Correction: BMC Public Health 22, 763 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13129-5
In the original publication of this article there was an error in some of the excel formulas and they pulled from the wrong data.
This caused errors in the below locations:
Result section
Discussion section
Table 5, 6 and 7
This doesn’t have a large impact on the results/conclusions, as the cell values were correct, it was the reporting of the percentages. There was no real consistency among the values across the various influencer types and their use in the captions and images, so the interpretation of the results remain the same.
The original article has been updated to correct these errors. The affected sections are shown in Additional file 1 (yellow highlight).
Supplementary Information
Additional file 1: Supplementary file 1.
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Additional file 1: Supplementary file 1.
