Abstract
Xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) is a rare autosomal recessive disorder characterized by a DNA repair defect caused by ultraviolet light and cutaneous manifestations, including solar lentigines, xerosis, actinic damage, and cutaneous neoplasms (e.g., basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and melanoma). Cutaneous angiosarcoma (AS) is a rare group of aggressive skin tumors that infrequently occur in patients with XP, usually involving the scalp or face. The AS has three subtypes: idiopathic, complicating lymphedema, and post-irradiation. The AS has diverse histopathological types, and the uncommon variants are clear cell, epithelioid, granular cell, pseudo lymphomatous, verrucous, and signet-ring cell variants. Although the foamy cell variant of AS is the rarest type, its diagnosis would be really challenging due to the wide variety of differential diagnoses, especially for poorly differentiated ones. Therefore, definitive diagnosis and effective management in the early stages are crucial, and immunohistochemical (IHC) tests are essential. Here we report a 50-year-old Iranian man with AS complicating XP who presented with an ulcerative erythematous and progressive plaque. Histopathologic studies revealed foamy cells and vascular markers (i.e., CD 31 and CD 34) were positive, immunohistochemically which was found unusual features. In addition,, we review previously reported cases in the literature to provide some information on the diagnosis and management of such cases.
Key Words: Angiosarcoma, Histopathology, Foamy cell, Malignancy, Skin cancer, Xerodermapigmentosum
Introduction
Xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) is a rare inherited condition transmitted in an autosomal recessive pattern (1-3). The main problem in more than 80% of cases is nucleotide excision repair (NER) defect causing a disturbed function of DNA repair harmed by sunlight ultraviolet radiation (1,4). This heightened photosensitivity results in sunburn, pigmentary changes, accelerated skin aging, anda significantly elevated incidence of skin neoplasms, including basal cell carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and melanoma (5, 6). Angiosarcomas (ASs) are a group of rare cutaneous and soft tissue sarcomas with a high tumor-related mortality rate that infrequently arise in XP cases (7-10).
Clinically, ASs are categorized into three distinctive settings: 1. Idiopathic type, classically on the head and neck of elderly patients, 2. Stewart-Treves type on lymph edematous limbs, and 3. Post-radiation type on the site of prior irradiation (11, 12). Histopathologically, ASs have a wide range of appearances, even in different sections of the same lesion (11). They are microscopically heterogeneous due to the degree of differentiation (13). Well-differentiated lesions consist of well-formed vascular spaces, while poorly differentiated ones appear with epithelioid or spindle cell patterns (9, 11, 14). The latter group is a real diagnostic challenge due to the wide range of differential diagnoses, including melanoma, lymphoma, and atypical fibroxanthoma. Consequently, variable immunohistochemical (IHC) studies are essential for definite diagnosis (15). Several rare variants of AS resulting in a signet ring or foamy cell appearance have been reported in a few reports that mimic other neoplasms and are a substantial diagnostic challengechallenging histopathologic diagnosis, diversity of variants, poor prognosis, and aggressive nature of AS (17, 18). Here, we present an XP case with angiosarcoma (AS) and foamy cells in the histopathologic examination. Furthermore, we review the findings of all the previously reported cases in the literature to provide more information on their diagnosis and management.
Case Presentation
The case is a known case of XP diagnosed since the age of 25 years with history of several recurrent BCCs and SCCs on sun-exposed areas (i.e., face, ear, and orbit) for 30 years. The patient had undergone several surgical excisions for those lesions. The patient had been born to non-consanguineous parents with no family history of XP. He presented to our clinic at age of 50 with the complaint of a progressive lesion on his nose of 2 years duration. Physical examination showed a 1.6×1.3 cm ulcerative erythematous non-bleeding progressive plaque on the right ala (Figure1). Further investigation showed no neurologic and ophthalmologic symptoms.
Fig 1.
(A, B), Clinical features. A: a 1.6 × 1.3 cm sized ulcerative erythematous, non-bleeding nodule on the right Ala. B: After the excision of the lesion and nasal tissue reconstruction with the forehead flap
A biopsy of the lesion was performed by surgical excision. Grossly, the specimen was hemorrhagic and necrotic. On microscopic appearance, numerous irregularly shaped anastomosing vascular channels with a highly infiltrative architecture and poor demarcation, which were lined by atypical endothelial cells, were present in the dermal component. In addition, dissecting collagen bundles were noted. Tumor cells were typically plump, hyperchromatic, pleomorphic, and mitotically active. Moreover, intratumoral foamy cells were frequently observed, and mild stromal lymphocytic aggregates were also present (Figure 2A-D). Immunohistochemicalmost tumoral cells expressed CD31 and CD34 with moderate intensity (Figure 3), and Ki67 was positive in about 10% of tumoral cells. They were negative for Pan CK, Melan A, S100, HMB45, CK7, CEA, and CD68.
Fig 3.
(A,B), immunohistochemical studies: Endothelial cell markers (x200) of CD31 (A) and CD34 (B) are strongly positive
According to the combination of histopathologic findings and immunohistochemical results, AS with foamy change was confirmed. The differential diagnoses included a reactive xanthogranulomatous process due to prominent foamy cell alteration of tumoral cells and clear cell dermatofibroma. Finally, the patient he underwent lesion excision with nasal tissue reconstruction with the forehead flap. The patient had no signs of recurrence or metastasis during 2-year of follow-up.
Fig 2.
(A-D), H&E slides. A: Irregularly shaped anastomosing vascular channels (x100).B: Extensive foamy cell alteration of the tumoral cells(arrows) resembling a reactive xanthogranulomatous process (x200).C: Highly infiltrative architecture and poor demarcation (x200). D: Multilayering of endothelial cells, nuclear atypia & increased mitoses (x400)
Discussion
In contrast to classical skin tumors in XP patients, cutaneous AS is a group of infrequent malignant lesions. Heterogeneity among their histopathologic findings makes them more difficult to diagnose. To our knowledge, several cases of AS in XP patients and a few cases of AS with foamy cell appearance in the histopathologic studies have been reported (Tables 1 and 2)(17). However, no cases with foamy cell manifestation of an AS tumor in an XP patient have been described yet. We presented the first case of AS in an XP patient with rare microscopic findings due to the presence of foamy cells.
Table 1.
Clinical, histopathologic, immunohistochemical, and genetic findings and outcome of the previously reported cases of xeroderma pigmentosum and associated angiosarcoma
| Variables | Present study | Won Jin Hong Study (1) |
Matthew T. Olson Study (8) |
J. LEAKE Study (20) |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Male | Male | Female | Male | Female |
| Age at diagnosis (years) | 50 | 65 | 11 | 73 | 15 |
| Site of the Lesion | Ala of nose | Scalp | Oral cavity | Auricle | Scalp |
| Lesion characteristics | Erythematous ulcerated plaque | Two erythematous firm nodules | Fungating polypoid mass | Erythematous ulcerated plaque | Rapidly growing nodule |
| Complaints | Gradual growth | Progressive skin pigmentation, multiple lentiginous, xerosis | Recurrent lesion of the tongue | Bleeding lesion on the left auricle | Rapidly growing nodule |
| Ocular symptoms | No | NA | Cataracts (complete visual loss in the right eye and partial vision loss in the left eye) | NA | NA |
| Neurological symptoms | No | No | No | NA | NA |
| Past dermatologic history | Recurrent BCC, and SCC | BCC, Actinic keratosis |
BCC, Recurrent lesion of the tongue |
BCC, SCC Melanoma |
BCC, SCC |
| Family history of XP | No | No | NA | Yes (sibling) | NA |
| Parents’ consanguinity | No | No | NA | NA | No |
