Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2022 Apr 2;132(2):226–232. doi: 10.1177/00034894221088179

Eight Tales of Cervical Necrotizing Fasciitis and Free Tissue Transfer

Nicholas A Rapoport 1, David S Lee 1, Jake J Lee 1, Sidharth V Puram 1, Ryan S Jackson 1, Patrik Pipkorn 1
PMCID: PMC9526756  NIHMSID: NIHMS1802402  PMID: 35373592

Abstract

Objectives:

Aggressive surgical debridement is required in cervical necrotizing fasciitis, and in severe defects, subsequent free tissue transfer might be necessary. However, there is concern that the inflammatory environment of the infection site may threaten free flap viability, particularly with concerns for thrombosis of feeding vessels and compromised tissue integration. Cases in the head and neck area are rare, so there are limited data regarding outcomes of free tissue transfer in these patients.

Methods:

A retrospective chart review assessed patients with cervical necrotizing fasciitis treated at an academic tertiary hospital between 2015 and 2021. Twenty-five patients were identified, and eight required free tissue transfer after adequate surgical debridement. Treatment, hospital course, and demographic data were collected on these eight patients.

Results:

All flaps had full survival at follow up (median follow up 3 months, range 1–39 months) without concerns for vascular compromise.

Conclusion:

These data suggest that in patients with large soft tissue defects due to cervical necrotizing fasciitis, free tissue transfer may be a safe treatment modality.

Keywords: head and neck surgery, deep neck infection, Free flap reconstruction, Free tissue transfer, Otolaryngology

Introduction

Necrotizing fasciitis is an aggressive and rapidly progressing infection of soft tissue and skin. While it is most common in the extremities and trunk, 1–10% of cases involve the head and neck area1. Infections in this area are most frequently due to odontogenic or pharyngeal sources1. Mortality rates have been estimated to be as high as 35%, with higher mortality associated with cases involving the mediastinum or progressing to septic shock2,3. Due to the rapidly progressive nature of necrotizing fasciitis, early and aggressive surgical debridement in conjunction with broad-spectrum antibiotics are cornerstones in management4.

Surgical management of necrotizing fasciitis in the head and neck presents unique challenges because appropriate control of disease often leads to significant tissue loss with exposure of important structures, including the great vessels and laryngeal framework. These cases are not adequately addressed by vacuum-assisted closure (VAC), skin grafts, and local flaps, and may necessitate free tissue transfer to cover the resulting defect. Many comorbidities associated with necrotizing fasciitis, such as diabetes, alcoholism, immunosuppression, intravenous drug abuse, malignancy, and vascular disease, are also associated with free flap failure5. Additionally, the inflammatory pathophysiology of necrotizing fasciitis raises concern for thrombosis, which is the primary cause of flap loss6. These reasons, coupled with the relative dearth of literature on free tissue transfer in the management of necrotizing fasciitis, has led to uncertainty regarding the success of such treatment.

Due to the rarity of this condition, even systematic reviews on free tissue transfer in necrotizing fasciitis and cervical necrotizing fasciitis have limited mention of this type of treatment1,3. This case series aims to add insights regarding the safety and outcomes of free tissue transfer in patients with cervical necrotizing fasciitis by analyzing eight patients who were treated with free tissue transfer and microvasculature reconstruction.

Methods

A retrospective chart review was performed between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2021 to identify patients treated for cervical necrotizing fasciitis at Washington University in St. Louis, School of Medicine. Twenty-four patients were identified, and eight patients required free tissue transfer with microvascular reconstruction. Two of these patients required two flaps: one concurrent and one sequential. The data collected included patient demographics, surgical and medical management details, free flap information, hospital course, and outcomes. This study was approved by the Washington University School of Medicine Institutional Review Board (IRB #202111093).

Results

Of the eight patients, median age was 51 (range 28–68) years, and there were 3 females. The most common source of infection was odontogenic (n=5), with the remainder of unknown origin (n=2) or originating from the oral mucosa (n=1). All patients had a different variety of causative organisms, with one patient’s tissue culture yielding no identifiable types. Three patients were observed via imaging to have mediastinal involvement. Additionally, three patients had growth on blood cultures, yielding different organisms for each patient. A summary of demographics, infection information, and medical management is provided in Table 1.

Table 1.

Demographics and infection information.

ID Age Sex Comorbiditiesa Infection Source Tissue Organisms Antibioticsb Mediastinal involvement Blood culture organism(s)
1 58 Female Alcoholism, hypertension unknown Streptococcus anginosa, MSSA Vancomycin, Clindamycin, Piperacillin-tazobactam, Cefepime Yes none
2 32 Male none odontogenic Actinomyces odontolyticus, Candida albicans Micafungin, Vancomycin, Piperacillin-tazobactam, Cefepime, Metronidazole, Clindamycin Yes Streptococcus Mitis, Aggregatibacter Segnis
3 46 Male HIV w/ AIDS oral mucosa (R cheek) Candida albicans, coagulase-negative Staphylococci Vancomycin, Cefepime, Metronidazole, Micafungin, Ampicillin-sulbactam No Campylobacter Rectus
4 43 Male none unknown GAS Vancomycin, Piperacillin-tazobactam, Cefepime, Clindamycin No GAS
5 68 Male Hypertension odontogenic Not identified Vancomycin, Clindamycin, Piperacillin-tazobactam, Cefepime Yes none
6 28 Male none odontogenic Streptococcus constellatus, Streptococcus anginosis, Candida albicans Vancomycin, Piperacillin-tazobactam, Micafungin, Ceftriaxone, Metronidazole, Fluconazole No none
7 60 Female Diabetes mellitus odontogenic Streptococcus constellatus Vancomycin, Cefepime, Metronidazole, Clindamycin, Ceftriaxone No none
8 56 Female Diabetes Mellitus, Malignancy Unknown Coagulase - Staphylococci Vancomycin, Cefepime, Metronidazole, Piperacillin-tazobactam, Meropenem, Ampicillin-sulbactam No none

Abbreviations: HIV: human immunodeficiency virus, AIDS: acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, MSSA: methicillin susceptible staphylococcus aureus, GAS: group A streptococcus

a

Comorbidities included diabetes mellitus, alcoholism, history of malignancy, immunosuppression, HIV, vascular disease and IV drug abuse

b

Includes all antibiotics used during hospital course

The median number of days from 1st debridement to flap placement was 12.5 (range 6–18). The median number of debridements was 4.5 (range 3–5). The flap sizes ranged from 8cm × 6cm to 13cm × 40cm (48cm2 to 520cm2). A summary of the debridement information, flap type and size, and vessels used is included in Table 2.

Table 2.

Surgical and free flap information.

ID Number of debridements Days to flap from 1st debridement Free flap type Artery used for anastomosis Vein used for anastomosis Secondary reconstruction cm × cm (cm2) Defect size cm × cm (cm2)
1a 5 11;18 L ALT; R ALT External carotid; R facial Internal jugular; main facial Adjacent tissue transfer 40 × 20 (800) 9 × 30 (270)(L); 30 × 10 (300)(R)
2 5 18 R ALT L external carotid Facial None 15 × 8 (120)
3b 3 15 L RF; R gracilis Facial Facial None 8 × 6 (48)(RF); 14 cm length (gracilis)
4 3 8 R ALT R transverse cervical R transverse cervical None 13 × 40 (520)
5 4 8 R ALT Facial Ranine None Not specified
6 5 17 R ALT Internal mammary Internal mammary None 10 × 14 (140)
7 5 14 L ALT Facial Facial None 15 × 20 (300)
8 2 6 L ALT L transverse cervical L external jugular None 10 × 15 (150)

Abbreviations. L: left, R: right, ALT: anterolateral thigh, RF: radial forearm

a

This patient received sequential flaps. Information is for 1st flap; 2nd flap

b

This patient received concurrent flow-through flaps

None of the eight patients experienced any vascular compromise to their free flap construction, and all flaps had full survival. The most common complications were hematoma (n=2) and suture dehiscence (n=2). The median intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay was 10.5 days (range 3–30), and the median hospital stay was 23 days from admission to discharge (range 14–47). Median length of follow up was 3 months (range 1–39). The median length of intubation was 9 days (range 2–28). Three out of the eight patients required tracheostomy for a range of 15–57 days. A summary of vascular events, flap outcomes, follow-up length, complications, and ICU and hospital stay is demonstrated in Table 3.

