Skip to main content
RSC Advances logoLink to RSC Advances
. 2022 Sep 23;12(42):27114. doi: 10.1039/d2ra90093a

Retraction: Experimental and theoretical studies of the nanostructured {Fe3O4@SiO2@(CH2)3Im}C(CN)3 catalyst for 2-amino-3-cyanopyridine preparation via an anomeric based oxidation

Mohammad Ali Zolfigol 1,, Mahya Kiafar 1, Meysam Yarie 1, Avat (Arman) Taherpour 2,3, Mahdi Saeidi-Rad 1
PMCID: PMC9504203  PMID: 36283019

Abstract

Retraction of ‘Experimental and theoretical studies of the nanostructured {Fe3O4@SiO2@(CH2)3Im}C(CN)3 catalyst for 2-amino-3-cyanopyridine preparation via an anomeric based oxidation’ by Mohammad Ali Zolfigol et al., RSC Adv., 2016, 6, 50100–50111, https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA12299J.


The Royal Society of Chemistry hereby wholly retracts this RSC Advances article as the synthesis of {Fe3O4@SiO2@(CH2)3Im}C(CN)3 reported in the article, whereby tricyanomethane is used as a starting material, is not reproducible. The authors stated that they did not report the synthesis of tricyanomethane in the published paper as they purchased this compound from a commercial center and used it in the synthesis of ionic liquids, molten salts and various kinds of catalysts. The authors thought the reaction between tricyanomethane and organic bases is a simple acid–base reaction, therefore they did not cite the previously reported literature and its related history for the preparation of tricyanomethane. However, according to papers by Banert et al.,1,2 and based on their obtained analysis of the chemical sold to them as tricyanomethane, it became clear to the authors that this purchased compound was not tricyanomethane as there were differences in the 1H NMR and 13C NMR chemical shift between the purchased compound and the reports of Banert et al.1 According to these documents, the authors believe that the compound sold to them as tricyanomethane was fake. While the authors have now re-prepared {Fe3O4@SiO2@(CH2)3Im}C(CN)3, by synthesising potassium tricyanomethanide as a starting material for the synthesis,3–5 the synthesis reported in this article is not accurate. Therefore, this article is being retracted to avoid misleading readers and to protect the accuracy and integrity of the scientific record.

Mohammad Ali Zolfigol and Meysam Yarie oppose the retraction. Mahya Kiafar, Avat (Arman) Taherpour and Mahdi Saeidi-Rad were contacted but did not respond.

Signed: Laura Fisher, Executive Editor, RSC Advances

Date: 17th August 2022

Supplementary Material

References

  1. Banert K. Hagedorn M. Synlett. 2019;30:1427. [Google Scholar]
  2. Banert K. Chityala M. Hagedorn M. Beckers H. Stueker T. Riedel S. Rueffer T. Lang H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017;56:9582. doi: 10.1002/anie.201704561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Trofimenko S. Little E. L. Mower H. F. J. Org. Chem. 1962;27:433. [Google Scholar]
  4. Carboni R. A. Org. Synth. 1959;39:64. [Google Scholar]
  5. Beaumont R. C. Aspin K. B. Demas T. J. Hoggatt J. H. Potter G. E. Inorg. Chim. Acta. 1984;84:141. [Google Scholar]

Articles from RSC Advances are provided here courtesy of Royal Society of Chemistry

RESOURCES