Skip to main content
Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience logoLink to Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience
. 2022 Sep 9;15:942548. doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2022.942548

Modality specific roles for metabotropic GABAergic signaling and calcium induced calcium release mechanisms in regulating cold nociception

Atit A Patel 1, Akira Sakurai 1, Nathaniel J Himmel 1, Daniel N Cox 1,*
PMCID: PMC9502035  PMID: 36157080

Abstract

Calcium (Ca2+) plays a pivotal role in modulating neuronal-mediated responses to modality-specific sensory stimuli. Recent studies in Drosophila reveal class III (CIII) multidendritic (md) sensory neurons function as multimodal sensors regulating distinct behavioral responses to innocuous mechanical and nociceptive thermal stimuli. Functional analyses revealed CIII-mediated multimodal behavioral output is dependent upon activation levels with stimulus-evoked Ca2+ displaying relatively low vs. high intracellular levels in response to gentle touch vs. noxious cold, respectively. However, the mechanistic bases underlying modality-specific differential Ca2+ responses in CIII neurons remain incompletely understood. We hypothesized that noxious cold-evoked high intracellular Ca2+ responses in CIII neurons may rely upon Ca2+ induced Ca2+ release (CICR) mechanisms involving transient receptor potential (TRP) channels and/or metabotropic G protein coupled receptor (GPCR) activation to promote cold nociceptive behaviors. Mutant and/or CIII-specific knockdown of GPCR and CICR signaling molecules [GABAB-R2, Gαq, phospholipase C, ryanodine receptor (RyR) and Inositol trisphosphate receptor (IP3R)] led to impaired cold-evoked nociceptive behavior. GPCR mediated signaling, through GABAB-R2 and IP3R, is not required in CIII neurons for innocuous touch evoked behaviors. However, CICR via RyR is required for innocuous touch-evoked behaviors. Disruptions in GABAB-R2, IP3R, and RyR in CIII neurons leads to significantly lower levels of cold-evoked Ca2+ responses indicating GPCR and CICR signaling mechanisms function in regulating Ca2+ release. CIII neurons exhibit bipartite cold-evoked firing patterns, where CIII neurons burst during rapid temperature change and tonically fire during steady state cold temperatures. GABAB-R2 knockdown in CIII neurons resulted in disorganized firing patterns during cold exposure. We further demonstrate that application of GABA or the GABAB specific agonist baclofen potentiates cold-evoked CIII neuron activity. Upon ryanodine application, CIII neurons exhibit increased bursting activity and with CIII-specific RyR knockdown, there is an increase in cold-evoked tonic firing and decrease in bursting. Lastly, our previous studies implicated the TRPP channel Pkd2 in cold nociception, and here, we show that Pkd2 and IP3R genetically interact to specifically regulate cold-evoked behavior, but not innocuous mechanosensation. Collectively, these analyses support novel, modality-specific roles for metabotropic GABAergic signaling and CICR mechanisms in regulating intracellular Ca2+ levels and cold-evoked behavioral output from multimodal CIII neurons.

Keywords: nociception, CICR, GABAB, IP3R, RyR, thermosensation, sensory multimodality, Drosophila

Introduction

Understanding how animals sense innocuous and/or potentially harmful stimuli, such as noxious temperature, chemical or mechanical insults, and respond appropriately is crucial for avoiding incipient damage that can lead to injury or death. Typically, upon sensing stimuli, an animal produces a set of behaviors that either mitigate or allow the animal to escape undesirable environmental conditions. Exposure to harmful temperatures can lead to impaired development, reproductive health, and survival, additionally, drastic changes in climate can lead to shifts in preferred temperature indices of species (Dowd et al., 2015; Williams et al., 2016). There are two types of metazoans: endotherms, which regulate body temperature independent of environment, and ectotherms, whose body temperature is dependent on environmental conditions (Clarke, 2014). Both endo- and ectotherms have adopted critical sensorimotor systems for maintaining thermal homeostasis and avoiding potentially harmful temperatures (Clarke, 2014; Gillooly et al., 2017). The somatosensory system plays a critical role in detecting thermal changes in vertebrates and invertebrates, where nociceptive neurons are strongly activated leading to tonic and/or bursting action potentials in response to potentially harmful stimuli (Im and Galko, 2012; Himmel et al., 2017). Integration and discrimination of sensory information is critical for animal survival, where failure to detect and avoid potentially harmful environmental cues can lead to injury. Understanding how integration and discrimination function in poly- or multi-modal sensory systems to generate stimulus relevant behavioral responses remain long-standing and active areas of research (Sherrington, 1906; Stockand and Eaton, 2013; Ohyama et al., 2015; Hu et al., 2017; Imambocus et al., 2022).

The Drosophila melanogaster larval peripheral nervous system primarily detects noxious (chemical, mechanical, and/or thermal) stimuli through high threshold nociceptors innervating the barrier epidermis and are similar to mammalian unmyelinated c-fiber nociceptors (Im and Galko, 2012; Himmel et al., 2017). There are two primary nociceptive neuronal types, polymodal CIV md neurons, sensitive to noxious thermal (high heat), mechanical, and chemical stimuli, where neural activation leads to characteristic corkscrew body roll followed by rapid peristalsis in Drosophila larvae (Tracey et al., 2003; Ohyama et al., 2013, 2015; Vogelstein et al., 2014; Burgos et al., 2018; Himmel et al., 2019; Lopez-Bellido et al., 2019) and multimodal CIII md neurons that are sensitive to noxious thermal (cold) and innocuous mechanical stimuli (Kernan et al., 1994; Tsubouchi et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2015; Turner et al., 2016, 2018; Jovanic et al., 2019; Masson et al., 2020). Detection of noxious (cold) and innocuous (mechanical) stimuli via CIII md neurons elicits stimulus specific behaviors. Noxious cold evokes sustained contraction (CT) of head and tail, thus reducing overall surface area to volume ratio, while innocuous mechanical stimulation leads to a suite of behaviors including head withdrawal, pause, turning, and/or reverse locomotion (Kernan et al., 1994; Tsubouchi et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2015; Jovanic et al., 2016; Turner et al., 2016). Sensory discrimination in CIII md neurons is dependent upon stimulus specific increases in cytosolic calcium (Ca2+) levels, where noxious cold stimulation leads to high levels of cytosolic Ca2+ and innocuous mechanical stimulation leads to mild increase of cytosolic Ca2+ (Turner et al., 2016). However, the mechanistic bases underlying modality-specific differential Ca2+ responses in CIII neurons remain incompletely understood.

In many animal species, transient receptor potential (TRP) channels have been implicated as primary sensory transducers for chemical, mechanical and thermal sensory modalities (Patapoutian and Macpherson, 2006; Venkatachalam and Montell, 2007; Fowler and Montell, 2013; Liman et al., 2014; Himmel et al., 2017; Himmel and Cox, 2020). Specifically, Pkd2, Trpm, and nompC are required in cold sensitive CIII md neurons for noxious cold thermosensation and innocuous mechanosensation (Tsubouchi et al., 2012; Turner et al., 2016). Recent work has revealed chloride ion homeostasis and calcium-activated chloride channel function via the TMEM16/anoctamins, subdued and white walker (wwk, CG15270), are required for cold nociception but dispensable for detection of innocuous mechanical sensory information (Himmel et al., 2021b) providing initial clues to molecular bases of multimodal sensory discrimination in these neurons. Here, we sought to identify molecular bases of multimodal sensory discrimination that arise from differential Ca2+ dynamics in CIII md neurons. Therefore, we investigated signaling pathways involved in increasing cytosolic Ca2+ concentrations. Intracellular increases in cytosolic Ca2+ can result from both ionotropic and metabotropic pathways. Ionotropic pathways include extracellular Ca2+ influx from voltage-gated Ca2+ channels (VGCCs) and TRP channels localized on the plasma membrane and organellar Ca2+ efflux from mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) (Berridge, 1998; Verkhratsky and Petersen, 1998; Grienberger and Konnerth, 2012; Fowler and Montell, 2013; Turner et al., 2016). Metabotropic pathways, specifically G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), are involved in a variety of sensory systems including vision, olfaction, audition, and thermosensation, and in part, function through organellar Ca2+ release (Fukuto et al., 2004; Julius and Nathans, 2012; Jin et al., 2013; Im et al., 2015; Leung and Montell, 2017; Herman et al., 2018; Gu et al., 2022; Imambocus et al., 2022). ER luminal Ca2+ efflux into the cytosol functions through the Ca2+ induced Ca2+ release (CICR) pathway via ryanodine receptor (RyR) and inositol trisphosphate receptor (IP3R). We hypothesized that noxious cold-evoked high intracellular Ca2+ responses in CIII neurons may rely upon CICR mechanisms via TRP channels and/or metabotropic GPCR activation to promote cold nociceptive behaviors.

In this study, we found that metabotropic GPCR and CICR signaling pathway genes are expressed in CIII md neurons and are required for cold nociceptive behaviors in third instar Drosophila larvae. Impaired GABAB-R2 receptor, RyR and IP3R signaling leads to reductions in cold-evoked Ca2+ responses. Extracellular electrical recordings of CIII md neurons revealed GABAB-R2 is required for proper patterning of cold-evoked activity and cold-evoked RyR mediated Ca2+ dynamics promote neuronal bursting. Furthermore, application of GABA or the GABAB-specific agonist baclofen potentiates cold-evoked CIII neuron activity. GABAB-R2 receptor and IP3R signaling is required specifically for cold nociception but not innocuous mechanical sensation, whereas RyR is required for both innocuous mechanical sensation and noxious cold detection. Pkd2 and IP3R genetically interact to specifically regulate cold nociception but not innocuous mechanical detection. GABAB-R2 receptor, RyR and IP3R signaling are not, however, required for CIII md neuron dendrite morphogenesis, action potential propagation or neurotransmitter release indicative of roles for these signaling machinery at the sensory transduction stage.

Materials and methods

Fly strains

All D. melanogaster strains used in this study are listed in Supplementary Table 1. All Drosophila reagents were maintained on standard cornmeal diet in 12:12 h light-dark cycle at ∼22°C. All control and experimental crosses were raised in 12:12 h light-dark cycle at ∼29°C, unless otherwise stated, to enhance GAL4 expression. We utilized several class III neuron GAL4 drivers: 19–12GAL4 (Xiang et al., 2010), nompCGAL4, and GMR83B04GAL4.

Cold plate assay

We assessed D. melanogaster larval responses to noxious cold temperatures via cold plate assay (Turner et al., 2016; Patel and Cox, 2017), where we acutely expose third instar larvae to cold temperatures (Supplementary Figure 1).

Equipment

We used Nikon DSLR (D5300) for recording larval behavioral response. The camera was mounted on a tripod, where the DSLR was facing down toward the table and focused on a pre-chilled (10°C) TE technologies Peltier plate (CP-031, TC-48-20, RS-100-12). We used goose neck oblique light source (Nikon, NI-150) to increase signal to noise ratio for better data processing.

Experiment

All F1 genetic crosses progeny used in assessing cold-evoked responses were raised in 29°C incubator. We tested age matched third instar larvae. We gently removed larvae from food using a thin brush and placed them on a wet Kimwipe. Next, food debris was passively removed by allowing the animals to freely locomote and then gently placing them on secondary wet Kimwipe. Using a spray bottle, we lightly misted water onto a thin black metal plate, after which we placed 5–7 larvae onto the plate. We allowed larvae to resume locomotion, while removing any excess water droplets from around the animals. Next, we began video recording on DSLR (1,920 × 1,080 pixels at 30 frames per seconds) and we placed the thin metal plate on a pre-chilled Peltier device. We assessed cold-evoked behaviors for first 5 s of stimulus.

Semi-automatic video processing and behavioral quantification

For high throughput video processing, we used FIJI and Noldus Ethovision XT. We used video to video convertor1 for uncompressing raw video files. We manually selected the first frame at which cold stimulus was delivered. Next, using custom built FIJI macro we processed the videos. The custom macro first trims each video to desired duration, identifies individual larvae using automatic thresholding (Triangle method) and creates individually cropped (250 × 250 pixels) larval videos. For increased throughput and signal to noise ratio, we next automatically removed background from individually cropped larval videos using automatic thresholding (Li method). For semi-automated quantitative surface area measurements, we utilized Noldus Ethovision XT software, only larvae that were elongated at the onset of the first frame were analyzed. For automatic data processing, we used custom built R macros.2 Briefly, custom R macro combined raw surface area measurements for individual animals within each genotype. Next, we calculated percent change in surface area over time, duration of response, and magnitude of behavioral response. Our primary threshold for behavioral analysis, derived from an in-depth examination of the behavior, percent contraction entails a response of at least a 10% reduction in surface area from initial area for at least 0.5 s. From this metric we also derived CT duration, the total time an animal spends below −10% change in surface area, and CT magnitude, defined as average percent change in surface area for duration of the assay.

Statistical analysis

We preformed following statistical tests for all cold plate assay data analysis. %CT response: Fisher’s exact with Benjamini-Hochberg for multiple comparison. We used r for performing comparisons of percent behavior response between genotypes, we used Benjamini-Hochberg multiple comparison correction. CT duration: Kruskal–Wallis with Benjamini, Krieger, and Yekutieli for multiple comparisons. CT duration data are not normal. CT magnitude: One-way ANOVA with Holm-Šídák’s for multiple comparisons.

Confocal imaging

In vivo dendrite morphology imaging: For assessing md CIII dendrite morphology, we crossed class III specific driver driving membrane tagged GFP (nompCGal4 > mCD4::tdGFP) to gene specific UAS-RNAi lines. Aged matched live third instar larvae were mounted on a microscope slide and anesthetized by using few drops of halocarbon and ether solution (1:5 v/v). Three-dimensional z-stacks were imaged using Zeiss LSM780 with Plan-Apochromat 20x/0.8 M27 objective and 488 nm laser. Image dimensions were 1,024 by 1,024 pixels (607.28 μm × 607.28 μm) with 2 μm step size. Quantitative dendrite morphology analysis was performed as previously described in Das et al. (2017).

GABAB-R2 expression imaging: For visualizing GABAB-R2 expression in md neurons, we utilized a recently developed Drosophila reagent for CRISPR mediated insertion of red fluorescent protein (RFP) after the first exon in GABAB-R2 (Bloomington Stock# 84504). We visualized expression of GABAB-R2::RFP in md CIII neurons using nompCGal4 > mCD4::tdGFP. We imaged the third instar larvae similar to dendrite morphology imaging. We captured red fluorescence using 561 nm laser. We identified md CIII neurons using GFP signal, and we identified other md and es neurons based on cell body position. Red and green fluorescence intensity were analyzed using Zeiss Zen blue software.

Calcium imaging assays

GCaMP imaging

We utilized GCaMP6m for analyzing transient in vivo cold-evoked Ca2+ dynamics in class III md neurons. We mounted live intact third instar larvae expressing GCaMP6m and RNAi in CIII md neurons (19–12GAL4) onto microscope slide as described previously (Turner et al., 2016; Patel and Cox, 2017). We placed the microscope slide onto a small peltier stage (Linkam Scientific Instruments, Redhill, United Kingdom, model: PE120, T95 linkpad and PE95) mounted on the microscope. Using Zeiss LSM780 laser confocal microscope, we imaged CIII md neuron (ddaF) in larval abdominal segment 1. After mounting the animal and visualizing the neuron of interest, we allowed the larva to acclimate to the set up and allowed calcium levels to return baseline. To mitigate condensation on the coverslip created from cold exposure, a very light air current was directed on top of the coverslip and below the objective lens. We next acquired time-lapse data (∼13 frames per second at 62.51 μm × 62.51 μm resolution) and with the following stimulus paradigm [30 s baseline (25°C), ramp down to 6°C at 20°C per minute, 10 s at 6°C, ramp up baseline at 20°C per minute, and hold at baseline for 30 s].

Quantitative GCaMP analysis

We stabilized raw time-lapse videos using Rigid Body transformation from StackReg in FIJI (Thevenaz et al., 1998; Linkert et al., 2010; Schindelin et al., 2012). We manually drew region of interest (ROI) around the cell body and measured area normalized fluorescence for each frame. Next, we calculated changes in fluorescence from baseline using the following equation: FFbaseline=Fn-FbaselineFbaseline*100 We report normalized ΔF/Fbaseline overtime and report average peak ΔF/Fbaseline.

CaMPARI assay and imaging

We utilized a Ca2+ integrator CaMPARI2 for assessing cold-evoked Ca2+ levels at a larger neural population level as previously described (Turner et al., 2016; Patel and Cox, 2017; Moeyaert et al., 2018). We expressed CaMPARI2 in CIII md neurons (GMR83B04GAL4) along with RNAi and tested age matched third instar larvae. We used our cold plate assay Peltier plate for delivering noxious cold stimulus and used AxioScope V16 Zeiss microscope for delivering photoconverting light. We placed individual third instar larvae on lightly water misted black metal plate. We allowed the animals to acclimate to plate before placing the black metal plate on the pre-chilled (experimental) or room temperature (control) Peltier plate, while simultaneously exposing the animals to photoconverting light. We exposed the larvae to cold and photoconverting light for 20 s. Next, within 5 min, we mounted the animals on a microscope slide and imaged dorsal clusters of CIII md neurons in abdominal segments 1–3. Imaging was conducted similarly as described in dendrite morphology imaging section.

CaMPARI quantitative analysis

For analyzing CaMPARI2 data, we chose a dual approach to analyze the red to green ratio from CaMPARI2 signal at the cell bodies and perform a modified Sholl analysis, where we measure fluorescence intensity at radial distances from the cell body.

Cell body analysis

We created a custom automatic pipeline for drawing regions of interest, where users verify ROIs before fluorescence quantification. Using FIJI, we created a custom script, where a maximum intensity projection of each z-stack image is created. Next, the GFP signal was thresholded (Moments method), then background and branches are removed using erode and dilate functions. After background clearing only the cell bodies remain, and the Analyze particle function is used to draw ROIs around cell bodies. We next created a separate batch processing macro, where we manually verify the accuracy of each ROI and manually redraw any incorrect ROIs. Upon ROI verification, area normalized red and green fluorescence intensities were extracted. As previously described (Fosque et al., 2015; Turner et al., 2016; Patel and Cox, 2017; Im et al., 2018), we report evoked photoconverted CaMPARI signal as Fred/Fgreen ratio.

Sholl intensity analysis

We created a set of sequential macros using FIJI for clearing background, drawing radial ROIs for cell body and dendrites of interest, and measuring fluorescence intensities at each radius. Briefly, for background clearing we manually threshold the GFP signal, remove neurites from neighboring cells using the “Paintbrush tool,” and using the “Wand tool” to select all branches and cell body for the neuron of interest. In a batch processing macro, which draws five-pixel wide radial ROIs at a single pixel interval, where only the dendrites and cell body are selected. After radial ROIs are drawn, area and area normalized red and green fluorescence intensities are quantified for each radial step from the center of the cell body. We report evoked photoconverted CaMPARI2 signal as Fred/Fgreen ratios away from the center of the cell body.

Optogenetic assay

We tested neural excitability and neural transmission capabilities for class III md neurons with RyR, IP3R, or GABAB-R2 knockdown. We crossed each UAS-RNAi line with class III specific optogenetic line (19–12GAL4 > ChETA::YFP). Drosophila do not produce a requisite light sensitive cofactor, all trans-retinal (ATR). Therefore, all adult animals in a cross were placed in ATR supplemented food, where the final ATR concentration in food plug was 1,500 μM. All F1 progeny were raised in ATR supplement food. All crosses were kept in a dark box at 29°C.

Equipment

We created a custom rig for our optogenetic experiments, where we implemented principles of dark field illumination for high signal to noise ratio imaging of Drosophila larval behaviors. We used a ring stand to mount white led ring light, where we limited white light exposure to on 2.5 cm circular opening on the stage. We placed two Thorlabs 470 nm (M470L3-C4) led lights below the stage. We recorded animals from above using Canon T3i DSLR camera. We used Noldus Ethovision XT software and Thorlabs led systems for automatically recording and controlling blue light exposure (Thorlabs: DC4100, DC4100-hub, and two M470L3-C4 led light. Noldus: mini-IO box).

Experimental approach

We tested age matched third instar larvae for blue light evoked responses in a dark room. Using a brush, we gently picked out third instar larvae from food and placed them on wet Kimwipe. Next, the animals were placed on a lightly water misted thin clear glass plate. The glass plate was placed onto the optogenetic ring stage and animals were exposed to blue light. Our neural stimulation paradigm was 5 s baseline (blue light off), 10 s of neural activation (blue light on) and 5 s neural inactivation (blue light off).

Quantification and analysis

Drosophila larval surface area was measured live using Noldus Ethovision XT. We used similar data processing pipeline as for cold plate assay analysis including percent response, duration, and percent change in area over time.

Microarray analysis

We analyzed our previously published microarray datasets, which were deposited in Gene Expression Omnibus, md CIII (GSE69353), md CIV (GSE46154), and whole larval (GSE46154) microarray datasets from Cox lab (Iyer et al., 2013; Turner et al., 2016).

Innocuous mechanical assay

We tested age matched third instar Drosophila larvae for behavioral responses to innocuous mechanical stimulation (Kernan et al., 1994; Turner et al., 2016; Himmel et al., 2021b). We placed third instar larvae on lightly misted black metal plate, same as cold plate assay, and allowed the animals to acclimate to the new arena. Using a single brush bristle, we gently touch the anterior segments. We performed three separate simulations with 30 s between each trial. We observed animal responses via Zeiss Stemi 305 microscope. After each mechanical stimulation, we manually scored the following behaviors: no response, pausing, head withdrawal, turning, and reverse locomotion. Each behavioral response receives a score of 1 and no response receives 0. We totaled scores from three trials for a max total of 12 and report average scores for each genotype. Additionally, we analyzed single trial total score (max 4), where we report proportion of each score in each trial for individual genotypes.

Electrophysiology

Extracellular recordings of age-matched third instar larvae were performed in de-muscled fileted preparations submerged in physiological saline and exposed to cold temperatures.

Larval preparation

A third instar Drosophila larva was dissected using fine scissors along the ventral midline and was fixed to the bottom of the experimental chamber by pinning at the edge of the body wall of the filet. After gently removing internal organs, longitudinal muscles were all removed by using a tungsten needle and fine scissors. The experimental chamber was filled with physiological saline (200 μL) and perfused at 30–40 μL/s. The composition of saline is as follows in mM: NaCl 120, KCl 3, MgCl2 4, CaCl2 1.5, NaHCO3 10, trehalose 10, glucose 10, TES 5, sucrose 10, and HEPES 10 (Xiang et al., 2010).

Temperature control

Cold temperature stimulus was delivered using an in-line solution cooler (SC-20, Warner Instruments, Hamden, CT, United States) and controlled by single channel temperature controller (CL-100, Warner Instruments, Hamden, CT, United States). The temperature in experimental chamber was constantly monitored by placing microprobe thermometer (BAT-12, Physitemp, Clifton, NJ, United States) close to larval filet.

Extracellular recording

Class III md neuronal extracellular activity was recorded using a borosilicate glass micropipette electrode (tip diameter, 5–10 μM) by applying gentle suction. Voltage clamp recordings were obtained using patch-clamp amplifier (MultiClamp 700A, Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, United States). The patch-clamp amplifier output was digitized at 10 kHz sampling rate using a Micro1401A/D (Cambridge Electronic Design, Cambridge, United Kingdom) and imported into a laptop using Spike2 software version 8 (Cambridge Electronic Design, Cambridge, United Kingdom).

For gene knockdown experiments, we expressed GABAB-R2RNAi or RyRRNAi in GFP tagged class III md neurons using 19–12GAL4. Extracellular recordings of ddaF md CIII neurons were obtained during cold exposure. The following temperature paradigm was used: 30 s at room temperature (∼22°C), fast ramp down to stimulus temperature (−3.3 ± 0.86°C/s, mean ± SD) and hold for 60 s, and fast ramp up to room temperature (−3.3 ± 0.86°C/s, mean ± SD). We tested three stimulus temperatures (20, 15, and 10°C), where stimulus delivery was randomized between animals and there was >2 min interval between trials.

For GABA, baclofen, and ryanodine pharmacology, we used GFP tagged CIII ddaF neurons (19–12 > GFP) and applied cold exposure similar to gene knockdown electrophysiological recordings. GABA (10–4 M), baclofen (10–4 M), or ryanodine (10–6 M) were applied through the perfusion path.

Spike sorting and firing rate classification: After each experiment, spikes were detected off-line by setting a threshold current in Spike2 software to calculate the average spiking rate in each time bin (10 s). For bursting spikes, a group of three or more consecutive spikes with a spike interval of less than 0.15 s was considered as a burst, and the spikes that constitute each burst were defined as bursting spikes. The remaining spikes were defined as tonic spikes.

Statistical analysis and data visualization

Statistical analyses were performed using R (Fisher’s exact test) and GraphPad Prism. All data were graphed using GraphPad Prism.

Results

Metabotropic GABA receptors are required for cold nociception

Class III md neurons differentially encode mechanical and thermal stimuli by utilizing differential activation levels mediated by Ca2+ signaling (Turner et al., 2016). Innocuous mechanical stimulation results in low evoked cytosolic Ca2+ responses, whereas noxious cold temperature results in high stimulus evoked cytosolic Ca2+ responses. Previous work has implicated the TRP channels Pkd2, NompC, and Trpm in sensing innocuous mechanical stimuli and noxious cold (Turner et al., 2016), however, the molecular bases of how CIII md neurons discriminately encode modality-specific information to elicit stimulus-relevant behavioral output remain unclear. We hypothesized that differential cytosolic Ca2+ levels in CIII md neurons likely arise from signaling mechanisms involved in cytosolic Ca2+ dynamics. Therefore, we first investigated the roles of GPCRs in noxious cold-evoked Drosophila larval behaviors.

We leveraged our previous cell type specific transcriptomic datasets to identify GPCRs that might be required in cold sensing specifically in CIII md neurons. We analyzed ionotropic GABAA (Rdl) and metabotropic GABAB (-R1, -R2, -R3) receptor expression levels in CIII md neurons, where on average Rdl, GABAB-R1, and GABAB-R3 had lower expression compared GABAB-R2 (Figure 1A). Additionally, we analyzed metabotropic GABAB (-R1, -R2, -R3) receptor expression for enrichment in CIII neurons by comparing expression levels between CIII md neurons, CIV md neurons, and whole larvae (WL). We have previously demonstrated that CIV neurons are largely cold-insensitive and are not required for cold-evoked CT behavior (Turner et al., 2016). CIII md neuron GABAB-R1 receptor expression was 1.8-fold higher compared to CIV md neurons and 0.26-fold lower compared to WL (Figure 1B). CIII md neuron expression for GABAB-R2 and -R3 receptor were similar, with an ∼4-fold higher expression compared to CIV md neurons and ∼2-fold higher expression compared to WL (Figure 1B). To further validate our GABAB-R2 CIII md neuron expression data, we visualized GABAB-R2 receptor localization. In order to visualize GABAB-R2 expression, we took advantage of recently published CRISPR-mediated fluorescently tagged GABAB-R2 receptor, where RFP was inserted after the first exon (Deng et al., 2019). We co-expressed membrane tagged green fluorescent protein (mCD8::GFP) and GABAB-R2::RFP in CIII md neuron using the nompCGAL4 driver. Live confocal imaging data revealed that GABAB-R2::RFP expression is not limited to CIII md neurons, but extended to other PNS neurons including multiple md neuron subtypes (CI and CII) and external sensory (ES) neurons (Figure 1C). Interestingly, CII md neurons have the highest GABAB-R2::RFP expression, followed by ES and CI md neurons with CIII md neurons showing the lowest relative expression (Figure 1C). Collectively, transcriptome data reveal that GABAB-R2 receptor has the highest expression levels of the three metabotropic GABA receptors and GABAB-R2::RFP receptor expression is present on dendrites and the cell body of CIII md neurons.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Metabotropic GABAB are expressed in CIII md neurons and are required for cold-evoked CT behavior. (A,B) md neuron transcriptomic analysis. (A) Quantile normalized expression levels of ionotropic (GABAA) and metabotropic (GABAB) receptors in CIII md neurons. All receptors are expressed above background levels and GABAB-R2 has very high expression in CIII md neurons. (B) Comparisons of transcriptomes between CIII md neurons and CIV md neurons or whole larvae (WL). We focused on metabotropic GABA receptors, which show, in general, greater expression in CIII md neurons compared to CIV md neurons or whole larvae (WL). (C) Visualization of GABAB-R2 expression in Drosophila larval PNS. CIII md neurons were visualized using membrane anchored GFP expression to mark overall morphology and GABAB-R2 expression was visualized using an RFP tagged GABAB-R2. GABAB-R2 RFP expression is detectable in CIII (ddaF, ddaA), CII (ddaB), CI (ddaD, ddaE), and ES neurons. Genotype: GABAB-R2::RFP, nompCGAL4 > GFP. (D,E) Cold plate assay assessing cold-evoked behaviors of third instar Drosophila larvae. We report %CT (left), CT duration in seconds (middle), CT magnitude (right). (D) Whole animal mutant analysis of GABAB receptor’s role in cold-evoked behaviors. For each GABAB (-R1, -R2, -R3) receptor, we tested one MiMIC and one CRISPR knockout (KO) line (truncated after first exon and inserted RFP). Additionally, we tested CRISPR GAL4 knock-in (KI) line, which replaces the RFP of KOCRISPR with the remaining exons restoring receptor function. NAverage = 65. (E) Class III specific knockdown of GABAB (-R1, -R2, -R3) receptors. Control conditions include: w1118, 19–12GAL4/+, and 19–12 > LucRNAi. There is no statistical difference between the controls. Knockdown of GABAB (-R1, -R2, -R3) receptors was tested with two independent RNAi lines and comparisons made to 19–12GAL4/+ control. NAverage = 46. Significant differences indicated via asterisks, where *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001.

To assess the role of metabotropic GABAB receptors, we exposed the ventral surface of Drosophila larvae to acute noxious cold temperatures (≤10°C) using a cold plate assay and observed stimulus evoked behavioral responses. Drosophila larvae have a stereotyped bilateral (anterior and posterior) withdrawal toward the middle of the animal, we defined this behavior as contraction (CT) response (Supplementary Figure 1; Turner et al., 2016; Patel and Cox, 2017). Cold plate assays performed on mutant larvae carrying Minos-mediated integration cassette (MiMIC) gene traps for GABAB receptors revealed significant deficits in cold-evoked CT response (Figure 1D). Only heterozygotes were viable for GABAB-R1 and GABAB-R2 MiMICs, which had 11% and 20% CT response, respectively, compared to 57% CT response for genetic controls (w1118). Homozygous GABAB-R3 MiMIC mutant larvae also had significant reduction in %CT response compared to control (19% vs. 57% CT response). GABAB (-R1, -R2, -R3) MiMICs all exhibited significant reductions in CT duration and magnitude of CT response compared to controls (Figure 1D). To independently validate our results for GABAB MiMICs, we used recently published GABAB truncation mutants (referred to as GABAB-KO) fused to RFP (Deng et al., 2019). GABAB (-R1, -R2, -R3) KO mutants all displayed significant reductions in CT response, CT duration and CT magnitude compared to control (Figure 1D), similar to what we observed for GABAB (-R1, -R2, -R3) MiMICs. We also utilized corresponding knock-in constructs (referred to as GABAB-KI), where truncation mutant (GABAB-KO) precursors were used to restore GABAB function by reinserting truncated exons and fusing GAL4 to the C-terminus (Deng et al., 2019). We tested whether these GABAB-KI restored noxious cold sensing deficits observed in GABAB-KO mutants. On their own, all GABAB (-R1, -R2, -R3) KI lines had mild, but insignificant reductions in cold-evoked CT behavioral response relative to control (Figure 1D). However, all GABAB (-R1, -R2, -R3) KI lines were sufficient to significantly rescue GABAB (-R1, -R2, -R3) KO mutant phenotypes for all the parameters tested (Figure 1D). Collectively, our whole animal mutant data suggest that GABAB (-R1, -R2, -R3) are required for noxious cold sensing in Drosophila larvae.

We next drove expression of GABABRNAi using a cell type specific GAL4 driver for CIII md neurons (19–12GAL4) and assessed cold-evoked behavioral responses. We controlled for genetic background (w1118), GAL4 expression (CIIIGAL4/+), and RNAi activity (LUCRNAi). All three control conditions had relatively similar %CT response, CT duration and CT magnitude. Only one of the two independent gene-specific RNAi lines tested for GABAB-R1, -R2, or -R3 gene knockdown led to significant reductions in %CT response compared to controls (Figure 1E). GABAB-R1 knockdown in CIII md neurons showed significant reductions in CT duration and magnitude in only one of the two RNAi lines tested. However, both RNAi lines tested for GABAB-R2 knockdown in CIII md neurons led to significant reductions in CT magnitude and duration (Figure 1E). GABAB-R3 knockdown in CIII md neurons had the mildest effect on cold-evoked CT behavioral response with only significant reductions in CT duration for both RNAi lines tested (Figure 1E). Whole animal mutations in GABAB receptors showed decreased cold sensitivity and cold sensitivity was rescued for all three GABAB receptors using KICRISPR constructs. Consistent with mutant analyses, our cell-type specific knockdowns of GABAB-R1 or -R2 led to strong reductions in cold-evoked responses, however, only GABAB-R2 showed similar deficits in cold-evoked responses using two independent RNAi lines. GABAB-R1 and -R2 form heterodimers, where GABAB-R1 contains GABA binding site and GABAB-R2 associates with heterotrimeric G-proteins (Benarroch, 2012; Papasergi-Scott et al., 2020). Collectively, GABAB-R2 is highly enriched in CIII md neurons compared to other GABA receptors, impairments in GABAB-R2 signaling showed consistent phenotypes for both whole animal mutants and cell-specific gene knockdown in CIII md neurons, and GABAB-R2 binds to heterotrimeric G-proteins, therefore, we primarily focus on GABAB-R2 for the remainder of the analyses.

Calcium induced calcium release mechanisms are necessary for cold sensing

We next sought to investigate signaling mechanisms involved in stimulus specific neural activation levels of CIII md neurons through increases in cytosolic Ca2+. Noxious cold stimulus significantly increases cytosolic Ca2+ levels through Ca2+ permeant TRP channels which are required for proper cold-evoked CT responses (Turner et al., 2016). Apart from Ca2+ influx through TRP channels, another possible mechanism for elevating cytosolic Ca2+ is from intracellular stores mediated through GPCR downstream signaling.

Activated GPCR’s may function through variety of trimeric G proteins including Gαi/o, Gαq, and Gαs. Gαi/o and Gαs generally function in opposing directions, whereby Gαi/o inhibits adenylyl cyclase to reduce cAMP and Gαs activates adenylyl cyclase to increase cAMP. Gαq activation leads to phospholipase Cβ (PLC) hydrolyzing phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) to diacylglycerol (DAG) and inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate (IP3). Furthermore, IP3 production leads to activation of IP3R releasing endoplasmic reticulum (ER) luminal Ca2+ thereby increasing cytosolic Ca2+ levels. In rat hippocampal neuron cultures, GABAB mediated increases in Ca2+ current is dependent upon Gαq signaling, however, it is unknown whether PLC activation is required (Karls and Mynlieff, 2015). Additionally, GABAB receptors have previously been shown to co-localize with Gαq (Karls and Mynlieff, 2015). Therefore, we investigated whether the Gαq signaling pathway is required for Drosophila larval cold nociception.

The D. melanogaster genome encodes three Gαq genes (Gαq, CG30054, and CG17760) and three PLC genes [norpA, small wing (sl), and Plc21C] (Yamanaka et al., 2015). Our CIII md neuron transcriptome analysis revealed that Gαq, CG17760, norpA, Plc21C, and sl are expressed more than 1.25-fold compared to either CIV md neurons or whole larva (Supplementary Figure 2A). Next, we assessed the requirement for the Gαq-type genes and PLC genes in CIII md neurons for cold nociception. Two independent CIII md neuron specific knockdowns of Gαq led to significant decreases in %CT response, CT duration and magnitude compared to controls (Supplementary Figure 2B). Knockdown of CG17760 or CG30054 in CIII md neurons led to subtle but insignificant reductions in cold-evoked %CT response and CT magnitude (Supplementary Figure 2B). However, there were significant reductions in cold-evoked CT duration upon knockdown of CG17760 or CG30054 in CIII md neurons (Supplementary Figure 2B). In addition, norpA, sl, and Plc21C gene knockdowns in CIII md neurons led to significant reductions in cold-evoked %CT response, CT duration and magnitude compared to controls (Supplementary Figure 2B). Collectively, our data support a main effect of Gα q among the three Gα q-type genes and also implicate all three PLC genes in regulating noxious cold-evoked behavior.

Transient receptor potential channels have been implicated in cold-evoked increases in cytosolic Ca2+ and we have shown evidence for metabotropic GABA signaling being required for cold nociception (Turner et al., 2016). Cytosolic Ca2+ concentrations are tightly controlled, where baseline concentrations range from 0.1 to 1 μM. By contrast, baseline ER luminal Ca2+ concentrations are maintained at much higher concentrations (10–3 M) (Reddish et al., 2021). Plasma and ER membranes share close apposition to one another in neurons at cell body, dendrites, and axons, where Ca2+ second messenger signaling can be tightly regulated (Wu et al., 2017; Woll and Van Petegem, 2022). IP3R and RyR are two major Ca2+ ion channels located on ER membrane, where both receptors are activated by Ca2+ binding and additionally IP3R is also gated by IP3 (Woll and Van Petegem, 2022). Therefore, we hypothesized stimulus evoked TRP channel mediated increases in Ca2+ result in activation of CICR mechanism and/or GPCR signaling results in Ca2+ release from ER stores.

Class III md neuron transcriptomics reveals relatively high levels of RyR and IP3R expression above background (Figure 2A). Comparative md neuron transcriptome analyses revealed that both IP3R and RyR are highly enriched in CIII md neurons compared to CIV md neurons (Figure 2B). RyR expression in CIII md neurons is 42-fold higher than whole larvae and IP3R expression in CIII md neurons is modestly enriched at 3.5-fold compared to whole larva (Figure 2B).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Calcium induced Ca2+ release genes IP3 and ryanodine receptors are required for cold-evoked behaviors. (A,B) Transcriptomic analysis using microarray datasets. (A) Quantile normalized expression of RyR and IP3R in CIII md neurons. (B) Comparative analysis of IP3R and RyR expression between CIII md neurons and CIV md neuron or whole larva (WL). (C,D) Cold plate analysis of RyR and IP3R. (C) Drosophila larvae heterozygous mutants for either IP3R (ug3, ka901, and 90B0 alleles) or RyR (16, Q3878X, and Y4452X alleles). All statistical comparisons were made to w1118. NAverage = 49. We report %CT (left), CT duration in seconds (middle), CT magnitude (right). (D) IP3R or RyR knockdown specifically in CIII md neurons using 19–12GAL4 driver. Control conditions include: w1118, 19–12GAL4/+, and 19–12 > LucRNAi. We report %CT (left), CT duration in seconds (middle), CT magnitude (right). There is no statistical difference between the controls. Knockdown of RyR and IP3R was tested using multiple independent RNAi lines and comparisons made to 19–12GAL4/+. NAverage = 55. Significant differences indicated via asterisks, where *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001.

Homozygous mutants for RyR or IP3R do not survive to the third instar larval developmental stage (Joshi et al., 2004) (data not shown). Therefore, we assessed cold-evoked behaviors of heterozygous mutants for IP3R including: IP3R90B0, a deficiency removing both IP3R and NMDAR genes, IP3Rug3, a missense mutant in the ligand binding domain that mutates polar serine to non-polar phenylalanine, and IP3Rka901, a mutation in the Ca2+ channel domain, where a conserved non-polar glycine is replaced with polar serine (Venkatesh and Hasan, 1997; Joshi et al., 2004). All three IP3R mutants had significant deficits in cold-evoked contraction behavior for %CT response, CT duration and magnitude compared to controls (Figure 2C). Three mutations for RyR were also tested for cold-evoked responses including RyR16, RyRQ3878X, and RyRY4452X. RyR16 is a transposase mutant, where the translational start site and parts of the second exon are deleted. RyRQ3878X is a nonsense mutant introducing a stop codon in the Ca2+ binding domain and RyRY4452X is another nonsense mutation, where the receptor is truncated at the transmembrane/pore domain (Gao et al., 2013). Heterozygous mutants for RyR16 had subtle, but statistically non-significant, reductions in cold-evoked %CT response and CT magnitude, however, CT duration was significantly reduced compared to control (Figure 2C). RyRQ3878X and RyRY4452X heterozygous mutants both exhibited significant reductions in all three cold-evoked behavioral metrics (Figure 2C).

Mutant analyses revealed that IP3R and RyR whole animal heterozygotes showed significant reductions in cold-evoked CT behaviors. Next, we performed cell type specific gene knockdown for RyR and IP3R to test whether these genes functions in cold sensitive CIII md neurons. We tested multiple independent UAS-RNAi transgenes targeting both genes. RNAi-mediated gene knockdowns for IP3R and RyR led to severe reductions in cold-evoked CT behaviors, where %CT response, CT duration and magnitude were significantly lower than controls (Figure 2D). Impairments in cold-evoked CT behaviors for IP3R and RyR gene knockdowns were much stronger than mutants for the respective genes. Collectively, our genetic and behavioral studies implicate CICR molecular machinery including Gα q, PLCβ, IP3R, and RyR in cold nociceptive behavior.

Additionally, we sought to decipher whether genes required for proper cytosolic and ER Ca2+ homeostasis may play a role in Drosophila larval cold sensitive neurons for cold nociception. We assessed the roles of store operated Ca2+ entry (SOCE), and Sarco/endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ ATPase (SERCA), both of which are responsible for maintaining proper ER luminal Ca2+ levels, in cold-evoked behaviors. SOCE functions via multi-protein complex involving Stim, an ER luminal Ca2+ sensor, which serves as docking site between the plasma membrane (PM) and ER membrane, and Orai, a PM localized Ca2+ channel (Zheng et al., 2018). SERCA is a P-type Ca2+ transporter localized on the ER membrane that maintains proper ER luminal Ca2+ levels (Magyar et al., 1995). Firstly, transcriptomic analysis revealed that SERCA is enriched in CIII md neurons compared to CIV md neurons or whole larvae. Stim was highly enriched in CIII md neurons compared to CIV md neurons, however, only modestly enriched compared to whole larval transcriptome. Orai is only modestly enriched in CIII md neurons compared to CIV md neuron (Supplementary Figure 3A). CIII neuron specific knockdowns of SERCA, Stim, or Orai lead to severe deficits in cold-evoked CT behaviors compared to controls (Supplementary Figure 3B). Collectively, our data reveal that GABAB receptor, G protein signaling, CICR, and ER Ca2+ homeostasis are required in CIII md neurons for Drosophila larval cold nociceptive behavior.

G protein coupled receptor and calcium induced calcium release signaling are not required for dendrite development or neural transmission

To test the possibilities that cold-evoked behavioral phenotypes of GPCR and CICR signaling impairments arise due to impaired neural development, neurotransmitter release, general excitability, and/or general stimulus processing, we performed morphometric as well as optogenetic analyses. We first assessed the effects of cell type specific gene knockdown in CIII md neurons on dendrite development. Morphologically CIII md neurons are characterized by having actin-rich dendritic filopodia emanating from major branches coupled to space-filling properties (Grueber et al., 2002). Cell-type specific knockdown of GABAB-R2, IP3R, or RyR did not result in significant defects in CIII md neuron dendritic morphology compared to controls (Figures 3A–C). Sholl analysis, which is used for quantitatively assessing spatial branch distribution, did not reveal any significant changes from control (Figure 3B). We performed a principal components analysis on multiple morphological metrics (dendrite branch length, terminal branches, branch density, and Sholl analysis) and we did not visualize any distinct clusters for gene knockdowns of GABAB-R2, IP3R, or RyR compared to controls (Figure 3C).

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

G protein coupled receptor (GPCR) and CICR signaling are not required for CIII neuron dendrite development, general excitability, or neural transmission. (AC) CIII md neuron dendrite morphometric analyses of cell type specific knockdown of GABAB-R2, IP3R, or RyR. CIII md neurons were visualized using nompCGAL4 > GFP. (A) Representative images of CIII md neuron (ddaF) dendrites with either GABAB-R2, IP3R, or RyR knockdown compared to control (LucRNAi). Scale bar = 100 μ m. (B) Sholl analysis of CIII md neuron dendrites, where numbers of intersections are plotted as a function of distance from the soma. (C) Principal components analysis of multiple morphometric parameters including total terminal branches, total dendritic length, branch density, max number of Sholl intersections and distance at which the max intersections occur in Sholl analyses. NAverage = 10. (DG) Neural activation of CIII md neurons using optogenetic actuator (ChETA) with cell type specific gene knockdown of GABAB-R2, IP3R, or RyR. Genotype: 19–12 > ChETA + gene-specific RNAi. (D) Schematic of optogenetic stimulation apparatus. (E) Plot of change in area over time for GABAB-R2, IP3R, or RyR knockdown compared to control (LucRNAi). Blue bar represents 10 s of blue light exposure resulting in neural activation of CIII md neurons. (F) Optogenetic CIII md neuron activation evoked %CT response of GABAB-R2, IP3R, or RyR knockdown compared to control. (G) CT duration in seconds for GABAB-R2, IP3R, or RyR knockdown compared to control. (EG) NAverage = 20. Statistics: %CT response: Fisher’s exact with Benjamini-Hochberg for multiple comparison. CT duration: One-way ANOVA with Holm-Šídák’s for multiple comparisons. (HJ) Drosophila larval responses to innocuous mechanical stimulation. (H) Gentle touch assay scoring schematic. Each behavioral response receives one point and no points, if there was no response, for a maximum of four points per trial. (I) Proportion of each score per trial for each genotype. (J) Average total touch scores for each larva per genotype. NAverage = 30. Statistics: Kruskal–Wallis with Benjamini, Krieger, and Yekutieli for multiple comparisons. Significant differences indicated via asterisks, where *p < 0.05. Created with BioRender.com.

Deficits in cold-evoked behavioral responses could be a byproduct of the defects in CIII md neuronal general excitability and/or defects in properly communicating with downstream neurons due to lack of neurotransmission or action potential propagation. To assess neural excitability and neurotransmitter release, we co-expressed ChETA, an excitatory optogenetic channel, with gene knockdown for GABAB-R2, IP3R, or RyR in CIII md neurons (Figure 3D). Drosophila larvae knocked down for GABAB-R2, IP3R, or RyR in CIII md neurons were still able to perform CT behavior upon optogenetic activation suggesting that CIII md neurons are still able to generate action potentials and release neurotransmitter to downstream neurons (Figure 3E). Initial CT magnitude and %CT response between CIII md neuron specific gene knockdown and control were not significantly different (Figures 3F,G). These data indicate that general CIII md neuron function is not dependent on expression of GPCR and CICR genes.

GABAB-R2 and inositol trisphosphate receptor function in stimulus discrimination but ryanodine receptor is required for multimodal processing

Class III md neurons are multimodal sensor and respond to both noxious cold and innocuous mechanical stimuli. Thus far our data indicate that GPCR and CICR genes are required for cold nociception but are not responsible for dendrite development or general excitability. We hypothesized that the ability of CIII md neurons to detect and respond to innocuous mechanical stimuli is not dependent on GPCR and CICR signaling. To assess innocuous mechanical sensitivity of Drosophila larvae, we performed gentle touch assays using a fine brush bristle on animals with CIII md neuron specific gene knockdowns for GABAB-R2, IP3R, or RyR (Kernan et al., 1994). Responses of Drosophila larvae to innocuous mechanical stimulation include pause, head withdrawal, turn and/or reverse locomotion, where an animal receives a score for performing each behavior, max score of 4 for each trail (Figure 3H; Kernan et al., 1994; Turner et al., 2016; Himmel et al., 2021b). Gentle touch-evoked responses of GABAB-R2 and IP3R knockdown in CIII md neurons were not significantly different from controls (Figures 3I,J). In contrast, RyR knockdown led to significant decreases in total gentle touch score compared to controls. Assessing individual trial data for proportions of gentle touch score revealed a greater portion of RyR knockdown larvae having no response (NR) and reduced proportion of animals performing a greater number of behaviors (Touch score 2 or higher) (Figures 3I,J). Our data reveal that GABAB-R2 and IP3R are not required for innocuous mechanical sensation, whereas RyR knockdown leads to deficits in innocuous mechanosensation. Collectively, these findings indicate that GABAB-R2 and IP3R function in noxious cold stimulus discrimination, whereas RyR has a multimodal requirement for cold and innocuous touch sensation.

G protein coupled receptor and calcium induced calcium release signaling are required for cold-evoked calcium dynamics

Class III md neuron multimodality arises at least in part due to differential Ca2+ responses to stimuli, where high intracellular Ca2+ is observed in response to noxious cold and relatively low intracellular Ca2+ levels in response to innocuous touch. We hypothesized that GABAB and CICR signaling mechanisms are required for cold-evoked high intracellular Ca2+ levels in CIII neurons. To evaluate Ca2+ responses, we utilized a transient Ca2+ sensor GCaMP6. Using a cell type specific GAL4 driver, we expressed GCaMP6 and RNAi for either GABAB-R2, IP3R, or RyR, in CIII neurons and imaged in vivo Ca2+ responses in intact Drosophila larvae (Figure 4A). In controls, there is a robust increase in GCaMP6 fluorescence in CIII md neuron cell bodies in response to noxious cold. Upon GABAB-R2 knockdown, there is a nearly 35% reduction in cold-evoked Ca2+ transient compared to controls. IP3R or RyR knockdown in CIII md neurons leads to nearly 50% reduction Ca2+ response compared to controls (Figures 4B,C). Therefore, cold-evoked intracellular increases Ca2+ are dependent on GPCR and CICR signaling in CIII md neurons.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

G protein coupled receptor (GPCR) and CICR signaling are required for cold-evoked Ca2+ dynamics. (A–C) Cold-evoked in vivo GCaMP6 imaging of CIII md neuron cell bodies. (A) Schematic of cold stimulus delivery and imaging system. (B) Plot of ΔF/Fbaseline over time of CIII md neuron cell body (ddaF) expressing GCaMP6m and gene knockdown for GABAB-R2, IP3R, or RyR compared to control (LucRNAi). (C) Max ΔF/Fbaseline for cold-evoked GCaMP response in CIII md neuron cell body. NAverage = 15. Statistics: One-way ANOVA with Holm-Šídák’s for multiple comparisons. (D,E) In vivo analysis of CaMPARI2 responses to noxious cold in CIII md neurons expressing gene knockdowns for GABAB-R2, IP3R, or RyR compared to control (LucRNAi). (D) Graphical schematic of cold plate assay combined with photoconverting (PC) light and post hoc imaging. (E) Left: Representative images of CIII md neurons expressing CaMPARI2 and gene specific RNAi. Cell bodies are outline in dashed white line. Scale bar: 5μM. Right: CaMPARI2 responses of CIII md neurons (ddaA and ddaF) plotted as fluorescence ratios of Fred/Fgreen. NAverage = 62. Statistics: Kruskal-Wallis with Benjamini, Krieger and Yekutieli for multiple comparisons. Significant differences indicated via asterisks, where *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001. Created with BioRender.com.

Assessing Ca2+ transient using GCaMP6 allows for time resolved Ca2+ responses to stimulus, however, this experimental design has restrictions on spatial resolution and depend on restraining the animal during stimulus delivery. To overcome these experimental design limitations, we visualized Ca2+ responses via a Ca2+ integrator, CaMPARI2, which allows for greater spatial resolution and larvae can be unrestrained and freely moving during the stimulus delivery (Moeyaert et al., 2018). We co-expressed CaMPARI2 and GABAB-R2, IP3R, or RyR RNAi in CIII md neurons and assessed cold-evoked CaMPARI2 responses along the body wall (Figure 4D). CaMPARI2’s fluorescence changes from green to red in presence of high intracellular Ca2+ and photoconverting (PC) light, where neuronal responses to stimuli are reported as Fred/Fgreen ratios (Fosque et al., 2015). We controlled for exposure to PC light, stimulus, and expression of the RNAi construct. When analyzing neuronal cell bodies, control CIII md neurons have significantly higher Fred/Fgreen ratios compared to two no stimulus controls, one with or without PC light (Figure 4E). Knockdowns of GABAB-R2, IP3R, or RyR in CIII md neurons results in significantly lower cold-evoked CaMPARI2 responses compared to controls (Figure 4E).

In addition to analyzing CaMPARI2 responses at the cell body, we took advantage of greater spatial resolution of CaMPARI2 to analyze Fred/Fgreen ratios along the dendritic arbor. We implemented general principles of Sholl analysis to analyze neuronal CaMPARI2 red and green fluorescence intensities along the dendrite (Supplementary Figure 4A). A similar approach has been utilized to analyze the neuronal cytoskeleton (Nanda et al., 2021), however, we created new higher throughput custom FIJI scripts to analyze CaMPARI2 in somatosensory neurons. As with the cell body analysis, cold-evoked CaMPARI2 responses along the dendrites were also reduced for GABAB-R2, IP3R, or RyR knockdowns (Supplementary Figure 4C). The observed reductions in Fred/Fgreen ratios are not due to differences in dendritic area of CIII md neurons across genotypes (Supplementary Figure 4B). Collectively, these results demonstrate that GABAB and CICR genes are required for cold-evoked Ca2+ responses of CIII md neurons.

GABAB-R2 and ryanodine receptors are required for bursting in cold sensing neurons

Here, we have demonstrated that GABAB-R2 and RyRs are required for cold-evoked behaviors, where they mediate increases in cytosolic Ca2+ in CIII md neurons in response to noxious cold temperatures. We hypothesized that GABAB-R2 and RyR are required for proper cold-evoked CIII firing patterns which we directly investigated by performing extracellular recordings of CIII neurons in third instar larval filets. We first investigated whether pharmacological application of GABAB agonists (GABA or baclofen) could potentiate CIII md neuron cold-evoked (10°C) electrical activity. GABA (10–4 M) bath application led to significant increases (30%) in cold-evoked firing rate of CIII md neurons during the first 10 s of stimulus delivery compared to control (Figures 5A,B). Since GABA can potentially activate both ionotropic and metabotropic GABAergic receptors, we sought to test whether using a GABAB specific agonist, baclofen, could lead to increased firing rate in CIII md neurons (Karls and Mynlieff, 2015). Consistent with our GABA pharmacology, bath application of baclofen (10–4 M) lead to significant increases (23%) in cold evoked firing rate during the first 10 s of stimulus delivery (Figures 5C,D).

FIGURE 5.

FIGURE 5

GABAB-R2 receptor is required for proper composition of cold-evoked tonic and bursting pattern in CIII md neurons. (A–D) Assessing cold-evoked electrical responses of CIII md neurons upon (A,B) GABA or (C,D) baclofen application. (A,C) Representative traces of extracellular recordings of CIII md neuron upon cold exposure and (A) GABA 10–4 M or (C) baclofen 10–4 M application. The heatmap represents average spike rate (spikes/second) in 10 s bins. Below, line graph shows real time temperature (10°C) exposure regime of Drosophila larval filet. (B,D) Average spike rate during the first 10 s of stimulus delivery. GABA application: NAverage = 14. Baclofen application: NAverage = 7. Statistics: Paired t-test. (E–I) Electrical responses of CIII md neurons with GABAB-R2 knockdown. (E) Representative physiological firing traces of CIII md neurons with GABAB-R2 knockdown compared to controls during each stimulus temperature (20, 15, and 10°C) and below shows real time temperature exposure regimes of Drosophila larval filet. (F) Average spikes/seconds of CIII md neurons at room temperature (RT) or cold stimulations (20, 15, and 10°C). NAverage = 32. Statistics: Multiple Mann–Whitney test with Benjamini, Krieger, and Yekutieli for multiple comparisons. (G,H) 10°C stimulus evoked tonic spike rate (G) and bursting spike rate (H). Individual spikes are considered to bursts, if inter spike interval is less than 0.15 s for at least three spikes and rest of the spikes counted as tonic spikes. Heatmap above each graph represents stimulus temperature. Spike rate is calculated in 10 s bins. Statistics: Multiple Mann–Whitney tests with Benjamini, Krieger, and Yekutieli for multiple comparisons. (I) Percent change from control for bursting or tonic firing in GABAB-R2 knockdown. Significant differences indicated via asterisks, where *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001.

We next tested whether knockdown of GABAB-R2 in CIII md neurons would lead to alterations in cold evoked electrical activity. We exposed Drosophila larvae to three different stimuli (20, 15, and 10°C), where there is a rapid ramp down to the target temperature and followed with continuous exposure to the stimulus temperature, for a total of 60 s (Figure 5E). In controls, a rapid decrease in temperature causes increased firing composed mainly of bursts, defined as three or more consecutive spikes with an inter-spike interval of less than 0.15 s (Himmel et al., 2021a,b; Maksymchuk et al., 2021, 2022; Figures 5E,H). During steady state cold exposure, CIII md neurons generally show tonic spiking (Himmel et al., 2021a; Maksymchuk et al., 2022; Figures 5E,G). GABAB-R2 knockdown led to significant reductions in average spike rate at room temperature (pre-stimulus baseline) and at 20 or 15°C cold exposure compared to controls (Figures 5E,F). However, we did not observe any change in cold-evoked firing upon 10°C exposure (Figures 5E,F). To further characterize how GABAB-R2 knockdown effects cold-evoked firing, we examined the composition of bursting and tonic activity in 10 s bins for the 10°C stimulus. GABAB-R2 knockdown led to a disorganized bursting pattern in cold exposed CIII md neuron, where on average there was a 28% increase in burst firing rate compared to controls (Figures 5H,I). Meanwhile, there were significant changes in tonic activity with an average of 28% reduction in tonic firing rate in GABAB-R2 depleted neurons compared to controls (Figures 5G,I). Combined, these data indicate that GABA agonist application potentiates cold-evoked CIII electrical activity whereas knockdown of GABAB-R2 leads to aberrant cold-evoked electrical activity patterns in CIII md neurons.

Next, we assessed how loss of RyR signaling affected the cold-evoked firing pattern of CIII md neurons (Figures 6A–C,G). RyR knockdown led to a significant decrease in average spike rate at room temperature (pre-stimulus baseline) and at 20 or 15°C cold exposure compared to their respective controls (Figure 6A; Supplementary Figure 5A). Similar to our findings with GABAB-R2, the average spike rate was not significantly different in RyR depleted neurons relative to controls in response to a 10°C stimulus (Figure 6A). To further characterize the effects on RyR depletion, we parsed out bursting and tonic spikes. RyR knockdown led to significant reductions, an average of 55% decrease, in cold-evoked bursts over the stimulus window (Figures 6B,G). Interestingly, RyR knockdown increased the tonic firing rate resulting in an average 53% percent increase in tonic firing rate within the first 30 s of stimulus compared to controls (Figures 6C,G). During last 30 s of 10°C stimulus, there was an average 27% increase in tonic firing rate compared to controls (Figures 6C,G). Together, our physiological analyses of CIII neuron specific RyR knockdown revealed that RyR functions to promote bursting and restrict tonic firing in CIII md neurons.

FIGURE 6.

FIGURE 6

Ryanodine receptor mediates cold-evoked bursting in CIII md neurons. (A–C) Average spike rate of GFP tagged CIII md neurons expressing RyRRNAi compared to control. (A) Average spikes/seconds of CIII md neurons at room temperature (RT) or cold stimulations (20, 15, and 10°C). NAverage = 29. Statistics: Multiple Mann–Whitney tests with Benjamini, Krieger, and Yekutieli for multiple comparisons. (B,C) 10°C stimulus evoked bursting spike rate (B) and tonic spike rate (C). Individual spikes are considered to bursts, if inter spike interval is less than 0.15 s for at least three spikes and rest of the spikes counted as tonic spikes. Heatmap above each graph represents stimulus temperature. Spike rate is calculated in 10 s bins. Statistics: Multiple Mann–Whitney test with Benjamini, Krieger, and Yekutieli for multiple comparisons. (D–F) Average spike rate of GFP tagged CIII md neurons in response to cold stimulus under ryanodine (10–6 M) pharmacology application. (D) Average spikes/seconds of CIII md neurons at room temperature (RT) or cold stimulations (20, 15, and 10°C). NAverage = 8. Statistics: Multiple Wilcoxon tests with Benjamini, Krieger, and Yekutieli for multiple comparisons. (E–F) 10°C stimulus evoked bursting spike rate (E) and tonic spike rate (F). (G,H) Percent change from control for bursting or tonic firing in RyR knockdown (G) or ryanodine application (H) at 10°C. (I) CICR mechanism through RyR functions in generating cold-evoked burst firing pattern in CIII md neuron. Significant differences indicated via asterisks, where *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001.

To independently investigate the relative effects of RyR depletion, we performed pharmacological experiments involving bath application of ryanodine (10–6 M) to larval filet preparations to activate RyRs, and assessed cold-evoked firing patterns of CIII md neurons (Figure 6D–F,H; Supplementary Figure 5B). In contrast to our observations with RyR knockdown (Figure 6A), ryanodine application led to significant increases in average firing rate at room temperature, as well as during 20, 15, or 10°C stimulus (Figure 6D; Supplementary Figure 5B). We next explored the role of ryanodine application on the types of firing patterns in CIII md neurons and did not find statistically significant differences, however, percent change from control analyses revealed an increase in bursting upon ryanodine application. In bath-applied ryanodine conditions, CIII md neurons exposed to 10°C exhibited an average 144% increase in bursting activity compared to controls (Figures 6E,H). Overall, ryanodine application did not affect the tonic firing rate (Figures 6F,H). These data support a role for RyR in promoting cold-evoked bursting activity in CIII md neuron (Figure 6I).

Transient receptor potential channel Pkd2 and inositol trisphosphate receptor genetically interact in cold nociception

Drosophila larval cold-evoked behaviors are dependent on TRP channels, specifically Pkd2, and cold-evoked increases in CIII md neuron cytosolic Ca2+ levels require Pkd2 (Turner et al., 2016). CICR mechanisms function in amplifying second messenger Ca2+ signaling, which relies upon Ca2+ influx through pathways including TRP channel mediated increases in cytosolic Ca2+. We hypothesized that Pkd2 and IP3R function synergistically in sensing noxious cold stimuli. To assess whether, Pkd2 and IP3R genetically interact, we utilized a transheterozygote mutant approach where there is a single mutant copy for each gene. Single allele mutants for either Pkd21 or IP3Rka901 led to significant reductions in cold-evoked %CT response, CT duration and CT magnitude compared to controls (Figure 7A). Drosophila larvae transheterozygous mutant for Pkd21 and IP3Rka901 had more severe reductions in cold-evoked CT behavior compared to either single allele mutants or controls (Figure 7A). CIII md neurons are also gentle touch mechanosensitive and Pkd2 is required for gentle touch mechanosensation in Drosophila larvae, therefore we also assessed whether Pkd2 and IP3R may genetically interact in mechanosensation (Turner et al., 2016). Similar to previous findings showing Pkd2 is required for innocuous mechanical stimuli evoked behaviors (Turner et al., 2016), Pkd21 heterozygote animals had significantly reduced gentle touch scores compared to controls (Figures 7B,C). In contrast, IP3Rka901 heterozygote animals did not exhibit altered gentle touch scores compared to controls (Figures 7B,C). Drosophila larvae bearing transheterozygous mutations for Pkd21 and IP3Rka901 had significantly reduced gentle touch scores compared to control or IP3Rka901 heterozygotes. However, Pkd21 and IP3Rka901 transheterozygote mutants gentle touch scores were not statistically different from those observed in Pkd21 heterozygote mutants alone (Figures 7B,C). These analyses demonstrate a modality-specific synergistic genetic interaction between IP3R and Pkd2 suggesting TRP channel and CICR signaling operate together to mediate cold-evoked nociceptive behaviors but not innocuous touch-evoked behaviors.

FIGURE 7.

FIGURE 7

Pkd2 and IP3R genetically interact in cold nociception, but not innocuous mechanosensation. (A) Cold plate analysis of Drosophila larvae mutant for either/both Pkd21 and IP3Rka901. We report %CT (left), CT duration in seconds (middle), CT magnitude (right). NAverage = 70. (B,C) Gentle touch assay of Drosophila larvae mutant for either/both Pkd21 and IP3Rka901. (B) Proportion of each touch score per trial for each genotype. (C) Average total touch scores for each larva per genotype. NAverage = 22. Statistics: Kruskal–Wallis with Benjamini, Krieger, and Yekutieli for multiple comparisons. (A–C) Genotypes include: w1118, Pkd21/+, and IP3Rka901/+, Pkd21/IP3Rka901. Significant differences indicated via asterisks, where *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, and ****p < 0.0001.

Discussion

We have demonstrated that both metabotropic GABAB receptor and CICR signaling pathways are required in D. melanogaster larva for cold nociceptive behaviors (Figure 8). First, we have shown that Drosophila larvae mutant for GABAB, IP3R, or RyR have impaired cold-evoked CT responses. GABAB, IP3R, and RyR function is specifically required in CIII md neurons for cold nociception, where gene knockdown results in reductions of cold-evoked Ca2+ responses. Extracellular recordings reveal that pharmacological application of GABAergic receptor agonists (GABA and baclofen) leads to increased cold-evoked electrical activity in CIII md neurons. Additionally, normal cold-evoked CIII md neuronal activity patterning is dependent upon GABAB-R2 and the bursting response is mediated by RyR presumptively related to Ca2+ release from ER stores. Behavioral and functional impairments in cold nociception are not due to structural or developmental defects of CIII md -between GABAB-R2, IP3R, or RyR knockdown and controls. Furthermore, loss of GABAB-R2, IP3R, or RyR did not lead to significant reductions in CT responses when CIII md neurons were optogenetically stimulated indicating that CIII-mediated neurotransmission is functional.

FIGURE 8.

FIGURE 8

Summary of molecules required for cold nociceptive behaviors. Plasma membrane localized TRP channels (Turner et al., 2016) and GPCR (GABAB-R2) are required for cold-evoked behaviors. Gα q and Plc signaling is also required for cold nociception. ER localized IP3R and RyR channels are required for cold-evoked CT response. GABAB-R2, IP3R, and RyR are all required for cold-evoked Ca2+ increases. Created with BioRender.com.

We show that GABAB-R2 in conjunction with Gα q/PLC mediated GPCR signaling is required for cold-evoked CT responses and evoked increases in cytosolic Ca2+. GABAB-R2/IP3R signaling are required for cold-evoked neural responses in CIII md neurons, when assessed by GCaMP or CaMPARI. In vivo GCaMP analyses indicated that cold-evoked Ca2+ increases at the cell body are reduced during temperature ramp down and return to baseline in GABAB-R2/IP3R knockdowns compared to control. Additionally, CaMPARI analyses reveal that these reductions in cold-evoked Ca2+ are not restricted to the cell body but also seen on dendrites. Our results indicate that one GPCR downstream signaling mechanism via Gα q, PLCs and IP3R is required for cold-evoked behaviors. However, GPCR activation of Gα q and PLCs leading to local depletion of PIP2 generating IP3 and DAG may have other possible impacts on plasma membrane localized ion channels. PIP2 positively enhances conductance of VGCCs, where PIP2 depletion through activation of either voltage sensitive lipid phosphatases, PLCs and/or Gq signaling pathways leads to inhibition of select VGCCs (Kammermeier et al., 2000; Liu et al., 2006; Heneghan et al., 2009; Suh et al., 2012). In rodents, dorsal root ganglion (DRG) neuronal pre-synaptic GABAB receptor function regulates N-type Ca2+ currents in a voltage dependent and independent manner (Li et al., 2002; Richman and Diverse-Pierluissi, 2004; Raingo et al., 2007; Callaghan et al., 2008). Metabotropic GABA receptors function in neuroprotection, where research in cerebellar granule cell cultures has shown that GABAB mediated activation of RhoA and Rac functions through G13 to promote synaptic activity and reduce apoptotic cascades (Wang et al., 2021). In neonatal hippocampal cultures, GABAB receptors have been shown to colocalize with Gα q and function through IP3R and PKCα enhancing L-type Ca2+ current (Karls and Mynlieff, 2015). Additionally, GABAB receptors are required in olfactory sensory neuron for Drosophila larval feeding responses (Slankster et al., 2020). These recent findings, including our reported findings, support new emerging roles for GABAB receptors in signaling pathways promoting stimulus evoked behaviors, where GABAB receptors are required for neural activity.

Our data support a role for metabotropic GABAB receptor function at the dendritic and soma level in CIII neurons. We report that loss of GABAB-R2 leads to significantly lower cold-evoked Ca2+ levels and alters cold-evoked electrical activity at the soma. We further demonstrate that CIII cold-evoked electrical activity is potentiated upon pharmacologic extracellular bath application of GABA receptor agonists including GABA and baclofen. Despite this evidence, the potential source(s) of the endogenous ligand, GABA, remains to be determined. Moreover, while GABA agonists increase CIII neuronal activity at the level of the soma suggesting GABAB receptor function in the periphery, we cannot rule out a potential role of GABAB receptor function at CIII pre-synaptic axon terminals which awaits future investigation. While, CIII md neuron downstream circuitry has been explored in the context of gentle touch mechanosensation (Masson et al., 2020), whether this same circuitry, or distinct circuitry, is engaged in the context of cold-evoked behavior remains unknown. We previously demonstrated that modality-specific stimulation of CIII neurons leads to low vs. high stimulus-evoked calcium responses to gentle touch vs. noxious cold, respectively (Turner et al., 2016) which could lead to differential, calcium-induced quantal release of neurotransmitters at CIII axon terminals onto their post-synaptic partners. Such differential release could impact activity in post-synaptic partner neurons and may contribute to modality-specific behavioral output, however future investigations are required to test this possibility as well as clarify the putative roles of CIII downstream circuitry in cold nociception and how GABAergic signaling may modulate sensory discrimination at varying levels of the somatosensory circuit.

Endoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ homeostasis in CIII md neurons is necessary for nociceptive behavioral responses. Our results indicate that ER Ca2+ release (IP3R and RyR) and reuptake channels (SERCA, STIM, and ORAI) are required in CIII md neurons for cold-evoked CT responses. Expectedly, CIII neuron specific impairments in ER Ca2+ release channels led to significant reductions in cold-evoked increases in cytosolic Ca2+ which may ultimately disrupt electrical activation patterns and/or neurotransmission. RyR’s primary ligand is Ca2+ and the likely source of Ca2+ is through cold sensitive Ca2+ permeant channels (Woll and Van Petegem, 2022). However, IP3R mediated Ca2+ release requires either IP3 production through G-protein signaling or cytosolic Ca2+ binding to the receptor (Woll and Van Petegem, 2022). IP3R and RyR have a biphasic sensitivity to Ca2+ binding and precise cytosolic Ca2+ required for channel activation/inactivation are dependent on specific cell types and receptor isoforms (Bezprozvanny et al., 1991; Laver, 2018). Interestingly, GABAB-R2 and IP3R, which are known to function in the same molecular pathway in the neonatal hippocampus (Karls and Mynlieff, 2015), are required for cold nociception and dispensable for innocuous mechanosensation. However, RyR is required for innocuous mechanosensation and noxious cold detection (Karls and Mynlieff, 2015). This suggests that Ca2+ sensitivity curves for both RyR and IP3R may be functionally different in CIII md neurons to allow for gating innocuous/noxious responses.

In response to noxious cold, CIII md neurons exhibit significant increases in cytosolic Ca2+ (Turner et al., 2016), coupled with temperature-dependent increases in electrical activity (Himmel et al., 2021a) where the CIII electrical responses to cold stimulus are linearly encoded as stimulus intensity increases. There are also linear increases in cold-evoked CT behavioral responses to increases in cold stimulus or optogenetic mediated activation of CIII md neurons (Turner et al., 2016). GABAB-R2 or RyR knockdown resulted in reduced cold sensitivity, where in the innocuous cool range GABAB-R2 or RyR depleted neurons require a greater magnitude cold stimulus to achieve similar spike rates relative to controls (i.e., GABAB-R2 or RyR knockdown at 15°C vs. Control at 20°C have spike rates that show no statistical difference; Figures 5B, 6A). However, in the noxious range (≤10°C), we did not observe significant differences in spike rates for GABAB-R2 or RyR depleted neurons relative to controls suggesting that GABAB-R2 or RyR have functional sensitivity at milder stimulus intensities. We have previously implicated NompC, Trpm and Pkd2 in cold nociception, along with emerging evidence for proper chloride (Cl) homeostasis being necessary for cold-evoked behaviors (Turner et al., 2016; Himmel et al., 2021b). It might be that at noxious cold temperature ranges that average spiking activity may be a result of TRP channels and Cl signaling, where GABAB-R2 or RyR function in patterning of cold evoked electrical activity in CIII md neurons. In our experimental paradigm, cold (10°C) stimulation of CIII md neurons consists of an initial rapid temperature decrease to target temperature and then steady state exposure for remaining of the recording. In control CIII md neurons, bursting response is observed during the initial rapid temperature decrease and then electrical activity transitions to primarily tonic spiking during steady state cold exposure. RyR depletion in CIII neurons leads to reduced bursting but increased tonic spiking, whereas RyR activation via ryanodine application facilitates bursting but has no effect on tonic spiking. However, for GABAB-R2 knockdown in CIII md neurons, we observed a disorganized firing pattern, where the composition of bursting and tonic activity was altered compared to controls. Our analyses on bursting and tonic spike activity suggest an overall role of GABAB-R2 and RyR in establishing the normal cold-evoked firing pattern. Sensory perception results in a specifically patterned response that results in feature detections and behavioral choice selection (Doron et al., 2014; Allen and Marsat, 2018). For example, sensory coding in the rat barrel cortex is dependent on spike frequency, where irregular sensory stimuli led to greater behavioral response rate and high frequency microstimulations resulted in the most robust behavioral response (Doron et al., 2014). In weakly electric fish, Apteronotus leptorhynchus, electrosensory lateral line utilizes a dual strategy for stimulus discrimination, where heterogenous and graded changes in firing convey greater information content. In contrast, synchronous bursting which results in low information content regarding environmental cues relating to neighboring fish (Allen and Marsat, 2018). Additionally, in crickets, Teleogryllus oceanicus, ultrasound sensitive AN2 interneurons have bursting spikes that are predictive of behavioral response (Marsat and Pollack, 2006). However, these investigations into neural encoding of sensory discrimination did not involve molecular bases of how action potential firing patterns at the level of individual neurons can encode stimulus evoked behavioral responses. Our findings present new possibilities for investigating the molecular bases of how sensory neuron spike patterning drives stimulus relevant behavioral responses.

A naïve hypothesis would be that loss of function in ER Ca2+ reuptake pathways may lead to increases in cytosolic Ca2+ levels thereby enhancing cold-evoked responses. However, knockdown of SERCA, Stim, or Orai in CIII md neurons led to significant reductions in cold-evoked CT responses. Dysregulated increases in cytosolic Ca2+ levels can lead to impaired activity of voltage gated Ca2+ channels, which are inactivated through Ca2+-calmodulin (CaM) complexes (Hering et al., 1997). Furthermore, calcium imaging studies in Drosophila wing disk development revealed that loss of SERCA led to severely reduced Ca2+ dynamics (Brodskiy et al., 2019). Hyper-elevated Ca2+ can also negatively regulate TRP channel function, whereby Ca2+-CaM binding leads to channel inactivation (Gordon-Shaag et al., 2008). Additionally, changes in Ca2+ gradients leading to localized outward Ca2+ current can cause long term inactivation of Pkd2 channels (DeCaen et al., 2016). Alternatively, excess Ca2+ might facilitate activation of Ca2+-activated K+ channels leading to disrupted firing patterns (Schumacher et al., 2001; Fakler and Adelman, 2008). How alterations in Ca2+ homeostasis lead to impaired cold insensitivity requires future investigations into interactions between Ca2+ signaling and PM localized ion channels. Alternatively, Ca2+ induced neuronal damage/degradation may also lead to impaired cold responses due to loss of function of ER Ca2+ reuptake machinery. High cytosolic Ca2+ could also lead to activation of Ca2+ sensitive proteases which have been shown to contribute to axonal degeneration (Yang et al., 2013; Williams et al., 2014; Vargas et al., 2015). Assessing roles of Ca2+ sensitive proteases, Calpains, which are ∼10-fold upregulated in CIII md neurons compared to whole larva, in context of ER Ca2+ reuptake pathways and cold nociception may yield further insights into the importance of ER Ca2+ homeostasis. Overall, our data indicate that Ca2+ homeostasis is important for cold-evoked electrical patterning as well as behavioral output, where perturbations leading to reduced or excessive cytosolic Ca2+ result in disrupted cellular processes.

Excessive increases in cytosolic Ca2+ can be cytotoxic, thus Ca2+ homeostasis is tightly regulated through local organization of Ca2+ sensors, channels, and transporters. GPCRs, G-protein signaling machinery, CICR signaling machinery, and Ca2+ reuptake proteins are required for cold nociceptive behaviors in Drosophila larvae. Elevated Ca2+ levels can impact multiple downstream targets including Ca2+-activated K+ or Cl channels (Shah et al., 2006; Berg et al., 2012). Anoctamins are a highly conserved family of Ca2+ sensitive proteins that function as chloride ion channels, lipid scramblases, and/or molecular tethers for linking PM and ER membranes (Benarroch, 2017; Ye et al., 2018; Jha et al., 2019). Anoctamin 1, ANO1, is required for nociceptive heat sensing in DRGs and in nociceptive neurons. ANO1 is specifically activated by CICR induced cytosolic increase in Ca2+, which is dependent upon coupling with IP3R (Liu et al., 2010; Cho et al., 2012; Jin et al., 2013). We have recently implicated two Drosophila Anoctamin/TMEM16 channels, subdued, orthologous to human ANO1/2, and white walker (wwk), orthologous to human ANO8, in Drosophila larval cold nociception (Himmel et al., 2021b). CIII md neurons lacking subdued or wwk have impaired cold-evoked electrical response, where knockdown of either gene led to reductions in tonic spiking activity which contrasts with our findings that RyR depleted neurons exhibit reduced bursting activity suggesting that cold-evoked electrical activity patterns (i.e., bursting vs. tonic spiking) can be parsed at the molecular level (Himmel et al., 2021b). Similar to findings in DRG cell cultures, CIII md neurons use excitatory Cl current physiology, where CIII-specific optogenetic activation of a light sensitive Cl channel, Aurora, evokes CT behavioral response (Cho et al., 2012; Himmel et al., 2021b). Additionally, increasing intracellular Cl concentration in CIII md neurons via ncc69 overexpression, orthologous to human NKCC1, resulted in increased bursting activity. Cl ion homeostasis is not required for innocuous mechanical sensation but it is required for cold nociception, which suggests similar functional roles in sensory discrimination for GABAB-R2, IP3R and stimulus evoked Cl current in Drosophila multimodal CIII neurons (Himmel et al., 2021b). However, it remains unclear whether Drosophila Anoctamins function in conjunction with GPCRs, IP3R, or RyR for stimulus evoked activation of cold sensitive pathways.

Transient receptor potential channels are required for Drosophila larval cold nociceptive behaviors (Turner et al., 2016). Specifically, Pkd2 is required for cold-evoked increases in cytosolic Ca2+ and can confer cold sensitivity to non-cold sensitive neurons. Pkd2 function in Drosophila larva is not, however, required for sensory discrimination between cold and innocuous touch (Turner et al., 2016). In mouse cell cultures, microdomains of Pkd2-IP3R interaction were required for CICR mechanism (Sammels et al., 2010). We explored whether Pkd2 and IP3R genetically interact in multimodal CIII md sensory neurons for detecting either cold or innocuous touch stimuli. Transheterozygous mutant analyses indicate that Pkd2 and IP3R genetically interact and function synergistically in Drosophila larval cold nociception. However, IP3R and Pkd2 do not genetically interact in detecting innocuous touch stimuli. Previous work in these multimodal sensory neurons revealed that noxious cold and innocuous touch stimuli-evoke significantly different levels of cytosolic Ca2+ levels (Turner et al., 2016). Perhaps, synergistic function between Pkd2 and IP3R may be required for large increases in cytosolic Ca2+ resultant from noxious cold stimuli but not innocuous touch stimuli. Synergistic function in cold nociception may be independent of GPCR mediated activation of IP3R pathway because at least our results suggest that GABAB and IP3R are specifically required for cold sensing but not innocuous mechanical detection. Future investigations are required to clarify whether Pkd2, GABAB, and IP3R co-localize with one another to form microdomains and how these molecules collectively contribute to modality-specific sensory discrimination.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author contributions

AP and DC: conceptualization. AP, AS, and DC: methodology. AP: cold-plate assays, optogenetics, neural morphometric analyses, and calcium imaging. AP and NH: innocuous touch assays. AS: electrophysiology. AP and AS: statistics and other formal analyses and visualization. AP and DC: writing–original draft. AP, AS, NH, and DC: Writing–review and editing. DC: supervision and funding acquisition. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Acknowledgments

We thank Romee Maitra in the Cox Lab for CaMPARI Sholl image processing. We also thank Shatabdi Bhattacharjee and Dustin E. A. Moon in the Cox Lab for critical comments on the manuscript. We acknowledge the electrophysiological data are obtained in Gennady Cymbalyuk’s laboratory, Gennady Cymbalyuk and Akira Sakurai developed the data analysis discriminating bursting and spiking events in spiking responses of CIII neurons, and role of N type of Ca2 + channels was discussed with Gennady Cymbalyuk. We also acknowledge the Georgia State University Imaging Core Facility for training and instrument support associated with this work.

Footnotes

Funding

This work was supported by NIH R01 NS115209 (to DC). AP was supported by a Brains and Behavior Fellowship, a 2CI Neurogenomics Fellowship, and a Kenneth W. and Georganne F. Honeycutt Fellowship from Georgia State University. NH was supported by NIH F31 NS117087.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnmol.2022.942548/full#supplementary-material

References

  1. Allen K. M., Marsat G. (2018). Task-specific sensory coding strategies are matched to detection and discrimination performance. J. Exp. Biol. 221(Pt 6):jeb170563. 10.1242/jeb.170563 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Benarroch E. E. (2012). GABAB receptors: structure, functions, and clinical implications. Neurology 78:578. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318247cd03 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Benarroch E. E. (2017). Anoctamins (TMEM16 proteins): Functions and involvement in neurologic disease. Neurology 89 722–729. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000004246 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Berg J., Yang H., Jan L. Y. (2012). Ca2+-activated Cl– channels at a glance. J. Cell Sci. 125 1367–1371. 10.1242/jcs.093260 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Berridge M. J. (1998). Neuronal calcium signaling. Neuron 21 13–26. 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80510-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bezprozvanny I., Watras J., Ehrlich B. E. (1991). Bell-shaped calcium-response curves of Ins(1,4,5)P3- and calcium-gated channels from endoplasmic reticulum of cerebellum. Nature 351 751–754. 10.1038/351751a0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brodskiy P. A., Wu Q., Soundarrajan D. K., Huizar F. J., Chen J., Liang P., et al. (2019). Decoding calcium signaling dynamics during drosophila wing disc development. Biophys. J. 116 725–740. 10.1016/j.bpj.2019.01.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Burgos A., Honjo K., Ohyama T., Qian C. S., Shin G. J.-E., Gohl D. M., et al. (2018). Nociceptive interneurons control modular motor pathways to promote escape behavior in Drosophila. eLife 7:e26016. 10.7554/eLife.26016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Callaghan B., Haythornthwaite A., Berecki G., Clark R. J., Craik D. J., Adams D. J. (2008). Analgesic alpha-conotoxins Vc1.1 and Rg1A inhibit N-type calcium channels in rat sensory neurons via GABAB receptor activation. J. Neurosci. 28 10943–10951. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3594-08.2008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cho H., Yang Y. D., Lee J., Lee B., Kim T., Jang Y., et al. (2012). The calcium-activated chloride channel anoctamin 1 acts as a heat sensor in nociceptive neurons. Nat. Neurosci. 15 1015–1021. 10.1038/nn.3111 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Clarke A. (2014). The thermal limits to life on Earth. Int. J. Astrobiol. 13 141–154. 10.1017/S1473550413000438 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Das R., Bhattacharjee S., Patel A. A., Harris J. M., Bhattacharya S., Letcher J. M., et al. (2017). Dendritic cytoskeletal architecture is modulated by combinatorial transcriptional regulation in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 207 1401–1421. 10.1534/genetics.117.300393 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. DeCaen P. G., Liu X., Abiria S., Clapham D. E. (2016). Atypical calcium regulation of the PKD2-L1 polycystin ion channel. eLife 5:13413. 10.7554/eLife.13413 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Deng B., Li Q., Liu X., Cao Y., Li B., Qian Y., et al. (2019). Chemoconnectomics: Mapping chemical transmission in Drosophila. Neuron 101 876-893.e4. 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.01.045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Doron G., von Heimendahl M., Schlattmann P., Houweling A. R., Brecht M. (2014). Spiking irregularity and frequency modulate the behavioral report of single-neuron stimulation. Neuron 81 653–663. 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.11.032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Dowd W. W., King F. A., Denny M. W. (2015). Thermal variation, thermal extremes and the physiological performance of individuals. J. Exp. Biol. 218(Pt 12), 1956–1967. 10.1242/jeb.114926 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Fakler B., Adelman J. P. (2008). Control of K(Ca) channels by calcium nano/microdomains. Neuron 59 873–881. 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.09.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Fosque B. F., Sun Y., Dana H., Yang C. T., Ohyama T., Tadross M. R., et al. (2015). Labeling of active neural circuits in vivo with designed calcium integrators. Science 347 755–760. 10.1126/science.1260922 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Fowler M. A., Montell C. (2013). Drosophila TRP channels and animal behavior. Life Sci. 92 394–403. 10.1016/j.lfs.2012.07.029 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Fukuto H. S., Ferkey D. M., Apicella A. J., Lans H., Sharmeen T., Chen W., et al. (2004). G protein-coupled receptor kinase function is essential for chemosensation in C. elegans. Neuron 42 581–593. 10.1016/s0896-6273(04)00252-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Gao S., Sandstrom D. J., Smith H. E., High B., Marsh J. W., Nash H. A. (2013). Drosophila ryanodine receptors mediate general anesthesia by halothane. Anesthesiology 118 587–601. 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31827e52c6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Gillooly J. F., Gomez J. P., Mavrodiev E. V. (2017). A broad-scale comparison of aerobic activity levels in vertebrates: endotherms versus ectotherms. Proc. Biol. Sci. 284:20162328. 10.1098/rspb.2016.2328 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Gordon-Shaag A., Zagotta W. N., Gordon S. E. (2008). Mechanism of Ca(2+)-dependent desensitization in TRP channels. Channels 2 125–129. 10.4161/chan.2.2.6026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Grienberger C., Konnerth A. (2012). Imaging calcium in neurons. Neuron 73 862–885. 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.02.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Grueber W. B., Jan L. Y., Jan Y. N. (2002). Tiling of the Drosophila epidermis by multidendritic sensory neurons. Development 129 2867–2878. 10.1242/dev.129.12.2867 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Gu P., Wang F., Shang Y., Liu J., Gong J., Xie W., et al. (2022). Nociception and hypersensitivity involve distinct neurons and molecular transducers in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 119:e2113645119. 10.1073/pnas.2113645119 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Heneghan J. F., Mitra-Ganguli T., Stanish L. F., Liu L., Zhao R., Rittenhouse A. R. (2009). The Ca2+ channel beta subunit determines whether stimulation of Gq-coupled receptors enhances or inhibits N current. J. Gen. Physiol. 134 369–384. 10.1085/jgp.200910203 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hering S., Aczel S., Kraus R. L., Berjukow S., Striessnig J., Timin E. N. (1997). Molecular mechanism of use-dependent calcium channel block by phenylalkylamines: role of inactivation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 94 13323–13328. 10.1073/pnas.94.24.13323 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Herman J. A., Willits A. B., Bellemer A. (2018). Galphaq and Phospholipase Cbeta signaling regulate nociceptor sensitivity in Drosophila melanogaster larvae. PeerJ 6:e5632. 10.7717/peerj.5632 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Himmel N. J., Cox D. N. (2020). Transient receptor potential channels: current perspectives on evolution, structure, function and nomenclature. Proc. Biol. Sci. 287:20201309. 10.1098/rspb.2020.1309 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Himmel N. J., Letcher J. M., Sakurai A., Gray T. R., Benson M. N., Cox D. N. (2019). Drosophila menthol sensitivity and the Precambrian origins of transient receptor potential-dependent chemosensation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 374:20190369. 10.1098/rstb.2019.0369 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Himmel N. J., Letcher J. M., Sakurai A., Gray T. R., Benson M. N., Donaldson K. J., et al. (2021a). Identification of a neural basis for cold acclimation in Drosophila larvae. iScience 24:102657. 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102657 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Himmel N. J., Sakurai A., Letcher J. M., Patel A. A., Bhattacharjee S., Benson M. N., et al. (2021b). Chloride-dependent mechanisms of multimodal sensory discrimination and neuropathic sensitization in Drosophila. bioRxiv [preprint] 10.1101/2021.12.10.472093 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Himmel N. J., Patel A. A., Cox D. N. (2017). Invertebrate Nociception. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Neuroscience. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 10.1093/acrefore/9780190264086.013.166 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Hu C., Petersen M., Hoyer N., Spitzweck B., Tenedini F., Wang D., et al. (2017). Sensory integration and neuromodulatory feedback facilitate Drosophila mechanonociceptive behavior. Nat. Neurosci. 20 1085–1095. 10.1038/nn.4580 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Im S. H., Galko M. J. (2012). Pokes, sunburn, and hot sauce: Drosophila as an emerging model for the biology of nociception. Dev. Dyn. 241 16–26. 10.1002/dvdy.22737 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Im S. H., Patel A. A., Cox D. N., Galko M. J. (2018). Drosophila Insulin receptor regulates the persistence of injury-induced nociceptive sensitization. Dis. Models Mech. 11:dmm034231. 10.1242/dmm.034231 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Im S. H., Takle K., Jo J., Babcock D. T., Ma Z., Xiang Y., et al. (2015). Tachykinin acts upstream of autocrine Hedgehog signaling during nociceptive sensitization in Drosophila. eLife 4:e10735. 10.7554/eLife.10735 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Imambocus B. N., Zhou F., Formozov A., Wittich A., Tenedini F. M., Hu C., et al. (2022). A neuropeptidergic circuit gates selective escape behavior of Drosophila larvae. Curr. Biol. 32 149-163 e148. 10.1016/j.cub.2021.10.069 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Iyer S. C., Ramachandran Iyer E. P., Meduri R., Rubaharan M., Kuntimaddi A., Karamsetty M., et al. (2013). Cut, via CrebA, transcriptionally regulates the COPII secretory pathway to direct dendrite development in Drosophila. J. Cell Sci. 126(Pt 20), 4732–4745. 10.1242/jcs.131144 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Jha A., Chung W. Y., Vachel L., Maleth J., Lake S., Zhang G., et al. (2019). Anoctamin 8 tethers endoplasmic reticulum and plasma membrane for assembly of Ca(2+) signaling complexes at the ER/PM compartment. EMBO J. 38:e101452. 10.15252/embj.2018101452 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Jin X., Shah S., Liu Y., Zhang H., Lees M., Fu Z., et al. (2013). Activation of the Cl- channel ANO1 by localized calcium signals in nociceptive sensory neurons requires coupling with the IP3 receptor. Sci. Signal. 6:ra73. 10.1126/scisignal.2004184 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Joshi R., Venkatesh K., Srinivas R., Nair S., Hasan G. (2004). Genetic dissection of itpr gene function reveals a vital requirement in aminergic cells of Drosophila larvae. Genetics 166 225–236. 10.1534/genetics.166.1.225 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Jovanic T., Schneider-Mizell C. M., Shao M., Masson J.-B., Denisov G., Fetter R. D., et al. (2016). Competitive disinhibition mediates behavioral choice and sequences in Drosophila. Cell 167 858-870.e819. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.09.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Jovanic T., Winding M., Cardona A., Truman J. W., Gershow M., Zlatic M. (2019). Neural substrates of Drosophila larval anemotaxis. Curr. Biol. 29 554-566.e4. 10.1016/j.cub.2019.01.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Julius D., Nathans J. (2012). Signaling by sensory receptors. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 4:a005991. 10.1101/cshperspect.a005991 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Kammermeier P. J., Ruiz-Velasco V., Ikeda S. R. (2000). A voltage-independent calcium current inhibitory pathway activated by muscarinic agonists in rat sympathetic neurons requires both Galpha q/11 and Gbeta gamma. J. Neurosci. 20 5623–5629. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-15-05623.2000 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Karls A., Mynlieff M. (2015). GABA(B) receptors couple to Galphaq to mediate increases in voltage-dependent calcium current during development. J. Neurochem. 135 88–100. 10.1111/jnc.13259 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Kernan M., Cowan D., Zuker C. (1994). Genetic dissection of mechanosensory transduction: mechanoreception-defective mutations of Drosophila. Neuron 12 1195–1206. 10.1016/0896-6273(94)90437-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Laver D. R. (2018). Regulation of the RyR channel gating by Ca(2+) and Mg(2). Biophys. Rev. 10 1087–1095. 10.1007/s12551-018-0433-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Leung N. Y., Montell C. (2017). Unconventional Roles of Opsins. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 33 241–264. 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100616-060432 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Li D. P., Chen S. R., Pan Y. Z., Levey A. I., Pan H. L. (2002). Role of presynaptic muscarinic and GABA(B) receptors in spinal glutamate release and cholinergic analgesia in rats. J. Physiol. 543(Pt 3), 807–818. 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.020644 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Liman E. R., Zhang Y. V., Montell C. (2014). Peripheral coding of taste. Neuron 81 984–1000. 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.02.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Linkert M., Rueden C. T., Allan C., Burel J. M., Moore W., Patterson A., et al. (2010). Metadata matters: access to image data in the real world. J. Cell Biol. 189 777–782. 10.1083/jcb.201004104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Liu B., Linley J. E., Du X., Zhang X., Ooi L., Zhang H., et al. (2010). The acute nociceptive signals induced by bradykinin in rat sensory neurons are mediated by inhibition of M-type K+ channels and activation of Ca2+-activated Cl– channels. J. Clin. Invest. 120 1240–1252. 10.1172/JCI41084 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Liu L., Zhao R., Bai Y., Stanish L. F., Evans J. E., Sanderson M. J., et al. (2006). M1 muscarinic receptors inhibit L-type Ca2+ current and M-current by divergent signal transduction cascades. J. Neurosci. 26 11588–11598. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2102-06.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Lopez-Bellido R., Himmel N. J., Gutstein H. B., Cox D. N., Galko M. J. (2019). An assay for chemical nociception in Drosophila larvae. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 374:20190282. 10.1098/rstb.2019.0282 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Magyar A., Bakos E., Varadi A. (1995). Structure and tissue-specific expression of the Drosophila melanogaster organellar-type Ca(2+)-ATPase gene. Biochem. J. 310(Pt 3), 757–763. 10.1042/bj3100757 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Maksymchuk N., Sakurai A., Cox D. N., Cymbalyuk G. (2021). Properties of Drosophila noxious-cold sensing neurons encoding rate and magnitude of change in temperature. J. Comput. Neurosci. 49, S57–S58. [Google Scholar]
  60. Maksymchuk N., Sakurai A., Cox D. N., Cymbalyuk G. (2022). Transient and steady-state properties of Drosophila sensory neurons coding noxious cold temperature. Front. Cell Neurosci. 16:831803. 10.3398/fncel.2022.831803 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Marsat G., Pollack G. S. (2006). A behavioral role for feature detection by sensory bursts. J. Neurosci. 26 10542–10547. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2221-06.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Masson J. B., Laurent F., Cardona A., Barre C., Skatchkovsky N., Zlatic M., et al. (2020). Identifying neural substrates of competitive interactions and sequence transitions during mechanosensory responses in Drosophila. PLoS Genet. 16:e1008589. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008589 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Moeyaert B., Holt G., Madangopal R., Perez-Alvarez A., Fearey B. C., Trojanowski N. F., et al. (2018). Improved methods for marking active neuron populations. Nat. Commun. 9:4440. 10.1038/s41467-018-06935-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Nanda S., Bhattacharjee S., Cox D. N., Ascoli G. A. (2021). An imaging analysis protocol to trace, quantify, and model multi-signal neuron morphology. STAR Protoc. 2:100567. 10.1016/j.xpro.2021.100567 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Ohyama T., Jovanic T., Denisov G., Dang T. C., Hoffmann D., Kerr R. A., et al. (2013). High-throughput analysis of stimulus-evoked behaviors in Drosophila larva reveals multiple modality-specific escape strategies. PLoS One 8:e71706–e71706. 10.1371/journal.pone.0071706 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Ohyama T., Schneider-Mizell C. M., Fetter R. D., Aleman J. V., Franconville R., Rivera-Alba M., et al. (2015). A multilevel multimodal circuit enhances action selection in Drosophila. Nature 520 633–639. 10.1038/nature14297 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Papasergi-Scott M. M., Robertson M. J., Seven A. B., Panova O., Mathiesen J. M., Skiniotis G. (2020). Structures of metabotropic GABAB receptor. Nature 584 310–314. 10.1038/s41586-020-2469-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Patapoutian A., Macpherson L. (2006). Channeling pain. Nat. Med. 12 506–507. 10.1038/nm0506-506 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Patel A., Cox D. (2017). Behavioral and functional assays for investigating mechanisms of noxious cold detection and multimodal sensory processing in Drosophila larvae. Bio-Protoc. 7:e2388. 10.21769/BioProtoc.2388 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Raingo J., Castiglioni A. J., Lipscombe D. (2007). Alternative splicing controls G protein-dependent inhibition of N-type calcium channels in nociceptors. Nat. Neurosci. 10 285–292. 10.1038/nn1848 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Reddish F. N., Miller C. L., Deng X., Dong B., Patel A. A., Ghane M. A., et al. (2021). Rapid subcellular calcium responses and dynamics by calcium sensor G-CatchER+. iScience 24:102129. 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102129 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Richman R. W., Diverse-Pierluissi M. A. (2004). Mapping of RGS12-Cav2.2 channel interaction. Methods Enzymol. 390 224–239. 10.1016/S0076-6879(04)90015-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Sammels E., Devogelaere B., Mekahli D., Bultynck G., Missiaen L., Parys J. B., et al. (2010). Polycystin-2 Activation by Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate-induced Ca2+ Release Requires Its Direct Association with the Inositol 1,4,5-Trisphosphate receptor in a signaling Microdomain. J. Biol. Chem. 285 18794–18805. 10.1074/jbc.M109.090662 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Schindelin J., Arganda-Carreras I., Frise E., Kaynig V., Longair M., Pietzsch T., et al. (2012). Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat. Methods 9 676–682. 10.1038/nmeth.2019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Schumacher M. A., Rivard A. F., Bachinger H. P., Adelman J. P. (2001). Structure of the gating domain of a Ca2+-activated K+ channel complexed with Ca2+/calmodulin. Nature 410 1120–1124. 10.1038/35074145 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Shah V. N., Chagot B., Chazin W. J. (2006). Calcium-Dependent Regulation of Ion Channels. Calcium Bind Proteins 1 203–212. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Sherrington C. S. (1906). The Integrative Action of the Nervous System. New York, NY: C. Scribner’s sons. [Google Scholar]
  78. Slankster E., Kollala S., Baria D., Dailey-Krempel B., Jain R., Odell S. R., et al. (2020). Mechanism underlying starvation-dependent modulation of olfactory behavior in Drosophila larva. Sci. Rep. 10:3119. 10.1038/s41598-020-60098-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Stockand J. D., Eaton B. A. (2013). Stimulus discrimination by the polymodal sensory neuron. Commun. Integr. Biol. 6:e23469. 10.4161/cib.23469 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Suh B. C., Kim D. I., Falkenburger B. H., Hille B. (2012). Membrane-localized beta-subunits alter the PIP2 regulation of high-voltage activated Ca2+ channels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109 3161–3166. 10.1073/pnas.1121434109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Thevenaz P., Ruttimann U. E., Unser M. (1998). A pyramid approach to subpixel registration based on intensity. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 7 27–41. 10.1109/83.650848 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Tracey W. D., Wilson R. I., Laurent G., Benzer S. (2003). painless, a Drosophila gene essential for nociception. Cell 113 261–273. 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00272-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Tsubouchi A., Caldwell J. C., Tracey W. D. (2012). Dendritic filopodia, Ripped Pocket, NOMPC, and NMDARs contribute to the sense of touch in Drosophila larvae. Curr. Biol. 22 2124–2134. 10.1016/j.cub.2012.09.019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Turner H. N., Armengol K., Patel A. A., Himmel N. J., Sullivan L., Iyer S. C., et al. (2016). The TRP Channels Pkd2, NompC, and Trpm act in cold-sensing neurons to mediate unique aversive behaviors to noxious cold in Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 26 3116–3128. 10.1016/j.cub.2016.09.038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Turner H. N., Patel A. A., Cox D. N., Galko M. J. (2018). Injury-induced cold sensitization in Drosophila larvae involves behavioral shifts that require the TRP channel Brv1. PLoS One 13:e0209577. 10.1371/journal.pone.0209577 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Vargas M. E., Yamagishi Y., Tessier-Lavigne M., Sagasti A. (2015). Live imaging of calcium dynamics during axon degeneration reveals two functionally distinct phases of calcium influx. J. Neurosci. 35 15026–15038. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2484-15.2015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Venkatachalam K., Montell C. (2007). TRP channels. Ann. Rev. Biochem. 76 387–417. 10.1146/annurev.biochem.75.103004.142819 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Venkatesh K., Hasan G. (1997). Disruption of the IP3 receptor gene of Drosophila affects larval metamorphosis and ecdysone release. Curr. Biol. 7 500–509. 10.1016/s0960-9822(06)00221-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Verkhratsky A. J., Petersen O. H. (1998). Neuronal calcium stores. Cell Calcium 24 333–343. 10.1016/s0143-4160(98)90057-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Vogelstein J. T., Park Y., Ohyama T., Kerr R. A., Truman J. W., Priebe C. E., et al. (2014). Discovery of brainwide Neural-Behavioral maps via multiscale unsupervised structure learning. Science 344 386–392. 10.1126/science.1250298 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Wang Y., Gai S., Zhang W., Huang X., Ma S., Huo Y., et al. (2021). The GABAB receptor mediates neuroprotection by coupling to G13. Sci. Signal. 14:eaaz4112. 10.1126/scisignal.aaz4112 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Williams C. M., Buckley L. B., Sheldon K. S., Vickers M., Pörtner H.-O., Dowd W. W., et al. (2016). Biological impacts of thermal extremes: mechanisms and costs of functional responses matter. Int. Comp. Biol. 56 73–84. 10.1093/icb/icw013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Williams P. R., Marincu B. N., Sorbara C. D., Mahler C. F., Schumacher A. M., Griesbeck O., et al. (2014). A recoverable state of axon injury persists for hours after spinal cord contusion in vivo. Nat. Commun. 5:5683. 10.1038/ncomms6683 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Woll K. A., Van Petegem F. (2022). Calcium-release channels: structure and function of IP3 receptors and ryanodine receptors. Physiol. Rev. 102 209–268. 10.1152/physrev.00033.2020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Wu Y., Whiteus C., Xu C. S., Hayworth Kenneth J., Weinberg Richard J., Hess Harald F., et al. (2017). Contacts between the endoplasmic reticulum and other membranes in neurons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 114 E4859–E4867. 10.1073/pnas.1701078114 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Xiang Y., Yuan Q., Vogt N., Looger L. L., Jan L. Y., Jan Y. N. (2010). Light-avoidance-mediating photoreceptors tile the Drosophila larval body wall. Nature 468 921–926. 10.1038/nature09576 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Yamanaka N., Marqués G., O’Connor M. B. (2015). Vesicle-mediated steroid hormone secretion in Drosophila melanogaster. Cell 163 907–919. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.10.022 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Yang J., Weimer R. M., Kallop D., Olsen O., Wu Z., Renier N., et al. (2013). Regulation of axon degeneration after injury and in development by the endogenous calpain inhibitor calpastatin. Neuron 80 1175–1189. 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.08.034 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Ye W., Han T. W., Nassar L. M., Zubia M., Jan Y. N., Jan L. Y. (2018). Phosphatidylinositol-(4, 5)-bisphosphate regulates calcium gating of small-conductance cation channel TMEM16F. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 115 E1667–E1674. 10.1073/pnas.1718728115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Zhang W., Cheng L. E., Kittelmann M., Li J., Petkovic M., Cheng T., et al. (2015). Ankyrin repeats convey force to gate the NOMPC Mechanotransduction channel. Cell 162 1391–1403. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.08.024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Zheng S., Zhou L., Ma G., Zhang T., Liu J., Li J., et al. (2018). Calcium store refilling and STIM activation in STIM- and Orai-deficient cell lines. Pflugers. Arch. 470 1555–1567. 10.1007/s00424-018-2165-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/Supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.


Articles from Frontiers in Molecular Neuroscience are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES