leucocytozoon, Garnia, Fallisia and related species of Babesia, Isospora, Lankesterella and Hepatozoon [2–4, 47, 48]. These organisms (Fig. 1a–o) often occur in co-infections. Haemoproteus species can be readily distinguished from all other avian intracellular haematozoa, except Plasmodium parasites, because their blood stages (gametocytes) develop exclusively in red blood cells and always contain refractive pigment granules (haemozoin granules) (Fig. 1a–c), which are absent in all other blood parasites (Fig. 1h–o). Even the smallest Haemoproteus gametocytes contain pigment granules and can be distinguished from other intracellular blood parasites (Fig. 1a), except for Plasmodium species, which sometimes look similar at the gametocyte or early trophozoite stages (Fig. 1d, e). Furthermore, it is important to note that gametocytes of some species of Haemoproteus are similar to the elongate gametocytes of malaria parasites (Fig. 1b–d). Species of Plasmodium can be readily distinguished because they multiply in blood cells and produce meronts (= schizonts), in which invasive merozoites develop (Fig. 1f, g). This is not the case in species of Haemoproteus. Extensive examination of blood films at magnification 500× usually provides opportunity to visualize meronts of Plasmodium even during low parasitaemia and thus to identify malaria infections. Examination of blood films using an oil immersion objective 50× is particularly convenient for this diagnostic procedure. However, an obstacle still might be a low Plasmodium sp. parasitaemia (< 0.001% of infected red blood cells), which however is the obstacle for identification of any haematozoan infection using microscopic examination of blood films and sometimes even sensitive PCR-based methods [38].
It should be noted that a shape of fully grown gametocytes is an important character for many Haemoproteus species identifications [2, 3, 49]. Several major gametocyte forms are readily distinguishable and were used in the keys (Fig. 2a–r). These forms are microhalteridial (fully grown gametocytes are small and do not reach the poles of infected erythrocytes, Fig. 2b–f), halteridial (fully grown gametocytes reach and occupy the poles of infected erythrocytes, Fig. 2g–j), circumnuclear (fully grown gametocytes encircle the nuclei of infected erythrocytes completely, Fig. 2o, p) and rhabdosomal (fully grown gametocytes push the nuclei of erythrocytes to polar position and finally enucleate the host cells, Fig. 2q, r). A non-infected erythrocyte was shown in Fig. 2a for comparison with the infected erythrocytes. Sometimes subdivisions of these main forms were also helpful during species identification, and they were mentioned in the keys. These forms are broadly-halteridial (fully grown gametocytes occupy the poles of infected erythrocytes and markedly displace the nuclei laterally, Fig. 2k, l) and close to circumnuclear (fully grown gametocytes encircle the nuclei of infected erythrocytes nearly completely, Fig. 2m, n). It is important to remind in this regard that the form of only fully grown gametocytes was considered in the keys.
Blood films should be carefully examined before parasite identification. When the most typical growing and fully-grown gametocytes of Haemoproteus are recognized in samples, the next step is the species identification using the keys. The latter were designed in the form of separate tables, each created for a separate group of avian hosts. To facilitate the use of the keys, a guide to all keys has been provided in Table 1. It lists all the tables for Haemoproteus species identification in relation to bird orders or relative families, as grouped in the keys.
Table 1.
Bird taxaa | Key for parasite species |
---|---|
Order Accipitriformes | Table 2, Fig. 3 |
Order Anseriformes | Table 3, Fig. 4 |
Order Apodiformes | Table 4, Fig. 5 |
Order Bucerotiformes | Table 5, Fig. 6 |
Order Caprimulgiformes | Table 6, Fig. 7 |
Order Cariamiformes | Table 7, Fig. 8 |
Order Cathartiformes | Table 8, Fig. 9 |
Order Charadriiformes | Table 9, Fig. 10 |
Order Ciconiiformes | Table 10, Fig. 11 |
Order Coliiformes | Table 11, Fig. 12 |
Order Columbiformes | Table 12, Fig. 13 |
Order Coraciiformes | Table 13, Fig. 14 |
Order Cuculiformes | Table 14, Fig. 15 |
Order Falconiformes | Table 15, Fig. 16 |
Order Galliformes | Table 16, Fig. 17 |
Order Gruiformes | Table 17, Fig. 18 |
Order Musophagiformes | Table 18, Fig. 19 |
Order Otidiformes | Table 19, Fig. 20 |
Order Pelecaniformes | Table 20, Fig. 21 |
Order Piciformes | Table 21, Fig. 22 |
Order Psittaciformes | Table 22, Fig. 23 |
Order Pterocliformes | Table 23, Fig. 24 |
Order Strigiformes | Table 24, Fig. 25 |
Order Suliformes | Table 25, Fig. 26 |
Order Passeriformes | |
Suborder Tyranni | Table 26, Fig. 27 |
Suboder Passeri | |
Families Meliphagidae, Oriolidae, Pachycephalidae, Vireonidae | Table 27, Fig. 28 |
Families Aegithinidae, Artamidae, Malaconotidae, Vangidae | Table 28, Fig. 29 |
Families Corvidae, Dicruridae, Laniidae, Monarchidae | Table 29, Fig. 30 |
Families Alaudidae, Cisticolidae, Melanocharitidae, Paridae | Table 30, Fig. 31 |
Families Acrocephalidae, Hirundinidae | Table 31, Fig. 32 |
Families Leiothrichidae, Phylloscopidae, Pycnonotidae, Sylviidae and Zosteropidae | Table 32, Fig. 33 |
Families Mimidae, Muscicapidae, Sittidae, Sturnidae and Turdidae | Table 33, Fig. 34 |
Families Dicaeidae, Estrildidae, Fringillidae, Motacillidae, Nectariniidae, Passeridae, Ploceidae | Table 34, Fig. 35 |
Families Emberizidae, Icteridae, Parulidae, Passerellidae and Thraupidae | Table 35, Fig. 36 |
aOnly orders and families of birds were shown, in whose Haemoproteus species were identified
Discussion
The recent discoveries of severe damage caused by tissue stages (meronts and megalomeronts) of Haemoproteus parasites in various organs, including the brain, heart, lungs, kidneys and skeletal muscles of naturally infected birds call for research aimed at better understanding the diversity and patterns of development of these pathogens [2, 24, 25, 27, 28, 170, 186]. This work requires parasite species identification and molecular data analysis. The combination of microscopic and PCR-based tools complements each other and increases the significance of research on haemosporidian parasite diversity, so is preferable, particularly in wildlife studies [36, 38, 40]. However, the progress in developing morphological identifications of Haemoproteus species is slow and noticeably falls behind the accumulation of DNA sequence information. This is unfortunate because the identification of the parasite species helps in accessing the basic data on the life cycles and patterns of pathogens’ development in various hosts and would be helpful for better understanding of haemoproteosis. The easy-to-use keys should stimulate taxonomic research and contribute to the discovery of new pathogen species by providing direct indications how to distinguish the parasites, which are morphologically different from described ones. In other words, the samples under identification, which are absent in the keys, likely represent new pathogens and would be worth targeted taxonomic investigation.
The following possible obstacles should be considered during the identification of Haemoproteus parasites using samples collected in wildlife. First, the intensity of parasitaemia is often low in naturally infected birds, and all necessary blood stages (young, growing or fully grown gametocytes) might be absent in a single sample. Experienced taxonomists can often perform the species identification by visualization of several Haemoproteus gametocytes, which are typical for the species, however this is hardly achievable for novices. As a result, low parasitaemia might limit the use of the keys. The negative effect of this factor can be minimized by sampling a sufficient number of host individuals belonging to the same species at the same study site. Extensive sampling of the same host species is common in population studies. The sample size needed for parasite taxonomical work depends on the prevalence of infection in a certain bird population [187]. The sampling of 10–30 host individuals often is sufficient and usually provides an opportunity to access various intensities of parasitaemia of the same parasite and then to visualize the full range of gametocytes, which are necessary for parasite species identification. This is preferable for the development of comprehensive descriptions of new pathogens.
Second, gametocytes of Haemoproteus inhabit erythrocytes, which are fragile cells and might be deformed during the preparation of blood films, resulting in presence of unusual parasite forms, which are artefacts from the taxonomic point of view and should be ignored during species identification and parasite descriptions. Morphological characters of typical (the most common) non-deformed gametocytes and their host cells should be selected for identification. Only such cells were used and shown in all corresponding illustrations in the keys (Figs. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36).
Third, the morphometric characters of Haemoproteus gametocytes and their host cells can be similar and might overlap in some parasite species. Thus, they should be carefully considered during parasite identification and description. It is important to note that morphometric characters are functions of gametocyte size (age). In other words, the length and shape of gametocytes as well as number of pigment granules of the same parasite species can change markedly as the gametocytes grow and mature. As a result, the morphometric data are considered taxonomically valuable only if the gametocytes measurements are standardized and accessed only in fully grown gametocytes, which selection requires some experience and good quality preparations. Minor morphometric differences might be a result of incorrect measurements and are usually of low taxonomic value [3]. Furthermore, it is important to note that measurement of parasites is time consuming and requires subsequent statistical evaluation. This is why the use of morphometric characters was minimized in the keys. However, some readily distinguishable morphometric data (the nuclear displacement ratio, number of pigment granules and their size, etc.) were essential for some species identifications, but they were provided only for fully grown gametocytes in the keys. Measurements of the growing gametocytes will distort taxonomic values of the morphometric characters and might abate their applicability during species identifications and thus should be discouraged.
Fourth, the co-infections of Haemoproteus and Plasmodium species often occur in naturally infected birds and require some experience to distinguish between co-existing parasites [35, 38, 39, 182]. The co-infections of several morphologically similar species belonging to the same genus might be particularly difficult to distinguish; such co-infections also often are hardly distinguishable by commonly used PCR-based methods, which apply general primers for the parasite detection [38, 40]. However, the co-infections of many Haemoproteus and other haemosporidian species belonging to same genus are readily distinguishable using morphological characters of blood stages (for example see Fig. 37a, b).
Fifth, the good quality of blood films is essential for the visualization of gametocyte morphological characters, which are needed for identification (Fig. 38a–d), but this is hardly possible in thick blood films (Fig. 38h) or in preparations affected by incorrect procedures of their drying, fixation, staining or storage [188]. Insufficient quality of preparations (Fig. 37e–h) is a significant obstacle in haemosporidian parasite species identification and description. It is essential to master methods of blood film preparation and storage before sample collection. These procedures are simple, relatively cheap and can be accomplished in any laboratory by careful application of well-described routine protocols [1, 3, 188, 189].
Sixth, the mature gametocytes of Haemoproteus parasites change morphology (round up and tend to escape from host cells) within one minute after the exposure to air [3, 148, 172]. This process naturally occurs in vectors before the exflagellation and gametogenesis [1–3, 7]. The form of gametocytes and their position in erythrocytes changes dramatically during this process, which readily occurs in vitro, including slowly drying blood films. As a result, such material can present distorted parasites and host cells and be unsuitable for species identification, and thus should be eliminated from the taxonomic work. The use of fans is recommended to quicken blood film drying, particularly during fieldwork in humid environments.
Molecular markers (barcodes) were developed and can be used for the detection and identification of approximately 42% of the named species (Table 36). Partial sequences of the mitochondrial cytochrome b gene (cytb) are easy to obtain using blood samples; they are known for many Haemoproteus species, and consequently are convenient and often used for haemoproteid and other haemosporidian parasite species delimitation (barcoding) [38]. However, most detected Haemoproteus parasite lineages remain non-characterized at the parasite species levels. Molecular characterization is best developed for the parasites of passeriform birds breeding and migrating in Europe, and it is weakest for the organisms inhabiting tropical bird species, which are more difficult to access for blood sampling [7, 13]. Parasites of most non-passeriform birds remained non-characterized molecularly for the same reason. This is a prominent obstacle in developing generalizations in biodiversity research of Haemoproteus and other haemosporidian parasites. It is important to note that some parasite molecular characterizations were based on incorrect species identifications and thus should be treated with caution. Several such cases were reported in Table 36. The development of molecular markers for the diagnosis of agents of haemoproteosis and other haemosporidioses is an important undertaking of current parasitology studies.
Table 36.
Parasite species | GenBank accession and lineage code (in parentheses)a | Referencesb |
---|---|---|
H. abdusalomovi | Not available | Not available |
H. aegithinae | Not available | Not available |
H. africanus | Not available | Not available |
H. alaudae | Not available | Not available |
H. ammoperdix | Not available | Not available |
H. anthi | Not available | Not available |
H. antigonis | KX223839 (GRUAME01)c, KX223842 (GRUAME02), KX223843 ((GRUAME03) | [190] |
H. apodus | Not available | Not available |
H. archilochus | Not available | Not available |
H. asymmetricus | MW492355 (TUPHI01) | [63] |
H. attenuatus | DQ630007 (LULU01)d, DQ451431 (LULU01), AY393807 (ROBIN01), KJ488597 (ROBIN01) | [16, 85, 147, 170] |
H. balearicae | Not available | Not available |
H. balmorali | DQ630008 (SFC1), DQ060770 (SFC1), JX026912 (SFC1), DQ630014 (hCOLL3) | [147, 148, 172] |
H. beckeri | Not available | Not available |
H. belopolskyi | DQ630006 (HIICT1), JX026904 (HIICT1), JX026909 (HIICT3), MN025422 (HIICT1), KJ627801 (HIICT1), AF254969 (MW1) | [147–149, 159, 160] |
H. bennetti | Not available | Not available |
H. bilobata | Not available | Not available |
H. borgesi | Not available | Not available |
H. brachiatus | MK580170 (LK03) | [100] |
H. bubalornis | Not available | Not available |
H. bucconis | Not available | Not available |
H. bucerotis | Not available | Not available |
H. bukaka | KX100323 (CRALOU01) | [143] |
H. burhini | Not available | Not available |
H. buteonis | Not available | Not available |
H. calandrellae | Not available | Not available |
H. caprimulgi | Not available | Not available |
H. catharti | MF953291 (CATAUR01)e | [69] |
H. centropi | Not available | Not available |
H. ciconiae | Not available | Not available |
H. circumnuclearis | Not available | Not available |
H. clamatori | Not available | Not available |
H. coatneyi | KT698210 (ARBRU02), KM211350 (ANSOM01), KF537292 (ARBRU01), KT698210 (ARBRU02), KF537309 (ATPAL02), KF537326 (PIOLI03), KF537285 (TANIG01), KF537283 (TANVAS02), KF537327 (ZOCAP13)f | [62, 182] |
H. columbae |
KU131584 (COLI03), KU1311585 (COQUI05), |
[62, 81, 191–193] |
H. concavocentralis | GQ396708 (HAWF2) | [91] |
H. contortus | Not available | Not available |
H. coraciae | KU297278 (CORGAR01) | [94] |
H. cornuata | Not available | Not available |
H. cracidarum | Not available | Not available |
H. crumenium | Not available | Not available |
H. cublae | Not available | Not available |
H. cuculis | Not available | Not available |
H. cyanomitrae | EU810741 (CYAOLI03), FJ404696 (CYAOLI05), FJ404698 (CYAOLI06) | [180] |
H. danilewskii | DQ451411 (COCOR01) | [85] |
H. dicaeus | Not available | Not available |
H. dicruri | Not available | Not available |
H. dolniki | Not available | Not available |
H. elani | Not available | Not available |
H. enucleator | DQ659592 (ALCLEU01)g | [194] |
H. erythrogravidus | KF537315 (ZOCAP01), KF537329 (ZOCAP14) | [182] |
H. eurylaimus | Not available | Not available |
H. eurystomae | Not available | Not available |
H. fallisi | Not available | Not available |
H. formicarius | Not available | Not available |
H. forresteri | Not available | Not available |
H. fringillae | DQ060764 (CCF3) | [43, 172] |
H. furnarius | Not available | Not available |
H. fuscae | EU810722 (CELEC01) | [93] |
H. gallinulae | Not available | Not available |
H. gavrilovi | KP462688 (MEAPI02) | [91] |
H. globulosus | Not available | Not available |
H. goodmani | Not available | Not available |
H. greineri | Not available | Not available |
H. halcyonis | Not available | Not available |
H. handai | Not available | Not available |
H. herodiadis | Not available | Not available |
H. hirundinis | KJ499183 (DELURB01), MN025423 (DELURB2) | [128, 149, 161] |
H. homobelopolskyi | HQ386240 (PLOMEL01), HQ386241 (PLOMEL02) | [177] |
H. homogeneae | MK580174 (SYAT16) | [100] |
H. homohandai | KY783725 (ARCHL01) | [125] |
H. homoleiothrichus | KY623721 (TROERY02)h | [165] |
H. homominutus | MK580175 (CUKI1) | [100] |
H. homopalloris | MH513601 (PHSIB2) | [168] |
H. homopicae | MK580172 (GAGLA07) | [100] |
H. homovelans | GU085195 (PICAN02) | [121] |
H. indicator | Not available | Not available |
H. iwa | JF833050 (FREMIN01) | [131] |
H. janovyi | Not available | Not available |
H. jenniae | CREFURO1 (JN827318) | [72] |
H. kairullaevi | Not available | Not available |
H. killangoi | JN661945 (ZOSMAD01), KT777738 (ZOSLAT07), KX604234 (ZOSLAT10), KX604236 (ZOSXAN03) | [93, 164] |
H. krylovi | Not available | Not available |
H. lairdi | Not available | Not available |
H. lanii | DQ451429 (RSB2) DQ630010 (RB1), MN025425 (RB1), JX026907 (RB1), KR049265 (RB1), KU529942 (RB1), DQ630011 (RBS2), DQ630012 (RBS4) | [23, 85, 147–150] |
H. larae | AB604310 (SPMAG12), LC230123 (LARCRA02), LC230122 (NUMPHA01) | [74] |
H. leiothrichus | KY623720 (TROERY01)h | [165] |
H. lophortyx | Not available | Not available |
H. macropigmentatus | Not available | Not available |
H. macrovacuolatus | KJ175078 (DENAUT01), KJ592828 (DENAUT01), KJ499987 (CA1017) | [55] |
H. madagascariensis | Not available | Not available |
H. magnus | DQ451426 (CCF7) | [85] |
H. majoris |
AF254977 (PARUS1), AY831755 (WW2), MN219405 (PHYBOR04)i |
[28, 43] |
H. mansoni | Not available | Not available |
H. manwelli | KP462687 (MEAPI01) | [91] |
H. megapodius | Not available | Not available |
H. meropis | Not available | Not available |
H. micronuclearis |
HQ386235 (RBQ11), HQ386236 (VILWE1), HQ386237 (PLONIG01), HQ386238 (PLONIG02), HQ386239 (PLONIG03) |
[177] |
H. minchini | KU160476 (CORCRI01) | [115] |
H. minutus | DQ630013 (TURDUS2), DQ060772 (TURDUS2), JX026900 (TURDUS2), DQ060772 (TURDUS2) | [16, 147, 148, 172] |
H. monarchus | Not available | Not available |
H. montezi | Not available | Not available |
H. motacillae | AF495579 (YWT01), AF495580 (YWT02), DQ368371 (YWT03), DQ368372 (YWT05), KC568475 (YWT06) | [16, 181] |
H. multipigmentatus | GU296216 (JH003W), GU296215 (ZEGAL05), GU296224 (JH3008W) | [82, 83] |
H. multivolutinus | JX275888 (TURTYM01) | [82] |
H. neseri | Not available | Not available |
H. nettionis | Not available | Not available |
H. nipponensis | Not available | Not available |
H. nisi | Not available | Not available |
H. noctuae | KP794612 (CIRCUM01) | [130] |
H. nucleocentralis | MT724553 (TANDES01) | [184] |
H. nucleocondensus | JX026901 (GRW1), MN025424 (GRW1) | [148, 149, 158] |
H. nucleofascialis | HQ386243 (MALRUB02), HQ386244 (PLOMEL03) | [177] |
H. nucleophilus | Not available | Not available |
H. orioli | Not available | Not available |
H. orizivorae | Not available | Not available |
H. ortalidum | KX171627 (PENOBS01) | [195] |
H. otocompsae | Not available | Not available |
H. pachycephalus | Not available | Not available |
H. pallidulus | AY831752 (SYAT03) | [169] |
H. pallidus | DQ630004 (hPFC1), JX026899 (hPFC1), DQ630005 (COLL2), DQ060771 (hSFC3) | [43, 147, 148, 172] |
H. palloris | AF254971 (WW1) | [91] |
H. palumbis | Not available | Not available |
H. parabelopolskyi |
AY831751 (SYAT2), AY831762 (SYAT16), AF495575 (SYBOR01), JX026902 (SYBOR01), |
[100, 128, 148, 159] |
H. parahirundinis | MT119966 (HIRUS05) | [161] |
H.paramultipigmentatus |
FJ462657 (COLPAS03), JN788939 (COLPAS05) |
[82] |
H. paranucleophilus | HQ386242 (MALRUB01) | [177] |
H. paraortalidum | MH036944 (ABUJAC01) | [108] |
H. parus | Not available | Not available |
H. passeris | DQ451420 (P37), DQ451421 (P102), DQ451422 (P89), DQ451423 (P138), HM146898 (PADOM05), GU065651 (PAHIS01) | [85, 196] |
H. pastoris | KJ499185 (LAMPUR01), KU752568 (LAMPUR01) | [128, 173] |
H. payevskyi | AF254968 (RW01), DQ630009 (RW01), JX026905 (RW01) | [147, 148] |
H. pelouroi | Not available | Not available |
H. philippinensis | Not available | Not available |
H. picae | Not availablej | Not available |
H. pittae | Not available | Not available |
H. plataleae | Not available | Not available |
H. porzanae | Not available | Not available |
H. pratasi | Not available | Not available |
H. psittaci | Not available | Not available |
H. pteroclis | Not available | Not available |
H. ptilotis |
KP721986 (LICHRYS01), JX021554 (LICFRE03), KP721990 (MELLEW03), KP721987 (MELALB01), KP721988 (MELALB02), KP721989 (MELALB03), AY714177 (MELLEW01), KP721992 (NMIN01) |
[138] |
H. pulcher | OL906298 (CARCRI02) k | [67] |
H. queleae | Not available | Not available |
H. quiscalus | Not available | Not available |
H. rileyi | Not available | Not available |
H. rotator | Not available | Not available |
H. sacharovi | JX073258 (MODO1) | [45] |
H. sanguinis | DQ451409 (BUL1), DQ451410 (BUL4) | [85] |
H. scolopaci | Not available | Not available |
H. sequeirae | Not available | Not available |
H. sittae | Not available | Not available |
H. skuae | Not available | Not available |
H. souzalopesil | Not available | Not available |
H. stableri | Not available | Not available |
H. stellaris | Not available | Not available |
H. syrnii | KJ451480 (OTSCO05), KF279523 (STAL02), DQ451424 (STSEL01), KP794611 (CULKIB01)m | [128–130] |
H. tartakovskyi | AY393806 (SISKIN01), JX026908 (SISKIN01), JX026903 (HAWF1), GU289671 (ALARV1), GU289672 (ALARV2), GU289673 (ALARV3) | [148, 150, 172, 179] |
H. telfordi | Not available | Not available |
H. thereicerycis | Not available | Not available |
H. timalus | Not available | Not available |
H. tinnunculin | MK580171 (FALSUB01) | [100] |
H. trochili | Not available | Not available |
H. trogonis | Not available | Not available |
H. turtur | DQ451425 (STSEN1) | [85] |
H. tyranni | Not available | Not available |
H. undulatus | Not available | Not available |
H. upupae | Not available | Not available |
H. uraeginthus | Not available | Not available |
H. vangii | Not available | Not available |
H. vacuolatus | EU770153 (ANLAT02) | [167] |
H. valkiunasi | GQ404559 (FREAND01) | [46] |
H. velans | MH311671 (MELCAR01), MH311672 (MELSTR01) | [120] |
H. vireonis | FJ168561 (VIGIL01), KF482350 (VIOLI05), KF537331 (VIOLI06) | [62, 136] |
H. wenyoni | Not available | Not available |
H. witti | JQ988105 (TROAED20), KF767420 (TROAED20) | [61, 62] |
H. xantholaemae | Not available | Not available |
H. zosteropis | JX021550 (ZOSLAT04), KX604237 (ZOSXAN02), KX604235 (ZOSLAT11), FJ664153 (ZOSSTE01) | [164] |
aMainly DNA sequences, for which parasite species identity was supported by morphological analysis were included in this table. In cases of the identical DNA sequences of same morphospecies, the preference was given to the GenBank accessions, which directed a reader straightforward to articles containing morphological parasite descriptions. This simplifies the parasite identification using GenBank information. Where possible, the codes of lineages were given according to MalAvi database
bReferences of articles containing description of parasite morphology and/or discussion on their molecular characterization, which are valuable for species identification
cDisputable quality of the data (consensus inferred from diverse partial cytb and cox1 gene sequences obtained from mixed infections) calls for support of the barcoding sequences of H. antigonis (see [9, 190])
dRe-examination of blood films from Luscinia luscinia showed that the lineage LULU01 belongs to H. attenuatus, but not to H. balmorali as reported formerly [147]
eMolecular characterization of H. catharti needs confirmation due to coinfections of several haemosporidian species in samples, which were used for the parasite molecular characterization [69]
fSee Table 35 for comments in regard of molecular characterization of H. paruli and H. thraupi
gMolecular characterization of H. enucleator needs confirmation because it was not supported by morphological data, and the DNA sequence was received from parasites found in non-type avian host [194]
hIn regard of molecular identification of H. homoleiothrichus and H. leiothrichus, see comments in Table 32
iLineages CCF5, CWT4, PHSIB1 were formerly attributed to H. majoris [43], but the morphological proof remains insufficient due to possible co-infection with other haemoproteids. Further research is needed to validate this action
jMolecular characterization of H. picae was incorrect in [197] because it was developed using samples, which came from non-type host (Picoides pubescens, Piciformes). Haemoproteus picae was originally described from Pica pica (Passeriformes) and ideally should be characterised molecularly using the samples from this avian host
kMolecular characterization of H. pulcher needs confirmation due to possible presence of overlapped sequences [67]
lHaemoproteus souzalopesi likely belongs to Plasmodium. See comments in Table 26
mStatus of H. ilanpapernai [129] remains unclear; this parasite might belong to H. syrnii group (see comments in Table 24)
nHaemoproteus obainae and H. deharoi are probable synonyms of H. tinnunculi. See comments in Table 15
Approximately 177 described species of avian Haemoproteus currently can be distinguished using morphological characters of their blood stages (Tables 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35). The molecular data supported the validity of most comprehensive morphological species descriptions, which were based on a package of distinct morphological characters (Table 36).
Table 2.
Step | Features and species | |
---|---|---|
1 (6) | Fully grown gametocytes, which markedly displace nuclei of infected erythrocytes laterally, often close to the erythrocyte envelope, develop and are common (Fig. 3a, b, d) | |
2 (3) | Both broadly halteridial (Fig. 3a, d) and circumnuclear (Fig. 3c, f) fully grown gametocytes occur simultaneously | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. janovyi (Fig. 3a–c) [3, 50] | |
3 (2) | Fully grown gametocytes predominantly are broadly halteridial (Fig. 3a, d). Circumnuclear fully grown gametocytes (Fig. 3c, f) are absent or occur only occasionally | |
4 (5) | Fully grown gametocytes fill the infected erythrocytes up to their poles (Fig. 3d) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. elani (Fig. 3d) [3, 51, 52] | |
5 (4) | Fully grown gametocytes predominantly do not fill the infected erythrocytes up to their poles (Fig. 3e) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. buteonis (Fig. 3e) [3, 53] | |
6 (1) | Fully grown gametocytes, which markedly displace nuclei of erythrocytes laterally, often close to the erythrocyte envelope (Fig. 3a, b, d), are absent or occur only occasionally. The majority of gametocytes grow around nuclei of the infected erythrocytes (Fig. 3f) and usually do not markedly displace the nuclei laterally (NDR is close to 1). Circumnuclear gametocytes (Fig. 3c, f) predominate among the fully grown gametocytes | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. nisi (Fig. 3f) [3, 53, 54] |
Table 3.
Step | Features and species | |
---|---|---|
1 (2) | Macrogametocytes often contain one or several large (2.5 μm and bigger) vacuoles (Fig. 4a, b) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. macrovacuolatus (Fig. 4a, b) [55] | |
2 (1) | Macrogametocytes do not contain large (2.5 μm and bigger) vacuoles (Fig. 4a, b) | |
3 (4) | Fully grown gametocytes predominantly grow around nuclei of infected erythrocytes and do not displace or slightly displace (Fig. 4c, d) the nuclei laterally; they markedly enclose the nuclei with their ends and can completely encircle the nuclei (Fig. 4c). Gametocytes markedly displacing erythrocyte nuclei laterally might occur occasionally during high parasitemia, but never predominate | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. greineri (Fig. 4c, d) [3, 56] | |
4 (3) | Fully grown gametocytes predominantly markedly displace the nuclei of infected erythrocytes laterally (Fig. 4e, f); they usually slightly enclose the nuclei with their ends but usually do not encircle the nuclei completely. Circumnuclear fully grown gametocytes might occur occasionally during high parasitemia, but never predominate | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. nettionis (Fig. 4e, f) [3, 57, 58] |
Table 4.
Step | Features and species | |
---|---|---|
1 (2) | Advanced gametocytes grow around nuclei of infected erythrocytes and markedly enclose the nuclei with their ends; fully grown gametocytes can completely encircle the nuclei and occupy all available cytoplasmic space in the erythrocytes (Fig. 5a, b) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. archilochus (Fig. 5a, b) [3, 59] | |
2 (1) | Advanced gametocytes grow along the nuclei of infected erythrocytes, but only slightly enclose the nuclei with their ends (Fig. 5c-h). Fully grown gametocytes do not completely encircle the nuclei of infected erythrocytes | |
3 (4) | The average number of pigment granules in fully grown gametocytes is greater than 18 | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. witti (Fig. 5c, d) [3, 60–63] | |
4 (3) | The average number of pigment granules in fully grown gametocytes is less than 18 | |
5 (6) | Growing gametocytes of dumbbell-like shape (Fig. 5e, f) are present | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. apodus (Fig. 5e, f) [3, 64] | |
6 (5) | Growing gametocytes of dumbbell-like shape (Fig. 5e, f) are absent | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. trochili Fig. (Fig. 5g, h) [3, 60] |
Table 5.
Step | Features and species | |
---|---|---|
1 (2) | Nuclei assume predominantly central or subcentral position in the fully grown macrogametocytes (Fig. 6a); subterminal position of nuclei is not characteristic. Pigment granules tend to aggregate in conspicuous groups (Fig. 6a) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. upupae (Fig. 6a) [3, 51] a | |
2 (1) | Nuclei assume predominantly subterminal position in the fully grown macrogametocytes (Fig. 6b); central or subcentral position of nuclei is not characteristic. Pigment granules are randomly scattered (Fig. 6b); they do not tend to aggregate in conspicuous groups | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. bucerotis (Fig. 6b) [3, 65] |
aRedescription of H. upupae is needed. Information about this parasite is scanty
Table 6.
Step | Features and species | |
---|---|---|
1 | One species has been described. The parasite with pleomorphic gametocytes (Fig. 7a–c). Fully grown gametocytes usually slightly enclose the nuclei of infected erythrocytes with their ends and markedly displace the nuclei laterally, but do not encircle them completely (Fig. 7b). However, the gametocytes sometimes also completely encircle the nuclei of erythrocytes and occupy all available cytoplasmic space in the host cells (Fig. 7c). Advanced growing gametocytes often do not adhere to nuclei of erythrocytes (Fig. 7a). The average number of pigment granules is about 20 in fully grown gametocytes | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. caprimulgi (Fig. 7a–c) [3, 66] |
Table 7.
Step | Features and species | |
---|---|---|
1 | One species has been described. Advanced growing gametocytes are closely appressed to the envelop of erythrocytes, but often do not touch nuclei of the erythrocytes (Fig. 8b). Form of fully grown gametocytes is close to circumnuclear (Fig. 8a). Fully grown gametocytes cause rounding of the erythrocyte nuclei, which become roundish or even circular in shape (Fig. 8a, b). The average number of pigment granules in fully grown macrogametocytes is greater than in microgametocytes | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. pulcher (Fig. 8a, b) [67] |
Table 8.
Step | Features and species | |
---|---|---|
1 | One species has been described. Gametocytes are thick, halteridial, with entire margins; they displace host cell nuclei laterally. Macrogametocyte nucleus is close to central position. Growing gametocytes usually do not adhere to erythrocyte nuclei. The number of pigment granules is close to 25 in fully grown gametocytes; the pigment granules are of medium size, scattered throughout the cytoplasm (Fig. 9a, b) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. catharti (Fig. 9a, b) [68, 69] |
Table 9.
Step | Features and species | |
---|---|---|
1 (2) | Fully grown gametocytes, which rotate erythrocyte nuclei 45° to 90° to the normal axis (Fig. 10a–c), are common | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. rotator (Fig. 10a–c) [3, 70] | |
2 (1) | Fully grown gametocytes, which rotate erythrocyte nuclei 45° to 90° to the normal axis (Fig. 10a–c), are absent or appear only incidentally | |
3 (9) | Fully grown gametocytes, which completely encircle the nuclei of erythrocytes, are present (Fig. 10d, e, h). Close to circumnuclear (Fig. 10f, g, i) and completely circumnuclear (Fig. 10d, e, h) forms are common at final stage of gametocyte growth | |
4 (12) | Fully grown circumnuclear macrogametocytes and microgametocytes are closely appressed to the nuclei of infected erythrocytes and occupy all available cytoplasmic space in the erythrocytes (Fig. 10d, h) | |
5 (6) | Nucleoli are readily visible in nuclei of advanced and fully grown macrogametocytes (Fig. 10d) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. scolopaci (Fig. 10d, e) [3, 71] | |
6 (5) | Nucleoli (Fig. 10d) are invisible in nuclei advanced and fully grown macrogametocytes | |
7 (8) | Fully grown gametocytes contain predominantly roundish or slightly oval, of approximately uniform size and shape pigment granules (Fig. 10f, g). Elongate rod-like (thin) pigment granules (Fig. 10h, i) usually are absent | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. jenniae (Fig. 10f, g) [72] | |
8 (7) | Fully grown gametocytes contain variable in size and shape pigment granules; roundish, oval and elongate rod-like (thin) pigment granules develop, but oval and rod-like pigment granules readily predominate (Fig. 10h, i) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. larae (Fig. 10h, i) [3, 73, 74] | |
9 (3) | Fully grown gametocytes, which completely encircle the nuclei of erythrocytes (Fig. 10d, e, h), are absent. Advanced and fully grown gametocytes are halteridial (Fig. 10j, k) | |
10 (11) | Fully grown gametocytes contain large (1.0 to 1.5 µm) pigment granules (Fig. 10 j) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. abdusalomovi (Fig. 10j) [3, 75] | |
11 (10) | Fully grown gametocytes do not contain large (1.0 to 1.5 µm) pigment granules | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. burhini (Fig. 10k) [3, 65] | |
12 (4) | Fully grown circumnuclear macrogametocytes are not closely appressed to the nuclei of infected erythrocytes and do not occupy all available cytoplasmic space in the erythrocytes (Fig. 10m, o, p). More or less evident unfilled space is present between fully grown circumnuclear macrogametocytes and nuclei of infected erythrocytes (Fig. 10m, o, p). Shape of fully grown macrogametocytes is markedly irregular (wriggled) (Fig. 10m, o, p) | |
13 (14) | Cytoplasm of advanced and fully grown gametocytes is markedly vacuolated, with several large (bigger than 1 µm) vacuoles often present (Fig. 10l, n). Fully grown microgametocytes, which adhere to the nuclei of infected erythrocytes (Fig. 10n), are common | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. skuae (Fig. 10l–n) [76] | |
14 (13) | Cytoplasm of advanced and fully grown gametocytes is not markedly vacuolated; large (bigger than 1 µm in diameter) vacuoles (Fig. 10l, n) usually are absent, but a few small vacuoles might occur. Fully grown gametocytes, which adhere to the nuclei of infected erythrocytes (Fig. 10n), are absent or occur only occasionally | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. contortus (Fig. 10o, p) [3, 70] |
Table 10.
Step | Features and species | |
---|---|---|
1 (2) | Fully grown gametocytes are broadly halteridial (Fig. 11a). Nuclei of fully grown macrogametocytes are median in position, often ribbon-like in form, closely appressed to the erythrocyte nuclei (Fig. 11a). One or several circular large (about 1 µm and bigger) vacuoles are often present in the macrogametocyte cytoplasm (Fig. 11a) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. crumenium (Fig. 11a) [3, 77] | |
2 (1) | Fully grown gametocytes are halteridial (Fig. 11b). Nuclei of fully grown macrogametocytes are median or submedian in position, markedly variable in form and position, usually do not closely appressed to the erythrocyte nuclei (Fig. 11b). Circular conspicuous (about 1 µm and bigger) vacuoles (Fig. 11a) usually are absent from the macrogametocyte cytoplasm, but small vacuoles (less than 0.5 µm) might be present | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. ciconiae (Fig. 11b) [78] |
Table 11.
Step | Features and species | |
---|---|---|
1 | One species has been described. Advanced gametocytes are wavy (undulated) or ameboid in outline (Fig. 12a); they grow around the nuclei of infected erythrocytes and markedly enclose them with their ends, but do not displace or only slightly displace the nuclei laterally (Fig. 12b). Growing gametocytes are usually appressed to the envelope of erythrocytes but do not touch the nuclei of the erythrocytes along their entire margin (Fig. 12a, b). Circumnuclear gametocytes occur | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. undulatus (Fig. 12a, b) [3, 79] |
Table 12.
Step | Features and species | |
---|---|---|
1 (12) | Fully grown gametocytes are predominantly halteridial in form (Fig. 13a–i); they outwardly are not similar to gametocytes of Leucocytozoon sp. | |
2 (9) | Volutin is prominent and readily visible in fully grown gametocytes (Fig. 13a–f) b | |
3 (8) | Volutin is arranged as discrete granules (volutin granules) (Fig. 13a–e), but does not overfill more or less evenly the entire gametocyte cytoplasm | |
4 (5) | Large (1 µm and bigger) discrete volutin granules are present in fully grown microgametocytes (Fig. 13b). Pigment granules (hemozoin) are present inside volutin granules; this is particularly well visible in microgametocytes (Fig. 13b) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. columbaec (Fig. 13a, b) [3, 45, 62, 80–83] | |
5 (4) | Large (1 µm and bigger) volutin granules (Fig. 13b) are absent from fully grown microgametocytes. Pigment granules (hemozoin) are absent from volutin granules (Fig. 13c–e) | |
6 (7) | Fully grown macrogametocytes and microgametocytes markedly displace nuclei of infected erythrocytes laterally (Fig. 13c, d). NDR is less than 0.5 | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. turturd (Fig. 13c, d) [3, 45, 82–85] | |
7 (6) | Fully grown macrogametocytes and microgametocytes do not displace or only slightly displace nuclei of infected erythrocytes laterally (Fig. 13e). NDR is greater than 0.5 | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. palumbisc (Fig. 13e) [3, 82, 83, 86] | |
8 (3) | Volutin (Fig. 13a-e) is not arranged as discrete granules (volutin granules); it is arranged as prominent irregular clamps, which often overlap and usually overfill more or less evenly the entire cytoplasm in fully grown gametocytes (Fig. 13f) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. multivolutinusc (Fig. 13f) [82] | |
9 (2) | Volutin is absent from fully grown gametocytes or difficult to visualize (Fig. 13g, i) b | |
10 (11) | The average number of pigment granules in fully grown macrogametocytes and microgametocytes is greater than 30. The earlies young gametocytes look like elongate slender bodies (Fig. 13h) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. multipigmentatusc (Fig. 13g, h) [45, 82, 83] | |
11 (10) | The average number of pigment granules in fully grown macrogametocytes and microgametocytes is less than 30. The earlies young gametocytes look like broadly ovoid bodies (Fig. 13j) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. paramultipigmentatusc (Fig. 13i, j) [82] | |
12 (1) | Fully grown gametocytes are highly pleomorphic; many of them are outwardly similar to gametocytes of Leucocytozoon (Fig. 13k, l); they cause marked deformation of the infected erythrocytes (Fig. 13k, l). Pigment granules are few (less than 10 on average), tiny (often dust-like in appearance, see Fig. 13l) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. sacharovid (Fig. 13k, l) [3, 45, 80, 82, 83, 87] |
aSpecies of subgenera Haemoproteus and Parahaemoproteus parasitize birds of order Columbiformes. Parasites of these two subgenera cannot be distinguished based on morphological characters of their gametocytes. To facilitate identification of all species parasitizing columbiform birds, the parasites of both subgenera were given in this key
bVisualisation and evaluation of volutin might be difficult in poorly stained blood films or fading preparations. Identification of parasite species should be avoided in poorly stained blood film preparations
cSpecies of subgenus Haemoproteus
dSpecies of subgenus Parahaemoproteus
Table 13.
Step | Features and species | |
---|---|---|
1 (6) | Fully grown gametocytes, which displace the nuclei of infected erythrocytes towards one pole of the erythrocytes (Fig. 14a, e) are present; some fully grown gametocytes can enucleate the erythrocytes (Fig. 14b–d) | |
2 (5) | The average number of pigment granules in gametocytes is greater than 11. Macrogametocytes usually do not possess a conspicuous large (bigger than 1 µm in diameter) vacuole (Fig. 14e). Microgametocytes with a highly ameboid outline (Fig. 14f) are not characteristic | |
3 (4) | Erythrocytes with fully grown gametocytes are significantly atrophied in width in comparison to uninfected erythrocytes | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. lairdi (Fig. 14a, b) [3, 88] | |
4 (3) | Erythrocytes with fully grown gametocytes are not significantly atrophied in width (Fig. 14c) in comparison to uninfected erythrocytes | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. enucleator (Fig. 14c, d) [3, 89] | |
5 (2) | The average number of pigment granules in gametocytes is less than 11. Macrogametocytes frequently possess one conspicuous large (greater than 0.5 µm in diameter) vacuole (Fig. 14e). Microgametocytes with a highly ameboid outline (Fig. 14f) are common | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. gavrilovi (Fig. 14e, f) [3, 90, 91] | |
6 (1) | Fully grown gametocytes, which displace the nuclei of infected erythrocytes toward one pole of the erythrocytes (Fig. 14a, e) are absent; fully grown gametocytes do not enucleate the erythrocytes | |
7 (10) | Fully grown gametocytes markedly enclose the nuclei of infected erythrocytes with their ends (Fig. 14g–k) and finally can completely encircle the nuclei (Fig. 14g, i). Circumnuclear gametocytes develop (Fig. 14g, h) | |
8 (9) | Circumnuclear fully grown gametocytes are common (Fig. 14i). Advanced growing gametocytes usually do not adhere to nuclei of infected erythrocytes (Fig. 14h). The average number of pigment granules in gametocytes is greater than 20 | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. fuscae (Fig. 14g–i) [3, 92, 93] | |
9 (8) | Fully grown gametocytes markedly enclose the nuclei of infected erythrocytes with their ends (Fig. 14j, k) and can completely encircle the nuclei of erythrocytes, but the circumnuclear fully grown gametocytes are uncommon and might appear only at final stages of gametocyte maturation. Advanced growing gametocytes are closely appressed to nuclei of the infected erythrocytes (Fig. 14j). The average number of pigment granules in gametocytes is less than 20 | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. coraciae (Fig. 14j, k) [3, 90, 94] | |
10 (7) | Fully grown gametocytes only slightly enclose the nuclei of infected erythrocytes with their ends (Fig. 14l–t) and never encircle them completely. Fully grown gametocytes are halteridial or broadly halteridial (Fig. 14l–t). Circumnuclear gametocytes (Fig. 14g, i) do not develop | |
11 (16) | Nuclei of microgametocytes are diffuse (non-condensed) (Fig. 14p, r); size of microgametocyte nuclei is greater than in macrogametocytes (compare Fig. 14p, r with Fig. 14q) | |
12 (13) | The average number of pigment granules in gametocytes is greater than 15 | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. eurystomae (Fig. 14l–n) [3, 95] | |
13 (12) | The average number of pigment granules in gametocytes is less than 15 | |
14 (15) | Fully grown gametocytes are broadly halteridial (Fig. 14o, p). The cytoplasm of advanced macrogametocytes often contains conspicuous small (usually less than 1 µm in diameter) circular vacuoles (Fig. 14o). The average width of fully grown gametocytes is greater than 4 µm. The average NDR is 0.5 or less | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. manwelli (Fig. 14o, p) [3, 88, 91] | |
15 (14) | Fully grown gametocytes are halteridial (Fig. 14q, r). The cytoplasm of advanced macrogametocytes usually do not contains conspicuous small circular vacuoles (Fig. 14o). The average width of fully grown gametocytes is less than 4 µm. The average NDR is greater than 0.5 | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. meropis (Fig. 12q, r) [3, 88] | |
16 (11) | Nuclei of microgametocytes are small (condensed) (Fig. 14t); size of nuclei in macrogametocytes Fig. 14s) and microgametocytes (Fig. 14t) are similar | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. halcyonis (Fig. 14s, t) [3, 92] |
aHaemoproteus goodmani and H. forresteri were described from the pitta-like ground-roller Atelornis pittoides and the rufous-headed ground-roller Atelornis crossleyi, respectively [96]. These birds belong to the Brachypteraciidae, the endemic to Madagascar bird family of Coraciiformes. Descriptions of these two parasite species were based on morphological characters of gametocytes from the pale-stained blood films, which are fading. It is clear from the original description that the fully grown gametocytes of H. goodmani are broadly halteridial with variable margins. This parasite is different from H. forresteri, whose fully grown gametocytes are circumnuclear. However, further taxonomically important details of gametocyte morphology of both species were scarcely addressed in the original description. Due to limited available information about morphology of gametocytes, H. goodmani and H. forresteri were not included in the key. Redescription of both parasites from their type hosts is needed
Table 14.
Step | Features and speciesa | |
---|---|---|
1 (2) | The average number of pigment granules in fully grown macrogametocytes is greater than 20 | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. cuculis (Fig. 15a) [97] | |
2 (1) | The average number of pigment granules in fully grown gametocytes is less than 20 | |
3(4) | Pigment granules in fully grown gametocytes tend to aggregate into compact large masses or loose clumps (Fig. 15c, e). Volutin granules were not reported | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. centropi (Fig. 15b-e) [3, 97, 98] | |
4 (3) | Pigment granules in fully grown gametocytes are not aggregated into compact large masses or loose clumps (Fig. 15c, e). Volutin granules usually present | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. clamatori (Fig. 15f) [97] |
aOriginal descriptions of H. centropi, H. cuculis and H. clamatori were incomplete, however, these parasites can be distinguished due to differences in number and morphology of pigment granules in fully grown gametocytes. Fully grown gametocytes of these parasites are broadly halteridial and markedly displace nuclei of infected erythrocytes laterally. Details of morphology of growing gametocytes remain insufficiently described. Redescription of these parasites is needed
Table 15.
Step | Features and species | |
---|---|---|
1 (2) | Gametocytes grow around the nuclei of infected erythrocytes (Fig. 16a–c). Advanced growing gametocytes are closely appressed to envelope of the infected erythrocytes (Fig. 16a). Growing gametocytes markedly displace the erythrocyte nuclei laterally (Fig. 16a). Outline of growing gametocytes vary from even to amoeboid. Fully grown gametocytes can completely encircle erythrocyte nuclei (Fig. 16b, c) and occupy all available cytoplasmic space in the erythrocytes, but broadly halteridial fully grown gametocytes also are present. Erythrocytes containing fully-grown circumnuclear gametocytes often assume roundish form (Fig. 16c) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. tinnunculi (Fig. 16a–c)[3, 99, 100] | |
2 (1) | Gametocytes grow around the nuclei of infected erythrocytes (Fig. 16d–f). Advanced growing gametocytes often do not adhere to envelope of erythrocytes (Fig. 16d). Growing gametocytes do not displace or only slightly displace the erythrocyte nuclei laterally (Fig. 16d, e). Growing gametocytes usually are highly irregular (Fig. 16d) or amoeboid in outline, with readily visible prominent and variable in form outgrowths (Fig. 16e). Fully grown gametocytes nearly completely (Fig. 16f) or even completely encircle the nuclei of infected erythrocytes, they usually do not occupy all available cytoplasmic space in the erythrocytes (Fig. 16f). Infected erythrocytes do not assume roundish form (compare Fig. 16c with Fig. 16f) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. brachiatus (Fig. 16d–f) [3, 100] |
aThe authors examined 12 single infections of H. tinnunculi from Eurasian hobby Falco subbuteo and Common kestrel Falco tinnunculus sampled in Eurasia and came to the conclusion that Haemoproteus obainae and Haemoproteus deharoi parasites, whose were described [101] in same avian hosts are morphological variants of H. tinnunculi. Gametocytes indistinguishable from H. obainae were present in each infected bird; they have similar cell structure (morphology of pigment, position of nuclei in macrogametocytes and appearance of the cytoplasm) and represent the final stage of development of H. tinnunculi in avian hosts. Description of H. deharoi shows rounded gametocytes, which appear within several minutes in most Haemoproteus infections as a result of preparation of mature gametocytes to exflagellation after exposure of blood to air [3]. This might occur if blood films were prepared or/and dried slowly after withdrawal of the blood from avian hosts. Both H. obainae and H. deharoi were considered as synonyms of H. tinnunculi
Table 16.
Step | Features and species | |
---|---|---|
1 (16) | Advanced growing and fully grown macrogametocytes do not contain one large (bigger than 1 µm in diameter) circular vacuole (Fig. 17j–l) | |
2 (7) | Gametocytes grow around nuclei of infected erythrocytes; they markedly enclose the nuclei with their ends (Fig. 17a–d) and finally encircle the nuclei completely. Fully grown gametocytes are circumnuclear (Fig. 17a, b, d) | |
3 (6) | Fully grown gametocytes usually do not occupy all available cytoplasmic space in infected erythrocytes. A more or less evident unfilled space (a ‘cleft’) usually is present between the fully grown gametocyte and the nucleus of erythrocyte (Fig. 17a–c) | |
4 (5) | The average number of pigment granules in macrogametocytes is greater than 15 | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. lophortyx (Fig. 17a,b) [3, 102] | |
5 (4) | The average number of pigment granules in macrogametocytes is less than 15 | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. stableri (Fig. 17c) [3, 103] | |
6 (3) | Fully grown gametocytes occupy all available cytoplasmic space in infected erythrocytes (Fig. 17d). An unfilled space (a ‘cleft’) (Fig. 17a, b) is absent between the fully grown gametocyte and nucleus of the erythrocyte | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. mansoni (probable syn. H. meleagridis) (Fig. 17d) [3, 104] | |
7 (2) | Fully grown gametocytes do not encircle the nuclei of infected erythrocytes completely. Fully grown gametocytes are halteridial (Fig. 17e–i) | |
8 (14) | The average number of pigment granules in fully grown macrogametocytes is greater than 15 | |
9 (15) | The outline of fully grown gametocytes predominantly is even (Fig. 17e–g) | |
10 (13) | Growing gametocytes with a highly constricted central portion, causing a ‘dip’ and presenting a dumbbell-like shape (Fig. 2e), are absent | |
11 (12) | Fully grown macrogametocytes markedly displace the nuclei of infected erythrocytes laterally (Fig. 17e); the average NDR is less than 0.7 | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. pratasi (Fig. 17e) [3, 105] | |
12 (11) | Fully grown gametocytes do not displace or slightly displace the nuclei of infected erythrocytes laterally (Fig. 17f); the average NDR is greater than 0.7 | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. ammoperdix (Fig. 17f) [3] | |
13 (10) | Growing gametocytes with a highly constricted central portion, causing a ‘dip’ and presenting a dumbbell-like shape (Fig. 2e), are present | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. megapodiusa [3, 106] | |
14 (8) | The average number of pigment granules in fully grown macrogametocytes is less than 15 | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. rileyi (Fig. 17g) [3, 105] | |
15 (9) | The outline of fully grown and advanced gametocytes predominantly is highly ameboid (Fig. 17h, i) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. cracidarum (Fig. 17h, i) [3, 107] | |
16 (1) | Advanced growing and fully grown macrogametocytes often contain one large (bigger than 1 µm in diameter) circular vacuole (Fig. 17j–l) | |
17 (18) | Fully grown gametocytes of roundish or various oval forms (Fig. 17k, l) are absent. Vacuole-like unstained spaces might be present on one or both ends of maturing and fully grown macrogametocytes (Fig. 17j). Gametocytes are overfilled with prominent distinct volutin granules (Fig. 17j) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. paraortalidum (Fig. 17j) [108] | |
18 (17) | Fully grown gametocytes of roundish or various oval forms (Fig. 17k, l) are present. Vacuole-like unstained spaces (Fig. 17j) are absent on both ends of growing or fully grown macrogametocytes. Gametocytes contain volutin, which is dispersed (Fig. 17k, l) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. ortalidum (Fig. 17k, l) [3, 109] |
aOriginal H. megapodius description is incomplete, and the type material was not available for investigation. Redescription of this pathogen is needed
Table 17.
Step | Features and species | |
---|---|---|
1 (6) | Growing dumbbell-shaped gametocytes (Fig. 18f, g) are absent | |
2 (3) | Growing and fully grown gametocytes are elongate and slender (Fig. 18a, b); they do not display or only slightly display nuclei of the infected erythrocytes laterally (Fig. 18a, b). The average NDR is close to 1 | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. balearicae (Fig. 18a, b) [3, 110] | |
3 (2) | Growing and fully grown gametocytes are broadly halteridial (Fig. 18c, d); they do not assume slender form (Fig. 18a, b). Fully grown gametocytes markedly display nuclei of the infected erythrocytes laterally (Fig. 18d, e); the average NDR is less than 0.5 | |
4 (5) | Average number of pigment granules in macrogametocytes is greater than 25 | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. gallinulae (Fig. 18c, d) [3, 111, 112] | |
5 (4) | Average number of pigment granules in macrogametocytes is less than 25 | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. antigonis (Fig. 18e) [3, 113] | |
6 (1) | Growing dumbbell-shaped gametocytes (Fig. 18f, g) are common | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. porzanae (Fig. 18f–h) [3, 112] |
Table 18.
Step | Features and species | |
---|---|---|
1 (2) | Fully grown gametocytes are halteridial; they only slightly enclose nuclei of infected erythrocytes with their ends (Fig. 19a, b). Both ends of advanced gametocytes usually are more or less narrowed in comparison to the widths of the gametocytes (Fig. 19a, b). One or both ends of advanced gametocytes often are pointed (Fig. 19a, b) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. montezi (Fig. 19a, b) [3, 114] | |
2 (1) | Fully grown gametocytes are halteridial; they only slightly enclose nuclei of infected erythrocytes with their ends (Fig. 19c). Both ends of advanced gametocytes usually are not narrowed in comparison to the widths of the gametocytes (Fig. 19c). Both ends of advanced gametocytes usually are approximately similarly rounded (Fig. 19c) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. minchini (Fig. 19c) [115] |
Table 19.
Step | Features and species | |
---|---|---|
1 | One species has been described. Growing gametocytes are closely appressed to the erythrocyte envelope but usually do not touch the erythrocyte nuclei, and as a result, a more or less evident unfilled space (a ‘cleft’) is present between the gametocytes and the erythrocyte nuclei (Fig. 20a). Fully grown gametocytes are closely appressed both to the nuclei and envelope of erythrocytes; they completely encircle the nuclei and occupy all available cytoplasmic space in the erythrocytes (Fig. 20b). The average number of pigment granules is about 17 in macrogametocytes | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. telfordi (Fig. 20a, b) [3, 113] |
Table 20.
Step | Features and species | |
---|---|---|
1 (2) | Fully grown gametocytes occupy all or nearly all cytoplasmic space in infected erythrocytes, including poles of the erythrocytes (Fig. 21a, b); they vary from broadly halteridial (Fig. 21a, c) to circumnuclear (Fig. 21b) in form (the former form predominates). The average number of pigment granules in macrogametocytes is greater than 25, and it is approximately half as many in microgametocytes (compare Fig. 21a, b with Fig. 21c) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. plataleae (Fig. 21a–c) [3, 116] | |
2 (1) | Fully grown gametocytes usually do not occupy all or nearly all cytoplasmic space in infected erythrocytes, including poles of erythrocytes (Fig. 21d, f, i); they are thin halteridial in form (Fig. 21d–f, i). The average number of pigment granules in macrogametocytes is less than 25, and it is approximately the same in macrogametocytes and microgametocytes | |
3 (4) | Markedly ameboid forms predominate among young gametocytes (Fig. 21e). Advanced growing and fully grown gametocytes are predominantly markedly irregular in outline (Fig. 21d, f) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. pelouroi (Fig. 21d–f) [3, 116, 117] | |
4 (3) | Ameboid forms do not predominate among young gametocytes; outline of growing gametocytes is predominantly even (Fig. 21g–i). Advanced growing (Fig. 21g, h) and fully grown gametocytes (Fig. 21i) are predominantly even in outline, but gametocytes with slightly wavy margins might occur occasionally | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. herodiadis (Fig. 21g–i) [3, 118] |
Table 21.
Step | Features and species | |
---|---|---|
1 (8) | Fully grown gametocytes do not encircle completely the nuclei of infected erythrocytes. Circumnuclear gametocytes (Fig. 22c, d) are absent | |
2 (11) | Fully grown gametocytes do not enucleate the infected erythrocytes | |
3 (16) | Clearly dumbbell-like or bilobed in shape (Fig. 22l, m) fully grown gametocytes are absent | |
4 (17) | The average number of pigment granules in fully grown macrogametocytes and microgametocytes is similar | |
5 (18) | Macrogametocyte nuclei are predominantly in median position (Fig. 22a, b). Fully grown gametocytes do not contain large compact volutin granules (Fig. 22p) | |
6 (7) | Advanced growing gametocytes and fully grown gametocytes are closely appressed to nuclei of infected erythrocytes (Fig. 22a) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. xantholaemae (Fig. 22a) [3, 119] | |
7 (6) | Advanced growing gametocytes and fully grown gametocytes, which do not touch nuclei of infected erythrocytes (Fig. 22b) are common | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. cornuata (Fig. 22b) [3, 119] | |
8 (1) | Fully grown gametocytes encircle completely the nuclei of infected erythrocytes (Fig. 22c, d). Growing gametocytes readily tend to grow around nuclei of the erythrocytes | |
9 (10) | Advanced growing and fully grown gametocytes contain numerous prominent volutin granules and clearly distinct volutin clumps (Fig. 22c), which mask pigment granulesa | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. velans (Fig. 22c) [3, 87, 120, 121] | |
10 (9) | Advanced growing and fully grown gametocytes do not contain numerous prominent volutin granules and their clearly distinct clumps (Fig. 22c), which mask pigment granulesa | |
………………………………………………. | H. homovelans (Fig. 22d) [121] | |
11 (2) | Fully grown gametocytes enucleate the infected erythrocytes at final stage of development (Fig. 22e, g, h). Growing advanced gametocytes markedly displace nuclei of infected erythrocytes, often to erythrocyte poles (Fig. 22f, i, k)b | |
12 (15) | The average number of pigment granules in fully grown gametocytes is less than 25 | |
13 (14) | Infected erythrocytes are hypertrophied (on average approximately 10%) in length in comparison to uninfected ones | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. bennetti (Fig. 22e–g) [3, 122] | |
14 (13) | Infected erythrocytes do not change significantly on average in length in comparison to uninfected ones | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. bucconis (Fig. 22h) [3, 64]c | |
15 (12) | The average number of pigment granules in fully grown gametocytes is greater than 25 | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. thereicerycis (Fig. 22i–k) [3, 119] | |
16 (3) | Clearly dumbbell-like or bilobed in shape (Fig. 22l, m) fully grown gametocytes are common | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. bilobata (Fig. 22l, m) [3, 119] | |
17 (4) | The average number of pigment granules in fully grown macrogametocytes is approximately half as many as in fully grown microgametocytes (compare Fig. 22n and o) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. indicator (Fig. 22n, o) [3, 64] | |
18 (5) | Macrogametocyte nuclei are predominantly of sub-terminal position (Fig. 22p). Fully grown gametocytes contain large compact volutin granules | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. borgesi (Fig. 22p) [3, 122] |
aVolutin is always readily visible, but might be present markedly unequally in different infections
bAvailability of gametocytes in enucleated erythrocytes is a function of the parasitemia stage. Such gametocytes might be rare or even absent in blood films, in which growing gametocytes predominate
cRedescription of H. bucconis is needed. Type material of this species is fading and many morphological characters are indistinguishable. This parasite is similar to H. bennetti. These two species can be distinguished mainly due to little differences in influence of fully grown gametocytes on the length of infected erythrocytes. The taxonomic value of this character needs clarification
Table 22.
Step | Features and species | |
---|---|---|
1 (4) | Fully grown gametocytes are circumnuclear; they markedly enclose the nuclei of infected erythrocytes with their ends and finally can completely encircle the nuclei (Fig. 23a–c). The average number of pigment granules in gametocytes is greater than 15 | |
2 (3) | Elongate (rod-like) pigment granules present and often predominate in advanced and fully grown gametocytes (Fig. 23a) | |
……………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. handai (Fig. 23a, b) [3, 123, 124] | |
3 (2) | Elongate (rod-like) pigment granules are rare, they do not predominate in advanced and fully grown gametocytes. Roundish or slightly oval pigment granules predominate (Fig. 23c) | |
…………………………………………………………………………. | H. homohandai (Fig. 23c) [125] | |
4 (1) | Fully grown gametocytes are halteridial, they do not encircle the nucleus of infected erythrocytes completely (Fig. 23d, e). The average number of pigment granules in gametocytes is less than 15 | |
…………………………………………………………………………. | H. psittaci (Fig. 23d, e) [3, 126] |
Table 23.
Step | Features and speciesa | |
---|---|---|
1 (2) | Nuclei of macrogametocytes are median in position (Fig. 24a) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. krylovi (Fig. 24a) [3] | |
2 (1) | Nuclei of macrogametocytes are subterminal in positionb | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. pteroclis (Fig. 24b) [3, 127] |
aThe original descriptions of the haemoproteids parasitizing Pterocliformes birds were fragmentary and incomplete. Redescription of H. krylovi and H. pteroclis is needed
bSubterminal position of nuclei in macrogametocytes of H. pteroclis was mentioned in the original parasite description, but it was not illustrated [127]
Table 24.
Step | Features and species | |
---|---|---|
1 (2) | Volutin is conspicuous in fully grown gametocytes; it is arranged as compact roundish or circular granules, which tend to gather close to gametocyte ends (Fig. 25a-c). Fully grown gametocytes are halteridial (Fig. 25b) or close to circumnuclear, occasionally circumnuclear (Fig. 25c); halteridial forms (Fig. 25b) usually common | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. syrnii (Fig. 25a–c) [3, 128–130]b | |
2 (1) | Volutin is present, but is not conspicuous in fully grown gametocytes (Fig. 25d, e); it is dispersed more or less evenly (Fig. 25d, e), but not arranged as compact roundish or circular granules, which tend to gather close to gametocytes ends (Fig. 25a–c). Fully grown gametocytes are predominantly close to circumnuclear (Fig. 25d), often circumnuclear (Fig. 25e); halteridial forms (Fig. 25b) are rare | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. noctuae (Fig. 25d, e) [3, 130] |
aHaemoproteus ilanpapernai [129] was considered as a species inquirenda. This haemoproteid probably belongs to H. syrnii or the same group of closely related species or subspecies. The original H. ilanpapernai description shows markedly rounded gametocytes, which likely represent changes due to preparation to the exflagellation in slowly drying blood films; this is a common phenomenon in avian haemoproteids preparations, which dry slowly in humid environments. Confirmation of existence of this organism is needed by examination of fresh material from type vertebrate host
bWell-stained blood films are needed for the evaluation of morphology of volutin in gametocytes
Table 25.
Step | Features and species | |
---|---|---|
1 (2) | The average number of pigment granules is greater than 40 in fully grown macrogametocytes (Fig. 26a). The average number of pigment granules in fully grown macrogametocytes is at least twice that in fully grown microgametocytes (compare Fig. 26a and b) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. iwab (Fig. 26a, b) [3, 131, 132] | |
2 (1) | The average number of pigment granules is less than 40 in fully grown macrogametocytes (Fig. 26c). The average number of pigment granules in fully grown macrogametocytes is not twice that in fully grown microgametocytes (Fig. 26c and d) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. valkiunasic (Fig. 26c, d) [46] |
aBased on phylogenetic analysis [46], the species of subgenera Haemoproteus and Parahaemoproteus parasitize birds of order Suliformes. Parasites of these two subgenera cannot be distinguished based on morphological characters of their gametocytes. To facilitate identification of all species parasitizing Suliformes birds, the parasites of both subgenera were given in this key
bSpecies of subgenus Haemoproteus
cSpecies of subgenus Parahaemoproteus
Table 26.
Step | Features and species | |
---|---|---|
1 (4) | Gametocytes tend to grow around nuclei of infected erythrocytes and advanced forms markedly enclose the nuclei with their ends. Fully grown gametocytes finally completely encircle the nuclei of infected erythrocytes (Fig. 27a–c) and can occupy all available cytoplasmic space in the erythrocytes (Fig. 27b) | |
2 (3) | Close to circumnuclear and circumnuclear gametocytes readily predominate among advanced and fully grown both macrogametocytes and microgametocytes (Fig. 27a, b). Halteridial gametocytes, which markedly displace nuclei of infected erythrocytes are absent or appear only occasionally | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. circumnuclearis (Fig. 27a, b) [3, 133] | |
3 (2) | Circumnuclear gametocytes readily predominate among advanced and fully frown macrogametocytes (Fig. 27c), but do not predominate among advanced and fully frown microgametocytes, which often assume broadly halteridial forms and markedly displace host cell nuclei (Fig. 27d) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. pittae (Fig. 27c, d) [3, 134] | |
4 (1) | Gametocytes do not tend to grow around nuclei of infected erythrocytes, they do not markedly enclose the nuclei with their ends (Fig. 27e–i). Fully grown gametocytes are halteridial; they do not completely encircle nuclei of infected erythrocytes and never occupy all available cytoplasmic space in the erythrocytes (Fig. 27e, g–i) | |
5 (6) | Advanced growing gametocytes, which length is bigger than the length of erythrocyte nuclei, are closely appressed to the nuclei and envelope of infected erythrocytes (Fig. 27e) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. tyranni (Fig. 27e) [3, 133] | |
6 (5) | Advanced growing gametocytes, which length is bigger than the length of erythrocyte nuclei, predominantly do not touch the envelope of infected erythrocytes along their entire margins (Fig. 27f) | |
7 (8) | The average number of pigment granules in gametocytes is close to 10 (Fig. 27g). Nuclei assume predominantly subterminal position in macrogametocytes (Fig. 27f, g). Attenuated (snake-like) advanced gametocytes develop (Fig. 27f) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. furnarius (Fig. 27f, g) [3, 135] | |
8 (7) | The average number of pigment granules in gametocytes is close to 15 or greater (Fig. 27h, i). Macrogametocyte nuclei assume predominantly median position (Fig. 27i) or their position is variable (median, submedian and subterminal) in different cells (Fig. 27h, i). Attenuated (snake-like) advanced gametocytes (Fig. 27f) do not develop | |
9 (10) | The average number of pigment granules in fully grown gametocytes is close to 15; medium size pigment granules (0.5–1 µm) predominate, but large (greater than 1 µm) pigment granules also might occur (Fig. 27h) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. formicarius (Fig. 27h) [3, 135] | |
10 (9) | The average number of pigment granules in fully grown gametocytes is close to 20; small (usually less than 0.5 µm) pigment granules predominate, and large (greater than 1 µm) pigment granules do not occur (Fig. 27i) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. eurylaimus (Fig. 27i) [3, 134] |
aHaemoproteus souzalopesi was described in species of the Tyrannidae [133]. This parasite has roundish gametocytes, which are similar to gametocytes of Plasmodium (Haemamoeba) species [3]. Examination of the hapantotype of this species (Queensland Museum accession number G440399, IRCAH accession number 83024) showed presence of numerous roundish gametocytes, but also numerous developing meronts of P. (Haemamoeba) species, suggesting that co-occurring gametocytes also belong to Plasmodium parasite. Species souzalopesi likely belong to genus Plasmodium. Further studies are needed to clarify this taxonomical uncertainty. Haemoproteus souzalopesi was considered as species inquirenda and not included in the key for identification
Table 27.
Step | Features and species | |
---|---|---|
1 (5) | Growing advanced gametocytes (size greater than length of erythrocyte nuclei), which do not touch the envelope of infected erythrocytes along their entire margin (Fig. 28e, f), are absent | |
2 (6) | Nuclei predominantly assume subterminal or submedian position in fully grown macrogametocytes (Fig. 28a, b) | |
3 (4) | Fully grown macrogametocytes and microgametocytes are halteridial (Fig. 28b). Pigment granules are markedly variable in size and form in advanced gametocytes (Fig. 28a). Small (less than 0.5 μm) and medium (0.5 to 1.0 μm) size pigment granules occur approximately equally in fully grown gametocytes (Fig. 28a, b) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. vireonis (Fig. 28a, b) [3, 62, 135, 136] | |
4 (3) | Fully grown macrogametocytes are halteridial (Fig. 28d), but microgametocytes are more pleomorphic (halteridial, close to circumnuclear and occasionally even circumnuclear forms occur). Pigment granules are usually more or less uniform in size and form in advanced gametocytes (Fig. 28c, d). Pigment granules in fully grown gametocytes are usually of medium size (0.5 to 1.0 μm). Small (less than 0.5 μm) pigment granules are not present or are uncommon in fully grown gametocytes (Fig. 28d) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. ptilotis (Fig. 28c, d) [3, 137, 138] | |
5 (1) | Growing advanced gametocytes (size greater than length of erythrocyte nuclei), which do not touch the envelope of infected erythrocytes along their entire margin (Fig. 28e, f), are common | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. pachycephalus (Fig. 28e, f) [3, 139] | |
6 (2) | Nuclei predominantly assume terminal or close to the terminal position in fully grown macrogametocytes (Fig. 28g, h) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. orioli (Fig. 28g, h) [3, 140] |
Table 28.
Step | Features and species | |
---|---|---|
1 (6) | Growing and fully grown macrogametocytes do not contain large (greater that 1.5 µm in diameter) vacuoles (Fig. 29d, e) | |
2 (7) | Fully grown gametocytes are halteridial; they reach poles of infected erythrocytes and occupy the poles completely (Fig. 29a) | |
3 (8) | Advanced growing gametocytes are closely appressed to nuclei of infected erythrocytes and often do not touch envelope of the erythrocytes along their entire margin (Fig. 29b, c) | |
4 (5) | The average number of pigment granules in fully grown gametocytes is greater than 12 | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. aegithinae (Fig. 29a–c) [3, 141] | |
5 (4) | The average number of pigment granules in fully grown gametocytes is less than 12 | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. vangiia [142] | |
6 (1) | Advanced growing and fully grown macrogametocytes often contain one large (greater that 1.5 µm in diameter) vacuole, which is of sub-terminal position in gametocytes and adheres to the erythrocyte envelope; the vacuole usually locates at gametocyte end, which is opposite in location to the gametocyte nucleus (Fig. 29d, e). Occasionally, up to three or even more small vacuoles can be present | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. bukaka (Fig. 29d, e) [143] | |
7 (2) | Fully grown gametocytes are microhalteridial; they usually do not reach poles of infected erythrocytes | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. madagascariensisa [142] | |
8 (3) | Advanced growing gametocytes often do not touch nuclei of infected erythrocytes along their entire margin, but are closely appressed to erythrocyte envelope (Fig. 29f) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. cublae (Fig. 29f) [3, 144] |
aImages of H. vangii and H. madagascariensis are not available. Type preparations of these parasites are markedly fading, and the provided diagnostic characters are based on the original description [142]. Redescription of these species is needed for better knowledge about other delicate diagnostic characters
Table 29.
Step | Features and species | |
---|---|---|
1 (7) | The average number of pigment granules in fully grown gametocytes is less than 20. Circumnuclear gametocytes (Fig. 30e) are absent or occur only occasionally among fully grown macrogametocytes | |
2 (8) | The nuclei of macrogametocytes are in subterminal (Fig. 30a, b) or close to terminal (Fig. 30j) positions and, as a rule, they are not closely appressed to the nuclei of infected erythrocytes (Fig. 30g) | |
3 (9) | Dumbbell-shaped growing gametocytes (Fig. 30b, i) are common | |
4 (10) | Dumbbell-shaped growing gametocytes, which do not touch the envelope of erythrocytes along their entire margin (Fig. 30i), are absent. Fully grown gametocytes fill the infected erythrocytes up to their poles (Fig. 30a, d) | |
5 (6) | The cytoplasm is markedly vacuolated in growing and fully grown microgametocytes, with several distinct large (greater than 1 µm in diameter) vacuoles often present (Fig. 30c) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. homopicae (Fig. 30a–c) [100] | |
6 (5) | The cytoplasm is not vacuolated or only slightly vacuolated in growing and fully grown microgametocytes (Fig. 30d); it does not contain distinct large (greater than 1 µm in diameter) vacuoles (Fig. 30c) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. picae (Fig. 30d) [3, 87, 145] | |
7 (1) | The average number of pigment granules in fully grown gametocytes is 20 or greater. Circumnuclear gametocytes (Fig. 30e) are common among fully grown macrogametocytes | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. danilewskii (Fig. 30e, f) [3, 118, 146] | |
8 (2) | The nuclei of macrogametocytes usually are in median (Fig. 30g) position and, as a rule, they are closely appressed to the nuclei of infected erythrocytes (Fig. 30g) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. lanii (Fig. 30g) [3, 23, 85, 118, 147–150] | |
9 (3) | Dumbbell-shaped growing gametocytes (Fig. 30b, i) are absent or appear only occasionally | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. dicruri (Fig. 30h) [3, 151] | |
10 (4) | Dumbbell-shaped growing gametocytes, which do not touch the envelope of erythrocytes along their entire margin (Fig. 30i), are common and predominate. Fully grown gametocytes usually do not fill the infected erythrocytes up to their poles (Fig. 30j) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. monarchus (Fig. 30i, j) [3, 139] |
Table 30.
Step | Features and species | |
---|---|---|
1 (8) | Roundish fully grown gametocytes (Fig. 31e, f) are absent | |
2 (9) | The nuclei of macrogametocytes usually are in subterminal position and do not locate close to the erythrocyte nuclei (Fig. 31a, b, d, i) | |
3 (10) | Fully grown gametocytes, which are closely appressed to the nuclei of erythrocytes but do not touch the envelope of the erythrocytes along their entire margin (Fig. 31h, i), are absent | |
4 (5) | The average number of pigment granules in fully grown gametocytes is greater than 15 (Fig. 31a) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. wenyoni (Fig. 31a) [3, 139] | |
5 (4) | The average number of pigment granules in fully grown gametocytes is less than 15 (Fig. 31b) | |
6 (7) | Dumbbell-shaped gametocytes are present among growing advanced macrogametocytes (Fig. 31c), and such forms are common | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. majorisa (Fig. 31b, c) [3, 28, 43, 91, 152, 153] | |
7 (6) | Dumbbell-shape gametocytes (Fig. 31c) are absent | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. alaudae (Fig. 31d) [3, 141] | |
8 (1) | Fully grown gametocytes are roundish; they markedly deform infected erythrocytes, markedly displace their nuclei, and can even enucleate the host cells (Fig. 31e, f) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. parusb (Fig. 31e, f) [3, 154] | |
9 (2) | The nuclei of macrogametocytes are median or submedian in positions; they usually adhere to the erythrocyte nuclei (Fig. 31g) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. calandrellae (Fig. 31g) [3, 155] | |
10 (3) |
Fully grown gametocytes are closely appressed to the nuclei of erythrocytes but do not touch the envelope of the erythrocytes along their entire margin (Fig. 31h, i) |
|
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. nucleophilus (Fig. 31h, i) [3, 156] |
aGametocytes of H. majoris were occasionally seen in birds of the Sylviidae, Phylloscopidae, Fringillidae, Muscicapidae and Turdidae in Eurasia [28, 43, 91]. This opportunity should be considered during identification of haemoproteids found in birds of these families. See Table 30 for identification of H. majoris
bIntensity of parasitemia was low in the hapantotype of H. parus. Gametocytes of this parasite are similar to gametocytes Plasmodium (Haemamoeba) spp. [3, 154]. However, the erythrocytic meronts were not observed in the type material, and molecular characterization of this parasite is not available. It is possible that H. parus belongs to Plasmodium genus. Further studies of this infection, preferably in samples from the type host and type locality, are needed to unravel this taxonomic uncertainty
Table 31.
Step | Features and species | |
---|---|---|
1 (10) | Gametocytes do not contain gigantic pigment granules (greater than 1.5 μm) (Fig. 32k, l). The average number of pigment granules in fully grown gametocytes is greater than five | |
2 (5) | The nuclear material is condensed in fully grown microgametocytes (Fig. 32b, c); the size of the nuclei in microgametocytes does not exceed that of the nuclei in macrogametocytes (compare Fig. 32a and Fig. 32b) | |
3 (4) | Fully grown gametocytes are microhalteridial; they usually do not reach poles of infected erythrocytes (Fig. 32a, b). Growing advanced gametocytes, which do not touch envelope of infected erythrocytes along their entire margins (Fig. 32d), are absent. Pigment granules in fully grown gametocytes tend to clamp in one or two louse groups, which often locate close to the gametocyte ends (Fig. 32b), however, the gametocytes with scattered pigment granules are also present (Fig. 32a) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. payevskyi (Fig. 32a, b) [3, 147, 148, 157] | |
4 (3) | Fully grown gametocytes are halteridial (Fig. 32c); they usually reach poles of infected erythrocytes (Fig. 32c). Advanced growing gametocytes, which do not touch envelope of infected erythrocytes along their entire margins, are present (Fig. 32d). Pigment granules in fully grown gametocytes are usually scattered (Fig. 32c, d), they do not tend to clamp in one or two louse groups, which locate close to the gametocyte ends (Fig. 32b) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. nucleocondensus (Fig. 32c, d) [148, 149, 158] | |
5 (2) | The nuclear material is diffuse (not condensed) in fully grown microgametocytes (Fig. 32e, j); the size of the nuclei in microgametocytes markedly exceeds that of the nucleus in macrogametocytes (compare Fig. 32e and Fig. 32f) | |
6 (7) | Gametocytes grow around nuclei of infected erythrocytes and only slightly (if at all) displace the nuclei laterally (Fig. 32g). Fully grown gametocytes markedly enclose the erythrocyte nuclei with their ends and are predominantly close to circumnuclear in form (Fig. 32f); completely circumnuclear forms might occur (Fig. 32e), but do not predominate. Ends of advanced growing gametocytes predominantly are more or less irregular or ameboid in outline (Fig. 32g) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. belopolskyi (Fig. 32e–g) [3, 147–149, 159, 160] | |
7 (6) | Gametocytes grow along nuclei of infected erythrocytes and markedly displace the nuclei laterally (Fig. 32h–j). Fully grown gametocytes are broadly halteridial (Fig. 32h, j); they only slightly enclose the erythrocyte nuclei with their ends (Fig. 32h, j); circumnuclear or close to circumnuclear gametocytes (Fig. 32e, f) are absent. Ends of advanced growing gametocytes predominantly are more or less even in outline (Fig. 32i) | |
8 (9) | The nuclei of fully grown macrogametocytes are predominantly median or submedian in position (Fig. 32h). Fully grown gametocytes contain the pigment granules of more or less uniform size, and oval to slightly elongate granules of medium size (0.5–1 μm) predominate (Fig. 32h). Large (1–1.5 μm) pigment granules are absent | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. parahirundinis (Fig. 32h) [161] | |
9 (8) | The nuclei of fully grown macrogametocytes are subterminal in position (Fig. 32i). Fully grown gametocytes contain pigment granules of markedly variable size, and small (< 0.5 μm), medium (0.5–1 μm) and sometimes even large (1–1.5 μm) pigment granules might occur simultaneously in same gametocytes (Fig. 32i, j) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. hirundinis (Fig. 32i, j) [3, 149, 161] | |
10 (1) | Gigantic pigment granules are present in fully grown gametocytes (Fig. 32k, l). The average number of pigment granules in fully grown gametocytes is less than five | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. stellaris (Fig. 32k, l) [3, 161, 162] |
Table 32.
Step | Features and species | |
---|---|---|
1 (12) | Advanced dumbbell-shaped gametocytes, which do not touch envelope of infected erythrocytes along their entire margin and have highly constricted (attenuated) central portion and readily thickened roundish ends (Fig. 33j), are absent | |
2 (13) | The majority of advanced macrogametocytes do not contain one clear roundish discrete vacuole, which is close to 1 µm in diameter (Fig. 33k, l) | |
3 (16) | Fully grown gametocytes are halteridial (Fig. 33a, f, h, g) or close to circumnuclear (Fig. 33c–e); they reach poles of infected erythrocytes and usually occupy poles of the erythrocytes completely (Fig. 33a, c–h) | |
4 (17) | Advanced growing macrogametocytes, which are closely appressed to the nuclei of infected erythrocytes but do not touch the envelope of the erythrocytes along their entire margin (Fig. 33n), are absent. Advanced growing gametocytes touch envelope of infected erythrocytes entirely (Fig. 33p) or in one/several points (Fig. 33b) | |
5 (20) | Advanced growing gametocytes, whose pellicle in the centre does not extend to the envelope of infected erythrocytes causing a ‘dip’ and giving a dumbbell-like appearance (Fig. 33b), are present and usually common | |
6 (7) | Fully grown gametocytes contain large (1–1.5 µm) elongate pigment granules (Fig. 33a), which are common and might predominate in some cells | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. killangoi (Fig. 33a, b) [3, 93, 163, 164] | |
7 (6) | Fully grown gametocytes usually do not contain large (1–1.5 µm) elongate pigment granules (Fig. 33a); such pigment granules can occur only occasionally in some cells | |
8 (9) | Fully grown gametocytes markedly enclose nuclei of infected erythrocytes with their end and tend to assume circumnuclear form (Fig. 33c–e); circumnuclear gametocytes sometimes occur (Fig. 33e), more often among microgametocytes. Fully grown gametocytes are predominantly close to circumnuclear in form (Fig. 33d) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. parabelopolskyib (Fig. 33c–e) [100, 128, 148, 159] | |
9 (8) | Fully grown gametocytes slightly enclose nuclei of infected erythrocytes with their ends (Fig. 33f–h), but do not tend to assume circumnuclear form. Fully grown gametocytes are predominantly halteridial (Fig. 33f, g, h) | |
10 (11) | Growing and fully grown gametocytes markedly displace nuclei of infected erythrocytes laterally (Fig. 33f, g). Fully grown gametocytes often displace erythrocyte nuclei close to the erythrocyte envelope (Fig. 33g). The average NDR is less than 0.7 | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. leiothrichus, H. homoleiothrichusc,d (Fig. 33f, g) [7, 165] | |
11 (10) | Growing and fully grown gametocytes do not markedly displace nuclei of infected erythrocytes laterally (Fig. 33h). Fully grown gametocytes usually do not displace erythrocyte nuclei close to the erythrocyte envelope (Fig. 33g). The average NDR is 0.7 or greater. Early gametocytes often are markedly ameboid in outline (Fig. 33i) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. timalusd (Fig. 33h, i) [3, 139] | |
12 (1) | Advanced dumbbell-shaped gametocytes, which do not touch envelope of infected erythrocytes along their entire margin and have highly constricted (attenuated) central portion and readily thickened roundish ends (Fig. 33j), are common | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. philippinensis (Fig. 33j) [3, 166] | |
13 (2) | The majority of advanced macrogametocytes contain a clear roundish discrete vacuole, which is close to 1 µm in diameter (Fig. 33k, l) | |
14 (15) | The average number of pigment granules in fully grown gametocytes is greater than 15 | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. vacuolatus (Fig. 33k) [63, 100, 167, 168] | |
15 (14) | The average number of pigment granules in fully grown gametocytes is less than 15 | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. palloris (Fig. 33l) [63, 91, 100, 168] | |
16 (3) | Fully grown gametocytes are microhalteridial, they do not reach poles of infected erythrocytes and do not occupy poles of the erythrocytes (Fig. 33m) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. homogeneae (Fig. 33m) [100] | |
17 (4) | Advanced growing macrogametocytes, which are closely appressed to the nuclei of infected erythrocytes but do not touch the envelope of the erythrocytes along their entire margin (Fig. 33n), are common | |
18 (19) | Nuclei of fully grown macrogametocytes are subterminal in position (Fig. 33) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. otocompsae (Fig. 33n, o) [3, 166] | |
19 (18) | Nuclei of fully grown macrogametocytes are median in position (Fig. 33p) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. sanguinis (Fig. 33p) [3, 166] | |
20 (5) | Advanced growing gametocytes, whose pellicle in the centre does not extend to the envelope of infected erythrocytes causing a ‘dip’ and giving a dumbbell-like appearance (Fig. 33b), are absent or appear only occasionally. Advanced growing gametocytes are closely appressed both to the nuclei and envelop of infected erythrocytes (Fig. 33v) | |
21 (24) | Fully grown gametocytes do not contain large (greater than 1 µm) pigment granules (Fig. 33t–v). The macrogametocyte cytoplasm is relatively pale-stained and is similar to microgametocytes based this character (compare Fig. 33q and r) | |
22 (23) | Fully grown gametocytes contain roundish, small (less than 0.5 µm) pigment granules (Fig. 33q, r). Pigment granules do not change size and shape significantly as parasite matures | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. pallidulus (Fig. 33q, r) [63, 100, 168, 169] | |
23 (22) | Fully grown gametocytes contain roundish and oval pigment granules (Fig. 33s), which are of medium size (0.5–1.0 μm). Pigment granules readily increase in size as parasite matures | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. homopalloris (Fig. 33s) [63, 168] | |
24 (21) | Fully grown gametocytes contain large (greater than 1 µm) pigment granules (Fig. 33t–v). Macrogametocytes are readily distinguishable from microgametocytes based on intensity of staining of their cytoplasm (Fig. 33t, u) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. zosteropis (Fig. 33t–v) [3, 163, 164] |
aThis group of Haemoproteus species is difficult to identify due to similar form of growing and mature gametocytes in many species. Visualisation of all gametocyte development stages (young, growing and fully grown) is essential for final conclusion about species identification
bHaemoproteus parabelopolskyi is common in birds of this group, however Haemoproteus belopolskyi might occur in some species of the Sylviidae and Phylloscopidae occasionally. The latter parasite is similar to H. parabelopolskyi. These two parasite species can be distinguished due to differences in size of nuclei of fully grown gametocytes [159]; the average area of the nuclei is greater than 3 µm2 in H. belopolskyi (Fig. 32f), but is less than 3 µm2 in H. parabelopolskyi (Fig. 33e)
cHaemoproteus majoris was seen in some species of the Sylviidae and Phylloscopidae. This parasite is morphologically similar to H. leiothrichus and H. homoleiothrichus. The latter two parasites seem to be of tropical distribution; transmission of H. majoris predominantly occurs in countries with temperate and cold climates
dHaemoproteus leiothrichus and H. homoleiothrichus seem to be cryptic species based on the original description of their gametocytes [165]. Taxonomic status of these species requires confirmation with regard to H. timalus. Gametocytes of H. leiothrichus and H. homoleiothrichus are similar morphologically [165], and they are barely distinguishable from gametocytes of H. timalus because of overlapping most diagnostic characters. Additionally, all three parasites develop in closely related birds of the family Leiothrichidae. Molecular characterization of H. timalus has not been done. Because H. timalus has priority in nomenclature, either H. leiothrichus or H. homoleiothrichus might be synonyms of H. timalus. Molecular characterization of H. timalus is needed to answer this question. More detail examination of these three parasites is needed
Table 33.
Step | Features and species | |
---|---|---|
1 (20) | Fully grown gametocytes do not contain large (1–1.5 µm) rod-like, thin pigment granules (Fig. 34o) | |
2 (21) | The average number of pigment granules in fully grown gametocytes is less than 20 | |
3 (24) | Fully grown gametocytes are closely appressed to the nuclei and envelope of infected erythrocytes (Fig. 34c–g). Fully grown gametocytes, which do not touch the erythrocyte envelope along their entire margin (Fig. 34s, t), are absent | |
4 (15) | Fully grown macrogametocytes and/or microgametocytes are halteridial (Fig. 34c–e, g); they reach poles of infected erythrocytes and can occupy the poles completely (Fig. 34c–e, g) | |
5 (8) | Volutin is present and abundant in gametocytes (Fig. 34a–d). Advanced and fully grown gametocytes are overfilled with volutin granules, which obscure visualization of pigment granules (Fig. 34a–d) | |
6 (7) | Advanced growing microgametocytes, which (i) fill the infected erythrocytes up to their poles and (ii) have the pronounced dumbbell-like shape with the portion of the parasite adjacent to the erythrocyte nucleus markedly narrowed (the width of the parasite at this portion is close to 1 µm) (Fig. 34b), are present | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. attenuatus (Fig. 34a, b)b [3, 46, 170] | |
7 (6) | Advanced growing microgametocytes, which (i) fill the infected erythrocytes up to their poles and (ii) have the pronounced dumbbell-like shape with the portion of the parasite adjacent to the erythrocyte nucleus markedly narrowed (the width of the parasite at this portion is close to 1 µm) (Fig. 34a, b), are absent | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. balmorali (Fig. 34c, d)b [3, 82, 153, 171, 172] | |
8 (5) | Volutin is absent or scanty. Advanced and fully grown gametocytes are not overfilled with volutin granules (Fig. 34a–d), which obscure visualization of pigment granules | |
9 (14) | The dumbbell-shaped macrogametocytes (Fig. 34j) are absent or occur only occasionally among growing advanced macrogametocytes | |
10 (11) | The medium size (0.5–1 µm) pigment granules predominate in fully grown gametocytes (Fig. 34e) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. pastoris (Fig. 34e) [3, 128, 146, 173] | |
11 (10) | The medium size (0.5–1 µm) pigment granules (Fig. 34e) are absent or occur only occasionally in fully grown gametocytes; small (less than 0.5 µm) pigment granules (Fig. 34f-i) readily predominate in fully grown gametocytes | |
12 (13) | Nearly fully grown gametocytes, which do not touch the envelope of infected erythrocytes along their entire margin (Fig. 34h), are absent. Nearly fully grown gametocytes are closely appressed to the envelope of infected erythrocytes (Fig. 34f) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. homominutus (Fig. 34f, g) [63, 100] | |
13 (12) | Nearly fully grown gametocytes, which do not touch the envelope of infected erythrocytes along their entire margin (Fig. 34h), are common and predominate | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. kairullaevi (Fig. 34h, i) [3, 174] | |
14 (9) | The dumbbell-shaped macrogametocytes (Fig. 34j) are common and predominate among growing advanced macrogametocytes | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. sittae (Fig. 34j) [3] | |
15 (4) | Fully grown gametocytes are microhalteridial (Fig. 34l–n); they do not reach poles of infected erythrocytes and do not occupy the poles completely (Fig. 34l–n) | |
16 (19) | The average number of pigment granules in fully grown gametocytes is greater than 10 | |
17 (18) | Macrogametocyte nuclei predominantly assume the central or subcentral position (Fig. 34k). The asymmetrical position of advanced growing gametocytes in regard of erythrocyte nuclei (Fig. 34k) is characteristic | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. asymmetricus (Fig. 34k) [63] | |
18 (17) | Macrogametocyte nuclei predominantly assume the subterminal position (Fig. 34l). The asymmetrical position of advanced growing gametocytes in regard of erythrocyte nuclei (Fig. 34k) is not characteristic | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. fallisi (Fig. 34l) [3, 63, 175] | |
19 (16) | The average number of pigment granules in fully grown gametocytes is less than 10. Macrogametocyte nuclei assume predominantly terminal or close to terminal position (Fig. 34m). The asymmetrical position of advanced growing gametocytes in regard of erythrocyte nuclei (Fig. 34k) is not characteristic | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. minutus (Fig. 34m, n) [3, 16, 63, 82, 100, 147, 173] | |
20 (1) | Fully grown gametocytes contain large (1–1.5 µm) rod-like, thin pigment granules (Fig. 34o) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. beckeri (Fig. 34o) [3, 176] | |
21 (2) | The average number of pigment granules in fully grown gametocytes is greater than 20 | |
22 (23) | Advanced growing gametocytes of dumbbell-shape (Fig. 34p, q) are present and common | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. neseri (Fig. 34p, q) [3, 79] | |
23 (22) | Advanced growing gametocytes of dumbbell-shape (Fig. 34p, q) are absent | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. nipponensis (Fig. 34r) [3, 139] | |
24 (3) | Fully grown gametocytes are closely appressed to the nuclei of infected erythrocytes, but do not touch the erythrocyte envelope along their entire margin (Fig. 34s, t) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. pallidus (Fig. 34s, t) [3, 63, 100, 147, 148, 153, 168, 173] |
aGametocytes of Haemoproteus majoris were occasionally reported in birds of the Muscicapidae and Turdidae. This opportunity should be considered during identification of haemoproteids found in birds of these families (see keys to the parasites of these bird families)
bFully grown gametocytes of H. attenuatus and H. balmorali (Fig. 34c, d) are very similar. However, these species are readily distinguishable due to the different mode of the gametocyte growth. Mainly, the attenuated growing gametocytes develop in H. attenuatus (Fig. 34b) but do not develop in H. balmorali. During species identification, this feature worth attention because co-infection of these parasites was reported
Table 34.
Step | Features and speciesa | |
---|---|---|
1 (30) | The readily distinguishable sickle-shaped space is absent between the growing advanced gametocyte and the nucleus of infected erythrocyte (Fig. 35u, v); advanced growing gametocytes never assume concave shapes (Fig. 35u, v) | |
2 (31) | Fully grown gametocytes usually do not assume rhabdosomal form (Fig. 35w, x); if rhabdosomal gametocytes develop occasionally, they never predominate. The fully grown gametocytes usually do not enucleate infected erythrocytes (Fig. 35x) | |
3 (6) | Fully grown microgametocytes contain markedly compressed (not diffuse) nuclei (Fig. 35a, c). The area of microgametocyte nuclei (Fig. 35a, c) is similar or even less than the area of nuclei of fully grown macrogametocytes (Fig. 35b) | |
4 (5) | Fully grown microgametocytes contain markedly compressed nuclei, which usually assume band-like shapes and are closely associated with the envelope of infected erythrocytes (Fig. 35a) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. nucleofascialis (Fig. 35a, b) [177] | |
5 (4) | Fully grown microgametocytes contain markedly compressed nuclei, which do not assume band-like shapes and usually are not associated with the envelope of infected erythrocytes, but locate free in the cytoplasm (Fig. 35c) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. micronuclearis (Fig. 35c) [177] | |
6 (3) | Fully grown microgametocytes contain large diffuse nuclei (Fig. 35d). The area of microgametocyte nuclei is greater that the area of nuclei of fully grown macrogametocytes (compare Fig. 35d and e) | |
7 (32) | Fully grown gametocytes, which are closely appressed to the nuclei of infected erythrocytes but do not touch the envelope of the erythrocytes along their entire margin (Fig. 35y), are absent | |
8 (33) | Advanced growing gametocytes (size significantly greater than erythrocyte nuclei, Fig. 35z), which are closely appressed to the nuclei of infected erythrocytes but do not touch the envelope of the erythrocytes along their entire margin (Fig. 35z), are absent | |
9 (36) | Fully grown gametocytes usually do not contain large (1–1.5 µm) pigment granules (Fig. 35aa–cc, ff, gg). Such pigment granules might occur only occasionally in fully grown gametocytes | |
10 (11) | Fully grown gametocytes are microhalteridial (Fig. 35d, e) or close to microhalteridial; they usually do not reach poles of infected erythrocytes (Fig. 35d, e) and do not occupy the poles of erythrocytes completely (Fig. 35f). Nuclei of fully grown macrogametocytes are predominantly of median position or close to the median position (Fig. 35e) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. africanus (Fig. 35d, e) [3, 178] | |
11 (10) | Fully grown gametocytes are halteridial (Fig. 35h, m, n, q, r, aa) or close to circumnuclear (Fig. 35f, g); they reach poles of infected erythrocytes and occupy the poles of erythrocytes completely. Nuclei of fully grown macrogametocytes are predominantly of subterminal position (Fig. 35f, h, m, r) | |
12 (21) | Dumbbell-shaped macrogametocytes (Fig. 35g, k, l) are common and often predominate among growing advanced macrogametocytes | |
13 (14) | Fully grown gametocytes markedly enclose the nuclei of infected erythrocytes with their ends (Fig. 35f) and tend to assume circumnuclear form (Fig. 35g). Circumnuclear gametocytes develop occasionally. The rod-like (thin) pigment granules are common in advanced and fully grown gametocytes (Fig. 35f, g) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. homobelopolskyi (Fig. 35f, g) [177] | |
14 (13) | Fully grown gametocytes only slightly enclose nuclei of infected erythrocytes with their ends (Fig. 35h); they do not tend to assume circumnuclear form. Circumnuclear gametocytes do not develop. Pigment granules in fully grown gametocytes predominantly are roundish or oval in form (Fig. 35h); rod-like (thin) pigment granules (Fig. 35f, g) are not characteristic | |
15 (16) | Young gametocytes (size of nuclei of erythrocytes) first adhere to the envelope of erythrocytes and then grow towards erythrocyte nuclei (Fig. 35i) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. passeris (Fig. 35h, i) [3, 145] | |
16 (15) | Young gametocytes (size of nuclei of erythrocytes) first adhere to the erythrocyte nuclei and then grow towards erythrocyte envelope (Fig. 35j) | |
17 (18) | Advanced growing macrogametocytes often are dumbbell-shaped and assume a distinct linear form (Fig. 35k), they deform infected erythrocytes by causing envelop protrusions, which are located in the non-invaded cytoplasmic region of the erythrocytes (Fig. 35k) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. fringillae (Fig. 35j, k) [3, 172] | |
18 (17) | Advanced macrogametocytes often are dumbbell-shaped, but do not assume a distinct linear form (Fig. 35k) and do not deform infected erythrocytes by causing envelop oval protrusions, which are located in the non-invaded cytoplasmic region of the erythrocytes (Fig. 35k) | |
19 (20) | The average number of pigment granules in fully grown gametocytes is less than 15. Markedly attenuated growing advanced dumbbell-shaped gametocytes (Fig. 35l) are common | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. dolniki (Fig. 35l) [3] | |
20 (19) | The average number of pigment granules in fully grown gametocytes is greater than 15. Markedly attenuated growing dumbbell-shaped gametocytes (Fig. 35l) are not characteristic | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. queleae (Fig. 35m) [3, 178] | |
21 (12) | Dumbbell-shaped macrogametocytes (Fig. 35g k, l) are absent or occur only occasionally; they never predominate among growing macrogametocytes | |
22 (27) | The average number of pigment granules in fully grown gametocytes is less than 18 | |
23 (24) | Fully grown gametocytes predominantly contain small pigment granules (less than 0.5 µm), which are dust-like in appearance; medium-size (0.5–1 µm) pigment granules might occur only occasionally | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. dicaeus (Fig. 35n) [3, 156] | |
24 (23) | Fully grown gametocytes predominantly contain medium-size (0.5–1 µm) pigment granules | |
25 (26) | The average number of pigment granules in fully grown macrogametocytes is greater than 12. The nuclei of fully grown broadly halteridial macrogametocytes (Fig. 35o) often lie free in the cytoplasm and do not adhere to the envelope of infected erythrocytes (Fig. 35o). Fully grown gametocytes markedly displace nuclei of infected erythrocytes both laterally (Fig. 35o) and sometimes also towards one pole of erythrocytes (Fig. 35p); they occasionally can enucleate the host cells, but gametocytes in enucleated erythrocytes are always rare and might occur only in preparations where fully grown mature forms predominate | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. tartakovskyi (Fig. 35o, p) [3, 148, 150, 172, 179] | |
26 (25) | The average number of pigment granules in fully grown macrogametocytes is less than 12. The nuclei of fully grown macrogametocytes always adhere to the envelope of infected erythrocytes (Fig. 35q). Fully grown gametocytes markedly displace nuclei of infected erythrocytes laterally (Fig. 35q), but never towards one pole of erythrocytes (Fig. 35p), they never enucleate the host cells | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. anthi (Fig. 35q) [3] | |
27 (22) | The average number of pigment granules in fully grown gametocytes is greater than 18 (Fig. 35r–t) | |
28 (29) | Fully grown gametocytes are broadly halteridial (Fig. 35r); circumnuclear (Fig. 35t) fully grown gametocytes do not occur | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. orizivorae (Fig. 35r) [3, 178] | |
29 (28) | Fully grown gametocytes are markedly pleomorphic, and both broadly halteridial (Fig. 35s) and circumnuclear (Fig. 35t) forms might occur simultaneously | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. globulosus (Fig. 35s, t) [3] | |
30 (1) | A readily distinguishable sickle-shaped space often is present between the growing advanced gametocyte and the nucleus of infected erythrocyte (Fig. 35u, v); due to this feature growing advanced gametocytes often assume concave shapes (Fig. 35u, v) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. concavocentralis (Fig. 35u, v) [63, 100, 121, 168] | |
31 (2) | Fully grown gametocytes often assume rhabdosomal form (Fig. 35w, x). Fully grown gametocytes often enucleate infected erythrocytes (Fig. 35x) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. uraeginthus (Fig. 35w, x) [3, 178] | |
32 (7) | Fully grown gametocytes, which are closely appressed to the nuclei of infected erythrocytes but do not touch the envelope of the erythrocytes along their entire margin (Fig. 35y), are common. Spaces between the fully grown gametocytes and envelope of infected erythrocytes are conspicuous (Fig. 35y) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. paranucleophilus (Fig. 35y) [177] | |
33 (8) | Advanced growing gametocytes (size significantly greater than erythrocyte nuclei, Fig. 35z), which are closely appressed to the nuclei of infected erythrocytes but do not touch the envelope of the erythrocytes along their entire margin (Fig. 35z), are common | |
34 (35) | Dumbbell-shaped forms (Fig. 35l, z) are common and predominate among growing advanced gametocytes | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. cyanomitrae (Fig. 35z) [180] | |
35 (34) | Dumbbell-shaped forms (Fig. 35l, z) usually are absent or occur only occasionally among growing advanced gametocytes | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. sequeirae [3] | |
36 (9) | Fully grown gametocytes contain large (1–1.5 µm) pigment granules (Fig. 35aa–dd, ff, gg) | |
37 (40) | Fully grown gametocytes markedly enclose nuclei of infected erythrocytes with their ends and tend to encircle the nuclei completely (Fig. 35aa–cc). Circumnuclear gametocytes might occur (Fig. 35bb), but usually are rare | |
38 (39) | The large (1–1.5 µm) elongate pigment granules (Fig. 35aa, bb) are present in fully grown gametocytes; the large (1–1.5 µm) roundish (pea-like in shape) pigment granules (Fig. 35cc) are absent or occur only occasionally | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. magnus (Fig. 35aa, bb) [3, 85] | |
39 (38) | The large (1–1.5 µm) roundish (pea-like in shape) pigment granules (Fig. 35cc) are present and predominate in fully grown gametocytes | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. macropigmentatus (Fig. 35cc) [3] | |
40 (37) | Fully grown gametocytes slightly enclose nuclei of infected erythrocytes with their ends (Fig. 35dd, gg), but do not tend to encircle the nuclei completely (Fig. 35bb). Circumnuclear gametocytes (Fig. 35bb) are absent | |
41 (42) | Dumbbell-shaped growing gametocytes (Fig. 35ee) are common. One or both ends of fully grown gametocytes are more or less rounded (Fig. 35dd, ff) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. motacillae (Fig. 35dd–ff) [3, 16, 153, 181] | |
42 (41) | Dumbbell-shaped growing gametocytes (Fig. 35ee) are absent or occur only occasionally. Both ends of fully grown gametocytes usually are more or less pointed (Fig. 35gg) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. bubalornis (Fig. 35gg) [3, 178] |
aGametocytes of H. majoris were occasionally found in birds of the Fringillidae. This opportunity should be considered during identification of haemoproteids in birds of this family. See Table 30 for identification of H. majoris
Table 35.
Step | Features and species | |
---|---|---|
1 (5) | The nuclei assume predominantly subterminal or terminal position in fully grown macrogametocytes (Fig. 36a, b, d). Dumbbell-shaped growing gametocytes (Fig. 36a, d) are common | |
2 (6) | Advanced dumbbell-shaped gametocytes, which do not touch envelope of erythrocytes along their entire margin (Fig. 36d), are absent. Advanced dumbbell-shaped gametocytes adhere to the envelope of erythrocytes by their ends (Fig. 36a). Dumbbell-shaped microgametocytes are common | |
3 (4) | Advanced and fully grown gametocytes markedly deform infected erythrocytes by causing balloon-like protrusions which are located in the non-invaded cytoplasmic region of the erythrocytes (Fig. 36a); as a result of this deformation, the infected erythrocytes assume a ‘gravid’ shape (Fig. 36a) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. erythrogravidus (Fig. 36a) [182] | |
4 (3) | Advanced and fully grown gametocytes do not deform infected erythrocytes by causing balloon-like protrusions which are located in the non-invaded cytoplasmic region of the erythrocytes (Fig. 36a). Infected erythrocytes do not assume a ‘gravid’ shape (Fig. 36b) | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | Group of H. coatneyi a (Fig. 36b) [3, 62, 182] | |
5 (1) | The nuclei assume predominantly median position in fully grown macrogametocytes (Fig. 36c). Dumbbell-shaped growing gametocytes (Fig. 36a, d) are absent | |
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… | H. nucleocentralis (Fig. 36c) [183] | |
6 (2) | Advanced dumbbell-shaped macrogametocytes, which do not touch envelope of erythrocytes along their entire margin (Fig. 36d), are present. Dumbbell-shaped microgametocytes are absent or develop only occasionally | |
…………………………………………………………………………………………………………………. | H. quiscalus (Fig. 36d) [3, 59] |
aBased on the available information [3, 184] and examination of the type and voucher preparations, gametocytes of H. coereba, H. paruli and H. thraupi are morphologically similar to H. coatneyi. Judging by the scattered distribution of H. coatneyi in phylogenetic trees, this morphospecies might be a complex of several cryptic species [3, 62, 182]. Gametocytes of these four parasites are similar morphologically, indicating possible existence of cryptic speciation, however, more detail analysis of their blood stages in type vertebrate hosts is preferable for confirmation of their taxonomic status. The examination of type material showed that the available specimens are insufficient to answer this question; additional samples with single infections of H. coereba, H. paruli, H. thraupi and H. coatneyi from their type vertebrate hosts are needed to solve this taxonomical uncertainty. This is an important question due to broad distribution of parasites of H. coatneyi group in American birds. Molecular characterizations of H. paruli (GenBanc accession AF465563, lineage TABI02 in MalAvi database) and H. thraupi (AF465583, PIOLI01) were not supported by gametocyte morphological data [185]. Furthermore, DNA sequences were obtained from non-type avian hosts, so the available barcodes of these two parasites remain questionable and need support by investigation of these pathogens in their type vertebrate hosts
The application of molecular diagnostic tools provides new opportunities to distinguish haemosporidian parasites using their unique DNA sequences [38]. This stimulates biodiversity studies of wildlife haemosporidians, particularly because the molecular markers make the research readily repeatable due to DNA sequence information. Additionally, parasite species detection becomes possible at all stages of the life cycle, including the relatively insubstantially studied sporogonic and tissue stages, which are still difficult to distinguish to species and even the subgeneric or generic levels using morphological characters. Due to the easy accessibility of peripheral blood of birds, the gametocytes of Haemoproteus parasites likely will remain the main stage used for parasite morphological identification in the nearest future. However, it is worth noting that haemosporidian species are morphologically remarkably diverse, and often are readily distinguishable at other stages of their life cycle, including gametes (Fig. 39a, b), zygotes (Fig. 39c, d), ookinetes (Fig. 39e–h), oocysts (Fig. 39i, j), sporozoites (Fig. 39k, l) and exoerythrocytic meronts (Fig. 39m–p). Morphological characters of these life cycle stages can be applied in species taxonomy, and this might reduce the number of so-called morphologically cryptic haemosporidian parasites, which are similar or non-distinguishable at the gametocyte stage [3, 7, 165]. It is interesting to note in this regard that many species of Haemoproteus can be distinguished due to the markedly different size of their mature ookinetes (Fig. 39g, h) and the rate of their development, which also can be considered taxonomic characters [3, 149]. For example, the fully grown ookinetes of Haemoproteus minutus, H. pallidus and H. asymmetricus usually do not exceed 12 µm on average in length, and they complete development rapidly (within 1 h at 18–20 °C) in vitro, but the ookinetes of H. tartakovskyi, H. fringillae and H. balmorali are at least 1/3 bigger and develop 3-times more slowly at the same conditions [3, 63].
Numerous morphologically indistinguishable Haemoproteus species have been described and are currently considered as synonyms of valid parasite names [3, 31, 32]. The lists of synonymous Haemoproteus species names as well as the names of unknown taxonomic position (incertae sedis), the names of species of doubtful identity (species inquirenda), were justified and are available in [3]; these data did not change significantly and were not repeated in this review. Most of these parasite descriptions were incomplete and came from old studies published in the twentieth century. Some new names of doubtful identity were reported in keys. Because of the high genetic diversity of avian Haemoproteus parasites and their relatively high vertebrate host specificity, some of the available synonymous names might be considered valid in the future. In other words, such names might be a reserve for future nomenclature studies [198]. Further morphological research combined with molecular parasite characterization are needed to prove the validity of available synonyms [3]. For taxonomic clearance, invalid species names (nomen nudum) of haemosporidian parasites should be excluded from taxonomic use [198, 199]. The Haemoproteus parasites belonging to categories of incertae sedis and species inquirenda [3, 31, 32] will require further investigation before their final taxonomic status is determined.
It should be mentioned that GenBank contains DNA sequences of haemosporidian parasites, where the molecular characterization was developed incorrectly or might be questionable [200, 201]. Parasite species identification and molecular characterization is the responsibility of researchers who deposit the sequence information in GenBank. With regard to Haemoproteus species, some such insufficiently dependable molecular characterizations are mentioned in the footnotes of Table 36. Selection of the sequences for phylogenetic analysis and related molecular research requires targeting efforts and the MalAvi database is a helpful resource of information for this purpose [13].
Conclusion
Haemoproteus is a sister genus to malaria parasites of genus Plasmodium. The parasites of both genera are common in birds globally, however, Haemoproteus species remain neglected. This is unfortunate because knowledge about close relatives of malaria pathogens is essential for understanding the evolutionary history of malaria and also the entire group of haemosporidian infections, which are flourishing in wildlife. Recent histopathological findings show that Haemoproteus parasites can damage bird organs during exo-erythrocytic development and thus can contribute to the overall bird health. However, these avian pathogens remain insufficiently studied partly due to difficulties in their species identification, which is an obstacle for comprehensive biodiversity research. This study developed illustrated dichotomous keys for the identification of described avian Haemoproteus species allowing their recognition using morphological features of blood stages (gametocytes). The most taxonomically valuable morphological characters of gametocytes and their host cells were systemized and used in the keys. In all, 177 species of Haemoproteus species parasitizing birds can be identified using the morphological characters of blood stages. The DNA sequences (taxonomic barcodes) are available for approximately 42% of them, and can simplify the identification of these parasites. The easy-to-use keys should be helpful not only for identification of described parasites, but also for distinguishing new pathogens, which still need discovery and description. It worth noting that species of Haemoproteus are remarkably morphologically diverse not only on gametocyte stage, but also on the exo-erythrocytic and vector stages, which remain insufficiently investigated and remain as unexplored reserves for future taxonomic and biodiversity studies. The majority of described Haemoproteus parasites also remain non-characterized using molecular markers; their development is an important task for current haemosporidian parasite researchers. This is particularly true because such markers are invaluable for haemosporidian parasite species identification in the sporogonic and tissue stages, which remain unassessed in most of these wildlife pathogens.
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. R. Adlard, Dr. C. T. Atkinson, Dr. S. Bensch, Dr. E. M. Braga, Dr. M. Bryant, Dr. D. Dimitrov, Dr. F. C Ferreira-Junior, Dr. E. Hoberg, Dr. N.E. Matta, Dr. M. A. J. Moens, Dr. Dr. P. G. Parker, Dr. R. N. M. Sehgal, Dr. A. Warren, Dr. H. Weissenböck, and Dr. P. Zehtindjiev for assistance in accessing parasite material. Dr. R. N. M. Sehgal kindly commented on an early draft of the article.
Author contributions
GV collected published articles and collection material, analysed the literature data and wrote the manuscript; TAI and GV analysed preparations of the blood stages; TAI and GV prepared plates of images. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This study was supported by the Open Access to research infrastructure of the NRC under Lithuanian open access network initiative.
Availability of data and materials
All data generated during this study are included in this published article.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Garnham PCC. Malaria parasites and other Haemosporidia. Oxford: Blackwell; 1966. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Atkinson CT, Thomas NJ, Hunter DB. Parasitic diseases of wild birds. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2008. [Google Scholar]
- 3.Valkiūnas G. Avian malaria parasites and other Haemosporidia. Boca Raton: CRC; 2005. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lainson R. Atlas of protozoan parasites of the Amazonian fauna of Brazil. Haemosporida of reptiles. Ananindeua: Instituto Evandro Chagas; 2012. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Santiago-Alarcon D, Marzal A. Avian malaria and related parasites in the tropics: ecology, evolution and systematics. Cham: Springer; 2020. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Telford SR. The hemoparasites of the reptilian. Boca Raton: CRC; 2009. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Valkiūnas G, Atkinson CT. Introduction to life cycles, taxonomy, distribution and basic research techniques. In: Santiago-Alarcon D, Marzal A, editors. Avian malaria and related parasites in the tropics: ecology, evolution and systematics. Berlin: Springer; 2020. pp. 45–80. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Bensch S, Canbäck B, DeBarry JD, Johansson T, Hellgren O, Kissinger JC, et al. The genome of Haemoproteus tartakovskyi and its relationship to human malaria parasites. Genome Biol Evol. 2016;8:1361–1373. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evw081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Pacheco MA, Matta NE, Valkiūnas G, Parker PG, Mello B, Stanley CE, Jr, et al. Mode and rate of evolution of Haemosporidian mitochondrial genomes: timing the radiation of avian parasites. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35:383–403. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Venugopal K, Hentzschel F, Valkiūnas G, Marti M. Plasmodium asexual growth and sexual development in the haematopoietic niche of the host. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2020;18:177–189. doi: 10.1038/s41579-019-0306-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Toscani Field J, Weinberg J, Bensch S, Matta NE, Valkiūnas G, Sehgal RNM. Delineation of the genera Haemoproteus and Plasmodium using RNA-Seq and multi-gene phylogenetics. J Mol Evol. 2018;86:646–654. doi: 10.1007/s00239-018-9875-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Galen SC, Borner J, Martinsen ES, Schaer J, Austin CC, West CJ, et al. The polyphyly of Plasmodium: comprehensive phylogenetic analyses of the malaria parasites (order Haemosporida) reveal widespread taxonomic conflict. R Soc Open Sci. 2018;5:171780. doi: 10.1098/rsos.171780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bensch S, Hellgren O, Pérez-Tris J. MalAvi: a public database of malaria parasites and related haemosporidians in avian hosts based on mitochondrial cytochrome b lineages. Mol Ecol Resour. 2009;9:1353–1358. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02692.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Clark NJ, Clegg SM, Lima MR. A review of global diversity in avian haemosporidians (Plasmodium and Haemoproteus: Haemosporida): new insights from molecular data. Int J Parasitol. 2014;44:329–338. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2014.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Schaer J, Reeder DM, Vodzak ME, Olival KJ, Weber N, Mayer F, et al. Nycteria parasites of Afrotropical insectivorous bats. Int J Parasitol. 2015;45:375–384. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2015.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Bukauskaitė D, Iezhova TA, Ilgūnas M, Valkiūnas G. High susceptibility of the laboratory-reared biting midges Culicoides nubeculosus to Haemoproteus infections, with review on Culicoides species that transmit avian haemoproteids. Parasitology. 2018;4:1–9. doi: 10.1017/S0031182018001373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Outlaw DC, Ricklefs RE. Rerooting the evolutionary tree of malaria parasites. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2011;108:13183–13187. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1109153108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Ricklefs RE, Outlaw DC. A molecular clock for malaria parasites. Science. 2010;329:226–229. doi: 10.1126/science.1188954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bensch S, Hellgren O, Križanauskienė A, Palinauskas V, Valkiūnas G, Outlaw D, et al. How can we determine the molecular clock of malaria parasites? Trends Parasitol. 2013;29:363–369. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2013.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bennett GF, Peirce MA, Ashford RW. Avian haematozoa: mortality and pathogenicity. J Nat Hist. 1993;27:993–1001. doi: 10.1080/00222939300770621. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Valkiūnas G, Iezhova TA. Detrimental effects of Haemoproteus infections on the survival of biting midge Culicoides impunctatus (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) J Parasitol. 2004;90:194–196. doi: 10.1645/GE-3206RN. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Valkiūnas G, Kazlauskienė R, Bernotienė R, Bukauskaite D, Palinauskas V, Iezhova TA. Haemoproteus infections (Haemosporida, Haemoproteidae) kill bird-biting mosquitoes. Parasitol Res. 2014;113:1011–1018. doi: 10.1007/s00436-013-3733-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bukauskaite D, Bernotienė R, Iezhova TA, Valkiūnas G. Mechanisms of mortality in Culicoides biting midges due to Haemoproteus infection. Parasitology. 2016;143:1748–1754. doi: 10.1017/S0031182016001426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Valkiūnas G, Iezhova TA. Exo-erythrocytic development of avian malaria and related haemosporidian parasites. Malar J. 2017;16:101. doi: 10.1186/s12936-017-1746-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Duc M, Ilgūnas M, Kubiliūnaitė M, Valkiūnas G. First report of Haemoproteus (Haemosporida, Haemoproteidae) megalomeronts in the brain of an avian host, with description of megalomerogony of Haemoproteus pastoris, the blood parasite of the Common starling. Animals. 2021;10:2824. doi: 10.3390/ani11102824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Atkinson CT, Forrester DJ, Greiner EC. Pathogenicity of Haemoproteus meleagridis (Haemosporina: Haemoproteidae) in experimentally infected domestic turkeys. J Parasitol. 1988;74:228. doi: 10.2307/3282448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Himmel T, Harl J, Kübber-Heiss A, Konicek C, Fernández N, Juan-Sallés C, et al. Molecular probes for the identification of avian Haemoproteus and Leucocytozoon parasites in tissue sections by chromogenic in situ hybridization. Parasit Vectors. 2019;12:282. doi: 10.1186/s13071-019-3536-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ilgūnas M, Chagas CRF, Bukauskaitė D, Bernotienė R, Iezhova T, Valkiūnas G. The life-cycle of the avian haemosporidian parasite Haemoproteus majoris, with emphasis on the exoerythrocytic and sporogonic development. Parasit Vectors. 2019;12:516. doi: 10.1186/s13071-019-3773-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Yoshimoto M, Ozawa K, Kondo H, Echigoya Y, Shibuya H, Sato Y, et al. A fatal case of a captive snowy owl (Bubo scandiacus) with Haemoproteus infection in Japan. Parasitol Res. 2021;120:277–288. doi: 10.1007/s00436-020-06972-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kelly EJ, Baldwin TJ, Frame DD, Childress AL, Wellehan JFX. Haemoproteus (Parahaemoproteus) spp. in captive-bred bobwhite quail (Colinus virginianus) in southern Utah, USA. J Wildl Dis. 2018;54:726–733. doi: 10.7589/2017-01-014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bennett GF, Whiteway M, Woodworth-Lynas C. A host-parasite catalogue of the avian haematozoa. Mem Univ Nfld Occ Pap Biol. 1982;5:1–243. [Google Scholar]
- 32.Bishop MA, Bennett GF. Host-parasite catalogue of the avian haematozoa: supplement 1, and Bibliography of the avian blood-inhabiting haematozoa. Mem Univ Nfld Occ Pap Biol. 1992;15:1–244. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Greiner EC, Bennett GF, White EM, Coombs RF. Distribution of the avian hematozoa of north America. Can J Zool. 1975;53:1762–1787. doi: 10.1139/z75-211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.McClure HE. Migration and survival of the birds of Asia. Bangkok; 1974.
- 35.Valkiūnas G, Bensch S, Iezhova TA, Križanauskienė A, Hellgren O, Bolshakov CV. Nested cytochrome b polymerase chain reaction diagnostics underestimate mixed infections of avian blood haemosporidian parasites: microscopy is still essential. J Parasitol. 2006;92:418–422. doi: 10.1645/GE-3547RN.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lotta IA, Valkiūnas G, Pacheco MA, Escalante AA, Hernández SR, Matta NE. Disentangling Leucocytozoon parasite diversity in the neotropics: descriptions of two new species and shortcomings of molecular diagnostics for leucocytozoids. Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2019;9:159–173. doi: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2019.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Braga EM, Silveira P, Belo NO, Valkiūnas G. Recent advances in the study of avian malariae: an overview with an emphasis on the distribution of Plasmodium spp. in Brazil. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2011;1:3–11. doi: 10.1590/S0074-02762011000900002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Bensch S, Hellgren O. The use of molecular methods in studies of avian haemosporidians. In: Santiago-Alarcon D, Marzal A, editors. Avian malaria and related parasites in the tropics: ecology, evolution and systematics. Berlin: Springer; 2020. pp. 113–136. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ciloglu A, Ellis VA, Bernotienė R, Valkiūnas G, Bensch S. A new one-step multiplex PCR assay for simultaneous detection and identification of avian haemosporidian parasites. Parasitol Res. 2019;118:191–201. doi: 10.1007/s00436-018-6153-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Valkiūnas G, Duc M, Iezhova TA. Increase of avian Plasmodium circumflexum prevalence, but not of other malaria parasites and related haemosporidians in northern Europe during the past 40 years. Malar J. 2022;21:105. doi: 10.1186/s12936-022-04116-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Oliveros CH, Field DJ, Ksepka DT, Barker FK, Aleixo A, Andersen MJ, et al. Earth history and the passerine superradiation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2019;116:7916–7925. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1813206116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Kuhl H, Frankl-Vilches C, Bakker A, Mayr G, Nikolaus G, Boerno ST, et al. An unbiased molecular approach using 3'UTRs resolves the avian family-level tree of life. Mol Biol Evol. 2021;38:108–127. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msaa191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Križanauskienė A, Hellgren O, Kosarev V, Sokolov L, Bensch S, Valkiūnas G. Variation in host specificity between species of avian hemosporidian parasites: evidence from parasite morphology and cytochrome b gene sequences. J Parasitol. 2006;92:1319–1324. doi: 10.1645/GE-873R.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Valkiūnas G, Ashford RW. Natural host range is not a valid taxonomic character. Trends Parasitol. 2002;18:528–529. doi: 10.1016/S1471-4922(02)02429-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Križanauskienė A, Iezhova TA, Sehgal RNM, Carlson JS, Palinauskas V, Bensch S, et al. Molecular characterization of Haemoproteus sacharovi (Haemosporida, Haemoproteidae), a common parasite of columbiform birds, with remarks on classification of haemoproteids of doves and pigeons. Zootaxa. 2013;3613:085–94. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.3616.1.7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Merino S, Hennicke J, Martínez J, Ludynia K, Torres R, Work TM, et al. Infection by Haemoproteus parasites in four species of frigatebirds and the description of a new species of Haemoproteus (Haemosporida: Haemoproteidae) J Parasitol. 2012;98:388–397. doi: 10.1645/GE-2415.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Chagas CRF, Harl J, Preikša V, Bukauskaitė D, Ilgūnas M, Weissenböck H, et al. Lankesterella (Apicomplexa, Lankesterellidae) blood parasites of passeriform birds: prevalence, molecular and morphological characterization, with notes on sporozoite persistence in vivo and development in vitro. Animals. 2021;11:1451. doi: 10.3390/ani11051451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Valkiūnas G, Mobley K, Iezhova TA. Hepatozoon ellisgreineri n. sp. (Hepatozoidae): description of the first avian apicomplexan blood parasite inhabiting granulocytes. Parasitol Res. 2016;115:609–613. doi: 10.1007/s00436-015-4777-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Bennett GF, Peirce MA. Morphological form in the avian Haemoproteidae and an annotated checklist of the genus Haemoproteus Kruse, 1890. J Nat Hist. 1988;22:1683–1696. doi: 10.1080/00222938800771061. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Greiner EC, Mundy PJ. Hematozoa from Southern African vultures, with a description of Haemoproteus janovyi sp. N. J Parasitol. 1979;651:147–153. doi: 10.2307/3280220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.de Mello IF. New haemoproteids of some Indian birds. Proc Indian Acad Sci. 1935;2:469–475. doi: 10.1007/BF03053034. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Peirce MA, Bennett GF, Bishop M. The haemoproteids of the avian order Falconiformes. J Nat Hist. 1990;24:1091–1100. doi: 10.1080/00222939000770681. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Wingstrand KG. On some haematozoa of Swedish birds with remarks on the schizogony of Leucocytozoon sakharoffi. Kungl Sven Vetenskapsakad Handl. 1947;24:1–31. [Google Scholar]
- 54.Peirce MA, Marquiss M. Haematozoa of British birds. VII. Haematozoa of raptors in Scotland with a description of Haemoproteus nisi sp. Nov. from the sparrowhawk (Accipiter nisus) J Nat Hist. 1983;1:813–821. doi: 10.1080/00222938300770621. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Matta NE, Pacheco MA, Escalante AA, Valkiūnas G, Ayerbe-Quiñones F, Acevedo-Cendales LD. Description and molecular characterization of Haemoproteus macrovacuolatus n. sp. (Haemosporida, Haemoproteidae), a morphologically unique blood parasite of black-bellied whistling duck (Dendrocygna autumnalis) from South America. Parasitol Res. 2014;113:2991–3000. doi: 10.1007/s00436-014-3961-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Bennett GF, Turner B, Whiteway M. Avian Haemoproteidae. 18. Haemoproteus greineri, a new species of haemoproteids from the waterfowl family Anatidae. Can J Zool. 1984;62:2290–2292. doi: 10.1139/z84-333. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Williams NA, Bennett GF. Avian Haemoproteidae. 13. The haemoproteids of the ducks and geese (Anatidae) Can J Zool. 1980;58:88–93. doi: 10.1139/z80-012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Johnston HT, Cleland JB. Notes on some parasitic Protozoa. Proc Linn Soc NSW. 1909;34:501–513. [Google Scholar]
- 59.Coatney GR, West E. Some blood parasites from Nebraska birds—II. Am Midl Nat. 1938;19:601–612. doi: 10.2307/2420473. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 60.White EM, Bennett GF, Williams NA. Avian Haemoproteidae. 11. The haemoproteids of the hummingbird family Trochilidae. Can J Zool. 1979;57:908–913. doi: 10.1139/z79-111. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Moens MJ, Valkiūnas G, Paca A, Bonaccorso E, Aguirre N, Pérez-Tris J. Parasite specialization in a unique habitat: hummingbirds as reservoirs of generalist blood parasites of Andean birds. J Anim Ecol. 2016;85:1234–1245. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.González AD, Lotta IA, García LF, Moncada LI, Matta NM. Avian haemosporidians from Neotropical highlands: evidence from morphological and molecular data. Parasitol Int. 2015;64:48–59. doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2015.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Valkiūnas G, Ilgūnas M, Bukauskaitė D, Duc M, Iezhova TA. Description of Haemoproteus asymmetricus n. sp. (Haemoproteidae), with remarks on predictability of the DNA haplotype networks in haemosporidian parasite taxonomy research. Acta Trop. 2021;218:105905. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2021.105905. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Bennett GF, Caines JR, Whiteway MA. Avian Haemoproteidae. 20. The haemoproteids of the avian families Apodidae (swifts), Bucconidae (puffbirds), and Indicatoridae (honeyguides) Can J Zool. 1986;64:766–770. doi: 10.1139/z86-113. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Bennett GF, Earlé RA, Squires-Parsons D. Additional new species of Haemoproteus, Hepatozoon and Leucocytozoon from South African birds. S Afr J Wildl Res. 1995;25:1–7. [Google Scholar]
- 66.Williams NA, Bennett GF, Mahrt JL. Avian Haemoproteidae. 6. Description of Haemoproteus caprimulgi sp. nov., and a review of the haemoproteids of the family Caprimulgidae. Can J Zool. 1975;53:916–919. doi: 10.1139/z75-106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Vanstreels RET, Anjos CC, Leandro HJ, Carvalho AM, Santos AP, Egert L, et al. A new haemosporidian parasite from the Red-legged Seriema Cariama cristata (Cariamiformes, Cariamidae) Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2022;28(18):12–19. doi: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2022.02.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Greiner EC, Fedynich AM, Webb SL, DeVault TL, Rhodes OE. Hematozoa and a new haemoproteid species from Cathartidae (New World vulture) in South Carolina. J Parasitol. 2011;97:1137–1139. doi: 10.1645/GE-2332.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Yabsley MJ, Vanstreels RET, Martinsen ES, Wickson AG, Holland AE, Hernandez SM, et al. Parasitaemia data and molecular characterization of Haemoproteus catharti from New World vultures (Cathartidae) reveals a novel clade of Haemosporida. Malar J. 2018;8(17):2. doi: 10.1186/s12936-017-2165-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Bennett GF. Avian Haemoproteidae. 10. The haemoproteids of the avian family Scolopacidae. Can J Zool. 1979;57:901–907. doi: 10.1139/z79-110. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Galli-Valerio B. Notes parasitologie. Zentralbl Bakteriol Parasitenkd Infektionskr Hyg I Abt Orig. 1929;112:54–59. [Google Scholar]
- 72.Levin II, Valkiūnas G, Iezhova TA, O’brien SL, Parker PG. Novel Haemoproteus species (Haemosporida: Haemoproteidae) from the swallow-tailed gull (Lariidae), with remarks on the host range of hippoboscid-transmitted avian hemoproteids. J Parasitol. 2012;98:847–854. doi: 10.1645/GE-3007.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Yakunin MP. Blood parasites of the wild birds of South-East Kazakhstan (in Russian) Trudi Inst Zool AN KazSSR. 1972;33:69–79. [Google Scholar]
- 74.Inumaru M, Aratani S, Shimizu M, Yamamoto M, Sato Y, Murata K, Valkiūnas G. Penguins are competent hosts of Haemoproteus parasites: the first detection of gametocytes, with molecular characterization of Haemoproteus larae. Parasit Vectors. 2020;13:307. doi: 10.1186/s13071-020-04176-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Subkhonov M. New species of blood parasites (Haemosporidia, Sporozoa) from birds of Tadzhikistan (in Russian) Parazitologiya. 1980;14:45–47. [Google Scholar]
- 76.Nola J, Parsons NL, Peirce MA, Strauss V. New species of haematozoa in Phalacrocoracidae and Stercorariidae in South Africa. Ostrich. 2010;81:103–108. doi: 10.2989/00306525.2010.488412. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Peirce MA, Cooper JE. Haematozoa of East African birds. IV. Redescription of Haemoproteus crumenium, a parasite of the marabou stork. E Afr Wildl J. 1977;15:169–172. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2028.1977.tb00393.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Valkiūnas G, Ilgūnas M, Bukauskaitė D, Iezhova TA. Description of Haemoproteus ciconiae sp. nov. (Haemoproteidae, Haemosporida) from the white stork Ciconia ciconia, with remarks on insensitivity of established polymerase chain reaction assays to detect this infection. Parasitol Res. 2016;115:2609–2616. doi: 10.1007/s00436-016-5007-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Bennett GF, Earlé RA. New species of Haemoproteus, Hepatozoon and Leucocytozoon from South African birds. S-Afr Tydskr Natuurnav. 1992;22:114–118. [Google Scholar]
- 80.Bennett GF, Peirce MA. The haemoproteid parasites of the pigeons and doves (family Columbidae) J Nat Hist. 1990;24:311–325. doi: 10.1080/00222939000770231. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Coral AA, Valkiūnas G, González AD, Matta NE. In vitro development of Haemoproteus columbae (Haemosporida: Haemoproteidae), with perspectives for genomic studies of avian haemosporidian parasites. Exp Parasitol. 2015;157:163–169. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2015.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Valkiūnas G, Iezhova TA, Evans E, Carlson JS, Martínez-Gómez JE, Sehgal RNM. Two new Haemoproteus species (Haemosporida: Haemoproteidae) from columbiform birds. J Parasitol. 2013;99:513–521. doi: 10.1645/12-98.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Valkiūnas G, Santiago-Alarcon D, Levin II, Iezhova TA, Parker PG. A new Haemoproteus species (Haemosporida: Haemoproteidae) from the indemic Galapagos dove Zenaida galapagoensis, with remarks on the parasite distribution, vectors, and molecular diagnostics. J Parasitol. 2010;96:783–792. doi: 10.1645/GE-2442.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Covaleda Ortega J, Gállego BJ. Haemoproteus aviares. Rev Ibér Parasitol. 1950;10:141–185. [Google Scholar]
- 85.Martinsen ES, Paperna I, Schall JJ. Morphological versus molecular identification of avian Haemosporidia: an exploration of three species concepts. Parasitology. 2006;133:279–288. doi: 10.1017/S0031182006000424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Baker JR. Haemoproteus palumbis sp. nov. (Sporozoa, Haemosporina) of the English Wood-Pigeon Columba p. palumbus. J Protozool. 1966;13:515–519. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1966.tb01954.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Coatney GR, Roudabus RL. Some blood parasites from Nebraska birds. Am Midl Nat. 1937;18:1005–1030. doi: 10.2307/2420600. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Bennett GF. Avian Haemoproteidae. 8. The haemoproteids of the bee-eater family (Meropidae) Can J Zool. 1978;56:1721–1725. doi: 10.1139/z78-236. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Bennett GF, Okia NO, Ashford RW, Campbell AG. Avian Haemoproteidae. II. Haemoproteus enucleator sp. n. from the Kingfisher, Ispidina picta (Boddaert) J Parasitol. 1972;58:1143–1147. doi: 10.2307/3278155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Valkiūnas G, Iezhova T. Parasitic Protozoa of the blood of birds in the USSR 6 Haemoproteidae of Columbiformes and Coraciiformes (in Russian) Ekologija. 1990;2:86–103. [Google Scholar]
- 91.Dimitrov D, Iezhova TA, Zehtindjiev P, Bobeva A, Ilieva M, Kirilova M, et al. Molecular characterisation of three avian haemoproteids (Haemosporida, Haemoproteidae), with the description of Haemoproteus (Parahaemoproteus) palloris n. sp. Syst Parasitol. 2016;93:431–449. doi: 10.1007/s11230-016-9638-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Bennett GF, Campbell AG. Avian Haemoproteidae. III. Description of Haemoproteus fusca sp. n. and redescription of Haemoproteus halcyonis de Mello, 1935, parasites of the kingfisher family Alcedinidae. J Parasitol. 1973;59:337–343. doi: 10.2307/3278830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Ivanova K, Zehtindjieva P, Mariaux J, Dimitrov D, Georgiev BB. Avian haemosporidians from rain forests in Madagascar: molecular and morphological data of the genera Plasmodium, Haemoproteus and Leucocytozoon. Infect Genet Evol. 2018;58:115–124. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2017.12.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Václav R, Betáková T, Švančarová P, Pérez-Serrano J, Criado-Fornelio Á, Škorvanová L, et al. Nest ecology of blood parasites in the European roller and its ectoparasitic carnid fly. Exp Parasitol. 2016;165:71–80. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2016.03.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Bishop A, Bennett GF. Avian Haemoproteidae. 23. The haemoproteids of the avian family Coraciidae (rollers) Can J Zool. 1986;64:1860–1863. doi: 10.1139/z86-277. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Savage AF, Greiner EC. Hematozoa of the avian family brachypteraciidae (the ground-rollers) J Parasitol. 2004;90:1468–1472. doi: 10.1645/GE-227R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Peirce MA, Adlard RD. The haemoproteids of the Cuculidae. J Nat Hist. 2005;39:2281–2287. doi: 10.1080/00222930500060942. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Peirce MA. Haematozoa of East African birds. II. Redescription of Haemoproteus centropi, a parasite of the Cuculidae. E Afr Wildl J. 1977;15:57–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2028.1977.tb00378.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Wasielewski T, Wülker G. Die Hämoproteus-Infektion des Turmfalken. Arch Schiffs Tropenhyg. 1918;22:1–100. [Google Scholar]
- 100.Valkiūnas G, Ilgūnas M, Bukauskaitė D, Chagas CRF, Bernotienė R, Himmel T, et al. Molecular characterization of six widespread avian haemoproteids, with description of three new Haemoproteus species. Acta Trop. 2019;197:105051. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2019.105051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Puech M-P, Chavatteb J-M, Landau I, Karadjian G. Haemoparasites of falcons in France: a 2-year survey in the Cevennes, with description of two new haemoproteid species from poly-parasitised birds. J Nat Hist. 2019;53:2023–2037. doi: 10.1080/00222933.2019.1675792. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 102.O’Roke EC. The morphology of Haemoproteus lophortyx sp. nov. Science. 1929;70:432. doi: 10.1126/science.70.1818.432. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103.White EM, Bennett GF. Avian Haemoproteidae. 12. The haemoproteids of the grouse family Tetraonidae. Can J Zool. 1979;57:1465–1472. doi: 10.1139/z79-190. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 104.Atkinson CT. Host specificity and morphometric variation of Haemoproteus meleagridis Levine, 1961 (Protozoa: Haemosporina) in gallinaceous birds. Can J Zool. 1986;64:2634–2638. doi: 10.1139/z86-382. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 105.Bennett GF, Peirce MA. The haemoproteids of the avian family Phasianidae. Can J Zool. 1989;67:1557–1565. doi: 10.1139/z89-221. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 106.Nandi NC, Mandal AK. Haemoproteus megapodius sp. nov. in Megapodius freycinet Abbotti Oberholser (Megapodiidae) from the South Nicobar. Rec Zool Surv India. 1980;77:51–54. doi: 10.26515/rzsi/v77/i1-4/1979/161840. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 107.Bennett GF, Gabaldon A, Ulloa G. Avian Haemoproteidae. 17. The haemoproteids of the avian family Cracidae (Galliformes); the guans, curassows, and chachalacas. Can J Zool. 1982;60:3105–3112. doi: 10.1139/z82-394. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 108.Ferreira-Junior FC, de Angeli DD, Martins NRS, Valkiūnas G, Braga ÉM. Haemoproteus paraortalidum n. sp. in captive Black-fronted Piping-guans Aburria jacutinga (Galliformes, Cracidae): high prevalence in a population reintroduced into the wild. Acta Trop. 2018;188:93–100. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2018.08.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109.Gabaldon A, Ulloa G. Subespecie de Haemoproteus rotundus Oliger, 1956 (Haemosporina: Haemoproteidae) presente en Venezuela. Bol Dir Malariol San Amb. 1978;18:165–174. [Google Scholar]
- 110.Peirce MA. Haemoproteus balearicae sp. nov., from crowned cranes, Balearica pavonina pavonina and B. pavonina gibbericeps. Bull Epizoot Dis Africa. 1973;2:467–475. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111.Sacchi L, Prigioni C. Haematozoa of Italian birds. II: First European record of Haemoproteus gallinulae de Mello, 1935 from Gallinula chloropus and redescription (Apicomplexa, Haemosporina) Atti Soc ital Sci nat Museo civ Stor nat Milano. 1986;127:27–32. [Google Scholar]
- 112.Bennett GF. Avian Haemoproteidae. 14. The haemoproteids of the avian family Rallidae. Can J Zool. 1980;58:321–325. doi: 10.1139/z80-041. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 113.Bennett GF, Forrester DJ, Greiner EC, Campbell AG. Avian Haemoproteidae. 4. Description of Haemoproteus telfordi sp. nov., and a review of the haemoproteids of the families Gruidae and Otidae. Can J Zool. 1975;53:72–81. doi: 10.1139/z75-009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114.Travassos Santos Dias JA. Resultados de um reconhecimento zoologico no alto dos de um reconhecimento zoologico no alto limpopo efectuado pelos Drs. F. Zumpt e J. A. T. Santos Dias. V. Hematozoários das aves: generos Haemoproteus Kruse 1890 e Carpanoplasma n. gen. Moçambique. 1953;73:69–99. [Google Scholar]
- 115.Chavatte J-M, Okumura C, Landau I. Haematozoa of the Great Blue Turacos, Corythaeola cristata (Vieillot, 1816) (Aves: Musophagiformes: Musophagidae) imported to Singapore Jurong Bird Park with description and molecular characterisation of Haemoproteus (Parahaemoproteus) minchini new species (Apicomplexa: Haemosporidia: Haemoproteidae) Raffles Bull Zool. 2017;65:325–340. [Google Scholar]
- 116.Bennett GF, Greiner EC, Campbell AG. Avian Haemoproteidae. 5. The haemoproteids of the family Threskiornithidae. Can J Zool. 1975;53:634–638. doi: 10.1139/z75-076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 117.Tendeiro J. Acerca dos hematozoários de algumas aves da Guiné Portuguesa. Rev Med Ve. 1947;42:287–350. [Google Scholar]
- 118.Mohammed AHH. Systematic and experimental studies on protozoan blood parasites of Egyptian birds. Cairo: Cairo Univ Press; 1958. [Google Scholar]
- 119.Bennett GF, Nandi NC. Avian Haemoproteidae. 16. The haemoproteids of the avian family Capitonidae (the barbets) Can J Zool. 1981;59:2064–2071. doi: 10.1139/z81-282. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 120.Groff TC, Lorenz TJ, Crespo R, Iezhova TA, Valkiūnas G, Sehgal RNM. Haemoproteosis lethality in a woodpecker, with molecular and morphological characterization of Haemoproteus velans (Haemosporida, Haemoproteidae) Int J Parasitol Parasites Wildl. 2019;10:93–100. doi: 10.1016/j.ijppaw.2019.07.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121.Dimitrov D, Zehtindjiev P, Bensch S, Ilieva M, Iezhova T, Valkiūnas G. Two new species of Haemoproteus Kruse, 1890 (Haemosporida, Haemoproteidae) from European birds, with emphasis on DNA barcoding for detection of haemosporidians in wildlife. Syst Parasitol. 2014;87:135–151. doi: 10.1007/s11230-013-9464-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122.Greiner EC, Mandal AK, Nandi NC. Haemoproteus bennetti sp. n. and a review of the haemoproteids from the Picidae (Woodpeckers) J Parasitol. 1977;63:651–656. doi: 10.2307/3279563. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123.Maqsood M. Haemoproteus handai (sp. nov.) occurring in Indian parakeet (Psittacula cyanocephala) Indian Vet J. 1943;20:109–111. [Google Scholar]
- 124.Bennett GF, Peirce MA. Avian Haemoproteidae. 21. The haemoproteids of the parrot family Psittacidae. Can J Zool. 1986;64:771–773. doi: 10.1139/z86-114. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 125.Valkiūnas G, Pendl H, Olias P. New Haemoproteus parasite of parrots, with remarks on the virulence of haemoproteids in naive avian hosts. Acta Trop. 2017;176:256–262. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2017.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126.Bennett GF, Peirce MA. Haemoproteus psittaci n. sp. (Haemoproteidae) from the African grey parrot Psittacus erithacus L. Syst Parasitol. 1992;23:21–24. doi: 10.1007/BF00008004. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 127.Shamsuddin M, Mohammad MK. Haematozoa of some Iraqi birds with description of two new species, Haemoproteus pteroclis and Leucocytozoon nycticoraxi (Protozoa: Haemosporina) Bull Nat Hist Res Centre. 1980;7:111–155. [Google Scholar]
- 128.Valkiūnas G, Palinauskas V, Ilgūnas M, Bukauskaite D, Dimitrov D, Bernotienė R, et al. Molecular characterization of five widespread avian haemosporidian parasites (Haemosporida), with perspectives on the PCR-based detection of haemosporidians in wildlife. Parasitol Res. 2014;113:2251–2263. doi: 10.1007/s00436-014-3880-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129.Karadjian G, Puech M-P, Duval L, Chavatte J-M, Snounou G, Landau I. Haemoproteus syrnii in Strix aluco from France: morphology, stages of sporogony in a hippoboscid fly, molecular characterization and discussion on the identification of Haemoproteus species. Parasite. 2013;20:32. doi: 10.1051/parasite/2013031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130.Bukauskaitė D, Žiegytė R, Palinauskas V, Iezhova TA, Dimitrov D, Ilgūnas M, et al. Biting midges (Culicoides, Diptera) transmit Haemoproteus parasites of owls: evidence from sporogony and molecular phylogeny. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8:303. doi: 10.1186/s13071-015-0910-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131.Levin II, Valkiūnas G, Santiago-Alarcon D, Cruz LL, Iezhova TA, O'Brien SL, et al. Hippoboscid-transmitted Haemoproteus parasites (Haemosporida) infect Galapagos pelecaniform birds: evidence from molecular and morphological studies, with a description of Haemoproteus iwa. Int J Parasitol. 2011;15:1019–1027. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2011.03.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132.Work TM, Rameyer RA. Haemoproteus iwa n. sp. in great frigatebirds (Fregata minor [Gmelin]) from Hawaii: parasite morphology and prevalence. J Parasitol. 1996;82:489–491. doi: 10.2307/3284091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 133.Bennett GF, Caine JR, Whiteway M. Avian Haemoproteidae. 22. The haemoproteids of the New World flycatchers, the Tyrannidae. Can J Zool. 1986;64:774–777. doi: 10.1139/z86-115. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 134.Bennett GF, Bishop MA, Peirce MA. The haemoproteids of the avian families Eurylaimidae (broadbills) and Pittidae (pittas) Syst Parasitol. 1991;18:111–116. doi: 10.1007/BF00017662. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 135.Bennett GF, Caines JR, Woodworth-Lynas CB. Avian Haemoproteidae. 24. The haemoproteids of the New World passeriform families Formicariidae, Furnariidae, Mimidae, and Vireonidae. Can J Zool. 1987;65:317–321. doi: 10.1139/z87-049. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 136.Perkins SL. Molecular systematics of the three mitochondrial protein-coding genes of malaria parasites: corroborative and new evidence for the origins of human malaria. Mitochondrial DNA. 2008;19:471–478. doi: 10.1080/19401730802570926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 137.Laird M, Laird E. Culicidae and haematozoa from Bellona and Rennell. Nat Hist Rennell Island, British Solomon Islands, Copenhagen. 1959;2:213–234. [Google Scholar]
- 138.Clark NJ, Adlard RD, Clegg SM. Molecular and morphological characterization of Haemoproteus (Parahaemoproteus) ptilotis, a parasite infecting Australian honeyeaters (Meliphagidae), with remarks on prevalence and potential cryptic speciation. Parasitol Res. 2015;114:1921–1928. doi: 10.1007/s00436-015-4380-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 139.Bennett GF, Bishop MA, Peirce MA. The species and distribution of the haemoproteids of the avian family Muscicapidae sensu latu (Passeriformes) J Nat Hist. 1991;25:23–43. doi: 10.1080/00222939100770041. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 140.Peirce MA. Haematozoa of Zambian birds. VII. Redescription of Haemoproteus orioli from Oriolus oriolus (Oriolidae) J Nat Hist. 1984;18:785–787. doi: 10.1080/00222938400770651. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 141.Bennett GF, Peirce MA. The haemoproteids of the Old World avian families Alaudidae (larks), Irenidae (leaf birds), and Motacillidae (wagtails and pipits) J Nat Hist. 1990;24:939–947. doi: 10.1080/00222939000770581. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 142.Savage AF, Ariey F, Greiner EC. Hematozoa of the avian family Vangidae (the Vangas) J Parasitol. 2004;90:1475–1479. doi: 10.1645/GE-229R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 143.Goulding W, Adlard RD, Clegg SM, Clark NJ. Molecular and morphological description of Haemoproteus (Parahaemoproteus) bukaka (species nova), a haemosporidian associated with the strictly Australo-Papuan host subfamily Cracticina. Parasitol Res. 2016;115:3387–3400. doi: 10.1007/s00436-016-5099-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 144.Peirce MA. Haematozoa of Zambian birds. III. Description of Haemoproteus cublae sp. nov. from Dryoscopus cubla (Malaconotidae) J Nat Hist. 1984;18:219–221. doi: 10.1080/00222938400770171. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 145.Valkiūnas G, Iezhova T. Parasitic Protozoa of the blood of birds in the USSR. 8. Haemoproteidae of Passeriformes (in Russian) Ekologija. 1992;1:59–83. [Google Scholar]
- 146.Bishop MA, Bennett GF. The haemoproteids of the avian families Corvidae (crows and jays) and Sturnidae (starlings and mynas) (Passeriformes) Can J Zool. 1990;68:2251–2256. doi: 10.1139/z90-313. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 147.Hellgren O, Križanauskienė A, Valkiūnas G, Bensch S. Diversity and phylogeny of mitochondrial cytochrome b lineages from six morphospecies of avian Haemoproteus (Haemosporida: Haemoproteidae) J Parasitol. 2007;93:889–896. doi: 10.1645/GE-1051R1.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 148.Valkiūnas G, Palinauskas V, Križanauskienė A, Bernotienė R, Kazlauskienė R, Iezhova TA. Further observations on in vitro hybridization of hemosporidian parasites: patterns of ookinete development in Haemoproteus spp. J Parasitol. 2013;99:124–136. doi: 10.1645/GE-3226.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 149.Chagas CRF, Bukauskaitė D, Ilgūnas M, Bernotienė R, Iezhova T, Valkiūnas G. Sporogony of four Haemoproteus species (Haemosporida: Haemoproteidae), with report of in vitro ookinetes of Haemoproteus hirundinis: phylogenetic inference indicates patterns of haemosporidian parasite ookinete development. Parasit Vectors. 2019;12:422. doi: 10.1186/s13071-019-3679-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 150.Valkiūnas G, Iezhova TA, Palinauskas V, Ilgūnas M, Bernotienė R. The evidence for rapid gametocyte viability changes in the course of parasitemia in Haemoproteus parasites. Parasitol Res. 2015;144:2903–2909. doi: 10.1007/s00436-015-4491-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 151.Peirce MA. Haematozoa of Zambian birds. VIII. Redescription of Haemoproteus dicruri from Dicrurus adsimilis (Dicruridae) J Nat Hist. 1984;18:789–791. doi: 10.1080/00222938400770661. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 152.Peirce MA. Haematozoa of British birds. V. Redescription of Haemoproteus majoris (Laveran) from the great tit Parus major. J Nat Hist. 1981;15:151–154. doi: 10.1080/00222938100770111. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 153.Žiegytė R, Markovets MY, Bernotienė R, Mukhin A, Iezhova TA, Valkiūnas G, et al. The widespread biting midge Culicoides impunctatus (Ceratopogonidae) is susceptible to infection with numerous Haemoproteus (Haemosporida) species. Parasit Vectors. 2017;10:397. doi: 10.1186/s13071-017-2317-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 154.Bennett GF. New species of haemoproteids from the avian families Paridae and Sittidae. Can J Zool. 1989;67:2685–2688. doi: 10.1139/z89-379. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 155.Valkiūnas G, Iezhova T. Parasitic Protozoa of the blood of birds in the USSR 9 Haemoproteidae of Passeriformes, Charadriiformes and Anseriformes (in Russian) Ekologija. 1992;2:52–73. [Google Scholar]
- 156.Bennett GF, Bishop MA. The haemoproteids (Apicomplexa: Haemoproteidae) of the flowerpeckers of the avian family Dicaeidae (Passeriformes) Syst Parasitol. 1990;18:159–164. doi: 10.1007/BF00009357. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 157.Valkiūnas G, Iezhova T, Chernetsov NS. Haemoproteus payevskyi sp. n. (Haemosporidia: Haemoproteidae) from reed warbler Acrocephalus scirpaceus (Passeriformes)] in Russian) Parazitologiya. 1994;28:469–474. [Google Scholar]
- 158.Križanauskienė A, Iezhova TA, Palinauskas V, Chernetsov N, Valkiūnas G. Haemoproteus nucleocondensus n. sp. (Haemosporida, Haemoproteidae) from a Eurasian songbird, the Great Reed Warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus. Zootaxa. 2012;3441:36–46. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.3441.1.3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 159.Valkiūnas G, Križanauskienė A, Iezhova TA, Hellgren O, Bensch S. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of circumnuclear hemoproteids (Haemosporida: Haemoproteidae) of sylviid birds, with a description of Haemoproteus parabelopolskyi sp. nov. J Parasitol. 2007;93:680–687. doi: 10.1645/GE-1102R.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 160.Žiegytė R, Palinauskas V, Bernotienė R, Iezhova TA, Valkiūnas G. Haemoproteus minutus and Haemoproteus belopolskyi (Haemoproteidae): complete sporogony in the biting midge Culicoides impunctatus (Ceratopogonidae), with implications on epidemiology of haemoproteosis. Exp Parasitol. 2014;145:74–79. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2014.07.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 161.Valkiūnas G, Ilgūnas M, Chagas CRF, Bernotienė R, Iezhova TA. Molecular characterization of swallow haemoproteids, with description of one new Haemoproteus species. Acta Trop. 2020;207:105486. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2020.105486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 162.White EM, Bennett GF. Avian Haemoproteidae. 9. Description of Haemoproteus stellaris n. sp. and a review of the haemoproteids of the swallow family Hirundinidae. Can J Zool. 1978;56:2110–2116. doi: 10.1139/z78-286. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 163.Bennett GF, Peirce M. Avian Haemoproteidae. 15. The haemoproteids of the avian family Zosteropidae. Can J Zool. 1981;59:1155–1160. doi: 10.1139/z81-161. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 164.Clark NJ, Wells K, Dimitrov D, Clegg SM. Co-infections and environmental conditions drive the distributions of blood parasites in wild birds. J Animal Ecol. 2016;85:1461–1470. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 165.Ishtiaq F, Rao M, Palinauskas V. Molecular characterization and morphological description of cryptic haemoproteids in the laughingthrushes (Leiothrichidae) in the western and eastern Himalaya. India Wellcome Open Res. 2018;3:94. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.14675.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 166.Rahal EM, Bishop MA, Bennett GF. Avian Haemoproteidae. 25. The haemoproteids of the avian family Pycnonotidae (bulbuls) Can J Zool. 1987;65:322–328. doi: 10.1139/z87-050. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 167.Valkiūnas G, Iezhova TA, Loiseau C, Chasar A, Smith TB, Sehgal RNM. New species of haemosporidian parasites (Haemosporida) from African rainforest birds, with remarks on their classification. Parasitol Res. 2008;103:1213–1228. doi: 10.1007/s00436-008-1118-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 168.Chagas CRF, Bukauskaitė D, Ilgūnas M, Iezhova T, Valkiūnas G. A new blood parasite of leaf warblers: molecular characterization, phylogenetic relationships, description and identification of vectors. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11:538. doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-3109-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 169.Križanauskienė A, Pérez-Tris J, Palinauskas V, Hellgren O, Bensch S, Valkiūnas G. Molecular phylogenetic and morphological analysis of haemosporidian parasites (Haemosporida) in a naturally infected European songbird, the blackcap Sylvia atricapilla, with description of Haemoproteus pallidulus sp. nov. Parasitology. 2010;137:217–227. doi: 10.1017/S0031182009991235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 170.Hernández-Lara C, Duc M, Ilgūnas M, Valkiūnas G. Massive infection of lungs with exo-erythrocytic meronts in European Robin Erithacus rubecula during natural Haemoproteus attenuatus haemoproteosis. Animals. 2021;11:3273. doi: 10.3390/ani11113273. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 171.Peirce MA. Haematozoa of Zambian birds. II. Description of Haemoproteus balmorali sp. nov. from Turdidae and Muscicapidae. J Nat Hist. 1984;18:123–125. doi: 10.1080/00222938400770121. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 172.Valkiūnas G, Iezhova TA, Križanauskienė A, Palinauskas V, Bensch S. In vitro hybridization of Haemoproteus spp.: an experimental approach for direct investigation of reproductive isolation of parasites. J Parasitol. 2008;94:1385–1394. doi: 10.1645/GE-1569.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 173.Bukauskaitė D, Chagas CRF, Bernotienė R, Žiegytė R, Ilgūnas M, Iezhova T, Valkiūnas G. A new methodology for sporogony research of avian haemoproteids in laboratory reared Culicoides spp., with description of the complete sporogonic development of Haemoproteus pastoris. Parasit Vectors. 2019;12:582. doi: 10.1186/s13071-019-3832-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 174.Valkiūnas G, Iezhova T. Haemoproteus kairullaevi sp. n. (Haemosporidia: Haemoproteidae) from common mynah Acridotheres tristis (Passeriformes) (in Russian) Zool zhurnal. 1993;72:141–146. [Google Scholar]
- 175.Bennett GF, Campbell AG. Avian Haemoproteidae. I. Description of Haemoproteus fallisi n. sp. and a review of the haemoproteids of the family Turdidae. Can J Zool. 1972;50:1269–1275. doi: 10.1139/z72-172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 176.Roudabush RL, Coatney GR. Haemoproteus beckeri n. sp. and Trypanosoma laverani var toxostomae n. var. from the brown thrasher (Toxostoma rufum) Iowa State Coll J Sci. 1935;10:1–6. [Google Scholar]
- 177.Iezhova TA, Dodge M, Sehgal RN, Smith TB, Valkiūnas G. New avian Haemoproteus species (Haemosporida: Haemoproteidae) from African birds, with a critique of the use of host taxonomic information in hemoproteid classification. J Parasitol. 2011;97:682–694. doi: 10.1645/GE-2709.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 178.Bennett GF, Peirce MA. The haemoproteids of the weaver finches (Passeriformes) J Ant Hist. 1991;25:7–22. [Google Scholar]
- 179.Zehtindjiev P, Križanauskienė A, Scebba S, Dimitrov D, Valkiūnas G, Heggemann A, et al. Haemosporidian infections in skylarks (Alauda arvensis): a comparative PCR-based and microscopy study on the parasite diversity and prevalence in southern Italy and the Netherlands. Eur J Wildl Res. 2012;58:335–344. doi: 10.1007/s10344-011-0586-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 180.Iezhova TA, Valkiūnas G, Loiseau C, Smith TB, Sehgal RNM. Haemoproteus cyanomitrae sp. nov. (Haemosporida, Haemoproteidae) from a widespread African songbird, the olive sunbird Cyanomitrae olivacea. J Parasitol. 2010;96:137–143. doi: 10.1645/GE-2198.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 181.Dimitrov D, Valkiūnas G, Zehtindjiev P, Ilieva M, Bensch S. Molecular characterization of haemosporidian parasites (Haemosporida) in yellow wagtail (Motacilla flava), with description of in vitro ookinetes of Haemoproteus motacillae. Zootaxa. 2013;3666:369–381. doi: 10.11646/zootaxa.3666.3.7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 182.Mantilla JS, Gonzalez AD, Lotta IA, Moens M, Pacheco MA, Escalante AA, et al. Haemoproteus erythrogravidus n. sp. (Haemosporida, Haemoproteidae): description and molecular characterization of a widespread blood parasite of birds in South America. Acta Trop. 2016;159:83–94. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2016.02.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 183.Anjos CC, Chagas CRF, Fecchio A, Schunck F, Costa-Nascimento MJ, Monteiro EF, et al. Avian malaria and related parasites from resident and migratory birds in the Brazilian Atlantic forest, with description of a new Haemoproteus species. Pathogens. 2021;10:103. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10020103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 184.Burry-Caines JR, Bennett GF. The Haemoproteidae (Apicomplexa: Haemosporina) of the avian families Fringillidae and Emberizidae. Can J Zool. 1992;70:1149–1160. doi: 10.1139/z92-161. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 185.Ricklefs RE, Fallon SM. Diversification and host switching in avian malaria parasites. Proc R Soc Lond, B, Biol Sci. 2002;269:885–892. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 186.Ortiz-Catedral L, Brunton D, Stidworthy MF, Elsheikha HM, Pennycott T, Schulze C. Haemoproteus minutus is highly virulent for Australasian and South American parrots. Parasit Vectors. 2019;12:40. doi: 10.1186/s13071-018-3255-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 187.Bush AO, Lafferty KD, Lotz JM, Shostak AW. Parasitology meets ecology on its own terms: Margolis et al. revisited. J Parasitol. 1997;83:575–583. doi: 10.2307/3284227. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 188.Valkiūnas G, Iezhova TA, Križanauskienė A, Palinauskas V, Sehgal RNM, Bensch S. A comparative analysis of microscopy and PCR-based detection methods for blood parasites. J Parasitol. 2008;94:1395–1401. doi: 10.1645/GE-1570.1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 189.Campbell TW. Avian hematology and cytology. Ames: Iowa State University Press; 1995. [Google Scholar]
- 190.Bertram MR, Hamer SA, Hartup BK, Snowden KF, Medeiros MC, Outlaw DC, et al. A novel Haemosporida clade at the rank of genus in North American cranes (Aves: Gruiformes) Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2017;109:73–79. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2016.12.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 191.Chagas CRF, Guimarães LO, Monteiro EF, Valkiūnas G, Michele Viana Katayama MV, Santos SV, et al. Hemosporidian parasites of free-living birds in the São Paulo Zoo, Brazil. Parasitol Res. 2016;115:1443–1452. doi: 10.1007/s00436-015-4878-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 192.Waldenström J, Bensch S, Kiboi S, Hasselquist D, Ottosson U. Cross-species infection of blood parasites between resident and migratory songbirds in Africa. Mol Ecol. 2002;11:1545–1554. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2002.01523.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 193.Yumoto F, Tokiwa T, Chou S, Ueda M. Haemoproteus columbae infection in a straggler racing pigeon sheltered in Japan. J Vet Med Sci. 2021;83:1760–1763. doi: 10.1292/jvms.21-0404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 194.Beadell JS, Ishtiaq F, Covas R, Melo M, Warren BH, Atkinson CT, et al. Global phylogeographic limits of Hawaii's avian malaria. Proc Biol Sci. 2006;273:2935–2944. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 195.Chagas CR, Valkiūnas G, de Oliveira GL, Monteiro EF, Guida FJ, Simões RF, et al. Diversity and distribution of avian malaria and related haemosporidian parasites in captive birds from a Brazilian megalopolis. Malar J. 2017;16:83. doi: 10.1186/s12936-017-1729-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 196.Marzal A, Ricklefs RE, Valkiūnas G, Albayrak T, Arriero E, Bonneaud C, et al. Diversity, loss and gain of malariae parasites in a globally invasive bird. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e21905. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 197.Martinsen ES, Perkins SL, Schall JJ. A three-genome phylogeny of malaria parasites (Plasmodium and closely related genera): evolution of life-history traits and host switches. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2008;47:261–273. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2007.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 198.International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature . International code of zoological nomenclature. 4. London: The International Trust for Zoological Nomenclature; 1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 199.Valkiūnas G, Iezhova TA. Keys to the avian malaria parasites. Malar J. 2018;17:212. doi: 10.1186/s12936-018-2359-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 200.Valkiūnas G, Atkinson CT, Bensch S, Sehgal RN, Ricklefs RE. Parasite misidentifications in GenBank: how to minimize their number? Trends Parasitol. 2008;24:247–248. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2008.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 201.Valkiūnas G, Ashford RW, Bensch S, Killick-Kendrick R, Perkins S. A cautionary note concerning Plasmodium in apes. Trends Parasitol. 2011;27:231–232. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2011.02.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
All data generated during this study are included in this published article.