Skip to main content
PMC home page
Frontiers in Psychology logoLink to Frontiers in Psychology
. 2022 Sep 12;13:993991. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.993991

What can we learn from the COVID-19 pandemic? Resilience for the future and neuropsychopedagogical insights

Patrizio Paoletti 1, Tania Di Giuseppe 1, Carmela Lillo 1, Tal Dotan Ben-Soussan 1, Aras Bozkurt 2, Golnaz Tabibnia 3, Kaltrina Kelmendi 4, Gaye Watson Warthe 5, Rotem Leshem 6, Vinca Bigo 7, Anthony Ireri 8, Cecilia Mwangi 8, Nandan Bhattacharya 9, Giulia Federica Perasso 1,*
PMCID: PMC9511169  PMID: 36172227

Introduction

The psychological effects of COVID-19 pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic caused a spike in the prevalence of stress and anxiety (Yao et al., 2020). Globally, between January 2020 and January 2021, depressive disorders increased by 27% while anxiety disorders increased by 25% (Santomauro et al., 2021). Despite attempts to promote mental health practices through digital resources (Arenliu et al., 2020), the pandemic massively impacted adolescents and young adults as it doubled the prevalence of depressive and anxiety symptoms among youths (Racine et al., 2021).

A “new normality” has changed our everyday life (Bozkurt and Sharma, 2020) and social norms (Andriani, 2020). Previous research on natural disaster preparedness (Kostouros and Warthe, 2020; Warthe et al., 2022; Di Giuseppe et al., 2023 (In Press)) does not suggest how to deal with a long-term phenomenon such as a pandemic that has caught global communities unprepared. COVID-19 and its effects have highlighted the urgency for individuals and societies to fortify themselves at a psychosocial level.

A key construct to address this need is resilience, defined as the ability to adaptively cope with adversity (Luthar et al., 2000), resulting from the dynamic interaction among genetic, biological, and environmental factors (Herrman et al., 2011). In this paper, we refer to resilience as the process that allows the individual, group, and community to cope with, overcome, and emerge strengthened from negative experiences (Grotberg, 1995; Hamby et al., 2018). To date, most studies on the effects of the pandemic primarily examine the risk factors for individuals' health, while studies that explore resources and assets that promote positive coping with the adverse effects of the pandemic are still scarce.

Starting from this premise, the following paper is the result of a collective reflection shared by resilience researchers across the globe (Fondazione Patrizio Paoletti, 2022), inquiring about how the pandemic can be considered a catalyst for change for building more resilient communities and social structures. As a contribution to facing the current emergency, resilience researchers share four interdisciplinary insights that are presented in the current paper.

Discussion

What can we learn from COVID-19?

Insight 1: Being more aware of brain functioning and its potential can help us face the global increase in anxiety and depression

Every individual, community, and institution should access theoretical and practical knowledge about the human brain and mental functioning to become more resilient. Adults can become more resilient by reprogramming their brains to counteract the effects of stress by enhancing the activity of the prefrontal cortex and coping circuits (Fredrickson, 1998; Davidson, 2000; Korb, 2015; Tabibnia and Radecki, 2018). Stressors negatively impact the prefrontal cortex, which is the seat of higher functions (Diamond, 2016), and the synthesis of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), which is critical for neuronal plasticity (Fritsch et al., 2010). Tabibnia (2020) highlights three neuroscience-based strategies that are key for building resilience: (1) reducing the negative impact of experience (e.g., via cognitive reappraisal) and therefore the distress responses of the amygdala, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, and autonomic nervous system; (2) increasing positive experience (e.g., optimism and social cohesion) and associated activation of mesostriatal reward circuits, which can counteract stress responses; (3) cultivating self-transcendence (with techniques such as meditation, mindfulness), thereby reducing the activation of the default mode network (DMN) and associated rumination, self-reflection, and mind-wandering. Different meditation techniques, such as Quadrato Motor Training (QMT), can indirectly incentivize resilience by increasing prefrontal activation and decreasing the DMN (Dotan Ben-Soussan et al., 2013; Paoletti and Ben-Soussan, 2021; Paoletti et al., 2022a).

Insight 2: It is necessary to develop an awareness of human interconnectedness to overcome adversity

Our wellbeing is not only dependent on our actions toward ourselves and toward others but is also influenced by the actions of others (White and McCallum, 2021). We can be more resilient when we are focused on other individuals and their needs through empathy, compassion, and tolerance (Jordan, 2004; Slavich et al., 2021). Additionally, the support of family, friends, and community is considered another source of strengths crucial to developing resilience and overcoming adversity in diverse cultural contexts and populations (Hamby et al., 2018; Kelmendi and Hamby, 2022). Conversely, “self-centered” resilience reinforces social alienation, hindering the development of a sense of brotherhood and responsibility to others (Mahdiani and Ungar, 2021). Individuals' sense of community is not yet sufficiently developed to cope with a global emergency (Hirsch, 2010; Turcotte and Caron, 2017), as indicated by the social tensions about biopower (Arminjon and Marion-Veyron, 2021) and the difficulties in complying with anti-contagion measures (Hills and Eraso, 2021). Noticeably, activities such as artistic engagement can improve the level of resilience of individuals and communities (Reed et al., 2020). The creative process (e.g., drawing) allows the expression and processing of emotions within group interventions as well as with COVID-19 patients (Bhattacharya et al., 2022). Plus, it has been demonstrated that the creative potential represents a protective factor against COVID-19 lockdown stress (D'Anselmo et al., 2022).

Insight 3: School-programs should educate next generations in resilience

To face the global spread of anxiety and depression among youth as a consequence of the pandemic (Racine et al., 2021), resilience must be promoted and integrated in educational settings. The educational landscape should create personalized and collective support strategies and integrate resilience in educational curricula around the world (Mwangi et al., 2017; Kelmendi and Hamby, 2022). Educational systems must develop new strategies to survive the long-term crisis sustainably, ensuring that no one is left behind (Bozkurt, 2022) in light of socioeconomic disparities between countries. Fundamental to this is the digitalization of educational systems, possibly facilitated by preparatory interventions to support students, teachers and parents (Hyseni- Duraku and Hoxha, 2020).

Insight 4: Self-training resilience tools can allow individuals, groups, and communities to access neuro-psycho-pedagogical knowledge to face adversities, uncertainty, and changes in everyday life

Self-educational programs can help people to understand the links between neuro-psycho-physiological states, emotions, and behaviors to re-interpret events and emergencies and create a resilient community. In this sense, Patrizio Paoletti Foundation designed a self-administered resilience-training program entitled “Ten Keys (i.e., suggestions) for Resilience” (Table 1; Paoletti et al., 2022a). The program was born in the framework of the Sphere Model of Consciousness (Paoletti, 2002a,b; Paoletti et al., 2022c; Paoletti and Ben Soussan, 2019), and was inspired by interdisciplinary literature (Fredrickson, 1998; Davidson, 2000; Korb, 2015; Paoletti, 2018; Tabibnia and Radecki, 2018). The 10 Keys for resilience are theoretical-practical indications describing how a resilient brain works. These indications support the process of awareness through the proactive re-signification of experience at a cognitive level, improving emotional regulation and the physical wellbeing of the individual. Taken collectively, the 10 Keys create an expanded conceptualization of resilience, where the individual trains to overcome adversity to transform the adversity into an opportunity for personal and collective growth (Paoletti et al., 2022a). The 10-Keys are organized according to the four neuro—psycho-pedagogical principles of the Pedagogy for the Third Millennium (PTM; Paoletti, 2008, 2018): Observation, Mediation, Translation, Normalization Paoletti and Selvaggio, 2011a,b, 2012, 2013; Paoletti et al., 2022a. The Ten-Keys were applied in emergency and challenging context (e.g., earthquake survivors, inmates, and juvenile penal justice educators) even during COVID-19 pandemic (Di Giuseppe et al., 2022c; Di Giuseppe, 2022; Di Giuseppe et al., 2022a,b, 2023 (In Press); Maculan et al., 2022; Paoletti et al., 2022b).

Table 1.

Ten-Keys for resilience by Patrizio Paoletti Foundation. Revised version from (Di Giuseppe et al., 2022a).

Key Content Neuropsychopedagogical principle
(1) Focus on what you can control and make small decisions. Bringing attention to the here and now and making small decisions to overcome uncertainty. Observation and Self-observation (Paoletti and Selvaggio, 2011a)
(2) Identify an attainable, exciting, measurable goal. Setting goals, foreseeing obstacles, and cultivating positive beliefs. Observation and Self-observation (Paoletti and Selvaggio, 2011a).
(3) Several times a day become aware of your posture. Setting body posture for physical activation, raising attention and self-confidence. Observation and Self-observation (Paoletti and Selvaggio, 2011a).
(4) Be inspired by stories. Following resilience role-models. Mediation (Paoletti and Selvaggio, 2011b).
(5) Ask yourself what is really important. Training in self-motivation, listening to your most intimate preferences. Mediation (Paoletti and Selvaggio, 2011b).
(6) Cultivate gratitude. Learning to cultivate positive emotions (e.g., gratitude) and to manage negative emotions. Mediation (Paoletti and Selvaggio, 2011b).
(7) Appreciate the other as a resource, cultivate and expand your social network. Listening, sharing experiences, enhancing social and interpersonal resources. Translation (Paoletti and Selvaggio, 2012).
(8) Cultivate curiosity. Learning from everything and from every experience. Translation (Paoletti and Selvaggio, 2012).
(9) Practice a few minutes of silence. Practicing multiple times a day intentional silence, envisioning the best version of yourself. Normalization (Paoletti and Selvaggio, 2013)
(10) Embrace and transform: before bedtime, generate your tomorrow today. Self-programming and foreshadowing of the future through proactive storytelling of daily life. Normalization (Paoletti and Selvaggio, 2013)
Open in a new tab

Conclusion

The four insights, resulting from the encounter among resilience researchers (Fondazione Patrizio Paoletti, 2022), offer an interpretation of the experiences lived during the pandemic. Taken collectively, these insights integrate neuroscience, psychology, and pedagogy to face the post-pandemic world with an interdisciplinary knowledge. The insights aim at helping us to face the current emergency and preparing us for the future, overcoming the global spread of anxiety and stress highlighted by scientific literature. Next generations could benefit from re-analyzing the concept of resilience as a set of strengths of the individual and community to promote wellbeing and mental health. It is also crucial, in the future of the educational systems, to integrate resilience in school programmes, and to promote self-training in resilience across the life cycle. These neuro-psycho-pedagogical insights eventually can be translated to a wide range of emerging future challenging situations which we are currently facing, such as financial instability, war, and climate change.

Author contributions

PP conceived and supervised the realization of the manuscript in the structure. TD, CL, GP, PP, AB, GT, KK, GW, VB, RL, TB-S, AI, CM, and NB contributed in the writing of the insights presented in the article. All authors contributed to the revision of the article and approved the final version.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

We thank Sandro Anella, Gianni Bernardi, Selene Di Domenicantonio, Damiano Moscatelli, Andrea Pintimalli, Ciro Scategni, and Meriel MacDivitt for helping us in the organization of the Round Table Resilience for the Future from which this paper was developed.

References

  1. Andriani H. (2020). Effectiveness of large-scale social restrictions (PSBB) toward the new normal era during COVID-19 outbreak: a mini policy review. J. Indonesian Health Policy Admin. 5, 4001. 10.7454/ihpa.v5i2.4001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Arenliu A., Uka F., Weine S. (2020). Building online and telephone psychological first aid services in a low resource setting during covid-19: the case of Kosovo. Psychiatria Danubina 32, 570–576. 10.24869/psyd.2020.570 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Arminjon M., Marion-Veyron R. (2021). Coronavirus biopolitics: the paradox of France's Foucauldian heritage. History Philos. Life Sci. 43, 1–5. 10.1007/s40656-020-00359-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bhattacharya N., Choudhury S., Roychowdhury M., Sinha M., Mistri P., Bhattacharya R., et al. (2022). ‘Art at Safe Homes': a pioneer study among COVID patients and their treatment Team. J. Prev. Assess. Rehabil. 2022, 211220. 10.3233/WOR-211220 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bozkurt A. (2022). Resilience, adaptability, and sustainability of higher education: a systematic mapping study on the impact of the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and the transition to the new normal. J. Learn. Dev. 9, 1–16. 10.56059/jl4d.v9i1.590 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Bozkurt A., Sharma R. C. (2020). Education in normal, new normal, and next normal: observations from the past, insights from the present and projections for the future. Asian J. Dist. Educ. 15, i-x. 10.5281/zenodo.4362664 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. D'Anselmo A., Agnoli S., Filardi M., Pizza F., Mastria S., Corazza G. E., et al. (2022). Being creative during lockdown: the relationship between creative potential and COVID-19-related psychological distress in narcolepsy type 1. J. Sleep Res. 31, e13461. 10.1111/jsr.13461 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Davidson R. J. (2000). Affective style, psychopathology, and resilience: brain mechanisms and plasticity. Am. Psychologist 55, 1196–1214. 10.1037/0003-066X.55.11.1196 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Di Giuseppe T, Perasso G, Maculan A, Vianello F, Paoletti P. (2022c). Envisioning the Future: Ten Keys to Enhance Resilience Predictors Among Inmates. In The Paris Conference on Education 2022: Official Conference Proceedings 10.22492/issn.2758-0962.2022.21 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Di Giuseppe T. (2022). Envisioning the Future and the 10 Keys for Resilience. In Resilience for the Future. An International Roundtable to Promote Resilience in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Available online at: https://elearning.fondazionepatriziopaoletti.org/resilience-for-the-future-in-time-of-pandemic-da-covid-19-an-international-round-table (accessed August 22, 2022).
  11. Di Giuseppe T., Perasso G., Maculan A., Vianello F., Paoletti P. (2022a). Envisioning the Future: Ten Keys to Enhance Resilience Predictors Among Inmates. Paris: The Paris Conference on Education. [Google Scholar]
  12. Di Giuseppe T., Perasso G., Paoletti P., Mazzeo C., Maculan A., Vianello F. (2022b). Envisioning the Future: A Neuropsychopedagogical Intervention on Resilience Predictors Among Inmates During the Pandemic. Ricerche di Psicologia. (In press). [Google Scholar]
  13. Di Giuseppe T., Serantoni G., Paoletti P., Perasso G. (2023). Un sondaggio a quattro anni da Prefigurare il Futuro, un intervento neuropsicopedagogico post-sisma [A survey four years after Envisioning the Future, a post-earthquake neuropsychopedagogic intervention]. Orientamenti Pedagogici. (In press). [Google Scholar]
  14. Diamond A. (2016). “Why assessing and improving executive functions early in life is critical,” in Executive Function in Preschool-age children: Integrating Measurement, Neurodevelopment, and Translational research, eds P. McCardle, L. Freund, and J. A. Griffin (Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; ), 11–43. 10.1037/14797-002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Dotan Ben-Soussan T., Glicksohn J., Goldstein A., Berkovich-Ohana A., Donchin O. (2013). Into the square and out of the box: the effects of Quadrato Motor Training on creativity and alpha coherence. PLoS ONE 8, e55023. 10.1371/journal.pone.0055023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Fondazione Patrizio Paoletti. (2022). Resilience for The Future. An International Roundtable to Promote Resilience in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Available online at: https://elearning.fondazionepatriziopaoletti.org/resilience-for-the-future-in-time-of-pandemic-da-covid-19-an-international-round-table (accessed August 22, 2022).
  17. Fredrickson B. L. (1998). What good are positive emotions? Rev. General Psychol. 2, 300–319. 10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.300 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Fritsch B., Reis J., Martinowich K., Schambra H. M., Ji Y., Cohen L. G., et al. (2010). Direct current stimulation promotes BDNF-dependent synaptic plasticity: potential implications for motor learning. Neuron 66, 198–204. 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.03.035 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Grotberg E. H. (1995). A Guide to Promoting Resilience in Children: Strengthening the Human Spirit, Vol. 8. The Hague: Bernard van leer foundation. [Google Scholar]
  20. Hamby S., Grych J., Banyard V. (2018). Resilience portfolios and poly-strengths: identifying protective factors associated with thriving after adversity. Psychol. Violence 8, 172–183. 10.1037/vio0000135 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Herrman H., Stewart D. E., Diaz-Granados N., Berger E. L., Jackson B., Yuen T. (2011). What is resilience? Can. J. Psychiatr. 56, 258–265. 10.1177/070674371105600504 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Hills S., Eraso Y. (2021). Factors associated with non-adherence to social distancing rules during the COVID-19 pandemic: a logistic regression analysis. BMC Public Health 21, 1–25. 10.1186/s12889-021-10379-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hirsch E. (2010). Traité de bioéthique: III - Handicaps, vulnérabilités, situations extrêmes. Érés, Toulouse. 10.3917/eres.hirsc.2010.03 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hyseni- Duraku Z., Hoxha L. (2020). The Impact of COVID-19 on Education and on the Well-being of Teachers, Parents, and Students: Challenges Related to Remote (Online) Learning and Opportunities for Advancing the Quality of Education. Available online at: https://www.~researchgate.net/publication/341297812 (accessed August 22, 2022).
  25. Jordan J. V. (2004). “Relational resilience,” in The Complexity of Connection: Writings From the Stone Center's Jean Baker Miller Training Institute, eds J. V. Jordan, M. Walker, and L. M. Hartling (New York, NY: Guilford Press; ), 28–46. [Google Scholar]
  26. Kelmendi K., Hamby S. (2022). Resilience after trauma in kosovo and southeastern europe: a scoping review. Trauma Violence Abuse 3, 1–5. 10.1177/15248380221093693 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Korb A. (2015). The Upward Spiral: Using Neuroscience to Reverse the Course of Depression, One Small Change at a Time. Oakland, CA: New Harbinger Publications. [Google Scholar]
  28. Kostouros P., Warthe D. G. (2020). Protocols and practices in emergency evacuation of women fleeing abuse. Greenwich Soc. Work Rev. 1, 1–10. 10.21100/gswr.v1i1.1088 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Luthar S. S., Cicchetti D., Becker B. (2000). Research on resilience: response to commentaries. Child Dev. 71, 573–575. 10.1111/1467-8624.00168 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Maculan A., Di Giuseppe T., Vivaldi S., Vianello F. (2022). Narrazioni e risorse. Gli operatori del sistema penale minorile al tempo del Covid. Autonomie locali e servizi sociali, n 2/2022, Ed. Il Mulino. [Google Scholar]
  31. Mahdiani H., Ungar M. (2021). The dark side of resilience. Adversity Resilience Sci. 2, 147–155. 10.1007/s42844-021-00031-z [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Mwangi C. N., Ireri A. M., Mwaniki E. W. (2017). Correlates of academic resilience among secondary school students in Kiambu County, Kenya. Interdiscipl. Educ. Psychol. 1, 1–10. 10.31532/InterdiscipEducPsychol.1.1.004 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Paoletti P. (2002a). Flussi, Territori, Luogo [Flows, Territories, Place]. Madeira: M.E.D. Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  34. Paoletti P. (2002b). Flussi, Territori, Luogo II [Flows, Territories, Place II]. Madeira: M.E.D. Publishing. [Google Scholar]
  35. Paoletti P. (2008). Crescere nell'eccellenza. Roma: Armando editore. [Google Scholar]
  36. Paoletti P. (2018). OMM The One Minute Meditation. Tenero, CH: Medidea. [Google Scholar]
  37. Paoletti P., Ben Soussan T. D. (2019). The sphere model of consciousness: from geometrical to neuro-psycho-educational perspectives. Logica Universalis. 13, 395–415. 10.1007/s11787-019-00226-0 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Paoletti P., Ben-Soussan T. D. (2021). “Emotional intelligence, identification, and self-awareness according to the sphere model of consciousness,” in The Science of Emotional Intelligence, ed S. G. Taukeni (London: Intech Open; ). [Google Scholar]
  39. Paoletti P., Di Giuseppe T., Lillo C., Anella S., Santinelli A. (2022a). Le Dieci Chiavi della Resilienza. Available online at: https://fondazionepatriziopaoletti.org/10-chiavi-resilienza/ (accessed August 22, 2022).
  40. Paoletti P., Di Giuseppe T., Lillo C., Serantoni G., Perasso G., Maculan A., et al. (2022b). “La resilienza nel circuito penale minorile in tempi di pandemia: un'esperienza di studio e formazione basata sul Modello Sferico della Coscienza su un gruppo di educatori,” in Narrare i Gruppi, latest - 10 luglio (2022), pp. 01–21. [Google Scholar]
  41. Paoletti P., Leshem R., Pellegrino M., Ben-Soussan T. D. (2022c). Tackling the electro-topography of the selves through the sphere model of consciousness. Front. Psychol. 2022, 1534. 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.836290 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Paoletti P., Selvaggio A. (2011a). Mediazione. Quaderni di Pedagogia per il Terzo Millennio. Perugia: Edizioni 3P. [Google Scholar]
  43. Paoletti P., Selvaggio A. (2011b). Osservazione. Quaderni di Pedagogia per il terzo Millennio. Perugia: Edizioni 3P. [Google Scholar]
  44. Paoletti P., Selvaggio A. (2012). Traslazione. Quaderni di Pedagogia per il Terzo Millennio. Perugia: Edizioni 3P. [Google Scholar]
  45. Paoletti P., Selvaggio A. (2013). Normalizzazione. Quaderni di Pedagogia per il Terzo Millennio. Perugia: Edizioni 3P. [Google Scholar]
  46. Racine N., McArthur B. A., Cooke J. E., Eirich R., Zhu J., Madigan S. (2021). Global prevalence of depressive and anxiety symptoms in children and adolescents during COVID-19: a meta-analysis. J. Am. Med. Assoc. Pediatr. 175, 1142. 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2021.2482 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Reed K., Cochran K. L., Edelblute A., Manzanares D., Sinn H., Henry M., et al. (2020). Creative arts therapy as a potential intervention to prevent burnout and build resilience in health care professionals. Adv. Crit. Care 31, 179–190. 10.4037/aacnacc2020619 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Santomauro D. F., Herrera A. M. M., Shadid J., Zheng P., Ashbaugh C., Pigott D. M., et al. (2021). Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet 398, 1700–1712. 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02143-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Slavich G. M., Roos L. G., Zaki J. (2021). Social belonging, compassion, and kindness: key ingredients for fostering resilience, recovery, and growth from the COVID-19 pandemic. Anxiety Stress Coping 35, 1–8. 10.1080/10615806.2021.1950695 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Tabibnia G. (2020). An affective neuroscience model of boosting resilience in adults. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 115, 321–350. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.05.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Tabibnia G., Radecki D. (2018). Resilience training that can change the brain. Consult. Psychol. J. 70, 59–88. 10.1037/cpb0000110 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  52. Turcotte M. F., Caron M. A. (2017). La transdisciplinarité et l'opérationnalisation des connaissances scientifiques. Montreal: Editions JFD. [Google Scholar]
  53. Warthe D. G., Kostouros P., Wotherspoon K. (2022). Learning Lessons From a Pandemic: Building Knowledge on Disaster Preparedness and Gender-Based Violence. Unpublished report prepared for the Canadian Women's Foundation and Women Shelters Canada. Toronto, ON: Canadian Women's Foundation and Women Shelters Canada [Google Scholar]
  54. White M. A., McCallum F. (2021). Crisis or Catalyst? Examining COVID-19's Implications for Wellbeing and Resilience Education. In Wellbeing and Resilience Education (London: Routledge; ), 1–17. 10.4324/9781003134190-1 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. Yao H., Chen J. -H., Xu Y. -F. (2020). Patients with mental health disorders in the COVID-19 epidemic. Lancet Psychiatry. 7, e21. 10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30090-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Frontiers in Psychology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES