Skip to main content
Regenerative Biomaterials logoLink to Regenerative Biomaterials
. 2022 Sep 5;9:rbac064. doi: 10.1093/rb/rbac064

Recent advances of natural and bioengineered extracellular vesicles and their application in vascular regeneration

Jianxiong Xu 1,#, Jinxuan Wang 2,#, Yidan Chen 3, Yuanfang Hou 4, Jianjun Hu 5,, Guixue Wang 6,
PMCID: PMC9514852  PMID: 36176713

Abstract

The progression of cardiovascular diseases such as atherosclerosis and myocardial infarction leads to serious vascular injury, highlighting the urgent need for targeted regenerative therapy. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) composed of a lipid bilayer containing nuclear and cytosolic materials are relevant to the progression of cardiovascular diseases. Moreover, EVs can deliver bioactive cargo in pathological cardiovascular and regulate the biological function of recipient cells, such as inflammation, proliferation, angiogenesis and polarization. However, because the targeting and bioactivity of natural EVs are subject to several limitations, bioengineered EVs have achieved wide advancements in biomedicine. Bioengineered EVs involve three main ways to acquire including (i) modification of the EVs after isolation; (ii) modification of producer cells before EVs’ isolation; (iii) synthesize EVs using natural or modified cell membranes, and encapsulating drugs or bioactive molecules into EVs. In this review, we first summarize the cardiovascular injury-related disease and describe the role of different cells and EVs in vascular regeneration. We also discuss the application of bioengineered EVs from different producer cells to cardiovascular diseases. Finally, we summarize the surface modification on EVs which can specifically target abnormal cells in injured vascular.

Keywords: cardiovascular disease, extracellular vesicle, vascular regeneration, biomedical engineering

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name rbac064f3.jpg

Introduction

Cardiovascular injury is the result of many diseases, such as atherosclerosis, percutaneous coronary intervention, autologous saphenous vein coronary artery bypass grafting and ischemia–reperfusion (I/R). Vascular regeneration or reconstruction after injury is critical for functional recovery. The main problems after vascular injury are endothelial inflammation and thrombosis, which delay the intimal formation and accelerate intimal hyperplasia [1–4]. Conventional clinical treatments are anti-inflammation, anti-thrombus and induction of intima formation [4–6]. Due to the low targeting of drugs and adverse drug reactions such as bleeding events and restenosis, it is difficult for repairing vascular injury with desired effect.

Extracellular vesicles (EVs), which are cell-derived membrane vesicles, are originally discovered to be the mediators of intercellular communication. EVs are natural carriers produced by various cell types, carrying lipids, proteins and RNA [7]. In general, EVs are categorized into four classes: exosomes, 40–100 nm; membrane particles, 50–80 nm; microvesicles, 100–1000 nm; apoptotic vesicles, more than 800 nm [8, 9]. Meanwhile, the small size of EVs (<200 nm), which can penetrate the endothelial barrier and enter deep tissue, are widely applied in nanomedicine [10]. Studies have shown that natural EVs play an important role in injured vascular regeneration through regulating vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) phenotype transition and endothelial cells (ECs) integrity [11]. However, the complex extraction process and biological function of EVs limit their application in clinical treatment. Bioengineered EVs derived from cell membranes, which have both original and modified functions, are widely used in targeted therapy. In recent years, bioengineered EVs have been used as carriers for nanomaterials, which have advantages in low cytotoxicity, strong targeting and immune escape [9].

In this review, we briefly introduce the molecular mechanism and regenerative process of vascular injury. We summarize the application of natural EVs and bioengineered EVs in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases and describe the function of EVs in injured vascular regeneration. Meanwhile, we further compare the characteristics and functions of different EVs and summarize targeted strategies for vascular injury-related diseases. We also introduce bioengineered methods to construct EVs and improve the bioactivity and targeting of EVs. Finally, we discuss the application of bioengineered EVs in the therapy of vascular injury-related diseases and the future of bioengineered EVs.

The molecular mechanism of vascular regeneration after injury

Vascular injury, caused by blood flow shear stress, inflammation and fibrosis, is the pathological foundation and causes of multi-cardiovascular diseases. Meanwhile, vascular injury usually occurs after the surgery of arterial occlusive disease, such as carotid endarterectomy, balloon dilatation surgeries and so on [12, 13]. The regeneration of injured vascular is a complex but orderly process. Generally, there are three stages of vascular repair, including inflammation, neointima formation and vascular remodeling. During the repair process, the first step is platelet aggregation and inflammatory cell infiltration; second, VSMCs will proliferate and ECs migrate to the vascular injury site; finally, the extracellular matrix is deposited in the injured site and then vascular remodeling has been completed (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

The functions of extracellular vesicles (EVs) in vascular injured disease. The injury repair of cardiovascular is a complex process, which include thrombosis, the adhesion and infiltration of macrophages to the activated ECs, uptake of apoptotic cells and debris, the directed migration, proliferation and phenotype transition of VSMCs, the recruitment and migration of endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) and ECs, and the synthesis of extracellular matrix to repair the injured sites. EVs are mainly released from macrophages and ECs/EPCs, which contain variety of microRNA (miRNA) and proteins to modulate cell function and microenvironment such as: inflammation (miR-98-5p, miR-24-3p) [14, 15], angiogenesis (miR-126, miR-21-5p, miR-155, miR-221-5p, integrin, miR-155-5p) [16–20], SMC phenotypic transition (miR-143, miR-145, Notch) [21, 22], macrophages polarization (miR-146b, miR-378a, miR-99a, miR-146a) [23, 24] and SMC proliferation/migration (miR-21-3p, miR-222) [25, 26].

ECs and endothelial progenitor cells

ECs, as the interface between the blood and tissues, are important in anti-thrombus, anti-inflammation and vascular barrier function. Importantly, ECs, which play an important role in intracellular communication during vascular injury, are considered as potential mediators of cardiovascular diseases. Furchgott and Zawadzki have first demonstrated that ECs can release endothelium-derived relaxing factors [3], which participate in multi-biological processes, such as oxidative stress, inflammation, vasoconstriction and thrombosis [27, 28].

After intimal injury, the repair of endothelial layer includes two main ways [29]. First, the regenerative cells at injured sites are mostly derived from nearby uninjured cells. Researchers find that the re-endothelialization of arterial intima has three independent stages: cleaning, rapid re-endothelialization/proliferation and maturation. This dynamic process starts at 6–24 h after endothelial injury. Then, ECs are able to complete re-endothelialization at 48 h after injury, and maturation when the ECs form continuous and integrity intimal structure at 96 h [30, 31]. Second, the circulating EPCs, including early EPCs and late EPCs, can promote the regenerative process of vascular intima [32, 33]. Early EPCs secrete a variety of angiogenic factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), stromal cell-derived factor 1 and so on, which participate in recruiting mature ECs and regulating ECs proliferation during vascular injury [34–36]. Late EPCs exhibit high cell proliferation rate and strong ability to promote regeneration [37, 38]. Wakabayashi et al. have reported that CD157+ EPCs display regenerative property and are essential for re-endothelialization [39]. Meanwhile, EPC/EC-derived EVs, containing varieties of miRNA and protein, also play a crucial role in attenuating vascular injury and promoting vascular regeneration [40, 41] (Fig. 1). During vascular injury, endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EndMT), as a cellular differentiation process, results in migration and fate transition of EC. The EndMT-derived myofibroblasts not only attenuate inflammation but also have the ability to deal with dead cells, which is important for myocardial infarction (MI) recovery [42]. However, excessive EndMT will affect collagen–matrix metalloproteinase balance, fibrosis and correlate with an unstable plaque phenotype in atherosclerosis and in-stent stenosis [43, 44]. Thus, the molecular mechanism of endothelial phenotype transition during vascular injury provides an insight into targeted therapy for re-endothelialization and the treatment of vascular disorders.

Vascular smooth muscle cells

VSMCs, as the media parts of vascular wall, are essential for vascular homeostasis. During vascular injury, VSMCs will switch cell fate into migratory and proliferative phenotypes. Therefore, VSMCs can be diverted into ‘contractile’ type (differentiated, non-proliferative) and ‘synthetic’ types (dedifferentiated, proliferative) [45]. The ‘synthetic’ VSMCs have stem cell properties, which exhibit high proliferation and soft stiffness, in response to inflammation and biomechanics during vascular injury [46, 47]. Meanwhile, the unexpected activated VSMCs will migrate from media to intima and start to proliferate after excessive vascular injury [48]. These alterations will result in intimal hyperplasia and lead to vascular stenosis, which significantly increases the risk of cardiovascular diseases, such as MI and stroke. Many growth factors and inflammatory factors, such as transforming growth factor-β, platelet-derived growth factor and interferon, lead to transforming the phenotype of VSMCs and regulating VSMCs proliferation [49]. Furthermore, researchers have also reported that EVs secreted by multiple cell types from pathological microenvironment play an important role in VSMCs phenotype transition and vascular tissue repair [11, 50, 51] (Fig. 1). Thus, EVs loading different contents may effectively target abnormal VSMCs and have potential in the therapy of cardiovascular disease.

Macrophages

Macrophages, as the important member of immune cells, can be recruited to the injured sites within 15 min to resolve inflammation and promote tissue repair [52–54]. In vascular injured diseases, such as atherosclerosis, MI and stroke, macrophages are essential for vascular repair and regeneration, contributing to ECs migration and proliferation, neovascularization and SMCs phenotype transition [55–57]. During vascular repair, macrophages will differentiate into pro-inflammatory M1 and anti-inflammatory M2, which is according to the different processes of injury [58]. M1 macrophages can secrete inflammatory cytokines to promote the initial infiltration of circulatory leukocytes [59]. After the early inflammatory phase, macrophages will clean necrotic cell debris via phagocytosis and conversion of M1 to pro-repair and anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype [60]. The M2 macrophages can promote cellular proliferation and vascular remodeling by controlling the production of growth factors, such as VEGF, transforming growth factor β1, insulin-like growth factor 1 and so on [55]. Furthermore, Liu et al. have reported that macrophages also directly mediate vascular repair via using mechanical forces to drag ECs healing and facilitate tight junction [61].

EVs from macrophages also play an important role in regulating vascular microenvironment and various pathophysiological processes. Recent research revealed that macrophages-derived EVs can regulate vascular ECs proliferation, migration and angiogenesis in cardiovascular disease [62] (Fig. 1). Thus, EVs as the regulator of cell/cell communication may act as targeting liposomes for drug delivery and therapy during vascular injury.

The different derived EVs for vascular therapy

In recent years, nanotechnology has been widely used in the diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular diseases [63, 64]. However, it is difficult for synthetic nano-drugs to target vascular injured sites through cell biological interactions. EVs are cell-derived membrane vesicles, which are essential for intracellular biological transduction and cellular communication [65]. In vascular injury sites, EVs released from activated vascular cells containing multi-bioactive factors are able to become promising candidates to treat cardiovascular diseases, which have ability in regulating cell proliferation, migration, trans-differentiation and apoptosis (Table 1). Meanwhile, because almost all cells are capable of secreting EVs, EVs are present in various organizations with long-time circulation and can be artificially isolated from body fluids such as blood, urine, cerebrospinal fluid and saliva in large quantities [66]. Therefore, using EVs as the shell of nano-drugs can prolong circulation time and greatly improve delivery efficiency. Moreover, researchers have created bioengineered EVs via modifying EV membranes and loading drugs into EVs to improve bio-targeting and bioactivity (Fig. 2) [67–69]. Furthermore, biomimetic EVs system constructed by cell membrane retains the membrane surface structure and unique biological functions. These systems have obvious advantages for systematic delivery of drugs in cardiovascular diseases, e.g. membrane encapsulating drugs at nanoscale can protect them from immune system and increase drug delivery efficiency with low toxicity [13, 70]. Due to different cell-derived EVs playing distinct roles in the process of vascular regeneration, it is important to select suitable EV systems for the therapy of vascular injured diseases. Here, we summarize the commonly used EVs system in vascular injured diseases including red blood cell (RBC)-derived EVs, EC-derived EVs, macrophage-derived EVs, platelet-derived EVs and stem cell-derived EVs (Table 1).

Table 1.

Natural and bioengineered EVs for the treatment of vascular injured diseases

Donor cell Methods Animal model Administration Characteristics Effects References
RBC
  • Extrusion through 200 nm ppm

  • Loading with PLGA–rapamycin NPs

Mouse atherosclerosis i.v.
  • Immune escape

  • Long circulating time

  • Decrease the size of atherosclerotic plaque

  • Reduces inflammation

[71]
  • Probe sonication

  • Modification with stroke homing peptide

  • Loading with PHB-dextran -NR2B9C NPs

Mouse I/R i.v.
  • Targeting stroke area

  • ROS-responsive drug release

  • High biocompatibility

  • Decreases infarct size

  • Prevent brain neurons

[72]
  • Probe sonication

  • Modifying with fibrin-targeting peptide

  • loading with dextran–tirofiban conjugate NPs

Mouse thrombosis i.v.
  • Targeting fibrin

  • ROS-responsive drug release

  • high biocompatibility

  • Increases anti-thrombotic activity

[73]
EC
  • Centrifugation at 20 500 g

Mouse atherosclerosis i.v.
  • miR-143/145 enrichment

  • Decrease the size of atherosclerotic plaque

  • Transits SMC to athero-protective phenotype

[21]
  • Overexpression Klf2 in donor cells

  • Gradient centrifugation

Mouse I/R i.v.
  • miR-24-3p enrichment

  • Decrease I/R injury

  • Reduces the recruitment of Ly6C+ monocyte

[15]
  • Overexpression Cxcr4 in donor cells

  • Extrusion through 200 nm ppm

  • Loading with HOP conjunct rapamycin NPs

Mouse I/R i.v.
  • Targeting Sdf-1 high expressed area

  • ROS-responsive drug release

  • Decreases infarct size

  • Reduces radical-induced damage and inflammation

[74]
Macrophage
  • IL-4 stimulates donor cell

  • Centrifugation at 100 000 g

Mouse atherosclerosis i.p.
  • miRNA-99a/146b/378a enrichment

  • Decreases inflammation and necrotic lesion areas

[23]
  • Centrifugation at 100 000 g

Rat stent implantation Local delivery
  • Using M2 macrophage-derived exosomes

  • Accelerates vascular tissue repair

  • Promotes VSMC dedifferentiation

[11]
  • Centrifugation at 100 000 g

  • Loading with HAL by electroporation

Mouse atherosclerosis i.p.
  • Targeting chemokine-enriched area

  • Increases the anti-inflammation effects

  • Alleviates atherosclerosis

[75]
  • IL-1βR, IL-6R and TNF-αR plasmids are transfected in donor cells

  • Extrusion through 400 nm ppm

  • Loading with miR-199a-3p-PEG–PLA NPs

Mouse MI i.v.
  • Targeting IL-1β, IL-1β, TNF-α enriched area

  • miR-199a-3p enrichment

  • Accelerates the recovery of cardiac function

  • Prevents hypoxia‐induced apoptosis

[76]
  • Extrusion and sonication

  • Loading with Oxi-COS-atorvastatin NPs

Mouse atherosclerosis i.v.
  • ROS-responsive drug release

  • Decrease the size of atherosclerotic lesion

  • Suppress local inflammation and ROS

[77]
Platelet
  • Centrifugation at 100 000 g

Rat MI Left ventricle
  • Stimulates VEGF, bFGF signaling pathway

  • Improve the process of revascularization

[78]
  • Probe sonication

  • Loading with docetaxel–PLA NPs

Balloon vascular injury i.v.
  • Collagen binding (injured target)

  • Immuno-compatibility

  • Suppresses coronary restenosis

[79]
  • Modifying with PEG on donor cell

  • Probe sonication

  • Loading with PLGA–rapamycin NPs

Mouse atherosclerosis i.v.
  • Accumulation in atherosclerotic plaque

  • Attenuates the progression of atherosclerosis

[80]
Progenitor/stem cell
  • Centrifugation at 100 000 g

Rat stent implantation Coating on stent
  • Stem cell-derived EVs have pro-healing property

  • Accelerates re-endothelialization

[81]
  • Overexpression Gata4 in donor cell

  • 0.2µm filtration and gradient certification

Rat MI i.o.
  • Enrich anti-apoptotic miRNAs (miR-19a)

  • Restores cardiac contractile function

  • Reduces infarct size

[82]
  • Overexpression Cxcr4 in donor cell

  • Probe sonication

  • Loading with VEGF–PLGA NPs by sonication

Mouse hindlimb ischemic i.v.
  • Targeting ischemic tissue

  • Enhances blood reperfusion

  • Accelerates limb salvage

[83]
  • Loading iron oxide NPs in donor cell

  • Extrusion through 400 nm ppm

Rat I/R i.v.
  • Therapeutic growth factors

  • Magnetically guided, targeted drug delivery

  • Decreases infarction volume

  • Promotes angiogenesis, anti-apoptosis and anti-inflammation

[84]

ppm, polycarbonate porous membrane; PEG-PLA, poly (ethylene glycol–polylactic acid); PLGA, poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid); HOP, p-hydroxybenzyl alcohol-oxalyl chloride-poly (ethylene glycol); Oxi-COS, amphiphilic oxidation-sensitive chitosan oligosaccharide; HAL, hexyl 5-aminolevulinate hydrochloride; i.v., intravenous injection; i.p., intraperitoneal injection; i.o., intramyocardial injection; local delivery, drugs were preloaded into pluronic gel F-127 (Sigma) and locally dress around the injured artery; I/R, ischemia-reperfusion; MI, myocardial infarction; NPs, nanoparticles.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

The synthetic strategies of bioengineered EVs. Producer cells can be loaded with therapeutic molecules such as drugs, nanoparticles (NPs), nucleic acid species and proteins via incubation with cells, lipofection and electroporation. Producer cells also can be transfected with plasmid or mRNA via lipofection, electroporation and viral transfection to express protein and peptides which have therapeutic and targeting characteristics. EVs from producer cells are then isolated through centrifugation with different centrifugal force. Moreover, EVs also can be synthesized by membrane extrusion and probe sonication. The bioengineered cell membrane fragments are extruded through pore size 0.1–1 µm polycarbonate film or sonicated in a water bath to synthesize biomimetic EVs. Biomimetic EVs have the biological inherencies from the producer cells including specifically surface receptor and bioactive molecular. Moreover, the drugs can be loaded in biomimetic EVs during synthesis.

RBC-based EV system

RBCs (also as erythrocyte), as the most abundant type of blood cells, play an important role in transporting oxygen and nutrients [85]. Meanwhile, RBCs not only have long-term circulatory property, but also RBCs-derived microvesicles can regulate a variety of cardiovascular diseases [86]. These long-circulating, biocompatible and non-immunogenic properties enable RBCs and their derived EVs to serve as protective shells for cargoes [87]. Recently, Usman et al. constructed a RBCs-derived EVs delivery system to load miRNA and CRISPR–Cas9 system showing higher transfecting efficiency than traditional reagents [88]. Furthermore, RBC membrane also has self-immune escape marker Cd47 and polysaccharide coating, which are essential for cell stability and immune escape [89]. Thus, RBCs membrane can be utilized to package drugs or small molecular, such as polymeric NPs and other nano-drug to construct biomimetic EVs with extended circulation time up to 72 h [90]. Our lab recent work uses RBCs encapsulating core-shell structured nanocomplexes to target atherosclerosis. Animal experimental results show that RBC-derived biomimetic EVs reduce immune clearance and increase the accumulation of NPs in atherosclerotic plaque [71]. Moreover, due to its highly flexible structure, RBC-derived biomimetic EVs can load different core NPs including polymeric NPs [91], magnetic NPs [92], gold NPs [93] and so on. These excellent properties make RBCs-based biomimetic EVs system have great potential in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases (Table 1).

EC-based EV system

ECs, as the interface between blood and vascular wall, are considered as the functional regulator in vascular homeostasis, especially in barrier function, inflammation and thrombus. Recent study has reported that EC-derived small EVs (sEVs) act as a new link between ECs and SMCs in vascular and play an important role in angiogenesis and the transition of SMC phenotype [94]. EVs containing miR-143/145 that are isolated from Klf2-overexpressing ECs can regulate SMC phenotypes and reduce atherosclerotic lesion formation [21]. Moreover, these KLF2-overexpressing EC-derived EVs also can attenuate myocardial I/R injury and reduce the recruitment of Ly6C+ monocyte [15]. Due to EC-derived EVs having great potential in cardiovascular disease, our lab recent work uses CXCR4-overexpressing primary mouse thoracic aorta EC-derived EVs loading with HBA-PC-PEG conjunct rapamycin NPs to target SDF1 highly expressed and ROS accumulated area during cerebral I/R injury. These synthetic EVs significantly improve cerebral I/R injury and suppress local inflammation [74]. Thus ECs-based EVs have been widely applied in the treatment of cardiovascular diseases.

Macrophage/monocyte-based EV system

Macrophage, which has specific receptors to recognize inflammation, tissue debris and foreign invasion, is the ‘guardian’ of the body [95]. Because EVs can inherit the membrane functional receptors from donor cells, macrophage-derived EVs are widely applied in injury and inflammation-related diseases [96, 97]. Macrophage-derived EVs show perfect inflammation-tropism and anti-inflammation properties via high expression of chemokine receptors and releasing anti-inflammatory cytokines [98]. Moreover, because M2 macrophage and its EV play an important role in targeting and resolving inflammation and tissue remodeling, researchers have utilized M2 macrophage-derived EVs to promote vascular regeneration. Recently, researchers have reported that bioengineered M2 macrophages exosomes loading with hexyl 5-aminolevulinate hydrochloride via electroporation exhibit excellent abilities for targeting chemokine-enriched area and reducing vascular necrotic area in atherosclerosis [75]. Furthermore, because EVs can involve in cell-to-cell communication, they contain numerous cargoes including miRNAs, lncRNAs, proteins and lipids that may act as therapeutic agents in cardiovascular diseases (Fig. 1) [99]. Bouchareychas et al. utilize IL-4 to foster macrophages to M2 polarization and find that these macrophage-derived exosomes, which contain miRNA-99a/146b/378a, can reduce inflammation and atherosclerotic plaque in vascular injury [23]. Because macrophages can adhere on vascular injured site, macrophage membrane is utilized to encapsulate ROS-responsive PCM-rapamycin NPs for targeting ROS accumulated and inflammatory area in pathological vascular injury. These biomimetic EVs can effectively inhibit intimal hyperplasia with low cytotoxicity on ECs [97, 100]. Moreover, Martinez et al. have utilized macrophage membrane proteins hybridizing with liposomes to target inflammatory ECs [101]. Because macrophage-based EV can target inflammatory site, which exhibits superior accumulation in injured area and can load a wide variety of solubility nano-drugs and contrast agents, they are increasingly used in all aspects of vascular injury-related disease therapy (Table 1).

Platelet-based EV system

Platelets are non-nucleated blood cells produced by mature megakaryocytes in the bone marrow and lungs, which play an important role in the process of coagulation, hemostasis, inflammation and immune regulation [102, 103]. Platelet-derived EVs contain nucleic acids, growth factors, lipids and proteins, can regulate injury repair, inflammation and immune response after vascular injury [104]. Brill et al. have reported that platelet-derived EVs can stimulate angiogenesis through VEGF signaling after MI [78]. Moreover, EVs derived from thrombin/collagen-induced platelets can enhance the adhesion of early outgrowth cells in vascular injured sites and promote re-endothelialization [105]. Meanwhile, due to platelets having the ability to adhere and aggregate in injured site, Hu et al. prepare biomimetic EVs by encapsulating docetaxel-loaded poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) NPs in platelet membrane. These biomimetic EVs have great immuno-compatibility and collagen targeting, which can selectively adhere to injured vascular and efficiently suppress coronary restenosis [79]. Moreover, to improve the circulation time of EVs in blood, PEG was utilized to modify on platelet membrane. These PEG-modified platelet-derived EVs loading with PLGA–rapamycin NPs exhibit 4.98-fold accumulated efficiency than normal NP in atherosclerotic arterial trees and significantly attenuate the progression of atherosclerosis [80]. Platelet-derived EVs preferentially accumulate in the collagen exposure area, which is associated with intimal injury, demonstrating an effectively targeted ability to vascular injured sites.

Progenitor/stem cell-based EV system

Stem/progenitor cells are self-renewing, multipotent cells that reside in various tissues and play an important role in tissue repair, anti-inflammation and multilineage differentiation [106, 107]. Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) as the abundant stem cell in vascular, which can produce amounts of EVs during physiological environment, is essential for tissue repair and differentiating to replace injured cells [108]. Meanwhile, a large amount of miRNA has been identified in MSC-derived EVs, many of which can inhibit inflammation and promote neovascularization [82]. Thus, recent studies have used MSC-derived exosomes to treat cardiovascular injury. Hu et al. fabricate MSC-derived exosome-released stent that can promote vascular healing and accelerate re-endothelialization after stent implantation [81]. Moreover, Zhao et al. find that MSC-derived exosomes can restore cardiac contractile function and transform macrophages to M2 phenotype through miR-182 [109]. Furthermore, peptide GSPREYTSYMPH is used to cross-link with MSC-derived nanovesicles, which can target disturbed flow site and significantly contribute to endothelial recovery after injury [110]. Due to the targeting ability of natural EVs still needing to enhance, CXCR4 is overexpressed in stem cells through plasmid transfection to acquire robust targeting. Then PLGA–VEGF NPs are encapsulated by cell membrane to construct nanovesicles, which have great potential for delivering VEGF to injured sites and promoting the recovery of vascular function [83]. Furthermore, Kim et al. co-cultured MSCs with iron oxide NPs to stimulate the expression of therapeutic growth factors in MSC and made MSC-derived EVs obtain magnetic targeting. The magnetic navigation makes MSC-derived EVs localize on the ischemic lesion and have great effects on the treatment of ischemic stroke [84]. Stem cell-derived EVs have great potential in the treatment of vascular injury due to their regenerative cargos.

Hybrid membrane-based biomimetic EV system

Cell membrane-wrapped biomimetic EV, which can be simply fabricated, is a new targeted nano-drug delivery system. Although single-type cell membrane-based EVs system has been applicated in cardiovascular disease therapy, it is still struggle to have therapeutic efficacy in the pathological microenvironment after vascular injury. Thus, recent researchers develop hybrid RBC–EC membrane-cloaked NPs to target choroidal neovascularization, in which RBC membrane is used to reduce immune phagocytosis and EC membrane is used as anti-VEGF nano agents to target retinal endotheliocytes [111]. Moreover, because RBCs have long-term circulatory property, RBC–platelet hybrid and RBC–cancer membrane hybrid are used to target tumor area and prolong drug circulation time [112–114]. Meanwhile, due to the platelet membrane also having immune-evading and cancer cell-binding ability, platelet membranes are widely used to fuse with other cell membranes such as leukocyte and cancer stem cell [115–117]. Furthermore, platelet membrane also is used to fuse with stem cell exosomes to enhance exosomes’ capability to target injured vascular [118]. Combination of the differently biological membrane can obtain both functions and characteristics of producer cells, which improve the targeting ability and circulating time.

The bioengineered strategies for EVs to target vascular injured site

EVs have been considered as advanced strategies to treat vascular injured disease, whereas, systemic exposure and off-target effect have limited the development of cardiovascular therapies. Moreover, the repair of vascular injury, as a multiple physiological process, is regulated by a variety of cells and factors, which make drugs hardly direct to the diseased site and have therapeutic index. For example, after stent implanting into the carotid arteries, preventing neointimal hyperplasia and re-endothelialization are the most important events to avoid arterial re-obstruction. Although anti-proliferative drugs such as rapamycin or paclitaxel have great effect on preventing neointimal thickening, the re-endothelialization also will be delayed by the suppression of endothelial proliferation. Meanwhile, compared with paclitaxel-eluting stents, MSC-derived exosomes-eluting stent accelerates re-endothelialization, but also promotes SMC proliferation in vascular injured sites [81]. Thus, it is important to modify EVs with targeting proteins or peptides that can specifically bind with cellular receptors and extracellular components expressed in injured vascular and make EVs-based systems can efficiently deliver drugs to targeted sites or even directly to the diseased/abnormal cells. Here, we summarize the targeting peptides and proteins for cardiovascular diseases (Table 2).

Table 2.

Potential strategies for targeting abnormal cells in cardiovascular diseases

Targeting cell Targeting point Disease Targeting agent/peptide Effects References
EC VCAM1 Atherosclerosis VHPK (peptide) Target inflammatory EC and reduce atherosclerotic plaque [119]
Atherosclerosis Integrin α4β1 (protein) Target activated EC and reduce atherosclerotic plaque [70]
E-selectin Atherosclerosis HPMA (polymer) Target inflammatory EC and reduce vascular inflammation [120]
α-2Ars Atherosclerosis Cys-L9R-Cys (peptide) Target lipid-activated EC and enhance eNOS expression [121]
Macrophage CCR2 Atherosclerosis YNFTNRKISVQRLASYRRITSSK (peptide) Target monocyte with inflammatory response imaging atherosclerotic area [122]
CCR5 Vascular injury DAPTA (peptide) Target recruited monocytes and imaging vascular injury [123]
P32 Atherosclerosis LYP-1 (peptide) Target macrophages in atherosclerotic plaque [124]
CD36 Atherosclerosis KOdiA-PC (lipid) Target macrophages in atherosclerotic plaque [125]
SMC PDGFRβ Vascular injury PDGF-BB peptide Reduce restenosis and neointimal hyperplasia. [126]
Heparan sulfate Hypertension CAR (peptide) Inhibit SMC proliferation and migration [127]
Cardiomyocytes Unknown MI CSTSMLKAC (peptide) Reduce cardiomyocytes necrosis and infarct area [128, 129]
Platelet GPIIb-IIIa Vascular injury RGD Imaging the aggravation of platelets. [130]

HPMA, N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide; LCCA, ligated left common carotid arteries; MI, myocardial infarction.

Target ECs in vascular injured sites

Vascular intima, which is composed of a continuous ECs layer, maintains the physiological homeostasis of blood vessels [131]. During cardiovascular events, activated ECs can undergo a dramatic transition in their functional phenotype in response to injury and inflammation [132, 133]. Furthermore, inflammatory ECs highly express many adhesion molecules (e.g. ICAM1, VCAM1, E-selectin and P-selectin), which play an important role in immune recruitment [134, 135]. Thus, designing drugs based on these inflammatory biomarkers of ECs can enhance the likelihood of EC targeting and uptake by activated ECs (Table 2). Our lab’s recent study uses integrin α4β1 highly expressed macrophage membrane to encapsulate rapamycin for inhibiting cell inflammation and autophagy. These biomimetic EVs can significantly target activated ECs (Vcam1+) and efficiently reduce inflammation and atherosclerotic plaque [70]. Moreover, MI as coronary acute ischemia and hypoxia-induced injury needs therapeutic angiogenesis to restore the blood supply. Thus, recent study has used cardiac homing peptide conjugated with cardiac stem cell-derived exosomes to target infarcted heart for regenerative therapy. These targeting exosomes can promote EC proliferation, which contributes to promoting angiogenesis and reducing scar size in heart [136].

Target macrophages/monocytes in vascular injured sites

Macrophages/monocytes, as an important member of immune system, can be recruited to the injured site as soon as 15 min [54], and differentiate into pro-inflammatory M1 and anti-inflammatory M2 macrophages according to the injured degree and type of the injured location [137]; whereas uncontrivable M1 macrophages in cardiovascular will exacerbate a variety of inflammation-based disorders, such as atherosclerosis, MI, intimal hyperplasia and so on [11, 18]. During myocardial I/R or other vascular injured diseases, abnormally accumulating M1 macrophages will result in inflammation and a disturbing reparative stage. Therefore, modulation of macrophage polarization is an important method for myocardial and vascular repair. Recent research has used MSC-derived EVs fusing with platelet membrane to mimic the binding effect of platelet Cd62p to macrophage Psg1. These modified EVs successfully reprogram M1 macrophages to M2 macrophages and accelerate cardiac repair [138]. Moreover, macrophage polarization markers such as M1 marker: MARCO, HLA-DPB1, CD80, CD86; M2 marker: MRC1, CD163, CD209, CLEC7A also can be used to design macrophages’ targeting EVs [139]. Macrophages that engulf excessive lipids and apoptotic cells via scavenger receptors (CD36, MSR1 and LOX-1) will form foam cells in vascular, resulting in tissue inflammation and apoptosis [140]. Nie et al. have used KOdiA-PC-modified liposome-like vesicles to target macrophage CD36 receptor and demonstrate that vesicles can co-localize with CD36+ macrophages and accumulation in vulnerable and inflammatory atherosclerotic plaque [125].

Target VSMCs/cardiomyocytes in vascular injured sites

VSMCs are the main cell types involved in constituting arterial vascular wall and ensuring vascular tension. The disorder of VSMCs will trans-differentiate to multiple cells including osteoblasts-like VSMC (Runx2, Msx2), macrophage-like VSMCs (Mac2, Cd11b) and synthetic VSMCs with proliferative property, which contribute to the progression of cardiovascular diseases such as hypertension, atherosclerosis and so on [141]. Thus, recent research mainly focuses on inhibiting the ‘malignant’ proliferation and trans-differentiation of VSMCs in the neointima during vascular injury. Wang et al. have used CAR peptide to modify MSC-derived EVs for targeted pulmonary hypertension therapy. CAR-modified EVs significantly target abnormal SMC and inhibit hypoxia-induced proliferation, migration and phenotype transition of SMC during pulmonary hypertension [127]. Moreover, Because PDGFRβ is overexpressed in proliferative SMC, PDGF–BB peptide conjunct dexamethasone–PLGA NP is designed to target injured SMCs, exhibiting significant inhibition of SMCs’ proliferation [126].

Cardiomyocytes as part of muscle cells play an important role in cardiac function. During myocardial I/R injury and infarction, cardiomyocytes as the main stimulus for the inflammation result in excessive necrosis and cardiac dysfunction. Thus, recent researchers have used myocardium‐targeting peptides to modify stem cell-derived exosomes for targeting injured cardiomyocytes, which significantly reduce cardiomyocytes necrosis and infarct area, and have improved cardiac function [128, 129].

Discussion

EVs, as secreted plasma membrane cargo carriers, are released from diversities of cells into blood flow and substantive organization under both developmental and stress environments [142]. In the past decades, a lot of work have indicated the physiological functions of EVs, which are essential for intercellular communication and the transduction of biological signals [143]. Cardiovascular diseases, which are accompanied by many risk factors, have complex disease processes and pathogenesis. EVs from vascular injured sites, due to their effect on inflammation, thrombosis, angiogenesis and endothelial homeostasis, play an important role in the initiation and progression of vascular regeneration [144–146]. Meanwhile, recent researchers have reported that exosomes derived from MSCs, as stent coating materials, can accelerate re-endothelialization and promote vascular repair after stent implantation [81, 147], whereas there are still three main limitations in EVs’ drug delivery system: (i) the isolation and purification of EVs especially in <100 nm exosomes currently need ultra-high-speed centrifuge with >100 000 g centrifugal force; (ii) given that the content of EV is determined by its donor cell or tissue fluid, the heterogeneity of donor cell is reflected in the EV, which needs bioengineered methods to reduce this heterogeneity; and (iii) the natural EVs, as the cellular membrane leaflet, have low functional proteins to recognize abnormal cells during targeted therapy.

To improve the EV-drug delivery system, researchers utilize a variety of bioengineered methods to modify natural EVs [148]. Recent efforts rationally provide a contemporary design for EVs-secreting cells to increase targeting components of EVs via stimulating induction and biogenetic modulation (Fig. 2). EVs derived from stem cells during inducing conditions (such as inflammation [149, 150], hypoxia [151] and so on) can improve vascular function and reduce unexpected inflammation after injury. Furthermore, EVs also can be pre-loaded with exogenous compounds (such as miRNA [152], lncRNA [153] and cytokines [154]) to enhance the bioactivity of EVs. Meanwhile, recent study has found that overexpression of glycolytic enzyme glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase in donor cells can increase the loading efficiency of siRNA and the generative rate of EVs [155]. However, compared with recent nanotechnology, the therapeutic effect and targeting accuracy of natural EVs still need to be enhanced.

Nowadays, biomimetic sEVs derived from synthetic cell membranes are widely utilized for targeted drug delivery, which has high biocompatibility, prolonger circulating time as well as specifically targeted ability. Recent research has created newly mimic exosomes, which combine synthetic liposome and macrophage-derived EVs to enhance drug delivery efficiency [156]. Furthermore, our recent researches find that synthetic RBC-derived sEVs can prolong circulating time, significantly attenuate the progression of atherosclerosis [71] and specifically be enriched in low shear stress area [157]. Moreover, synthetic EVs can also be modified to construct targeting structures on the membrane surface via genetic engineering and chemical conjunction [158, 159].

Overall, EVs as cell-based therapies for vascular injury take unique advantages of surviving in the circulation, breaking through the vascular barrier and delivering molecular cargo to recipient cells. Moreover, EVs can be modulated and synthesized through bioengineered methods, which can easily enhance the bioactivity and targeting of EVs. Meanwhile, during vascular injury, EVs as biological agents derived from repairing cells play an important mediator in the pathophysiological process. Bioengineered EVs loading with single or multiple biomolecules and drugs are emerging as therapeutic methods for vascular regeneration.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all other members of the Professor Guixue Wang’s laboratory for their constructive discussions as well as the support from the Public Experiment Center of State Bioindustrial Base (Chongqing), China.

Contributor Information

Jianxiong Xu, Key Laboratory for Biorheological Science and Technology of Ministry of Education, State and Local Joint Engineering Laboratory for Vascular Implants, Bioengineering Modern Life Science Experiment Teaching Center of Bioengineering College, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China.

Jinxuan Wang, Key Laboratory for Biorheological Science and Technology of Ministry of Education, State and Local Joint Engineering Laboratory for Vascular Implants, Bioengineering Modern Life Science Experiment Teaching Center of Bioengineering College, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China.

Yidan Chen, Key Laboratory for Biorheological Science and Technology of Ministry of Education, State and Local Joint Engineering Laboratory for Vascular Implants, Bioengineering Modern Life Science Experiment Teaching Center of Bioengineering College, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China.

Yuanfang Hou, Key Laboratory for Biorheological Science and Technology of Ministry of Education, State and Local Joint Engineering Laboratory for Vascular Implants, Bioengineering Modern Life Science Experiment Teaching Center of Bioengineering College, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China.

Jianjun Hu, Department of Pathology, Guizhou Provincial People’s Hospital, Guiyang 550002, China.

Guixue Wang, Key Laboratory for Biorheological Science and Technology of Ministry of Education, State and Local Joint Engineering Laboratory for Vascular Implants, Bioengineering Modern Life Science Experiment Teaching Center of Bioengineering College, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400030, China.

Authors’ contributions

G.W., J.W. and J.X. conceived the idea. J.X. and J.W. performed original draft preparation. J.W., J.X., J.H. drafted the picture and table. G.W., J.H. and J.X. wrote and revised the article. G.W. made final approval of the article.

Funding

The work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [Grant Nos. 12032007, 31971242] to G.W.; Chongqing Science and Technology Bureau [Grant No. cstc2019jcyj-zdxmX0028] to G.W.; Chongqing Municipal Education Commission, China [Grant No. KYYJ202001] to G.W.; Guizhou Provincial Science and Technology Projects [Grant No. Qiankehejichu(2018)1103] to J.H.

Conflicts of interest statement. All authors state that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1. Gaudino M, Antoniades C, Benedetto U, Deb S, Di Franco A, Di Giammarco G, Fremes S, Glineur D, Grau J, He GW, Marinelli D, Ohmes LB, Patrono C, Puskas J, Tranbaugh R, Girardi LN, Taggart DP, Alliance A;. ATLANTIC (Arterial Grafting International Consortium) Alliance. Mechanisms, consequences, and prevention of coronary graft failure. Circulation 2017;136:1749–64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Chaabane C, Otsuka F, Virmani R, Bochaton-Piallat ML.. Biological responses in stented arteries. Cardiovasc Res 2013;99:353–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Furchgott RF, Zawadzki JV.. The obligatory role of endothelial cells in the relaxation of arterial smooth muscle by acetylcholine. Nature 1980;288:373–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Brevetti G, Giugliano G, Brevetti L, Hiatt WR.. Inflammation in peripheral artery disease. Circulation 2010;122:1862–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Adhyaru BB, Jacobson TA.. Safety and efficacy of statin therapy. Nat Rev Cardiol 2018;15:757–69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Makaryus JN, Halperin JL, Lau JF.. Oral anticoagulants in the management of venous thromboembolism. Nat Rev Cardiol 2013;10:397–409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Antimisiaris SG, Mourtas S, Marazioti A.. Exosomes and exosome-inspired vesicles for targeted drug delivery. Pharmaceutics 2018;10:218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Thery C, Ostrowski M, Segura E.. Membrane vesicles as conveyors of immune responses. Nat Rev Immunol 2009;9:581–93. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. van der Meel R, Fens MH, Vader P, van Solinge WW, Eniola-Adefeso O, Schiffelers RM.. Extracellular vesicles as drug delivery systems: lessons from the liposome field. J Control Release 2014;195:72–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Matsumoto J, Stewart T, Banks WA, Zhang J.. The transport mechanism of extracellular vesicles at the blood–brain barrier. Curr Pharm Des 2017;23:6206–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Yan W, Li T, Yin T, Hou Z, Qu K, Wang N, Durkan C, Dong L, Qiu J, Gregersen H, Wang G.. M2 macrophage-derived exosomes promote the c-KIT phenotype of vascular smooth muscle cells during vascular tissue repair after intravascular stent implantation. Theranostics 2020;10:10712–28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Zhang Y, Chen S, Zhang H, Ma C, Du T, Qiao A.. Model construction and numerical simulation of arterial remodeling after stent implantation with variations of cell concentration. Med Nov Technol Devices 2022;16:100144. [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Wang H, Xing M, Deng W, Qian M, Wang F, Wang K, Midgley AC, Zhao Q.. Anti-Sca-1 antibody-functionalized vascular grafts improve vascular regeneration via selective capture of endogenous vascular stem/progenitor cells. Bioact Mater 2022;16:433–50. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Zhang L, Wei Q, Liu X, Zhang T, Wang S, Zhou L, Zou L, Fan F, Chi H, Sun J, Wang D.. Exosomal microRNA-98-5p from hypoxic bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells inhibits myocardial ischemia–reperfusion injury by reducing TLR4 and activating the PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Int Immunopharmacol 2021;101:107592. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Qiao S, Zhang W, Yin Y, Wei Z, Chen F, Zhao J, Sun X, Mu D, Xie J, Xu B.. Extracellular vesicles derived from Krüppel-Like factor 2-overexpressing endothelial cells attenuate myocardial ischemia–reperfusion injury by preventing Ly6C(high) monocyte recruitment. Theranostics 2020;10:11562–79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Wang J, Chen S, Zhang W, Chen Y, Bihl JC.. Exosomes from miRNA-126-modified endothelial progenitor cells alleviate brain injury and promote functional recovery after stroke. CNS Neurosci Ther 2020;26:1255–65. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Hu H, Wang B, Jiang C, Li R, Zhao J.. Endothelial progenitor cell-derived exosomes facilitate vascular endothelial cell repair through shuttling miR-21-5p to modulate Thrombospondin-1 expression. Clin Sci (Lond) 2019;133:1629–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Liu S, Chen J, Shi J, Zhou W, Wang L, Fang W, Zhong Y, Chen X, Chen Y, Sabri A, Liu S.. M1-like macrophage-derived exosomes suppress angiogenesis and exacerbate cardiac dysfunction in a myocardial infarction microenvironment. Basic Res Cardiol 2020;115:22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Yang Y, Guo Z, Chen W, Wang X, Cao M, Han X, Zhang K, Teng B, Cao J, Wu W, Cao P, Huang C, Qiu Z.. M2 macrophage-derived exosomes promote angiogenesis and growth of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma by targeting E2F2. Mol Ther 2021;29:1226–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Wang Z, Zhao Y, Zhao Y, Zhang Y, Yao X, Hang R.. Exosomes secreted by macrophages upon copper ion stimulation can promote angiogenesis. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2021;123:111981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Hergenreider E, Heydt S, Tréguer K, Boettger T, Horrevoets AJ, Zeiher AM, Scheffer MP, Frangakis AS, Yin X, Mayr M, Braun T, Urbich C, Boon RA, Dimmeler S.. Atheroprotective communication between endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells through miRNAs. Nat Cell Biol 2012;14:249–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Lin X, Li S, Wang YJ, Wang Y, Zhong JY, He JY, Cui XJ, Zhan JK, Liu YS.. Exosomal Notch3 from high glucose-stimulated endothelial cells regulates vascular smooth muscle cells calcification/aging. Life Sci 2019;232:116582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Bouchareychas L, Duong P, Covarrubias S, Alsop E, Phu TA, Chung A, Gomes M, Wong D, Meechoovet B, Capili A, Yamamoto R, Nakauchi H, McManus MT, Carpenter S, Van Keuren-Jensen K, Raffai RL.. Macrophage exosomes resolve atherosclerosis by regulating hematopoiesis and inflammation via MicroRNA cargo. Cell Rep 2020;32:107881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Nguyen MA, Karunakaran D, Geoffrion M, Cheng HS, Tandoc K, Perisic Matic L, Hedin U, Maegdefessel L, Fish JE, Rayner KJ.. Extracellular vesicles secreted by atherogenic macrophages transfer MicroRNA to inhibit cell migration. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2018;38:49–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Zhu J, Liu B, Wang Z, Wang D, Ni H, Zhang L, Wang Y.. Exosomes from nicotine-stimulated macrophages accelerate atherosclerosis through miR-21-3p/PTEN-mediated VSMC migration and proliferation. Theranostics 2019;9:6901–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Wang Z, Zhu H, Shi H, Zhao H, Gao R, Weng X, Liu R, Li X, Zou Y, Hu K, Sun A, Ge J.. Exosomes derived from M1 macrophages aggravate neointimal hyperplasia following carotid artery injuries in mice through miR-222/CDKN1B/CDKN1C pathway. Cell Death Dis 2019;10:422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Godo S, Shimokawa H.. Endothelial functions. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2017;37:e108–e114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Muñoz M, López-Oliva ME, Rodríguez C, Martínez MP, Sáenz-Medina J, Sánchez A, Climent B, Benedito S, García-Sacristán A, Rivera L, Hernández M, Prieto D.. Differential contribution of Nox1, Nox2 and Nox4 to kidney vascular oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction in obesity. Redox Biol 2020;28:101330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Heusch G, Libby P, Gersh B, Yellon D, Bohm M, Lopaschuk G, Opie L.. Cardiovascular remodelling in coronary artery disease and heart failure. Lancet 2014;383:1933–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. McDonald AI, Shirali AS, Aragon R, Ma F, Hernandez G, Vaughn DA, Mack JJ, Lim TY, Sunshine H, Zhao P, Kalinichenko V, Hai T, Pelegrini M, Ardehali R, Iruela-Arispe ML.. Endothelial regeneration of large vessels is a biphasic process driven by local cells with distinct proliferative capacities. Cell Stem Cell 2018;23:210–225.e6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Itoh Y, Toriumi H, Yamada S, Hoshino H, Suzuki N.. Resident endothelial cells surrounding damaged arterial endothelium reendothelialize the lesion. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2010;30:1725–32. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Zampetaki A, Kirton JP, Xu Q.. Vascular repair by endothelial progenitor cells. Cardiovasc Res 2008;78:413–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Wang M, Xu H, Li Y, Cao C, Zhu H, Wang Y, Zhao Z, Pei G, Zhu F, Yang Q, Deng X, Zhou C, Guo Y, Wu J, Liao W, Yang J, Yao Y, Zeng R.. Exogenous bone marrow derived-putative endothelial progenitor cells attenuate ischemia reperfusion-induced vascular injury and renal fibrosis in mice dependent on pericytes. Theranostics 2020;10:12144–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Yue Y, Wang C, Benedict C, Huang G, Truongcao M, Roy R, Cimini M, Garikipati VNS, Cheng Z, Koch WJ, Kishore R.. Interleukin-10 deficiency alters endothelial progenitor cell-derived exosome reparative effect on myocardial repair via integrin-linked kinase enrichment. Circ Res 2020;126:315–29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Bianconi V, Sahebkar A, Kovanen P, Bagaglia F, Ricciuti B, Calabro P, Patti G, Pirro M.. Endothelial and cardiac progenitor cells for cardiovascular repair: a controversial paradigm in cell therapy. Pharmacol Ther 2018;181:156–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Calabriso N, Stanca E, Rochira A, Damiano F, Giannotti L, Di Chiara Stanca B, Massaro M, Scoditti E, Demitri C, Nitti P, Palermo A, Siculella L, Carluccio MA.. Angiogenic properties of concentrated growth factors (CGFs): the role of soluble factors and cellular components. Pharmaceutics 2021;13:635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Ito MT, da Silva Costa SM, Baptista LC, Carvalho-Siqueira GQ, Albuquerque DM, Rios VM, Ospina-Prieto S, Saez RC, Vieira KP, Cendes F, Ozelo MC, Saad STO, Costa FF, Melo MB.. Angiogenesis-related genes in endothelial progenitor cells may be involved in sickle cell stroke. J Am Heart Assoc 2020;9:e014143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Fan X, He L, Dai Q, He J, Chen X, Dai X, Zhang C, Sun D, Meng X, Sun S, Huang J, Chen J, Lin L, Chen L, Tan Y, Yan X.. Interleukin-1β augments the angiogenesis of endothelial progenitor cells in an NF-κB/CXCR7-dependent manner. J Cell Mol Med 2020;24:5605–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Wakabayashi T, Naito H, Suehiro JI, Lin Y, Kawaji H, Iba T, Kouno T, Ishikawa-Kato S, Furuno M, Takara K, Muramatsu F, Weizhen J, Kidoya H, Ishihara K, Hayashizaki Y, Nishida K, Yoder MC, Takakura N.. CD157 marks tissue-resident endothelial stem cells with homeostatic and regenerative properties. Cell Stem Cell 2018;22:384–97.e6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Zhou Y, Li P, Goodwin AJ, Cook JA, Halushka PV, Chang E, Fan H.. Exosomes from endothelial progenitor cells improve the outcome of a murine model of sepsis. Mol Ther 2018;26:1375–84. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Li Y, Wang J, Chen S, Wu P, Xu S, Wang C, Shi H, Bihl J.. miR-137 boosts the neuroprotective effect of endothelial progenitor cell-derived exosomes in oxyhemoglobin-treated SH-SY5Y cells partially via COX2/PGE2 pathway. Stem Cell Res Ther 2020;11:330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Nakaya M, Watari K, Tajima M, Nakaya T, Matsuda S, Ohara H, Nishihara H, Yamaguchi H, Hashimoto A, Nishida M, Nagasaka A, Horii Y, Ono H, Iribe G, Inoue R, Tsuda M, Inoue K, Tanaka A, Kuroda M, Nagata S, Kurose H.. Cardiac myofibroblast engulfment of dead cells facilitates recovery after myocardial infarction. J Clin Invest 2017;127:383–401. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Evrard SM, Lecce L, Michelis KC, Nomura-Kitabayashi A, Pandey G, Purushothaman KR, d’Escamard V, Li JR, Hadri L, Fujitani K, Moreno PR, Benard L, Rimmele P, Cohain A, Mecham B, Randolph GJ, Nabel EG, Hajjar R, Fuster V, Boehm M, Kovacic JC.. Endothelial to mesenchymal transition is common in atherosclerotic lesions and is associated with plaque instability. Nat Commun 2016;7:11853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Hou Z, Yan W, Li T, Wu W, Cui Y, Zhang X, Chen YP, Yin T, Qiu J, Wang G.. Lactic acid-mediated endothelial to mesenchymal transition through TGF-β1 contributes to in-stent stenosis in poly-L-lactic acid stent. Int J Biol Macromol 2020;155:1589–98. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Shi J, Yang Y, Cheng A, Xu G, He F.. Metabolism of vascular smooth muscle cells in vascular diseases. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2020;319:H613–31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Bongiorno T, Chojnowski JL, Lauderdale JD, Sulchek T.. Cellular stiffness as a novel stemness marker in the corneal limbus. Biophys J 2016;111:1761–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Song L, Martinez L, Zigmond ZM, Hernandez DR, Lassance-Soares RM, Selman G, Vazquez-Padron RI.. Vazquez-Padron RI. c-Kit modifies the inflammatory status of smooth muscle cells. PeerJ 2017;5:e3418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Jeong Y, Yao Y, Yim EKF.. Current understanding of intimal hyperplasia and effect of compliance in synthetic small diameter vascular grafts. Biomater Sci 2020;8:4383–95. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Tian B, Ding X, Song Y, Chen W, Liang J, Yang L, Fan Y, Li S, Zhou Y.. Matrix stiffness regulates SMC functions via TGF-beta signaling pathway. Biomaterials 2019;221:119407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Ibrahim A, Ciullo A, Li C, Akhmerov A, Peck K, Jones-Ungerleider KC, Morris A, Marchevsky A, Marbàn E, Ibrahim AG.. Engineered fibroblast extracellular vesicles attenuate pulmonary inflammation and fibrosis in bleomycin-induced lung injury. Front Cell Dev Biol 2021;9:733158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Arishe OO, Priviero F, Wilczynski SA, Webb RC.. Exosomes as intercellular messengers in hypertension. Int J Mol Sci 2021;22:11685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Nathan C, Ding A.. Nonresolving inflammation. Cell 2010;140:871–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Tauzin S, Starnes TW, Becker FB, Lam PY, Huttenlocher A.. Redox and Src family kinase signaling control leukocyte wound attraction and neutrophil reverse migration. J Cell Biol 2014;207:589–98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Xu J, Wang J, Qiu J, Liu H, Wang Y, Cui Y, Humphry R, Wang N, DurKan C, Chen Y, Lu Y, Ma Q, Wu W, Luo Y, Xiao L, Wang G.. Nanoparticles retard immune cells recruitment in vivo by inhibiting chemokine expression. Biomaterials 2021;265:120392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Wynn TA, Vannella KM.. Macrophages in tissue repair, regeneration, and fibrosis. Immunity 2016;44:450–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Guo L, Akahori H, Harari E, Smith SL, Polavarapu R, Karmali V, Otsuka F, Gannon RL, Braumann RE, Dickinson MH, Gupta A, Jenkins AL, Lipinski MJ, Kim J, Chhour P, de Vries PS, Jinnouchi H, Kutys R, Mori H, Kutyna MD, Torii S, Sakamoto A, Choi CU, Cheng Q, Grove ML, Sawan MA, Zhang Y, Cao Y, Kolodgie FD, Cormode DP, Arking DE, Boerwinkle E, Morrison AC, Erdmann J, Sotoodehnia N, Virmani R, Finn AV.. CD163+ macrophages promote angiogenesis and vascular permeability accompanied by inflammation in atherosclerosis. J Clin Invest 2018;128:1106–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Hadi T, Boytard L, Silvestro M, Alebrahim D, Jacob S, Feinstein J, Barone K, Spiro W, Hutchison S, Simon R, Rateri D, Pinet F, Fenyo D, Adelman M, Moore KJ, Eltzschig HK, Daugherty A, Ramkhelawon B.. Macrophage-derived netrin-1 promotes abdominal aortic aneurysm formation by activating MMP3 in vascular smooth muscle cells. Nat Commun 2018;9:5022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Orecchioni M, Ghosheh Y, Pramod AB, Ley K.. Macrophage polarization: different gene signatures in M1(LPS+) vs. Classically and M2(LPS–) vs. alternatively activated macrophages. Front Immunol 2019;10:1084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Shapouri-Moghaddam A, Mohammadian S, Vazini H, Taghadosi M, Esmaeili SA, Mardani F, Seifi B, Mohammadi A, Afshari JT, Sahebkar A.. Macrophage plasticity, polarization, and function in health and disease. J Cell Physiol 2018;233:6425–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Kroner A, Greenhalgh AD, Zarruk JG, Passos-Dos Santos R, Gaestel M, David S.. TNF and increased intracellular iron alter macrophage polarization to a detrimental M1 phenotype in the injured spinal cord. Neuron 2014;83:1098–116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Liu C, Wu C, Yang Q, Gao J, Li L, Yang D, Luo L.. Macrophages mediate the repair of brain vascular rupture through direct physical adhesion and mechanical traction. Immunity 2016;44:1162–76. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Yang Y, Luo H, Zhou C, Zhang R, Liu S, Zhu X, Ke S, Liu H, Lu Z, Chen M.. Regulation of capillary tubules and lipid formation in vascular endothelial cells and macrophages via extracellular vesicle-mediated microRNA-4306 transfer. J Int Med Res 2019;47:453–69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Wu Z, Zhou M, Tang X, Zeng J, Li Y, Sun Y, Huang J, Chen L, Wan M, Mao C.. Carrier-free trehalose-based nanomotors targeting macrophages in inflammatory plaque for treatment of atherosclerosis. ACS Nano 2022;16:3808–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Bonnet S, Prévot G, Mornet S, Jacobin-Valat MJ, Mousli Y, Hemadou A, Duttine M, Trotier A, Sanchez S, Duonor-Cérutti M, Crauste-Manciet S, Clofent-Sanchez G.. A nano-emulsion platform functionalized with a fully human scFv-Fc antibody for atheroma targeting: towards a theranostic approach to atherosclerosis. Int J Mol Sci 2021;22:5188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. de Abreu RC, Fernandes H, da Costa Martins PA, Sahoo S, Emanueli C, Ferreira L.. Native and bioengineered extracellular vesicles for cardiovascular therapeutics. Nat Rev Cardiol 2020;17:685–97. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Chen CC, Liu L, Ma F, Wong CW, Guo XE, Chacko JV, Farhoodi HP, Zhang SX, Zimak J, Segaliny A, Riazifar M, Pham V, Digman MA, Pone EJ, Zhao W.. Elucidation of exosome migration across the blood–brain barrier model in vitro. Cell Mol Bioeng 2016;9:509–29. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Carmona-Ribeiro AM. Biomimetic nanoparticles: preparation, characterization and biomedical applications. Int J Nanomedicine 2010;5:249–59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Li B, Wang F, Gui L, He Q, Yao Y, Chen H.. The potential of biomimetic nanoparticles for tumor-targeted drug delivery. Nanomedicine (Lond) 2018;13:2099–118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Li L, Wang J, Kong H, Zeng Y, Liu G.. Functional biomimetic nanoparticles for drug delivery and theranostic applications in cancer treatment. Sci Technol Adv Mater 2018;19:771–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Wang Y, Zhang K, Li T, Maruf A, Qin X, Luo L, Zhong Y, Qiu J, McGinty S, Pontrelli G, Liao X, Wu W, Wang G.. Macrophage membrane functionalized biomimetic nanoparticles for targeted anti-atherosclerosis applications. Theranostics 2021;11:164–80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Wang Y, Zhang K, Qin X, Li T, Qiu J, Yin T, Huang J, McGinty S, Pontrelli G, Ren J, Wang Q, Wu W, Wang G.. Biomimetic nanotherapies: red blood cell based core-shell structured nanocomplexes for atherosclerosis management. Adv Sci (Weinh) 2019;6:1900172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Lv W, Xu J, Wang X, Li X, Xu Q, Xin H.. Bioengineered boronic ester modified dextran polymer nanoparticles as reactive oxygen species responsive nanocarrier for ischemic stroke treatment. ACS Nano 2018;12:5417–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Zhao Y, Xie R, Yodsanit N, Ye M, Wang Y, Gong S.. Biomimetic fibrin-targeted and H(2)O(2)-responsive nanocarriers for thrombus therapy. Nano Today 2020;35:100986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Luo L, Zang G, Liu B, Qin X, Zhang Y, Chen Y, Zhang H, Wu W, Wang G.. Bioengineering CXCR4-overexpressing cell membrane functionalized ROS-responsive nanotherapeutics for targeting cerebral ischemia–reperfusion injury. Theranostics 2021;11:8043–56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Wu G, Zhang J, Zhao Q, Zhuang W, Ding J, Zhang C, Gao H, Pang DW, Pu K, Xie HY.. Molecularly engineered macrophage-derived exosomes with inflammation tropism and intrinsic heme biosynthesis for atherosclerosis treatment. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2020;59:4068–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Xue Y, Zeng G, Cheng J, Hu J, Zhang M, Li Y.. Engineered macrophage membrane-enveloped nanomedicine for ameliorating myocardial infarction in a mouse model. Bioeng Transl Med 2021;6:e10197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Gao C, Huang Q, Liu C, Kwong CHT, Yue L, Wan JB, Lee SMY, Wang R.. Treatment of atherosclerosis by macrophage-biomimetic nanoparticles via targeted pharmacotherapy and sequestration of proinflammatory cytokines. Nat Commun 2020;11:2622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Brill A, Dashevsky O, Rivo J, Gozal Y, Varon D.. Platelet-derived microparticles induce angiogenesis and stimulate post-ischemic revascularization. Cardiovasc Res 2005;67:30–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Hu CM, Fang RH, Wang KC, Luk BT, Thamphiwatana S, Dehaini D, Nguyen P, Angsantikul P, Wen CH, Kroll AV, Carpenter C, Ramesh M, Qu V, Patel SH, Zhu J, Shi W, Hofman FM, Chen TC, Gao W, Zhang K, Chien S, Zhang L.. Nanoparticle biointerfacing by platelet membrane cloaking. Nature 2015;526:118–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Song Y, Huang Z, Liu X, Pang Z, Chen J, Yang H, Zhang N, Cao Z, Liu M, Cao J, Li C, Yang X, Gong H, Qian J, Ge J.. Platelet membrane-coated nanoparticle-mediated targeting delivery of rapamycin blocks atherosclerotic plaque development and stabilizes plaque in apolipoprotein E-deficient (ApoE(–/–)) mice. Nanomedicine 2019;15:13–24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Hu S, Li Z, Shen D, Zhu D, Huang K, Su T, Dinh PU, Cores J, Cheng K.. Exosome-eluting stents for vascular healing after ischaemic injury. Nat Biomed Eng 2021;5:1174–88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Yu B, Kim HW, Gong M, Wang J, Millard RW, Wang Y, Ashraf M, Xu M.. Exosomes secreted from GATA-4 overexpressing mesenchymal stem cells serve as a reservoir of anti-apoptotic microRNAs for cardioprotection. Int J Cardiol 2015;182:349–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Bose RJ, Kim BJ, Arai Y, Han IB, Moon JJ, Paulmurugan R, Park H, Lee SH.. Bioengineered stem cell membrane functionalized nanocarriers for therapeutic targeting of severe hindlimb ischemia. Biomaterials 2018;185:360–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Kim HY, Kim TJ, Kang L, Kim YJ, Kang MK, Kim J, Ryu JH, Hyeon T, Yoon BW, Ko SB, Kim BS.. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived magnetic extracellular nanovesicles for targeting and treatment of ischemic stroke. Biomaterials 2020;243:119942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Crawford JH, Chacko BK, Kevil CG, Patel RP.. The red blood cell and vascular function in health and disease. Antioxid Redox Signal 2004;6:992–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Giannopoulos G, Oudatzis G, Paterakis G, Synetos A, Tampaki E, Bouras G, Hahalis G, Alexopoulos D, Tousoulis D, Cleman MW, Stefanadis C, Deftereos S.. Red blood cell and platelet microparticles in myocardial infarction patients treated with primary angioplasty. Int J Cardiol 2014;176:145–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Zhu L, Zhong Y, Wu S, Yan M, Cao Y, Mou N, Wang G, Sun D, Wu W.. Cell membrane camouflaged biomimetic nanoparticles: focusing on tumor theranostics. Mater Today Bio 2022;14:100228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Usman WM, Pham TC, Kwok YY, Vu LT, Ma V, Peng B, Chan YS, Wei L, Chin SM, Azad A, He AB, Leung AYH, Yang M, Shyh-Chang N, Cho WC, Shi J, Le MTN.. Efficient RNA drug delivery using red blood cell extracellular vesicles. Nat Commun 2018;9:2359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Xia Q, Zhang Y, Li Z, Hou X, Feng N.. Red blood cell membrane-camouflaged nanoparticles: a novel drug delivery system for antitumor application. Acta Pharm Sin B 2019;9:675–89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Hu CM, Zhang L, Aryal S, Cheung C, Fang RH, Zhang L.. Erythrocyte membrane-camouflaged polymeric nanoparticles as a biomimetic delivery platform. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011;108:10980–5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Fan Z, Li PY, Deng J, Bady SC, Cheng H.. Cell membrane coating for reducing nanoparticle-induced inflammatory responses to scaffold constructs. Nano Res 2018;11:5573–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Su J, Sun H, Meng Q, Zhang P, Yin Q, Li Y.. Enhanced blood suspensibility and Laser-Activated tumor-specific drug release of theranostic mesoporous silica nanoparticles by functionalizing with erythrocyte membranes. Theranostics 2017;7:523–37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Gao W, Hu CM, Fang RH, Luk BT, Su J, Zhang L.. Surface functionalization of gold nanoparticles with red blood cell membranes. Adv Mater 2013;25:3549–53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Fontaine M, Herkenne S, Ek O, Paquot A, Boeckx A, Paques C, Nivelles O, Thiry M, Struman I.. Extracellular vesicles mediate communication between endothelial and vascular smooth muscle cells. Int J Mol Sci 2021;23:331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Madjid M, Awan I, Willerson JT, Casscells SW.. Leukocyte count and coronary heart disease: implications for risk assessment. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:1945–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Raffaele S, Gelosa P, Bonfanti E, Lombardi M, Castiglioni L, Cimino M, Sironi L, Abbracchio MP, Verderio C, Fumagalli M.. Microglial vesicles improve post-stroke recovery by preventing immune cell senescence and favoring oligodendrogenesis. Mol Ther 2021;29:1439–58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Liu B, Yan W, Luo L, Wu S, Wang Y, Zhong Y, Tang D, Maruf A, Yan M, Zhang K, Qin X, Qu K, Wu W, Wang G.. Macrophage membrane camouflaged reactive oxygen species responsive nanomedicine for efficiently inhibiting the vascular intimal hyperplasia. J Nanobiotechnology 2021;19:374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Shan X, Zhang C, Mai C, Hu X, Cheng N, Chen W, Peng D, Wang L, Ji Z, Xie Y.. The biogenesis, biological functions, and applications of macrophage-derived exosomes. Front Mol Biosci 2021;8:715461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Wu R, Gao W, Yao K, Ge J.. Roles of exosomes derived from immune cells in cardiovascular diseases. Front Immunol 2019;10:648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Wang Q, Ren Y, Mu J, Egilmez NK, Zhuang X, Deng Z, Zhang L, Yan J, Miller D, Zhang HG.. Grapefruit-derived nanovectors use an activated leukocyte trafficking pathway to deliver therapeutic agents to inflammatory tumor sites. Cancer Res 2015;75:2520–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Martinez JO, Molinaro R, Hartman KA, Boada C, Sukhovershin R, De Rosa E, Kirui D, Zhang S, Evangelopoulos M, Carter AM, Bibb JA, Cooke JP, Tasciotti E.. Biomimetic nanoparticles with enhanced affinity towards activated endothelium as versatile tools for theranostic drug delivery. Theranostics 2018;8:1131–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Schulz C, Massberg S.. Platelets in atherosclerosis and thrombosis. Handb Exp Pharmacol 2012;210:111–33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Fuentes QE, Fuentes QF, Andres V, Pello OM, Font de Mora J, Palomo GI.. Role of platelets as mediators that link inflammation and thrombosis in atherosclerosis. Platelets 2013;24:255–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Puhm F, Boilard E, Machlus KR.. Platelet extracellular vesicles: beyond the blood. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2021;41:87–96. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. Mause SF, Ritzel E, Liehn EA, Hristov M, Bidzhekov K, Müller-Newen G, Soehnlein O, Weber C.. Platelet microparticles enhance the vasoregenerative potential of angiogenic early outgrowth cells after vascular injury. Circulation 2010;122:495–506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Yu B, Zhang X, Li X.. Exosomes derived from mesenchymal stem cells. Int J Mol Sci 2014;15:4142–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Chen L, Mou S, Hou J, Fang H, Zeng Y, Sun J, Wang Z.. Simple application of adipose-derived stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles coating enhances cytocompatibility and osteoinductivity of titanium implant. Regen Biomater 2021;8:rbaa038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Yeo RW, Lai RC, Zhang B, Tan SS, Yin Y, Teh BJ, Lim SK.. Mesenchymal stem cell: an efficient mass producer of exosomes for drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2013;65:336–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Zhao J, Li X, Hu J, Chen F, Qiao S, Sun X, Gao L, Xie J, Xu B.. Mesenchymal stromal cell-derived exosomes attenuate myocardial ischaemia–reperfusion injury through miR-182-regulated macrophage polarization. Cardiovasc Res 2019;115:1205–16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Yoon JK, Kim DH, Kang ML, Jang HK, Park HJ, Lee JB, Yi SW, Kim HS, Baek S, Park DB, You J, Lee SD, Sei Y, Ahn SI, Shin YM, Kim CS, Bae S, Kim Y, Sung HJ.. Anti-atherogenic effect of stem cell nanovesicles targeting disturbed flow sites. Small 2020;16:e2000012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Li M, Xu Z, Zhang L, Cui M, Zhu M, Guo Y, Sun R, Han J, Song E, He Y, Su Y.. Targeted noninvasive treatment of choroidal neovascularization by hybrid cell-membrane-cloaked biomimetic nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2021;15:9808–19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Wang D, Dong H, Li M, Cao Y, Yang F, Zhang K, Dai W, Wang C, Zhang X.. Erythrocyte-cancer hybrid membrane camouflaged hollow copper sulfide nanoparticles for prolonged circulation life and homotypic-targeting photothermal/chemotherapy of melanoma. ACS Nano 2018;12:5241–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Jiang Q, Liu Y, Guo R, Yao X, Sung S, Pang Z, Yang W.. Erythrocyte-cancer hybrid membrane-camouflaged melanin nanoparticles for enhancing photothermal therapy efficacy in tumors. Biomaterials 2019;192:292–308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Dehaini D, Wei X, Fang RH, Masson S, Angsantikul P, Luk BT, Zhang Y, Ying M, Jiang Y, Kroll AV, Gao W, Zhang L.. Erythrocyte-platelet hybrid membrane coating for enhanced nanoparticle functionalization. Adv Mater 2017;29:1606209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Bu LL, Rao L, Yu GT, Chen L, Deng WW, Liu JF, Wu H, Meng QF, Guo SS, Zhao XZ, Zhang WF, Chen GJ, Gu Z, Liu W, Sun ZJ.. Cancer stem cell–platelet hybrid membrane-coated magnetic nanoparticles for enhanced photothermal therapy of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Adv Funct Mater 2019;29:1807733. [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Rao L, Meng QF, Huang QQ, Wang ZX, Yu GT, Li A, Ma WJ, Zhang NG, Guo SS, Zhao XZ, Liu K, Yuan YF, Liu W.. Platelet-leukocyte hybrid membrane-coated immunomagnetic beads for highly efficient and highly specific isolation of circulating tumor cells. Adv Funct Mater 2018;28:1803531. [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Chen HY, Deng J, Wang Y, Wu CQ, Li X, Dai HW.. Hybrid cell membrane-coated nanoparticles: a multifunctional biomimetic platform for cancer diagnosis and therapy. Acta Biomater 2020;112:1–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118. Hu S, Wang X, Li Z, Zhu D, Cores J, Wang Z, Li J, Mei X, Cheng X, Su T, Cheng K.. Platelet membrane and stem cell exosome hybrid enhances cellular uptake and targeting to heart injury. Nano Today 2021;39:101210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119. Zhong Y, Qin X, Wang Y, Qu K, Luo L, Zhang K, Liu B, Obaid E, Wu W, Wang G. “Plug and Play” functionalized erythrocyte nanoplatform for target atherosclerosis management. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 2021;13:33862–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120. Tsoref O, Tyomkin D, Amit U, Landa N, Cohen-Rosenboim O, Kain D, Golan M, Naftali-Shani N, David A, Leor J.. E-selectin-targeted copolymer reduces atherosclerotic lesions, adverse cardiac remodeling, and dysfunction. J Control Release 2018;288:136–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121. Ul Ain Q, Chung H, Chung JY, Choi JH, Kim YH.. Amelioration of atherosclerotic inflammation and plaques via endothelial adrenoceptor-targeted eNOS gene delivery using redox-sensitive polymer bearing l-arginine. J Control Release 2017;262:72–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Chung EJ, Mlinar LB, Nord K, Sugimoto MJ, Wonder E, Alenghat FJ, Fang Y, Tirrell M.. Monocyte-targeting supramolecular micellar assemblies: a molecular diagnostic tool for atherosclerosis. Adv Healthc Mater 2015;4:367–76. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. Luehmann HP, Pressly ED, Detering L, Wang C, Pierce R, Woodard PK, Gropler RJ, Hawker CJ, Liu Y.. PET/CT imaging of chemokine receptor CCR5 in vascular injury model using targeted nanoparticle. J Nucl Med 2014;55:629–34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124. Uchida M, Kosuge H, Terashima M, Willits DA, Liepold LO, Young MJ, McConnell MV, Douglas T.. Protein cage nanoparticles bearing the LyP-1 peptide for enhanced imaging of macrophage-rich vascular lesions. ACS Nano 2011;5:2493–502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125. Nie S, Zhang J, Martinez-Zaguilan R, Sennoune S, Hossen MN, Lichtenstein AH, Cao J, Meyerrose GE, Paone R, Soontrapa S, Fan Z, Wang S.. Detection of atherosclerotic lesions and intimal macrophages using CD36-targeted nanovesicles. J Control Release 2015;220:61–70. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126. Kona S, Specht D, Rahimi M, Shah BP, Gilbertson TA, Nguyen KT.. Targeted biodegradable nanoparticles for drug delivery to smooth muscle cells. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 2012;12:236–44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127. Wang J, Hu L, Huang H, Yu Y, Wang J, Yu Y, Li K, Li Y, Tian T, Chen F.. CAR (CARSKNKDC) peptide modified ReNcell-derived extracellular vesicles as a novel therapeutic agent for targeted pulmonary hypertension therapy. Hypertension 2020;76:1147–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128. Wang X, Chen Y, Zhao Z, Meng Q, Yu Y, Sun J, Yang Z, Chen Y, Li J, Ma T, Liu H, Li Z, Yang J, Shen Z.. Engineered exosomes with ischemic myocardium-targeting peptide for targeted therapy in myocardial infarction. J Am Heart Assoc 2018;7:e008737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129. Antes TJ, Middleton RC, Luther KM, Ijichi T, Peck KA, Liu WJ, Valle J, Echavez AK, Marbán E.. Targeting extracellular vesicles to injured tissue using membrane cloaking and surface display. J Nanobiotechnology 2018;16:61. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130. Srinivasan R, Marchant RE, Gupta AS.. In vitro and in vivo platelet targeting by cyclic RGD-modified liposomes. J Biomed Mater Res A 2010;93:1004–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131. Khaddaj Mallat R, Mathew John C, Kendrick DJ, Braun AP.. The vascular endothelium: a regulator of arterial tone and interface for the immune system. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 2017;54:458–70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132. Gimbrone MA, García-Cardeña G.. Vascular endothelium, hemodynamics, and the pathobiology of atherosclerosis. Cardiovasc Pathol 2013;22:9–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133. Topper JN, Gimbrone MA Jr. Blood flow and vascular gene expression: fluid shear stress as a modulator of endothelial phenotype. Mol Med Today 1999;5:40–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134. Vanhoutte PM. Endothelial dysfunction: the first step toward coronary arteriosclerosis. Circ J 2009;73:595–601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135. Galkina E, Ley K.. Vascular adhesion molecules in atherosclerosis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2007;27:2292–301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136. Vandergriff A, Huang K, Shen D, Hu S, Hensley MT, Caranasos TG, Qian L, Cheng K.. Targeting regenerative exosomes to myocardial infarction using cardiac homing peptide. Theranostics 2018;8:1869–78. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137. Wu H, Zheng J, Xu S, Fang Y, Wu Y, Zeng J, Shao A, Shi L, Lu J, Mei S, Wang X, Guo X, Wang Y, Zhao Z, Zhang J.. Mer regulates microglial/macrophage M1/M2 polarization and alleviates neuroinflammation following traumatic brain injury. J Neuroinflammation 2021;18:2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138. Li Q, Huang Z, Wang Q, Gao J, Chen J, Tan H, Li S, Wang Z, Weng X, Yang H, Pang Z, Song Y, Qian J, Ge J.. Targeted immunomodulation therapy for cardiac repair by platelet membrane engineering extracellular vesicles via hitching peripheral monocytes. Biomaterials 2022;284:121529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139. Stöger JL, Gijbels MJ, van der Velden S, Manca M, van der Loos CM, Biessen EA, Daemen MJ, Lutgens E, de Winther MP.. Distribution of macrophage polarization markers in human atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis 2012;225:461–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140. Tabas I, Bornfeldt KE.. Macrophage phenotype and function in different stages of atherosclerosis. Circ Res 2016;118:653–67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141. Durham AL, Speer MY, Scatena M, Giachelli CM, Shanahan CM.. Role of smooth muscle cells in vascular calcification: implications in atherosclerosis and arterial stiffness. Cardiovasc Res 2018;114:590–600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142. Raposo G, Stoorvogel W.. Extracellular vesicles: exosomes, microvesicles, and friends. J Cell Biol 2013;200:373–83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143. van Niel G, D’Angelo G, Raposo G.. Shedding light on the cell biology of extracellular vesicles. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2018;19:213–28. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144. Ma Y, Yang X, Chatterjee V, Meegan JE, Beard RS Jr, Yuan SY.. Role of neutrophil extracellular traps and vesicles in regulating vascular endothelial permeability. Front Immunol 2019;10:1037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145. Chen B, Li Q, Zhao B, Wang Y.. Stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles as a novel potential therapeutic tool for tissue repair. Stem Cells Transl Med 2017;6:1753–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146. Todorova D, Simoncini S, Lacroix R, Sabatier F, Dignat-George F.. Extracellular vesicles in angiogenesis. Circ Res 2017;120:1658–73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147. Gardin C, Ferroni L, Erdoğan YK, Zanotti F, De Francesco F, Trentini M, Brunello G, Ercan B, Zavan B.. Nanostructured modifications of titanium surfaces improve vascular regenerative properties of exosomes derived from mesenchymal stem cells: preliminary in vitro results. Nanomaterials (Basel) 2021;11:3452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148. Vader P, Mol EA, Pasterkamp G, Schiffelers RM.. Extracellular vesicles for drug delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2016;106:148–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149. Xu R, Zhang F, Chai R, Zhou W, Hu M, Liu B, Chen X, Liu M, Xu Q, Liu N, Liu S.. Exosomes derived from pro-inflammatory bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells reduce inflammation and myocardial injury via mediating macrophage polarization. J Cell Mol Med 2019;23:7617–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150. Loyer X, Zlatanova I, Devue C, Yin M, Howangyin KY, Klaihmon P, Guerin CL, Kheloufi M, Vilar J, Zannis K, Fleischmann BK, Hwang DW, Park J, Lee H, Menasche P, Silvestre JS, Boulanger CM.. Intra-cardiac release of extracellular vesicles shapes inflammation following myocardial infarction. Circ Res 2018;123:100–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151. Gray WD, French KM, Ghosh-Choudhary S, Maxwell JT, Brown ME, Platt MO, Searles CD, Davis ME.. Identification of therapeutic covariant microRNA clusters in hypoxia-treated cardiac progenitor cell exosomes using systems biology. Circ Res 2015;116:255–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152. Wei Z, Qiao S, Zhao J, Liu Y, Li Q, Wei Z, Dai Q, Kang L, Xu B.. miRNA-181a over-expression in mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes influenced inflammatory response after myocardial ischemia–reperfusion injury. Life Sci 2019;232:116632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153. Born LJ, Harmon JW, Jay SM.. Therapeutic potential of extracellular vesicle-associated long noncoding RNA. Bioeng Transl Med 2020;5:e10172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154. Tang TT, Wang B, Wu M, Li ZL, Feng Y, Cao JY, Yin D, Liu H, Tang RN, Crowley SD, Lv LL, Liu BC.. Extracellular vesicle-encapsulated IL-10 as novel nanotherapeutics against ischemic AKI. Sci Adv 2020;6:eaaz0748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155. Dar GH, Mendes CC, Kuan WL, Speciale AA, Conceicao M, Gorgens A, Uliyakina I, Lobo MJ, Lim WF, El Andaloussi S, Mager I, Roberts TC, Barker RA, Goberdhan DCI, Wilson C, Wood MJA.. GAPDH controls extracellular vesicle biogenesis and enhances the therapeutic potential of EV mediated siRNA delivery to the brain. Nat Commun 2021;12:6666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156. Rayamajhi S, Nguyen TDT, Marasini R, Aryal S.. Macrophage-derived exosome-mimetic hybrid vesicles for tumor targeted drug delivery. Acta Biomater 2019;94:482–94. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157. Qin X, Zhang K, Qiu J, Wang N, Qu K, Cui Y, Huang J, Luo L, Zhong Y, Tian T, Wu W, Wang Y, Wang G.. Uptake of oxidative stress-mediated extracellular vesicles by vascular endothelial cells under low magnitude shear stress. Bioact Mater 2022;9:397–410. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158. Park JH, Jiang Y, Zhou JR, Gong H, Mohapatra A, Heo JY, Gao WW, Fang RH, Zhang LF.. Genetically engineered cell membrane-coated nanoparticles for targeted delivery of dexamethasone to inflamed lungs. Sci Adv 2021;7:eabf7820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159. Tang D, Wang Y, Wijaya A, Liu BY, Maruf A, Wang JX, Xu JX, Liao XL, Wu W, Wang GX.. ROS-responsive biomimetic nanoparticles for potential application in targeted anti-atherosclerosis. Regen Biomater 2021;8:rbab033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Regenerative Biomaterials are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES