Skip to main content
European Respiratory Review logoLink to European Respiratory Review
. 2017 Sep 27;26(145):170050. doi: 10.1183/16000617.0050-2017

Recent lessons learned in the management of acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

Yasuhiro Kondoh 1, Vincent Cottin 2, Kevin K Brown 3,
PMCID: PMC9488992  PMID: 28954766

Abstract

Recognising recent advances, the definition and diagnostic criteria for acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (AE-IPF) have been updated by an international working group. The new definition describes any acute, clinically significant respiratory deterioration (both idiopathic and triggered events) characterised by evidence of new widespread alveolar abnormality. The new criteria require a previous or concurrent diagnosis of IPF, an acute worsening or development of dyspnoea typically less than 1 month in duration, chest imaging evidence on computed tomography (CT) of new bilateral ground-glass opacity and/or consolidation superimposed on a background imaging pattern of usual interstitial pneumonia not fully explained by cardiac failure or fluid overload. Due to high in-hospital mortality rates, current treatment guidelines say that the majority of patients with AE-IPF should not receive mechanical ventilation. However, new data suggest that the prognosis may have improved. This modest improvement in overall survival seen in more recent studies may be the result of differences in the diagnostic criteria, study design, baseline clinical risk factors and/or improvements in management. Based on our updated knowledge of possible preventive and therapeutic measures, including mechanical ventilation and pharmacological therapies, the current approach to the treatment of AE-IPF requires careful decision-making.

Short abstract

Recent preventive and therapeutic measures for acute exacerbation of IPF may modestly improve short-term survival http://ow.ly/n6GK30e8mN5

Introduction

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a devastating disease with a median survival time of 3–4 years [1]. The natural history of IPF is heterogeneous; depending upon the timeframe studied, most patients follow a slowly progressive clinical course after diagnosis, while a significant minority experience episodes of acute respiratory worsening, namely acute exacerbations (AEs) [2]. AE-IPF attracts attention because of its prognostic impact and, to date, its inability to be predicted or prevented [3]. The international working group for AE-IPF published a comprehensive update in 2016 [4], but we focus on recent improvements in the prognosis and management of AE-IPF.

New definitions and diagnostic criteria of IPF-AE

Based on recent advances, the international working group for AE-IPF has developed a new conceptual framework for acute respiratory deterioration in IPF, and has revised the definition and diagnostic criteria for AE-IPF (table 1) [4]. The new definition and diagnostic criteria include any respiratory event characterised by new bilateral ground-glass opacification/consolidation not fully explained by cardiac failure or fluid overload, which parallels the Berlin criteria for acute respiratory distress syndrome. Because of the difficulty in distinguishing idiopathic from respiratory events triggered by known causes [57] (apart from cases with evident infectious pneumonia), both idiopathic and triggered events (e.g. infection, post-procedural/postoperative, drug toxicity, aspiration) resulting in worsening respiratory symptoms and widespread alveolar damage can be diagnosed as AE-IPF. However, the difference between infection-triggered AE and pneumonia in terms of therapeutic strategy and prognosis remains unknown [8].

TABLE 1.

Proposed revised definition and diagnostic criteria for acute exacerbations of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (AE-IPF)

Revised definition
An acute, clinically significant respiratory deterioration characterised by evidence of new widespread alveolar abnormality
Revised diagnostic criteria
•Previous or concurrent diagnosis of IPF#
•Acute worsening or development of dyspnoea typically <1 month duration
•Computed tomography with new bilateral ground-glass opacity and/or consolidation superimposed on a background pattern consistent with usual interstitial pneumonia pattern
•Deterioration not fully explained by cardiac failure or fluid overload+

#: If the diagnosis of IPF is not previously established, this criterion can be met by the presence of radiological and/or histopathological changes consistent with usual interstitial pneumonia pattern on the current evaluation. : If no previous computed tomography is available, the qualifier “new” can be dropped. +: Events that are clinically considered to meet the definition of acute exacerbation of IPF but fail to meet all four diagnostic criteria owing to missing computed tomography data should be termed “suspected acute exacerbations”. Reprinted from [4], with permission from the publisher.

Improving prognosis

The available data suggest that up to 46% of IPF-related deaths are preceded by an AE [913], with the majority of patients dying within the first month and most of the rest dying within a year [5].

In studies prior to 2007, mortality rates of up to 80% (178/223) were reported [3] and when mechanical ventilation was required, an in-hospital mortality of 87% and overall mortality of 94% among 135 cases was seen [14]. Hence, current IPF guidelines say that while the majority of patients with respiratory failure due to IPF should not receive mechanical ventilation, it may be a reasonable intervention in a minority (weak recommendation, low-quality evidence) and that noninvasive ventilation (NIV) may be appropriate in some [1]. Management of AE-IPF in the intensive care unit may be justified particularly in patients in whom the possibility of lung transplantation exists and in those who have not yet undergone clinical evaluation for the cause of the respiratory worsening.

However, more recent studies that include 995 patients with AE-IPF suggest modestly better survival, including 1 month 66% (177/270; range 47–85%), 3 month 41% (142/344; range 0–54%), and survival to hospital discharge of 44% (227/517; 4–77%), respectively [6, 7, 11, 1544]. For patients treated with invasive (IMV) or noninvasive (NIV) mechanical ventilation, in-hospital mortality has been reported as 67% among 193 patients in studies published after 2008 (table 2) [4449]. More recently, two national cohorts were reported. Analysis of the US cohort revealed an in-hospital mortality of approximately 50% (51.6% with IMV and 30.9% in NIV) among 2481 patients with IPF who were mechanically ventilated [50]. Analysis of the Japanese cohort demonstrated that among 209 patients receiving an average of 12.8 days of IMV, short-term (within 30 days) survival was 44.6% and long-term (within 90 days) survival of 24.6%. Therefore, within the past decade, prognosis of AE-IPF has improved considerably [51]. These changes may be due to a number of issues, including differences in diagnostic criteria and their application, study design variables, the clinical characteristics of the population studied (e.g. severity of the underlying disease and/or of the acute event), selection criteria for the institution of MV and improvements in management, especially protective ventilation.

TABLE 2.

Prognosis of acute exacerbations of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (AE-IPF) with mechanical ventilation: summary of studies published after 2008

First author [ref.], country (timeframe) N Patients Methods Hospital survival Overall survival
Yokoyama [44], Japan
(1998–2004)
11 MV for AE-IPF NIV (IMV)
CPAP 10 cmH2O, PS/PEEP 5/10 cmH2O
45% (5/11)
3 month
45%
3 month
Mollica [46], Italy
(2000–2007)
34 MV for ARF in ICU IMV or NIV
V T 7.5 mL·kg−1 or PS/PEEP 18/7 cmH2O
15% (5/34) 3%
6 month
Güngör [47], Turkey
(2000–2007)
96 MV for ARF in ICU IMV or NIV
V T 6–8 mL·kg−1, PEEP 5–7 cm H2O
36% (35/96)
Fernández-Pérez [45],
USA (2002–2006)
30 MV for ARF in ICU IMV
V T 7–8 mL·kg−1
40% (12/30)
Gaudry [48], France
(2002–2009)
22 MV for ARF in ICU IMV
V T 5.9 mL·kg−1, PEEP 7.1 cm H2O
23% (5/22)
ICU discharge
Vianello [49], Italy
(2005–2013)
18 MV for ARF in ICU NIV (IMV)
V T 6–8 mL·kg−1, PEEP 6.4 cm H2O
14%
90 days
Total 193 33% (63/193) 13%

MV: mechanical ventilation; NIV: noninvasive ventilation; IMV: invasive mechanical ventilation; CPAP: continuous positive pressure ventilation; PS: pressure support; PEEP: positive end-expiratory pressure; ARF: acute respiratory failure; ICU: intensive care unit; VT: tidal volume.

TABLE 3.

Definition of acute exacerbations of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (AE-IPF) in clinical trials

First author [ref.] Year Intervention AE-IPF Symptom Radiology Oxygenation DDx
Kubo [19] 2005 Warfarin Part of the primary outcome Deterioration of dyspnoea within a few weeks New GGO/consolidation and honeycombing on HRCT or CXR PaO2/FIO2 <300 Exclusion of identifiable cause
Azuma [52] 2005 Pirfenidone Secondary outcome Deterioration of dyspnoea within a month New GGO/consolidation and honeycombing on HRCT Deterioration of PaO2 ≥10 torr Exclusion of identifiable cause
King [53] 2008 Bosentan 1 Part of the primary outcome Deterioration of dyspnoea within a month Supplemental oxygen ≥5 L
King [54] 2009 IFNγ1b Tertiary outcome Deterioration of dyspnoea New GGO on HRCT Deterioration of PaO2 ≥8 torr Exclusion of identifiable cause
Taniguchi [55] 2010 Pirfenidone Tertiary outcome Deterioration of dyspnoea within a month New GGO/consolidation and honeycombing on HRCT Deterioration of PaO2 ≥10 torr Exclusion of identifiable cause
Zisman [56] 2010 Sildenafil Secondary outcome Deterioration of dyspnoea or cough within a month New GGO/consolidation on HRCT or new infiltrates on CXR Deterioration of SpO2 ≥5% or PaO2 ≥8 torr Exclusion of identifiable cause with no physical and microbiological findings suggesting infection
King [57] 2011 Bosentan Part of the primary outcome Deterioration of dyspnoea within 4 weeks Needs supplemental oxygen ≥5 L
Richeldi [58] 2011 Nintedanib Secondary outcome Progression of dyspnoea within 4 weeks New GGO on CXR or HRCT Deterioration of PaO2 ≥10 torr Exclusion of identifiable cause of acute lung injury
Noble [59] 2011 Pirfenidone Secondary outcome Deterioration of dyspnoea within 4 weeks New GGO ≥ one lobe on HRCT Deterioration of PaO2 ≥8 torr Exclusion of identifiable cause, cardiac disorder, pulmonary embolism, aspiration and infection
Noth [60] 2012 Warfarin Secondary outcome Deteriooration of dyspnoea within 30 days New GGO/consolidation on HRCT or new infiltrates on CXR Deterioration of SpO2 ≥5% or deterioration of PaO2 ≥8 torr Exclusion of infection by sputum culture or BAL culture, and identifiable cause of acute lung injury
Martinez [62] 2014 Pirfenidone+
azathioprin+
N-acetylcystein
Secondary outcome Deterioration of dyspnoea within 30 days New GGO/consolidation on HRCT or new infiltrates on CXR Deterioration of SpO2 ≥5% or deterioration of PaO2 ≥8 torr Exclusion of infection by sputum culture or BAL culture, and identifiable cause of acute lung injury
Richeldi [61] 2014 Nintedanib Secondary outcome Deterioration of dyspnoea within 30 days New diffuse infiltrates on CXR or GGO on CT Exclusion of infection by routine clinical practice and microbiological studies, left heart failure, pulmonary embolism, and identifiable cause of acute lung injury

DDx: differential diagnosis; GGO: ground-glass opacities; HRCT: high-resolution CT; CXR: chest X-ray; PaO2: arterial oxygen tension; FIO2: inhaled oxygen fraction; BAL: Bronchoalveolar lavage; SpO2: arterial oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry.

Influence of diagnostic criteria, missing data and diagnostic accuracy

A variety of diagnostic criteria have been used both in retrospective and prospective studies (table 3). Differences in these criteria and their application may have a significant influence on both the incidence and prognosis of AE [19, 5262].

Because of the common inability to obtain all required clinical data during the evaluation of an AE, the term, “suspected AE” has been used in many clinical studies, i.e. patients with an otherwise idiopathic acute respiratory decline that could not be classified as a definite AE due to missing data. However, the prognosis of these patients appears to be very similar to those with a definite AE [7, 61], suggesting that the process of accelerated disease itself rather than the underlying cause of the AE (i.e. idiopathic versus events with a recognised trigger) is driving the prognosis.

Importance of non-elective hospitalisation

Non-elective hospitalisations are associated with considerable cost [63], and respiratory-related hospitalisations in particular have prognostic significance in IPF [6466]. Brown et al. [65] have reported that most hospitalisations in IPF are respiratory-related, and associated with high in-hospital mortality and limited survival beyond discharge. Even in the setting of a respiratory-related hospitalisation, the presence of AE is associated with a worse prognosis. Moua et al. [66] reviewed consecutive patients with a fibrosing interstitial lung disease hospitalised with acute respiratory worsening and found that those diagnosed with an AE had a worse prognosis than those without (OR 4.06, 95% CI 1.32–13.8; p=0.014). These studies emphasise the prognostic importance of both non-elective and respiratory hospitalisation as well as AE in IPF.

Influence of study design

In prospective treatment trials, study subjects are under active observation and evaluated at predetermined intervals, making this study design particularly valuable when evaluating the incidence and short-term prognosis of AE; however, these data are most informative only for the patient population described by the inclusion and exclusion criteria used in the underlying treatment trial. Retrospective cohort studies often include the full spectrum of disease severity, but the results need to be corrected for the known baseline prognostic factors present at the time of the AE [67, 68]. Recent evidence from the placebo arm subjects of prospective clinical trials [60], as well as a number of retrospective studies, suggests that the incidence and prognosis of AE-IPF are influenced by the baseline degree of physiological impairment [6, 11, 30]. In a prespecified subgroup analysis of INPULSIS trials, the one-year-incidence of AE in patients with a forced vital capacity (FVC) of <70% predicted and FVC ≥70% predicted were 14.9% and 3.3%, respectively [69]. This factor probably explains a large part of the variability observed across studies.

Influence of proximate trigger of respiratory decline

Despite previous criteria for the diagnosis of AE focusing on the importance of excluding recognised causes of respiratory decline, it appears that neither the presence nor absence of a known trigger has an impact on prognosis. In separate studies, both Huie [5] and Song [6] showed no differences in prognosis between patients with a definite idiopathic AE (all known causes excluded) and those with a respiratory decline triggered by infection. Separately, the results of the STEP-IPF (Sildenafil Trial of Exercise Performance in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis) trial suggested that patients with both definite and suspected AE-IPF had a prognosis similar to those with identifiable trigger of the acute respiratory decline [7].

Influence of baseline prognostic variables

Several clinically defined prognostic factors have been identified. Similar to IPF in general, lower baseline FVC and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) predict mortality [30], as do a shorter duration of symptoms prior to diagnosis and poor gas-exchange at the time of hospitalisation [32, 39]. On chest imaging, the high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) pattern at the time of diagnosis is important, with higher mortality when a diffuse ground-glass pattern is present compared to a multifocal or peripheral distribution [23]. Higher composite HRCT scores including extent of ground-glass opacification, consolidation, traction bronchiectasis and honeycombing predict mortality [23, 29]. Blood-based biomarkers of a worse outcome include elevated lactate dehydrogenase [23, 41], C-reactive protein [6], Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) [29, 41], pro-calcitonin [40], circulating fibrocytes [70], elevated interleukin-17 [28] and anti-heat shock protein 70 autoantibodies [39], but none of these have been validated prospectively, or impact clinical decision making. Recently, a staging system for AE with several variables was proposed [41]. Such prognostic information may be useful in future decision making about the level and continuation of care.

Influence of management strategies

There are no currently proven beneficial management strategies for patients with AE-IPF [14, 8], but there are several possible approaches that may influence prognosis [8, 71, 72].

Preventive measures

Prevention is likely more effective than any therapeutic strategy. Measures to prevent respiratory infection are important, as infection is thought to be an important trigger for AE [4] (table 4). Vaccination for influenza virus and Pneumococcus are felt to be useful [71]. Hand washing and avoidance of sick contacts, especially in the winter season, may also be useful [71]. Because gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has been suggested to be a risk factor for AE [32], the use of pharmocological and non-pharmocological measures to minimise reflux is thought to be appropriate. However, a recent study reported that antacid therapy increased the risk of overall infection and pulmonary infection in patients with advanced IPF (i.e. FVC<70%) [72]. Therefore, the balance of benefit and risk of antacid therapy for prevention of AE-IPF may vary by clinical situation. Because exposure to air pollution has also been reported as a possible risk factor [38], the avoidance of airborne irritants or air pollution may be appropriate.

TABLE 4.

Possible preventive and therapeutic measures in acute exacerbations of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (AE-IPF)

Prevention Recommendation
• Influenza and pneumococcal vaccination
• Hand washing, avoidance of sick contacts
• Approaches to minimise gastro-oesophageal reflex
• Avoidance of airborne irritants and pollutants
• When mechanical ventilation is required, strategies to minimise ventilator-induced lung injury
  Low tidal volume ventilation
  Noninvasive ventilation
  High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy
• Nintedanib
• Pirfenidone
• Avoidance of the combination of prednisone and azathioprine
+
+
+/−
+
+/−



+/−
−/+
+
Therapeutics Recommendation
Ventilation
• Low tidal volume ventilation
• Noninvasive ventilation
• High-flow nasal cannula oxygen therapy
Pharmacology
• Corticosteroid
• Empiric antibiotics
• Immunosuppressant#
• Thrombomodulin
Lung transplantation
Others
• Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
• Polymixin B haemoperfusion
• Rituximab, plasma exchange, intravenous immunoglobulin
• Non-steroid approach

+
+
+/−

+
+/−
−/+
−/+
+/−

§
−/+

+: Would consider using in most patients as potential benefit seems to outweigh potential harm; +/−: would consider using in selected patients as the balance of benefit and risk varies by clinical situation; −/+: would not consider using in majority of patients as the balance of benefit and risk varies by clinical situation; −: would not consider using in most patients as evidence is lacking to support a clinical benefit. #: Cyclophosphamide, cyclosporine, tacrolimus. : Immediate cessation of immunosuppression (if any), best supportive care, broad-spectrum antimicrobials. §: Would consider as a bridge to lung transplantation.

With a fibrotic, non-compliant lung, ventilator-induced lung injury is always a risk [8, 71]. Fernández-Pérez et al. [45] reported that the use of high positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) is associated with worse prognosis. In those patients with IPF and acute respiratory failure who are appropriate for mechanical ventilatory support, in order to reduce the risk of barotrauma, there is a trend towards the use of a protective ventilation (low tidal volume) strategy. Alternatively, NIV may also lower the risk of ventilator-induced lung injury and a recent study of high-flow nasal cannula oxygen in subjects with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure suggests its superiority over NIV [73]. Ventilator-induced injury during surgery, particularly thoracic surgery, is also a speculated mechanism of AE [74]. Strategies to minimise the risk of lung injury during surgery, such as reducing the partial pressure of oxygen and tidal volume and less invasive surgical techniques, may be of benefit [8, 71, 75, 76].

Therapies shown to be beneficial for the treatment of IPF itself may reduce the risk of AE-IPF. A phase 2 trial of nintedanib in the treatment of IPF (TOMORROW) demonstrated a delay in the time to first investigator-reported AE-IPF with nintedanib therapy [58]. The subsequent phase 3 trials showed mixed results; INPULSIS-1 showed no significant difference in the time to development of AE-IPF between the nintedanib and the placebo groups, but INPULSIS-2 demonstrated a benefit of nintedanib therapy [61]. The time to first adjudicated AE-IPF in the prespecified pooled analysis (INPULSIS 1 and 2) and the time to first investigator-reported AE-IPF in a separate pooled analysis of all three trials (TOMORROW and INPULSIS-1 and 2) demonstrated a delay with nintedanib therapy [77].

A Japanese phase 2 placebo-controlled randomised clinical trial of pirfenidone was stopped early because of a reduction in the rate of AE-IPF in those allocated to receive pirfenidone [52]. However, the following Japanese phase 3 clinical trial did not confirm this result [55], and the subsequent multinational phase 3 clinical trials of pirfenidone (CAPACITY and ASCEND) did not report acute exacerbations as an end-point [59, 78]. Pirfenidone has also been suggested to reduce the risk of postoperative AE by observational study [79]. Additional data are needed to fully understand the impact of IPF therapies on the risk and outcome of acute exacerbation [4].

Therapeutic measures

The evidence-based IPF guidelines in 2011 recommended that the majority of patients with AE-IPF be treated with corticosteroids, but that not treating with corticosteroids may be reasonable in a minority (weak recommendation, very low-quality evidence) [1]. This recommendation places a high value on anecdotal reports of benefit and the high mortality of AE-IPF. The appropriate dose, route and duration of therapy are not clear [1]. Several studies have suggested that the combination of an immunosuppressant with corticosteroids is more effective than corticosteroid monotherapy [8083]. Because these studies are mostly small and uncontrolled, the results are inconclusive.

Patients with AE-IPF occasionally present with fever and flu-like symptoms, and the majority of them are treated with high-dose corticosteroids. So, it is reasonable that most of them receive empiric antibiotic therapy [8, 71, 75]. One prospective study suggests the possible usefulness of azithromycin therapy for AE-IPF [84]. In addition, one prospective randomised trial showed that procalcitonin-guided antibiotic treatment resulted in a shorter duration of therapy, with a similar mortality to that of standard clinician-determined antibiotic treatment [85].

Several investigators studied the efficacy of recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin (rhTM), which exhibits a range of physiologically important anti-inflammatory, anticoagulant and antifibrinolytic properties for AE-IPF [68, 8688]. They found a favourable mortality rate in the rhTM groups compared with historical control groups, but caution should be used when interpreting such uncontrolled studies. A phase 3 clinical study of rhTM for AE-IPF is now ongoing (JapicCTI-163326). It remains uncertain whether any of the vast number of pharmacological strategies has influenced survival [4, 8].

The IPF guideline also recommends that appropriate patients with IPF undergo lung transplantation (LTx) [1]. It is therefore appropriate that transplant-eligible patients with IPF be referred to a transplantation centre for evaluation early in the course of their disease, before an episode of AE-IPF. In selected patients with AE-IPF who fulfil the criteria for LTx, mechanical ventilation alone or in combination with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) may be appropriate as a bridge to LTx [89, 90]. Although this is associated with a worse prognosis than LTx without a bridge [9193], it can provide a survival chance for patients who would probably have died otherwise [93, 94]. In addition, recent strategies of ambulatory ECMO or awake and non-intubated ECMO as a bridge to LTx have shown encouraging results [9597].

The polymyxin B-immobilized fibre column (PMX), which removes endotoxin, has been studied in patients with AE-IPF. The therapeutic benefits of direct haemoperfusion with PMX (PMX-DHP) are postulated to be based on the adsorption of proinflammatory, profibrotic and proangiogenic cytokines by PMX-DHP fibres. Several uncontrolled studies and one observational cohort with historical controls suggest some efficacy [67, 98100].

Recent evidence that autoantibodies may be involved in IPF progression has prompted the use of therapies for AE-IPF that target autoantibodies. Donahoe et al. [101] performed a pilot study to evaluate the efficacy of plasma exchange, rituximab and intravenous immunoglobulin for AE-IPF, and showed better one-year survival than historical controls without serious adverse events. On the other hand, based on the results of the PANTHER trial, which demonstrated that the combination of prednisone, azathioprine and N-acetyl cysteine was harmful for IPF [102], Papiris et al. [103] hypothesised that previous immunosuppression and the administration of high-dose steroids adversely affect outcome of AE-IPF, and studied a protocol of immediate cessation of immunosuppression (if any), best supportive care and broad-spectrum antimicrobials. Their uncontrolled results revealed that the steroid avoidance strategy might be of benefit. Overall, significant debate remains when choosing among the varying approaches to the treatment of AE-IPF. A summary of possible preventive and therapeutic measures are shown in table 4.

In summary, IPF patients who experience an AE remain at high risk for early mortality, with in-hospital mortality rates of 55–80%. Recent results suggest that the prognosis may have improved. The modest improvement in short-term overall survival seen in more recent studies may be the result of differences in the diagnostic criteria used and their application, study design, baseline risk factors and/or improvements in management. However, patients who survive an AE-IPF event are at very high risk of further events, leading to very high longer-term mortality. Careful decision making for AE-IPF should be conducted based on recent knowledge gains regarding possible preventive and therapeutic measures.

Disclosures

K.K. Brown ERR-0050-2017_Brown (1.2MB, pdf)

V. Cottin ERR-0050-2017_Cottin (1.2MB, pdf)

Y. Kondoh ERR-0050-2017_Kondoh (1.2MB, pdf)

Footnotes

This article has been revised according to the erratum published in the June 2018 issue of the European Respiratory Review.

Number 1 in the Series “Acute exacerbations in pulmonary medicine” Edited by Michael Kreuter and Vincent Cottin

Conflict of interest: Disclosures can be found alongside this article at err.ersjournals.com

Provenance: Commissioned article, peer reviewed.

References

  • 1.Raghu G, Collard HR, Egan JJ, et al. An official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT statement: idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: evidence-based guidelines for diagnosis and management. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011; 183: 788–824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.King TE Jr, Pardo A, Selman M. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Lancet 2011; 378: 1949–1961. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Collard HR, Moore BB, Flaherty KR, et al. Acute exacerbations of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007; 176: 636–643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Collard HR, Ryerson CJ, Corte TJ, et al. Acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. An international working group report. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016; 194: 265–275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Huie TJ, Olson AL, Cosgrove GP, et al. A detailed evaluation of acute respiratory decline in patients with fibrotic lung disease: aetiology and outcomes. Respirology 2010; 15: 909–917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Song JW, Hong SB, Lim CM, et al. Acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: incidence, risk factors and outcome. Eur Respir J 2011; 37: 356–363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Collard HR, Yow E, Richeldi L, et al. Suspected acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis as an outcome measure in clinical trials. Respir Res 2013; 14: 73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Taniguchi H, Kondoh Y. Acute and subacute idiopathic interstitial pneumonias. Respirology 2016; 21: 810–820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Okamoto T, Ichiyasu H, Ichikado K, et al. Clinical analysis of the acute exacerbation in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Nihon Kokyuki Gakkai Zasshi 2006; 44: 359–367. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jeon K, Chung MP, Lee KS, et al. Prognostic factors and causes of death in Korean patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respir Med 2006; 100: 451–457. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kondoh Y, Taniguchi H, Katsuta T, et al. Risk factors of acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis 2010; 27: 103–110. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Ley B, Collard HR, King TE Jr. Clinical course and prediction of survival in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011; 183: 431–440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Natsuizaka M, Chiba H, Kuronuma K, et al. Epidemiologic survey of Japanese patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and investigation of ethnic differences. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2014; 190: 773–779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mallick S. Outcome of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) ventilated in intensive care unit. Respir Med 2008; 102: 1355–1359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Akira M, Hamada H, Sakatani M, et al. CT findings during phase of accelerated deterioration in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168: 79–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tajima S, Oshikawa K, Tominaga S, et al. The increase in serum soluble ST2 protein upon acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Chest 2003; 124: 1206–1214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Inase N, Sawada M, Ohtani Y, et al. Cyclosporin A followed by the treatment of acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis with corticosteroid. Intern Med 2003; 42: 565–570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Al-Hameed FM, Sharma S. Outcome of patients admitted to the intensive care unit for acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Can Respir J 2004; 11: 117–122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Kubo H, Nakayama K, Yanai M, et al. Anticoagulant therapy for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Chest 2005; 128: 1475–1482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kim DS, Park JH, Park BK, et al. Acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: frequency and clinical features. Eur Respir J 2006; 27: 143–150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Silva CI, Müller NL, Fujimoto K, et al. Acute exacerbation of chronic interstitial pneumonia: high-resolution computed tomography and pathologic findings. J Thorac Imaging 2007; 22: 221–229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Tomioka H, Sakurai T, Hashimoto K, et al. Acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: role of Chlamydophila pneumoniae infection. Respirology 2007; 12: 700–706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Akira M, Kozuka T, Yamamoto S, et al. Computed tomography findings in acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2008; 178: 372–378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Collard HR, Calfee CS, Wolters PJ, et al. Plasma biomarker profiles in acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 2010; 299: L3–L7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tcherakian C, Cottin V, Brillet PY, et al. Progression of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: lessons from asymmetrical disease. Thorax 2011; 66: 226–231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Horita N, Akahane M, Okada Y, et al. Tacrolimus and steroid treatment for acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Intern Med 2011; 50: 189–195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Abe S, Hayashi H, Seo Y, et al. Reduction in serum high mobility group box-1 level by polymyxin B-immobilized fiber column in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis with acute exacerbation. Blood Purif 2011; 32: 310–316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tachibana K, Inoue Y, Nishiyama A, et al. Polymyxin-B hemoperfusion for acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: serum IL-7 as a prognostic marker. Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis 2011; 28: 113–122. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Fujimoto K, Taniguchi H, Johkoh T, et al. Acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: high-resolution CT scores predict mortality. Eur Radiol 2012; 22: 83–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Simon-Blancal V, Freynet O, Nunes H, et al. Acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: outcome and prognostic factors. Respiration 2012; 83: 28–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Tachikawa R, Tomii K, Ueda H, et al. Clinical features and outcome of acute exacerbation of interstitial pneumonia: collagen vascular diseases-related versus idiopathic. Respiration 2012; 83: 20–27. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Lee JS, Song JW, Wolters PJ, et al. Bronchoalveolar lavage pepsin in acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Eur Respir J 2012; 39: 352–358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Mura M, Porretta MA, Bargagli E, et al. Predicting survival in newly diagnosed idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a 3-year prospective study. Eur Respir J 2012; 40: 101–109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Abe S, Azuma A, Mukae H, et al. Polymyxin B-immobilized fiber column (PMX) treatment for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis with acute exacerbation: a multicenter retrospective analysis. Intern Med 2012; 51: 1487–1491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Anzai M, Fukushima Y, Obara K, et al. Clinical characteristics of acute exacerbations of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and involvement of viral, Mycoplasma pneumoniae, and Chlamydophila pneumoniae infections. Dokkyo J Med Sci 2013; 40: 9–16. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Ding J, Chen Z, Feng K. Procalcitonin-guided antibiotic use in acute exacerbations of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Int J Med Sci 2013; 10: 903–907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Kakugawa T, Yokota S, Ishimatsu Y, et al. Serum heat shock protein 47 levels are elevated in acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Cell Stress Chaperones 2013; 18: 581–590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Johannson KA, Vittinghoff E, Lee K, et al. Acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis associated with air pollution exposure. Eur Respir J 2014; 43: 1124–1131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kahloon RA, Xue J, Bhargava A, et al. Patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis with antibodies to heat shock protein 70 have poor prognoses. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2013; 187: 768–775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Usui Y, Kaga A, Sakai F, et al. A cohort study of mortality predictors in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic fibrosing interstitial pneumonia. BMJ Open 2013; 3: e002971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Kishaba T, Tamaki H, Shimaoka Y, et al. Staging of acute exacerbation in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Lung 2014; 192: 141–149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Tomassetti S, Ruy JH, Gurioli C, et al. The effect of anticoagulant therapy for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in real life practice. Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis 2013; 30: 121–127. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Tsushima K, Yamaguchi K, Kono Y, et al. Thrombomodulin for acute exacerbations of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a proof of concept study. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 2014; 29: 233–240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Yokoyama T, Kondoh Y, Taniguchi H, et al. Noninvasive ventilation in acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Intern Med 2010; 49: 1509–1514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Fernández-Pérez ER, Yilmaz M, Jenad H, et al. Ventilator settings and outcome of respiratory failure in chronic interstitial lung disease. Chest 2008; 133: 1113–1119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Mollica C, Paone G, Conti V, et al. Mechanical ventilation in patients with end-stage idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respiration 2010; 79: 209–215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Güngör G, Tatar D, Saltürk C, et al. Why do patients with interstitial lung diseases fail in the ICU? A 2-center cohort study. Respir Care 2013; 58: 525–531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Gaudry S, Vincent F, Rabbat A, et al. Invasive mechanical ventilation in patients with fibrosing interstitial pneumonia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 147: 47–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Vianello A, Arcaro G, Battistella L, et al. Noninvasive ventilation in the event of acute respiratory failure in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. J Crit Care 2014; 29: 562–567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Rush B, Wiskar K, Berger L, et al. The use of mechanical ventilation in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in the United States: A nationwide retrospective cohort analysis. Respir Med 2016; 111: 72–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Oda K, Yatera K, Fujino Y, et al. Efficacy of concurrent treatments in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients with a rapid progression of respiratory failure: an analysis of a national administrative database in Japan. BMC Pulm Med 2016; 16: 91. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Azuma A, Nukiwa T, Tsuboi E, et al. Double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of pirfenidone in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2005; 171: 1040–1047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.King TE Jr, Behr J, Brown KK, et al. BUILD-1: a randomized placebo-controlled trial of bosentan in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2008; 177: 75–81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.King TE Jr, Albera C, Bradford WZ, et al. Effect of interferon gamma-1b on survival in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (INSPIRE): a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 2009; 374: 222–228. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Taniguchi H, Ebina M, Kondoh Y, et al. Pirfenidone in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Eur Respir J 2010; 35: 821–829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Zisman DA, Schwarz M, Anstrom KJ, et al. A controlled trial of sildenafil in advanced idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 620–628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.King TE Jr, Brown KK, Raghu G, et al. BUILD-3: a randomized, controlled trial of bosentan in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011; 184: 92–99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Richeldi L, Costabel U, Selman M, et al. Efficacy of a tyrosine kinase inhibitor in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 1079–1087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Noble PW, Albera C, Bradford WZ, et al. Pirfenidone in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (CAPACITY): two randomised trials. Lancet 2011; 377: 1760–1769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Noth I, Anstrom KJ, Calvert SB, et al. A placebo-controlled randomized trial of warfarin in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2012; 186: 88–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Richeldi L, du Bois RM, Raghu G, et al. Efficacy and safety of nintedanib in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 2071–2082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Martinez FJ, de Andrade JA, Anstrom KJ, et al. Randomized trial of acetylcysteine in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 2093–2101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Cottin V, Schmidt A, Catella L, et al. Burden of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis progression: a 5-year longitudinal follow-up study. PLoS ONE 2017; 12: e0166462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Du Bois RM, Weycker D, Albera C, et al. Ascertainment of individual risk of mortality for patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011; 184: 459–466. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Brown AW, Fischer CP, Shlobin OA, et al. Outcomes after hospitalization in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a cohort study. Chest 2015; 147: 173–179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Moua T, Westerly BD, Dulohery MM, et al. Patients with fibrotic interstitial lung disease hospitalized for acute respiratory worsening: a large cohort analysis. Chest 2016; 149: 1205–1214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Enomoto N, Mikamo M, Oyama Y, et al. Treatment of acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis with direct hemoperfusion using a polymyxin B-immobilized fiber column improves survival. BMC Pulm Med 2015; 15: 15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Kataoka K, Taniguchi H, Kondoh Y, et al. Recombinant human thrombomodulin in acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Chest 2015; 148: 436–443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Costabel U, Inoue Y, Richeldi L, et al. Efficacy of nintedanib in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis across prespecified subgroups in INPULSIS. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2016; 193: 178–185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Moeller A, Gilpin SE, Ask K, et al. Circulating fibrocytes are an indicator of poor prognosis in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2009; 179: 588–594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Johannson K, Collard HR. Acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a proposal. Curr Respir Care Rep 2013; 2: 233–240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Kreuter M, Spagnolo P, Wuyts W, et al. Antacid therapy and disease progression in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis who received pirfenidone. Respiration 2017; 93: 415–423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Frat JP, Thille AW, Mercat A, et al. High-flow oxygen through nasal cannula in acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. N Engl J Med 2015; 372: 2185–2196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Kondoh Y, Taniguchi H, Kitaichi M, et al. Acute exacerbation of interstitial pneumonia following surgical lung biopsy. Respir Med 2006; 100: 1753–1759. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Maher TM, Whyte MK, Hoyles RK, et al. Development of a consensus statement for the definition, diagnosis, and treatment of acute exacerbations of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis using the Delphi technique. Adv Ther 2015; 32: 929–943. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Sato T, Kondo H, Watanabe A, et al. A simple risk scoring system for predicting acute exacerbation of interstitial pneumonia after pulmonary resection in lung cancer patients. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015; 63: 164–172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Richeldi L, Cottin V, du Bois RM, et al. Nintedanib in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: combined evidence from the TOMORROW and INPULSIS® trials. Respir Med 2016; 113: 74–79. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.King TE Jr, Bradford WZ, Castro-Bernardini S, et al. A phase 3 trial of pirfenidone in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. N Engl J Med 2014; 370: 2083–2092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Iwata T, Yoshino I, Yoshida S, et al. A phase II trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of perioperative pirfenidone for prevention of acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in lung cancer patients undergoing pulmonary resection: West Japan Oncology Group 6711 L (PEOPLE Study). Respir Res 2016; 17: 90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Inase N, Sawada M, Ohtani Y, et al. Cyclosporin A followed by the treatment of acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis with corticosteroid. Intern Med 2003; 42: 565–570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Homma S, Sakamoto S, Kawabata M, et al. Cyclosporin treatment in steroid-resistant and acutely exacerbated interstitial pneumonia. Intern Med 2005; 44: 1144–1150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Sakamoto S, Homma S, Miyamoto A, et al. Cyclosporin A in the treatment of acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Intern Med 2010; 49: 109–115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Horita N, Akahane M, Okada Y, et al. Tacrolimus and steroid treatment for acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Intern Med 2011; 50: 189–195. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Kawamura K, Ichikado K, Suga M, et al. Efficacy of azithromycin for treatment of acute exacerbation of chronic fibrosing interstitial pneumonia: a prospective, open-label study with historical controls. Respiration 2014; 87: 478–484. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Ding J, Chen Z, Feng K. Procalcitonin-guided antibiotic use in acute exacerbations of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Int J Med Sci 2013; 10: 903–907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Tsushima K, Yamaguchi K, Kono Y, et al. Thrombomodulin for acute exacerbations of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a proof of concept study. Pulm Pharmacol Ther 2014; 29: 233–240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Isshiki T, Sakamoto S, Kinoshita A, et al. Recombinant human soluble thrombomodulin treatment for acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a retrospective study. Respiration 2015; 89: 201–207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Abe M, Tsushima K, Matsumura T, et al. Efficacy of thrombomodulin for acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and nonspecific interstitial pneumonia: a nonrandomized prospective study. Drug Des Devel Ther 2015; 9: 5755–5762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Thabut G, Mal H, Castier Y, et al. Survival benefit of lung transplantation for patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2003; 126: 469–475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Gaudry S, Vincent F, Rabbat A, et al. Invasive mechanical ventilation in patients with fibrosing interstitial pneumonia. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014; 147: 47–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Singer JP, Blanc PD, Hoopes C, et al. The impact of pretransplant mechanical ventilation on short- and long-term survival after lung transplantation. Am J Transplant 2011; 11: 2197–2204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Mason DP, Thuita L, Nowicki ER, et al. Should lung transplantation be performed for patients on mechanical respiratory support? The US experience. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010; 139: 765–773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Boussaud V, Mal H, Trinquart L, et al. One-year experience with high-emergency lung transplantation in France. Transplantation 2012; 93: 1058–1063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Smits JM, Nossent GD, de Vries E, et al. Evaluation of the lung allocation score in highly urgent and urgent lung transplant candidates in Eurotransplant. J Heart Lung Transplant 2011; 30: 22–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Toyoda Y, Bhama JK, Shigemura N, et al. Efficacy of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to lung transplantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 145: 1065–1070. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Hoopes CW, Kukreja J, Golden J, et al. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to pulmonary transplantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013; 145: 862–867. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Garcia JP, Iacono A, Kon ZN, et al. Ambulatory extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a new approach for bridge-to-lung transplantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2010; 139: e137–e139. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Seo Y, Abe S, Kurahara M, et al. Beneficial effect of polymyxin B-immobilized fiber column (PMX) hemoperfusion treatment on acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Intern Med 2006; 45: 1033–1038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Tachibana K, Inoue Y, Nishiyama A, et al. Polymyxin-B hemoperfusion for acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: serum IL-7 as a prognostic marker. Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis 2011; 28: 113–122. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Abe S, Azuma A, Mukae H, et al. Polymyxin B-immobilized fiber column (PMX) treatment for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis with acute exacerbation: a multicenter retrospective analysis. Intern Med 2012; 51: 1487–1491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Donahoe M, Valentine VG, Chien N, et al. Autoantibody-targeted treatments for acute exacerbations of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. PLoS ONE 2015; 10: e0127771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Clinical Research Network, Raghu G, Anstrom KJ, et al. . Prednisone, azathioprine, and N-acetylcysteine for pulmonary fibrosis. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 1968–1977. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Papiris SA, Kagouridis K, Kolilekas L, et al. Survival in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis acute exacerbations: the non-steroid approach. BMC Pulm Med 2015; 15: 162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

K.K. Brown ERR-0050-2017_Brown (1.2MB, pdf)

V. Cottin ERR-0050-2017_Cottin (1.2MB, pdf)

Y. Kondoh ERR-0050-2017_Kondoh (1.2MB, pdf)


Articles from European Respiratory Review are provided here courtesy of European Respiratory Society

RESOURCES