Skip to main content
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology logoLink to Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
. 2022 Jun 15;72(5):673–675. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2022.05.008

Next generation in ultrasound imaging to assess upper airway

Miguel Ángel Fernandez-Vaquero a,b,⁎, Ernesto Delgado-Cidranes c, Robert Greif d,e
PMCID: PMC9515680  PMID: 35714713

Point of Care Ultrasound (POCUS) is well established in anesthetic practice but underused for and during airway management. In addition to 2D images, three/four Dimensional (3D/4D) ultrasound technology provides clearer and more accurate imaging for airway, and additional visual information to diagnose potential pathological conditions more efficiently.1 Moreover, POCUS facilitates rapid screening for possible difficult laryngoscopy2 and identification of the cricothyroid membrane.3 We present a complete four-step upper airway assessment in 2D (Column 1) images and the correspondence with 3D/4D images (Column 2), and the position for ultrasound probe (Column 3).

Figure 1 shows four-step measurements of ultrasound parameters that assess upper airway anatomy suggesting difficult laryngoscopy. Picture 1a and 1b corresponds to Hyomental Distance (HMD) in Midline Sagittal Plane (MSP); Picture 2a and 2b is the Distance from Skin to Hyoid bone (DSH) in Transversely Plane (TP); Picture 3a and 3b shows the Distance from Skin to Epiglottis (DSE) in TP; Picture 4a and 4b displays the Distance from Skin to Vocal Cords (DSVC) in TP.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Four-step measurements of ultrasound parameters that assess upper airway anatomy suggesting difficult laryngoscopy. Column 1: 2D images; Column 2: 3D/4D images. Gained from a Voluson Swift ultrasound machine and a Convex Array Volume Probe (GE; Little Chalfont, UK). QR available. Picture 1a/b Midline sagittal scan of Hyomental Distance (HMD); Hyoid bone; Mandible; Genioglossus muscle; Palate; Mylohyoid Muscle (MH) and Geniohyoid Muscle (GH). Picture 2a/b transverse midline scan of Distance from Skin to hyoid bone (DSH) and Hyoid bone. Picture 3a/b transverse midline scan of Distance from Skin to Epiglottis (DSE); Pre-Epiglottic Space (PRE-E); Epiglottis and Air-Mucosa interface (A-M). Picture 4a/b transverse midline scan of Distance from Skin to Vocal Cords (DSVC); Anterior Commissure (AC); True Cords (TC); False Cords (FC); Arytenoids and Thyroid cartilage. Picture 5 the position of the ultrasound probe for pictures 1-2-3-4 respectively.

Figure 2 shows four-step tracheal structures to identify the cricothyroid membrane. Pictures 1a and 1b corresponds to Cricoid cartilage in TP; Pictures 2a and 2b, to tracheal rings in TP; Pictures 3a and 3b, to Cricoid cartilage and tracheal rings in MSP and Pictures 4a and 4b, to cricothyroid membrane in MSP.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Four-step tracheal structures to identify the cricothyroid membrane. Column 1: 2D images; Column 2. 3D/4D images. Gained from a Voluson Swift ultrasound machine and a Convex Array Volume Probe (GE; Little Chalfont, UK). QR available. Picture 1a/b transverse midline scan of Cricoid cartilage. Picture 2a/b transverse midline scan of a tracheal ring; Airway and Air-Mucosa interface (A-M). Picture 3a/b midline sagittal scan of Cricoid cartilage; Tracheal rings and airway. Picture 4a/b midline sagittal scan of Thyroid Cartilage (Thyroid C.); Cricothyroid Membrane (C-T Membrane); Cricoid cartilage (Cricoid C.); Airway and Air-Mucosa interface (A-M). Picture 5 the position of the ultrasound probe for pictures 1-2-3-4 respectively.

Presentation

The images have been accepted for presentation at Euroanaesthesia (June 2022 Milan, Italy), the annual conference of ESAIC (European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care).

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

EDC is Editor in Chief at the Journal of Pain Management and Therapy and CEO/Founder at Advanced Pain & Gynecology Research International Center (CIMEG), Madrid. RG is Board Member and Treasurer of the European Airway Management Society (EAMS).

Footnotes

Supplementary material associated with this article can be found in the online version at doi:10.1016/j.bjane.2022.05.008.

Appendix. Supplementary materials

Download video file (191KB, mp4)
Download video file (135.9KB, mp4)
Download video file (170KB, mp4)
mmc4.docx (3.5MB, docx)

References

  • 1.Apfelbaum JL, Hagberg CA, Connis RT, et al. 2022 American Society of Anesthesiologists Practice Guidelines for Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology. 2022;136:31–81. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Sotoodehnia M, Rafiemanesh H, Mirfazaelian H, Safaie A, Baratloo A. Ultrasonography indicators for predicting difficult intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Emerg Med. 2021;21:76. doi: 10.1186/s12873-021-00472-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Austin DR, Chang MG, Bittner EA. Use of handheld point-of-care ultrasound in emergency airway management. Chest. 2021:159. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2020.09.083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Download video file (191KB, mp4)
Download video file (135.9KB, mp4)
Download video file (170KB, mp4)
mmc4.docx (3.5MB, docx)

Articles from Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES