Skip to main content
Molecules logoLink to Molecules
. 2022 Sep 12;27(18):5914. doi: 10.3390/molecules27185914

Characterization of Volatile Organic Compounds in Kiwiberries (Actinidia arguta) Exposed to High Hydrostatic Pressure Processing by HS-SPME/GC-MS

Małgorzata Starowicz 1,*, Wioletta Błaszczak 1,*, Ewa Ciska 1, Piotr Latocha 2
Editors: Nazimah Hamid, Kevin Kantono
PMCID: PMC9502335  PMID: 36144650

Abstract

HS-SPME/GC-MS analysis was carried out to characterize the profile of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in kiwiberry cultivars (Geneva and Weiki) exposed to high hydrostatic pressure (HHP) (450–550–650/5 and 15 min). The sum of individual VOCs in Geneva (6.493 mg/kg) and Weiki (11.939 mg/kg) samples was found to be significantly reduced after processing, particularly for pressurization conditions of 650 MPa/15 min (decrease of 62%) and 550 MPa/15 min (decrease of 84%), respectively. On the other hand, Geneva and Weiki exposed to 450 MPa/5 min manifested the lowest loss in the sum of the VOCs. Geneva exposure to 450 MPa/5 min led to an increase in the hexanal (r = 0.782) and linalool (r = 0.806) content. Sample pressurization (450 MPa/15 min) promoted the formation of methyl butanoate, ethyl hexanoate, and cis-geraniol, simultaneously increasing the benzaldehyde (r = 0.886) concentration. However, the treatment of Weiki at 450 MPa/5 min favored trans-2-heptenal (r = 0.999) and linalool (r = 0.970) formation, as well as the (-)-terpinen-4-ol (r = 0.848) and geraniol (r = 0.694) content. Ethyl butanoate, hexanal, and 1-octen-3-ol were highly concentrated in the HHP-treated (450 MPa/5 or 15 min) Weiki. Pressurization decreased the terpenoid contribution, but also increased the contribution of alcohols and aldehydes to the overall VOC number in both tested cultivars.

Keywords: cultivars, kiwiberry, high hydrostatic pressure, volatiles, microextraction, GC-MS

1. Introduction

Kiwiberry (Actinidia arguta) is included in the group of dessert fruit, and it is grown in many European countries, including Poland. Kiwiberry contains over 20 essential nutrients, making it one of the most nutrient-dense fruits [1]. Kiwiberry varies from the well-known and popular fruit of the Actinidia deliciosa or Actinidia chinensis, since it is smaller and hairless. The kiwiberry is an attractive fruit for consumers, due to its health-promoting potential [2] and rich aromatic flavor [3]. This fruit has been shown to have tropical fruit, candy, and green aromas. However, the aroma of the common kiwifruit has been described as more green, grassy, and sulfurous, with a melon and sweet candy flavor [3,4]. The volatile organic compounds (VOCs) of kiwiberries are mainly esters, aldehydes, alcohols, and some monoterpenes.

The delicate fruit of kiwiberry very often responds to improper storage conditions with changes in fruit quality, such as skin softening and wrinkling. Moreover, during kiwiberry production, high amounts of damaged fruit, or fruit without the proper size, are generated. The fruit that does not meet the standards required for the dessert fruit cannot be commercialized; therefore, it is frequently processed into jams and juices [2].

It is well known that plant cultivars, ripening, storage, and technological processes are the key factors affecting the profile of VOCs in kiwifruit-based products [3]. As reported by these authors, kiwifruit-based products demonstrate strong off-odors, which have been described as old cut grass, hay, and overripe. The processing of kiwifruit juice favored the formation of (E)-3-hexenal, which is responsible for the characteristic hay off-odor. In contrast, the aroma of kiwiberry juice—not from concentrate—has been described as green, grassy, fruity, floral, resulting from a propenal, hexanal, pentane, 1-hexanol, and methanol composition [5]. Overripe and terpene-like off-flavors were formed in kiwifruit puree upon storage, which were related to the formation of VOCs such as (E)-2-hexenal, cyclohexanone, terpene esters, linalyl acetate, isobornyl acetate, and α-terpenyl acetate. On the other hand, the main odorants found in fresh puree are 3-penten-2-ol, ethyl butanoate, (E)-2-hexenal, 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one, 1-octen-3-ol, methyl benzoate, and hexyl hexanoate [6]. Among the freshness descriptors for fruits, aroma was a principal factor for high consumer acceptance [7]. Traditional thermal processes increased the stability, and thus, the shelf life, of fruit-based products, but distinctly reduced the fresh- and fruity-like aroma notes.

High hydrostatic pressure (HHP) is a physical process used in food preservation, wherein the food is exposed to pressure (up to 700 MPa), and the processing temperature usually does not exceed 50 °C. Therefore, HHP enabled the production of products with prolonged shelf lives and with high nutritional quality due to the preservation of the majority of bioactive food constituents [8]. Moreover, HHP-treated plant-based products demonstrated a natural fresh-like appearance and aroma [9]. According to Zhao et al. [9], the juice obtained from the common kiwifruit and exposed to a pressure of 500 MPa for 10 min presents a similar volatile profile to that of a fresh sample. Chen et al. [10] demonstrated that ethyl acetate, with ethereal, fruity, and brandy-like aromas found in fresh kiwifruit pulp, does not change after HHP processing (400–500–600 MPa/5–10–15 min). In contrast, a substantial decrease in the butyl acetate content (ester with fruity aroma notes) was observed after sample exposure to pressures above 400 MPa.

The influence of high-pressure treatment on the VOCs in the common kiwifruit of A. deliciosa or A. chinensis had been evaluated in previous reports [9,10,11]. However, there are scarce data available regarding the effect of pressurization on the profile of volatile compounds in kiwiberries (A. arguta) with an emphasis on the plant cultivars. Therefore, the aim of this research was to study the profile of VOCs in two kiwiberry cultivars (cvs), i.e., Geneva and Weiki, as well as to characterize the changes in the VOC profiles as a result of kiwiberry processing under HHP (450–550–650 MPa for 5 and 15 min). We elaborated the VOC profile using headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). Additionally, statistical tools were used to determine the relationship between the studied parameters.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Qualitative Analysis of VOCs in Kiwiberry Cultivars

The cv Geneva used in this study had fruit with green flesh and skin, while the fruit of cv Weiki was characterized by green flesh and a red blush. The tested cvs showed significant variation in the profile of the volatile organic compounds (VOCs). A total of 39 and 68 volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were detected in all the tested (untreated and HHP-treated) samples of cvs Geneva and Weiki, respectively (Table 1 and Table 2). Most of the VOCs were linked with their aroma notes. Therefore, aroma descriptors for identified compounds were collected from the online databases pherobase.com and pubchem.com (accessed on 1 August 2022).

Table 1.

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) identified in the untreated and the HHP-treated (450–550–650 MPa/5 and 15 min) cv Geneva. VOCs are listed according to the experimental linear retention indices (LRI exp.).

Compounds Aroma Description 1 LRI exp. LRI lit. 2 Untreated 450MPa/5′ 450MPa/15′ 550MPa/5′ 550MPa/15′ 650MPa/5′ 650MPa/15′
methyl butanoate fruity, apple 990 993 +
(Z)-2-decanal - 988 984 +
ethyl butanoate fruity, pineapple 1030 1026 + + + + + + +
pentanal fermented, fruity 1088 1097 +
α-myrcene sweet, fruity 1170 1176 +
α-terpinene fruity, lemon 1190 1188 + + + + + + +
α-limonene citrus, fruity 1210 1212 + + + + +
isopentyl alcohol fermented 1220 1221 + + +
hexanal grassy 1226 1228 + + + + + + +
ethyl hexanoate fruity, strawberry 1240 1240 + + + + +
o-cymene citrus 1245 1248 +
hexyl acetate fruity 1285 1280 +
α-terpinolene sweet, fruity 1288 1297 + + + + + + +
2-hexenal fruity, green 1290 1300 + + + + + + +
1-octen-3-one earthy, mushroom 1315 1317 + + + + + + +
octanal lemon, citrus 1320 1319 + + + + + +
6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one green, citrus 1330 1330 + + + + + + +
1-hexanol fatty, fruity 1359 1360 + + + + + + +
3-hexen-1-ol - 1377 1384 +
3-octanol citrus, nutty 1415 1417 + + + + + +
(E)-2-hexen-1-ol vegetable 1420 1420 + + + + + + +
ethyl caprylate fruity, sweet 1424 1421 +
(Z)-2-heptenal - 1435 1437 + + + + + + +
3,5,5-trimethyl-2-hexene - 1452 MS 3 + + +
p-α-dimethyl-styrene phenolic, spicy 1439 1440 + + + + + +
(E)-2-octenal fatty, fruity 1459 1461 + + + + +
2-ethyl-1-hexanol citrus 1480 1484 + + +
benzaldehyde burnt sugar 1522 1525 + + + + + + +
α-linalool sweet, lemon 1560 1562 + + + + + + +
terpinen-4-ol sweet, fruity 1590 1593 + + + + +
methyl benzoate flowery, honey 1614 1615 + + + + + + +
(E,E)-2,4-heptadienal - 1623 1627 + + + + + +
butanoic acid oily 1624 1628 +
ethyl benzoate Chamomile flower, celery, fruity 1640 1644 + + + + + + +
1-nonanol floral 1662 1668 + + + + + +
carvone basil, bitter 1743 1749 +
cis-geraniol floral, geranium 1838 1840 + + + + +
p-mentha-1,8-dien-9-ol - 1955 1962 + + + +
octanoic acid fruity, acidic 2053 2046 +

1 Aroma descriptors collected from pherobase.com and pubchem.com. 2 Linear retention indices according to data in the literature. 3 MS—compounds identified according to their mass spectrum.

Table 2.

Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) identified in the untreated and HHP-treated (450–550–650 MPa/5 and 15 min) cv Weiki. VOCs are listed according to the experimental linear retention indices (LRI exp.).

Compounds Aroma Description 1 LRI exp. LRI lit. 2 Untreated 450MPa/5′ 450MPa/15′ 550MPa/5′ 550MPa/15′ 650MPa/5′ 650MPa/15′
pentanal fermented, fruity 988 984 + + + +
methyl butanoate fruity, apple 990 993 + + + +
α-pinene pine 1005 1008 + + + + + + +
ethyl butanoate fruity, pineapple 1030 1026 + + + + + + +
propionoic acid propyl ester apple, pine 1045 1059 +
hexanal grassy 1088 1097 + + + + + + +
(Z)-2-undecane fruity 1163 1173 + +
α-myrcene sweet, fruity 1170 1176 + + + + + + +
α-terpinene fruity, lemon 1190 1188 +
2-heptanone banana-like 1186 1185 +
α-limonene citrus, fruity 1210 1212 + + + + + + +
(2Z)-3-pentyl-2,4-pentadien-1-ol - 1218 MS 3 +
isopentyl alcohol fermented 1220 1221 +
eucalyptol minty, sweet 1224 1224 + + + + + + +
2-hexenal fruity, green 1226 1228 + + + + + + +
ethyl hexanoate fruity, strawberry 1240 1240 + + + + + + +
γ-terpinene bitter, citrus 1241 1243 + + + + + +
β-cis-ocimene citrus 1243 1245 + +
o-cymene citrus 1245 1248 + + + + + +
p-cymene lemon, fruity 1275 1277 +
hexyl acetate fruity 1285 1280 + + + + + +
α-terpinolene sweet, fruity 1288 1297 + + + + + + +
octanal lemon, citrus 1290 1300 + + + +
3-hydroxy-2-butanone - 1299 MS +
2,3-dimethyl-3-undecanol - 1305 MS +
(Z)-3-hexen-1-ol, acetate banana, floral 1312 1313 + + + + +
1-octen-3-one earthy, mushroom 1315 1317 + +
(Z)-2-heptenal - 1320 1319 +
(E)-2-hexen-1-ol, acetate green 1324 1325 + + + + +
6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one green, citrus 1330 1330 + + + + + + +
E,E-2,6-dimethyl-1,3,5,7-octatetraene - 1345 MS +
1-hexanol fatty, fruity 1359 1360 + + + + + +
2,6-dimethyl-2,6-octadiene - 1364 MS + +
3-hexen-1-ol - 1377 1384 + + +
nonanal fruity, citrus 1412 1415 +
3-octanol citrus, nutty 1415 1417 + + + +
6-methyl-3-heptanol - 1418 MS +
(E)-2-hexen-1-ol vegetable 1420 1420 + + + + + +
ethyl caprylate fruity, sweet 1424 1421 + +
(E)-2-octenal fatty, fruity 1435 1437 + +
p-α-dimethyl-styrene phenolic, spicy 1439 1440 + + + + + + +
ethyl octanoate fruity, sweet 1440 1441 + +
1-octen-3-ol mushroom-like 1445 1451 + + + + + + +
3,5,5-trimethyl-2-hexene - 1452 MS + + + + + +
(E,E)-2,4-heptadienal - 1459 1461 +
2-ethyl-1-hexanol citrus 1480 1484 + +
benzaldehyde burnt sugar 1522 1525 + +
(Z)-2-nonenal fatty, cucumber 1530 1528 +
α-linalool sweet, lemon 1560 1562 + + + + + +
terpinen-4-ol sweet, fruity 1590 1593 + + + + + + +
p-menth-1-en-4-ol - 1608 MS +
methyl benzoate flowery, honey 1614 1615 + + +
(Z)-2-decanal - 1623 1627 +
butanoic acid oily 1624 1628 +
verbenol fresh, pine 1625 1629 +
ethyl benzoate Chamomile flower, celery, fruity 1640 1644 + + + + + + +
1-nonanol floral 1662 1668 +
cis-citral lemon-like 1674 1678 +
α-terpineol peach, fruity 1730 1720 + + + + + + +
verbenone minty, spicy 1733 1735 + +
carvone basil, bitter 1743 1749 +
cis-geraniol floral, geranium 1838 1840 + + + + + +
cis-carveol citrus, fruity 1841 1846 +
trans-geraniol floral 1860 1865 + + + + + +
p-cymen-8-ol floral, sweet, citrus 1882 1887 + +
2-phenylethanol rose-like, fruity 1928 1932 + + +
p-mentha-1,8-dien-9-ol - 1955 1962 + +
octanoic acid fruity, acidic 2053 2046 +

1 Aroma descriptors collected from pherobase.com and pubchem.com. 2 Linear retention indices according to data in the literature. 3 MS—compounds identified according to their mass spectrum.

A total of 18 and 28 VOCs were identified in the untreated Geneva (Table 1) and Weiki (Table 2) kiwiberries, respectively. However, the HHP-treated samples showed a different number of VOCs, depending on the parameters used upon HHP processing (450, 550, 650 MPa, for 5 and 15 min).

As shown, pressurization of cv Geneva led to a distinct increase in the number of identified VOCs. The highest number of VOCs (30 highly volatilized compounds) was found after sample processing at 450 MPa for 15 min. However, the lowest VOC number (22 compounds) was distinguished after sample exposure to 450 MPa/5 min. Evidently, the pressurization of Geneva favored the formation of ethyl hexanoate, octanal, 3-octanol, 3,5,5-trimethyl-2-hexene, p-α-dimethyl-styrene, (E)-2-octenal, 2-ethyl-1-hexanol, (E,E)-2,4-heptadienal, 1-nonanol, cis-geraniol, or p-metha-1,8-dien-9-ol. However, methyl butanoate, (Z)-2-decanal, o-cymene, ethyl caprylate, and octanoic acid were only observed after sample exposure to 450 MPa/15 min. In contrast, α-myrcene and carvone are lost after processing.

Similarly, the HHP treatment of cv Weiki increased the number of VOCs in the tested samples (Table 2). The highest number of VOCs (45 volatiles) was identified after Weiki exposure to 450 MPa for 5 min. Pentanal, hexyl acetate, octanal, (Z)-3-hexen-1-ol acetate, (E)-2-hexen-1-ol acetate, 1-hexanol, 3-heksen-1-ol, 3-octanol, (E)-2-heksen-1-ol, 3,5,5-trimethyl-2-hexene, and α-linalool were detected in the HHP-treated samples. Some of the volatilized compounds were formed only under particular conditions for the HHP process; for example, the treatment of Weiki at 450 MPa/5 min led to the formation of 9 new compounds: α-terpinene, (2Z)-3-pentyl-2,4-pentadien-1-ol, (Z)-2-heptenal, (E,E)-2,4-heptadienal, (Z)-2-decanal, verbenol, 1-nonanol, cis-citral, and carvone. On the other hand, 2-heptanone, isopentyl alcohol, 3-hydroxy-2-butanone, 6-methyl-3-heptanol, ethyl caprylate, 2-ethyl-1-hexanol, benzaldehyde, and octanoic acid were generated under 650 MPa for 5 and/or 15 min. In contrast, E,E-2,6-dimethyl-1,3,5,7-octatetraene, butanoic acid, and cis-carveol were lost after pressurization.

The major volatile compounds of A. arguta were mainly esters, alcohols, and aldehydes, with ethyl butanoate, ethyl hexanoate, (E)-2-hexenal, and hexanal as the main contributors to its aroma [12]. These authors also reported that 1-penten-3-one, pentanal, 1-octen-3-ol, linalool, terpinen-4-ol, and α-terpineol substantially contribute to the kiwiberry aroma of the cv Ananasnaya. Moreover, flavor compounds also accumulate in plant tissue material as nonvolatile glycoconjugates, and they have been considered an important potential source of flavor compounds, which can be released from the sugar moiety during either maturation or processing [3]. According to the findings presented in the work of Garcia et al. [12], hexanal and 1-octen-3-ol appear in both the bound and free volatile extracts of ripe A. arguta. It is well known that HHP induces the disruption of plant cell walls through mechanical damage during compression (pressure build up) and decompression phenomena, which in turn can facilitate both the extractability and release of some compounds from the complexes formed with other plant tissue constituents [2]. This phenomenon was likely responsible for the appearance of new volatiles in the group of samples subjected to the HHP treatment.

VOCs identified in the cvs Geneva and Weiki can be grouped into different chemical classes: alcohols, aldehydes, carboxylic acids, esters, ketones, and terpenoids (Figure 1 and Figure 2). The predominant group identified in the native Geneva (Figure 1) are terpenoids (39% of the total number of identified VOCs), followed by aldehydes (22%), esters (17%), alcohols (11%), and ketones (11%). Evidently, the contribution of terpenoids to the VOC profile of Geneva is reduced after HHP treatment. The largest decrease in this contribution (from 39% to 19%) was observed after sample exposure to 650 MPa (irrespective of the processing time). In contrast, a distinct increase was found in the contribution of the alcohols (from 11 to 27%) and aldehydes (from 22 to 31%) to the VOC profile after sample processing at 650 MPa for 5 min and 15 min, respectively. The results presented were consistent with recently published data [9], which showed an increasing trend towards the contribution of alcohols to the VOC profile of kiwifruit juice after processing at 500 MPa for 10 min. Contrary to our results, however, these authors observed a slight reduction in the aldehyde contribution after pressurization, which in turn resulted in a deterioration in the freshness of kiwifruit juice, as aldehydes are mainly desirable compounds, with a grassy aroma.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The chemical groups of VOCs identified in the untreated and the HHP-treated (450–550–650 MPa/5 and 15 min) cv Geneva.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The chemical groups of VOCs identified in the untreated and the HHP-treated (450–550–650 MPa/5 and 15 min) cv Weiki.

Similarly, the dominant volatile group found in the untreated Weiki were terpenoids (Figure 2), and in this case, pressurization decreased their contribution to the VOC profile. The most pronounced drop (from 52% to 41%) was observed after sample exposure to 450 MPa/15 min, 550 MPa/5 min, and 650 MPa/15 min, respectively. On the other hand, the pressurization of Weiki induced an increase in the contribution of aldehydes and alcohols. The most distinct increased in aldehyde (from 7% to 18%) and alcohol (from 11% to 19%) contributions was found after exposure of Weiki to a pressure of 450 MPa for 5 and 15 min, respectively. As mentioned above, the contribution of esters showed an irregular change with pressurization. Exposure of Weiki to higher pressure levels distinctly increased the contribution of ketones, particularly the treatment at 650 MPa/15 min, after which an increase from 4% to 10% was observed.

As mentioned above, the profile of the VOCs, with an emphasis on hydrocarbon terpenes, alcohols, esters, or aldehydes, can be altered by HHP processing. Moreover, pressurization can enhance and/or retard various enzymatic and chemical reactions, and this, in turn, can directly affect the content of particular volatiles, as well as their contribution to the kiwiberry aroma [13]. According to García-Parra et al. [14], most volatile compounds originate from lipid oxidation, carotenoids degradation, and/or Maillard reactions. As reported, peroxidase (POD) promotes lipid oxidation, with consequent off-flavor formation, and PPO is responsible for enzymatic browning [15]. Therefore, it can be concluded that the changes observed in volatile composition can also be due to the POD/PPO activity. It was shown that effective inactivation of POD isolated from kiwifruit required a pressure higher than 400 MPa, combined with temperature treatment at 50 °C, as well as processing time of up to 30 min [16].

2.2. Quantitative Analysis of VOCs in Geneva and Weiki cvs

A total of 12 and 18 major volatiles of untreated Geneva and Weiki samples analyzed by GC-MS were tabulated in Table 3 and Table 4, respectively.

Table 3.

The content of major VOCs estimated in the untreated and HHP-treated cv Geneva. Results are presented as µg per kg of fruit.

No. Compounds Untreated 450MPa/5′ 450MPa/15′ 550MPa/5′ 550MPa/15′ 650MPa/5′ 650MPa/15′
1 methyl butanoate nd nd 242.89 ± 0.89 nd nd nd nd
2 ethyl butanoate 818.71 ± 5.19 a 428.33 ± 25.00 b 179.98 ± 44.62 d 196.24 ± 3.05 d 466.72 ± 20.21 b 274.81 ± 11.95 c 291.50 ± 16.87 c
3 myrcene 122.42 ± 10.93 nd nd nd nd nd nd
4 (R)-(+)-limonene 266.80 ± 29.15 a 157.48 ± 3.22 bc 174.05 ± 16.66 b 128.03 ± 8.43 bcd 104.32 ± 56.45 cd 67.05 ± 1.48 d 71.71 ± 0.91 d
5 hexanal 1183.20 ± 30.68 b 1645.28 ± 168.09 a 521.37 ± 61.17 c 658.67 ± 50.25 c 211.62 ± 13.92 d 271.54 ± 12.19 d 230.69 ± 17.91 d
6 ethyl hexanoate nd nd 311.98 ± 29.16 a nd 45.81 ± 1.83 b nd nd
7 terpinolene 819.93 ± 36.50 a 93.83 ± 5.50 d 277.44 ± 21.60 b 146.14 ± 4.81 c 138.62 ± 17.08 c 152.54 ± 4.55 c 113.96 ± 11.66 cd
8 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one 614.33 ± 59.1 a 123.84 ± 12.32 c 164.64 ± 20.35 bc 114.13 ± 17.49 c 222.65 ± 9.71 b 114.17 ± 2.33 c 177.50 ± 25.64 bc
9 1-hexanol 831.93 ± 19.15 f 803.75 ± 10.89 f 886.68 ± 5.19 e 1515.37 ± 14.20 a 1132.90 ± 24.08 c 1179.57 ± 5.91 b 1094.46 ± 7.58 d
10 benzaldehyde 89.94 ± 12.19 f 284.82 ± 17.81 b 527.87 ± 17.88 a 191.69 ± 4.96 d 240.14 ± 2.75 c 116.89 ± 10.44 ef 129.24 ± 4.42 e
11 linalool 212.38 ± 20.92 b 264.00 ± 9.57 a 159.65 ± 11.84 de 157.63 ± 9.67 de 127.41 ± 14.72 c 179.26 ± 5.26 e 134.22 ± 1.35 cd
12 (-)-terpinen-4-ol 518.74 ± 34.05 nd nd nd nd nd nd
13 methyl benzoate 406.24 ± 39.40 a 224.82 ± 14.86 b 178.53 ± 13.49 c 100.27 ± 1.37 de 129.06 ± 4.32 d 68.12 ± 8.65 e 75.74 ± 5.56 e
14 ethyl benzoate 608.44 ± 46.35 a 138.35 ± 5.47 b 155.66 ± 15.77 b 134.91 ± 6.47 b 132.21 ± 3.96 b 61.11 ± 5.36 c 123.92 ± 5.63 b
15 cis-geraniol nd nd 44.31 ± 4.15 bc 36.14 ± 1.70 c 68.18 ± 13.15 a 51.62 ± 1.98 b 40.24 ± 3.07 bc
Sum of VOCs 6493.06 ± 343.69 a 4164.5 ± 272.73 b 3825.05 ± 262.77 bc 3379.22 ± 122.4 cd 3019.64 ± 182.18 de 2536.68 ± 70.1 ef 2483.18 ± 100.6 f

Data expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3); a–f—different letters within the same row indicate statistically significant differences at p < 0.05 using one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s test.

Table 4.

The content of major VOCs estimated in the untreated and HHP-treated cv Weiki. Results are presented as µg per kg of fruit.

No. Compounds Untreated 450MPa/5′ 450MPa/15′ 550MPa/5′ 550MPa/15′ 650MPa/5′ 650MPa/15′
1 methyl butanoate 127.11 ± 13.32 a 89.53 ± 8.30 b 31.65 ± 0.42 c 34.53 ± 0.55 c nd nd nd
2 α-pinene 146.75 ± 12.27 a 58.68 ± 7.55 b 42.25 ± 1.99 bc 51.48 ± 0.21 b 46.32 ± 3.85 bc 53.22 ± 6.51 b 30.04 ± 3.75 c
3 ethyl butanoate 2324.55 ± 29.85 a 1275.02 ± 37.12 b 182.96 ± 12.37 e 269.39 ± 35.13 d 99.58 ± 10.02 f 119.80 ± 4.77 ef 558.99 ± 43.29 c
4 hexanal 340.77 ± 4.67 d 447.49 ± 9.16 bc 588.37 ± 26.53 a 486.03 ± 66.48 b 188.87 ± 6.05 e 475.37 ± 3.08 bc 402.83 ± 13.91 cd
5 myrcene 1004.91 ± 20.34 a 988.95 ± 109.63 a 360.49 ± 26.38 b 422.48 ± 15.60 b 24.00 ± 3.33 d 379.08 ± 25.65 b 229.97 ± 23.68 c
6 (R)-(+)-limonene 713.78 ± 5.32 a 590.85 ± 80.57 b 114.24 ± 11.83 e 131.09 ± 4.47 e 364.47 ± 6.28 c 243.97 ± 19.03 d 122.71 ± 16.77 e
7 eucalyptol 2009.82 ± 91.88 a 777.48 ± 58.24 b 444.37 ± 40.60 c 399.41 ± 29.66 c 111.80 ± 1.83 d 449.25 ± 10.87 c 49.79 ± 2.53 e
8 ethyl hexanoate 368.49 ± 37.52 b 88.00 ± 6.86 c 20.97 ± 1.24 d 19.03 ± 1.89 d 661.31 ± 11.37 a 23.13 ± 3.42 d 84.97 ± 1.43 c
9 γ-terpinene 246.41 ± 36.62 a 87.10 ± 2.58 b 24.40 ± 2.34 c 31.51 ± 1.59 c 14.26 ± 0.72 c 26.44 ± 1.51 c nd
10 β-cis-ocimene 72.05 ± 2.07 a 53.21 ± 2.25 b nd nd nd nd nd
11 terpinolene 2908.45 ± 25.27 a 1607.05 ± 28.69 b 349.31 ± 37.71 e 487.07 ± 18.14 cd 110.51 ± 6.46 f 436.15 ± 10.01 d 543.18 ± 41.67 c
12 trans-2-heptenal nd 72.99 ± 2.42 nd nd nd nd nd
13 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one 185.79 ± 4.95 a 96.56 ± 2.42 b 66.88 ± 0.96 d 44.61 ± 0.81 e 19.28 ± 1.19 f 81.82 ± 5.00 c 36.92 ± 0.69 e
14 1-hexanol nd 161.23 ± 23.24 c 295.00 ± 16.40 a 223.80 ± 5.32 b 48.94 ± 1.54 d 277.19 ± 6.25 a 301.71 ± 18.66 a
15 ethyl octanoate 260.52 ± 18.78 a 259.48 ± 5.33 a nd nd nd nd nd
16 1-octen-3-ol 40.40 ± 0.86 d 86.15 ± 11.26 b 100.12 ± 5.47 ab 85.95 ± 3.63 b 60.12 ± 1.69 c 107.53 ± 4.86 a 46.46 ± 3.93 cd
17 benzaldehyde nd nd nd nd nd 12.05 ± 1.22 a 11.53 ± 0.25 a
18 linalool nd 595.66 ± 54.21 a 113.54 ± 13.02 b 98.65 ± 6.71 b 19.53 ± 2.24 c 133.66 ± 2.78 b 89.96 ± 7.83 b
19 (-)-terpinen-4-ol 784.89 ± 78.01 b 1328.86 ± 212.42 a 68.47 ± 6.81 c 49.57 ± 3.18 c 101.47 ± 13.17 c 68.00 ± 4.34 c 12.25 ± 1.24 c
20 methyl benzoate 90.04 ± 5.71 a 22.71 ± 3.38 b 24.05 ± 2.68 b nd nd nd nd
21 ethyl benzoate 280.35 ± 6.15 a 38.36 ± 0.13 b 28.42 ± 3.78 c 28.95 ± 0.75 c 21.66 ± 3.23 c 29.90 ± 2.24 bc 26.63 ± 2.95 c
22 cis-geraniol 33.64 ± 2.19 b 43.36 ± 0.45 a 16.55 ± 1.59 d 16.05 ± 0.89 d 14.56 ± 0.31 d 23.80 ± 2.04 c nd
Sum of VOCs 11938.72 ± 395.78 a 8768.72 ± 666.21 b 2872.04 ± 212.12 c 2879.60 ± 195.01 c 1906.68 ± 73.28 d 2940.36 ± 113.58 c 2547.94 ± 182.58 cd

Data expressed as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3); a–f—different letters within the same row indicate statistically significant differences at p < 0.05 using one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s test.

As indicated, the concentration of the most important volatiles (ethyl butanoate, ethyl hexanoate, hexanal, 1-octen-3-ol) to the aroma of A. arguta [3] varies distinctly between the studied cv Geneva and cv Weiki. A nearly three-fold higher concentration of ethyl butanoate was found in the untreated Weiki kiwiberry than in cv Geneva. Similarly, ethyl hexanoate, which was not found in the untreated cv Geneva, is the second predominant ester in the Weiki sample. In contrast, other green-smelling esters, such as methyl benzoate and ethyl benzoate, were more dominant in the Geneva sample than in the Weiki sample. Geneva manifests a more than three-fold higher concentration of hexanal than Weiki. However, 1-octen-3-ol was not found in Geneva. It is worth mentioning that terpinolene was the major volatile in the untreated Weiki. Although terpinolene was also found to be the predominant volatile in Geneva, its concentration was 72% lower compared to the concentration noted in the Weiki sample. The untreated Weiki manifested a high concentration of eucalyptol—the minty, sweet terpenoid—which was not found in the cv Geneva. As indicated, eucalyptol has been identified in yellow-fleshed (Gold) kiwifruit, in relatively high concentrations [17].

The results obtained from GC-MS analysis prove that the HHP treatment significantly affected the VOC profile in the tested Geneva samples (Table 3). The sum of VOCs in Geneva (6.493 mg/kg) was found to be reduced after processing, particularly for pressurization conditions of 650 MPa/15 min (a decrease of 62%). On the other hand, Geneva exposed to 450 MPa/5 min manifested the lowest loss in the sum of the VOCs. The described changes of VOCs could be easily observed in superimposed chromatograms of untreated and HPP-treated Geneva samples (Supplementary Materials). As shown, the concentration of hexanal increased significantly (nearly 40%) after sample treatment at 450 MPa/5 min compared to the untreated Geneva. However, further processing of Geneva resulted in hexanal reduction, and the most pronounced decrease (82%) was observed after processing at 550 MPa/15 min. Hexanal, the product of lipid degradation, was found to be the predominant volatile of kiwifruit [9]. Indeed, despite the observed decrease, the hexanal and 1-hexanol content were found to be the highest compared to the estimated concentration of the other VOCs in the Geneva samples. However, in contrast to hexanal, the concentration of 1-hexanol increased significantly throughout the sample processing, and the most distinct increase (82%) was found after exposure of the sample to 550 MPa/5 min. According to Zhao et al. [9], both of these volatiles were responsible for the characteristic fresh and grassy kiwifruit aroma. Similarly, the content of benzaldehyde increased after the processing of the Geneva sample, with an emphasis on the sample exposed to 450 MPa/15 min, where a nearly five-fold increase was noted. This volatile has been previously found in Hayward kiwifruit (A. deliciosa) as the major bound volatile compound. A high concentration of other benzaldehydes has been reported to be responsible for the apple aroma of A. deliciosa [3]. We also noted a more than 20% increase in the linalool concentration after Geneva processing at 450 MPa/5 min. Moreover, processing at 450 MPa for 15 min favored the formation of methyl butanoate and ethyl hexanoate. Similarly, the tested processing parameters led to the formation of cis-geraniol, with the highest concentration obtained after sample treatment at 550 MPa/15 min. As mentioned above, aldehydes were responsible for the freshness of kiwifruit, while terpenoids are floral volatiles [3,9].

The sum of VOCs in Weiki (11.939 mg/kg) samples was found to be significantly reduced after processing, particularly for pressurization conditions of 550 MPa/15 min (decrease of 84%). The smallest change in the sum of the VOCs was noticed in Weiki exposed to 450 MPa/5 min. The 1-octen-3-ol was another predominant aroma contributor of A. arguta [12] (Table 4). This volatile was characterized by a highly aromatic, sweet, and earthy odor, with a strong herbaceous note [18]. The HHP treatment of Weiki favored the formation of 1-hexanol. Similarly, pressurization led to the formation of linalool and benzaldehyde. However, the latter volatile was observed only in the samples treated at 650 MPa. The concentration of geraniol was also increased by nearly 30% after processing at 450 MPa/5 min. As mentioned above, linalool and geraniol were floral terpenoids found in kiwifruit, mainly in bound form [3,12]. In contrast, the HHP treatment of both Geneva and Weiki kiwiberries resulted in a distinct decrease in ethyl butanoate concentration. As reported, ethyl butanoate was the most common ester of kiwiberry fruit [19] and has been described as the major contributor to the kiwiberry aroma [20].

Moreover, not only ethyl butanoate, but also methyl benzoate and ethyl benzoate were identified (by GC-MS-O) to be present in the free volatile extracts of A. arguta, with highly distinct odor intensities [11].

Considering the results obtained in our study, as well as in the above-cited reports, we can conclude that volatiles such as 1-octen-3-ol, benzaldehyde, hexanal, linalool, and cis-geraniol can be effectively released from the sugar moiety for certain parameters of the pressurization process for the tested kiwiberry cultivars. However, volatiles classified in the literature as free-form compounds, with an emphasis on ethyl butanoate and methyl butanoate, appeared to be more vulnerable to the pressurization process. We can also conclude that as for the case of Geneva, the HHP treatment of Weiki also reduced the sum of the individual VOCs. However, for the case of Weiki, the most pronounced decrease (by 80%) was noted after exposure to 550 MPa/15 min. Following the assumptions of Oey et al. [12], we may conclude that the effect of HHP on the VOCs profile is rather complex. The observed decrease in the concentration of volatile compounds likely resulted from a fact that pressurization enhanced and/or retarded some enzymatic (i.e., PPO/POD) activity, as well as chemical reactions, such as oxidative chemical reactions or hydrolysis [10], which are the key factors for the stability of VOCs. Therefore, not only was the content of the individual volatiles disturbed, but the entire profile of the VOCs was also changed as a consequence of the HHP processing. Our preliminary results (not shown in this article) indicated that the conditions used during HHP treatment (450–550–650 MPa/5 and 15 min) of the kiwiberry samples were insufficient to completely inhibit PPO and POD activity. On the other hand, they were equally effective in inhibiting the growth of microorganisms to a level below 10 microorganisms per 1 g of the FW of kiwiberry sample. Therefore, we can confidently state that the effect of microorganisms and the processes resulting from their activity on the profile of the tested VOCs can be excluded.

Multivariate PLS-DA analysis was performed for untreated and HHP-treated (450–550–650 MPa/5 and 15 min) samples and different variables (individual VOC concentration, sum of individual VOCs in the tested material) to investigate the structure and regularity of the relationships between variables for the cases of Geneva (Figure 3) or Weiki (Figure 4).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

The bi-plot of PLS-DA for VOCs identified in the untreated and HHP-treated (450–550–650 MPa/5 and 15 min) cv Geneva.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

The bi-plot of PLS-DA for VOCs identified in the untreated and HHP-treated (450–550–650 MPa/5 and 15 min) cv Weiki.

As indicated by the obtained results, the VOC profile of the untreated Geneva sample (Figure 3) was strongly correlated with the ethyl benzoate (r = 0,987), 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one (r = 0.975), terpinolene (r = 0.974), methyl benzoate (r = 0.881), ethyl butanoate (r = 0.872), and (R)-(+)-limonene (r = 0.815) content. The sample treated at 450 MPa/5 was highly and positively correlated with linalool (r = 0.806) and hexanal (r = 0.782). The concentrations of methyl benzoate (r = 0.986), ethyl benzoate (r = 0.930), and (R)-(+)-limonene (r = 0.978) were significantly correlated with the sum of the individual VOCs in the tested Geneva sample. Similarly, terpinolene (r = 0.892), 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one (r = 0.848), and ethyl butanoate (r = 0.791) were positively correlated with the sum of the individual VOCs. The HHP treatment (450 MPa/15 min) of Geneva was highly correlated with the benzaldehyde (r = 0.886) and ethyl hexanoate (r = 0.989) concentrations. Moreover, the sample treated at 550 MPa/15 min was significantly correlated with the cis-geraniol content (r = 0.582), while the sample exposed to 550 MPa/5 min was well correlated with 1-hexanol (r = 0.796).

The VOC profile of the untreated Weiki (Figure 4) was characterized by a significant contents of α-pinene (r = 0.972), ethyl benzoate (r = 0.998), methyl benzoate (r = 0.942), γ-terpinene (r = 0.948), eucalyptol (r = 0.932), ethyl butanoate (r = 0.868), and 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one (r = 0.876). However, the VOC profile for Weiki exposed to 450 MPa/5 min was significantly correlated with the concentrations of trans-2-heptenal (r = 0.999) and linalool (r = 0.970) and with the (-)-terpinen-4-ol and cis-geraniol (r = 0.848 and 0.694, respectively) contents. The benzaldehyde concentration was positively correlated only with the Weiki processing at 650 MPa/5 and 15 min (r = 0.625). The content of 1-hexanol was well correlated with the Weiki treatment at 650 MPa/15 min (r = 0.416), while the 1-octen-3-ol concentration was correlated with the sample exposure at 450 MPa/15 min and 650 MPa/5 min (r = 0.540). The hexanal content was positively correlated with the sample treatment at 450 MPa/15 min (r = 0.590) and negatively correlated with the exposure to 550 MPa/15 min (r = −0.798). The sample processing at 550 MPa/15 min was correlated with the ethyl hexanoate content (r = 0.864).

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Chemicals

The VOCs standards β-cis-ocimene, benzaldehyde (≥99%), cis-geraniol (≥97%), hexanal (≥95%), 1-hexanol (≥98%), ethyl benzoate, ethyl butanoate, ethyl hexanoate, ethyl octanoate, eucalyptol (≥99%), methyl benzoate, methyl butanoate (≥98%), 6-methyl-5-hepten-2-one, myrcene (≥90%), (R)-(+)-limonene (~90%), linalool (≥97%), α-pinene, 1-octen-3-ol (≥95%), γ-terpinene, terpinolene, (-)-terpinen-4-ol, trans-2-heptenal (≥95%), and C7-C40 n-alkanes mix were purchased from Sigma (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA). All standards were of at least analytical grade.

3.2. Material and Sample Preparation

The kiwiberry cv Geneva and Weiki were purchased from a kiwiberry orchard, Mini Kiwi Kostrzewa (Bodzew, Belsk Duży, Poland). The obtained healthy and fresh fruit was kept at 8 °C until it reached the eating-ripe stage of maturity. The fruit taken for the analysis (~1000 g of each cultivar) was characterized by similar average values for the titratable acidity and soluble solid content, i.e.:

  • -

    0.90 g/100 g citric acid and 19 °Brix, respectively, for Geneva;

  • -

    1.23 g/100 g citric acid and 18.5 °Brix, respectively, for Weiki.

After removing the peduncle and stem-ends, the fruit (~150 g) was homogenized using a laboratory mixer (B-400, Buchi, Switzerland) equipped with ceramic knives. The homogenization process was carried out at 9000 rpm, and homogenization time was not longer than 15 s. The procedure was performed in triplicate for each cultivar, and the sample obtained was immediately subjected to HHP processing.

3.3. High Hydrostatic Pressure (HHP) Processing

Pressurization was carried out according to the conditions and parameters used in our previous studies for kiwiberry fruit [2]. Briefly, Teflon tubes (50 mL) filled with homogenized fruit were closed and placed in a high-hydrostatic pressure chamber (100 mL, High Pressure System U33, Unipress, Warsaw, Poland). The chamber was filled with a pressure-transmitting medium (water—propylene glycol (propane-1,2-diol), 1:1, v/v), and the samples were exposed to pressures of 450 MPa, 550 MPa, and 650 MPa for 5 and 15 min. The processing temperatures were 33 ± 1.5 °C (for 450 MPa), 36 ± 1.5 °C (for 550 MPa), and 39 ± 1.5 °C (for 650 MPa), and the compression and decompression rates were 8 MPa/s and 10 MPa/s, respectively. The processing parameters were monitored using OMEGASOFT® Data Acquisition Software (OMB DAQ-54, OMEGA Inc., Budapest, Hungary). The analyses were performed in triplicate for each cultivar and production step. The untreated and HHP-treated samples were stored at −24 °C (for no longer than 7 days) until analysis.

3.4. Headspace Solid-Phase Microextraction (HS-SPME)

Volatile compounds of the kiwifruits were extracted based on the HS-SPME technique, according to Starowicz et al. [21] and Wan et al. [22], with slight modifications. The HS-SPME parameters were established in the initial experiment (data not shown). Therefore, 2 g of the thawed material was weighed into a 20 mL vial and sealed with a PTFE-silicon septum. The vials were placed onto an Eppendorf agitator/heater (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany), shaken and heated (40 °C, 50 min), and then the volatiles were allowed to absorb onto the SPME fiber for 15 min at 50 °C. A divinylbenzene/carboxen/polydimethylsiloxane (DVB/CAR/PDMS) fiber (2 cm, 50/30 µm, stable flex, Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA) was used for extraction, and the fiber was installed into the manual SPME holder. According to the producer’s instructions, DVB/CAR/PDMS fiber was conditioned for 1 h at 270 °C in a GC injector port (Agilent Technologies 7890A GC system, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The injection was performed manually. Thus, the SPME fiber was introduced into the chromatograph injection port (splitless mode), where the analytes were desorbed at 250 °C for 5 min.

3.5. Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) Analysis

The GC-MS analyses were performed using a gas chromatograph (Agilent Technologies 7890A GC system, Santa Clara, CA, USA) coupled to a mass spectrometer (Agilent Technologies 5975C VL MSD, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The volatiles were separated onto a capillary column (DB-WAX, 30 m, 0.25 mm × 0.50 µm). The temperature was initially set to 40 °C and held for 5 min. The temperature was then increased to 200 °C and held for 1 min. Finally, the temperature was increased to 240 °C and held for 5 min. In this method, helium was used as the carrier gas, with a flow rate of 1 mL min−1. The flow was kept constant. The electron ionization source temperature was 230 °C, and the ionization electron energy was 70 eV. The mass range was scanned in the full-scan acquisition mode from 30–450.

The volatile compounds were identified by comparing the obtained linear retention indices, retention times, and mass spectra with the Wiley Registry 7th Edition Mass Spectral Library (Wiley and Sons Inc., Weinheim, Germany) and the National Institute Standards and Technology (NIST) 2005 Mass Spectral Library. Linear retention indices (LRIs) were elaborated using a C7-C40 n-alkanes mix (Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA). The results were calculated based on the calibration curves for the external standards (R2 = 0.980–0.998). All analyses were carried out in triplicate.

3.6. Statistical Analysis

The obtained data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s test (p ≤ 0.05) for post hoc multiple comparison of the means. Untreated and HHP-treated (450–550–650 MPa/5 and 15 min) sample comparisons were performed to assess the structure and regularity in the relationships between variables. Thus, partial least squares discrimination analysis (PLS-DA) was applied to study the correlations that may be apparent between the HPP treatment and VOCs for the cases of Geneva (Figure 3) or Weiki (Figure 4). The statistical study was implemented using Statistica 13.1 (Statsoft Inc., Tulsa, OH, USA) and Simca 17.0 (Sartorius, Göttingen, Deutschland).

4. Conclusions

HS-SPME/GC-MS analysis of the volatile profile of kiwiberry revealed significant differences in the number, contribution, and concentration of individual VOCs for the tested Geneva and Weiki cultivars.

The major volatiles found in the VOCs profile of Geneva were hexanal and 1-hexanol. However, terpinolene, ethyl butanoate, and eucalyptol were the predominant volatiles found in the VOCs profile of Weiki. Moreover, Weiki manifested an almost two-fold higher concentration of volatiles than Geneva. Similarly, a one and a half-fold higher number of VOCs was identified in the untreated Weiki than in the Geneva. Terpenoids were found to be the dominant VOC group in both of the tested cultivars.

The HHP treatment led to a substantial decrease in the contribution of terpenoids, but also increased the contribution of alcohols and aldehydes to the overall VOCs profile of the processed Geneva and Weiki fruit. As shown, all the analyzed Geneva and Weiki samples showed a reduction in the sum of the major individual volatiles, regardless of the parameters of the HHP treatment. However, Geneva and Weiki exposed to 450 MPa/5 min treatment manifested the smallest loss in the sum of the individual VOCs. Moreover, the treatment of Geneva at 450 MPa/5 min significantly increased the hexanal (r = 0.782) and linalool (r = 0.806) content. On the other hand, sample exposure to 450 MPa/15 min promoted the formation of methyl butanoate, ethyl hexanoate and cis-geraniol, simultaneously increasing the concentration of benzaldehyde (r = 0.886). Geneva treated at 550 MPa for 5 and 15 min favored 1-hexanol (r = 0.796) and cis-geraniol (r = 0.582) concentrations, respectively.

For the case of Weiki, exposure to 450 MPa/5 min favored the formation of trans-2-heptenal (r = 0.999), 1-hexanol, and linalool (r = 0.970). The concentrations of (-)-terpinen-4-ol and cis-geraniol are also found to be highly correlated with the test treatment parameters (r = 0.848 and r = 0.694, respectively). The other important volatiles (ethyl butanoate, hexanal, 1-octen-3-ol) for the aroma of A. arguta were also found to be highly concentrated in the HHP-treated (450 MPa/5 or 15 min) Weiki samples. However, the concentrations of benzaldehyde (r = 0.625) and 1-hexanol (r = 0.416) were correlated only with the processing of Weiki at 650 MPa for 5 and 15 min, respectively. However, the tested processing parameters led to a distinct decrease (more than 75%, on average) in the sum of the VOCs.

Taking into consideration the obtained results, we can conclude that the processing of Geneva at 450 MPa for 5 or 15 min and Weiki at 450 MPa for 5 min is required to obtain an attractive kiwiberry-based product in terms of the composition of the volatiles, since the formation of new volatiles and an increase in the concentration of pre-existing individual major volatiles of A. arguta, observed regarding the tested pressurization conditions, are clearly responsible for a green, fresh, fruity, and floral aroma—as required for consumer acceptance.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules27185914/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.S., W.B., and P.L.; methodology, M.S. and W.B.; software, M.S., W.B., and E.C.; validation, M.S. and E.C.; formal analysis, M.S.; investigation, M.S.; resources, M.S. and W.B.; data curation, M.S. and W.B.; writing—original draft preparation, W.B.; writing—review and editing, M.S. and W.B.; visualization, M.S. and W.B.; supervision, W.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data are available upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sample Availability

Samples of the compounds are available from the authors.

Funding Statement

The work was supported by the Institute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research, Polish Academy of Sciences in Olsztyn, Poland, within the statutory research.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Latocha P. The Nutritional and health benefits of kiwiberry (Actinidia arguta)—A review. Plant Foods Hum. Nutr. 2017;72:325–334. doi: 10.1007/s11130-017-0637-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Błaszczak W., Latocha P., Jeż M., Wiczkowski W. The impact of high-pressure processing on the polyphenol profile and antiglycaemic, anti-hypertensive and anti-cholinergic activities of extracts obtained from kiwiberry (Actinidia arguta) fruits. Food Chem. 2021;343:128421. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Garcia C.V., Quek S.-Y., Stevenson R.J., Winz R.A. Kiwifruit flavour: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2012;24:82–91. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2011.08.012. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Lindhorst A.C., Steinhaus M. Aroma-active compounds in the fruit of the hardy kiwi (Actinidia arguta) cultivars Ananasnaya, Bojnice, and Dumbarton Oaks: Differences to common kiwifruit (Actinidia deliciosa ‘Hayward’) Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2016;242:967–975. doi: 10.1007/s00217-015-2603-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Kostyra E., Król K., Knysak D., Piotrowska A., Żakowska-Biemans S., Latocha P. Characteristics of Volatile Compounds and Sensory Properties of Mixed Organic Juices Based on Kiwiberry Fruits. Appl. Sci. 2021;11:529. doi: 10.3390/app11020529. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Jordán M.J., Margaría C.A., Shaw P.E., Goodner K.L. Aroma active components in aqueous kiwi fruit essence and kiwi fruit puree by GC-MS and multidimensional GC/GC-O. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002;50:5386–5390. doi: 10.1021/jf020297f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Péneau S., Hoehn E., Roth H.-R., Escher F., Nuessli J. Importance and consumer perception of freshness of apples. Food Qual. Prefer. 2006;17:9–19. doi: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.05.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Jeż M., Błaszczak W., Penkacik K., Amarowicz R. Quality Parameters of Juice Obtained from Hydroponically Grown Tomato Processed with High Hydrostatic Pressure or Heat Pasteurization. Int. J. Food Sci. 2020;2020:4350461. doi: 10.1155/2020/4350461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhao Y., Wang P., Zhan P., Tian H., Lu C., Tian P. Aroma characteristics of cloudy kiwifruit juices treated with high hydrostatic pressure and representative thermal processes. Food Res. Int. 2021;139:109841. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Chen Y., Feng X., Ren H., Yang H., Liu Y., Gao Z., Long F. Changes in physicochemical properties and volatiles of kiwifruit pulp beverage treated with high hydrostatic pressure. Foods. 2020;9:485. doi: 10.3390/foods9040485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Yi J., Kebede B.T., Grauwet T., Van Loey A., Hu X., Hendrickx M. Comparing the impact of high-pressure processing and thermal processing on quality of “Hayward” and “Jintao” kiwifruit purée: Untargeted headspace fingerprinting and targeted approaches. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2016;9:2059–2069. doi: 10.1007/s11947-016-1783-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Oey I., Lille M., Van Loey A., Hendrickx M. Effect of highpressure processing on colour, texture and flavour of fruit and vegetable-based food products: A review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2008;19:320–328. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2008.04.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Garcia C.V., Quek S.-Y., Stevenson R.J., Winz R.A. Characterization of the bound volatile extract from baby kiwi (Actinidia arguta) J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011;59:8358–8365. doi: 10.1021/jf201469c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Bi S., Sun S., Lao F., Liao X., Wu J. Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry combined with multivariate data analysis as a tool for differentiating between processed orange juice samples on the basis of their volatile markers. Food Chem. 2020;311:125913. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.García-Parra J., González-Cebrino F., Ramírez R. Volatile compounds of a pumpkin (Cucurbita moschata) purée processed by high pressure thermal processing. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2020;100:4449–4456. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.10485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zhou C.-L., Mi L., Hu X.-Y., Zhu B.-H. Evaluation of three pumpkin species: Correlation with physicochemical, antioxidant properties and classification using SPME-GC-MS and E-nose methods. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2017;54:3118–3131. doi: 10.1007/s13197-017-2748-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Fang L., Jiang B., Zhang T. Effect of combined high pressure and thermal treatment on kiwifruit peroxidase. Food Chem. 2008;109:802–807. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.01.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Friel E.N., Wang M., Taylor A.A.J., MacRae E.A. In vitro and in vivo release of aroma compounds from yellow-fleshed kiwifruit. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007;55:6664–6673. doi: 10.1021/jf063733x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lin L., Zhuang M., Lei F., Yang B., Zhao M. GC/MS analysis of volatiles obtained by headspace solid-phase microextraction and simultaneous–distillation extraction from Rabdosia serra (MAXIM.) HARA leaf and stem. Food Chem. 2013;136:555–562. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2012.08.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Česonienė L., Daubaras R., Bogačiovienė S., Maruška A.S., Stankevičius M., Valatavičius A., Zych M., Ercisli S., Ilhan G. Investigations of volatile organic compounds in berries of different Actinidia kolomikta (Rupr. & Maxim.) Maxim. Accessions. Pol. J. Food Nutr. Sci. 2020;70:291–300. doi: 10.31883/pjfns/124029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Starowicz M., Koutsidis G., Zieliński H. Determination of antioxidant capacity, phenolics and volatile Maillard reaction products in rye-buckwheat biscuits supplemented with 3β-D-rutinoside. Molecules. 2019;24:982. doi: 10.3390/molecules24050982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Wan X.M., Stevenson R.J., Chen X.D., Melton L.D. Application of headspace solid-phase microextraction to volatile flavor profile development during storage and ripening of kiwifruit. Food Res. Int. 1999;32:175–183. doi: 10.1016/S0963-9969(99)00074-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The data are available upon request.


Articles from Molecules are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES