Skip to main content
NCBI home page
ACS Omega logoLink to ACS Omega
. 2022 Sep 15;7(38):33866–33872. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c02730

Intracluster Reaction Dynamics of Ionized Micro-Hydrated Hydrogen Peroxide (H2O2): A Direct Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Study

Shuhei Yamasaki †, Hiroto Tachikawa ‡,*
PMCID: PMC9520719  PMID: 36188254

Abstract

graphic file with name ao2c02730_0008.jpg

Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is a unique molecule that is applied in various fields, including energy chemistry, astrophysics, and medicine. H2O2 readily forms clusters with water molecules. In the present study, the reactions of ionized H2O2–water clusters, H2O2+(H2O)n, after vertical ionization of the parent neutral cluster were investigated using the direct ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) method to elucidate the reaction mechanism. Clusters with one to five water molecules, H2O2–(H2O)n (n = 1–5), were examined, and the reaction of [H2O2+(H2O)n]ver was tracked from the vertical ionization point to the product state, where [H2O2+(H2O)n]ver is the vertical ionization state (hole is localized on H2O2). After ionization, fast proton transfer (PT) from H2O2+ to the water cluster (H2O)n was observed in all clusters. The HOO radical and H3O+(H2O)n−1 were formed as products. The PT reaction proceeds directly without an activation barrier. The PT times for n = 1–5 were calculated to be 36.0, 9.8, 8.3, 7.7, and 7.1 fs, respectively, at the MP2/6-311++G(d,p) level, indicating that PT in these clusters is a very fast process, and the PT time is not dependent on the cluster size (n), except in the case of n = 1, where the PT time was slightly longer because the bond distance and angle of the hydrogen bond in n = 1 were deformed from the standard structure. The reaction mechanism was discussed based on these results.

1. Introduction

Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) is a unique molecule that is applied in various fields. In the field of energy chemistry, H2O2 serves as a safe and clean hydrogen carrier molecule.1−4 Hydrogen molecule (H2) can be extracted easily from H2O2 under the action of a catalyst by visible-light irradiation.1 Recently, Shiraishi et al. showed that H2 molecules can be produced from H2O2 by photo-irradiation.5 Photoirradiation of H2O2 under catalytic conditions efficiently produces H2. This method is expected to be effective for H2 production in spacecraft and space stations because H2O2 can be used to produce H2 under mild conditions.

H2O2 is a well-known molecule in medicine and is commonly used as a disinfectant. Recently, hydrogen peroxide water (H2O2–H2O) achieved breakthrough results in radiotherapy. Nimalasena et al. reported a rapid increase in the cancer recovery rate after radiotherapy by injecting H2O2–H2O into tumor areas.6 Thus, H2O2–H2O has potential as a radiation response enhancer in cancers for which conventional radiotherapy is insufficient for local control. However, its mechanism has not been elucidated thus far; the ionization and electron capture reactions of H2O2–H2O clusters may be responsible for the initial reaction processes after irradiation.

Additionally, H2O2 has been observed in space, where radiation and cosmic rays are emitted. A European research group observed a molecular cloud in Ophiuchus (Oph), and H2O2 was detected in the cloud core of ρ Oph-A.7 Notably, H2O2 is an essential molecule for producing water in space and forms clusters with H2O.8,9 However, no study on the effects of cosmic ray irradiation on the reactions of H2O2–H2O clusters has been reported to date.

The simplest reaction of H2O2 without H2O in Earth is its photolysis under UV light. From the perspective of atmospheric chemistry, Kawasaki and co-workers measured the Doppler profiles of H atoms formed from the photo-dissociation of H2O2 at 193 nm using a laser-induced fluorescence method.10,11 They suggested that the excited state of H2O2 (A1A) is responsible for H atom formation from H2O2. Thus, photoreactions of H2O2 have been extensively investigated.12−14 However, information on the reaction of micro-solvated H2O2 is limited. In particular, reactions involving the ionized state of micro-solvated H2O2 are scarcely known.

In the present study, the reactions of ionized hydrogen peroxide–water clusters, denoted as [H2O2–(H2O)n]+, after vertical ionization of neutral cluster, are investigated using the direct ab initio molecular dynamics (MD) method15−17 to elucidate the effects of micro-solvation on the reaction of H2O2. Clusters with one to five water molecules, H2O2–(H2O)n (n = 1–5), are examined.

Previously, the structures of micro-solvated H2O2 (neutral state) were determined using ab initio calculations. Kulkarni et al. investigated the structures and binding energies of H2O2–(H2O)n (n = 1–6).18 The binding energy of the H2O2–H2O 1:1 complex was calculated to be 7.4–11.2 kcal/mol, which is larger than the hydrogen bonding energy of the water dimer (5.0–6.0 kcal/mol). They found several conformers of the clusters. The ionization and excitation energies were calculated by Ferreira et al.19 They showed that these energies are not dependent on the size of the cluster because the excitation and ionization are localized on H2O2 in the clusters. Thus, the ionized states of the clusters were investigated only for static states. The reactions of the ionized states of the clusters were not calculated. In this study, we focus on the reaction dynamics of the ionized states of the clusters.

2. Computational Details

2.1. Ab Initio Calculations

The geometries of the neutral clusters, H2O2(H2O)n (n = 1–5), were optimized using the second-order perturbation Møller–Plesset (MP2) method with the 6-311++G(d,p) basis set.20,21 In addition, the CAM-B3LYP functional was also utilized.22 The coupled-cluster single, double, and perturbative triple excitation (CCSD(T)) method23 was used for small clusters (n = 1 and 2). For n = 1–3, quadratic configuration interaction with singles and doubles (QCISD)24 and fourth-order MP theory correction including the single, double, and quadruple substitution MP4(SDQ) method25 were used to determine the structures of the clusters. The atomic and molecular charges were calculated using the natural population analysis (NPA) approach. Standard Gaussian 09 and 16 program packages were used for all static ab initio calculations.26,27

2.2. Direct AIMD Calculations

Two methods were used in the direct ab initio molecular dynamics (AIMD) calculations using: (a) the optimized structure of the neutral cluster as a starting structure and (b) the zero-point vibrational energy (ZPE). The NVE ensemble (microcanonical ensemble) was employed. In the direct AIMD calculation of the optimized structure, neutral clusters, H2O2(H2O)n, were first optimized at the MP2/6-311++G(d,p) level. Thereafter, the trajectory of H2O2+–(H2O)n was started from the vertical ionization point. The rotational temperature, momentum vector, and excess energy of [H2O2+–(H2O)n]ver were set to be zero (time = 0 fs). The maximum simulation time was 2.1 ps. A time step was 0.10 fs. The velocity Verlet algorithm was utilized to solve the equations of motion for the system. The drift of total energy was less than 0.01 kcal/mol. Similar calculations were performed using the CAM-B3LYP functional.

The effects of ZPE on the reaction mechanism were investigated using the classical vibrational sampling method (microcanonical ensemble).28−30 The effects of the functional on the reaction mechanism were investigated using the ωB97XD functional31 and compared with those obtained with the CAM-B3LYP functional. Direct AIMD calculations were carried out using our own code.15−17

3. Results

3.1. Structures of H2O2(H2O)n (n = 1–5)

The optimized structure of the H2O2–H2O 1:1 neutral complex is shown in Figure 1 (n = 1). In this structure, one of the protons of H2O2 (H1) is oriented toward the oxygen atom of H2O, and the oxygen atom of H2O2 (O2) accepts a proton from H2O.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

Optimized structures of H2O2(H2O)n neutral clusters (n = 1–5). Spatial distribution shows the spin density of vertical ionization state, [H2O2–H2O+]ver. The calculations were carried out at the MP2/6-311++G(d,p) level. Bond lengths are in Å.

The spatial distribution of the spin density of [H2O2+–H2O+]ver for the ionization state is illustrated in Figure 1 (n = 1, right), where [H2O2+–H2O]ver indicates the vertical ionization state of H2O2–H2O. The molecular spin densities of H2O2 and H2O were calculated to be 0.999 and 0.001, respectively, implying that the unpaired electrons (holes) are fully localized on H2O2. The spin densities of the hydroxyl groups (H1O1) and (O2H2) of [H2O2–H2O+]ver were +1.180 and −0.179, respectively, suggesting that the spin density on the OH group (H1O1) is induced by the interaction with H2O. The spin densities of the OH groups of free H2O2+ (without H2O) were calculated as (H1O1) = 0.500 and (O2H2) = 0.500.

The optimized structure of H2O2(H2O)n (n = 2) and spatial distribution of the spin density of [H2O2(H2O)2+]ver are illustrated in Figure 1 (n = 2) and Figure S1 (n = 2), respectively. In this structure, the water dimer is oriented toward H2O2 with two hydrogen bonds. The hydrogen bond distances are 1.787 Å (W1) and 1.916 Å (W2), which are significantly shorter than those of the 1:1 complex (1.896 and 2.436 Å for n = 1).

In the vertical ionization state, the molecular spin densities of H2O2, W1, and W2 were calculated to be 1.001, 0.005, and −0.006, respectively, indicating that the unpaired electron is localized on H2O2. The spin densities of the OH groups of H2O2 for n = 2 were 0.576 and 0.426, respectively, indicating that water molecules induced slight polarization of the spin densities on (H2O2)+.

The optimized structures for n = 3–5 are given in Figure 1 (n = 3–5), and the spin density distributions are shown in Figure S1. The NPA charges are listed in Table S1 (MP2) and Table S2 (CAM-B3LYP). In all of the clusters, the spin densities were mainly localized on the H2O2 moiety of the [H2O2+(H2O)n]ver (n = 3–5) clusters. The spin densities on H2O (the MP2 values) were 0.971 (n = 3), 0.969 (n = 4), and 0.946 (n = 5). This trend is because the ionization energy of H2O2 (10.5 eV) is lower than that of H2O (12.6 eV).32,33 Moreover, spin polarization was observed in all cluster cations. The optimized structures of the neutral clusters are in good agreement with previous calculations.18,19

3.2. Reaction Dynamics of H2O2+–H2O after Ionization

In this section, the reaction following the ionization of the parent neutral complex is considered. The potential energy of [H2O2+–H2O], following ionization, was plotted as a function of time, as shown in Figure 2A.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Time evolution of (A) potential energy and (B) snapshots of the H2O2–(H2O)n+ reaction system (n = 1) after ionization of the parent neutral cluster. Direct AIMD calculation was performed at the MP2/6-311++G(d,p) level. The MP/6-311++G(d,p)-optimized geometry was used as the initial geometry of [H2O2–H2O+]ver at time zero.

The zero energy level adopts the total energy of the vertical ionization point. Figure 2B presents snapshots of H2O2+–H2O over time. The spin densities of H2O2 and H2O were 0.999 and 0.001, respectively, at time zero, indicating that the holes were localized on H2O2. The H1 proton was located at r1 = 1.896 and r2 = 0.973 Å at time zero, denoted as (r1, r2) = (1.896, 0.973). The potential energy decreased suddenly after ionization. This is due to rapid proton transfer (PT) from H2O2+ to H2O: the H1 proton was located in the central region between H2O2 and H2O at 27.5 fs with (1.223, 1.241) and (1.011, 1.164) at 37.9 fs. PT occurred immediately, and a radical-ion complex, HOO–(H3O+), was formed. At 50.1 fs, the complex underwent structural relaxation. The potential energy was the lowest at 50.1 fs, where the stable complex HOO–(H3O+) was formed. A short time later, the complex dissociated into the HOO radical and H3O+, as shown in the snapshot at 200 fs.

3.3. Reaction Dynamics of H2O2+(H2O)n+ (n = 2) after Ionization

The time evolution of potential energy and snapshots of [H2O2+(H2O)2], following the vertical ionization, are shown in Figure 3A.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Time evolution of (A) potential energy and (B) snapshots of the H2O2–(H2O)n+ reaction system (n = 2) after ionization of the parent neutral cluster. Direct AIMD calculation was performed at the MP2/6-311++G(d,p) level. The MP/6-311++G(d,p)-optimized geometry was used as the initial geometry of [H2O2–(H2O)2+]ver at time zero.

The spin densities of H2O2, W1, and W2 at the vertical ionization point were 1.001, 0.005, and −0.006, respectively, suggesting that the unpaired electron is localized on H2O2, similar to the case for n = 1. In H2O2+, the spin density of the hydroxyl group with the proton donor (density = 0.579) was larger than that of the other group (density = 0.426). After ionization, the H1 proton underwent rapid PT from H2O2+ to H2O, which generated H3O+. At time = 9.8 fs, H1 was located at (r1, r2) = (0.975, 1.767), indicating that PT was completed and was significantly fast. The energy declined rapidly to −50.0 kcal at 9.8 fs. Structural relaxation within the HOO–H+(H2O)2 cluster occurred immediately, as observed at time = 31.7 fs. In the final stage of the reaction, a Zundel complex composed of H+(H2O)2 was formed, which interacted weakly with the HOO radical. In the case of n = 2, dissociation of the HOO radical was not observed and the complex remained in the reaction field.

3.4. Reaction Dynamics of H2O2+(H2O)n (n = 3–5) after Ionization

The same calculations were performed for larger clusters, [H2O2+(H2O)n] (n = 3–5). The results are shown in Figure S2 (n = 3), Figure S3 (n = 4), and Figure S4 (n = 5). The calculated PT times for n = 3, 4, and 5 were 8.3, 7.7, and 7.1 fs, respectively, at the MP2/6-311++G(d,p) level of theory. Similar calculations were performed at the CAM-B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) level. The calculated PT times for n = 1–5 were 26.8, 10.4, 8.8, 7.7, and 7.1 fs, respectively, at the CAM-B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) level. The PT times obtained using MP2 and CAM-B3LYP are summarized in Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Proton transfer (PT) time for H2O2–(H2O)n+, following vertical ionization of neutral cluster, plotted as a function of cluster size (n). MP2(opt) indicates that the MP/6-311++G(d,p)-optimized geometry was used as the initial geometry of [H2O2–(H2O)n+]ver at time zero, and direct AIMD calculation was carried out at the MP2/6-311++G(d,p) level. CAM(opt) indicates that the CAM-B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p)-optimized geometry was used as the initial geometry of [H2O2–(H2O)n+]ver at time zero, and direct AIMD calculation was carried out at the CAM-B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) level. CAM(ZPE) indicates that direct AIMD calculations were carried out, including zero-point vibrational energies (ZPEs); average PT times are shown.

As clearly seen in this figure, the trends and values obtained at both levels of theory (MP2 and CAM-B3LYP) are in excellent agreement with each other. The PT time for n = 1 was slightly longer than that for the other clusters, whereas the PT times for n = 2–5 were almost constant (7–11 fs). This trend is consistent for both methods. The observations will be explained in Section 4.

3.5. Effects of Zero-Point Vibrational Energy (ZPE) on the Reaction Mechanism

In this section, the effects of the zero-point energy (ZPE) on the PT time are examined. All calculations were performed at the CAM-B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) level of theory. First, the geometries of H2O2(H2O)n (n = 1–5) were optimized. Thereafter, the zero-point vibrational energy (ZPE) was applied to H2O2(H2O)n. The microcanonical ensemble of classical harmonic vibrations in the sampling method was applied to the reaction system.28−30 All atoms in the initial state of [H2O2+(H2O)n+]ver had momenta corresponding to their vibrational energies. Direct AIMD calculations were carried out for n = 1–5. Ten trajectories were performed for each cluster size (n). The time evolution of the potential energy of H2O2+(H2O)n, following ionization of the H2O2–H2O 1:1 complex, including the ZPE, is plotted in Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

Effects of ZPE on the time evolution of the potential energy for n = 1 (five trajectories are given). Direct AIMD calculation was performed at the CAM-B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) level.

Five trajectories are shown as a sample. After ionization, the potential energy decreased rapidly, and PT rapidly ensued. The PT time was distributed in the range of 12.4–35.8 fs, where the average PT time was 19.5 fs for n = 1. After PT, the structure of the complex was energetically relaxed.

The same calculations were carried out for n = 2–5. The results are shown in Figures S5 and S6. Similar PT was also observed. The average PT time is shown in Figure 4 (denoted as CAM(ZPE)). The average PT times for n = 1–5 were 19.5, 11.0, 9.1, 10.5, and 10.4 fs, respectively. Considering the ZPE, the PT time was the longest for n = 1. This trend is the same as that in the case without the zero-point vibrational energy. In the case of n = 1, the PT time was 19.5 fs (ZPE) and 26.8 fs (no-ZPE), indicating that the ZPE slightly accelerates the PT time.

3.6. Potential Energy Curves for the Reaction System

As a summary of the present calculations, a schematic illustration of the potential energy curves for the reaction system is given in Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Energy diagram for the reaction system. IE means ionization energy of clusters.

The relative energies are listed in Table S3 (MP2) and Table S4 (CAM-B3LYP). After the ionization of H2O2(H2O)n, the reaction point shifted toward the vertical ionization state, termed “vertical state”. PT occurred immediately to generate the PT complex, HOO–H+(H2O)n. PT in the present reaction system is a very fast process because the reaction proceeds without a barrier and has a large excess energy. The PT times for n = 1–5 were 36.0, 9.8, 8.3, 7.7, and 7.1 fs, respectively, at the MP2/6-311++G(d,p) level. Although the energy level of the product state (PD) is lower than that of the vertical state, dissociation to HOO + H+(H2O)n occurred only for n = 1 due to the fact the large number of degrees of freedom in n = 2–5 prevents dissociation. The excess energy of the PT complex is dissipated efficiently into the vibrational modes of the PT complex.

The optimized structures of the PT complexes are shown in Figure S7 together with those obtained by direct AIMD calculations. The structures of PT complex obtained from direct AIMD calculation and geometry optimization were similar to each other: the structure is composed of HOO radical and H3O+ in both cases.

The dissociation energy for the reaction (ΔE3), HOO=H+(H2O)n → HOO + H+(H2O)n, becomes smaller in larger clusters. However, the dissociation was not found within this time scale. This is due to the fact that large degrees of freedom prevent the dissociation in larger clusters (n = 3–5). Namely, the excess energy was efficiently transferred into the internal modes of clusters (the stretching vibrational and bending modes)

3.7. Effects of Functional and Initial Geometries on Reaction Mechanism

The direct AIMD calculations in the previous sections were carried out using the MP2 and DFT methods (CAM-B3LYP functional), starting from the initial geometry obtained by each method. The effects of the functional (ωB97XD) and initial geometries on the reaction mechanism are discussed in this section. The initial geometries were calculated at the ωB97XD, QCISD, and CCSD/6-311++G(d,p) levels of theory, and direct AIMD calculations were performed for each geometry. The obtained PT times are listed in Table 1.

Table 1. Effects of Initial Geometry and Functional on PT Time (in fs)a.

geometry AIMD n = 1 n = 2 n = 3
MP2 MP2 36.0 9.8 8.3
CAM-B3LYP CAM-B3LYP 26.8 10.4 8.8
ωB97XD ωB97XD 32.6 12.2 9.3
MP4SDQ MP2 34.0 10.5 9.1
QCISD MP2 34.1 10.6 9.1
CCSD MP2 34.2 10.6 not calc.
Open in a new tab
a

“Geometry” indicates the method of calculation used to obtain the initial geometry (time = 0 fs), and “AIMD” refers to direct AIMD calculation. The 6-311++G(d,p) basis set was used in all calculations.

At all levels of theory, the PT time for n = 1 was longer than that for n = 2, and the results were independent of the method used.

4. Discussion and Conclusions

The present calculations show that vertically ionized cluster cations can undergo PT as an intracluster reaction. The PT time for n = 1 is slightly longer than that for n = 2–5 (36.0 fs for n = 1 and 9.8 fs for n = 2). This difference arises because the bond distance and angle of the hydrogen-bond structure in n = 1 deviate from the standard hydrogen bond, as shown in Figure S8. In the water dimer, the distance and angle are 1.950 Å and 176.8°, respectively, and 1.787 Å and 168.7° for H2O2–H2O in n = 2. In contrast, the corresponding values are 1.896 Å and 148.5° in the H2O2–H2O 1:1 complex (n = 1), deviating from the normal hydrogen bonds appearing in n = 2–5 and in the water dimer. The angle of the hydrogen bond (O–H=H) at n = 1 is largely distorted from the normal collinear form. This difference leads to a longer PT time for n = 1.

In the present study, several approximations were introduced in the calculations. In the direct AIMD calculations, the normal mode sampling method was used in the initial sampling using ZPEs and the quantum effects of nuclear motion were neglected.34,35 The Wigner phase-space sampling method is more accurate for the initial sampling. However, these effects on the reaction mechanism are minimal because the present reaction system is composed of a simple repulsive dissociation surface.

The number of trajectories used in the calculations was limited because the direct AIMD calculation at the MP2/6-311++G(d,p) level required a significant amount of central processing unit (CPU) time; only 10 trajectories were run for each cluster.

The PT time with error bars is shown in Figure S9, and wide error bars (standard deviation) were observed. Especially, the error bar in n = 1 was larger than the others. If more accurate PT time is required, an increase in the number of calculations is necessary. Although several approximations were used in this study, the direct AIMD method can provide useful information regarding the reaction dynamics of H2O2–H2O ion clusters.

In space, H2O2 is electronically excited by UV irradiation, producing a reactive HOO radical and hydrogen atom. At even higher excitation energies, H2O2 is ionized. In the micro-hydrated H2O2, UV and cosmic ray irradiation ionizes the H2O2 moiety of the H2O2–(H2O)n cluster, as expressed by eq 1. The present study shows that PT from H2O2+ to the water clusters occurs after ionization, as shown in eq 2. The reactions are expressed by the following equations

4. 1
4. 2

The PT process was extremely fast (∼10 fs for n = 2–5). Thus, the reaction mechanism of hydrated H2O2+ after ionization of the neutral cluster was proposed in this study.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge partial support from JSPS KAKENHI (Grant Numbers 21H05415 and 21K04973).

Supporting Information Available

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsomega.2c02730.

  • Optimized structures of H2O2(H2O)n neutral clusters (n = 1–5), time evolution of potential energy of H2O2(H2O)n+ (n = 3, 4, and 5), snapshots, effects of ZPE on the time evolution of potential energies for n = 2 and 3, time evolution of distances and angles of hydrogen bond between H2O2 and H2O, spin densities and NPA molecular charges on H2O2 and (H2O)n, hydration energies of H2O2, relaxation energies, and reaction energies, and dissociation energies (PDF)

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Supplementary Material

ao2c02730_si_001.pdf (1.2MB, pdf)

References

  1. Shiraishi Y.; Matsumoto M.; Ichikawa S.; Tanaka S.; Hirai H. Polythiophene-Doped Resorcinol–Formaldehyde Resin Photocatalysts for Solar-to-Hydrogen Peroxide Energy Conversion. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021, 143, 12590–12599. 10.1021/jacs.1c04622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Liu T.; Pan Z.; Vequizo J. J. M.; Kato K.; Wu B.; Yamakata K.; Katayama K.; Chen B.; Chen B.; Chu C.; Chu C.; Domen K. Overall Photosynthesis of H2O2 by an Inorganic Semiconductor. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 1034 10.1038/s41467-022-28686-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Tachikawa H. Formation of Hydrogen Peroxide from O-(H2O)n Clusters. J. Phys. Chem. A 2021, 125, 4598–4605. 10.1021/acs.jpca.1c02883. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kou M.; Wang Y.; Xu Y.; Ye L.; Huang Y.; Jia B.; Li H.; Ren J.; Deng Y.; Chen J.; Zhou Y.; Lei K.; Wang L.; Liu W.; Huang H.; Ma T. Molecularly Engineered Covalent Organic Frameworks for Hydrogen Peroxide Photosynthesis. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2022, 61, e202200413 10.1002/anie.202200413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Shiraishi Y.; Ueda Y.; Soramoto; Hinokuma S.; Hirai T. Photocatalytic Hydrogen Peroxide Splitting on Metal-Free Powders Assisted by Phosphoric Acid as a Stabilizer. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 3386 10.1038/s41467-020-17216-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Nimalasena S.; Gothard L.; Anbalagan S.; Allen S.; Sinnett V. Mohammed, K.; Kothari, G., Intratumoral Hydrogen Peroxide With Radiation Therapy in Locally Advanced Breast Cancer: Results From a Phase 1 Clinical Trial. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2020, 108, 1019–1029. 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.06.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Bergman P.; Parise B.; Liseau R.; Larsson B.; Olofsson H.; Menten K. M.; Gusten R. Detection of interstellar hydrogen peroxide. A&A 2011, 531, L8. 10.1051/0004-6361/201117170. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Miyauchi N.; Hidaka H.; Chigai T.; Nagaoka A.; Watanabe N.; Kouchi A. Formation of hydrogen peroxide and water from the reaction of cold hydrogen atoms with solid oxygen at 10 K. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2008, 456, 27–30. 10.1016/j.cplett.2008.02.095. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ioppolo S.; Cuppen H. M.; Romanzin C.; van Dishoeck E. F.; Linnartz H. Laboratory Evidence for Efficient Water Formation in Interstellar Ices. Astrophys. J. 2008, 686, 1474–1479. 10.1086/591506. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Inagaki Y.; Matsumi Y.; Kawasaki M. Formation of a Hydrogen Atom from the Photodissociation of Hydrogen Peroxide at 193 nm. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1993, 66, 3166–3170. 10.1246/bcsj.66.3166. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Yoshihara K.; Sakamoto Y.; Kawasaki M.; Takatori Y.; Kato K.; Kajii Y. UV-Light-Induced Water Condensation in Air and the Role of Hydrogen Peroxide. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 2014, 87, 593–602. 10.1246/bcsj.20130322. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Park S. M.; Kang C. M.; Kwon C. H.; Kim H. L. Dynamics of H Atom Production from Photodissociation of H2O2 at 205nm. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2014, 592, 124–126. 10.1016/j.cplett.2013.12.018. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Thiebaud J.; Aluculesei A.; Fittschen C. Formation of HO2 Radicals from the Photodissociation of H2O2 at 248nm. J. Chem. Phys. 2007, 126, 186101 10.1063/1.2723732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Nakayama T.; Takahashi K.; Matsumi Y. Quantum Yield for hydrogen Atom Formation from H2O2 Photolysis in the Range 193–240 nm. Int. J. Chem. Kinet. 2005, 37, 751–754. 10.1002/kin.20127. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  15. Tachikawa H. Reaction Mechanism of an Intracluster SN2 Reaction Induced by Electron Capture. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2022, 24, 3941–3950. 10.1039/D1CP04697G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Tachikawa H. Reaction Dynamics of NO+ with Water Clusters. J. Phys. Chem. A 2022, 126, 119–124. 10.1021/acs.jpca.1c09461. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Tachikawa H. Reactions of Photoionization-Induced CO–H2O Cluster: Direct Ab Initio Molecular Dynamics Study. ACS Omega 2021, 6, 16688–16695. 10.1021/acsomega.1c02612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kulkarni A. D.; Pathak R. K.; Bartolotti L. J. Structures, Energetics, and Vibrational Spectra of H2O2···(H2O)n, n = 1–6 Clusters: Ab Initio Quantum Chemical Investigations. J. Phys. Chem. A 2005, 109, 4583–4590. 10.1021/jp044545h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ferreira C.; Martinianno H. F. M. C.; Costa Cabral B. J.; Aquilant V. Electronic Excitation and Ionization of Hydrogen Peroxide-Water Clusters: Comparison With Water Clusters. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 2011, 111, 1824–1835. 10.1002/qua.22844. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  20. McLean A. D.; Chandler G. S. Contracted Gaussian-Basis Sets for Molecular Calculations. I. Second Row Atoms, Z = 11-18. J. Chem. Phys. 1980, 72, 5639–5648. 10.1063/1.438980. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. Head-Gordon M.; Head-Gordon T. Analytic MP2 Frequencies Without Fifth Order Storage: Theory and Application to Bifurcated Hydrogen Bonds in the Water Hexamer. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1994, 220, 122–128. 10.1016/0009-2614(94)00116-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  22. Yanai T.; Tew D.; Handy N. A new hybrid exchange-correlation functional using the Coulomb-attenuating method (CAM-B3LYP). Chem. Phys. Lett. 2004, 393, 51–57. 10.1016/j.cplett.2004.06.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Watts J. D.; Gauss J.; Bartlett R. J. Coupled-cluster methods with noniterative triple excitations for restricted open-shell Hartree-Fock and other general single determinant reference functions. Energies and analytical gradients. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 8718–8733. 10.1063/1.464480. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Salter E. A.; Trucks G. W.; Bartlett R. J. Analytic Energy Derivatives in Many-Body Methods. I. First Derivatives. J. Chem. Phys. 1989, 90, 1752–1766. 10.1063/1.456069. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  25. Raghavachari K.; Frisch M. J.; Pople J. A. Contribution of triple substitutions to the electron correlation energy in fourth-order perturbation theory. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1980, 72, 4244–4245. 10.1063/1.439657. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Frisch M. J.; Trucks G. W.; Schlegel H. B.; Scuseria G. E.; Robb M. A.; Cheeseman J. R.; Scalmani G.; Barone V.; Mennucci B.; Petersson G. A.. et al. Gaussian 09, revision D.01; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, 2013.
  27. Frisch M. J.; Trucks G. W.; Schlegel H. B.; Scuseria G. E.; Robb M. A.; Cheeseman J. R.; Scalmani G.; Barone V.; Petersson G. A.. et al. Gaussian 16, revision A.03; Gaussian, Inc.: Wallingford, CT, 2016.
  28. Schlegel H. B.; Millam J. M.; Iyengar S. S.; Voth G. A.; Daniels A. D.; Scuseria G. E.; Frisch M. J. Ab initio Molecular Aerodynamics: Propagating the Density Matrix with Gaussian Orbitals. J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 114, 9758–9763. 10.1063/1.1372182. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Iyengar S. S.; Schlegel H. B.; Millam J. M.; Voth G. A.; Scuseria G. E.; Frisch M. J. Ab initio Molecular Dynamics: Propagating the Density Matrix with Gaussian Orbitals. II. Generalizations based on Mass-weighting, Idempotency, Energy Conservation and Choice of Initial Conditions. J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 115, 10291–10302. 10.1063/1.1416876. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Schlegel H. B.; Iyengar S. S.; Li X.; Millam J. M.; Voth G. A.; Scuseria G. E.; Frisch M. J. Ab initio molecular dynamics: Propagating the Density Matrix with Gaussian Orbitals. III. Comparison with Born-Oppenheimer Dynamics. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 117, 8694–8704. 10.1063/1.1514582. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Chai J.-D.; Head-Gordon M. Systematic Optimization of Long-Range Corrected Hybrid Density Functionals. J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 128, 084106 10.1063/1.2834918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Snow K. B.; Thomas T. F. Mass Spectrum, Ionization Potential, and Appearance Potentials for Fragment Ions of Sulfuric Acid Vapor. Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Processes 1990, 96, 49–68. 10.1016/0168-1176(90)80041-Z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Brown R. S. A Photoelectron Investigation of the Peroxide Bond. Can. J. Chem. 1975, 53, 3439–3447. 10.1139/v75-493. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Zobel J. P.; Nogueira J. J.; Gonzalez L. Finite-temperature Wigner phase-space sampling and temperature effects on the excited-state dynamics of 2-nitronaphthalene. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2019, 21, 13906–13915. 10.1039/C8CP03273D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Benitez Y.; Lu D.; Lunny K. G.; Li J.; Guo H.; Continetti R. E. Photoelectron-Photofragment Coincidence Studies on the Dissociation Dynamics of the OH-CH4 Complex. J. Phys. Chem. A 2019, 123, 4825–4833. 10.1021/acs.jpca.9b02441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

ao2c02730_si_001.pdf (1.2MB, pdf)

Articles from ACS Omega are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES