References
|
Design
|
Subjects
|
Criteria for inclusion
|
TACE alone/TACE with non-TACE/non-TACE
|
TACE alone/TACE with non-TACE/ non-TACE
|
Outcome
|
Wei et al. (2020) [34]
|
Retrospective study
|
108
|
Unresectable HCC
|
TACE+MWA
|
TACE+RFA
|
Median survival of both the groups (20.9 months and 13 months) with unresectable HCC was increased. TACE combined with MWA also decreased the rate of complication occurrence (66% vs. 88.3%).
|
Yoon et al. (2018) [36]
|
Randomized clinical trial
|
90
|
Liver confined HCC showing macrovascular invasion
|
TACE +RT
|
Sorafenib
|
RT offered better progression-free survival (87% vs. 34.3%) than sorafenib and was very well tolerated with a higher radiological response rate (33.3% vs. 2.2%) and overall survival (55 weeks vs. 43 weeks).
|
Kalva et al. (2011) [39]
|
Retrospective study
|
54
|
Unresectable HCC
|
DEB-TACE
|
-
|
DEB-TACE was effective with better median survival at six months, one year, and two years at a percentage of 77%, 59%, and 32%, respectively, and overall median survival of 95%; DEB-TACE was well tolerated in patients with unresectable HCC.
|
Kudo et al. (2020) [41]
|
Randomized, multicentre, prospective trial
|
156
|
Unresectable HCC
|
TACE + sorafenib
|
TACE
|
Patients with TACE combined with sorafenib had a significant median progression-free survival (25.2 months vs. 13.5 months), the median time to untreatable progression (TTUP) ( 26.7 months vs. 20.6 months), and better overall survival at one and two years (96.2% and 82.7%) than TACE alone (77.2% and 64.6%).
|
Britten et al. (2012) [42]
|
Pilot study
|
30
|
HCC
|
TACE+ Bevacizumab
|
-
|
TACE when used in combination with bevacizumab, demonstrated less neovascularity (14% vs. 33%) compared to patients who had undergone TACE alone.
|
Finn et al. (2020) [43]
|
Interventional, global, open-label, phase III trial
|
336
|
Unresectable HCC without prior systemic therapy
|
Atezolizumab+ Bevacizumab
|
Sorafenib
|
Patients are given atezolizumab combined with bevacizumab, which resulted in increased median overall survival (6.8 months vs. 4.3 months) and progression-free survival at 12 months (67.2% vs. 56.6%) compared to sorafenib.
|