Abstract
Background/objectives: Diagnosis of human infection by various species of the bacterial genus Borrelia is mainly reliant on serological testing, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or culture but such serological tests have been reported to have heterogeneous sensitivities, while Borrelia PCR and culture have been reported as being of modest diagnostic value. It has been suggested that the adjunctive use of the lymphocyte transformation test-memory lymphocyte immunostimulation assay (LTT-MELISA) may be helpful in this regard; however, the clinical usefulness of this assay has been questioned. The Borrelia immunodominant 41-kDa flagellin protein almost always gives rise to a marked human antibody response following infection. It was therefore decided to determine whether the LTT-MELISA detects the human antibody response to this antigen. Methods: Blood samples from consecutive patients with possible borreliosis attending a clinic were independently tested by both Western blots and LTT-MELISA. Results: After omitting cases with indeterminate Western blot results and equivocal LTT-MELISA results, multiple linear regression modelling demonstrated that the 41-kDa flagellin immunoglobulin (Ig) M level was predictable from two LTT-MELISA variables (F 2,51 = 5.981, P = 0.005). Similarly, the corresponding 41-kDa IgG model also contained two LTT-MELISA variables (F 2,57 = 3.700, P = 0.031). Conclusion: It is concluded that the LTT-MELISA appears to be able to detect the response to this antigen.
Keywords: Flagellin, lymphocyte transformation test, MELISA
Introduction
The bacterial genus Borrelia belongs to the phylum Spirochaetota [1]. These spirochaetes are Gram negative and use axial filamentous endoflagella to enable movement to take place in a corkscrew-like fashion [2,3]. The endoflagellum of the bacterium is contained in the periplasmic space, amidst an outer envelope which provides protection, and comprises subunits of the globular protein flagellin; this protein has a molecular mass of 41 kDa [3]. The outer surface proteins (Osps) appear to play an important role in virulence, dissemination, tissue tropism and evasion of the host immune system by the bacteria [4,5].
Many species, including B. burgdorferi sensu stricto, B. garinii, B. afzelii, B. spielmanii and B. bavariensis, are associated with the arthropod-borne zoonosis Lyme borreliosis [6]. Other species, such as B. recurrentis, B. duttonii and B. turicatae, are associated with relapsing fever [7]. Clinical manifestations of Lyme borreliosis include dermatological lesions such as erythema migrans and acrodermatitis chronica atrophicans; arthritis; cardiac disorders such as conduction abnormalities, endocarditis, myocarditis and pericarditis; and neurological disorders such as polyradiculitis, meningoradiculoneuritis, (Garin-Bujadoux-Bannwarth syndrome), polyneuropathy, encephalitis, cerebral vasculitis and stroke [8-13]. Clinical manifestations of Borrelia-associated relapsing fever include, in the case of soft tick-borne relapsing fever, febrile episodes, chills, rigor, iritis, uveitis, acute respiratory distress, myocarditis, cranial nerve palsy and splenic rupture; and, in the case of louse-borne relapsing fever, febrile episodes, rigor, meningism, hepatomegaly, icterus, epistaxis, dermatological lesions, subconjunctival haemorrhage, acute respiratory distress, splenic rupture, disseminated intravascular coagulation and coma [7,14,15].
Diagnosis of human infection by various Borrelia species is mainly reliant on serological testing, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or culture [16]. However, the serological tests have been reported to have heterogeneous sensitivities, while Borrelia PCR and culture have been reported as being of modest diagnostic value [16,17].
To address these difficulties, Valentine-Thon and colleagues developed a novel lymphocyte transformation test-memory lymphocyte immunostimulation assay (LTT-MELISA) using informative recombinant antigens [18]. Valentine-Thon and her colleagues reported that 86% of 90 LTT-MELISA positive patients were seropositive for borreliosis and symptomatic; the new assay was reported to have a specificity of almost 97% and a reproducibility of almost 93% [18]. A subsequent study by von Baehr and colleagues reported a sensitivity for clinically active borreliosis of this assay of over 89% and a specificity of almost 99% [19]. The latter group therefore suggested that this assay “could fill a gap in the difficult diagnostics of borreliosis” [20]. On the other hand, several groups have strongly argued against the use of this assay, partly on the basis that it has not been shown to be clinically useful [16,21,22], although this has been disputed [23,24].
Given that the Borrelia immunodominant 41-kDa flagellin protein almost always gives rise to a marked antibody response following infection [25-29], it could be argued that if the LTT-MELISA were clinically useful, then at the very least it should detect this response. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to determine whether the LTT-MELISA detects the human antibody response to this antigen. This represents an extension of a previous LTT-MELISA study by our group, in which we reported that, out of 45 patients who were seronegative for borreliosis according to the serodiagnostic algorithm recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 19 (42%) were positive by the LTT-MELISA [30,31].
Materials and methods
Subject samples
For clinical purposes, venous blood samples were obtained from 106 patients, 42 (40%) males and 64 females, of mean age 40.2 years (standard error 1.6 years), who presented consecutively to a clinic in the United Kingdom with a clinical history and symptomatology consistent the possibility of borreliosis. Inclusion criteria included being male or female; a history of one or more tick bites; a clinical history or physical signs of infection by Borrelia, without any clinical history or other evidence of an alternative aetiology, including any of the following: dermatological lesions such as erythema migrans; arthritis; cardiac disorders such as conduction abnormalities, endocarditis, myocarditis and pericarditis; and neurological disorders such as polyradiculitis, meningoradiculoneuritis, (Garin-Bujadoux-Bannwarth syndrome), polyneuropathy, encephalitis, cerebral vasculitis, stroke, relapsing unexplained pyrexia, meningism and cranial nerve involvement such as facial palsy. Patients for whom a non-Borrelia-related cause for their symptomatology was known were excluded. Part of each sample was centrifuged and the serum obtained sent for Western blot (immunoblot) analyses by IGeneX (Palo Alto, CA), while non-centrifuged whole blood was sent for LTT-MELISA assessments by LADR, Medizinisches Versorgungszenrum (Bremen, Germany). Both laboratories were blinded from each other in respect of these samples. This retrospective clinical audit received ethical approval from a Research Ethics Committee and was carried out according to the Declaration of Helsinki.
Outcome and predictor variables
The principal outcome variables were Western blot 41-kDa IgM and IgG levels. Each band intensity, xi , was classified as follows: negative (-): xi = 0 (that is, no band detected); indeterminate: 0 < xi < ci ; one-plus positive (+): xi = ci ; two-plus or greater (++ to ++++): xi > ci ; where ci is the intensity of the calibration standard corresponding to xi .
The predictor variables were the stimulation indices of wells in which peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were incubated with recombinant OspC from B. afzelii; recombinant OspC from B. burgdorferi sensu stricto; recombinant p41 from B. garinii; recombinant p41 from B. afzelii; recombinant p41 from B. burgdorferi sensu stricto; recombinant p100 from B. afzelii; recombinant peptide mix (OspA/VlsE from B. afzelii, B. garinii and B. burgdorferi sensu stricto); and full antigen lysate from B. burgdorferi sensu stricto.
The methodologies for carrying out the Western blots and the LTT-MELISA assessments are described, respectively, in the next two subsections.
Western blots
Ten microlitres of serum from each patient sample was aliquoted and tested using Western blot (immunoblot) strips prepared from a mixture of the B31 and 297 strains of B. burgdorferi, as previously described [32]. The B31 strain (vlsE B31) was isolated from the adult Ixodes dammini tick vector by Burgdorfer and colleagues in 1982, while the 297 strain (vlsE 297) was recovered from infected human cerebrospinal fluid by Steere and colleagues in 1983 [33-35]. Internal validation was carried out whereby each intensity of the 41-kDa IgM and IgG bands, xi , was compared with the corresponding calibration standard intensity, ci , and the result expressed on the ordinal scale described in the previous subsection.
LTT-MELISA
One million PBMCs in 1 mL medium from each of the subjects, and control samples, were incubated in a multi-well plate coated with recombinant Borrelia antigens at 310 K with 5% CO2 for five days, as described previously [18,36]. The recombinant antigens used are listed above and were present at three different dilutions. The samples were then exposed for five hours to methyl-3H-thymidine (Amersham Buchler, Brunswick) at a radioactive intensity of 3 μC (specific activity 185 GBq/mmol), following which the uptake of the radiolabelled thymidine was determined using a 1450 MicroBeta TriLux microplate scintillation and luminescence counter (PerkinElmer, Shelton, CT). The stimulation index (SI) of a given well was calculated as the ratio of its radioactive count to the mean reading from three control sample wells. The cut-offs were as follows: SI < 2: negative; 2 ≤ SI ≤ 3: a possible reaction; SI > 3: positive.
Statistical analysis
Multiple linear regression analyses were carried out with the Western blot 41-kDa IgM and IgG levels in turn as the outcome or dependent variable, each treated as a scale variable and not including any cases in which the IgM or IgG results were reported as being indeterminate. The LTT-MELISA variables given above were treated as predictor variables; any cases in which these variables were reported as being equivocal were not included. A backward method was used with a stepwise removal criterion of P > 0.1. The intercept was included in the analyses, corresponding in each case to a statistical error term. The statistical analyses were carried out using R v. 4.1.1 and JASP 0.16.2 [37,38].
Results
41-kDa IgM
For the Western blot 41-kDa IgM data, the regression analysis yielded the following statistically significant model (F 2,51 = 5.981, P = 0.005):
41-kDa IgM = 2.145 + 0.602x 1 - 0.099x 2
The variable x 1 corresponded to the LTT-MELISA recombinant p41 from B. garinii while x 2 corresponded to the LTT-MELISA recombinant peptide mix (OspA/VlsE from B. afzelii, B. garinii and B. burgdorferi sensu stricto). The intercept term was statistically significant, as were the coefficients of x 1 (standard error = 0.212; P = 0.006) and x 2 (standard error = 0.034; P = 0.006).
41-kDa IgG
The regression analysis also yielded a statistically significant model for the Western blot 41-kDa IgG data (F 2,57 = 3.700, P = 0.031), as follows:
41-kDa IgG = 3.021 - 0.350x 3 + 0.251x 4
The variable x 3 corresponded to the LTT-MELISA recombinant OspC from B. burgdorferi sensu stricto and x 4 corresponded to the LTT-MELISA recombinant p100 from B. afzelii. Again, the intercept term was statistically significant, as was the coefficient of x 4 (standard error = 0.117; P = 0.036). The standard error of the coefficient of x 3 was 0.179 (P = 0.055).
Discussion
The first main result of this study is that the 41-kDa flagellin IgM level is predictable from LTT-MELISA variables. Thus, the LTT-MELISA appears to be able to detect the early immunological response to this antigen.
The second main result is that the 41-kDa flagellin IgG level can also be predicted from LTT-MELISA variables. It follows that the LTT-MELISA appears to be able to detect the late immunological response to this antigen.
Taken together, both of the above results are consistent with previous reports that the LTT-MELISA indexes active borreliosis and so has diagnostic value in cases which are clinically or serologically ambiguous [18-20,30].
Turning to the predictor variables found in this study, it is noteworthy that one of the two predictor variables for the 41-kDa flagellin IgM was an OspA/VlsE recombinant peptide mix, while one of the two predictor variables for the 41-kDa flagellin IgG was a recombinant OspC. This is of relevance in relation to the serological testing which tends to be used for the detection of borreliosis. More traditional immunoassay techniques, such as the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and enzyme immunoassay (EIA), require binding by the detecting or primary antibodies to the surface bacterial antigens and are favoured by the CDC in its serological testing guidelines for borreliosis [39]. However, immunofluorescence experiments have demonstrated that B. burgdorferi OspA, OspB and OspC have only limited exposure at the bacterial surface [40]. It is possible that this accounts for the heterogeneous sensitivity of such serological testing in borreliosis. In contrast, LTT-MELISA relies on the ability of the bacterial antigens to transform lymphocytes; the change in activity of activated lymphocytes is assayed [18]. Thus, it is plausible that the LTT-MELISA might offer an improved diagnostic capability.
One shortcoming of this study is that it did not involve investigation by microscopy techniques. Future research should include such techniques in conjugation with appropriate immunofluorescent markers.
Flagellar antigens can be helpful diagnostically owing to their high discriminative value; indeed, the 41-kDa antigen has been incorporated into an antigen biochip for potential diagnostic use in borreliosis for this reason [41].
In Borrelia, and indeed most spirochaetes, flagellin proteins create an inner flagellar core (FlaB proteins) and an outer layer (FlaA proteins), with the 41-kDa flagellin being principally associated with the FlaB protein [42,43]. However, the 41-kDa flagellin is not only associated with spirochaetal periplasmic flagella but can be found in many non-spirochaetal bacterial species. For example, purified flagella of Bartonella clarridgeiae have been reported to be built from a 41-kDa polypeptide [44]. Thus, LTT-MELISA may have a role to play in the diagnosis of non-borrelial bacterial infections. It may also be worthwhile investigating the possible role of LTT-MELISA as a prognostic biomarker; in a recent systematic review, anti-flagellin antibodies comprised one of just two serological biomarkers with statistically significant prognostic potential in relation to developing severe Crohn’s disease [45].
Disclosure of conflict of interest
None.
References
- 1.Parte AC, Sardà Carbasse J, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Reimer LC, Göker M. List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN) moves to the DSMZ. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2020;70:5607–5612. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Fumarola D. Endotoxicity of newly recognized gram negative organism: a collective review. Boll Ist Sieroter Milan. 1985;64:255–261. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Coleman JL, Benach JL. Identification and characterization of an endoflagellar antigen of Borrelia burgdorferi. J Clin Invest. 1989;84:322–330. doi: 10.1172/JCI114157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Howe TR, Mayer LW, Barbour AG. A single recombinant plasmid expressing two major outer surface proteins of the Lyme disease spirochete. Science. 1985;227:645–646. doi: 10.1126/science.3969554. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kenedy MR, Lenhart TR, Akins DR. The role of Borrelia burgdorferi outer surface proteins. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2012;66:1–19. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2012.00980.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Steinbrink A, Brugger K, Margos G, Kraiczy P, Klimpel S. The evolving story of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato transmission in Europe. Parasitol Res. 2022;121:781–803. doi: 10.1007/s00436-022-07445-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Faccini-Martínez ÁA, Silva-Ramos CR, Santodomingo AM, Ramírez-Hernández A, Costa FB, Labruna MB, Muñoz-Leal S. Historical overview and update on relapsing fever group Borrelia in Latin America. Parasit Vectors. 2022;15:196. doi: 10.1186/s13071-022-05289-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kullberg BJ, Vrijmoeth HD, van de Schoor F, Hovius JW. Lyme borreliosis: diagnosis and management. BMJ. 2020;369:m1041. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Steere AC, Strle F, Wormser GP, Hu LT, Branda JA, Hovius JW, Li X, Mead PS. Lyme borreliosis. Nat Rev Dis Primer. 2016;2:16090. doi: 10.1038/nrdp.2016.90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Rauer S, Kastenbauer S, Fingerle V, Hunfeld KP, Huppertz HI, Dersch R. Lyme neuroborreliosis. Dtsch Ärztebl Int. 2018;115:751–756. doi: 10.3238/arztebl.2018.0751. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Lochhead RB, Strle K, Arvikar SL, Weis JJ, Steere AC. Lyme arthritis: linking infection, inflammation and autoimmunity. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2021;17:449–461. doi: 10.1038/s41584-021-00648-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Radesich C, Del Mestre E, Medo K, Vitrella G, Manca P, Chiatto M, Castrichini M, Sinagra G. Lyme carditis: from pathophysiology to clinical management. Pathogens. 2022;11:582. doi: 10.3390/pathogens11050582. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Yeung C, Baranchuk A. Diagnosis and treatment of Lyme carditis: JACC review topic of the week. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73:717–726. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.11.035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Talagrand-Reboul E, Boyer PH, Bergström S, Vial L, Boulanger N. Relapsing fevers: neglected tick-borne diseases. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2018;8:98. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2018.00098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Jakab Á, Kahlig P, Kuenzli E, Neumayr A. Tick borne relapsing fever - a systematic review and analysis of the literature. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2022;16:e0010212. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0010212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Raffetin A, Saunier A, Bouiller K, Caraux-Paz P, Eldin C, Gallien S, Jouenne R, Belkacem A, Salomon J, Patey O, Talagrand-Reboul E, Jaulhac B, Grillon A. Unconventional diagnostic tests for Lyme borreliosis: a systematic review. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020;26:51–59. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2019.06.033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Lohr B, Fingerle V, Norris DE, Hunfeld KP. Laboratory diagnosis of Lyme borreliosis: current state of the art and future perspectives. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2018;55:219–245. doi: 10.1080/10408363.2018.1450353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Valentine-Thon E, Ilsemann K, Sandkamp M. A novel lymphocyte transformation test (LTT-MELISA) for Lyme borreliosis. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007;57:27–34. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2006.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.von Baehr V, Doebis C, Volk HD, von Baehr R. The lymphocyte transformation test for Borrelia detects active Lyme borreliosis and verifies effective antibiotic treatment. Open Neurol J. 2012;6:104–112. doi: 10.2174/1874205X01206010104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.von Baehr V. The lymphocyte transformation test for the diagnosis of Lyme borreliosis could fill a gap in the difficult diagnostics of borreliosis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20:O1155–O1156. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12755. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Dessau RB, Fingerle V, Gray J, Hunfeld KP, Jaulhac B, Kahl O, Kristoferitsch W, Stanek G, Strle F. The lymphocyte transformation test for the diagnosis of Lyme borreliosis has currently not been shown to be clinically useful. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20:O786–787. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Dersch R, Fingerle V. Lyme borreliosis and Lyme neuroborreliosis - an update. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2021;146:728–732. doi: 10.1055/a-1265-4397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.von Baehr V. The lymphocyte transformation test for the diagnosis of Lyme borreliosis. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015;21:e22. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2014.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Dessau RB, Fingerle V, Gray J, Hunfeld KP, Jaulhac B, Kristoferitsch W, Stanek G, Strle F. The authors reply to comments on “The lymphocyte transformation test for the diagnosis of Lyme borreliosis has currently not been shown to be clinically useful”. Clin Microbiol Infect 2014; 20: O786-O787. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015;21:e21. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2014.08.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Gassmann GS, Deutzmann R, Vogt A, Göbel UB. N-terminal amino acid sequence of the Borrelia burgdorferi flagellin. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1989;51:101–105. doi: 10.1016/0378-1097(89)90085-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Flisiak I, Chodynicka B. Antibodies against Borrelia afzelli in patients with an early stage of Lyme disease. Wiad Lek. 2001;54:19–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Flisiak R, Prokopowicz D. Antibodies against Borrelia garinii in diagnosis of Lyme disease. Przegl Lek. 2000;57:147–149. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Flisiak R, Wierzbicka I, Prokopowicz D. Western blot banding pattern in early Lyme borreliosis among patients from an endemic region of north-eastern Poland. Rocz Akad Med Bialymst. 1998;43:210–220. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Davidson MM, Chisholm SM, Wiseman AD, Joss AW, Ho-Yen DO. Improved serodiagnosis of Lyme disease. Clin Mol Pathol. 1996;49:M80–M84. doi: 10.1136/mp.49.2.m80. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Puri BK, Segal DR, Monro JA. Diagnostic use of the lymphocyte transformation test-memory lymphocyte immunostimulation assay in confirming active Lyme borreliosis in clinically and serologically ambiguous cases. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014;7:5890–5892. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Recommendations for test performance and interpretation from the Second National Conference on Serologic Diagnosis of Lyme Disease. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1995;44:590–591. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Shah JS, Du Cruz I, Narciso W, Lo W, Harris NS. Improved clinical sensitivity for detection of antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi by Western blots prepared from a mixture of two strains of B. burgdorferi, 297 and B31, and interpreted by in-house criteria. Eur Infect Dis. 2010;4:56–60. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Burgdorfer W, Barbour AG, Hayes SF, Benach JL, Grunwaldt E, Davis JP. Lyme disease-a tick-borne spirochetosis? Science. 1982;216:1317–1319. doi: 10.1126/science.7043737. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Steere AC, Grodzicki RL, Kornblatt AN, Craft JE, Barbour AG, Burgdorfer W, Schmid GP, Johnson E, Malawista SE. The spirochetal etiology of Lyme disease. N Engl J Med. 1983;308:733–740. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198303313081301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kurtti TJ, Munderloh UG, Johnson RC, Ahlstrand GG. Colony formation and morphology in Borrelia burgdorferi. J Clin Microbiol. 1987;25:2054–2058. doi: 10.1128/jcm.25.11.2054-2058.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Valentine-Thon E, Schiwara HW. Validity of MELISA for metal sensitivity testing. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2003;24:57–64. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2021. [Google Scholar]
- 38.JASP Team. JASP (Version 0.16.2). Computer software. University of Amsterdam. 2022 [Google Scholar]
- 39.Pratt GW, Platt M, Velez A, Rao LV. A comparison of Lyme serological testing platforms with a panel of clinically characterized samples from various stages of Lyme disease. J Appl Lab Med. 2022:jfac047. doi: 10.1093/jalm/jfac047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Cox DL, Akins DR, Bourell KW, Lahdenne P, Norgard MV, Radolf JD. Limited surface exposure of Borrelia burgdorferi outer surface lipoproteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:7973–7978. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.15.7973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Du W, Ma X, Nyman D, Povlsen K, Akguen N, Schneider EM. Antigen biochips verify and extend the scope of antibody detection in Lyme borreliosis. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2007;59:355–363. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2007.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Ge Y, Li C, Corum L, Slaughter CA, Charon NW. Structure and expression of the FlaA periplasmic flagellar protein of Borrelia burgdorferi. J Bacteriol. 1998;180:2418–2425. doi: 10.1128/jb.180.9.2418-2425.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Güner ES, Hashimoto N, Kadosaka T, Imai Y, Masuzawa T. A novel, fast-growing Borrelia sp. isolated from the hard tick Hyalomma aegyptium in Turkey. Microbiology (Reading) 2003;149:2539–2544. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.26464-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Sander A, Zagrosek A, Bredt W, Schiltz E, Piémont Y, Lanz C, Dehio C. Characterization of Bartonella clarridgeiae flagellin (FlaA) and detection of antiflagellin antibodies in patients with lymphadenopathy. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38:2943–2948. doi: 10.1128/jcm.38.8.2943-2948.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Halligan S, Boone D, Archer L, Ahmad T, Bloom S, Rodriguez-Justo M, Taylor SA, Mallett S. Prognostic biomarkers to identify patients likely to develop severe Crohn’s disease: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess. 2021;25:1–66. doi: 10.3310/hta25450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
