Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jan 17.
Published in final edited form as: Inorg Chem. 2021 Dec 28;61(2):778–785. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c03326

Isotopomeric Elucidation of the Mechanism of Temperature Sensitivity in 59Co NMR Molecular Thermometers

Tyler M Ozvat 1, Anthony K Rappé 2, Joseph M Zadrozny 3
PMCID: PMC9531048  NIHMSID: NIHMS1839400  PMID: 34962806

Abstract

Understanding the mechanisms governing temperature-dependent magnetic resonance properties is essential for enabling thermometry via magnetic resonance imaging. Herein we harness a new molecular design strategy for thermometry—that of effective mass engineering via deuteration in the first coordination shell—to reveal the mechanistic origin of 59Co chemical shift thermometry. Exposure of [Co(en)3]3+ (1; en = ethylenediamine) and [Co(diNOsar)]3+ (2; diNOsar = dinitrosarcophagine) tomixtures of H2O and D2O produces distributions of [Co(en)3]3+-dn (n = 0–12) and [Co(diNOsar)]3+-dn (n = 0–6) isotopomers allresolvable by 59Co NMR. Variable-temperature 59Co NMRanalyses reveal a temperature dependence of the 59Co chemicalshift, ΔδT, on deuteration of the N-donor atoms. For 1, deuteration amplifies ΔδT by 0.07 ppm/°C. Increasing degrees of deuteration yield an opposing influence on 2, diminishing ΔδT by −0.07 ppm/°C. Solution-phase Raman spectroscopy in the low-frequency 200–600 cm−1 regime reveals a red shift of Raman-active Co–N6 vibrational modes by deuteration. Analysis of the normal vibrational modes shows that Raman modes produce the largest variation in 59Co δ. Finally, partition function analysis of the Raman-active modes shows that increased populations of Raman modes predict greater ΔδT, representing new experimental insight into the thermometry mechanism.

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-1839400-f0001.jpg

INTRODUCTION

Environmentally sensitive nuclear spins offer a route to novel magnetic resonance imaging agents or quantum-sensing molecular platforms.1,2 One such environmental stimulus of interest is temperature because noninvasive thermometry could enable guided thermal therapies and imaging.36 Cobalt-59 (59Co) nuclear spins are highly promising for this application because of the strong temperature dependence of the 59Co chemical shift, δ.711 The current record for the sensitivity of the chemical shift to temperature (ΔδT) from a 59Co nucleus is 3.15 ppm/°C in Co(acac)3.12 Higher sensitivities are ultimately necessary for utility, yet the precise molecular factors (specifically, ligand identity) that control ΔδT are unknown.

Theoretical studies decades ago1315 proposed strict bond-distance expansion as the mechanistic origin of ΔδT. In this picture, temperature-dependent changes in the physical structure modulate the ligand-field splitting (Δo) and thus determine 59Co δ by changing the energies of the 1A1g and 1T1g states of a Co3+ complex, a change that affects the 59Co paramagnetic shift as described by Ramsey’s equation.7 The effect is analogous to the origin of temperature-independent paramagnetism in Co3+ complexes.16 More “flexible” ligands could be envisioned to produce species with greater temperature-dependent inner-coordination spheres, thereby producing higher ΔδT. However, recent studies by us1719 and others20,21 suggest that bond-distance expansion alone is not the dominant feature. In a prior work, we posited a model wherein structural rigidity imparted by the ligand shell engenders long-lived vibrations caused by collisions of a given 59Co NMR thermometer with the surrounding solvent (Figure 1) and thus temperature-driven structures and ΔδT.17 If this model is correct, then we posited that changes to the donor-atom mass would affect ΔδT because changes in the mass would be expected to alter the vibrational lifetimes, amplitudes, and equilibrium Co–L distances and ultimately the electronic structure.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Overview of studies of controlling 59Co thermometric properties and donor atom deuteration. This work combines these two approaches to affect 59Co nuclear spin (I = 7/2) chemical shift thermometry in structures 1 and 2 (shown) and reveal mechanistic insight. Most H atoms and counterions are omitted for clarity.

A controlled test of varying the donor-atom mass on ΔδT via typical coordination chemistry strategies is, however, intrinsically challenging. For example, a simple swap of the N-donor atoms for heavier O- or P-donor atoms will simultaneously affect the ligand mass and ligand-field strength. Separately, isotopically enriched donor-atom ligands are frequently exorbitant and limited in availability. We hypothesized that a facile route to controlled variable-mass studies of the mechanistic origins of ΔδT was to use H/D exchange on protonated N-donor atoms (Scheme 1). We envisioned that the resulting N-donor atoms would retain nearly constant ligand fields while mimicking heavier-atom behavior.

Scheme 1. Depiction of the Deuteration Process for 1 and 2 to Prepare 1-dn (n = 0–12) and 2-dn (n = 0–6)a.

Scheme 1.

aEach complex has an overall 3+ charge compensated by chloride anions (omitted for clarity).

Herein, we show that H/D exchange on ligand N-donor atoms offers a new strategy to adjust ΔδT. We do so via studies of deuterated isotopomers of molecules [Co(en)3]3+ (1; en = ethylenediamine) and [Co(diNOsar)]3+ (2; diNOsar = dinitrosarcophagine). These species contain −NH2 (primary) and −NH− (secondary) amine donor atoms that can be deuterated when treated with D2O.2224 We show that this deuteration produces a spectroscopically resolvable distribution of H/D isotopomers in solution by 59Co NMR. Comparative analyses of the temperature dependence of the 59Co chemical shifts of these isotopomers demonstrate that the ligand mass plays a modest role in governing temperature-dependent 59Co NMR signals. Investigation of vibrational modes via Raman spectroscopy suggests a new model for thermometry based not on the vibration lifetime but on the number and energy of low-frequency Raman-active vibrations.

EXPERIMENTAL SECTION

General Considerations.

Compounds tris(ethylenediamine)-cobalt(III) chloride ([Co(en)3]Cl3, 1) and (1,8-dinitro-3,6,10,13,16,19-hexaazabicyclo[6.6.6]iscosane)cobalt(III) chloride ([Co(diNOsar)]Cl3 2) were synthesized according to previous literature preparations.25,26 Properties and characterization of these complexes were as described previously by us.17 Samples that contained D2O were allowed to complete H/D equilibration over the course of 7 days before any spectroscopic investigation. Periodic analysis of the 59Co NMR signal during those days established when the equilibration was finalized, generally within the 7-day window. Those samples containing portions of D2O were prepared in plastic scintillation vials after thorough drying of 1 and 2 via the high-vacuum removal of residual water.

UV–Vis Spectrophotometry.

UV–vis spectra were collected on an Agilent 8435 UV–vis spectrophotometer as 5 mM aqueous solutions at room temperature. Fully protiated and fully deuterated complexes were measured in their respective H2O and 99.9% D2O solutions. UV–vis spectrophotometric data were fit (Gaussian) to determine the peak values. Quantitation of the ligand fields Δo was permitted using a d6 Tanabe–Sugano diagram in correspondence to the d–d transitions of the central Co3+ octahedral ions in 1 and 2.

Variable-Temperature 59Co NMR.

59Co NMR spectra were collected on an Agilent Unity INOVA 500 MHz (1H) spectrometer with a broadband probe using 15 mM samples in varying compositions (0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 99.9%) of D2O and H2O solution mixtures. The spectrometer magnet was locked to a sample of D2O and tuned to the 59 Co standard of 1 M K3[Co(CN)6] before collection of the highly chemical-shifted samples 1 and 2, absent of locking, shimming, and spinning. It should be noted that any error introduced to the spectra by the unlocked magnet i on the order of 0.1 Hz/h. Such deviations are negligible considering the 1–6 kHz (10–50 ppm) scale of the collected peaks. Variable-temperature measurements were made on each sample over 10–60 °C in 5 °C intervals. The temperature was controlled using a FTS Systems TC-84 Kinetics AirJet temperature controller. The probe temperature was monitored via a thermocouple output. Temperature equilibration of the sample was allowed to occur over 15 min before tuning and subsequent spectral collection. Deconvolution of all peaks in the 59Co NMR spectra (Figure 3a,b) was achieved by fitting spectra with Lorentzian peaks. Evaluation of ΔδT for each isotopomer (Figure 4) was then based on the Lorentzian peak positions as a function of the temperature. Evaluating the complete set of isotopomers for 2 (from 2-d0 to 2-d6) was achievable using a single sample with 50% D2O in H2O. However, for 1, three separate samples in varied amounts of D2O in H2O had to be used (i.e., 25%, 50%, and 75% D2O) to capture all of the isotopomers. Minute inconsistencies in the magnet (e.g., field and temperature inhomogeneities, dephasing) required alignment of the peaks between the sample spectra. Alignments to the peak positions were made with respect to the 50% D2O in H2O spectra. Similarly, ΔδT could be accurately compared between the three samples by simply evaluating the change in ΔδT determined at 0.006 ppm/°C (Figure S8). While the increase in ΔδT with increasing deuteration is minute between isotopomers that differ by one deuteron, the difference between fully protiated and deuterated complexes is significant relative to the error. Furthermore, the changes in ΔδT between all of the isotopomers for 1 was reproducible over three separate sample measurements.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Stacked variable-temperature 59Co NMR spectra of isotopomer ensembles of 1 (top) and 2 (bottom) from 10 to 60 °C. Measurements were made on equilibrated samples in 50% D2O/H2O.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Peak positions of all isotopomers as a function of the temperature for 1 (circles, 10–60 °C) and 2 (diamonds, 35–60 °C). The solid lines are linear regressions for each isotopomer, and extracted values of ΔδT can be found in the main text and Tables S2 and S3.

Raman Spectroscopy.

Raman spectra of compounds 1 and 2 were collected for their fully deuterated and fully protiated forms in H2O (deionized) and D2O (99.9%), respectively. Preparation of the solution-phase samples included complete equilibration of the isotopomer distribution over 7 days prior to measurement. All samples were prepared in 4 mL volume vials to 30 mM concentrations and measured using a Horiba Scientific ONDAX IHR 550 spectrometer equipped with a 785 nm near-IR laser. The collected spectral range was made over 200–600 cm−1 and background-subtracted from each sample’s respective H2O or D2O blank. Acquisitions were made for 600 s at room temperature. The collected spectra were baselined and fit to identify peak values. The peaks were modeled to pseudo-Voigt functions to yield peak maxima (frequencies, ν) and full width half-maxima (line widths, Γ). Values from the fits are tabulated in Tables S8 and S9.

Frequency and 59Co NMR Calculations.

Frequency calculations of vibrational modes were acquired from optimized structures of complexes 1 and 2 (Tables S10 and S11). Optimization and frequency calculations were both made with the Gaussian 16 electronic software structure package27 using the ωB97X-D28,29 density functional and 6–311+g(2d,p) basis set.30 Harmonic approximations via this computational method yielded Raman spectra agreeable with the experimental spectra for all computed structures (Figure 5a,b). Such an agreement allowed the assignment and depiction of experimental vibrational modes, and as a result, a scaling factor was not applied. 59Co NMR property calculations of the vibrationally displaced structures of 1 and 2 were analyzed along the fullest extent of the distortional pathway (Q = +1 to −1) of experimentally observed vibrational modes (Table S8). These predictions were performed with the ORCA 4.11 electronic software package at the GIAO-B3LYP level31 with def2-TZVPP and def2/JK basis sets.32 In all predictions, the 59Co nucleus was individually assigned a def2-QZVPP basis set.32 In both complexes 1 and 2, analysis of the isotropic shielding was used to determine the range of Δδ (59Co) and is dominated by the paramagnetic term. Evaluation of Δδ was done only for the lowest-energy vibrational modes of the 200–600 cm−1 energy regime owing to their higher predicted population of states. Thus, vibrationally driven changes to 59Co δ are expected to be governed namely by low-energy, high-population vibrational modes of the Co–N6 core in this low-energy regime.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

(a) Experimental Raman spectra of 1 (top) and 2 (bottom) between fully protiated (black) and fully deuterated (blue) isotopomers at 30 mM over 200–600 cm−1. (b) Predicted Raman spectra of 1 (top) and 2 (bottom) between fully protiated (black) and fully deuterated (blue) isotopomers. (c) Depiction of the vibrational motions of the most intense Raman modes: pincer modes of ca. 260–340 cm−1 (ν1 for 1 and ν4 for 2) and breathing modes of ca. 450–510 cm−1 (ν4 for 1 and ν6 for 2).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The initial evaluations of 1 and 2 by 59Co NMR (11.74 T, 118 MHz) in separate solutions of H2O and 99.9% D2O showed the mass-dependent effect of the N–H- and N–D-donor atoms on 59Co δ. At 10 °C, 59Co δ of the fully protiated species 1-d0 in H2O is 7123 ppm, while the peak of the fully deuterated species 1-d12 in D2O is 7061 ppm (Figure S1). Similarly, the fully protiated 2-d0 in H2O shows a broad peak at 6857 ppm, while the fully deuterated 2-d6 peak in D2O is 6817 ppm (Figure S2). The mass-driven chemical shift moves 59Co δ upfield by 62 ppm for 1 and 40 ppm for 2. The effect of deuteration on 59Co δ is the same up to 60 °C yet produces sharper NMR signals (Figures S3 and S4).

Further 59Co NMR analysis in 1:1 mixtures of H2O and D2O reveals distributions of 59Co peaks spaced out by approximately 5.0(1) and 6.7(1) ppm in 1 (Figure 2a) and 2 (Figure 2b), respectively. We note the remarkable similarity of these spectra to the isotopic distributions sometimes observed in mass spectrometry data. Each of the different peaks in these spectra represent a unique isotopomer of 1 and 2, for which there are a total of 13 for 1-dn (n = 0–12) and 7 for 2-dn (n = 0–6). In this case, the number of observed peaks depends on the number of exchangeable protons to the N-donor atoms.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

(a) Solution-phase 59Co NMR spectrum (500 MHz magnet) depicting an ensemble of isotopomer peaks for 1-dn (n = 1–10) at 60 °C after equilibration in a one-to-one D2O/H2O mixture. (b) Isotopomer peaks for 2-dn (n = 0–6) at 60 °C after equilibration in 50% D2O in H2O. (c) Solution-phase UV–vis spectra of 1 fully protiated (1-d0 in H2O, black) and fully deuterated (1-d12 in D2O, blue) at 5 mM. (d) UV–vis spectra of 2 fully protiated (2-d0 in H2O, black) and fully deuterated (2-d6 in D2O, blue) at 2.14 mM. Both complexes show blue-shifted transitions after complete H/D exchange.

Room-temperature UV–vis spectroscopy data demonstrate the relatively small, but measurable, ligand-field consequences of the H/D exchanges. The UV–vis spectrum of 1-d0 in H2O shows two peaks at 21614(9) and 29572(16) cm−1. Upon dissolution and equilibration in D2O, 1-d12 shows the same two peaks but blue-shifted to 21668(8) and 29731(14) cm−1 (Figure 2c). For 2-d0, two peaks at 21008(8) and 27762(10) cm−1 are observed in pure H2O, and these also shift to higher energy, 21138(5) and 28327(8) cm−1, when dissolved in D2O (Figure 2d). For Oh Co3+ ions, these two peaks correspond to the 1A1g1T1g and 1A1g1T2g transitions within a low-spin d6 system.7,33 Tanabe–Sugano analyses (Table S1) of the changes in the UV–vis spectra suggest a difference in Δο of 77 cm−1 for 1 upon deuteration, increasing from 23462 cm−1 (1-d0) to 23540 cm−1 (1-d12). A larger, 223 cm−1 change of Δο is observed for 2-d0 (22595 cm−1) versus 2-d6 (22818 cm−1).

The difference in Δο observed between protiated and deuterated species permits the evaluation of ligand-field strength changes per deuteration step. For 1, the total 77 cm−1 increase in Δο corresponds to a ca. 6.7 cm−1 increase per deuteron. For 2, a greater sensitivity in Δo of ca. 37.2 cm−1 per deuteron is observed. Extensive prior analysis of multiple families of Oh N-donor Co3+ complexes revealed a nearly linear relationship between the 59Co δ and Δo (6.5 ppm/cm−1).8,10 The stepwise 5.0 ppm shift in the 59Co δ peak location and 6.7 cm−1 shift in Δo per deuteron for 1 are thus consistent with those prior studies. Complex 2, in contrast, exhibits a much larger effect with half as many deuterons.

The observed change in the chemical shift is due to the extraordinary sensitivity of the 59Co nuclear spin to the electronic structure of the Co3+ ion. The deuterated ligands are slightly heavier (by ~13% mass for N–D2 vs N–H2 and ~7% for N–D vs N–H) and, because of that heavier mass, are likely to remain at slightly different equilibrium distances from the Co3+ ion in solution. This changing distance, which is likely too small to measure by normal structural methods, enables a change to the Co–N orbital overlap and, thus, Δo. In principle, the more closely bound N atom will cause the antibonding eg* orbitals to raise in energy, increasing Δo. The increase in Δo then weakens the 59Co paramagnetic shift and causes 59Co δ to move upfield, which is observed for both complexes. In a way, the effect demonstrates that the 59Co nucleus serves as an extraordinarily sensitive detector of minute structural differences. Finally, we note that the spectroscopic resolution of the different isotopomers in the 59Co NMR spectra crucially permits their individual interrogation to test how deuteration affects ΔδT.

The mass effect of the H/D exchange on ΔδT was tested by investigating the variable-temperature 59Co NMR spectra of 1 and 2 from 10 to 60 °C. These studies were performed in multiple different mixtures of D2O and H2O to ensure that the behaviors of all isotopomers were captured (Figures S5 and S6). With increasing temperature from 10 °C, all 59Co NMR peaks shift downfield for 1 and 2 (Figure 3). For 1, all peaks remain resolvable over the temperature range and shift over an approximate 70 ppm window. For 2, however, the peaks appear to broaden and coalesce with decreasing temperature (relative to the 60 °C spectrum), and the peak itself moves by approximately 100 ppm over the studied temperature range. All peaks were identified from deconvolution of the spectra where possible (10–60 °C for 1 and 35–60 °C for 2). The relative magnitudes of the temperature-driven chemical shifts are consistent with prior analyses of the fully protiated versions of 1 and 2.17 The relative intensities appear to be consistent as a function of the temperature, indicating negligible redistribution of the isotopomer populations during the measurements.

Analysis of the 59Co δ (ppm) peak positions as a function of the temperature T (°C) for individual isotopomers provides the key test of the role of deuteration on ΔδT (Figure 4). For 1, the well-resolved peaks enable the isolation of ΔδT values for all possible H/D isotopomers. In the case of 2, the discernability of each isotopomer signal is obscured below 35 °C, and analyses were applied only above this temperature (Figure S7). In both complexes (and across all samples), a comparison of the ΔδT values for the different isotopomers shows a mild but consistent change in the temperature sensitivity with increasing deuteration (Tables S2 and S3). For 1, the trend across all isotopomers shows a steady increase in ΔδT (Figure S8) with deuteration, from 1.35(1) to 1.42(1) ppm/°C from 1-d0 to 1-d12, respectively. Over the 35–60 °C temperature range, 2, in contrast, shows a decrease in ΔδT with increasing deuteration, from 2.03(3) to 1.96(2) ppm/°C from 2-d0 to 2-d6, respectively.

We also tested the temperature dependence of the dynamic magnetic properties, specifically spin–lattice, T1, and spin–spin dephasing, T2*, relaxation of the 59Co nuclei for the different isotopomers (Figures S9S17 and Tables S4S7) but did not see any appreciable difference between the isotopomers. We note the expectation of a trend to be perhaps overambitious because there may be many different H/D substitutions for the same dn isotopomer. Each of these isomers could have differing symmetries (e.g., 1-d2 possessing two deuterons could be distributed on the same N-donor atom across different ligands), and thus different T1 and T2* values, because 59Co T1 is typically governed by quadrupolar relaxation. This relaxation mechanism is intimately tied to the ligand structure, and the longer relaxation times in 1 likely stem from a closer-to-Oh symmetry structure compared to 2.19,34

The foregoing data demonstrate that deuteration produced opposing effects on the change in 59Co ΔδT. Previous studies of ours suggested a correlation between longer lifetimes for low-energy vibrations (hypothesized to be predominantly Co–N in character)35,36 and higher ΔδT.17 Here, we collected solution-phase Raman spectroscopy on 1, 1-d12, 2, and 2-d6 from 200 to 600 cm−1 to test that hypothesis. Experimental data for 1 revealed four significant active modes at 279(1), 376(1), 445(1), and 529(1) cm−1. Upon deuteration, all four peaks showed a modest red shift to 273(1), 353(1), 419(1), and 497(1) cm−1, respectively (Figure 5a). The red-shifted frequencies of the Raman peaks are attributed to the higher mass of the N–D2. For 2-d0, eight significant modes were present, ranging from 219(1) to 546(1) cm−1 (Table S8). Upon deuteration, 2-d6 showed a similar red shift in the vibrational modes but smaller in magnitude relative to 1. The largest change, in both intensity and energy, was observed for the vibrations at ca. 500 cm−1 in both complexes. Lifetimes, defined as τ = 1/fwhm (fwhm = full width at half-maximum), were averaged over all observed Raman peaks (Table S9). As protiated species, τavg was 0.61(3) ps for 1 and 0.7(1) ps for 2. Upon deuteration, both spectra sharpened, and τavg increased to 0.70(2) and 0.8(1) ps for 1 and 2, respectively. In both complexes, deuteration yielded longer τ, but ΔδT does not increase for both. We therefore interpret these results as disproof of our prior hypothesis that longer vibration lifetimes alone enhance ΔδT.17

Despite this disproof, the very clear spectral differences between 1, 1-d12, 2, and 2-d6 provide an exciting opportunity to test for the possible consequences of deuteration on vibrations and therefore 59Co δ. We consider a new hypothesis for the governing phenomena of ΔδT. We propose that the population of the molecular vibrational states (Raman- and IR-active modes) within the inner coordination shell guides the structural distortions that dictate ΔδT. If true, then changes in the populations, energies, and types of specific vibrations, not lifetimes, should correlate to ΔδT and provide the true design strategies for controlled 59Co temperature sensitivities.

We sought to test this picture against our experimental observations with two separate analyses that estimated the relative populations of the different vibrational states and the individual impacts on 59Co δ. We considered 1, 1-d12, 2, and 2-d6 and the record-holding Co(acac)3, which displayed a ΔδT of 3.15 ppm/°C in CDCl3.12 Frequency calculations were first performed to obtain a complete picture of the vibrational activity. Computed Raman spectra nicely agree with the experimental spectra and reproduced the experimentally red-shifted Raman-mode peaks upon deuteration (Figure 5b).

The performed frequency calculations enabled a qualitative assignment of the observed vibrations. Within the low-energy regime below 600 cm−1, many of the vibrations were complex, incorporating bond stretches, scissoring, and bending motions of the Co–N6 coordination sphere (Tables S10 and S11). The most intense modes (experimentally and computationally) were found to possess strong symmetric Co–N stretching character. These were at 261 and 512 cm−1 for 1 and 338 and 487 cm−1 for 2 (Figure 5b). These predicted frequencies agree with the experimentally collected solution-phase Raman spectra and are supported by literature values.37,38 Of these two stretching modes, the lower-energy vibrations (261 cm−1 for 1 and 338 cm−1 for 2) are described by a N–Co–N pincer-like mode of the ethylenediamine ligands in 1 and the ethylenediamine-like side arms in 2 (Figure 5c). The higher-energy mode (512 cm−1 for 1 and 487 cm−1 for 2) arises because of symmetric stretching of the six N-donor atoms along their bonds to the metal center. This higher-energy vibration, which showed the greatest red shift after deuteration in both structures, is best-described as the A1g breathing mode of the octahedral Co–N6 core.

Analysis of the populations of vibrational states revealed what we believe is the mechanism governing ΔδT. We compare ΔδT to the total vibrational partition functions, qTotal, of 1, 1-d12, 2, and 2-d6 using the computed vibrations from the frequency calculations including Raman- and IR-active modes (Figure S18). We also computed qTotal of additional Co3+ complexes with reported ΔδT in the literature including Co(acac)3, [Co(NO2)6]3−, [Co(CN)6]3−, [Co(NH3)6]3+, [Co(tn)3]3+, and [Co(tame)2]3+.12,15,17 Harmonic frequency calculations were first made to predict the normal modes (3N–6) of each structure. Total vibrational partition functions, qTotal, are calculated from the product of each normal mode by q = 1/(1 − eE/kBT), where E is the normal-mode energy (cm−1), kB is Boltzmann’s constant, and T is the temperature (K). These partition functions depend on the number of vibrational normal modes, their respective frequencies, and the temperature. At 25 °C, the value of qTotal for 1 (5.4 × 103) is surpassed by 2 (2.0 × 107) by 4 orders of magnitude, and the value of Co(acac)3 (2.2 × 1011) is even larger. Higher values of qTotal reflect a higher population of vibrational states for a given molecule, enabled by greater numbers of low-energy vibrations. Out of all of the computed normal vibrational modes of 1, 23% are below 600 cm−1. Similarly, 25% of the modes in 2 and 32% of the modes in Co(acac)3 are below 600 cm−1. The number of low-energy modes in each complex roughly reflects the 25 °C value of qTotal.

Owing to this result, we posit that higher values of ΔδT are attributed to generally higher populations of low-energy modes at a given temperature. This insight is unique from all prior proposed models of the origin of the temperature dependence of 59Co δ.14,15,17,39 The result also establishes a key design principle for ΔδT, wherein synthetic strategies to change qTotal may guide the enhancement of ΔδT. However, analysis of qTotal alone did not account for the differing effects of deuteration on ΔδT between 1 and 2. Above, we proposed that the individual vibrations and their respective impacts on 59Co δ must be active, and subsequent calculations were performed to test the relevance of this concept to 59Co ΔδT.

In principle, one might expect all 3N–6 vibrations for a complex to be important for 59Co δ because all modes may contribute to a varying structure. However, different vibrations will affect the 1A1g and 1T1g energies to different extents depending on how they affect the eg* orbital energies. We hypothesized that only Raman-active vibrations, such as the Co–N6 breathing mode, would be the most influential on 59Co δ because symmetric distortions should produce large-amplitude changes in the metal–ligand overlap (and thus eg* and Δo). To test this idea, we computed 59Co δ as a function of the atomic displacement along the coordinate pathway Q (Figure 6) for vibrations between 200 and 600 cm−1. The vibrational coordinate Q describes the displacement away from the optimized structure (Q = 0) following the progression of a given vibration. ΔδQ curves were then constructed from computed 59Co chemical-shift calculations at individual points along Q.

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

(a) 59Co δ as a function of the vibrational coordinate Q, for experimentally determined Raman modes in 1 between 200 and 600 cm−1. (b) 59Co δ as a function of Q for Raman modes in 2 between 200 and 600 cm−1. The Co–N6 symmetric A1g breathing mode is indicated by filled circles with solid traces.

We found that in all cases the 59Co δ values vary over thousands of parts per million and often nonlinearly between the extremes of Q (−1 and +1). For a given vibration, we can describe the change in 59Co δ relative to Q via ΔδQ at Q = 0, which represents a coupling strength between the vibration and 59Co δ. The symmetric Co–N6 breathing modes yielded the largest values of ΔδQ: 7922 ppm/Q for 1, 6436 ppm/Q for 2, and 6113 ppm/Q for Co(acac)3 (Figure S19). The pincer modes showed the second highest ΔδQ values, of 2338 ppm/Q and 1445 ppm/Q, for 1 and 2, respectively. In contrast, ΔδQ for IR-active modes were all substantially smaller (3–17 ppm/Q), reflected by the parabolic functions centered at Q = 0 (Figure S20). These results collectively suggest that Raman-active modes (not IR) are key vibrational influences of 59Co δ, with the breathing mode exhibiting the highest effect. It is likely that these modes are most impactful because they shift the eg* orbitals by the highest amount. This change then induces the largest difference in the paramagnetic shift via changes to the low-lying excited-state energies.

The revealed importance of the Raman modes inspired us to evaluate their role in ΔδT with regard to the partition function of just these modes, qRaman. A comparison of ΔδT to qRaman (Figure 7) improves upon the original trend with qTotal, further suggesting that Raman-active modes are the fundamental vibrational components driving ΔδT. The key finding of this analysis also follows the opposing trends in ΔδT between 1 and 2: qRaman increases from 10.4 to 16.6 at 25 °C for 1 to 1-d12 and decreases from 559.4 to 463.3 at 25 °C for 2 to 2-d6. The values of qRaman follow the changes in ΔδT upon deuteration. For both IR- and Raman-active modes, deuteration was expected to lower vibrational energies, yet, on the basis of the ΔδQ values, we propose that changes in the energies of the Raman-active vibrations, thus changing to the populations of these states, will significantly contribute to ΔδT. For 1, deuteration lowered the energies of the Raman vibrations to foster higher ΔδT via higher qRaman. For 2, deuteration also lowered the Raman vibration frequencies, but qRaman decreased. In 2, the IR vibrations also dropped in energy such that they consequently leach population from Raman to IR vibrational states, thus the reason for producing a lower ΔδT upon deuteration.

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Relationship between the 59Co ΔδT temperature sensitivity and total vibrational partition function of Raman modes, qRaman (logarithmic) for 1, 1-d12, 2, 2-d6, and other Co3+ complexes with known ΔδT sensitivities.12,15,17 The linear correlation by R2 is 0.82. The error bars for the ΔδT values are within 0.03 ppm/°C and the edges of the symbols. The shaded areas highlight the trends in protiated (black) and deuterated (blue) pairs of 1 and 2.

The foregoing data inform potential synthetic design strategies aimed at complexes with higher 59Co thermometric sensitivities. (1) The higher numbers of vibrations at low energy are advantageous, meaning that potentially higher-coordination numbers, or more complex coordination geometries than the Oh, six-coordinate molecules here may produce higher ΔδT. (2) The larger mass for donor atoms can be used for potentially enhancing ΔδT, although this effect appears to be ligand-specific. (3) Raman vibrations appear to be the most important for ΔδT, and thus low-symmetry coordination shells are desirable because these should feature more Raman-active vibrations. Tests of these ideas will be reported in due course.

CONCLUSION

The foregoing data establish a rationale for how ligand identity enhances 59Co ΔδT, namely, by increasing the number and populations of Raman-active vibrations that include the first coordination shell of the Co3+ ion because these modes produce the largest-amplitude changes in 59Co δ. As a result of this discovery, we generate a new figure of merit to target in the molecular design of high ΔδT: qRaman. This parameter describes not only existing trends in ΔδT identified in a family of Co(III) complexes but also the observed opposing impacts of deuteration, where ΔδT increases with deuteration for 1 but decreases for 2. We note qRaman can be computed independently of molecular isolation. Thus, the pursuit of highly temperature-sensitive 59Co-based spin probes is no longer limited to strict synthetic exploration but can potentially proceed in silico. More broadly, the approach here may be useful in estimating or predicting the temperature response of other metal-complex physical properties that involve vibrations, such as reactivity40 or magnetic relaxation.41,42

Supplementary Material

supplementary information

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We acknowledge Y. Farah and Prof. A. Krummel for use of their Raman instrumentation and experimental assistance. This research was performed with the support of Colorado State University (CSU) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH; Grant R21-EB027293). We thank the Analytical Resources Core at CSU where NMR experiments and standard molecular characterization were performed, which was supported by an NIH-SIG award (Award 1S10OD021814-01) and the CSU-CORES Program. Computational resources are enabled by the Catalysis Collaboratory for Light-activated Earth Abundant Reagent (C-CLEAR), which is supported by the National Science Foundation and the Environmental Protection Agency through the Networks for Sustainable Molecular Design and Synthesis (Grant CHE-1339674) at CSU, Fort Collins.

Footnotes

Supporting Information

The Supporting Information is available free of charge at https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c03326.

Full experimental details, including sample preparation and analyses, additional magnetic resonance characterizations, and computational details (PDF)

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

Complete contact information is available at: https://pubs.acs.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c03326

Contributor Information

Tyler M. Ozvat, Department of Chemistry, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, United States

Anthony K. Rappé, Department of Chemistry, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, United States.

Joseph M. Zadrozny, Department of Chemistry, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, United States.

REFERENCES

  • (1).Liu Y-Y; Chang B-M; Chang H-C Nanodiamond-Enabled Biomedical Imaging. Nanomedicine 2020, 15 (16), 1599–1616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (2).Yu C-J; von Kugelgen S; Laorenza DW; Freedman DE A Molecular Approach to Quantum Sensing. ACS Cent. Sci 2021, 7 (5), 712–723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (3).Bogachev YV; Nikitina AV; Frolov VV; Chizhik VI MRI-Guided Therapy. Tech. Phys 2020, 65 (9), 1427–1435. [Google Scholar]
  • (4).Kokuryo D; Kumamoto E; Kuroda K Recent Technological Advancements in Thermometry. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev 2020, 163–164, 19–39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (5).Winter L; Oberacker E; Paul K; Ji Y; Oezerdem C; Ghadjar P; Thieme A; Budach V; Wust P; Niendorf T Magnetic Resonance Thermometry: Methodology, Pitfalls and Practical Solutions. Int. J. Hyperthermia 2016, 32 (1), 63–75. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (6).Rieke V; Butts Pauly K MR Thermometry. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2008, 27 (2), 376–390. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (7).Bramley R; Brorson M; Sargeson AM; Schaeffer CE Cobalt-59 NMR Chemical Shifts of Cobalt(III) Complexes; Correlations with Parameters Calculated from Ligand-Field Spectra. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1985, 107 (9), 2780–2787. [Google Scholar]
  • (8).Griffith JS; Orgel LE The Residual Paramagnetism and Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectra of Cobaltic Complexes. Trans. Faraday Soc 1957, 53, 601. [Google Scholar]
  • (9).Proctor WG; Yu FC On the Nuclear Magnetic Moments of Several Stable Isotopes. Phys. Rev 1951, 81 (1), 20–30. [Google Scholar]
  • (10).Freeman R; Murray GR; Richards RE Cobalt Nuclear Resonance Spectra. Proc. R. Soc. London. Ser. A 1957, 242 (1231), 455–466. [Google Scholar]
  • (11).Dharmatti SS; Kanekar CR Chemical Shifts in the Nuclear Magnetic Resonance of Co59 and the Ligand Field Theory. J. Chem. Phys 1959, 31 (5), 1436–1437. [Google Scholar]
  • (12).Levy GC; Terry Bailey J; Wright DA A Sensitive NMR Thermometer for Multinuclei FT NMR. J. Magn. Reson 1980, 37 (2), 353–356. [Google Scholar]
  • (13).Koplitz LV; Kim K; McClure DS Temperature Dependence of 10Dq for Aqueous Hexaaquomanganese(II). Inorg. Chem 1994, 33 (4), 702–704. [Google Scholar]
  • (14).Jameson CJ; Rehder D; Hoch M Isotope and Temperature Dependence of Transition-Metal Shielding in Complexes of the Type M(XY)6. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1987, 109 (9), 2589–2594. [Google Scholar]
  • (15).Benedek GB; Englman R; Armstrong JA Temperature and Pressure Dependence of the Co59 Nuclear Resonance Chemical Shift. J. Chem. Phys 1963, 39 (12), 3349–3363. [Google Scholar]
  • (16).Kahn O Molecular Magnetism. J. Chem. Educ 1995, 72 (1), A19. [Google Scholar]
  • (17).Ozvat TM; Peña ME; Zadrozny JM Influence of Ligand Encapsulation on Cobalt-59 Chemical-Shift Thermometry. Chem. Sci 2019, 10 (27), 6727–6734. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (18).Ozvat TM; Sterbinsky GE; Campanella AJ; Rappé AK; Zadrozny JM EXAFS Investigations of Temperature-Dependent Structure in Cobalt-59 Molecular NMR Thermometers. Dalton Trans 2020, 49 (45), 16380–16385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (19).Ozvat TM; Johnson SH; Rappé AK; Zadrozny JM Ligand Control of 59Co Nuclear Spin Relaxation Thermometry. Magnetochemistry 2020, 6 (4), 58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (20).Pham CT; Barnard I; Nguyen HH; Abram U; Koch KR Cobalt(III) Metallacryptates and Their Guest Cation-Exchange in Solution Monitored by 59Co NMR. Inorg. Chem 2020, 59 (2), 1183–1192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (21).Davis JC; Bühl M; Koch KR Probing Isotope Shifts in 103Rh and 195Pt NMR Spectra with Density Functional Theory. J. Phys. Chem. A 2013, 117 (33), 8054–8064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (22).Asaro F; Liguori L; Pellizer G Exceptional Deshielding of 59Co Caused by Deuteration of the Hydrogen Bonds in Cobaloximes. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed 2000, 39 (11), 1932–1934. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (23).Harris RK; Morrow RJ Cobalt-59 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Studies of the Kinetics and Mechanism of Deuteration for Tris(Ethylenediamine) Cobalt Chloride. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans 1 1984, 80 (11), 3071–3094. [Google Scholar]
  • (24).Bendall MR; Doddrell DM Proton-Deuterium Isotope Shifts in 59Co N.M.R. Aust. J. Chem 1978, 31 (5), 1141–1143. [Google Scholar]
  • (25).Krause R; Megargle E Student Synthesis of Tris-(Ethylenediamine)Cobalt(III) Chloride | Journal of Chemical Education. J. Chem. Educ 1976, 53 (10), 667. [Google Scholar]
  • (26).Bottomley G; Clark I; Creaser I; Engelhardt L; Geue R; Hagen K; Harrowfield J; Lawrance G; Lay P; Sargeson A; See A; Skelton B; White A; Wilner F The Synthesis and Structure of Encapsulating Ligands: Properties of Bicyclic Hexamines. Aust. J. Chem 1994, 47 (1), 143. [Google Scholar]
  • (27).Frisch MJ; Trucks GW; Schlegel HB; Scuseria GE; Robb MA; Cheeseman JR; Scalmani G; Barone V; Petersson GA; Nakatsuji H; Li X; Caricato M; Marenich AV; Bloino J; Janesko BG; Gomperts R; Mennucci B; Hratchian HP; Ortiz JV; Izmaylov AF; Sonnenberg JL; Williams; Ding F; Lipparini F; Egidi F; Goings J; Peng B; Petrone A; Henderson T; Ranasinghe D; Zakrzewski VG; Gao J; Rega N; Zheng G; Liang W; Hada M; Ehara M; Toyota K; Fukuda R; Hasegawa J; Ishida M; Nakajima T; Honda Y; Kitao O; Nakai H; Vreven T; Throssell K; Montgomery JA Jr.; Peralta JE; Ogliaro F; Bearpark MJ; Heyd JJ; Brothers EN; Kudin KN; Staroverov VN; Keith TA; Kobayashi R; Normand J; Raghavachari K; Rendell AP; Burant JC; Iyengar SS; Tomasi J; Cossi M; Millam JM; Klene M; Adamo C; Cammi R; Ochterski JW; Martin RL; Morokuma K; Farkas O; Foresman JB; Fox DJ Gaussian 16, revision C.01; Gaussian Inc.: Wallingford, CT, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • (28).Neese F A Spectroscopy Oriented Configuration Interaction Procedure. J. Chem. Phys 2003, 119 (18), 9428–9443. [Google Scholar]
  • (29).Grimme S; Antony J; Ehrlich S; Krieg H A Consistent and Accurate Ab Initio Parametrization of Density Functional Dispersion Correction (DFT-D) for the 94 Elements H-Pu. J. Chem. Phys 2010, 132 (15), 154104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (30).Krishnan R; Binkley JS; Seeger R; Pople JA Self-consistent Molecular Orbital Methods. XX. A Basis Set for Correlated Wave Functions. J. Chem. Phys 1980, 72 (1), 650–654. [Google Scholar]
  • (31).Ditchfield R Self-Consistent Perturbation Theory of Diamagnetism. Mol. Phys 1974, 27 (4), 789–807. [Google Scholar]
  • (32).Weigend F; Ahlrichs R Balanced Basis Sets of Split Valence, Triple Zeta Valence and Quadruple Zeta Valence Quality for H to Rn: Design and Assessment of Accuracy. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys 2005, 7(18), 3297. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (33).Geue RJ; Hambley TW; Harrowfield JM; Sargeson AM; Snow MR Metal Ion Encapsulation: Cobalt Cages Derived from Polyamines, Formaldehyde, and Nitromethane. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1984, 106 (19), 5478–5488. [Google Scholar]
  • (34).Kirby CW; Puranda CM; Power WP Cobalt-59 Nuclear Magnetic Relaxation Studies of Aqueous Octahedral Cobalt(III) Complexes. J. Phys. Chem 1996, 100 (35), 14618–14624. [Google Scholar]
  • (35).Chen Y; Christensen DH; Sørensen GO; Nielsen OF; Pedersen E The Skeletal Vibrational Spectra and Metal—Ligand Force Constants of Cobalt(III) Ammine Complexes. J. Mol. Struct 1993, 299, 61–72. [Google Scholar]
  • (36).Stein P; Miskowski V; Woodruff WH; Griffin JP; Werner KG; Gaber BP; Spiro TG Raman Antiresonance: De-enhancement of Raman Intensity by Forbidden Electronic Transitions. J. Chem. Phys 1976, 64 (5), 2159–2167. [Google Scholar]
  • (37).Saito Y; Takemoto J; Hutchinson B; Nakamoto K Infrared Studies of Coordination Compounds Containing Low-Oxidation-State Metals. I. Tris(2,2′-Bipyridine) and Tris(1,10-Phenanthroline) Complexes. Inorg. Chem 1972, 11 (9), 2003–2011. [Google Scholar]
  • (38).Flint CD; Matthews AP Totally Symmetric Metal-Nitrogen Stretching Vibrations of Ethylenediamine Chelate Complexes. Inorg. Chem 1975, 14 (5), 1219–1220. [Google Scholar]
  • (39).Jameson CJ Vibrational Analysis and Mean Bond Displacements in M(XY)6 Complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1987, 109(9), 2586–2588. [Google Scholar]
  • (40).Guo H; Liu K Control of Chemical Reactivity by Transition-State and Beyond. Chem. Sci 2016, 7 (7), 3992–4003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (41).Mirzoyan R; Kazmierczak NP; Hadt RG Deconvolving Contributions to Decoherence in Molecular Electron Spin Qubits: A Dynamic Ligand Field Approach. Chem. - Eur. J 2021, 27 (37), 9482–9494. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • (42).Kazmierczak NP; Mirzoyan R; Hadt RG The Impact of Ligand Field Symmetry on Molecular Qubit Coherence. J. Am. Chem. Soc 2021, 143 (42), 17305–17315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

supplementary information

RESOURCES