Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ophthalmology. 2022 Jun 1;129(10):1120–1128. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.05.019

Table 5.

Cycloplegic Refraction Findings at the 12-Month Outcome Examination

Overall Total Dose of Bevacizumab Injected Into Eye Prior to 12 Months P-Value
>0.25mg >0.125 to 0.25mg >0.063 to 0.125mg >0.031 to 0.063mg >0.016 to 0.031mg >0.008 to 0.016mg >0.004 to 0.008mg >0.002 to 0.004mg >0 to 0.002mg 0mg
N=196
Eyesa
N=33
Eyesa
N=26
Eyesa
N=24
Eyesa
N=18
Eyesa
N=16
Eyesa
N=17
Eyesa
N=16
Eyesa
N=21
Eyesa
N=16
Eyesa
N=9
Eyesa
N % N % N % N % N % N % N % N % N % N % N %
Cycloplegic Refraction (Spherical Equivalent) b .09c
    >+5.00D 2 1% 2 6% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 0%
    >=+1.00D to <=+5.00D 47 24% 4 12% 9 35% 9 39% 4 22% 4 25% 4 24% 4 25% 5 24% 2 13% 2 22 %
    >−1.00D to <+1.00D 60 31% 8 24% 8 31% 8 35% 8 44% 5 31% 5 29% 3 19% 7 33% 5 31% 3 33 %
    −5.00D to <= −1.00D 48 24% 11 33% 3 12% 3 13% 4 22% 4 25% 5 29% 7 44% 5 24% 4 25% 2 22 %
    <−5.00D 23 12% 7 21% 4 15% 3 13% 2 11% 2 13% 2 12% 2 13% 1 5% 0 0% 0 0%
    Not Doneb 16 8% 1 3% 2 8% 1 4% 0 0% 1 6% 1 6% 0 0% 3 14% 5 31% 2 22 %
    Mean (SD)  −1.31D (3.81D)  −2.48D (5.30D)  −0.73D (3.53D)  −0.50D (3.24D)  −1.31D (3.59D)  −1.58D (4.75D)  −1.46D (3.79D)  −2.04D (3.36D)  −0.74D (2.62D)  −0.86D (2.43D)  −0.09D (1.67D)
    Median Quartiles −0.31D
−2.50D, +1.13D
−1.31D
−4.88D, +0.13D
0.00D
−2.38D, +1.69D
+0.75D
−1.38D, +1.5D
+0.19D
−2.50D, +0.75D
−0.13D
−2.38D, +1.25D
−0.25D
−3.38D, +1.31D
−1.88D
−3.94D, +0.81D
−0.25D
−1.25D, +1.25D
0.00D
−2.50D, +0.50D
0.13D
−2.00D, +1.63D
    Range −16.25D to +7.50D −13.75D to +7.50D −10.50D to +4.50D −8.88D to +3.00D −10.00D to +2.25D −16.25D to +3.50D −10.00D to +3.50D −8.75D to +2.00D −7.50D to +2.50D −5.00D to +2.50D −2.63D to +1.75D

CI = Confidence Interval

Percentages are not adjusted for any correlation between eyes.

a

Number of eyes initially examined at the 12-month exam. Gray text indicates doses that were previously reported (19).

b

Cycloplegic refraction analysis excludes 2 aphakic eyes, included in the tabulation under the “not done” category.

c

P-value from linear mixed model accounting for any correlation between eyes for an association between the continuous outcome and total dose as a categorical factor.