Abstract
Lipopolysaccharides (LPS) are highly toxic compounds, even at a trace amount. When recombinant proteins are produced in E. coli, it is inevitable that LPS contaminates. However, LPS removal is still technically challenging and costly due to the high degree of solubility in a wide range of solvents. In this study, we explored the possibility of using the N-terminal region containing cysteine-rich, EGF-like, and sushi1–3 domains (CES3) of Factor C from the horseshoe crab Carcinoscorpius rotundicauda to develop a platform to remove LPS from recombinant proteins. We expressed CES3 as part of a recombinant protein, BiP:NT:CBM3:SUMO:CES3:His:HDEL, in Nicotiana benthamiana and found that purified or microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) bead-immobilised CES3 showed strong binding to LPS-containing E. coli. To produce CES3:CBM3 in an LPS-free environment, we generated Arabidopsis transgenic plants harbouring a recombinant gene, BiP:NT:SUMO:CES3:CBM3:HDEL, and found that transgenic plants mainly produce CES3:CBM3:His:HDEL, a truncated version of BiP:NT:SUMO:CES3:CBM3:HDEL via endogenous protease-mediated proteolytic processing in vivo. CES3:CBM3:HDEL purified from Arabidopsis plant extracts and immobilised onto MCC beads removed LPS contamination from protein samples. We propose that the CES3:CBM3 fusion protein produced in plants and immobilised on MCC beads can be a robust and easy platform for LPS removal from recombinant proteins.
Subject terms: Biological techniques, Biotechnology, Plant sciences
Introduction
Recombinant proteins are in great demand for pharmaceutical use. Various organisms have been developed as platforms to produce recombinant proteins. Of these platforms, E. coli is still favourable due to fast growth, use of simple growth medium, availability of a variety of genetic tools, high yield of protein production, and a great deal of experience in the production of vastly diverse proteins. Indeed, E. coli is the host of 30–40% of approved therapeutic proteins today1–3. Despite this success, E. coli as a host for recombinant protein production still has a serious limitation—endotoxin contamination3–8.
Endotoxin is a domain of LPS, a major component of the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria. LPS consists of three domains: a hydrophobic domain known as lipid A (or endotoxin), a nonrepeating core oligosaccharide, and a distal polysaccharide (or O-antigen)9. Lipid A (endotoxin) of LPS is responsible for toxicity by triggering proinflammatory cytokine production10,11. The presence of a trace amount of endotoxin, as low as 1 ng of endotoxin per kg body weight, can cause a pyrogenic reaction12,13. However, it is not easy to remove due to its high stability and resistance to heat and a range of pH. Moreover, given its chemical nature, endotoxins can interact with both hydrophobic and hydrophilic materials under diverse physiological conditions. Various methods have been developed and widely applied to remove endotoxins from pharmaceutical products8,14–20. These include filtration, hydrophilic–hydrophobic phase separation, and ion-exchange chromatography14,17,21,22. However, these methods are limited by one or more aspects, such as high cost, low productivity, low efficiency, low protein recovery, effect on protein stability, or contamination of undesirable chemicals. Recently, the focus of endotoxin removal has shifted to affinity absorbents that include dimethylaminoethanol, poly-1-lysine, poly(ethyleneimine) (pEI), histamine, histidine, diaminohistidine, polyvinyl alcohol, chitosan, and polymixin B. These ligands were immobilised on the membranes of cellulose, cellulose acetate, nylon, or polyvinyl acetate8. Recently, nanoparticles (NPs) have been used to immobilise ligands, such as poly-ε-caprolactone (PCL)8.
The haemocyte of horseshoe crabs (Carcinoscorpius rotundicauda) is attributed to its extraordinary ability to coagulate Gram-negative bacteria by a cascade of pathways initiated by a protein called Factor C, a serine protease zymogen, the main component of the LAL endotoxin test kit23,24. Factor C is composed of an N-terminal signal peptide (1–25), a heavy chain (26–690), and a light chain (691–1019). The heavy chain contains multiple domains. Of these domains, the cysteine-rich domain, or sushi domain, is proposed to bind to LPS25,26. However, Koshiba et al.27 suggested that tripeptide, Arg36-Trp37-Arg38, at the cys-rich domain of the horseshoe crab Tachypleus tridentatus is essential for LPS binding and substitution of these three residues leads to loss of LPS-binding ability. The C-terminal region contains a serine protease domain. After processing, the two chains are connected via a disulphide bond. Factor C shows an extremely high affinity to LPS with 1.7 × 10–10 M of kd, the highest binding affinity among LPS-binding molecules. Moreover, Factor C showed positive cooperativity in LPS binding that culminates in an increase in the kd value 2.7 × 10–12 M25. LPS binding to the N-terminal region leads to the activation of Factor C, which in turn activates Factor B in the cascade of the coagulation pathway upon bacterial infection. Recombinant Factor C (rFC) has been produced in insect and animal cells for the purpose of using it to detect LPS28,29. Indeed, LPS test kits have now been developed using recombinant Factor C, thereby eliminating the use of haemocytes from horseshoe crabs29.
In this study, we investigated the possibility of using the LPS-binding ability of Factor C to develop an endotoxin removal system from protein samples. For this purpose, we expressed the N-terminal LPS binding region containing cysteine-rich, EGF-like, and three sushi domains (CES3) of Factor C as part of a recombinant protein in plants, immobilised it onto the solid surface of microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) beads using CBM3, and tested for the removal of LPS from protein samples. We showed that a polypeptide consisting of CES3 and CBM3 (CES3:CBM3) was expressed in soluble form in Arabidopsis transgenic plants. Moreover, CES3:CBM3 immobilised onto MCC beads effectively removed LPS from the protein samples.
Results
Expression of recombinant proteins containing the LPS-binding region CES3 of Factor C in Nicotiana benthamiana
To explore the possibility of using the LPS-binding domain, CES3, of Factor C in a device for removing LPS in biological samples, we examined whether the N-terminal region of Factor C could be expressed as part of a recombinant protein at a high level in plants. We first used Nicotiana benthamiana as a host. It has been widely used as a plant for recombinant protein production30. Of the full-length Factor C, we focused on the production of the N-terminal region containing cysteine-rich, EGF-like, sushi1-3 domains (named CES3) as part of recombinant proteins. To express CES3, we generated a recombinant gene, BiP:M:CBM3:SUMO:CES3:His:HDEL (BMCS:CES3:His), consisting of the Arabidopsis BiP1 leader sequence for targeting the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), translational enhancer M domain, cellulose-binding module CBM3, SUMO domain, CES3, His tag, and ER retention signal HDEL (Fig. 1A)31. The M domain, an extracellular domain containing multiple N-glycosylation sites from human tyrosine phosphatase receptor C (CD45), increases translation in plants32. CBM3 tightly binds to microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) beads. The SUMO domain of Brachypodium is used to release the C-terminal region containing CES3 from the full-length recombinant protein by proteolysis, using bdSNEP1, a SUMO protease from Brachypodium33. The His-tag of 6 histidine residues (His) was used for western blot analysis and purification using the Ni2+-NTA affinity column. The ER retention signal HDEL leads to a high level of protein accumulation in the ER. To express the recombinant protein BMCS:CES3:His, the recombinant gene construct BMCS:CES3:His was fused with a 5’ UTR sequence showing high translational efficiency32 and then placed between the CaMV 35S promoter and the Hsp terminator31.
To express the recombinant protein (BMCS:CES3:His) in N. benthamiana, BMCS:CES3:His was introduced into the Agrobacterium strain GV3101. Subsequently, Agrobacterium harbouring BMCS:CES3:His and Agrobacterium harbouring gene silencing suppressor, p38, were mixed at 1:1 and used for syringe-mediated infiltration into N. benthamiana. Leaf tissues were harvested at 3-, 5-, or 7-days post-infiltration (dpi). Total extracts were prepared from leaf tissues and fractionated into soluble and pellet fractions. These fractions were separated by SDS-PAGE and analysed by western blotting using an anti-CBM3 antibody. The protein level of BMCS:CES3:His detected at the position of approximately 77 kD gradually increased with time (Fig. 1B) (a full version of modified immunoblot and CBB staining membranes are available in supplementary Figs. S1–S4). Co-expression of p38 was crucial to increasing the expression level, as reported previously34,35. However, most proteins were detected in the pellet fraction at 5 and 7 dpi, indicating that recombinant proteins exist largely as protein aggregates. To improve the solubility of CES3-containing recombinant proteins, we used the conserved hydrophilic N-terminal (NT) domain of MaSp 1b, a major ampullate spidroin 1B, from Nephila clavipes. The NT domain of MaSp 1a of Euprosthenops australis helps to sequester the hydrophobic portion of spidroin from aqueous surroundings by forming a micellar structure36. A previous study showed that the substitution of Asp40 with Lys and Lys65 with Asp in the NT domain of MaSp 1a of Euprosthenops australis prevents dimer formation via decreased electrostatic interaction between monomers. However, the mutant NT domain retained its ability to solubilise a neighbouring hydrophobic domain by micelle formation at a wide range of pH37. We also substituted Asp59 with Lys and Lys84 with Asp to produce NT-m. We replaced the M domain in BMCS:CES3:His:HDEL with the NT-m domain to generate BiP:NT-m:CBM3:SUMO:CES3:His:HDEL (BNCS:CES3:His) (Fig. 1A). Agrobacterium harbouring BNCS:CES3:His infiltrated N. benthamiana leaf tissues with or without Agrobacterium harbouring p38. Total extracts were prepared from leaf tissues that had been collected at 3, 5, and 7 dpi and separated into soluble and insoluble fractions. These fractions were separated by SDS-PAGE and analysed by western blotting against the anti-CBM3 antibody. The expression level increased with time, and p38 was critical for high-level expression. Moreover, recombinant protein BNCS:CES3:His at a position of approximately 78 kD was largely detected in the soluble fraction (Fig. 1C), indicating that the NT-m domain leads to the solubilisation of BNCS:CES3:His (Fig. 1C). However, the anti-CBM3 antibody detected two bands at positions 78 and 51 kD, indicating that proteolytic processing occurs in the recombinant protein in vivo. The upper band corresponds to the full-length recombinant protein. A previous study showed that a recombinant protein containing the SUMO domain is subject to proteolytic cleavage at the C-terminal end of the SUMO domain by an unknown endogenous protease33. Thus, BNCS:CES3:His might have been subject to proteolysis at the C-terminal end of the SUMO domain to give a truncated polypeptide at the 51 kD position33.
Purified CES3:His from protein extracts of N. benthamiana plants binds with E. coli cells
Next, we wanted to test whether plant-produced CES3 binds to LPS. First, we attempted to release the CES3:His region from full-length recombinant protein BNCS:CES3:His via proteolytic cleavage using HA:bdSENP1 in vivo. In a previous study, we showed that co-expression of HA:bdSENP1 with the target protein, hLIF, leads to proteolytic processing in vivo33. Both HA:bdSENP1 and BNCS:CES3:His were co-expressed in the leaf tissues of N. benthamiana via Agrobacterium-mediated infiltration. p38 was also included in the expression. Total extracts from leaf tissues were analysed by western blotting using the anti-His antibody. At both 5 and 7 dpi, co-expression of HA:bdSENP1 with BNCS:CES3:His led to release CES3:His which was detected at the position of approximately 28 to 36 kD. The multiple bands corresponded to the size of fully or partially N-glycosylated CES3:His (Fig. 2A). The results indicated that HA:bdSENP1 leads to the proteolysis of BNCS:CES3:His in vivo. However, the co-expression of HA:bdSENP1 caused a great decrease in the expression of recombinant protein. We also confirmed the expression of HA:bdSNEP1, which was tagged with a small epitope, HA, at the N-terminus, by western blot analysis using an anti-HA antibody (Fig. 2B). Next, we purified CES3:His proteins using the His-tag. Protein extracts were prepared from the leaves of N. benthamiana co-infiltrated with BNCS:CES3:His, HA:bdSENP1, and p38, harvested at 7 dpi, and used for purification of CES3:His using Ni2+-NTA agarose beads. Purified CES3:His was analysed by both SDS-PAGE and western blotting against the anti-His antibody. CES3:His was detected at positions ranging from 28 to 35 kD, indicating that CES3:His is N-glycosylated (Fig. 2C,D).
We determined whether plant-produced CES3 binds to LPS. Gram-negative bacteria, such as E. coli, contain LPS as a major component of the outer membrane. Therefore, we used E. coli to test the functionality of CES3:His for binding with LPS. E. coli JM109 cells grown overnight were collected by centrifugation and washed twice with PBS. Purified CES3:His was mixed with E. coli and incubated at room temperature. E. coli cells were precipitated to the pellet fraction by centrifugation and washed extensively with PBS. The pellet fraction containing E. coli was separated by SDS-PAGE and analysed by western blotting using an anti-His antibody. CES3:His at 28 to 36 kD was detected in the E. coli pellet fraction (Fig. 3A,B), indicating that CES3:His tightly binds to E. coli. E. coli cells alone and CES3:His alone were used as controls. Using the similar procedure, we also tested whether CES3-His binds to gram-positive bacteria, Lactobacillus Sakei, and found that CES3-His did not bind to L. Sakei (Fig. 3A,B).
Fusion of cellulose-binding domain CBM3 to the C-terminus of CES3 immobilized CES3 on MCC beads
We evaluated whether CES3 could be used to remove endotoxins from protein samples. We designed a new recombinant construct, BiP:NT-m:SUMO:CES3:CBM3:His:HDEL (BNS:CES3:CBM3), which contains the CBM3 domain at the C-terminus of CES3. In this construct, the CES3:CBM3 domain can be released from the full-length recombinant protein by bdSENP1 and can also be immobilised onto microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) beads by the CBM3 domain (Fig. 4A). Agrobacterium harbouring BNS:CES3:CBM3 and Agrobacterium harbouring p38 were mixed at a 1:1 ratio and used to co-infiltrate N. benthamiana leaf tissues. Total extracts were prepared from leaf tissues harvested at 5 and 7 dpi and analysed by western blotting using an anti-CBM3 antibody. BNS:CES3:CBM3 was expressed at high levels on both dpi (Fig. 4B). Next, we examined the binding of BNS:CES3:CBM3 to the MCC beads. Total soluble protein extracts were incubated with prewashed MCC beads at 4 °C with gentle shaking for 2 h. The MCC beads were collected after centrifugation and washed with buffer three times. Protein-bound MCC beads were released by boiling in SDS-PAGE sample buffer, separated by SDS-PAGE, and analysed by western blotting using an anti-CBM3 antibody. BNS:CES3:CBM3 (and CES3:CBM3) was detected in the protein sample released from the MCC beads, indicating that the recombinant proteins bind to the MCC beads (Fig. 4C). Unbound supernatant or washing-off solutions were included in the analysis. These samples did not show any signal of BNS:CES3:CBM3, indicating that BNS:CES3:CBM3 showed strong binding to the MCC beads.
Generation of transgenic Arabidopsis to produce BNS:CES3:CBM3 in an endotoxin-free condition
To further explore the possibility of developing an LPS removal system using BNS:CES3:CBM3, we sought to produce BNS:CES3:CBM3 in transgenic plants. In N. benthamiana, we used the transient expression of BNS:CES3:CBM3:His:HDEL via infiltration mediated by Agrobacterium, a Gram-negative bacterium. Thus, proteins produced in N. benthamiana might have a chance of LPS contamination. Thus, to produce BNS:CES3:CBM3 in a completely endotoxin-free environment, we generated transgenic Arabidopsis plants expressing BNS:CES3:CBM3 (Fig. 5A) using the floral dipping method38. The expression of BNS:CES3:CBM3 in transgenic plants was examined at the T3 generation. Total protein extracts from individual plants of the T3 generation were separated by SDS-PAGE and analysed by western blotting using an anti-CBM3 antibody. Of the many transgenic lines, independent lines 9 and 14 showed high expression (Fig. 5B). The anti-CBM3 antibody detected a strong band at 48 kD and a weak band at 78 kD (Fig. 5B). The 78 kD protein band corresponded to full-length BNS:CES3:CBM3, whereas the smaller band at 48 kD represented a truncated form corresponding to CES3:CBM3, indicating that the full-length protein undergoes proteolytic processing in vivo. One possibility is that BNS:CES3:CBM3 is cleaved at the SUMO site by an endogenous protease, even without co-expression of bdSNEP1. This is similar to the transient expression of BNS:CES3:CBM3 in N. benthamiana.
Next, we purified CES3:CBM3 using MCC beads. Transgenic Arabidopsis plants were grown in a growth chamber under aseptic conditions. Protein extracts were prepared from leaf tissues using an endotoxin-free buffer. The total soluble protein extracts were mixed with prewashed MCC beads. After incubation, the MCC beads were precipitated by centrifugation and washed extensively. Proteins released from the MCC beads by boiling were separated by SDS-PAGE and analysed by western blotting using an anti-CBM3 antibody. A protein band at the position of 48 kD was detected, indicating that the proteolytically processed form of CES3:CBM3 in vivo could be purified by MCC beads (Fig. 5C).
CES3:CBM3 bound to MCC beads removes endotoxin from protein samples
We examined whether CES3:CBM3 bound to MCC beads could remove LPS from the protein samples. We prepared LPS-containing protein samples by mixing 1 µg endotoxin-free BSA (bovine serum albumin) with 0.9 EU LPS of E. coli O111:B4. The endotoxin-containing BSA solution was incubated with 2 mg MCC beads alone or with CES3:CBM3-bound MCC beads for 30 min at room temperature. After centrifugation of the samples, the MCC beads and supernatant were collected separately. The supernatant was examined to determine the BSA and LPS content. The amount of LPS in the supernatant from samples incubated with CES3:CBM3-bound MCC beads and MCC beads alone was reduced to 80 and 20% of the input of LPS, respectively, indicating that CES3:CBM3 immobilised onto MCC beads can remove LPS from protein samples. In addition, MCC beads removed LPS to a certain degree (Fig. 6A). We examined the amount of BSA in the supernatant and found no loss of BSA by the MCC beads (Fig. 6B).
We further tested whether CES3:CBM3 bound to MCC beads can remove endotoxins from protein samples when proteins are produced from E. coli. We purified His:bdSNEP1 from E. coli using Ni2+-NTA affinity column chromatography. Approximately 1 µg of His:bdSENP1 containing approximately one EU of endotoxin was incubated with CES3:CBM3-MCC beads for 30 min at room temperature. As a control, we included MCC beads alone. After centrifugation, the supernatant was collected, and the amount of endotoxin was measured using an LAL chromogenic endotoxin measuring kit. The LPS in the supernatant from MCC beads alone and CES3:CBM3-MCC beads contained 90 and 40% of the input of LPS, respectively (Fig. 6C), indicating that CES3:CBM3-MCC beads can remove LPS from protein samples during protein purification from E. coli. We examined the amount of His:bdSENP1 in the supernatants and found that there was no loss of bdSENP1 by the MCC beads (Fig. 6D).
Discussion
In this study, we showed that CES3, the LPS-binding N-terminal region of Factor C from the horseshoe crab, can be produced as part of a recombinant protein with the ability to bind to LPS. The CES3-containing protein, CES3:CBM3, was easily purified from plant extracts using MCC beads. Moreover, the CES3 region immobilised onto MCC beads via the CBM3 of recombinant protein CES3:CBM3 removed a significant amount of endotoxin from the protein sample without affecting the amount of protein (Fig. 7).
The N-terminal region of Factor C containing cysteine-rich, EGF-like, and sushi 1–3 domains is sufficient to bind to LPS at an extremely high affinity23–26,39. Factor C has been reported to detect a femtogram of endotoxins, which is much lower than the detection limit recommended for pharmaceutical products26,40. However, it is not known which domain(s) of the N-terminal region of Factor C is responsible for LPS binding; both the cysteine-rich domain27 and sushi 1–3 domains41,42 have been reported to specifically bind to LPS. We used the N-terminal CES3 region, which contains both the cysteine-rich domain and sushi 1–3 domains for LPS binding. When we expressed CES3-containing recombinant protein in the ER, it was produced mostly as an insoluble aggregate. To solubilise CES3-containing recombinant proteins, we exploited an N-terminal domain of spidroin, which is crucial for the solubilisation of spidroin, one of the most insoluble proteins in the spinning ducts of silkworms. It has been proposed that the conserved hydrophilic N-terminal (NT) domain sequesters the hydrophobic portion of spidroin from aqueous surroundings by forming a micellar structure36. The NT domain is known to form a dimer43,44. As reported previously by Kronqvist et al. (2014)43, to prevent dimer formation of the NT domain, we introduced two mutations, Asp59/Lys and Lys84/Asp, to give NT-m. Fusion of NT-m greatly improved the solubility of CES3-containing recombinant protein, similar to the previous study37. At the same time, this brought another unexpected outcome: the processing of full-length recombinant protein into a smaller form with an apparent molecular weight of 48 kD. Based on the size and the fact that the 48 kD band is detected by the anti-CBM3 antibody, we thought that the 48 kD band corresponds to BNCS that is produced by processing downstream of the SUMO domain. In fact, a previous study in our lab showed that SUMO domain-containing recombinant proteins are processed downstream of SUMO by unknown endogenous proteases in the ER in N. benthamiana33. In addition, BNS:CES3:CBM3 also produced the processed form in transgenic Arabidopsis plants; transgenic Arabidopsis plants that harbour BNS:CES3:CBM3 produced the 48 kD band as a major form and the 78 kD band as a minor form. It also appeared that the full-length protein was processed downstream of the SUMO domain to yield the 48 kD band. In fact, this is advantageous in producing CES3:CBM3 without extra domains in the N-terminal region used for recombinant protein expression, but it is not directly related to the functionality of the recombinant protein.
The most important aspect of this study was whether CES3 produced in plants maintains its ability to bind to LPS. Purified CES3 or CES3:CBM3, which had been released from full-length recombinant protein, showed a binding affinity with intact E. coli (Fig. 3A,B). Moreover, CES3:CBM3 produced in transgenic Arabidopsis plants and immobilised onto MCC beads was able to remove 80% of E. coli O111:B4 endotoxins contaminated with BSA without affecting the protein amount(Fig. 6A). Nevertheless, the MCC beads alone also showed a certain degree of binding to the endotoxin. In addition, CES3:CBM3 immobilised onto MCC beads was able to remove endotoxins from the recombinant proteins produced from E. coli, confirming the functionality of CES3-containing recombinant proteins in removing LPS from protein samples (Fig. 6C). In the current study, we did not directly compare the ability of our system with others in the market to remove endotoxins from protein sample33. On the market, however, most of the available cost-effective endotoxin removal kits are prepared based on affinity resin. These resins were conjugated with affinity ligands, such as poly(ε-lysine) and polymyxin B.
In removing endotoxins from protein samples, two important aspects of the LPS-binding ligands are how strongly and how much the ligand can bind to LPS. A previous study showed that the sushi1-3 domains show a high affinity to endotoxins, with a Kd value of 1.7 × 10–10 M25. In comparison, polymyxin B and poly(ε-lysine) had Kd values of 7.1 × 10–7 M and 3.6 × 10–5 M, respectively45. Thus, the sushi1-3 domains have a higher binding affinity to LPS than polymyxin B and poly(ε-lysine). The currently acceptable level of endotoxin is 0.1 ng/ml. Thus, a ligand with a Kd value of 1.7 × 10–10 M would be much better at removing LPS below the acceptable level. In addition to strong binding to the LPS, Factor C has also been reported to bind to other lipids including phosphatidylserine, phosphatidylinositol, and cholesterol46. Here we showed that CES3-His did not bind to gram-positive bacteria L. sakei, suggesting that the N-terminal region of Factor C, in particularly CES3, is specific to the LPS of gram-negative bacteria (Fig. 3A,B). The Factor C is a mosaic protein, composed of multiple domains. Thus, one possible explanation is that full length of Factor C is required for binding to phosphatidylserine, phosphatidylinositol, and cholesterol. It also remains to be tested how strongly Factor C binds to phosphatidylserine, phosphatidylinositol, and cholesterol in a complex situation where both LPS and these lipids are present. Another important aspect is the capacity of the ligand to remove LPS. The molecular mass of CES3:CBM3 with 48 kD is much higher than that of polymixin B and poly(ε-lysine). Thus, the capacity of CES3:CBM3-MCC beads is lower than that of polymixin B and poly(ε-lysine). However, one important aspect of LPS is that it largely exists as a micelle or aggregates in solution. Thus, CES3, which has multiple LPS-binding sites with cooperative binding between sites and a high affinity, can be better suited to remove LPS en mass in the form of micelle or aggregates, thereby compensating for the lower capacity of CES3. Another advantage of CES3:CBM3 is its ease of immobilisation onto MCC beads. There is no need to use any other means to immobilise CES3:CBM3 onto MCC beads because CBM3 shows irreversible binding to MCC beads33. In contrast, in the existing system, all resins, including cellulose, need to be chemically modified for the conjugation of ligands, which in turn leads to an increase in the production cost47. However, to upgrade this system to a commercial level requires substantial improvement in the expression level, especially in transgenic plants. In the present expression system, we found that the BNCS:CES3:CBM3 yield is around ~ 25 mg/kg (data not shown) fresh weight of biomass but it decrease significantly to ~ 10 mg/kg fresh weight (data not shown) in transgenic plants of Arabidopsis. In addition, Arabidopsis is not a suitable host for a large-scale production of recombinant proteins. One possible solution would be to generate transgenic Nicotiana benthamiana with more stronger expression system.
In conclusion, based on the results presented in this work, we propose that plant-produced and MCC bead-immobilised CES3:CBM3 is an effective endotoxin removal platform.
Materials and methods
Vector construction for transient and transgenic expression in Nicotiana benthamiana and Arabidopsis, respectively
All vectors were constructed in the backbone derived from pCAMBIA1300. The primers sequences related to this work are available in Supplementary materials (Table S1).
BiP:M:CBM3:SUMO:CES3:His:HDEL
The chimeric gene CES3:His:HDEL (CES3 can be found in GenBank, S77063.1, and UniprotKB, Q26422 Amino acid 26 to 301) with NaeI and Xho1 sites at the 3’ and 5’ ends, respectively, was chemically synthesised (Bioneer, Dajeon, Korea), digested with restriction endonucleases NaeI and XhoI, and ligated with p1300-C3bdSU:hIL631 that had been digested with NaeI and XhoI to yield BiP:M:CBM3:SUMO:CES3:His:HDEL (BMCS:CES3:His).
BiP:NT-m:CBM3:SUMO:CES3:His:HDEL
The N-terminal (459 bp) domain of MaSp1b (ACF19412.1), a major ampullate spidroin 1B, from Nephila clavipes was chemically synthesised with BamHI and Spe1 restriction sites at the 3’ and 5’ end, respectively (BIONEER, Korea), digested with BamHI and SpeI, and ligated to BMCS:CES3:His:HDEL, which had been digested with BamHI and SpeI to yield BiP:NT-m:CBM3:SUMO:CES3:His:HDEL (BNCS:CES3:His).
BiP:NT-m:SUMO:CES3:CBM3:His:HDEL
The CES3:CBM3 fusion construct was prepared by overlapping PCR. The CES3 fragment was amplified by PCR using primers NaeI-CES3_F and CBM3-CES3_R, and the CBM3 fragment using primers CES3-CBM3_F and Xho1-HDEL-CBM3_R. The two PCR products were used for overlapping PCR with Nae1-CES3_F and Xho1-HDEL-CBM3_R to produce NaeI-CES3-CBM3-XhoI. The PCR product and the vector BNCS:CES3:His were digested with NaeI and XhoI and ligated to yield BiP:NT-m:SUMO:CES3:CBM3:His:HDEL (BNS:CES3:His).
Plant material and growth
The model wild type Nicotiana benthamiana and Arabidopsis thaliana (Col0) plants were obtained in accordance with the relevant institutional, national, and international guidelines and legislation. The Arabidopsis was obtained from ABRC and the seeds of Nicotiana benthamiana was kindly provided by Professor Doil Choi at the Department of Plant Science, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea. Wild-type N. benthamiana plants were grown in soil. The soil was composed of Zeolite (30 g), perlite (130 g), coco-peat (705.3 g), peat moss (130 g), and wetting agent (0.1 g). N. benthamiana were grown in a greenhouse under the condition of the 14 h/10 h light/dark cycle, with a light intensity of 140 µmol.m−2S−1 at 26 ± 2 °C and relative humidity of 60 ± 5% for 3–4 weeks. Arabidopsis thaliana was grown on growth chamber set up with 70–80 μmol.m−2S−1 white light under a 16/8 h light/dark cycle at 22 ± 1 °C.
Transient expression of the gene in Nicotiana benthamiana
The expression vectors BMCS:CES3:His and BNCS:CES3:His were introduced into the Agrobacterium EHA 105 strain by electroporation and plated on LB agar (Luria Broth, Sigma-Aldrich) containing 50 µg/mL kanamycin and 50 µg/mL rifampicin. After incubation for 36 h at 26 °C, a single colony from the plate was inoculated into a 5 mL LB liquid medium containing both kanamycin and rifampicin at 50 μg/mL (AG Scientific, Pro.#R-2639) and incubated in a shaker incubator at 26 °C overnight. The culture was then inoculated into a 50 mL LB liquid medium with kanamycin and rifampicin at 50 μg/mL and incubated for 16 h. The cells were pelleted by centrifugation at 3700 × g and resuspended in infiltration buffer (10 mM MES and 10 mM Mg(SO)4, pH 5.6). The cell concentration was adjusted to 0.8 of OD600, and the cell suspension was kept at room temperature for 1 h. Agrobacterium harbouring p38 was also prepared in the same way. Agrobacterium suspensions harbouring the target recombinant gene and p38 were mixed at a 1:1 ratio, supplemented with 400 µM acetosyringone (Sigma, Cat. D134406) and infiltrated into leaves of 3-week-old N. benthamiana using a 1 mL syringe without needle. The infiltrated plants were placed in a greenhouse under the conditions of a 14 h light/10 h dark cycle, 25 °C temperature, 40–65% humidity, and light intensity of 140 µMm-2 S-1 for 4 to 6 weeks. The leaves were harvested on different days post-infiltration (dpi) to examine the expression of recombinant genes.
To release CES3:His from full-length BNCS:CES3:His in vivo, Agrobacterium harbouring BNCS:CES3:His was co-infiltrated with Agrobacterium harbouring HA:bdSNEP1 and the gene silencing suppressor, p38. Thus, the concentration of Agrobacterial suspension of target construct (BNCS:CES3:his) was reduced to 2/3 compared with the infiltration of only BNCS:CES3:His and p38 co-expression. An equal amount of total soluble protein extract was loaded on a SDS-PAGE gel to evaluate the expression level of BNCS:CES3:His and CES3:His.
Purification of proteins using Ni2+-NTA affinity column chromatography and binding test with gram-positive and -negative bacteria
Infiltrated leaves were harvested at 7 dpi and ground in liquid nitrogen using a mortar and pestle. The leaf powder was mixed with 5 volumes (V/W) of extraction buffer (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5, 1 mM DTT, 0.1% Triton X-100, and 1X EDTA-free O’ complete protease inhibitor) and vortexed for 10 min. The mixture was centrifuged at 18,000 × g for 20 min, and the supernatant was filtrated through Miracloth (EMD Millipore Corp. Cat. 475,855) and centrifuged again at 18,000 × g for 20 min. The supernatant was filtrated through a 0.45 µM filter (GVS, Lot. 7,103,692), mixed with 10 mM imidazole (Sigma-Aldrich Lot. SLBT7469) and placed on a column packed with Ni2+-NTA agarose beads (QIAGEN Lot. 163013340). The protein extract was allowed to pass through the column by gravitational force, and flow-through was collected for analysis. The beads were washed with 5 column volumes of washing buffer (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5, and 20 mM imidazole). The protein was eluted with an elution buffer (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5, and 250 mM imidazole). Imidazole in the protein eluent was removed and exchanged with PBS buffer (137 mM NaCl, 2.7 mM KCl, 10 mM Na2HPO4, and 1.8 mM KH2PO4, pH 7.5) using an Amicon® Ultra centrifugal Filter and 10 kD cut-off Centricon (Merck Millipore Ltd., Lot R1CB94240).
To examine the functionality of CES3-containing recombinant proteins for binding to LPS, E. coli cells were used. E. coli strain JM109 was grown in LB medium overnight. The culture was collected by centrifugation, and the pelleted cells were resuspended in PBS buffer and washed at least 4 times using the same buffer. Purified CES3:His protein (10 µg) was mixed with 10 µL of E. coli suspension. The volume of the mixture was brought to 30 µL and incubated at room temperature for 30 min. The mixture was then centrifuged, and both the supernatant and pellet were collected separately. The pellet fraction was resuspended with 30 µL PBS buffer and 1X loading buffer, boiled for 10 min, and used as the binding fraction. The supernatant was mixed with 1X loading buffer, boiled, and used as an unbound fraction. Only E. coli cells without incubation with CES3:His were used as a negative control. Samples were separated by SDS-PAGE and analysed by western blotting using an anti-His antibody (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA).
To test whether the CES3-His binds to gram-positive bacteria, we grew Lactobacillus sakei in MRS broth medium (Sigma cat. 69,966). At 0.8 of OD600, the cells were harvested by centrifugation at 4000 × g for 10 min and the pellet containing L. sakei was washed four times with PBS. 10 µg of CES3-His protein incubated with L. sakei for 30 min at room temperature and centrifuged at 4.000 × g for 5 min. The pellet was collected separately and washed as described above for E. coli. The flowthrough, the cells after binding and the cells without incubation with CES3-His were prepared for SDS-PAGE and western blot analyses.
Generation of transgenic Arabidopsis plants
To generate transgenic Arabidopsis plants harbouring BNS:CES3:CBM3, we used the floral dipping method48. The seeds of Arabidopsis, ecotype Colombia, were plated on 1/2 MS-agar plates (0.5 X Murashige and Skoog Macro and Micronutrient, 0.8% agar) (Duchefa Biocheme, Pro. No. M0222.0050), with or without 50 µg/mL hygromycin. Plants were grown on 1/2 MS plates in a growth chamber under a 16/8 h light/dark cycle, with a light intensity of 120–150 µmol.m−2S−1 at 24 °C. Transgenic plants were screened using hygromycin resistance. The expression level of BNS:CES3:CBM3:6xHis:HDEL was examined at the T1 generation by western blot analysis using the anti-CBM3 antibody (Bioapp, Pohang, South Korea). Homozygous plants were screened at the T2 generation and used in further analysis.
Protein extraction, SDS-PAGE, and western blotting
Leaves harvested from both Arabidopsis and N. benthamiana were ground using a mortar and pestle with liquid nitrogen. The leaf powder was mixed with 2 volumes (W/V) of extraction buffer (150 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5, Triton-X-100 0.1%, DTT 1 mM, 1 X Protease inhibitor cocktail), vortexed for 5 min, and centrifuged at 1,8000 xg for 15 min. The supernatant was collected and considered total soluble protein extracts. The debris was saved and considered an insoluble protein extract. Proteins were separated by 10–12.5% sodium dodecyl sulphate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and analysed by western blotting using appropriate antibodies. In addition, gels were stained with 0.25% CBB R-250 (AMRESCO, cat. no: 6104-59-2) in a solution containing 45% methanol and 10% glacial acetic acid. Western blot bands were visualised using an enhanced chemiluminescence kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Buckinghamshire, UK), and images were obtained using a LAS 4000 image capture system (FUJIFILM, NJ).
Preparation of MCC and CES3:CBM3-MCC beads
Microcrystalline cellulose (MCC) beads of 50 µm in size (Sigma-Aldrich Lot. MKCB1667V) were suspended in pyrogen-free water. The suspension was shaken for a few minutes and kept on the bench for MCC beads to settle. The supernatant was discarded. This whole procedure was repeated 3 to 4 times until all dust and minute particles were removed from the MCC suspension. The MCC beads were mixed with an equal volume of endotoxin-free water and stored at 4 °C.
Just before use, the MCC beads were added with a protein extract of CBM3:CES3 and incubated for 1 h at 4 °C. The centrifuged mixture was separated from the supernatant and washed five times with washing buffer (40 mM Tris–HCl, pH 7.5).
Endotoxin detection
The endotoxin was detected using Pierce™ LAL Chromogenic Endotoxin Quantitation Kit (Thermo Scientific, Catalogue No. 88282) following the guidelines provided by the manufacturer. Endotoxin, E. coli O111:B4, was dissolved and diluted using endotoxin-free water by following the guidelines. The endotoxin was added to 1 µg endotoxin-free BSA to a final concentration of 0.9 EU in 1 mL, vortexed, and kept at room temperature for 10 min. MCC beads and CES:CBM3 immobilised onto MCC beads were added to the mixture of BSA–endotoxin followed by incubation at room temperature for 30 min. The mixture was centrifuged briefly, and the supernatant was collected to measure the endotoxin.
We prepared a standard curve to calculate the amount of LPS in the samples. First, a serial dilution of a known amount of endotoxin was prepared according to the guidelines and used to measure the endotoxin level to generate a standard curve with a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.98. The absorbance of the samples was measured using the plate reader (BioTeK) and converted to the amount of endotoxin using the standard curve.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
This work was carried out with the support of "Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science and Technology Development (Project No. PJ015701012021)" Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea and also a grant of the Korea Health Technology R&D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health (HV20C0156), Republic of Korea.
Author contributions
I.H. conceived the project. R.I.K. and I.H. designed experiments. R.I.K. performed the experiments. M.S.T. contributed reagent, and technical assistance. H.K. aided with protein purification. R.I.K. and I.H. analyzed and interpreted the results, R.I.K. wrote the draft of the manuscript and I.H. revised and finalized it.
Data availability
The source of the genetic materials such as CES3 (S77063.1), NT domain of MaSp1b (ACF19412.1), M domain from CD45 (Gene ID: 5788), CBM3 (AEI55081), bdSUMO (XP_003564931.1), BiP (AT5G28540.1) are available in NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). following the accession number mentioned in the bracket. All the other dataset produced in this study are included in this manuscript and supplementary information.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-022-20776-6.
References
- 1.Baeshen MN, et al. Production of biopharmaceuticals in E coli: Current scenario and future perspectives. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015;25(7):953–962. doi: 10.4014/jmb.1412.12079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Berlec A, Strukelj B. Current state and recent advances in biopharmaceutical production in Escherichia coli, yeasts and mammalian cells. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013;40:257–274. doi: 10.1007/s10295-013-1235-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wilding KM, et al. Endotoxin-free e-coli-based cell-free protein synthesis: Pre-expression endotoxin removal approaches for on-demand cancer therapeutic production. Biotechnol. J. 2019;14(3):e1800271. doi: 10.1002/biot.201800271. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mack L, Brill B, Delis N, Groner B. Endotoxin depletion of recombinant protein preparations through their preferential binding to histidine tags. Anal. Biochem. 2014;466:83–88. doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2014.08.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Aida Y, Pabst MJ. Removal of endotoxin from protein solutions by phase-separation using triton X-114. J. Immunol. Methods. 1990;132:191–195. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(90)90029-U. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gorbet MB, Sefton MV. Endotoxin: The uninvited guest. Biomaterials. 2005;26:6811–6817. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.04.063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Magalhaes PO, et al. Methods of endotoxin removal from biological preparations: A review. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2007;10:388–404. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Schneier M, Razdan S, Miller AM, Briceno ME, Barua S. Current technologies to endotoxin detection and removal for biopharmaceutical purification. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2020;117:2588–2609. doi: 10.1002/bit.27362. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Dullah EC, Ongkudon CM. Current trends in endotoxin detection and analysis of endotoxin-protein interactions. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 2017;37:251–261. doi: 10.3109/07388551.2016.1141393. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Tapouk FA, et al. Endotoxin removal from aqueous solutions with dimethylamine-functionalized graphene oxide: Modeling study and optimization of adsorption parameters. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019;368:163–177. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.01.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Daneshian M, Guenther A, Wendel A, Hartung T, von Aulock S. In vitro pyrogen test for toxic or immunomodulatory drugs. J. Immunol. Methods. 2006;313:169–175. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2006.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Miyamoto T, Okano S, Kasai N. Inactivation of Escherichia coli endotoxin by soft hydrothermal processing. Appl. Environ. Microb. 2009;75:5058–5063. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00122-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hirayama C, Sakata M. Chromatographic removal of endotoxin from protein solutions by polymer particles. J. Chromatogr. B Anal. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2002;781:419–432. doi: 10.1016/S1570-0232(02)00430-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.El-Moghazy ANA. Factors affecting endotoxin removal from aqueous solutions by ultrafiltration process. J. Sci. Ind. Res. India. 2011;70:55–59. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Saraswat M, et al. Preparative purification of recombinant proteins: Current status and future trends. Biomed. Res. Int. 2013;2013:312709. doi: 10.1155/2013/312709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Serdakowski London A, Kerins B, Tschantz WR, Eisfeld J, Mackay K. Endotoxin removal and prevention for pre-clinical biologics production. Biotechnol. J. 2012;7:1509–1516. doi: 10.1002/biot.201200220. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.van Reis R, Zydney A. Membrane separations in biotechnology. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2001;12:208–211. doi: 10.1016/S0958-1669(00)00201-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wu Q, et al. Fabrication of membrane absorbers based on amphiphilic carbonaceous derivatives for selective endotoxin clearance. J. Mater. Chem. B. 2017;5:8219–8227. doi: 10.1039/C7TB01778B. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gun'ko VM, Betz WR, Patel S, Murphy MC, Mikhalovsky SV. Adsorption of lipopolysaccharide on carbon sieves. Carbon. 2006;44:1258–1262. doi: 10.1016/j.carbon.2005.10.038. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mitaka C, et al. Polymyxin B-immobilized fiber column hemoperfusion removes endotoxin throughout a 24-hour treatment period. J Crit Care. 2014;29:728–732. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.03.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Szermer-Olearnik B, Boratynski J. Removal of endotoxins from bacteriophage preparations by extraction with organic solvents. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(3):e0122672. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Szymczyk K, Taraba A. Properties of aqueous solutions of nonionic surfactants, Triton X-114 and Tween 80, at temperatures from 293 to 318 K: Spectroscopic and ultrasonic studies. Chem. Phys. 2017;483:96–102. doi: 10.1016/j.chemphys.2016.11.015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ding JL, Navas MA, 3rd, Ho B. Molecular cloning and sequence analysis of factor C cDNA from the Singapore horseshoe crab, Carcinoscorpius rotundicauda. Mol. Mar. Biol. Biotechnol. 1995;4:90–103. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Pui AWM, Ho B, Ding JL. Yeast recombinant Factor C from horseshoe crab binds endotoxin and causes bacteriostasis. J. Endotoxin Res. 1997;4:391–400. doi: 10.1177/096805199700400602. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Tan NS, et al. Definition of endotoxin binding sites in horseshoe crab factor C recombinant sushi proteins and neutralization of endotoxin by sushi peptides. FASEB J. 2000;14:1801–1813. doi: 10.1096/fj.99-0866com. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tan NS, Ho B, Ding JL. High-affinity LPS binding domain(s) in recombinant factor C of a horseshoe crab neutralizes LPS-induced lethality. FASEB J. 2000;14:859–870. doi: 10.1096/fasebj.14.7.859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Koshiba T, Hashii T, Kawabata SI. A structural perspective on the interaction between lipopolysaccharide and Factor C, a receptor involved in recognition of Gram-negative bacteria. J. Biol. Chem. 2007;282:3962–3967. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M609198200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Mizumura H, et al. Genetic engineering approach to develop next-generation reagents for endotoxin quantification. Innate Immun-London. 2017;23:136–146. doi: 10.1177/1753425916681074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Piehler M, Roeder R, Blessing S, Reich J. Comparison of LAL and rFC assays-Participation in a proficiency test program between 2014 and 2019. Microorganisms. 2020;8:418. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8030418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Schillberg S, Finnern R. Plant molecular farming for the production of valuable proteins ? Critical evaluation of achievements and future challenges. J. Plant Physiol. 2021;258:153359. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2020.153359. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Islam MR, et al. Cost-effective production of tag-less recombinant protein in Nicotiana benthamiana. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2019;17:1094–1105. doi: 10.1111/pbi.13040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kang H, Park Y, Lee Y, Yoo YJ, Hwang I. Fusion of a highly N-glycosylated polypeptide increases the expression of ER-localized proteins in plants. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:4612. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-22860-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Islam MR, Choi S, Muthamilselvan T, Shin K, Hwang I. In Vivo removal of n-terminal fusion domains from recombinant target proteins produced in Nicotiana benthamiana. Front. Plant Sci. 2020;11:440. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.00440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Norkunas K, Harding R, Dale J, Dugdale B. Improving agroinfiltration-based transient gene expression in Nicotiana benthamiana. Plant Methods. 2018;14:71. doi: 10.1186/s13007-018-0343-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Habibi P, et al. Gene-silencing suppressors for high-level production of the HIV-1 entry inhibitor griffithsin in Nicotiana benthamiana. Process Biochem. 2018;70:45–54. doi: 10.1016/j.procbio.2018.04.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lin Z, Huang W, Zhang J, Fan JS, Yang D. Solution structure of eggcase silk protein and its implications for silk fiber formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009;106:8906–8911. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0813255106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Kronqvist N, et al. Efficient protein production inspired by how spiders make silk. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:15504. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Zhang XR, Henriques R, Lin SS, Niu QW, Chua NH. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana using the floral dip method. Nat. Protoc. 2006;1:641–646. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2006.97. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Ding JL, Chai C, Pui AWM, Ho B. Expression of full length and deletion homologues of Carcinoscorpius rotundicauda Factor C in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Immunoreactivity and endotoxin binding. J. Endotoxin Res. 1997;4:33–43. doi: 10.1177/096805199700400105. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Muta T, Iwanaga S. Invertebrate Immunology. Springer; 1996. Clotting and immune defense in Limulidae; pp. 154–189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Ding JL, Li P, Ho B. The Sushi peptides: structural characterization and mode of action against Gram-negative bacteria. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2008;65:1202–1219. doi: 10.1007/s00018-008-7456-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Li P, Sun M, Wohland T, Ho B, Ding JL. The molecular mechanism of interaction between sushi peptide and pseudomonas endotoxin. Cell Mol. Immunol. 2006;3:21–28. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kronqvist N, et al. Sequential pH-driven dimerization and stabilization of the N-terminal domain enables rapid spider silk formation. Nat/ Commun/ 2014;5:3254. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Landreh M, et al. A pH-dependent dimer lock in spider silk protein. J. Mol. Biol. 2010;404:328–336. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2010.09.054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Anspach FB, Hilbeck O. Removal of endotoxins by affinity sorbents. J. Chromatogr. A. 1995;711:81–92. doi: 10.1016/0021-9673(95)00126-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ariki S, et al. A serine protease zymogen functions as a pattern-recognition receptor for lipopolysaccharides. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004;101:953–958. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0306904101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Razdan S, Wang JC, Barua S. PolyBall: A new adsorbent for the efficient removal of endotoxin from biopharmaceuticals. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:8867. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45402-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Bent A. Arabidopsis thaliana floral dip transformation method. Methods Mol. Biol. 2006;343:87–103. doi: 10.1385/1-59745-130-4:87. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The source of the genetic materials such as CES3 (S77063.1), NT domain of MaSp1b (ACF19412.1), M domain from CD45 (Gene ID: 5788), CBM3 (AEI55081), bdSUMO (XP_003564931.1), BiP (AT5G28540.1) are available in NCBI (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). following the accession number mentioned in the bracket. All the other dataset produced in this study are included in this manuscript and supplementary information.