Skip to main content
PMC home page
Surgical Case Reports logoLink to Surgical Case Reports
. 2022 Sep 26;8:180. doi: 10.1186/s40792-022-01541-3

Totally laparoscopic resection using delta-shaped anastomosis of jejunal leiomyosarcoma with intussusception at the angle of Treitz: a case report

Kenichi Nakamura 1, Susumu Shibasaki 1,✉, Seiji Yamada 2, Kazumitsu Suzuki 1, Akiko Serizawa 1, Shingo Akimoto 1, Masaya Nakauchi 3, Tsuyoshi Tanaka 1, Kazuki Inaba 3, Ichiro Uyama 3,4, Koichi Suda 1,4
PMCID: PMC9512942  PMID: 36156747

Abstract

Background

A leiomyosarcoma of the gastrointestinal tract is extremely rare. We report a case of jejunal leiomyosarcoma with intestinal intussusception at the angle of Treitz that was successfully treated with laparoscopic resection followed by intracorporeal reconstruction using a delta-shaped anastomosis.

Case presentation

A 54-year-old man was referred to our hospital due to fatigue and loss of appetite. Blood tests showed anemia. Enteroscopy and subsequent enterography using meglumine sodium amidotrizoate showed easily hemorrhagic tumor (10 cm in diameter) in the jejunum just beyond the angle of Treitz. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed jejunojejunal intussusception. Histopathological examination of a biopsy specimen revealed a leiomyosarcoma. Laparoscopic resection of the tumor without reduction of the intussusception was performed. The resected line of the proximal intestine was very close to the ligament of Treitz in the present case. Intracorporeal jejunojejunostomy was completed using a delta-shaped anastomosis, wherein anastomosis was performed between the posterior walls of the proximal and distal jejunums after minimal mobilization around the ligament of Treitz. The patient’s postoperative course was uneventful, and he was discharged at 10 days postoperatively. No recurrence has been observed within 2 years after surgery.

Conclusions

We present a case in which a totally laparoscopic surgery for leiomyosarcoma located at the angle of Treitz with jejunojejunal intussusception was performed successfully.

Keywords: Small bowel tumor, Leiomyosarcoma, Laparoscopic surgery, Mesenchymal tumors

Background

A leiomyosarcoma (LMS) of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract belonging to soft tissue sarcomas is extremely rare and accounts for approximately 1% of malignant mesenchymal tumors in the GI tract [1], and surgical resection is the only curative treatment option. No report exists on complete laparoscopic surgery of the LMS of the GI tract, especially in the angle of Treitz. Herein, we report a case of jejunal LMS with intestinal intussusception at the angle of Treitz that was successfully treated with laparoscopic resection followed by intracorporeal reconstruction using a delta-shaped anastomosis [2].

Case presentation

A 54-year-old man with loss of appetite and fatigue 3 weeks prior was admitted to our hospital due to vomiting and anemia. His medical history included depression and arrhythmia. He had no family history of malignant neoplasia. During presentation, he had tachycardia with a heart rate of 95/min was present, but his other vital signs were within normal limit. Abdominal examination showed normal findings with no palpable mass or tenderness. The blood tests showed a low hemoglobin level (6.2 g/dL) with microlytic anemia, whereas the levels of carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19–9 were within the normal range. An esophagogastroduodenoscopy showed no obvious abnormalities. A double-balloon enteroscopy and enterography using meglumine sodium amidotrizoate showed a large circumferential tumor located in the jejunum just beyond the angle of Treitz (Fig. 1a, b). Contrast-enhanced computed tomography from the chest to the pelvis revealed a tumor that equally contrasted with jejunum, inducing intussusception and regional lymph node swelling at the angle of Treitz, although there were no obvious findings of distant metastasis (Fig. 1c). Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography demonstrated that this neoplasm had marked hypermetabolism, showing a standardized uptake value (SUV) max of 8.3, and the swollen regional lymph node showed mild hypermetabolism with a SUV max of 3.7 (Fig. 1d). Histopathological examination of a biopsy specimen revealed fascicles of spindle-shaped cells with elongated hyperchromatic nuclei showing variably pleomorphism and abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm in the stroma (Fig. 2a). Immunohistochemically, the tumor cells were positive for α-smooth muscle actin (Fig. 2b), h-caldesmon (Fig. 2c), calponin (Fig. 2d), and vimentin, and negative for cytokeratin (AE1/AE3) (Fig. 2e) cytokeratin (CAM5.2), CD34 (Fig. 2f), c-kit (Fig. 2g), DOG-1, S-100 protein (Fig. 2h), and myogenin. The Ki-67 labeling index was approximately 30% (Fig. 2i). Therefore, we diagnosed the patient with a LMS of the jejunum located just beyond the angle of Treitz with intussusception. We considered that the intussusception gradually occurred with tumor growth; thus, elective laparoscopic tumor resection was performed without reducing the intussuscepted jejunum (Fig. 3a–c). The swollen lymph nodes around the tumor were also removed. After extracorporeal extraction of the tumor, an intracorporeal delta-shaped anastomosis was performed in the same manner as that for gastroduodenostomy, as previously described [2]. In brief, the transection line of the proximal jejunum extended from the posterior wall to the anterior wall (Fig. 3b). In contrast, the transection line of the distal intestine extended from the mesenteric side to the antimesenteric side (Fig. 3c). The stump of the proximal side was mobilized by dissecting the ligament of Treitz from the retroperitoneum (Fig. 3d). Then, a small hole was created on the posterior side of the staple line of the proximal jejunum and on the mesenteric side of the staple line of the distal jejunum (Fig. 4a). A 45-mm linear stapler was inserted into both small holes. The posterior walls of the proximal and distal jejunums were put together, and the stapler was closed and fired (Fig. 4b). Then, maximum possible distance was kept between each staple line to secure sufficient blood perfusion in the area between the staple lines (Fig. 4b). The common entry hole was temporarily closed by three full-thickness stitches while widening the V-shaped anastomosis made by first stapling (Fig. 4c) and then permanently closed with one application of a 60-mm linear stapler (Fig. 4c, d) [3]. These procedures produced a torsion-free anastomosis while maintaining the physiological axes of the intestinal tract, resulting in an appropriate gap in the staple line of the common entry hole closure between the staple lines of the proximal and distal jejunum stumps (Fig. 4d) [3]. The operative time and estimated blood loss were 263 min and 180 ml, respectively. The time required for delta-shaped anastomosis was 20 min. Macroscopy of the resected tumor revealed a white solid mass with a size of 10 × 8 × 5 cm located throughout the jejunal wall (Fig. 5a). Histologically, the tumor grew by engulfing the jejunal mucosa (Fig. 5b). The tumor cells showed a brisk mitotic activity (> 20 mitoses per 10 high power fields) (Fig. 5c), and there were scattered tumor necroses (Fig. 5d), indicating that the histological grade of the tumor was 3 according to the French Federation Nationale des Centers de Lutte Contre le Cancer system [4]. All surgical margins were negative for the tumor, and there were no obvious findings of lymphovascular invasion. Furthermore, there were no metastatic findings in all dissected lymph nodes (0/13). The patient’s postoperative course was uneventful, and he was discharged at 10 days after surgery. Neither signs of recurrence nor stenosis has been observed within the 2 years after surgery (Fig. 6).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

Preoperative imaging findings. a Endoscopic findings: enteroscopy revealed an easily hemorrhagic tumor in the jejunum. b Findings of the small bowel series using meglumine sodium amidotrizoate: a tumor (white arrow) was found in the jejunum at the angle of Treitz. c Contrast-enhanced computed tomography findings: The tumor with intussusception appeared as a reniform shape (pseudokidney sign) longitudinally and demonstrated multilayered concentric rings of mass (target sign) transversely. A tumor with intussusception and regional lymph node swelling was located at the angle of Treitz. d Findings of the fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography: this tumor had marked hypermetabolism, showing a standardized uptake value (SUV) max of 8.3, and the swollen regional lymph node showed mild hypermetabolism with a SUV max of 3.7

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

Microscopic and immunohistochemical findings of a biopsy specimen. a Hematoxylin and eosin staining. b α-Smooth muscle actin. c h-Caldesmon. d calponin. e Vimentin and cytokeratin (AE1/AE3). f Cytokeratin (CAM5.2) and CD34. g c-Kit. h DOG-1 and S-100 protein. i Myogenin (the Ki-67 labeling index was approximately 30%)

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

Intraoperative findings. a Intestinal intussusception was seen at the angle of Treitz. b Transection line of the proximal jejunum extended from the posterior wall to the anterior wall. c After resection of the tumor, the residual duodenal stump was short. d Proximal jejunal stump was mobilized from the retroperitoneum

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Open in a new tab

Procedure for creating a delta-shaped anastomosis. a Small hole was created on the posterior side of the staple line of the proximal jejunum and on the mesenteric side of the staple line of the distal jejunum. b Dorsal walls of the proximal and distal walls of the jejunum were stapled with sufficient distance (arrows) between each other’s staple lines to maintain blood flow. c Common entry hole was temporarily closed by three full-thickness sutures while widening the V-shaped anastomosis made by first stapling and then permanently closed with a stapler. d Jejunojejunostomy was performed using delta-shaped anastomosis (double arrow: an appropriate gap between the staple lines of the proximal and distal jejunum stumps maintained the physiological axes of the intestinal tract). PJ proximal jejunum, DJ distal jejunum, VSA V-shaped anastomosis

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

Open in a new tab

Macroscopic findings of the cross-section and histological findings of the resected specimen. a Tumor was a white solid mass (10 × 8 × 5 cm in size) located throughout the jejunal wall. b Tumor grew by engulfing the jejunal mucosa. c Tumor cells showed a brisk mitotic activity (arrow, > 20 mitoses per 10 high power fields). d There were scattered tumor necroses

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

Open in a new tab

Contrast-enhanced computed tomography findings 2 years after surgery. Neither signs of recurrence nor stenosis has been observed

Discussion

We experienced a very rare case of LMS in the small intestine at the angle of Treitz, for which laparoscopic resection was performed, followed by delta-shaped anastomosis. In the present case, totally laparoscopic surgery led to a good postoperative course, including quick recovery and no wound infection.

LMS of the GI tract is extremely rare with an incidence compared to gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) of 1:50–65 [1, 5, 6]. Its biological behavior is aggressive, and it has a poor prognosis; the response rates of chemotherapy and targeted treatments such as the administration of tyrosine kinase inhibitors, on LMS have been low [7, 8], and radiotherapy also seems to be unbeneficial due to radio-resistance [9, 10]. Thus, surgical resection has remained the only curative treatment option. Nevertheless, the recurrence rate after surgery has been reported to be high ranging from 39 to 80% [11, 12], and the 5-year overall survival rate was 51.6% [5]. Although surgical resection with negative margins is important, some studies suggest that regional lymphadenectomy did not contribute to the improvement of the long-term outcomes [8, 13, 14].

Although the number of reports on the LMS of the GI tract has been limited, the number of reports of minimal invasive surgery for the LMS of the GI tract have been recently increasing with favorable outcomes. A PubMed search using the key words “leiomyosarcoma” and “laparoscopic surgery” since 1998 revealed six case reports (seven patients) of laparoscopic resection of the LMS in the GI tract [6, 9, 11, 15–17]. Among them, two cases were located in the small intestine, one in the stomach, and the remaining four in the colon. Although the complications in one case had not been described, the remnant cases had no postoperative complications (Table 1). These findings suggest that laparoscopic resection of the LMS in the GI tract could contribute to favorable short-term outcomes. Regarding anastomotic procedures, intracorporeal anastomosis was performed in four cases, except for one case in which the anastomotic procedure was not described. The present case was the only one in which intracorporeal end-to-end anastomosis using a linear stapler (delta-shaped anastomosis) was performed after resecting the LMS in the small intestine. All cases had no lymph node metastasis, and during the observation periods that ranged from 6 to 24 months, no recurrence was observed, except for one who had invasion into the peritoneum and abdominal wall and two who were not described about outcomes (Table 1). These findings indicate that regional lymphadenectomy could not potentially contribute to the improvement of the long-term outcomes [11].

Table 1.

Case reports of laparoscopic resection of the leiomyosarcoma in the gastrointestinal tract

Case Author (year) Age Sex Site Size (cm) Procedure Postoperative complication Lymph node metastasis Invasion of other organs in pathology Prognosis
1

Hamm [6]

(2013)

 45 F Proximal ileum 8 × 6 × 4.5 cm Segmental resection and intracorporeal side-to-side anastomosis – Not described – No recurrence at 6 MAS
2

Bananzadeh [9]

(2021)

 48 M Sigmoid colon 8 × 6 × 4.5 cm Anterior resection and intracorporeal colorectal anastomosis – No lymph node metastasis – No recurrence at 21 MAS
3

Bananzadeh [9]

(2021)

 49 M Descending colon 3 × 4 × 3.5 cm Left hemicolectomy and extracorporeal anastomosis – No lymph node metastasis  + (Peritoneum and abdominal wall) Recurrence at 16 MAS
4

Guzel [11]

(2016)

 87 M Terminal ileum 5 × 4 × 3.7 cm Segmental resection and extracorporeal end-to-end anastomosis – Not described – No recurrence at 12 MAS
5

Yahagi [15]

(2019)

 46 M Sigmoid colon 4.2 × 3.7 × 2.8 cm Sigmoid colectomy and intracorporeal colorectal anastomosis using the double-stapling technique – No lymph node metastasis – No recurrence at 18 MAS
6

Takagi [16]

(2021)

 59 M Proximal stomach 1.8 × 1.5 × 1 cm Partial gastrectomy and intracorporeal hand–sewn sutures – No lymph node dissection – No recurrence at 12 MAS
7

Wong [17]

(2021)

 59 M Cecum 2 × 2 × 0.7 cm Right hemicolectomy (the anastomotic procedure was not described) Not described No lymph node metastasis – No recurrence at 6 MAS
8

Our case

(2022)

 54 M Proximal jejunum 10 × 8 × 5 cm Segmental resection and intracorporeal end-to-end anastomosis using a linear stapler (delta-shaped anastomosis) – No lymph node metastasis – No recurrence at 24 MAS
Open in a new tab

MAS months after surgery

Contrarily, there have been some reports of totally laparoscopic surgery for tumors of the angle of Treitz [7, 18]. Tanaka et al. and Bracale et al. have reported a case of a GIST at the angle of Treitz that was treated with totally laparoscopic resection, followed by an intracorporeal duodenojejunostomy between the second or third duodenal portion and the jejunum [7, 18]. They considered this procedure as technically demanding due to the anatomical complexity around the ligament of Treitz [7]. Especially, the superior mesenteric artery, superior mesenteric vein, and the confluence of the inferior mesenteric and splenic veins are close by, and the duodenojejunal junction is firmly adherent to the retroperitoneum. Therefore, there is a risk of injuring these major vessels and the intestine during mobilization around the ligament of Treitz [7, 18]. In the present case, an intracorporeal delta-shaped anastomosis was performed. As a result, we could successfully complete the intracorporeal jejunojejunostomy with minimal dissection around the ligament of Treitz in such a short time. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of totally laparoscopic jejunojejunostomy using delta-shaped anastomosis after resection of a tumor at the angle of Treitz. Delta-shaped anastomosis has been recognized as a major intracorporeal Billroth I reconstruction procedure after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy, wherein circumferentially full-thickness anastomosis with good blood perfusion is easily created without slack and torsion, similarly to functional end-to-end anastomosis or overlap anastomosis; this technique has been reported to be safe with highly reproducible outcomes [3]. In addition, it seems likely that this procedure is advantageous owing to its minimal requirement of mobilization of the anastomotic intestinal tract as compared to functional end-to-end anastomosis or overlap anastomosis. Recently, Tajima et al. have reported on the application of this procedure in reconstruction after laparoscopic colectomy in the same manner as gastroduodenostomy, with favorable short-term outcomes [19]. This study suggests that the application of the delta-shaped anastomosis in intestinal reconstruction is feasible.

In the present case, we performed tumor resection without reducing intussusception. Although it is controversial whether the intussuscepted intestine is reduced before resection for malignant tumors concurrent with the intussusception, many studies suggest that the reduction procedure can potentially increase the risk of unfavorable outcomes, which are as follows: (1) intraluminal seeding and venous tumor dissemination, (2) perforation and seeding of microorganisms and tumor cells to the peritoneal cavity, and (3) anastomotic complications of the manipulated friable and edematous bowel tissue [20–23]. In contrast, when a reduction procedure is not performed, excessive bowel resection would be required, and as a result, the reconstruction procedure would become more difficult. In fact, the resected line of the proximal intestine was very close to the ligament of Treitz in the present case. Fortunately, we could perform reconstruction by performing a delta-shaped anastomosis, leading to a favorable operative course. Therefore, we consider that resection without the reduction procedure is preferred for malignant tumors concurrent with intussusception, when the length of the intestine is adequate to safely perform anastomosis.

Conclusions

We present a case in which a totally laparoscopic surgery for leiomyosarcoma located at the angle of Treitz with jejunojejunal intussusception was successfully performed. In the present case report, this experience is too less to prove the procedure efficacy. Therefore, further studies and investigations to assess the safety and long prognosis of laparoscopic surgery for LMS at the angle of Treitz are necessary.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Maruzen Co., Ltd. (Tokyo, Japan) for their English language review of this manuscript.

Abbreviations

LMS

Leiomyosarcoma

GI

Gastrointestinal

SUV

Standardized uptake value

GIST

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor

Author contributions

K.N. and S.S. wrote the manuscript. K.N. and K.S performed the operation. S.Y. made the pathological diagnosis. K.N., S.S., K.S., A.S., S.A., M.N., T.T., K.I., I.U., and K.S. contributed to the treatment of this case. All of the authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Authors’ information

K.N. is an assistant professor at Fujita Health University and S.S. is an associate professor at Fujita Health University. Both are “Board Certified Surgeons” of Japan surgical society and the Japanese society of Gastroenterological Surgery, “Board Certified Gastroenterologists” of The Japanese Society of Gastroenterology, “Endoscopic surgical skill qualification system: qualified surgeons” of Japan society for Endoscopic Surgery, and Fellow of the American College of Surgeons.

Funding

Not applicable.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

All the procedures were completed in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration. Informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this case report and any accompanying images.

Competing interests

Kenichi Nakamura, Susumu Shibasaki, Seiji Yamada, Kazumitsu Suzuki, Akiko Serizawa, Shingo Akimoto, Masaya Nakauchi, Tsuyoshi Tanaka, Kazuki Inaba, Ichiro Uyama, and Koichi Suda have no commercial association with or financial involvement that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article. Ichiro Uyama has received lecture fees from Intuitive Surgical, Inc. Ichiro Uyama and Tsuyoshi Tanaka have been funded by Medicaroid, Inc. in relation to the Collaborative Laboratory for Research and Development in Advanced Surgical Technology, Fujita Health University. Koichi Suda has been funded by Medicaroid, Inc. in relation to the Collaborative Laboratory for Research and Development in Advanced Surgical Intelligence, Fujita Health University, and has also received advisory fees from Medicaroid, Inc. outside of the submitted work.

Footnotes

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Contributor Information

Kenichi Nakamura, Email: naka_ken_nmu@yahoo.co.jp.

Susumu Shibasaki, Email: susumushi48@mist.ocn.ne.jp.

Seiji Yamada, Email: yamadas@fujita-hu.ac.jp.

Kazumitsu Suzuki, Email: vaivaio123@yahoo.co.jp.

Akiko Serizawa, Email: sericcho@gmail.com.

Shingo Akimoto, Email: akis-ducatist@p09.itscom.net.

Masaya Nakauchi, Email: naka57ma38@hotmail.com.

Tsuyoshi Tanaka, Email: tsuyoshi.tanaka@fujita-hu.ac.jp.

Kazuki Inaba, Email: kinaba@fujita-hu.ac.jp.

Ichiro Uyama, Email: iuyama@mac.com.

Koichi Suda, Email: ko-suda@nifty.com.

References

  • 1.Agaimy A, Wünsch PH. True smooth muscle neoplasms of the gastrointestinal tract: morphological spectrum and classification in a series of 85 cases from a single institute. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2007;392:75–81. doi: 10.1007/s00423-006-0092-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kanaya S, Gomi T, Momoi H, Tamaki N, Isobe H, Katayama T, et al. Delta-shaped anastomosis in totally laparoscopic Billroth I gastrectomy: new technique of intraabdominal gastroduodenostomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2002;195:284–287. doi: 10.1016/S1072-7515(02)01239-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Nakamura K, Suda K, Suzuki A, Nakauchi M, Shibasaki S, Kikuchi K, et al. Intracorporeal isosceles right triangle-shaped anastomosis in totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2018;28:193–201. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000535. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Trojani M, Contesso G, Coindre JM, Rouesse J, Bui NB, de Mascarel A, et al. Soft-tissue sarcomas of adults; study of pathological prognostic variables and definition of a histopathological grading system. Int J Cancer. 1984;33:37–42. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910330108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Yamamoto H, Handa M, Tobo T, Setsu N, Fujita K, Oshiro Y, et al. Clinicopathological features of primary leiomyosarcoma of the gastrointestinal tract following recognition of gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Histopathology. 2013;63:194–207. doi: 10.1111/his.12159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hamm JK, Chaudhery SI, Kim RH. Laparoscopic resection of small bowel sarcoma. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2013;23:e138–e140. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e318280638e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tanaka E, Kim M, Lim JS, Choi YY, Saklani A, Noh SH, Hyung WJ. Usefulness of laparoscopic side-to-side duodenojejunostomy for gastrointestinal stromal tumors located at the duodenojejunal junction. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;19:313–318. doi: 10.1007/s11605-014-2699-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Martin-Liberal J. Leiomyosarcoma: principles of management. Intractable Rare Dis Res. 2013;2:127–129. doi: 10.5582/irdr.2013.v2.4.127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bananzadeh A, Mokhtari M, Sohooli M, Shekouhi R. Two cases of primary leiomyosarcoma of sigmoid colon treated with laparoscopic surgery: a case report and a review of literature. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2021;87:106420. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2021.106420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Koczkowska M, Lipska BS, Grzeszewska J, Limon J, Biernat W, Jassem J. Primary leiomyosarcoma of the mesentery in two sisters: clinical and molecular characteristics. Pol J Pathol. 2013;64:59–63. doi: 10.5114/pjp.2013.34605. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Guzel T, Mech K, Mazurkiewicz M, Dąbrowski B, Lech G, Chaber A, Słodkowski M. A very rare case of a small bowel leiomyosarcoma leading to ileocaecal intussusception treated with a laparoscopic resection: a case report and a literature review. World J Surg Oncol. 2016;14:48. doi: 10.1186/s12957-016-0798-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Hilal L, Barada K, Mukherji D, Temraz S, Shamseddine A. Gastrointestinal (GI) leiomyosarcoma (LMS) case series and review on diagnosis, management, and prognosis. Med Oncol (Northwood, London, England) 2016;33:20. doi: 10.1007/s12032-016-0730-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Ng EH, Pollock RE, Munsell MF, Atkinson EN, Romsdahl MM. Prognostic factors influencing survival in gastrointestinal leiomyosarcomas Implications for surgical management and staging. Ann Surg. 1992;215:68–77. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199201000-00010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ng EH, Pollock RE, Romsdahl MM. Prognostic implications of patterns of failure for gastrointestinal leiomyosarcomas. Cancer. 1992;69:1334–1341. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19920315)69:6<1334::AID-CNCR2820690606>3.0.CO;2-S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Yahagi M, Ishii Y, Hara A, Watanabe M. Laparoscopic surgery to treat leiomyosarcomas of the sigmoid colon: a case report and literature review. Surg Case Rep. 2019;5:20. doi: 10.1186/s40792-019-0579-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Takagi T, Saito S, Yokota S, Kaneko Y, Takahashi K, Kanamaru R, et al. Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for leiomyosarcoma of the stomach: a case report with a review of the literature. Surg Case Rep. 2021;7:146. doi: 10.1186/s40792-021-01218-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wong GS, Yudina SV, Reyes MCD. Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy to curatively treat primary leiomyosarcoma at the ileocecal valve. ACG Case Rep J. 2021;8:e00670. doi: 10.14309/crj.0000000000000670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bracale U, Pontecorvi E, Silvestri V, Cuccurullo D, D’Ambra M, Lionetti R, et al. Laparoscopic segmental resection for tumours of the Angle of Treitz: a challenging but feasible surgical option. Results from a retrospective case-series analysis. Updates Surg. 2021;73:179–186. doi: 10.1007/s13304-020-00910-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tajima JY, Nagayama S, Hiyoshi Y, Mukai T, Nagasaki T, Yamaguchi T, et al. Colonic delta-shaped anastomosis using linear staplers in laparoscopic colectomy. Tech Coloproctol. 2021;25:473–474. doi: 10.1007/s10151-020-02341-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Honjo H, Mike M, Kusanagi H, Kano N. Adult intussusception: a retrospective review. World J Surg. 2015;39:134–138. doi: 10.1007/s00268-014-2759-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Begos DG, Sandor A, Modlin IM. The diagnosis and management of adult intussusception. Am J Surg. 1997;173:88–94. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9610(96)00419-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Erkan N, Haciyanli M, Yildirim M, Sayhan H, Vardar E, Polat AF. Intussusception in adults: an unusual and challenging condition for surgeons. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2005;20:452–456. doi: 10.1007/s00384-004-0713-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Marinis A, Yiallourou A, Samanides L, Dafnios N, Anastasopoulos G, Vassiliou I, Theodosopoulos T. Intussusception of the bowel in adults: a review. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15:407–411. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Articles from Surgical Case Reports are provided here courtesy of Springer-Verlag

RESOURCES