Abstract
When a chiral nanoparticle is optically trapped using a circularly polarized laser beam, a circular polarization (CP)–dependent gradient force can be induced on the particle. We investigated the CP-dependent gradient force exerted on three-dimensional chiral nanoparticles. The experimental results showed that the gradient force depended on the handedness of the CP of the trapping light and the particle chirality. The analysis revealed that the spectral features of the CP handedness–dependent gradient force are influenced not only by the real part of the refractive index but also by the electromagnetic field perturbed by the chiral particle resonant with the incident light. This is in sharp contrast to the well-known behavior of the gradient force, which is governed by the real part of the refractive index. The extended aspect of the chiral optical force obtained here can provide novel methodologies on chirality sensing, manipulation, separation, enantioselective biological reactions, and other fields.
Optical trapping force of chiral nanoparticle was dependent on the handedness of incident circularly polarized light.
INTRODUCTION
Chirality is a geometrical property that dictates that matter cannot be superposed on its mirror image. Chiral materials exhibit chiro-optical effects, which have different interactions with left and right circularly polarized (LCP and RCP) light (1–7). The chiro-optical effects of chiral molecules and nanoparticles can be observed with optical polarization measurements, such as circular dichroism (CD) and optical rotation (OR) (8, 9). Chiro-optical effects can also influence the motion of chiral materials illuminated by circularly polarized (CPd) light when an optical force acts on the particles (4, 10–13). In previous studies, the optical scattering forces induced by LCP and RCP light were reported to act differently on the micrometer-scale droplets of liquid crystals composed of chiral molecules (14, 15). Although these reports presented a novel approach for investigating chiral optical forces, their relation with chiro-optical effects has yet to be fully revealed. We can also expect that the optical force exerted by CPd light on a chiral particle with a diameter of less than half the wavelength of light will influence the motion of the particle (11). A lot of theoretical studies have reported the optical force relating to the chirality of nanoparticles (10–13, 16–20). By establishing a more detailed relationship between the chiro-optical properties of nanoparticles and CP-dependent optical forces, including scattering and gradient forces, we can greatly extend the potential for optical manipulations of nanomaterials.
In the present study, we investigated the chiral characteristics of gradient forces for chiral nanoparticles, which had not previously been studied experimentally. We analyzed the mechanical behavior of chiral gold nanoparticles (21), which exhibit strong chiro-optical effects when optically trapped by CPd light. Chiral gold nanoparticles can be used to represent chiral nanomaterials and molecules with dimensions smaller than the wavelength of the interacting light. We observed the chiral characteristics of the gradient force on the nanoparticles and discussed the underlying mechanisms. We observed that the strength of the gradient force differed under LCP illumination and RCP illumination in the wavelength region where the particles exhibited strong chiro-optical effects. The strength of the gradient force was estimated on the basis of the position fluctuation (dispersion) σ of the trapped particle due to Brownian motion. The difference between the position dispersion under LCP trapping and that under RCP trapping (σL − σR) was found to be as much as approximately 20 % of the average dispersion ((σL + σR)/2), depending on the wavelength of the light. The correlation between the spectral features of the chiral trapping force and those of the chiro-optical effect (CD and OR) of the particle was also elucidated.
To discuss the optical gradient force acting on a chiral particle, we assumed that the particle was isotropic and sufficiently smaller than half the wavelength of the incident light. The induced polarization is expressed as follows (10, 13, 17)
| (1) |
where α and χ denote the electric and cross-term (electric-magnetic) polarizabilities of the isotropic particle, respectively. Note that χ is related to the chirality of the particles (22). Although these quantities are of tensor character in origin, we assume that, here, the anisotropy of the particle is small and the polarizabilities are treated as scalar quantities for simplicity. E and H represent the total electric and magnetic fields, respectively. Then, the time-averaged gradient force exerted on the particle can be expressed as (13, 23)
| (2) |
Conventional nanoparticle optical trapping arises from the first term in the bracket in Eq. 2 (24, 25). The second term must be considered if the particle is chiral; this term is proportional to the optical chirality of the field, which is defined as 𝒞 = − (1/2)ωϵ0 Im [B · E*] (4), where ω and ϵ0 are the angular frequency of the light and the vacuum permittivity, respectively, and B denotes the magnetic flux density. In general, Re[χ] is much smaller than Re[α] for small materials (4), and the gradient force originating from the second chirality is hardly observable. However, chiral materials that exhibit a strong chiro-optical effects, such as the chiral gold nanoparticles investigated here (21, 26), have large Re[χ] values in the wavelength region with the chiral optical transitions. The second term in Eq. 2 is thus expected to contribute substantially to the gradient force.
The chiral gold nanoparticles were fabricated with solution chemical synthesis (21). The morphologies of the synthesized D- and L-form particles were imaged by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), as shown in Fig. 1 (A and B), respectively. On the basis of these SEM images, the base lengths of the particles were estimated to be ∼190 nm. The chiro-optical effects (CD and OR) and the extinction spectra of the particles are shown in Fig. 1 (C and D), respectively. As shown in Fig. 1 (C and D), the chiro-optical effect appeared for the plasmonic modes in the wavelength region between 550 and 750 nm. The optical gradient force was expected to depend on the handedness of the incident CPd light in this wavelength region. We optically trapped the chiral nanoparticles with the experimental setup depicted in Fig. 1E. The trapping laser was incident on the bottom of the system. The polarization of the trapping laser light can be adjusted by the λ/4 wave plate mounted just below the bottom objective lens. In free space, the strong scattering force prevents the optical trapping of the nanoparticle in the focal spot, when the incident wavelength is resonant with the plasmon mode. This is because the scattering force pushes the nanoparticle in the direction of the incident light propagation, releasing the particle from the trapping. To avoid this, we prevented the gold nanoparticle from moving in the z direction with a cover glass, trapping the particle in the focal spot area in the xy plane. The trapped particle was illuminated by light-emitting diodes (LEDs) from the side of the sample glass cell and observed by a complementary metal-oxide semiconductor (CMOS) camera after passing through the top objective lens and the short-pass filter (see the Supplementary Material for additional experiment details).
Fig. 1. Measurements of the chiral gold nanoparticles.
(A and B) SEM images of D-form and L-form chiral gold nanoparticles, respectively. (C and D) Chiro-optical effects (CD and OR) and extinction (EXT) spectra of left- and right-handed chiral nanoparticles in colloidal solutions, respectively. a.u., arbitrary units. (E) Schematic illustration of the experimental optical trapping system. NA, numerical aperture; WD, working distance (mm); SP, short pass.
RESULTS
Measurement of Brownian motion
In Fig. 2 (A, B, D, and E), the recorded lateral positions in the xy plane of the trapped particle in each frame of the video images are plotted, under the illumination of CPd light at a wavelength of 680 nm, with the CD signals showing nearly extremal values [see Fig. 1 (C and D)]. The dot colors in the plots indicate the passage of time. As shown in these plots, the positions of the particles were extended to a certain area because of Brownian motion. The histograms in each axis direction (x and y) were fit to a Gaussian function (), and the fitting parameters of A, r0, and σr were estimated (27). For the D-form particle (Fig. 2, A and B), the average dispersion (σ = (σx + σy)/2) of the position under LCP illumination was smaller than that under RCP illumination. The respective average dispersions under RCP and LCP illumination, σR and σL, were ∼0.65 and ∼0.54 μm, respectively. This difference in the dispersion with respect to the handedness of the CPd light was attributed to the factor of Im[H · E*] in the second term of Eq. 2. The trapping behavior of the L-form particle with respect to the polarization of the incident light had the opposite trend as shown in Fig. 2 (D and E) (σR ∼ 0.96 μm and σL ∼ 1.17 μm). The dispersion values varied with the degree of circular polarization of the incident light, defined as (EL − ER)/(EL + ER) (EL and ER are the absolute amplitudes of the LCP and RCP components of the electric field, respectively), as shown in Fig. 2 (C and F) for the D- and L-form particles, respectively. These plots of the dispersion show the opposite dependencies on the handedness of the circular polarization for the D- and L-form particles. The reversed dependencies of the D- and L-form particles can be explained by the opposite signs of Re[χ] in Eq. 2.
Fig. 2. Measurement of the Brownian motions of the nanoparticles.
(A and B) Position traces for the D-form particle under LCP and RCP illumination, respectively. The colors of the dots indicate the passage of time. (C) Position dispersion σ for the D-form particle as a function of the ellipticity of the light, (EL − ER)/(EL + ER), where EL and ER are the absolute amplitudes of the LCP and RCP components of the electric field, respectively. (D and E) Position traces for the L-form particle. (F) Position dispersion for the L-form particle as a function of the ellipticity of the light. The intensities of the incident laser were 15 and 34 mW for the D-form (A to C) and L-form (D to F) particles, respectively.
Wavelength dependence of Brownian motion
The observed CP-dependent gradient force was expected to be correlated with the chiro-optical characteristics of the trapped particle (13). To clarify the relationship between the chiro-optical effect and the gradient force, we observed the wavelength dependence of the Brownian motion of the particles between 680 and 720 nm and plotted the difference in the position dispersion between LCP and RCP illumination. The result is shown in Fig. 3A. The dispersion differences between LCP and RCP illumination (σL − σR) were normalized by −(σL + σR)/2, which defines the dissymmetry factor of the position dispersion, gσ = −2(σL − σR)/(σL + σR), at each wavelength. For both the D- and L-form particles, the largest difference was found at 680 nm (the shortest wavelength that our laser can provide), which approximately corresponds to the CD spectral peaks of the particles. The absolute values of gσ decrease as the wavelength gets longer. To further clarify the relationship between the spectral characteristics of the gradient force and the chiro-optical effect, we synthesized slightly larger L-form particles (base length of ∼200 nm), with the CD peak at a longer wavelength (see the Supplementary Materials), and investigated the wavelength-dependent trapping characteristics. The gσ value is plotted as a function of the wavelength in Fig. 3B. The gσ value has a negative peak (gσ ∼ −0.3) at ∼700 nm, which is close to the negative CD peak position (see the Supplementary Materials for the CD spectrum).
Fig. 3. Relationship between the spectral characteristics of the gradient force and the chiro-optical effect.
(A) Spectral features of the measured position dispersion dissymmetry (gσ; circles and squares) and the numerically simulated dissymmetry factors of the gradient force [gf (see the text); dotted curves] for the D- and L-form chiral particles. The intensities of the incident laser were 15 and 34 mW for the D- and L-form particles, respectively. (B) Measured gσ (squares) and numerically simulated gf (dotted curves) for a large L-form nanoparticle. The intensity of the laser was 8 mW. (C) Simulated spectral feature of gf and the force difference between LCP and RCP illumination (Δ∣Fx∣), as well as a comparison with the simulated CD and OR spectra.
To analyze the behavior shown in Fig. 3 (A and B), we numerically simulated the dissymmetry factor for the gradient force, defined as the difference between the forces under LCP and RCP illumination normalized by their average, gf = 2(∣FxL∣ − ∣FxR∣)/(∣FxL∣+∣FxR∣). The simulation was based on the finite element method (see the Supplementary Material for the details of the simulation process). Note that gf approximately corresponds to gσ when it is assumed that the particle is trapped in a harmonic potential. The simulated wavelength dependence curves of gf reproduce the experimental gσ curves of both the L- and D-form particles well, as shown in Fig. 3A, and qualitatively reproduces the gσ curve for the larger L-form particle (Fig. 3B) when the simulated gf curve is slightly shifted to the longer wavelength side. Then, we simulated the CD and OR with the same model and compared the results with gf, as shown in Fig. 3C. The difference in the gradient force between LCP and RCP illumination (Δ∣Fx∣ = ∣FxL∣ − ∣FxR∣) is also plotted in the figure. Here, the CD was evaluated in the simulation as the difference between the absorption of the particle (corresponding to the imaginary part of the complex refractive index) under LCP illumination and that under RCP illumination. Similarly, the OR was evaluated on the basis of the real part of the complex refractive index of the particle. Note that the spectral features of the simulated gf (blue dashed curve) and Δ∣Fx∣ (green dot-dashed curve) follow the simulated CD spectrum (black solid curve) rather than the OR spectrum (red broken curve). Considering that OR and CD are correlated with the real part and imaginary part of the refractive index, respectively, and that the nonchiral gradient force is proportional to the real part of the refractive index, this finding for the simulated gf (and Δ∣Fx∣) is counterintuitive. The same trend was observed with another simulation algorithm, the discrete dipole approximation method (see fig. S8).
DISCUSSION
As this observation is relevant to an essential factor for the optical forces on chiral particles, we discuss the possible physical origins of this observation based on the analytical formulae of the gradient force. On the basis of Eq. 2, the force difference between LCP and RCP illumination can be represented by Eq. 3
| (3) |
In the preceding studies, only the real part of the cross-term polarizability (Re[χ]) in Eq. 3 was considered (13). However, we should also consider the Im [H · E *] in Eq. 3. H and E in this factor should be rather the total field at the position of the dipole (particle) than the incident field.
In macroscopic CD and OR spectroscopy, the signals are considered to be proportional to the imaginary and real parts of the complex refractive index, which are correlated with Im[χ] and Re[χ], respectively (see the Supplementary Materials). Thus, the observation that the wavelength dependence of Δ∣Fx∣ resembles the CD spectrum is most likely due to the wavelength dependence of the factor ∇Im[H · E*]. The electromagnetic field at the position of the particle has spatial characteristics distinct from the incident field due to the existence of a chiral particle resonant with the incident field. Hence, the modification of the factor ∇Im[H · E*] due to the particle is expected to affect the wavelength dependence of the chiral optical force. This effect is thought to be the primary reason for the observation that the chiral gradient force exhibited spectral characteristics similar to CD rather than OR. This point should be noted when discussing optical forces and optical manipulation of chiral materials, as it is a basic characteristic. More detailed discussion on this point based on the electromagnetic simulation is given in section S4.1.3 and fig. S9.
In summary, we successfully observed the CP-dependent optical gradient force exerted on chiral gold nanoparticles. The CP-dependent gradient force dominated at the wavelength where the particle had the most chiro-optical activity. In particular, for the investigated chiral gold nanoparticles, a CP-dependent force was observed either in the wavelength region where a large CD signal was observed or in a slightly redshifted region. This result differs from that of conventional CP-independent gradient forces, where the force is determined by the real part of the polarizability, which is closer to the (real part of the) refractive index than the absorption of the particle. The novel findings on the CP-dependent gradient force presented here provide a basis for the discussion of optical forces on chiral materials and introduce a new optical approach for manipulating and separating chiral materials with CPd light.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
For the measurements of the Brownian motion of the chiral gold nanoparticles, we used a home-build optical trapping system, as illustrated in Fig. 1E. The laser source for the trapping was a Chameleon Ultra II (Coherent Inc.), which provided tunable wavelength pulses with ∼100 fs in width. To avoid the nonlinear effect of optical trapping, which appears as a repulsive gradient force under the use of femtosecond lasers (28), we stretched the pulse width to over several hundreds of picoseconds by a grating pair. The beam was collimated to a diameter of less than 2 mm by passing through a beam expander (a combination of ×10 and ×100 objective lenses), a λ/4 wave plate, and an objective lens for the focusing as shown in Fig. 1E.
The objective lens used for focusing had a low numerical aperture (NA = 0.20) and long working distance (WD = 50 mm). The spot size was ∼3 μm. We adopted such a weak focusing condition for the following reasons: (i) When particles are trapped with a tightly focused laser beam, the trapped particles melt and stick on the glass cell. If we try to trap the particles with the low laser power to avoid the melting while keeping the tightly focusing condition, the particle easily go away from the focusing spot due to the weak gradient force, and we cannot obtain enough long measurement time to evaluate the Brownian motion characteristics. (ii) To evaluate the relatively weak CP-dependent gradient force (<Fcp−grad>), the large trapping area and the long measurement time is preferable. The CP-dependent gradient force is estimated to be nearly ∼10 times smaller than the CP-independent gradient force (<Fcp−grad>) for the chiral gold nanoparticles. Therefore, the weak focusing condition is essential to increase the measurement sensitivity and detect the CP-dependent force.
The trapped particle was illuminated from the side of the cell by LEDs, and the scattered light from the trapped particle was imaged on a CMOS camera (pco.1200, PCO AG) after passing thorough an objective lens (NA = 0.9, WD = 1 mm) and a short-pass filter, which is used for the elimination of the trapping laser light. The frame rate of the CMOS camera was 25 Hz, and the measurement time to evaluate the Brownian motion characteristics of the particles was ∼12 min. The colloidal water solution of the chiral gold nanoparticles were contained in a glass cell. The density of the particles was ∼1011 m−3. The dispersions of the position in x and y directions (σx, σy) were calculated from the histogram of the positions projected to x and y axes by the Gaussian fitting, respectively. The Gaussian function used for the fitting was as follows
| (4) |
where A, σ, and r0 (r0 = x0, y0) are the fitting parameters. r represents the position in x or y direction in the trapping plane (r = x, y).
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Y. Tanaka (University of Tokyo) for helpful advice on the data analysis.
Funding: This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI (grant nos. JP16H06505, JP21H04641, JP21K18884, and JP22H05135). We would like to express our gratitude to Equipment Development Center of the Institute for Molecular Science for assistance with the experimental setup.
Authors contributions: J.Y., S.H., and H.O. conceived the measurement of the optical gradient force on the chiral particles. J.Y. performed the experiments and analyzed the data. J.Y., H.Y., and H.I. performed the electromagnetic simulations. H.-Y.A. and K.T.N. synthesized and provided the chiral particle. J.Y. and H.O. wrote the paper. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Data and materials availability: All data needed to evaluate the conclusions in the paper are present in the paper and/or the Supplementary Materials.
Supplementary Materials
This PDF file includes:
Sections S1 to S6
Figs. S1 to S13
References
REFERENCES AND NOTES
- 1.A. Rodger, B. Nordén, Circular Dichroism and Linear Dichroism, vol. 1 (Oxford Univ. Press, 1997). [Google Scholar]
- 2.N. Berova, K. Nakanishi, R. W. Woody, Circular Dichroism: Principles and Applications (John Wiley & Sons, 2000). [Google Scholar]
- 3.L. D. Barron, Molecular Light Scattering and Optical Activity (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2009). [Google Scholar]
- 4.M. Schäferling, Chiral nanophotonics: Chiral optical properties of plasmonic systems, in Springer Series in Optical Sciences (Springer International, 2017), vol. 205, pp. 159. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hendry E., Carpy T., Johnston J., Popland M., Mikhaylovskiy R. V., Lapthorn A. J., Kelly S. M., Barron L. D., Gadegaard N., Kadodwala M., Ultrasensitive detection and characterization of biomolecules using superchiral fields. Nat. Nanotechnol. 5, 783–787 (2010). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Ben-Moshe A., Wolf S. G., Sadan M. B., Houben L., Fan Z., Govorov A. O., Markovich G., Enantioselective control of lattice and shape chirality in inorganic nanostructures using chiral biomolecules. Nat. Commun. 5, 4302 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Fan Z., Govorov A. O., Chiral nanocrystals: Plasmonic spectra and circular dichroism. Nano Lett. 12, 3283–3289 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Greenfield N. J., Using circular dichroism spectra to estimate protein secondary structure. Nat. Protoc. 1, 2876–2890 (2006). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hassey R., Swain E. J., Hammer N. I., Venkataraman D., Barnes M. D., Probing the chiroptical response of a single molecule. Science 314, 1437–1439 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wang S. B., Chan C. T., Lateral optical force on chiral particles near a surface. Nat. Commun. 5, 3307 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zhao Y., Saleh A. A. E., Dionne J. A., Enantioselective optical trapping of chiral nanoparticles with plasmonic tweezers. ACS Photonics 3, 304–309 (2016). [Google Scholar]
- 12.Zhao Y., Saleh A. A. E., van de Haar M. A., Baum B., Briggs J. A., Lay A., Reyes-Becerra O. A., Dionne J. A., Nanoscopic control and quantification of enantioselective optical forces. Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 1055–1059 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Canaguier-Durand A., Hutchison J. A., Genet C., Ebbesen T. W., Mechanical separation of chiral dipoles by chiral light. New J. Phys. 15, 123037 (2013). [Google Scholar]
- 14.Tkachenko G., Brasselet E., Spin controlled optical radiation pressure. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 033605 (2013). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Tkachenko G., Brasselet E., Optofluidic sorting of material chirality by chiral light. Nat. Commun. 5, 3577 (2014). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Albaladejo S., Marqués M. I., Laroche M., Sáenz J. J., Scattering forces from the curl of the spin angular momentum of a light field. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 113602 (2009). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Cameron R. P., Barnett S. M., Yao A. M., Discriminatory optical force for chiral molecules. New J. Phys. 16, 013020 (2014). [Google Scholar]
- 18.Chen H., Jiang Y., Wang N., Lu W., Liu S., Lin Z., Lateral optical force on paired chiral nanoparticles in linearly polarized plane waves. Opt. Lett. 40, 5530–5533 (2015). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Li M., Yan S., Zhang Y., Liang Y., Zhang P., Yao B., Optical sorting of small chiral particles by tightly focused vector beams. Phys. Rev. A 99, 033825 (2019). [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zheng H., Chen H., Ng J., Lin Z., Optical gradient force in the absence of light intensity gradient. Phys. Rev. B 103, 035103 (2021). [Google Scholar]
- 21.Lee H.-E., Ahn H. Y., Mun J., Lee Y. Y., Kim M., Cho N. H., Chang K., Kim W. S., Rho J., Nam K. T., Amino-acid-and peptide-directed synthesis of chiral plasmonic gold nanoparticles. Nature 556, 360–365 (2018). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hansen P. M., Bhatia V. K., Harrit N., Oddershede L., Expanding the optical trapping range of gold nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 5, 1937–1942 (2005). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.L. Novotny, B. Hecht, Principles of Nano-Optics (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2012). [Google Scholar]
- 24.Svoboda K., Block S. M., Optical trapping of metallic rayleigh particles. Opt. Lett. 19, 930–932 (1994). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Juan M. L., Righini M., Quidant R., Plasmon nano-optical tweezers. Nat. Photonics 5, 349–356 (2011). [Google Scholar]
- 26.Cho N. H., Byun G. H., Lim Y. C., Im S. W., Kim H., Lee H. E., Ahn H. Y., Nam K. T., Uniform chiral gap synthesis for high dissymmetry factor in single plasmonic gold nanoparticle. ACS Nano 14, 3595–3602 (2020). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Yan Z., Sweet J., Jureller J. E., Guffey M. J., Pelton M., Scherer N. F., Controlling the position and orientation of single silver nanowires on a surface using structured optical fields. ACS Nano 6, 8144–8155 (2012). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Jiang Y., Narushima T., Okamoto H., Nonlinear optical effects in trapping nanoparticles with femtosecond pulses. Nat. Phys. 6, 1005–1009 (2010). [Google Scholar]
- 29.L. A. Nafie, Vibrational Optical Activity: Principles and Applications (John Wiley & Sons, 2011). [Google Scholar]
- 30.Karst J., Cho N. H., Kim H., Lee H. E., Nam K. T., Giessen H., Hentschel M., Chiral scatterometry on chemically synthesized single plasmonic nanoparticles. ACS Nano 13, 8659–8668 (2019). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.K. Cho, Reconstruction of Macroscopic Maxwell Equations, vol. 237 (Springer, 2018). [Google Scholar]
- 32.K. Sakoda, Electromagnetic Metamaterials: Modern Insights Into Macroscopic Electromagnetic Fields, vol. 287 (Springer Nature, 2019). [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sihvola A., Electromagnetic modeling of BI-isotropic media. Prog. Electromagn. Res. 9, 45–86 (1994). [Google Scholar]
- 34.T. G. Mackay, A. Lakhtakia, Electromagnetic Anisotropy and Bianisotropy: A Field Guide (World Scientific, 2009). [Google Scholar]
- 35.Setoura K., Ito S., Miyasaka H., Stationary bubble formation and marangoni convection induced by CW laser heating of a single gold nanoparticle. Nanoscale 9, 719–730 (2017). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Seol Y., Carpenter A. E., Perkins T. T., Gold nanoparticles: Enhanced optical trapping and sensitivity coupled with significant heating. Opt. Lett. 31, 2429–2431 (2006). [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Sections S1 to S6
Figs. S1 to S13
References



