Skip to main content
Oncotarget logoLink to Oncotarget
. 2022 Sep 28;13:1068. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.28266

Correction: Exploratory comparisons between different anti-mitotics in clinically-used drug combination in triple negative breast cancer

Bruna Cândido Guido 1, Douglas Cardoso Brandão 1, Ana Luisa Augusto Barbosa 1, Monique Jacob Xavier Vianna 1, Lucas Faro 1, Luciana Machado Ramos 2, Fabíola Nihi 1, Márcio Botelho de Castro 3, Brenno AD Neto 4, José Raimundo Corrêa 1,, Sônia Nair Báo 1,
PMCID: PMC9518687  PMID: 36187557

This article has been corrected: In Supplementary Figure 1, there is an accidental image overlap of panel C across panel D. The corrected figure with the new panel D, obtained from the original data, is shown below. The authors declare that these corrections do not change the results or conclusions of this paper.

Supplementary Figure 1. Histopathological analysis of lung sections in control animal and upon monotherapy or drug combination treatments.

Supplementary Figure 1

Representative images of paraffin-embedded sections of lungs stained with H&E from the different experimental groups: (A) Healthy control, or administered intraperitoneally (i.p.) with: (B) vehicle, (C) 4bt (80 mg/Kg), (D) 4bc (80 mg/Kg), (E) paclitaxel (20 mg/Kg), (F) Doxorubicin (10 mg/Kg) + Cyclophosphamide (100 mg/Kg) followed by paclitaxel (10 mg/Kg) (AC-T) and (G) Doxorubicin (10 mg/Kg) + Cyclophosphamide (100 mg/Kg) followed by KIF11 inhibitor 4bt (AC-4bt). Metastatic foci or morphological alterations were not observed in any experimental group compared to control of healthy animals. Bars: 200 μm.

Original article: Oncotarget. 2021; 12:1920–1936. 1920-1936. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.28068


Articles from Oncotarget are provided here courtesy of Impact Journals, LLC

RESOURCES