Abstract
Background
The emergence of de novo or intrinsic trastuzumab resistance is exceedingly high in breast cancer that is HER2 positive and correlates with an abundant cancer stem cell (CSC)-like population. We sought to examine the capacity of β-escin, an anti-inflammatory drug, to address trastuzumab resistance in HER2-positive breast cancer cells.
Methods
The effect of β-escin on trastuzumab-resistant and -sensitive cell lines in vitro was evaluated for apoptosis, expression of HER2 family members, and impact on CSC-like properties. An in vivo model of trastuzumab-resistant JIMT-1 was used to examine the efficacy and toxicity of β-escin.
Results
β-escin induced mitochondrial-mediated apoptosis accompanied by reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and increased active p18Bax fragmentation, leading to caspase-3/-7 activation. Attenuation of CSC-related features by β-escin challenge was accompanied by marked reductions in CD44high/CD24low stem-like cells and aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 (ALDH1) activity as well as hindrance of mammosphere formation. β-escin administration also significantly retarded tumor growth and angiogenesis in a trastuzumab-resistant JIMT-1 xenograft model via downregulation of CSC-associated markers and intracellular domain HER2. Importantly, β-escin selectively inhibited malignant cells and was less toxic to normal mammary cells, and no toxic effects were found in liver and kidney function in animals.
Conclusions
Taken together, our findings highlight β-escin as a promising candidate for the treatment of trastuzumab-resistant HER2-positive breast cancers.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12935-022-02713-9.
Keywords: β-escin, Trastuzumab resistance, Drug repurposing, p95HER2, HER2-positive breast cancer, Cancer stem cells
Introduction
Despite significant advances in treatment strategies and precision medicine, breast cancer remains a multifaceted and serious disease that accounts for approximately 15% of cancer mortality in women worldwide [1]. The HER2 oncogene is upregulated in 20–30% of breast cancers and is associated with more aggressive biological behavior, shorter disease-free intervals and poorer outcomes. The HER2-targeting antibody trastuzumab has shown significant clinical benefits in improving overall survival rates in patients with early-stage or metastatic breast cancer that is HER2-positive [2–4]. However, in HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer patients, the emergence of de novo or intrinsic resistance to trastuzumab monotherapy is exceedingly high, ranging between 66 and 88% [5].
Trastuzumab resistance is a multifactorial phenomenon arising from the steric effects of p95HER2, heterodimerization of HER2 family members, activation of HER2 downstream signaling pathways, and the presence of cancer stem cells [6]. p95HER2 is a truncated form lacking the extracellular domain to which trastuzumab binds and elicits steric hindrance resulting in tyrosine kinase activity and survival signal transduction pathways. HER2 forms homo- or heterodimers with other HER family members including EGFR, HER3 and HER4, which initiate activation of the PI3K and MAPK pathways leading to cell survival, proliferation and avoidance of apoptosis [7–9]. In particular, HER2/HER3 dimers are highly mitogenic and significant mediators of survival signaling, and together they drive neoplastic cell transformation and mammary carcinoma growth [10, 11].
Cancer stem cells (CSCs) harbor the ability to self-renew and can differentiate into diverse lineages of cancer cells, a major cause of drug resistance, allowing cancer stem cells to survive and expand after chemotherapy [12, 13]. The capacity of CSCs to self-renew contributes to a survival advantage via the repair of DNA damage, while their differentiation properties promote tumorigenesis [13, 14]. The CD44high/CD24low phenotype combined with high activity of aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 (ALDH1) are common hallmarks of breast cancer stem cells (BCSCs) [15, 16]. Considerable upregulation of the detoxifying enzyme ALDH1 confers aggressive properties and drug resistance to tumor cells after chemotherapy [17, 18]. The cell surface glycoprotein CD44 complexes with hyaluronan to mask its cognate epitope from binding to HER2, thereby facilitating trastuzumab resistance [6, 19]. In this context, a potential clinical strategy to address trastuzumab resistance is to simultaneously target cancer stem cells and tyrosine kinase activation of HER family members including the inactivation of steric effects.
β-escin is the primary active compound in horse chestnut (Aesculus hippocastanum) [20] and has anti-inflammatory and anti-edematous properties with an exceptional safety profile in clinical studies [21]. β-escin is known to exhibit anti-cancer effects in various cancer cell types via suppression of NF-kB activity, ROS production, induction of the intrinsic apoptotic pathway and G2/M arrest [22–24]. However, the antitumor efficacy and molecular mechanisms of β-escin on the HER2 signaling pathway and CSC-stem-like properties in HER2-positive breast cancer have not been elucidated. Herein, for the first time, we report the potent efficacy of β-escin, a drug repurposing candidate with an exceptional safety profile in addressing trastuzumab-resistant HER2-positive breast cancer.
Materials and methods
Reagents and antibodies
β-escin, propidium iodide (PI), Triton X-100 and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) were manufactured by Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO). Primary antibodies were obtained for: Ki-67, CD31, ALDH1A1, CD44 and vimentin (Abcam, Cambridge, UK); HER2, HER3, phospho-HER2 (Y1221/1222), phospho-HER3 (Y1289), Akt, PARP, cleaved-caspase-3, Bcl-2, cleaved-PARP, cleaved-caspase-7 and Bax (Cell Signaling, Beverly, MA); cytochrome c and phospho-Akt (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, CA); anti-intracellular domain (ICD) HER2 clone 4B5 (Ventana Medical Systems, AZ); TOM 20 and GAPDH (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). Secondary antibodies were HRP-conjugated anti-mouse and rabbit and IgG (Bio-Rad Laboratories, CA) and Alexa Fluor-594 and -488 goat anti-rabbit IgG (Invitrogen).
Breast cancer cell lines
The human breast cancer cell lines SKBR3, BT474, MDA-MB-453 (ATCC; American Type Culture Collection), MDA-MD-231 (PerkinElmer, Inc. USA) and JIMT-1 (DSMZ GmbH, Germany) were cultured in DMEM, MEME or RPMI 1640 (Gibco, MD) containing 10% FBS and streptomycin-penicillin (100 U/mL). The human normal mammary epithelial MCF10A cell line (ATCC) was grown in MEGM supplemented with hEGF, hydrocortisone, insulin and bovine pituitary extract (SingleQuots™ Kit, Lonza, CA) with 100 U/mL streptomycin-penicillin. Cells were incubated at 37 °C in an atmosphere of 5% CO2. All human cell lines were validated by short tandem repeat profiling by Microgen Inc. (Seoul, South Korea).
Generation of stabilized HER2- and high p95HER2-expressing MDA-MB-231 cells
HER2 and p95HER2 were stably overexpressed independently in MDA-MB-231 cells using a lentiviral vector, as described previously [25, 26].
Cell viability assay
Cells were analyzed with a CellTiter 96® AQueous One Solution Cell Proliferation Assay according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Promega, Madison, WI). The concentration of formazan product was measured by at 490 nm using a microplate reader, 800TS (BioTek, VT) and analyzed using Gen5 software.
Sub-G1 assessment and Annexin V assay
Cells were recovered and fixed using 95% ethanol with 0.5% Tween-20 for 24 h and incubated in propidium iodide (PI, 50 mg/mL) and 50 mg/mL RNase (30 min). The early and late apoptosis was analyzed with a FITC Annexin V Apoptosis Detection Kit (BD Biosciences), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Stained cells were assessed using flow cytometry with a BD LSRFortessa™ X-20 Cell Analyzer (BD Biosciences).
CD44/CD24 staining and Aldefluor-positivity assay
ALDH1 activity was analyzed with an Aldefluor assay kit (Stem Cell Technologies, Canada) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. For 45 min (37 ℃), cells were incubated in Aldefluor assay buffer containing ALDH protein substrate BODIPY-aminoacetaldehyde (BAAA, 1 µM/0.5 × 106 cells). The ALDH1-specific inhibitor diethylamino-benzaldehyde (DEAB; 50 mM) was defined as the baseline of Aldefluor fluorescence with flow cytometry using a BD Cell Analyzer. For CD44/CD24 analysis, cells (1 × 106) were immunostained with FITC-conjugated anti-CD24 or PE-conjugated anti-mouse IgG and PE-conjugated anti-CD44 antibodies (BD Biosciences) at 4 °C (30 min) and analyzed by flow cytometry.
Western blot
Cells were lysed in cold lysis buffer [0.5% Triton X-100, 30 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris–HCl (pH 7.4)] containing protease and phosphatase inhibitor cocktail tablets. Cell supernatant was recovered after centrifugation (14,000g at 4 °C for 20 min) and protein concentrations were quantified with a Quick Start™ Bradford Protein Assay (Bio-Rad). Equal amounts of protein (25 μg) were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred to PVDF membranes (Millipore, Burlington, MA). After blocking with 5% skim milk for 30 min, membranes were incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies diluted with 5% BSA [HER2 (1:2000), phospho-HER2 (1:1000), HER3 (1:2000), phospho-HER3 (1:2000), Akt (1:2000), phospho-Akt (1:2000), Bcl-2 (1:2000), Bax (1:2000), cleaved-PARP (1:2000), PARP (1:2000), cleaved-caspase-7 (1:2000) cleaved-caspase-3 (1:2000), or GAPDH (1:3000)], followed by incubation with HRP-conjugated mouse or rabbit secondary antibodies (1:3000–1:10,000). Protein signal intensity was measured with an ECL Western Blotting Substrate (Thermo Fisher) on X-ray film (Agfa Healthcare, Belgium) and quantitated with AlphaEaseFC software (Alpha Innotech, CA).
Reactive oxygen species generation
Cells were treated with β-escin (20 or 30 μM) for 3 and 6 h. The cells were then stained with 20 μM 2′, 7′-Dichlorodihydrofluorescin diacetate (DCFH-DA; Cell Biolabs, San Diego, CA) for 30 min at 37 °C. Fluorescence 2′, 7′- Dichlorodihydrofluorescein (DCF) oxidized by intracellular ROS was measured at 480 nm excitation and 530 nm emission using a BD LSRFortessa™ X-20 Cell Analyzer using FlowJo software.
Immunocytochemistry
Cells were fixed in 8-well chamber slides (BD Biosciences) with 4% paraformaldehyde, washed with PBS, and incubated with 0.2% Triton X-100 (10 min). The cells were then incubated with primary antibodies [HER2 (1:100), cytochrome c (1:100) and TOM 20 (1:100)] in antibody diluent (Dako, Santa Clara, CA) overnight at 4 ℃, before the addition of an Alexa Fluor®-594 conjugated secondary antibody. The cells were mounted using Antifade Mount plus DAPI (Invitrogen) and images were acquired with a confocal microscope (Carl Zeiss, Germany).
In vitro mammosphere formation assay
JIMT-1 (1.5 × 104/mL) and BT474 (5 × 104/mL) cells were plated using ultralow attachment dishes and grown in HuMEC basal serum free medium (Gibco) with B27 (1:50, Invitrogen), 20 ng/mL human epidermal growth factor (EGF, Sigma-Aldrich), 20 ng/mL basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF, Sigma-Aldrich), 1% antibiotic–antimycotic, 4 μg/mL heparin, and 15 μg/mL gentamycin at 37 °C (5% CO2). The number and volumes of the mammospheres was assessed with a CKX53 inverted microscope (Olympus Life Science). Mammosphere volumes were calculated by the formula volume = 4/3*3.14(π)*r3 (r: radius).
Xenograft experiments
All animal procedures were conducted according to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, with the approval of Korea University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC, KOREA-2021–0070). Female BALB/c nude mice (5 weeks old) were purchased from NARA Biotech (Seoul, Korea) and kept in a specific pathogen-free environment. JIMT-1 cells (4 × 106) were inserted into the fourth mammary fat pads of the BALB/c nude female mice after one-week acclimation (n = 8/each group). When average tumor volumes reached 100 mm3, test animals were randomized into 2 groups (n = 8/each group), with solvent control (DMSO/PBS, 1:9) or β-escin (4 mg/kg, 5 times per week) and administered intraperitoneally for 28 days. Tumor volumes and body weight were measured twice per week after the first treatment, and tumor volumes were calculated with the formula V = (Length × Width2)/2.
Serum biochemistry for liver and renal injury biomarkers
After sacrifice, blood samples were collected from each animal, and serum activities of alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels were assessed with an assay kit following the manufacturer’s protocol (Sigma-Aldrich). All assays were measured with a Spectra Max 190 (Molecular devices, CA) and analyzed using SoftMax Pro 7 software.
Immunohistochemistry with apoptosis in-situ localization (TUNEL)
After removal, tumors were fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin before paraffin embedding. Tissue Sects. (5 µm) were then placed on positively-charged glass slides before deparaffinization with xylene and dehydrated via a graded alcohol series to water. Sections were boiled in citric acid buffer for antigen retrieval (pH 6.0). The tissue sections with primary antibodies [Ki-67 (1:100), HER2 (1:100), CD31 (1:100), 4B5 (1:100), CD44 (1:100), ALDH1A1 (1:100) and vimentin (1:300)] in antibody diluent were incubated overnight (4 °C) before reaction with Alexa Fluor-conjugated secondary antibodies (Alexa Fluor® 488- or 594, RT; 2 h) followed by Antifade Mount plus DAPI. TUNEL assay was performed with tissue sections using an In Situ Cell Death Detection TUNEL kit (Roche, Switzerland) in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol.
Wound healing assessment
To analyze kinetic migration, JIMT-1 cells were grown to ~ 90% confluency in 96-well plates (Essen ImageLock, MI). Physical wounds were created using a 96-pin Wound Maker device before washing in media to prevent reattachment of removed cells. Cells were treated with β-escin after wound creation. The wound fields were monitored, and an image captured each hour up to 24 h using an IncuCyte™ ZOOM® live-cell Imaging System (Essen BioScience). Wound confluency was assessed by the IncuCyte™ Scratch Wound Analysis Software Module.
Statistical analysis
Data was analysed with GraphPad Prism 9.0 (San Diego, CA). Results are shown as mean ± SEM after at least three independent experiments. Data was assessed by student’s t-test, and ANOVA (one- or two-way) as appropriate. Significance between multiple groups was determined with the Bonferroni’s post-hoc test, defined at p < 0.05.
Results
β-escin reduces cell viability and increases apoptosis in HER2-positive breast cancer cells
Escin is a pentacyclic triterpene saponins and exists as α and β isomers. β-escin is the primary active compound that consists of a hydrophobic aglyconic part (pentacyclic triterpene) harboring corticosteroid-like activity and a hydrophilic glyconic part with glucuronic acid and glucose (Fig. 1A). We first sought to investigate the effect of β-escin on cell viability and apoptosis in HER2-positive breast cancer cells, trastuzumab-sensitive BT474 and SKBR3 cells, and trastuzumab-resistant JIMT-1 and MDA-MB-453 cells. The cells were treated with β-escin or DMSO (control vehicle) at varying concentrations for 48 h. β-escin (1-100 μM, 48 h) significantly reduced cell viability in a dose-dependent manner in both trastuzumab-sensitive and -resistant cells (****p<0.0001, Fig. 1D and E). From concentrations of 40 μM, cells exhibited severe toxicity, thus we chose an optimal concentration range of between 10 and 30 μM for further experiments investigating apoptosis, immunoblot analysis, and cancer stem-like properties. The cells treated with β-escin (10-30 µM, 48 h) showed typical morphological features of cytotoxicity with cytosolic shrinkage (Fig. 1B and C). Flow cytometry analyses revealed that β-escin induced a marked accumulation in the sub-G1 population and a significant increase in the number of early and late apoptotic cells in trastuzumab-sensitive BT474 (**p<0.01 and ****p<0.0001, Fig. 1F and H, respectively) and -resistant JIMT-1 cells (**p<0.01 and ****p<0.0001, Fig. 1G and I, respectively). The cell population of the sub-G1 phase in human normal mammary epithelial MCF10A cells had no statistically significant alterations at concentrations up to 30 μM (NS, Fig. 1J). Our data implies that β-escin selectively causes apoptotic cell death in tumor cells and was not toxic in normal cells.
β-escin-induced apoptosis is concomitant with caspase-3/-7 activation and mitochondrial events
It is known that β-escin induces apoptosis via mitochondrial dysfunction such as loss of membrane potential and the induction of oxidative stress [27]. To investigate whether β-escin induces the intrinsic apoptosis pathway in HER2-positive breast cancer cells, we examined mitochondrial events, including activation of effector caspases, expression of pro- and anti-apoptotic mitochondrial proteins, ROS production and cytochrome c release. Exposure to β-escin (10-30 μM, 48 h) resulted in the activation of caspase-3 and caspase-7 leading to subsequent cleavage of PARP in BT474 (*p<0.05, Fig. 2A) and JIMT-1 cells (*p<0.05, Fig. 2B). β-escin-induced apoptosis was accompanied by increased ROS production at an early stage (3-6 h) (Fig. 2E). Deregulation of mitochondrial proteins was observed in the presence of β-escin, as evidenced by Bcl-2 downregulation and increased cleaved Bax fragments at 18 kDa, representing the active form (**p<0.01, Fig. 2C and D). To determine whether these mitochondrial alterations induced cytochrome c release, we further performed double-immunocytochemistry for cytochrome c and the translocase of outer membrane 20 (TOM 20) as a mitochondrial marker. The green signal intensity profile represents the subcellular localization of cytochrome c with remarkable release from the mitochondria into the cytoplasm in the presence of β-escin (30 μM, 24 h, Fig. 2F). Furthermore, quantification of the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) suggests that cytosolic cytochrome c was significantly increased after β-escin challenge (right panel, ****p<0.0001). Our findings suggest that the β-escin-induced intrinsic apoptosis pathway is initiated by excessive ROS generation at an early stage as well as the induction of disproportionate Bcl-2 and Bax levels, thus resulting in the release of cytochrome c and effector caspase-3/-7 activation.
β-escin downregulates HER2/HER3/Akt and truncated p95HER2
We next evaluated whether β-escin affects expression of HER2 family members in HER2-positive breast cancer cells. Treatment with β-escin (10-30 μM, 48 h) significantly decreased total and phosphorylated HER2 (Y1221/1222) and HER3 (Y1289) with subsequent downregulation of Akt and phospho-Akt in both trastuzumab-sensitive BT474 (*p<0.05, Fig. 3A and C) and -resistant JIMT-1 cells (**p<0.01, Fig. 3B and D). β-escin treatment also caused downregulation of truncated p95HER2 and phospho-p95HER2 (Fig. 3A and B) which elicits the tyrosine kinase activity thought to be responsible for trastuzumab resistance. Immunocytochemical analysis further supported the notion that β-escin (30 μM, 24 h) induces a remarkable reduction in HER2 expression in both trastuzumab-sensitive BT474 (Fig. 3E and Additional file 1: Fig. S1A) and -resistant JIMT-1 cells (Fig. 3F and Additional file 1: Fig. S1B).
To confirm that β-escin downregulates HER2 and p95HER2, full-length HER2- and p95HER2-overexpressing MDA-MB-231 cells (Fig. 3G) were treated with β-escin (30 μM, 24 h). Intensity profiling revealed that HER2 or ICD-HER2 was highly expressed in the plasma membrane with green fluorescent signal in the MDA-MB-231-HER2 and MDA-MB-231-p95HER2 cells, respectively, while their expression was markedly diminished in the presence of β-escin (Fig. 3H, I and Additional file 1: Fig. S1C, D).
β-escin hampers BCSC-like properties and migratory ability
Cumulative evidence suggests that the occurrence of cancer stem cells in HER2-positive breast cancers is linked with tumor aggression and trastuzumab resistance [28, 29]. To explore the influence of β-escin on cancer stem-like properties in HER2-positive breast cancer cells, ALDH1 activity and the CD44high/CD24low phenotype were analyzed, as well as in vitro mammosphere-forming ability. A CSC biomarker, ALDH1 is also a putative marker of resistance to chemotherapeutic drugs and promotes tumor stemness and cancer progression [15, 30]. Aldefluor-positivity assessment revealed that ALDH1 activity was dose-dependently reduced after exposure to β-escin (10-30 μM, 48 h) in both BT474 (***p<0.001, Fig. 4A) and JIMT-1 (**p<0.01, Fig. 4B). Mammospheres harbor plentiful mammary stem-like cells and the sphere formation assay is an efficient tool for evaluating the effect of CSC targeting drugs [31]. We have previously reported that stemness-related proteins including ALDH1, Nanog, Oct4, and Sox2 were higher in mammospheres compared to their adherent counterparts [32]. Formation of mammospheres derived from BT474 and JIMT-1 cells was markedly attenuated in response to β-escin treatment (10-20 μM), as evidenced by a significant decrease in the number and volume of mammosphere formed under anchorage-independent serum-free culture conditions (***p<0.001, Fig. 4C and D).
The mesenchymal-like CD44high/CD24low population is an aggressive phenotype, that is highly tumorigenic and more resistant to drugs [28]. The CD44high/CD24low phenotypes account for approximately 0.5% of trastuzumab-sensitive BT474 cells, whereas they account for more than 50% in trastuzumab-resistant JIMT-1 cells [32, 33]. In the present study, the CD44high/CD24low subpopulations of JIMT-1 cells were as high as 63.4%, and these cell populations were significantly reduced by β-escin challenge (***p<0.001, Fig. 4E). CD44 is a key regulator in the rearrangement of membrane-associated cytoskeletal components, and participates in cell adhesion, integrate, motility and invasiveness [34, 35]. We next explored whether β-escin affects the migratory ability of trastuzumab-resistant HER2-positive breast cancer cells. A kinetic analysis of cell migration was performed in JIMT-1 cells following β-escin treatment (0-40 µM, 24 h). β-escin significantly reduced the migration of JIMT-1 cells in a dose-dependent manner (****p<0.0001, Fig. 4F–H), suggesting that it could contribute to preventing cell dissemination of trastuzumab-resistant cells with high CD44 expression.
β-escin retards tumor growth in trastuzumab-resistant JIMT-1 xenografts
JIMT-1 cells (4 x 106) were injected into the fourth mammary gland fat pads of 6-week-old female BALB/c nude mice, and β-escin (4 mg/kg·BW) or vehicle control (DMSO/PBS, 1:9) was administered 5 times per week for 4 weeks after the tumor volume reached approximately 100 mm3 in size. β-escin administration caused significant inhibition of tumor growth (**p<0.01, Fig. 5A, n=8, each group), tumor weight (***p<0.001, Fig. 5B) and tumor burden (Fig. 5C). There was no significant difference in body weight between the β-escin-treated and control groups (NS, Fig. 5D). Representative histological images for H&E staining revealed that the tumor tissue of the β-escin-treated group exhibited greater cell shrinkage and nuclear condensation (black arrow) compared with their control counterparts, while there were no histologically significant alterations in the kidney, liver and lung (Fig. 5E). We further employed blood biochemical assays for ALT, AST and BUN to evaluate the potential organ toxic effects of β-escin. There were no statistically significant changes in ALT, AST, or BUN levels in serum (NS, Fig. 5F–H), suggesting that β-escin had no observable effects on hepatic and renal functions.
The inhibitory effects of β-escin on tumor growth were accompanied by a decrease in Ki-67 index (***p<0.001, Fig. 5I and Additional file 1: Fig. S2A) and a significant increase in apoptosis as determined by TUNEL-positivity representing DNA fragments (****p<0.0001, Fig. 5J and Additional file 1: Fig. S2B). To further assess the effect of β-escin on angiogenesis, we performed a microvessel density assay with a specific endothelial adhesion molecule CD31. The number of CD31-positive microvessels in both intra-tumoral and peri-tumoral areas was markedly reduced in the β-escin-treated groups compared with their control counterparts (****p<0.0001, Fig. 5K and Additional file 1: Fig. S2C).
β-escin downregulates HER2, ICD-HER2, and BCSC-related markers in JIMT-1-derived xenograft tumors
Our previous in vitro findings revealed that β-escin dramatically downregulates HER2 and p95HER2 levels in both trastuzumab-sensitive and -resistant HER2-positive breast cancer cells. To confirm these important observations, immunostaining analyses for full-length HER2 and intracellular domain (ICD)-HER2 were assessed in trastuzumab-resistant xenograft tumors. Expression levels of ICD-HER2 were measured using the FDA-approved antibody 4B5, which targets a specific epitope of the ICD of HER2. β-escin-treated tumors exhibited significant downregulation of HER2 (****p<0.0001, Fig. 6A and Additional file 1: Fig. S3A) and ICD-HER2 (****p<0.0001, Fig. 6B and Additional file 1: Fig. S3B) expression when compared with their control counterparts. Consistent with earlier in vitro observations of the eradication of BCSC-like traits, β-escin administration also elicited a considerable reduction in the expression of ALDH1 (****p<0.0001, Fig. 6C and Additional file 1: Fig. S3C) and CD44 (****p<0.0001, Fig. 6D and Additional file 1: Fig. S3D) in vivo.
The cytoskeletal protein vimentin is considered a major epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) factor responsible for cell migration and integrity and contributes to an aggressive phenotype in breast cancer [36, 37]. Although the JIMT-1 cell line displays an epithelial-like phenotype lacking vimentin expression, we found that JIMT-1 xenograft tumors harbor vimentin-positive cells. It is conceivable that these cells gained an EMT-like phenotype during tumor development. Of particular note, vimentin was predominantly localized to the peritumoral region, comprised of cells with the highest infiltrating ability in trastuzumab-resistant JIMT-1 xenograft tumors. Immunofluorescence analysis revealed that β-escin administration caused a significant downregulation in the expression of vimentin in the peritumoral area (****p<0.0001, Fig. 6E and Additional file 1: Fig. S3E).
Discussion
Drug repositioning is an effective strategy to apply existing drugs towards the treatment of alternate diseases. Development can benefit from existing data on the safety profile, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Hence, the strategy can reduce the risk of process failure, shorten timelines and simplify experimental requirements and costs compared to de novo drugs [38]. Nevertheless, drug repurposing in cancer is an intensive endeavor due to the heterogeneous nature of cancer and the complexities of intracellular pathways. Herein, for the first time, we investigated β-escin, a drug repurposing candidate to overcome trastuzumab resistance in HER2-positive breast cancer via impairment of cancer stem-like properties and mitochondrial dysfunction. Importantly, while β-escin selectively inhibited tumor cell proliferation, it was significantly less toxic towards normal cells. Furthermore, undesirable toxic outcomes were not found in blood biochemical analysis in β-escin-treated mice, indicating that it does not affect liver or kidney health.
β-escin induced mitochondria-dependent apoptosis was accompanied by the initiation of oxidative stress and increased levels of active p18Bax, leading to the release of cytochrome c from the mitochondrial intermembrane space and consequent activation of effector caspases-3/-7. Interestingly, we found that β-escin generated a potent pro-apoptotic 18-kDa fragment. It is well known that p18Bax, a proteolytic fragment form of p21Bax arising from calpain activation, elicits more potent cytotoxicity than p21Bax [39, 40]. During apoptosis, p18Bax oligomerization is localized to the inner mitochondrial membrane, increasing its intrinsic cytotoxic properties via mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization, release of cytochrome c and DNA fragmentation [39]. It therefore seems plausible that the increase in p18Bax by β-escin could contribute to enhanced mitochondrial dysfunction.
CSCs are capable of new tumor initiation and differentiation and are associated with a higher risk of tumor recurrence and distant metastases [41, 42]. Despite CSCs only comprising approximately 0.01-2% of the total cancer cells within a heterogeneous tumor mass, conventional anticancer treatments are rarely able to eradicate them [43]. Treatment with β-escin not only significantly eliminated the rapid proliferating tumor cells but also effectively eradicated BCSC-like populations. The latter phenomenon may be associated with the increased ROS production observed. Mitochondrial ROS are important mediators of apoptosis and augmented levels of ROS increases susceptibility to cytotoxicity [44, 45]. In particular, low ROS concentrations in CSCs appear to be important for self-renewal and maintenance, as well as for protecting their genome from oxidative damage [46, 47]. ALDH1 has antioxidant properties and contributes to CSC homeostasis, survival and protection by eliminating increased ROS after chemotherapy or radiation therapy [48, 49]. We observed that ALDH1 activity was significantly reduced in HER2-positive breast cancer cells after β-escin challenge. Therefore, it is possible that impairment of tumor stemness and ALDH1 activity by treatment with β-escin could be related to the increased ROS accumulation, and ROS-mediated anticancer strategies may lead to the clearance of CSCs.
Clinical and preclinical studies have shown that the HER2/HER3/Akt pathway is highly implicated in trastuzumab resistance, where heterodimerization of HER family members and existence of p95HER2 is associated with breast cancer treatment [6, 50]. We observed that β-escin targets HER2 and HER3, as well as the steric effects of p95HER2 and subsequently downregulates Akt in both trastuzumab-sensitive and -resistant HER2-positive breast cancer cells. High p95HER2 expression was associated with a worsening of progression-free survival (PFS) in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer [51]. β-escin appears to downregulate p95HER2 in both trastuzumab-sensitive and -resistant cells in vitro as well as JIMT-1 trastuzumab-resistant xenograft tumors in vivo. Furthermore, we confirmed that β-escin caused a significant reduction in p95HER2-overexpressing MDA-MB-231 cells, highlighting its potential application against trastuzumab-resistant cancers. Treatment for patients expressing p95HER2 refractory to trastuzumab with the small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor lapatinib has been proposed as an alternative strategy to inhibit the HER2 signaling pathway [52]. Preclinical studies have shown that p95HER2-overexpressing MCF7 cells are sensitive to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor lapatinib, and lapatinib treatment resulted in suppression of cell proliferation via downregulation of p95HER2 phosphorylation and inactivation of Akt and MAPK. In the present study, both lapatinib- and trastuzumab-resistant cell lines JIMT-1 and MDA-MB-453 were used and our observations revealed that the cells were sensitive to β-escin, implying that it could be effective in overcoming cancers refractory to trastuzumab as well as lapatinib.
The inhibitory effect of β-escin on tumor growth was associated with impairment of tumoral angiogenesis in vivo, as evidenced by a significant decline in the number of CD31-positive microvessels in the intra- and peri-tumoral areas. Angiogenesis leads to the formation of new blood vessels and plays a pivotal role in the early stage of tumor progression [53]. Recent studies have reported that β-escin is an effective inhibitor of angiogenesis accompanied by the suppression of proliferation and migration in HUVEC cells in vitro as well as reducing capillary tube formation in vivo [54]. With its anti-angiogenic properties, β-escin may have substantial advantages in preventing cancer progression.
Conclusions
β-escin effectively targets tumor heterogeneity in HER2-positive breast cancer by deregulating mitochondrial function and attenuating tumor stemness-related factors. β-escin effectively suppresses tumor growth and angiogenesis, with no evidence of toxicity found in terms of liver and kidney function. Due to inactivation of the HER2/HER3/Akt pathway and anti-CSC properties, further investigation of β-escin is warranted to understand its role in addressing trastuzumab resistance in HER2-positive breast cancers (Fig. 7).
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
Not applicable.
Abbreviations
- ALDH1
Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1
- ALT
Alanine aminotransferase
- AST
Aspartate aminotransferase
- BCSC
Breast cancer stem cell
- bFGF
Basic fibroblast growth factor
- BUN
Blood urea nitrogen
- CD31
Cluster of differentiation 31
- CD44
Cluster of differentiation 44
- CSC
Cancer stem cell
- CTL
Control
- DAPI
4′,6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole
- DCF
2′, 7′- Dichlorodihydrofluorescein
- DCFH-DA
2′, 7′-Dichlorodihydrofluorescin diacetate
- DEAB
Diethylamino-benzaldehyde
- DMSO
Dimethyl sulfoxide
- EGFR
Epidermal growth factor receptor
- GAPDH
Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase
- hEGF
Human epidermal growth factor
- HER2
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2
- ICD
Intracellular domain
- H&E
Hematoxylin and eosin
- HRP
Horseradish peroxidase
- MAPK
A mitogen-activated protein kinase
- MTS
3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium
- NANOG
Nanog homeobox
- OCT4
Octamer-binding transcription factor 4
- PARP
Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase
- PI
Propidium iodide
- ROS
Reactive oxygen species
- SOX2
SRY-Box transcription factor 2
- TNBC
Triple-negative breast cancer
- TOM 20
Translocase of outer membrane 20
Author contributions
SP contributed to the conception, the acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data, and drafted the manuscript. JMP contributed to the animal experiment and confocal analysis. MP contributed to the animal experiment. DK contributed to the animal experiment and flowcytometry data acquisition. SK contributed to the animal experiment. JS contributed to the animal experiment. KDN contributed to data analysis. EJ contributed to data analysis. LF contributed to interpretation of the data and revised the manuscript. YJK contributed to the conception, experimental design, analysis, funding acquisition, and drafted the manuscript. JYK contributed to the conception, experimental design, analysis, funding acquisition, and revised the manuscript. JHS contributed to the conception and funding acquisition.
Funding
This research was supported under a grant from Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea [grant number: HA17C0053, HR20C0021], the National Research Foundation (NRF) supported by the Korean government (MSIT) [grant number: 2019M3E5D1A01068998, 2021R1A2C2009723, 2021R1I1A1A01045588, 2018R1A2B6005347], and was supported by the Brain Korea (BK) 21 Plus Program.
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
Declarations
Ethical approval and consent to participate
The animal experiments received approval from the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC), Korea University, Republic of Korea (ID: KOREA-2021-0070). The study was conducted following the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Soeun Park, Email: tgc02202@naver.com.
Jung Min Park, Email: parkju34@korea.ac.kr.
Minsu Park, Email: freenon72@gmail.com.
Dongmi Ko, Email: kdong00121@naver.com.
Seongjae Kim, Email: kseong0531@naver.com.
Juyeon Seo, Email: tjaldus5@naver.com.
Kee Dal Nam, Email: kdnam222@naver.com.
Eunsun Jung, Email: silverline1209@gmail.com.
Lee Farrand, Email: lee.farrand@adelaide.edu.au.
Yoon-Jae Kim, Email: natureyj@nate.com.
Ji Young Kim, Email: amaryllis1210@gmail.com.
Jae Hong Seo, Email: cancer@korea.ac.kr.
References
- 1.Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, Parkin DM, Pineros M, Znaor A, Bray F. Cancer statistics for the year 2020: an overview. Int J Cancer. 2021 doi: 10.1002/ijc.33588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lv S, Wang Y, Sun T, Wan D, Sheng L, Li W, Zhu H, Li Y, Lu J. Overall survival benefit from trastuzumab-based treatment in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: a retrospective analysis. Oncol Res Treat. 2018;41:450–455. doi: 10.1159/000488202. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Spector NL, Blackwell KL. Understanding the mechanisms behind trastuzumab therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:5838–5847. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.1507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Slamon DJ, Leyland-Jones B, Shak S, Fuchs H, Paton V, Bajamonde A, Fleming T, Eiermann W, Wolter J, Pegram M, Baselga J, Norton L. Use of chemotherapy plus a monoclonal antibody against HER2 for metastatic breast cancer that overexpresses HER2. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:783–792. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200103153441101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Nahta R, Esteva FJ. HER2 therapy: molecular mechanisms of trastuzumab resistance. Breast Cancer Res. 2006;8:215. doi: 10.1186/bcr1612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Pohlmann PR, Mayer IA, Mernaugh R. Resistance to trastuzumab in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:7479–7491. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-0636. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Arteaga CL, Sliwkowski MX, Osborne CK, Perez EA, Puglisi F, Gianni L. Treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer: current status and future perspectives. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2011;9:16–32. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2011.177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Yarden Y. Biology of HER2 and its importance in breast cancer. Oncology. 2001;61(Suppl 2):1–13. doi: 10.1159/000055396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Schlam I, Swain SM. HER2-positive breast cancer and tyrosine kinase inhibitors: the time is now. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2021;7:56. doi: 10.1038/s41523-021-00265-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Dey N, Williams C, Leyland-Jones B, De P. A critical role for HER3 in HER2-amplified and non-amplified breast cancers: function of a kinase-dead RTK. Am J Transl Res. 2015;7:733–750. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Alimandi M, Romano A, Curia MC, Muraro R, Fedi P, Aaronson SA, Di Fiore PP, Kraus MH. Cooperative signaling of ErbB3 and ErbB2 in neoplastic transformation and human mammary carcinomas. Oncogene. 1995;10:1813–1821. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Clarke MF, Fuller M. Stem cells and cancer: two faces of eve. Cell. 2006;124:1111–1115. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Carrasco E, Alvarez PJ, Prados J, Melguizo C, Rama AR, Aranega A, Rodriguez-Serrano F. Cancer stem cells and their implication in breast cancer. Eur J Clin Invest. 2014;44:678–687. doi: 10.1111/eci.12276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Liu S, Wicha MS. Targeting breast cancer stem cells. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:4006–4012. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.27.5388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ginestier C, Hur MH, Charafe-Jauffret E, Monville F, Dutcher J, Brown M, Jacquemier J, Viens P, Kleer CG, Liu S, Schott A, Hayes D, Birnbaum D, Wicha MS, Dontu G. ALDH1 is a marker of normal and malignant human mammary stem cells and a predictor of poor clinical outcome. Cell Stem Cell. 2007;1:555–567. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2007.08.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Sheridan C, Kishimoto H, Fuchs RK, Mehrotra S, Bhat-Nakshatri P, Turner CH, Goulet R, Jr, Badve S, Nakshatri H. CD44+/CD24− breast cancer cells exhibit enhanced invasive properties: an early step necessary for metastasis. Breast Cancer Res. 2006;8:R59. doi: 10.1186/bcr1610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zhong Y, Shen S, Zhou Y, Mao F, Guan J, Lin Y, Xu Y, Sun Q. ALDH1 is a better clinical indicator for relapse of invasive ductal breast cancer than the CD44+/CD24− phenotype. Med Oncol. 2014;31:864. doi: 10.1007/s12032-014-0864-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Januchowski R, Wojtowicz K, Zabel M. The role of aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH) in cancer drug resistance. Biomed Pharmacother. 2013;67:669–680. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2013.04.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zheng Q, Zhang M, Zhou F, Zhang L, Meng X. The breast cancer stem cells traits and drug resistance. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:599965. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.599965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Aesculus hippocastanum (Horse chestnut). Monograph. Altern. Med Rev. 2009; 14: 278–283 [PubMed]
- 21.Gallelli L. Escin: a review of its anti-edematous, anti-inflammatory, and venotonic properties. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2019;13:3425–3437. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S207720. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Cheong DHJ, Arfuso F, Sethi G, Wang L, Hui KM, Kumar AP, Tran T. Molecular targets and anti-cancer potential of escin. Cancer Lett. 2018;422:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.02.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Akar S, Donmez-Altuntas H, Hamurcu Z. beta-Escin reduces cancer progression in aggressive MDA-MB-231 cells by inhibiting glutamine metabolism through downregulation of c-myc oncogene. Mol Biol Rep. 2022 doi: 10.1007/s11033-022-07536-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Paneerselvam C, Ganapasam S. beta-Escin alleviates cobalt chloride-induced hypoxia-mediated apoptotic resistance and invasion via ROS-dependent HIF-1alpha/TGF-beta/MMPs in A549 cells. Toxicol Res (Camb) 2020;9:191–201. doi: 10.1093/toxres/tfaa019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Park JM, Kim YJ, Park S, Park M, Farrand L, Nguyen CT, Ann J, Nam G, Park HJ, Lee J, Kim JY, Seo JH. A novel HSP90 inhibitor targeting the C-terminal domain attenuates trastuzumab resistance in HER2-positive breast cancer. Mol Cancer. 2020;19:161. doi: 10.1186/s12943-020-01283-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Pedersen K, Angelini PD, Laos S, Bach-Faig A, Cunningham MP, Ferrer-Ramon C, Luque-Garcia A, Garcia-Castillo J, Parra-Palau JL, Scaltriti M, Ramon y Cajal S, Baselga J, Arribas J, Cunningham MP, Ferrer-Ramon C, et al. A naturally occurring HER2 carboxy-terminal fragment promotes mammary tumor growth and metastasis. Mol Cell Biol. 2009;29:3319–3331. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01803-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Mojzisova G, Kello M, Pilatova M, Tomeckova V, Vaskova J, Vasko L, Bernatova S, Mirossay L, Mojzis J. Antiproliferative effect of beta-escin - an in vitro study. Acta Biochim Pol. 2016;63:79–87. doi: 10.18388/abp.2015_1013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Qiu Y, Yang L, Liu H, Luo X. Cancer stem cell-targeted therapeutic approaches for overcoming trastuzumab resistance in HER2-positive breast cancer. Stem Cells. 2021;39:1125–1136. doi: 10.1002/stem.3381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Shah D, Osipo C. Cancer stem cells and HER2 positive breast cancer: The story so far. Genes Dis. 2016;3:114–123. doi: 10.1016/j.gendis.2016.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Prieto-Vila M, Takahashi RU, Usuba W, Kohama I, Ochiya T. Drug resistance driven by cancer stem cells and their niche. Int J Mol Sci. 2017 doi: 10.3390/ijms18122574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Dontu G, Abdallah WM, Foley JM, Jackson KW, Clarke MF, Kawamura MJ, Wicha MS. In vitro propagation and transcriptional profiling of human mammary stem/progenitor cells. Genes Dev. 2003;17:1253–1270. doi: 10.1101/gad.1061803. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Park S, Kim YJ, Park JM, Park M, Nam KD, Farrand L, Nguyen CT, La MT, Ann J, Lee J, Kim JY, Seo JH. The C-terminal HSP90 inhibitor NCT-58 kills trastuzumab-resistant breast cancer stem-like cells. Cell Death Discov. 2021;7:354. doi: 10.1038/s41420-021-00743-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kim JY, Cho Y, Oh E, Lee N, An H, Sung D, Cho TM, Seo JH. Disulfiram targets cancer stem-like properties and the HER2/Akt signaling pathway in HER2-positive breast cancer. Cancer Lett. 2016;379:39–48. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2016.05.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Boulbes DR, Chauhan GB, Jin Q, Bartholomeusz C, Esteva FJ. CD44 expression contributes to trastuzumab resistance in HER2-positive breast cancer cells. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015;151:501–513. doi: 10.1007/s10549-015-3414-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Xu H, Tian Y, Yuan X, Wu H, Liu Q, Pestell RG, Wu K. The role of CD44 in epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cancer development. Onco Targets Ther. 2015;8:3783–3792. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S95470. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Huang J, Li H, Ren G. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition and drug resistance in breast cancer (Review) Int J Oncol. 2015;47:840–848. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2015.3084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Vuoriluoto K, Haugen H, Kiviluoto S, Mpindi JP, Nevo J, Gjerdrum C, Tiron C, Lorens JB, Ivaska J. Vimentin regulates EMT induction by Slug and oncogenic H-Ras and migration by governing Axl expression in breast cancer. Oncogene. 2011;30:1436–1448. doi: 10.1038/onc.2010.509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Pushpakom S, Iorio F, Eyers PA, Escott KJ, Hopper S, Wells A, Doig A, Guilliams T, Latimer J, McNamee C, Norris A, Sanseau P, Cavalla D, Pirmohamed M. Drug repurposing: progress, challenges and recommendations. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2019;18:41–58. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2018.168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wood DE, Newcomb EW. Cleavage of Bax enhances its cell death function. Exp Cell Res. 2000;256:375–382. doi: 10.1006/excr.2000.4859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Wood DE, Thomas A, Devi LA, Berman Y, Beavis RC, Reed JC, Newcomb EW. Bax cleavage is mediated by calpain during drug-induced apoptosis. Oncogene. 1998;17:1069–1078. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1202034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Song K, Farzaneh M. Signaling pathways governing breast cancer stem cells behavior. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2021;12:245. doi: 10.1186/s13287-021-02321-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Li S, Li Q. Cancer stem cells and tumor metastasis (Review) Int J Oncol. 2014;44:1806–1812. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2014.2362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Yang L, Shi P, Zhao G, Xu J, Peng W, Zhang J, Zhang G, Wang X, Dong Z, Chen F, Cui H. Targeting cancer stem cell pathways for cancer therapy. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2020;5:8. doi: 10.1038/s41392-020-0110-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Simon HU, Haj-Yehia A, Levi-Schaffer F. Role of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in apoptosis induction. Apoptosis. 2000;5:415–418. doi: 10.1023/a:1009616228304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Perillo B, Di Donato M, Pezone A, Di Zazzo E, Giovannelli P, Galasso G, Castoria G, Migliaccio A. ROS in cancer therapy: the bright side of the moon. Exp Mol Med. 2020;52:192–203. doi: 10.1038/s12276-020-0384-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Shi X, Zhang Y, Zheng J, Pan J. Reactive oxygen species in cancer stem cells. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2012;16:1215–1228. doi: 10.1089/ars.2012.4529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ding S, Li C, Cheng N, Cui X, Xu X, Zhou G. Redox regulation in cancer stem cells. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2015;2015:750798. doi: 10.1155/2015/750798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Singh S, Brocker C, Koppaka V, Chen Y, Jackson BC, Matsumoto A, Thompson DC, Vasiliou V. Aldehyde dehydrogenases in cellular responses to oxidative/electrophilic stress. Free Radic Biol Med. 2013;56:89–101. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2012.11.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Raha D, Wilson TR, Peng J, Peterson D, Yue P, Evangelista M, Wilson C, Merchant M, Settleman J. The cancer stem cell marker aldehyde dehydrogenase is required to maintain a drug-tolerant tumor cell subpopulation. Cancer Res. 2014;74:3579–3590. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-3456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Vernieri C, Milano M, Brambilla M, Mennitto A, Maggi C, Cona MS, Prisciandaro M, Fabbroni C, Celio L, Mariani G, Bianchi GV, Capri G, de Braud F. Resistance mechanisms to anti-HER2 therapies in HER2-positive breast cancer: current knowledge, new research directions and therapeutic perspectives. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2019;139:53–66. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Chumsri S, Sperinde J, Liu H, Gligorov J, Spano JP, Antoine M, Moreno Aspitia A, Tan W, Winslow J, Petropoulos CJ, Chenna A, Bates M, Weidler JM, Huang W, Dueck A, Perez EA. High p95HER2/HER2 ratio associated with poor outcome in trastuzumab-treated HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer NCCTG N0337 and NCCTG 98–32–52 (Alliance) Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24:3053–3058. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-1864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Bilancia D, Rosati G, Dinota A, Germano D, Romano R, Manzione L. Lapatinib in breast cancer. Ann. Oncol. 2007;18(Suppl 6):26–30. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdm220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Nishida N, Yano H, Nishida T, Kamura T, Kojiro M. Angiogenesis in cancer. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2006;2:213–219. doi: 10.2147/vhrm.2006.2.3.213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Varinska L, Faber L, Kello M, Petrovova E, Balazova L, Solar P, Coma M, Urdzik P, Mojzis J, Svajdlenka E, Mucaji P, Gal P. beta-Escin Effectively Modulates HUVECS Proliferation and Tube Formation. Molecules. 2018;23:197. doi: 10.3390/molecules23010197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.