| Histopathologic findings | Irregularly shaped anastomosing vascular channels lined by atypical endothelial cells with a highly infiltrative architecture and poor demarcation Intratumoral foamy cell changes |
A proliferation of atypical endothelial cells with a network of anastomosing vessels, small vascular channels dissecting the collagen fibers | Rounded epithelioid cells with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm, large vesicular nuclei, and prominent nucleoli. irregular anastomosing channels |
Atypical endothelial cells with markedly hyperchromatic pleomorphic nuclei in the dermis, forming an undifferentiated vascular structure |
Infiltrative
tumor, poorly differentiated, foci of plump endothelial cells lined anastomosing vascular channels, pleomorphic epithelioid and spindle-shaped cells with large nucleoli, phagocytosed hemosiderin pigment |
| Immunohistochemical stains panel | CD31: Positive CD34: Positive Ki67: Positive (10%) PanCK: Negative Melan A: Negative S100, CK7, CEA, CD68: Negative |
CD31: Positive HMB45: Negative HHV8: Negative |
CD31: Positive CD34: Positive HHV8: Negative AE1/AE3: Negative P63: Negative |
CD31: Positive CD34: Positive D2–40: Positive |
Von Willebrand: +
Ulexewropaeus agglutinin type 1: + JC 70: + QBEND: + |
| Gene | NA | POLH | NA | POLH | NA |
| Variant | NA | c.490G>T | NA | c.1066C>T | NA |
| Metastasis | No | No | NA | No | NA |
| Treatment | Excision with graft | Radiotherapy + excision |
Radiotherapy + excision |
Excision | Excision |
| Outcome | No recurrence for 2 years of follow-up | No recurrence for 4.5 years of follow-up | NA | No recurrence for 15 months of follow-up | Recurred locally within 5 weeks |
| Variables | Shilpi Sharma Study (7) |
D.Ludolph-hauser Study (21) |
Karkouche Study (22) |
Karkouche Study (22) |
Karkouche
Study (22) |
| Gender | Male | Female | Male | Female | Female |
| Age at diagnosis(years) | 25 | 13 | 18 | 21 | 27 |
| Lesion site | Scalp | Shin | Left sub palpebral | Right internal canthus | Parotid gland |
| Lesion characteristics | Non-healing bleeding ulcer with irregular, rolled-out edges | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Complaints | Non-healing bleeding ulcer | A lesion on the right shin | A lesion on sub palpebral | A lesion on the internal canthus | |
| Ocular symptoms | No | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Neurological symptoms | No | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Past dermatologic history | SCC, Myoepithelial carcinoma of the dermis, benign skin adnexal tumor of hair follicle differentiation | SCC, BCC, Actinic keratosis, Hemangiomas | BCC, actinic keratosis | BCC | NA |
| Family history of XP | Yes (2nd- and 3rd-degree relatives) | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Parents’ consanguinity | No | First cousin | NA | NA | NA |
| Histopathologic findings |
Disordered proliferation of atypical endothelial cells with hyperchromatic markedly pleomorphic nuclei and eosinophilic cytoplasm. Small vascular channels with red blood cells were seen lined by similar cells dissecting through the dermis and around the adnexal structure |
Deep infiltrate of pleomorphous tumor cells | A vascular proliferation, with a network of anastomosing vessels lined by atypical endothelial cells | NA | NA |
| Immunohistochemical stains panel | CD31: Positive CD34: Positive Cytokeratin: Negative |
CD31: Positive Factor VIII: Positive |
CD31: Positive CD34: Positive |
NA | NA |
| Gene | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Variant | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Metastasis | No | NA | NA | NA | NA |
| Treatment | Radiotherapy | Excision | Excision | Incomplete excision | Complete resection |
| Outcome | NA | NA | No sign of recurrence after 19 months |
Recurred after 11 months | No sign of recurrence after 27 months |
Table 2.
Clinical, histopathology, and IHC findings of the previously reported cases of cutaneous foamy cell angiosarcoma
| Case number | Author | Age | Gender | Location | Clinical findings | Histopathology | Immunohistochemistry |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ackerman et al. (23) | NA | NA | NA | NA | Focal areas of neoplastic cells with a foamy appearance | NA |
| 2 | Tatsas et al. (24) | 73 | M | Forehead | A Purpuric growing macule with a nodule |
Dermal, diffuse involvement by large, pale, relatively monomorphous mononuclear cells with abundant vacuolated cytoplasm |
Positivity for CD31, CD34, Fli-1,
Factor VIII-related antigen and podoplanin |
| 3 | Tatsas et al.(24) | 23 | M | Shoulder | A nodule with color change | Dermal, diffuse involvement by large, pale, relatively monomorphous mononuclear cells with abundant vacuolated cytoplasm |
Positivity for CD31, CD34, Fli-1,
Factor VIII-related antigen and podoplanin |
| 4 | Svajdler et al.(11) | 86 | M | Scalp | An ulcerated plaque | Epithelioid cells with foamy cytoplasm and round, oval angulated nuclei indented by intracytoplasmic vacuoles with few mitoses. |
Positivity for vimentin, CD34,
CD31, D2-40, Fli-1 and ERG and negativity for CD68, CD163, cytokeratin, EMA, CD10, S100, HMB45 and Melan A |
| 5 | Wood et al.(15) | 68 | M | Face | A large plaque | Sheet-like growth of finely multivacuolated cells with centrally placed nuclei with no signs of indentation |
Positivity for CD31, ERG, factor
VIII, CD68 and CD163 (finely granular cytoplasmic). Negativity for SMA, CD34, desmin, adipophilin, EMA, and cytokeratin. |
| 6 | Wood et al.(15) | 78 | M | Scalp, forehead and face |
Multinodular plaque |
Sheet-like growth of finely multivacuolated cells with centrally placed nuclei with no signs of indentation |
Positivity for CD31, ERG, CD68, and CD163 (finely granular
cytoplasmic). Negativity for S100protein, SMA, desmin, adipophilin, EMA, and cytokeratin. |
| 7 | Llamas-Velasco et al.(17) | 85 | M | Scalp | A large plaque | Dermal diffuse infiltration of large cells with foamy cytoplasm intermingled with lymphocytes and erythrocytes. |
Positivity for CD31, CD34, ERG,
podoplanin, Lyve-1, and NKIC3. Negativity for CD68 andlysozyme. Ser10 showed 3–4 mitoses per high power field |
| 8 | Curent case | 50 | M | Ala of nose | Erythematous ulcerated plaque | irregularly shaped anastomosing vascular channels lined by atypical endothelial cells with a highly infiltrative architecture and poor demarcation, Tumor cells were typically plump, hyperchromatic, pleomorphic, and mitotically active, and Intratumoral foamy cell changes were frequently seen, Mild Stromal lymphocytic aggregates |
Positive for CD31, CD34, KI67,
Negative for PanCK, MelanA, S100, HBM45, CK7, CEA, and CD68. |
Co-occurrence of XP and AS is observed almost equally in both genders (Table 1). In contrast to our study and two other investigations (1, 19), most previously reported cases of AS occurred in XP patients, were younger adults. Approximately half of AS cases occurs on the head and neck skin (19). Regarding the site of lesion, almost all previously reported AS cases in XP patients have been located on the head and neck with a preference for the scalp with an exception on the shin (1, 21). Our patient's lesion was on the nose, which was the same as a previously described 15-year-old male case (1). Moreover, its size was <5 cm, similar to most prior cases (19).
The main clinical presentation of AS in XP patients is a progressive and likely ulcerative erythematous plaque or nodule. Recurrent BCCs and SCCs had occurred in this case for a long time prior to AS diagnosis, which is in line with the most former cases (1, 8, 19-22). In terms of familial history and parents' consanguinity, same as most prior cases, the current case had no affected relatives or consanguineous parents. Therefore, among mentioned factors, age, site, size, clinical presentation, as well as BCC and SCC history can be worthy in facilitating diagnosis despite gender, family history, and parents' consanguinity.
In terms of histopathologic features, studies revealed the significant finding of foamy cell alterations of the tumoral cells, which resembled a reactive xanthogranulomatous process. The most important differential diagnoses include xanthoma, dermatofibroma (clear cell variant), and sebaceous carcinoma (17, 25-27). Critical features for final diagnosis include irregularly shaped anastomosing vascular channels with highly infiltrative architecture and poor demarcation, as well as the multilayering of endothelial cells with nuclear atypia and increased mitoses (28-30). These changes are supported by immunohistochemical markers (30, 31). Compared to the previous reports of foamy cell appearance for AS, histopathologic studies of our case showed more mitoses, pleomorphism, and atypia (Table 2), and for the first time, foamy change were observed in the histopathologic examination of an XP patient with AS. A panel of immunohistochemical stains showed that the present tumor was positive for the Ki67 marker and the vascular markers including CD31 and CD34. However, the markers of Pan CK, MelanA, S100, HMB45, CK7, CEA, and CD68 were negative. It has been shown that both CD31 and CD34 are positive in almost all AS cases occurred in XP patients, which would be helpful in differentiation of AS form the mimics (Table 2).
Regarding the treatment options for patients with AS, the traditional surgical excision procedure with or without postoperative radiation therapy remains the gold standard of care (32). Nonetheless, the role of adjuvant therapy is still a matter of debate, and a retrospective analysis of 764 cases indicated that only surgery, not radiotherapy or chemotherapy, is associated with improved survival (33). Even after the complete resection of the tumor, cutaneous AS has a significant risk of recurrence (32). Fujisawa et al. found that taxane maintenance therapy is effective for patients who had surgical resection and postoperative radiation and can lower the chance of recurrence (34). Recent investigations have focused on the functional features of AS, and some of the findings have led to the discovery of novel therapeutic targets. For instance, survivin was discovered to be a potential marker and therapeutic target for cutaneous ASs in a study (35). Systemic therapies are required for individuals with unresectable or metastatic tumors. Few clinical trials have evaluated systemic therapies for cutaneous AS. However, several studies have recommended paclitaxel as the first line of treatment, followed by pazopanib, bevacizumab, propranolol, and trabectedin, as the second-line treatment options (36-40).
Our patient was treated surgically with a forehead flap and showed no signs of recurrence or metastasis after 2 year follow-up. Most previous cases were also treated with surgical excision except for a few patients in the advanced disease stage who received chemotherapy and radiotherapy (1). Generally, the patients had no signs of recurrence. However, two 15 and 21-year-old females experienced recurrence within 2 and 11 months, respectively, which may be related to the more aggressive nature of malignancies in younger ages (20, 22).
In summary, this case is the first reported example of cutaneous AS with a rare variant of intratumoral foamy cell change in a patient diagnosed with XP. The patient underwent surgical excision, which was an effective cure. The authors of this paper have worked on skin cancers and associated disorders, which could be useful and practical for other researchers (41-43).
Conclusion
Cutaneous ASs are rare presentation of XP patients and are usually found as an erythematous and small plaque or nodule on the head and neck of younger adult XP patients that often have a history of BCC and SCC. Foamy cell AS is a rare histopathological variant of AS that is difficult to diagnose, and immunohistochemical assessments are helpful in correct diagnosis. Awareness of such rare clinical and histopathological presentations in XP patients can help clinicians better diagnose and treat.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Author Contributions
FM reported the histopathologic and immunohistochemical findings of the case. FM and AG designed the study. FM, AZ, AD and AM wrote the paper. AG edited the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the content of the manuscript.
Financial Support
None.
Ethics Committee Approval
Due to the research protocol at the Iran University of medical sciences, the ethical committee's approval for case reports is not needed; however, the patient's consent for publication was obtained.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication, and the subjects' rights were protected.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to express their gratitude to the Rasool Akram Medical Complex Clinical Research Development Center (RCRDC) staff specially Mrs Farahnaz Nikkhah for their technical and editorial assistance.
References
- 1.Hong WJ, Lee SE, Roh MR, Kim JE, Nishigori C, Kim SC. Angiosarcoma arising on the scalp in a Korean patient with xerodermapigmentosum variant type. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2018;34(5):343–6. doi: 10.1111/phpp.12391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Vempuluru VS, Ganguly A, Kaliki S. Ocular Surface Squamous Neoplasia Following Keratoplasty in XerodermaPigmentosa: A Series of Seven Cases. Curr Eye Res. 2021;46(11):1631–6. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2021.1921218. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ozkan MC, Cinel ZL. Pleomorphic Dermal Sarcoma and 4 Different Types of Skin Cancer in a Boy WithXerodermaPigmentosum. Dermatol Surg. 2021;47(10):1402–3. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000003175. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Boucher D, Kariawasam R, Burgess J, Gimenez A, Ocampo TE, Ferguson B, et al. hSSB2 (NABP1) is required for the recruitment of RPA during the cellular response to DNA UV damage. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):20256 . doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99355-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hoeijmakers JH. DNA damage, aging, and cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(15):1475–85. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0804615. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Pereira T, Castro LP, Menck CFM, Maia MHT, Souza LL, Fonseca FP, et al. Xerodermapigmentosum variant: squamous cell carcinoma of the lower lip harboring exon 11 mutation of POLH. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2021;132(3):e97–e105. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2021.03.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Sharma S, Deshmukh AD, Bal MM, Chaukar DA, Dcruz AK. Angiosarcoma of the scalp associated with Xerodermapigmentosum. Indian J Med PaediatrOncol. 2012;33(2):126–9. doi: 10.4103/0971-5851.99753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Olson MT, Puttgen KB, Westra WH. Angiosarcoma arising from the tongue of an 11-year-old girl with xerodermapigmentosum. Head Neck Pathol. 2012;6(2):255–7. doi: 10.1007/s12105-011-0303-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Wilssens NO, Den Hondt M, Duponselle J, Sciot R, Hompes D, Nevens THG. An uncommon presentation of a cutaneous angiosarcoma. ActaChir Belg. 2021;121(5):351–3. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2020.1722926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Schott I, Liffers ST, Farzaliyev F, Falkenhorst J, Steinau HU, Treckmann JW, et al. Localized Angiosarcoma, Not One Disease: A Retrospective Single-Center Study on Prognosis Depending on the Primary Site and Etiology. Sarcoma. 2021;2021:9960085. doi: 10.1155/2021/9960085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Svajdler M, Benicky M, Frohlichova L, Benes T, Hojstricova Z, Kazakov DV. Foamy cell angiosarcoma is a diagnostic pitfall: a case report of an angiosarcoma mimicking xanthoma. Am J Dermatopathol. 2014;36(8):669–72. doi: 10.1097/DAD.0000000000000052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chan JY, Lim JQ, Yeong J, Ravi V, Guan P, Boot A, et al. Multiomic analysis and immunoprofiling reveal distinct subtypes of human angiosarcoma. J Clin Invest. 2020;130(11):5833–46. doi: 10.1172/JCI139080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ronchi A, Cozzolino I, Zito Marino F, De Chiara A, Argenziano G, Moscarella E, et al. Primary and secondary cutaneous angiosarcoma: Distinctive clinical, pathological and molecular features. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2020;48:151597. doi: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2020.151597. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Requena C, Sendra E, Llombart B, Sanmartin O, Guillen C, Lavernia J, et al. Cutaneous Angiosarcoma: Clinical and Pathology Study of 16 Cases. ActasDermosifiliogr. 2017;108(5):457–65. doi: 10.1016/j.ad.2017.01.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wood A, Mentzel T, van Gorp J, Flucke U, Huschka U, Schneider J, et al. The spectrum of rare morphological variants of cutaneous epithelioid angiosarcoma. Histopathology. 2015;66(6):856–63. doi: 10.1111/his.12589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Brenn T. Pleomorphic dermal neoplasms: a review. AdvAnatPathol. 2014;21(2):108–30. doi: 10.1097/PAP.0000000000000009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Llamas-Velasco M, Kutzner H, Requena L. Cutaneous angiosarcoma mimicking xanthoma: a challenging histopathologic diagnosis with important consequences. J Cutan Pathol. 2016;43(9):792–7. doi: 10.1111/cup.12739. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Linda DD, Harish S, Alowami S, DeNardi F, Deheshi BM. Radiology-pathology conference: cutaneous angiosarcoma of the leg. Clin Imaging. 2013;37(3):602–7. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2012.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Onishi M, Tsunoda K, Maeda F, Moriwaki S, Amano H. Angiosarcoma of the Auricle in a Patient with XerodermaPigmentosum Variant. Case Rep Dermatol. 2020;12(2):144–9. doi: 10.1159/000508884. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ludolph-Hauser D, Thoma-Greber E, Sander C, Sommerhoff CP, Rocken M. Mast cells in an angiosarcoma complicating xeroderma-pigmentosum in a 13-year-old girl. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000;43(5 Pt 2):900–2. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Leake J, Sheehan MP, Rampling D, Ramani P, Atherton DJ. Angiosarcoma complicating xerodermapigmentosum. Histopathology. 1992;21(2):179–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.1992.tb00370.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Karkouche R, Kerob D, Battistella M, Soufir N, Hadj-Rabia S, Bagot M, et al. angiosarcoma in patients with xerodermapigmentosum: less aggressive and not so rare? J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013;69(3):e142–e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2013.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Mahajan V, Rao S, Mangal M. Admixed foamy cell and signet ring cell change in a cutaneous angiosarcoma-A diagnostic pitfall. Curr Med Res Pract. 2016;6(2):85–8. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Requena C, Alsina M, Morgado-Carrasco D, Cruz J, Sanmartin O, Serra-Guillen C, et al. Kaposi Sarcoma and Cutaneous Angiosarcoma: Guidelines for Diagnosis and Treatment. Actas Dermosifiliogr (Engl Ed) 2018;109(10):878–87. doi: 10.1016/j.ad.2018.06.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Laporte JL, Grossin M, Crickx B, Bourgeois-Droin C, Belaich S, Potet F. [Clinico-pathologic spectrum of cutaneous angiosarcoma and the difficulties of pathologic diagnosis] Ann Pathol. 1996;16(4):247–53. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Mitteldorf C, Llamas-Velasco M, Schulze HJ, Thoms KM, Mentzel T, Tronnier M, et al. Deceptively bland cutaneous angiosarcoma on the nose mimicking hemangioma-A clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical analysis. J CutanPathol. 2018 doi: 10.1111/cup.13275. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Farid M, Ong WS, Lee MJ, Jeevan R, Ho ZC, Sairi AN, et al. Cutaneous versus non-cutaneous angiosarcoma: clinicopathologic features and treatment outcomes in 60 patients at a single Asian cancer centre. Oncology. 2013;85(3):182–90. doi: 10.1159/000354215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Mentzel T, Kutzner H, Wollina U. Cutaneous angiosarcoma of the face: clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of a case resembling rosacea clinically. J Am AcadDermatol. 1998;38(5 Pt 2):837–40. doi: 10.1016/s0190-9622(98)70470-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Motaparthi K, Lauer SR, Patel RM, Vidal CI, Linos K. MYC gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization and MYC protein expression by immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis of cutaneous angiosarcoma: Systematic review and appropriate use criteria. J CutanPathol. 2021;48(4):578–86. doi: 10.1111/cup.13912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ishida Y, Otsuka A, Kabashima K. Cutaneous angiosarcoma: update on biology and latest treatment. CurrOpinOncol. 2018;30(2):107–12. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0000000000000427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Trofymenko O, Curiel-Lewandrowski C. Surgical treatment associated with improved survival in patients with cutaneous angiosarcoma. J EurAcadDermatolVenereol. 2018;32(1):e29–e31. doi: 10.1111/jdv.14479. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Fujisawa Y, Yoshino K, Kadono T, Miyagawa T, Nakamura Y, Fujimoto M. Chemoradiotherapy with taxane is superior to conventional surgery and radiotherapy in the management of cutaneous angiosarcoma: a multicentre, retrospective study. Br J Dermatol. 2014;171(6):1493–500. doi: 10.1111/bjd.13110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Tsuneki M, Kinjo T, Mori T, Yoshida A, Kuyama K, Ohira A, et al. Survivin: A novel marker and potential therapeutic target for human angiosarcoma. Cancer science. 2017;108(11):2295–305. doi: 10.1111/cas.13379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ray-Coquard IL, Domont J, Tresch-Bruneel E, Bompas E, Cassier PA, Mir O, et al. Paclitaxel Given Once Per Week With or Without Bevacizumab in Patients With Advanced Angiosarcoma: A Randomized Phase II Trial. J ClinOncol. 2015;33(25):2797–802. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.60.8505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Agulnik M, Yarber JL, Okuno SH, von Mehren M, Jovanovic BD, Brockstein BE, et al. An open-label, multicenter, phase II study of bevacizumab for the treatment of angiosarcoma and epithelioid hemangioendotheliomas. Ann Oncol. 2013;24(1):257–63. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kollar A, Jones RL, Stacchiotti S, Gelderblom H, Guida M, Grignani G, et al. Pazopanib in advanced vascular sarcomas: an EORTC Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group (STBSG) retrospective analysis. ActaOncol. 2017;56(1):88–92. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2016.1234068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Pasquier E, Andre N, Street J, Chougule A, Rekhi B, Ghosh J, et al. Effective Management of Advanced Angiosarcoma by the Synergistic Combination of Propranolol and Vinblastine-based Metronomic Chemotherapy: A Bench to Bedside Study. EBioMedicine. 2016;6:87–95. doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2016.02.026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Le Cesne A, Ray-Coquard I, Duffaud F, Chevreau C, Penel N, Bui Nguyen B, et al. Trabectedin in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma: a retrospective national analysis of the French Sarcoma Group. Eur J Cancer. 2015;51(6):742–50. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Yaghoobi R, Pazyar N, Kalantar H, Nikoo A, Naraghi Z, Kamyab K, et al. Diagnostic concordance among dermatopathologists in basal cell carcinoma subtyping: Results of a study in a skin referral hospital in Tehran, Iran. Iran J Dermatol. 2017;20(1):21–5. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Kamyab-Hesari K, Seirafi H, Jahan S, Aghazadeh N, Hejazi P, Azizpour A, et al. Nevus sebaceus: a clinicopathological study of 168 cases and review of the literature. Int J Dermatol. 2016;55(2):193–200. doi: 10.1111/ijd.12845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Eftekhari H, Fahim S, Aryanian Z, Goodarzi A, Sadeghinia A, Nourmohammadpour P, et al. A Retrospective Large Original Study of Cutaneous Melanoma. Pakistan Journal of Medical and Health Sciences. 2021;15(6):1995–8. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Manner J, Radlwimmer B, Hohenberger P, Mossinger K, Kuffer S, Sauer C, et al. MYC high level gene amplification is a distinctive feature of angiosarcomas after irradiation or chronic lymphedema. Am J Pathol. 2010;176(1):34–9. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2010.090637. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Tatsas AD, Keedy VL, Florell SR, Simpson JF, Coffin CM, Kelley MC, et al. Foamy cell angiosarcoma: a rare and deceptively bland variant of cutaneous angiosarcoma. J Cutan Pathol. 2010;37(8):901–6. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0560.2010.01512.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



