Skip to main content
The American Journal of Case Reports logoLink to The American Journal of Case Reports
. 2022 Sep 26;23:e937094-1–e937094-9. doi: 10.12659/AJCR.937094

Alleviation of Post-COVID-19 Cognitive Deficits by Treatment with EGb 761®: A Case Series

Udo A Zifko 1,E,, Muhammad Yacob 1,E, Benedikt J Braun 1,B,E, Gunnar PH Dietz 2,E,F
PMCID: PMC9523733  PMID: 36156538

Abstract

Case series

Patients: Male, 33-year-old • Female, 26-year-old • Female, 32-year-old • Female, 26-year-old • Male, 59-year-old

Final Diagnosis: Post-COVID-19 cognitive deficits

Symptoms: Memory loss • concentration difficulties

Medication: EGb 761®

Clinical Procedure: Individual basis

Specialty: Neurology

Objective:

Unusual or unexpected effect of treatment

Background:

Cognitive symptoms persisting longer than 3 months after infection, such as memory loss, or difficulties concentrating, have been reported in up to one-third of patients after COVID-19. Evidence-based therapeutic interventions to treat post-COVID-19 symptoms (also called “Long-COVID symptoms”) have not yet been established, and the treating physicians must rely on conjecture to help patients. Based on its mechanism of action and its efficacy in treating cognitive impairment, as well as its good tolerability, the Ginkgo biloba special extract EGb 761® has been suggested as a remedy to alleviate cognitive post-COVID-19 symptoms. In many studies, EGb 761® has been demonstrated to protect endothelial cells, to have potent anti-inflammatory effects, and to enhance neuroplasticity.

Case Reports:

Here, we report for the first time the application of EGb 761® in the therapy of post-COVID-19-related cognitive deficits. Three women and 2 men, aged 26 to 59 years (average age 34.6 years), presented with concentration and attention deficits, cognitive deficiencies, and/or fatigue 9-35 weeks after infection. A daily dose of 2×80 mg of EGb 761® did not cause any detectable adverse effects, and it substantially improved or completely restored cognitive deficits and, when initially present, also other symptoms, such as fatigue and hyposmia, within an observation period of up to 6 months.

Conclusions:

Our observations support the hypothesis that EGb 761® might be a low-risk treatment option for post-COVID-19 patients with cognitive symptoms. Moreover, we derive recommendations for randomized controlled clinical trials to confirm efficacy in that indication.

Keywords: SARS-CoV-2, Cognitive Dysfunction, Post-Acute COVID-19 Syndrome, Neurocognitive Disorders

Background

The global pandemic with the SARS-CoV-2 virus started in December 2019. The acute disease is often asymptomatic or benign, while in certain patients, especially those with risk factors such as advanced age, a multitude of severe symptoms can develop [1], which includes a plethora of neurological symptoms [2]. Results by our own research group showed that 83% of patients with acute COVID-19 displayed nervous system symptoms [3]. This was recorded in both the outpatient setting and the inpatient setting at approximately equal incidences. The majority (63.4%) of neurologic symptoms occurred on the first or second day of illness and were characterized by the simultaneous occurrence of multiple neurologic symptoms in nearly three-quarters of all patients. Those symptoms can persist long after infection, and can frequently occur even in patients with an initially mild disease course [4]. Depending on patient selection and methodology of the assessment, in single studies, up to three-quarters of patients had post-COVID-19 symptoms such as long-term fatigue or exhaustion, up to one-third had memory dysfunction, and up to one-quarter had cognitive deficits [5].

The reasons for frequent neurological or psychiatric post-COVID-19 symptoms are not clear and are certainly complex and depend on many factors, including neuroinvasiveness and neurotropism of SARS-CoV-2 [2]. Some evidence suggests that the virus might cross the blood-brain barrier by damaging the endothelial cell layer [2]. Moreover, it may induce neurovascular complications by inflammatory processes and endothelial dysfunction [6]. Evidence also suggests that COVID-19 disease mechanisms involve endothelial damage; receptors with an affinity for the viral spike protein are expressed on endothelial cells, and damage to endothelial cells could explain much of the pathology of multiple organ dysfunctions observed in COVID-19 [7]. Not only in acute COVID-19, but also in post-COVID-19, endothelial damage appears to play a role. For instance, increased endothelial progenitor production, which is an indicator of vascular damage, is present in post-COVID-19 patients [8]. Besides endothelial dys-function, they also display altered endothelial biomarkers [9].

The Ginkgo biloba special extract EGb 761® has been demonstrated to protect epithelial cells from the kidney [1012], retina [13,14], intestine [15], and aorta [16], to name just a few examples. Moreover, Ginkgo extract protects the cardiovascular system, also by acting on epithelial cells; it improves the circulation of coronary blood vessels in healthy people and in patients with coronary heart disease [17]. Ginkgo extract protected the olfactory neuroepithelium in a mouse anosmia model [18]. Those findings are consistent with the assumption that endothelial cells, which are specialized epithelial cells, targeted by SARS-CoV-2, would also be protected by EGb 761®. Indeed, EGb 761® maintains endothelial function [19], protects myocardial endothelial cells [20], and protects brain micro-vascular endothelial cells [21]. Moreover, Ginkgo extract exerts an anti-thrombotic effect on endothelial cells [22]. In addition, inflammatory processes may also mediate some of the post-COVID-19 symptoms, and the anti-inflammatory activities of EGb 761® have long been established in numerous studies [23,24]. Moreover, EGb 761®-associated improvement of synaptic plasticity [25,26] and neurotransmission [27], as well as the neurotrophic properties and direct antioxidant free radical scavenging properties [28] of the extract, may be beneficial in post-COVID-19 induced cognitive dysfunction. To what extent an improvement of microcirculation through the reduction of blood viscosity [29] could also contribute to the treatment of post-COVID-19 remains unclear.

Although 59 trials investigating treatment of post-COVID symptoms have been recently registered [30], to date, no therapeutic regimens have been established for such patients. However, for the above reasons, the use of Ginkgo extract in COVID-19 infections has been suggested [24].

Here, we describe the results from the treatment of 5 patients with Ginkgo biloba leaf special extract EGb 761®.

Case Reports

Patients and Treatment

We established a post-COVID-19 outpatient clinic with exclusive care of neurological deficits in July 2021. Based on our experience, cognitive deficits represented the main concern for many patients, especially in terms of professional reintegration but also in terms of sufficient management of daily activities. The COVID-19 disease course was scored to be either mild, moderate, critically, or severely affected according the COVID-19 infection severity scale [31]. SARS-CoV-2 infection status was initially determined using commercial antibody tests, confirmed by PCR analysis. None of the patients required hospitalization for acute COVID-19 treatment.

From 5 outpatients who had SARS-CoV-2 infection between December 2020 and July 2021, with later concerns about cognitive dysfunction, demographic and anamnestic data were assessed, as well as the neuropsychological performance using the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) [32] and neurological status (Table 1). Specific neurological examinations, MRI brain imaging, and EEG were performed according to symptomatology and clinical findings.

Table 1.

Demographic data and baseline neurological symptoms from all 5 patients.

Female 60%
Average age (range) 34.6 (26–59) years
Average time from infection to first outpatient visit 19.4 (9–35) weeks
Neurological symptoms Fatigue 4/5
Headache 2/5
Hyposmia 3/5
Depressive mood 2/5
Position tremor 1/5
Autonomic dysfunction 1/5

The extent of cognitive deficits was quantified on the day of the initial assessment using the Clinical Global Impression Severity (CGIS) scale and the recording of change at follow-up using the Clinical Global Improvement or Change (CGIC) scale [33]. The CGIS is a numerical rating scale of severity of illness, ranging from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill patients). The initial scales detected among the 5 patients were 4 (moderately ill), 5 (markedly ill), and 6 (severely ill). CGIC is a numerical rating scale of therapeutic drug effects, ranging from 1 to 16, with 1 meaning complete or nearly complete remission of all symptoms with no side effects; 5 meaning decided improvement with partial remission of symptoms and no side effects; and 16 meaning unchanged or worse, with adverse effects outweighing the benefits.

Patients were given 2 x 80 mg EGb 761® daily. EGb 761® is a dry extract from Ginkgo biloba leaves (35-67: 1), extraction solvent: acetone 60% (w/w). The extract is adjusted to 22–27% Ginkgo flavonoids calculated as Ginkgo flavone glycosides and 5.4–6.6% terpene lactones consisting of 2.8–3.4% ginkgolides A, B, C, and 2.6–3.2% bilobalide and contains less than 5 ppm ginkgolic acids. Patients were asked to sign a letter of consent to publish the data.

Individual patients

Case 1

The 33-year-old male skilled worker was infected with SARSCoV-2 at the end of March 2021, with a moderate disease course. He had not been vaccinated at the time of infection. During acute COVID infection, he mainly had headache, fever up to 38.5°C, sore throat, hyposmia, joint and body aches, and dry cough over a period of weeks. Hospitalization was not required. In addition to shortness of breath for about 8 weeks after the first positive PCR test, he visited the outpatient clinic for the first time on July 2, 2021 because of attention deficit, CGIS value 5/7, 3–4×weekly headache symptoms with nausea, fatigue, and depressed mood. The patient had a history of insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and transient focal epilepsy in 2017, which had been treated with levetiracetam over 1 year. Cognitive symptoms limited his job activities but did not interfere with private activities.

The neurological status showed a diminished sense of smell, with otherwise unremarkable findings. MRI of the brain was unremarkable, with chronic sinusitis as a secondary finding. The EEG showed a flat curve pattern without abnormalities. The MoCA score was 29 points. The patient could only name 9 items beginning with the letter F.

In addition to 500 mg paracetamol for headache therapy as needed, the patient received 2×80 mg EGb 761® per day, starting on July 3, 2021. At the September 16, 2021 follow-up, the MoCA had improved to the maximum achievable score of 30. A substantial improvement in cognitive concerns (CGIC 05) was reported, in addition to a decreased perception of fatigue and an improvement in olfaction. No adverse events were reported.

Case 2

A 26-year-old woman, doctor of laws, experienced a moderate course of COVID-19 in December 2020 including fever of 38°C for 3–4 days, body aches, circulatory problems, and generalized weakness for 14 days. She had not been vaccinated at that time. Symptomatic treatment with antipyretic drugs and pain killers was performed at home. However, she had persistent fatigue symptoms and attention disturbance (CGIS 4/7), as well as transient worsening of the previously known migraine symptoms between March and June 2021. She mainly reported difficulties due to attention deficits in her daily job activities as a lawyer. On August 20, 2021, the patient first presented herself at the outpatient clinic. The neurological status also showed hyposmia. Otherwise, no objective abnormalities were detected. The MoCA score was 30.

After the administration of 2×80 mg EGb 761® in combination with 2×500 mg/d ascorbic acid starting on August 21, 2021, there was a significant improvement in concentration and a decrease in fatigue as early as October 9, 2021. The MoCA score remained unaltered at its maximum value of 30. According to a telephone follow-up after 3 months (January 8, 2022), concentration deficits had completely regressed (CGIC 01), and the medication was well tolerated.

Case 3

A 32-year-old woman trained as Bachelor for Arabic linguistics had mild COVID-19 in February 2021, including tension headache, tiredness, dull muscle pain, and sweating at night within the first 2 days, which was treated at home. She had not received a vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. On clinical-neurological examination on July 21, 2021, she presented with pre-existing left Horner’s syndrome and birth-related brachial plexus weakness. Concentration and attention deficits were substantial (CGIS 4/7) in family activities only, as she did not work during the time of COVID infection.

An MRI of the brain was unremarkable and the MoCA test result was 29 points. The repetition of 5 words after an interval of 1 min resulted in 1 missing word. The patient started on July 22, 2021 with 2×80 mg of EGb 761® daily. At the November 2021 follow-up, a marked improvement in cognitive deficits was documented (CGIC 05). The MoCA score increased to a value of 30. No adverse events were reported.

Case 4

A 26-year-old woman, master of journalism and working as freelance journalist, with 1 mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in June 2021, was infected with SARS-CoV-2 in July 2021 (prior to a planned second immunization) with a moderately severe disease course. She had hoarseness, painful swallowing, some shortness of breath and cough, and intense tiredness. She did not receive a booster vaccination. On September 10, 2021, she presented to our outpatient clinic. In addition to arterial hypotension with circulatory disturbances, position tremor, autonomic dysfunction, the patient suffered in particular from cognitive deficits with impaired concentration and attention, CGIS 4/7, and rapid fatigability. Before developing COVID-19, the patient was treated for depression with sertraline 50 mg 1-0-0, to which she had responded well, and treatment was continued throughout the observation period.

The clinical-neurological status was unremarkable. However, neuropsychological testing with the MoCA resulted in 24 points, which is below the suggested cut-off [32]. Clock-drawing test resulted in 3 of 5 possible points and only 2 of 5 words were recalled correctly after a period of 5 min. The patient was not able to do her work duties, and also asked for support in performing daily activities at home, such as shopping and cooking.

The patient received symptomatic therapy for orthostatic dys-regulation (3×7 drops Midodrin hydrochlorid/d≈183 mg/d) in addition to 2×80 mg/d EGb 761®.

At the follow-up examination on November 29, 2021, the MoCA score had improved to 28 points, and there was a significant improvement in the concentration disorder and also a reduction in fatigability, with no adverse effects as assessed by the CGIC rating (score of 5).

Case 5

A 59-year-old man working as commercial artist had a severe course of COVID-19 in March 2021, with fever above 38°C over a 2-week period and marked shortness of breath with generalized muscle weakness over several weeks. No ventilation was required, and the patient was treated at home. He had not been vaccinated against SARS-CoV-2. Post-COVID-19 symptoms persisted until initial assessment on July 14, 2021. At that time, he had moderate depression, fatigue, a low threshold irritability, and cognitive deficits interfering with job activities, and CGIS was 4/7. Neurological status showed hyposmia with otherwise unremarkable findings. The MoCA score was 30 and the DemTect score was 18.

At initial assessment, a purely antidepressant therapy with 20 mg Escitalopram/day as well as an herbal preparation in the evening to promote sleep – 1 capsule of “Relaxum”/d, containing extracts of lemon balm (90 mg), hops (28 mg), valerian root (100 mg), passionflower (100 mg) – was administered. At the first follow-up after 6 weeks, significant improvement of the depressive episode, fatigue, irritability, and olfactory disturbance was observed. However, the cognitive and attention deficits remained unchanged. Vitamin C (2×500 mg/d) and 2×80 mg/d EGb 761® were thus prescribed in addition with continued antidepressant therapy.

At an additional check-up 6 weeks later, he had a continued stable mood, almost complete improvement of cognitive deficits without adverse effects, and CGIC 01 was observed.

Discussion

Under EGb 761® treatment, among the 5 patients described here (data summarized in Table 2), 3 experienced a partial remission of their post-COVID-19 cognitive impairment (CGIC 5), while 2 showed a nearly complete remission of all cognitive symptoms (CGIC 1). None of the patients had any adverse effects of EGb 761® treatment. Moreover, neuropsychiatric symptoms and hyposmia also improved in several instances.

Table 2.

Overview of the findings.

Patient 1 Gender, age Male, 33 y
Initial COVID-19 symptoms Moderate
Approximate time to first outpatient visit after COVID-19 infection 13 wks
Initial complaints and result of initial cognitive testing Marked attention deficit, headaches, nausea, depression, hyposmia; CGIS value 5/7; MoCA 29
Treatment in addition to 160 mg EGb 761®/d Paracetamol 500 mg for headache treatment as needed
Approximate time between initial visit and follow-up 11 weeks
Result at follow-up Substantially alleviated cognitive complaints and fatigue; improved hyposmia, CGCI 05, MoCA 30
Patient 2 Gender, age Female, 26 y
Initial COVID-19 symptoms and result of initial cognitive testing Moderate
Approximate time to first outpatient visit after COVID-19 infection 35 weeks
Initial complaints Fatigue; Attention disturbance; worsening of migraine; hyposmia; CGIS 4/7; MoCA 30
Treatment in addition to 160 mg EGb 761®/d 2×500 mg ascorbic acid/d
Approximate time between initial visit and follow-up 7 weeks
Result at first follow-up improved concentration and fatigue
Time between 1st and 2nd follow-up 13 weeks
Result at second follow-up No concentration deficit, CGCI 01; MoCA 30
Patient 3 Gender, age Female, 32 y
Initial COVID-19 symptoms and result of initial cognitive testing Mild; CGIS 4/7; MoCA 29
Approximate time to first outpatient visit after COVID-19 infection 22 wks
Initial complaints Moderate concentration and attention deficits
Treatment in addition to 160 mg EGb 761®/d None
Approximate time between initial visit and follow-up 4 months
Result at follow-up Substantially improved cognitive deficits (CGIC 05).
MoCA 29
Patient 4 Gender, age 26, female
Initial COVID-19 symptoms and result of initial cognitive testing Moderate (1×vaccinated); CGIS 4/7; MoCA 24
Approximate time to first outpatient visit after COVID-19 infection 9 weeks
Initial complaints Besides hypotension with circulatory disturbance, serious cognitive deficits and fatigue
Treatment in addition to 160 mg EGb 761®/d Continued treatment with Sertralin started already before infection; Midodrin hydrochlorid (∼3×61 mg/d)
Approximate time between initial visit and follow-up 7 weeks
Result at follow-up improved concentration and fatigue (CGIC 05; MoCA improvement by 4 points to 28)
Patient 5 Gender, age Male, 59
Initial COVID-19 symptoms and result of initial cognitive testing Severe, but no ventilation; CGIS 4/7; MoCA 30
Approximate time to first outpatient visit after COVID-19 infection 18 weeks
Initial complaints Cognitive deficits; moderate depression; irritability; hyposmia
Initial treatment Escitalopram and plant-based tranquilizer
Approximate time between initial visit and follow-up 6 weeks
Result at first follow-up No change in cognitive deficits; improvement in depression, fatigue, irritability, hyposmia
Additional treatment after first follow-up EGb 761® 160 mg; 2×500 mg ascorbic acid/d
Time between 1st and 2nd follow-up 6 weeks
Result at second follow-up Complete remission of cognitive symptoms (CGIC 1); continued stable mood; MoCA 30

The present data suggest that symptomatic treatment of cognitive performance deficits in the context of post-COVID-19 with EGb 761® may be of substantial therapeutic help. This is plausible based on the known mechanisms discussed above.

Our patients reported concentration and attention deficits during everyday activities. During treatment, the MoCA test result increased by 4 points to a score of 28 in patient 4. In all other cases, the test score was close to or at the maximum achievable value of 30. Although clear subjective cognitive concerns were present before treatment, this deficit was in most cases not detectable using the MoCA or DemTect. This experience suggests that those tests are not sufficiently sensitive to be used as a screening tool for post-COVID-19-related cognitive disturbances, unless the symptoms are very severe.

To that end, a recent publication provided evidence for cognitive tests more amenable to detect post-COVID-19 symptoms [34], in which 401 patients who were infected with SARSCoV-2 aged 51 to 81 years showed several findings related to the cognitive changes described in this study. It was shown that at an average time of 141 days between the first brain scans and the second examination, after SARS-CoV-2 infection, significant effects were evident compared with subjects without infection. These included a greater reduction in gray matter in the orbitofrontal cortex and parahippocampal area compared with the control group. Furthermore, greater changes in the primary olfactory center and an overall greater reduction in brain size were also observed. The detailed neuropsychological examinations also showed a loss of cognitive abilities. That result could also be reproduced a period when only COVID-19 individuals who were not hospitalized were included. In the neuropsychological tests, the “Trail Making Test” proved to be particularly helpful. Thus, while memory tests were not sufficiently sensitive, attention and concentration deficits could be objectified. That report encompassed data from when the viral alpha variant was prevalent. To what extent this correlates with the now-current omicron variant remains to be determined. In the context of the cases presented here, patients with both the alpha variant and the delta variant have been described.

Patient 1, who also had hyposmia, regained his sense of smell during treatment. That observation is consistent with previous studies in which Ginkgo extract alleviated loss of olfaction due to viral infection [35,36]. In contrast, in healthy young adults without olfactory impairment, Ginkgo extract did not improve the sense of smell [37]. Possibly the already mentioned well-documented circulation-enhancing, antioxidant effect and the effect on brain adaptability (neuroplasticity) of Ginkgo extract, including in the olfactory brain [38] makes such an effect plausible. Furthermore, preclinical studies suggest that Ginkgo leaf extract may promote regeneration of the damaged olfactory sense [18,39,40].

Patient 5 showed an improvement of the depressive mood and impulse disturbance under general symptomatic therapy measures, but no improvement of the attention deficit. That improvement only occurred when treatment was supplemented with 160 mg EGb 761®.

Whereas most clinical trials demonstrating efficacy and safety of EGb 761® have been performed with older patients, here, successful treatment was shown with patients as young as 26 years. While it would be premature to assume that EGb 761® would be effective as a neuroenhancer in young, healthy people, it may be beneficial in the challenged brain, regardless of age.

In recent trials, 240 mg/d of EGb 761® has usually been used [41]. Whether an even stronger effect of the medication can be observed when higher doses than the 160 mg/d used in those 5 post-COVID-19 cases remains to be seen.

A big concern is that many post-COVID-19 patients, as in our study, bear their symptoms for many months before they make an appointment with a physician. Treatment might be more effective if it was started at the start of the disease rather than when cognitive and psychiatric symptoms have been established for months.

Our results are consistent with theoretical considerations suggesting that the use of EGb 761® is a promising therapeutic intervention for cognitive deficits in patients with post-COVID-19 conditions.

Conclusions

In a consecutive series of 5 cases, we observed clear and rapid improvement or complete regression of post-COVID-19 cognitive deficits during administration of EGb 761® (Figure 1). In many patients, at least some aspects of post-COVID-19-related cognitive impairment subside over time [42]. Thus, from a case series it is not clear which aspects of the recovery were due to the pharmacologic effects of EGb 761®. On the other hand, the fact that the cognitive deficits had been persisting for quite some time and were alleviated soon after EGb 761® was given suggests that a controlled clinical trial testing EGb 761® in the treatment of post-COVID-19 symptoms is warranted.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

The COVID-19 pandemic left many patients with long-lasting cognitive or psychiatric symptoms. Here, we report a substantial alleviation of those symptoms in 5 patients after treatment with Ginkgo extract EGb 761®. Indicated below the Ginkgo leaf is the structure of bilobalide B, a terpene lactone which is one of several hundred compounds present in EGb 761®. Drawing by Ulrike Möltgen.

Furthermore, this case series shows that the MoCA only detects cases of clinically severe cognitive impairment in post-COVID-19 patients. Thus, for clinical assessment of cognitive post-COVID-19 symptoms, more sensitive neuropsychological tests should be used, which also address fatigue.

To treat patients with post-COVID-19-associated cognitive deficits, evidence-based therapeutic options have not yet been established. In light of the good tolerability and low interaction potential with other drugs, the use of EGb 761® at a daily dose of at least 160 mg is a therapeutic option to be considered.

Acknowledgments

Ulrike Möltgen (Wuppertal, Germany) contributed Figure 1.

Abbreviations:

SARS-CoV-2

severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2;

CGIC

Clinical Global Improvement or Change;

CGIS

Clinical Global Impression Severity;

COVID-19

Coronavirus Disease 2019

Footnotes

Declaration of Figures’ Authenticity

All figures submitted have been created by the authors who confirm that the images are original with no duplication and have not been previously published in whole or in part.

References:

  • 1.Gallo Marin B, Aghagoli G, Lavine K, et al. Predictors of COVID-19 severity: A literature review. Rev Med Virol. 2021;31(1):1–10. doi: 10.1002/rmv.2146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Bauer L, Laksono BM, de Vrij FMS, Kushner SA, et al. The neuroinvasiveness, neurotropism, and neurovirulence of SARS-CoV-2. Trends Neurosci. 2022;45:358–68. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2022.02.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Zifko U, Schmiedlechner T, Saelens J, et al. COVID-19: Involvement of the nervous system. Identifying neurological predictors defining the course of the disease. J Neurol Sci. 2021;425:117438. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2021.117438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mehandru S, Merad M. Pathological sequelae of long-haul COVID. Nat Immunol. 2022;23(2):194–202. doi: 10.1038/s41590-021-01104-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Nasserie T, Hittle M, Goodman SN. Assessment of the frequency and variety of persistent symptoms among patients with COVID-19: A systematic review. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(5):e2111417. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.11417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Reddy ST, Garg T, Shah C, et al. Cerebrovascular disease in patients with COVID-19: A review of the literature and case series. Case Rep Neurol. 2020;12(2):199–209. doi: 10.1159/000508958. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sardu C, Gambardella J, Morelli MB, et al. Hypertension, thrombosis, kidney failure, and diabetes: Is COVID-19 an endothelial disease? A comprehensive evaluation of clinical and basic evidence. J Clin Med. 2020;9(5):1417. doi: 10.3390/jcm9051417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Poyatos P, Luque N, Eizaguirre S, et al. Post-COVID-19 patients show an increased endothelial progenitor cell production. Transl Res. 2022;243:14–20. doi: 10.1016/j.trsl.2022.01.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Haffke M, Freitag H, Rudolf G, et al. Endothelial dysfunction and altered endothelial biomarkers in patients with post-COVID-19 syndrome and chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) J Transl Med. 2022;20(1):138. doi: 10.1186/s12967-022-03346-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Song J, Liu D, Feng L, et al. Protective Effect of Standardized Extract of Ginkgo biloba against Cisplatin-Induced Nephrotoxicity. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013:846126. doi: 10.1155/2013/846126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wang Y, Pei DS, Ji HX, Xing SH. Protective effect of a standardized Ginkgo extract (ginaton) on renal ischemia/reperfusion injury via suppressing the activation of JNK signal pathway. Phytomedicine. 2008;15(11):923–31. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2008.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Naidu MU, Shifow AA, Kumar KV, Ratnakar KS. Ginkgo biloba extract ameliorates gentamicin-induced nephrotoxicity in rats. Phytomedicine. 2000;7(3):191–97. doi: 10.1016/s0944-7113(00)80003-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Schütt F, Aretz S, Auffahrt GU, Kopitz J. [Role of energy metabolism in retinal pigment epithelium] Ophthalmologe. 2013;110(4):346–52. doi: 10.1007/s00347-012-2752-3. [in German] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Behar-Cohen FF, Heydolph S, Faure V, et al. Peroxynitrite cytotoxicity on bovine retinal pigmented epithelial cells in culture. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1996;226(3):842–49. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1996.1438. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Liu KX, He W, Rinne T, et al. The effect of Ginkgo biloba extract (EGb 761®) pre-treatment on intestinal epithelial apoptosis induced by intestinal ischemia/reperfusion in rats: Role of ceramide. Am J Chin Med. 2007;35(5):805–19. doi: 10.1142/S0192415X07005284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Chen JW, Chen YH, Lin FY, et al. Ginkgo biloba extract inhibits tumor necrosis factor-alpha-induced reactive oxygen species generation, transcription factor activation, and cell adhesion molecule expression in human aortic endothelial cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003;23(9):1559–66. doi: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000089012.73180.63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wu YZ, Li SQ, Zu XG, et al. Ginkgo biloba extract improves coronary artery circulation in patients with coronary artery disease: Contribution of plasma nitric oxide and endothelin-1. PhytotherRes. 2008;22(6):734–39. doi: 10.1002/ptr.2335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lee CH, Mo JH, Shim SH, et al. Effect of Ginkgo biloba and dexamethasone in the treatment of 3-methylindole-induced anosmia mouse model. AmJRhinol. 2008;22(3):292–96. doi: 10.2500/ajr.2008.22.3167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Mansour SM, Bahgat AK, El-Khatib AS, Khayyal MT. Ginkgo biloba extract (EGb 761®) normalizes hypertension in 2K, 1C hypertensive rats: Role of antioxidant mechanisms, ACE inhibiting activity and improvement of endothelial dysfunction. Phytomedicine. 2011;18(8–9):641–47. doi: 10.1016/j.phymed.2011.01.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Zhang XH, Zhang M, Wu JX, et al. Gingko biloba extract EGb 761® alleviates heat-stress damage in chicken heart tissue by stimulating Hsp70 expression in vivo in vascular endothelial cells. Br Poult Sci. 2020;61(2):180–87. doi: 10.1080/00071668.2019.1697425. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Qiao P, Yan H, Wang J. EGb 761® protects brain microvascular endothelial cells against oxygen-glucose deprivation-induced injury through lncRNA Rmst/miR-150 axis. Neurochem Res. 2020;45(10):2398–408. doi: 10.1007/s11064-020-03099-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chiu YL, Tsai WC, Wu CH, et al. Ginkgo biloba induces thrombomodulin expression and tissue-type plasminogen activator secretion via the activation of Kruppel-like factor 2 within endothelial cells. Am J Chin Med. 2020;48(2):357–72. doi: 10.1142/S0192415X20500184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Diamond BJ, Shiflett SC, Feiwel N, et al. Ginkgo biloba extract: mechanisms and clinical indications. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81(5):668–78. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(00)90052-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Ibrahim MA, Ramadan HH, Mohammed RN. Evidence that Ginkgo biloba could use in the influenza and coronavirus COVID-19 infections. J Basic Clin Physiol Pharmacol. 2021;32(3):131–43. doi: 10.1515/jbcpp-2020-0310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Tchantchou F, Lacor PN, Cao Z, et al. Stimulation of neurogenesis and synaptogenesis by bilobalide and quercetin via common final pathway in hippocampal neurons. J Alzheimers Dis. 2009;18(4):787–98. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2009-1189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Tchantchou F, Xu Y, Wu Y, et al. EGb 761® enhances adult hippocampal neurogenesis and phosphorylation of CREB in transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Faseb J. 2007;21(10):2400–8. doi: 10.1096/fj.06-7649com. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Fehske CJ, Leuner K, Müller WE. Ginkgo biloba extract (EGb 761®) influences monoaminergic neurotransmission via inhibition of NE uptake, but not MAO activity after chronic treatment. Pharmacol Res. 2009;60(1):68–73. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2009.02.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Eckert A, Keil U, Kressmann S, et al. Effects of EGb 761® Ginkgo biloba extract on mitochondrial function and oxidative stress. Pharmacopsychiatry. 2003;36(Suppl. 1):S15–S23. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-40449. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kellermann AJ, Kloft C. Is there a risk of bleeding associated with standardized Ginkgo biloba extract therapy? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pharmacotherapy. 2011;31(5):490–502. doi: 10.1592/phco.31.5.490. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Ceban F, Leber A, Jawad MY, et al. Registered clinical trials investigating treatment of long COVID: A scoping review and recommendations for research. Infect Dis (Lond) 2022;54(7):467–77. doi: 10.1080/23744235.2022.2043560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ständiger Arbeitskreis der Kompetenz- und Behandlungszentren für Krankheiten durch hochpathogene Erreger am Robert Koch-Institut Hinweise zu Erkennung Diagnostik und Therapie von Patienten mit COVID-19. ( https://edoc.rki.de/bitstream/handle/176904/6511/STAKOB-Therapie_2020-03-13-14h_Hyperlinks-14Maerz13h.pdf?sequence=1). 2020.
  • 32.Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bedirian V, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: A brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53(4):695–99. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Guy W. CGI Clinical Global Impressions. In: Guy W, editor. ECDEU assessment manual for psychopharmacology. Rockville, Md: U.S. Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare; 1976. pp. 217–22. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Douaud G, Lee S, Alfaro-Almagro F, et al. SARS-CoV-2 is associated with changes in brain structure in UK Biobank. Nature. 2022;604(7907):697–707. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04569-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Seo BS, Lee HJ, Mo JH, et al. Treatment of postviral olfactory loss with glucocorticoids, Ginkgo biloba, and mometasone nasal spray. Arch OtolaryngolHead Neck Surg. 2009;135(10):1000–4. doi: 10.1001/archoto.2009.141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Guo YC, Yao LY, Wei YX. [Clinical treatment effect of glucocorticoids and extract of Ginkgo biloba on post-viral olfactory dysfunction.] Lin Chung Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017;31(20):1585–88. doi: 10.13201/j.issn.1001-1781.2017.20.010. [in Chinese] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mattes RD, Pawlik MK. Effects of Ginkgo biloba on alertness and chemosensory function in healthy adults. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2004;19(2):81–90. doi: 10.1002/hup.562. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Droy-Lefaix MT. Effect of the antioxidant action of Ginkgo biloba extract (EGb 761®) on aging and oxidative stress. Age (Omaha) 1997;20(3):141–49. doi: 10.1007/s11357-997-0013-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Lee GS, Cho JH, Park CS, et al. The effect of Ginkgo biloba on the expression of intermediate-early antigen (c-fos) in the experimentally induced anosmic mouse. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2009;36(3):287–91. doi: 10.1016/j.anl.2008.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Didier A, Jourdan F. The Ginkgo biloba extract modulates the balance between proliferation and differentiation in the olfactory epithelium of adult mice following bulbectomy. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand) 2002;48(6):717–23. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Gauthier S, Schlaefke S. Efficacy and tolerability of Ginkgo biloba extract EGb 761© in dementia: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized placebo-controlled trials. Clinical Interventions in Aging. 2014;9:2065–77. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S72728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ferrucci R, Dini M, Rosci C, et al. One-year cognitive follow-up of COVID-19 hospitalized patients. Eur J Neurol. 2022;29(7):2006–14. doi: 10.1111/ene.15324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The American Journal of Case Reports are provided here courtesy of International Scientific Information, Inc.

RESOURCES