Abstract
The presentation of several autoimmune neurological disorders in a single patient is rare and often debilitating. However, early diagnosis and efficacious treatment can lead to a significant recovery. Here, we present an interesting case of a triple antibody-positive autoimmune neurological syndrome patient who manifested the clinical features of neuromyelitis optica (NMO) spectrum disorder (NMOSD), N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis, and myasthenia gravis (MG). Hence, the patient manifested both central and peripheral nervous system immune-mediated neurological syndromes. A middle-aged female with a history of seropositive aquaporin-4 (AQP4) NMOSD on mycophenolate 1 g twice daily presented with severe fatigue and right eye ptosis (three months since NMOSD diagnosis) and tested positive for acetylcholine receptor (AchR) binding antibody, consistent with MG. Six months after the patient’s NMOSD diagnosis, she began to experience subacute progressive cognitive decline, behavioral changes, imbalance, anxiety/panic attacks, and paranoid delusions. NMDAR encephalitis was suspected, and she tested positive for cerebrospinal fluid NMDAR antibodies. After treatment with steroids failed, she was given two doses of rituximab 1 g, two weeks apart, and reported improvement in her symptoms shortly after the second dose.
Keywords: anti-nmda receptor encephalitis, autoimmune encephalitis, anti-achr antibody, aquaporin-4 (aqp4) antibody, neuro-immunology, neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (nmosd), myasthenia gravis (mg)
Introduction
The co-existence of several autoimmune conditions has been reported with neuromyelitis optica (NMO) spectrum disorders (NMOSD) [1]. While a rare disorder, there have been documented cases of concurrent N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) encephalitis and anti-aquaporin-4 (AQP4) NMOSD [2,3]. In a case series of 691 patients with anti-NMDA receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis, 23 patients were identified with overlapping demyelinating syndromes associated with AQP4 and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) with clinical and radiographic features preceded or followed by the demyelinating disease process [3]. Another prospective observational study with the co-existence of MOG and AQP4 antibodies with anti-NMDAR showed that 0.6% of patients with NMOSD had overlapping NMDAR encephalitis and 11.9% of patients had anti-MOG disease [2]. The co-existence of myasthenia gravis (MG) has been reported with NMOSD [1].
In this case report, we present a middle-aged patient displaying the clinical manifestations of these three rare neurological disorders (NMOSD, MG, and anti-NMDAR encephalitis). By presenting this unusual case, we hope to help clinicians be more vigilant about the possibility of overlapping neurological syndromes that will help avoid delays in the diagnosis and treatment of these conditions. This article was previously presented as a meeting abstract at the 2022 American Academy of Neurology (AAN) Annual Meeting on April 3, 2022.
Case presentation
A 44-year-old previously healthy female presented to an outside hospital emergency department with a headache followed by imbalance, right upper and lower extremity numbness, and weakness. Her examination findings on admission were notable for 3/5 strength of her right upper and lower extremities. She also had a loss of sensation in her right upper extremity. The rest of her examination was unremarkable. She had a head computed tomography (CT) performed, which was unremarkable. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain showed T2 hyperintensities in the bilateral hypothalamic regions and pontomedullary junction, prominent on the left side without associated diffusion restriction and enhancement (Figure 1A-1C). The patient refused a lumbar puncture and was told to follow up with a neurology outpatient. At her three-month follow-up, she reported that her symptoms have gradually improved with physical therapy and now only has residual right-handed numbness. As a demyelinating process was suspected, she had an extensive neurological workup over the next three months. She underwent a lumbar puncture with an opening pressure of 12 cm H2O, a protein count of 35 mg/dl, and a cell count of 1/mm3. Serum studies showed negative cell-based assay serology for AQP4 immunoglobulin (Ig) G and MOG-IgG and mildly elevated ribonuclear protein (RNP) and Sjogren’s antibody for soluble substance A/Ro (SS-Ro) (Table 1). Workup for sarcoidosis was negative with normal angiotensin-converting enzyme levels and normal chest CT without mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy. MRI of the cervical spine revealed T2 signal changes from the cervicomedullary junction to C3 level with faint enhancement (Figure 1D, 1E). MRI of the thoracic spine was normal without signal changes. Cerebrospinal fluid analysis and paraneoplastic panel were negative except for mildly elevated N-type calcium channel antibodies of 0.04 and mildly elevated IgG index of 0.8 (Table 2).
Table 1. Patient initial serum laboratory results with reference values.
Ab: antibody; AchR: acetylcholine receptor; AGNA-1: anti-glial nuclear antibody type 1; ANA: antinuclear antibody; ANCA: antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies; ANNA: antineuronal nuclear antibody; C-ANCA: antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody, cytoplasmic; CRMP-5: collapsin response-mediator protein-5; ds: double-stranded; DRVVT: dilute Russell viper venom time; GAD: glutamic acid decarboxylase; HB: hepatitis B; Ig: immunoglobulin; P-ANCA: perinuclear anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies; PCA: Purkinje cytoplasmic antibody; PCA-Tr: Purkinje cytoplasmic antibody titer; PT: prothrombin time; PTT: partial thromboplastin time; S: serum; SM: smooth muscle; SS: Sjogren’s syndrome; TPMT: thiopurine S-methyltransferase; ELISA: enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; HBsAg: hepatitis B surface antigen; HBc: hepatitis B core; IFA: immunofluorescent assay
| Laboratories | Values | Reference range and units |
| ANA screen and titer | Negative | Negative, <1:80 titer |
| Borrelia burgdorferi total IgG/IgM Ab | 0.23 | <0.90 index value |
| C-reactive protein | 0.1 | <0.5 mg/dl |
| Erythrocyte sedimentation rate | 19 | <20 mm/hour |
| HBsAg | Negative | Negative |
| HBc Ab IgM | Negative | Negative |
| Hepatitis C Ab | Negative | Negative |
| Hepatitis A Ab IgM | Negative | Negative |
| International normalized ratio | 0.94 | 1 |
| Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-IgG1 | Negative | Negative |
| Neuromyelitis optica/aquaporin-4 IgG | Negative | Negative |
| N-Methyl-D-aspartate receptor Ab, IgG | <1:10 | <1:10 |
| Acetylcholine receptorAb | 0.53 | <0.3 nmo/L |
| B2 glycoprotein IgG Ab | <9 | <20 SGU |
| B2 glycoprotein IgM Ab | <9 | <20 SMU |
| B2 glycoprotein IgA Ab | <9 | <20 SMU |
| Angiotensin-converting enzyme | 39 | 8-52 U/L |
| Methylmalonic acid | 0.13 | <0.40 umol/L |
| Quantiferon TB Plus | Negative | Negative |
| IgG | 1939 | 700-1600 mg/dl |
| Albumin | 3963 | 3848-5304 mg/dl |
| Ribonuclear protein Ab | 1.8 | <1.0 ELISA units |
| SM Ab | 0.2 | <1.0 ELISA units |
| SS A/Ro Ab | 3.0 | <1.0 ELISA units |
| SS B/La Ab | <0.2 | <1.0 ELISA units |
| Treponemal IgG/IgM | Nonreactive | Nonreactive |
| C-ANCA | <1:20 | <1:20 titer |
| P-ANCA | <1:20 | <1:20 titer |
| PT | 12.7 | 12.1-14.5 seconds |
| PTT | 34 | 22-36 seconds |
| DRVVT | 31 | 27-45 seconds |
| Lupus anticoagulant | 37.5 seconds | 30.3-43.2 seconds |
| DNA Ab (ds) Crithidia, IFA | Negative | Negative |
| TPMT enzyme activity | 26.2 | >21 EU |
| Cardiolipin Ab IgA | 42.9 | <12 APL |
| Cardiolipin Ab IgG | <9.0 | <15 GPL |
| Cardiolipin Ab IgM | <9.0 | <12.5 MPL |
| Vitamin B1, whole blood | 50 | 38-122 ug/L |
| Varicella IgG Ab | 2.6 | <1.0 units |
| Varicella IgM Ab | 1.26 | <0.9 index |
| Striated muscle Ab IgG | 1:40 | <1:40 |
| AchR ganglionic neuronal Ab, S | 0.00 | <0.02 nmol/L |
| Amphiphysin Ab, S | Negative | <1:240 titer |
| AGNA-1, S | Negative | <1:240 titer |
| ANNA-1, S | Negative | <1:240 titer |
| ANNA-2, S | Negative | <1:240 titer |
| ANNA-3, S | Negative | <1:240 titer |
| CRMP-5-IgG, S | Negative | <1:240 titer |
| GAD65 Ab, S | 0.00 | 0.02 |
| Neuronal (V-G) K+ channel Ab, S | Negative | <0.02 nmol/L |
| N-type calcium channel Ab | 0.04 | <0.03 nmol/L |
| P/Q-type calcium channel Ab | 0.00 | <0.02 nmol/L |
| PCA-1, S | Negative | <1:240 |
| PCA-2, S | Negative | <1:240 |
| PCA-Tr, S | Negative | <1:240 |
| Striational (striated muscle) Ab, S | Negative | <1:120 |
Table 2. Patient CSF initial and repeat (18 months later) laboratory results with reference values.
Ab: antibody; AGNA-1: anti-glial nuclear antibody type 1; ANNA: antineuronal nuclear antibody; CSF: cerebrospinal fluid; CRMP-5: collapsin response-mediator protein-5; EBV: Epstein-Barr virus; HSV: herpes simplex virus; Ig: immunoglobulin; PCA: Purkinje cytoplasmic antibody; PCA-Tr: Purkinje cytoplasmic antibody titer; PCR: polymerase chain reaction; S: serum; VDRL: venereal disease research laboratory
| Laboratories | Initial values | Repeat (18 months) values | Reference range and units |
| N-Methyl-D-aspartate receptor Ab IgG serum with reflex to titer | - | 1:5 | <1:1 |
| West Nile IgG Abs | - | <1.3 | <1.30 antibody not detected, 1.30-1.49 equivocal, and >1.49 antibody detected |
| West Nile IgM Abs | - | <0.9 | <0.90 antibody not detected, 0.90-1.10 equivocal, and >1.10 antibody detected |
| Varicella zoster, PCR | - | Not detected | Not detected |
| Cytomegalovirus PCR, qualitative | Not detected | Not detected | Not detected |
| EBV DNA, PCR CSF | - | Not detected | Not detected |
| HSV 1 DNA | - | Not detected | |
| HSV 2 DNA | - | Not detected | |
| VDRL | Nonreactive | Nonreactive | |
| Protein | 34.9 | 50 | 15-55 mg/dl |
| Lactic acid | - | 1.4 | 1.2-2.4 mmol/L |
| Glucose | 64 | 58 | 40-80 mg/dl |
| Red blood cells | 1 | <3 | 0/mm3 |
| White blood cells | 1 | 7 | 0-5/mm3 |
| Neutrophils | 0 | 0 | 0%-6% |
| Lymphocytes | 94 | 97 | 40%-80% |
| Monocytes | 6 | 2 | 15%-45% |
| Mononucleates | 0 | 0 | 15%-45% |
| Macrophages | 0 | 0 | 0% |
| Eosinophils | 0 | 0 | 0% |
| Basophils | 0 | 0 | 0% |
| IgG | 7.4 | 6.1 | 0.5-6.1 mg/dl |
| Albumin | 18.7 | 18.7 | 10-31 mg/dl |
| IgG index/CSF | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.3-0.7 ratio |
| Angiotensin-converting enzyme | <5 | - | <15 U/L |
| Amphiphysin Ab, S | Negative | - | <1:240 titer |
| AGNA-1, S | Negative | - | <1:240 titer |
| ANNA-1, S | Negative | - | <1:240 titer |
| ANNA-2, S | Negative | - | <1:240 titer |
| ANNA-3, S | Negative | - | <1:240 titer |
| CRMP-5-IgG, S | Negative | - | <1:240 titer |
| PCA-1, S | Negative | - | <1:240 |
| PCA-2, S | Negative | - | <1:240 |
| PCA-Tr, S | Negative | - | <1:240 |
Figure 1. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain and cervical spine.
MRI of the brain fluid-attenuated inversion recovery axially showing T2 hyperintensities in the bilateral hypothalamic regions (A, B) and pontomedullary junction (C), with interval resolution imaging after a year (F-H). MRI of the cervical spine showing T2 signal changes from cervicomedullary junction to C3 level (D) with faint gadolinium enhancement (E). Repeat MRI of the brain, interval of two years, showing new T2 hyperintensities in the bilateral thalami (I, J). Repeat MRI of the cervical spine, interval of 18 months, showing improved T2 hyperintensities within cervical medullary junction (K), without enhancement (L)
The patient was recommended clinical observation and a repeat MRI of the brain and NMO IgG in six months. She had a repeat MRI of the brain a year later (delayed due to the COVID-19 pandemic), which showed complete resolution of the initially reported T2 signal changes in the bilateral hypothalamus and pontomedullary junction (Figure 1F-1H). Re-imaging of the cervical and thoracic spine was not performed at this time. NMO IgG serology was repeated and was positive with a titer of 1:100 one year after she initially tested negative (Table 1). To prevent future attacks, the patient was started on mycophenolate mofetil 1 g twice daily for AQP4-positive NMOSD. A few months later, the patient presented with severe fatigue, diplopia, anorexia, generalized weakness, and an unintentional 30 lb weight loss. Neurological examination was normal except for mild right fatigable ptosis. Laboratory testing showed normal complete blood count; comprehensive metabolic panel, thyroid profile, folate level, iron profile, and monoclonal protein evaluation; and low normal vitamin B12 level of 189 pg/ml with normal methylmalonic acid. She had normal glycated hemoglobin, parathyroid hormone, and vitamin D levels. Repeat antinuclear antigen was positive with a titer of 1:320 homogenous. Due to her constellation of symptoms, she was tested for acetylcholine receptor (AchR) binding antibodies, which were positive at 0.53 nmol/L, consistent with the diagnosis of MG. The patient declined neurophysiological testing at that time. She underwent a chest/abdomen/pelvis CT for evaluation of a thymoma, which was negative for malignancy. She was started on pyridostigmine 30 mg three times/day for MG-related fatigue and generalized weakness.
Eighteen months after her NMOSD diagnosis, the patient presented with subacute progressive cognitive decline, imbalance, and behavioral problems. She was accompanied by her sister, who reported that the patient was having severe panic attacks, bizarre behavior, paranoid delusions, and short-term memory problems. Neither the patient nor her sister reported a history of anxiety. Neurological examination showed mild cognitive impairment and impaired tandem gait. On the Montreal Cognitive Assessment, she scored 24/30 and showed difficulty with executive, visuospatial functioning, recall, and fluency. Given the subacute progressive cognitive decline, there was a high suspicion of encephalitis and vasculitis. A repeat MRI of the brain/cervical/thoracic spine was performed and showed new areas of T2 hyperintense foci within the bilateral posterior thalami without associated enhancement (Figure 1I, 1J). In the cervical spine, there was improvement in the previously reported T2 signal changes without new lesions (Figure 1K, 1L). The thoracic spine showed only mild degenerative changes and was negative for any demyelinating lesions.
Repeat lumbar puncture showed normal cell count, glucose, and protein (Table 2). Cerebrospinal fluid viral polymerase chain reactions were negative. Cerebrospinal fluid was positive for anti-NMDAR IgG at 1:5, indicative of NMDAR encephalitis. Serum anti-NMDAR IgG was negative (Table 1). She was given a three-day course of intravenous methylprednisolone 1 g without improvement. She had chest/abdomen/pelvis CT, which showed a right ovarian cyst but was negative for malignancy. Transvaginal ultrasound was performed and negative for a possible teratoma. The patient received rituximab 1 g, two doses, two weeks apart, and her anxiety, behavioral symptoms, and cognition significantly improved.
The patient was seen most recently eight months after her first rituximab infusion. She has received two rounds of infusions so far per her maintenance therapy plan. Her cognition and focal neurological deficits have remained stable. She has not had a relapse of her NMOSD or MG symptoms. She continues to suffer from anxiety and depression, which is being treated with clonazepam 0.5 mg at bedtime. Additionally, she reported a new sugar craving and weight gain, which is thought to possibly be related to limbic involvement of her NMDAR encephalitis. She was referred to behavior health for assistance in treating the symptoms, and the patient will follow up before each infusion (every six months).
Discussion
While these three conditions are rare, there have been documented cases of concurrent NMOSD-NMDAR encephalitis and NMOSD-MG [3-8]. We could not find any literature related to a patient who exhibited the symptoms of these disorders while testing positive for all three antibodies (AQP4, AchR, and NMDAR) on different occasions.
The clinical significance of patients with overlapping NMOSD-NMDA encephalitis remains unclear. However, overlapping cases typically presented with more severe symptoms and required high-efficacy treatment [3]. In prior documented cases, there does not appear to be a pattern of one condition preceding the other. Patients who develop these disorders may test positive for only one antibody at the time of diagnosis and later develop detectable levels of the other antibodies [2,3]. It is thought that the immune upregulation involved in the pathogenesis of these syndromes may increase one’s susceptibility to other autoimmune disorders. These two conditions have very different clinical manifestations. Clinicians treating patients with NMOSD who later develop psychiatric symptoms, such as bizarre behavior, delusions, or hallucinations, should consider testing for anti-NMDAR.
While there are no published cases of patients with NMDA encephalitis and MG, there have been reports of concurrent MG and leucine-rich glioma-inactivated 1 (LGI1) protein antibody-associated encephalitis. This disease process presents with characteristic faciobrachial seizures and the same psychiatric symptoms as NMDA encephalitis [9]. The patient has not been tested for anti-LGI1 IgG at the time of writing. However, the patient’s lack of seizures and negative limbic involvement on imaging make LGI1 encephalitis unlikely. However, the association between these disorders should prompt anti-LGI1 IgG testing when patients with MG present with symptoms of encephalitis.
In patients with concurrent MG and anti-AQP4 NMOSD, MG typically presented several years before NMOSD, and the presentation of NMOSD did not correlate with cessation of MG immunosuppressive therapy [4,8,10]. Patients typically tested positive for the anti-AQP4 antibody at the time of MG presentation but did not show symptoms until years later [8]. Concurrent MG was not related to a worse prognosis in patients with AQP4-NMOSD [10]. While thymic hyperplasia is a well-known source of anti-AchR, new evidence suggests that the thymus could be a source of anti-AQP4 [7]. This could explain the increased incidence of these disorders occurring together compared to chance. Although the patient’s imaging was negative for a thymoma, CT is only 35% sensitive for thymic hyperplasia and 20% sensitive for a focal thymic mass [11]. Therefore, the thymic origin of these disorders cannot be excluded. Individuals diagnosed with MG should be tested for anti-AQP4 and counseled on the possibility of developing NMOSD in the future.
The subsequent manifestations of these rare disorders are likely a consequence of coexisting autoimmunity. NMDA encephalitis has been associated with concomitant demyelinating syndromes [3]. The mechanism behind this phenomenon remains unclear. Malignancies and their associated paraneoplastic syndromes often cause new-onset autoimmune disorders, including those seen in this patient. However, the patient’s workup has been negative for malignancy thus far.
Rituximab is a monoclonal antibody against the CD20 B-cell surface receptor. The binding of the antibody to this receptor triggers B-cell death and has a powerful systematic immunosuppressive effect [12,13]. Conveniently, rituximab has been shown to be an efficacious treatment for all three disorders [14-16]. A systematic review found that 30% of AchR+ patients saw decreased posttreatment antibody titers [14]. Response to rituximab is strong, with the majority of patients having some or all of their encephalitis symptoms reversed posttreatment [16]. We believe the benefit of treating these three conditions with a single drug will provide the best possible outcome for the patient with the least amount of side effects.
Conclusions
Over the course of two years, this patient developed the clinical manifestations of three rare neurological autoimmune disorders at subsequent points in time. Not only did the symptoms of each disease overlap, but also the patient had positive serology for all three conditions simultaneously. After failing first-line therapy with glucocorticoids, she continues to respond well to rituximab. It is essential to address poor response to first-line immunosuppressive therapies early on, as the continuation of these therapies may not be effective in some cases. Additionally, central (NMOSD and NMDAR encephalitis) and peripheral (MG) neurological syndromes can occur simultaneously and even present at distant points in time. Clinicians need to be vigilant about the overlap of neurological syndromes affecting the central and peripheral nervous systems to avoid delays in the diagnosis and treatment to prevent poor clinical outcomes.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the patient and all the physicians and health personnel involved in the care of this patient. The authors thank Stephanie Stebens, MLIS, AHIP, at Henry Ford Hospital for her editorial assistance.
The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Human Ethics
Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study
References
- 1.A review of the current literature and a guide to the early diagnosis of autoimmune disorders associated with neuromyelitis optica. Iyer A, Elsone L, Appleton R, Jacob A. Autoimmunity. 2014;47:154–161. doi: 10.3109/08916934.2014.883501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Comparison of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)-antibody disease and AQP4-IgG-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) when they co-exist with anti-NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate) receptor encephalitis. Fan S, Xu Y, Ren H, et al. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2018;20:144–152. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2018.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Overlapping demyelinating syndromes and anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor encephalitis. Titulaer MJ, Höftberger R, Iizuka T, et al. Ann Neurol. 2014;75:411–428. doi: 10.1002/ana.24117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Anti-MOG and anti-AQP4 positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder in a patient with myasthenia gravis. Bates M, Chisholm J, Miller E, Avasarala J, Guduru Z. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2020;44:102205. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2020.102205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Role of complement and potential of complement inhibitors in myasthenia gravis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: a brief review. Chamberlain JL, Huda S, Whittam DH, Matiello M, Morgan BP, Jacob A. J Neurol. 2021;268:1643–1664. doi: 10.1007/s00415-019-09498-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Myasthenia gravis: subgroup classification and therapeutic strategies. Gilhus NE, Verschuuren JJ. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14:1023–1036. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00145-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Japanese cases of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder associated with myasthenia gravis and a review of the literature. Ikeguchi R, Shimizu Y, Suzuki S, et al. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014;125:217–221. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2014.07.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders in patients with myasthenia gravis: ten new aquaporin-4 antibody positive cases and a review of the literature. Jarius S, Paul F, Franciotta D, et al. Mult Scler. 2012;18:1135–1143. doi: 10.1177/1352458511431728. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Clinical features of limbic encephalitis with LGI1 antibody. Wang M, Cao X, Liu Q, Ma W, Guo X, Liu X. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2017;13:1589–1596. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S136723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Myasthenia gravis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: a multicenter study of 16 patients. Leite MI, Coutinho E, Lana-Peixoto M, et al. Neurology. 2012;78:1601–1607. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31825644ff. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Clinical and radiologic review of the normal and abnormal thymus: pearls and pitfalls. Nasseri F, Eftekhari F. Radiographics. 2010;30:413–428. doi: 10.1148/rg.302095131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Autoantibodies in neurological disease. Prüss H. Nat Rev Immunol. 2021;21:798–813. doi: 10.1038/s41577-021-00543-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.A tale of two antibodies: obinutuzumab versus rituximab. Freeman CL, Sehn LH. Br J Haematol. 2018;182:29–45. doi: 10.1111/bjh.15232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Efficacy and safety of rituximab therapy in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Damato V, Evoli A, Iorio R. JAMA Neurol. 2016;73:1342–1348. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2016.1637. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rituximab treatment of myasthenia gravis: a systematic review. Tandan R, Hehir MK 2nd, Waheed W, Howard DB. Muscle Nerve. 2017;56:185–196. doi: 10.1002/mus.25597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Treatment and prognostic factors for long-term outcome in patients with anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis: an observational cohort study. Titulaer MJ, McCracken L, Gabilondo I, et al. Lancet Neurol. 2013;12:157–165. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(12)70310-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

