Skip to main content
BioTech logoLink to BioTech
. 2022 Aug 25;11(3):38. doi: 10.3390/biotech11030038

Diversity of Endophytic Yeasts from Agricultural Fruits Positive for Phytohormone IAA Production

Aleksey Kachalkin 1,2, Anna Glushakova 1,3,*, Rostislav Streletskii 1
Editor: Daniel Cozzolino
PMCID: PMC9497158  PMID: 36134912

Abstract

This study reports the diversity of cultivable endophytic yeasts from agricultural fruits that respond positively to the plant-promoting property of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) production. The IAA synthesis by the strains was quantified with an Agilent 1100 series liquid chromatography system. IAA was present in the culture liquid of 72% of all 97 strains examined after three days of cultivation. The most active endophytic yeast strains in this study belonged to the species Aureobasidium pullulans, Candida zeylanoides, Hanseniaspora uvarum, Metschnikowia pulcherrima, Meyerozyma caribbica, Rhodotorula mucilaginosa, and Yarrowia galli. The highest IAA production was observed in the endophytic strain of A. pullulans (9109.19 ± 146.02 μg/g). No significant differences were found between IAA production in strains from agricultural products of different countries. However, the level of IAA production was strictly strain-specific. Our results suggest that the internal tissues of fruits may be a promising source for the isolation of plant-beneficial yeasts that can be used to promote plant growth.

Keywords: endophytic yeasts, IAA, plant beneficial trait, fruits

1. Introduction

Endophytic yeasts are one of the most promising areas in the study of microbe–plant associations. Plants and yeasts, developing within their internal tissues, together form a single symbiotic system that serves as an excellent model for studying fundamental questions of ecology and evolution, as well as for addressing a number of modern practical questions in agriculture. One of these current practical questions is the search for plant growth-promoting microorganisms (PGPMs) in the diverse range of endophytic yeasts in agriculturally important plants, for example, those that produce phytohormones such as auxins, cytokinins, etc. [1,2,3,4,5]. The effects of strains producing important phytohormones are often responsible for the microbial stimulation of germination, growth and development of higher plants [6,7].

Although many indole compounds in the auxin series have biological activity, IAA is the most potent, widely used and studied in nature. For example, the ascomycete yeasts Cyberlindnera saturnus (ex. Williopsis saturnus) isolated from the roots of maize could also produce IAA and stimulate growth processes in the plant [8]. Basidiomycete yeasts, Rhodotorula mucilaginosa, isolated from poplar and willow were able to produce IAA, which can also promote the growth of some important crops such as corn, tomato, pepper, squash, sunflower, and grasses under nitrogen stress [9]. Thai researchers have extensively studied the phytohormonal activity of epiphytic and endophytic yeasts associated with sugarcane, rice, and other tropical crops. Screening studies indicate a widespread ability of endophytic yeasts to synthesize IAA. The strain dependence of the intensity of the manifestation of this trait is highlighted [6,10,11]. The strain dependence of this trait for the ascomycete yeast Aureobasidium pullulans isolated from the phyllosphere and rhizosphere of Drosera spatulata is also supported by the results of the study conducted by Taiwanese researchers [12]. The authors also tested the effect of IAA-active strains on the growth of tobacco seedlings (Nicotiana benthamiana). It was found that the most active IAA producers stimulated the growth of lateral roots, root hairs, increase in the amount of chlorophyll, elongation of the stem and increase in the number of leaves. No significant effect was found on root length.

Studies on endophytic yeasts and their phytohormonal activity have been actively conducted for some time and show extremely interesting results [13,14,15,16]. However, they are usually limited to a small sample of strains or a narrow range of plants. In a study of 24 yeast strains from corn roots, 10 strains were able to produce IAA after one week of cultivation [8]. Of the seven yeast strains from mandarins, only four could be reliably confirmed to produce IAA [17]. In another study with endophytic yeasts from mandarins, the activity was detected in all eight strains [18]. In a study with yeasts from grapevine, 67 of the 69 strains were shown to be able to synthesize IAA both without the addition of tryptophan and with this precursor [19]. This prompted us to conduct a large-scale study on the IAA-producing capabilities of endophytic yeast strains isolated from the inner tissues of fruits derived from different countries and to evaluate the potential contribution of endophytic yeasts to stimulate plant growth.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Location and Sampling

A study on the synthesis of indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) was carried out for a sample of 97 endophytic yeast strains isolated from fruits of different production purchased from trade networks in the Moscow region (Argentina, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Brazil, China, Chile, Dominican Republic, Egypt, Georgia, Iran, Israel, Kenya, Moldova, Peru, Russia, Serbia, Spain, Turkey, Uzbekistan and Vietnam).

2.2. Microbiological Analyses and Species Identification

To study endophytic yeast communities in 2019–2020, fruits were treated according to the following scheme: 70% ethanol, 30 min; 2% sodium hypochlorite, 30 min; 70% ethanol, 30 s; and washing in sterile distilled water for 10 min [20,21]. After the exocarp was removed with a sterile scalpel, the inner tissue was excised, homogenized, and poured with sterile water to obtain a 1:10 dilution. The suspensions were vortexed on a Multi Reax Vortexer (Heidolph Instruments, Germany) for 15 min at 2000 rpm. Three suspensions were prepared for each fruit. The prepared suspensions were plated in three replicates each on glucose-peptone-yeast extract (GPY) agar (20 g/L glucose, 10 g/L peptone, 5 g/L yeast extract, 20 g/L agar) supplemented with chloramphenicol (500 mg/L) to prevent bacterial growth. A total of 3318 plates were incubated at 22 °C for 5–7 days. The grown yeast colonies were classified into morphological types using a dissecting microscope and the number of colonies of each type was counted. From 5 to 7 colonies of each morphotype were isolated in a pure culture. Purified yeast strains were cryopreserved in 10% (v/v) glycerol in water solution at −80 °C in the yeast collection of the Soil Biology Department at Lomonosov Moscow State University (WDCM 1173). Identification of yeast species was based on the ITS rDNA nucleotide sequence. DNA isolation and PCR were performed according to the procedure described previously [22]. DNA sequencing was performed using the Big Dye Terminator V3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) with subsequent analysis of the reaction products on an Applied Biosystems 3130xl Genetic Analyzer at the facilities of Evrogen (Moscow, Russia). For sequencing, the ITS5 primer (5’-GGA AGT AAA AGT CGT AAC AAG G) was used [22]. For species identification, nucleotide sequences were compared with those in public databases, using the BLAST NCBI (www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (accessed on 7 July 2022)) and the MycoID (www.mycobank.org (accessed on 7 July 2022)) tools. The resulting sequences have been deposited in NCBI (GenBank OP216812-OP216908). The ITS regions of the strains studied were 99.5–100% similar to the type strains. Endophytic strains of 17 yeast species commonly occurring in fruits were examined: Aureobasidium pullulans (8 strains); Candida parapsilosis (4 strains); Candida zeylanoides (7 strains); Debaryomyces fabryi (8 strains), Debaryomyces hansenii (8 strains), Filobasidium magnum (3 strains), Filobasidium wieringae (4 strains), Hanseniaspora uvarum (7 strains), Metschnikowia pulcherrima (9 strains), Meyerozyma caribbica (7 strains), Meyerozyma guilliermondii (5 strains), Rhodotorula babjevae (6 strains), Rhodotorula mucilaginosa (8 strains), Yarrowia deformans (4 strains), Yarrowia divulgata (3 strains), Yarrowia galli (3 strains), Yarrowia lipolytica (3 strains). Information on the strains examined is presented in Table 1. A full list of the yeasts isolated in the work has been published previously [23].

Table 1.

IAA production (with standard deviations) of studied strains and information about it.

Strain KBP Species Phylum Country of Origin Substrate IAA, mg/L IAA, μg/g
YE-0002 Candida zeylanoides ASC * Turkey nectarine - -
YE-0007 Debaryomyces hansenii ASC Turkey nectarine - -
YE-0013 Metschnikowia pulcherrima ASC Turkey cherry 0.1 ± 0.01 15.85 ± 2.16
YE-0017 Debaryomyces hansenii ASC Iran pepper 0.01 ± 0.00 1.09 ± 0.24
YE-0024 Hanseniaspora uvarum ASC Russia gooseberry - -
YE-0031 Metschnikowia pulcherrima ASC Russia apple 0.07 ± 0.01 17.15 ± 2.51
YE-0034 Filobasidium wieringae BAS Turkey cherry - -
YE-0043 Hanseniaspora uvarum ASC Iran grapes 0.05 ± 0.01 7.53 ± 1.25
YE-0045 Meyerozyma caribbica ASC Brazil mango 0.29 ± 0.24 40.24 ± 33.14
YE-0053 Filobasidium wieringae BAS Moldova cherry 0.03 ± 0.00 21.32 ± 1.15
YE-0058 Yarrowia galli ASC Russia apple 0.11 ± 0.00 17.85 ± 0.03
YE-0061 Yarrowia galli ASC Argentina apple - -
YE-0065 Rhodotorula babjevae BAS Russia apple 0.08 ± 0.00 16.08 ± 0.00
YE-0066 Rhodotorula babjevae BAS Argentina apple 0.05 ± 0.00 8.78 ± 0.89
YE-0067 Yarrowia lipolytica ASC Russia apple - -
YE-0068 Yarrowia galli ASC Turkey apple 0.63 ± 0.02 100.60 ± 4.75
YE-0069 Filobasidium wieringae BAS Russia apple 0.06 ± 0.01 7.86 ± 1.30
YE-0070 Hanseniaspora uvarum ASC Russia apple 0.11 ± 0.03 25.34 ± 3.90
YE-0071 Yarrowia divulgata ASC Russia apple - -
YE-0072 Candida zeylanoides ASC Chile apple 0.08 ± 0.01 37.57 ± 1.66
YE-0073 Candida zeylanoides ASC Russia apple - -
YE-0074 Rhodotorula mucilaginosa BAS Russia apple 0.54 ± 0.09 91.74 ± 13.51
YE-0079 Candida zeylanoides ASC Russia apple - -
YE-0080 Yarrowia lipolytica ASC Russia apple 0.08 ± 0.01 12.35 ± 1.08
YE-0081 Yarrowia divulgata ASC Russia gooseberry 0.08 ± 0.01 14.85 ± 3.00
YE-0086 Yarrowia lipolytica ASC Russia apple 0.26 ± 0.05 44.61 ± 7.70
YE-0093 Yarrowia deformans ASC Russia apple 0.31 ± 0.06 58.33 ± 11.56
YE-0106 Hanseniaspora uvarum ASC Russia apple 0.04 ± 0.00 12.94 ± 0.03
YE-0114 Yarrowia divulgata ASC Russia gooseberry 0.03 ± 0.00 4.15 ± 0.14
YE-0118 Candida parapsilosis ASC Russia beet 0.03 ± 0.01 7.63 ± 3.10
YE-0119 Yarrowia deformans ASC Russia apple - -
YE-0120 Rhodotorula babjevae BAS Russia beet - -
YE-0122 Candida parapsilosis ASC Russia apple 0.01 ± 0.00 5.97 ± 0.38
YE-0125 Yarrowia deformans ASC Belarus pepper 0.02 ± 0.00 3.31 ± 0.06
YE-0128 Yarrowia deformans ASC Egypt tangerine 0.02 ± 0.00 3.85 ± 0.05
YE-0130 Meyerozyma guilliermondii ASC Egypt tangerine 0.02 ± 0.00 3.41 ± 0.19
YE-0131 Candida zeylanoides ASC Russia apple 0.06 ± 0.00 7.67 ± 0.13
YE-0133 Filobasidium magnum BAS Russia apple 0.18 ± 0.02 41.04 ± 4.55
YE-0139 Metschnikowia pulcherrima ASC Russia apple - -
YE-0151 Debaryomyces hansenii ASC Spain tangerine 0.15 ± 0.01 38.44 ± 2.23
YE-0159 Metschnikowia pulcherrima ASC Russia quince 0.22 ± 0.03 366.21 ± 24.36
YE-0164 Rhodotorula mucilaginosa BAS Serbia plum 0.04 ± 0.00 5.86 ± 0.78
YE-0166 Rhodotorula mucilaginosa BAS Russia apple 0.04 ± 0.00 7.9 ± 0.41
YE-0177 Rhodotorula mucilaginosa BAS Russia pea 0.03 ± 0.00 6.1 ± 0.05
YE-0179 Meyerozyma caribbica ASC Dominican Republic coconut 0.51 ± 0.06 71.42 ± 7.22
YE-0180 Debaryomyces hansenii ASC Russia tomato 0.13 ± 0.01 23.76 ± 0.2
YE-0204 Meyerozyma caribbica ASC Iran kiwi 0.02 ± 0.00 3.13 ± 0.08
YE-0205 Rhodotorula mucilaginosa BAS Iran kiwi 0.05 ± 0.01 11.35 ± 1.79
YE-0214 Debaryomyces hansenii ASC Russia pepper - -
YE-0216 Hanseniaspora uvarum ASC Russia apple - -
YE-0217 Candida zeylanoides ASC Russia apple - -
YE-0220 Rhodotorula babjevae BAS Russia carrot - -
YE-0221 Filobasidium wieringae BAS Russia tomato 0.04 ± 0.01 9.09 ± 0.86
YE-0230 Filobasidium magnum BAS Israel persimmon 0.12 ± 0.02 33.42 ± 5.34
YE-0242 Aureobasidium pullulans ASC Peru mango 0.75 ± 0.05 736.80 ± 37.48
YE-0250 Metschnikowia pulcherrima ASC Russia strawberry 0.05 ± 0.01 60.11 ± 9.85
YE-0256 Aureobasidium pullulans ASC Serbia cherry 0.11 ± 0.03 19.35 ± 4.5
YE-0260 Aureobasidium pullulans ASC Turkey apricot 0.43 ± 0.02 319.26 ± 7.01
YE-0269 Aureobasidium pullulans ASC Peru mango 0.06 ± 0.06 10.33 ± 10.33
YE-0270 Aureobasidium pullulans ASC Turkey apricot 0.04 ± 0.00 5.84 ± 0.61
YE-0282 Filobasidium magnum BAS Turkey grapes 0.02 ± 0.00 4.48 ± 1.00
YE-0289 Aureobasidium pullulans ASC Russia currants 0.08 ± 0.01 13.74 ± 1.30
YE-0299 Rhodotorula babjevae BAS Russia apple 0.09 ± 0.00 27.32 ± 0.84
YE-0302 Hanseniaspora uvarum ASC Russia apple - -
YE-0303 Metschnikowia pulcherrima ASC Russia apple 0.57 ± 0,01 163.87 ± 38.82
YE-0310 Hanseniaspora uvarum ASC Azerbaijan persimmon 0.06 ± 0.01 96.13 ± 4.20
YE-0316 Metschnikowia pulcherrima ASC Israel persimmon 0.07 ± 0.01 13.97 ± 1.54
YE-0337 Candida zeylanoides ASC Azerbaijan persimmon 1.32 ± 0.21 176.43 ± 30.64
YE-0347 Debaryomyces hansenii ASC Georgia pistachios - -
YE-0367 Candida parapsilosis ASC Vietnam banana - -
YE-0503 Meyerozyma caribbica ASC Vietnam jackfruit 0.1 ± 0.01 14.55 ± 1.55
YE-0623 Candida parapsilosis ASC Vietnam passion fruit - -
YE-0625 Meyerozyma caribbica ASC Vietnam passion fruit 0.05 ± 0.01 7.82 ± 1.46
YE-0652 Metschnikowia pulcherrima ASC Vietnam tangerine 0.03 ± 0.00 4.49 ± 0.08
YE-0672 Debaryomyces fabryi ASC Russia walnut - -
YE-0676 Debaryomyces fabryi ASC Egypt tangerine 0.03 ± 0.00 5.14 ± 0.37
YE-0678 Debaryomyces fabryi ASC Chile apple - -
YE-0680 Debaryomyces fabryi ASC Chile kiwi 0.07 ± 0.01 15.56 ± 1.96
YE-0681 Debaryomyces fabryi ASC Turkey grapes 0.03 ± 0.00 4.45 ± 0.15
YE-0684 Debaryomyces fabryi ASC Georgia peanuts 0.04 ± 0.01 8.95 ± 2.24
YE-0688 Debaryomyces fabryi ASC Turkey tomato 0.04 ± 0.01 7.83 ± 1.91
YE-0700 Meyerozyma guilliermondii ASC Egypt orange 0.07 ± 0.02 9.2 ± 2.02
YE-0712 Meyerozyma guilliermondii ASC Egypt orange 0.15 ± 0.02 28.57 ± 5.10
YE-0713 Debaryomyces fabryi ASC Spain tangerine - -
YE-0718 Debaryomyces hansenii ASC Spain tangerine - -
YE-0719 Debaryomyces hansenii ASC Turkey apple 0.11 ± 0.00 21.71 ± 0.53
YE-0721 Rhodotorula babjevae BAS Turkey apple 0.47 ± 0.06 45.29 ± 3.94
YE-0722 Meyerozyma guilliermondii ASC Vietnam longan 0.06 ± 0.01 11.56 ± 0.95
YE-0725 Metschnikowia pulcherrima ASC Vietnam passion fruit - -
YE-0728 Meyerozyma guilliermondii ASC Vietnam longan 0.07 ± 0.00 18.87 ± 0.00
YE-0735 Meyerozyma caribbica ASC Vietnam guava - -
YE-0878 Meyerozyma caribbica ASC Iran watermelon - -
YE-0882 Rhodotorula mucilaginosa BAS Iran melon 0.05 ± 0.00 9.87 ± 0.51
YE-0959 Rhodotorula mucilaginosa BAS Israel watermelon 0.03 ± 0.00 5.5 ± 0.18
YE-0967 Rhodotorula mucilaginosa BAS Israel watermelon 0.61 ± 0.08 94.98 ± 19.35
YE-0979 Aureobasidium pullulans ASC Israel cress 14.96 ± 1.73 9109.19 ± 146.02
YE-1002 Aureobasidium pullulans ASC Uzbekistan parsley 0.05 ± 0.05 11.98 ± 11.98

* ASC—Ascomycota; BAS—Basidiomycota.

2.3. Synthesis of IAA

For IAA synthesis, yeasts were cultured in a liquid medium for 72 h at 22 °C using a Heidolph shaker. An aliquot of 100 µL of the yeast suspension (OD595) was added to 20 mL of liquid medium. The medium for culturing the yeasts contained 6.7 g of nitrogenous base (Fluka) and 10 g of glucose per 1 L of water with the addition of tryptophan (1 g/L).

Sample preparation for the determination of IAA: 20 mL of the culture liquid was acidified to pH = 3 with hydrochloric acid and placed in a 100 mL separatory funnel, to which 20 mL of ethyl acetate [24] was added and shaken vigorously for 1 min. The aqueous phase was then drained and subjected to this procedure again, and the organic phase was placed in a 100 mL evaporation flask. The re-extracted aqueous phase was drained and a new portion of the organic phase was poured into the same flask. The funnel was then washed with 10 mL of ethyl acetate, which was also poured into the flask. The extract was concentrated on a rotary evaporator (50 rpm) to a final volume of ≤0.5 mL [25]. The resulting concentrate was transferred to a 1.5 mL chromatography vial, and 0.5 mL of acetonitrile was added to the evaporation flask and placed in an ultrasonic bath for 1 min to separate the IAA from the flask walls. The acetonitrile from the flask was also transferred to the vial. Then, 0.5 mL of acetonitrile was again added to the flask and the treatment was repeated. If necessary, the contents of the vial were made up to 1.5 mL of acetonitrile. Quantification of IAA was performed using an Agilent 1100 series high performance liquid chromatograph with UV detector. A Security Guard Catridges C18 4 ×3.0 mm precolumn and a Diasfer 110-C18 5 µm 4.0 × 250 mm analytical HPLC column were used. The detection wavelength was 222 nm. Flow rate of the eluent—1.0 mL/min. Mobile phase—water, acetonitrile, 0.05% trifluoroacetic acid (45:54:1% v/v). The volume of the injected sample was 10 µL. The temperature of the column thermostat was 25 °C. The analysis was performed for 18 min.

Solutions of the standard substance indole-3-acetic acid (DiaM) in acetonitrile were used to calibrate the instrument.

IAA produced by yeasts was expressed as per liter and per gram of dry biomass.

Calibration was performed in six steps (Figure 1). The correlation coefficient r > 0.995. The biomass was used to calculate the specific auxin concentration [26,27]. For each strain, the study was repeated twice.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Calibration curve for standard solutions of IAA.

2.4. Data Analyses

Statistical data processing and graphical presentation of the obtained results were carried out using Excel 2010 (Microsoft, Albuquerque, NM, USA) and Statistica 8.0 (StatSoft, Tulsa, OK, USA) programs. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) was carried out for groups comparison. Statistical significance was judged at the level of p < 0.05.

3. Results

Indole-3-acetic acid was present in the culture liquid of 69 (72% of all strains examined) of the 97 endophytic yeast strains studied after three days of cultivation (Table 1).

This value of active strains differs from the data we previously obtained for non-endophytic yeast strains from different natural substrates. At that time, the percentage of active strains was 92% [27,28]. The observed differences can be explained by the different approaches used in the analysis: in the current study, the determination of indole-3-acetic acid in the culture liquid was performed without the step of pre-concentration and the minimum values of IAA synthesis were not considered. In addition, we were interested in the rapid response of the yeasts and the ability to produce IAA in significant amounts. However, it is known that for some strains the maximum concentration of IAA in the culture liquid is reached only on day 5–7 [17]. The results we obtained for strains of the most abundant yeast species in agricultural products show that all yeast species studied are capable of synthesizing IAAs, but the extent of production is strictly strain-specific (Table 2 and Figure 2).

Table 2.

Proportion of active strains of the studied endophytic yeast species and average IAA production (with standard deviations) in the culture liquid and per unit biomass.

Yeast Species Proportion (%) of Strains Starting to Synthesize IAA after 72 h IAA, mg/L IAA, μg/g Dry Biomass
Aureobasidium pullulans 100 2.06 ± 1.27 1278.31 ± 766.88
Candida parapsilosis 50 0.01 ± 0.01 3.40 ± 1.43
Candida zeylanoides 42.9 0.22 ± 0.14 34.10 ± 18.25
Debaryomyces fabryi 62.5 0.03 ± 0.01 5.24 ± 1.36
Debaryomyces hansenii 50 0.05 ± 0.02 10.62 ± 3.67
Filobasidium magnum 100 0.11 ± 0.03 26.31 ± 7.28
Filobasidium wieringae 75 0.03 ± 0.01 9.56 ± 2.91
Hanseniaspora uvarum 57.1 0.04 ± 0.01 20.28 ± 8.93
Metschnikowia pulcherrima 77.8 0.12 ± 0.04 71.29 ± 28.21
Meyerozyma caribbica 71.4 0.14 ± 0.06 19.59 ± 7.75
Meyerozyma guilliermondii 100 0.07 ± 0.02 13.82 ± 3.32
Rhodotorula babjevae 66.7 0.14 ± 0.06 19.87 ± 5.88
Rhodotorula mucilaginosa 100 0.18 ± 0.06 29.16 ± 9.83
Yarrowia deformans 75 0.09 ± 0.05 16.37 ± 9.43
Yarrowia divulgata 66.7 0.04 ± 0.02 7.60 ± 3.20
Yarrowia galli 66.7 0.25 ± 0.12 39.49 ± 19.64
Yarrowia lipolytica 66.7 0.12 ± 0.05 18.99 ± 8.65

Figure 2.

Figure 2

IAA production by the strains of the studied yeast species (logarithmic scale).

Maximum IAA production (9109.2 μg/g) was found in strain A. pullulans (YE-0979) Strains of this species are regularly cited as the most active producers of IAA in various studies [12,29]. In our previous study on the phytohormonal activity of non-endophytic yeasts, we found the maximum IAA production (7990.4 µg/g) in strain Metschnikowia pulcherrima Y-5623 [27]. In this study, the endophytic strains of this ascomycetous yeast species also showed high IAA activity.

A comparison of the yeast groupings studied, such as Phylum and Origin, showed no statistically significant results. It is most likely that the ability of endophytic yeast to synthesize IAA is determined by the nature of the strains.

4. Discussion

It is widely recognized that endophytic yeasts have an excellent ability to promote plant growth, which can be a boon to agricultural practices. This ability of endophytic yeasts is based on their ability to secrete bioactive compounds such as auxins, gibberellins, siderophores [30,31]. The production of plant hormones provides a direct method of promoting plant growth by endophytes. Auxins and gibberellins have many growth-promoting properties in plants, including promotion of root growth and stem elongation and, more broadly, cell proliferation and elongation. IAA has also been shown to play a role in controlling fungal diseases [31,32]. In particular, the production of IAA by endophytic yeasts has been reported and discussed in detail by several groups [5,8,30]. Our screening of strains from the internal tissues of fruits from different countries shows that more than 70% of endophytic yeast strains produce a significant amount of IAA relatively quickly, i.e., within the first 72 h after cultivation. No significant differences were found between the production of IAA by strains from agricultural products from different countries (Table 1). However, our previous studies have shown that tropical strains of ascomycete yeasts have significantly higher phytohormonal activity compared to strains from other regions [27,28]. Our results suggest that endophytic yeast complexes from the internal tissues of fruits may be a promising source of plant-beneficial yeast strains that can be used to promote plant growth. The isolation of an opportunistic yeast species, Candida parapsilosis, deserves separate consideration. The studied endophytic strains of this species showed the lowest IAA synthesis property. Previously, we detected C. parapsilosis yeasts in high abundance in the internal tissues of ripe fruits of apples and pears growing in conditions of high anthropogenic stress [22,23]. Most likely, opportunistic yeasts belong to the species contaminating agricultural products. This is indirectly indicated by their weak ability to synthesize the phytohormone IAA.

IAA biosynthesis by endophytic yeasts from different fruits is highly strain-specific. Further detailed studies are planned to investigate the multiple factors affecting gene expression of IAA biosynthesis to varying degrees at both species and strain levels.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.K. and A.G.; methodology, R.S., A.K. and A.G.; formal analysis, A.K. and R.S.; writing—original draft preparation, A.K. and A.G.; writing—review and editing, A.K. and A.G.; supervision, A.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Funding Statement

This research was funded by the Russian Ministry of Science and Higher Education, Grant Agreement No. 075-15-2021-1396.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Schulz B., Boyle C.J.M.R. The endophytic continuum. Mycol. Res. 2005;109:661–686. doi: 10.1017/S095375620500273X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Ling L., Tu Y., Ma W., Feng S., Yang C., Zhao Y., Wang N., Li Z., Lu L., Zhang J. A potentially important resource: Endophytic yeasts. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020;36:110. doi: 10.1007/s11274-020-02889-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Streletskii R.A., Kachalkin A.V., Glushakova A.M., Yurkov A.M., Demin V.V. Yeasts producing zeatin. Peer J. 2019;7:e6474. doi: 10.7717/peerj.6474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Duca D., Lorv J., Patten C.L., Rose D., Glick B.R. Indole-3-acetic acid in plant-microbe interactions. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2014;106:85–125. doi: 10.1007/s10482-013-0095-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Doty S.L. Endophytic Yeasts: Biology and Applications. In: Aroca R., editor. Symbiotic Endophytes. Springer; Berlin, Germany: 2013. pp. 335–343. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Limtong S., Koowadjanakul N. Yeasts from phylloplane and their capability to produce indole-3-acetic acid. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2012;28:3323–3335. doi: 10.1007/s11274-012-1144-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tsavkelova E.A., Klimova S.Y., Cherdyntseva T.A., Netrusov A.I. Microbial producers of plant growth stimulators and their practical use: A review. Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 2006;42:117–126. doi: 10.1134/S0003683806020013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Nassar A.H., El-Tarabily K.A., Sivasithamparam K. Promotion of plant growth by an auxin-producing isolate of the yeast Williopsis saturnus endophytic in maize (Zea mays L.) roots. Biol. Fertil. Soils. 2005;42:97–108. doi: 10.1007/s00374-005-0008-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Xin G., Glawe D., Doty S.L. Characterization of three endophytic, indole-3- acetic acid-producing yeasts occurring in Populus trees. Mycol. Res. 2009;113:973–980. doi: 10.1016/j.mycres.2009.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Limtong S., Kaewwichian R., Yongmanitchai W., Kawasaki H. Diversity of culturable yeasts in phylloplane of sugarcane in Thailand and their capability to produce indole-3-acetic acid. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2014;30:1785–1796. doi: 10.1007/s11274-014-1602-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nutaratat P., Srisuk N., Arunrattiyakorn P., Limtong S. Plant growth-promoting traits of epiphytic and endophytic yeasts isolated from rice and sugar cane leaves in Thailand. Fungal Biol. 2014;118:683–694. doi: 10.1016/j.funbio.2014.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Fu S.F., Sun P.F., Lu H.Y., Wei J.Y., Xiao H.S., Fang W.T., Cheng B.Y., Chou J.Y. Plant growth-promoting traits of yeasts isolated from the phyllosphere and rhizosphere of Drosera spatulata Lab. Fungal Biol. 2016;120:433–448. doi: 10.1016/j.funbio.2015.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Camatti-Sartori V., da Silva-Ribeiro R.T., Valdebenito-Sanhueza R.M., Pagnocca F.C., Echeverrigaray S., Azevedo J.L. Endophytic yeasts and filamentous fungi associated with southern Brazilian apple (Malus domestica) orchards subjected to conventional, integrated or organic cultivation. J. Basic Microbiol. 2005;45:397–402. doi: 10.1002/jobm.200410547. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cui Y., Jiang X., Qi F., Liu Y. Isolation and primary identification of endophytic yeast from wine grape. China Brew. 2012;9:82–84. [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Infante E.D.P., Marquínez X., Moreno G. Tomato peel (Solanum lycopersicum L.) colonization by the endophyte yeast Candida guilliermondii (Castellani) Langeron et Guerra. Agron. Colomb. 2012;30:388–394. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tantirungkij M., Nasanit R., Limtong S. Assessment of endophytic yeast diversity in rice leaves by a culture-independent approach. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2015;108:633–647. doi: 10.1007/s10482-015-0519-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Ling L., Li Z., Jiao Z., Zhang X., Ma W., Feng J., Zhang J., Lu L. Identification of novel endophytic yeast strains from Tangerine peel. Curr. Microbiol. 2019;76:1066–1072. doi: 10.1007/s00284-019-01721-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Peng X., Wang Y., Tang L.J., Li X.X., Xiao Y.W., Zhang Z.B., Yan R.M., Yang H.L., Chang J., Zhu B., et al. Yeasts from Nanfeng mandarin plants: Occurrence, diversity and capability to produce indole-3-acetic acid. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2018;32:1496–1506. doi: 10.1080/13102818.2018.1487337. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Fernandez-San Millan A., Farran I., Larraya L., Ancin M., Arregui L.M., Veramendi J. Plant growth-promoting traits of yeasts isolated from Spanish vineyards: Benefits for seedling development. Microbiol. Res. 2020;237:126480. doi: 10.1016/j.micres.2020.126480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Gai C.S., Lacava P.T., Maccheroni W., Jr., Glienke C., Araújo W.L., Miller T.A., Azevedo J.L. Diversity of endophytic yeasts from sweet orange and their localization by scanning electron microscopy. J. Basic Microb. 2009;49:441–451. doi: 10.1002/jobm.200800328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Isaeva O., Glushakova A., Yurkov A., Chernov I.Y. The yeast Candida railenensis in the fruits of English oak (Quercus robur L.) Microbiology. 2009;78:355–359. doi: 10.1134/S002626170903014X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Glushakova A., Kachalkin A. Endophytic yeasts in Malus domestica and Pyrus communis fruits under anthropogenic impact. Microbiology. 2017;86:128–135. doi: 10.1134/S0026261716060102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kachalkin A.V., Glushakova A.M., Venzhik A.S. Presence of clinically significant endophytic yeasts in agricultural crops: Monitoring and ecological safety assessment. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2021;723:042005. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/723/4/042005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Tien T.M., Gaskins M.H., Hubbell D.H. Plant growth substances produced by Azospirillum brasilense and their effect on the growth of pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum L.) Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1979;37:1016–1024. doi: 10.1128/aem.37.5.1016-1024.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Lu Q., Chen L., Lu M., Chen G., Zhang L. Extraction and analysis of auxins in plants using dispersive liquid−liquid microextraction followed by high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010;58:2763–2770. doi: 10.1021/jf903274z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Streletskii R.A., Glushakova A.M., Zavgorodnyaya Y.A., Demin V.V., Chernov I.Y. 3-indole acetic acid generated by yeast fungi of different ecological groups. Mikol. Fitopatol. 2013;47:116–119. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Streletskii R.A., Kachalkin A.V., Glushakova A.M., Demin V.V., Chernov I.Y. Quantitative determination of indole-3-acetic acid in yeasts using high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Microbiology. 2016;85:727–736. doi: 10.1134/S0026261716060187. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Streletskiy R.A., Kachalkin A.V., Demin V.V. Widespread phytohormonal activity among natural yeasts. Adv. Biotechnol. Microbiol. 2017;4:1–2. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Mestre M.C., Fontenla S., Bruzone M.C., Fernández N.V., Dames J. Detection of plant growth enhancing features in psychrotolerant yeasts from Patagonia (Argentina) J. Basic Microbiol. 2016;56:1098–1106. doi: 10.1002/jobm.201500728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Moller L., Lerm B., Botha A. Interactions of arboreal yeast endophytes: An unexplored discipline. Fungal Ecol. 2016;22:73–82. doi: 10.1016/j.funeco.2016.03.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Joubert P.M., Doty S.L. Endophytes of Forest Trees. Springer; Cham, Switzerland: 2018. Endophytic Yeasts: Biology, Ecology and Applications; pp. 3–14. Forestry Sciences. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Petti C., Reiber K., Ali S.S., Berney M., Doohan F.M. Auxin as a player in the biocontrol of Fusarium head blight disease of barley and its potential as a disease control agent. BMC Plant Biol. 2012;12:224. doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-12-224. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.


Articles from BioTech are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES