ABSTRACT
Treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis with combinations of carbapenems and β-lactamase inhibitors carries risks for dysbiosis and for the development of resistances in the intestinal microbiota. Using Escherichia coli producing carbapenemase KPC-2 as a model, we show that carbapenems can be modified to obtain drugs that are inactive against E. coli but retain antitubercular activity. Furthermore, functionalization of the diazabicyclooctanes scaffold provided drugs that did not effectively inactivate KPC-2 but retained activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis targets.
KEYWORDS: carbapenem, carbapenemase, diazabicyclooctane, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, narrow-spectrum drug
INTRODUCTION
Tuberculosis (TB) remains a major cause of mortality by infectious diseases, ranking above AIDS (1). The emergence and spread of multidrug- and extensively drug-resistant (MDR/XDR) Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains constitute a serious threat for the control of the TB pandemic. Second-line drugs used in the treatment of MDR/XDR-TB are often associated with adverse effects that frequently interrupt therapy and negatively impact the outcome (2). Drugs of the β-lactam family, in particular carbapenems associated with β-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs), have regained interest for the treatment of MDR/XDR-TB since they are well-tolerated antibiotics. Mechanistically, the broad-spectrum β-lactamase produced by M. tuberculosis (BlaC) is irreversibly inactivated by clavulanate, a first-generation BLI, and carbapenems are active on cell wall targets (3, 4). Meropenem, a β-lactam of the carbapenem class, has shown efficacy in combination with clavulanate in a phase II clinical trial (5). Carbapenems are the only β-lactam class effectively inhibiting both penicillin-binding proteins (PBPs) and l,d-transpeptidases (Ldts). Second-generation BLIs belonging to the diazabicyclooctane (DBO) family, such as avibactam, have been developed in combination with ceftazidime (a third-generation cephalosporin) to treat bacterial infections due to Gram-negative bacteria producing Ambler class A, class C, and certain class D β-lactamases (6). Although DBOs are not effective for the inhibition of BlaC since the carbamoylation is irreversible but slow (7, 8), they act as slow-binding inhibitors of Ldts (9). These enzymes are nonclassical peptidoglycan polymerases (10, 11) that are responsible for formation of the majority (70% to 80%) of the peptidoglycan cross-links in mycobacteria (12, 13) and in Clostridium difficile (14, 15).
Although carbapenems are potentially useful for the treatment of MDR/XDR-TB and are well tolerated (16, 17), these drugs have several disadvantages related to their broad antibacterial spectrum, namely, deleterious effects on the microbiota, which can potentially lead to dysbiosis and selection of carbapenemase-producing enterobacteria. Use of BLIs of the DBO family is also at similar risk, since emergence of resistance to the ceftazidime-avibactam combination resulting from impaired β-lactamase inhibition has already been reported under treatment (18, 19) and in vitro for various β-lactamases (20–22). Thus, treatment of MDR/XDR-TB by carbapenem-BLI combinations for extended time periods incurs a high risk of emergence of resistance to drugs that are the last line of defense against important multidrug-resistant pathogens, such as carbapenemase-producing enterobacteria (23). Since this risk could be mitigated by the use of drugs specific to M. tuberculosis, we investigate here a series of synthetic carbapenems (24, 25) and DBOs (9, 26) for their antibacterial activity against M. tuberculosis and Escherichia coli and their interaction with the KPC-2 carbapenemase. We show that modifications of the carbapenem and DBO scaffolds are a promising approach to develop drug combinations selectively active against M. tuberculosis.
Hydrolysis of carbapenems by KPC-2.
The routes of synthesis of the carbapenem series, containing various R1 and R2 side chains (Table 1), have previously been reported (24, 25), except for compound 29a (see the supplemental material). Exploiting the nucleophilicity of the C8 hydroxyl group has been used to introduce chemical diversity in the R2 position of carbapenems and increase similarity between the drugs and the substrates of the transpeptidases (25). Compound 29a was added to this series of carbapenems in order to determine whether introduction of a charged amine at the R2 position instead of a phenethyl group would affect the kinetics of hydrolysis by β-lactamases and antibacterial activity. Purification of KPC-2 and determination of kinetic parameters were performed as previously described (27). Esterification of the hydroxyethyl side chain of the carbapenem scaffold (R2) led to drastic decreases (up to 10,000-fold) of the catalytic efficacy (kcat/Km) of KPC-2 due to decreases in the catalytic parameter kcat and, to a lesser extent, to increases in Km. These results indicate that modification of the R2 side chain can be used to minimize the selective advantage conferred by the production of KPC-2 in enterobacteria exposed to carbapenems.
TABLE 1.
Efficacy of hydrolysis of carbapenems by KPC-2a
Kinetic parameters kcat, Km, and kcat/Km for hydrolysis of carbapenems were determined at 20°C in 2-(N-morpholino)ethanesulfonic acid (MES; 100 mM; pH 6.4) by spectrophotometry, as previously described (27). The kinetic constants kcat and Km were determined by fitting the equation vi (initial velocity) = kcat[E][S]/Km + [S] to data generated in a minimum of six progress curves and two independent experiments (27). Synthesis, purification, and characterization of compounds were described in reference 25, except for 2′ (24) and 29a (this work, supplemental material).
Antibacterial activity of carbapenems against E. coli.
We compared the MICs of synthetic carbapenems on the E. coli TOP10 strain and the NR698 strain, which is hyperpermeable to drugs due to defects in the outer membrane (28). MICs were determined by the broth microdilution method (29). Carbapenems obtained by modification of the R1 and R2 side chains were not active against E. coli TOP10 (Table 2). The absence of activity was at least partly due to reduced penetration of the drugs in the periplasm, since synthetic carbapenems were more active against the NR698 hyperpermeable strain than against TOP10. However, most synthetic carbapenems were less active than meropenem against NR698, indicating that the inhibition of PBP targets was also affected. The low antibacterial activity of the synthetic carbapenems against NR698 was achieved by introduction of a phenethyl side chain at the R1 position. The antibacterial activity was further decreased when this modification was associated with introduction of R2 substituents. These results indicate that modifications of the R1 and R2 side chains can be used to obtain drugs that are inactive against E. coli due to limited penetration in the periplasm and limited interaction with the PBP targets.
TABLE 2.
Antibacterial activity of carbapenems against Escherichia coli and Mycobacterium tuberculosisa
Antibacterial activity of synthetic carbapenems against M. tuberculosis.
We have previously reported that the esterification of the hydroxyethyl side chain (R2) of the carbapenem scaffold does not compromise the efficacy of inactivation of a model l,d-transpeptidase, namely, Ldtfm from Enterococcus faecium (25). Indeed, synthetic carbapenems with R2 substituents were at least as active as meropenem for acylation of the purified Ldtfm enzyme (25). This activity in an acellular assay was translated into antibacterial activity similar to that of meropenem against the E. faecium M512 strain (25), a mutant that exclusively relies on Ldtfm for peptidoglycan cross-linking under conditions of inhibition of PBPs by ampicillin (30). This prompted us to determine the MICs of the synthetic carbapenems against the M. tuberculosis H37Rv strain that also predominantly relies on Ldts for peptidoglycan cross-linking (Table 2). MICs for M. tuberculosis were determined by the broth microdilution method (29). This analysis indicated that certain carbapenems obtained by modification of the R1 and R2 side chains retained antitubercular activity. In particular, the MICs of five compounds, 28a, 28c, 28e, 28l, and 29a, were similar to that of meropenem (4 or 8 μg/mL versus 8 μg/mL, respectively). Altogether, these results show that the carbapenem scaffold can be functionalized to obtain drugs that are active against M. tuberculosis but not against the model enterobacterium E. coli.
Inhibition specificity of synthetic DBOs.
Avibactam was previously reported to potentiate the activity of amoxicillin against M. tuberculosis, presumably by inhibiting a combination of cell wall targets such as classical PBPs (amoxicillin) and Ldts (9). Thus, DBOs and β-lactams are candidate scaffolds for the development of drug combinations active against M. tuberculosis. Since the use of such combinations would be at risk for the selection of resistant enterobacteria, we investigated whether the DBO scaffold could be modified to prevent inhibition of the KPC-2 β-lactamase. This would avoid the selection of mutations that would result in decreased inhibition of β-lactamases by DBOs (18–22). To that end, we tested a series of functionalized triazole derivatives of the DBO scaffold. The route of synthesis of these compounds, which contained a substituted triazole ring instead of the carboxamide present in avibactam, has previously been reported (9, 26). This modification impaired the efficacy of inhibition of purified KPC-2, as shown for the representative DBOs depicted in Table 3 (from 28- to 137-fold). This was associated with impaired potentiation of aztreonam antibacterial activity by the DBOs against E. coli producing KPC-2 (MICs, ≥32 μg/mL). The disk diffusion assay indicated that the DBOs either were noneffective or displayed reduced efficacy against β-lactamases CTX-M-15, AmpC, and OXA-48 (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). The strains remained resistant in the presence of DBOs according to the EUCAST susceptibility breakpoints except for inhibition of CTX-M-15 by DBOs 7b and 7f (Table S1). In contrast, the triazole-containing DBOs retained biological activity against M. tuberculosis since they potentiated amoxicillin activity (MICs = 16 to 32 μg/mL versus 8 μg/mL for amoxicillin-triazole-containing DBOs and amoxicillin-avibactam, respectively).
TABLE 3.
Specificity of triazole-containing DBOs
Conclusion.
Carbapenems and DBOs have been developed to obtain broad-spectrum drugs and drug combinations active on β-lactamase-producing pathogens, including enterobacteria. More recently, it was recognized that carbapenems are also active against M. tuberculosis in combination with clavulanate, which irreversibly inactivates BlaC, a class A β-lactamase intrinsically produced by all members of this species. Although avibactam is a poor inhibitor of BlaC, this DBO displays antibacterial activity in combination with β-lactams, presumably by inactivating cell wall biosynthesis enzymes. These observations suggest that carbapenems and DBOs could be optimized for the treatment of tuberculosis. Accordingly, we previously showed that the carbapenem scaffold can be functionalized to obtain drugs that are superior to meropenem with respect to in vitro inactivation of the l,d-transpeptidases of M. tuberculosis (e.g., LdtMt1) and limited hydrolysis by BlaC (24). In the current study, we explored another facet of drug optimization, namely, the design of drugs specifically active against M. tuberculosis to limit side effects on the intestinal microbiota in terms of dysbiosis and selection of resistances. Using KPC-2-producing E. coli as a model, we show that the carbapenem scaffold can be functionalized to obtain compounds that are essentially devoid of biological activity against E. coli since they combine ineffective inactivation of PBPs and poor penetration. In addition, the synthetic carbapenems and DBOs displayed slow hydrolysis and ineffective inhibition of KPC-2, respectively. Functionalization of the carbapenem and DBO scaffolds resulted in compounds that retained activity against M. tuberculosis and is thus a promising avenue for the development of selective antitubercular drugs. We have not directly tested carbapenems and DBOs in combination, and it is currently unclear whether the antibacterial activities of these compounds, which are potentially active against similar targets, are additive or synergistic, but that is a goal of future research.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by ANR project MycWall (ANR-17-CE18-0010-01). S.S. and F.B. were supported by fellowships from the Ministère de l’Enseignement Supérieur, de la Recherche et de l’Innovation (S.S.) and the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR), Project MycWall (N°ANR-17-CE18-0010-01) (F.B.).
Footnotes
Supplemental material is available online only.
Contributor Information
Emmanuelle Braud, Email: emmanuelle.braud@u-paris.fr.
Michel Arthur, Email: michel.arthur@crc.jussieur.fr.
REFERENCES
- 1.WHO. 2020. Global tuberculosis report 2020. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lan Z, Ahmad N, Baghaei P, Barkane L, Benedetti A, Brode SK, Brust JCM, Campbell JR, Chang VWL, Falzon D, Guglielmetti L, Isaakidis P, Kempker RR, Kipiani M, Kuksa L, Lange C, Laniado-Laborín R, Nahid P, Rodrigues D, Singla R, Udwadia ZF, Menzies D, Collaborative Group for the Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient Data in MDR-TB treatment 2017 . 2020. Drug-associated adverse events in the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Lancet Respir Med 8:383–394. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30047-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hugonnet JE, Blanchard JS. 2007. Irreversible inhibition of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis beta-lactamase by clavulanate. Biochemistry 46:11998–12004. doi: 10.1021/bi701506h. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hugonnet J-E, Tremblay LW, Boshoff HI, Barry CE, Blanchard JS. 2009. Meropenem-clavulanate is effective against extensively drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Science 323:1215–1218. doi: 10.1126/science.1167498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Diacon AH, van der Merwe L, Barnard M, von Groote-Bidlingmaier F, Lange C, García-Basteiro AL, Sevene E, Ballell L, Barros-Aguirre D. 2016. Beta-lactams against tuberculosis-new trick for an old dog? N Engl J Med 375:393–394. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1513236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Papp-Wallace KM, Bonomo RA. 2016. New beta-lactamase inhibitors in the clinic. Infect Dis Clin North Am 30:441–464. doi: 10.1016/j.idc.2016.02.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Soroka D, Ourghanlian C, Compain F, Fichini M, Dubée V, Mainardi J-L, Hugonnet J-E, Arthur M. 2017. Inhibition of β-lactamases of mycobacteria by avibactam and clavulanate. J Antimicrob Chemother 72:1081–1088. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Xu H, Hazra S, Blanchard JS. 2012. NXL104 irreversibly inhibits the beta-lactamase from Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Biochemistry 51:4551–4557. doi: 10.1021/bi300508r. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Edoo Z, Iannazzo L, Compain F, Li de la Sierra Gallay I, van Tilbeurgh H, Fonvielle M, Bouchet F, Le Run E, Mainardi J-L, Arthur M, Ethève-Quelquejeu M, Hugonnet J-E. 2018. Synthesis of avibactam derivatives and activity on beta-lactamases and peptidoglycan biosynthesis enzymes of mycobacteria. Chemistry 24:8081–8086. doi: 10.1002/chem.201800923. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mainardi J-L, Villet R, Bugg TD, Mayer C, Arthur M. 2008. Evolution of peptidoglycan biosynthesis under the selective pressure of antibiotics in Gram-positive bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Rev 32:386–408. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2007.00097.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mainardi J-L, Fourgeaud M, Hugonnet J-E, Dubost L, Brouard J-P, Ouazzani J, Rice LB, Gutmann L, Arthur M. 2005. A novel peptidoglycan cross-linking enzyme for a beta-lactam-resistant transpeptidation pathway. J Biol Chem 280:38146–38152. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M507384200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lavollay M, Fourgeaud M, Herrmann J-L, Dubost L, Marie A, Gutmann L, Arthur M, Mainardi J-L. 2011. The peptidoglycan of Mycobacterium abscessus is predominantly cross-linked by L,D-transpeptidases. J Bacteriol 193:778–782. doi: 10.1128/JB.00606-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Lavollay M, Arthur M, Fourgeaud M, Dubost L, Marie A, Veziris N, Blanot D, Gutmann L, Mainardi J-L. 2008. The peptidoglycan of stationary-phase Mycobacterium tuberculosis predominantly contains cross-links generated by L,D-transpeptidation. J Bacteriol 190:4360–4366. doi: 10.1128/JB.00239-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Peltier J, Courtin P, El Meouche I, Lemée L, Chapot-Chartier M-P, Pons J-L. 2011. Clostridium difficile has an original peptidoglycan structure with a high level of N-acetylglucosamine deacetylation and mainly 3–3 cross-links. J Biol Chem 286:29053–29062. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.259150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Sutterlin L, Edoo Z, Hugonnet JE, Mainardi JL, Arthur M. 2017. Peptidoglycan cross-linking activity of L,D-transpeptidases from Clostridium difficile and inactivation of these enzymes by beta-lactams. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e01607-17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01607-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Tiberi S, Payen M-C, Sotgiu G, D’Ambrosio L, Alarcon Guizado V, Alffenaar JW, Abdo Arbex M, Caminero JA, Centis R, De Lorenzo S, Gaga M, Gualano G, Roby Arias AJ, Scardigli A, Skrahina A, Solovic I, Sulis G, Tadolini M, Akkerman OW, Alarcon Arrascue E, Aleska A, Avchinko V, Bonini EH, Chong Marín FA, Collahuazo López L, de Vries G, Dore S, Kunst H, Matteelli A, Moschos C, Palmieri F, Papavasileiou A, Spanevello A, Vargas Vasquez D, Viggiani P, White V, Zumla A, Migliori GB. 2016. Effectiveness and safety of meropenem/clavulanate-containing regimens in the treatment of MDR- and XDR-TB. Eur Respir J 47:1235–1243. doi: 10.1183/13993003.02146-2015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Payen MC, Muylle I, Vandenberg O, Mathys V, Delforge M, Van den Wijngaert S, Clumeck N, De Wit S. 2018. Meropenem-clavulanate for drug-resistant tuberculosis: a follow-up of relapse-free cases. Int J Tuber Lung Dis 22:34–39. doi: 10.5588/ijtld.17.0352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Shields RK, Potoski BA, Haidar G, Hao B, Doi Y, Chen L, Press EG, Kreiswirth BN, Clancy CJ, Nguyen MH. 2016. Clinical outcomes, drug toxicity and emergence of ceftazidime-avibactam resistance among patients treated for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections. Clin Infect Dis 63:1615–1618. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Shields RK, Chen L, Cheng S, Chavda KD, Press EG, Snyder A, Pandey R, Doi Y, Kreiswirth BN, Nguyen MH, Clancy CJ. 2017. Emergence of ceftazidime-avibactam resistance due to plasmid-borne blaKPC-3 mutations during treatment of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e02097-16. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02097-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Compain F, Dorchene D, Arthur M. 2018. Combination of amino acid substitutions leading to CTX-M-15-mediated resistance to the ceftazidime-avibactam combination. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e00357-18. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00357-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Compain F, Debray A, Adjadj P, Dorchêne D, Arthur M. 2020. Ceftazidime-avibactam resistance mediated by the N(346)Y substitution in various AmpC beta-lactamases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 64:e02311-19. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02311-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Compain F, Arthur M. 2017. Impaired inhibition by avibactam and resistance to the ceftazidime-avibactam combination due to the D179Y substitution in the beta-lactamase KPC-2. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e00451-17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00451-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Yahav D, Giske CG, Grāmatniece A, Abodakpi H, Tam VH, Leibovici L. 2020. New beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations. Clin Microbiol Rev 34:e00115-20. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00115-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Iannazzo L, Soroka D, Triboulet S, Fonvielle M, Compain F, Dubée V, Mainardi J-L, Hugonnet J-E, Braud E, Arthur M, Etheve-Quelquejeu M. 2016. Routes of synthesis of carbapenems for optimizing both the inactivation of L,D-transpeptidase LdtMt1 of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and the stability toward hydrolysis by beta-Lactamase BlaC. J Med Chem 59:3427–3438. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b00096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Saidjalolov S, Edoo Z, Fonvielle M, Mayer L, Iannazzo L, Arthur M, Etheve-Quelquejeu M, Braud E. 2021. Synthesis of carbapenems containing peptidoglycan mimetics and inhibition of the cross-linking activity of a transpeptidase of l,d specificity. Chemistry 27:3542–3551. doi: 10.1002/chem.202004831. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bouchet F, Atze H, Fonvielle M, Edoo Z, Arthur M, Ethève-Quelquejeu M, Iannazzo L. 2020. Diazabicyclooctane functionalization for inhibition of beta-lactamases from Enterobacteria. J Med Chem 63:5257–5273. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b02125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ourghanlian C, Soroka D, Arthur M. 2017. Inhibition by avibactam and clavulanate of the β-lactamases KPC-2 and CTX-M-15 harboring the substitution N132G in the conserved motif SDN. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e02510-16. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02510-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Ruiz N, Falcone B, Kahne D, Silhavy TJ. 2005. Chemical conditionality: a genetic strategy to probe organelle assembly. Cell 121:307–317. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2015. Methods for dilution susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically; approved standard. M7-A8, 10th ed. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Mainardi J-L, Morel V, Fourgeaud M, Cremniter J, Blanot D, Legrand R, Frehel C, Arthur M, Van Heijenoort J, Gutmann L. 2002. Balance between two transpeptidation mechanisms determines the expression of beta-lactam resistance in Enterococcus faecium. J Biol Chem 277:35801–35807. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M204319200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Table S1 and supplemental materials and methods. Download aac.02357-21-s0001.pdf, PDF file, 0.4 MB (374.1KB, pdf)