Table 3.

Outcomes and hospital course

ID Vascular Compromise Flap outcome Length of follow up (months)a Complications Complication treatment ICU length of stay Overall length of hospitalization Duration of intubation (days) Duration of tracheostomy (days)b
1 None Full survival 3 Superior suture dehiscence Daily saline-soaked kerlix packing 30 47 28 57
2 None Full survival 2 Hematoma Chest wall exploration for evacuation of hematoma 24 25 15 16
3 None Full survival 3 None None 4 28 3 0
4 None Full survival 1 Hematoma Neck exploration for evacuation of hematoma 3 21 2 0
5 None Full survival 39 None None 8 14 7 0
6 None Full survival 8 None None 5 21 8 15
7 None Full survival 6 Posterior and anterior suture dehiscence Twice daily saline-soaked kerlix packing 16 29 14 0
8 None Full survival 1 None None 13 20 10 0
a

Most recent follow up appointment since flap procedure

b

Date of placement through date of decannulation

Figure 1 displays images from the surgical course of patient ID # 1. This patient underwent two sequential flaps. The pictures show the complete defect, the outcome of the staged flap procedures, and the patient at follow-up.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Patient ID #1 underwent five debridements for cervical necrotizing fasciitis with a resulting defect of 570 cm2. The complete defect (A) demonstrates exposed right sternocleidomastoid (SCM), left omohyoid (OMO), thyroid lobes (*), thyroid cartilage (arrow), and left internal jugular vein (arrowhead). A staged double flap (B and C) was performed on hospital days 11 and 18 given the overall size of the defect. In panel B, * marks the first anterolateral thigh free flap after inset, arrowhead indicates the venous coupler (facial vein) of the second anterolateral thigh free flap, and arrow denotes an implantable doppler over the anastomosed artery (right facial artery). Patient ID #1 was discharged on hospital day 47 and was seen in clinic 3 months later (D) with complete integration of both free flaps and closure of prior tracheostomy stoma.

Discussion

In this series of eight patients with cervical necrotizing fasciitis who underwent 10 free flap reconstructions in total, there were no flap failures, including partial losses. The infections described in this case series predominantly affected the deep neck spaces. Patient ID#3 was the only patient with extension into the buccal space, requiring debridement of a substantial portion of the cheek (Table 1). This defect was repaired with concurrent flow-through flaps using the left radial forearm and right gracilis muscle. Additionally, the hospital course, including ICU length of stay and total hospital length of stay, appear to be similar to cases without free tissue transfer.

Cervical necrotizing fasciitis is a rare and rapidly spreading soft tissue infection with significant mortality rates. Due to the anatomic location, progression to mediastinitis is a common progression and is associated with decreased survival7. Surgical debridement is a necessary treatment, but in severe cases it can lead to exposure of the great vessels and even airway structures. While skin grafting is usually sufficient, free tissue transfer is sometimes required for large defects. However, many comorbidities associated with cervical necrotizing fasciitis are also associated with free flap failure. This begs the question about feasibility of free flaps and their survival in this context.

Thrombosis is a common complication in necrotizing fasciitis due to the immune response and subsequent ischemia inducing tissue damage and cell death8. Post-flap thrombosis is associated with extremely low rates of flap survival and thus is a concern in treating a condition which frequently causes blood clots9. When treated with adequate debridement and complete removal of infected tissue beforehand, the release of inflammatory mediators should be halted and allow for healthy blood flow10. The largest literature review to date reports a mean range of 2–5 surgical debridements per case1. Our median number of debridements were consistent with the literature (Table 2). Additionally, there were no instances of vascular compromise in any of our patients after flap surgery (Table 3). This suggests that extent of surgical debridement is similar in patients who require free tissue transfer and those who do not, and that thrombosis can be avoided with sufficient debridement.

Cervical necrotizing fasciitis often involves a long and complicated hospital course. General necrotizing fasciitis cases required an average of 24 days in the hospital11, and other studies have found cervical infections to have a median stay of 22 days12. Except for a notable outlier requiring 47 days and two sequential flaps due to a massive defect (Figure 1), our patients fit into this range (Table 3). ICU admissions are common, with some sources indicating up to 70% of patients require an admission13. It is unsurprising that cases severe enough to require free tissue transfer almost always necessitate ICU admission, but among all ICU admissions with necrotizing fasciitis, there do not appear to be differences in length of stay between those requiring tissue transfer and those that do not3. This finding held true in our case series and indicates that patients who receive free tissue transfer do not require extra length in the hospital or additional ICU resources. (Table 3).

Airway management in the setting of cervical necrotizing fasciitis warrants particular discussion. Most patients are intubated at presentation to avoid impending airway compromise. In cases where the infection quickly resolves and there is no longer an airway concern, they may be extubated by the intensive care unit. In cases that require prolonged intubation, a tracheotomy may be considered. Since cervical necrotizing fasciitis may cause significant tissue loss overlaying the trachea, there may not be adequate soft tissue to stabilize a tracheostomy. To address this concern, one may place a surgical airway a few days prior to free tissue transfer to allow the airway to granulate and stabilize the tracheostomy. This approach was taken in three out of eight patients that underwent tracheotomy (Table 3). An alternative approach would be to keep the patient intubated for a prolonged period to avoid tracheotomy altogether (Patients 7 and 8; Table 3).

When considering reconstructive choices for necrotizing fasciitis, defect size and exposure of important structures, such as the trachea and great vessels, should inform the treatment plan. Other case series have described negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) as a potential method of facilitating wound closure14. This therapy appears to provide improved clinical outcomes when compared with wound care, but the defects reported in this study were less extensive and did not expose critical structures14. This contrasts the patients in the present study that had large defects and involvement down to the trachea and great vessels. While there is no particular threshold that indicates free tissue transfer, recruiting epithelialized bulky tissue with relatively low donor site morbidity has a role in reconstructing large defects caused by cervical necrotizing fasciitis. Free tissue transfer has been refined to the point of near universal success rates, with some sources indicating success rates of 95% or higher15. Reconstruction in cervical necrotizing fasciitis, as with all free tissue reconstruction, is strongly influenced by the dimensions, geometry, and complexity of the defect16. This cohort demonstrated success with anterolateral thigh flaps, with seven of the eight patients receiving at least one ALT flap (Table 2). Although it is always appropriate to start with more conservative management, such as skin grafts, NPWT, or rotational flaps, free tissue transfer is a viable option for more severe defects. Regarding timing of wound closure, the infection should be resolved, and the wound bed should be clean with evidence of granulation. Collaboration with the intensivist is also recommended to medically optimize the patient before attempting closure.

This study has several limitations. As is natural in a retrospective case series, patient selection may have played a role in the favorable results that we present. In addition, this is a relatively limited case series of free tissue transfer in this setting and the results need to be interpreted in that context. Finally, our results were obtained from a high-volume academic center with a large volume of free tissue transfer cases; thus, the results may not be generalizable to a different setting.

Despite these limitations, this study demonstrates 10 successful cases of free tissue transfer in eight patients following cervical necrotizing fasciitis. The hospital course of patients who require free tissue transfer does not appear to differ significantly from patients who do not require it. Despite significant comorbidities and complications involving sepsis and mediastinitis, no patient experienced flap failure. In patients with tissue defects that cannot be managed by primary closure or skin grafts alone, free tissue transfer offers a different method of reconstruction. While patients with necrotizing fasciitis often have comorbidities that overlap with risk factors for flap failure, adequate debridement and medical management seem to allow for safe tissue transfer.

Future studies could retrospectively compare outcomes of patients who had free tissue transfer and those that did not. Additionally, a prospective cohort study would be beneficial in analyzing long term flap outcomes.

Conclusions

In patients with extensive cervical necrotizing fasciitis, free tissue transfer and microvascular reconstruction may be a viable reconstructive option. In this cohort of eight patients who underwent 10 free tissue transfers, all flaps survived. We believe that the success of our cohort is promising and should encourage consideration of free tissue reconstruction in cervical necrotizing fasciitis. Despite the complex pathophysiology and entwined comorbidities, it appears that in select patients, free tissue transfer can be successfully employed.

Acknowledgments

Statement of Support:

Research reported in this publication was supported by the National Institute of Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD) within the National Institutes of Health (NIH), through the “Development of Clinician/Researchers in Academic ENT” training grant, award number T32DC000022. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official view of the NIH.

Footnotes

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

References

  • 1.Gunaratne DA, Tseros EA, Hasan Z, et al. Cervical necrotizing fasciitis: Systematic review and analysis of 1235 reported cases from the literature. Head Neck. 2018;40(9):2094–2102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wong CH, Chang HC, Pasupathy S, Khin LW, Tan JL, Low CO. Necrotizing fasciitis: clinical presentation, microbiology, and determinants of mortality. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85(8):1454–1460. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gawaziuk JP, Liu T, Sigurdson L, et al. Free tissue transfer for necrotizing fasciitis reconstruction: A case series. Burns. 2017;43(7):1561–1566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Goh T, Goh LG, Ang CH, Wong CH. Early diagnosis of necrotizing fasciitis. Br J Surg. 2014;101(1):e119–e125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.van Gijn DR, D’Souza J, King W, Bater M. Free Flap Head and Neck Reconstruction with an Emphasis on Postoperative Care. Facial Plast Surg. 2018;34(6):597–604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Forner D, Williams BA, Makki FM, Trites JR, Taylor SM, Hart RD. Late free flap failure in head and neck reconstruction: A systematic review. Ear Nose Throat J. 2018;97(7):213–216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sarna T, Sengupta T, Miloro M, Kolokythas A. Cervical necrotizing fasciitis with descending mediastinitis: literature review and case report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70(6):1342–1350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Oguz H, Yilmaz MS. Diagnosis and management of necrotizing fasciitis of the head and neck. Curr Infect Dis Rep. 2012;14(2):161–165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Henderson PW, Fernandez JG, Cemal Y, et al. Successful Salvage of Late Anastomotic Thrombosis after Free Tissue Transfer. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2016;32(4):316–324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Vieira F, Allen SM, Stocks RM, Thompson JW. Deep neck infection. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2008;41(3):459–vii. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Bernal NP, Latenser BA, Born JM, Liao J. Trends in 393 necrotizing acute soft tissue infection patients 2000–2008. Burns. 2012;38(2):252–260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wolf H, Rusan M, Lambertsen K, Ovesen T. Necrotizing fasciitis of the head and neck. Head Neck. 2010;32(12):1592–1596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Audureau E, Hua C, de Prost N, et al. Mortality of necrotizing fasciitis: relative influence of individual and hospital-level factors, a nationwide multilevel study, France, 2007–12. Br J Dermatol. 2017;177(6):1575–1582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Chen SJ, Chen YX, Xiao JR, Wei XZ, Chen SM, Jiang WZ. Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in Necrotizing Fasciitis of the Head and Neck. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;77(1):87–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Fulda GJ, Khan SU, Zabel DD. Special issues in plastic and reconstructive surgery. Crit Care Clin. 2003;19(1):91–vi. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Weiss A, Nelson P, Movahed R, Clarkson E, Dym H. Necrotizing fasciitis: review of the literature and case report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69(11):2786–2794. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES