Abstract
Uveal melanoma is the most common intraocular cancer in adults. Metastatic uveal melanoma has a poor prognosis. Tebentafusp-tebn is the first drug in the new immune mobilizing monoclonal T-cell receptors against cancer (ImmTAC) class of T cell–directed therapy. Tebentafusp-tebn has been shown in a randomized phase III clinical trial to lead to improved overall survival and progression-free survival when compared with single-agent pembrolizumab, ipilimumab, or dacarbazine in previously untreated human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A*02:01-positive metastatic uveal melanoma patients. Tebentafusp-tebn is now approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in HLA-A*02:01-positive uveal melanoma patients as first-line therapy in the metastatic setting.
Uveal melanoma is the most common intraocular cancer in adults, representing approximately 3% to 5% of all melanomas (Jager et al., 2020). The annual incidence of uveal melanoma in Europe and the US is approximately 6 cases per million population per year (Jager et al., 2020). The incidence of uveal melanoma is low in Africa and Asia, with an incidence rate of 0.2 to 3 cases per million per year (Kaliki & Shields, 2017). Risk factors for developing uveal melanoma include fair skin, light-colored eyes, inability to tan, and ocular or oculodermal melanocytosis (Kaliki & Shields, 2017). While uveal melanomas also arise from melanocytes, they are a distinct entity from cutaneous melanomas, with different drivers and a different microenvironment (Coupland et al., 2013; van der Kooij et al., 2019). Unfortunately, these differences lead uveal melanoma patients to worse outcomes with systemic therapy, including immunotherapy (Buder et al., 2013; Rantala et al., 2019). Around 50% of patients with uveal melanoma will present with metastatic disease, and the prognosis in these patients is poor, with a median overall survival of approximately 1 year (Rantala et al., 2019; Kujala et al., 2003; Weis et al., 2016). There is a paucity of data in this setting with systemic therapy.
The presence of human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A*02:01 is seen in approximately 45% of individuals with uveal melanoma in the United States and Europe (Nathan et al., 2021). Metastatic uveal melanoma is a historically treatment-refractory tumor with a high expression of glycoprotein 100 (gp100; Khoja et al., 2019). Molecules called immune mobilizing monoclonal T-cell receptors against cancer (ImmTAC) are a new class of T cell–redirecting bispecific fusion proteins that use an engineered high-affinity T-cell receptor to target a specific protein, including intracellular antigens, that is presented as a peptide–HLA complex on the target-cell surface (Liddy et al., 2012; Lowe et al., 2019). Once ImmTAC molecules are bound to their specific peptide–HLA complexes on the target-cell surface, they recruit and activate polyclonal T cells through CD3 to release cytokines and cytolytic mediators against target cells (Liddy et al., 2012; Bossi et al., 2014). Tebentafusp-tebn (Kimmtrak) is currently the first and only drug in the new ImmTAC class.
PHARMACOLOGY AND MECHANISM OF ACTION
Tebentafusp-tebn is a T cell–redirecting bispecific fusion protein that redirects the immune system to target gp100-expressing uveal melanoma tumor cells. Tebentafusp-tebn is comprised of a soluble HLA-A*02:01-restricted T-cell receptor that is specific for the gp100 peptide and is fused to an anti-CD3 single-chain variable fragment (Nathan et al., 2021). Tebentafusp-tebn has a 1-million-fold greater affinity for gp100 presented by HLA-A*02:01 than natural T-cell receptors. Once bound to HLA-A*02:01-positive uveal melanoma cells, tebentafusp-tebn recruits and activates polyclonal T cells (via CD3) to release inflammatory cytokines and cytotoxic proteins, resulting in direct lysis of uveal melanoma tumor cells (Boudousquie et al., 2017; Middleton et al., 2020). The steady-state volume of distribution of tebentafusp-tebn is 7.56 liters (Immunocore Ltd., 2022). Tebentafusp-tebn is expected to be catabolized into small peptides and amino acids. The geometric mean clearance of tebentafusp-tebn is 16.4 liters per day with the median terminal half-life of 7.5 hours (range 6.8 to 7.5 hours).
CLINICAL TRIALS
The approval of tebentafusp-tebn was based on IMCgp100-202, a randomized, open-label, multicenter, phase III clinical trial of 378 patients with metastatic uveal melanoma. Patients were required to be HLA-A*02:01 genotype positive as identified by a central assay. Patients with prior surgical resection of oligometastatic disease were permitted in the study. Exclusion criteria included patients who received prior systemic therapy or localized liver-directed therapy and those with clinically significant cardiac disease or symptomatic, untreated brain metastases (Nathan et al., 2021).
Patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive weekly tebentafusp-tebn (N = 252) or investigator’s choice (N = 126) of pembrolizumab (Keytruda), ipilimumab (Yervoy), or dacarbazine. Randomization was stratified by lactate dehydrogenase level at study entry. Patients in the tebentafusp-tebn group received a dose-escalation regimen starting with 20 μg on day 1 and 30 μg on day 8, followed by 68 μg on day 15 and weekly thereafter. For the investigator’s choice, pembrolizumab was dosed at 2 mg/kg up to a maximum of 200 mg administered intravenously or 200 mg fixed dose every 3 weeks (82%). Ipilimumab was given at 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks (12%). A small number of patients received dacarbazine 1,000 mg/m2 every 3 weeks (6%).
The major efficacy outcome was overall survival (OS). Additional efficacy outcomes were investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) per the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. The baseline demographic and clinical characteristics of the two groups were well balanced. The median OS was 21.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 18.6–28.6) for patients treated with tebentafusp-tebn and 16 months (95% CI = 9.7–18.4) in the investigator’s choice arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.51, 95% CI = 0.37–0.71, p < .0001) in the intention-to-treat population. Moreover, PFS was 3.3 months (95% CI = 3–5) in the tebentafusp-tebn arm and 2.9 months (95% CI = 2.8–3) in the investigator’s choice arm (HR, 0.73, 95% CI = 0.58–0.94, p = .0139). The ORR was 9.1% (95% CI = 5.9–13.4) in the tebentafusp-tebn arm compared with 4.8% (95% CI = 1.8–10.1) in the investigator’s choice arm.
ADVERSE EFFECTS
Based on the pivotal phase III clinical trial, the most common treatment-related adverse events (≥ 30%) in patients who received tebentafusp-tebn were cytokine release syndrome (89%), rash (83%), pyrexia (76%), pruritus (69%), chills (47%), nausea (43%), fatigue (41%), and hypotension (38%; Nathan et al., 2021). The most common laboratory abnormalities (≥ 50%) were decreased lymphocyte count, increased creatinine, increased glucose, increased aspartate aminotransferase, increased alanine aminotransferase, decreased hemoglobin, and decreased phosphate. Adverse events due to tebentafusp-tebn led to 3.3% of patients discontinuing treatment. The frequency and severity of adverse events such as cytokine release syndrome, skin reactions, and elevated liver enzymes were seen most often with the first three doses and decreased with subsequent infusions (Nathan et al., 2021).
A list of treatment-related adverse events occurring in more than 20% of patients from the IMCgp100-202 trial is summarized in Table 1. Additionally, significant laboratory abnormalities (≥ 10%) worsening from baseline are listed in Table 2. Other clinically relevant adverse events occurring in less than 20% of patients who received tebentafusp-tebn included back pain, anorexia, constipation, hypertension, tachycardia, dyspnea, paresthesia, dizziness, flushing, muscle spasms, myalgia, pain in extremity, alopecia, skin hyperpigmentation, influenza-like illness, oropharyngeal pain, and night sweats (Nathan et al., 2021).
Table 1. Treatment-Related Adverse Events Occurring in ≥ 20% of Patients.
Adverse reactions | All grades, % | Grades 3–4, % | |
---|---|---|---|
Immune system disorders | Cytokine release syndrome | 89 | 0.8 |
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Rash | 83 | 18.0 |
Pruritus | 69 | 4.5 | |
Dry skin | 31 | 0 | |
Skin hypopigmentation | 28 | NA | |
Erythema | 24 | 0 | |
Hair color changes | 20 | NA | |
General disorders and administration site conditions | Pyrexia | 76 | 3.7 |
Fatigue | 64 | 6.0 | |
Chills | 48 | 0.4 | |
Edema | 45 | 0 | |
Gastrointestinal disorders | Nausea | 49 | 2.0 |
Abdominal pain | 45 | 2.9 | |
Vomiting | 30 | 1.2 | |
Diarrhea | 25 | 1.2 | |
Vascular disorders | Hypotension | 39 | 3.3 |
Nervous system disorders | Headache | 31 | 0.4 |
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Arthralgia | 22 | 0.8 |
Note. Information from Immunocore Ltd. (2022).
Table 2. Select Laboratory Abnormalities Occurring in ≥ 10% of Patients.
Adverse reactions | Grades 1–4, % | Grades 3–4, % | |
---|---|---|---|
Hematology | Lymphocyte count decreased | 91 | 56.0 |
Hemoglobin decreased | 51 | 0.8 | |
Platelet count decreased | 16 | 0 | |
Neutrophil count decreased | 14 | 2.0 | |
Chemistry | Creatinine increased | 87 | 0.4 |
Glucose increased | 66 | 3.3 | |
Aspartate aminotransferase increased | 55 | 13.0 | |
Alanine aminotransferase increased | 52 | 9.0 | |
Phosphate decreased | 51 | 11.0 | |
Albumin decreased | 47 | 2.1 | |
Calcium decreased | 45 | 2.1 | |
Lipase increased | 37 | 15.0 | |
Magnesium decreased | 34 | 0 | |
Alkaline phosphatase decreased | 34 | 2.9 | |
Sodium decreased | 30 | 2.9 | |
Potassium increased | 29 | 1.6 | |
Bilirubin increased | 27 | 4.1 | |
Amylase increased | 23 | 4.1 | |
Glucose decreased | 18 | 0.4 | |
Potassium decreased | 17 | 0.8 | |
Calcium increased | 13 | 0 |
Note. Information from Immunocore Ltd. (2022).
DOSING AND ADMINISTRATION
Tebentafusp-tebn is indicated for the treatment of HLA-A*02:01-positive adult patients with unresectable or metastatic uveal melanoma (Immunocore Ltd., 2022). Tebentafusp-tebn is administered once weekly via continuous intravenous infusion over 15 to 20 minutes. The recommended starting dose is 20 μg for week 1. The dose is increased to 30 μg for week 2 and 68 μg for week 3 and beyond. Patients are treated until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. The first three infusions are given in an appropriate health-care setting with immediate access to medications and resuscitation equipment to manage cytokine release syndrome. Patients should be monitored during the infusion and for at least 16 hours after the completion of each dose.
Tebentafusp-tebn can be administered in the outpatient setting starting at the fourth dose in the absence of any hypotension requiring medical intervention with the most recent dose. Additionally, patients are required to be monitored for a minimum of 30 minutes with subsequent doses in an appropriate ambulatory care setting. A summary of recommended monitoring parameters is provided in Table 3.
Table 3. Monitoring Parameters and Frequency of Monitoring.
Monitoring parameter(s) | Frequency of monitoring | |
---|---|---|
Vital signs | Temperature Pulse rate Respiratory rate Blood pressure |
At least every 4 hours during the first three doses; twice post-infusion starting at the fourth dose |
Labs | Complete metabolic panel | Prior to initiation; duration of treatment |
Complete blood count (with differential) | Prior to initiation; duration of treatment | |
Pregnancy status | Prior to treatment |
Note. Information from Immunocore Ltd. (2022).
There are no dosage adjustments provided in the prescribing information for altered kidney function or hepatic impairment before treatment with tebentafusp-tebn. The prescribing information does provide dosing modifications for adverse events occurring during treatment. These recommendations are summarized in Table 4.
Table 4. Tebentafusp Dosing Modification for Adverse Events.
Adverse reaction | Severity | Dosing modifications |
---|---|---|
Cytokine release syndrome | Moderate is defined as temperature ≥ 38oC with:
|
|
Severe is defined as temperature ≥ 38oC with:
|
|
|
Life-threatening is defined as temperature ≥ 38oC with:
|
|
|
Skin reactionsa | Grade 2 or 3 |
|
Grade 4 |
|
|
Elevated liver enzymesa | Grade 3 or 4 |
|
Other adverse reactionsa | Grade 3 |
|
Grade 4 |
|
Note. CRS = cytokine release syndrome. Information from Immunocore Ltd. (2022).
Grading based on the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.03.
IMPLICATIONS FOR THE ADVANCED PRACTITIONER
As the first ImmTAC, tebentafusp-tebn provides a new treatment option for select patients with unresectable or metastatic uveal melanoma. T cell–engaging immunotherapeutic agents signify impressive progress in our ability to target previously untreated diseases; however, serious and potentially fatal adverse events should be noted, especially with cytokine release syndrome. Tebentafusp-tebn has a boxed warning for cytokine release syndrome, requiring monitoring for at least 16 hours following the first three infusions. Cytokine release syndrome may manifest with fevers, hypotension, hypoxia, chills, nausea, vomiting, rash, elevated transaminases, fatigue, and headache (Immunocore Ltd., 2022). Based on the IMCgp100-202 trial, 60% of patients experienced grade 2 or higher cytokine release syndrome with more than one infusion (Nathan et al., 2021). The median number of cytokine release syndrome events was two (range 1–12). Approximately 84% of cytokine release syndrome episodes started the day of the infusion. The median time to resolution was 2 days among cases where cytokine release syndrome was resolved. Special precautions must be taken to prevent life-threatening complications. The advanced practitioner should ensure that immediate access to medications and resuscitative equipment is available to manage cytokine release syndrome. Patients should be euvolemic prior to the initiation of the infusions. Patients should also be closely monitored for signs and symptoms of cytokine release syndrome following infusions.
There are no contraindications listed in the prescribing information; however, tebentafusp-tebn does carry warnings and precautions for skin reactions, elevated liver enzymes, and embryo-fetal toxicity (Immunocore Ltd., 2022). Dermatologic toxicity such as rash, pruritus, and cutaneous edema have been reported with a median time to onset of 1 day (range 1 to 55 days). In the IMCgp100-202 trial, skin reactions occurred in 91% of treated patients with a high incidence of grade 2 (44%) and grade 3 (21%) adverse events. The median time to improvement in skin reactions (grade 1 or less) was 6 days. Patients should be monitored for skin reactions and be treated with supportive care therapies such as an antihistamine, or topical or systemic steroids, as clinically indicated.
In the IMCgp100-202 trial, the majority (65%) of patients experienced elevated liver enzymes (Nathan et al., 2021). Of those who experienced elevated liver enzymes, 73% occurred within the first three infusions, noted as part of a clinical manifestation of cytokine release syndrome. Fortunately, most patients who experienced grade 3 or 4 elevated liver enzymes had improvement within 7 days (grade 1 or less). Grade 3 or higher elevation in liver enzymes outside of cytokine release syndrome was less common, occurring in 8% of patients (Nathan et al., 2021). Patients should be monitored with liver function panels prior to starting and during treatment with tebentafusp-tebn.
There are no available data regarding the use of tebentafusp-tebn in pregnant women. Animal reproductive and developmental toxicity studies are also not available. Based on the mechanism of action, tebentafusp-tebn is postulated to cause fetal harm to pregnant women. Women with reproductive potential should use effective contraception during and for 1 week after the last treatment dose. Tebentafusp-tebn may be excreted in human milk. Thus, patients should be advised not to breastfeed while receiving treatment with tebentafusp-tebn.
Tebentafusp-tebn is currently only available as a single-dose, preservative-free vial of 100 μg/0.5 mL (Immunocore Ltd., 2022). The estimated average wholesale price (AWP) for one vial is $22,512 (Lexicomp, n.d.). Based on the AWP and current dosing schedule, the cost of tebentafusp-tebn for each patient will exceed $1.1 million per year. The rising cost of cancer care, especially for new oncology treatment options, poses financial toxicity to patients (Shah et al., 2022). The advanced practitioner should routinely screen for financial toxicity and discuss costs with patients. The American Society of Clinical Oncology recommends that clinicians discuss the cost of cancer care with patients to enhance shared decision-making (Agarwal et al., 2021). The opportunity to meet with a financial counselor may alleviate anxiety and cost concerns before beginning therapy (Coughlin et al., 2021). The patient’s out-of-pocket expense for this therapy will depend on the individual’s insurance coverage. Copay support of $7,500 is currently available to commercially insured patients, whereas patients insured through governmental programs such as Medicare, Medicaid, and Tricare may be eligible for foundation support. A Prescription Assistance Program is available from the manufacturer for uninsured or underinsured patients. Early discussions and possible financial solutions and support will help the patient navigate their care and financial responsibilities.
CONCLUSION
Historically, patients with metastatic uveal melanoma have had a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Tebentafusp-tebn is the first drug in the new ImmTAC class of T cell–directed therapy. Tebentafusp-tebn has been demonstrated to lead to significantly improved overall survival and progression-free survival in select (HLA-A*02:01-positive) metastatic uveal melanoma patients. As with other forms of T cell–directed therapy, cytokine release syndrome remains a treatment-related adverse event seen in patients with tebentafusp-tebn administration. The approval of the novel agent, tebentafusp-tebn, represents a major paradigm shift in the treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma.
Footnotes
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
References
- Agarwal, A., Livingstone, A., Karikios, D. J., Stockler, M. R., Beale, P. J., & Morton, R. L. (2021). Physician-patient communication of costs and financial burden of cancer and its treatment: A systematic review of clinical guidelines. BMC Cancer, 21(1), 1036. 10.1186/s12885-021-08697-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bossi, G., Buisson, S., Oates, J., Jakobsen, B. K., & Hassan, N. J. (2014). ImmTAC-redirected tumour cell killing induces and potentiates antigen cross-presentation by dendritic cells. Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy, 63(5), 437–448. 10.1007/s00262-014-1525-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boudousquie, C., Bossi, G., Hurst, J. M., Rygiel, K. A., Jakobsen, B. K., & Hassan, N. J. (2017). Polyfunctional response by ImmTAC (IMCgp100) redirected CD8+ and CD4+ T cells. Immunology, 152(3), 425–438. 10.1111/imm.12779 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Buder, K., Gesierich, A., Gelbrich, G., & Goebeler, M. (2013). Systemic treatment of metastatic uveal melanoma: Review of literature and future perspectives. Cancer Medicine, 2(5), 674–686. 10.1002/cam4.133 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Coughlin, S. S., Dean, L. T., & Cortes, J. E. (2021). Financial assistance programs for cancer patients. Current Cancer Reports, 3(1), 119–123. 10.25082/ccr.2021.01.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Coupland, S. E., Lake, S. L., Zeschnigk, M., & Damato, B. E. (2013). Molecular pathology of uveal melanoma. Eye, 27(2), 230–242. 10.1038/eye.2012.255 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Immunocore Ltd. (2022). Kimmtrak (tebentafusp-tebn) package insert. https://www.immunocore.com/download_file/309/0
- Jager, M. J., Shields, C. L., Cebulla, C. M., Abdel-Rahman, M. H., Grossniklaus, H. E., Stern, M. H.,…Damato, B. E. (2020). Uveal melanoma. Nature Reviews. Disease Primers, 6(1), 24. 10.1038/s41572-020-0158-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kaliki, S., & Shields, C. L. (2017). Uveal melanoma: Relatively rare but deadly cancer. Eye, 31(2), 241–257. 10.1038/eye.2016.275 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Khoja, L., Atenafu, E. G., Suciu, S., Leyvraz, S., Sato, T., Marshall, E.,…Joshua, A. M. (2019). Meta-analysis in metastatic uveal melanoma to determine progression free and overall survival benchmarks: An international rare cancers initiative (IRCI) ocular melanoma study. Annals of Oncology, 30(8), 1370–1380. 10.1093/annonc/mdz176 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kujala, E., Mäkitie, T., & Kivelä, T. (2003). Very long-term prognosis of patients with malignant uveal melanoma. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 44(11), 4651–4659. 10.1167/iovs.03-0538 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lexicomp. (n.d.). Tebentafusp: Drug information. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/tebentafusp-drug-information
- Liddy, N., Bossi, G., Adams, K. J., Lissina, A., Mahon, T. M., Hassan, N. J.,…Jakobsen, B. K. (2012). Monoclonal TCR-redirected tumor cell killing. Nature Medicine, 18(6), 980–987. 10.1038/nm.2764 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lowe, K. L., Cole, D., Kenefeck, R., OKelly, I., Lepore, M., & Jakobsen, B. K. (2019). Novel TCR-based biologics: Mobilising T cells to warm ‘cold’ tumours. Cancer Treatment Reviews, 77, 35–43. 10.1016/j.ctrv.2019.06.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Middleton, M. R., McAlpine, C., Woodcock, V. K., Corrie, P., Infante, J. R., Steven, N. M.,…Sznol, M. (2020). Tebentafusp, a TCR/anti-CD3 bispecific fusion protein targeting gp100, potently activated antitumor immune responses in patients with metastatic melanoma. Clinical Cancer Research, 26(22), 5869–5878. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-1247 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nathan, P., Hassel, J. C., Rutkowski, P., Baurain, J. F., Butler, M. O., Schlaak, M.,…IMCgp100-202 Investigators. (2021). Overall survival benefit with tebentafusp in metastatic uveal melanoma. New England Journal of Medicine, 385(13), 1196–1206. 10.1056/NEJMoa2103485 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rantala, E. S., Hernberg, M., & Kivelä, T. T. (2019). Overall survival after treatment for metastatic uveal melanoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Melanoma Research, 29(6), 561–568. 10.1097/CMR.0000000000000575 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shah, K., Zafar, S. Y., & Chino, F. (2022). Role of financial toxicity in perpetuating health disparities. Trends in Cancer, 8(4), 266–268. 10.1016/j.trecan.2021.12.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van der Kooij, M. K., Speetjens, F. M., van der Burg, S. H., & Kapiteijn, E. (2019). Uveal versus cutaneous melanoma; same origin, very distinct tumor types. Cancers, 11(6), 845. 10.3390/cancers11060845 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weis, E., Salopek, T. G., McKinnon, J. G., Larocque, M. P., Temple-Oberle, C., Cheng, T.,…Shea-Budgell, M. (2016). Management of uveal melanoma: A consensus-based provincial clinical practice guideline. Current Oncology, 23(1), e57–e64. 10.3747/co.23.2859 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]