Skip to main content
Iranian Journal of Pathology logoLink to Iranian Journal of Pathology
. 2022 Aug 16;17(3):335–341. doi: 10.30699/IJP.2022.540459.2746

Long-term Effects of Regular Whole Blood Donation on Peripheral Blood CD34+ Cells Population with using Leukoreduction Filters

Parvaneh Abbasi Sourki 1, Ali Akbar Pourfathollah 2,*, Mahdi Pakjoo 1, Zahra Abbasi-Malati 3, Mona A Tajrishi 3
PMCID: PMC9508535  PMID: 36247501

Abstract

Background & Objective:

Trapped cell population in leukoreduction filters (LRFs) contains such a significant number of CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells that can be recovered to be used in research studies.

Methods:

Samples (n=20) were obtained from 10 first-time donors and 10 regular blood donors with more than 30 times blood donation. After separating leukocytes from LRFs by backflushing, total leukocyte number and differential count were determined in both groups using an automated haemocytometer. Then cell viability and CD34+ cell quantification were assessed using 7- amino-actinomycin D and fluorescent-labeled monoclonal antibodies using flow cytometry, respectively.

Results:

Total leukocyte count was 665±164.92×106 in the first-time blood donors and 883±233.89×106 in the regular donors, which were not significantly different (P=0.08). While the number of CD34+ cells was significantly reduced in the regular donors compared to the first-time donors (0.58±0.20×106/µL vs. 0.36±0.22×106/µL; P=0.034). There was no significant difference in terms of absolute neutrophil count (10.58±3.66×06 vs. 13.17±6.45×106/µL; P=0.349), lymphocytes (7.75±3.11×106 vs. 10.38±3.77×106 /µL; P=0.917), and monocytes (2.31±0.88×106 vs. 2.59±1.09×106/µL; P=0.591) between the first-time and regular donor groups, respectively. Based on the correlation coefficients, the participants’ age had no significant effect on these variables.

Conclusion:

The results of this study depicted that regular blood donation reduces the number of CD34+ cells in the peripheral blood (PB) of regular donors while it has no significant effect on the ratio of myeloid to lymphoid cells of the two groups.

Key Words: leukoreduction filter, CD34+ hematopoietic stem cells, Regular blood donation, Donor safety

Introduction

Blood products are indispensable part of therapy in many emergencies like accidents, natural disasters, and some genetic disorders (e.g., β-thalassemia major) (1, 2). Voluntary non-remunerated donation of blood from low-risk donors is mostly recommended to supply the needed blood products of healthcare centers (3-5). Leukoreduction filters (LRFs, also known as leukodepletion filters) have been shown to significantly decrease the immunomodulatory effects of transfusion, as well as reducing the possibility of transmission of leukocyte-related infections, particularly, Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), cytomegalovirus (CMV), and human T-lymphotropic virus-I/II (HTLV)-I/II (2, 6-9). Leukodepletion filters, in addition to the functional white blood cells (WBCs), are proved to contain other active cells like dendritic cells (DCs), endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs), hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), platelets, and red blood cells (RBCs); and as a buffy coat, they have been shown to effectively enhance the in-vitro platelet production (6, 10-15).

It has been shown that the average number of cluster of differentiation 34 positive (CD34+) cells in LRFs reaches 0.4-1.6×106 in each 400-mL blood bag which offers a great opportunity in research around donor hemovigilance while they are usually discarded (7, 16, 17). HSCs and hematopoietic progenitor cells (HPCs) replenish all specialized blood cells during whole life and are recognized and isolated using CD34 glycoprotein marker from bone marrow (BM), umbilical cord blood (UCB), and peripheral blood (PB) by different methods (7, 18-22). LRFs are shown to be highly potential in the stem cell research area, nonetheless, their application in hemovigilance has not yet been investigated.

Regular blood donation not only provides blood units for patients with the need for blood products like thalassemia, but also it has been shown that donated units by regular donors are safer compared to the units donated by first-time blood donors (3, 23, 24). However, the impact of long-term donation on the quantity and quality of circulating peripheral blood stem cells has not yet been investigated.

Considering that the effects of regular blood donation on the population and viability of HSCs of donors are not known, it is important to investigate whether regular blood donation has any adverse effect on the quantity and/or quality of HSCs and blood cells. Here, we took the advantage of LRFs to determine the effects of long-time regular blood donation on the CD34+ cell population and viability of the PB of first-time and regular blood donors.

Material and Methods

Subjects 

Participants were selected from those who attended Vesal Blood Transfusion Center, Tehran, Iran. We provided the donors with a questionnaire, accompanied by an information form. Ethical approval was obtained from the National Institute for Medical Research Development (NIMAD, approval number: IR-NIMAD-REC.1396.349). In all procedures described in this article, we followed the ethical guidelines provided by Iranian Blood Transfusion Organization.

Leukocyte Recovery from LRFs

The blood bags were stored at room temperature for 2 hours and filtration was done within 8 hours after collection. The cells were isolated from LRFs and analyzed immediately after filtration. A total of 20 used Leukoflex LCR-5 (Maco Pharma Company, Alborz, Iran) was divided into two groups, including LRFs from 10 first-time blood donors and 10 regular donors with more than 30 times blood donations. LRFs were kept at 4ºC before filtrating and then filtration was carried out at room temperature for 30 minutes by gravity flow. Afterward, the cells were isolated from LRFs using backflushing in a total volume of 200-mL elution buffer using a 60mL sterile syringe filled with phosphate buffer saline (PBS; pH: 7.2) containing 5-mM EDTA and 2.5% sucrose. To remove the remained RBCs, the isolated cells were washed twice using slow centrifugation at 300×g for 10 minutes, and then the pellets were resuspended in PBS.

Quantification of the Viable Recovered Cells

Cell counting and survival rate were measured by a hemocytometer (Sysmex Xs-800i, Kobe, Japan) and 7-amino-actinomycin D (7-ADD) staining, respectively.

Determination of CD34 + Cell Population

To evaluate the immunophenotypic markers by flowcytometry, a cell suspension (105 cells in each sample) was combined with 10 µL of fluorescently-labeled monoclonal antibodies (CD34/PE, and CD45/FITC; DAKO Company, Carpinteria, California) and incubated in dark for 30 minutes at 4ºC. After lysing RBCs by FACS lysing solution, the cells were washed with 500 µL of PBS and fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde. Finally, they were immunophenotyped using Partec PAS III flow cytometer and FlowJo software. 

Data Analysis

Data were analyzed using the SPSS software version 24 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and the results were expressed as means ± standard deviations of triplicates. The normality of the data distribution was evaluated by the Shapiro-Wilk test. Differences between the groups were tested by the student’s t-test after Levene’s test for the equality of variances. The correlation test of age on the numbers of CD34+ HSCs and WBCs were assessed by calculating Spearman's and Pearson's coefficients. Flow cytometry results were analyzed using FlowJo software and immunophenotypic data were analyzed using Partec software. In all analyses, P-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant and data were plotted by the GraphPad Prism software version 7.00 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla California USA) and SPSS software.

Results

Characteristics of Subjects

The basic information about donors is summarized in Table 1. Since women with more than 30 times donations were rare, they were excluded from both groups before donation. A total of 20 subjects were then enrolled, including 10 first-time donors (aged 20-57 years old with a median weight of 86.3 kg [range: 55-108 kg] and hemoglobin level of 12-17 g/dL) and 10 donors with more than 30 times donations (aged 41-56 years old with a median weight of 90.8 kg [range: 79-130 kg] and hemoglobin level of 14.5-16 g/dL).

Table 1.

The basic information of participants

Regular donors (>30 times) First-time donors
90.8 (79-130) 86.3 (55-108) Weight (kg)
49.5 (41-56) 33.8 (20-57) Age (years)
462 (453-471) 465 (450-476) Blood volume (mL)
15.35 (14.5-16) 14.23 (12-17) Hemoglobin (g/dL)

Effect of Blood Donation Frequency on Derived Leukocytes from LRFs

By comparing the number of derived cells from LRFs of first-time and regular blood donors, a significant difference was observed between the two groups regarding the number of CD34+ cells (Table 2). The number of CD34+ cells in the regular blood donors was 0.36±0.22×106/µL (P=0.034), which significantly reduced compared to their numbers in the first-time blood donors (0.58±0.20×106/µL, P=0.034). The number of CD34+ cells was not normally distributed among the regular blood donors (P=0.001; Table 3). Moreover, the average number of recovered WBCs from LRFs in the first-time and regular blood donors were 665±164.92×106 and 883±233.89×106/µL, respectively, which were not significantly different (P=0.08). In addition, there were no significant difference between the first-time and regular donors in terms of the number of neutrophils (0.58±3.66×06 vs. 13.17±6.45×106/µL; P=0.349), lymphocytes (7.75±3.11×106 vs. 10.38±3.77×106 /µL; P= 0.917), and monocytes (2.31±0.88×106 vs. 2.59±1.09×106/µL; P= 0.591), respectively.

Table 2.

Equalities of variances and means of each parameter between the two groups were tested by Levene’s test and Independent Sample Test, respectively

Independent Sample Test
Variables Levene's Test for Equality of Variances t-test for Equality of Means
F P-value t df Sig. (2-tailed) Mean difference Std. Error Difference 95% confidence interval of the Difference
Lower Upper
Recovered WBC count Equal variances
assumed
1.236 0.281 -1.85 18 0.08 -168.1 90.502 -358.238 22.038
Equal variances not assumed - - -1.85 16.175 0.082 -168.1 90.502 -359.787 23.587
LRFs CD34 + cells Equal variances
assumed
0.089 0.768 2.28 18 0.034 0.22 0.0960 0.0180 0.421
Equal variances not assumed - - 2.28 17.758 0.035 0.22 0.0960 0.017 0.422
Recovered Neutrophils per µl Equal variances
assumed
2.368 0.148 -0.97 13 0.349 -2.588 2.662 -8.339 3.163
Equal variances not Assumed - - 0.93 9.223 0.373 -2.588 2.762 -8.815 3.638
Recovered Lymphocytes per µl Equal variances
assumed
0.0130 0.910 0.10 13 0.917 0.204 1.921 -3.945 4.355
Equal variances not assumed - - 0.10 12.618 0.917 0.204 1.925 -3.967 4.377
Recovered Monocytes per µl Equal variances
assumed
0.349 0.565 0.55 13 0.591 0.281 0.511 -0.822 1.386
Equal variances not assumed - - 0.54 11.572 0.597 0.281 0.518 -0.853 1.417

*The significant variables are in bold from

Table 3.

Normality of the data distribution using Shapiro-Wilk test

First-time donors Regular donors (>30 times)
Parameters Shapiro-Wilk Shapiro-Wilk
Statistic Sig. Normality Statistic Sig. Normality
WBC 0.908 0.269 Normal 0.955 0.724 Normal
CD34+cells 0.920 0.357 Normal 0.682 0.001 Non-normal
Neutrophils 0.913 0.374 Normal 0.870 0.151 Normal
Lymphocytes 0.934 0.552 Normal 0.909 0.347 Normal
Monocytes 0.928 0.495 Normal 0.949 0.697 Normal
Viability 0.825 0.029 Non-normal 0.818 0.024 Non-normal
Age 0.883 0.143 Normal 0.945 0.613 Normal

The viability of isolated leukocytes was determined for both groups after backflushing using the 7-ADD staining. The viability percentage of isolated leukocytes from the first-time blood donors was 97.2±1.13 in comparison with 94.6±2.71 from the regular donors, which did not have a normal distribution based on Shapiro-Wilk test (Table 3). No significant difference was observed between the two groups (P=0.02) in terms of viability of isolated leukocytes.

The Characteristics of Isolated Leukocytes from LRFs

The isolated leukocytes were evaluated using the surface markers of CD34 and CD45. As shown in R1 regions of figures 2A and 2B, the expression percentages of CD45+ cells were 0.081% and 0.055% in the first-time and regular blood donors, respectively. The proportion of CD34+ cells was 21.68% and 5.75% of recovered CD45+ cells in the first and second groups, respectively (as shown in R2 regions of Figures 2A and 2B). The proportion of CD34+/CD45dim cells are shown in R3 regions which were 17.32% and 17.11% of recovered cells in the two groups, respectively.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Cell viability and immunophenotypic characterization of CD34+/CD45+ cells isolated from LRFs of (A) first-time donors and (B) regular donors

Correlation coefficients between the Age of Subjects and Other Variables

Spearman's and Pearson's coefficients were used to investigate the correlation between the age of the subjects and other variables in accordance with the types of distribution (as represented in Table 2). There was no significant relationship between the age and other variables (Table 4).

Table 4.

The correlation coefficients between the age of the subjects and other variables

First-time donors Regular donors (>30 times)
Parameters Correlation coefficients Correlation coefficients
Statistic Sig. Statistic Sig.
WBC -0.491 0.149 0.310 0.383
CD34+cells 0.129 0.731 -0.281 0.431
Neutrophils -0.275 0.509 0.531 0.220
Lymphocytes -0.447 0.267 -0.089 0.849
Monocytes -0.236 0.574 0.590 0.163
Viability -0.129 0.722 0.254 0.479

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

The number of recovered leukocytes isolated from LRFs of the first-time and regular donors according to the type of cells. The results (means ±standard deviations) only comparatively represent a significant difference between the two groups in terms of the number of CD34+ cells (*P˂ 0.05)

Discussion

Previous studies have majorly evaluated the effects of regular blood donation on hematopoiesis through the measurement of iron-associated blood parameters and have introduced iron deficiency as its main side effect (18, 25). Although one study has reported that there is no significant difference between the number of CD34+ cells isolated from donors before and immediately after a blood donation, it was a short-term study and could not predict long-term effects of blood donation (26). Here, we analyzed the data related to donors whose health was determined by regular examinations in the transfusion centers before donation and showed that there was 1.19-fold reduction in the number of CD34+ cells from the regular donors while the myeloid to leucocyte (M/L) ratio did not significantly change (Table 3). In addition, the decreased number of leukocytes had no adverse effect on donors as they were diagnosed healthy and ready to donate by physicians of transfusion centers according to the universal guidelines.

The number/proportion of PB-CD34+ cells, myeloid cells, and lymphocytes is imbalanced in many of disorders like leukemia and bone marrow (BM)

fibrosis versus the healthy condition in which the number of PB-CD34+ cells decrease, and the number of myeloid and lymphoid cells and BM-HSCs remains constant as people age (9, 27-29). Hence, measurement of the quantity and viability of CD34+ cells, total leukocyte number, their differential number, and M/L ratio allow us to monitor significant changes in the number or ratio of WBCs to predict possible hematopoiesis failure following regular donation. However, the differences among mentioned parameters between the first-time and regular donors were not significant and the percentage of viable CD34+ cells was more than 90% in both groups.

It was initially hypothesized that the reduction in LRF-CD34+ cells was correlated with the age, however the statistical analyses revealed that there was no relationship between the measured parameters in this study and the age of participants so that the loss of sensitivity to PB stimuli or any reduction in mobilizing cytokines might be the possible mechanisms of this decrease (28-32).

Conclusion

In this study, a decrease in LRF-CD34+ cell count was seen while no adverse effect on the number or function of leukocytes was seen. This study was not a cause-and-effect study and donor clinical parameters were not the target of the study, however, all the donors were diagnosed healthy with routine principals of blood donation at transfusion centers.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the National Institute for Medical Research Development (NIMAD), Tehran, Iran with Grant No: IR-NIMAD-REC.1396.349.

References

  • 1.Sasani N, Roghanian R, Emtiazi G, Aghaie A. A Novel Approach on Leukodepletion Filters: Investigation of Synergistic Anticancer Effect of Purified alpha-Defensins and Nisin. Adv Pharm Bull. 2021;11(2):378–84. doi: 10.34172/apb.2021.036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sharma RR, Marwaha N. Leukoreduced blood components: Advantages and strategies for its implementation in developing countries. Asian J Transfus Sci. 2010;4(1):3–8. doi: 10.4103/0973-6247.59384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hashemi S, Maghsudlu M, Nasizadeh S, Esmaielifar G, Pourfathollah AA. Effective ways to retain first-time blood donors: a field-trial study. Transfusion. 2019;59(9):2893–8. doi: 10.1111/trf.15404. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.He H, Tang L, Jiang N, Zheng R, Li W, Gu Y, et al. Characterization of peripheral blood mononuclear cells isolated using two kinds of leukocyte filters. Transfus Clin Biol. 2020;27(1):10–7. doi: 10.1016/j.tracli.2019.11.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Nair S, Mammen J. Repeat voluntary non-remunerated blood donor is the best quality indicator for blood safety. Indian J Med Res. 2015;141(6):749 –5916. doi: 10.4103/0971-5916.160687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ivanovic Z, Duchez P, Morgan DA, Hermitte F, Lafarge X, Chevaleyre J, et al. Whole‐blood leukodepletion filters as a source of CD34+ progenitors potentially usable in cell therapy. Transfusion. 2006;46(1):118–25. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2005.00677.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Peytour Y, Villacreces A, Chevaleyre J, Ivanovic Z, Praloran V. Discarded leukoreduction filters: a new source of stem cells for research, cell engineering and therapy? Stem Cell Res. 2013;11(2):736–42. doi: 10.1016/j.scr.2013.05.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Nair SC, Mammen JJ. Repeat voluntary non-remunerated blood donor is the best quality indicator for blood safety. Indian J Med Res. 2015;141(6):749–52. doi: 10.4103/0971-5916.160687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Sasani N, Roghanian R, Emtiazi G, Jalali S, Zarif MN, Aghaie A. Design and introduction of a rational mechanical eluting system for leukocyte recovery from leukoreduction filters: A cell differential approach. Transfus Clin Biol. 2020;27(3):172–8. doi: 10.1016/j.tracli.2020.03.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bassiouny M, El-Chennawi F, Mansour A, Yahia S, Darwish A. Transplantation and Cellular Engineering. Transfusion. 2015;55:1263–8. doi: 10.1111/trf.12978. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.McKenna DH, Stroncek DF. Cellular Engineering: Hematopoietic Transplant, Immune Cell Therapy, and Regenerative Medicine. Transfus Med. 2021:477–99. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Néron S, Thibault L, Dussault N, Côté G, Ducas É, Pineault N, et al. Characterization of mononuclear cells remaining in the leukoreduction system chambers of apheresis instruments after routine platelet collection: a new source of viable human blood cells. Transfusion. 2007;47(6):1042–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2007.01233.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Meyer TP, Zehnter I, Hofmann B, Zaisserer J, Burkhart J, Rapp S, et al. Filter Buffy Coats (FBC): a source of peripheral blood leukocytes recovered from leukocyte depletion filters. J Immunol Methods. 2005;307(1-2):150–66. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2005.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Peytour Y, Guitart A, Villacreces A, Chevaleyre J, Lacombe F, Ivanovic Z, et al. Obtaining of CD34+ cells from healthy blood donors: development of a rapid and efficient procedure using leukoreduction filters. Transfusion. 2010;50(10):2152–7. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02683.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Valizadeh M, Purfathollah AA, Raoofian R, Homayoonfar A, Moazzeni M. Optimized simple and affordable procedure for differentiation of monocyte-derived dendritic cells from LRF: An accessible and valid alternative biological source. Exp Cell Res. 2021;406(2):112754. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2021.112754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Sivertsen J, Braathen H, Lunde THF, Kristoffersen EK, Hervig T, Strandenes G, et al. Cold-stored leukoreduced CPDA-1 whole blood: in vitro quality and hemostatic properties. Transfusion. 2020;60(5):1042–9. doi: 10.1111/trf.15748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Shastry S, Raturi M, Baliga P. Impact of regular whole-blood donation on body iron stores. Transfus Med Hemother. 2020;47(1):75–9. doi: 10.1159/000499768. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pei X. Who is hematopoietic stem cell: CD34+ or CD34-? Int J Hematol. 1999;70(4):213–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ando K. Human CD34− hematopoietic stem cells: basic features and clinical relevance. Int J Hematol. 2002;75(4):370–5. doi: 10.1007/BF02982126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Nielsen JS, McNagny KM. Novel functions of the CD34 family. J Cell Sci. 2008;121(22):3683–92. doi: 10.1242/jcs.037507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Dehdilani N, Shamsasenjan K, Movassaghpour A, Akbarzadehlaleh P, Amoughli Tabrizi B, Parsa H, et al. Improved Survival and Hematopoietic Differentiation of Murine Embryonic Stem Cells on Electrospun Polycaprolactone Nanofiber. Cell J. 2016;17(4):629–38. doi: 10.22074/cellj.2016.3835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ferdowsi S, Pourfathollah A. Leukocyte reduction filters: A source of peripheral blood leukocytes for research and drug production. Glob J Transfus Med. 2019;4(1):122. doi: 10.1016/j.htct.2020.10.963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Dezfouli AB, Pourfathollah AA, Nikougoftar-Zarif M, Khosravi M, Tajrishi M, Ezzati N, et al. Optimizing the recovery of peripheral blood mononuclear cells trapped in leukoreduction filters-A comparison study. Hematol Transfus Cell Ther. 2020 doi: 10.1016/j.htct.2020.09.155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Javadzadeh Shahshahani H, Attar M, Taher Yavari M. A study of the prevalence of iron deficiency and its related factors in blood donors of Yazd, Iran, 2003. Transfus Med. 2005;15(4):287–93. doi: 10.1111/j.0958-7578.2005.00590.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Pala C, Mumcuoglu H, Kurnaz F, Sivgin S, Kaynar L, Keklik M, et al. Changes in CD34+ cell count in peripheral blood after whole blood donation. Transfus Apher Sci. 2013;49(2):259–62. doi: 10.1016/j.transci.2013.04.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hallek M. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia: 2020 update on diagnosis, risk stratification and treatment. Am J Hematol. 2019;94(11):1266–87. doi: 10.1002/ajh.25595. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Tuljapurkar SR, McGuire TR, Brusnahan SK, Jackson JD, Garvin KL, Kessinger MA, et al. Changes in human bone marrow fat content associated with changes in hematopoietic stem cell numbers and cytokine levels with aging. J Anat. 2011;219(5):574–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2011.01423.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Povsic TJ, Zhou J, Adams SD, Bolognesi MP, Attarian DE, Peterson ED. Aging is not associated with bone marrow-resident progenitor cell depletion. J Immunol Methods. 2010;65(10):1042–50. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glq110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mittal S, Chacko MP, Varughese S, Raj A, Gowri M, Thankachen R, et al. Laboratory and clinical comparison of the efficacy of prestorage leukoreduction of red cells at cold versus room temperature. Transfusion. 2021;61(9):2556–65. doi: 10.1111/trf.16570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.da Silva NDM, Nukui Y, Takahashi J, de Souza Nogueira L. Effect of post-storage filters vs pre-storage filters for leukoreduction of blood components on clinical outcomes: a systematic review protocol. JBI Evid Synth. 2021;19(9):2382–8. doi: 10.11124/JBIES-20-00353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Muchtar E, Dingli D, Kumar S, Buadi F, Dispenzieri A, Hayman S, et al. Autologous stem cell transplant for multiple myeloma patients 70 years or older. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2016;51(11):1449–55. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2016.174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Iranian Journal of Pathology are provided here courtesy of Iranian Society of Pathology

RESOURCES