Skip to main content
The Innovation logoLink to The Innovation
. 2022 Sep 6;3(6):100310. doi: 10.1016/j.xinn.2022.100310

Multifunctional succinate additive for flexible perovskite solar cells with more than 23% power-conversion efficiency

Minghao Li 1, Junjie Zhou 1, Liguo Tan 1, Hang Li 1, Yue Liu 1, Chaofan Jiang 1, Yiran Ye 1, Liming Ding 2, Wolfgang Tress 3, Chenyi Yi 1,
PMCID: PMC9490203  PMID: 36160942

Abstract

Flexible perovskite solar cells (FPSCs) have emerged as power sources in versatile applications owing to their high-efficiency characteristics, excellent flexibility, and relatively low cost. Nevertheless, undesired strain in perovskite films greatly impacts the power-conversion efficiency (PCE) and stability of PSCs, particularly in FPSCs. Herein, a novel multifunctional organic salt, methylammonium succinate, which can alleviate strain and reinforce grain boundaries, was incorporated into the perovskite film, leading to relaxed microstrain and a lower defect concentration. As a result, a PCE of 25.4% for rigid PSCs and a record PCE of 23.6% (certified 22.5%) for FPSCs have been achieved. In addition, the corresponding FPSCs exhibited excellent bending durability, maintaining ∼85% of their initial efficiency after bending at a 6 mm radius for 10 000 cycles.

Graphical abstract

graphic file with name fx1.jpg

Public summary

  • FPSCs hold promise as power sources for flexible electronics and spacecraft

  • Succinate additives enable high-quality perovskite films with reduced microstrain

  • An efficiency of 25.4% has been achieved for perovskite solar cells

  • An efficiency of 23.6% has been achieved for FPSCs with excellent durability

Introduction

Perovskite solar cells (PSCs) have emerged as a cost-effective photovoltaic technology, as is obvious from the power-conversion efficiency (PCE), which has surpassed 25.7%.1, 2, 3, 4 With a high power-to-weight ratio and excellent flexibility, flexible PSCs (FPSCs) hold promise as power sources for flexible electronic devices, wearable equipment, and spacecraft.5 With the experience accumulated in rigid PSCs, the PCE of FPSCs has reached over 22% in small areas6,7 and 15% in large areas.8,9 In addition, an increasing number of researchers have begun to explore the industrial roll-to-roll fabrication of FPSCs,10,11 showing a promising future in flexible photovoltaic applications.

However, the PCE of FPSCs still lags far behind that of rigid PSCs, which can be mainly attributed to the inferior perovskite thin film quality on flexible substrates compared with that of glass substrates. The difference in the physical properties of glass substrates and flexible plastic substrates, such as thermal properties and surface roughness, increases the difficulty in obtaining high-quality perovskite thin films on plastic substrates.12 Additives comprising small molecules and polymers were employed in the perovskite precursor to regulate the perovskite crystallization process,13 improve crystallization, strengthen the perovskite crystals,14 and passivate defects.15

Due to their polycrystalline nature, perovskite films also suffer from the influence of strain on the optoelectronic properties and stability.16,17 The residual strain is related to the stability of the perovskite18 and usually accelerates its degradation by increasing ion migration and reducing perovskite structural stability.19 The microstrain, which originates from local lattice mismatch or misorientation and is related to the local lattice disorder and defects,20 is highly detrimental to the perovskite film and thus urgently needs to be mitigated. Although modifying the perovskite lattice by cation doping, such as Cd2+21 and MDA2+,22 has been demonstrated to lower microstrain for efficient and stable PSCs, the strain related to environmental effects such as bending, which is extremely important for FPSCs, cannot be alleviated by the above-mentioned method.

In this work, we judiciously designed a novel multifunctional additive, methylammonium succinate (MS), to alleviate strain and passivate interface defects in a perovskite film. It has been reported that FAI-terminated surfaces and PbI2-terminated surfaces are stable surfaces in FAPbI3 grains.23 The two terminal carboxyl groups in MS can form hydrogen bonds with formamidine (FA) with two neighboring perovskite grains, while the ethylene group between the two carboxyl groups provides flexibility to release the strain caused by environmental effects such as thermal stress and bending of flexible devices, leading to perovskite films with reduced defects and enhanced durability. In addition, the carboxyl group can coordinate with the dangling Pb2+ present at the surface of perovskite grains, and the MA+ can compensate for the A position vacancy in the ABX3 perovskite, reducing the number of defects. As a result, we achieved a high PCE of 25.4% and 23.6% (certified 22.5%) for rigid and flexible PSCs, respectively, which is the highest reported PCE for FPSCs (Figure 1A) to date. In addition, the bilateral anions bind strongly with the perovskite grain surfaces, strengthening the grain boundaries (Figure 1B) and releasing the strain during the bending process. Therefore, the FPSCs exhibited improved bending durability, retaining ∼85% of their initial efficiency after 10 000 bending cycles (at a 6 mm radius).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

PCE result and the functions of the MS additive

(A) Summarized PCE development of FPSCs with this work highlighted.

(B) Proposed mechanism of the bilateral MS molecule at the perovskite grain boundaries.

Results and discussion

The grain boundaries of perovskite thin films are rich in defects and the start points of the cracks, corrosion, and decomposition. The multifunctional additive MS was designed to heal the defects and strengthen the grain boundaries by interacting with two adjacent grain boundaries. With two terminal carboxyl groups, the succinate can bond with FA+ cations via hydrogen bonds and coordinate with dangling Pb2+ in the grain boundaries. To investigate the effect of the MS additives, FAPbI3 perovskite thin films were fabricated by a conventional sequential deposition method as previously reported.24,25 The acquired perovskite thin films are denoted “control” and “MS-perovskite” for the films without and with MS additive (in PbI2 solution), respectively. The surface scanning electron microscopy images of the control and MS-perovskite film morphologies are shown in Figures 2A and 2B. A small amount (∼0.4 mol %) of MS additive resulted in a smoother surface, and the holes sighted in the control film were diminished. The cross-sectional images (Supplemental Figure 1) show that more grain boundaries exist near the control perovskite/SnO2 interface, while the MS-perovskite film looks more uniform.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Perovskite thin film characterization

(A–F) Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of top-view morphology (A and B), UV–visible spectra (C), static photoluminescence spectra (D), time-resolved photoluminescence decay (E), and X-ray diffraction pattern (F) of the control and MS-perovskite films (# denotes the PbI2 phase, ∗ denotes the FAPbI3 perovskite phase, and Δ denotes the FTO substrate).

Detailed studies of the photophysical properties of the films indicate that MS incorporation improves the perovskite film quality without sacrificing light absorption. The absorption spectra (Figure 2C) and extracted band gap from the Tauc plot (Supplemental Figure 2) are almost identical for both films. This means that the MS additive did not compromise the light absorbing and absorption edge of the FAPbI3 perovskite thin film. Photoluminescence (PL) spectra did not show any obvious peak shift either (Figure 2D). However, the MS-perovskite sample demonstrates a stronger PL intensity and longer PL lifetime (τavg = 867.1 versus 659.6 ns for the control sample; Figure 2E), revealing a reduced defect concentration in the perovskite film after MS incorporation. These results indicate that the MS molecule contributed to an improved thin film quality of the FAPbI3 perovskite films.

Figure 2F shows the X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the control and MS-modified films on the FTO substrates. It should be noted that residual PbI2 is common in two-step-processed perovskite films.26,27 On the other hand, the XRD patterns show no detectable peak shift or new peak arising in the MS-modified film. Therefore, we speculate that the MS molecule should not be incorporated into the FAPbI3 lattice but is mainly located in the grain boundaries. The bilateral structure of the MS molecule enables it to bond from both sides. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) measurements were performed to elucidate the interaction mechanism between the MS molecule and the FAPbI3 perovskite. As illustrated in the 1H-NMR spectra (Figure 3A), for the two parts of the MS molecule, the MA+ cation tends to interact with the inorganic PbI2, as indicated by the shift of –CH3 groups at approximately 2.3 ppm after mixing PbI2 in the precursor solution. On the other hand, the succinate2− anion prefers to bond with the FA+ cation via N–H O hydrogen bonding, as indicated by the prominent shift of the resonance peak of the –NH2 groups in FA+. The shift of the COO group in the 13C-NMR spectra (Figure 3B) indicates the interaction between Pb2+ and succinate2− anions. In a word, the NMR results indicate that succinate2− can bond with both FA+ and Pb2+. To compare the strength of the interactions, we calculated the absorption energy of succinate anions on the two kinds of perovskite surfaces (FAI terminated and PbI2 terminated) by density functional theory. Negative absorption energy values are obtained in both situations, −4.86 eV in the FAI-terminated state and −4.16 eV in the PbI2-terminated situation, which indicates a stronger interaction between the succinate anion and FA+ cations. We speculated that MS interacts more with FA-related defects by forming hydrogen bonds with FA cations, suppressing the formation of FA vacancies.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Interaction between the MS molecule and FAPbI3 perovskite

(A)1H-NMR result reveals that MS interacts with Pb2+ ions (MA+ cations) and FA+ ions (succinate2− anions).

(B)13C-NMR result reveals that –COO groups interact with PbI2.

(C and D) Microstrains in control and MS-perovskite thin films.

To evaluate the effects of MS additives on the perovskite crystal structure, we first performed grazing incidence XRD characterizations to analyze the residual strain of the perovskite films.28,29 Both control and MS-perovskite were almost strain free, while MS-perovskite showed a slightly compressed manner (Supplemental Figure 3). We consider this reasonable because residual strain is affected by the thermal expansion mismatch between perovskite and substrates,30 while the perovskite composition, substrates, and annealing process were all the same in our case. We further analyzed the microstrain in the perovskite films through the Williamson-Hall equation:31

βTcosθ=ε(4sinθ)+KλD,

where βT is the full width at half maximum of the perovskite peaks in the XRD patterns, θ is the diffraction angle, K is the shape factor, λ is the wavelength of the X-ray source, and D is the crystallite size. The equation represents a linear relationship between βT cos θ and 4 sin θ, and the slope ε extracted here reveals the microstrain in the films. The MS additive effectively reduced the microstrain in the FAPbI3 thin films from 1.22 × 10−3 to 4.14 × 10−4 (Figures 3C and 3D). As indicated by NMR measurements, the succinate anions can bond with FA+ and Pb2+ atoms, which in turn can potentially suppress lattice defects and distortion at the grain boundaries, which will be beneficial to alleviate the microstrain in the perovskite films.20 To exclude the crystalline size effect on the peak broadening of XRD patterns, we estimated the averaged crystalline sizes through the Scherrer equation:22

D=Kλβcosθ.

The averaged crystalline sizes barely changed from 55.2 to 56.3 nm (Supplemental Table 5). Therefore, we concluded that the peak-broadening difference here mainly comes from the microstrain and that the crystal size effect contributes little. Previous reports have found that such microstrain in perovskite films is unfavorable for both PSC efficiency and stability.21,22 The reduced microstrain is in line with the reduced defect concentration revealed by PL characterization,22 which will be beneficial for the performance enhancement of PSCs. We also performed strain analysis for the flexible devices. The residual strain of the perovskite films on flexible substrates is higher than that of rigid substrates, which might be related to the different film growth process, arising from the roughness difference of flexible and rigid substrates.8 Compared with the pristine perovskite film, a slightly lower residual tensile strain is obtained in the MS-perovskite (Supplemental Figure 4), which is favorable for the FPSCs. As shown in Supplemental Figure 5, the XRD patterns show strong features of PEN substrates. Nevertheless, we can elucidate the microstrains by analyzing the perovskite peaks not overlapped with PEN with Williamson-Hall equation, showing a reduced microstrain for the MS-perovskite film (Supplemental Figure 6), which is favorable for the performances of the FPSCs.

The performances of the PSCs without and with MS incorporation were investigated by J-V characterization. Devices were fabricated based on the standard configuration using SnO2 and spiro-OMeTAD as electron- and hole-transporting layers, respectively. The J-V curves of the champion control and MS-PSCs are shown in Figure 4A. The control device demonstrated a PCE of 23.4%. The MS-PSC reached a higher efficiency of 25.4%, with a short-circuit current density (Jsc) of 26.31 mA/cm2, an open-circuit voltage (Voc) of 1.164 V, and fill factor of 82.82%. The unencapsulated MS-PSC showed a stable power output at 1.02 V bias with a PCE of ∼24.5% during the recorded 400 s in air (Figure 4B), reflecting the excellent short-term stability, while the control device dropped obviously from 22.5% to ∼20.5%. Moreover, the statistical distribution confirmed the overall improvement brought by MS incorporation, especially in the PCE (Figure 4C) and Voc (Supplemental Figure 7).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Photovoltaic characterization of the PSCs on glass substrates

(A)J-V curves and photovoltaic metrics of the champion control and MS-PSCs.

(B) Stable power output of the champion control and MS-PSCs at 0.98 and 1.02 V, respectively.

(C) PCE distribution of control and MS-PSCs.

(D) IPCE and the integrated Jsc curves of the control and MS-PSCs.

(E) EQEEL at different current densities and EL spectra of the control and MS-PSCs.

(F)Voc versus light intensity and linear fit for the control and MS-PSCs.

The incident photon-to-current conversion efficiency (IPCE) results shown in Figure 4D verified the measured Jsc. The IPCE spectra of the control and modified devices show only small differences. The integrated Jsc of the control and MS-PSCs are 25.15 and 25.54 mA/cm2, respectively, which matches well with the J-V analysis. Electroluminescence (EL) was conducted to reveal the nonradiative recombination in the PSCs (Figure 4E). The MS device not only shows a more pronounced electroluminescence intensity at 1.3 V but also demonstrates a higher external quantum efficiency (EQE) for all applied currents, indicating suppressed nonradiative recombination in the perovskite. The relationship between Voc and the light intensity is investigated to determine the ideality factor n, which is related to trap-assisted recombination. The lower n (1.27) of the MS device than that of the control device (1.68) indicates the reduced trap-assisted recombination of the MS device (Figure 4F). Moreover, transient photovoltage decay (Supplemental Figure 8A) and space-charge-limited current measurements (Supplemental Figure 9) further support the reduced trap densities and improved Voc and device performance.

The bilateral structure of the MS molecule, which is able to bind strongly with grain boundaries and relax microstrain, should be beneficial for the mechanical durability of perovskite films. This inspired us to fabricate MS-perovskite-based FPSC devices using PEN/ITO substrates (Figure 5A). Figure 5B demonstrates the J-V curves and photovoltaic metrics for the champion FPSC with and without MS incorporation. The champion MS-FPSC had a maximum PCE of 23.6% in the reserve scan, along with a Jsc of 24.72 mA cm−2, a Voc of 1.151 V, and a fill factor of 82.93%, exceeding the 21.6% PCE of champion control. This outstands as the highest PCE reported for FPSCs.6,7,9,32,33 The champion device showed little hysteresis, which reached 23.2% in the forward scan. The integrated Jsc deduced from the IPCE measurement also reached 23.44 mA cm−2 (Figure 5C), which is consistent with that acquired from J-V analysis. To further verify the measured efficiency, we sent one of our MS-FPSCs for certification, which displays a certified efficiency of 22.5% with a stabilized power output efficiency of ∼22.0% at 1.01 V bias (Supplemental Figure 13). The quasi-steady-state and stabilized efficiency both rank as the highest in all certified FPSCs.6,7 The overall improvement of the FPSC performance is outstanding (Figure 5D), in line with the results obtained on rigid PSCs. The application of the MS additive also demonstrated over 20% PCE for the large-area 1 cm2 device (Figure 5E), which could be higher with further optimization.4

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Photovoltaic characterization of the FPSCs

(A) Device structure and the cross-sectional SEM image of the MS-FPSC.

(B)J-V curves and photovoltaic metrics of the champion FPSCs.

(C) IPCE and the integrated Jsc of the champion MS-FPSC.

(D) Statistical distribution of the PCE of control and MS-FPSCs.

(E)J-V curve of the 1 cm2 aperture area MS-FPSC.

The stability of the PSCs was measured, and the MS-PSCs demonstrated improved resistance to humidity and operation conditions. We first tracked the shelf-life stability of the unencapsulated PSCs. After 1000 h of storage under ∼30% relative humidity, the control device lost ∼40% of the initial PCE, while the MS device showed a slower degradation of ∼15% (Figure 6A). The enhanced humidity resistance could be attributed to the hydrophobic alkyl chain located at the grain boundaries, which is the main channel for water infiltration. Unencapsulated devices were also aged under continuous light soaking in our homemade maximum power point tracking system at 25°C in a N2 atmosphere to further assess the long-term operational stability (Figure 6B). Despite experiencing a rapid burn in, the power output of the MS-PSC maintained >80% of the initial PCE for ∼500 h. However, the PCE of the control device dropped quickly to ∼60% of its initial value after 100 h, in good agreement with the short-term stability displayed in Figure 4B. It is well known that the degradation process in perovskite starts mainly from the grain boundaries.34 As revealed by the PL and NMR measurements, the MS additive not only reduced the defects in the bulk perovskite but also strengthened the perovskite lattice structure via hydrogen bonding at the grain boundaries, which contributed to the enhanced operational stability.35,36

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Tracked stability of the solar cell devices

(A) The stability of the unencapsulated control and MS-PSCs under ∼30% relative humidity.

(B) Long-term stability of the unencapsulated PSCs under continuous light irradiation in a N2 atmosphere.

(C) The bending stability of FPSCs (R = 6 mm, ∼30% relative humidity, ∼25°C).

(D–I) Top-view SEM images of the perovskite film from FPSCs after 10 000 bending cycles at 6 mm, with the Au electrode removed by tape and spiro-OMeTAD removed by chlorobenzene.

For mechanical stability, we performed a continuous bending test to evaluate the mechanical durability of FPSC devices and recorded their efficiency change during the test. The control FPSC gradually dropped to 60% of the initial PCE after 10 000 bending cycles (bending radius 6 mm), while the MS-FPSC retained ∼85% of its initial PCE (Figure 6C), indicating improved mechanical durability of the modified devices. The improved mechanical stability of the MS-FPSC could be attributed to the strengthened grain boundaries and relaxed microstrain, which inhibited perovskite fracture and defect formation.21,37 We further observed the morphology change of the perovskite film of the devices after the cyclic bending test. The metal electrode and the spiro-OMeTAD layer were removed to expose the perovskite layer. The crack in the control film is obvious and mainly develops inter granularly (Figures 6D and 6E). In contrast, the MS-perovskite film shows no cracks (Figures 6F and 6I). The well-maintained film morphology could also inhibit moisture infiltration in the ambient environment in our bending,32 which further confirmed the improved stability of the MS-FPSCs. In addition, we performed a bending test with a radius of 5 mm. Although both devices degraded faster than that of the 6 mm bending test, possibly due to ITO fracture, the MS-FPSC showed a T80 4 times longer than that of the control FPSC (Supplemental Figure 15).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, we demonstrated the incorporation of bilateral MS molecules into a perovskite thin film for high performance and stable PSCs. The additive molecule effectively reduces the microstrain in the FAPbI3 perovskite thin film, resulting in improved quality and reduced defect concentration of the thin film. High-efficiency PSCs were fabricated on both rigid substrates and flexible PEN substrates. Specifically, FPSCs with MS incorporation showed an impressively high efficiency of 23.6% (certified 22.5%), which ranks as the highest value in the reported literature to date. Furthermore, MS-FPSCs showed improved bending durability, retaining ∼85% of the initial efficiency after 10 000 bending cycles. The efficiency and mechanical stability of the FPSCs are closely related to the microstrain of the perovskite film. This work provides a new solution to reduce microstrain by using a multifunctional organic additive that does not incorporate into the perovskite lattice but strengthens the grain boundaries and heals the defects. A variety of new molecules with similar supermolecular interactions such as hydrogen bond, coordination, and halogen bond can be designed to alleviate microstrain, which will further improve the performances and stability of FPSCs, promoting the large-scale application of this power sources.

Methods

Please refer to the supplemental information for details on methods.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (no. 21872080) and projects supported by the State Key Laboratory of Power System and Generation Equipment (nos. SKLD21Z03 and SKLD20M03), the Chinese Thousand Talents Program for Young Professionals, and State Grid Corporation of China, National Bio Energy Co., Ltd. This work was also supported by grant no. 52789922000D, China Huaneng Group Co., Ltd., and grant no. HNKJ20-H88.

Author contributions

C.Y. conceived the idea and directed the project. M.L., J.Z., and L.T. performed the experiments. M.L. prepared the draft. All the authors participated in the discussion of the results and revision of the manuscript. The lead contact’s websites are as follows: https://www.x-mol.com/groups/Tsinghua-EEA-312lab?lang=en and https://www.eea.tsinghua.edu.cn/en/faculties/yicy.htm.

Declaration of interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Published Online: September 6, 2022

Footnotes

Supplemental information can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2022.100310.

Supplemental information

Document S1. Supplemental methods, Supplemental Figures 1–16, and Supplemental Tables 1–6
mmc1.pdf (893KB, pdf)
Document S2. Article plus supplemental information
mmc2.pdf (4.6MB, pdf)

References

  • 1.NREL best research-cell efficiency chart. https://www.nrel.gov/pv/assets/pdfs/best-research-cell-efficiencies-rev220126.pdf
  • 2.Zhang F., Park S.Y., Yao C., et al. Metastable Dion-Jacobson 2D structure enables efficient and stable perovskite solar cells. Science. 2022;375:71–76. doi: 10.1126/science.abj2637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Li X., Zhang W., Guo X., et al. Constructing heterojunctions by surface sulfidation for efficient inverted perovskite solar cells. Science. 2022;375:434–437. doi: 10.1126/science.abl5676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wang S., Tan L., Zhou J., et al. Over 24% efficient MA-free CsxFA1−xPbX3 perovskite solar cells. Joule. 2022;6:1344–1356. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hu Y., Niu T., Liu Y., et al. Flexible perovskite solar cells with high power-per-weight: progress, application, and perspectives. ACS Energy Lett. 2021;6:2917–2943. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zheng Z., Li F., Gong J., et al. Pre-buried additive for cross-layer modification in flexible perovskite solar cells with efficiency exceeding 22. Adv. Mater. 2022;34:2109879. doi: 10.1002/adma.202109879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yang L., Feng J., Liu Z., et al. Record-efficiency flexible perovskite solar cells enabled by multifunctional organic ions interface passivation. Adv. Mater. 2022;34:2201681. doi: 10.1002/adma.202201681. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Dai X., Deng Y., Van Brackle C.H., et al. Scalable fabrication of efficient perovskite solar modules on flexible glass substrates. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019;10:1903108. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chung J., Shin S.S., Hwang K., et al. Record-efficiency flexible perovskite solar cell and module enabled by a porous-planar structure as an electron transport layer. Energy Environ. Sci. 2020;13:4854–4861. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Othman M., Zheng F., Seeber A., et al. Millimeter-sized clusters of triple cation perovskite enables highly efficient and reproducible roll-to-roll fabricated inverted perovskite solar cells. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022;32:2110700. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Li H., Zuo C., Angmo D., et al. Fully roll-to-roll processed efficient perovskite solar cells via precise control on the morphology of PbI2:CsI layer. Nano-Micro Lett. 2022;14:79. doi: 10.1007/s40820-022-00815-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Jung H.S., Han G.S., Park N.-G., Ko M.J. Flexible perovskite solar cells. Joule. 2019;3:1850–1880. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Feng J., Zhu X., Yang Z., et al. Record efficiency stable flexible perovskite solar cell using effective additive assistant strategy. Adv. Mater. 2018;30:e1801418. doi: 10.1002/adma.201801418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hu X., Huang Z., Li F., et al. Nacre-inspired crystallization and elastic “brick-and-mortar” structure for a wearable perovskite solar module. Energy Environ. Sci. 2019;12:979–987. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yang L., Xiong Q., Li Y., et al. Artemisinin-passivated mixed-cation perovskite films for durable flexible perovskite solar cells with over 21% efficiency. J. Mater. Chem. 2021;9:1574–1582. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Liu D., Luo D., Iqbal A.N., et al. Strain analysis and engineering in halide perovskite photovoltaics. Nat. Mater. 2021;20:1337–1346. doi: 10.1038/s41563-021-01097-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Cheng Y., Ding L. Pushing commercialization of perovskite solar cells by improving their intrinsic stability. Energy Environ. Sci. 2021;14:3233–3255. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Rolston N., Bush K.A., Printz A.D., et al. Engineering stress in perovskite solar cells to improve stability. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018;8:1802139. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Zhao J., Deng Y., Wei H., et al. Strained hybrid perovskite thin films and their impact on the intrinsic stability of perovskite solar cells. Sci. Adv. 2017;3:eaao5616. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aao5616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wu J., Liu S.-C., Li Z., et al. Strain in perovskite solar cells: origins, impacts and regulation. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2021;8:nwab047. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwab047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Saidaminov M.I., Kim J., Jain A., et al. Suppression of atomic vacancies via incorporation of isovalent small ions to increase the stability of halide perovskite solar cells in ambient air. Nat. Energy. 2018;3:648–654. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Kim G., Min H., Lee K.S., et al. Impact of strain relaxation on performance of α-formamidinium lead iodide perovskite solar cells. Science. 2020;370:108–112. doi: 10.1126/science.abc4417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Oner S.M., Sezen E., Yordanli M.S., et al. Surface defect formation and passivation in formamidinium lead triiodide (FAPbI3) perovskite solar sell absorbers. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2022;13:324–330. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c03645. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Zhou J., Li M., Wang S., et al. 2-CF3-PEAI to eliminate Pb0 traps and form a 2D perovskite layer to enhance the performance and stability of perovskite solar cells. Nano Energy. 2022;95:107036. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Li M., Zhou J., Tan L., et al. Brominated PEAI as multi-functional passivator for high-efficiency perovskite solar cell. Energy Environ. Mater. 2022:eem2.12360. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Yang X., Fu Y., Su R., et al. Superior carrier lifetimes exceeding 6 μs in polycrystalline halide perovskites. Adv. Mater. 2020;32:2002585. doi: 10.1002/adma.202002585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Xue J., Wang R., Chen X., et al. Reconfiguring the band-edge states of photovoltaic perovskites by conjugated organic cations. Science. 2021;371:636–640. doi: 10.1126/science.abd4860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Zhu C., Niu X., Fu Y., et al. Strain engineering in perovskite solar cells and its impacts on carrier dynamics. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:815. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-08507-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Li F., Deng X., Qi F., et al. Regulating surface termination for efficient inverted perovskite solar cells with greater than 23% efficiency. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020;142:20134–20142. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c09845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Xue D.-J., Hou Y., Liu S.-C., et al. Regulating strain in perovskite thin films through charge-transport layers. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:1514. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15338-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Williamson G.K., Hall W.H. X-ray line broadening from filed aluminium and wolfram. Acta Metall. 1953;1:22–31. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Dong Q., Chen M., Liu Y., et al. Flexible perovskite solar cells with simultaneously improved efficiency, operational stability, and mechanical reliability. Joule. 2021;5:1587–1601. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wu S., Li Z., Zhang J., et al. Low-bandgap organic bulk-heterojunction enabled efficient and flexible perovskite solar cells. Adv. Mater. 2021;33:2105539. doi: 10.1002/adma.202105539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Jeong J., Kim M., Seo J., et al. Pseudo-halide anion engineering for α-FAPbI3 perovskite solar cells. Nature. 2021;592:381–385. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03406-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Li X., Dar M.I., Yi C., et al. Improved performance and stability of perovskite solar cells by crystal crosslinking with alkylphosphonic acid omega-ammonium chlorides. Nat. Chem. 2015;7:703–711. doi: 10.1038/nchem.2324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Bai S., Da P., Li C., et al. Planar perovskite solar cells with long-term stability using ionic liquid additives. Nature. 2019;571:245–250. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1357-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Huang Z., Hu X., Liu C., et al. Nucleation and crystallization control via polyurethane to enhance the bendability of perovskite solar cells with excellent device performance. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017;27:1703061. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Document S1. Supplemental methods, Supplemental Figures 1–16, and Supplemental Tables 1–6
mmc1.pdf (893KB, pdf)
Document S2. Article plus supplemental information
mmc2.pdf (4.6MB, pdf)

Articles from The Innovation are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES